Controlled trial of captopril in chronic heart failure: a rest and exercise hemodynamic study

Converting enzyme inhibition and heart failure

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are known to improve cardiac performance in patients with severe heart failure, and are probably safer and more effective than other vasodilators. Less is known about their effects in mild and moderate heart failure. Results at one year are presented about an ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study on 94 outpatients in New York Heart Association functional class II and III. After a three-week period during which appropriate doses of digoxin were administered and a stable response to exercise was obtained, diuretic therapy was withdrawn if in use and captopril or placebo treatment was assigned randomly. The assessment of patients was performed by symptom history, clinical examination, New York Heart Association functional class, chest radiograph, 12-lead electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter monitoring, M-mode echocardiography, and bicycle exercise at the time of random selection and at specified times during a two-year follow-up. Preliminary data after one year suggest that patients receiving placebo may have a greater tendency to need diuretics and may improve New York Heart Association functional class less often than those receiving captopril. No statistically significant treatment differences were found for the noninvasive test results. Detailed analysis suggests that treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor may be more advantageous than that with placebo for some groups of patients. Investigations are under way to determine which patients might benefit most from angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

There is convincing evidence that ACE inhibitors, alone or in combination with a diuretic, effectively lower blood pressure in patients with all grades of essential or renovascular hypertension and that they are of particular benefit as adjunctive therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The hemodynamic, hormonal and clinical effects of the presently available ACE inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, are comparable and their side effect profiles are extremely favorable. One important difference between the two oral ACE inhibitors, however, is their pharmacokinetics; enalapril's action is slower to begin and is of longer duration. Compared with other agents, ACE inhibitors offer important advantages, among them an improved feeling of well being. It is, therefore, expected that ACE inhibitors will gain greater acceptance by patients and physicians in the future.

Delayed tolerance to furosemide diuresis. Influence of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition by lisinopril

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the development of tolerance to the diuretic effect of furosemide was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Furosemide in a dose of 40 mg daily for one week had a brisk acute diuretic effect, but did not lead to dehydration, hyponatremia or fall in blood pressure. The reason for this was a reduction in sodium excretion between doses (rebound effect) and a decrease in sensitivity to furosemide from day 1 to day 7. The latter phenomenon is referred to as delayed tolerance to furosemide. Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme with lisinopril 20 mg daily did not change the renal furosemide excretion rate, the renal sensitivity to furosemide or the tolerance development. Thus, delayed tolerance to furosemide diuresis was not related to dehydration or activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Other mechanisms, probably intrarenal, will have to be looked for.

A randomized cross-over study of enalapril in congestive heart failure: haemodynamic and hormonal effects during rest and exercise

We performed a randomized double-blind placebo controlled cross-over study of enalapril in 16 patients with chronic congestive heart failure, to assess haemodynamic and hormonal effects at rest and on exercise. Acute effects were measured 4 h after enalapril 10 mg, and chronic effects after 6 weeks treatment with enalapril 10-20 mg per day. Exercise tolerance, assessed by the duration of a maximal bicycle ergometer test, was not altered by enalapril. Mean blood pressure was reduced after enalapril, at rest and on exercise, acutely by 7% and 8% respectively, and chronically by 14% and 16%. Systemic vascular resistance was reduced by 16% at rest both acutely (NS) and chronically (p less than 0.05). The resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was reduced by 28% with chronic treatment. In the acute study, total body oxygen consumption on exercise was 26% higher after enalapril. Chronically, resting oxygen consumption was reduced by 13% after enalapril, with mixed venous oxygen saturation increasing by 16%. In the acute study enalapril increased plasma renin activity at rest and on exercise by 181% and by 189%, and reduced aldosterone by 49% (NS) and 39% (p less than 0.05), and these effects were sustained after 6 weeks. Enalapril increased antidiuretic hormone concentrations at rest acutely by 73% (NS) and chronically by 34% (p less than 0.05) but not on exercise; the increase in the acute study correlated with plasma enalaprilat levels (r = 0.66, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of felodipine in chronic congestive heart failure: a placebo controlled haemodynamic study at rest and during exercise and orthostatic stress

A vascular selective calcium antagonist, felodipine, was evaluated in a randomised, double blind, crossover trial in 18 patients with chronic congestive heart failure of ischaemic cause. Felodipine (10 mg twice daily) or a corresponding placebo was added to conventional treatment. After three weeks haemodynamic function was assessed at rest, during a standard supine leg exercise, and during 45 degrees passive upright tilt. In patients in the supine resting position, felodipine reduced the mean arterial pressure (9%) and systemic vascular resistance (24%) and increased the stroke volume (25%) and cardiac index (23%). The heart rate and right and left ventricular filling pressures were unchanged. During felodipine treatment the standard exercise was accomplished at a similar cardiac index but at a substantially lower heart rate (7%), arterial pressure (10%), systemic vascular resistance (17%), and left ventricular filling pressure (19%), and a higher stroke volume (13%). During both placebo and felodipine administration there were substantial reductions in cardiac filling pressure during upright tilting. Upright tilting during the placebo phase did not increase the heart rate. It also caused a greater fall in systemic vascular resistance while the arterial pulse pressure but not the mean pressure was maintained and the cardiac index and stroke volume increased. The reduced cardiac filling pressures during the felodipine upright tilt were accompanied by reductions in arterial pulse pressure and stroke volume and the patients were able to maintain the mean arterial pressure by an increase in both the heart rate and systemic vascular resistance. Thus three weeks treatment with felodipine improved haemodynamic function at rest and during standard exercise and normalised the baroreflex mediated haemodynamic response in patients with congestive heart failure. The haemodynamic efficacy of the drug in such patients may be associated with a baroreceptor mediated effect as well as direct vasodilatation.

Dependence of enhanced maximal exercise performance on increased peak skeletal muscle perfusion during long-term captopril therapy in heart failure

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2), skeletal muscle blood flow by xenon-133 washout technique and femoral vein arteriovenous oxygen difference and lactate were measured at rest and during maximal bicycle exercise in eight patients with severe congestive heart failure before and after 8 weeks of therapy with captopril. During therapy, skeletal muscle blood flow at rest increased significantly from 1.5 +/- 0.6 to 2.6 +/- 1.0 ml/100 g per min (p less than 0.05), with a concomitant decrease in the femoral arteriovenous oxygen difference from 10.0 +/- 1.7 to 8.3 +/- 1.9 ml/100 ml (p less than 0.05). Maximal VO2 increased significantly from 13.4 +/- 3.0 to 15.5 +/- 4.1 ml/kg per min (p less than 0.05). In four patients, the increase in maximal VO2 averaged 3.7 ml/kg per min (range 2.7 to 4.9), whereas in the remaining four patients, it was less than 1 ml/kg per min. Overall, peak skeletal muscle blood flow attained during exercise did not change significantly during long-term therapy with captopril (19.6 +/- 6.2 versus 27.6 +/- 14.3 ml/100 g per min, p = NS). However, the four patients with a significant increase in maximal VO2 experienced substantial increases in peak skeletal muscle blood flow and the latter changes were linearly correlated with changes in maximal VO2 (r = 0.95, p less than 0.001). Femoral arteriovenous oxygen difference at peak exercise was unchanged (12.6 +/- 2.6 versus 12.6 +/- 2.4 ml/100 ml). Thus, improvement in maximal VO2 produced by long-term therapy with captopril is associated with an increased peripheral vasodilatory response to exercise, and this improvement only occurs when the peak blood flow is augmented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combined therapy with dobutamine and amrinone in severe heart failure. Improved hemodynamics and increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system with combined intravenous therapy

