A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients

Ischemic preconditioning of the liver: a few perspectives from the bench to bedside translation

Utilization of ischemic preconditioning to ameliorate ischemia/reperfusion injury has been extensively studied in various organs and species for the past two decades. While hepatic ischemic preconditioning in animals has been largely beneficial, translational efforts in the two clinical contexts--liver resection and decreased donor liver transplantation--have yielded mixed results. This review is intended to critically examine the translational data and identify some potential reasons for the disparate clinical results, and highlight some issues for further studies.

The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C and what influences this

1. Liver failure and liver cancer from chronic hepatitis C are the most common indications for liver transplantation and numbers of both are projected to double over the next 20 years. 2. Recurrent hepatitis C infection of the allograft is universal and immediate following liver transplantation and associated with accelerated progression to cirrhosis, graft loss and death. 3. Graft and patient survival is reduced in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection compared to HCV-negative recipients. 4. The natural history of chronic hepatitis C is accelerated following liver transplantation compared C, with 20% progressing to cirrhosis by 5 years. However, the rate of fibrosis progression is not uniform and may increase over time. 5. The rates of progression from cirrhosis to decompensation and from decompensation to death are also accelerated following liver transplantation. 6. Multiple host, donor and viral factors are associated with rapid fibrosis progression and HCV-related graft failure. 7. Over the last decade, graft and patient survival rates have improved following liver transplantation for non-HCV disease but not for HCV-cirrhosis. This may reflect worsening donor quality and changes in immunosuppression strategies over recent years. 8. Viral eradication by antiviral therapy prevents disease progression and improves survival. 9. The severity of recurrent hepatitis C at one year post-transplant predicts subsequent progression to cirrhosis. Annual protocol biopsies are recommended to help determine need for antiviral therapy. 10. The projected impact of recurrent hepatitis C on graft and patient survival can only be avoided by the development of safe and effective antiviral strategies which can both prevent initial graft infection and eradicate established hepatitis C recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in patients with Crohn's disease and chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Efficacy and safety of antiviral combination therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is presently not established and consequently CHC is rarely treated in CD patients.

AIM

To analyse the efficacy and tolerability of antiviral interferon/ribavirin therapy in patients with CHC and CD.

METHODS

Eleven HCV-infected CD patients received either 3 x 1.5 microg/kg/week interferon-alpha-2b or 180 microg/week peginterferon-alpha-2a (PEGASYS; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as monotherapy (n = 1) or in combination with 800-1200 mg/day ribavirin (COPEGUS; Roche) (n = 10) for 24-54 weeks according to HCV-genotype and initial response respectively. Eight patients were under CD-specific therapy.

RESULTS

Five (46%) patients (HCV-1: a = 3; HCV-2: n = 0; HCV-3: n = 1; unknown: n = 1) achieved a sustained virological response, three (27%) patients relapsed, three (27%) were nonresponders (all GT 1b). At baseline, the Harvey--Bradshaw Index was 0 (0-8) [median (range)], increased on antiviral therapy to 4 (1-15) (P = 0.005) and decreased to baseline level 0 (0-6) after 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience demonstrates that treatment of CHC in patients with CD is comparable to the treatment of CHC in those without CD. However, gastrointestinal symptoms may be temporarily exacerbated and haemopoietic growth factors may be required.

Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Under the current liver-transplantation policy, donor organs are offered to patients with the highest risk of death.

METHODS

Using data derived from all adult candidates for primary liver transplantation who were registered with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in 2005 and 2006, we developed and validated a multivariable survival model to predict mortality at 90 days after registration. The predictor variable was the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score with and without the addition of the serum sodium concentration. The MELD score (on a scale of 6 to 40, with higher values indicating more severe disease) is calculated on the basis of the serum bilirubin and creatinine concentrations and the international normalized ratio for the prothrombin time.

RESULTS

In 2005, there were 6769 registrants, including 1781 who underwent liver transplantation and 422 who died within 90 days after registration on the waiting list. Both the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration were significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio for death, 1.21 per MELD point and 1.05 per 1-unit decrease in the serum sodium concentration for values between 125 and 140 mmol per liter; P<0.001 for both variables). Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration, indicating that the effect of the serum sodium concentration was greater in patients with a low MELD score. When applied to the data from 2006, when 477 patients died within 3 months after registration on the waiting list, the combination of the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration was considerably higher than the MELD score alone in 32 patients who died (7%). Thus, assignment of priority according to the MELD score combined with the serum sodium concentration might have resulted in transplantation and prevented death.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-wide study shows that the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration are important predictors of survival among candidates for liver transplantation.

Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Under the current liver-transplantation policy, donor organs are offered to patients with the highest risk of death.

METHODS

Using data derived from all adult candidates for primary liver transplantation who were registered with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in 2005 and 2006, we developed and validated a multivariable survival model to predict mortality at 90 days after registration. The predictor variable was the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score with and without the addition of the serum sodium concentration. The MELD score (on a scale of 6 to 40, with higher values indicating more severe disease) is calculated on the basis of the serum bilirubin and creatinine concentrations and the international normalized ratio for the prothrombin time.

RESULTS

In 2005, there were 6769 registrants, including 1781 who underwent liver transplantation and 422 who died within 90 days after registration on the waiting list. Both the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration were significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio for death, 1.21 per MELD point and 1.05 per 1-unit decrease in the serum sodium concentration for values between 125 and 140 mmol per liter; P<0.001 for both variables). Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration, indicating that the effect of the serum sodium concentration was greater in patients with a low MELD score. When applied to the data from 2006, when 477 patients died within 3 months after registration on the waiting list, the combination of the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration was considerably higher than the MELD score alone in 32 patients who died (7%). Thus, assignment of priority according to the MELD score combined with the serum sodium concentration might have resulted in transplantation and prevented death.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-wide study shows that the MELD score and the serum sodium concentration are important predictors of survival among candidates for liver transplantation.

Hepatitis C and liver transplantation: enhancing outcomes and should patients be retransplanted

Hepatitis C (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Safe expansion of the donor pool with improved rates of deceased donation and more widespread use of living and extended criteria donation are likely to decrease wait list mortality. In addition, improved antiviral treatments and a better understanding of the delicate balance between under- and over-immunosuppression in this population are needed. Finally, when recurrent advanced fibrosis occurs, the criteria for patient selection for retransplantation remain widely debated. This article reviews the literature on these topics and the work being done in each area to maximize outcomes in patients receiving transplants for HCV-related cirrhosis.

The impact of donor age on the outcome of adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The negative effects of increased donor age on liver transplantation became evident in deceased donor liver transplantation. In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the details remain unclear.

METHODS

Initially, 137 adult LDLT recipients from August 1996 to May 2005 were divided into two groups (donors <50 years of age: n=99, donors >or= 50 years of age: n=38) for the retrospective study. Then, 24 recipients who received LDLT from June 2005 to July 2006 were divided into two groups: group 1 (donors <50 years of age, n=14) and group 2 (donors >or= 50 years of age, n=10) and enrolled in the prospective study to analyze their clinical course and prognostic factors in the aged graft.

RESULTS

In the retrospective study, the younger donor group had significantly better survival than that of the aged donor group (P=0.015, Log rank test). In the prospective study, the postoperative graft functions showed that the serum total bilirubin levels were significantly lower in group 1 (P<0.02, by ANOVA analysis). The phosphorylated-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription3 expression at 4 hr after reperfusion (RT2) in group 2 was significantly lower than that in group 1. At RT2, the expressions were up-regulated in group 1, but were down-regulated in group 2. The serum 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine value became significantly higher in group 1 two weeks after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

In the near term, Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription3 gene induction during cold preservation may be of great use in improving the outcome of aged grafts in LDLT.

Comparison of hepatitis C histological recurrence rates and patient survival between split and deceased donor liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists as to whether there is an increased severity or frequency of recurrent hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) grafts. We sought to examine the time to histological recurrence and survival in HCV (+) patients who underwent split liver transplantation (SLT), which is technically similar to what occurs in the LDLT procedure.

METHODS

Twenty four HCV (+) adult recipients were identified through the UNOS database as having had SLT procedures at three centers: Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Chicago, and University of California at Los Angeles. Of these, 17 patients with comprehensive data were matched to 32 HCV (+) patients who underwent whole deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) during the same time period. Outcome and time to initial HCV recurrence as documented by liver biopsy were assessed. Liver biopsy was performed when clinically indicated.

RESULTS

Patients who had SLT were significantly older (P=.01). There was no difference in number of rejection episodes (P=.40). Fifteen of 17 SLT (88%) versus 24/32 DDLT (75%) patients had documented HCV recurrence by biopsy (P=.46). The time to median cumulative incidence of recurrence of HCV post-liver transplantation was 12.6 months (SLT) versus 39.8 months (DDLT) patients. There was no difference in survival between SLT and DDLT patients (47 vs 70 months, P=.62) nor in cumulative incidence of histological HCV recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years (P=.198, .919, and .806, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in the cumulative incidence of histological recurrence of HCV post-liver transplant or in survival between recipients of deceased donor and split liver transplants.

Randomized trial of steroid-free induction versus corticosteroid maintenance among orthotopic liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus: impact on hepatic fibrosis progression at one year

BACKGROUND

Due to the known high recurrence rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients who receive tacrolimus+corticosteroid maintenance, use of steroid-free induction was considered.

METHODS

OLT recipients with HCV were randomized to receive tacrolimus+daclizumab (steroid-free) vs. tacrolimus+corticosteroids during 1999-2001 and then tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+daclizumab (steroid-free) vs. tacrolimus+MMF+corticosteroids during 2002-2005. Patients in the steroid-free arm of both periods received no steroids except for treating biopsy-proven rejection. Primary objective was to compare mean fibrosis stage at the 1-year protocol biopsy, between the steroid-free and corticosteroid arms, stratifying by period.

RESULTS

No noticeable differences in mean fibrosis stage between the two treatment arms, either averaging across periods (P=0.99) or during either period (P>0.35) were found. Occurrence of acute rejection during the first year was the only factor associated with a significantly increased fibrosis stage at 1 year (P=0.0003); stage > or =2 was seen in 63% (17 of 27) vs. 19% (8 of 43) of those with vs. without rejection. In addition, MMF use was associated with significantly fewer patients experiencing acute rejection during the first 6 and 12 months posttransplant (P=0.006 and 0.046). Regarding steroid-related side effects, posttransplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 10% vs. 45%, and wound infection in 6% vs. 31% of steroid-free vs. corticosteroid patients (P=0.003 and 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

OLT recipients with HCV tolerated the steroid-free protocol with fewer side effects; however, its use had no apparent impact on hepatic fibrosis progression. Occurrence of acute rejection was strongly associated with increased hepatic fibrosis at 1 year, and MMF use appears to have significantly reduced the rejection rate.

A cause-specific hazard rate analysis of prognostic factors among 877 adults who received primary orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

In orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) distinct causes of graft failure (GF) and death with a functioning graft (DFG) exist. Prognostic factors for one failure type may be distinctly different from those predictive of other types, and an accurate portrayal of these relationships may more clearly explain each factor's importance.

METHODS

A multivariable cause-specific hazard (CSH) rate analysis using Cox stepwise regression was performed among 877 adults who received primary OLT during 1996-2004 with tacrolimus+steroids as immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Older donor age (P=0.004) implied greater primary dysfunction GF, while primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; P=0.0002) implied greater vascular thrombosis GF. Recurrent nonmalignant liver disease GF was higher among hepatitis C virus patients (P<0.00001), and younger recipient age (P=0.005) implied greater death from recurrent (metastatic) hepatocellular carcinoma. African-American race (P<0.00001), PSC (P=0.003), and younger recipient age (P=0.005) were independently associated with greater GF due to chronic rejection. Older donor age (P=0.003) implied greater infection DFG, while older recipient age (P=0.003) and pretransplant diabetes (P=0.03) were independently associated with greater cardiovascular/cerebrovascular DFG. Finally, most of these cause-specific predictors were not significant in an overall Cox model for graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSH approach should be more widely used in investigations of prognostic factors. The result of older donor age implying greater primary dysfunction GF and infection DFG but having no association with other failure types demonstrates that its impact is specific to the graft's early posttransplant functional status. In addition, while recipient age was an important prognosticator, its direction of association reverses depending upon the outcome being analyzed.

Rapidly progressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection starting 9 days after liver transplantation

Early histological recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) has a negative impact on patient and graft survival. We report a case of histological recurrence of HCV occurring in the second week after LT. A 75-year-old woman with chronic HCV and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LT with an organ from a 75-year-old HCV-negative deceased donor. After an uneventful early postoperative period, an increase in the transaminases was observed, and on postoperative day 9 day, the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 673 IU/mL and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 300 IU/mL, with normal alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. Analysis of liver biopsy samples showed diffuse necroinflammatory changes with acidophilic bodies and concomitant mild acute cellular rejection. Subsequently there was a further increase in the transaminases, and on postoperative day 13, the AST rose to 445 IU/mL and ALT to 992 IU/mL. Repeat biopsy was performed, and analysis of the samples revealed lymphocytic portal inflammation with lymphoid aggregates and mild interface hepatitis, parenchymal necrosis, activation of sinusoidal lining cells, and mild steatosis. The biopsy sample was characteristic for HCV recurrence. The HCV RNA level was 84,000,000 copies/mL, and markers for other viral causes were not present. The patient became jaundiced and her course progressively worsened. She died on day 87 after transplantation. To our knowledge, this is the earliest reported case of histological recurrence of HCV after LT. It illustrates the importance of older donor and recipient age in the same patient as cofactors for early HCV recurrence and poor outcome.

Expanding donor options: marginal, living, and split donors

One of the most important factors in the increasing number of liver transplantations performed in the United States is the growing acceptance of marginal grafts, which are defined as organs at increased risk for poor function or failure that may subject the recipient to greater risks of morbidity or mortality. Based on encouraging results, a growing number of liver transplantation centers are broadening their criteria for transplantation of marginal grafts. This article discusses the use of the extended criteria donor liver, split-liver, and living-donor liver transplantation.

Trends in post-liver transplant survival in patients with hepatitis C between 1991 and 2001 in the United States

It has been suggested that the post-liver transplantation (LT) survival rate of patients with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) has declined in recent years. To compare the outcome of LT in patients with HCV at various time intervals between 1991 and 2001, we used United Network for Organ Sharing data to compare the post-LT survival of adult patients (age >18 years) with HCV with those without HCV. Of the 37,101 patients who underwent LT during the study period, 28,193 patients (HCV 7,459 and 20,734 non-HCV) were eligible for the study. On the basis of the time of transplantation, patients were divided into 3 groups: 1991-1993 (period 1), 1994-1997 (period 2), and 1998-2001 (period 3). The patient and graft survival rates were adjusted for other known confounding variables that influenced outcomes. The 3-year patient survival rate was lower in HCV patients compared with non-HCV recipients (78.5% vs. 81.4%, hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.23, P = 0.001). The graft (72.8%, 71.0%, and 69.8%) and patient (77.4%, 79.6%, and 78.5%) survival of HCV patients remained unchanged during study periods 1-3, respectively. However, the graft and patient survival rates of non-HCV recipients improved markedly during study periods 2 and 3 compared with period 1. The graft and patient survival has remained unchanged between 1991 and 2001 in HCV recipients, but during the same period, there was a great improvement in survival among non-HCV recipients.

Older donor allografts are associated with poor patient survival after living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related liver diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The significance of donor age in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 136 patients who underwent LDLT for HBV-related liver diseases from January 1999 to April 2004. The recipients were divided into an older donor group (donor age > or = 40) and a younger donor group (donor age < 40). Posttransplant clinical outcomes and survival were compared between two groups, and predictors of survival after LDLT were evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups, except for more number of female donors and higher positive donor anti-HBc rate in the older group. The frequencies of acute rejection and early mortality after transplantation were similar in the two groups. The long-term survival rates for the older donor group were significantly lower than those of the younger donor group (1-, 3-, 5-year survival rate = 84%, 75%, 46% vs. 92%, 86%, and 83%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that older donor age was the only independent risk factor associated with survival after LDLT (HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.1-5.6, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that older donor allografts would be associated with poor patient survival after LDLT for HBV-related liver diseases.

Recurrent hepatitis C post-transplantation: where are we now and where do we go from here? A report from the Canadian transplant hepatology workshop

Approximately 400 liver transplants are performed in Canada every year and close to 6000 per year in the United States. Forty per cent to 45% of all liver transplants are performed for patients with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. These patients have a different natural history, new complication risks and different treatment efficacy than nontransplant HCV patients. Every effort must be made to identify those patients at highest risk for progressive liver disease post-transplant. Recurrent HCV is an Achilles' heel to transplant hepatology. The true natural history of this disease is only starting to unravel and many questions remain unanswered on the optimal management of these patients after liver transplantation. The present report summarizes the literature and ongoing research needs that are specific to HCV-related liver transplantation.

