The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study

Personalized Radiation Therapy in Cancer Pain Management

The majority of advanced cancer patients suffer from pain, which severely deteriorates their quality of life. Apart from analgesics, bisphosphonates, and invasive methods of analgesic treatment (e.g., intraspinal and epidural analgesics or neurolytic blockades), radiation therapy plays an important role in pain alleviation. It is delivered to a growing primary tumour, lymph nodes, or distant metastatic sites, producing pain of various intensity. Currently, different regiments of radiation therapy methods and techniques and various radiation dose fractionations are incorporated into the clinical practice. These include palliative radiation therapy, conventional external beam radiation therapy, as well as modern techniques of intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetrically modulated arch therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy or radionuclide treatment (e.g., radium-223, strontium-89 for multiple painful osseous metastases). The review describes the possibilities and effectiveness of individual patient-tailored conventional and innovative radiation therapy approaches aiming at pain relief in cancer patients.

Single-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases

Purpose

This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT).

Methods and materials

An institutional, retrospective review was conducted of patients with prostate cancer receiving radiation therapy to bone metastases. In-field failure (IFF) was the primary outcome of the study, and distant failure (DF) and biochemical failure (BF) were secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 249 metastases (191 SBRT; 58 CFRT) in 201 patients with a median follow-up of 2.2 years were analyzed. The SBRT prescription dose was predominantly 18 Gy (45.5%) or 20 Gy (46.6%) in a single fraction. CFRT was given either as 8 Gy in 1 fraction (56.9%) or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (41.4%). Imaging follow up was performed most frequently with ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (79%) or bone scan (10%). The median time to IFF was 1.6 years for CFRT-treated lesions and not met (>4.4 years) for SBRT. The 1- and 3-year IFF estimates were 34.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9-46.2) and 53.3% (95% CI, 34.3-66.8) for lesions treated with CFRT compared with 4.5% (95% CI, 1.4-7.5) and 12.9% (95% CI, 6.6-18-8) for those treated with SBRT (P < .01). On multivariate regression, the hazard ratio (HR) for IFF with CFRT compared with SBRT was 6.8 (95% CI, 3.7-12.5; P < .01). There were nonsignificant reduced rates of BF (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P = .05) and DF (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8; P = .08) in patients who received SBRT. The 3-year BF and DF estimates in these patients were 88.6% (95% CI, 82.0-92.8) and 82.2% (95% CI, 74.5-87.6), respectively.

Conclusions

SBRT for the management of prostate cancer bone metastases significantly reduces radiographic IFF. However, the high rate of subsequent DF and BF highlights the challenges in selecting patients who may benefit from aggressive radiation therapy.

Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Painful Bone Metastases: Past Developments, Current Status, Recent Advances and Future Directions

Bone pain arising from secondary skeletal malignancy constitutes one of the most common types of chronic pain among patients with cancer which can lead to rapid deterioration of the quality of life. Radionuclide therapy using bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals based on the concept of localization of the agent at bone metastases sites to deliver focal cytotoxic levels of radiation emerged as an effective treatment modality for the palliation of symptomatic bone metastases. Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals not only provide palliative benefit but also improve clinical outcomes in terms of overall and progression-free survival. There is a steadily expanding list of therapeutic radionuclides which are used or can potentially be used in either ionic form or in combination with carrier molecules for the management of bone metastases. This article offers a narrative review of the armamentarium of bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals based on currently approved investigational and potentially useful radionuclides and examines their efficacy for the treatment of painful skeletal metastases. In addition, the article also highlights the processes, opportunities, and challenges involved in the development of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. Radium-223 is the first agent in this class to show an overall survival advantage in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients with bone metastases. This review summarizes recent advances, current clinical practice using radiopharmaceuticals for bone pain palliation, and the expected future prospects in this field.

Evaluation of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective cohort study

Objective

Radiotherapy is the standard local treatment for patients with painful bone metastases, but effectiveness has primarily been evaluated in trial populations. The aim of this study was to study pain response to palliative radiotherapy in a prospective cohort of unselected patients with bone metastases.

Methods

Patients with painful bone metastases referred to the UMC Utrecht for radiotherapy and enrolled in the PRESENT cohort were included in this study. For all patients, pain response to radiotherapy was assessed, and responders were defined as patients with a complete or partial pain response. Patients with stable pain scores, pain increase, or undetermined response were regarded non-responders. Pain scores obtained at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks following radiotherapy were obtained. Pain response rates of the total treated population, as well as response rates of the assessable patients, were calculated. To measure the percentage of the remaining time spent with pain relief, the net pain relief (NPR) was calculated by dividing the period of pain relief by the period of survival.

Results

Of the 432 patients enrolled in this study, 262 patients (61%) experienced a complete or partial response. In the 390 assessable patients, this percentage was 67%. Median time to response was 4 weeks (range 1–15 weeks), and the NPR was 64%.

Conclusion

Compared to randomized trial populations, palliative radiotherapy in our unselected patients with bone metastases showed similar pain response rates (61%), with a reasonable duration of this effect.

Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review

Background

Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer is associated with high personal and economic burden. Recently, new treatment options for castration-resistant prostate cancer became available with promising survival advantages. However, cost-effectiveness of those new treatment options is sometimes ambiguous or given only under certain circumstances. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies on the cost-effectiveness of treatments and costs of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastasizing castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) on their methodological quality and the risk of bias.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, CINAHL Complete, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection for costs-effectiveness analyses, model-based economic evaluations, cost-of-illness analyses and budget impact analyses. Reported costs were inflated to 2015 US$ purchasing power parities. Quality assessment and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist and the Bias in Economic Evaluations checklist, respectively.

Results

In total, 38 articles were identified by the systematic literature search. The methodological quality of the included studies varied widely, and there was considerable risk of bias. The cost-effectiveness treatments for CRPC and mCRPC was assessed with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from dominance for mitoxantrone to $562,328 per quality-adjusted life year gained for sipuleucel-T compared with prednisone alone. Annual costs for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer ranged from $3,067 to $77,725.

Conclusion

The cost-effectiveness of treatments of CRPC strongly depended on the willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year gained/life-year saved throughout all included costs-effectiveness analyses and model-based economic evaluations. High-quality cost-effectiveness analyses based on randomized controlled trials are needed in order to make informed decisions on the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer and the resulting financial impact on the healthcare system.

