CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Navigating the Complexities of Brain Metastases Management

The management of brain metastases, a potentially devastating complication of advanced cancers, has become increasingly complex with advancements in local and systemic therapies. Improved outcomes and extended survival for patients with metastatic solid tumors have led to a surge in the prevalence and possibly incidence of brain metastases, affecting up to 40% of individuals with solid tumors. Enhanced imaging technologies contribute to more accurate and early detection, shaping the understanding of the intricate landscape of this condition. Traditionally, surgery and radiation stood as the mainstays of treatment because of the limited efficacy of systemic therapies within the brain. However, emerging clinical data, particularly in melanoma, lung, and breast cancers, reveal promising results with novel systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Despite the historical exclusion of patients with active brain metastases from clinical trials, a shift is occurring toward a more inclusive approach. This chapter delves into the multifaceted challenges associated with managing brain metastases, with a focus on the evolving landscape of systemic approaches as well as the intricacies of shared decision making, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state and future directions in navigating the complexities of brain metastases management.

Effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Osimertinib is used as the first-line therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, early dose reduction is often required due to adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy and safety. This was a retrospective study including patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were started on osimertinib as the first-line therapy between August 2018 and December 2021. Patients whose doses were reduced to less than 80 mg/day within 6 months of osimertinib initiation or started at 40 mg/day were defined as the dose reduction group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Factors affecting PFS were explored using the Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 85 patients were included in this study. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the dose reduction (n = 25) and standard dose groups (n = 60). The median PFS in the dose reduction group was significantly prolonged compared with that in the standard dose group (26.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis of 84 patients, excluding a patient with unknown brain metastasis, revealed that EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, malignant pleural effusion or pleural metastasis, liver metastasis, and dose reduction within 6 months were independent factors affecting PFS. Early dose reduction of osimertinib is an effective therapeutic strategy for prolonging PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

First-line Osimertinib for Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Exon 19 Mutations and EGFR Compound Mutations

Introduction

Up to 20% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC cases harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, including atypical exon 19 and compound mutations. Relatively little is known about the efficacy of osimertinib in these cases.

Methods

Patients treated with first-line osimertinib for NSCLC with rare EGFR exon 19 (non E746_A750del) or compound mutations were included. Response assessment and time to progression were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-seven patients with NSCLC harboring an atypical EGFR exon 19 mutation or compound mutation were treated with first-line osimertinib at Johns Hopkins from 2016 to 2021. Overall response rate (ORR) was 76% and median PFS, TTD, and OS were 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10-15), 22 months (95% CI: 17-32) and 36 months (95% CI, 29-48), respectively. Among atypical exon 19 mutations (n = 25), ORR was 80%, median PFS was 12 months (95% CI: 10-15), median TTD was 19 months (95% CI: 17-38), and median OS was 48 months (95% CI: 25-not reached). Compound mutations (n = 12) had an ORR of 67%, median PFS of 14 months (95% CI: 5-22), median TTD of 26 months (95% CI: 5-36), and median OS of 36 months (95% CI: 20-46). Twelve patients (32%) continued first-line osimertinib after local therapy for oligoprogression.

Conclusions

Osimertinib exhibited favorable outcomes for rare EGFR exon 19 and compound mutations. The heterogeneity in outcomes among these groups of tumors with similar mutations underscores the need for continued reporting and further study of outcomes among rare variants to optimize management for each patient.

Activity of osimeRTInib in non-small-cell lung Cancer with UNcommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: retrospective Observational multicenter study (ARTICUNO)

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib represents the standard of care for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, constituting 80%-90% of all EGFR alterations. In the remaining cases, an assorted group of uncommon alterations of EGFR (uEGFR) can be detected, which confer variable sensitivity to previous generations of EGFR inhibitors, overall with lower therapeutic activity. Data on osimertinib in this setting are limited and strongly warranted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ARTICUNO study retrospectively evaluated data on osimertinib activity from patients with advanced NSCLC harboring uEGFR treated in 21 clinical centers between August 2017 and March 2023. Data analysis was carried out with a descriptive aim. Investigators collected response data according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients harboring uEGFR and treated with osimertinib were identified. Patients with 'major' uEGFR, that is, G719X, L861X, and S768I mutations (n = 51), had an overall response rate (ORR) and mPFS of 50% and 9 months, respectively. Variable outcomes were registered in cases with rarer 'minor' mutations (n = 27), with ORR and mPFS of 31% and 4 months, respectively. Among seven patients with exon 20 insertions, ORR was 14%, while the best outcome was registered among patients with compound mutations including at least one classical EGFR mutation (n = 13). Thirty patients presented brain metastases (BMs) and intracranial ORR and mPFS were 58% and 9 months, respectively. Amplification of EGFR or MET, TP53 mutations, and EGFR E709K emerged after osimertinib failure in a dataset of 18 patients with available rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

The ARTICUNO study confirms the activity of osimertinib in patients with uEGFR, especially in those with compound uncommon-common mutations, or major uEGFR, even in the presence of BMs. Alterations at the E709 residue of EGFR are associated with resistance to osimertinib.

Survival after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Era of Targeted Therapy: Number of Metastases No Longer Matters

Randomised control trial data support the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in up to 4 brain metastases (BMs), with non-randomised prospective data complementing this for up to 10 BMs. There is debate in the neuro-oncology community as to the appropriateness of SRS in patients with >10 BMs. We present data from a large single-centre cohort, reporting survival in those with >10 BMs and in a >20 BMs subgroup. A total of 1181 patients receiving SRS for BMs were included. Data were collected prospectively from the time of SRS referral. Kaplan-Meier graphs and logrank tests were used to compare survival between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to account for differences in group characteristics. Median survival with 1 BM (n = 379), 2-4 BMs (n = 438), 5-10 BMs (n = 236), and >10 BMs (n = 128) was 12.49, 10.22, 10.68, and 10.09 months, respectively. Using 2-4 BMs as the reference group, survival was not significantly different in those with >10 BMs in either our univariable (p = 0.6882) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.0564). In our subgroup analyses, median survival for those with >20 BMs was comparable to those with 2-4 BMs (10.09 vs. 10.22 months, p = 0.3558). This study contributes a large dataset to the existing literature on SRS for those with multi-metastases and supports growing evidence that those with >10 BMs should be considered for SRS.

Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid tumor DNA in lung cancer patients with suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

Cerebrospinal fluid tumor-derived DNA (CSF-tDNA) analysis is a promising approach for monitoring the neoplastic processes of the central nervous system. We applied a lung cancer-specific sequencing panel (CAPP-Seq) to 81 CSF, blood, and tissue samples from 24 lung cancer patients who underwent lumbar puncture (LP) for suspected leptomeningeal disease (LMD). A subset of the cohort (N = 12) participated in a prospective trial of osimertinib for refractory LMD in which serial LPs were performed before and during treatment. CSF-tDNA variant allele fractions (VAFs) were significantly higher than plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) VAFs (median CSF-tDNA, 32.7%; median plasma ctDNA, 1.8%; P < 0.0001). Concentrations of tumor DNA in CSF and plasma were positively correlated (Spearman's ρ, 0.45; P = 0.03). For LMD diagnosis, cytology was 81.8% sensitive and CSF-tDNA was 91.7% sensitive. CSF-tDNA was also strongly prognostic for overall survival (HR = 7.1; P = 0.02). Among patients with progression on targeted therapy, resistance mutations, such as EGFR T790M and MET amplification, were common in peripheral blood but were rare in time-matched CSF, indicating differences in resistance mechanisms based on the anatomic compartment. In the osimertinib cohort, patients with CNS progression had increased CSF-tDNA VAFs at follow-up LP. Post-osimertinib CSF-tDNA VAF was strongly prognostic for CNS progression (HR = 6.2, P = 0.009). Detection of CSF-tDNA in lung cancer patients with suspected LMD is feasible and may have clinical utility. CSF-tDNA improves the sensitivity of LMD diagnosis, enables improved prognostication, and drives therapeutic strategies that account for spatial heterogeneity in resistance mechanisms.

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer leptomeningeal metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysiss

Purpose

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In patients with NSCLC LM harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, osimertinib is favored over alternative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the efficacy of osimertinib relative to other EGFR-TKIs is not well established for patients with LM. We aimed to compare the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC LM.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to PRISMA guidelines included studies of adult patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and a diagnosis of LM who received an EGFR-TKI for the treatment of LM. We searched Medline ALL, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The evaluation of biases was done by using the Ottawa-Newscastle scale. The hazard ratio was used as the parameter of interest for overall survival (OS) and central nervous system-specific progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

128 publications were included with 243 patients and 282 lines of EGFR-TKI for NSCLC LM that met inclusion criteria. The median PFS in patients receiving any EGFR-TKI was 9.1 months, and the median OS was 14.5 months. In univariate analyses of the entire cohort, osimertinib treatment demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS, but not OS, compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib demonstrated significantly prolonged PFS and OS in the subset of patients who were previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, but not in EGFR-TKI naïve patients.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is associated with improved outcomes compared to other EGFR-TKIs, particularly in patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. An important limitation is that most patients were derived from retrospective reports. These results highlight the need for prospective studies for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Comprehensive genomic and clinical analyses identify APOBEC mutational signatures as a brain metastasis risk factor in lung adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common source of brain metastasis (BM), resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify patients with high BM risk who possibly benefit from brain-penetrant drugs, prophylactic cranial irradiation, or close brain magnetic resonance imaging surveillance.

METHODS

Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with extracranial tumor samples profiled by a next-generation sequencing panel targeting 425 tumor-related genes were retrospectively enrolled between February 2008 and July 2021. We compared BM and non-BM patients' genomic and clinical features and studied their associations with BM risk. Two external cohorts were used for result validation and molecular mechanisms investigation, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 174 eligible patients, including 90 having developed BM by the end of follow-up. Age≤60, EGFR activating mutations, and high-level apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutational signatures were associated with elevated BM risk. Similar findings in BM-free survival were obtained by fitting Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models addressing competing risks. Increased BM risk related to APOBEC mutational signatures was validated in an external cohort (N = 440). RNA sequencing data analyses performed in another external cohort (N = 230) revealed that expressions of metastasis-related pathways such as transforming growth factor (TGF)β and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) were upregulated in the patients with high-level APOBEC mutational signatures.

CONCLUSION

APOBEC mutational signatures related to upregulated TGFβ and EMT, could serve as an independent risk factor for BM and BM-free survival in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients. Further investigations are warranted to tailor personalized treatments to improve the susceptible patient's outcomes.

Osimertinib plus local treatment for brain metastases versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is highly effective for brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unclear whether local treatment (LT) for BMs prior to osimertinib administration improves survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We aimed to reveal the survival benefit of upfront local treatment (LT) for BMs in patients treated with osimertinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with EGFR mutation (19del or L858R)-positive NSCLC who had BMs before osimertinib initiation between August 2018 and October 2021. We compared overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) between patients who received upfront LT for BMs (the upfront LT group), and patients who received osimertinib only (the osimertinib-alone group). Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients analyzed, 57 and 64 patients had 19del and L858R, respectively. Forty-five and 76 patients were included in the upfront LT group and the osimertinib-alone groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the OS of the upfront LT group was significantly longer than that of the osimertinib-alone group (median, 95 % confidence intervals [95 %CI]: Not reached [NR], NR-NR vs. 31.2, 21.7-33.2; p = 0.021). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and CNS-PFS was 0.37 (95 %CI, 0.16-0.87) and 0.36 (95 %CI, 0.15-0.87), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS and CNS-PFS of patients who received upfront LT for BMs followed by osimertinib were significantly longer than those of patients who received osimertinib alone. Upfront LT for BMs may be beneficial in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Clinical Management of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain Metastases, and Actionable Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, and approximately 20% have brain metastases (BrMs) at diagnosis. During the disease course, 25-50% of patients will develop BrMs. Despite available treatments, survival rates for patients with NSCLC and BrMs remain low, and their overall prognosis is poor. Even with newer agents for NSCLC, options for treating BrMs can be limited by their ineffective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique brain tumor microenvironment. The presence of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) is a key determinant of optimal treatment selection, which aims to maximize responses and minimize toxicities. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to understand the current landscape of the clinical management of patients with NSCLC and BrMs, particularly those with AGAs.

METHOD

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant SLR was conducted to identify studies in patients with BrMs in NSCLC. Searches used the EMBASE and MEDLINE® databases, and articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 26, 2022 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 studies were included in the SLR. This subset review focused on 80 studies that included patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], two single-arm studies, and 59 observational studies). Sixty-four of the 80 studies reported on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 14 on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, and two on both alterations. Ninety-five percent of studies evaluated targeted therapy. All RCTs allowed patients with previously treated, asymptomatic, or neurologically stable BrMs; the percentage of asymptomatic BrMs varied across observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although targeted therapies demonstrate systemic benefits for patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs, there remains a continued need for effective therapies to treat and prevent BrMs in this population. Increased BBB permeability of emerging therapies may improve outcomes for this population.

Osimertinib readministration for central nervous system metastases in non-small cell lung cancer positive for EGFR activating mutations

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib shows pronounced efficacy for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including associated central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Tumors inevitably develop resistance to the drug, however. Osimertinib is sometimes readministered after completion of standard chemotherapy. To clarify which patients might receive benefit from osimertinib readministration, we have retrospectively assessed its efficacy with a focus on CNS metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed for 21 patients who underwent osimertinib readministration at Kyushu University Hospital between March 2016 and April 2023. CNS metastases were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

RESULTS

Among the 21 enrolled patients, 16 individuals had target lesions on the basis of RECIST. One (6.3%) of these 16 patients achieved a partial response to osimertinib readministration, with the remaining 15 patients showing stable or progressive disease. The median overall progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival for all 21 patients were 3.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. The efficacy of osimertinib readministration for CNS metastases was evaluable in eight patients including five individuals with leptomeningeal metastases. The objective response rate for CNS metastases and the improvement rate for leptomeningeal metastases were both 100%. The median PFS with regard to CNS or non-CNS lesions for these eight patients was 24.7 and 10.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib readministration showed limited efficacy for non-CNS lesions but excellent efficacy for CNS metastases, suggesting that such treatment is an option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with CNS metastases.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Focusing on EGFR-Mutant Tumors

Druggable oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer has led to innovative systemic treatment options, improving patients' outcome. This benefit is not only achieved in the metastatic setting but also in the postsurgical setting, such as in lung cancers harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK-rearrangement. To enhance the outcome of these patients, we need to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance and evaluate the role of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment landscape. In this chapter, we review treatment strategies of EGFR-mutant tumors in all stages, the mechanisms of acquired strategies, and novel therapies in this subset.

Combinatorial Approaches for Chemotherapies and Targeted Therapies With Radiation: United Efforts to Innovate in Patient Care

Combinatorial therapies consisting of radiation therapy (RT) with systemic therapies, particularly chemotherapy and targeted therapies, have moved the needle to augment disease control across nearly all disease sites for locally advanced disease. Evaluating these important combinations to incorporate more potent therapies with RT will aid our understanding of toxicity and efficacy for patients. This article discusses multiple disease sites and includes a compilation of contributions from expert Red Journal editors from each disease site. Leveraging improved systemic control with novel agents, we must continue efforts to study novel treatment combinations with RT.

Long-term survival in patients with brain metastases-clinical characterization of a rare scenario

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess clinical, treatment, and prognostic features in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors achieving long-term survival (LTS). Further, the accuracy of diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment scores (ds-GPA) to predict LTS was evaluated.

METHODS

Patients admitted for radiotherapy of BM between 2010 and 2020 at a large tertiary cancer center with survival of at least 3 years from diagnosis of BM were included. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and ds-GPA were compiled retrospectively.

RESULTS

From a total of 1248 patients with BM, 61 (4.9%) survived ≥ 3 years. In 40 patients, detailed patient charts were available. Among LTS patients, median survival time from diagnosis of BM was 51.5 months. Most frequent primary tumors were lung cancer (45%), melanoma (20%), and breast cancer (17.5%). At the time of diagnosis of BM, 11/40 patients (27.5%) had oligometastatic disease. Estimated mean survival time based on ds-GPA was 19.7 months (in 8 cases estimated survival < 12 months). Resection followed by focal or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was often applied (60%), followed by primary stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (20%) or WBRT (20%). 80% of patients received systemic treatment, appearing particularly active in specifically altered non-small lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and HER2-positive breast cancer. Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and the presence of oligometastatic disease at BM diagnosis were persisting prognostic factors in LTS patients.

CONCLUSION

In this monocentric setting reflecting daily pattern of care, LTS with BM is heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Effective local treatment and modern systemic therapies often appear crucial for LTS. The impact of concomitant diseases and frailty is not clear.

Brain metastases in patients with salivary duct carcinoma: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a high-grade adenocarcinoma with a 5-year survival rate of 40%. Although drug therapy has improved patients' prognosis, the impact of brain metastasis (BM) remains poorly understood. We aimed to retrospectively examine the incidence of BM in patients with SDC (n = 464) and develop a tool to estimate their prognoses.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 464 patients with SDC enrolled in a multicenter study. We investigated the incidence of BM, overall survival (OS) rates, and factors affecting prognosis in patients with BM. We also developed an SDC-graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score for disease prognostication.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (14%) patients had BM. The median OS (mOS) was 13.1 months. On univariate and multivariate analyses, factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >1, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative status, and locoregional uncontrolled disease were associated with poor OS. SDC-GPA scores according to the prognostic factors were 0, 1, 2, and 3 points, and mOS estimates were 50.5, 16.1, 3.9, and 1.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SDC-GPA score emerged as a useful prognostication tool for patients with BM.

[Advances in the targeted treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) paradigmatically shows the potential of personalized and therefore precise cancer treatment. For around one third of the patients, predominantly suffering from adenocarcinoma, targetable driver mutations could be characterized in the meantime. Targeted therapies, mostly with kinase inhibitors, achieve impressive advances in the prolongation of overall survival often over many years and excellent quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted treatment is also increasingly evaluated as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in early inoperable stages of NSCLC. An absolute prerequisite for the use of personalized treatment is upfront broad molecular diagnostics before the decision on first line treatment. The limitations of personalized treatment are the so far unavoidable development of resistance mutations and increasing clonal heterogeneity during the course of the treatment. Approaches to further improve treatment results comprise the development of next-generation inhibitors, the combination of targeted substances, also with chemotherapy and the use of new immunoconjugates.

Lessons from ADAURA: Can we improve on a positive trial?

Although ADAURA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02511106) was a positive trial that produced a significant improvement in both disease‐free survival and overall survival, the limited crossover to postprotocol osimertinib and some other methodological issues detract from the cancer community’s ability to distinguish the benefits of timing of osimertinib versus overall access to osimertinib at a later point. Discrete refinements can be applied to global, randomized phase 3 trials to ensure their design optimally addresses the key clinical question while reducing disparities in best management practices based on resources across health care systems.

CNS Efficacy of Osimertinib With or Without Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

We report CNS efficacy of first-line osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the phase III FLAURA2 study according to baseline CNS metastasis status.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed (combination) or osimertinib monotherapy until disease progression or discontinuation. Brain scans were performed in all patients at baseline and progression and at scheduled assessments until progression for patients with baseline CNS metastases; scans were assessed by neuroradiologist CNS blinded independent central review (BICR).

RESULTS

On the basis of baseline CNS BICR, 118 of 279 (combination) and 104 of 278 (monotherapy) randomly assigned patients had ≥one measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesion and were included in the CNS full analysis set (cFAS); 40 of 118 and 38 of 104 had ≥one measurable target CNS lesion and were included in the post hoc CNS evaluable-for-response set (cEFR). In the cFAS, the hazard ratio (HR) for CNS progression or death was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.01). In patients without baseline CNS metastases, the HR for CNS progression or death was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.43 to 1.04). In the cFAS, CNS objective response rates (ORRs; 95% CI) were 73% (combination; 64 to 81) versus 69% (monotherapy; 59 to 78); 59% versus 43% had CNS complete response (CR). In the cEFR, CNS ORRs (95% CI) were 88% (73 to 96) versus 87% (72 to 96); 48% versus 16% had CNS CR.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed demonstrated improved CNS efficacy compared with osimertinib monotherapy, including delaying CNS progression, irrespective of baseline CNS metastasis status. These data support this combination as a new first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases.

Rate of pachymeningeal failure following adjuvant WBRT vs SRS in patients with brain metastases

Background

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has supplanted whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as standard-of-care adjuvant treatment following surgery for brain metastasis (BrM). Concomitant with the adoption of adjuvant SRS, a new pattern of failure termed "Pachymeningeal failure" (PMF) has emerged.

Methods

We reviewed a prospective registry of 264 BrM patients; 145 and 119 were treated adjuvantly with WBRT and SRS, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify variables correlating to outcomes. Outcomes were calculated using the cumulative incidence (CI) method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were done to identify factors associated with PMF.

Results

CI of PMF was 2 % and 18 % at 12 months, and 2 % and 23 % at 24 months for WRBT and SRS, respectively (p < 0.001). The CI of classic leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 3 % and 4 % at 12 months, and 6 % and 6 % at 24 months for WBRT and SRS, respectively (P = 0.67). On UVA, adjuvant SRS [HR 9.75 (3.43-27.68) (P < 0.001)]; preoperative dural contact (PDC) [HR 6.78 (1.64-28.10) (P = 0.008)]; GPA score [HR 1.64 (1.11-2.42) (P = 0.012)]; and lung EGFR/ALK status [HR 3.11 (1.02-9.45) (P = 0.045)]; were associated with PMF risk. On MVA, adjuvant SRS [HR 8.15 (2.69-24.7) (P < 0.001)]; and PDC [HR 6.28 (1.51-26.1) (P = 0.012)] remained associated with PMF.

Conclusions

Preoperative dural contact and adjuvant SRS instead of adjuvant WBRT were associated with an increased risk of PMF. Strategies to improve pachymeningeal radiation coverage to sterilize at risk pachymeninges should be investigated.

A Phase II trial of alternating osimertinib and gefitinib therapy in advanced EGFR-T790M positive non-small cell lung cancer: OSCILLATE

In this phase II, single arm trial (ACTRN12617000720314), we investigate if alternating osimertinib and gefitinib would delay the development of resistance to osimertinib in advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation (n = 47) by modulating selective pressure on resistant clones. The primary endpoint is progression free-survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, and secondary endpoints include: feasibility of alternating therapy, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 12-month PFS rate is 38% (95% CI 27.5-55), not meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis reveals decrease and clearance of the original activating EGFR and EGFR-T790M mutations which are prognostic of clinical outcomes. In 73% of participants, loss of T790M ctDNA is observed at progression and no participants have evidence of the EGFR C797S resistance mutation following the alternating regimen. These findings highlight the challenges of treatment strategies designed to modulate clonal evolution and the clinical importance of resistance mechanisms beyond suppression of selected genetic mutations in driving therapeutic escape to highly potent targeted therapies.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Future Possibilities

Glioblastoma, a grade 4 glioma as per the World Health Organization, poses a challenge in adult primary brain tumor management despite advanced surgical techniques and multimodal therapies. This review delves into the potential of targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with small-molecule inhibitors and antibodies as a treatment strategy. EGFR, a mutationally active receptor tyrosine kinase in over 50% of glioblastoma cases, features variants like EGFRvIII, EGFRvII and missense mutations, necessitating a deep understanding of their structures and signaling pathways. Although EGFR inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in other cancers, their application in glioblastoma is hindered by blood-brain barrier penetration and intrinsic resistance. The evolving realm of nanodrugs and convection-enhanced delivery offers promise in ensuring precise drug delivery to the brain. Critical to success is the identification of glioblastoma patient populations that benefit from EGFR inhibitors. Tools like radiolabeled anti-EGFR antibody 806i facilitate the visualization of EGFR conformations, aiding in tailored treatment selection. Recognizing the synergistic potential of combination therapies with downstream targets like mTOR, PI3k, and HDACs is pivotal for enhancing EGFR inhibitor efficacy. In conclusion, the era of precision oncology holds promise for targeting EGFR in glioblastoma, contingent on tailored treatments, effective blood-brain barrier navigation, and the exploration of synergistic therapies.

A new, potential and safe neoadjuvant therapy strategy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive resectable non-small-cell lung cancer-targeted therapy: a retrospective study

Background

Studies of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been conducted. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the benefits of osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Method

This retrospective study evaluated patients with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21 who received targeted therapy with osimertinib (80 mg per day) before surgery between January 2019 and October 2023 in Henan Cancer Hospital.

Results

Twenty patients were evaluated, all of whom underwent surgery. The rate of R0 resection was 100% (20/20). The objective response rate was 80% (16/20), and the disease control rate was 95% (19/20). Postoperative pathological analysis showed a 25% (5/20) major pathological response rate and 15% (3/20) pathological complete response rate. In total, 25% (5/20) developed adverse events (AEs), and the rate of grades 3-4 AEs was 10% (2/20). One patient experienced a grade 3 skin rash, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea.