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors with respect to the outcome of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: results of a meta-analysis

A controversy exists over whether the outcome of a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection-related liver transplant differs based on the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) used. We have performed a systematic review and a subsequent meta-analysis evaluating tacrolimus (Tac)-based vs. cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Searches were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials comparing Tac vs. cyclosporine A. Data on HCV liver transplant recipients were obtained, independently of whether the study was specifically designed for patients with this disease or not. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of the relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. A total of 5 articles (366 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences between Tac-based vs. cyclosporine A-based therapies were not found for mortality (P = 0.11; RR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.08), graft survival (P = 0.37; RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61-1.21), biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.65; RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36), corticoresistant acute rejection (P = 0.26; RR = 2.25; 95% CI, 0.55-9.29), and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = 0.92; RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.41-2.26). In 1 study, no differences were detected regarding severe fibrosis at 1 yr. In conclusion, patient and graft survivals in HCV-positive liver transplant patients are similar independently of the CNI selected as basic immunosuppressant. Unfortunately, data on the severity of recurrence and effect on viremia are scarce. Well-designed randomized prospective studies are needed to determine whether there are differences between the 2 CNIs regarding these specific variables.

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.

Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains the most common cause of hepatic failure requiring orthotopic liver transplantation, and the disparity between the number of patients in need of liver replacement and the number of organs available continues to grow. Unfortunately, without viral eradication before transplantation, HCV recurrence is universal and is associated with poor graft and patient survival. Despite expansion of the donor pool and attempts to suppress HCV activity with various pretransplant and posttransplant antiviral therapies, many questions remain. This article reviews the literature regarding the evaluation of patients for transplantation, the antiviral therapies available in the peritransplant period, the immunosuppressive regimens, used, and the approach to patients with recurrent HCV infection.

Hépatite C et transplantation hépatique

Hepatitis C virus-related end-stage liver disease, alone or in combination with alcohol, has become the leading indication for liver transplantation in most transplant programs accounting for approximately half of transplants performed in European centers. Hepatitis C virus infection recurs virtually in every post-transplant patient. The natural history of hepatitis C after liver transplantation is variable. Progression of chronic hepatitis C virus is more aggressive after liver transplantation with a cumulative probability of developing graft cirrhosis estimated to reach 30% at 5 years. Approximately 10% of the patients with recurrent disease will die or require re-transplantation within 5 years post-transplantation. Several factors, including those related to the virus, the host, the environment and the donor, are probably implicated in the outcome. The immune status represents the main significant variable in influencing disease severity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients; with higher HCV viral load and the significant association described between the degree of immunosuppression and disease severity. Interventions to prevent, improve, or halt the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection have been evaluated by multiple small studies worldwide with similar overall rates of virological clearance of approximately 9-30%. Current consensus recommends combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for those patients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection and fibrosis. Therapy is adjusted to tolerance and rescued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin for bone marrow suppression. In this article we present a comprehensive review of post-transplant hepatitis C virus infection; in particular fibrosis progression and the major challenges according to treatment.

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.

The status of liver transplantation for hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects 3% of the world's population, or approximately 170 million people. Most of those acutely infected progress to chronic infection and are unresponsive to existing antiviral treatment. Over a 20-year period, chronic HCV infection leads to cirrhosis and the sequelae of end-stage liver disease, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, variceal haemorrhage and hepatocellular carcinoma. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the optimal treatment for decompensated HCV cirrhosis, but is limited by organ availability and universal graft reinfection. This review discusses the results with OLT for HCV from the Dumont-UCLA Liver Transplant Center and discusses future directions in the management of HCV.

The natural history of hepatitis C virus in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Although rare in the pediatric population, the natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in pediatric patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV has not been well described. We performed an analysis of all 67 pediatric patients (< 17 years old) who have undergone OLT for HCV in the United States between 1/1988 and 6/2005. The 67 pediatric patients received a total of 83 OLTs for HCV. Following initial OLTs performed for HCV, the patient and allograft survival rates were 71.6% and 55.0%, respectively, at 5 years. Following retransplantation these rates decreased to 55.0% and 33.8%, respectively, following retransplantation. Recipients were listed for retransplantation after 31.3% of all OLTs, and overall recipients were retransplanted after 19.3% of OLTs. The overwhelming majority of retransplants were performed for HCV recurrence. A mean of 1.2 OLTs were performed per patient for HCV. The median time between OLTs for HCV was 290 days. In conclusion, the risk of HCV recurrence in pediatric OLT recipients is high and is associated with a high rate of retransplantation. Still, OLT represents the only treatment option that may achieve long-term survival in pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to HCV that is recalcitrant to medical management.

Recurrence of diseases following orthotopic liver transplantation

Long-term graft survival and mortality after liver transplantation continue to improve. However, disease recurrence remains a major stumbling block, especially among patients with hepatitis C. Chronic hepatitis C recurs to varying degrees in nearly all patients who undergo transplantation. Transplantation for hepatitis C is associated with higher rates of graft failure and death compared with transplantation for other indications, and retransplantation for hepatitis C related liver failure remains controversial. Recurrence of hepatitis B has been markedly reduced with improved prophylactic regimens. Further, rates of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence have also decreased, as improved patient selection criteria have prioritized transplantation for those with a low risk of recurrence. Primary biliary cirrhosis recurs in some patients, but it is often relatively mild. Autoimmune liver disease has also been shown to have a relatively benign post-transplantation course, but some studies have indicated that it slowly progresses in most recipients. It has been recently reported that alcoholic liver disease liver transplant recipients who return to drinking have worsened mortality. In such patients worse outcomes are not due to graft failure, but instead to other comorbidities. Recurrences of other diseases, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, are now being recognized as having potentially detrimental effects on graft survival and mortality. Expert clinical management may help prevent and treat complications associated with disease recurrence.

Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Results From a Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is a virtually constant finding and leads to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in variable proportions. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of alpha-interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin for recurrent HCV following liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty of 55 patients (54.5%) with histologically proven HCV recurrence after liver transplantation were given antiviral therapy (alpha-IFN at a dose of 6 MU x 3 x week IM associated with oral ribavirin 1 g/d for 12 months) and followed up for a further 12 months after the end of the treatment. Liver and renal function tests, hemocytometric values, and HCV-RNA were assessed every 3 months throughout the therapy and follow-up. Liver biopsy was performed before and after the treatment and after another 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Eight patients (26.7%) were withdrawn from the treatment due to adverse events and another 8 (26.7%) needed a dosage reduction. Eleven patients (36.7%) had a biochemical and virological response, becoming aminotransferase and HCV-RNA negative at the end of the treatment; 6 patients (20%) still had a sustained response after 12 months of follow-up. All 6 patients are clinically stable at 6 years after completing the antiviral therapy. A low viral load before therapy was a positive predictor of sustained response. No histologically significant improvement was seen at the end of the therapy or after the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of alpha-IFN plus ribavirin induced a sustained virologic response in 20% of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV, but intolerance of the therapy prompted its discontinuation or a dosage reduction in a large proportion of patients. However, we have observed a long-term efficacy of the antiviral therapy in the sustained responders.

A prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus and steroids with tacrolimus monotherapy in liver transplantation: the impact on recurrence of hepatitis C

The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to study the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy (TACRO) and compare it with our standard treatment of tacrolimus plus steroids (TACRO + ST) after liver transplant (LT). Furthermore, the impact of steroid-free immunosuppression on outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was analysed. Between 1998 and 2000, 60 patients (mean age: 57 years) were included in the study and randomized to receive TACRO (n = 28) or TACRO + ST (n = 32). Indication for LT was postnecrotic cirrhosis in all cases (58.3% were HCV-positive). Mean follow-up was 44 months. Survival, incidence of rejection, infection and side-effects were compared between the two groups. In patients with HCV infection, incidence and severity of acute hepatitis C, long-term outcome of recurrent hepatitis C and survival were studied in an intention-to-treat analysis or in the real group analysis (real-TACRO versus real-TACRO + ST). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years, tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, incidence of rejection infections and side-effects were similar. In patients with HCV, the incidence and severity of graft hepatitis C tended to be lower in TACRO (47%) compared with TACRO + ST (67%) (P = NS), and also in real-TACRO (42%) compared with real-TACRO + ST (61%) (P = NS). A poor outcome considered as evolution to cirrhosis at 3 years was observed in one (9%) living patient in real-TACRO and nine (45%) in real-TACRO + ST (P = 0.04). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 92% and 73% for real-TACRO and 78%, 61% and 51% for real TACRO + ST (P = 0.07). Steroid-free immunosuppression appears to be safe and efficacious. The main advantage of this regimen could be in HCV patients, as recurrence of hepatitis in the graft was less severe in the group of patients in whom steroids could be avoided completely.

Hyponatremia impairs early posttransplantation outcome in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hyponatremia is associated with reduced survival in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. However, it is not known whether hyponatremia also represents a risk factor of poor outcome after transplantation. We aimed to assess the effects of hyponatremia at the time of transplantation on posttransplantation outcome in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Two-hundred forty-one consecutive patients with cirrhosis submitted to liver transplantation during a 4-year period (January 2000-December 2003) were included in the study. The main end point was survival at 3 months after transplantation. Secondary end points were complications within the first month after transplantation.

RESULTS

Patients with hyponatremia (serum sodium lower than 130 mEq/L) had a greater incidence of neurologic disorders, renal failure, and infectious complications than patients without hyponatremia (odds ratio; 4.6, 3.4 and 2.7, respectively) within the first month after transplantation. By contrast, hyponatremia was not associated with an increased incidence of severe intra-abdominal bleeding, acute rejection, or vascular and biliary complications. Hyponatremia was an independent predictive factor of early posttransplantation survival. Three-month survival of patients with hyponatremia was 84% compared with 95% of patients without hyponatremia (P < .05). Survival was similar after 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis, the presence of hyponatremia is associated with a high rate of neurologic disorders, infectious complications, and renal failure during the first month after transplantation and reduced 3-month survival. In cirrhosis, hyponatremia should be considered not only a risk factor of death before transplantation but also a risk factor of impaired early posttransplantation outcome.

Influence of donor/recipient HLA-matching on outcome and recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching on outcome, severity of recurrent hepatitis C and risk of rejection in hepatitis C positive patients after liver transplantation (LT). In a retrospective analysis, 165 liver transplants in patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) with complete donor/recipient HLA typing were reviewed for recurrence of HCV and outcome. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 158 months (median, 74.5 months). Immunosuppression consisted of either cyclosporine-A- or tacrolimus-based quadruple induction therapy including or an interleukin 2-receptor antagonist. Protocol liver biopsies were performed after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years and staged according to the Scheuer scoring system. The overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival figures were 81.8%, 69.11 and 62%, respectively. There was no correlation in the study population between number of HLA mismatches and graft survival. The number of rejection episodes increased significantly in patients with more HLA mismatches (P < 0.05). In contrast to this, the fibrosis progression was significantly faster in patients with 0-5 HLA mismatches compared to patients with a complete HLA mismatch. In conclusion, HLA matching did not influence graft survival in patients after LT for end-stage HCV infection, however, despite less rejection episodes, the fibrosis progression increased in patients with less HLA mismatches within the first year after LT.

[Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: Erythropoietin allows maintenance of antiviral treatment]

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C recurs on grafts after liver transplantation and cirrhosis develops more rapidly than in patients without transplants. It is thus essential to develop effective antiviral treatments for these patients. Prolonged virologic response rate after treatment by pegylated interferon and ribavirin of recurrent HVC is limited, because so many patients stop or reduce the treatment because, in particular, of profound anemia. Administration of erythropoietin can enable these patients to continue treatment and thus improve viral eradication.

CASES

We report three cases where antiviral treatment continued although the clinical data would, in the absence of erythropoietin, have led us to interrupt it and where prolonged virologic response was obtained.

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that the onset of anemia largely explains the failure of previous trials, although response to treatment is at least as good as in non-transplanted patients, despite immunosuppressive treatment.

Antihepatitis C virus therapy in liver transplanted patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) management in the transplant setting is still an open issue. The therapeutic strategies being addressed include: (a) pre-transplant prophylaxis (to prevent the infection of the transplanted organ); (b) post-transplant prophylaxis (to reduce the possibility of developing acute hepatitis); (c) management once the chronic disease has already set in and stabilized. Combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin seems to play an important role for patients with established recurrent hepatitis C.

Recurrent hepatitis C posttransplant: early preservation injury may predict poor outcome

Organ cold/warm ischemia is thought to be a risk factor for increased severity of recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) post liver transplantation. We had noted some HCV patients with preservation injury (PI) to have particularly poor outcomes. Our goal was to determine if PI on biopsy in HCV patients is associated with earlier, more rapidly progressive recurrence or graft and patient survival. Sixty-nine patients from the University of Nebraska transplant database were included: 23 HCV patients with PI (group = 1), 23 non-HCV patients with PI (group = 2), and 23 HCV patients without PI (group = 3). Patient groups were matched for gender, age, immunosuppression, and time of transplantation for analysis. No difference in time to recurrence was noted between HCV groups (256 vs. 316 days posttransplant). More patients in group 1 had progression to stage 3 or 4 fibrosis, compared to group 3 (43 vs. 9%, P = 0.02). One-year survival for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 78, 82, and 100% respectively, whereas 3-yr survival was 59, 82, and 88% (group 1 vs. group 2 or 3 respectively, P = 0.0055). There was no difference in survival between groups 2 and 3. Patients in group 1 that received antiviral treatment had improved survival, compared to those who did not (P = 0.012). Risk factors for poor survival on univariate analysis included severity of PI (Relative Risk = 2.78, P < 0.001) and donor age of >55 (P = 0.014). Multivariate analysis shows HCV is the most important factor. In conclusion, HCV transplant patients with evidence of early PI on biopsy have poorer survival outcomes than non-HCV transplant patients with PI or HCV transplant patients without PI. Consideration for antiviral therapy early in the posttransplant course may be warranted in this subset of patients.

Management of HCV infection and liver transplantation

A major challenge facing liver transplant recipients and their physicians is recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following otherwise technically successful liver transplantation. Recurrent infection leads to diminished graft and patient survival. Although a number or predictors of severe recurrence have been identified, no definitive strategy has been developed to prevent recurrence. Generally the tempo of hepatitis C recurrence is gauged by serial liver biopsies with the decision to intervene with antiviral therapy based on local philosophy and expertise. Treating hepatitis C in this population has a number of major challenges including diminished patient tolerance for side-effects as well as managing the patient's immunesuppression. However sustained viral responses are possible with the potential to reduce the impact of recurrent hepatitis on the graft. However recurrent hepatitis C virus infection will remain the most frequent form of recurrent disease in liver transplant programs for the foreseeable future.

Recurrent hepatitis C after retransplantation: factors affecting graft and patient outcome

Retransplantation (re-LT) of patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) carries significant morbidity and mortality, negatively impacting on an already scarce donor allograft pool. In this study, we investigated the outcome of allografts and patients after re-LT due to recurrent HCV. Between 1989 and 2002, 47 patients were retransplanted at our institution due to HCV-related graft failure. Clinical HCV recurrence after re-LT was diagnosed when patients had acute liver enzyme elevation correlated with histological recurrence. The independent influence of these variables on survival was tested using Cox regression model. Chi-squared tests were used to examine the influence of individual demographic and pre/perioperative variables on recurrence. Thirty-one (66%) patients died after re-LT (median 2.2 months). Donor age >60, clinical HCV recurrence, and graft failure due to cirrhosis were significant risk factors for mortality (risk ratios of 3.6, 3.3, and 2.4, respectively). Pre-LT MELD score was lower among survivors (22+/- 5 vs. 27+/- 8). Following re-LT, 38 patients had at least one biopsy due to acute liver dysfunction; 19 of them (50%) had recurrence within the first 3 months. High-dose solumedrol was correlated with early recurrence. No association was found between time of recurrence after the first LT and time of recurrence after re-LT. In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis due to recurrent HCV undergoing re-LT have an extremely high mortality rate; older allografts should be avoided in retransplanting these patients. The timing of clinical recurrence after initial liver transplantation is not predictive of the timing of recurrence after re-LT. Patients experiencing early graft failure due to accelerated forms of HCV should not be denied re-LT with the expectation that a similar disease course will occur after re-LT.

AASLD/ILTS transplant course: is there an extended donor suitable for everyone?

1. The clinical success of liver transplantation coupled with the current era of organ shortage has caused many centers to expand their criteria for acceptable donors. 2. The definition of "Extended Criteria Donor" (ECD) is becoming better understood and quantified. 3. Recipient factors that portend poor outcome must be recognized and factored in as well. Grafts and recipients must be "matched" to manage and minimize the risk from ECDs. 4. Maintaining acceptable outcomes as ECD concepts evolve is paramount. 5. Absolute risk factors for poor graft function still exist and must be respected, but relative risk factors are now well identified, quantified, accepted, and managed as an alternative to high waiting list mortality.

Immunosuppression for liver transplantation in HCV-infected patients: mechanism-based principles

We retrospectively analyzed 42 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who underwent cadaveric liver transplantation under two strategies of immunosuppression: (1) daily tacrolimus (TAC) throughout and an initial cycle of high-dose prednisone (PRED) with subsequent gradual steroid weaning, or (2) intraoperative antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and daily TAC that was later space weaned. After 36 +/- 4 months, patient and graft survival in the first group was 18/19 (94.7%) with no examples of clinically serious HCV recurrence. In the second group, the three-year patient survival was 12/23 (52%), and graft survival was 9/23 (39%); accelerated recurrent hepatitis was the principal cause of the poor results. The data were interpreted in the context of a recently proposed immunologic paradigm that is equally applicable to transplantation and viral immunity. In the framework of this paradigm, the disparate hepatitis outcomes reflected different equilibria reached under the two immunosuppression regimens between the relative kinetics of viral distribution (systemically and in the liver) and the slowly recovering HCV-specific T-cell response. As a corollary, the aims of treatment of the HCV-infected liver recipients should be to predict, monitor, and equilibrate beneficial balances between virus distribution and the absence of an immunopathologic antiviral T-cell response. In this view, favorable equilibria were accomplished in the nonweaned group of patients but not in the weaned group. In conclusion, since the anti-HCV response is unleashed when immunosuppression is weaned, treatment protocols that minimize disease recurrence in HCV-infected allograft recipients must balance the desire to reduce immunosuppression or induce allotolerance with the need to prevent antiviral immunopathology.

Mortality predictors in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recipients of orthotopic liver transplant for hepatitis C (HCV) invariably develop recurrent disease. The risk factors for death and retransplantation following the development of cirrhosis from HCV are unclear. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of survival in liver transplant recipients who develop cirrhosis from recurrent HCV.

METHODS

We reviewed records of patients who underwent liver transplantation for cirrhosis due to HCV between January 1990 and December 2001. Prognostic factors of patient survival following the development of recurrent cirrhosis were identified through multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, 511 patients underwent transplantation for HCV cirrhosis. Of these, 65 patients (13%) developed biopsy proven recurrent cirrhosis from HCV; 43 (8%) were relisted for transplantation, and 24 (5%) underwent retransplantation. The overall Kaplan-Meier patient survival rates after the histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis at 1 and 5 years were 66% and 30%, respectively. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed patients with higher last (i.e. at follow-up or prior to retransplantation) International normalized ratio (INR) values (hazard ratios (HR)=2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.26, 3.24, P<0.01) to have an increased risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested survival was decreased after the diagnosis of cirrhosis from recurrent HCV. Higher INR was associated with an increased risk of death following the development of cirrhosis.

Hepatitis C and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy to correct liver failure, portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma arising from hepatitis C infection. But despite the successful use of living donors and improvements in immunosuppression and antiviral therapy, organ demand continues to outstrip supply and recurrent hepatitis C with accelerated progression to cirrhosis of the graft is a frequent cause of graft loss and the need for retransplantation. Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of transplantation, coupled with better pre- and post-transplant antiviral therapy, are needed to improve outcomes.

Survival Outcome After Hepatic Retransplantation for Hepatitis C Virus–Positive and –Negative Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Recurrence of HCV infection in these recipients is almost uniform. The currently available antiviral treatment is known to cause significant side effects, and the rate of sustained viral response is low. There is still controversy about whether such patients should undergo subsequent transplantations for HCV disease. This study compared outcomes for hepatic retransplantation performed in HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients at a single center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1994 through November 2003, 68 patients at our institution received a second liver allograft. Nineteen of the recipients were HCV(+) (group A) and 49 were HCV(-) (group B). All patients were followed until January 2004. The mean follow-up time after initial retransplantation was 37 +/- 29 months. Patient and graft survival for the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Seven recipients in group A (36.8%) and 22 recipients in group B (44.9%) died during follow-up. The actuarial 3-year patient survival after initial retransplantation for groups A and B were 61.7% and 51.6%, respectively. Nine patients required a second retransplantation, 3 (15.8%) in group A and 6 (12.2%) in group B. The actuarial 3-year graft survival from initial retransplantation for groups A and B were 56.3% and 45.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We observed slightly better patient and graft survivals at 3 years from initial retransplantation in HCV(+) recipients compared to HCV(-) recipients. This may be due to younger donor age and better selection of HCV(+) recipients in this series.

Analysis of long-term outcomes of 3200 liver transplantations over two decades: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work analyzes the experience of nearly 2 decades by the same team in a single center. Outcomes of OLT and factors affecting survival were analyzed.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 3200 consecutive OLTs that were performed at our institution, between February 1984 and December 31, 2001.

RESULTS

Of 2662 recipients, 578 (21.7%) and 659 (24.7%) were pediatric and urgent patients, respectively. Overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year patient and graft survival estimates were 81%, 72%, 68%, 64% and 73%, 64%, 59%, 55%, respectively. Patient survival significantly improved in the second (1992-2001) versus the era I (1984-1991) of transplantation (P < 0.001). Similarly, graft survival was better in the era II of transplantation (P < 0.02). However, biliary and infectious complications increased in era II. When OLT indications were considered, best recipient survival was obtained in children with biliary atresia (82%, 79%, and 78% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), while malignant disease in adult patients resulted in the worst outcomes of 68% and 43% at 1 and 5 years, post-OLT. Further, patients <18 years and nonurgent recipients exhibited superior survival when compared with recipients >18 years (P < 0.001) or urgent patients (P < 0.001). Of 13 donor and recipient variables, era of OLT, recipient age, urgent status, donor age, donor length of hospital stay, etiology of liver disease, retransplantation, warm and cold ischemia, but not graft type (whole, split, living-donor), significantly impacted patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term benefits of OLT are greatest in pediatric and nonurgent patients. Multiple factors involving the recipient, etiology of liver disease, donor characteristics, operative variables, and surgical experience influence long-term survival outcomes. By balancing and matching these factors with a given recipient, optimum results can be achieved.

MELD Scores Do Not Predict Patient Morbidity While on the Liver Transplant Waiting List

The goals of this study were to assess waitlist morbidity in terms of the frequency of health care services utilized by patients while on the liver transplant (LTX) waiting list and to determine whether that utilization can be predicted by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Sixty-three noncomatose subjects were followed from waitlist placement until death, change in status, LTX, or study discontinuance. Health care events included doctor/clinic visits, labs, outpatient/inpatient tests and procedures, and hospital/intensive care unit days. Listing MELD scores and LTX MELD scores were examined against the number of health care event occurrences within 60 days of listing and 60 days of LTX, respectively, as were changes in MELD scores between listing and LTX and differences in the number of occurrences between the two time points. The only significant correlations noted were between LTX MELD scores and number of hospital days near LTX (r = .360, P = .046) and between LTX MELD scores and the sum total number of occurrences near LTX (r = .370, P = .044). These results suggest that MELD scores do not appear to predict morbidity in terms of health care utilization in patients awaiting LTX. Developing a system capable of predicting waitlist morbidity may lead to the implementation of medical interventions aimed at circumventing foreseeable complications and/or crises in patients awaiting LTX.

Donor Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Organ availability is affecting the development of liver transplantation in its entirety, leading to transplant teams expanding the criteria for accepting organ donors. In these circumstances, analysis of the impact of the donor's characteristics on graft survival becomes mandatory.

METHODS

Fifty-two donor variables from 5,150 liver transplants performed in Spain between 1994 and 2001 were analyzed through a univariate analysis. Those with statistically significant impact on graft survival were entered in a Cox regression model with the recipients' characteristics and other factors linked to the graft technique.

RESULTS

Several donor factors negatively affect graft survival: donor age, cause of death, body mass index, vasoactive drug administration, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, increased alkaline phosphatase and liver enzyme levels, low bicarbonate level, and antecedents of hypertension. However, only four can be mentioned as representing a risk for losing the graft when donor variables are controlled with recipient or technique variables in a Cox regression model: donor age, antecedents of hypertension, prolonged ICU stay, and low bicarbonate level. In the same analysis, norepinephrine administration has a relative risk less than 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The multivariate analysis of the impact of 52 donor characteristics on liver graft survival showed the negative effect of an elderly donor, with hypertension combined with the presence of metabolic acidosis, or a prolonged ICU donor stay. The administration of norepinephrine alone during donor management showed a protective effect.

Immunosuppression and donor age with respect to severity of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation

In HCV cirrhotic patients after liver transplantation, survival and recurrence of HCV appears to be worsening in recent years. Donor age has been suggested as a cause. However, it is not clear if early and/or late mortality is affected and whether donor age is a key factor, as opposed to changes in immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to assess impact of donor age and other factors with respect to the severity of HCV recurrence posttransplant. A consecutive series of 193 HCV cirrhotic patients were transplanted with cadaveric donors, median age 41.5 years (13-73) and median follow-up of 38 months (1-155). Donor age and other factors were examined in a univariate/multivariate model for early/late survival, as well as fibrosis (grade 4 or more, Ishak score) with regular biopsies, 370 in total, from 1 year onwards. Results of the study indicated that donor age influenced only short-term (3 months) survival, with no significant effect on survival after 3 months. Known HCC independently adversely affected survival, as did the absence of maintenance azathioprine. Severe fibrosis (stage > or = 4) in 51 patients was related to neither donor age nor year of transplantation, but it was independently associated with combined biochemical/histological hepatitis flare (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.76-4.9) whereas maintenance steroids were protective (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23-0.83). In conclusion, in this cohort donor age did not influence late mortality in HCV transplanted cirrhotic patients or development of severe fibrosis, which was related to absence of maintenance steroids and a hepatitis flare. Maintenance azathioprine gave survival advantage.

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: cohort study of 38 patients

AIM

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is universal following liver transplantation. Patients are often treated with interferon and ribavirin in an attempt to eradicate the virus. We describe our experience with 38 patients with recurrent HCV from a single liver transplant program.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and November 2001, 38 patients with recurrent HCV were treated with interferon alpha 2b 3 million units three times a week and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg per day. HCV RNA and liver biopsies were performed before treatment at the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT in patients who were HCV RNA negative at EOT.

RESULTS

There were 29 males and nine females. Median age was 49 years. In total, 34 patients were genotype 1 and two each were genotype 3 and 4. Six patients received HCV positive donors and 24 patients (63%) completed treatment. The most common indication for discontinuation of treatment was severe fatigue in 14 patients (37%). On intention to treat analysis, a sustained biochemical and virological response occurred in 10 patients (26%). Unchanged or improved fibrosis scores were present in 37% of patients, of whom 71% were non-responders to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin were poorly tolerated in this series of recurrent HCV patients, with sustained HCV eradication occurring in only 26% of patients. However, the majority of non-responders demonstrated unchanged or improved fibrosis scores, suggesting that a subset of patients may benefit from maintenance antiviral therapy to prevent the development of cirrhosis.