151
|
Pupíková M, Rektorová I. Non-pharmacological management of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2019; 127:799-820. [PMID: 31823066 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-019-02113-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the therapeutic effects of non-pharmacological interventions (cognitive training, physical activity, and non-invasive brain stimulation) on cognitive symptoms in Parkinson's disease. A comprehensive literature search for non-pharmacological intervention randomized controlled trials was performed and effect sizes were calculated for each suitable study intervention approach and cognitive domain. Despite the heterogeneity of the study results, we report level B evidence for the probable efficacy of cognitive training in improving or maintaining attention/working memory and memory domains. Level C (possible efficacy) evidence was found for specific physical training types with respect to enhancing executive functions. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and combinatorial approaches show preliminary but promising results. Prediction markers evaluating distinct treatment responses should be identified that would help to choose the best candidates for specific treatment strategies and cognitive symptoms. Future directions and recommendations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pupíková
- Applied Neuroscience Research Group, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University (CEITEC MU), Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Irena Rektorová
- Applied Neuroscience Research Group, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University (CEITEC MU), Brno, Czech Republic. .,Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and School of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Hendriks S, Grady C, Chiong W, Fins JJ, Ford P, Goering S, Greely HT, Hutchison K, Kelly ML, Kim SY, Klein E, Lisanby SH, Mayberg H, Maslen H, Miller FG, Ramos KM, Rommelfanger K, Sheth SA, Wexler A. Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices: A Review. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76:1506-1514. [PMID: 31621797 PMCID: PMC9395156 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Developing more and better diagnostic and therapeutic tools for central nervous system disorders is an ethical imperative. Human research with neural devices is important to this effort and a critical focus of the National Institutes of Health Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative. Despite regulations and standard practices for conducting ethical research, researchers and others seek more guidance on how to ethically conduct neural device studies. This article draws on, reviews, specifies, and interprets existing ethical frameworks, literature, and subject matter expertise to address 3 specific ethical challenges in neural devices research: analysis of risk, informed consent, and posttrial responsibilities to research participants. Observations Research with humans proceeds after careful assessment of the risks and benefits. In assessing whether risks are justified by potential benefits in both invasive and noninvasive neural device research, the following categories of potential risks should be considered: those related to surgery, hardware, stimulation, research itself, privacy and security, and financial burdens. All 3 of the standard pillars of informed consent-disclosure, capacity, and voluntariness-raise challenges in neural device research. Among these challenges are the need to plan for appropriate disclosure of information about atypical and emerging risks of neural devices, a structured evaluation of capacity when that is in doubt, and preventing patients from feeling unduly pressured to participate. Researchers and funders should anticipate participants' posttrial needs linked to study participation and take reasonable steps to facilitate continued access to neural devices that benefit participants. Possible mechanisms for doing so are explored here. Depending on the study, researchers and funders may have further posttrial responsibilities. Conclusions and Relevance This ethical analysis and points to consider may assist researchers, institutional review boards, funders, and others engaged in human neural device research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Hendriks
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christine Grady
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Winston Chiong
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph J. Fins
- Division of Medical Ethics and CASBI, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Ford
- Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sara Goering
- Department of Philosophy and Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Katrina Hutchison
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, Australia
| | - Michael L. Kelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHeath Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Y.H. Kim
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eran Klein
- Department of Philosophy and Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Sciences, University Portland, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sarah H. Lisanby
- Division of Translational Research, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Helen Mayberg
- Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Hannah Maslen
- The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Franklin G. Miller
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Khara M. Ramos
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Cognitive Science and Neuromodulation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Kasten FH, Duecker K, Maack MC, Meiser A, Herrmann CS. Integrating electric field modeling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5427. [PMID: 31780668 PMCID: PMC6882891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13417-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) of the brain can have variable effects, plausibly driven by individual differences in neuroanatomy and resulting differences of the electric fields inside the brain. Here, we integrated individual simulations of electric fields during tES with source localization to predict variability of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) aftereffects on α-oscillations. In two experiments, participants received 20-min of either α-tACS (1 mA) or sham stimulation. Magnetoencephalogram (MEG) was recorded for 10-min before and after stimulation. tACS caused a larger power increase in the α-band compared to sham. The variability of this effect was significantly predicted by measures derived from individual electric field modeling. Our results directly link electric field variability to variability of tACS outcomes, underline the importance of individualizing stimulation protocols, and provide a novel approach to analyze tACS effects in terms of dose-response relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian H Kasten
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.,Neuroimaging Unit, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Duecker
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Marike C Maack
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Arnd Meiser
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph S Herrmann
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany. .,Neuroimaging Unit, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany. .,Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Ji GJ, Wei JJ, Liu T, Li D, Zhu C, Yu F, Tian Y, Wang K, Zhang L, Hu P. Aftereffect and Reproducibility of Three Excitatory Repetitive TMS Protocols for a Response Inhibition Task. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:1155. [PMID: 31749674 PMCID: PMC6848026 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols have been developed for modulating brain function non-invasively. To identify the most powerful one, these protocols have been compared in the context of the motor system. However, to what extent the conclusions could be generalized to high-level functions is largely unknown. In this study, we compared the modulatory effect of three excitatory rTMS protocols on high-level cognition represented by response inhibition ability. Our first experiment revealed that intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) could significantly improve reaction time in a stop signal task, while 5-Hz and 25-Hz stimuli were ineffective. This iTBS effect was significantly higher than that for the sham simulation and only occurred in the second session of the stop signal task after iTBS in the first experiment. However, this aftereffect of iTBS was not reproduced in the second experiment, indicating high variability across subjects. Thus, on the one hand, our findings indicate that iTBS on the pre-SMA could improve inhibitory control, but on the other hand, the reliability and reproducibility of this effect needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gong-Jun Ji
- Department of Medical Psychology, Chaohu Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Jun-Jie Wei
- Department of Medical Psychology, Chaohu Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Tingting Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
| | - Dandan Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
| | - Chunyan Zhu
- Department of Medical Psychology, Chaohu Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Fengqiong Yu
- Department of Medical Psychology, Chaohu Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yanghua Tian
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Medical Psychology, Chaohu Clinical Medical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Panpan Hu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, China
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Prestimulus cortical EEG oscillations can predict the excitability of the primary motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1508-1516. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
156
|
Bland NS, Sale MV. Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS. Exp Brain Res 2019; 237:3071-3088. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05666-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
157
|
|
158
|
Liu J, Zhang B, Wilson G, Kong J. New Perspective for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Site Selection in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Based on Meta- and Functional Connectivity Analyses. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 11:228. [PMID: 31551754 PMCID: PMC6736566 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been widely used to treat mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there exists no consensus on the best stimulation sites. Objective To explore potential stimulation locations for NIBS treatment in patients with MCI, combining meta- and resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) analyses. Methods The meta-analysis was conducted to identify brain regions associated with MCI. Regions of interest (ROIs) were extracted based on this meta-analysis. The rsFC analysis was applied to 45 MCI patients to determine brain surface regions that are functionally connected with the above ROIs. Results We found that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were the overlapping brain regions between our results and those of previous studies. In addition, we recommend that the temporoparietal junction (including the angular gyrus), which was found in both the meta- and rsFC analysis, should be considered in NIBS treatment of MCI. Furthermore, the bilateral orbital prefrontal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, medial superior frontal gyrus, and right inferior occipital gyrus may be potential brain stimulation sites for NIBS treatment of MCI. Conclusion Our results provide several potential sites for NIBS, such as the DLFPC and IFG, and may shed light on the locations of NIBS sites in the treatment of patients with MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Liu
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Binlong Zhang
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Georgia Wilson
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jian Kong
- Author Affiliations: UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco University of Southern California Mayo Clinic, Rochester Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; U Pennsylvania; USC; UC Davis; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Indiana University Washington University St. Louis University of Pennsylvania; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020 (Chair) Siemens; Alzheimer's Association University of Pittsburgh Washington University St. Louis Cornell University; Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; AD Drug Discovery Foundation; Acumen Pharmaceuticals; Washington University St. Louis; Northwestern University; National Institute of Mental Health; Brown University; Eli Lilly (Chair); BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI) University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC Davis (Core PI); UC Davis; UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; University of London; UCLA School of Medicine; UCSF MRI; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; University of Pittsburgh; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; UPenn School of Medicine; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; UC San Diego; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; UC San Diego; National Institute on Aging; UC San Francisco; Brown University; National Institute of Mental Health; Cornell University; Johns Hopkins University; Richard Frank Consulting; Prevent Alzheimer's Disease 2020; National Institute on Aging; Oregon Health & Science University; University of Southern California; University of California - San Diego; University of Michigan; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Baylor College of Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center; Washington University, St. Louis; University of Alabama - Birmingham; Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Johns Hopkins University; New York University; Duke University Medical Center; University of Pennsylvania; University of Kentucky; University of Pittsburgh; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical School; Emory University; University of Kansas, Medical Center; University of California, Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Indiana University; Yale University School of Medicine; McGill Univ., Montreal-Jewish General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Ontario; U.B.C. Clinic for AD & Related Disorders; Cognitive Neurology - St. Joseph's, Ontario; Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health; Northwestern University; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Stanford University; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Boston University; Howard University; Case Western Reserve University; University of California, Davis - Sacramento; Neurological Care of CNY; Parkwood Hospital; University of Wisconsin; University of California, Irvine - BIC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Dent Neurologic Institute; Ohio State University; Albany Medical College; Hartford Hospital, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Rhode Island Hospital; Butler Hospital; UC San Francisco; Medical University South Carolina; St. Joseph's Health Care; Nathan Kline Institute; University of Iowa College of Medicine; Cornell University; University of South Florida: USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute; University of California, San Francisco; University of Southern California; UC San Francisco; University of Southern California; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School; UC Davis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Indiana University; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; UC San Francisco; Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; BWH/HMS (Chair); University of Washington (Chair); Core PI; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); University of Southern California; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Diego; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC San Francisco; UC Davis (Core PI); UC San Diego; Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Core PI); Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic; UC Berkeley (Core PI); University of Michigan; University of Utah; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; Banner Alzheimer's Institute; UC Berkeley; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Washington University St. Louis; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; Perelman School of Medicine, UPenn; USC (Core PI); USC; USC; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC Irvine; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; Indiana University; UC San Francisco; Department of Defense (retired); University of Southern California; University of California, San Diego; Columbia University Medical Center; Rush University Medical Center; Wien Center; Duke University Medical Center; University of Rochester Medical Center; University of California, Irvine; Medical University South Carolina; Premiere Research Inst (Palm Beach Neurology); University of California, San Francisco; Georgetown University Medical Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Banner Sun Health Research Institute; Howard University; University of Wisconsin; University of Washington; Stanford University; Cornell University.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
159
|
Cespón J, Rodella C, Miniussi C, Pellicciari MC. Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy elderly and Alzheimer's disease patients: A pilot study. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:2038-2052. [PMID: 31541981 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modify cognitive performance and neural activity in healthy elderly and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. METHODS Fourteen healthy elderly and twelve AD patients performed a working memory task during an electroencephalogram recording before and after receiving anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Behavioural performance, event-related potentials (P200, P300) and evoked cortical oscillations were studied as correlates of working memory. RESULTS Anodal tDCS increased P200 and P300 amplitudes in healthy elderly. Cathodal tDCS increased P200 amplitude and frontal theta activity between 150 and 300 ms in AD patients. Improved working memory after anodal tDCS correlated with increased P300 in healthy elderly. In AD patients, slight tendencies between enhanced working memory and increased P200 after cathodal tDCS were observed. CONCLUSIONS Functional neural modulations were promoted by anodal tDCS in healthy elderly and by cathodal tDCS in AD patients. SIGNIFICANCE Interaction between tDCS polarity and the neural state (e.g., hyper-excitability exhibited by AD patients) suggests that appropriate tDCS parameters (in terms of tDCS polarity) to induce behavioural improvements should be chosen based on the participant's characteristics. Future studies using higher sample sizes should confirm and extend the present findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cespón
- Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; BCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language, Donostia/San Sebastián, Spain.
| | - C Rodella
- Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - C Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy; Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - M C Pellicciari
- Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Abellaneda-Pérez K, Vaqué-Alcázar L, Solé-Padullés C, Bartrés-Faz D. Combining non-invasive brain stimulation with functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neural substrates of cognitive aging. J Neurosci Res 2019; 100:1159-1170. [PMID: 31418480 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
As aging population is increasing, new methodologies to apprehend and enhance the mechanisms related to optimal brain function in advancing age become urgent. This review describes how the combined use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides novel experimental data on the putative neurophysiological mechanisms underlying inter-individual differences in cognitive status among older adults, also further illuminating our understanding of theoretical models proposed within the cognitive neuroscience of aging literature. In addition, it explores published evidence of how this combined procedure entails the capacity to modify the activity and connectivity of specific brain networks in older adults, potentially leading to improvements in cognitive function and other measures reflecting mental health status. Although additional research is needed, combining NIBS with fMRI might provide innovative understanding of how fundamental brain plasticity mechanisms operate in advancing age, a knowledge that may be eventually used to refine more individually tailored approaches to promote brain health in aged populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian Abellaneda-Pérez
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Solé-Padullés
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Bartrés-Faz
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Wagner J, Makeig S, Hoopes D, Gola M. Can Oscillatory Alpha-Gamma Phase-Amplitude Coupling be Used to Understand and Enhance TMS Effects? Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:263. [PMID: 31427937 PMCID: PMC6689956 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent applications of simultaneous scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that adapting stimulation to underlying brain states may enhance neuroplastic effects of TMS. It is often assumed that longer-lasting effects of TMS on brain function may be mediated by phasic interactions between TMS pulses and endogenous cortical oscillatory dynamics. The mechanisms by which TMS exerts its neuromodulatory effects, however, remain unknown. Here, we discuss evidence concerning the functional effects on synaptic plasticity of oscillatory cross-frequency coupling in cortical networks as a potential framework for understanding the neuromodulatory effects of TMS. We first discuss evidence for interactions between endogenous oscillatory brain dynamics and externally induced electromagnetic field activity. Alpha band (8-12 Hz) activities are of special interest here because of the wide application and therapeutic effectiveness of rhythmic TMS (rTMS) using a stimulus repetition frequency at or near 10 Hz. We discuss the large body of literature on alpha oscillations suggesting that alpha oscillatory cycles produce periodic inhibition or excitation of neuronal processing through phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of low-frequency oscillations with high-frequency broadband (or gamma) bursting. Such alpha-gamma coupling may reflect excitability of neuronal ensembles underlying neuroplasticity effects of TMS. We propose that TMS delivery with simultaneous EEG recording and near real-time estimation of source-resolved alpha-gamma PAC might be used to select the precise timing of TMS pulse deliveries so as to enhance the neuroplastic effects of TMS therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Wagner
- Swartz Center for Computational Neurosciences, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Scott Makeig
- Swartz Center for Computational Neurosciences, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - David Hoopes
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Mateusz Gola
- Swartz Center for Computational Neurosciences, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.,Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Di Rosa E, Brigadoi S, Cutini S, Tarantino V, Dell'Acqua R, Mapelli D, Braver TS, Vallesi A. Reward motivation and neurostimulation interact to improve working memory performance in healthy older adults: A simultaneous tDCS-fNIRS study. Neuroimage 2019; 202:116062. [PMID: 31369810 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies have evaluated the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the enhancement of working memory (WM) performance in healthy older adults. However, the mixed results obtained so far suggest the need for concurrent brain imaging, in order to more directly examine tDCS effects. The present study adopted a continuous multimodal approach utilizing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine the interactive effects of tDCS combined with manipulations of reward motivation. Twenty-one older adults (mean age = 69.7 years; SD = 5.05) performed an experimental visuo-spatial WM task before, during and after the delivery of 1.5 mA anodal tDCS/sham over the left prefrontal cortex (PFC). During stimulation, participants received performance-contingent reward for every fast and correct response during the WM task. In both sessions, hemodynamic activity of the bilateral frontal, motor and parietal areas was recorded across the entire duration of the WM task. Cognitive functions and reward sensitivity were also assessed with standard measures. Results demonstrated a significant impact of tDCS on both WM performance and hemodynamic activity. Specifically, faster responses in the WM task were observed both during and after anodal tDCS, while no differences were found under sham control conditions. However, these effects emerged only when taking into account individual visuo-spatial WM capacity. Additionally, during and after the anodal tDCS, increased hemodynamic activity relative to sham was observed in the bilateral PFC, while no effects of tDCS were detected in the motor and parietal areas. These results provide the first evidence of tDCS-dependent functional changes in PFC activity in healthy older adults during the execution of a WM task. Moreover, they highlight the utility of combining reward motivation with prefrontal anodal tDCS, as a potential strategy to improve WM efficiency in low performing healthy older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Di Rosa
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
| | - Sabrina Brigadoi
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Simone Cutini
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincenza Tarantino
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberto Dell'Acqua
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniela Mapelli
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Todd S Braver
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Antonino Vallesi
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Chen L, Chung SW, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Is theta burst stimulation ready as a clinical treatment for depression? Expert Rev Neurother 2019; 19:1089-1102. [PMID: 31282224 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1641084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Major depression is a common and debilitating mental disorder that can be difficult to treat. Substantive evidence over the past two decades has established repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an effective antidepressant therapy, although scope exists to improve its efficacy and efficiency. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a novel rTMS pattern attracting much research interest as a tool to study neurophysiology and treat neuropsychiatric disorders. Areas covered: This article outlines rTMS' state of development and explores the physiology studies underpinning TBS development and its observable neuronal conditioning and metabolic effects. We present a systematic review of studies that applied TBS to treat depression, followed by commentary on safety and practical considerations. Expert opinion: Much experimental and clinical research have advanced our understanding of the antidepressant effects of TBS, although unanswered questions remain relating to its physiological effects, response variability and optimal parameters for therapeutic purposes. A small number of sham-controlled trials, and one large comparative trial, support the therapeutic efficacy of TBS and demonstrates its non-inferiority relative to traditional rTMS. In this light, TBS can reasonably be offered as an alternative to rTMS in treatment-resistant depression, while ongoing research is likely to inform its therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo Chen
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia.,Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Health Care , Camberwell , VIC , Australia.,Alfred Mental and Addiction Health, Alfred Health , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Sung Wook Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia.,Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Health Care , Camberwell , VIC , Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia.,Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Health Care , Camberwell , VIC , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Chirumamilla VC, Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Koirala N, Bonertz T, von Grotthus S, Muthuraman M, Groppa S. Cortical Excitability Dynamics During Fear Processing. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:568. [PMID: 31275095 PMCID: PMC6593288 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the modulation of cortical excitability in the prefrontal cortex during fear processing in humans. Here, we aimed to transiently modulate and test the cortical excitability during fear processing using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and brain oscillations in theta and alpha frequency bands with electroencephalography (EEG). Methods: We conducted two separate experiments (no-TMS and TMS). In the no-TMS experiment, EEG recordings were performed during the instructed fear paradigm in which a visual cue (CS+) was paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (electric shock), while the other visual cue was unpaired (CS-). In the TMS experiment, in addition the TMS was applied on the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). The participants also underwent structural MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scanning and were assigned pseudo-randomly to both experiments, such that age and gender were matched. The cortical excitability was evaluated by time-frequency analysis and functional connectivity with weighted phase lag index (WPLI). We further linked the excitability patterns with markers of stress coping capability. Results: After visual cue onset, we found increased theta power in the frontal lobe and decreased alpha power in the occipital lobe during CS+ relative to CS- trials. TMS of dmPFC increased theta power in the frontal lobe and reduced alpha power in the occipital lobe during CS+. The TMS pulse increased the information flow from the sensorimotor region to the prefrontal and occipital regions in the theta and alpha bands, respectively during CS+ compared to CS-. Pre-stimulation frontal theta power (0.75–1 s) predicted the magnitude of frontal theta power changes after stimulation (1–1.25 s). Finally, the increased frontal theta power during CS+ compared to CS- was positively correlated with stress coping behavior. Conclusion: Our results show that TMS over dmPFC transiently modulated the regional cortical excitability and the fronto-occipital information flows during fear processing, while the pre-stimulation frontal theta power determined the strength of achieved effects. The frontal theta power may serve as a biomarker for fear processing and stress-coping responses in individuals and could be clinically tested in mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkata C Chirumamilla
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nabin Koirala
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tamara Bonertz
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah von Grotthus
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Jami AS, Guo X, Kulkarni P, Henin SE, Liu A, Chen Z. Tracking Changes in Brain Network Connectivity under Transcranial Current Stimulation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2019; 2019:6430-6433. [PMID: 31947314 PMCID: PMC8011934 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation has been widely used in experimental and clinical applications to perturb the brain activity, aiming at promoting synaptic plasticity or enhancing functional connectivity within targeted brain regions. However, there are different types of neurostimulations and various choices of stimulation parameters; how these choices influence the intermediate neurophysiological effects and brain connectivity remain incompletely understood. We propose several quantitative methods to investigate the brain connectivity of an epileptic patient before and after transcranial alternating/direct current stimulation (tACS/tDCS). The neuro-feedback derived from our analyses may provide useful cues for the effectiveness of neurostimulation.
Collapse
|
166
|
|
167
|
Romero MC, Davare M, Armendariz M, Janssen P. Neural effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation at the single-cell level. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2642. [PMID: 31201331 PMCID: PMC6572776 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10638-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can non-invasively modulate neural activity in humans. Despite three decades of research, the spatial extent of the cortical area activated by TMS is still controversial. Moreover, how TMS interacts with task-related activity during motor behavior is unknown. Here, we applied single-pulse TMS over macaque parietal cortex while recording single-unit activity at various distances from the center of stimulation during grasping. The spatial extent of TMS-induced activation is remarkably restricted, affecting the spiking activity of single neurons in an area of cortex measuring less than 2 mm in diameter. In task-related neurons, TMS evokes a transient excitation followed by reduced activity, paralleled by a significantly longer grasping time. Furthermore, TMS-induced activity and task-related activity do not summate in single neurons. These results furnish crucial experimental evidence for the neural effects of TMS at the single-cell level and uncover the neural underpinnings of behavioral effects of TMS. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can modulate human brain activity, but the extent of the cortical area activated by TMS is unclear. Here, the authors show that TMS affects monkey single neuron activity in an area less than 2 mm diameter, while TMS-induced activity and task-related activity do not summate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Romero
- Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Onderzoeksgroep Bewegingscontrole & Neuroplasticiteit, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Leuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Marco Davare
- Onderzoeksgroep Bewegingscontrole & Neuroplasticiteit, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Leuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Marcelo Armendariz
- Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Janssen
- Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Yeh N, Rose NS. How Can Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Used to Modulate Episodic Memory?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol 2019; 10:993. [PMID: 31263433 PMCID: PMC6584914 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize the existing literature on how transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to modulate episodic memory. Given the numerous parameters of TMS protocols and experimental design characteristics that can be manipulated, a mechanistic understanding of how changes in the combination of parameters (e.g., frequency, timing, intensity, targeted brain region, memory task) modulate episodic memory is needed. To address this, we reviewed 59 studies and conducted a meta-analysis on 245 effect sizes from 37 articles on healthy younger adults (N = 1,061). Analyses revealed generally more beneficial effects of 1-Hz rTMS vs. other frequencies on episodic memory. Moderation analyses revealed complex interactions as online 20-Hz rTMS protocols led to negative effects, while offline 20-Hz rTMS led to enhancing effects. There was also an interaction between stimulation intensity and frequency as 20-Hz rTMS had more negative effects when applied below- vs. at-motor threshold. Conversely, 1-Hz rTMS had more beneficial effects than other frequencies when applied below- vs. at- or above-motor threshold. No reliable aggregate or hypothesized interactions were found when assessing stimulation site (frontal vs. parietal cortex, left vs. right hemisphere), stimulated memory process (during encoding vs. retrieval), the type of retrieval (associative/recollection vs. item/familiarity), or the type of control comparison (active vs. sham or no TMS) on episodic memory. However, there is insufficient data to make strong inference based on the lack of aggregate or two-way interactions between these factors, or to assess more complex (e.g., 3-way) interactions. We reviewed the effects on other populations (healthy older adults and clinical populations), but systematic comparison of parameters was also prevented due to insufficient data. A database of parameters and effects sizes is available as an open source repository so that data from studies can be continuously accumulated in order to facilitate future meta-analysis. In conclusion, modulating episodic memory relies on complex interactions among the numerous moderator variables that can be manipulated. Therefore, rigorous, systematic comparisons need to be further investigated as the body of literature grows in order to fully understand the combination of parameters that lead to enhancing, detrimental or null effects on episodic memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Yeh
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States
| | - Nathan S Rose
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Intracortical Dynamics Underlying Repetitive Stimulation Predicts Changes in Network Connectivity. J Neurosci 2019; 39:6122-6135. [PMID: 31182638 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0535-19.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted stimulation can be used to modulate the activity of brain networks. Previously we demonstrated that direct electrical stimulation produces predictable poststimulation changes in brain excitability. However, understanding the neural dynamics during stimulation and its relationship to poststimulation effects is limited but critical for treatment optimization. Here, we applied 10 Hz direct electrical stimulation across several cortical regions in 14 human subjects (6 males) implanted with intracranial electrodes for seizure monitoring. The stimulation train was characterized by a consistent increase in high gamma (70-170 Hz) power. Immediately post-train, low-frequency (1-8 Hz) power increased, resulting in an evoked response that was highly correlated with the neural response during stimulation. Using two measures of network connectivity, corticocortical evoked potentials (indexing effective connectivity), and theta coherence (indexing functional connectivity), we found a stronger response to stimulation in regions that were highly connected to the stimulation site. In these regions, repeated cycles of stimulation trains and rest progressively altered the stimulation response. Finally, after just 2 min (∼10%) of repetitive stimulation, we were able to predict poststimulation connectivity changes with high discriminability. Together, this work reveals a relationship between stimulation dynamics and poststimulation connectivity changes in humans. Thus, measuring neural activity during stimulation can inform future plasticity-inducing protocols.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Brain stimulation tools have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite the widespread use of brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, the therapeutic efficacy of these technologies remains suboptimal. This is in part because of a lack of understanding of the dynamic neural changes that occur during stimulation. In this study, we provide the first detailed characterization of neural activity during plasticity induction through intracranial electrode stimulation and recording in 14 medication-resistant epilepsy patients. These results fill a missing gap in our understanding of stimulation-induced plasticity in humans. In the longer-term, these data will also guide our translational efforts toward non-invasive, personalized, closed-loop neuromodulation therapy for neurological and psychiatric disorders in humans.
Collapse
|
170
|
Kroczek LO, Gunter TC, Rysop AU, Friederici AD, Hartwigsen G. Contributions of left frontal and temporal cortex to sentence comprehension: Evidence from simultaneous TMS-EEG. Cortex 2019; 115:86-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
171
|
Snyder AZ, Bauer AQ. Mapping Structure-Function Relationships in the Brain. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2019; 4:510-521. [PMID: 30528965 PMCID: PMC6488459 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Mapping the structural and functional connectivity of the brain is a major focus of systems neuroscience research and will help to identify causally important changes in neural circuitry responsible for behavioral dysfunction. Several methods for examining brain activity in humans have been extended to rodent and monkey models in which molecular and genetic manipulations exist for linking to human disease. In this review, which is part of a special issue focused on bridging brain connectivity information across species and spatiotemporal scales, we address mapping brain activity and neural connectivity in rodents using optogenetics in conjunction with either functional magnetic resonance imaging or optical intrinsic signal imaging. We chose to focus on these techniques because they are capable of reporting spontaneous or evoked hemodynamic activity most closely linked to human neuroimaging studies. We discuss the capabilities and limitations of blood-based imaging methods, usage of optogenetic techniques to map neural systems in rodent models, and other powerful mapping techniques for examining neural connectivity over different spatial and temporal scales. We also discuss implementing strategies for mapping brain connectivity in humans with both basic and clinical applications, and conclude with how cross-species mapping studies can be utilized to influence preclinical imaging studies and clinical practices alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Z Snyder
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Adam Q Bauer
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Tremblay S, Rogasch NC, Premoli I, Blumberger DM, Casarotto S, Chen R, Di Lazzaro V, Farzan F, Ferrarelli F, Fitzgerald PB, Hui J, Ilmoniemi RJ, Kimiskidis VK, Kugiumtzis D, Lioumis P, Pascual-Leone A, Pellicciari MC, Rajji T, Thut G, Zomorrodi R, Ziemann U, Daskalakis ZJ. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:802-844. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
173
|
Koch G. The new era of TMS-EEG: Moving towards the clinical practice. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:791-792. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
174
|
Hilbert S, McAssey M, Bühner M, Schwaferts P, Gruber M, Goerigk S, Taylor PCJ. Right hemisphere occipital rTMS impairs working memory in visualizers but not in verbalizers. Sci Rep 2019; 9:6307. [PMID: 31004125 PMCID: PMC6474855 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42733-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Distinguishing between verbal and visual working memory processes is complicated by the fact that the strategy used is hard to control or even assess. Many stimuli used in working memory tasks can be processed via verbal or visual coding, such as the digits in the digit span backwards task (DSB). The present study used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the use of visual processing strategies in the DSB. A total of 47 German university students took part in the study, 23 spontaneously using a verbal processing strategy and 24 using a visual strategy. After rTMS to the right occipital cortex, visualizers showed a significantly stronger mean performance decrease compared to verbalizers. The results indicate that the visual cortex is more critical for visualizers compared to verbalizers in the DSB task. Furthermore, the favored processing modality seems to be determined by the preference for a cognitive strategy rather than the presentation modality, and people are aware of the applied strategy. These findings provide insight into inter-individual differences in working memory processing and yield important implications for laboratory studies as well as clinical practice: the stimulus does not necessarily determine the processing and the participant can be aware of that.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Hilbert
- Faculty of Psychology, Educational Science, and Sport Science, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Michaela McAssey
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neuroscience, Research Training Group 2175, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany
| | - Markus Bühner
- Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, LMU Munich, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany
| | - Patrick Schwaferts
- Institute of Statistics, Methodological Foundations of Statistics and its Applications, Ludwigstraße 33, 80539, München, Germany
| | - Monika Gruber
- Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, LMU Munich, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany
| | - Stephan Goerigk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany
- Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Infanteriestraße 11A, 80797, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Christopher John Taylor
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Abstract
Magnetic fields pass through tissue undiminished and without producing harmful effects, motivating their use as a wireless, minimally invasive means to control neural activity. Here, we review mechanisms and techniques coupling magnetic fields to changes in electrochemical potentials across neuronal membranes. Biological magnetoreception, although incompletely understood, is discussed as a potential source of inspiration. The emergence of magnetic properties in materials is reviewed to clarify the distinction between biomolecules containing transition metals and ferrite nanoparticles that exhibit significant net moments. We describe recent developments in the use of magnetic nanomaterials as transducers converting magnetic stimuli to forms readily perceived by neurons and discuss opportunities for multiplexed and bidirectional control as well as the challenges posed by delivery to the brain. The variety of magnetic field conditions and mechanisms by which they can be coupled to neuronal signaling cascades highlights the desirability of continued interchange between magnetism physics and neurobiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Christiansen
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander W Senko
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Laboratory of Electronics, and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
| | - Polina Anikeeva
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Research Laboratory of Electronics, and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Brabenec L, Klobusiakova P, Barton M, Mekyska J, Galaz Z, Zvoncak V, Kiska T, Mucha J, Smekal Z, Kostalova M, Rektorova I. Non-invasive stimulation of the auditory feedback area for improved articulation in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 61:187-192. [DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
177
|
Pellegrino G, Arcara G, Di Pino G, Turco C, Maran M, Weis L, Piccione F, Siebner HR. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the sensory-motor regions inhibits gamma synchrony. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40:2736-2746. [PMID: 30854728 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique able to induce plasticity phenomena. Although tDCS application has been spreading over a variety of neuroscience domains, the mechanisms by which the stimulation acts are largely unknown. We investigated tDCS effects on cortical gamma synchrony, which is a crucial player in cortical function. We performed a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study on healthy subjects, combining tDCS and magnetoencephalography. By driving brain activity via 40 Hz auditory stimulation during magnetoencephalography, we experimentally tuned cortical gamma synchrony and measured it before and after bilateral tDCS of the primary sensory-motor hand regions (anode left, cathode right). We demonstrated that the stimulation induces a remarkable decrease of gamma synchrony (13 out of 15 subjects), as measured by gamma phase at 40 Hz. tDCS has strong remote effects, as the cortical region mostly affected was located far away from the stimulation site and covered a large area of the right centro-temporal cortex. No significant differences between stimulations were found for baseline gamma synchrony, as well as early transient auditory responses. This suggests a specific tDCS effect on externally driven gamma synchronization. This study sheds new light on the effect of tDCS on cortical function showing that the net effect of the stimulation on cortical gamma synchronization is an inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Pellegrino
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Giorgio Arcara
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Pino
- Department of Neurology, NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Turco
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Matteo Maran
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Luca Weis
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Francesco Piccione
- Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Antonenko D, Hayek D, Netzband J, Grittner U, Flöel A. tDCS-induced episodic memory enhancement and its association with functional network coupling in older adults. Sci Rep 2019; 9:2273. [PMID: 30783198 PMCID: PMC6381175 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38630-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) augments training-induced cognitive gains, an issue of particular relevance in the aging population. However, negative outcomes have been reported as well, and few studies so far have evaluated the impact of tDCS on episodic memory formation in elderly cohorts. The heterogeneity of previous findings highlights the importance of elucidating neuronal underpinnings of tDCS-induced modulations, and of determining individual predictors of a positive response. In the present study, we aimed to modulate episodic memory formation in 34 older adults with anodal tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) over left temporoparietal cortex. Participants were asked to learn novel associations between pictures and pseudowords, and episodic memory performance was subsequently assessed during immediate retrieval. Prior to experimental sessions, participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. tDCS led to better retrieval performance and augmented learning curves. Hippocampo-temporoparietal functional connectivity was positively related to initial memory performance, and was positively associated with the magnitude of individual tDCS-induced enhancement. In sum, we provide evidence for brain stimulation-induced plasticity of episodic memory processes in older adults, corroborating and extending previous findings. Our results demonstrate that intrinsic network coupling may determine individual responsiveness to brain stimulation, and thus help to further explain variability of tDCS responsiveness in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Antonenko
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Dayana Hayek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Justus Netzband
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Grittner
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Stroke Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnes Flöel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Karabanov AN, Saturnino GB, Thielscher A, Siebner HR. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Localize Brain Function? Front Psychol 2019; 10:213. [PMID: 30837911 PMCID: PMC6389710 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) uses constant (TDCS) or alternating currents (TACS) to modulate brain activity. Most TES studies apply low-intensity currents through scalp electrodes (≤2 mA) using bipolar electrode arrangements, producing weak electrical fields in the brain (<1 V/m). Low-intensity TES has been employed in humans to induce changes in task performance during or after stimulation. In analogy to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation, TES-induced behavioral effects have often been taken as evidence for a causal involvement of the brain region underlying one of the two stimulation electrodes, often referred to as the active electrode. Here, we critically review the utility of bipolar low-intensity TES to localize human brain function. We summarize physiological substrates that constitute peripheral targets for TES and may mediate subliminal or overtly perceived peripheral stimulation during TES. We argue that peripheral co-stimulation may contribute to the behavioral effects of TES and should be controlled for by "sham" TES. We discuss biophysical properties of TES, which need to be considered, if one wishes to make realistic assumptions about which brain regions were preferentially targeted by TES. Using results from electric field calculations, we evaluate the validity of different strategies that have been used for selective spatial targeting. Finally, we comment on the challenge of adjusting the dose of TES considering dose-response relationships between the weak tissue currents and the physiological effects in targeted cortical areas. These considerations call for caution when attributing behavioral effects during or after low-intensity TES studies to a specific brain region and may facilitate the selection of best practices for future TES studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Ninija Karabanov
