CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Phase 2 study of irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or refractory small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who develop disease progression with standard cisplatin-based therapy are reported to have a poor overall prognosis. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are active as single agents and exhibit preclinical synergy in SCLC cell lines. A phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate this combination in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC who progressed with 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and had measurable disease present; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function were included in the study. Paclitaxel (at a dose of 75 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The target response rate of interest was > or =30%.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom received at least 1 dose of therapy. The majority of the patients had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (96%). A median of 3 cycles of treatment was administered, and 15 patients received > or =6 cycles. Seventeen patients experienced toxicity of grade 3 or higher (neutropenia in 8 patients and fatigue in 5 patients). The overall response rate was 21%. The median survival was 25.4 weeks, and the 1-year survival rate was 22%.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of irinotecan and paclitaxel was found to be tolerated well in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC. Although modest anticancer activity was noted, the efficacy failed to meet the primary endpoint of interest.

Treatment options for small cell lung cancer - do we have more choice?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a significant health problem worldwide because of its high propensity for relapse. This review discusses existing and future therapies for the treatment of SCLC.

Effects of oral administration of S-1 on the pharmacokinetics of SN-38, irinotecan active metabolite, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Previous studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with irinotecan (7-ethyl-10-[4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin, CPT-11) and S-1, containing tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, in the treatment of colorectal and gastric cancer. The objective of this study was to describe the interaction between CPT-11 and S-1 in 4 patients with colorectal cancer. Coadministration of S-1 changed the pharmacokinetic behavior of CPT-11 and its metabolites. In particular, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycampothecin (SN-38) was markedly decreased by coadministration of S-1. For SN-38, the median ratio of Cmax and AUC with S-1 to those without S-1 was median 0.34 (range 0.24-0.78) and 0.56 (range 0.23-0.68), respectively. A markedly difference in drug interaction among individual patients was observed. We conclude that the plasma concentration of SN-38 was decreased by oral administration of S-1 in patients with colorectal cancer. This observation might be important for clinical decisions regarding combination therapy.

Long-term disease-free survivor of metastatic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung treated with amrubicin and irinotecan

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a relatively uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer. Since the biological characteristics of LCNEC are similar to those of small cell lung cancer, LCNEC is usually treated with chemotherapy regimens used for small cell lung cancer. However, the outcomes are usually dismal. Here, we report a patient with LCNEC (a metastasis to the brain). After whole brain irradiation, he received a combination of amrubicin and irinotecan chemotherapy, and has been relapse-free for two years. This treatment regimen may be beneficial for patients with advanced LCNEC.

Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of amrubicin in refractory and relapsed small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin, a totally synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, was evaluated retrospectively for the treatment of refractory and relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed in 32 patients. Amrubicin was infused over 5 min on days 1-3, with courses repeated at 3- or 4-week intervals. Amrubicin was given at a dose of 45 mg/m(2) per day, 40 mg/m(2) per day, 35 mg/m(2) per day, 30 mg/m(2) per day, or 25 mg/m(2) per day depending on medical conditions (patients' age and performance status [PS]), and the dose was modulated according to myelosuppression.

RESULTS

The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range, 1-6). Seventeen patients (53.1%) had a partial response. Median progression-free survival time for all patients was 96 days, and median survival time was 166 days. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities comprised neutropenia (78.1%), anemia (65.6%), and thrombocytopenia (50.0%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 8 patients (25.0%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Treatment-related death was observed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with amrubicin appeared effective in SCLC patients previously treated with chemotherapy, although it was not necessarily safe, because of myelosuppression. Further research is warranted to investigate amrubicin treatment for patients with SCLC.

A multicenter randomized phase II study of the irinotecan/gemcitabine doublet versus irinotecan monotherapy in previously treated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety profile of irinotecan (I) versus the combination of irinotecan/gemcitabine (IG) as second-line treatment of patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

TREATMENT

Patients with SCLC who have received at least one chemotherapy regimen were randomized to receive either the IG regimen (gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan 300mg/m(2) i.v. on day 8) or I monotherapy (300mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1) both every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the IG and 31 in the I arm. Due to slow accrual an early closure of the study was decided. Response rate was significantly higher in the IG than in I arm (23.7% vs. 0%; p=0.004). The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.9 months (range: 0.5-14.5 months; 95% CI: 1.4-6.6) and 1.7 months (range: 0.5-9.9 months; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3) (p=0.010) for the IG and I arms, respectively. There was no difference in terms of median overall survival between the two arms (6.8 months and 4.6 months for the IG and I arm, respectively). The most frequent toxicities were grade III/IV neutropenia and grade III/IV diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the IG regimen seems to be more active than the I monotherapy, the premature closure of the study prevents the drawing of definitive conclusions.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Amrubicin With Topotecan in Patients With Previously Treated Small-Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402

Purpose

Amrubicin, a new anthracycline agent, and topotecan are both active for previously treated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). No comparative study of these agents has been reported. This randomized phase II study was conducted to select amrubicin or topotecan for future evaluation.

Patients and Methods

Patients with SCLC previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive amrubicin (40 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3) or topotecan (1.0 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5). Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, 1, or 2) and type of relapse (chemotherapy sensitive or refractory). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity profile.

