Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging

Focal liver lesions: Whether a standard dose (0.05mmol/kg) gadobenate dimeglumine can provide the same diagnostic data as the 0.1mmol/kg dose

OBJECTIVE

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) is a liver-specific contrast agent also showing a distribution in the extracellular compartment which is recommended to be used at standard dose (0.05 mmol/kg) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of liver lesions. However, its use at 0. 1mmol/kg is gradually increasing in recent clinical practice. Which dose should we use in routine MRI of liver lesions from now on? This study investigated the efficacy of Gd-BOPTA at a standard dose versus 0.1 mmol/kg dose in demonstrating diagnostic data in MRI of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 47 patients with focal liver lesions. Twenty-two patients received standard dose and 25 patients received 0.1 mmol/kg dose Gd-BOPTA intravenously. MRI of both groups was carried out with T1-A FLASH-2D and T2-A TURBO spin echo before contrast injection and T1-A FLASH-2D sequences in dynamic and late phase (90th minute) after the contrast injection. The lesion conspicuity for each image was evaluated qualitatively. Liver signal to noise ratio (SNR), absolute lesion-liver contrast to noise ratio (CNR), mean lesion-liver CNR and contrast enhancement rate of the liver obtained from both groups were compared quantitatively.

RESULTS

While liver contrast enhancement rate in the group receiving standard dose Gd-BOPTA were 41%+/-42 in the arterial phase, 66%+/-58 in the portal phase, 45%+/-45 in the venous phase and 42%+/-88 in the late phase, these values were 43%+/-59, 86%+/-73, 63%+/-75 and 61%+/-105, respectively, in the group receiving the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. There were no statistically significant differences between the means of both groups. While the absolute lesion-liver CNR values were 18+/-15 precontrast, 22+/-18 in the arterial phase, 19+/-17 in the portal phase, 15+/-10 in the venous phase and 24+/-26 in the late phase in the group receiving the standard dose Gd-BOPTA, these values were 13+/-11, 18+/-15, 15+/-15, 13+/-13 and 19+/-21, respectively, in the group receiving the 0.1 mmol/kg dose. There were no statistically significant differences between the means of both groups (p>0.05). However, when the mean lesion-liver CNR values were compared, there was statistically significant difference between each arterial and portal phases of metastases in both groups (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference found in other lesions. When lesion conspicuity scores were compared, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In liver lesions, similar diagnostic data are obtained in dynamic and late phase MRI with either standard dose Gd-BOPTA or with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Because there was a difference in only metastases in both groups, in oncological patients who are being investigated for liver metastasis, it is expedient to use a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.

Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine diagnostic performance and safety of contrast material-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight gadobenate dimeglumine for depiction of significant steno-occlusive disease (> or =51% stenosis) of renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter study was approved by local institutional review boards; all patients provided written informed consent. Patient enrollment and examination at centers in the United States complied with HIPAA. Two hundred ninety-three patients (154 men, 139 women; mean age, 61.0 years) with severe hypertension (82.2%), progressive renal failure (11.3%), and suspected renal artery stenosis (6.5%) underwent CE MR angiography with three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequences after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 2 mL/sec. Anteroposterior and oblique DSA was performed in 268 (91.5%) patients. Three independent blinded reviewers evaluated CE MR angiographic images. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE MR angiography for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease (> or =51% vessel lumen narrowing) were determined at segment (main renal artery) and patient levels. Positive and negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios were determined. Interobserver agreement was analyzed with generalized kappa statistics. A safety evaluation (clinical examination, electrocardiogram, blood and urine analysis, monitoring for adverse events) was performed.

RESULTS

Of 268 patients, 178 who were evaluated with MR angiography and DSA had significant steno-occlusive disease of renal arteries at DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE MR angiography for detection of 51% or greater stenosis or occlusion were 60.1%-84.1%, 89.4%-94.7%, and 80.4%-86.9%, respectively, at segment level. Similar values were obtained for predictive values and for patient-level analyses. Few CE MR angiographic examinations (1.9%-2.8%) were technically inadequate. Interobserver agreement for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease was good (79.9% agreement; kappa = 0.69). No safety concerns were noted.

CONCLUSION

CE MR angiography performed with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine, compared with DSA, is safe and provides good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of significant renal artery steno-occlusive disease.

Visualization of the biliary tract using gadobenate dimeglumine: preliminary findings

OBJECTIVE

To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography (CE-MRC) performed with gadobenate dimeglumine with T2-weighted MRC (T2-MRC) for visualization of the bile ducts in nondilated biliary systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging (MRI) of the liver and pancreas with nondilated intrahepatic ducts were included in this retrospective study. T2-weighted MRC was performed using a multislice, high-resolution fat-suppressed half-Fourier acquisition turbo spin-echo sequence. Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography was performed using a fat-suppressed 3-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence acquired 1 to 1.5 hour after intravenous administration of gadobenate dimeglumine. For image interpretation, the biliary system was divided into 8 segments. Two readers graded visualization of each segment on T2-MRC and CE-MRC using a 5-point scale (0, nonvisualization; 4, excellent visualization). Final opinion for each sequence was rendered by consensus. Superiority of visualization was assessed using the McNemar test and comparing adequately (visualization scores 3 and 4) and inadequately (visualization scores 0, 1, and 2) visualized segments of the ducts on both sequences. Interobserver variability was assessed with kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Overall and segment-based evaluation revealed superior visualization of biliary segments with CE-MRC compared with T2-MRC. We also found a statistically significant difference between the 2 sequences for overall and for right hepatic duct and cystic channel visualization (P < 0.05). A high concordance between readers 1 and 2 both for T2-MRC and CE-MRC was achieved (85.8% and 89.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadobenate dimeglumine can be used as an alternative intrabiliary contrast agent for contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography in nondilated biliary systems in patients with normal excretory liver function tests.

Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: a critical review

Gadolinium-based contrast agents are widely used to enhance image contrast in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. Over recent years, there has been a renewed interest in the physicochemical properties of gadolinium chelates used as contrast agents for MRI procedures, as it has been suggested that dechelation of these molecules could be involved in the mechanism of a recently described disease, namely nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The aim of this paper is to discuss the structure-physicochemical properties relationships of marketed gadolinium chelates in regards to their biological consequences. Marketed gadolinium chelates can be classified according to key molecular design parameters: (a) nature of the chelating moiety: macrocyclic molecules in which Gd3+ is caged in the pre-organized cavity of the ligand, or linear open-chain molecules, (b) ionicity: the ionicity of the complex varies from neutral to tri-anionic agents, and (c) the presence or absence of an aromatic lipophilic residue responsible for protein binding. All these molecular characteristics have a profound impact on the physicochemical characteristics of the pharmaceutical solution such as osmolality, viscosity but also on their efficiency in relaxing water protons (relaxivity) and their biodistribution. These key molecular parameters can also explain why gadolinium chelates differ in terms of their thermodynamic stability constants and kinetic stability, as demonstrated by numerous in vitro and in vivo studies, resulting in various formulations of pharmaceutical solutions of marketed contrast agents. The concept of kinetic and thermodynamic stability is critically discussed as it remains a somewhat controversial topic, especially in predicting the amount of free gadolinium which may result from dechelation of chelates in physiological or pathological situations. A high kinetic stability provided by the macrocyclic structure combined with a high thermodynamic stability (reinforced by ionicity for macrocyclic chelates) will minimize the amount of free gadolinium released in tissue parenchymas.

