Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database

Laparoscopic liver surgery for everyone: the hybrid method

Minimally invasive techniques have been described recently for liver resections. We have developed a surgical approach to liver resection that combines the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with the safety of open liver resection. We have applied this hybrid approach to selected cases, and we feel that it can be adopted by most hepatobiliary surgeons, even those with minimal or no laparoscopic experience. Briefly, this technique consists of laparoscopic mobilization of the target liver lobe, followed by standard open liver resection through the extraction site. The required incisions parallel those needed for hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resections. We have compared these hybrid procedures with contemporaneous laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open liver resections at our institution and have found that they compare favorably with minimally invasive procedures. A wider utilization of this approach by both general and hepatobiliary surgeons will result in a more generalized acceptance of minimally invasive liver resection that ultimately will advance the field and benefit patients in need of liver surgery.

Steatosis predicts postoperative morbidity following hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Few studies are available on the effect of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection for CRLM from January 2000 to September 2005 were identified from a hepatobiliary database. Data analysed included laboratory measurements, extent of hepatic resection, blood transfusion requirements and steatosis.

RESULTS

There were 386 patients with a median age of 66 (range 32-87) years, of whom 201 had at least one co-morbid condition and 194 had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of I. Anatomical resection was performed in 279 patients and non-anatomical resection in 107; 165 had additional procedures. Steatosis in 194 patients was classified as mild in 122, moderate in 60 and severe in 12. The overall morbidity rate was 36 per cent (139 patients) and the mortality rate was 1.8 per cent (seven patients). Admission to the intensive care unit, morbidity, infective complications and biochemical profile changes were associated with greater severity of steatosis. Independent predictors of morbidity were steatosis, extent of hepatic resection and blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Steatosis is associated with increased morbidity following hepatic resection. Other predictors of outcome were extent of hepatic resection and blood transfusion.

Changing trends in surgical outcomes after major hepatobiliary resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience over 25 years

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatobiliary resection (HBR) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCa) remains a technically demanding procedure and is still associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to characterize changes in surgical outcomes following major HBR for HCCa at a single center over a 25-year period.

METHODS

Between 1980 and 2004, 126 patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, portal vein embolization, and major HBR were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the chronological treatment period; i.e., patients who underwent surgery during the initial 20-year period (1980-1999; early group [EG]) and those who underwent surgery during the most recent 5-year period (2000-2004; late group [LG]). Clinicopathological variables were compared retrospectively between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mortality rate improved from 7.9% in the EG to 0% in the LG, but this difference did not reach the level of statistical significance (P = 0.058). The overall survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82.4%, 43.9%, and 35.2%, respectively. The overall survival rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.153). Morbidity was documented in 57.1% of all the patients, and was comparable in the two groups (P = 0.471), but the rate of major morbidity was significantly higher in the EG (P = 0.031). Red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the LG, both in regard to the number of patients and the amount of blood product administered. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced, from 74.4 + -56.3 days in the EG to 29.0 + -11.8 days in the LG (P < 0.001). Sixty-nine patients (54.8%) had stage III or IV disease (according to the General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of the biliary tract of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery), and 55 patients (43.7%) showed positive surgical margins. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of surgical margins or pathological staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements were documented in rates of major morbidity, length of hospital stay, and the mortality rate in the LG when compared with the EG. The overall survival rate was similar in the two groups. Blood transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the LG when compared with the EG. However, the high proportion of patients with positive surgical margins remains a significant problem.

[Surgical resection of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Experience in Sant Pau Hospital]

INTRODUCTION

Surgical resection is the only available treatment that improves survival in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer, particularly when carried out by a multidisciplinary team.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 116 patients who underwent 138 liver resections (65.4% minor and 35.5% major) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer between 1998 and 2004. In 34.5% of the patients, the lesions were synchronous. All patients were individually assessed by a multidisciplinary team. The mean number of metastases removed per patient was 2.43 (range: 1-10). The mean size of the largest tumor per patient was 40 mm (range: 12-90). In 67.3% of the patients, the primary tumor was at an advanced stage (III-IV). In 98% of the patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by helical computed tomography scans/magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity was 31.2% and mortality was 2.2%. A mean of 2.7 units of blood was transfused per patient. Overall 5-year survival was 43.2% (median 50 months). Survival rates varied according to whether the patients had < 4 or > or = 4 colorectal liver metastases (50 and 43 months respectively), tumor size (more or less than 5 cm) (60 and 50.6 months respectively) and whether the site was monolobar or bilobar (60 and 43.11 months respectively). In 16 patients, recurrence of liver metastases led to 22 rehepatectomies. Overall 5-year survival was 36.7% (median 60 months) after the first rehepatectomy but was 36 and 12 months respectively after a second or third rehepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that multidisciplinary decisions and interventions by specialist liver surgeons, as in our hospital, reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase survival in patients requiring surgical removal of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma in a large population

BACKGROUND

Previous reports of liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are typically from single centers and cannot account for selection or referral bias. We measured longterm survival after liver resection for metastatic CRC in the province of Ontario, Canada (population 12 million).

STUDY DESIGN

The Ontario Cancer Registry is an administrative database that links all hospital records, pathology reports, and vital statistics for patients with a diagnosis of cancer. We used the Registry to identify and obtain information on all patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic CRC in calendar years 1996 to 2004. Pathology reports of the original CRC resection and subsequent liver resections were individually reviewed.

RESULTS

Eight hundred forty-one resections were performed at 43 centers across Ontario during the 9-year period, including wedge resection (n = 303; 36%); lobectomy (n = 466; 55%); and trisectionectomy (n = 72; 9%). Ninety-one percent and 54% of resections were performed at teaching and high-volume centers (> 80 resections), respectively. Most liver resections were performed more than 120 days after original CRC operation (672 of 841; 80%). Perioperative mortality was 3%. Unadjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival after liver resection was 88%, 59%, and 43%, respectively. Survival was improved when resection was performed for fewer than 2 tumor nodules, at high-volume centers, or in the years 2001 to 2004.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in this population-based series are consistent with those of single-hospital series assessing longterm survival after liver resection for metastatic CRC. These findings support continued efforts to aggressively identify and resect CRC liver metastases.

Simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety of simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM) is not established. This multi-institutional retrospective study compared postoperative outcomes after simultaneous and staged colorectal and hepatic resections.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data, treatments, and postoperative outcomes from patients who underwent simultaneous or staged colorectal and hepatic resections at three hepatobiliary centers from 1985-2006 were reviewed.

RESULTS

610 patients underwent simultaneous (n = 135) or staged (n = 475) resections of colorectal cancer and SCRLM. Seventy staged patients underwent colorectal and hepatic resections at the same institution. Simultaneous patients had fewer (median 1 versus 2) and smaller (median 2.5 versus 3.5 cm) metastases and less often underwent major (> or = three segments) hepatectomy (26.7% versus 61.3%, p < 0.05). Combined hospital stay was lower after simultaneous resections (median 8.5 versus 14 days, p < 0.0001). Mortality (1.0% versus 0.5%) and severe morbidity (14.1% versus 12.5%) were similar after simultaneous colorectal resection and minor hepatectomy compared with isolated minor hepatectomy (both p > 0.05). For major hepatectomy, simultaneous colorectal resection increased mortality (8.3% versus 1.4%, p < 0.05) and severe morbidity (36.1% versus 15.1%, p < 0.05). Combined severe morbidity after staged resections was lower compared to simultaneous resections (36.1% versus 17.6%, p = 0.05) for major hepatectomy but similar for minor hepatectomy (14.1% versus 10.5%, p > 0.05). Major hepatectomy independently predicted severe morbidity after simultaneous resections [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.4, p = 0.008].

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous colorectal and minor hepatic resections are safe and should be performed for most patients with SCRLM. Due to increased risk of severe morbidity, caution should be exercised before performing simultaneous colorectal and major hepatic resections.

Morbidity and mortality after liver resection: results of the patient safety in surgery study

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is performed with increasing frequency. Nearly all of the published information on operative mortality and morbidity rates associated with liver resection is derived from studies that rely on retrospective data collection from single centers. The goal of this study is to use audited multiinstitutional data from the private sector of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study to characterize complications after liver resection and to identify variables that are associated with 30-day morbidity and mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospectively collected data on liver resection patients from 14 hospitals were collected using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's methodology. Rates of occurrence of 21 defined postoperative complications were measured. Bivariate analyses and stepwise logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with 30-day morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

At least one complication occurred in 22.6% of patients within 30 days. Stepwise logistic regression identified several preoperative factors associated with morbidity, including serum albumin, SGOT > 40, previous cardiac operation, operative work relative value unit, and history of severe COPD. Mortality within 30 days was observed in 2.6% of patients. Factors associated with mortality were found to be male gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher, presence of ascites, dyspnea, and severe COPD. Only 0.7% of patients without any complications died, compared with 9.0% of patients with at least 1 complication (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective, standardized, audited, multiinstitutional data were analyzed to identify several preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with morbidity and mortality after liver resection. These factors should be considered during patient selection and perioperative management.

Prognosis and results after resection of very large (>or=10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Few potentially curative treatment options exist besides resection for patients with very large (>or=10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We sought to examine the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after resection of >or=10 cm HCC.

METHODS

Perioperative and long-term outcomes were examined for 189 consecutive patients from 1993 to 2004 who underwent potentially curative resection of HCC >or=10 cm (n = 24; 13%) vs. those with HCC <10 cm (n = 165; 87%). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 34 months. Tumors >or=10 cm were more likely to be symptomatic, of poorer grade, and have vascular invasion (p < 0.05). Twelve patients (50%) underwent an extended resection of more than four hepatic segments or resection of adjacent organs for oncologic clearance (diaphragm-2, inferior vena cava (IVC)-2, median sternotomy-1). Postoperative complications were more common after resection of >10 cm HCC (12/24, 50% vs. 35/165, 21%; p = 0.04). Median DFS was significantly shorter in patients with large HCC (>or=10 cm) group compared to patients with smaller HCC (8.4 vs. 38 months; p = 0.001), but overall survival was not different between the two groups (5-year survival 54% vs. 53%; p = 0.43). Seventeen patients (71%) with very large HCC developed recurrences (12 intrahepatic, five systemic); eight of these patients (47%) underwent additional therapy (resection-4, TACE-3, RFA-1). Pathological positive margins and vascular invasion were significant determinants of DFS in tumors >or=10 cm (p < 0.05), but only vascular invasion was an independent risk factor for recurrence after multivariate analysis (HR 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04-0.8). Median OS after recurrence was 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the optimal therapy for very large (>or=10 cm) HCC. Although recurrences are common after resection of these tumors, overall survival was not significantly different from patients after resection of smaller HCC in this series.

Mortality following liver resection in US medicare patients: does the presence of a liver transplant program affect outcome?

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection is a complicated procedure, at times associated with significant morbidity. Liver transplantation programs may improve outcomes following resective liver surgery at the institutional level by a number of means, including: availability of ancillary services and personnel, specialized critical care, and added surgical expertise.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the presence of a liver transplant program at a center improves outcomes following hepatic resection when compared to centers without an associated liver transplant program.

METHODS

Using data from the national Medicare claims database, 30-day mortality following all hepatic resections performed over a 2-year period (1999, 2000) were studied. Regression techniques were used to assess the relationship between mortality at centers with an associated liver transplant program in comparison to those without, while controlling for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients dying within 30 days among 4,661 patients that underwent hepatic resection was 6.65%. Factors that did increase the risk of dying after hepatic resection included: urgent or emergent surgery (vs. elective), primary liver cancer (vs. metastatic), male sex, increasing comorbidity score, low hospital volume, and extent of surgery. The presence of a liver transplant program within a center was not associated with any improvement in mortality.

CONCLUSION

At an institutional level, the presence of a liver transplant program was not associated with decreased 30-day mortality following hepatic resection.

Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer who have isolated hepatic metastases; however, the long-term survival benefits of hepatectomy in this population have not been characterized well outside of case series. For the current study, a population-based database was used to compare the survival of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer who did and did not undergo hepatectomy.

METHODS

Patients aged >or=65 years with incident colorectal cancer who were diagnosed from 1991 to 2001 were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Liver metastasis diagnoses, colorectal resections, and hepatectomies were identified from hospital, outpatient, and physician-supplier claims. Patients who did not undergo colorectal resection were excluded. Five-year survival from the time of cancer diagnosis was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate survival.

RESULTS

Among 13,599 patients who were identified with incident colorectal cancer and liver metastases, 7673 patients (56.4%) presented with stage IV disease, and the remaining patients presented with earlier stage disease and developed subsequent metastases. Only 833 patients (6.1%) in the cohort underwent hepatic resection, and their 30-day mortality rate was 4.3%. The 5-year survival was 32.8% among patients who underwent hepatic resection, compared with 10.5% among patients who did not undergo hepatic resection (P < .0001), and better survival was observed in the subset of patients who presented initially with disease in stages I through III. In a Cox model, which was controlled for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and stage at presentation, lack of hepatic resection was associated with a 2.78-fold increased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hepatectomy rates among patients with colorectal cancer were low, hepatic resection was associated with improved survival.

Liver resection for benign liver tumors: indications and outcome

BACKGROUND

The indications for intervention in cases of benign liver tumors include symptoms, suspicion of malignancy, or risk of malignant change.

METHODS

Eighty-four liver resections for benign tumors were performed in our hospital from June 1996 to December 2004. The patient records were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The study group (41 females, 43 males; average age, 41.4 +/- 10.5 y) included 46 cavernous hemangiomas, 27 focal nodular hyperplasias, 5 hepatic adenomas, and 6 liver cysts. The indications for resection were inability to rule out malignancy (50 [59.5%]), symptoms (33 [39.3%]), and others (1 [1.2%]). Postoperatively, 28 of the 33 patients had resolution of symptoms. Twenty-nine patients (34.5%) had chronic hepatitis B infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection for benign liver tumor is safe, but indications for intervention must be evaluated carefully. The presence of chronic parenchymal liver disease does not increase morbidity in these patients.

Selective use of older adults in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Many centers are reluctant to use older donors (>44 years) for adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) due to concerns about possible increased morbidity in donors and poorer outcomes in recipients. Since 2000, 130 adult RLDLTs have been performed at our institution. Recipients were divided into those who received a right lobe graft from a donor </=age 44 (n = 89, 68%; median age 30) and those who received a liver graft from a donor age >44 (n = 41, 32%; mean age 52). The two donor and recipient populations had similar demographic and operative profiles. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the severity and number of complications in older donors were similar to those in younger donors. No living donor died. Older donor allografts had initial allograft dysfunction compared to younger donors. Complication rates were similar among recipients in both groups but there was a higher bile duct stricture rate with older donor grafts (27% vs. 12%; p = 0.04). One-year recipient graft survival was 86% for older donors and 85% for younger donors (p = 0.95). Early experience with the use of selected older adults (>44 years) for RLDLT is encouraging, but may be associated with a higher rate of biliary complications in the recipient.

Two hundred and forty-one consecutive liver resections: an experience from India

BACKGROUND

Although liver resection has become an established procedure in western countries and South-east Asia it is still not performed frequently in most centres in India. In the last 10 years newly created specialized units have been performing more liver resections but no major series have been reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed the results of 241 hepatic resections in the Gyan Burman Liver Unit, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital to compare our results with those published from established centres and to identify the factors relating to morbidity and mortality. To examine the effect of a greater experience with the procedure we compared the outcome of our operations from 1996-2000 (first period) and those from 2001-2005 (second period).

RESULTS

The overall mortality and morbidity rates were 6.6% and 44.8%, respectively, which are comparable with those of most recently published Western series. Life-threatening complications occurred in 12.4% patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of comorbid conditions, intraoperative blood transfusions of >3 units, hepatocellular carcinoma with underlying cirrhosis and gall bladder carcinoma with jaundice were the independent risk factors for morbidity, whereas the presence of comorbid illness and underlying liver cirrhosis were the risk factors for mortality. During the second period there was an increase in the number of operations performed (66 vs 175; first vs second period), but the mortality rates remained essentially unchanged (6.1% vs 6.8%).

DISCUSSION

Hepatic resections can be performed safely in India with results comparable to those achieved in the West. Increasing experience did not reduce overall mortality. Perhaps more careful patient selection and better perioperative management of comorbid illnesses may reduce the morbidity and mortality further.

Recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors, treatment, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Tumor recurrence remains the major cause of death after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the recurrence of HCC and to examine long-term outcomes after resection.

METHODS

From July 1992 to July 2004, 193 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection as primary therapy with curative intent for HCC were included in this single-center analysis. The perioperative mortality rate was 5%. Time to recurrence (disease-free survival) and overall survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were tested for their prognostic significance by univariate and multivariate analysis with the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.

RESULTS

Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 71 +/- 11 months; disease-free survival was 34 months (range, 1-149 months). After a median follow-up time of 34 months, 98 patients (51%) experienced recurrent cancer; initial tumor recurrence was confined to the liver in 86 patients (88%). With the use of multivariate analysis, preoperative vascular invasion detected on radiologic imaging studies; postoperative vascular invasion found on pathologic assessment, and intermediate and poor tumor differentiation and tumor size and number were significant predictors of disease-free survival. Of the 98 patients who had tumor recurrence, 53 patients (54%) underwent additional therapy (ablation, 31 patients; re-resection, 11 patients; transarterial chemoembolization, 8 patients; liver transplantation, 3 patients) with improvement in survival.

CONCLUSION

Despite recurrences in >50% of patients, long-term survival can be achieved after resection of HCC. Identification of risk factors, close follow-up evaluation, and early detection are mandatory because recurrences that are confined to the liver may be amenable to treatment with an additional survival benefit.

Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections

BACKGROUND

Division of major vascular and biliary structures during major hepatectomies can be carried out either extrahepatically at the porta hepatic or intrahepatically during the parenchymal transection. In this retrospective study we test the hypothesis that the intrahepatic technique is associated with less early biliary complications.

METHODS

150 patients who underwent major hepatectomies were retrospectively allocated into an intrahepatic group (n = 100) and an extrahepatic group (n = 50) based on the technique of hilar division. The two groups were operated by two different surgical teams, each one favoring one of the two approaches for hilar dissection. Operative data (warm ischemic time, operative time, blood loss), biliary complications, morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

In extrahepatic patients, operative time was longer (245 +/- 50 vs 214 +/- 38 min, p < 0.05) while the overall complication rate (55% vs 52%), hospital stay (13 +/- 7 vs 12 +/- 4 days), bile leak rate (22% vs 20%) and mortality (2% vs 2%) were similar compared to intrahepatic patients. However, most (57%) bile leaks in extrahepatic patients were grade II (leaks that required non-operative interventional treatment, while most (70%) leaks in the intrahepatic group were grade I (leaks that resolved and presented two injuries (4%) of the remaining bile ducts (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intrahepatic hilar division is as safe as extrahepatic hilar division in terms of intraoperative blood requirements, morbidity and mortality. The extrahepatic technique is associated with more severe bile leaks and biliary injuries.

Contemporary management of benign hepatic adenoma using percutaneous radiofrequency ablation

Hepatic adenoma is a benign liver tumor that occurs primarily in women. Complete resection of the adenoma is the standard therapy. The authors present an unusual case report of a histologically proven benign hepatic adenoma occurring in an adolescent boy treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA). A 13-year-old adolescent boy presenting with complaints of back pain was incidentally found to have a 3.5 x 2.5-cm solitary hyperechoic region in the liver on ultrasound. Magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a lobular solid mass in the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver that did not have the classic appearance of a hemangioma. An ultrasound-guided percutaneous core biopsy of the lesion was performed. Histologic examination revealed a benign liver adenoma. The tumor was treated with RFA by the interventional radiologist. Postprocedure computed tomography scans obtained at 6 weeks, 8 months, and 1 year and magnetic resonance imaging scan obtained 2 years after the procedure showed complete ablation of the tumor with no evidence of tumor recurrence. Traditionally, surgical resection has been the mainstay of therapy for the treatment of benign hepatic adenoma. In selected cases of histologically proven hepatic adenoma, minimally invasive techniques such as RFA can be safely used as an alternative to open surgical resection.

Atypical Laparoscopic Resection of a Liver Tumor in a 4-Year-Old Girl

Despite the advances in minimally invasive surgery in children, considerable concern exists about employing such techniques in oncologic cases. We report our experience with a 4-year-old girl with a symptomatic tumor in the liver. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a 3 x 4 cm lesion, confined to segments II and III. Tumor markers were negative and true-cut needle biopsy did not rule out malignancy. We performed a diagnostic laparoscopy using four 5-mm ports. Since the tumor did not cause any alterations of the liver surface, a 5-mm flexible endoscopic ultrasound probe (5 MHz) was applied to reveal the extent of the tumor. Parenchymal dissection was performed with a radiofrequency probe, and the LigaSure device was used to seal larger vessels and bile ducts. The tumor was resected completely and removed in a specimen bag via the umbilical incision. Histology revealed fibrous nodular hyperplasia. The postoperative course was uneventful and the girl was discharged on postoperative day 5. We conclude that laparoscopic resection of confined liver lesions is feasible in children, employing standard principles of oncologic surgery and safety.

Single centre experience of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients outside transplant criteria

INTRODUCTION

To report analysis of our results of liver resection for HCC outside the transplant criteria with preserved liver function.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and March 2005, 279 patients with HCC were seen at our institution and entered into a prospective database. There were 51 patients who did not fulfill the transplant criteria and underwent partial hepatectomy. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The median tumour size was 10.0 cm with a range of 3-20 cm. Twenty-nine patients had solitary tumours and 21 patients had two or more liver tumours, with four patients whose tumours were less than 5 cm in maximal diameter. Ten patients had bilobar disease. The 30-day mortality was 8%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival was 63, 40 and 33%, respectively, and the median survival was 16.6 months. Fifteen potential variables were analysed as potential predictors of adverse outcome. Multivariate analysis showed Child-Pugh classification, presence of cirrhosis, rupture on presentation and tumour histology to be independent prognostic factors on survival.

CONCLUSION

Partial hepatectomy in patients with advanced HCC who are ineligible for transplantation can be performed safely and can achieve a 5-year survival of 33%.

Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method

BACKGROUND

Abdominal drainage is a standard procedure after hepatectomy, but this practice has been challenged recently.

METHODS

Between September 2004 and March 2005, 120 consecutive patients who had undergone hepatic resection by the same surgical team were randomly allocated into drainage and no drainage groups (60 in each group). Patient characteristics, preoperative liver function, presence of cirrhosis, resection-related factors and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in terms of demographics, indications for surgery, preoperative liver function test results, presence of cirrhosis, extent of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss and requirement for blood transfusion. Symptomatic subphrenic collection and pleural effusion occurred in four patients (7 per cent) who had abdominal drainage and three (5 per cent) who did not. Local wound complications occurred in 17 (28 per cent) and two (3 per cent) patients respectively (P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was similar in the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of cirrhosis and abdominal drainage were independently related to the development of postoperative wound complications.

CONCLUSION

Routine abdominal drainage is unnecessary after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who have undergone prior renal transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Because renal transplantation recipients require immunosuppressive drugs, they have a higher incidence of subsequent malignancies. Among them, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is common. Although liver resection remains an option for curing HCC, the role of liver resection in renal transplantation recipients remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective review of liver resection for newly diagnosed HCC in 680 patients was conducted. Among them, 18 patients had undergone prior renal transplantation (RT group). The patient background, tumor characteristics, early and long-term results after liver resection were compared with the other 662 patients who had not previously undergone renal transplantation (non-RT group).

RESULTS

The patient's background characteristics were comparable between RT and non-RT group. The tumor characteristics, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rates in RT and non-RT groups were 18.8% and 41.2%, respectively (P = 0.242), whereas 5-year actuarial survival rates in RT and non-RT groups were 59.1% and 58.3%, respectively (P = 0.738). Two patients lost their graft kidney 3 and 8 years after liver resection.

CONCLUSION

With careful protection of the graft kidney, liver resection is still a justified treatment option for HCC in patients who have undergone renal transplantation.