Palliation of Vertebral Metastases with Radiotherapy: Exploration of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy From Development to Implementation in Routine Clinical Practice

The development of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in radiation therapy has allowed for improved dose escalation and a decrease in radiation-induced toxicities for patients. This article will describe a single centre's experience in development and implementation of VMAT for palliation of vertebral metastases. A retrospective planning analysis of 10 cases identified that utilization of VMAT decreases overall planning time with a statistically significant improvement in target coverage when compared with the current conventional technique. PTV Dmax (P = .02), PTV V95_{19Gy (95%)} (P = .01), dose conformation (P = 1.8e-004), and the homogeneity index (P = .019) were all superior for VMAT plans with an average PTV length of 22.46 cm. Another benefit of VMAT utilization is a significant decrease in treatment delivery time, which reduced treatment times from 9.95 minutes to 2.98 minutes. Immobilization was also carefully considered, and rotational errors were measured and fell within institutional tolerances when VMAT was delivered using simple immobilization devices. Clinical implementation of this technique, utilizing a highly conformal target volume to decrease radiation-induced toxicities and minimizing the length of time patients are required to maintain their treatment positions, aims to improve the palliative radiotherapy experience for patients with painful spinal metastases.

Choosing Wisely at the End of Life: Use of Shorter Courses of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis

PURPOSE

American Society for Radiation Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend ≤10 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastasis, with consideration for 1 fraction in patients with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate characteristic differences in guideline concordance to fractionation regimens in a modern cohort of older patients with a diagnosis of bone metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years treated with RT for bone metastasis from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Guideline-concordant RT fractionation was defined in the entire cohort as ≤10 fractions. Utilization of 1 fraction versus ≥2 fractions was analyzed in deceased patients. Patient demographic, disease, and facility characteristics associated with shorter fractionation were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 569 patients treated with RT, the median age at diagnosis was 73 years. The most common cancer types were lung (37%), genitourinary (26%), breast (15%), and gastrointestinal (10%). Among all patients, 34%, 30%, and 36% received 1 fraction, 2 to 10 fractions, and ≥11 fractions, respectively. In comparison with receipt of 1 to 10 fractions, receipt of ≥11 fractions was associated with a $1467 increase in per-patient cost to Medicare during the calendar quarter of RT. Almost two-thirds of patients who died within 30 days of RT completion were treated with >1 fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Although guideline concordance was high overall, a large number of patients received longer courses of RT at the end of life. Strong consideration should be made for utilization of shorter courses, particularly in patients with a limited prognosis.

Impact of Performance Status and Comorbidity on Palliative Radiation Treatment Tolerance and End-Of-Life Decision-Making

Purpose

Previous studies have indicated a relationship between functional status and comorbidity on overall survival when treating patients with bone and brain metastases. However, the degree to which these findings have been integrated into modern-day practice remains unknown. This study examines the impact of performance measures, including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and comorbidity, on palliative radiation therapy treatment tolerance and fractionation schedule. The relationship between a shorter fractionation schedule (SFx) and pending mortality is examined.

Methods and materials

This study included patients who were treated with palliative intent to the brain or bone between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2016. Demographic and medical characteristics collected included KPS score (stratified as good [90-100], fair [70-80], and poor (≤60]), socioeconomic status, comorbidity (binary measure using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 scale), site of metastatic disease, and treatment facility. Univariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to assess the impact of the variables on the prescribed number of fractions (binary measure, ≥10 [long fractionation schedule], and <10 [SFx]), and major treatment interruptions (MTIs; defined as missing ≥3 radiation therapy treatment days or ending treatment prematurely).

Results

A total of 145 patients were eligible for study inclusion, including 95 patients who were treated for bony metastatic disease and 50 patients for brain metastases. High comorbidity (P = .029) and both fair (P = .051) and poor (P = .065) functional status were associated with more frequent MTIs. However, high comorbidity and low KPS score were not associated with shorter treatment plans. In addition, patients with an earlier time to death were not more likely to receive an SFx (P = .871).

Conclusions

Low KPS and elevated comorbidity scores predict for a poorer prognosis and more frequent MTIs; however, there was no indication that physicians incorporated this information in the fractionation scheduling.

Single vs multiple fraction palliative radiotherapy for uncomplicated painful bone metastases treated at University of Malaya Medical Centre: A single institutional Malaysian experience

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to compare pain response between single and multiple fraction palliative radiotherapy and to describe prognostic factors affecting treatment response in University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).

METHODS

The case records of 162 patients with uncomplicated painful bone metastases treated with palliative radiotherapy from 2006 to 2014 were analyzed. Treatment outcomes were pain score response, analgesic score response, response according to International Consensus Endpoints (complete response and overall response) at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, retreatment rate, symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks, pain score response for single and multiple fraction group was 82.3% and 88.5%, analgesic score response was 54.8% and 61.5%, and overall response according to International Consensus Endpoint was 61.3% and 67.7%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment response between the 2 treatment groups for all endpoints. ECOG (<2 vs ≥2: aOR 3.405, 95% CI 1.708-6.790, P = .001) and primary breast and prostate (breast vs others: aOR 5.231, 95% CI 1.973-13.869, P = .001; prostate vs others: aOR 5.522, 95% CI 1.493-20.420, P = .01) were significant variables on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Single fraction radiotherapy is as effective as multiple fraction radiotherapy for the palliation of uncomplicated bone metastases.

Palliative radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases at diagnosis: A hospital-based analysis of patterns of care, RT fractionation scheme, and overall survival

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies associated with bone metastases, and palliative radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment option. A total of 2641 patients were identified with PCa and bone metastases at diagnosis from 2010 to 2014 in the NCDB. Fractionation scheme was designated as short course ([SC‐RT]: 8 Gy in 1 fraction and 20 Gy in 5 fractions) vs long course ([LC‐RT]: 30 Gy in 10 fractions and 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions). Patient characteristics were correlated with fractionation scheme using logistic regression. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method, log‐rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score‐matched analyses. A total of 2255 (85.4%) patients were included in the LC‐RT group and 386 (14.6%) patients in the SC‐RT group. SC‐RT was more common in patients over 75 years age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32‐2.20), treatment at an academic center (OR: 1.76, 1.20‐2.57), living greater than 15 miles distance to treatment facility (OR: 1.38, 1.05‐1.83), treatment to the rib (OR: 2.99, 1.36‐6.60), and in 2014 (OR: 1.73, 1.19‐2.51). RT to the spine was more commonly long course (P < .0001). In the propensity‐matched cohort, LC‐RT was associated with improved OS (P < .0001), but no OS difference was observed between 37.5 Gy and either 8 Gy in one fraction or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (P > .5). LC‐RT remains the most common treatment fractionation scheme for palliative bone metastases in PCa patients. Use of palliative SC‐RT is increasing, particularly in more recent years, for older patients, treatment at academic centers, and with increasing distance from a treatment center.