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance angiography of the renal arteries: interindividual comparison of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol at 1.5 T and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 3.0 T

The purpose was to evaluate the image quality of high-spatial resolution MRA of the renal arteries at 1.5 T after contrast-agent injection of 0.2 mmol/kg body weight (BW) in an interindividual comparison to 3.0 T after contrast-agent injection of 0.1 mmol/kg BW contrast agent (CA). After IRB approval and informed consent, 40 consecutive patients (25 men, 15 women; mean age 53.9 years) underwent MRA of the renal arteries either at a 1.5-T MR system with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol or at a 3.0-T MR scanner with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine used as CA in a randomized order. A constant volume of 15 ml of these contrast agents was applied. The spatial resolution of the MRA sequences was 1.0 x 0.8 x 1.0 mm(3) at 1.5 T and 0.9 x 0.8 x 0.9 mm(3) at 3.0 T, which was achieved by using parallel imaging acceleration factors of 2 at 1.5 T and 3 at 3.0 T, respectively. Two radiologists blinded to the administered CA and the field strength assessed the image quality and the venous overlay for the aorta, the proximal and distal renal arteries independently on a four-point Likert-type scale. Phantom measurements were performed for a standardized comparison of SNR at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the image quality at 3.0 T with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine compared to the exams at 1.5 T with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol. The median scores were between 3 and 4 (good to excellent vessel visualization) for the aorta (3 at 1.5 T/4 at 3.0 T for reader 1 and 2). For the proximal renal arteries, median scores were 3 for the left and right renal artery at 1.5 T for both readers. At 3.0 T, median scores were 3 (left proximal renal artery) and 4 (right proximal renal artery) for reader 1 and 3 (left/right) for reader 2 at 3.0 T. For the distal renal arteries, median scores were between 2 and 3 at both field strengths (moderate and good) for both readers. The kappa values for both field strengths were comparable and ranged between 0.571 (moderate) for the distal renal arteries and 0.905 (almost perfect) for the proximal renal arteries. In the phantom measurements, a 40% higher SNR was found for the measurements at 3 T with gadobenate dimeglumine. High-spatial resolution renal MRA at 3.0 T with 0.1 mmol/kg BW gadobenate dimeglumine yields at least equal image quality compared with renal MRA at 1.5 T with 0.2 mmol/kg BW gadobutrol.

Improving lesion detection and visualization: implications for neurosurgical planning and follow-up

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is considered the most sensitive method for detecting tumors in the central nervous system (CNS). The primary objective is to improve lesion detection, delineation, and characterization (benign or malignant) in order to more accurately define the location, extent, and type of disease and the appropriate treatment option for improved patient outcome (surgical intervention, radiation therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy). This article reviews the various types of tumor occurring in the brain and the specific role of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the evaluation of these tumors. Emphasis is placed on the value of contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of primary intra-axial brain lesions and how high relaxivity contrast agents such as MultiHance (Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy) might improve detection, treatment planning, and follow-up.

Model-based analysis of Gd-BOPTA-induced MR signal intensity changes in cirrhotic rat livers

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the hepatic transport of the hepatobiliary contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) in rats with biliary cirrhosis of various severity degrees from magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensities using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR signal intensity was recorded during the Gd-BOPTA perfusion of normal and cirrhotic isolated rat livers. Similar experiments were conducted with Gd-labeled Gd-BOPTA to quantify Gd-BOPTA content in liver, bile, and perfusate. All experimental data were analyzed together according to a population pharmacokinetic approach.

RESULTS

A 6-compartment model developed from the radioactivity data adequately fit all MRI data when 4 image parameters were added to describe the relationship between the amount of contrast agent and the signal intensity. The model showed that entry of Gd-BOPTA into hepatocytes was decreased in cirrhotic livers when compared to normal livers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the MR signal intensity is similar in normal and cirrhotic livers, the population pharmacokinetic approach developed in this study shows a decreased entry of Gd-BOPTA into cirrhotic hepatocytes.

Comprehensive investigation of the non-covalent binding of MRI contrast agents with human serum albumin

Three techniques, electrospray mass spectrometry, ultrafiltration, and proton relaxometry, are compared in the context of the quantitative analysis of non-covalent binding between human serum albumin (HSA) and MRI contrast agents. The study of the affinity by proton relaxometry reveals the association constant and the number of interaction sites assuming that all sites are identical and independent. Ultrafiltration was adapted for the study of paramagnetic complexes. This technique confirmed the results obtained by relaxometry. Electrospray mass spectrometry, an original method able to study non-covalent binding because of its soft ionization process that allows for the survival of weak binding, provides qualitative and quantitative results. Electrospray mass spectrometry confirmed the affinity measured by proton relaxometry and ultrafiltration. This technique requires very small amounts of products and directly gives the stoichiometry of the association, information not easily obtained by classic techniques. Nevertheless, proton relaxometry remains a useful and mandatory technique for determining the enhancement of the relaxation subsequent to the binding although it demands large amounts of compounds. It is to be pointed out that even if the three techniques lead to a similar ranking of the affinity of the contrast agents for HSA, the absolute values of the association constants disagree as a result of the difference in the experimental conditions (presence of salt, native protein or desalted one, approximations in the fitting of the data, liquid or gas phases).

Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) mammography for depiction of synchronous contralateral breast cancer in patients with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions, with histologic analysis or follow-up as reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study had ethics committee approval; all patients provided written informed consent. One hundred eighteen consecutive women (mean age, 52 years) with unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions and negative findings in the contralateral breast at physical examination, ultrasonography, and conventional mammography underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T MR mammography. Transverse three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes after gadobenate dimeglumine administration (0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was used to categorize breast density and the level of suspicion for malignant contralateral breast lesions. Results were compared with histologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for contrast-enhanced MR mammography were evaluated.

RESULTS

Contrast-enhanced MR mammography revealed contralateral lesions in 28 (24%) of 118 patients. Twenty-four lesions were detected in patients with dense breasts (BI-RADS breast density category III or IV). Lesions in eight (29%) of 28 patients were BI-RADS category 4; patients underwent biopsy. Lesions in 20 (71%) patients were BI-RADS category 5; patients underwent surgery. At histologic analysis, 22 lesions were confirmed as malignant; six lesions were fibroadenomas. No false-negative lesions were detected; none of the fibroadenomas were BI-RADS category 5. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for depiction of malignant or high-risk contralateral lesions were 100%, 94%, 95%, 79%, and 100%, respectively. Follow-up findings (12-24 months) confirmed absence of contralateral lesions in 90 of 118 patients with negative contrast-enhanced MR mammographic findings in the contralateral breast.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced MR mammography is accurate for detection of synchronous contralateral cancer or high-risk lesions in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or high-risk lesions.

Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention

Object

The goal in this article was to compare 0.1 mmol/kg doses of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and gadopentetate dimeglumine, also known as gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA), for enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of intraaxial brain tumors.

Methods

Eighty-four patients with either intraaxial glioma (47 patients) or metastasis (37 patients) underwent two MR imaging examinations at 1.5 tesla, one with Gd-BOPTA as the contrast agent and the other with Gd-DTPA. The interval between fully randomized contrast medium administrations was 2 to 7 days. The T1-weighted spin echo and T2-weighted fast spin echo images were acquired before administration of contrast agents and T1-weighted spin echo images were obtained after the agents were administered. Acquisition parameters and postinjection acquisition times were identical for the two examinations in each patient. Three experienced readers working in a fully blinded fashion independently evaluated all images for degree and quality of available information (lesion contrast enhancement, lesion border delineation, definition of disease extent, visualization of the lesion's internal structures, global diagnostic preference) and quantitative enhancement (that is, the extent of lesion enhancement after contrast agent administration compared with that seen before its administration [hereafter referred to as percent enhancement], lesion/brain ratio, and contrast/noise ratio). Differences were tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

Significantly better diagnostic information/imaging performance (p < 0.0001, all readers) was obtained with Gd-BOPTA for all visualization end points. Global preference for images obtained with Gd-BOPTA was expressed for 42 (50%), 52 (61.9%), and 56 (66.7%) of 84 patients (readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively) compared with images obtained with Gd-DTPA contrast in four (4.8%), six (7.1%), and three (3.6%) of 84 patients. Similar differences were noted for all other visualization end points. Significantly greater quantitative contrast enhancement (p < 0.04) was noted after administration of Gd-BOPTA. Reader agreement was good (κ > 0.4).