Results

From February 2004 to July 2007, 60 patients were enrolled, and 59 patients (36 patients with sensitive and 23 patients with refractory relapse) were assessable for efficacy and safety evaluation. Neutropenia was severe, and one treatment-related death owing to infection was observed in the amrubicin arm. ORRs were 38% (95% CI, 20% to 56%) for the amrubicin arm and 13% (95% CI, 1% to 25%) for the topotecan arm. In sensitive relapse, ORRs were 53% for the amrubicin arm and 21% for the topotecan arm. In refractory relapse, ORRs were 17% for the amrubicin arm and 0% for the topotecan arm. Median PFS was 3.5 months for patients in the amrubicin arm and 2.2 months for patients in the topotecan arm. Multivariate analysis revealed that amrubicin has more influence than topotecan on overall survival.

Conclusion

Amrubicin may be superior to topotecan with acceptable toxicity for previously treated patients with SCLC. Further evaluation of amrubicin for relapsed SCLC is warranted.

Dose escalation study of amrubicin in combination with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The combination of amrubicin (Am) and irinotecan (CPT) shows appreciable activity against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in vitro.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a dose escalation study of Am in combination with CPT to determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicities and efficacy against extensive (ED) SCLC.

RESULTS

Thirteen previously untreated patients with ED-SCLC were treated with CPT at 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and dose-escalated Am on days 1-3 with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor subcutaneously on days 5-9 every 2-3 weeks. At level 3 (40 mg/m(2)/day Am), 3 of 4 registered patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity such as grade 4 neutropenic fever, and therefore, this was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. A total of 31 courses was administered at dose level 2 (35 mg/m(2)/day) in 6 patients, and grade 4 neutropenia was observed during 5 courses (16.1%). Non-hematological toxicities, except 1 course of grade 3 transfusion of red blood cells and 1 course of grade 3 transaminase elevation, were mild. Thus, dose level 2 of Am was recommended for further study. One patient achieved complete remission and 12 achieved partial remission, and the overall response rate was 100%. The median survival time was 17.4 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 76.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT at 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and Am at 35 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support every 3 weeks is recommended for Japanese patients with ED-SCLC.

Irinotecan-cisplatin therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: use patterns among American medical oncologists 2000-2006

BACKGROUND

Etoposide-platinum doublet therapy has been the American standard first-line management for patients with small cell lung cancer for more than a decade. In the 1990s, Japanese investigators developed a regimen of irinotecan-cisplatin for extensive-stage patients and, in one head-to-head trial, the irinotecan therapy produced a statistically significant survival advantage compared with etoposide and cisplatin. We were interested in how American oncologists integrate clinical trial data into their current prescribing practices and studied case-based prescribing recommendations as a surrogate for current clinical practice. We evaluated Network for Medical Communications and Research data from 7 years of live physician meetings to assess changes in use patterns for irinotecan cisplatin since the initial report of the Japanese clinical trial.

METHODS

Data from 38 meetings involving 2174 medical professional attendees (MD; DO; MD PhD) were reviewed. Attendees were given a case scenario and asked to select the treatment option that they felt was most appropriate for the hypothetical setting provided. At each meeting, responses were collected electronically and immediately displayed to the attendees. Aggregate response data are held in the Network for Medical Communications and Research database.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, regimens including etoposide and platinum have consistently been the most frequently recommended for small cell lung cancer therapy by the meeting participants. The selection of irinotecan-cisplatin by American oncologists was initially infrequent, with a modest, transient impact of a plenary session presentation of the Japanese phase III trial data at the 2000 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Publication of the phase III trial findings in the New England Journal of Medicine in early 2002 stimulated a marked increase in irinotecan-cisplatin prescribing with a commensurate decrease in the selection of etoposide and cisplatin therapy. Since 2002, the prescribing patterns have shown an accelerating return to the use of etoposide and platinum despite continuing study of irinotecan-platinum regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant advantages demonstrated in a single phase III clinical trial may have only a modest and transient impact on American oncologists' prescribing behaviors. Factors other than the phase III trial results themselves play a role in the likelihood that prescribing behavior will evolve over time. Corroborating trial data among unambiguously relevant populations will be necessary to stimulate a change in standard treatment paradigms.

Belotecan, new camptothecin analogue, is active in patients with small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter early phase II study

BACKGROUND

Belotecan (Camtobell, Chong Keun Dang Corp, Seoul, Korea; CKD602) is a new camptothecin analogue. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of single-agent belotecan for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with chemotherapy-naive or chemosensitive SCLC were treated with belotecan 0.5 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 of a 3-week cycle. All 27 patients were assessable for toxicity, and 21 patients assessable for response.

RESULTS

Nine patients (42.9%) showed objective tumor responses including one complete response; seven (63.6%) in 11 chemotherapy-naive patients; and two (20.0%) in 10 chemosensitive patients. With a median follow-up of 5 years, median progression-free and survival time for chemotherapy-naive patients were 4.8 months and 11.9 months, respectively, while the corresponding values for chemosensitive patients were 3.3 months and 10.5 months, respectively. The most common toxicity was neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Belotecan was active in SCLC patients as a single agent, warranting further investigations of belotecan in combination with platinum or other active agents.