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Guilherme Bicalho Saturnino
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Ke Y, Wang N, Du J, Kong L, Liu S, Xu M, An X, Ming D. The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Working Memory Training in Healthy Young Adults. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:19. [PMID: 30774590 PMCID: PMC6367257 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Working memory (WM) is a fundamental cognitive ability to support complex thought, but it is limited in capacity. WM training has shown the potential benefit for those in need of a higher WM ability. Many studies have shown the potential of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to transiently enhance WM performance by delivering a low current to the brain cortex of interest, via electrodes on the scalp. tDCS has also been revealed as a promising intervention to augment WM training in a few studies. However, those few tDCS-paired WM training studies, focused more on the effect of tDCS on WM enhancement and its transferability after training and paid less attention to the variation of cognitive performance during the training procedure. The current study attempted to explore the effect of tDCS on the variation of performance, during WM training, in healthy young adults. All the participants received WM training with the load-adaptive verbal N-back task, for 5 days. During the training procedure, active/sham anodal high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) was used to stimulate the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). To examine the training effect, pre- and post-tests were performed, respectively, 1 day before and after the training sessions. At the beginning of each training session, stable-load WM tasks were performed, to examine the performance variation during training. Compared to the sham stimulation, higher learning rates of performance metrics during the training procedure were found when WM training was combined with active anodal HD-tDCS. The performance improvements (post–pre) of the active group, were also found to be higher than those of the sham group and were transferred to a similar untrained WM task. Further analysis revealed a negative relationship between the training improvements and the baseline performance. These findings show the potential that tDCS may be leveraged as an intervention to facilitate WM training, for those in need of a higher WM ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufeng Ke
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ningci Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiale Du
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Linghan Kong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Minpeng Xu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingwei An
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Dong Ming
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Treccani G. From Structure to Behavior: Circuit Specificity of Stress-Induced Synaptic Plasticity in the Basolateral Amygdala Projection Neurons. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 85:e7-e9. [PMID: 30621860 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Treccani
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences, and German Resilience Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany, and the Translational Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Pini L, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Pizzini FB, Frisoni GB, Pievani M. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Dementia: A Complex Network Story. NEURODEGENER DIS 2019; 18:281-301. [PMID: 30695786 DOI: 10.1159/000495945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is emerging as a promising rehabilitation tool for a number of neurodegenerative diseases. However, the therapeutic mechanisms of NIBS are not completely understood. In this review, we will summarize NIBS results in the context of brain imaging studies of functional connectivity and metabolites to gain insight into the possible mechanisms underlying recovery. We will briefly discuss how the clinical manifestations of common neurodegenerative disorders may be related with aberrant connectivity within large-scale neural networks. We will then focus on recent studies combining resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging with NIBS to delineate how stimulation of different brain regions induce complex network modifications, both at the local and distal level. Moreover, we will review studies combining magnetic resonance spectroscopy and NIBS to investigate how microscale changes are related to modifications of large-scale networks. Finally, we will re-examine previous NIBS studies in dementia in light of this network perspective. A better understanding of NIBS impact on the functionality of large-scale brain networks may be useful to design beneficial treatments for neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Pini
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rosa Manenti
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Cotelli
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca B Pizzini
- Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostics and Pathology, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michela Pievani
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Steinberg F, Pixa NH, Fregni F. A Review of Acute Aerobic Exercise and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Cognitive Functions and Their Potential Synergies. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 12:534. [PMID: 30687048 PMCID: PMC6336823 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Today, several pharmaceutic and non-pharmaceutic approaches exist to treat psychiatric and neurological diseases. Because of the lack of treatment procedures that are medication free and without severe side effects, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and aerobic exercise (AE) have been tested to explore the potential for initiating and modulating neuroplasticity in the human brain. Both tDCS and AE could support cognition and behavior in the clinical and non-clinical context to improve the recovery process within neurological or psychiatric conditions or to increase performance. As these techniques still lack meaningful effects, although they provide multiple beneficial opportunities within disease and health applications, there is emerging interest to find improved tDCS and AE protocols. Since multimodal approaches could provoke synergetic effects, a few recent studies have begun to combine tDCS and AE within different settings such as in cognitive training in health or for treatment purposes within clinical settings, all of which show superior effects compared to single technique applications. The beneficial outcomes of both techniques depend on several parameters and the understanding of neural mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. Recent studies have begun to directly combine tDCS and AE within one session, although their interactions on the behavioral, neurophysiological and neurochemical levels are entirely unclear. Therefore, this review: (a) provides an overview of acute behavioral, neurophysiological, and neurochemical effects that both techniques provoke within only one single application in isolation; (b) gives an overview regarding the mechanistic pathways; and (c) discusses potential interactions and synergies between tDCS and AE that might be provoked when directly combining both techniques. From this literature review focusing primarily on the cognitive domain in term of specific executive functions (EFs; inhibition, updating, and switching), it is concluded that a direct combination of tDCS and AE provides multiple beneficial opportunities for synergistic effects. A combination could be useful within non-clinical settings in health and for treating several psychiatric and neurologic conditions. However, there is a lack of research and there are several possibly interacting moderating parameters that must be considered and more importantly must be systematically investigated in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Steinberg
- Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Pixa
- Sport Psychology, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Iturrate I, Pereira M, Millán JDR. Closed-loop electrical neurostimulation: Challenges and opportunities. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
185
|
Affiliation(s)
- Til O Bergmann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study. Neural Plast 2018; 2018:3156796. [PMID: 30425735 PMCID: PMC6218719 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3156796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Response inhibition is the cognitive process required to cancel an intended action. During that process, a “go” reaction is intercepted particularly by the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). After the commission of inhibition errors, theta activity (4–8 Hz) is related to the adaption processes. In this study, we intend to examine whether the boosting of theta activity by electrical stimulation over rIFG reduces the number of errors and the reaction times in a response inhibition task (Go/NoGo paradigm) during and after stimulation. 23 healthy right-handed adults participated in the study. In three separate sessions, theta tACS at 6 Hz, transcranial random noise (tRNS) as a second stimulation condition, and sham stimulation were applied for 20 minutes. Based on behavioral data, this study could not show any effects of 6 Hz tACS as well as full spectrum tRNS on response inhibition in any of the conditions. Since many findings support the relevance of the rIFG for response inhibition, this could mean that 6 Hz activity is not important for response inhibition in that structure. Reasons for our null findings could also lie in the stimulation parameters, such as the electrode montage or the stimulation frequency, which are discussed in this article in more detail. Sharing negative findings will have (1) positive impact on future research questions and study design and will improve (2) knowledge acquisition of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation techniques.