Conclusions

Lesion visualization, delineation, definition, and contrast enhancement are significantly better after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA, potentially allowing better surgical planning and follow up and improved disease management.

Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents

This paper compares the physicochemical properties of six low molecular weight clinical complexes of gadolinium studied under identical experimental conditions. Magnevist, Dotarem, Omniscan, ProHance, MultiHance and Gadovist were investigated by oxygen-17 relaxometry at different temperatures and by proton relaxometry at various magnetic fields, temperatures and media [pure water, zinc(II)-containing aqueous solutions and HSA-containing solutions]. Osmolality, viscosity and stability versus transmetallation by zinc(II) ions were added for a more comprehensive description. The relaxivities of the clinical formulations as measured in water are similar in the imaging magnetic field region, with a slightly better performance for MultiHance. This can be explained by a shorter distance between the hydrogen nuclei of the water molecule bound to the Gd(3+) ion and this paramagnetic centre. In contrast to the open-chain complexes, all macrocyclic systems (Dotarem, ProHance and Gadovist) are insensitive to transmetallation by zinc ions. The stability of the open-chain complexes with respect to transmetallation depends on the chemical structure of the ligand, with a better stability for MultiHance. The presence of human serum albumin has no significant effect on the proton relaxivity of Magnevist, Dotarem, Omniscan, ProHance and Gadovist but markedly increases the relaxivity of MultiHance because of a non-covalent interaction with the protein. As a result, the relaxivity of MultiHance in HSA-containing media of fixed concentration decreases with increasing concentration of the contrast agent.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system tumors: agents, mechanisms, and applications

Brain tumors are one of the most common neoplasms in young adults and are associated with a high mortality and disability rate. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely accepted to be the most sensitive imaging modality in the assessment of cerebral neoplasms. Because the detection, characterization, and exact delineation of brain tumors require a high lesion contrast that depends on the signal of the lesion in relation to the surrounding tissue, contrast media is given routinely. Anatomical and functional, contrast agent-based MRI techniques allow for a better differential diagnosis, grading, and especially therapy decision, planing, and follow-up. In this article, the basics of contrast enhancement of brain tumors will be reviewed. The underlying pathology of a disrupted blood-brain barrier and drug influences will be discussed. An overview of the currently available contrast media and the influences of dosage, field strength, and application on the tumor tissue contrast will be given. Challenging, contrast-enhanced, functional imaging techniques, such as perfusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, are presented both from the technical side and the clinical experience in the assessment of brain tumors. The advantages over conventional, anatomical MRI techniques will be discussed as well as possible pitfalls and drawbacks.

Evaluation of a Novel Time-Efficient Protocol for Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate gadobenate dimeglumine for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in the unenhanced and already pre-enhanced liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were evaluated prospectively. Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient echo (T1wGRE) and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2wTSE) images were acquired followed by contrast-enhanced T1wGRE images during the dynamic, equilibrium, and delayed phases after the bolus injection of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. An identical series of dynamic images was then acquired after the delayed scan following a second 0.05 mmol/kg bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine. Images were evaluated randomly in 2 sessions by 3 independent blinded readers. Evaluated images in the first session comprised the unenhanced images, the first or second set of dynamic images, and the delayed images. The second session included the unenhanced images, the dynamic images not yet evaluated in the first session, and the delayed images. The 2 reading sessions were compared for lesion characterization and diagnosis, and kappa (kappa) values for interobserver agreement were determined. Quantitative evaluation of lesion contrast enhancement was also performed.

RESULTS

The enhancement behavior in the second dynamic series was similar to that in the first series, although pre-enhancement of the normal liver resulted in reduced lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratios and the visualization of some lesions only on arterial phase images. Typical imaging features for the lesions included in the study were visualized clearly in both series. Strong agreement (kappa=0.56-0.89; all evaluations) between the 2 images sets was noted by all readers for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and for definition of specific diagnosis, and between readers for diagnoses established based on images acquired in the unenhanced and pre-enhanced liver.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic imaging in the hepatobiliary phase gives similar information as dynamic imaging of the unenhanced liver. This might prove advantageous for screening protocols involving same session imaging of primary extrahepatic tumors and liver.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for detection of significant steno-occlusive disease of the carotid, renal, and pelvic vasculature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients with suspected disease of the renal (n = 16), pelvic (n = 41), or carotid (n = 27) arteries underwent CE-MRA (3D-spoiled gradient-echo sequences) at 1.5T. CE-MRA was performed with gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg (23, 24, 19, and 18 patients, respectively) administered at 2 mL/sec. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) for detection of significant disease (>50% stenosis or occlusion for renal/pelvic arteries; >70% stenosis or occlusion for carotid arteries) was determined by three fully blinded, independent radiologists using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard. All comparisons were tested statistically (ANOVA, chi-square, and Mantel-Haenszel tests as appropriate) and reader agreement (kappa) was assessed.

RESULTS

Values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV on CE-MRA were consistently higher for 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (accuracy = 95.2-97.3%, sensitivity = 84.2% (all readers), specificity = 96.9-99.2%, PPV = 80.0-94.1%, NPV = 97.6-97.7%). The greater accuracy of the 0.1 mmol/kg dose was significant (P < 0.01, all readers) compared to all other dose groups. Agreement between the three readers was good for all dose groups (kappa >/=0.58), with the highest percent agreement (85.7%) noted for the 0.1 mmol/kg dose.

CONCLUSION

Significantly better diagnostic performance on CE-MRA of the renal, pelvic, and carotid arteries is achieved with a gadobenate dimeglumine dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight.

Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla in 5 minutes with slow infusion of Gd-BOPTA, a high-relaxivity clinical contrast agent

T(1)-shortening contrast agents have been used to improve the depiction of coronary arteries with breath-hold magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The spatial resolution and coverage are limited by the duration of the arterial phase of the contrast media passage. In this study we investigated the feasibility of acquiring free-breathing, whole-heart coronary MRA during slow infusion of the contrast media (0.3 ml/s) for prolonged blood signal enhancement time. Ultrashort TR (3 ms) and parallel data acquisition were used to allow the whole-heart MRA in approximately 5 min. A newly approved gadolinium (Gd)-based high T(1) relaxivity contrast agent, gadobenate dimeglumine ([Gd-BOPTA](2-)), was used and coronary MRA was performed on a whole-body 3 Tesla (T) system to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results from eight volunteers demonstrate that this coronary MRA method is capable of imaging the whole heart in 4.5 +/- 0.6 min. Major coronary arteries are well depicted with high SNR (42.4 +/- 12.5) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR; 27.1 +/- 7.6).

