The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies

Different standards for healthy screenees than patients in routine clinics?

Less than 5% of colorectal adenomas will become malignant, but we do not have sufficient knowledge about their natural course to target removal of these 5% only. Thus, 95% of polypectomies are a waste of time exposing patients to a small risk of complications. Recently, a new type of polyps, sessile serrated polyps, has attracted attention. Previously considered innocuous, they are now found to have molecular similarities to cancer and some guidelines recommend to have them removed. These lesions are often flat, covered by mucous, not easily seen and situated in the proximal colon where the bowel wall is thinner. Thus, polypectomy carries a higher risk of perforation than predominantly left-sided, stalked adenomas - and we do not know what is gained in terms of cancer prevention. Screening is a neat balance between harms and benefit for presumptively healthy participants not interested in risk exposure to obtain confirmation of being healthy. The situation is quite different for patient worried about symptom. Thus, the standards set for evidence-based practice may be higher for screening than for routine clinics - a mechanism which may benefit patients in the long run.

Management of antithrombotic agents for colonoscopic polypectomies in Israeli gastroenterologists relative to published guidelines

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic procedures are commonly performed in patients taking antithrombotic agents.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the correlation between the management of antithrombotic drugs for colonoscopic polypectomies and the published guidelines.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

A structured survey delivered to gastroenterologists in 15 major Israeli hospitals and three central HMO clinics.

RESULTS

We collected 100 filled out surveys. Polypectomies on aspirin were performed by 78%. Most physicians did not perform polypectomies on clopidogrel. None of the physicians performed polypectomies on warfarin. Cessation of aspirin for ≥ 3 days post-polypectomy was recommended by 60%. Renewal of LMWH or warfarin was recommended ≥ 2 days post-polepectomy in 91% and 71%, respectively. The greatest variation in recommendations was found for clopidogrel, where the majority of gastroenterologists advised renewal after 1-2 days (38%). Years in practice and increasing colonoscopy volume work had no significant association with management of antithrombotic agents. Working in a HMO clinic was associated with lower rates of polypectomies on aspirin (P=0.036).

DISCUSSION

When the guidelines are clear, most gastroenterologists practice according to the existing recommendation. However, lack of prospective studies limits the ability to publish evidence-based recommendation and guidelines. We found that the practice of our cohort study varies in these situations.

Management of complex colonic polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

BACKGROUND

Large sessile or flat colonic polyps, defined as polyps at least 20  mm in size, are difficult to treat endoscopically and may harbour malignancy. The aim of this study was to describe their current management to provide insight into optimal management.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study identified patients with large sessile or flat polyps detected in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme between 2006 and 2009. Initial therapeutic modality (surgical or endoscopic), subsequent management and outcomes were recorded. The main outcome measures analysed were: presence of malignancy, need for surgical treatment, complications, and residual or recurrent polyp at 12 months.

RESULTS

In total, 557 large sessile or flat polyps with benign appearance or initial histology were identified in 557 patients. Some 436 (78.3 per cent) were initially managed endoscopically and 121 (21.7 per cent) were managed surgically from the outset. Seventy of those initially treated endoscopically subsequently required surgery owing to the presence of malignancy (19) or not being suitable for further endoscopic management (51). Residual or recurrent polyp was present at 12 months in 26 (6.0 per cent) of 436 patients managed endoscopically. There was wide variation between centres in the use of surgery as a primary therapy, ranging from 7 to 36 per cent. Endoscopic complications included bleeding in 13 patients (3.0 per cent) and perforation in two (0.5 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Management of large sessile or flat colonic polyps is safe and effective in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Wide variation in the use of surgery suggests a need for standardized management algorithms. Presented to a meeting of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Birmingham, U.K., March 2011.

Continued use of low-dose aspirin does not increase the risk of bleeding during or after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although recent guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend noninterruption of low-dose aspirin (LDA) perioperatively, this strategy is controversial. It was our practice to interrupt LDA therapy 5-7 days before to ESD until December 2010, when we instituted the new guidelines and performed ESD without interrupting LDA therapy. Our purpose in this study was to confirm the validity of noninterrupted use of LDA in patients undergoing ESD for EGC.

METHODS

We studied 78 consecutive patients with 94 EGCs who were routinely taking LDA and were treated by ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between April 2005 and June 2012. The patients were of two groups: those in whom LDA was interrupted perioperatively (53 patients with 66 EGCs) and those in whom LDA was continued perioperatively (25 patients with 28 EGCs).

RESULTS

The complete resection rate was 92.4 % (61/66) in the LDA-interrupted group and 100 % (28/28) in the LDA-continued group. Incidences of poor bleeding control during the procedure and bleeding after procedure were 10.6 % (7/66) and 4.8 % (3/66), respectively, in the LDA-interrupted group and 7.1 % (2/28) and 3.6 % (1/28) in the LDA-continued group. Two patients in the interrupted-LDA group suffered cerebrovascular infarction before ESD, and 2 patients in this group suffered acute myocardial infarction after ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that continued use of LDA does not increase the risk of bleeding during or after ESD for EGC and does decrease the risk of ischemic events.

A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopists are now expected to perform polypectomy routinely. Colonic polypectomy varies in difficulty, depending on polyp morphology, size, location and access. The measurement of the degree of difficulty of polypectomy, based on polyp characteristics, has not previously been described.

OBJECTIVE

To define the level of difficulty of polypectomy.

METHODS

Consensus by nine endoscopists regarding parameters that determine the complexity of a polyp was achieved through the Delphi method. The endoscopists then assigned a polyp complexity level to each possible combination of parameters. A scoring system to measure the difficulty level of a polyp was developed and validated by two different expert endoscopists.

RESULTS

Through two Delphi rounds, four factors for determining the complexity of a polypectomy were identified: size (S), morphology (M), site (S) and access (A). A scoring system was established, based on size (1-9 points), morphology (1-3 points), site (1-2 points) and access (1-3 points). Four polyp levels (with increasing level of complexity) were identified based on the range of scores obtained: level I (4-5), level II (6-9), level III (10-12) and level IV (>12). There was a high degree of interrater reliability for the polyp scores (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93) and levels (κ=0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring system is feasible and reliable. Defining polyp complexity levels may be useful for planning training, competency assessment and certification in colonoscopic polypectomy. This may allow for more efficient service delivery and referral pathways.

Endoscopic resection of giant colonic lipoma: case series with partial resection

Colonic lipoma, a very rare form of benign tumor, is typically detected incidentally in asymptomatic patients. The size of lipoma is reported variously from 2 mm to 30 cm, with higher likelihood of symptoms as the size is bigger. Cases with symptom or bigger lesion are surgically resected in principle; endoscopic resection, which has developed recently with groundbreaking advance of endoscopic excision technology, is being used more often but with rare report of success due to high chance of complications such as bowel perforation or bleeding. The authors report here, together with a literature review, our experiences of three cases of giant colonic lipomas showing complete remission after aggressive unroofing technique, at certain intervals, using snare catheter at the origin of the lipoma so that the remaining lipoma could be drained out of the exposed surface spontaneously, in order to reduce complications.

Colonoscopic polypectomy: current techniques and controversies

Colonoscopic polypectomy is fundamental to effective colonoscopy. Through its impact on the polyp-cancer sequence, colonoscopic polypectomy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Because it eliminates electrosurgical risk, cold snaring has emerged as the preferred technique for most small and all diminutive polyps. Few clinical trial data are available on the effectiveness and safety of specific techniques. Polypectomy technique seems highly variable between endoscopists, with some techniques more effective than others are. Further research is needed to investigate operator variation in polypectomy outcomes and establish an evidence base for best practice.

Colon polypectomy: a review of routine and advanced techniques

The value of performing comprehensive screening colonoscopy with complete colon polypectomy is widely accepted. Colon cancer is a significant cause of worldwide mortality and prospective studies have proven that colonoscopic polypectomy reduces both the incidence and mortality related to this disease. Over the past few decades the array of instruments and techniques have greatly expanded to assist with the safe endoscopic removal of colon polyps. This article will review the published literature regarding efficacy and safety of standard polypectomy techniques such as snare polypectomy, electrocautery, and endoscopic mucosal resection along with newer techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and combined laparoscopic techniques.

Risk stratification system for evaluation of complex polyps can predict outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection

BACKGROUND

Apart from size, little is known about what makes a colonic polyp difficult to endoscopically remove.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate polyp complexity by using a novel classification system and to assess how this affects success at endoscopic resection.

DESIGN

This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom.

INTERVENTIONS

Data were collected on patients referred for endoscopic resection of polyps >2 cm in size. Lesions were classified on the basis of size, morphology, site, and ease of access with the use of a novel scoring system (size/morphology/site/access). Endoscopic resection was performed to resect the lesions. Patients were followed up endoscopically to assess clinical outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the endoscopic cure and complication rate by size/morphology/site/access grade and the cost savings of endoscopic resection over surgery.

RESULTS

Endoscopic resection was performed on 220 patients (135 male) with 220 polyps, mean size of 43 mm (range, 20 mm-150 mm). Thirty-seven percent were classified as size/morphology/site/access 2 or 3; 63% were classified as the most challenging size/morphology/site/access level 4. Complete endoscopic clearance was achieved in 90% of cases with the first endoscopic resection attempt, improving to 96% with further endoscopic resection attempts. There were complications in 18 of 220 (8.1%) of cases. Complications were independent of lesion size and location but were affected by size/morphology/site/access grade (p = 0.018). Probability of clearance at first endoscopic resection attempt was affected by lesion complexity. Size/morphology/site/access 2 and 3 = 97.5 vs SMSA 4 = 87.5% (p = 0.009). Probability of cancer was not affected by size/morphology/site/access grade. For the whole cohort, endoscopic resection represented a cost saving of £726,288 ($1,123,858.05) over that of surgery.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation of this study is that it is a single-center, single-endoscopist series.

CONCLUSIONS

The size/morphology/site/access scoring system is easy to use and provides valuable information on the lesion complexity and success and complication rates of endoscopic resection. This can be used for service planning, training endoscopists, and providing prognostic information for patients.

Differences in the endoscopic closure of colonic perforation due to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of a single center regarding the feasibility of endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colonic perforations and to elucidate differences between the efficacy of endoscopic clip closure due to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective institutional computer-based search of records of colonoscopic perforation occurring between January 2004 and December 2011 was undertaken. Data on patients undergoing colonoscopy were entered into a clinical database. To further improve the detection of all cases of colon perforations, the authors also searched their separate surgical database for every patient with a colon perforation treated or operated on in the surgery department. Statistical significance was tested using either Fortran-Subroutine Fytest, chi-square testing or t-test.

RESULTS

Over 8 years, 22,924 patients underwent colonoscopy, of which 105 consecutive patients suffered iatrogenic perforation. Clip application was possible in 62 patients (81.58%) after perforation due to a therapeutic colonoscopy, whereas clip application was only possible in 9 patients (31.03%) after perforation due to a diagnostic colonoscopy. 4 out of 9 patients (44.44%) in the diagnostic group compared with 7 out of 62 patients (11.29%) after clipping a perforation during a therapeutic colonoscopy were sent to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' data indicate significant differences in the potential for and success of endoscopic closure of iatrogenic perforations occurring during diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. The frequency of surgery was significantly greater after clipping a perforation during a diagnostic colonoscopy.

Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy

The growing importance of colonoscopy in the prevention of colorectal cancer has stimulated an effort to identify and track quality indicators for this procedure. Several factors have been identified so far which are readily measurable and in many cases have been associated with improved patient outcomes. There is also ample evidence of variations in performance of this procedure. As a result, gathering data about quality indicators may play a vital role in the process of continuous quality improvement. Quality indicators for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention are described along with the evidence that supports their use in benchmarking, quality reporting, and continuous quality improvement.

Risk factors for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage is a rare but serious complication. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of patients who developed delayed hematochezia after receiving colonoscopic polypectomy. The control patients underwent uneventful polypectomy and were selected at a 4:1 ratio.

RESULTS

Of the 7447 lesions examined from the 3253 patients who received colonoscopic polypectomy, 53 lesions (0.7%) of 42 patients (1.3%) developed delayed hemorrhage, and 168 patients were selected as controls. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, a polyp larger than 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 2.355, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.225-4.528, P = 0.010), a pedunculated polyp (OR 3.473, 95% CI 1.576-7.657, P = 0.002), and a polyp located in the right hemi-colon (OR 2.690, 95% CI 1.465-4.940, P = 0.001) were significant risk factors for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage. The presence of comorbidities did not increase the risk of delayed hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Polyp size (large), shape (pedunculated), and location (right hemi-colon) represented substantial risk factors for the development of delayed hemorrhage after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Adverse events requiring hospitalization within 30 days after outpatient screening and nonscreening colonoscopies

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adverse events (AEs) is a crucial factor when colonoscopy is considered for mass screening, but few studies have addressed delayed and non-GI AEs.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk of AEs requiring hospitalization after screening and nonscreening colonoscopies compared with control subjects who did not undergo colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort.

SETTING

Statutory health insurance fund in Germany.

PATIENTS

A total of 33,086 individuals who underwent colonoscopy as an outpatient (8658 screening, 24,428 nonscreening) and 33,086 matched controls who did not undergo colonoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Outpatient screening and nonscreening colonoscopies.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS

Risk of AEs (perforation, bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, splenic injury, and others) requiring hospitalization within 30 days after colonoscopy/index date and risk differences between the group that underwent colonoscopy and the group that did not.

RESULTS

The incidence of perforation was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.7) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.1) per 1000 screening and nonscreening colonoscopies, respectively. Hospitalizations because of bleeding occurred in 0.5 (95% CI, 0.1-1.2) and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.7) per 1000 screening and nonscreening colonoscopies, respectively. The incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, and other non-GI AEs was similar in colonoscopy and control groups. No splenic injury was observed. Those with AEs generally had a higher mean age and comorbidity rate than the overall study population.

LIMITATIONS

The analysis relies on health insurance claims data.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence of the safety of colonoscopy in routine practice with regard to delayed and non-GI AEs. Hospitalizations because of the investigated AEs were uncommon or rare for both screening and nonscreening colonoscopies.

Laparoscopic Primary Colorrhaphy for Acute Iatrogenic Perforations during Colonoscopy

Purpose. We present our experience with laparoscopic colorrhaphy as definitive surgical modality for the management of colonoscopic perforations. Methods. Over a 17-month period, we assessed the outcomes of consecutive patients presenting with acute colonoscopic perforations. Patient characteristics and perioperative parameters were tabulated. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated within 30 days following discharge. Results. Five female patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 9.7 years (range: 58–83), mean BMI of 26.4 ± 3.4 kg/m² (range: 21.3–30.9), and median ASA score of 2 (range: 2-3) presented with acute colonoscopic perforations. All perforations were successfully managed through laparoscopic colorrhaphy within 24 hours of development. The perforations were secondary to direct trauma (n = 3) or thermal injury (n = 2) and were localized to the sigmoid (n = 4) or cecum (n = 1). None of the patients required surgical resection, diversion, or conversion to an open procedure. No intra- or postoperative complications were encountered. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 0.8 days (range: 3–5). There were no readmissions or reoperations. Conclusion. Acute colonoscopic perforations can be safely managed via laparoscopic primary repair without requiring resection or diversion. Early recognition and intervention are essential for successful outcomes.

Bleeding risk after invasive procedures in aspirin/NSAID users: polypectomy study in veterans

BACKGROUND

Aspirin, by virtue of inhibition of platelet hemostatic function, is withheld before many invasive procedures because of the bleeding risk. American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines acknowledge the paucity of "high quality data" to make recommendations regarding the use of aspirin (ASA) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) before endoscopic procedures. Yet the majority of endoscopists hold ASA/NSAIDs before polypectomy.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted at Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. The objectives were to assess the postpolypectomy bleeding risk in ASA/NSAID users in a large cohort of veterans undergoing colonoscopic polypectomy and to identify risk factors associated with postpolypectomy bleeding. All patients undergoing polypectomy between January 2002 and October 2007 were eligible. Patients on anticoagulants/other antiplatelet agents were excluded. Patients were selected randomly by cluster sampling techniques. Electronic medical and pharmacy records were reviewed for patient demographics, polypectomy techniques, and postpolypectomy bleeding rates. Univariate analysis was performed between patients on ASA and NSAIDs (group A) versus those not on ASA or NSAIDs (group B). Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with postpolypectomy bleeding.

RESULTS

Five hundred two (43%) of 1174 patients (mean age 66 years, 92% white) were on ASA or NSAIDs, or both. There was no significant difference between postpolypectomy bleeding rates among the 2 groups (3.2% vs 3.0%). Age, sex, polyp characteristics, and polypectomy techniques were comparable between groups A and B. In multiple logistic regression analysis, ASA or NSAID use was not a significant risk factor for postpolypectomy bleeding. Number of polyps removed per patient was the only risk factor significantly associated with postpolypectomy bleeding (P <.01, odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large study, use of ASA or NSAIDs did not increase the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding. Cessation of ASA/NSAIDs before colonoscopy/polypectomy is therefore unnecessary.

[Risk factors of delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy: case-control study]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Colonoscopic polypectomy is a valuable procedure for preventing colorectal cancer, but is not without complications. Delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy is a rare, but serious complication. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors of delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a single university hospital. Forty cases and 120 controls were included. Data collected included comorbidity, use of antiplatelet agents, size and number of resected polyps, histology and gross morphology of resected polyps, endoscopist's experience, resection method, use of sedation, and use of prophylactic hemostasis.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, size, histology and number of resected polyps, endoscopist's experience, resection method and use of prophylactic hemostasis were significant risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. In multivariate analysis, risk of delayed bleeding increased by 11.6% for every 1 mm increase in resected polyp diameter (OR, 1.116; 95% CI 1.041-1.198; p=0.002). Number of resected polyps (OR, 1.364; 95% CI, 1.113-1.671; p=0.003) and endoscopist's experience (OR, 6.301; 95% CI, 2.022-19.637; p=0.002) were significant risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Size and numbers of resected polyps, and endoscopist's experience were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. More caution would be necessary when removing polyps with these factors.

Endoscopy in the patient on antithrombotic therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of antithrombotics during the periendoscopic period is a common clinical problem. This review focuses on recent literature addressing this issue, primarily on articles published from 2009 to 2012.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large proportion of the studies retrieved focused on the effect of antithrombotics on bleeding risk following diagnostic endoscopy, polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and submucosal dissection, whereas studies involving other endoscopic procedures were scarce. Recent American and European guidelines direct the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing endoscopy according to the procedure's risk of bleeding and the patient's thromboembolic risk. The difficulty in determining a priori the need for endotherapy and hence appropriate classification of risk of bleeding prior to the procedure is a potential limitation of such classification. Moreover, most studies have primarily addressed the risk of immediate or early bleeding by proposing interruption of antithrombotic therapy prior to endotherapy, and few have focused on the risk of delayed bleeding and the optimal time for resumption of these agents following high-risk procedures.

SUMMARY

Management of patients on antithrombotics remains complex, especially in high-risk settings. Existing guidelines are valuable but should not be a substitute for a careful personalized risk assessment strategy involving patient and physician.

Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic resection techniques for treating colorectal tumors have advanced recently so that large colorectal tumors can now be treated endoscopically, although some patients experience delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection. Our aim was to clarify the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors≥20 mm in diameter. Endoscopic submucosal dissection cases were excluded because of the low incidence of delayed bleeding after such procedures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using a prospectively completed database and patient medical records at a single, national cancer institution. A total of 403 colorectal endoscopic resections were performed on 375 consecutive patients. We analyzed the database and retrospectively assessed patient age, gender, hypertension and current use of anticoagulant (warfarin) or antiplatelet drugs (e.g. aspirin, ticlopidine) as well as tumor location, size, macroscopic type, histopathological findings, resection method and whether or not placement of prophylactic clips was performed during the endoscopic resection.

RESULTS

The overall rate of delayed bleeding was 4.2% (17/403) and the median interval between endoscopic resection and the onset of delayed bleeding was 2 days (range, 1-14 days). All delayed bleeding cases were successfully controlled by endoscopic hemostasis involving clipping and/or electrocoagulation without the need for surgical interventions or blood transfusions. Based on our univariate analysis, the delayed bleeding rate was significantly higher in both males (P=0.04) and those patients without prophylactic clip placement (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results indicated that prophylactic clip placement may be an effective method for preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors.

Postpolypectomy bleeding: incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management

Endoscopic polypectomy is at the forefront of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. However, endoscopic polypectomy is not completely free of complications, with bleeding being one of the most common complications encountered. In view of the ongoing campaign to introduce colorectal cancer screening to the population, addressing the issue of colonoscopic complications, and postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) in particular is becoming more important. Despite the fact that the overall incidence of PPB is low, predisposing factors need to be elucidated to further decrease the frequency of this complication. Furthermore, the role of various techniques of PPB prophylaxis remains controversial. We review recent studies on the incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis, and management of PPB.

Colonic perforation following polypectomy of a gastrointestinal follicular lymphoma masquerading as a colon polyp

INTRODUCTION

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the predominant site for primary extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), accounting for 5-10% of all extranodal disease.

CASE

A 74-year-old man underwent colonoscopy for a positive fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm polyp in the descending colon and was removed by snare cautery polypectomy. Post-polypectomy site showed a 0.3-0.5-cm mucosal defect. Five endoclips were applied to close the mucosal defect. The patient remained stable during subsequent intensive monitoring and never required surgical intervention. Pathology of the polyp revealed follicular lymphoma (FL) involving the lamina propria of the mucosa with extension into the submucosa. The patient had no systemic symptoms, and staging for NHL with contrast computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed no evidence suggestive of lymphoma.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 6-20% of all primary GI-NHL are in the colon. The frequency of GI-FL accounts for 1-3.6% of all GI-NHL. After a search of the current literature, there have been no cases of a follicular lymphoma presenting solely as an isolated colon polyp. Likewise, bowel perforation due to polypectomy of such polyps has never been cited. Retrospectively, the diagnosis and extent of the polyp could have been established using endoscopic end-to-end forceps biopsy and/or endoscopic ultrasound with a radial scanning catheter probe and fine-needle aspiration of the lesion. Such a diagnosis could have changed the strategy for endoscopic removal of the polyp. Our case is interesting because it is the first report of a follicular lymphoma presenting as a single isolated colon polyp involving all layers of the colonic mucosa.

Incidence and predictors of postpolypectomy bleeding in colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm

BACKGROUND

It is well-established that the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) increases with polyp size, but little is known about the factors that predict PPB in polyps larger than 10 mm.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the incidence and risk factors for PPB in colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm.

METHODS

A historical cohort study was carried out in an open access endoscopy unit from January 2007 to December 2008. Endoscopic polypectomy was performed in 1894 (28%) patients. Clinical records of patients with polyps of at least 10 mm were reviewed. Data on demographics, comorbidity, polyp-related features, and resection technique were collected. The incidence of immediate bleeding (during polypectomy) and delayed bleeding (up to 1 month later) was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 424 large polyps (median size=12 mm; P₂₅-P₇₅: 10-16 mm) were resected. Thirty-five episodes of PPB occurred in 33 (7.8%) polyps, of which 12 (2.8%) were delayed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a polyp size of at least 14 mm was the most important predictor of PPB [odds ratio (OR) 3.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.492-6.751, P=0.003], compared with the presence of a villous architecture (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.056-4.705, P=0.035) or high-grade dysplasia (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.305-6.692, P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

In the current study, the rate of PPB was almost 8% in polyps larger than 10 mm, occurring in most cases during the endoscopic procedure. A polyp of size at least 14 mm was the most important predictor for PPB. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether preventive endoscopic therapy may reduce PPB in these patients.

Routine and advanced polypectomy techniques

The performance of colon polypectomy has proven to be one of the most impactful services provided by today's endoscopist. Advancements in instrumentation and endoscopic techniques have been studied intensely by endoscopists over the past decade in order to expand their extent of resection capabilities to large and complex polyps. Much of the research in the past year has focused on the safety and efficacy of performing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and combined laparascopic-endoscopic resections (CLER). Experts have published case-series, multicenter studies, and even nationwide results on the use of these methods for complex polypectomy. Because of the novelty and increased risk of these procedures, recent research has also focused on the prevention, identification and management of complications related to polypectomy, particularly bleeding and perforation. This manuscript will review the recent literature addressing basic and advanced colon polypectomy techniques.

Endoskopische Möglichkeiten der Behandlung von Nahtinsuffizienzen im Rektum

<b><i>Hintergrund: </i></b>Anastomoseninsuffizienzen stellen eine gefürchtete Komplikation der kolorektalen Chirurgie dar. Endoskopische Techniken haben sich in der Therapie der Leckagen zunehmend etabliert. In dieser Übersicht möchten wir einen Überblick der wichtigsten endoskopischen Verfahren geben. <b><i>Methode: </i></b>Systematische Recherche der vorhandenen Literatur. <b><i>Ergebnisse: </i></b>Die bedeutendsten endoskopischen Verfahren zur Behandlung der kolorektalen Anastomoseninsuffizienzen stellen die Fibrininjektion, die Vakuumschwammtherapie (Endo-Sponge), spezielle Clip-Systeme (OTSC) sowie die Stentimplantation dar. Der breiten klinischen Anwendung dieser Verfahren steht jedoch eine unzureichende Studienlage gegenüber. <b><i>Schlussfolgerung: </i></b>Die Einschätzung der Wertigkeit der einzelnen endoskopischen Verfahren untereinander und in speziellen therapeutischen Situationen hängt im Wesentlichen von der Erfahrung der Untersucher ab. Es bedarf der Durchführung randomisierter, prospektiver Studien, um diese Erfahrungen zu objektivieren.

Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that advancing age is an independent risk factor for experiencing adverse events during colonoscopy. Yet many of these studies are limited by small sample sizes and/or marked variation in reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence rates for specific adverse events in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy and calculate incidence rate ratios for selected comparison groups.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Perforation, bleeding, cardiovascular (CV)/pulmonary complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

Our literature search yielded 3328 articles, of which 20 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled incidence rates for adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) in patients 65 years of age and older were 26.0 (95% CI, 25.0-27.0) for cumulative GI adverse events, 1.0 (95% CI, 0.9-1.5) for perforation, 6.3 (95% CI, 5.7-7.0) for GI bleeding, 19.1 (95% CI, 18.0-20.3) for CV/pulmonary complications, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-2.2) for mortality. Among octogenarians, adverse events (per 1000 colonoscopies) were as follows: cumulative GI adverse event rate of 34.9 (95% CI, 31.9-38.0), perforation rate of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-1.9), GI bleeding rate of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-4.6), CV/pulmonary complication rate of 28.9 (95% CI, 26.2-31.8), and mortality rate of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.06-1.9). Patients 80 years of age and older experienced higher rates of cumulative GI adverse events (incidence rate ratio 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-1.9) and had a greater risk of perforation (incidence rate ratio 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.1) compared with younger patients (younger than 80 years of age). There was an increased trend toward higher rates of GI bleeding and CV/pulmonary complications in octogenarians but neither was statistically significant.

LIMITATIONS

Heterogeneity of studies included and not all complications related to colonoscopy were captured.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients, especially octogenarians, appear to have a higher risk of complications during and after colonoscopy. These data should inform clinical decision making, the consent process, public health policy, and comparative effectiveness analyses.

The submucosal cushion does not improve the histologic evaluation of adenomatous colon polyps resected by snare polypectomy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although the "submucosal cushion" technique or injection-assisted polypectomy (IAP) is often used to resect colon polyps, little is known on the influence of this technique on histologic interpretation. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of a submucosal cushion improves the histologic and margin evaluation of colon polyps.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing polypectomy with and without IAP were included. An experienced blinded gastrointestinal pathologist evaluated the specimens using standardized criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven sessile colon adenomas were analyzed (IAP, n = 65, standard, n = 46). Two-thirds of polyps ranged in size from 10 to 20 mm; the average polyp size was 13.2 mm for IAP and 9.9 mm for standard snare polypectomy (P = .001). The cautery degree, cautery amount, and margin evaluability, did not differ substantially with regard to the resection technique. For polyps ≥10-20 mm, the overall architecture quality was better in polyps resected with standard technique as compared with IAP.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of IAP did not result in a better margin evaluability of the resected polyp. Overall, IAP does not result in a better histologic polyp evaluability.

Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: a large prospective UK series

OBJECTIVES

At present, all colonic polyps are removed and sent for histopathological evaluation, resulting in laboratory and reporting costs. Recent American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines have set standards for in-vivo diagnosis in place of conventional histopathology, and all future technologies will have to be tested against these standards. Data on flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) were very limited. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of FICE and indigo carmine (IC) for in-vivo histology prediction for polyps of less than 10 mm in size and to assess the economic impact of this strategy.

METHODS

In a screening population, polyps of less than 10 mm were assessed using white light (WLI) by FICE, by IC, and the predicted diagnosis was recorded. Polyps were then removed and sent for histological analysis. Accuracy of the predicted rescope interval was calculated using British Society of Gastroenterology and ASGE guidelines. Two models for using in-vivo diagnosis were proposed and savings in terms of histopathology costs calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 232 polyps of less than 10 mm were examined. FICE improved the accuracy of in-vivo diagnosis of adenoma to 88% compared with 75% with WLI (P<0.0001). IC after FICE improved this further to 94%. Rescope interval could be set correctly using FICE or IC in 97% of cases by British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines or 97% with FICE and 99% with IC using ASGE guidelines. A saving of £678,253 (€762767) per annum could be made within the UK national screening population.

CONCLUSION

FICE and IC significantly improves the in-vivo diagnosis of colonic polyps over WLI and can lead to significant cost savings.

Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes after endoscopic removal of submucosal invasive colorectal tumors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Oncologic surgery is recommended after endoscopic resection of submucosal invasive T1 colorectal carcinomas if patients are considered to be at high risk for tumor recurrence or metastasis. However, there are sparse data on the outcome of high-risk patients treated only by endoscopy.

METHODS

Data were collected from 474 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancers from 1974-2002 at Neuperlach Hospital in Munich, Germany. Patient files were reviewed, and patients or referring physicians were contacted to assess outcomes during a follow-up period of at least 24 months (n = 390). