101
|
Sawyer IA, Dundr M. Chromatin loops and causality loops: the influence of RNA upon spatial nuclear architecture. Chromosoma 2017; 126:541-557. [PMID: 28593374 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-017-0632-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
An intrinsic and essential trait exhibited by cells is the properly coordinated and integrated regulation of an astoundingly large number of simultaneous molecular decisions and reactions to maintain biochemical homeostasis. This is especially true inside the cell nucleus, where the recognition of DNA and RNA by a vast range of nucleic acid-interacting proteins organizes gene expression patterns. However, this dynamic system is not regulated by simple "on" or "off" signals. Instead, transcription factor and RNA polymerase recruitment to DNA are influenced by the local chromatin and epigenetic environment, a gene's relative position within the nucleus and the action of noncoding RNAs. In addition, major phase-separated structural features of the nucleus, such as nucleoli and paraspeckles, assemble in direct response to specific transcriptional activities and, in turn, influence global genomic function. Currently, the interpretation of these data is trapped in a causality dilemma reminiscent of the "chicken and the egg" paradox as it is unclear whether changes in nuclear architecture promote RNA function or vice versa. Here, we review recent advances that suggest a complex and interdependent interaction network between gene expression, chromatin topology, and noncoding RNA function. We also discuss the functional links between these essential nuclear processes from the nanoscale (gene looping) to the macroscale (sub-nuclear gene positioning and nuclear body function) and briefly highlight some of the challenges that researchers may encounter when studying these phenomena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain A Sawyer
- Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Miroslav Dundr
- Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Ayana R, Singh S, Pati S. Decoding Crucial LncRNAs Implicated in Neurogenesis and Neurological Disorders. Stem Cells Dev 2017; 26:541-553. [PMID: 28095733 DOI: 10.1089/scd.2016.0290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Unraveling transcriptional heterogeneity and the labyrinthine nature of neurodevelopment can probe insights into neuropsychiatric disorders. It is noteworthy that adult neurogenesis is restricted to the subventricular and subgranular zones of the brain. Recent studies suggest long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as an avant-garde class of regulators implicated in neurodevelopment. But, paucity exists in the knowledge regarding lncRNAs in neurogenesis and their associations with neurodevelopmental defects. To address this, we extensively reviewed the existing literature databases as well as performed relevant in-silico analysis. We utilized Allen Brain Atlas (ABA) differential search module and generated a catalogue of ∼30,000 transcripts specific to the neurogenic zones, including coding and non-coding transcripts. To explore the existing lncRNAs reported in neurogenesis, we performed extensive literature mining and identified 392 lncRNAs. These degenerate lncRNAs were mapped onto the ABA transcript list leading to detection of 20 lncRNAs specific to neurogenic zones (Dentate gyrus/Lateral ventricle), among which 10 showed associations to several neurodevelopmental disorders following in-silico mapping onto brain disease databases like Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative, AutDB, and lncRNADisease. Notably, using ABA correlation module, we could establish lncRNA-to-mRNA coexpression networks for the above 10 candidate lncRNAs. Finally, pathway prediction revealed physical, biochemical, or regulatory interactions for nine lncRNAs. In addition, ABA differential search also revealed 54 novel significant lncRNAs from the null set (∼30,000). Conclusively, this review represents an updated catalogue of lncRNAs in neurogenesis and neurological diseases, and overviews the field of OMICs-based data analysis for understanding lncRNome-based regulation in neurodevelopment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ayana
- 1 Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University , Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shailja Singh
- 1 Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University , Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India .,2 Special Center for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University , Delhi, India
| | - Soumya Pati
- 1 Department of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University , Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
The crosstalk between long non-coding RNAs and PI3K in cancer. Med Oncol 2017; 34:39. [PMID: 28176240 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0897-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are able to positively or negatively regulate other genes expression in cis or in trans. Their effect can be achieved through RNA-protein, RNA-DNA, or RNA-RNA interactions. They can recruit transcription factors and act as scaffolds or guides for chromatin-modifying enzymes. PI3K kinases transform external stimuli to intracellular signals regulating cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, survival, intracellular trafficking, cytoskeletal changes, cell migration and motility, and metabolism. PI3K is activated in cancer and affects several aspects of oncogenesis. LncRNAs and PI3K have been shown to be interconnected in several different cancer subtypes enhancing aberrant cell proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion, and also cancer cell metabolism. In this review, we have assembled recent data describing the interaction between lncRNAs and PI3K and the results of such interaction.