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan as first-line treatment in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemo-naïve adult patients with a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received cisplatin 20mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days, etoposide 75mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days and irinotecan 120mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2, every 21 days for six to eight cycles. Administration of G-CSF was given in the presence of febrile neutropenia and as a 5-day prophylaxis around the recorded nadir day in patients who developed grades 3-4 neutropenia.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were assessable. The median age was 62.2 years; 96.4% had PS 0-1, 33.5% had >3 metastatic sites. The overall response rate was 80.4% with 8 (14.3%) patients achieving a complete response. The median time to tumor progression was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1-8.6 months] with a median survival of 15.1 months [95% CI, 9.7-20.5 months] and 1-year survival rate of 56.5%. One patient died from toxicity. Grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37.5% of patients, grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 10.9% of patients and 11 (19.6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were primarily nausea-vomiting 3.6%, diarrhea 7.1% and fatigue 3.6%.

CONCLUSION

This study strongly suggests that cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan combination is very effective for the treatment of E-SCLC with good safety profile. The triplet regimen currently seems a promising regimen and has to be further explored in phase III trials.

Evaluation of the Recommended Dose and Efficacy of Amrubicin as Second- and Third-Line Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to evaluate the recommended dose and activity of amrubicin (AMR) as second- or third-line chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Small-cell lung cancer patients with measurable disease who had previously been treated with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Two groups of patients were selected: (1) a group to be treated with second-line chemotherapy and (2) a group to be treated with third-line chemotherapy. AMR was administered to both groups as a 5-minute daily intravenous injection at a dose of 40 or 35 mg/m2 for three consecutive days every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Between March 2003 and June 2006, 27 patients (second-line, 40 mg/m2: 13 patients; third-line, 40 mg/m2: seven patients; and 35 mg/m2: seven patients) were enrolled. Although the 40-mg/m2 dose of AMR was feasible (one of 13 patients developed febrile neutropenia and four of 13 patients had grade 4 neutropenia) and effective (six of 13 patients had a partial response) in the second-line group, it produced unacceptable toxicity in a third-line setting (three of seven patients with grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities [febrile neutropenia in two patients and fatigue in one patient] and four of seven patients with grade 4 neutropenia). The 35-mg/m2 dose of AMR had acceptable toxicity in the third-line group (one of seven patients with febrile neutropenia and one of seven had grade 4 neutropenia) and moderate efficacy (one of seven patients had a partial response and two of seven had stable disease).

CONCLUSIONS

AMR exhibits significant activity as second-line or third-line chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. The recommended dose is 40 mg/m2 in a second-line setting and 35 mg/m2 in a third-line setting.

Gemcitabine and irinotecan for patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer: SWOG 0119

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the activity of a nonplatinum-, nonetoposide-containing regimen for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Patients with brain metastases were eligible if asymptomatic or controlled after radiation.

RESULTS

Eighty-four eligible patients with untreated extensive stage small cell lung cancer with adequate organ function and a performance status of 0-2 were accrued. The median age was 64 years (range, 42-85) and 45 (54%) were women. Six cycles were completed by 28 (33%) patients. Some degree of diarrhea occurred in 57% (grade 3/4, 18%). Other grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26%), anemia (10%), thrombocytopenia (8%), febrile neutropenia (5%), fatigue (11%), nausea (10%), and vomiting (8%). The response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval: 22%-43%) among the 81 patients with measurable disease. The median survival was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval: 7.0-9.8) with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 26% and 7%, respectively. Salvage therapy data were captured by prospective collection, and only 50% of patients were treated secondarily.

CONCLUSION

The overall response rate with the combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan was disappointing, and the median survival rate was lower than expected. Further development of this combination in small cell lung cancer is not recommended.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and irinotecan in previously treated patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity of gemcitabine combined with irinotecan in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SCLC patients who had experienced treatment failure with one prior chemotherapy were eligible. Patients were required to have a performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 30 patients received protocol treatment (10 had refractory disease and 20 had sensitive disease). The median age was 64 years, and the median performance status was one. An objective response was obtained in 36.7% (95% CI: 17.3.1-56.0%) of the patients. The median overall survival time was 14.4 months, and the 1 year survival rate was 51%. The chief grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (3%), diarrhea (9%), and liver dysfunction (3%). The only grade 4 toxicities were one case of grade 4 neutropenia (3.3%) and one case of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (3.3%).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine plus irinotecan is an active regimen that seems to be well-tolerated by patients with previously treated SCLC.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of combination chemotherapy using irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the maximum tolerated doses, dose-limiting toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profiles in the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel. Eligibility criteria included age 75 years or younger, good performance status, adequate organ function, and unresectable non-small cell or extensive disease of small cell lung cancer. Irinotecan was administered on days 1 and 8 over 90 minutes, and paclitaxel was administered on day 8 over 3 hours after 90 minutes from the end of the irinotecan infusion. Irinotecan and paclitaxel were dose-escalated from 40 and 135 mg/m and repeated every 4 weeks. The authors also administered a higher dosage with preventive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support from day 9. Thirty-one patients were assessed for toxicities and responses. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The dose of irinotecan 60 mg/m and paclitaxel 200 mg/m with preventive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was tolerable and suitable for a phase II trial. Nine of 25 (36%) patients with non-small cell and all six patients with small cell carcinoma achieved partial response. The areas under the concentration versus time curves of irinotecan and its metabolites on day 8 were significantly higher than on day 1. This combination therapy must be planned only after careful consideration of the drug-drug interaction.

A multi-center phase II study of weekly topotecan as second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the response rate, toxicity, failure free and overall survival of weekly topotecan in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer who received one prior platinum based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty two patients with relapsed disease after response to one prior chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and patients with relapse more than 90 days after their last therapy received topotecan 4mg/m(2) intravenous over 30min on days 1,8,15; every 4 weeks (3 weeks on and 1 weeks off). Chemotherapy was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients, none of the patients responded to weekly topotecan therapy. Four patients had stable disease. After a median follow up of 1 year, median time to progression was 6 weeks and median survival was 5 months. The common toxicities associated with this regimen were anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, GI side effects and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Weekly topotecan was well tolerated but ineffective in this trial. Although commonly used, weekly regimen of topotecan should be used with caution in relapsed SCLC.

Treatment options for relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer is a chemo-sensitive disease with a response rate ranging from 70 to 90% for first-line treatment; however, relapses are very common and as a result long-term survival is poor. Chemotherapy has demonstrated a benefit over the best supportive care, even in patients who have relapsed after initial treatment with a platinum-based regimen. Agents currently being used in salvage therapy include topotecan, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine regimen. In the last 5 years, several drugs have shown promise in initial evaluation; however, randomized phase III trials would be needed to answer this question. Our understanding of the biology of small-cell lung cancer has improved dramatically over the past few years and this has translated into the developments of new therapeutic targets for this disease. Agents affecting several targets, including bcl-2, matrix metalloproteinases, epidermal growth factors and angiogenesis, are being studied currently and have the potential to change the treatment paradigms of this otherwise fatal malignancy. This review focuses on the various current and future options, including cytoxic and targeted agents, for salvage therapy in patients with this disease.

Amrubicin for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Does Effectiveness Cross the Pacific?

Amrubicin is a synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline that has significant antitumor activity in Japanese patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Clinical trials ongoing in the United States and Europe will determine whether amrubicin will be effective in other ethnic groups (whites) or whether this will be an example of geographic and/or genetic variation. Genetic polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene have been identified as one of the causes of the increased diarrhea seen in white patients treated with irinotecan when compared with Japanese patients. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form-quinone oxidoreductase (NQ01) is an enzyme that participates in the metabolism of amrubicin and polymorphisms of the enzyme, known to occur in the Asian population, might explain the effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with small cell lung cancer. Studies to evaluate the drug in US and European patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer are ongoing. Levels of NQ01 will also be determined in these studies.

Phase II trial of irinotecan/gemcitabine as second-line therapy for relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 39902

BACKGROUND

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the irinotecan/gemcitabine combination in patients with relapsed/refractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable tumor who had received one previous chemotherapy or chemotherapy/radiation regimen were eligible. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered i.v. over 30 min followed immediately by irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) i.v. over 90 min, both on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Patients were stratified based on response to initial treatment [i.e. primary sensitive disease with progression >or=3 months (group A), or refractory disease (group B)].

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were enrolled but one never received treatment and one ineligible patient did not have SCLC. Median patient ages of the remaining patients were 61 and 63 years in groups A (n = 35) and B (n = 36), respectively, with performance status of 0 or 1 in 85% of 71 patients. Primary grade 3/4 toxic effects in groups A versus B were neutropenia (36% versus 43%), thrombocytopenia (36% versus 26%), nausea (12% versus 11%), vomiting (0 versus 11%), diarrhea (12% versus 9%), and pulmonary (12% versus 12%). Two patients had fatal events including pneumonitis (n = 1) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 1). Responses occurred in 11 group A [two complete responses and nine partial responses (PRs)] and four group B (all PRs) patients, for response rates of 31% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17%, 49%) and 11% (95% CI 3%, 26%), respectively. Median survival and progression-free survival times were 7.1 (95% CI 6, 10.5) versus 3.5 (95% CI 3.1, 5.7) months, and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6, 5.3) versus 1.6 (95% CI 1.4, 2.8) months for group A versus B.

CONCLUSION

The irinotecan/gemcitabine combination is active and well tolerated as second-line therapy in SCLC patients. Additional studies are warranted as second-line therapy in patients who progressed 90 days or more after first-line therapy. However, the observed efficacy results in refractory SCLC patients indicate that this regimen should not be further explored in this population.