Palliative radiation and fractionation in medicare patients with incurable non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Palliative radiation therapy (RT) can improve quality of life but also incurs time and financial costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with use and intensity of palliative RT for incurable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a retrospective analysis of Medicare's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data. We identified patients who were diagnosed with incurable (American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition stage IIIB with malignant effusion or stage IV) NSCLC between 2004 and 2011. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with the receipt of palliative RT and the use of >10 fractions during the first course of radiation. Among patients who were treated with radiation, freestanding versus hospital-based center information was collected on the basis of the location of the RT delivery claim.

RESULTS

Among 55,258 patients with incurable NSCLC, 38% (21,053 patients) received palliative RT during the first year after diagnosis. Among patients who received RT, 56% (11,717 patients) received >10 fractions. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with greater RT use included younger age group (overall P < .01), lower modified Charlson comorbidity score (overall P < .01), female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.1; P < .01), marital status (OR: 1.1; P < .01), and chemotherapy use (OR: 3.6; P < .01). Predictors for >10 fractions were chemotherapy use (OR: 1.7; P < .01) and treatment at a freestanding versus hospital-based facility (58% vs 43%; OR: 1.7; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

More than a third of patients diagnosed with incurable lung cancer receive palliative RT and 56% received >10 fractions. The use of RT varied by region and patient characteristics, and patients treated at freestanding RT centers were more likely to receive >10 fractions. Further research into factors that influence treatment decisions including potential financial incentives may contribute to the high value and strategic utilization of palliative RT.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung, spine and oligometastatic disease: current evidence and future directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) also referred to as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is a technique which has emerged over the past two decades due to improvements in radiation technology. Unlike conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) which traditionally delivers radiation in small doses [approximately 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction] over several weeks, SBRT, typically delivered in one to eight fractions, is a technique whereby potentially ablative doses of radiotherapy (usually 7.5-20 Gy per fraction) can be delivered with steeper dose gradients and sub millimetre precision, minimising risk to surrounding normal tissues. The potential benefits of excellent tumor control with low toxicity has led to the increasing use of SBRT in a number of clinical situations. Due to compelling evidence, SBRT is now the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Controversy remains however as to its efficacy and safety for central or ultra-central lung tumors. The evidence base supporting the use of SBRT as a novel treatment for spinal metastases and oligometastases is rapidly expanding but challenges remain in these difficult patient populations. In an era where targeted therapy and improved systemic treatments for stage IV cancer have resulted in increased disease-free survival, and our knowledge of the oligometastatic state is ever expanding, using SBRT to treat metastatic disease and gain durable local control is increasingly desirable. Several randomized trials are currently underway and are sure to provide valuable information on the benefit and utility of SBRT across many tumor sites including early-stage NSCLC, spinal metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recognizing the evolving role of SBRT in clinical practice, this paper provides a critical review of recent developments in each of these areas particularly highlighting the challenges facing clinicians and discusses potential areas for future research.

Analysis of curative effect of I125 implantation combined with radiofrequency ablation in treating bone metastases

The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical effects of I¹²⁵ implantation combined with radiofrequency ablation in treating bone metastases (BM) and analyze its clinical application so as to provide better treatment protocols for the treatment of BM. A total of 63 BM patients were randomly divided into the I¹²⁵ implantation group (CON, treated with I¹²⁵ seeds alone, 33 patients) and the combination group (I¹²⁵-MA, 30 patients) to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse effects. After treatment, the clinical efficacy of Group I¹²⁵-MA was significantly better than Group CON, and the quality of life was improved significantly (P< 0.05). I¹²⁵-MA has relatively better clinical efficacy in treating BM, which can not only significantly improve patients' life quality but also cause no serious adverse reaction. The therapy of I¹²⁵ implantation combined with radiofrequency ablation provides a new idea for treating bone metastases. Compare Group I¹²⁵-MA and Group CON, remission rates of bone pain were 76.7% vs 42.4% (P< 0.05); movement ability: 73.3% vs 39.4% (P< 0.05); quality of life: improvement rates: 70% vs 42.4% (P< 0.05), the median initial time of relieve pain: 3.5 days vs 7.6 days (P< 0.05).

Analysis of predictors of pain response in patients with bone metastasis undergoing palliative radiotherapy: Does age matter?

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate whether age is a predictor of pain response after radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis (BM).

METHODS

Between June 2010 and June 2014, 204 patients with BM undergoing palliative radiotherapy participated in a multicentre prospective study. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) to rate the intensity pain (from 0 to 10) at baseline and 4 weeks after radiotherapy. To determine which variables predicted pain response and particularly whether age is a predictor, logistic regression analysis was used. Baseline variables considered were: age (≤65/66-75/>75 years), sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1/≥2), pretreatment pain score (≤4/5-7/≥8), radiotherapy (single/multiple fraction), primary tumour location, visceral metastases (yes/no), concomitant systemic chemotherapy and bisphosphonate use (yes/no).

RESULTS

Pain response was assessed in the 128 patients who completed BPI pretreatment and at 4 weeks after radiotherapy. According to univariate analysis, pain response was better in over 75-year-olds than younger patients: (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1; P = 0.031). Response was better in patients receiving multiple fractions rather than a single fraction of 8 Gy (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1; P = 0.01), and in patients with a pretreatment pain score ≥8 vs ≤7 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.0; P = 0.017). No other variables were significant. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment schedule (OR, 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-7.9; P = 0.004) and pre-radiotherapy pain score (OR, 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-6.3; P = 0.009) were the only independent predictors of pain response.

CONCLUSION

All patients with painful bone metastasis should be referred for palliative radiotherapy to relieve the pain regardless of age. Therefore, an older age should not be a reason to withhold palliative radiation treatment.

Use of Radiation Therapy Within the Last Year of Life Among Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

We examined radiation therapy (RT) use within the last year of life (LYOL). As palliative RT (PRT) has been well studied in patients with ≥6-week life expectancies, we hypothesized that PRT use would be constant over the LYOL, except for the last 30 days, when use would decline given lack of prospective data supporting it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At a single institution, 870 cancer patients died between October 2, 2014, and September 30, 2015, and had ≥3 evaluation and management visits within the LYOL. Claims and RT data were extracted and linked. Over the LYOL, we evaluated RT use by intent (curative vs palliative) and indications.

RESULTS

Within the LYOL, one-third of patients underwent RT in the last 365 days of life to 444 sites, which decreased to 24.3% and 8.5% in the last 180 and 30 days of life, respectively. Patients who received any RT in the last 365 days of life were younger at death and had a higher proportion of lung, sarcoma, and transplant disease groups. One-quarter of sites were irradiated with curative intent, which remained constant over the LYOL. In contrast, PRT was used at a supralinear rate, in which treatment of bone metastases and use of single-fraction PRT increased closer to death.

CONCLUSIONS

PRT appears to be disproportionately used closer to death, with an increasing proportion of irradiated sites being bone metastases. This may be secondary to increased symptoms from advanced cancer toward the end of life. As patients with very poor prognoses (eg, within 30 days of death) are generally not included in RT clinical trials, further studies are warranted to assess whether PRT for bone metastases at the end of life is efficacious.

Present role and future perspectives of interventional radiology in the treatment of painful bone lesions

Interventional radiology has experienced an exponential growth in the last years. Nowadays it is possible to treat painful benign lesions or metastases with optimal results in terms of pain management and disease control. Among the benign lesions, osteoid osteoma is the most frequently treated with minimal invasive techniques and the results are excellent. Another lesion, traditionally treated with surgery (osteoblastoma) represent today another field of application. In the oncological field, metastases are, numerically, the most diffuse indications for treatment. Research carried out during the last decades has provided the interventional radiologist with a great variety of techniques of ablation and devices for monitoring the sensitive structures close to the target lesion. New ablation techniques and monitoring devices contribute to the achievement of significantly increasing rates of effectiveness and safety of interventional radiology procedures.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Regimens for Painful Bone Metastases

Aims and background

In 75% of the patients with bone metastases (BM) pain is the dominant symptom. Radiotherapy (XRT) plays a major role in the palliation of pain in patients with BM. Several schedules of short and long fractionation XRT are used in clinical practice, with hypofractionated treatments being even more attractive for practical reasons. A considerable body of evidence supports the clinical use of short schedules and single-dose XRT. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of two short fractionated schedules of 8 Gy as a single dose and 20 Gy in 5 fractions in relieving pain in patients with multiple uncomplicated BM.

Method

From January to December 2001, 130 patients with 146 painful BM were treated with palliative localized XRT. There were 42 males and 88 females with a median age of 58 years (range 28–84). The commonest sites of treatment were the spine (59.6%) and pelvis (14.4%). The primary endpoint was clinically significant pain relief in the first six months of follow-up evaluated with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) pain measurement score measuring pain severity and pain frequency. Analgesic use was also recorded before and after treatment as drug frequency and drug severity. Patients with painful BM from any primary tumor site were irradiated. Treatment schedules consisted of a course of XRT with 4 Gy/fraction/day (total dose: 20 Gy/5 fractions) (group A, 59 lesions) or with a single dose of 8 Gy (group B, 87 lesions).

Results

There was no significant difference in complete response (CR) rates between treatment schedules: complete pain relief was achieved in 17/59 lesions (29%) in the fractionated group and in 29/87 lesions (33%) in the single-dose group. Also the overall response (complete + partial) was similar: 35/59 lesions (60%) in group A and 60/87 (69%) in group B. The minimum, maximum and median follow-up was 3, 23, and 9 months, respectively, for group A and 3, 20, and 11 months for group B. The actuarial median duration of pain relief was similar: 4.5 months in group A and 4 months in group B. No particular side effects were recorded in either group.

Conclusions

There were no differences between the two fractionation schedules used in our study with regard to pain relief and use of analgesics. Palliation of pain was obtained in approximately two thirds of patients with both schedules, providing further evidence of the similar efficacy between single and multiple fractions. With regard to pain response these data justify a recommendation for the use of a more simple and convenient 8 Gy single fraction for the palliation of uncomplicated BM.

External Beam Irradiation in the Palliation of Bone Metastases: A Practice Analysis among Sicilian Departments of Radiation Oncology

Background

In the treatment of bone metastases, the choice of radiation fractionation, total radiation dose, delivery technique, and imaging studies before treatment varies among radiation oncologists. Surveys on this issue, using case scenarios, have been published by groups from Europe, North America, and Australia-New Zealand. Our objective was to analyze retrospectively the “real” practice in nine radiotherapy centers located in Sicily.

Method

A questionnaire including 17 items was distributed to 30 practicing radiation oncologists working in seven departments of four Sicilian cities (Messina, Catania, Ragusa and Palermo) during a meeting of the Sicilian Division of the Associazione Italians Radioterapia Oncologica (AIRO). Participants were asked to answer the questions using a card for every patient treated with external beam irradiation from 1 January to 31 December, 2000.

Results

Six centers returned the questionnaires; 332 cards were valuable for a total of 5644 responses. All six responding departments used linear accelerators for treatment delivery. The most common dose fractionation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions and the most common technique used was opposed parallel local fields. Before the start of irradiation a bone scan was performed in 325 of the 332 (98%) patients treated and CT and/or MRI was performed in 320 (96%); surprisingly, standard roentgenograms were used in only 142 of 332 patients (42.8%).

Conclusion

The “real” radiation practice for bone metastases in the region of Sicily confirms the results of the previously reported international surveys: there is a clear preference for fractionated treatment and local field therapy. The results of randomized studies, which demonstrated both the efficacy and the feasibility of a single 6–8 Gy fraction in the palliation of bone metastases, have little or no impact on the pattern of practice.

[Radiotherapy of bone metastases in France: A descriptive monocentric retrospective study]

PURPOSE

Bone metastases cause pain and affect patients' quality of life. Radiation therapy is one of the reference analgesic treatments. The objective of this study was to compare the current practices of a French radiotherapy department for the treatment of uncomplicated bone metastases with data from the literature in order to improve and optimize the management of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study of patients who underwent palliative irradiation of uncomplicated bone metastases was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients had 116 treatments of uncomplicated bone metastases between January 2014 and December 2015, including 44 men (48%) and 47 women (52%) with an average age of 63years (25-88years). Primary tumours most commonly found were breast cancer (35%), lung cancer (16%) and prostate cancer (12%). The regimens used were in 29% of cases 30Gy in ten fractions (group 30Gy), in 21% of cases 20Gy in five fractions (group 20Gy), in 22% of cases 8Gy in one fraction (group 8Gy) and in 28% of cases 23.31Gy in three fractions of stereotactic body irradiation (stereotactic group). The general condition of the patient (P<0.001), pain score and analgesic (P<0.001), oligometastatic profile (P=0.003) and practitioner experience (P<0.001) were factors influencing the choice of the regimen irradiation. Age (P=0.46), sex (P=0.14), anticancer treatments (P=0.56), concomitant hospitalization (P=0.14) and the distance between the radiotherapy centre and home (P=0.87) did not influence the decision significantly. A total of three cases of spinal compression and one case of post-therapeutic fracture were observed, occurring between one and 128days and 577days after irradiation, respectively. Eight percent of all irradiated metastases were reirradiated with a delay ranging between 13 and 434days after the first irradiation. The re-irradiation rate was significantly higher after 8Gy (P=0.02). The rate of death was significantly lower in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001) and overall survival was significantly greater in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients' analysed was comparable to the population of different studies. Predictive factors for the choice of the treatment regimen were identified. Non-fractionnated therapy was underutilised while stereotactic treatment was increasingly prescribed, showing an evolution in the management of patients.

Role of radiotherapy in extracranial metastatic malignant melanoma in the modern era

Background

To assess the role of radiotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) patients in modern era.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study of MM patients treated with radiotherapy at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2014. Patients with pre- and post-treatment imaging studies (CT, MRI, and/or PET/CT) were assessed for metastasis failure (MF), regional/distant failure, and overall survival (OS).

Results

In 75 MM patients, 56 and 68 lesions were treated with conventional/hypofractionated radiotherapy (CHRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), respectively. The median doses for CHRT and SBRT were 30 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. 1-year MF was 17% (SBRT 6% vs CHRT 31%, p < 0.01). 1-year regional (5% vs 29%, p < 0.01) and distant progression (75% vs 89%, p < 0.01) were improved with SBRT. Median OS was 15.6 months (CHRT 7.0 vs SBRT 22.9, p < 0.01). Prognostic factors for OS included age ≤55 years (RR 0.25), oligometastatic disease (RR 0.34), SBRT (RR 0.38) and treating all lesions (RR 0.28, all p < 0.01).

Conclusions

SBRT for extracranial MM exhibited improved MF compared with CHRT, consistent with intracranial radiosurgery data. Though these data are retrospective and subject to selection bias, our findings support the prudent use of SBRT in a select group of favorable, oligometastatic MM patients, and should be discussed as an alternative to surgery and ablation.

Radiation for Treatment of Painful Bone Metastases

Several variables may be considered when deciding on optimal modality of radiation therapy for each cancer patient with bone pain, including prognosis, tumor histology, location and extent of metastases, and association with cord compression. Hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy is as effective as a multiple fraction radiotherapy course in most cases, although retreatment rates are higher after a single dose of radiation. Stereotactic body radiation may be used in cases of oligometastatic disease, repeat irradiation, and radiation-resistant tumors. Radiopharmaceuticals may be used for pain from diffuse bone metastases and have an overall survival benefit in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

The role of radiation therapy in bone metastases management

Bone metastases represent an important complication of malignant tumours. Despite improvement in surgical techniques and advances in systemic therapies, management of patients with bone metastatic disease remains a powerful cornerstone for the radiation oncologist. The primary goal of radiation therapy is to provide pain relief, preserving patients quality of life.

Update of the systematic review of palliative radiation therapy fractionation for bone metastases

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is an effective modality for pain management of symptomatic bone metastases. We update the previous meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing single fraction to multiple fractions of radiation therapy in patients with uncomplicated bone metastases.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register. Ten new randomized trials were identified since 2010, five with adequate and appropriate data for inclusion, resulting in a total of 29 trials that were analyzed. Forest plots based on each study's odds ratios were computed using a random effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel statistic.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was similar in patients for single fraction treatments (61%; 1867/3059) and those for multiple fraction treatments (62%; 1890/3040). Similarly, complete response rates were nearly identical in both groups (23% vs 24%, respectively). Re-treatment was significantly more frequent in the single fraction treatment arm, with 20% receiving additional treatment to the same site versus 8% in the multiple fraction treatment arm (p < 0.01). No significant difference was seen in the risk of pathological fracture at the treatment site, rate of spinal cord compression at the index site, or in the rate of acute toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Single fraction and multiple fraction radiation treatment regimens continue to demonstrate similar outcomes in pain control and toxicities, but re-treatment is more common for single fraction treatment patients.

Radiofrequency ablation versus 125I-seed brachytherapy for painful metastases involving the bone

This retrospective study aimed to demonstrate and compare the safety and effectiveness of computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ¹²⁵I-seed brachytherapy for painful bone metastases after failure of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). From June 2013 to October 2015, 79 patients with moderate-to-severe pain caused by metastatic bone lesions who underwent either RFA (n = 41) or ¹²⁵I-seed brachytherapy (n = 38) were enrolled. Pain in patients was measured using the brief pain inventory (BPI) before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. Response rates were assessed by measuring the changes in pain and incorporation of changes in the analgesic requirements. At baseline, 1 week, and 3 months, the mean worst pain scores of BPI were 7.8, 5.4, and 2.7, respectively, for the RFA group and 7.7, 6.1, and 2.8, respectively, for the brachytherapy group. At 1 week, the complete and partial response rates were 12% and 59%, respectively, in the RFA group compared with 3% and 45%, respectively, in the brachytherapy group. At 3 months, the complete and partial response rates were 23% and 58%, respectively, in the RFA group compared with 24% and 52% in the brachytherapy group (p = 0.95). The response rates in the RFA group were significantly higher than those in the brachytherapy group at 1 week (p = 0.32), but comparable at 3 weeks (p = 0.95). Both groups had low rates of complications and no treatment-related mortality. In conclusion, the short-term curative efficiency of RFA was better than that of brachytherapy, but the log-term efficiency of both treatments was equal.

Intraoperative Radiotherapy during Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Metastases (Kypho-IORT): First Clinical Results

Aims and background

Kyphoplasty is an effective procedure providing structural stability and pain alleviation in vertebral metastases. To prevent early regrowth, patients typically receive postoperative fractionated radiotherapy, which is associated with long treatment duration. Therefore, we established a new approach to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty to shorten the treatment time and reach structural stability and sterilization of the metastases (Kypho-IORT).

Methods and study design

For Kypho-IORT, a 50 kV X-ray source with a specially designed applicator was used. A radiation dose of 8 Gy in 5 mm distance was delivered. After radiation the device was removed and the kyphoplasty was completed according to the standard procedure. Since August 2009, 18 patients with instable or painful spinal metastases received Kypho-IORT. The median age was 63 years (range, 43–73).

Results

Kypho-IORT was successfully performed in 18 of 21 vertebral lesions (86%). No severe complications occurred during or early after IORT. The median pain score using a visual analogue scale decreased from 5/10 before the procedure to 2.5/10 at day 1 (P <0.001) and to 0/10 six weeks after the procedure (P = 0.001). Imaging studies were available for 15 of 18 patients. Stable disease within the irradiated vertebral body was seen in 14 patients (93%) and local progressive disease in one patient (7%). No re-irradiation due to local progressive disease or pain recurrence was necessary within the median follow-up of 4.5 months.

Conclusions

Kypho-IORT is well tolerated without severe side effects and provides fast improvement of pain. Although stable disease was seen in 93% of the patients, a longer follow-up is necessary to assess the effectiveness. A dose escalation study to establish the maximally tolerated dose has been initiated.

De Bari B, Chiesa S, Filippi AR, Gambacorta MA, D'Emilio V, Murino P, Livi L. The INTER-ROMA Project - a Survey among Italian Radiation Oncologists on Their Approach to the Treatment of Bone Metastases

Aims and background

Radiotherapy has an established palliative role for bone metastases but despite the large number of patients treated there is still controversy surrounding the optimal radiotherapy schedule to prescribe. The aim of this survey was to determine the decision patterns of Italian radiation oncologists in four different clinical cases of patients with bone metastases.

Methods and study design

During the latest national meeting of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), four clinical cases were presented to attending radiation oncologists. The cases were different with respect to the histology of the primary tumor, performance status, pain before and after analgesics, tumor site, and radiological characteristics of the metastatic lesions. For each clinical case the respondents were asked to give an indication for treatment; prescribe doses, volumes and treatment field arrangements; decide whether to prescribe prophylactic supportive therapy or not; and provide information about factors that particularly influenced prescription. Finally, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Three hundred questionnaires were distributed to radiation oncologists attending the congress. One hundred twenty-five questionnaires were returned but only 122 (40.6%) were adequately completed and considered for the analysis. Considerable differences were observed among radiation oncologists in prescribing and delivering radiotherapy for bone metastases. There was also a notable divergence from international guidelines, which will be discussed in this report.

Conclusions

Despite the results of clinical trials, Italian radiation oncologists differ considerably in their decisions on treatment doses and volumes. National guidelines are needed in order that patients can be treated uniformly and better data will become available for evidence-based palliative radiotherapy.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning of thoracic vertebral metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy

Purpose/Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the plan quality, treatment efficiency, and accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for thoracic spine metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Materials/Methods

Seven patients with thoracic vertebral metastases treated with noncoplanar hybrid arcs (NCHA) (1 to 2 3D‐conformal partial arcs +7 to 9 IMRT beams) were re‐optimized with VMAT plans using three coplanar arcs. Tumors were located between T2 and T7 and PTVs ranged between 24.3 and 240.1 cc (median 48.1 cc). All prescriptions were 30 Gy in 5 fractions with 6 MV beams treated using the Novalis Tx linac equipped with high definition multileaf collimators (HDMLC). MR images were fused with planning CTs for target and OAR contouring. Plans were compared for target coverage using conformality index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D90, D98, D2, and Dmedian. Normal tissue sparing was evaluated by comparing doses to the spinal cord (Dmax, D0.35, and D1.2 cc), esophagus (Dmax and D5 cc), heart (Dmax, D15 cc), and lung (V5 and V10). Data analysis was performed with a two‐sided t‐test for each set of parameters. Dose delivery efficiency and accuracy of each VMAT plan was assessed via quality assurance (QA) using a MapCHECK device. The Beam‐on time (BOT) was recorded, and a gamma index was used to compare dose agreement between the planned and measured doses.

Results

VMAT plans resulted in improved CI (1.02 vs. 1.36, P = 0.05), HI (0.14 vs. 0.27, P = 0.01), D98 (28.4 vs. 26.8 Gy, P = 0.03), D2 (32.9 vs. 36.0 Gy, P = 0.02), and Dmedian (31.4 vs. 33.7 Gy, P = 0.01). D90 was improved but not statistically significant (30.4 vs. 31.0 Gy, P = 0.38). VMAT plans showed statistically significant improvements in normal tissue sparing: Esophagus D_max (22.5 vs. 27.0 Gy, P = 0.03), Esophagus 5 cc (17.6 vs. 21.5 Gy, P = 0.02), and Heart D_max (13.1 vs. 15.8 Gy, P = 0.03). Improvements were also observed in spinal cord and lung sparing as well but were not statistically significant. The BOT showed significant reduction for VMAT, 4.7 ± 0.6 min vs. 7.1 ± 1 min for NCHA (not accounting for couch kicks). VMAT plans demonstrated an accurate dose delivery of 95.5 ± 1.0% for clinical gamma passing rate of 3%/3 mm criteria, which was similar to NCHA plans.

Conclusions

VMAT plans have shown improved dose distributions and normal tissue sparing compared to NCHA plans. Significant reductions in treatment time could potentially minimize patient discomfort and intrafraction movement errors. VMAT planning for SBRT is an attractive option for the treatment of metastases to thoracic vertebrae, and further investigation using alternative fractionation schedules is warranted.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of painful spinal metastasis: a systematic literature assessment of analgesia and safety

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most common percutaneous technique applied to treat painful spinal metastasis; however, experience in this field is somehow still limited. A systematic literature research was performed to understand the effects of RFA in terms of analgesia and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows: (1) randomised controlled or non-randomised studies with a prospective or retrospective design; (2) population made up of adults with spinal metastasis; (3) spinal metastasis treated with RFA alone or in combination/comparison with other treatments; (4) studies reporting about patients' pain before and at least one time-point following RFA; and (5) English-language studies.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-three articles were screened and 8 (4 prospective, 4 retrospective) matched the inclusion criteria. Study population ranged between 10 and 92 patients across studies. Five out of eight studies reported a highly effective pain management (≥4 points of pain reduction between baseline and the last time-point available); 2/8 studies reported moderate results (≥2 points of pain reduction between baseline and the last time-point available). All studies combined RFA with cement augmentation in the vast majority of patients (40-100%) or metastasis (94-95.8%). Grade I-IIIa neural complications were reported in up to 16% of the cases and were always managed conservatively or with steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA, combined with vertebral augmentation in most of the cases, is effective and safe in achieving short- to mid-term (from 1 week to 6 months) analgesia in patients affected by painful spinal metastasis.

Efficacy of 8 Gy Single Fraction Palliative Radiation Therapy in Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience

Introduction Bone metastasis (BM) is a major complication of many solid tumors like breast, prostate, lung and renal cancers. BM leads to serious sequelae of pain, fractures, spinal cord compression and hypercalcemia. Radiotherapy has an established role in relieving pain caused by BM. Worldwide different radiotherapy schedules are being used for BM. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of single fraction palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Methods Between April 2014 and April 2017, single fraction radiotherapy was used to treat 73 patients in our institution. They had pathologically proven breast, prostate, lung or renal cancer with radiological evidence of bone metastases. There were 39 males (53%) and 34 females (47%). The median age was 58 years (range 33-87 years). 39% patients (n = 28) had breast cancer, 35% had prostate cancer (n = 26), 23% had lung cancer (n = 17), and 3% had renal cancer (n = 2). On presentation, all the patients had a pain score of more than five on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Results Response assessment to pain after three months from single fraction radiotherapy was found to be complete response (CR) in 23% patients (n = 17), partial response (PR) in 38% patients (n = 28), stable disease (SD) in 26% patients (n = 19) and progressive disease (PD) in 12% patients (n = 9). The overall efficacy of treatment was 62%, with CR 23% and PR 38%. Pre-treatment mean pain score was 8.15 compared to 4.68 post-treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions Single fraction palliative radiotherapy of 8 Gy showed significant efficacy in painful bone metastases in our setting and merits further investigation in our population.

Epidural and intramedullary spinal metastasis: clinical features and role of fractionated radiotherapy

Metastases involving the spinal epidural space and cord parenchyma are major sources of neurological impairment and decreased quality of life in cancer patients. Herein we review the clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, importance of early diagnosis and initiation of treatment, and role of fractionated radiotherapy of these disorders.

Screening for psychological distress before radiotherapy for painful bone metastases may be useful to identify patients with high levels of distress

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress (PD) has a major impact on quality of life. We studied the incidence of PD before and after radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Furthermore, we aimed to identify factors predictive for PD.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 1998, the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study included 1157 patients with painful bone metastases. Patients were randomized between two fractionation schedules. The study showed a pain response of 74% in both groups. Patients filled out weekly questionnaires for 13 weeks, then monthly for two years. The questionnaires included a subscale for PD on the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. We used generalized estimating equations and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

At baseline, 290 patients (27%) had a high level of PD. For the entire group, the level of PD remained constant over time. The majority of patients with a low level of PD at baseline remained at a low level during follow-up. In patients with a high level of PD at baseline, the mean level of PD decreased after treatment and stabilized around the cutoff level. Female patients, higher age, worse performance, lower pain score and worse self-reported QoL were associated with an increased chance of PD, although the model showed moderate discriminative power.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients had a high level of PD before and after radiotherapy for painful bone metastases. Most patients who reported high levels of PD when referred for palliative radiotherapy remained at high levels thereafter. Therefore, screening of PD prior to treatment seems appropriate, in order to select patients requiring intervention.

Metastatic Osseous Pain Control: Radiation Therapy

Metastatic disease to the bone is a common manifestation of advanced cancer, and can result in pain, pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, and overall functional compromise. External beam radiation is a proven, highly efficacious, and noninvasive therapy that can provide symptomatic relief from painful osseous lesions. When deciding upon the best treatment regimen, it is important to consider patient factors such as overall life expectancy, performance status, disease burden, and site of osseous metastatic pain. Determination of best treatment ideally requires multidisciplinary input from radiologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, pain management, and palliative care specialists together with radiation oncologists.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in painful bone metastases: Using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as an indicator of effectiveness of single fraction versus multiple fraction radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Bone metastases are a common cause of cancer-related pain. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal radiotherapy schedule for the treatment of painful bone metastases and verify if could cause different biological effects on bone. This has been achieved using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients received Multiple Fractions Radiation Therapy (MFRT) with a total dose of 30Gy in 10 daily fractions of 3Gy given over 2 weeks and 15 patients received a Single Fraction Radiation Therapy (SFRT) with a dose of 8Gy. Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values after SFRT or MFRT were compared with response to treatment (pain relief), assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before radiotherapy and at 1 and 3 months after the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The two schedules had equal efficacy in terms of pain control, without any difference at 1 and 3 months post radiotherapy. In both treatments, pain reduction was related to an increase in the ADC. However, the median ADC value had an increase of 575 points between the baseline and 3 months (from 1010 to 1585, p=0.02) in the 30Gy group, while it was only 178 points (from 1417 to 1595) in the 8Gy group.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in the ADC values after radiotherapy corresponds to increased cell death. Despite an equal pain control, MFRT treatment seems to be more effective to achieve cancer cells kill. Our preliminary data could also explain the higher retreatment rates in SFRT vs MFRT in long survivors.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastasis: A Matched-Pair Study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an alternative local therapy for patients with painful bone metastasis for whom standard conventional radiation therapy (RT) has failed. However, the therapeutic effects of MRgFUS as a first-line treatment for bone metastasis remain uncertain.

METHODS

A matched-pair study was conducted to compare the therapeutic effects of MRgFUS with those of conventional RT as a first-line treatment for patients with painful bone metastasis. The MRgFUS and RT-treated groups were matched 1:2 by age, sex, primary cancer, pretreatment pain score, and treated site.

RESULTS

According to the criteria for patient eligibility and matching, 21 and 42 patients (total, 63 patients) with bone metastasis treated with MRgFUS and conventional RT, respectively, were enrolled for analyses. The median ages of the MRgFUS and RT-treated patients were 59 and 61 years, respectively. Among the enrolled patients, 52% were male and 48% were female. The results showed that both MRgFUS and RT were effective. However, MRgFUS was more efficient than RT in terms of the time course of pain palliation as it yielded a significantly higher response rate at 1 week after treatment (71% versus 26%, p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

MRgFUS provides a similar overall treatment response rate but faster pain relief compared with conventional RT and has the potential to serve as the first-line treatment for painful bone metastasis in selected patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique

Background

Conventional radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases can be delivered with a single posterior-anterior (PA) or two opposed anterior-posterior (APPA) fields. We studied the effectiveness and toxicity of both techniques and studied whether treatment technique was predictive for abdominal and skin toxicity.

Patients and methods

Within the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 343 patients received 8 Gray in a single fraction or 24 Gray in six fractions for painful spinal metastases. Treatment technique was not randomized. At baseline and weekly during follow-up, patients reported pain and other physical complaints. Any complaint increasing within 4 weeks after treatment was noted as a side effect. Pain response was calculated according to international standards, taking into account changes in pain score and medication. Repeated measurement analyses and multivariate logistic analyses were performed.

Results

Patients were mainly treated on the thoracic (34%) and lumbar (53%) spine and 73% received a PA field. Pain response was similar between both techniques (74%). In patients treated at the thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spine, with multiple fractions, significantly more abdominal complaints were noticed. In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy technique did not predict for side effects.

Conclusion

Conventional radiotherapy of painful spinal metastases provides limited toxicity. Radiotherapy technique is not an independent predictor of abdominal and skin toxicity of irradiation.

Cost evaluations of radiotherapy: What do we know? An ESTRO-HERO analysis

Although economic evidence is becoming mandatory to support health care decision-making, challenges remain in generating high quality cost data, especially for complex and rapidly evolving treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy. The overall aim of this systematic literature review was to critically analyse the type and quality of radiotherapy cost information available in cost calculation studies, from the health care provider's perspective, published since 1981. A selection process, based on strict and explicit criteria, yielded 52 articles. In spite of meeting our criteria these studies displayed large heterogeneity in scope, costing method, inputs and outputs. The limited use of conventional costing methodologies along with insufficient information on resource inputs hampered comparability across studies. A consistent picture of radiotherapy costs, based on methodologically sound costing studies, has yet to emerge. These results call for developing a well-defined and generally accepted cost methodology for performing economic evaluation studies in radiotherapy.

Consideration of patient and disease characteristics in selecting radiation regimens for treatment of bone metastases

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is one of the mainstays of treatment for painful bone metastases; however, the optimal fractionation and dosing of radiation for a given patient and disease characteristics are still subject to debate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively examined 475 patients who received radiation for bone metastases at our institution from 2009 through 2014 and evaluated survival outcomes based on parameters of their first treatment course and patient demographics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze factors associated with overall survival (OS). A recursive partition analysis (RPA) was used to generate a decision tree of patient characteristics resulting in significant differences in survival. A Cox model was used to verify the RPA and evaluate the significance of biologically equivalent dose (BED) along with other factors.

RESULTS

In our cohort, median age was 62 years and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70. Survival time by primary tumor type: breast (median, 35.9 months), prostate (12.8 months), other (median, 11.0 months), lung (median, 5.3 months), and gastrointestinal (median, 4.0 months) (P < .0001). Primary tumor type and KPS significantly affected survival, whereas age was also significant for survival in certain primary tumor types. Pain control was not found to be significantly affected by primary tumor type (P = .72) or BED (P = .14).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that selection of radiation fractionation schedules should take into account primary tumor type, KPS, and age, and we have generated an RPA model including these factors to help guide decision making. We also found that shorter fractionation schedules are as effective as longer fractionation schedules for pain control, regardless of primary tumor type.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Single-Fraction Versus Multiple-Fraction Radiotherapy in Patients with Painful Bone Metastases: An Iranian Patient's Perspective Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate two of the various treatment strategies of bone metastasis- single-fraction radiotherapy and multiple-fraction radiotherapy.

METHODS

A multistage Markov decision model was applied to assess the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of single fraction against multiple fractions. The model had a monthly cycle length over a lifetime horizon with 1000 hypothetical cohort samples. The EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire was used to estimate the health-related quality of life in patients. To cope with parameters of uncertainty, we conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte-Carlo simulation technique. Both cost and utility variables were discounted by 3% in the base model. Strategies were assessed considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of US $6578 per QALY gained.

RESULTS

The expected mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years were, respectively, US $447.28 and 5.95 months for patients receiving single-fraction radiotherapy and US $1269.66 and 7.87 months for those receiving multiple-fraction radiotherapy. The incremental cost-utility ratio was US $428.38 per QALY. Considering the Iranian gross domestic product per capita (US $6578) as the recommended willingness to pay for 1 QALY gained, the multiple-fraction method was found to be a cost-effective strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers should advocate the multiple-fraction method instead of the single-fraction method in the treatment of patients with painful bone metastases.

The role of radiotherapy in bone metastases: A critical review of current literature

Radiotherapy is considered the treatment of choice for painful bone metastases. However, novel modalities of radiotherapy have emerged in the concept of oligometastasic disease. In addition, the increase of overall survival of patients with bone metastatic disease in the last decades due to systemic treatments has issued the silent topic of re-irradiation. The aim of this manuscript was to present a current thorough search of relevant literature. Originally, 6,087 articles revealed from PubMed database related to radiotherapy and bone metastases. The first objective was to identify prospective randomised phase III studies dealing with bone metastases and which treated primary with radiotherapy. Abstracts and non-English citations were excluded. Twenty-three phase III clinical trials, 17 prospective studies and eight meta-analysis/systemic reviews matching with these criteria, were identified. Eleven randomised studies were comparing single dose fraction to multi-fraction schedules of radiotherapy. The overall response rates and complete response rates were not significant between the two arms. Re-irradiations rates were significantly higher for the single dose fraction arms. Stereotactic radiotherapy showed excellent tumour control rates more than 80%. All trials showed the equivalence of either single or multi-fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic bone lesions. Stereotactic irradiation is feasible and safe for oligometastatic disease. However, it seems that the single fraction of 8 Gy is superior to 4 Gy, in terms of efficacy.

Single vs. multiple fraction regimens for palliative radiotherapy treatment of multiple myeloma : A prospective randomised study

PURPOSE

To compare the impact of a single fraction (8 Gy × 1 fraction) and multifraction (3 Gy × 10 fractions) radiotherapy regimens on pain relief, recalcification and the quality of life (QoL) in patients with bone destructions due to multiple myeloma (MM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 101 patients were included in a randomised prospective clinical trial: 58 patients were included in the control arm (3 Gy × 10 fractions) and 43 patients into the experimental arm (8 Gy × 1 fraction). The response rate was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy criteria. Recalcification was evaluated with radiographs. QoL questionnaires were completed before and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Pain relief was obtained in 81/101 patients (80.2%): complete response in 56 (69%) and partial in 25 patients (30.9%). No significant differences were observed in analgesic response between the groups. Significant factors for pain relief were female gender, age under 65, IgG MM type, presence of recalcification at the irradiated site. Recalcification was found in 32/101 patients (33.7%): complete in 17 (53.2%) and partial in 15 (46.2%). No significant differences were observed in recalcification between the groups. Significant factors for recalcification were Karnofsky index ≥ 60%, haemoglobin level ≤ 80 g/dl, MM stage II and analgesic response at the irradiated site. The QoL after radiotherapy was improved in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The same analgesic and recalcification response was observed using two different radiotherapy regimens. Higher doses should be used to achieve a better QoL.

Considerations for Quality Improvement in Radiation Oncology Therapy for Patients with Uncomplicated Painful Bone Metastases

Background: There is an increasing need for evidence-based efficiency in providing a growing amount of cancer care. One example of a quality gap is the use of multiple-fraction palliative radiation for patients with advanced cancer who have uncomplicated bone metastases; evidence suggests similar pain outcomes for treatment regimens with a lower burden of treatments. Methods: During the first phase of quality improvement work, we used RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology to understand how radiation oncologists at one academic medical center rate the appropriateness of different treatment regimens for painful uncomplicated bone metastases. We compared radiation oncologist appropriateness ratings for radiation treatments with radiation therapy provided by these oncologists to patients with painful bone metastases between July 2012 and June 2013. Results: Appropriateness ratings showed that single-fraction (8 Gy) treatment (a low burden treatment) was consistently considered an appropriate option to treat a variety of uncomplicated bone metastases. The use of >10 fractions was consistently rated as inappropriate regardless of other factors. Eighty-one patients receiving radiation therapy for painful bone metastases during the study period had an available medical record for chart abstraction. Almost one-third of metastases were considered complicated because of a concern of spinal cord compression, a history of prior irradiation, or an associated pathological fracture. Among uncomplicated bone metastases, 25% were treated with stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Among the 54 uncomplicated bone metastases treated with conformal radiation, only one was treated with single-fraction treatment and 32% were treated with greater than 10 fractions. Conclusions: Treatment at the study site demonstrates room for improvement in providing low-burden radiation oncology treatments for patients with painful bone metastases. Choosing a radiation treatment schedule for patients with advanced cancer and painful bone metastases requires consideration of many medical and patient-centered factors. Our experience suggests that it will take more than the existence of guidelines to change practice in this area.