The hemodynamic and hormonal responses to dobutamine alone and with the addition of amrinone were studied in ten patients with severe heart failure. Dobutamine significantly increased heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke volume index and significantly decreased mean right atrial and systemic arterial pressures and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance. The addition of amrinone further decreased significantly mean right atrial, pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures and systemic vascular resistance, while heart rate rose. The response of the cardiac index was variable, increasing in seven and decreasing in three patients. Plasma renin activity rose significantly with dobutamine and further increased with amrinone. We conclude that in most patients with severe heart failure, amrinone, when combined with dobutamine, improves hemodynamics. The further increase in heart rate, variable effects on the cardiac index, and marked activation of the renin-angiotensin system suggest caution and potential limitations in the use of this combination.

Effects of afterload reduction (diuretics and vasodilators) on left ventricular volume and mitral regurgitation in severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

The mechanism by which afterload reduction increases left ventricular stroke volume while decreasing left ventricular filling pressure has not previously been established. In 15 patients with severe congestive heart failure due to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, absolute ventricular volume, ejection fraction and total stroke volume from radionuclide ventriculography were compared with thermodilution stroke volume before and after intensive afterload reduction with vasodilators and diuretics titrated to hemodynamic goals. After 48 to 72 hours, pulmonary artery wedge pressure decreased from 32 +/- 8 to 16 +/- 4 mm Hg and systemic vascular resistance from 1,960 +/- 700 to 1,200 +/- 400 dynes s cm-5. End-diastolic volume decreased from 390 +/- 138 to 301 +/- 126 ml (p less than 0.01) and end-systolic volume from 316 +/- 127 to 241 +/- 111 (p less than 0.01). Ejection fraction did not change and total stroke volume decreased from 74 +/- 22 to 59 +/- 20 ml (p less than 0.01). Simultaneous forward stroke volume by thermodilution increased from 37 +/- 14 to 52 +/- 14 ml (p less than 0.01), and forward fraction increased from 0.55 +/- 0.40 to 0.96 +/- 0.42. Intensive reduction of ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance decreased total ventricular stroke volume by 20% but increased forward stroke volume by 40%. The major effect of intensive afterload reduction for severe congestive heart failure may be the reduction of ventricular volume and mitral regurgitation.

31P nuclear magnetic resonance evidence of abnormal skeletal muscle metabolism in patients with congestive heart failure

In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), exercise limitation correlates poorly with central hemodynamic abnormalities, suggesting that additional abnormalities in skeletal muscle blood flow or metabolism play an important pathophysiologic role. Therefore, muscle metabolism was examined by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) at rest and during repetitive bulb squeeze exercise in 11 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV CHF and 7 age-matched control subjects. Serial spectra were obtained at rest, at 2 levels of exercise and during recovery. At rest, the only abnormal finding was an elevated inorganic phosphate (Pi) concentration (5.0 +/- 1.5 vs 3.6 +/- 0.4 mM, p less than 0.01). At the lower exercise level, phosphocreatine (PCr) utilization, which was followed as the ratio of [PCr]/[( PCr] + [Pi]), was greater (0.36 +/- 0.16 vs 0.53 +/- 0.10, p less than 0.02), and pH fell more rapidly and to a lower value (6.38 +/- 0.25 vs 6.85 +/- 0.17, p less than 0.001). At the higher level of exercise, the patients could not work effectively and the group differences narrowed. Compared with control subjects, acidification was disproportionately greater in relation to PCr depletion in patients, further suggesting excessive dependence on glycolytic metabolism. The Pi peak was prominently double in 5 patients, indicating presence of a population of muscle fibers undergoing unusually active glycolysis. PCr resynthesis, a reflection of oxidative phosphorylation, was delayed in 4 patients. These findings indicate that in many patients with CHF, exercising muscle has marked metabolic changes consistent with impaired substrate availability and altered biochemistry.

Long term use of enalapril in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure

Fifty-five patients of both sexes, aged 39-72, suffering from congestive heart failure of varying aetiology were admitted to a double blind study in which enalapril given in a dose of 5-10 mg twice daily or placebo was added to existing medication. A significant increase in exercise performance (P less than 0.004) was seen in the group treated with enalapril, an improvement which was still evident after 24 weeks of therapy. No significant difference was seen between the mean ejection fractions but subjective assessment suggested improvement in the enalapril-treated group.

Acute and short-term effects of clonidine in heart failure

The authors performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the tolerance and effects of chronic oral clonidine administration on the clinical status, exercise tolerance, and ventricular function of 10 male patients with chronic heart failure. Patients were given either oral clonidine (400 micrograms/day) or matching placebo for twelve weeks and then tapered off medication over a two-week period. Results are summarized as follows: Profiles over time between groups were significantly different for resting heart rate (p = 0.0005), were different for arterial pressure (p = 0.04), were different for left ventricular ejection fraction (p less than 0.006), and were different for mean accumulated workload (p = 0.076). Exercise double product at 25 watts changed little in three patients and showed a decrease in 2 patients following six weeks of oral clonidine; after twelve weeks, it decreased in three patients, increased in 1, and changed little in another. After washout, double product returned toward baseline values. In the placebo groups, double product showed little change. Resting of the heart by decreasing heart rate, systemic arterial blood pressure, and venous tone are thought by the authors to be major contributing factors to the observed beneficial effect of chronic oral clonidine in chronic heart failure.

Hemodynamic correlates of left ventricular versus right ventricular radionuclide volumetric responses to vasodilator therapy in congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy

Previous studies have failed to demonstrate the clinical relevance of radionuclide functional measurements during treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). In the present study, data derived before and during nitroprusside infusion were analyzed in 16 patients with CHF to compare correlations of changes in left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) radionuclide measurements with simultaneous changes in 8 hemodynamic variables. Nitroprusside infusion decreased systemic artery pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, right atrial pressure, and pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance, and increased cardiac output. Nitroprusside decreased LV and RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and increased LV and RV ejection fraction and stroke volume. Changes in RV volumes exceeded changes in LV volumes. LV radionuclide measurements did not correlate significantly with any hemodynamic measurement except for a weak correlation between changes in LV end-systolic volume and right atrial pressure (r = 0.51). In contrast, the combination of changes in RV end-systolic volume and stroke volume predicted changes in pulmonary artery peak systolic (r = 0.90) and mean (r = 0.89) pressures. Changes in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure correlated with changes in RV end-diastolic (r = 0.78) and end-systolic (r = 0.71) volumes. In conclusion, LV radionuclide measurements are of limited value in predicting hemodynamic responses to vasodilator therapy in CHF, whereas RV volumes are strongly influenced by load changes. Their responses to nitroprusside correlate well with changes in pulmonary artery and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures.

Ramipril and captopril in patients with heart failure: effects on hemodynamics and vasoconstrictor systems

Fifteen patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association III) were randomly assigned to treatment with either captopril or ramipril, a newly developed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Both groups were similar with respect to baseline hemodynamic measurements and plasma levels of norepinephrine, renin and vasopressin. The group receiving ramipril showed hemodynamic changes comparable to the group receiving captopril on the seventh day of treatment. The stroke volume index increased by 20% versus 21%, respectively, and the total peripheral resistance decreased by 13% versus 20%, respectively. The decrease in blood pressure and the tendency to decrease heart rate were similar in both groups. All patients had reactive hyperreninemia during therapy with the converting enzyme inhibitor. The resting elevated plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups significantly, whereas vasopressin did not change. The hemodynamic improvement was more pronounced and comparable in both groups during exercise. Thus, ramipril is equally effective compared with captopril in the treatment of patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Hemodynamic effects of PN 200-110 (isradipine) in congestive heart failure

PN 200-110 (isradipine), a dihydropyridine derivative, is a newly available calcium antagonist with potent vasodilatory properties. To determine if PN 200-110 might benefit patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), its acute hemodynamic effects were evaluated in a group of 12 patients with severe CHF. Measurements of cardiac performance were obtained after oral administration of placebo and 15 mg of PN 200-110. Placebo resulted in no significant changes in any of the variables. PN 200-110 decreased mean arterial pressure from 94 +/- 14 (mean +/- standard deviation) to 77 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) and increased both cardiac index from 2.1 +/- 0.4 to 2.8 +/- 0.6 liters/m2 (p less than 0.01) and stroke volume index from 26 +/- 7 to 36 +/- 10 ml/m2 (p less than 0.001). Systemic vascular resistance was reduced from 1,726 +/- 563 to 1,099 +/- 370 dynes s cm-5 (p less than 0.01). Neither heart rate nor pulmonary artery wedge pressure changed significantly. Of the 7 patients discharged receiving PN 200-110, 6 improved clinically and there was evidence of a substantial reduction in cardiothoracic ratio on chest x-ray in some patients. No serious side effects were encountered. Vasodilation with PN 200-110 can improve cardiac performance acutely in patients with CHF. Although this clinical experience is encouraging, carefully performed long-term trials must be done to determine the value of this drug in the management of patients with CHF.

Hemodynamic findings during sinus rhythm, atrial and AV sequential pacing compared to ventricular pacing in a dog model

The hemodynamic responses of atrial (AP), atrioventricular sequential (AVP) and ventricular pacing (VP) were compared to sinus rhythm (SR) in seventeen anesthetized dogs with intact AV conduction. The atrium and/or ventricle were paced at fixed rates above the control sinus rate. An AV interval shorter than normal conduction was selected to capture the ventricle. The changes of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP, mmHg), mean aortic pressure (MAP, mmHg), cardiac output (CO, L/min), systemic vascular resistance (SVR, dynes/s/cm-5), left ventricular stroke work index (SWI) and mean systolic ejection rate (MSER, ml/s) during sinus rhythm, atrial pacing and atrioventricular sequential pacing (expressed in percentages of the individual values during ventricular pacing) were: (Chart: See text) The importance of atrial systole for cardiac performance was clearly demonstrated in dogs with normally compliant hearts. In both atrial and atrioventricular sequential pacing compared to ventricular pacing there was a reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p less than 0.01) despite an increase in cardiac output (CO). The lesser mean systolic ejection rate (MSER) found during atrioventricular sequential pacing compared to sinus rhythm and atrial pacing may be explained by the abnormal ventricular depolarization in this pacing mode; nevertheless, the mean systolic ejection rate was still greater than that found during ventricular pacing (p less than 0.05).

Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To evaluate the concept that long duration of action is an advantageous property of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of severe heart failure, we randomly assigned 42 patients to therapy with either a short-acting inhibitor (captopril, 150 mg daily) or a long-acting inhibitor (enalapril, 40 mg daily) for one to three months while concomitant therapy with digoxin and diuretics was kept constant. The treatment groups had similar hemodynamic and clinical characteristics at base-line evaluation and similar initial responses to converting-enzyme inhibition. During long-term therapy, captopril and enalapril produced similar decreases in systemic blood pressure, but the hypotensive effects of enalapril were more prolonged and persistent than those of captopril. Consequently, although the patients in both groups improved hemodynamically and clinically during the study, serious symptomatic hypotension (syncope and near syncope) was seen primarily among those treated with enalapril. Sustained hypotension also probably accounted for the decline in creatinine clearance (P less than 0.05) and the notable retention of potassium (P less than 0.05) observed in the patients treated with enalapril but not in those treated with captopril. We conclude that when large, fixed doses of converting-enzyme inhibitors are used in the treatment of patients with severe chronic heart failure, long-acting agents may produce prolonged hypotensive effects that may compromise cerebral and renal function, and thus they may have disadvantages in such cases, as compared with short-acting agents.

Acute hemodynamic and hormonal effects of lisinopril (MK-521) in congestive heart failure

The acute hemodynamic and hormonal effects of the oral angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril (MK-521) were assessed over a period of 96 hours in 12 patients with heart failure. This compound is the lysine analogue of enalaprilat (MK-422), is biologically active following absorption, and is cleared via the urine without any known metabolic transformation. Single doses of lisinopril, ranging from 1.25 mg to 10 mg, were administered on days 1 and 3, each followed by 48 hours of intensive hemodynamic observation. Across all doses, maximal reductions in mean arterial pressure (17.2%), mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (28%), and systemic vascular resistance (25.6%) were observed compared to baseline values. No significant changes in heart rate were recorded. Arterial blood was sampled at frequent intervals for angiotensin II, ACE activity, plasma renin activity, renin substrate, plasma aldosterone, and serum drug levels. Right atrial blood was sampled simultaneously for angiotensin I, thus permitting assessment of the degree of pulmonary conversion to angiotensin II. The results indicate potent inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system along with hemodynamic efficacy over a period exceeding 24 hours. Frequent clinical follow-up on long-term chronic therapy has revealed no adverse experience.

