Ectopic E2F expression induces S phase and apoptosis in Drosophila imaginal discs

Collaborative role of E2F transcriptional activity and G1 cyclindependent kinase activity in the induction of S phase

A considerable body of evidence points to a role for both cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)2 activity and E2F transcription activity in the induction of S phase. We show that overexpression of cyclin E/cdk2 in quiescent cells induces S phase, that this coincides with an induction of E2F activity, and that coexpression of E2F enhances the cyclin E/cdk2-mediated induction of S phase. Likewise, E2F overexpression can induce S phase and does so in the apparent absence of cyclin E/cdk2 activity. In addition, although the inhibition of cyclin E/cdk2 activity blocks the induction of S phase after growth stimulation of normal mouse embryo fibroblasts, inhibition of cyclin E/cdk2 does not block S phase induction in Rb-/- cells where E2F activity is deregulated. These results point to the important roles for E2F and cyclin E/cdk2 in the induction of S phase. Moreover, the nature of the E2F targets and the suspected targets for cyclin E/cdk2 suggests a potential molecular mechanism for the collaborative action of cyclin E/cdk2 and E2F in the induction of S phase.

E2F mediates developmental and cell cycle regulation of ORC1 in Drosophila

Throughout the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the level of origin recognition complex (ORC) is constant and ORCs are bound constitutively to replication origins. Replication is regulated by the recruitment of additional factors such as CDC6. ORC components are widely conserved, and it generally has been assumed that they are also stable factors bound to origins throughout the cell cycle. In this report, we show that the level of the ORC1 subunit changes dramatically throughout Drosophila development. The accumulation of ORC1 is regulated by E2F-dependent transcription. In embryos, ORC1 accumulates preferentially in proliferating cells. In the eye imaginal disc, ORC1 accumulation is cell cycle regulated, with high levels in late G1 and S phase. In the ovary, the sub-nuclear distribution of ORC1 shifts during a developmentally regulated switch from endoreplication of the entire genome to amplification of the chorion gene clusters. Furthermore, we find that overexpression of ORC1 alters the pattern of DNA synthesis in the eye disc and the ovary. Thus, replication origin activity appears to be governed in part by the level of ORC1 in Drosophila.

ORC localization in Drosophila follicle cells and the effects of mutations in dE2F and dDP

We isolated mutations in Drosophila E2F and DP that affect chorion gene amplification and ORC2 localization in the follicle cells. In the follicle cells of the ovary, the ORC2 protein is localized throughout the follicle cell nuclei when they are undergoing polyploid genomic replication, and its levels appear constant in both S and G phases. In contrast, when genomic replication ceases and specific regions amplify, ORC2 is present solely at the amplifying loci. Mutations in the DNA-binding domains of dE2F or dDP reduce amplification, and in these mutants specific localization of ORC2 to amplification loci is lost. Interestingly, a dE2F mutant predicted to lack the carboxy-terminal transcriptional activation and RB-binding domain does not abolish ORC2 localization and shows premature chorion amplification. The effect of the mutations in the heterodimer subunits suggests that E2F controls not only the onset of S phase but also origin activity within S phase.

The role of RBF in the introduction of G1 regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis

The first appearance of G1 during Drosophila embryogenesis, at cell cycle 17, is accompanied by the down-regulation of E2F-dependent transcription. Mutant alleles of rbf were generated and analyzed to determine the role of RBF in this process. Embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic RBF products show constitutive expression of PCNA and RNR2, two E2F-regulated genes, indicating that RBF is required for their transcriptional repression. Despite the ubiquitous expression of E2F target genes, most epidermal cells enter G1 normally. Rather than pausing in G1 until the appropriate time for cell cycle progression, many of these cells enter an ectopic S-phase. These results indicate that the repression of E2F target genes by RBF is necessary for the maintenance but not the initiation of a G1 phase. The phenotype of RBF-deficient embryos suggests that rbf has a function that is complementary to the roles of dacapo and fizzy-related in the introduction of G1 during Drosophila embryogenesis.