Collapse
|
187
|
Conde V, Tomasevic L, Akopian I, Stanek K, Saturnino GB, Thielscher A, Bergmann TO, Siebner HR. The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies. Neuroimage 2018; 185:300-312. [PMID: 30347282 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 09/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) excites populations of neurons in the stimulated cortex, and the resulting activation may spread to connected brain regions. The distributed cortical response can be recorded with electroencephalography (EEG). Since TMS also stimulates peripheral sensory and motor axons and generates a loud "click" sound, the TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) reflect not only neural activity induced by transcranial neuronal excitation but also neural activity due to somatosensory and auditory processing. In 17 healthy young individuals, we systematically assessed the contribution of multisensory peripheral stimulation to TEPs using a TMS-compatible EEG system. Real TMS was delivered with a figure-of-eight coil over the left para-median posterior parietal cortex or superior frontal gyrus with the coil being oriented perpendicularly or in parallel to the target gyrus. We also recorded the EEG responses evoked by realistic sham stimulation over the posterior parietal and superior frontal cortex, mimicking the auditory and somatosensory sensations evoked by real TMS. We applied state-of-the-art procedures to attenuate somatosensory and auditory confounds during real TMS, including the placement of a foam layer underneath the coil and auditory noise masking. Despite these precautions, the temporal and spatial features of the cortical potentials evoked by real TMS at the prefrontal and parietal site closely resembled the cortical potentials evoked by realistic sham TMS, both for early and late TEP components. Our findings stress the need to include a peripheral multisensory control stimulation in the design of TMS-EEG studies to enable a dissociation between truly transcranial and non-transcranial components of TEPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Conde
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Clinical Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Leo Tomasevic
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Irina Akopian
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Konrad Stanek
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Guilherme B Saturnino
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Center for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Center for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; Institute for Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hartwig Roman Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 København NV, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Non-linear transfer characteristics of stimulation and recording hardware account for spurious low-frequency artifacts during amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). Neuroimage 2018; 179:134-143. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
189
|
Herring JD, Esterer S, Marshall TR, Jensen O, Bergmann TO. Low-frequency alternating current stimulation rhythmically suppresses gamma-band oscillations and impairs perceptual performance. Neuroimage 2018; 184:440-449. [PMID: 30243972 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Low frequency oscillations such as alpha (8-12 Hz) are hypothesized to rhythmically gate sensory processing, reflected by 40-100 Hz gamma band activity, via the mechanism of pulsed inhibition. We applied transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) at individual alpha frequency (IAF) and flanking frequencies (IAF-4 Hz, IAF+4 Hz) to the occipital cortex of healthy human volunteers during concurrent magnetoencephalography (MEG), while participants performed a visual detection task inducing strong gamma-band responses. Occipital (but not retinal) TACS phasically suppressed stimulus-induced gamma oscillations in the visual cortex and impaired target detection, with stronger phase-to-amplitude coupling predicting behavioral impairments. Retinal control TACS ruled out retino-thalamo-cortical entrainment resulting from (subthreshold) retinal stimulation. All TACS frequencies tested were effective, suggesting that visual gamma-band responses can be modulated by a range of low frequency oscillations. We propose that TACS-induced membrane potential modulations mimic the rhythmic change in cortical excitability by which spontaneous low frequency oscillations may eventually exert their impact when gating sensory processing via pulsed inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim D Herring
- Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sophie Esterer
- CUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tom R Marshall
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ole Jensen
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Til O Bergmann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Habibollahi Saatlou F, Rogasch NC, McNair NA, Biabani M, Pillen SD, Marshall TR, Bergmann TO. MAGIC: An open-source MATLAB toolbox for external control of transcranial magnetic stimulation devices. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:1189-1191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
191
|
Antonenko D, Nierhaus T, Meinzer M, Prehn K, Thielscher A, Ittermann B, Flöel A. Age-dependent effects of brain stimulation on network centrality. Neuroimage 2018; 176:71-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
192
|
Guarnieri R, Marino M, Barban F, Ganzetti M, Mantini D. Online EEG artifact removal for BCI applications by adaptive spatial filtering. J Neural Eng 2018; 15:056009. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aacfdf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
193
|
Abend R, van 't Wout M. Commentary: Augmentation of Fear Extinction by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12:121. [PMID: 30002621 PMCID: PMC6031735 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rany Abend
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mascha van 't Wout
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Brown Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Baeken C, Dedoncker J, Remue J, Wu GR, Vanderhasselt MA, De Witte S, Poppa T, Hooley JM, De Raedt R. One MRI-compatible tDCS session attenuates ventromedial cortical perfusion when exposed to verbal criticism: The role of perceived criticism. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39:4462-4470. [PMID: 29956424 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential treatment strategy for mood and anxiety disorders, but how this application may influence emotional processes, and whether this is related to individual characteristics, is not well understood. It has been proposed that perceived criticism (PC) may represent a vulnerability factor for the development of such mental illnesses. To decipher whether neural mechanisms of action of tDCS potentially differ depending on PC status (low vs. high), we evaluated mood and brain perfusion before and after applying MRI-compatible tDCS, and after participants were exposed to verbal criticism in the scanner. Experimental design 30 healthy nondepressed females were included in a sham-controlled crossover MRI-compatible tDCS study. Brain perfusion was measured by means of arterial spin labeling (ASL) before and after tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and after hearing criticism. Before the experiment, all participants provided a rating of PC in their closest environment. Principal observations at the behavioral level, criticism made participants angrier. This was unrelated to the active or sham stimulation. After being criticized, females scoring high on PC had significantly decreased brain perfusion in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) and medioprefrontal cortex (mPFC), after active tDCS but not sham. The decrease in pgACC/mPFC perfusion points to a significant impact of tDCS in brain areas related to stress responses and self-referential processes, especially in females scoring high on PC, which has been shown to be related to vulnerability for mood and anxiety disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Baeken
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital UZBrussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Josefien Dedoncker
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jonathan Remue
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guo-Rong Wu
- Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| | - Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sara De Witte
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tasha Poppa
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jill M Hooley
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Rudi De Raedt
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Stecher HI, Herrmann CS. Absence of Alpha-tACS Aftereffects in Darkness Reveals Importance of Taking Derivations of Stimulation Frequency and Individual Alpha Variability Into Account. Front Psychol 2018; 9:984. [PMID: 29973896 PMCID: PMC6019480 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has found widespread use as a basic tool in the exploration of the role of brain oscillations. Many studies have shown that frequency-specific tACS is able to not only alter cognitive processes during stimulation, but also cause specific physiological aftereffects visible in the electroencephalogram (EEG). The relationship between the emergence of these aftereffects and the necessary duration of stimulation is inconclusive. Our goal in this study was to narrow down the crucial length of tACS-blocks, by which aftereffects can be elicited. We stimulated participants with α-tACS in four blocks of 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-min length, once in increasing and once in decreasing order. After each block, we measured the resting EEG for 10 min during a visual vigilance task. We could not find lasting enhancement of α-power following any stimulation block, when comparing the stimulated groups to the sham group. These findings offer no information regarding the crucial stimulation duration. In addition, this conflicts with previous findings, showing a power increase following 10 min of tACS in the alpha range. We performed additional explorative analyses, based on known confounds of (1) mismatches between stimulation frequency and individual alpha frequency and (2) abnormalities in baseline α-activity. The results of an ANCOVA suggested that both factor explain variance, but could not resolve how exactly both factors interfere with the stimulation effect. Employing a linear mixed model, we found a significant effect of stimulation following 10 min of α-tACS in the increasing sequence and a significant effect of the mismatch between stimulated frequency and individual alpha frequency. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko I Stecher
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for all", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph S Herrmann
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for all", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Esch L, Sun L, Klüber V, Lew S, Baumgarten D, Grant PE, Okada Y, Haueisen J, Hämäläinen MS, Dinh C. MNE Scan: Software for real-time processing of electrophysiological data. J Neurosci Methods 2018; 303:55-67. [PMID: 29621570 PMCID: PMC5940556 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) are noninvasive techniques to study the electrophysiological activity of the human brain. Thus, they are well suited for real-time monitoring and analysis of neuronal activity. Real-time MEG/EEG data processing allows adjustment of the stimuli to the subject's responses for optimizing the acquired information especially by providing dynamically changing displays to enable neurofeedback. NEW METHOD We introduce MNE Scan, an acquisition and real-time analysis software based on the multipurpose software library MNE-CPP. MNE Scan allows the development and application of acquisition and novel real-time processing methods in both research and clinical studies. The MNE Scan development follows a strict software engineering process to enable approvals required for clinical software. RESULTS We tested the performance of MNE Scan in several device-independent use cases, including, a clinical epilepsy study, real-time source estimation, and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) application. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) Compared to existing tools we propose a modular software considering clinical software requirements expected by certification authorities. At the same time the software is extendable and freely accessible. CONCLUSION We conclude that MNE Scan is the first step in creating a device-independent open-source software to facilitate the transition from basic neuroscience research to both applied sciences and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Esch
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA; Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Gustav-Kirchhoff- Str. 2, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
| | - Limin Sun
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Viktor Klüber
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Gustav-Kirchhoff- Str. 2, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany; Institute of Nuclear and Energy Technologies, KIT - Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Seok Lew
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Engineering, Olivet Nazarene University, 1 University Ave, Bourbonnais, 60914 IL, USA
| | - Daniel Baumgarten
- Institute of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, UMIT - University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - P Ellen Grant
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Yoshio Okada
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Jens Haueisen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Gustav-Kirchhoff- Str. 2, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany; Biomagnetic Center, Clinic for Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Christoph Dinh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 13th St., Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Vosskuhl J, Strüber D, Herrmann CS. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12:211. [PMID: 29887799 PMCID: PMC5980979 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive neuroscience set out to understand the neural mechanisms underlying cognition. One central question is how oscillatory brain activity relates to cognitive processes. Up to now, most of the evidence supporting this relationship was correlative in nature. This situation changed dramatically with the recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, which open up new vistas for neuroscience by allowing researchers for the first time to validate their correlational theories by manipulating brain functioning directly. In this review, we focus on transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), an electrical brain stimulation method that applies sinusoidal currents to the intact scalp of human individuals to directly interfere with ongoing brain oscillations. We outline how tACS can impact human brain oscillations by employing different levels of observation from non-invasive tACS application in healthy volunteers and intracranial recordings in patients to animal studies demonstrating the effectiveness of alternating electric fields on neurons in vitro and in vivo. These findings likely translate to humans as comparable effects can be observed in human and animal studies. Neural entrainment and plasticity are suggested to mediate the behavioral effects of tACS. Furthermore, we focus on mechanistic theories about the relationship between certain cognitive functions and specific parameters of brain oscillaitons such as its amplitude, frequency, phase and phase coherence. For each of these parameters we present the current state of testing its functional relevance by means of tACS. Recent developments in the field of tACS are outlined which include the stimulation with physiologically inspired non-sinusoidal waveforms, stimulation protocols which allow for the observation of online-effects, and closed loop applications of tACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Vosskuhl
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence “Hearing4all,” European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Strüber
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence “Hearing4all,” European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph S. Herrmann
- Experimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence “Hearing4all,” European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Wunder S, Hunold A, Fiedler P, Schlegelmilch F, Schellhorn K, Haueisen J. Novel bifunctional cap for simultaneous electroencephalography and transcranial electrical stimulation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:7259. [PMID: 29740054 PMCID: PMC5940899 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25562-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulation induced by transcranial electric stimulation (TES) exhibited promising potential for clinical practice. However, the underlying mechanisms remain subject of research. The combination of TES and electroencephalography (EEG) offers great potential for investigating these mechanisms and brain function in general, especially when performed simultaneously. In conventional applications, the combination of EEG and TES suffers from limitations on the electrode level (gel for electrode-skin interface) and the usability level (preparation time, reproducibility of positioning). To overcome these limitations, we designed a bifunctional cap for simultaneous TES-EEG applications. We used novel electrode materials, namely textile stimulation electrodes and dry EEG electrodes integrated in a flexible textile cap. We verified the functionality of this cap by analysing the effect of TES on visual evoked potentials (VEPs). In accordance with previous reports using standard TES, the amplitude of the N75 component was significantly decreased post-stimulation, indicating the feasibility of using this novel flexible cap for simultaneous TES and EEG. Further, we found a significant reduction of the P100 component only during TES, indicating a different brain modulation effect during and after TES. In conclusion, the novel bifunctional cap offers a novel tool for simultaneous TES-EEG applications in clinical research, therapy monitoring and closed-loop stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Wunder
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany
- neuroConn GmbH, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany
| | - Alexander Hunold
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.
| | - Patrique Fiedler
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens Haueisen
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Biomagnetic Center, Jena University Hospital, 07747, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Berger A, Pixa NH, Steinberg F, Doppelmayr M. Brain Oscillatory and Hemodynamic Activity in a Bimanual Coordination Task Following Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS): A Combined EEG-fNIRS Study. Front Behav Neurosci 2018; 12:67. [PMID: 29720935 PMCID: PMC5915568 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor control is associated with synchronized oscillatory activity at alpha (8–12 Hz) and beta (12–30 Hz) frequencies in a cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. Previous studies demonstrated that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is capable of entraining ongoing oscillatory activity while also modulating motor control. However, the modulatory effects of tACS on both motor control and its underlying electro- and neurophysiological mechanisms remain ambiguous. Thus, the purpose of this study was to contribute to gathering neurophysiological knowledge regarding tACS effects by investigating the after-effects of 10 Hz tACS and 20 Hz tACS at parietal brain areas on bimanual coordination and its concurrent oscillatory and hemodynamic activity. Twenty-four right-handed healthy volunteers (12 females) aged between 18 and 30 (M = 22.35 ± 3.62) participated in the study and performed a coordination task requiring bimanual movements. Concurrent to bimanual motor training, participants received either 10 Hz tACS, 20 Hz tACS or a sham stimulation over the parietal cortex (at P3/P4 electrode positions) for 20 min via small gel electrodes (3,14 cm2 Ag/AgCl, amperage = 1 mA). Before and three time-points after tACS (immediately, 30 min and 1 day), bimanual coordination performance was assessed. Oscillatory activities were measured by electroencephalography (EEG) and hemodynamic changes were examined using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Improvements of bimanual coordination performance were not differently between groups, thus, no tACS-specific effect on bimanual coordination performance emerged. However, physiological measures during the task revealed significant increases in parietal alpha activity immediately following 10 Hz tACS and 20 Hz tACS which were accompanied by significant decreases of Hboxy concentration in the right hemispheric motor cortex compared to the sham group. Based on the physiological responses, we conclude that tACS applied at parietal brain areas provoked electrophysiological and hemodynamic changes at brain regions of the motor network which are relevant for bimanual motor behavior. The existence of neurophysiological alterations immediately following tACS, especially in the absence of behavioral effects, are elementary for a profound understanding of the mechanisms underlying tACS. The lack of behavioral modifications strengthens the need for further research on tACS effects on neurophysiology and behavior using combined electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Berger
- Department of Sports Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nils H Pixa
- Department of Sports Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Fabian Steinberg
- Department of Sports Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Doppelmayr
- Department of Sports Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Koponen LM, Nieminen JO, Ilmoniemi RJ. Multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation-theory and implementation. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:849-855. [PMID: 29627272 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method: a magnetic field pulse from a TMS coil can excite neurons in a desired location of the cortex. Conventional TMS coils cause focal stimulation underneath the coil centre; to change the location of the stimulated spot, the coil must be moved over the new target. This physical movement is inherently slow, which limits, for example, feedback-controlled stimulation. OBJECTIVE To overcome the limitations of physical TMS-coil movement by introducing electronic targeting. METHODS We propose electronic stimulation targeting using a set of large overlapping coils and introduce a matrix-factorisation-based method to design such sets of coils. We built one such device and demonstrated the electronic stimulation targeting in vivo. RESULTS The demonstrated two-coil transducer allows translating the stimulated spot along a 30-mm-long line segment in the cortex; with five coils, a target can be selected from within a region of the cortex and stimulated in any direction. Thus, far fewer coils are required by our approach than by previously suggested ones, none of which have resulted in practical devices. CONCLUSION Already with two coils, we can adjust the location of the induced electric field maximum along one dimension, which is sufficient to study, for example, the primary motor cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lari M Koponen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaakko O Nieminen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|