Perioperative parenteral tranexamic acid in liver tumor resection: a prospective randomized trial toward a "blood transfusion"-free hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility of a real "blood transfusion"-free hepatectomy in a large group of patients with liver tumors.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Bleeding control and blood transfusion remains problematic in liver resection. A real "blood transfusion"-free hepatectomy in a large group of patients has rarely been reported. The impact of tranexamic acid (TA), an antifibrinolytic agent, on blood transfusion in liver resection is unknown.

METHODS

A prospective double-blind randomized trial was performed on elective liver tumor resections. In group A, TA 500 mg was intravenously administered just before operation followed by 250 mg, every 6 hours, for 3 days. In group B, only placebo was given. The patients' background, blood transfusion rates, and early postoperative results in the 2 groups were compared. Factors that influenced blood requirement were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 108 hepatectomies in group A and 106 hepatectomies in group B. The patients' backgrounds, operative procedures, and hepatectomy extent did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Although the differences of the operative morbidity and postoperative stay were not significant, a significantly lower amount of operative blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter operative time, and lower hospital costs were found in group A patients. No patient in group A received blood transfusion. No hospital mortality occurred in either group. Tumor size and use of TA were independent factors that influenced blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative parenteral use of TA reduced the amount of operative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion in elective liver tumor resection. A real "blood transfusion"-free hepatectomy may be feasible with the assistance of parenteral TA.

[The impact of intra operative ultrasound in metastases liver surgery]

BACKGROUND

Twenty-five to 50% of the patients with hepatic metastases are potential candidates for curative surgery. Intraoperative ultrasound has been employed to guide the surgery.

AIM

To evaluate this method in liver surgeries and compare it to other imaging methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients (20 females, with median age of 56 years) with hepatic metastases were prospectively studied between February 2001 and July 2003. Patients had as primary tumors: colorectal cancer (24), neuroendocrine tumors (3), renal cell carcinoma (2), melanoma (2), others (4). Each patient was submitted to at least: computed tomography (30), ultrasonography (14) and magnetic resonance imaging (8). Intraoperative ultrasound was performed in all patients in order to detect liver nodules. The number and location of liver lesions were compared to preoperative results.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ultrasound was useful in 23 (65.6%) of the 35 surgeries and changed the planned surgical strategy in 9 (25.7%). There was a statistical significant correlation between the mean number of nodules identified by ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative ultrasound. We found no statistical difference between magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative ultrasound in identifying hepatic nodules. Fifty-five nodules were submitted to histological evaluation, the gold standard method and 52/55 (94.5%) were identified by intraoperative ultrasound. Intraoperative ultrasound identified 91.6% of the smaller than 1.5 cm lesions, ultrasonography identified 15.0% of them, computed tomography 33.3% and magnetic resonance imaging 66.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ultrasound is crucial in the evaluation and decision making in hepatic surgery. Intraoperative ultrasound presents the highest sensibility in the detection of hepatic nodules compared to other imaging methods, especially for small lesions.

Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference?

Commonly performed elective surgical procedures on the alimentary tract are carried out with low morbidity and low mortality in most hospitals in the United States. There are some procedures on the alimentary tract that are performed with a relatively low frequency and are associated with higher mortality. Volume is a surrogate marker associated with improved outcome, with relative differences being dependent on the complexity of the procedure and the frequency with which it is done. Both surgeon and institutional volume matters, but it seems that improved operative mortality can be reached with lower surgeon volume in high-volume institutions. It appears that volume can be substituted in part for by specialization and training, with improved outcomes based on specialist credentials and fellowship training.

Analysis and outcomes of right lobe hepatectomy in 101 consecutive living donors

The shortage of deceased organ donors has created a need for right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) in adults. Concerns regarding donor safety, however, necessitate continuous assessment of donor acceptance criteria and documentation of donor morbidity. We report the outcomes of our first 101 donors who underwent right lobectomy between April 2000 and November 2004. The cohort comprised 58 men and 43 women with a median age of 37.8 years (range: 18.6-55 years); median follow-up is 24 months. The middle hepatic vein (MHV) was taken with the graft in 55 donors. All complications were recorded prospectively and stratified by grade according to Clavien's classification. Overall morbidity rate was 37%; all complications were either grade 1 or 2, and the majority occurred during the first 30 days after surgery. Removal of the MHV did not affect morbidity rate. There were significantly fewer complications in the later half of our experience. All donors are well and have returned to full activities. With careful donor selection and specialized patient care, low morbidity rates can be achieved after right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation.

How much liver resection is too much?

BACKGROUND

Hepatic failure occurring after liver resection carries a poor prognosis and is a complication dreaded by surgeons. Inadequate reserve in the remaining parenchyma leads to a steady decrease in liver function, inability to regenerate, and progression to liver failure. For this reason, many methods to quantify functional hepatic reserve have been developed.

METHODS

This article reviews the main methods used in the assessment of hepatic reserve in patients undergoing hepatectomy and their use in operative decision making.

RESULTS

A range of methods to categorically quantify the functional reserve of the liver have been developed, ranging from scoring systems (such as the Child-Pugh classification) to tests assessing complex hepatic metabolic pathways to radiological methods to assess functional reserve. However, no one method has or is ever likely to emerge as a single measure with which to dictate safe limits of resectability.

CONCLUSIONS

In the future, the role of residual liver function assessment may be of most benefit in the routine stratification of risk, thus enabling both patient consent to be obtained and surgical procedure to be performed, with full information and facts regarding operative risks. However, there is no one single test that remains conclusively superior.

Liver operations in Sweden in 1987-99

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver surgery is developing with new techniques and treatment modalities. The aim of this study is to describe liver surgery over a long period of time in a country with a public health care system.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A register study including adult patients admitted for liver resection in Sweden (population 8.8 million) selected from the Inpatient Register 1987-99. Additional data were collected from the Swedish Cancer Register and the Cause of Death Register. Analyses of the patients, indications, mortality and causes of death are presented.

RESULTS

2,405 operations were performed (21 per million per year). The most frequent indication was colorectal metastases (27%). The 5-year survival after an operation for primary liver cancer and colorectal liver metastases was 27% and 26%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Few patients were admitted for liver operations compared to expected figures. The survival rates are in conformity with those previously published. With an increasing awareness of the relatively favourable prognosis and the introduction of new methods, the volume of liver operations will probably increase in Sweden.

The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

For complex oncological procedures, hospital volume affects short and long-term patient outcome. We examined the association of hospital volume and long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With a cohort study design, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked files to identify a population based sample of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer treated primarily with radical prostatectomy. Failure of cancer control was defined as the use of postoperative medical or surgical hormone ablation or treatment with radiation therapy more than 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 12,635 men underwent radical prostatectomy for incident prostate cancer. After adjusting for age, comorbidity, histological grade and clinical stage, the risk of adjuvant therapy was greater among those treated at low (1 to 33 cases) and medium (34 to 61 cases) volume hospitals than at very high (more than 108 cases) volume hospitals (HR 1.25, p <0.001 and HR 1.11, p =0.023 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated at lower volume institutions are at increased risk of initiation of subsequent adjuvant therapy with radiation therapy, medical hormone ablation or orchiectomy. Noted differences in cancer control provide additional evidence regarding issues surrounding the debate over surgical volume standards for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Is Hepatic Resection for Large or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Justified? Results From a Multi-Institutional Database

BACKGROUND

The role of surgical resection in patients with large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the long-term outcome of patients with hepatic resection for large (>5 cm in diameter) or multinodular (more than three nodules) HCC by using a multi-institutional database.

METHODS

The perioperative and long-term outcomes of 404 patients with small HCC (<5 cm in diameter; group 1) were compared with those of 380 patients with large or multinodular HCC (group 2). The prognostic factors in the latter group were analyzed.

RESULTS

The postoperative complication rate (27% vs. 23%; P = .16) and hospital mortality rate (2.4% vs. 2.7%; P = .82) were similar between groups. The overall survival rates were significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (1 year, 88% vs. 74%; 3 years, 76% vs. 50%; 5 years, 58% vs. 39%; P < .001). Among patients in group 2, five independent prognostic factors were identified to be associated with a worse overall survival: namely, symptomatic disease, presence of cirrhosis, multinodular tumor, microvascular tumor invasion, and positive histological margin.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection can be safely performed in patients with large or multinodular HCC, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 39%. Symptomatic disease, the presence of cirrhosis, a multinodular tumor, microvascular invasion, and a positive histological margin are independently associated with a less favorable survival outcome.

Factors affecting outcome in liver resection

BACKGROUND

Studies demonstrate an inverse relationship between institution/surgeon procedural volumes and patient outcomes. Similar studies exist for liver resections, which recommend referral of patients for liver resections to 'high-volume' centers. These studies did not elucidate the factors that underlie such outcomes. We believe there exists a complex interaction of patient-related and perioperative factors that determine patient outcomes after liver resection. We sought to delineate these factors.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 114 liver resections by a single surgeon from 1993-2003: Records were reviewed for demographics; diagnosis; type/year of surgery; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score; preoperative albumin, creatinine, and bilirubin; operative time; intraoperative blood transfusions; epidural use; and intraoperative hypotension. Main outcome measurements were postoperative morbidities, mortalities and length of stay (LOS). Data were analyzed using a multivariate linear regression model (SPSS v10.1 statistical analysis program).

RESULTS

Primary indications for resections were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (N=57), metastatic colorectal cancer (N=25), and benign disease (N=18). There were no intraoperative mortalities and 4 perioperative (30-day) mortalities (3.5%). Mortality occurred in patients with malignancies who were older than 50 years. Morbidity was higher in malignant (15.6%) versus benign (5.5%) disease. Complications included bile leak/stricture (N=6), liver insufficiency (N=3), postoperative bleeding (N=2), myocardial infarction (N=2), aspiration pneumonia (N=1), renal insufficiency (N=1), and cancer implantation into the wound (N=1). Average LOS for all resections was 8.6 days. Longer operative time (p=0.04), lower albumin (p<0.001), higher ASA score (p<0.001), no epidural use (p=0.04), and higher creatinine (p<0.001) all correlated positively with longer LOS. ASA score and creatinine were the strongest predictors of LOS. LOS was not affected by patient age, sex, diagnosis, presence of malignancy, intraoperative transfusion requirements, intraoperative hypotension, preoperative bilirubin, case volume per year or year of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resections can be performed with low mortality/morbidity and with acceptable LOS by an experienced liver surgeon. Outcome as measured by LOS is most influenced by patient comorbidities entering into surgery. Annual case volume did not influence LOS and had no impact on patient safety. Length of stay may not reflect surgeon/institution performance, as LOS is multifactorial and likely related to patient population, patient selection and increased high-risk cases with a surgeon's experience.

Liver resection: 10-year experience from a single Institution

BACKGROUND: Liver resection constitutes the main treatment of most liver primary neoplasms and selected cases of metastatic tumors. However, this procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. AIM: To analyze our experience with liver resections over a period of 10 years to determine the morbidity, mortality and risk factors of hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent liver resection from January 1994 to March 2003. RESULTS: Eighty-three (41 women and 42 men) patients underwent liver resection during the study period, with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 13-82 years). Metastatic colorectal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma were the main indications for hepatic resection, with 36 and 19 patients, respectively. Extended and major resections were performed in 20.4% and 40.9% of the patients, respectively. Blood transfusion was needed in 38.5% of the operations. Overall morbidity was 44.5%. Life-threatening complications occurred in 22.8% of cases and the most common were pneumonia, hepatic failure, intraabdominal collection and intraabdominal bleeding. Among minor complications (30%), the most common were biliary leakage and pleural effusion. Size of the tumor and blood transfusion were associated with major complications (P = 0.0185 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Operative mortality was 8.4% and risk factors related to mortality were increased age and use of vascular exclusion (P = 0.0395 and P = 0.0404, respectively). Median hospital stay was 6.7 days. CONCLUSION: Liver resections can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity rates. Blood transfusion may be reduced by employing meticulous technique and, whenever indicated, vascular exclusion.

Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database

OBJECTIVE

To assess the trends in perioperative outcome of hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases.

METHODS

Data of 1222 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases from July 1989 to June 2003 in a tertiary institution were collected prospectively. Perioperative outcome of patients in the first (group I) and second (group II) halves of this period was compared. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Diagnoses included hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 734), other liver cancers (n = 257), extrahepatic biliary malignancies (n = 43), hepatolithiasis (n = 101), benign liver tumors (n = 61), and other diseases (n = 26). The majority of patients (61.8%) underwent major hepatectomy of > or = 3 segments. The overall hospital mortality and morbidity were 4.9% and 32.4%, respectively. The number of hepatectomies increased from 402 in group I to 820 in group II, partly as a result of more liberal patient selection. Group II had more elderly patients (P = 0.006), more patients with comorbid illnesses (P = 0.001), and significantly worse liver function. Nonetheless, group II had lower blood loss (median 750 versus 1450 mL, P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (17.3% versus 67.7%, P < 0.001), morbidity (30.0% versus 37.3%, P = 0.012), and hospital mortality (3.7% versus 7.5%, P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, major hepatic resection, and transfusion were the significant predictors of hospital mortality, whereas concomitant extrahepatic procedure, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion were the predictors of morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcome has improved despite extending the indication of hepatectomy to more high-risk patients. The role of hepatectomy in the management of hepatobiliary diseases can be expanded. Reduced perioperative transfusion is the main contributory factor for improved outcome.

Appraisal of concomitant splenectomy in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenic thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Liver resection usually is not recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. The role of concomitant splenectomy in liver resection for HCC in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenic thrombocytopenia (HT) resulting from portal hypertension remains undefined.

METHODS

Among 526 cirrhotic patients who underwent liver resection for HCC, 41 underwent a concomitant splenectomy (Sp group) because of HT (platelet count </=80 x 10(3)/mm(3)). The patients' backgrounds, pathologic characteristics of HCC, and short- and long-term results after liver resection of Sp group were compared with those of the other 485 cirrhotic patients who did not undergo splenectomy (non-Sp group).

RESULTS

Compared to the non-Sp group, the liver function was worse, the tumor size was smaller, the liver resection extent was narrower, and tumor stages were earlier in the Sp group. The postoperative morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and hospital costs were not significantly different between the groups. The disease-free survival rate of the Sp group was better than that of non-Sp group, but the actuarial survival rates of both groups were similar. After stratification with UICC-TNM stages, there were no significant differences regarding the disease-free and actuarial survival rates in each stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant splenectomy extends the indication of liver resection for HCC in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. It is justified in selected cirrhotic patients with HCC and HT.

Long-term Survival of Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases treated by Percutaneous Interstitial Laser Thermotherapy

In situ ablation of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases is an accepted form of treatment for selected patients. It is associated with low morbidity and mortality and increases the number of patients who may benefit from therapy compared to resection alone. This study assesses the impact of interstitial laser thermotherapy (ILT) on local tumor control and long-term survival in patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases. Percutaneous ILT was performed in patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases between January 1992 and December 1999 using a bare-tip quartz fiber connected to an Nd:YAG laser source. This was prior to the routine use of a diffusing fiber for ablative therapy. Treatment was monitored with real-time ultrasonography. Tumors were considered unresectable based on their anatomic location or the extent of liver involvement. Patients with extrahepatic disease, more than five liver metastases, or tumors larger than 10 cm in diameter were excluded from this study. Local tumor control was assessed by dynamic computed tomography (CT) 6 months after therapy. Long-term follow-up was undertaken, and the impact of various factors on survival was analyzed. Eighty patients with a mean age of 63.8 years were suitable for ILT. In total, 168 liver tumors with a median diameter of 5 cm (range 1-10 cm) were so treated. There were no procedure-related deaths. The overall complication rate was 16%, with all cases managed conservatively. Bradycardia (n = 5), pneumothorax (n = 3), and persistent pyrexia (n = 3) were the most common complications. Complete tumor ablation was noted in 67% of patients assessed by CT 6 months following the initial therapy. Median follow-up was 35 months (range 4-96 months), with 10 patients alive at the end of this period. Altogether there were 67 deaths, which were related to hepatic disease in 55 cases and to extrahepatic disease in 9; they were unrelated to malignancy in 3 others. Three patients were excluded from follow-up after ILT down-staging of tumors that allowed complete surgical resection. The median disease-free survival of patients treated by ILT was 24.6 months, with a 5-year survival of 3.8%. Poor tumor differentiation and the presence of more than two hepatic metastases were associated with lower overall survival (p < 0.01). Fourteen patients treated by ILT for postoperative hepatic recurrences had the best outcome, with a median overall survival of 36.3 months and a 5-year survival of 17.2%. Percutaneous ILT is a minimally invasive, safe, effective technique that appears to improve overall survival in specific patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases, compared to the natural history of untreated disease reported in the literature.

National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection1 1No competing interests declared

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection is increasingly performed for primary and metastatic tumors. Reports from tertiary care centers show improved outcomes over time with lower operative mortality rates. The objective of this investigation was to characterize trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection in the US during a recent 13-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

Adult patients with a procedures code for hepatic resection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1988 to 2000 were included. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is a 20% representative sample of all discharges in the US. Outcomes variables included in-hospital mortality and length of stay. High volume hospitals performed 10 or more (>50th percentile) procedures per year.

RESULTS

During the 13-year period, 16,582 patients underwent hepatic resection. The number of procedures performed increased nearly twofold, from 820 per year in 1988 to 1,420 per year in 2000. Similar changes in use were seen for each indication for operation. The overall mortality rate declined from 10.4% (1988 to 1989) to 5.3% (1999 to 2000) during the study period (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was lower at high volume centers than at lower volume centers (5.8% versus 8.9%, p < 0.001), and the decline in mortality over time was greater at high volume centers (10.1% to 3.9%, p < 0.001) compared with to low volume centers (10.6% to 7.4%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of hepatic resections performed in the US has increased significantly. Short-term outcomes have also improved over the same time period, with more improvement seen at higher volume centers than in lower volume centers.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: surgical and endoscopic approaches

HCCa remains an uncommon malignancy, though increasing use of more radical surgery has led to prolonged survival in those patients who undergo curative resection. The extent of these resections suggest that the best results are likely to be obtained in centers with the resources and experience to conduct these operations in a safe fashion. Until major advances in the systemic therapy of HCCa are made, however, the management should focus on optimal preoperative imaging and palliation of jaundice with improvement in quality of life.

Contemporary management of benign liver tumors

Benign lesions of the liver represent diagnostic dilemmas, clinically and radiographically; however, certain clues can help the extensive differential diagnosis of both benign and malignant processes. Hemangiomas and simple cysts have very distinct and very specific radiographic characteristics, and if diagnosed, no further work-up is necessary. The remaining benign lesions have significant overlap, even though there are some more common characteristics to each of the entities. Still, differentiation of any particular lesion outside simple cysts or hemangioma may be difficult. It is reasonable and relatively simple, with minimal invasiveness, to perform US- or CT-guided, percutaneous core-needle biopsies. It is recommended that core biopsies be performed, because many of the benign entities have some overlapping histologic features, and if fine-needle aspirations are performed, a definitive diagnosis may be difficult to obtain. A definitive pathological diagnosis still cannot be made in some cases, even after needle biopsy. Therefore, a surgical resection or wedge resection may be necessary if a benign process cannot be definitively ruled out.

Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the volume-outcome relationship in patients undergoing nephrectomy for neoplastic disease by examining the impact of the number of cases performed on in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Surgical volume is associated with postoperative mortality for many complex procedures; however, this relationship has not been characterized for patients undergoing nephrectomy for neoplastic disease.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 20,765 patients who underwent nephrectomy for neoplasm from 1993 through 1997 were identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes. Cases were stratified into volume groups on the basis of annual nephrectomy rates: low-volume hospitals performed 1 to 14 nephrectomies per year, medium-volume hospitals performed 15 to 33 per year, and high-volume hospitals performed more than 33 per year. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 1.39%. Mortality declined as surgical volume increased. The mortality rate for low-volume hospitals was 1.60% versus 1.49% for medium-volume hospitals and 1.04% for high-volume hospitals (P = 0.017). After adjusting for case mix, high-volume hospitals had a 32% lower risk of in-hospital mortality than medium-volume hospitals (P = 0.029) and a 25% lower risk than low-volume hospitals (P = 0.094). Length of stay was not affected by hospital volume. Other independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality included age older than 65 years, chronic pulmonary disease, metastatic disease, and the urgent nature of the admission.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater surgical volume, age younger than 65 years, elective conditions, and less comorbidity are associated with a significantly decreased risk of in-hospital mortality after nephrectomy. These findings provide compelling evidence that hospital volume and patient characteristics have important effects on surgical outcome specific to renal neoplasms.

Living-donor right hepatectomy with or without inclusion of middle hepatic vein: comparison of morbidity and outcome in 56 patients

Venous congestion of segments V and VIII is observed frequently in living-donor right lobe liver transplants without middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage, and can be a cause of graft dysfunction and failure. Inclusion of the MHV with the graft is controversial, however, because of the perceived potential for increased donor morbidity. We compared the outcome of living liver donors in whom the MHV was either left intact in the donor (group 1; n = 28) or was removed with the graft (group 2; n = 28). All prospective donors completed an extensive multidisciplinary evaluation to determine suitability for surgery and to ensure that the MHV could be removed safely without compromising venous outflow from the remaining liver. Patient demographics including age, weight, body-mass index, and liver volumetry as determined by computerized tomography were similar in both groups. Operative time in group 2 was significantly shorter than in group 1. There was no difference in estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, peak serum liver tests, time interval from surgery to complete normalization of liver tests, complications, and length of hospitalization. We conclude that including the MHV with living-donor right lobe grafts can be performed safely in most donors.

Interstitial laser thermotherapy for liver tumours

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastases from colorectal cancer are the most common malignant liver tumours. Surgical resection is the optimum treatment in suitable patients. Interstitial laser thermotherapy (ILT) is gaining acceptance for the treatment of irresectable liver tumours and as a potential alternative to surgery. An understanding of the principles of therapy and review of clinical outcomes may allow better use of this technology.

METHOD

An electronic search using the Medline database was performed for studies on the treatment of hepatic malignancy published between January 1983 and February 2003.

RESULTS

Current information on the efficacy of ILT is based on prospective studies. ILT appears to be a safe and minimally invasive technique that consistently achieves tumour destruction. The extent of destruction depends on the fibre design, delivery system, tumour size and tumour biology. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging provides the most accurate assessment of laser-induced tumour necrosis. In selected patients with HCC and colorectal cancer liver metastases, ILT achieves complete tumour necrosis, provides long-term local control, and improves survival, compared with the natural history of the disease. In addition, ILT has survival benefits for patients with other tumour types, especially those with isolated liver metastases from a breast cancer primary.

CONCLUSION

ILT improves overall survival in specific patients with liver tumours. Advances in laser technology and refinements in technique, and a better understanding of the processes involved in laser-induced tissue injury, may allow ILT to replace surgery as the procedure of choice in selected patients with liver malignancies.

Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?

BACKGROUND

Data on the relative clinical and economic impact of postoperative complications are needed in order to direct quality improvement efforts.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing two high-risk surgical procedures, hepatectomy (n = 569) and esophagectomy (n = 366), from 1994 to 1998 were included. Data were abstracted from the Maryland hospital discharge database. Relative resource use was determined using median regression, adjusting for patient comorbidities and other case-mix variables.

RESULTS

A total of 935 patients were studied. Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.1%; complication rate was 38.4%. Median cost for all patients was $14,527 (interquartile range $10,936-$21,412) and length of stay 9 days (interquartile range 7-13 days). Median hospital cost was increased for patients with complications ($16,868 versus $12,861; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, several complications remained associated with increased cost. Acute renal failure ($25,219), septicemia ($18,852), and myocardial infarction ($9,573) were associated with the greatest increase in resource use. But because the incidence of each complication varies, the attributable fraction of total resource use was highest for acute renal failure (19%), septicemia (16%), and surgical complications (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications are independently associated with increased resource use after high-risk surgery. Population-based studies may be valuable in determining the relative economic importance of postoperative complications. Quality improvement efforts for these complications should be prioritized based on both the incidence of the complication and its independent contribution to increased resource use.