Kinase-independent activity of Cdc2/cyclin A prevents the S phase in the Drosophila cell cycle

BACKGROUND

The Cdc2-dependent inhibition of S phase is required in G2 for the correct ordering of the S and M phases in yeasts and Drosophila. This function of Cdc2 has been ascribed to its ability to phosphorylate replication factors to prevent the assembly of a preinitiation complex at the origin of replication. Whether this is the sole mechanism of S phase inhibition by Cdc2 in higher metazoans is not known because the pleiotropic functions of this essential cell cycle regulator make genetic analysis difficult.

RESULTS

We show that Cdc2 co-expressed with Cyclin A inhibits the S phase in Drosophila salivary glands and diploid abdominal histoblasts. A kinase defective mutant of Cdc2 failed to promote mitosis, but was still able to inhibit the S phase with the same efficiency as the wild-type protein. In addition, Cdc2 and Cyclin A cooperatively inhibit transcriptional activation by the essential S phase regulator E2F. Cdc2 binds to E2F in vitro, and post-transcriptionally promotes its accumulation in vivo. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of Cdc2 on S phase is overridden by E2F.

CONCLUSION

The inhibition of S phase by Cdc2 is achieved in part by a kinase-independent mechanism, which is likely to be mediated by the inhibition of E2F.

Establishing links between developmental signaling pathways and cell-cycle regulation in Drosophila

During development, cell signaling often mediates the choice of cell fate and the accompanying cell biological events that dictate morphogenesis - such as progress through the cell division cycle. Recent genetic analyses in Drosophila are beginning to reveal the molecular connections between developmental signaling pathways and key regulators of the cell cycle.

Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in Drosophila with peptide aptamers

Two-hybrid technology provides a simple way to isolate small peptide aptamers that specifically recognize and strongly bind to a protein of interest. These aptamers have the potential to dominantly interfere with specific activities of their target proteins and, therefore, could be used as in vivo inhibitors. Here we explore the ability to use peptide aptamers as in vivo inhibitors by expressing aptamers directed against cell cycle regulators in Drosophila. We expressed two peptide aptamers, each of which specifically recognizes one of the two essential cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), DmCdk1 and DmCdk2, in Drosophila. Expression of each Cdk aptamer during organogenesis caused adult eye defects typical of those caused by cell cycle inhibition. Co-overexpression of DmCdk1 or DmCdk2 resulted in suppression of the eye phenotypes, indicating that each aptamer interacts with a Cdk target in vivo and suggesting that these peptides disrupt normal eye development by inhibiting Cdk function. Moreover, the specificity of each aptamer for one of the two Cdks as determined in two-hybrid assays was retained in Drosophila. Combined, our results demonstrate that peptide aptamers generated by yeast two-hybrid methods can serve as inhibitory reagents to target specific proteins in vivo.

dE2F2, a novel E2F-family transcription factor in Drosophila melanogaster

Mammalian E2F transcription factors comprise a family of proteins encoded by distinct genes which function in the form of heterodimers with DP proteins. In Drosophila melanogaster, only a single E2F-related transcription factor, dE2F, has been reported. We have now identified and characterized a cDNA encoding another E2F family member in Drosophila, termed dE2F2. The predicted amino acid sequence shares 38.8% identity with dE2F, including the QKRRIYDITNVLEGI motif which is highly conserved in mammalian E2F family members and dE2F. The 18 amino acids, located in the carboxy-terminal region of the mammalian E2F family, sufficient for binding to pRb are also conserved in dE2F2. Band mobility shift analyses with glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins revealed dE2F2 binding to E2F-recognition sites to be dependent on the presence of dDP protein, in apparent contrast to dE2F. Furthermore, cotransfection experiments in Kc cells demonstrated dE2F2 repression of the PCNA gene promoter activity, while dE2F caused activation, the target site for the repression being identical to the dE2F-recognition site.

A cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes that inhibits activation by E2F

The adenovirus E1A protein both activates and represses gene expression to promote cellular proliferation and inhibit differentiation. Here we report the identification and characterization of a cellular protein that antagonizes transcriptional activation and cellular transformation by E1A. This protein, termed CREG for cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes, shares limited sequence similarity with E1A and binds both the general transcription factor TBP and the tumor suppressor pRb in vitro. In transfection assays, CREG represses transcription and antagonizes 12SE1A-mediated activation of both the adenovirus E2 and cellular hsp70 promoters. CREG also antagonizes E1A-mediated transformation, as expression of CREG reduces the efficiency with which E1A and the oncogene ras cooperate to transform primary cells. Binding sites for E2F, a key transcriptional regulator of cell cycle progression, were found to be required for repression of the adenovirus E2 promoter by CREG, and CREG was shown to inhibit activation by E2F. Since both the adenovirus E1A protein and transcriptional activation by E2F function to promote cellular proliferation, the results presented here suggest that CREG activity may contribute to the transcriptional control of cell growth and differentiation.