Albumin marks pseudopodia of astrocytoma cells responding to hepatocyte growth factor or serum

It is well accepted that dysfunction in the blood brain barrier (BBB) allows permeation of albumin from the bloodstream into astrocytic brain tumors, especially glioblastomas, the most aggressive astrocytomas. In vitro, bovine serum albumin (BSA) aids functional cell assays by maintaining cytokines and growth factors in solution and delivering its cargo of fatty acids. Earlier, we showed that BSA was prominent in lysates prepared from pseudopodia formed by U87 astrocytoma cells. The present studies investigated the association of albumin with pseudopodia formed by U87 and LN229 astrocytoma cells. With hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulation, cell migration was enhanced and BSA, especially its dimerized form, was prominent in pseudopodia compared to unmigrated cells on one-dimensional gels and immunoblots. When lysates were equalized for levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the rise for BSA levels in pseudopodia vs migrated cells was comparable or greater than levels noted for established pseudopodial proteins, beta-actin and ezrin. The increase for dimerized BSA in pseudopodia compared to unmigrated cells was greater than the rise in levels of beta-actin, ezrin, HGF, and phosphorylated Met when pseudopodia were harvested from filters with 1 mum pores using either cell line. Fluorescein (F)-labeled BSA co-localized with HGF on actin-rich cellular protrusions and with CM-DiI labeled pseudopodial plasma membranes. The F-BSA highlighted small, individual pseudopodial profiles more so than complex pseudopodial networks (reticulopodia) or unmigrated cells. Labeled human serum albumin also decorated pseudopodia preferentially. Albumin's association with pseudopodia may help to explain its selective accumulation in astrocytomas in vivo. The leaky BBB permits serum albumin to enter the microenvironment of astrocytomas thus allowing their invasive cells contact with serum albumin as a source of fatty acids that would be useful for remodeling cell membranes in pseudopodia. Thus, albumin potentially aids and marks invasion as it accumulates in these tumors.

Macromolecular MRI contrast agents for imaging tumor angiogenesis

Angiogenesis has long been accepted as a vital process in the growth and metastasis of tumors. As a result it is the target of several novel anti-cancer medications. Consequently, there is an urgent clinical need to develop accurate, non-invasive imaging techniques to improve the characterization of tumor angiogenesis and the monitoring of the response to anti-angiogenic therapy. Macromolecular MR contrast media (MMCM) offer this diagnostic potential by preferentially exploiting the inherent hyperpermeable nature of new tumor vessels compared with normal vessels. Over the last 10-15 years many classes of MMCM have been developed. When evaluated with dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, a number of MMCM have demonstrated in vivo imaging properties that correlate with ex vivo histological features of angiogenesis. The enhancement patterns with some MMCM have been reported to correlate with tumor grade, as well as show response to anti-angiogenic and anti-vascular drugs. Future applications of MMCM include targeted angiogenesis imaging and drug delivery of anti-cancer 'payloads'. Herein we discuss the best known MMCMs along with their advantages and disadvantages.

Contrast Enhancement of Central Nervous System Lesions: Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparative Study of Two MR Contrast Agents

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight) for enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of central nervous system (CNS) lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was HIPAA-compliant at U.S. centers and was conducted at all centers according to the Good Clinical Practice standard. Institutional review board and regulatory approval were granted; written informed consent was obtained. Seventy-nine men and 78 women (mean age, 50.5 years +/- 14.4 [standard deviation]) were randomized to group A (n = 78) or B (n = 79). Patients underwent two temporally separated 1.5-T MR imaging examinations. In randomized order, gadobenate followed by gadopentetate was administered in group A; order of administration was reversed in group B. Contrast agent administration (volume, speed of injection), imaging parameters before and after injection, and time between injections and postinjection acquisitions were identical for both examinations. Three blinded neuroradiologists evaluated images by using objective image interpretation criteria for diagnostic information end points (lesion border delineation, definition of disease extent, visualization of internal morphologic features of the lesion, enhancement of the lesion) and quantitative parameters (percentage of lesion enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]). Overall diagnostic preference in terms of lesion conspicuity, detectability, and diagnostic confidence was assessed. Between-group comparisons were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Readers 1, 2, and 3 demonstrated overall preference for gadobenate in 75, 89, and 103 patients, compared with that for gadopentetate in seven, 10, and six patients, respectively (P < .0001). Significant (P < .0001) preference for gadobenate was demonstrated for diagnostic information end points, percentage of lesion enhancement, and CNR. Superiority of gadobenate was significant (P < .001) in patients with intraaxial and extraaxial lesions.

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate compared with gadopentetate at an equivalent dose provides significantly better enhancement and diagnostic information for CNS MR imaging.

Safety of Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance)

OBJECTIVES

Prospective studies and retrospective analyses were undertaken to evaluate the clinical safety of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) and to assess tolerability in special populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 3092 subjects received MultiHance in 79 clinical trials. Data from comparisons with other contrast agents and studies in children, subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, or subjects with coronary artery disease were reviewed. Postmarketing safety surveillance data after more than 1.5 million applications were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 413 of 2982 (14%) adult subjects receiving MultiHance reported at least one adverse event (AE) definitely or potentially related to MultiHance, an incidence that was similar to that observed with placebo (21/127, 17%) or active controls (59/723, 8%). In crossover studies, 23 of 287 (8%) subjects receiving MultiHance experienced AE compared with 25 of 295 (9%) receiving gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist). No increased AE rate was observed in children and no worsening of renal or liver function was observed in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment. No detrimental effect on cardiac electrophysiology could be observed from a retrospective analysis of ECG parameters in more than 1000 patients and healthy volunteers. The AE reporting rate from postmarketing safety surveillance of MultiHance was 0.05%. Serious AEs were rarely reported and included dyspnea, nausea, urticaria, hypotension, and anaphylactoid reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

MultiHance appears to be well tolerated in adults and children and in subjects with impaired liver or kidney function or coronary artery disease. In controlled trials, MultiHance demonstrated a similar safety profile to that of Magnevist.

Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) possesses a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared to other available gadolinium contrast agents. The study was conducted to evaluate the benefits of this increased relaxivity for MR imaging of intracranial enhancing brain lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients (31 males, 14 females) with suspected glioma or cerebral metastases were evaluated. Patients received Gd-BOPTA and either Gd-DTPA (n = 23) or Gd-DOTA (n = 22) in fully randomized order at 0.1 mmol/kg body weight and at a flow rate of 2 ml/s. The second agent was administered 1-14 days after the first agent. Images were acquired precontrast (T1wSE, T2wFSE sequences) and at sequential postcontrast time-points (T1wSE sequences at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and 15 min and a T1wSE-MT sequence at 12 min) at 1.0 or 1.5 T using a head coil. Determination of contrast enhancement was performed quantitatively (lesion-to-brain ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and percent enhancement) and qualitatively (border delineation, internal morphology, contrast enhancement, and diagnostic preference) by two independent, fully blinded readers.

RESULTS

Images from 43/45 patients were available for quantitative assessment. After correction for precontrast values, significantly greater lesion-to-brain ratio (P < .003), contrast-to-noise ratio (P < .03), and percent enhancement (P < .0001) was noted by both readers for Gd-BOPTA-enhanced images at all time-points from 2 min postcontrast. Qualitative assessment of all patients similarly revealed significant preference for Gd-BOPTA for lesion border delineation (P < .004), lesion internal morphology (P < .008), contrast enhancement (P < .0001), and diagnostic preference (P < .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater T1 relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA permits improved visualization of intracranial enhancing lesions compared to conventional gadolinium agents.

Evaluation of CH3-DTPA-Gd (NMS60) as a new MR contrast agent: early phase II study in brain tumors and dual dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging

PURPOSE

A newly developed contrast material, CH3-DTPA-Gd (NMS60), a trimer containing 3 Gd(3+) atoms per molecule, has been shown to offer greater enhancement and longer vascular retention than gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in animals. We report on our early phase II study on NMS60 in brain tumor patients together with supplementary investigations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The longitudinal relaxation rate (R(1)=1/T(1)) and the transverse relaxation rate (R(2)*=1/T(2)*) of NMS60 and Gd-DTPA were determined at 20 degrees C in water at 1.5 T. An NMS60 dose of 0.1 or 0.2 mmol (Gd)/kg was randomly assigned and administered to 10 patients (five women, five men; mean age: 49 years) with brain tumors. Safety and contrast-enhancing ability of NMS60 were evaluated. Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1) and R(2)* studies (DUCE imaging) were also carried out in two patients.

