Structured elements drive extensive circular RNA translation

Integrated lncRNA function upon genomic and epigenomic regulation

Although some long noncoding (lnc)RNAs are known since the 1950s, the past 25 years have uncovered myriad lncRNAs with diverse sequences, structures, and functions. The advent of high-throughput and sensitive technologies has further uncovered the vast heterogeneity of lncRNA-interacting molecules and patterns of expressed lncRNAs. We propose a unifying functional theme for the expansive family of lncRNAs. At an elementary level, the genomic program of gene expression is elicited via canonical transcription and post-transcriptional mRNA assembly, turnover, and translation. Building upon this regulation, an epigenomic program refines the basic genomic control by modifying chromatin architecture as well as DNA and RNA chemistry. Superimposed over the genomic and epigenomic programs, lncRNAs create an additional regulatory dimension: by interacting with the proteins and nucleic acids that regulate gene expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm, lncRNAs help establish robust, nimble, and specific transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. We describe our present understanding of lncRNA-coordinated control of protein programs and cell fate and discuss challenges and opportunities as we embark on the next 25 years of lncRNA discovery.

Circular RNAs: Characterization, cellular roles, and applications

Most circular RNAs are produced from the back-splicing of exons of precursor mRNAs. Recent technological advances have in part overcome problems with their circular conformation and sequence overlap with linear cognate mRNAs, allowing a better understanding of their cellular roles. Depending on their localization and specific interactions with DNA, RNA, and proteins, circular RNAs can modulate transcription and splicing, regulate stability and translation of cytoplasmic mRNAs, interfere with signaling pathways, and serve as templates for translation in different biological and pathophysiological contexts. Emerging applications of RNA circles to interfere with cellular processes, modulate immune responses, and direct translation into proteins shed new light on biomedical research. In this review, we discuss approaches used in circular RNA studies and the current understanding of their regulatory roles and potential applications.

Clinical Implications of Circulating Circular RNAs in Lung Cancer

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are single-stranded RNAs with a covalently closed-loop structure that increases their stability; thus, they are more advantageous to use as liquid biopsy markers than linear RNAs. circRNAs are thought to be generated by back-splicing of pre-mRNA transcripts, which can be facilitated by reverse complementary sequences in the flanking introns and trans-acting factors, such as splicing regulatory factors and RNA-binding factors. circRNAs function as miRNA sponges, interact with target proteins, regulate the stability and translatability of other mRNAs, regulate gene expression, and produce microproteins. circRNAs are also found in the body fluids of cancer patients, including plasma, saliva, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, and these “circulating circRNAs” can be used as cancer biomarkers. In lung cancer, some circulating circRNAs have been reported to regulate cancer progression and drug resistance. Circulating circRNAs have significant diagnostic value and are associated with the prognosis of lung cancer patients. Owing to their functional versatility, heightened stability, and practical applicability, circulating circRNAs represent promising biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring.

Ribosome-Associated ncRNAs (rancRNAs) Adjust Translation and Shape Proteomes

The regulation of protein synthesis is of extreme importance for cell survival in challenging environmental conditions. Modulating gene expression at the level of translation allows a swift and low-energy-cost response to external stimuli. In the last decade, an emerging class of regulatory ncRNAs, namely ribosome-associated non-coding RNAs (rancRNAs), has been discovered. These rancRNAs have proven to be efficient players in the regulation of translation as a first wave of stress adaptation by directly targeting the ribosome, the central enzyme of protein production. This underlying principle appears to be highly conserved, since rancRNAs are present in all three domains of life. Here, we review the major findings and mechanistic peculiarities of rancRNAs, a class of transcripts that is providing new and broader perspectives on the complexity of the ribosome and translation regulation.

Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Circular RNA Is Barely Detectable for the Claimed Biological Activity

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E7 oncoprotein plays an essential role in cervical carcinogenesis and is encoded predominantly by an E6*I mRNA through alternative RNA splicing of a P97 promoter-transcribed bicistronic E6E7 pre-mRNA. Recently, an HPV16 circular RNA, circE7, was detected in two HPV16-positive cervical cancer cell lines, CaSki and SiHa. It was generated through back-splicing of the E6E7 pre-mRNA. The reported findings showed that, because viral E6*I RNA was nuclear, E7 was mainly translated from the cytoplasmic circE7, and knockdown of circE7 in CaSki cells led to reduction of E7 oncoprotein, cell proliferation, and xenograft tumor formation. We have reanalyzed the published data, conducted detailed experiments, and found that the circE7 in CaSki cells is only 0.4 copies per cell, which is ∼1,640-fold lower than E6*I RNA and also barely detectable from two W12 subclone cell lines, 20861 (integrated HPV16) and 20863 (extrachromosomal HPV16) cells derived from a low-grade cervical lesion. We also determined HPV16 E6*I and E6*II RNAs in CaSki cells are mainly cytoplasmic in cell fractionation analyses, as reported in other studies. We further demonstrated that the claimed circE7 functions in the published report have resulted from off-target effects on E6*I RNA by the circE7 small interfering RNAs used in the reported study. IMPORTANCE RNA back-splicing is a rare splicing event accounting for <1% of canonical RNA splicing and, thus, is thought to have little or no biological significance. Recently, circular RNAs (circRNAs) from RNA back-splicing have been found widely in cells and tissues and may have a role in modulating RNA transcription, splicing, and interference and antiviral innate immunity. A recent report claimed that the predominant HPV16 E6*I RNA was nuclear and unable to encode E7. Rather, a viral circE7 was responsible for translating the oncoprotein E7 in CaSki cells, a cervical cancer cell line. However, we found that both HPV16 E6*I and circE7 RNAs in CaSki cells are primarily cytoplasmic and that the copy number of viral E6*I RNA is 656 copies per cell, whereas the viral circE7 is only 0.4 copies per cell. Most importantly, we found that the claimed circE7 function resulted from off-target effect on viral E6*I RNA by the small interfering RNA (siRNA) si-circE7 designed to knock down the back-spliced circE7 RNA.

A Split NanoLuc Reporter Quantitatively Measures Circular RNA IRES Translation

Internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) are RNA secondary structures that mediate translation independent from the m7G RNA cap. The dicistronic luciferase assay is the most frequently used method to measure IRES-mediated translation. While this assay is quantitative, it requires numerous controls and can be time-consuming. Circular RNAs generated by splinted ligation have been shown to also accurately report on IRES-mediated translation, however suffer from low yield and other challenges. More recently, cellular sequences were shown to facilitate RNA circle formation through backsplicing. Here, we used a previously published backsplicing circular RNA split GFP reporter to create a highly sensitive and quantitative split nanoluciferase (NanoLuc) reporter. We show that NanoLuc expression requires backsplicing and correct orientation of a bona fide IRES. In response to cell stress, IRES-directed NanoLuc expression remained stable or increased while a capped control reporter decreased in translation. In addition, we detected NanoLuc expression from putative cellular IRESs and the Zika virus 5' untranslated region that is proposed to harbor IRES function. These data together show that our IRES reporter construct can be used to verify, identify and quantify the ability of sequences to mediate IRES-translation within a circular RNA.

Circular RNAs Modulate Cancer Hallmark and Molecular Pathways to Support Cancer Progression and Metastasis

Simple Summary

Circular RNAs (circRNA) are a type of RNA molecule of circular shape that are now being extensively studied due to the important roles they play in different biological processes. In addition, they were also shown to be implicated in disease such as cancer. Cancer is a complex process which is often defined by a combination of specific processes called cancer hallmarks. In this review, we summarize the literature on circRNAs in cancer and classify them as being implicated in specific cancer hallmarks.

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are noncoding products of backsplicing of pre-mRNAs which have been established to possess potent biological functions. Dysregulated circRNA expression has been linked to diseases including different types of cancer. Cancer progression is known to result from the dysregulation of several molecular mechanisms responsible for the maintenance of cellular and tissue homeostasis. The dysregulation of these processes is defined as cancer hallmarks, and the molecular pathways implicated in them are regarded as the targets of therapeutic interference. In this review, we summarize the literature on the investigation of circRNAs implicated in cancer hallmark molecular signaling. First, we present general information on the properties of circRNAs, such as their biogenesis and degradation mechanisms, as well as their basic molecular functions. Subsequently, we summarize the roles of circRNAs in the framework of each cancer hallmark and finally discuss the potential as therapeutic targets.

Emerging roles of circular RNAs in liver cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma are the most common primary liver tumours, whose incidence and associated mortality have increased over recent decades. Liver cancer is often diagnosed late when curative treatments are no longer an option. Characterising new molecular determinants of liver carcinogenesis is crucial for the development of innovative treatments and clinically relevant biomarkers. Recently, circular RNAs (circRNAs) emerged as promising regulatory molecules involved in cancer onset and progression. Mechanistically, circRNAs are mainly known for their ability to sponge and regulate the activity of microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins, although other functions are emerging (e.g. transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation, protein scaffolding). In liver cancer, circRNAs have been shown to regulate tumour cell proliferation, migration, invasion and cell death resistance. Their roles in regulating angiogenesis, genome instability, immune surveillance and metabolic switching are emerging. Importantly, circRNAs are detected in body fluids. Due to their circular structure, circRNAs are often more stable than mRNAs or miRNAs and could therefore serve as promising biomarkers - quantifiable with high specificity and sensitivity through minimally invasive methods. This review focuses on the role and the clinical relevance of circRNAs in liver cancer, including the development of innovative biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.

CRAFT: a bioinformatics software for custom prediction of circular RNA functions

Circular RNAs (circRNAs), transcripts generated by backsplicing, are particularly stable and pleiotropic molecules, whose dysregulation drives human diseases and cancer by modulating gene expression and signaling pathways. CircRNAs can regulate cellular processes by different mechanisms, including interaction with microRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBP), and encoding specific peptides. The prediction of circRNA functions is instrumental to interpret their impact in diseases, and to prioritize circRNAs for functional investigation. Currently, circRNA functional predictions are provided by web databases that do not allow custom analyses, while self-standing circRNA prediction tools are mostly limited to predict only one type of function, mainly focusing on the miRNA sponge activity of circRNAs. To solve these issues, we developed CRAFT (CircRNA Function prediction Tool), a freely available computational pipeline that predicts circRNA sequence and molecular interactions with miRNAs and RBP, along with their coding potential. Analysis of a set of circRNAs with known functions has been used to appraise CRAFT predictions and to optimize its setting. CRAFT provides a comprehensive graphical visualization of the results, links to several knowledge databases, and extensive functional enrichment analysis. Moreover, it originally combines the predictions for different circRNAs. CRAFT is a useful tool to help the user explore the potential regulatory networks involving the circRNAs of interest and generate hypotheses about the cooperation of circRNAs into the modulation of biological processes.

Translation and emerging functions of non-coding RNAs in inflammation and immunity

Regulatory non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) including small non‐coding RNAs (sRNAs), long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) have gained considerable attention in the last few years. This is mainly due to their condition‐ and tissue‐specific expression and their various modes of action, which suggests them as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets. One important mechanism of ncRNAs to regulate gene expression is through translation of short open reading frames (sORFs). These sORFs can be located in lncRNAs, in non‐translated regions of mRNAs where upstream ORFs (uORFs) represent the majority, or in circRNAs. Regulation of their translation can function as a quick way to adapt protein production to changing cellular or environmental cues, and can either depend solely on the initiation and elongation of translation, or on the roles of the produced functional peptides. Due to the experimental challenges to pinpoint translation events and to detect the produced peptides, translational regulation through regulatory RNAs is not well studied yet. In the case of circRNAs, they have only recently started to be recognized as regulatory molecules instead of mere artifacts of RNA biosynthesis. Of the many roles described for regulatory ncRNAs, we will focus here on their regulation during inflammation and in immunity.

RNA-Binding Proteins as Regulators of Internal Initiation of Viral mRNA Translation

Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that depend on the host’s protein synthesis machinery for translating their mRNAs. The viral mRNA (vRNA) competes with the host mRNA to recruit the translational machinery, including ribosomes, tRNAs, and the limited eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIFs) pool. Many viruses utilize non-canonical strategies such as targeting host eIFs and RNA elements known as internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) to reprogram cellular gene expression, ensuring preferential translation of vRNAs. In this review, we discuss vRNA IRES-mediated translation initiation, highlighting the role of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), other than the canonical translation initiation factors, in regulating their activity.

Research Progress of circRNAs in Glioblastoma

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of single-stranded covalently closed non-coding RNAs without a 5' cap structure or 3' terminal poly (A) tail, which are expressed in a variety of tissues and cells with conserved, stable and specific characteristics. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal tumor in the central nervous system, characterized by high recurrence and mortality rates. The specific expression of circRNAs in GBM has demonstrated their potential to become new biomarkers for the development of GBM. The specific expression of circRNAs in GBM has shown their potential as new biomarkers for GBM cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion, which provides new ideas for GBM treatment. In this paper, we will review the biological properties and functions of circRNAs and their biological roles and clinical applications in GBM.

Research Progress on Circular RNA in Glioma

The discovery of circular RNA (circRNA) greatly complements the traditional gene expression theory. CircRNA is a class of non-coding RNA with a stable cyclic structure. They are highly expressed, spatiotemporal-specific and conservative across species. Importantly, circRNA participates in the occurrence of many kinds of tumors and regulates the tumor development. Glioma is featured by limited therapy and grim prognosis. Cancer-associated circRNA compromises original function or creates new effects in glioma, thus contributing to oncogenesis. Therefore, this article reviews the biogenesis, metabolism, functions and properties of circRNA as a novel potential biomarker for gliomas. We elaborate the expression characteristics, interaction between circRNA and other molecules, aiming to identify new targets for early diagnosis and treatment of gliomas.