Key roles for E2F1 in signaling p53-dependent apoptosis and in cell division within developing tumors

Apoptosis induced by the p53 tumor suppressor can attenuate cancer growth in preclinical animal models. Inactivation of the pRb proteins in mouse brain epithelium by the T121 oncogene induces aberrant proliferation and p53-dependent apoptosis. p53 inactivation causes aggressive tumor growth due to an 85% reduction in apoptosis. Here, we show that E2F1 signals p53-dependent apoptosis since E2F1 deficiency causes an 80% apoptosis reduction. E2F1 acts upstream of p53 since transcriptional activation of p53 target genes is also impaired. Yet, E2F1 deficiency does not accelerate tumor growth. Unlike normal cells, tumor cell proliferation is impaired without E2F1, counterbalancing the effect of apoptosis reduction. These studies may explain the apparent paradox that E2F1 can act as both an oncogene and a tumor suppressor in experimental systems.

Coordination of growth and cell division in the Drosophila wing

In most tissues, cell division is coordinated with increases in mass (i.e., growth). To understand this coordination, we altered rates of division in cell clones or compartments of the Drosophila wing and measured the effects on growth. Constitutive overproduction of the transcriptional regulator dE2F increased expression of the S- and M-phase initiators Cyclin E and String (Cdc25), thereby accelerating cell proliferation. Loss of dE2F or overproduction of its corepressor, RBF, retarded cell proliferation. These manipulations altered cell numbers over a 4- to 5-fold range but had little effect on clone or compartment sizes. Instead, changes in cell division rates were offset by changes in cell size. We infer that dE2F and RBF function specifically in cell cycle control, and that cell cycle acceleration is insufficient to stimulate growth. Variations in dE2F activity could be used to coordinate cell division with growth.

Inhibition of mesangial cell proliferation by E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotide in vitro and in vivo

The transcription factor E2F coordinately activates several cell cycle-regulatory genes. We attempted to inhibit the proliferation of mesangial cells in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting E2F activity using a 25-bp decoy oligodeoxynucleotide that contained consensus E2F binding site sequence (E2F-decoy) as a competitive inhibitor. The decoy's effect on human mesangial cell proliferation was evaluated by [3H]thymidine incorporation. The E2F decoy inhibited proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas a mismatch control oligodeoxynucleotide had little effect. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the decoy's inhibitory effect was due to the binding of the decoy oligodeoxynucleotide to E2F. The effect of the E2F decoy was then tested in a rat anti-Thy 1.1 glomerulonephritis model. The E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotide was introduced into the left kidney 36 h after the induction of glomerulonephritis. The administration of E2F decoy suppressed the proliferation of mesangial cells by 71%. Furthermore, treatment with the E2F decoy inhibited the glomerular expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen at the protein level as well as the mRNA level. These findings indicate that decoy oligonucleotides can suppress the activity of the transcription factor E2F, and may thus have a potential in treating glomerulonephritis.

Inhibition of cyclin D1 kinase activity is associated with E2F-mediated inhibition of cyclin D1 promoter activity through E2F and Sp1

Coordinated interactions between cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), their target "pocket proteins" (the retinoblastoma protein [pRB], p107, and p130), the pocket protein binding E2F-DP complexes, and the Cdk inhibitors regulate orderly cell cycle progression. The cyclin D1 gene encodes a regulatory subunit of the Cdk holoenzymes, which phosphorylate the tumor suppressor pRB, leading to the release of free E2F-1. Overexpression of E2F-1 can induce apoptosis and may either promote or inhibit cellular proliferation, depending upon the cell type. In these studies overexpression of E2F-1 inhibited cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity, cyclin D1 protein levels, and promoter activity. The DNA binding domain, the pRB pocket binding region, and the amino-terminal Sp1 binding domain of E2F-1 were required for full repression of cyclin D1. Overexpression of pRB activated the cyclin D1 promoter, and a dominant interfering pRB mutant was defective in cyclin D1 promoter activation. Two regions of the cyclin D1 promoter were required for full E2F-1-dependent repression. The region proximal to the transcription initiation site at -127 bound Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4, and the distal region at -143 bound E2F-4-DP-1-p107. In contrast with E2F-1, E2F-4 induced cyclin D1 promoter activity. Differential regulation of the cyclin D1 promoter by E2F-1 and E2F-4 suggests that E2Fs may serve distinguishable functions during cell cycle progression. Inhibition of cyclin D1 abundance by E2F-1 may contribute to an autoregulatory feedback loop to reduce pRB phosphorylation and E2F-1 levels in the cell.

DDB, a putative DNA repair protein, can function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1

The transcription factor E2F1 is believed to be involved in the regulated expression of the DNA replication genes. To gain insights into the transcriptional activation function of E2F1, we looked for proteins in HeLa nuclear extracts that bind to the activation domain of E2F1. Here we show that DDB, a putative DNA repair protein, associates with the activation domain of E2F1. DDB was identified as a heterodimeric protein (48 and 127 kDa) that binds to UV-damaged DNA. We show that the UV-damaged-DNA binding activity from HeLa nuclear extracts can associate with the activation domain of E2F1. Moreover, the 48-kDa subunit of DDB, synthesized in vitro, binds to a fusion protein of E2F1 depending on the C-terminal activation domain. The interaction between DDB and E2F1 can also be detected by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Immunoprecipitation of an epitope-tagged DDB from cell extracts resulted in the coprecipitation of E2F1. In a reciprocal experiment, immunoprecipitates of E2F1 were found to contain DDB. Fractionation of HeLa nuclear extracts also revealed a significant overlap in the elution profiles of E2F1 and DDB. For instance, DDB, which does not bind to the E2F sites, was enriched in the high-salt fractions containing E2F1 during chromatography through an E2F-specific DNA affinity column. We also observed evidence for a functional interaction between DDB and E2F1 in living cells. For instance, expression of DDB specifically stimulated E2F1-activated transcription. In addition, the transcriptional activation function of a heterologous transcription factor containing the activation domain of E2F1 was stimulated by coexpression of DDB. Moreover, DDB expression could overcome the retinoblastoma protein (Rb)-mediated inhibition of E2F1-activated transcription. The results suggest that this damaged-DNA binding protein can function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1. We speculate that the damaged-DNA binding function of DDB, besides repair, might serve as a negative regulator of E2F1-activated transcription, as damaged DNA will sequester DDB and make it unavailable for E2F1. Furthermore, the binding of DDB to damaged DNA might be involved in downregulating the replication genes during growth arrest induced by damaged DNA.

Identification of positively and negatively acting elements regulating expression of the E2F2 gene in response to cell growth signals

Mammalian cell growth is governed by regulatory activities that include the products of genes such as c-myc and ras that act early in G1, as well as the E2F family of transcription factors that accumulate later in G1 to regulate the expression of genes involved in DNA replication. Previous work has shown that the expression of the E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 gene products is tightly regulated by cell growth. To further explore the mechanisms controlling accumulation of E2F activity, we have isolated genomic sequences flanking the 5' region of the E2F2 coding sequence. Various assays demonstrate promoter activity in this sequence that reproduces the normal control of E2F2 expression during a growth stimulation. Sequence comparison reveals the presence of a variety of known transcription factor binding sites, including E-box elements that are consensus Myc binding sites, as well as E2F binding sites. We demonstrate that the E-box elements, which we show can function as Myc-responsive sites, contribute in a positive fashion to promoter function. We also find that E2F-dependent negative regulation in quiescent cells plays a significant role in the cell growth-dependent control of the promoter, similar to the regulation of the E2F1 gene promoter.

Mutations in Drosophila DP and E2F distinguish G1-S progression from an associated transcriptional program

The E2F transcription factor, a heterodimer of E2F and DP subunits, is capable of driving the G1-S transition of the cell cycle. However, mice in which the E2F-1 gene had been disrupted developed tumors, suggesting a negative role for E2F in controlling cell proliferation in some tissues. The consequences of disrupting the DP genes have not been reported. We screened for mutations that disrupt G1-S transcription late in Drosophila embryogenesis and identified five mutations in the dDP gene. Although mutations in dDP or dE2F nearly eliminate E2F-dependent G1-S transcription, S-phase still occurs. Cyclin E has been shown to be essential for S-phase in late embryogenesis, but in dDP and dE2F mutants the peaks of G1-S transcription of cyclin E are missing. Thus, greatly reduced levels of cyclin E transcript suffice for DNA replication until late in development. Both dDP and dE2F are necessary for viability, and mutations in the genes cause lethality at the late larval/pupal stage. The mutant phenotypes reveal that both genes promote progression of the cell cycle.

Facing death in the fly: genetic analysis of apoptosis in Drosophila

Apoptosis, a gene-directed form of cell death, occurs normally during development and plays a major role in many diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Molecular genetic studies in Drosophila have revealed the existence of three novel apoptotic activators, reaper, head involution defective and grim. Additionally, Drosophila homologs of evolutionarily conserved IAPs (inhibitor of apoptosis proteins) and CED-3/ICE-like proteases have been identified and characterized. Through the combined use of genetic, molecular, biochemical and cell biological techniques in Drosophila it should now be possible to elucidate the precise mechanism by which apoptosis occurs, and how the death program is activated in response to many distinct death-inducing signals.

Cdks and the Drosophila cell cycle

Cyclin-dependent kinases play essential roles in driving the cell cycle. Much progress has been made in Drosophila over the past year in identifying the specific requirements for individual cyclins in particular cell cycle events. These studies encompass many aspects of the cell cycle, from the addition of a G1 phase to the cell cycle during embryogenesis to the role of cyclin degradation in progression through anaphase.

Developmental control of cell cycle regulators: a fly's perspective

During early development in many species, maternally supplied gene products permit the cell cycle to run at maximum velocity, subdividing the fertilized egg into smaller and smaller cells. As development proceeds, zygotic controls are activated that first limit divisions to defined spatial and temporal domains, coordinating them with morphogenesis, and then halt proliferation altogether, to allow cell differentiation. Analysis of the regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) in Drosophila has provided insights into how this embryonic program of cell proliferation is controlled at the molecular level and how it is linked to developmental cues. Recent studies have also begun to reveal how cell proliferation is controlled during the second phase of Drosophila development, which occurs in imaginal tissues. In contrast to their embryonic progenitors, imaginal cells proliferate with a cycle that requires cell growth and is linked to patterning processes controlled by secreted cell signaling molecules. The functions of these signaling molecules appear to be nearly as conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates as the cell cycle control apparatus itself, suggesting that the mechanisms that coordinate growth, patterning, and cell proliferation in developing tissues have ancient origins.

Cancer cell cycles

Uncontrolled cell proliferation is the hallmark of cancer, and tumor cells have typically acquired damage to genes that directly regulate their cell cycles. Genetic alterations affecting p16(INK4a) and cyclin D1, proteins that govern phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (RB) and control exit from the G1 phase of the cell cycle, are so frequent in human cancers that inactivation of this pathway may well be necessary for tumor development. Like the tumor suppressor protein p53, components of this "RB pathway," although not essential for the cell cycle per se, may participate in checkpoint functions that regulate homeostatic tissue renewal throughout life.

The retinoblastoma gene product protects E2F-1 from degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway

E2F-1 plays a crucial role in the regulation of cell-cycle progression at the G1-S transition. In keeping with the fact that, when overproduced, it is both an oncoprotein and a potent inducer of apoptosis, its transcriptional activity is subject to multiple controls. Among them are binding by the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb), activation by cdk3, and S-phase-dependent down-regulation of DNA-binding capacity by cyclin A-dependent kinase. Here we report that E2F-1 is actively degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Efficient degradation depends on the availability of selected E2F-1 sequences. Unphosphorylated pRb stabilized E2F-1, protecting it from in vivo degradation. pRb-mediated stabilization was not an indirect consequence of G1 arrest, but rather depended on the ability of pRb to interact physically with E2F-1. Thus, in addition to binding E2F-1 and transforming it into a transcriptional repressor, pRb has another function, protection of E2F-1 from efficient degradation during a period when pRb/E2F complex formation is essential to regulating the cell cycle. In addition, there may be a specific mechanism for limiting free E2F-1 levels, failure of which could compromise cell survival and/or homeostasis.

Expression of the HsOrc1 gene, a human ORC1 homolog, is regulated by cell proliferation via the E2F transcription factor

The initiation of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the action of a multisubunit complex of six proteins known as the origin recognition complex (ORC). The identification of higher eukaryotic homologs of several ORC components suggests a universal role for this complex in DNA replication. We now demonstrate that the expression of one of these homologs is regulated by cell proliferation. Expression of the human Orc1 gene (HsOrc1) is low in quiescent cells, and it is then dramatically induced upon stimulation of cell growth. In contrast, expression of the HsOrc2 gene does not appear to be similarly regulated. We have isolated the promoter that regulates HsOrc1 transcription, and we show that the promoter confers cell growth-dependent expression. We also demonstrate that the cell growth control is largely the consequence of E2F-dependent negative transcription control in quiescent cells. Activation of HsOrc1 transcription following growth stimulation requires G1 cyclin-dependent kinase activity, and forced E2F1 expression can bypass this requirement. These results thus provide a direct link between the initiation of DNA replication and the cell growth regulatory pathway involving G1 cyclin-dependent kinases, the Rb tumor suppressor, and E2F.

Inhibition of cell proliferation by an RNA ligand that selectively blocks E2F function

The control of cell proliferation is of central importance to the proper development of a multicellular organism, the homeostatic maintenance of tissues, and the ability of certain cell types to respond appropriately to environmental cues. Disruption of normal cell growth control underlies many pathological conditions, including endothelial proliferative disorders in cardiovascular disease as well as the development of malignant tumors. Particularly critical for the control of cell growth is the pathway involving the G1 cyclin-dependent kinases that regulate the Rb family of proteins, which in turn control E2F transcription factor activity. Because E2F is critical for regulation of cell proliferation, we sought to identify and to develop specific inhibitors of E2F function that might also be useful in the control of cellular proliferation. Moreover, because the control of E2F activity appears to be the end result of G1 regulatory cascades, the ability to inhibit E2F may be particularly effective in impeding a wide variety of proliferative events. We have used in vitro selection to isolate several unique RNA species from high complexity RNA libraries that avidly bind to the E2F family of proteins. These RNAs also inhibit the DNA binding capacity of the E2F proteins. We also show that an E2F RNA ligand can block the induction of S phase in quiescent cells stimulated by serum addition. As such, these data demonstrate the critical role for E2F activity in cell proliferation and suggest that such RNA molecules may be effective as therapeutic entities to control cellular proliferation.

The accumulation of an E2F-p130 transcriptional repressor distinguishes a G0 cell state from a G1 cell state

Previous studies have demonstrated cell cycle-dependent specificities in the interactions of E2F proteins with Rb family members. We now show that the formation of an E2F-p130 complex is unique to cells in a quiescent, G0 state. The E2F-p130 complex does not reform when cells reenter a proliferative state and cycle through G1. The presence of an E2F-p130 complex in quiescent cells coincides with the E2F-mediated repression of transcription of the E2F1 gene, and we show that the E2F sites in the E2F1 promoter are important as cells enter quiescence but play no apparent role in cycling cells. In addition, the decay of the E2F-p130 complex as cells reenter the cell cycle requires the action of G1 cyclin-dependent kinase activity. We conclude that the accumulation of the E2F-p130 complex in quiescent cells provides a negative control of certain key target genes and defines a functional distinction between these G0 cells and cells that exist transiently in G1.

E2F-induced S phase requires cyclin E

Both the heterodimeric transcription factor, E2F, and the G1 cyclin, cyclin E, are required for the G1-S transition at the start of the metazoan cell cycle. It has been established that cyclin E can act as an upstream activator of E2F. In addition to this action, we show here that cyclin E has an essential role in DNA replication distinct from activating E2F. We have created transgenic Drosophila capable of inducible, ectopic production of E2F activity. Simultaneous overexpression of both Drosophila E2F subunits, dE2F and dDP, in embryos stimulated the expression of multiple E2F-target genes including cyclin E, and also caused the initiation of S phase. Mutation of cyclin E prevented the initiation of S phase after overexpression of dE2F/dDP without affecting induction of target gene expression. Thus, E2F-directed transcription cannot bypass loss of cyclin E in Drosophila embryos.