RESULTS

Regarding the relaxivity per Gd, R(1) and R(2)* of NMS60 were 9.5 and 11.0 (mmol/L x s)(-1), respectively, compared to 4.8 and 7.2 (mmol/L x s)(-1) for Gd-DTPA. Although a transient slight increase of alanine aminotransferase was observed in one case, no other adverse reactions were observed after administration of NMS60. Contrast enhancement by NMS60 was excellent at both concentrations, and when tumor detectability was assessed with a five-point scale, the diagnostic usefulness was 4 or higher in all cases. In DUCE imaging, NMS60 appeared to show high signal intensity, when compared with the data obtained separately for Gd-DTPA.

CONCLUSION

NMS60 had a high contrasting effect and little toxicity, and is expected to be clinically useful.

Intraindividual Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadobutrol for Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 1.5 T

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg body weight (bw) doses gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA; MultiHance) and gadobutrol (Gd-BT-DO3A; Gadovist) for cerebral perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T.

METHODS

Twelve healthy male volunteers enrolled into a randomized intraindividual comparative study underwent 4 perfusion MR imaging examinations with 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg bw doses of each contrast agent. The imaging parameters, slice positioning, and contrast agent application were highly standardized. Quantitative determinations based on signal intensity/time (SI/T) curves at regions of interest (ROI) on the gray and white matter were made of the regional cerebral blood volume and flow (rCBV and rCBF, respectively), the percentage signal drop, and the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the SI/T curve. Qualitative evaluation of the quality of the rCBV and rCBF maps was assessed by an independent offsite blinded reader.

RESULTS

A single dose of both agents was sufficient to achieve high-quality, diagnostically valid perfusion maps at 1.5 T, and no significant benefit for one agent over the other was noted for quantitative or qualitative determinations. The susceptibility effect, described by percentage of signal loss (gadobutrol: 29.4% vs gadobenate dimeglumine: 28.3%) and the FWHM (gadobutrol: 6.4 seconds vs gadobenate dimeglumine: 7.0 seconds) were similar for 0.1 mmol/kg bw doses of the 2 agents. Double doses of the 2 agents produced better overall image quality but no clinical benefit over the single-dose examinations.

CONCLUSION

Both the 1 molar MR contrast agent gadobutrol and the weak protein-interacting agent gadobenate dimeglumine permit the acquisition of high-quality perfusion maps at doses of 0.1 mmol/kg bw. The susceptibility effect is comparable for both agents and stronger than for conventional MR contrast agents.

The Efficacy of Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) at 3 Tesla in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to analyze the differences in contrast enhancement using gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA or MultiHance) at 3 T versus 1.5 T and to compare Gd-BOPTA with a standard gadolinium chelate, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA or Magnevist), at 3 T in a rat glioma model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve rats with surgically implanted gliomas were randomized to either comparing Gd-BOPTA at 1.5 T versus 3 T (n=7) or comparing Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 3 T (n=5). Matched T1-weighted spin-echo techniques were used for both comparisons and the order of examinations was randomized. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lesion enhancement (LE) were evaluated using a region-of-interest analysis. A veterinary histopathologist evaluated all brain specimens.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of Gd-BOPTA at 3 T and 1.5 T, there were significant increases in SNR, LE, and CNR at 3 T. Average increases in brain and tumor SNR were 93% (P<0.0001) and 92% (P<0.0001), respectively. CNR increased by 121% (P<0.0001). Comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 3 T demonstrated significantly higher CNR and LE with Gd-BOPTA. CNR increased by 35% (P=0.002). LE increased by 44% (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-BOPTA provides significantly higher CNR at 3 T compared with 1.5 T and also demonstrates significantly higher CNR when compared with a standard Gd-chelate at 3 T. As a result of transient protein binding, Gd-BOPTA may be superior to standard gadolinium chelates in neurologic imaging at 3 T.

Influence of Human Serum Albumin on Longitudinal and Transverse Relaxation Rates (R1 and R2) of Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents

OBJECTIVES

Exogenous magnetic resonance (MR) contrast media (CM) are used to improve detection and delineation of physiological and pathologic structures. Temporary binding between CM and proteins such as human serum albumin (HSA) may alter the relaxation-enhancing properties of specific contrast agents. In this study, the presence and strength of HSA interaction with different CM was investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three contrast agents were chosen: Gd-DTPA, Gd-BT-DO3A, and Gd-BOPTA, each of which is known to have a different protein interaction. Samples were prepared using 7 different HSA concentrations, all at a constant CM concentration of 0.5 mmol/L. The relaxation rates, R1 and R2, of each sample were measured at 1.5 T. Virtual docking studies were performed to estimate the number of high affinity-binding sites of Gd-BOPTA and the surface of the HSA dimer.

RESULTS

Gd-BOPTA caused the greatest increase in R1 and R2, which followed an exponential dependency with increasing HSA concentration. Between the range of 0 and 7 g/dL of HSA, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A showed a relative change in both relaxation rates of approximately 13% and 22% for R1 and 26% and 30% for R2, respectively. In contrast, Gd-BOPTA demonstrated a relative increase of approximately 108% and 363% for R1 and R2, respectively. Changes of HSA concentration within physiological range (3.5-5.5 g/dL) resulted in an increase of R1 and R2 of approximately 40% when using Gd-BOPTA. The docking study revealed that approximately 10 small hydrophobic pockets exist on the HSA surface where the aromatic tail of Gd-BOPTA can fit in and a stronger noncovalent binding can occur compared with Gd-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A.

CONCLUSION

Relaxation rates of Gd-BOPTA showed a strong dependency on HSA. In contrast, Gd-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A demonstrated little or no relevant dependency. On the basis of these results, the influence of serum protein concentration should be considered in both research studies and in clinical use.

Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the relaxivity and accurate relaxation rates of Gd-DTPA, Gd-BT-DO3A, and Gd-BOPTA at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 T in human blood plasma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Contrast media concentrations between 0.01 and 16 mM in human plasma were used for relaxation measurements. The R1 and R2 relaxation rates and r1 and r2 relaxivities were determined.

RESULTS

Gd-BOPTA produced the highest relaxation rates and relaxivities at all field strengths. The r1 and r2 values for Gd-BOPTA were 107-131% and 91-244% higher than for Gd-DTPA, respectively, and 72-98% and 82-166% higher than for Gd-BT-DO3A. Higher field strengths resulted in lower values of R1, R2, and r1 for all contrast agents tested and of r2 for Gd-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A. A linear dependence of R1 and R2 on concentration was found for Gd-DTPA and Gd-BT-DO3A and a nonlinear dependence for Gd-BOPTA for concentrations larger than 1 mM. The r1 and r2 relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA increased with decreasing concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-BOPTA demonstrates the highest longitudinal r1 at all field strengths, which is ascribable to weak protein interaction. The R2/R1 ratio increases at higher field strength only for Gd-BOPTA, hence very short echo times are required for Gd-BOPTA to benefit from the higher longitudinal relaxivity.

The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI

The intravenous administration of a standard dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents produces higher contrast between the tumor and normal brain at 3.0 Tesla (T) than at 1.5 T, which allows reducing the dose to half of the standard one to produce similar contrast at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. The assessment of cumulative triple-dose 3.0 T images obtained the best results in the detection of brain metastases compared to other sequences. The contrast agent dose for dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.1 mmol compared to 0.2 mmol at 1.5 T due to the increased susceptibility effects at higher magnetic field strengths. Contrast agent application makes susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 3.0 T clinically attractive, with an increase in spatial resolution within the same scan time. Whereas a double dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents was optimal in SWI with respect to sensitivity and image quality, a standard dose of gadobenate dimeglumine, which has a two-fold higher T1-relaxivity in blood, produced the same effect. For MR-arthrography, optimized concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents are similar at 3.0 and 1.5 T. In summary, high field MRI requires the optimization of the contrast agent dose in different clinical applications.

How to compare the efficiency of albumin-bound and nonalbumin-bound contrast agents in vivo: the concept of dynamic relaxivity

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare, in a rabbit experimental model that mimics a magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic protocol, the efficiency of the following types of compound on the MR signal: (1) a nonalbumin-bound blood pool contrast agent: P792; (2) a weak albumin-bound extracellular contrast agent: Gd-BOPTA; and (3) a strong albumin-bound blood pool contrast agent: MS325.

METHODS

The 2 main phases of early distribution after contrast agent injection, ie, the bolus phase (0-15 seconds postinjection) and the postbolus phase (1-5 minutes postinjection) were investigated by measuring Gd blood concentrations in the first 5 minutes postinjection. In the case of MS325 and Gd-BOPTA, the percentage of the free and bound forms were calculated throughout the pharmacokinetic profile. The dynamic relaxivity at 60 MHz in plasma of each contrast agent was determined in the 2 phases after contrast agent injection, ie, the bolus phase and the postbolus phase.

RESULTS

Injected under similar conditions, the 3 contrast agents had a comparable profile during the bolus phase (0-15 seconds postinjection). At 1 minute postinjection, only 38% of Gd-BOPTA remained in the blood, whereas 85% of P792 was still present in the blood. MS-325 had an intermediate position with 61% remaining in the blood. During the postbolus phase, the various compounds demonstrated similar behavior: the plasma concentration of P792 was higher than that of MS325 and Gd-BOPTA, ie, Ci/C0 (P792)>Ci/C0 (MS325)>Ci/C0 (Gd-BOPTA). At the peak of the bolus, 75% of MS325 and 93% of Gd-BOPTA was present in free form. This proportion decreased progressively during the postbolus phase, because 5 minutes postinjection, 23% of the free form remained for MS325 and 82% for Gd BOPTA. A significant decrease in dynamic r1 relaxivity was observed at 60 MHz for the products that bind to albumin (Gd-BOPTA and MS325) during the bolus phase. The dynamic relaxivity for MS325 at the bolus phase was 8.6 mMs and 5.2 mMs for Gd-BOPTA. At the postbolus phase, the dynamic relaxivity increased (17.3 mMs for MS325 and 6.7 mMs for Gd-BOPTA). The dynamic relaxivity of P792, which does not bind to albumin, was constantly equal to 26 mMs at each time point of the pharmacokinetic profile (bolus and postbolus phase).

CONCLUSIONS

The physicochemical measurements of relaxivity in plasma are made in vitro at a fixed concentration of gadolinium and the value of relaxivity is not necessarily an accurate reflection of the efficiency of the contrast agent in vivo, especially for contrast agents that bind to albumin. Indeed, in vivo, the proportion of free and bound forms of albumin-binding contrast agents varies according to the pharmacokinetic profile, and the relaxivities of albumin-bound and free contrast agents are different. Consequently, the concept of dynamic relaxivity was introduced to compare the efficiency of MS325, Gd-BOPTA, and P792 in vivo. The variation of the dynamic relaxivity of MS325 and Gd-BOPTA between the bolus and postbolus phase is significant (101% for MS325 and 29% for Gd-BOPTA) as a result of the variation in the quantity of bound and free forms during the pharmacokinetic profile. The blood pool agent P792 has different properties, which result from its intravascular retention and its lack of albumin binding. Indeed, contrary to Gd-BOPTA and MS325, the dynamic relaxivity of P792 is higher at the bolus phase (26 mMs) and does not vary during the pharmacokinetic profile. The impact of these different dynamic relaxivities should be integrated in the analysis of the performance of the different classes of contrast agents in clinical MRA protocols.

Quantification of Gd-BOPTA uptake and biliary excretion from dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in rat livers: model validation with 153Gd-BOPTA

OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop and validate a pharmacokinetic model allowing description of the magnetic resonance (MR) signal intensity induced by the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-BOPTA and to quantify the overall Gd-BOPTA transport in rat liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR signal intensity was recorded during the perfusion of rat livers with Gd-DTPA, an extracellular contrast agent, and Gd-BOPTA, a hepatobiliary contrast agent. Similar experiments were conducted with Gd-labeled contrast agents for quantitative measurement in liver, bile and perfusate.

RESULTS

A complete 6-compartment, 8 parameter open model was first developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of the compound based on the radioactivity data analysis. Because perfusate and bile data were not available in MRI experiments, a reduced model (6-compartment, 5 parameters) was considered for the MRI data. The performance of the reduced model was tested using the radioactivity data. The reduced model successfully described the contrast agent amount in the liver and correctly predicted amounts in bile and perfusate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic modeling of MR signal intensity induced by Gd-BOPTA permits quantification of Gd-BOPTA uptake and biliary excretion in rat livers.

Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To characterize and compare commercially available contrast media (CM) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of their relaxivity at magnetic field strengths ranging from 0.47 T to 4.7 T at physiological temperatures in water and in plasma. Relaxivities also were quantified in whole blood at 1.5 T.

METHODS

Relaxivities of MRI-CM were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy at 0.47 T and MRI phantom measurements at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 4.7 T, respectively. Both longitudinal (T1) and transverse relaxation times (T2) were measured by appropriate spin-echo sequences. Nuclear magnetic resonance dispersion (NMRD) profiles were also determined for all agents in water and in plasma.

RESULTS

Significant dependencies of relaxivities on the field strength and solvents were quantified. Protein binding leads to both increased field strength and solvent dependencies and hence to significantly altered T1 relaxivity values at higher magnetic field strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the field strength and solvent associated with relaxivity data is crucial for the comparison and evaluation of relaxivity values. Data observed at 0.47 T can thus be misleading and should be replaced by relaxivities measured at 1.5 T and at 3 T in plasma at physiological temperature.

Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: Clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) relative to that of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in patients and volunteers undergoing MRI for various clinical conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 924 subjects were enrolled in 10 clinical trials in which Gd-BOPTA was compared with Gd-DTPA. Of these subjects, 893 were patients with known or suspected disease and 31 were healthy adult volunteers. Of the 893 patients, 174 were pediatric subjects (aged two days to 17 years) referred for MRI of the brain or spine. Safety evaluations included monitoring vital signs, laboratory values, and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

The rate of AE in adults was similar between the two agents (Gd-BOPTA: 51/561, 9.1%; Gd-DTPA: 33/472, 7.0%; P = 0.22). In parallel-group studies in which subjects were randomized to either agent, the rate of AE was 10.9% for Gd-BOPTA and 7.9% for Gd-DTPA (P = 0.21). In the subset of subjects receiving both agents in intraindividual crossover trials, the rate of AE was 8.0% for Gd-BOPTA and 8.5% for Gd-DTPA (P = 0.84). Results of other safety assessments (laboratory tests, vital signs) were similar for the two agents.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of Gd-BOPTA is similar to Gd-DTPA in patients and volunteers. Both compounds are equally well-tolerated in patients with various disease states undergoing MRI.

Color-coded automated signal intensity curves for detection and characterization of breast lesions: preliminary evaluation of a new software package for integrated magnetic resonance-based breast imaging

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of a color-coded automated signal intensity curve software package for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography (CE-MRM) in patients with suspected breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six women with suspected breast cancer based on mammographic and sonographic examinations were preoperatively evaluated on CE-MRM. CE-MRM was performed on a 1.5-T magnet using a 2D Flash dynamic T1-weighted sequence. A dosage of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA was administered at a flow rate of 2 mL/s followed by 10 mL of saline. Images were analyzed with the new software package and separately with a standard display method. Statistical comparison was performed of the confidence for lesion detection and characterization with the 2 methods and of the diagnostic accuracy for characterization compared with histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

At pathology, 54 malignant lesions and 14 benign lesions were evaluated. All 68 (100%) lesions were detected with both methods and good correlation with histopathologic specimens was obtained. Confidence for both detection and characterization was significantly (P < or = 0.025) better with the color-coded method, although no difference (P > 0.05) between the methods was noted in terms of the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for lesion characterization. Excellent agreement between the 2 methods was noted for both the determination of lesion size (kappa = 0.77) and determination of SI/T curves (kappa = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel color-coded signal intensity curve software allows lesions to be visualized as false color maps that correspond to conventional signal intensity time curves. Detection and characterization of breast lesions with this method is quick and easily interpretable.

Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver

Imaging of the liver is performed most often to detect and characterize focal liver lesions. MR imaging has been the method of choice to assess focal liver lesions accurately. Nonspecific intravenous contrast agents have been used for routine abdominal MR imaging protocols including liver imaging. Over the last 10 to 15 years new contrast agents have been developed that combine the excellent contrast resolution of MR imaging with improved tissue specificity. This article reviews various contrast agents that are in clinical use for liver MR imaging and discusses their potential clinical role.

Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization at Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography: Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine

PURPOSE

To prospectively and intraindividually compare equivalent (0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight) doses of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for accuracy of detection and characterization of breast lesions at contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) mammography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Twenty-six consecutive women (mean age, 47.8 years) suspected of having a breast tumor at mammography and sonography underwent two identical MR examinations at 1.5 T; examinations were separated by more than 48 hours but less than 72 hours. A T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence was used, and images were acquired before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes after randomized injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobenate dimeglumine at an identical flow rate of 2 mL/sec. Separate and combined assessment of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced, and subtracted images was performed blindly by two readers in consensus. Accuracy for lesion detection was determined against a final diagnosis based on findings at conventional mammography, sonography, and surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy for malignant lesion identification were determined against histologic results. Data were analyzed with the McNemar test, proportional odds models, and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

MR mammography with gadobenate dimeglumine depicted significantly (P = .003) more lesions (45 of 46) than did that with gadopentetate dimeglumine (36 of 46), and detected lesions were significantly (P < .001) more conspicuous with gadobenate dimeglumine. Confidence for characterization was significantly (P = .031) greater with gadobenate dimeglumine. Comparison of the contrast agents for their ability to help identify malignant lesions revealed significant (P = .02) superiority for gadobenate dimeglumine: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for malignant lesion identification were, respectively, 94.7%, 100%, 100%, 80.0%, and 95.6% with gadobenate dimeglumine and 76.3%, 100%, 100%, 47.1%, and 80.4% with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Quantitative evaluation of signal intensity-time curves revealed significantly (P < .001) greater lesion enhancement with gadobenate dimeglumine.

CONCLUSION

Detection of breast lesions and accurate identification of malignant lesions at MR imaging are significantly superior with gadobenate dimeglumine in comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Necrosis Avid Contrast Agents

Two categories of necrosis-avid contrast agents (NACAs), namely porphyrin- and nonporphyrin-based complexes, have thus far been discovered as necrosis-targeting markers for noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identification of acute myocardial infarction, assessment of tissue or organ viability, and therapeutic evaluation after interventional therapies. In addition to necrosis labeling, other less-specific functions, such as first-pass perfusion, blood pool contrast effect, hepatobiliary contrast enhancement (CE), adrenal and spleen CE, and renal functional imaging, also are demonstrated with NACAs. Despite various investigations with a collection of clues in favor of certain hypotheses, the mechanisms of such a unique targetability for NACAs still remain to be elucidated. However, a few things have become clear that porphyrin-like structures are not necessary for necrosis avidity and the albumin binding is not the supposed driving force but only a parallel nonspecific feature shared by both NACAs and non-NACA substances. Although the research and development of NACAs still remain in preclinical stage at a relatively small scale, their significance rests upon striking enhancement effects, which may warrant their eventual versatile clinical applications. The present review article is intended to summarize the cumulated facts about the evolving research on this topic, to demonstrate experimental observations for better understanding of the mechanisms, to trigger broader public interests and more intensive research activities, and to advocate, toward both academics and industries, further promotion of preclinical and clinical development of this unique and promising class of contrast agents.

Myocardial infarct: depiction with contrast-enhanced MR imaging--comparison of gadopentetate and gadobenate

Institutional review board approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. On two separate occasions, 24 hours apart, contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed prospectively at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 minutes after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine in 15 patients (11 men, four women) with history of myocardial infarction. Both agents allowed detection of infarcted myocardium. T1 values at all times were significantly (P < .05) lower for gadobenate, compared with values for gadopentetate, in both infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium. At 1 minute after administration of both agents, T1 values in left ventricular cavity (LVC) were not different; at 3-20 minutes after injection, values were significantly (P < .05) lower for gadobenate. Differences between contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values of infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium were significantly higher on gadobenate-enhanced images (P < .05). CNR values between infarcted myocardium and LVC were significantly higher on gadopentetate-enhanced images (P < .05). Gadopentetate might permit better delineation of infarcts, especially subendocardial infarcts.

Carotid Artery Stenosis: Intraindividual Correlations of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography, Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography, Conventional DSA, and Rotational Angiography for Detection and Grading

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and rotational angiography for depiction of stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study had Ethics Committee approval, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-nine patients (18 women, mean age, 67.2 years +/- 9.1 [+/- standard deviation], and 31 men, mean age, 63.1 years +/- 8.0) with symptomatic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) diagnosed at duplex ultrasonography underwent transverse 3D TOF MR angiography with sliding interleaved kY acquisition and coronal contrast-enhanced MR angiography, followed by DSA and rotational angiography within 48 hours. MR angiography was performed at 1.5-T with a cervical coil. Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained after a bolus injection of 20 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine. Maximum ICA stenosis on maximum intensity projection and source images was quantified according to NASCET criteria. Correlations for 3D TOF MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were determined by means of cross tabulation, and accuracy for detection and grading of stenoses were calculated. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and McNemar test, all at significance of P < .05.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight ICAs were evaluated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography, and 97 were evaluated at 3D TOF MR angiography. Correlations for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 3D TOF MR angiography, and DSA relative to rotational angiography were r2 = 0.9332, r2 = 0.9048, and r2 = 0.9255, respectively. Lower correlation (r2 = 0.8593) was noted for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA. Respective sensitivity and specificity for detection of hemodynamically relevant stenosis relative to rotational angiography were 100% and 90% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 95.5% and 87.2% for 3D TOF MR angiography, and 88.6% and 100% for DSA. Four of 31 severe stenoses were underestimated at DSA, and three were underestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Three severe stenoses were underestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and one was misclassified as occluded. Of 13 moderate (50%-69%) stenoses, one was overestimated at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, two were underestimated and three overestimated at 3D TOF MR angiography, and two were underestimated at DSA.

CONCLUSION

DSA results in an underestimation of ICA stenosis compared with rotational angiography. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography correlates best with rotational angiography.

Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective study

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine the accuracy of differentiating benign focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA) and liver adenomatosis (LA) by using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ethics committee at each center approved the study, and all patients provided informed consent. Seventy-three patients with confirmed FNH and 35 patients with confirmed HA (n = 27) or LA (n = 8) underwent MR imaging before (T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement or T2-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo [GRE] sequences) and at 25-30 seconds (arterial phase), 70-90 seconds (portal venous phase), 3-5 minutes (equilibrium phase), and 1-3 hours (delayed phase) after (T1-weighted GRE sequences only, with or without fat suppression) bolus administration of 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight gadobenate dimeglumine. The enhancement of 235 lesions (128 FNH, 32 HA, and 75 LA lesions) relative to the normal liver parenchyma was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy for the differentiation of FNH from HA and LA were determined.

RESULTS

Hyper- and isointensity on T2-weighted and iso- and hypointensity on T1-weighted GRE images were noted for 177 (88.9%) of 199 lesions visible on unenhanced images. On dynamic phase images after contrast material administration, 231 (98.3%) of 235 lesions showed rapid strong enhancement during the arterial phase and appeared hyper- to isointense during portal venous and equilibrium phases. Accurate differentiation of FNH from HA and LA was not possible on the basis of precontrast or dynamic phase images alone. At 1-3 hours after contrast material enhancement, 124 (96.9%) of 128 FNHs appeared hyper- or isointense, while 107 (100%) HA and LA lesions appeared hypointense. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy for the differentiation of FNH from HA and LA were 96.9%, 100%, 100%, 96.4%, and 98.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Accurate differentiation of FNH from HA and LA is achievable on delayed T1-weighted GRE images after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine.

Direct evidence of the temperature dependence of Gd-BOPTA transport in the intact rat liver

The aim was to study the influence of temperature on the transport of the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). Rat livers were isolated and perfused with Gd-BOPTA at 12, 25, 30, 36 and 38 degrees C. After the perfusion period, biopsies were collected and the MR signal intensity was measured. Uptake and biliary excretion were quantified with radiolabeled Gd-BOPTA. MR signal intensity decreased with temperature of perfusion. This phenomenon was appropriately quantified with 153Gd and 153Sm labeling, in contrast to 67Ga.

Gadobenate Dimeglumine–enhanced MR Imaging Breast Vascular Maps: Association between Invasive Cancer and Ipsilateral Increased Vascularity

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare three different doses of gadobenate dimeglumine with a standard dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging evaluation of breast vessels and to evaluate the accuracy of one-sided increased vascularity seen on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR images as an indicator of ipsilateral breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The original study had local ethics committee approval; informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients. Ninety-five patients known to have or suspected of having breast cancer were randomly assigned to four groups to receive gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.05, 0.10, or 0.20 mmol per kilogram of body weight or gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.10 mmol/kg. T1-weighted gradient-echo MR images were acquired before and 2 minutes after intravenous contrast material injection. Subtracted images were used to obtain maximum intensity projections (MIPs). Two readers blinded to the type and dose of contrast agent administered scored the MIPs obtained in the dose groups for vessel number, length, and conspicuity from 0, which indicated absent or low breast vascularity, to 3, which indicated high breast vascularity. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of one-sided increased vascularity in association with ipsilateral malignancy for 69 histopathologically confirmed lesions (reference standard) were determined after gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging.

RESULTS

The mean MIP scores assigned to the gadobenate dimeglumine groups were significantly higher than those assigned to the gadopentetate dimeglumine group (P < or = .044). Histopathologic analysis revealed malignant lesions in 52 of 69 patients examined with gadobenate dimeglumine MR imaging: invasive ductal carcinoma in 45, invasive lobular carcinoma in four, and invasive mixed ductal-lobular carcinoma in three patients. Seventeen patients had benign lesions. Two cases of bilateral invasive cancer with symmetric breast vascular maps were excluded. Thus, the overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of one-sided increased vascularity as a finding associated with ipsilateral malignancy were 88% (44 of 50 patients), 82% (14 of 17 patients), 87% (58 of 67 patients), 94% (44 of 47 patients), and 70% (14 of 20 patients), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate dimeglumine is effective for MR imaging evaluation of breast vessels at doses as low as 0.05 mmol/kg. One-sided increased vascularity is an MR imaging finding frequently associated with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer.

Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for enhanced MR imaging of brain and spine tumours in children

BACKGROUND

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) demonstrates superior enhancement of brain tumours in adult patients than Gd-DTPA.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Gd-BOPTA has advantages over Gd-DTPA for enhanced MR imaging of paediatric brain and spine tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three subjects, aged 6 months to 16 years, who were enrolled in a prospective, fully blinded, randomized parallel-group phase III clinical trial, received 0.1 mmol/kg doses of either Gd-BOPTA (n=29) or Gd-DTPA (n=34). The MR images were acquired before and within 10 min of contrast agent injection. The primary objective was to compare the difference from pre-dose to post-dose lesion visualization between Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA. Lesion visualization was determined as the sum of individual scores for three criteria of lesion morphological characteristics (lesion border delineation, internal morphology, and contrast enhancement), each assessed qualitatively using 4-point scales. Quantitative evaluation compared changes in lesion-to-background (LBR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios and per cent enhancement. Monitoring for adverse events and evaluation of vital signs and laboratory values was performed.

RESULTS

Pre-dose to post-dose changes in lesion visualization were significantly better for Gd-BOPTA for both lesion level (2.68+/-2.17 vs. 1.05+/-1.90, P=0.0106) and patient level (2.55+/-2.18 vs. 1.14+/-1.68, P=0.0079) comparisons. The mean pre-dose to post-dose change in CNR was greater for Gd-BOPTA (9.13+/-15.36) than Gd-DTPA (2.18+/-9.90), but the difference was only marginally significant (P=0.0779; 95% CI: -0.553, 14.454) because of wide variations of signal intensity between lesions. Similar findings were obtained for LBR and per cent enhancement. No differences between the agents were noted in terms of safety parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

At an equivalent dose Gd-BOPTA is significantly better than Gd-DTPA for visualization of enhancing CNS tumours in paediatric patients.

Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in MR imaging of the CNS: studies to assess the benefits of a high relaxivity contrast agent

The use of Gd-BOPTA as a contrast agent for morphological and functional MR imaging allows improved detection and delineation of CNS lesions compared to conventional gadolinium agents. This results not only to more confident diagnosis, but also to a substantially improved differential diagnosis process. The higher relaxivity of Gd-BOPTA also helps to optimize functional MR imaging studies e.g. perfusion MRI and dynamic MR angiographic protocols.

Three-dimensional dynamic liver MR imaging using sensitivity encoding for detection of hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced mr imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional dynamic liver imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE), including double arterial phase images and increased resolution, by comparing it to superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with 50 HCCs underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhanced dynamic imaging using SENSE and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging with at least a 24-hour interval between examinations. Using a three-dimensional gradient-echo technique applying SENSE, dynamic imaging consisting of double arterial phase-, portal phase- and delayed phase-images, was obtained. Using T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T2*-weighted fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was obtained. For qualitative analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of both MR examinations for detecting the 50 HCCs was evaluated using the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic method. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value of three-dimensional dynamic imaging with SENSE were 91.3% and 89.2%, respectively, and those of SPIO-enhanced imaging were 77.3% and 92.6 %, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the two images (P <0.05). The mean Az value of three-dimensional dynamic imaging with SENSE (0.97 +/- 0.01) was significantly higher than that of SPIO-enhanced imaging (0.90 +/- 0.02) (P=0.00).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional dynamic liver MR imaging using SENSE for acquiring double arterial phase images is more efficient than SPIO-enhanced MR imaging for detecting HCCs.