Is inotropic therapy appropriate for patients with chronic congestive heart failure? Or is the digitalis leaf withering?

The appropriateness of inotropic therapy in chronic heart failure was examined by critically reviewing five assumptions upon which this form of therapy has been justified. Only the first, that cardiac performance can be acutely improved by inotropic therapy, has been empirically proven. That such acute improvement is sustained appears to be true with non-catecholamine agents whereas the chronic haemodynamic efficacy of oral catecholamines remains in doubt. That any inotropic agent can improve exercise tolerance, make the patient feel better, or effect a change without deleteriously affecting the myocyte is very much in doubt. Thus, although the prospect of using powerful inotropic therapy in the patient with heart failure is theoretically appealing, its utility remains to be proven.

Comparative hemodynamic and clinical effects of long-term treatment with prazosin and captopril for severe chronic congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Short- and long-term hemodynamic and clinical responses to sequential therapy with prazosin (15 mg/day for 3 to 12 weeks) and captopril (75 to 300 mg/day for 2 to 15 weeks) were compared in 22 patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. First doses of prazosin produced marked increases in cardiac index and stroke volume index (p less than 0.01), but these effects were lost during long-term treatment. First doses of captopril produced only modest increases in both variables, but these persisted without attenuation during prolonged therapy. Both drugs produced immediate decreases in left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, mean right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance; these changes became significantly attenuated (p less than 0.01) with prazosin but not with captopril. At the end of treatment, stroke volume index was significantly higher and right and left ventricular filling pressures were significantly lower with captopril than with prazosin (p less than 0.05 to 0.01). Only 8 of the 22 patients (36%) treated with prazosin benefited clinically, whereas 14 of 19 patients (74%) treated with captopril felt that they had improved (p less than 0.05). These differences could not have been predicted by comparing responses to first doses of the 2 drugs. These findings indicate that the choice of 1 vasodilator drug over another in patients with congestive heart failure should be based on studies that compare their long-term rather than short-term hemodynamic and clinical effects.

Effect of captopril on the cerebral circulation in chronic heart failure

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was investigated in 8 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (functional class III) and in twelve controls before and after administration of 6.25 mg and 25 mg captopril, respectively. In four controls, CBF was measured by the intracarotid xenon-133 (133Xe) injection technique using stationary external detectors, while inhalation of 133Xe and single photon emission computer tomography was used in the remaining cases. In the control group, the cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen was calculated from measurements of the arterio-venous oxygen difference as well. Mean CBF was significantly (P less than 0.01) lower in the patients with CHF as compared to our controls. Following captopril administration the mean arterial blood pressure decreased in the CHF patients, ranging from 5 to 40%. Three patients showed decreases of blood pressure to values of 56, 65, and 76 mm Hg, but no symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion were elicited. CBF was unchanged after captopril administration, even in the patients showing a marked reduction in blood pressure. In the control group, the blood pressure, CBF and the cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen remained essentially constant following captopril administration. It is concluded that the cerebral circulation is well preserved during captopril treatment of chronic heart failure. This might be explained by a shift of the lower limit of CBF autoregulation towards lower blood pressure levels.

Role of the renin-angiotensin system in the development of hemodynamic and clinical tolerance to long-term prazosin therapy in patients with severe chronic heart failure

Right heart catheterization was performed before and during long-term therapy with prazosin in 27 patients with severe chronic heart failure who underwent serial hemodynamic studies during 3 to 12 weeks of treatment with the drug. Doses of digoxin and furosemide remained constant during the trial; in addition, 11 of the 27 patients were assigned to concomitant therapy with spironolactone, while the remaining 16 patients did not receive the aldosterone antagonist. First doses of prazosin produced marked increases in cardiac index and marked decreases in mean arterial pressure, left ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance in both groups of patients (all p less than 0.01), but these effects became rapidly attenuated (p less than 0.01) in both groups after 48 hours and remained attenuated during long-term therapy. After 3 to 12 weeks, values for cardiac index returned to pretreatment levels and did not decrease when the drug was withdrawn; values for mean arterial pressure, left ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance remained significantly decreased (although attenuated) after 3 to 12 weeks (p less than 0.01) and increased to pretreatment values when the drug was withdrawn. The magnitude and time course of these responses were not altered by concomitant therapy with spironolactone. Complete loss of hemodynamic efficacy (prazosin tolerance) was noted in 14 (58%) of the 24 patients who underwent long-term hemodynamic study and was not accompanied by long-term changes in plasma renin activity or body weight. These data indicate that prazosin produces long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in only 30 to 40% of patients with severe chronic heart failure and do not support a role for the renin-angiotensin system in the development of tolerance to alpha-adrenergic blockade. This low response rate explains why most randomized double-blind trials of prazosin in heart failure have not been able to demonstrate a significant difference between patients treated with placebo and those receiving active drug.

Adverse reactions with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors

Teprotide, a nonapeptide isolated from the venom of a Brazilian pit viper, Bothrops jararaca, was the first angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to be discovered and tested. It was found to be an effective, non-toxic antihypertensive agent as well as an afterload-reducing agent for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The primary activity of teprotide resulted from blockade of the angiotensin I converting enzyme--the pivotal step in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and consequent reductions in angiotensin II levels. There was limited clinical testing for teprotide because of: its scarcity; the need for parenteral administration; and the subsequent discovery and synthesis of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Captopril is the prototype oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and has been extensively studied since the initiation of formal studies in 1976. Perhaps one of the most closely researched drugs in modern times, the experience with captopril now includes more than 12,000 patients studied in formalized trials and over 4,000,000 patients treated world-wide by physicians for hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril (MK421) is the first of what appears to be a growing number of analogues which are structurally and pharmacodynamically different from captopril; yet, they possess the same capacity for inhibiting the activity of angiotensin converting enzyme. The side effect profile of enalapril (and presumably future) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors appears to be similar to captopril, though clearly more experience is needed with newer agents. The initial use of captopril was troubled by a relatively high incidence of side effects which will form the focus of this discussion. Partially the result of incomplete pharmacokinetic information, captopril was administered in early studies at dosages now recognised to be far in excess of those necessary for drug action. In addition, dosages were given without regard for deficiencies of renal function, now known to be the main excretory route of captopril. The population of those patients studied frequently had chronic, treatment-resistant hypertension, often associated with concomitant end-organ disease (especially renal disease); and many additional factors further complicating the clinical setting, e.g. a relatively high incidence of collagen vascular disease and immunosuppressive treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Central and peripheral components of cardiac failure

Chronic heart failure results from two processes, i.e., myocardial and congestive failure. Myocardial failure is clinically silent, most often progresses slowly, and is documented by a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Multiple etiologic factors include systolic and diastolic overloads, myocardial necrosis and/or ischemia, and, perhaps, microvascular spasm. Myocardial failure ultimately leads to exaggerated neurohumoral compensatory mechanisms and derangements of the peripheral circulation, which are the hallmarks of congestive heart failure. At that stage of the syndrome, patients have symptoms, initially, with exercise and, later, at rest. Objective assessment of severity is afforded by determination of maximal oxygen uptake during maximal exercise testing. When congestive heart failure supervenes, the prognosis is poor. Current medical therapy is aimed at improving the derangements of the peripheral circulation, which relieves the symptoms but leaves the primary myocardial process unaffected. The goal of future therapy is to intervene at an earlier stage of the syndrome to halt or even partially reverse the myocardial failure.

Effectiveness of converting enzyme inhibition (enalapril) for mild congestive heart failure

The present study investigates the effectiveness of converting enzyme inhibition (CEI) on cardiac performance of patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II). Outpatients (n = 12) were treated with enalapril, 5 to 10 mg twice daily, in addition to stable doses of digitalis and diuretic drugs. Before and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment a treadmill exercise test and echocardiography were performed. Maximal oxygen uptake and exercise tolerance increased significantly and mean arterial pressure at rest and on exertion decreased significantly. Heart rate did not change. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased significantly. Serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity was reduced to nearly 0; plasma renin concentration, which was already elevated, increased further. Plasma norepinephrine levels did not change significantly. Treatment was tolerated well by all patients. CEI decreased preload and afterload, suggesting that they might have had an inappropriately elevated arteriolar and venous tone owing to a moderately stimulated renin angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system. These conditions may lead to further deterioration of cardiac performance. By means of CEI one may be able to interrupt these pathogenetic mechanisms, relieving the already damaged heart from inappropriate elevations of preload and afterload and delaying or even preventing further deterioration of cardiac performance.

The role of vasodilator therapy in the treatment of severe chronic heart failure

The rationale for the use of vasodilating agents in the treatment of congestive heart failure is to reverse the systemic vasoconstriction that characterises patients with this disorder, and which may further limit cardiac performance. Nitrates were the first vasodilators used, followed by arterial vasodilators (hydralazine, minoxidil), alpha-adrenergic blockers (prazosin, trimazosin) and, more recently, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, beta-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The choice of vasodilator should be based on consideration of overall benefit-risk profiles. Consideration of pharmacological action together with classification of patients into haemodynamic subsets has been used as a basis from which to initiate vasodilator therapy. However, such a classification may not lead to a logical choice of drug and there is no evidence to suggest that patients so selected do better when given long term treatment with peripherally specific drugs than with agents that are not tailored to pretreatment haemodynamic variables. Moreover, changes in central haemodynamics after administration of specific vasodilator drugs may differ from those expected on the basis of their presumed actions on the peripheral vasculature. Dosage requirements are difficult to predict with many vasodilator drugs. Traditionally, such requirements have been established by titrating vasodilating drugs to achieve an arbitrarily defined haemodynamic response. However, there is little correlation between haemodynamic end-points and clinical efficacy in patients with heart failure, and short and long term haemodynamic responses to vasodilator drugs are not necessarily related. Drug-specific haemodynamic and clinical tolerance occurs during the course of treatment with all vasodilator drugs; the extent and frequency with which it develops differs between agents. Tolerance is thought to arise from a reduction in drug receptor affinity and/or density or activation of counter-regulatory forces (mainly neurohormonal) that limit the magnitude of vasodilatation that can be achieved. Development of tolerance to a single agent does not usually preclude efficacy of other agents. ACE inhibitors have been associated with a relatively low incidence of tolerance. This may relate to their natriuretic effect and ability to decrease the degree of neurohormonal activation, actions not shared by other vasodilators. Tolerance is the principal reason for failure of prazosin and nitrates as therapeutic agents in severe chronic heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mixed venous blood temperature response to exercise in heart failure patients treated with short-term vasodilators

Deep-body or core temperature decreases during exercise in patients with heart failure, primarily due to the circulatory inadequacies associated with the pathophysiology of this condition. Vasodilators are commonly used to treat patients suffering from heart failure because these drugs improve total cardiac output and blood-flow to the regional circulations. In heart failure patients, the core temperature response to exercise should also be affected if the circulation is improved by vasodilators. Patients with severe heart failure were studied at rest and during upright bicycle exercise before, and after, short-term treatment with vasodilators (2-minoxidil, 3-hydralazine, 5-captopril). Their heart rate increased significantly (P less than 0.05) from rest to exercise before (87 +/- 15 109 +/- 14 beats/min), and after 89 +/- 13- 112 +/- 15 beats/min) vasodilators, but there was no drug-related affect on these changes. Mean arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were significantly (P less than 0.05) decreased at rest and after the administration of vasodilators (mean arterial pressure 88 +/- 7 mmHg before; 77 +/- 8 mmHg after; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 25 +/- 8 mmHg before, 19 +/- 9 mmHg after). During exercise, the increases in mean arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were not significantly different from the before vasodilator values (mean arterial pressure 92 +/- 14 mmHg before, 87 +/- 14 mmHg after; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 31 +/- 11 mmHg before, 29 +/- 11 mmHg after). Vasodilators increased cardiac output significantly (P less than 0.05) at rest (3.1 +/- 0.6 litre/min to 4.1 +/- 1.1 litre/m) and during exercise (4.8 +/- .2 litre/min-5.6 +/- 1.7 litre/min). The core temperature (mixed venous blood temperature) decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) during exercise from 37.04 +/- 0.62 degrees C to 36.65 +/- 0.65 degrees C, before treatment with vasodilators. After administration of vasodilators, resting core temperature was not significantly different (36.95 +/- 0.54 degrees C) and still decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) during exercise to 36.73 +/- 0.53 degrees C. This decrease was significantly (P less than 0.05) different from the core temperature response before the administration of vasodilators. We conclude that heart failure patients, treated with short-term vasodilators, have an attenuation of the core temperature response that typically occurs during exercise. This change in the core temperature response is the result of the vasodilator-induced improvement in circulation.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Unique and effective therapy for hypertension and congestive heart failure

Major developments in the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure have occurred since the discovery of captopril in June 1975. Early in the past decade, this oral ACE inhibitor was restricted to refractory and severe cases of hypertension. By July 1985, the Food and Drug Administration approved its use not only for all degrees of hypertension but also for the initial treatment of hypertensive patients with uncomplicated disease. New information has confirmed the effectiveness of twice-daily administration (which favorably influences compliance) and the lack of a need to monitor blood or urine levels to assure safety. The renin-mediated and non-renin-mediated mechanisms of action of captopril-induced ACE inhibition have been fully delineated, as has its side effect profile, which does not include various CNS, sympathetic reflex, and metabolic side effects seen with other antihypertensive agents. As the first vasodilator to prove its efficacy in the acute and chronic treatment of congestive heart failure to the FDA, captopril is now widely used throughout the United States. ACE inhibition reduces symptoms, enhances exercise capacity, and favorably affects sodium, water, and potassium homeostasis in patients with heart failure. Also, recent but as yet unconfirmed evidence suggests that ACE inhibition may prolong survival in these patients. The success of captopril, the first oral agent of this class, promises to hold true for other ACE inhibitors (such as enalapril), which have similar activities but differing pharmacokinetic properties and will soon be available for clinical use. Further information on these newer agents is anxiously awaited. In the near future, the clinician will undoubtedly be able to choose from a large selection of ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Therefore, it is important to learn about any meaningful differences among ACE inhibitors and to contrast this class of agents with older, standard therapies. This learning process is crucial as we assess whether newer agents offer clinical advantages over the old.

Hemodynamic and clinical significance of the pulmonary vascular response to long-term captopril therapy in patients with severe chronic heart failure

Exercise capacity in patients with left heart failure is closely related to the performance of the right ventricle and the pulmonary circulation. To determine the significance of changes in pulmonary resistance during long-term vasodilator therapy, hemodynamic studies were performed before and after 1 to 3 months of treatment with captopril in 75 patients with severe chronic left heart failure. Patients were grouped according to the relative changes in pulmonary and systemic resistances during long-term therapy: patients in Group I (n = 24) showed greater decreases in pulmonary arteriolar resistance (PAR) than in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (% delta PAR/% delta SVR greater than 1.0), whereas patients in Group II showed predominant systemic vasodilation (% delta PAR/% delta SVR less than 1.0). Despite similar changes in systemic resistance, patients in Group I showed greater increases in cardiac index, stroke volume index and left ventricular stroke work index (p less than 0.01 to 0.001) but less dramatic decreases in mean systemic arterial pressure (p less than 0.02) than did patients in Group II. Despite similar changes in left ventricular filling pressure, patients in Group I showed greater decreases in mean pulmonary artery and mean right atrial pressures (p less than 0.02 to 0.01) than did patients in Group II. Pretreatment variables in Groups I and II were similar, except that plasma renin activity was higher (8.7 +/- 2.1 versus 3.0 +/- 0.6 ng/ml per h) and serum sodium concentration was lower (133.1 +/- 0.9 versus 137.1 +/- 0.6 mEq/liter) in Group II than in Group I (both p less than 0.05). Both groups improved clinically after 1 to 3 months, but symptomatic hypotension occurred more frequently in Group II than in Group I (36 versus 8%) (p less than 0.005). These findings indicate that changes in the pulmonary circulation modulate alterations in both right and left ventricular performance during the treatment of patients with left heart failure. Hyponatremic patients are likely to experience symptomatic hypotension with captopril because they are limited in their ability to increase cardiac output as a result of an inadequate pulmonary vasodilator response to the drug.

Effects of enalapril in heart failure: a double blind study of effects on exercise performance, renal function, hormones, and metabolic state

Several studies have shown symptomatic and haemodynamic improvement after the introduction of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with heart failure treated with diuretics. The concomitant long term effects of the new orally effective long acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, on symptoms, exercise performance, cardiac function, arrhythmias, hormones, electrolytes, body composition, and renal function have been further assessed in a placebo controlled double blind cross over trial with treatment periods of eight weeks. Twenty patients with New York Heart Association functional class II to IV heart failure who were clinically stable on digoxin and diuretic therapy were studied. Apart from the introduction of enalapril, regular treatment was not changed over the study period; no order or period effects were noted. Enalapril treatment significantly improved functional class, symptom score for breathlessness, and exercise tolerance. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower on enalapril treatment. Echocardiographic assessment indicated a reduction in left ventricular dimensions and an improvement in systolic time intervals. In response to enalapril, the plasma concentration of angiotensin II was reduced and that of active renin rose; plasma concentrations of aldosterone, vasopressin, and noradrenaline fell. There were significant increases in serum potassium and serum magnesium on enalapril. Glomerular filtration rate measured both by isotopic techniques and by creatinine clearance declined on enalapril while serum urea and creatinine rose and effective renal plasma flow increased. Body weight and total body sodium were unchanged indicating that there was no overall diuresis. There was a statistically insignificant rise in total body potassium, though the increase was related directly to pretreatment plasma renin (r = 0.5). On enalapril the improvement in symptoms, exercise performance, fall in plasma noradrenaline, and rise in serum potassium coincided with a decline in the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles recorded during ambulatory monitoring. Adverse effects were few. In patients with heart failure, enalapril had a beneficial effect on symptoms and functional capacity. The decline in glomerular filtration rate on enalapril may not be beneficial in early heart failure.

Usefulness of plasma renin activity in predicting haemodynamic and clinical responses and survival during long term converting enzyme inhibition in severe chronic heart failure. Experience in 100 consecutive patients

The relation between plasma renin activity before treatment and the haemodynamic and clinical responses to converting enzyme inhibition was determined in 100 consecutive patients with severe chronic heart failure who were treated with captopril or enalapril. Initial doses of captopril produced significant increases in cardiac index and decreases in left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, mean right atrial pressure, heart rate, and systemic vascular resistance that varied linearly with the pretreatment value for plasma renin activity. In contrast, there was no relation between the pretreatment activity and the magnitude of haemodynamic improvement after 1-3 months of treatment with the converting enzyme inhibitors, and, consequently, a similar proportion of patients with a high (greater than 6 ng/ml/h; greater than 4.62 mmol/l/h), intermediate (2-6 ng/ml/h; 1.54-4.62 mmol/l/h), and low (less than 2 ng/ml/h; less than 1.54 mmol/l/h) pretreatment value improved clinically during long term treatment (64%, 60%, and 64% respectively). Long term survival after one, two, and three years was similar in the three groups. Estimating the degree of activation of the renin-angiotensin system by measuring pretreatment plasma renin activity fails to predict the long term haemodynamic or clinical responses to converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with severe chronic heart failure, and thus appears to be of limited value in selecting those patients likely to benefit from treatment with these drugs.

Epidemiology of congestive heart failure

The incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) is influenced by a variety of factors, including availability of medical care, socioeconomic status, geography, nutrition and race. The etiology of CHF in China, England, Botswana and Sweden will be examined and compared with prospective findings from Boston and Detroit. Because the therapy used in the treatment of CHF varies with the underlying causes, which may be as diverse as rheumatic fever, systemic hypertension and viral infection, the importance of fully determining its pathogenesis is emphasized.

Acute and long-term effects of enalapril on the cardiovascular response to exercise and exercise tolerance in patients with congestive heart failure

Enalapril is a recently developed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor that improves cardiac function at rest in patients with congestive heart failure. This study investigated the acute effects of enalapril on the cardiovascular response to exercise, and then evaluated the long-term effects of enalapril on exercise capacity and functional status during a 12 week placebo-controlled trial in patients with heart failure. Ten patients underwent hemodynamic monitoring while at rest and during incremental bicycle exercise before and after 5 to 10 mg of enalapril orally. At rest, enalapril decreased mean blood pressure 13% (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance 20% (p less than 0.05) and increased stroke volume index 21% (p less than 0.01). During maximal exercise, enalapril decreased systemic vascular resistance and increased both cardiac and stroke volume indexes. Enalapril acutely increased exercise duration (p less than 0.05) and maximal oxygen consumption (p less than 0.001). These 10 patients and an additional 13 patients were then randomized to either placebo or enalapril treatment and followed up for 12 weeks. Of the 11 patients assigned to active treatment, 73% considered themselves improved compared with 25% of the patients assigned to placebo treatment (p less than 0.02). During long-term treatment, exercise capacity increased in patients receiving enalapril (p less than 0.001) but was unchanged in patients receiving placebo (intergroup difference, p less than 0.05). During long-term treatment, no adverse effects of enalapril occurred. Thus, enalapril improves cardiac function at rest and during exercise. Compared with placebo, maintenance therapy with enalapril results in symptomatic improvement and increased exercise capacity.

Immediate effects of milrinone on metabolic and sympathetic responses to exercise in severe congestive heart failure

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol was used to determine whether milrinone exerts an immediate effect on exercise performance in patients with severe congestive heart failure. In each of 14 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, intravenous milrinone (mean 57 +/- 5 micrograms/kg) and placebo were randomly administered just before maximal progressive upright cycle ergometry. The duration of exercise was significantly longer with milrinone than with placebo treatment (placebo 11.0 +/- 0.6 minutes, milrinone 12.5 +/- 0.9 minutes, p = 0.01). Compared with placebo, milrinone caused a higher peak oxygen uptake (placebo 10.8 +/- 0.6 ml/kg/min, milrinone 12.4 +/- 0.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.001) and oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (placebo 7.8 +/- 0.4 ml/kg/min, milrinone 9.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg/min, p = 0.001). At peak exercise intensity, systolic blood pressure (placebo 119 +/- 5 mm Hg, milrinone 131 +/- 5 mm Hg, p = 0.001) and heart rate (placebo 114 +/- 5 beats/min, milrinone 126 +/- 6 beats/min, p = 0.001) were both increased with milrinone. Likewise, at matched submaximal exercise intensities, heart rate (placebo 111 +/- 19 beats/min, milrinone 117 +/- 20 beats/min, p less than 0.05) and systolic blood pressure (placebo 116 +/- 19 mm Hg, milrinone 121 +/- 19 mm Hg, p = 0.04) were higher with milrinone; plasma norepinephrine (placebo 1,692 +/- 208 ng/liter, milrinone 1,320 +/- 216 ng/liter, p = 0.05) and blood lactate concentrations (placebo 2.2 +/- 0.2 mM, milrinone 1.9 +/- 0.2 mM, p less than 0.05) were lower.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative effects of captopril and isosorbide dinitrate on pulmonary arteriolar resistance and right ventricular function in patients with severe left ventricular failure: results of a randomized crossover study

We compared the short-term hemodynamic effects of isosorbide dinitrate (40 mg orally) and captopril (25 mg orally) in 18 patients with severe chronic heart failure in a randomized, crossover study conducted on consecutive days. Captopril and isosorbide dinitrate produced similar decreases in systemic vascular resistance, but whereas nitrate therapy decreased pulmonary arteriolar resistance significantly, captopril did not; the difference between the two drugs was highly significant (-25% vs -5%, p less than 0.001). Left ventricular filling pressures declined similarly with both captopril (-10.5 mm Hg) and with isosorbide dinitrate (-9.3 mm Hg), but because pulmonary arteriolar resistance fell significantly with nitrate therapy, mean right atrial pressure decreased more with isosorbide dinitrate than with captopril (-5.4 vs -2.8 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.001). Although systemic resistance declined similarly with both drugs, cardiac index increased more with nitrate therapy than during converting-enzyme inhibition (+0.47 vs +0.23 L/min/m2) (p less than 0.01), and therefore mean arterial pressure fell less with isosorbide dinitrate than with captopril (-10.5 mm Hg vs -16.7 mm Hg); p less than 0.05); two patients developed symptomatic hypotension with captopril, whereas none did so with the nitrate. The difference in the effects of the two drugs on cardiac index was not due to differences in their effects on heart rate, since heart rate fell similarly with both drugs, and thus both drugs produced similar increases in stroke volume index. These data indicate that, in patients with severe chronic heart failure, nitrates exert favorable dilating effects on the pulmonary circulation not shared by captopril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term oral administration of amrinone for congestive heart failure: lack of efficacy in a multicenter controlled trial

A number of uncontrolled studies have indicated that oral administration of amrinone, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor with potent positive inotropic effects in experimental preparations, may be beneficial in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. The present multicenter trial was designed to prospectively evaluate clinical response and change in exercise tolerance during 12 weeks of amrinone therapy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. Ninety-nine patients with NYHA functional class 3 or 4 congestive heart failure on digitalis and diuretics, of whom 31 were also receiving captopril, were enrolled. After baseline clinical assessment and determination of exercise tolerance, radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction, and roentgenographic cardiothoracic ratio, patients were randomly assigned to receive amrinone or placebo, beginning at 1.5 mg/kg tid and increasing to a maximum dosage of 200 mg tid. After 12 weeks of therapy or at the last blinded evaluation in patients who did not complete this protocol, there were no significant differences from baseline values between treatment with amrinone or placebo with regard to symptoms, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiothoracic ratio, frequency and severity of ventricular ectopy, or mortality. Exercise tolerance improved significantly from baseline by 37 +/- 10% (mean 163 sec) in patients on amrinone and 35 +/- 11% (mean 149 sec) in patients on placebo, but there was no significant difference between treatments. Adverse reactions were significantly more frequent and more severe on amrinone, occurring in 83% of patients and necessitating withdrawal in 34%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Haemodynamic and neurohumoral response to exercise in patients with congestive heart failure treated with captopril

The contribution of the renin-angiotensin system to the cardiovascular response to exercise was studied in 12 patients with congestive heart failure. The haemodynamic effects of captopril were measured at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. After captopril administration, resting systemic vascular resistance fell by 26.6% and mean blood pressure by 16.7% and cardiac index increased by 19.7%. During exercise, captopril decreased systemic vascular resistance by 25.6% and mean blood pressure by 8.2% and increased cardiac index by 24.4%. Pulmonary wedge pressure fell by 25% at rest but was not altered by captopril during exercise. Pretreatment plasma renin activity increased from 13.4(16.0) ng/ml/hr (10.3(12.3) mmol/l/hr) at rest to 20.0(27.8) ng/ml/hr (15.4(21.4) mmol/l/hr) during exercise. Pretreatment plasma noradrenaline concentration increased from 659(433) pg/ml (39(25.6) nmol/l) at rest to 2622(1486) pg/ml during exercise (155(88) nmol/l). Captopril favourably alters systemic vascular resistance and cardiac index during exercise in patients with congestive heart failure. This may reflect inhibition of the increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system during exercise in these patients and a subsequent reduction in systemic vasoconstriction.

Hemodynamic changes mimicking a vasodilator drug response in the absence of drug therapy after right heart catheterization in patients with chronic heart failure

We suspected that patients with severe chronic heart failure may show hemodynamic changes after cardiac catheterization in the absence of drug therapy that could complicate assessment of the hemodynamic effects of new vasodilator and inotropic agents. To evaluate this phenomenon prospectively, hemodynamic variables were measured in 21 patients with heart failure 30 min and 2, 6, 24, and (in 12 patients) 48 hr after right heart catheterization, during which time therapy was not altered. During the first 2 hr we noted a significant increase in cardiac index and decreases in left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, mean right atrial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance (p less than .01); a further decline in left ventricular filling pressure was noted over the next 24 hr, after which all hemodynamic variables remained stable. The magnitude of these hemodynamic changes resembled the effects of many established vasodilator drugs and was further enhanced after meals. These data indicate that hemodynamic improvement may be observed without any therapeutic intervention during the course of invasive studies in patients with severe chronic heart failure; such changes may lead investigators to attribute efficacy to ineffective drug therapy. To minimize the occurrence of such responses, we recommend that intravascular catheters be inserted the day before drug evaluation and that hemodynamic measurements be made with patients in a postprandial state.

Stability and inter-relationships of hormone, haemodynamic and electrolyte levels in heart failure in man

Relationships between clinical status, haemodynamic measurements, hormone and biochemical indices, and maintenance diuretic dose in patients with chronic cardiac failure, are not clear. This study assessed such relationships and their stability under standardized conditions in 21 hospitalized patients. The daily maintenance dose of frusemide correlated closely and in a positive fashion with plasma levels of renin activity, angiotensin II and aldosterone (P less than 0.001), and to a lesser extent with plasma noradrenaline. Although there was some overlap, patients most incapacitated by their heart failure had the highest circulating levels of renin activity, angiotensin II, aldosterone and noradrenaline. Plasma aldosterone correlated closely with concomitant angiotensin II levels (r = 0.70, P less than 0.001) but not with its other secretagogues ACTH (as reflected by plasma cortisol) or plasma potassium. Close positive correlations between angiotensin II and plasma levels of urea and creatinine (P less than 0.01) were observed. Both renin and angiotensin II showed positive relationships with right heart pressures, but were inversely related to cardiac index and arterial pressure. These results show close relationships between clinical and haemodynamic indices on one hand, and hormones on the other. The renin-angiotensin system appears to be the primary regulator of aldosterone under these conditions, and its activity relates closely to haemodynamic measurements and to the degree of azotaemia.

Methodologic problems in clinical trials in heart failure

Trials designed to establish the effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy in chronic heart failure illustrate methodologic problems associated with intervention trials in chronic disease. Early improvement in hemodynamic status or exercise capacity does not predict long-term changes, and hemodynamic variables do not correlate with exercise capacity. Mortality may not be a feasible outcome, suggesting that an adequate measure of quality of life is necessary to establish patient benefit. Care must be taken to ensure that subjects recruited are representative of the underlying population with respect to drug response. Need for cointervention can be dealt with by comparing only periods of comparable treatment, treating need for cointervention as a treatment failure, or using changes in non-study drugs as a measure of outcome. While cross-over designs can improve feasibility, the investigator runs the risk of inadequate followup and a time-treatment interaction. These issues must be considered in planning intervention trials in chronic disease.

Hemodynamic and clinical limitations of long-term inotropic therapy with amrinone in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To determine the hemodynamic and clinical effects of long-term positive inotropic stimulation on the myocardium, we treated 31 patients with severe chronic heart failure with oral amrinone (600 mg daily) and performed invasive hemodynamic studies during short- and long-term treatment with the drug. Stroke volume and stroke work indexes increased markedly during the first 48 hr of therapy (p less than .01) but returned to pretreatment values after 2 to 10 weeks; upon drug withdrawal, both variables deteriorated rapidly to values significantly lower than those observed before treatment with amrinone (p less than .01), despite similar values for left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. This pattern of response indicated that progression of the underlying heart disease had occurred during treatment with amrinone and contributed importantly to its failure to produce long-term benefits. Progression of left ventricular dysfunction was associated with a progressive increase in heart rate and plasma renin activity and a decline in serum sodium concentration. Clinically, amrinone therapy was complicated by sustained symptomatic ventricular tachycardia in four patients, worsening myocardial ischemia in four patients, and worsening congestive heart failure in eight patients, all of whom had been stable before entry into the study; only three of the 31 patients improved clinically. Ten patients died during the first 2 weeks of treatment, and 16 (52%) were dead within 3 months, a mortality rate twice as great as that seen during comparable trials with vasodilating drugs. Although noncardiac adverse effects were frequent, they were not the primary reason for drug failure. In conclusion, long-term therapy with amrinone may accelerate progression of left ventricular dysfunction, exacerbate myocardial ischemia, and provoke life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, thereby shortening survival in patients with severe chronic heart failure. Prolonged administration of inotropic drugs may achieve short-term gains at the expense of long-term detrimental effects on the myocardium.

Captopril in heart failure. A double blind controlled trial

The effect of the converting enzyme inhibitor captopril as long term treatment was investigated in 14 patients with severe congestive heart failure in a double blind trial. Captopril reduced plasma concentrations of angiotensin II and noradrenaline, with a converse increase in active renin concentration. Effective renal plasma flow increased and renal vascular resistance fell; glomerular filtration rate did not change. Serum urea and creatinine concentrations rose. Both serum and total body potassium contents increased; there were no long term changes in serum concentration or total body content of sodium. Exercise tolerance was appreciably improved, and dyspnoea and fatigue lessened. Left ventricular end systolic and end diastolic dimensions were reduced. There was an appreciable reduction in complex ventricular ectopic rhythms. Adverse effects were few: weight gain and fluid retention were evident in five patients when captopril was introduced and two patients initially experienced mild postural dizziness; rashes in two patients did not recur when the drug was reintroduced at a lower dose; there was a significant reduction in white cell count overall, but the lowest individual white cell count was 4000 X 10(6)/l. Captopril thus seemed to be of considerable value in the long term treatment of severe cardiac failure.