Conclusion

Osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC is safe and well tolerated. Osimertinib has the potential to improve the radical resection rate and prognosis.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of brain oligometastases

The management of patients with brain oligometastases is complex and relies on specific reasoning compared to extracranial oligometastases. The levels of evidence are still low because patients with brain oligometastases are frequently excluded from randomized clinical trials. Stereotactic radiotherapy should be preferred in this indication over whole brain irradiation, both for patients with metastases in place and for those who have undergone surgery. The decision of local treatment and its timing must be a multidisciplinary reflection taking into account the histological and molecular characteristics of the tumor as well as the intracranial efficacy of the prescribed systemic treatments. Great caution must be observed when using stereotactic radiotherapy and concomitant systemic treatments because interactions are still poorly documented. We present the recommendations of the French society of radiation oncology on the management of brain oligometastatic patients with radiotherapy.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

Brain metastases and next-generation anticancer therapies: a survival guide for clinicians

Historically, patients with brain metastases (BMs) have been characterized by few systemic treatment options and poor prognosis. The recent introduction of next-generation anticancer therapies such as molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have revolutionized the clinical decision-making process of this sub-population, posing new challenges to physicians. In this review, current evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in patients with BMs are discussed, with a focus on lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, providing suggestions and potential workflows for daily clinical practice. Several other on-going and future challenges, such as clinical trials design, ways to improve CNS penetration of novel drugs and unique molecular characteristics of BMs, are also discussed. The aim is producing an updated and easy-to-read guide for physicians, to improve decision-making in clinical practice.

Distinct Progression and Efficacy of First-Line Osimertinib Treatment According to Mutation Subtypes in Metastatic NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations

Introduction

Osimertinib (OSI), a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients with naive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nevertheless, information on how the mutation subtype affects disease progression after the failure of OSI treatment is scarce.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received OSI as a first-line treatment between April 2015 and December 2021.

Results

This study included 229 patients. The objective response rate was 71%, with intracranial and extracranial response rates of 71% and 90%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 23.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.6-26.7), and the median overall survival was 33.7 mo (95% CI: 31.3-58.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.34, p = 0.0328) and liver metastasis (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.53-4.49, p = 0.0004) were significant predictors of progression-free survival in OSI treatment. The concomitant disease progression involving the central nervous system metastasis was significantly more common in patients with L858R (p = 0.048), whereas concomitant disease progression involving primary lesions was significantly more common in patients with exon 19 deletion mutation (p = 0.01). In addition, the probability of disease progression over time was higher for L858R compared with that for exon 19 deletion mutation, in patients with central nervous system metastasis (log-rank test, p = 0.027).

Conclusions

The mutation subtype had an impact not only on the clinical outcome of the first-line OSI treatment but also on progression patterns after OSI treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Modeling to Predict Disease Progression in First-Line Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This exploratory, post hoc analysis aimed to model circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and predict disease progression in patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm)-positive non-small cell lung cancer, from the FLAURA trial (NCT02296125). Patients were randomized 1:1 and received osimertinib 80 mg once daily (q.d.) or comparator EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib 250 mg q.d. or erlotinib 150 mg q.d.). Plasma was collected at baseline and multiple timepoints until treatment discontinuation. Patients with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) imaging data and detectable EGFR mutations (Ex19del/L858R) at baseline and ≥ 3 additional timepoints were evaluable. Joint modeling was conducted to characterize the relationship between longitudinal changes in ctDNA and probability of progression-free survival (PFS). A Bayesian joint model of ctDNA and PFS was developed solving differential equations with the ctDNA dynamics and the PFS time-to-event probability. Of 556 patients, 353 had detectable ctDNA at baseline. Evaluable patients (with available imaging and ≥ 3 additional timepoints, n = 320; ctDNA set) were divided into training (n = 259) and validation (n = 61) sets. In the validation set, the model predicted a median PFS of 17.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-28.3) for osimertinib (n = 23) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-14.8) for comparator (n = 38), consistent with observed RECIST PFS (16.4 months and 9.7, respectively). The model demonstrates that EGFRm ctDNA dynamics can predict the risk of disease progression in this patient population and could be used to predict RECIST-defined disease progression.

Spinal Cord Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

This article discusses the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected neoplasms of the spinal cord and reviews the most common primary and metastatic spinal neoplasms and their presentations.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Neoplasms of the spinal cord are rare entities that can involve the spinal cord parenchyma, the dura and leptomeninges, or the extradural space. The most common intramedullary spinal cord neoplasms are primary spinal cord tumors, including ependymomas, pilocytic astrocytomas, and diffuse midline gliomas. The most common primary neoplasms of the spine are intradural extramedullary spinal meningiomas, whereas primary neoplasms of the leptomeninges are rare. Advances in molecular characterization of spinal cord tumors and recent clinical trials of these rare entities are expanding the repertoire of systemic therapy options for primary spinal cord neoplasms. Metastases to the spine most often affect the extradural space. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression is a neurologic emergency that requires a rapid, multidisciplinary response to preserve neurologic function.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neurologists should understand the diagnostic approach to neoplasms of the spinal cord. Knowledge of the most common spinal cord neoplasms will allow for appropriate management and optimal patient care.

Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Adjuvant Osimertinib in Patients With Stage IB to IIIA EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC After Complete Tumor Resection: ADAURA China Subgroup Analysis

Introduction

In Chinese patients with NSCLC, prevalence of EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) disease is high. In the global phase 3 ADAURA study (NCT02511106), adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC. We present efficacy and safety data from a subgroup analysis of 159 Chinese patients enrolled in the People's Republic of China from ADAURA.

Methods

In ADAURA, patients with completely resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R) NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 years or until disease recurrence/discontinuation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted before randomization, per physician/patient choice. Primary end point was investigator-assessed DFS in stage II to IIIA disease; secondary end points included DFS in stage IB to IIIA (overall population), overall survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety.

Results

Of 682 patients enrolled globally, 159 patients in the People's Republic of China were included in this subgroup analysis (osimertinib n = 77; placebo n = 82). Baseline characteristics were balanced across the treatment arms. At data cutoff, stage II to IIIA DFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.42; maturity 59%); stage IB to IIIA DFS HR was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.17-0.48; maturity 42%). At 13% maturity (21 deaths), HR for overall survival in the stage IB to IIIA population was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.21-1.20). HRQoL was maintained from baseline, and safety was consistent with the global population.

Conclusions

In this population of Chinese patients from ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a clinically meaningful improvement in DFS versus placebo, with maintained HRQoL and a safety profile consistent with the global study population.

An epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patient with brain lesions resisted to osimertinib monotherapy but achieved more than 4 years of survival in osimertinib plus bevacizumab metronomic treatment

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been identified as promising therapeutic targets for non-small cell lung cancer. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeting drug, has good anti-tumor ability and excellent intracranial effects. However, management of osimertinib resistance is a clinical challenge. The clinical benefit of osimertinib combined with the antiangiogenic drug, bevacizumab, remains to be determined.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old female with right lung adenocarcinoma (cT2aN3M1c, IVb) was confirmed positive for EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (c.2235_2249del, 1.3%). After receiving 5 months of osimertinib (80 mg, qd) therapy, the patient's disease progressed and she subsequently accepted treatment with osimertinib (80 mg, qd) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, q21d) and achieved notable clinical remission for 23 months until renal impairment occurred, after which bevacizumab was discontinued. The patient had 6 months of remission before progression, after which bevacizumab was added again. To date, the disease has been under control. The brain lesion showed partial response again, and the side effects of bevacizumab were tolerable. The overall survival time exceeded 4 years.

Conclusion

This case report describes a treatment strategy for osimertinib-resistant patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations. Metronomic treatment with osimertinib plus bevacizumab was achieved for more than 4 years.

The efficacy of upfront craniocerebral radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

The present study aims to investigate the therapeutic value of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with cranial radiotherapy (RT) in patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs).

Methodology

This is a retrospective study that involved 213 patients with EGFR-NSCLC and BMs, with the patients divided into two groups: the upfront cranial RT (ucRT) group (n = 96) and the non-ucRT group (n = 117). All patients were administered with osimertinib, and those in the ucRT group also underwent RT. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (IPFS) of the two groups were compared.

Results

The ucRT group manifested a markedly higher IPFS than the non-ucRT group (29.65 months vs 21.8 months; P < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis revealed that patients with oligometastases (OLOGO-BMs; 1-3 BMs) demonstrated a notably longer OS (44.5 months vs 37.3 months; P < 0.0001), PFS (32.3 months vs 20.8 months; P = 0.6884) and IPFS (37.8 months vs 22.1 months; P < 0.0001) in the ucRT group than in the non-ucRT group. However, for patients with multiple BMs, there was no significant difference in OS (27.3 months vs 34.4 months; P = 0.0710) and PFS (13.7 months vs 13.2 months; P = 0.0516) between the ucRT group and the non-ucRT group; the ucRT group exhibited a higher IPFS (26.4 months vs 21.35 months; P = 0.0028). Cox's multivariate analysis of patients with OLOGO-BM indicated that the use of ucRT was linked to a better OS (heart rate [HR] = 0.392; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.178-0.863; P = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 0.558; 95% CI: 0.316-0.986; P = 0.044).

Conclusion

Upfront cerebral cranial stereotactic radiosurgery can improve outcomes in EGFR-positive patients with NSCLC and OLOGO-BM. However, for patients with multiple BMs, the preferable strategy may be pre-treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

First-Line Osimertinib for Previously Untreated Patients With NSCLC and Uncommon EGFR Mutations: The UNICORN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon EGFR mutations is a rare subgroup, composing 14% of all EGFR mutations.

Objective

To determine the usefulness of osimertinib in previously untreated patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, excluding exon 20 insertion mutations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, open-label, single-group, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients from April 10, 2020, to May 31, 2022, with a follow-up of 6 months from the date the last patient was enrolled. The study enrolled 42 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations, of whom 40 were eligible.

Intervention

Osimertinib, 80 mg once daily, was administered orally to patients.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), and safety of osimertinib. Patients were included in the study on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

Of the 40 eligible patients, 22 were men (55.0%) and the median age was 72 years (range, 39.0-88.0 years). The most common mutations were G719X (20 [50.0%]), S768I (10 [25.0%]), and L861Q (8 [20.0%]). The ORR was 55.0% (90% CI, 40.9%-68.5%) and the DCR was 90.0% (95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%). The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-15.2 months) after a median follow-up of 12.7 months (range, 2.7-30.7 months). The median TTF was 9.5 months (95% CI, 5.6-30.3 months), median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 19.3 months to NR), and median DoR was 22.7 months (95% CI, 9.5 months to NR). The ORR for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 45.5% (90% CI, 26.9%-65.3%) and 66.7% (90% CI, 43.7%-83.7%), respectively. Median PFS for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.6-22.7 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 months to NR), respectively. Median OS for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 23.0 months (95% CI, 12.3 months to NR) and NR, respectively. Median DoR for patients with solitary or compound uncommon EGFR mutations was 22.7 months (95% CI, 3.6-22.7 months) or NR (95% CI, 5.7 months to NR), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported by 11 patients (27.5%), and 5 patients (12.5%) developed interstitial lung disease. All adverse events were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions and Relevance

Osimertinib showed clinical activity with manageable toxic effects among previously untreated patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations other than exon 20 insertion mutations. The results support the use of osimertinib as a treatment option for this patient population.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs071200002.

Prevalence of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: Treatment implications for resource-constrained settings

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are common in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, routine neuroimaging in asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC is controversial as there is no conclusive evidence of benefit from the detection and treatment of asymptomatic BM. Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic BM and its treatment implications in a resource-limited setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) were included. Subjects who already had clinical or radiological features suggestive of BM were excluded from the study. All eligible subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Management of the detected BM was at the discretion of the treating clinicians.

RESULTS

Among 809 subjects who were screened, 100 (12.4%) were included in the study and underwent MRI. BM was present in 30 (30%) of the subjects and absent in the remaining 70 subjects. A majority of BM were multiple (70%), involved the frontal lobe commonly (73.3%), and had a mean (standard deviation) size of 13.2 (7.3) mm. Detection of BM resulted in a treatment alteration in 17 (17%) of the study subjects (brain irradiation, n = 17, change in targeted therapy, n = 3) with BM. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent treatment alteration for management of BM compared to those who did not ( P = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-third of patients with metastatic NS-NSCLC had BM in MRI despite the absence of symptoms. Despite treatment of the majority of the patients with BM with brain irradiation, there was no demonstrable survival benefit. Hence, we conclude that although routine neuroimaging of asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC may result in treatment alteration (primarily brain irradiation) in a small proportion of patients, it may not influence outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Targeted treatment for unresectable EGFR mutation-positive stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Emerging evidence and future perspectives

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in up to one third of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC is consolidation durvalumab for patients who have not progressed following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (the 'PACIFIC regimen'). However, the benefit of immunotherapy, specifically in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) tumors, is not well characterized, and this treatment approach is not recommended in these patients, based on a recent ESMO consensus statement. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. The benefits of these agents have also translated to patients with EGFRm early-stage resectable disease as adjuvant therapy. The role of EGFR-TKIs has yet to be prospectively characterized in the unresectable setting. Preliminary efficacy signals for EGFR-TKIs in unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC have been reported from a limited number of subgroup and retrospective studies. Several clinical trials are ongoing assessing the safety and efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in this patient population. Here, we review the current management of unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC. We outline the rationale for investigating EGFR-TKI strategies in this setting and discuss ongoing studies. Finally, we discuss the evidence gaps and future challenges for treating patients with unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC.

Therapeutic role of EGFR - Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a significant complication that advances fast and has a poor prognosis for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Current therapies for LM are inconsistent and ineffective, and established techniques such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery continue to fall short of potential outcomes. Nonetheless, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exhibit potent anti-tumor activity and hold considerable promise for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Thus, assessing EGFR-TKIs effectiveness in treating these central nervous system (CNS) problems is crucial. This review integrates current literature on the intracranial efficacy of EGFR-TKIs to explore the varying impacts of approved EGFR-TKIs in LM patients and the therapeutic possibilities presented by other EGFR-TKIs in development. To delineate the optimal clinical treatment strategy, further exploration is needed regarding the optimal sequencing of EGFR-TKIs and the selection of alternative therapy options following initial treatment failure with EGFR-TKIs.

TARGET: A Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of 5-Year Adjuvant Osimertinib in Completely Resected EGFR-Mutated Stage II to IIIB NSCLC Post Complete Surgical Resection

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is a central nervous system (CNS)-active, third generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present the rationale and design for TARGET (NCT05526755), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 years of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with completely resected EGFRm stage II to IIIB NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TARGET is a phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm study. Adults aged ≥18 years (Taiwan ≥20 years), with resected stage II to IIIB NSCLC are eligible; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. Eligible patients must have locally confirmed common (exon 19 deletion or L858R) or uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and/or S768I) EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations, alone or in combination. Patients will receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily for 5 years or until disease recurrence, discontinuation or death. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort). Secondary endpoints include: investigator-assessed DFS at 3 and 4 years; overall survival at 3, 4, and 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort); DFS at 3, 4, and 5 years (uncommon EGFR mutations cohort); safety and tolerability, type of recurrence and CNS metastases (both cohorts). Exploratory endpoints include: tissue/plasma concordance; analysis of circulating molecules in plasma samples using different profiling approaches to detect minimal residual disease; incidence and change over time of incidental pulmonary nodules.

RESULTS

TARGET is currently recruiting, and completion is expected in 2029.

Patterns of progression on first line osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Swiss cohort study

AIM

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer as first-line treatment. However, treatment resistance inevitably emerges and may present as oligo-progressive disease (OPD) or systemic progressive disease (SPD). The incidence of OPD on first-line osimertinib is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received first-line osimertinib at 13 Swiss centers. The rate of OPD (PD in ≤ 5 lesions) and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the 148 patients was 68.2 years (range. 38.0-93.3). There were 62 % females, 83 % with a PS ≤ 1, 59 % never smokers, 57 % of patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion and 37 % with EGFR p.L858R exon 21. 77 % experienced OPD. Median overall survival (OS) was 51.6 months (95 % CI, 38.4-65.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.2 (95 % CI, 14.3-23.5) and 8.7 (95 % CI, 2.8-15.6) months for patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with OPD compared to SPD had a significantly longer time to treatment failure and longer OS of (22.9 vs. 10.8 months, p < 0.001 and 51.6 vs. 26.4 months, p = 0.004, respectively). The most common organ sites of PD were lung (62 %), brain (30 %), lymph nodes (30 %), bone (27 %) and pleura (27 %). Twenty-six patients (45 %) with OPD received local ablative treatment (LAT). The OS of OPD patients with LAT was 60.0 (95 % CI, 51.6-NA) vs. 51.4 (95 % CI 38.4-65.3) months (p = 0.43) without LAT.

CONCLUSION

The rate of OPD of patients receiving first line osimertinib was 77 %. Patients with OPD had a significantly better OS compared to patients with SPD (51.6 vs. 26.4 months). Patients with OPD receiving LAT had the longest median OS (60.0 months).

Is oligoprogression a potentially curable disease in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma?

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown impressive results in EGFR mutant lung cancer (LC) patients in terms of disease control rate with a positive impact on overall survival. Nevertheless, after months of treatment with targeted therapy, progression inevitably occurs. Some patients develop oligoprogression and local treatment is required for optimal disease control while maintaining EGFR-TKIs. This work features a clinical case of a patient harboring an EGFR mutant LC undergoing oligoprogression to EGFR-TKIs, first into the brain and afterward to the primary tumor, requiring local ablative strategies, including primary tumor resection three years after the start of osimertinib. Currently, the patient is still alive and continues with a complete response upon EGFR-TKIs maintenance. Hence, oligoprogression, even in driven oncogenic tumors, represents a distinct biological entity and potential curative disease that deserves particular consideration in multidisciplinary tumor boards. In this case, tumor primary resection after three years of the initial diagnosis represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of EGFR mutant patients.

Successful treatment of a patient with NSCLC carrying uncommon compound L861Q/G719X epidermal growth factor receptor mutations using Afatinib

The availability of targeted therapies for molecular aberrations have substantially improved the outcomes of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring sensitive mutations. However, patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations such as G719X and L861Q often resulted in a lack of response to the first and third generation of EGFR TKIs. In this study, we reported a 64-year-old female patient, who initially presented with symptoms of pneumonia and showed positive response to anti-infection treatment, eventually diagnosed with stage Ⅳ lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) harboring a rare EGFR G719X and L861Q compound mutations. The patient received 40 mg/day of afatinib and experienced no severe adverse events. As a result, partial response (PR) was observed based on CT scan and a progression free survival of 24 month was achieved. Her follow-up is still ongoing. The results of the present case support the effectiveness and safety of afatinib in LUAD patients carrying EGFR G719X and L861Q compound mutations.

Intracranial Outcomes of De Novo Brain Metastases Treated With Osimertinib Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Introduction

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC have a high incidence of brain metastases. The EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib has intracranial activity, making the role of local central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapies, such as radiation and surgery, less clear.

Methods

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases who received osimertinib as initial therapy after brain metastasis diagnosis were included. Individual lesion responses were assessed using adapted RANO-BM criteria. CNS progression and local progression of brain metastasis from osimertinib start were analyzed using cumulative incidence treating death as a competing risk. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

There were 36 patients who had a median interval from brain metastasis diagnosis to first-line osimertinib initiation of 25 days. In total, 136 previously untreated brain metastases were tracked from baseline. Overall, 105 lesions (77.2%) had complete response and 31 had partial response reflecting best objective response of 100%. Best response occurred at a median of 96 days (range: 28-1113 d) from baseline magnetic resonance imaging. This reflects a best objective response rate of 100%. Two-year overall survival was 80%. CNS progression rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-years post-osimertinib were 21%, 32%, and 41%, respectively. Lesion-level local failure was estimated to be 0.7% and 4.7% at 1- and 2-years post-osimertinib, respectively. No clinicodemographic factors including brain metastasis number were associated with post-osimertinib progression.

Conclusions

Intracranial response to osimertinib is excellent for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with de novo, previously untreated brain metastases. Very low local failure rates support a strategy of upfront osimertinib alone in selected patients.

Management of Brain Metastases: A Review of Novel Therapies

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and most commonly originate from lung, followed by breast, melanoma, kidney, and colorectal cancer. Management of BM is individualized based on the size and number of brain metastases, the extent of extracranial disease, the primary tumor subtype, neurological symptoms, and prior lines of therapy. Until recently, treatment strategies were limited to local therapies, like surgical resection and radiotherapy, the latter in the form of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. The next generation of local strategies includes laser interstitial thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermic therapy, post-resection brachytherapy, and focused ultrasound. New targeted therapies and immunotherapies with documented intracranial activity have transformed clinical outcomes. Novel systemic therapies with intracranial utility include new anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors like brigatinib and ensartinib; selective "rearranged during transfection" inhibitors like selpercatinib and pralsetinib; B-raf proto-oncogene inhibitors like encorafenib and vemurafenib; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene inhibitors like sotorasib and adagrasib; ROS1 gene rearrangement (ROS1) inhibitors, anti-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase agents like larotrectinib and entrectinib; anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 agent like poziotinib; and antibody-drug conjugates like trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. This review highlights the modern multidisciplinary management of BM, emphasizing the integration of systemic and local therapies.

Dacomitinib in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a single-arm, phase II study

INTRODUCTION

Dacomitinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in the ARCHER1050 study. However, because that study did not include patients with brain metastases, the efficacy of dacomitinib in patients with brain metastases has not been clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-arm phase II study enrolled 30 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations from January 2021 to June 2021 and started them on dacomitinib (45 mg/day). All patients had non-irradiated brain metastases with a diameter of ≥5 mm. The primary endpoint was confirmed intracranial objective response rate (iORR).

RESULTS

Patients had exon 19 deletions (46.7%) and L858R mutations in exon 21 (55.3%). The confirmed iORR was 96.7% (29/30), with an intracranial complete response of 63.3%. Median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was not reached, with 12- and 18-month iPFS rates of 78.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.8% to 95.4%] and 70.4% (95% CI 54.9% to 90.1%), respectively. In the competing risk analysis, the 12-month cumulative incidence of intracranial progression was 16.7%. Regarding the overall efficacy for intracranial and extracranial lesions, the overall ORR was 96.7%, and the median PFS was 17.5 months (95% CI 15.2 months-not reached). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16.7% of patients, and 83.3% required a reduced dacomitinib dose to manage adverse events. However, none permanently discontinued dacomitinib treatment due to treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacomitinib has outstanding intracranial efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases.

Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Atypical EGFR Mutations

OPINION STATEMENT

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) should always be considered when treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atypical EGFR mutations. The first choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation(s) present and its effect on structure and function of the EGFR protein. Afatinib is the only EGFR TKI currently FDA approved for atypical EGFR mutations and has the strongest data to support its use in PACC mutations, a subgroup of atypical EGFR mutations which includes G719X and S7681. Dacomitinib may also be an option for these mutations given similar efficacy to afatinib. In contrast, for classical-like mutations such as L861Q, osimertinib should be considered the first choice given that their behavior mimics that of the classical mutations exon 19 deletion and L858R. Osimertinib should also be utilized in the setting of a concurrent T790M mutation. Superior CNS penetrance and well managed toxicity profile may also be reasons to consider osimertinib. Given that the choice of TKI may depend on the specific mutation, it is crucial that every patient diagnosed with NSCLC undergo comprehensive sequencing to identify these mutations.

Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response.

RESULTS

Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3-NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8-NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses.

A Phase 2 Single-Arm Study of Osimertinib for Radiotherapy-Naive Central Nervous System Metastasis NSCLC: Results for the First-Line Cohort of the OCEAN Study (LOGIK 1603/WJOG 9116L)

Introduction

Osimertinib may be effective in treating central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, but its efficacy in treating radiation therapy (RT)-naive metastasis is unclear. The OCEAN study assessed the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis in patients previously treated (T790M cohort) and untreated patients (first-line cohort) with EGFR mutation. Here, we report the results of the first-line cohort.

Methods

Previously untreated patients with RT-naive CNS metastasis and EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were treated with osimertinib. The brain metastasis response rate (BMRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in the first-line cohort were secondary end points.

Results

A total of 26 patients were enrolled in the study between September 2019 and July 2020. The median age was 72.0 years with 80.8% female. There were 20 patients who had multiple CNS metastases. BMRR assessed by PAREXEL criteria was 76.9% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 63.3%-90.5%), BMRR assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 76.9% (95% CI: 54.0%-99.8%), and median PFS of CNS metastasis was 22.0 months (95% CI: 9.7 mo-not reached). The overall response rate was 64.0% (95% CI: 45.2%-82.8%), median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 6.9 mo-not reached), and median survival time was 23.7 months (95% CI: 16.5 mo-not reached). Paronychia and increased creatinine level were the most frequent nonhematological toxicities observed in 13 patients (50%). Grade three and higher adverse events were less than 10%, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Pneumonitis was observed in five patients (19.2%).

Conclusions

These results suggest that osimertinib is effective in untreated patients with RT-naive asymptomatic CNS metastasis in a clinical practice first-line setting.

Trial registration

UMIN identifier: UMIN000024218. jRCT identifier: jRCTs071180017.