Collapse
|
104
|
Ruiz-Velasco M, Zaugg JB. Structure meets function: How chromatin organisation conveys functionality. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
105
|
Barutcu AR, Lian JB, Stein JL, Stein GS, Imbalzano AN. The connection between BRG1, CTCF and topoisomerases at TAD boundaries. Nucleus 2017; 8:150-155. [PMID: 28060558 PMCID: PMC5403164 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2016.1276145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The eukaryotic genome is partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs). Despite recent advances characterizing TADs and TAD boundaries, the organization of these structures is an important dimension of genome architecture and function that is not well understood. Recently, we demonstrated that knockdown of BRG1, an ATPase driving the chromatin remodeling activity of mammalian SWI/SNF enzymes, globally alters long-range genomic interactions and results in a reduction of TAD boundary strength. We provided evidence suggesting that this effect may be due to BRG1 affecting nucleosome occupancy around CTCF sites present at TAD boundaries. In this review, we elaborate on our findings and speculate that BRG1 may contribute to the regulation of the structural and functional properties of chromatin at TAD boundaries by affecting the function or the recruitment of CTCF and DNA topoisomerase complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rasim Barutcu
- a Department of Cell and Developmental Biology , University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , MA , USA
| | - Jane B Lian
- b Department of Biochemistry , University of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington , VT , USA
| | - Janet L Stein
- b Department of Biochemistry , University of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington , VT , USA
| | - Gary S Stein
- b Department of Biochemistry , University of Vermont College of Medicine , Burlington , VT , USA
| | - Anthony N Imbalzano
- a Department of Cell and Developmental Biology , University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , MA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Mironov AA. A model of regulation of monoallelic gene expression. Biophysics (Nagoya-shi) 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s0006350917010134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
107
|
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are over 200 nucleotides in length and are transcribed from the mammalian genome in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated pattern. There is growing recognition that lncRNAs are novel biomarkers and/or key regulators of toxicological responses in humans and animal models. Lacking protein-coding capacity, the numerous types of lncRNAs possess a myriad of transcriptional regulatory functions that include cis and trans gene expression, transcription factor activity, chromatin remodeling, imprinting, and enhancer up-regulation. LncRNAs also influence mRNA processing, post-transcriptional regulation, and protein trafficking. Dysregulation of lncRNAs has been implicated in various human health outcomes such as various cancers, Alzheimer's disease, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases, as well as intermediary metabolism such as glucose, lipid, and bile acid homeostasis. Interestingly, emerging evidence in the literature over the past five years has shown that lncRNA regulation is impacted by exposures to various chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene, cadmium, chlorpyrifos-methyl, bisphenol A, phthalates, phenols, and bile acids. Recent technological advancements, including next-generation sequencing technologies and novel computational algorithms, have enabled the profiling and functional characterizations of lncRNAs on a genomic scale. In this review, we summarize the biogenesis and general biological functions of lncRNAs, highlight the important roles of lncRNAs in human diseases and especially during the toxicological responses to various xenobiotics, evaluate current methods for identifying aberrant lncRNA expression and molecular target interactions, and discuss the potential to implement these tools to address fundamental questions in toxicology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L Dempsey
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105
| | - Julia Yue Cui
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Wang XQD, Dostie J. Chromosome folding and its regulation in health and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2016; 43:23-30. [PMID: 27940207 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
There are many ways in which cells may not adequately behave or respond to their environment, and the molecular mechanisms leading to these defects are as diverse as they are many. In this review, we report on how spatial chromatin organization contributes to the proper expression of genes, relating how CTCF-one of its main architects-contributes to gene regulation. We also touch on the emerging role of long noncoding RNAs in shaping chromatin organization and activity. The HOX gene clusters have been used as paradigm in the study of various biological pathways, and the overview we provide gives emphasis to what research on these loci has revealed about chromatin architecture and its regulation in the control of gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Qing David Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 815A, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G1Y6
| | - Josée Dostie
- Department of Biochemistry and Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Room 815A, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G1Y6.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Melé M, Mattioli K, Mallard W, Shechner DM, Gerhardinger C, Rinn JL. Chromatin environment, transcriptional regulation, and splicing distinguish lincRNAs and mRNAs. Genome Res 2016; 27:27-37. [PMID: 27927715 PMCID: PMC5204342 DOI: 10.1101/gr.214205.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
While long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) and mRNAs share similar biogenesis pathways, these transcript classes differ in many regards. LincRNAs are less evolutionarily conserved, less abundant, and more tissue-specific, suggesting that their pre- and post-transcriptional regulation is different from that of mRNAs. Here, we perform an in-depth characterization of the features that contribute to lincRNA regulation in multiple human cell lines. We find that lincRNA promoters are depleted of transcription factor (TF) binding sites, yet enriched for some specific factors such as GATA and FOS relative to mRNA promoters. Surprisingly, we find that H3K9me3—a histone modification typically associated with transcriptional repression—is more enriched at the promoters of active lincRNA loci than at those of active mRNAs. Moreover, H3K9me3-marked lincRNA genes are more tissue-specific. The most discriminant differences between lincRNAs and mRNAs involve splicing. LincRNAs are less efficiently spliced, which cannot be explained by differences in U1 binding or the density of exonic splicing enhancers but may be partially attributed to lower U2AF65 binding and weaker splicing-related motifs. Conversely, the stability of lincRNAs and mRNAs is similar, differing only with regard to the location of stabilizing protein binding sites. Finally, we find that certain transcriptional properties are correlated with higher evolutionary conservation in both DNA and RNA motifs and are enriched in lincRNAs that have been functionally characterized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Melé
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Kaia Mattioli
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.,Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - William Mallard
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - David M Shechner
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Chiara Gerhardinger
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - John L Rinn
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016; 17:756-770. [DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2016.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 420] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
111
|
Abstract
The survival of all organisms is dependent on complex, coordinated responses to environmental cues. Non-coding RNAs have been identified as major players in regulation of gene expression, with recent evidence supporting roles for long non-coding (lnc)RNAs in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. Evidence from our laboratory shows that lncRNAs have the ability to form hybridized structures called R-loops with specific DNA target sequences in S. cerevisiae, thereby modulating gene expression. In this Point of View, we provide an overview of the nature of lncRNA-mediated control of gene expression in the context of our studies using the GAL gene cluster as a model for controlling the timing of transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary T Beck
- a Department of Biochemistry , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA
| | - Zheng Xing
- a Department of Biochemistry , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA
| | - Elizabeth J Tran
- a Department of Biochemistry , Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.,b Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Abstract
We are beginning to understand the function of 3D genome architecture in the immune system. In this issue, Bunting et al. (2016) reported massive multi-layer genome reorganization from naive B cells to germinal center B cells, centered on a locus control region of Bcl6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gangqing Hu
- Systems Biology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Keji Zhao
- Systems Biology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|