Extraction and composition of three naturally occurring anti-cancer alkaloids in Camptotheca acuminata seed and leaf extracts

Naturally occurring camptothecins (CPT) are important sources of chemotherapeutic agents for clinical treatment of cancer. Extraction of CPT from Camptotheca acuminata trees remains to be a cost-effective way in the supply equation compared with a total synthesis. This study conducted a series of experiments to determine efficient solvent for the maximal extraction of CPT and its two derivatives, hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) and methoxycamptothecin, from seeds and leaves of C. acuminata. Methanol as an extraction solvent demonstrated in seeds a significantly higher recovery of these three alkaloids than dichloromethane and acetone. Methanol concentrations at 70% in water resulted in maximum extraction of all the three alkaloids regardless of the type of plant materials. However, other strengths of methanol, lower or higher, either decreased the extracting power or showed no improvement in the extraction. Seed extract contained all the three alkaloids whereas leaf extract was absent of HCPT. A stable ratio of the three alkaloids was discovered but it was dependent upon seed or leaf extract of C. acuminata, which with various compositions can be produced. Ecological and medicinal implications of the leaf and seed extract characterized with different chemical compositions are discussed.

Phase II Trial of Amrubicin for Treatment of Refractory or Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group Study 0301

Purpose

This multicenter, phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity of amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, against refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients and Methods

SCLC patients with measurable disease who had been treated previously with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible. Two groups of patients were selected: patients who experienced first-line treatment failure less than 60 days from treatment discontinuation (refractory group), and patients who responded to first-line treatment and experienced disease progression ≥ 60 days after treatment discontinuation (sensitive group). Amrubicin was administered as a 5-minute daily intravenous injection at a dose of 40 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks.

Results

Between June 2003 and December 2004, 60 patients (16 refractory and 44 sensitive) were enrolled. The median number of treatment cycles was four (range, one to eight). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities comprised neutropenia (83%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and anemia (33%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in three patients (5%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. No treatment-related death was observed. The overall response rates were 50% (95% CI, 25% to 75%) in the refractory group, and 52% (95% CI, 37% to 68%) in the sensitive group. The progression-free survival, overall survival, and 1-year survival in the refractory group and the sensitive group were 2.6 and 4.2 months, 10.3 and 11.6 months, and 40% and 46%, respectively.

Conclusion

Amrubicin exhibits significant activity against SCLC, with predictable and manageable toxicities; this agent deserves to be studied more extensively in additional trials.

A phase II trial of fractionated irinotecan plus carboplatin for previously untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Irinotecan plus cisplatin has been previously documented to be effective in the treatment of extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of combination chemotherapy of irinotecan and carboplatin in previously untreated ED-SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2002 to October 2005, 39 patients with previously untreated ED-SCLC were enrolled. Patients were treated with irinotecan (50mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin (target AUC=5 IV on day 1) every 4 weeks for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (87.2%) were male and the median age was 65 years. ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 20 (51.3%) patients and 2 in 19 (48.7%) patients. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range: 1-6 cycles). Thirty-five patients were assessable for response evaluation. The overall response rate was 69.2% (1 CR, 26 PR) under the intent-to-treat analysis. After a median follow-up of 22.7 months, the median time to progression was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-7.1 months) and median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.9-12.0 months). The estimated 1-year survival rate was 42.5%. In terms of toxicities, Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in eight (25.6%) and five (15.4%) patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea (10.3%), anorexia (7.7%), infection (10.3%), and neutropenic fever (12.8%). There was one treatment-related death due to superimposed infection on the broncho-pleural fistula.

CONCLUSION

The combination chemotherapy of irinotecan and carboplatin was effective and tolerable in previously untreated ED-SCLC patients.

Diffuse alveolar damage after a single dose of topotecan in a patient with pulmonary fibrosis and small cell lung cancer

Drug-induced pulmonary toxicities of anticancer agents have been well described, but the pathophysiology of agents typically used in advanced disease has not been well studied. Symptoms of pulmonary drug toxicity in advanced lung cancer patients may frequently be attributed to disease progression, pulmonary embolism, or infection. In patients with pre-existing interstitial pulmonary fibrosis even less is known. This report describes an unfortunate patient with pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis and progressive extensive stage small cell lung cancer. After receiving a single intravenous dose of topotecan, the patient developed sub-acute respiratory failure, and died 15 days later with pathology findings of organizing, reparative phase, diffuse alveolar damage. To our knowledge this is the first pathology confirmation of diffuse alveolar damage in a patient developing dyspnea following topotecan therapy. The frequency with which camptothecin-related dyspnea is associated with diffuse alveolar damage might be underestimated and is of special concern in patients with limited pulmonary reserve.

Phase II study of amrubicin in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin, (+)-(7S, 9S)-9-acetyl-9-amino-7-[(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentopyranosyl )oxy]-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,11-dihydroxy-5,12-naphthacenedione hydrochloride, in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 35 previously untreated patients with extensive-disease SCLC were entered into the study. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous infusion at 45 mg/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. Unless there was tumor regression of 25% or greater after the first cycle, or 50% or greater after the second cycle, treatment was switched to salvage chemotherapy in combination with etoposide (100 mg/m(2), days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1).

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients entered, 33 were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of the 33 patients, 3 (9.1%) had a complete response (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-24.3%) and 22 had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 75.8% (95% CI, 57.7-88.9%). Median survival time was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.9-15.3 months), and 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 48.5% and 20.2%, respectively. The most common toxicity was hematologic. Non-hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or 4 was only seen in 3 patients with anorexia (9.1%) and 1 patient with alopecia (3.0%). Salvage chemotherapy was administered to only 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin was active for extensive-disease SCLC with acceptable toxicity. Further studies in combination with other agents for SCLC are warranted.

The synergism between Belotecan and cisplatin in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We wanted to demonstrate the anti-cancer effect and interaction between belotecan and cisplatin on gastric cancer cell line and we evaluated the mechanisms of this synergistic effect in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The growth inhibitory effect of belotocan and cisplatin against several gastric cancer cell lines (SNU-5, SNU-16 and SNU-601) was estimated by tetrazolium dye assay. The effect of a combination treatment was evaluated by the isobologram method. The biochemical mechanisms for the interaction between the drugs were analyzed by measuring the formation of DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) and DNA topo-I activity.

RESULTS

Belotecan showed synergism with cisplatin for growth inhibitory effect on the gastric cancer cell lines SNU-5, and SNU-16, but this was subadditive on the SNU-601 cell line. The formation of DNA ICLs in SNU-16 cells by cisplatin was increased by combination with belotecan, but this was not affected in SNU-601 cells. The topo-I inhibition by belotecan was enhanced at high concentrations of cisplatin in SNU-16, but not in SNU-601 cells.

CONCLUSION

Belotecan and cisplatin show various combination effect against gastric cancer cells. The synergism between cisplatin and belotecan could be the result of one of the following mechanisms: the modulating effect of belotecan on the repair of cisplatin-induced DNA adducts and the enhancing effect of cisplatin on the belotecan-induced topo-I inhibitory effect.

A Phase II NCCTG study of irinotecan and docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This Phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with measurable NSCLC who had relapsed after an initial response to chemotherapy or who had failed to respond to initial chemotherapy, received 130 mg/m2 of irinotecan IV over 90 minutes and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel IV over 60 minutes on Day 1 q3 weeks for 6 cycles. Dexamethasone and diphenhydramine pretreatment were given. Response to treatment was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors RECIST criteria, and toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) version 2.0.

RESULTS

The most common severe (NCI CTC Grade 3+) adverse events were neutropenia (67 percent), diarrhea (28 percent), fatigue (20 percent), nausea (17 percent), infection (15 percent), vomiting (13 percent), leucopenia (13 percent), abdominal pain (11 percent), and dyspnea (11 percent). Grade 5 toxic events were seen in 2 patients. One of these 2 cases was a possibly-treatment related event (intestinal fistula). The median number of treatment cycles received was 3. Twelve patients (26 percent) received all 6 cycles of treatment. Five patients (11 percent) had a confirmed response (complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or regression). Median follow-up for the five surviving patients is 26.5 months (range: 25.1-28.4). Forty-two patients have reported progressive disease and 41 patients have died. Median time-to-progression (TTP) and survival are 2.6 months and 7.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This second-line treatment regimen of irinotecan and docetaxel in NSCLC patients has shown activity, but can not be recommended over single-agent regimens because of significant toxicity.

A phase II study of weekly irinotecan as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma, at least one bidimensionally measurable metastatic lesion, and no prior chemotherapy were selected. Irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m2 was administered intravenously for 90 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pharmacokinetics was examined on day 1 of the first cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 40 enrolled patients were assessable for efficacy and toxicity. A partial response was obtained in 10 patients, giving an overall response rate of 27.0% (95% confidence interval 13.8-44.1%). The median overall survival was 7.3 months with a 1-year survival rate of 29.5%. Although toxicities were generally tolerated, one patient died of disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome induced by neutropenia with watery diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic study showed that patients with biliary drainage seemed to have higher area under the concentration versus time curve for irinotecan and its metabolites compared with patients without biliary drainage.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent irinotecan has significant efficacy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The toxicity with this schedule appears manageable, though it must be monitored carefully.

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite chemotherapy and radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients die within 2 years. Response rates for second-line chemotherapy are 15-25%, with a median survival of 5 months. Caelyx, a pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, may be better tolerated and has activity in SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a phase II study of intravenous Caelyx (35 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) and vincristine (1.2 mg/m2) every 21 days as second-line therapy in SCLC for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were evaluable for response, with a response rate of 10%. Another two had an unconfirmed response. Stable disease (SD) for >or=2 cycles was seen in an additional 53%. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was seen in 17 (55%) patients (26 [22%] cycles) and included fatigue, mucositis, plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia, rash and neuropathy. Twelve patients required transfusions. All patients on study have now expired, with a median survival of 28 weeks (7 months). For patients with SD or partial response, median time to progression was 15 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Caelyx, cyclophosphamide and vincristine, despite cyclophosphamide and Caelyx dose reductions, has modest activity in relapsed SCLC with acceptable toxicity.

Irinotecan for children with relapsed solid tumors

Irinotecan is expected to become a new drug for childhood solid tumors. Sixteen children with relapsed solid tumors received irinotecan 180 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, repeated once after 25 days off. Their original tumors were neuroblastoma in 7, rhabdomyosarcoma in 3, nephroblastoma and undifferentiated sarcoma in 2 each, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor and leiomyosarcoma in 1 each. The average age at trials was 6 years. Partial response was achieved in 5 (31.3%) (neuro-blastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, nephroblastoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma), and decrease in tumor marker in the other 2. Irinotecan appears promising, and could become included in the first-line treatment.

Irinotecan in the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a review of patient safety considerations

A water soluble derivative of camptothecin, irinotecan (CPT-11) is effective against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), as well as non-SCLC and gastrointestinal cancers. This extended review of recently concluded and ongoing studies focuses on irinotecan in the treatment of limited (LD) and extensive (ED) SCLC specifically considering the safety of patients. Irinotecan-induced diarrhoea is pervasive, and can be severe and life-threatening especially in combination with neutropenia. It can have a significant impact on patient quality of life, negatively influencing compliance with therapy and dose-intensity. For LD SCLC, irinotecan can be administered with radiotherapy concurrently or sequentially. In a Phase III study for ED SCLC comparing etoposide and cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) regimens, severe myelosuppression was more frequent in the EP arm than in the IP arm, and conversely severe or life-threatening diarrhoea was more frequent in the IP arm than in the EP arm. IP resulted in significantly higher response rates and overall survival in Japan, and confirmatory Phase III studies are ongoing. Irinotecan should not be administered to patients with any degree of ongoing diarrhoea above their baseline. Irinotecan can be administered with relative safety for patients with SCLC only through careful patient monitoring, especially regarding diarrhoea and myelosuppression.

Pilot phase II study of weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (with a target area under the concentration versus time curve of 2 mg min/ml using the Calvert formula) were administered to patients with previously- treated SCLC on days 1 and 8 at every 3-4 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (pts) [male/female, 26/3 pts; median age 62.7 years (43-74); performance status 0/1/2, 9/10/10 pts] were enrolled between March 2000 and June 2002. The mean number of cycles administered per pt was 3 (1-7). The overall response rate was 69% (95% confidence interval 52-86%), and 83% (15/18) in sensitive pts and 45% (5/11) in refractory pts (P<0.01). The overall median survival time was 29.6 weeks with a 1-year survival rate of 37% [34.1 weeks in sensitive pts and 23.1 weeks in refractory pts (P=0.085), 46.9 weeks in PS 0-1 and 16.3 weeks in PS 2 (P<0.001)]. The median time to progressive disease was 16.4 weeks [21.7 weeks in sensitive pts and 15.3 weeks in refractory pts (P=0.32)]. Hematologic toxicities observed included grade >or=3 neutropenia in 55%, grade >or=3 anemia in 36%, and grade >or=3 thrombocytopenia in 3%. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild except for grade 3 diarrhea in three pts and grade 3 pneumonitis in one pt.

CONCLUSION

Weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin was well- tolerated and gave a high-response rate in pts with refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

Pilot study of concurrent etoposide and cisplatin plus accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9903

PURPOSE

Irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) significantly improved survival compared with etoposide and cisplatin (EP), in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a previous Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) randomized trial. JCOG9903 was conducted to evaluate the safety of sequentially given IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TRT) for the treatment of limited-stage SCLC (LSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Between October 1999 and July 2000, 31 patients were accrued from 10 institutions. Thirty patients were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. Treatment consisted of etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, and concurrent twice-daily TRT of 45 Gy beginning on day 2. The IP regimen started on day 29 and consisted of irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, with three 28-day cycles.

RESULTS

There were no treatment-related deaths. The response rate was 97% (complete response, 37%; partial response, 60%). Median overall survival was 20.2 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 76%, 41%, and 38%, respectively. Of the 24 patients who started the IP regimen, 22 received two or more cycles. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (67%), anemia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (4%). Nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included diarrhea (8%), vomiting (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). Of the 20 patients with recurrence, none had local recurrence alone and only two had both local and distant metastasis as the initial sites of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily TRT is safe with acceptable toxicities. A randomized phase III trial comparing EP with IP following EP plus concurrent TRT for LSCLC is ongoing (JCOG0202).

Pulmonary toxicity from novel antineoplastic agents

BACKGROUND

The pulmonary side-effects induced by novel antineoplastic agents have not been well characterized.

METHODS

To further investigate this topic, relevant English and non-English language studies were identified through Medline. For our search we used the generic names of novel cytotoxic or non-cytotoxic antineoplastic agents and the key phrases pulmonary/lung toxicity, dyspnea, pneumonitis, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome and alveolar damage. The references from the articles identified were reviewed for additional sources. Abstracts from International Meetings were also included. Furthermore, information was obtained from the Pneumotox website, which provides updated knowledge on drug-induced respiratory disease as well as from pharmaceutical websites.

RESULTS

Most novel antineoplastic drugs may induce pulmonary toxicity, which involves mainly the parenchyma, and less frequently the airways, pleura or the pulmonary circulation. Furthermore, a subset of these agents impairs pulmonary function tests. The exact incidence of lung toxicity remains unclear. The most common patterns consist of dyspnea without further details and infiltrative lung disease (ILD), denoting changes in the interstitium or alveoli. The diagnosis is one of exclusion. ILD is usually benign and responds to appropriate treatment; however, fatalities have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of the potential of most novel antineoplastic agents to cause lung toxicity. A high index of suspicion is required if these are combined with other cytotoxic drugs or radiation.

Novel fluoro-substituted camptothecins: in vivo antitumor activity, reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization

PURPOSE

The novel fluoro-substituted camptothecin analog, BMS-286309, and its prodrug, BMS-422461, were evaluated for their pharmacologic, toxicologic, metabolic and pharmacokinetic developmental potential.

METHODS

In vitro and in vivo assays were used to assess the compounds for topoisomerase I activity, antitumor activity, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

BMS-286309-induced topoisomerase I-mediated DNA breaks in vitro and was similar in potency to camptothecin. Both BMS-286309 and -422461 were comparable to irinotecan regarding preclinical antitumor activity assessed in mice bearing distal site murine and human tumors. BMS-422461 was also found to be orally active. Both analogs were >100-fold more potent in vivo than irinotecan and both were superior to irinotecan with respect to toxicological assessment of GI injury in mice. The generation of parent compound from BMS-422461 was qualitatively similar in mouse, rat and human blood and liver S9 fractions. The percentage of BMS-286309 remaining as the active lactone form at equilibrium was comparable in mouse and human plasma. The pharmacokinetic profile in rat blood demonstrated that BMS-422461 was rapidly cleaved to BMS-286309.

CONCLUSIONS

The favorable in vivo metabolic activation of BMS-422461, and the pharmacokinetic characteristics of BMS-286309, suggest that the good efficacy of BMS-422461 is derived from robust in vivo release of BMS-286309 in rodents and the likelihood that this biotransformation will be preserved in humans. The comparable antitumor activity of BMS-422461 to irinotecan, as well as reduced preclinical GI toxicity, make this novel camptothecin analog attractive for clinical development.

A phase I study of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged over 75 years with previously untreated SCLC were enrolled in this study. Both topotecan and cisplatin were administered on days 1-3 and repeated every 3 weeks. The starting dose of topotecan was 0.5 mg/m2/day, while cisplatin was fixed at the dose of 20 mg/m2/day. Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC received thoracic irradiation after the completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one elderly patients were enrolled in this study and received a total of 59 cycles. The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia and non-hematological toxicities including diarrhea were generally mild and reversible. The MTD of topotecan was determined as 1.2 mg/m2/day. The recommended phase II study dose of topotecan was determined as 1.0 mg/m2/day with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day daily for 3 days. An objective response was observed in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with LD-SCLC and 6 of 11 (55%) with extensive disease (ED) SCLC. The median survival time in patients with LD-SCLC and those with ED-SCLC were 16.0 and 11.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination chemotherapy of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin appears to be tolerable and effective in elderly patients with SCLC.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with irinotecan and docetaxel: A multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the irinotecan plus docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with irinotecan 200mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2) support from day 2 to 9. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response was achieved in 9 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9.85-36.3%) patients; stable and progressive disease were observed in 10 (25.6%) and 20 (51.4%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 7.1 months and the median time to tumor progression 3 months. The median survival time was 10.8 months and the 1-year survival 42.2%. Four (10.3%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and all but one were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Nine (23.1%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea while grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in nine (23.1%), and grade 3 mucositis in two (2.6%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan/docetaxel is a relatively active non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity, which could be given in an outpatient basis; this regimen merits to be further studied in order to improve its tolerance and evaluate its clinical relevance in patients who can not tolerate platinum-based doublets.

In vitro and in vivo irinotecan-induced changes in expression profiles of cell cycle and apoptosis-associated genes in acute myeloid leukemia cells

OBJECTIVE

To study irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced changes in expression profiles of genes associated with cell cycle control and apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

HL60 cells were exposed to clinically achievable concentrations of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), the active metabolite of CPT-11, and blood sampled from patients with acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast transformation treated with CPT-11. Gene expression changes were studied by cDNA microarray and correlated with biological responses by studying DNA distributions by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

cDNA microarray analysis showed down-regulation and up-regulation of specific cell cycle-associated genes, consistent with loss of S-phase cells and temporary delay of G(1)-S-phase transition seen by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry showed that cells in S phase during SN-38 exposure underwent apoptosis, whereas cells in G(2)-M and G(1) were delayed in G(1) and entered S phase only 6 to 8 hours after drug removal, consistent with the observed changes in gene expression. Proapoptotic changes in gene transcription included down-regulation of antiapoptotic genes and up-regulation of proapoptotic genes. Many gene expression changes observed following in vitro SN-38 exposure were also seen following in vivo administration of 10 or 15 mg/m(2) CPT-11; notably, proapoptotic changes included reduced transcription of survivin pathway-associated genes and increased transcription of death receptor 5.

CONCLUSION

CPT-11-induced changes in gene expression profiles in vitro and in vivo are consistent with temporary delay in G(1)-S transition and enhanced responsiveness to apoptosis, both of which may contribute to the synergistic interactions of this drug with antimetabolites.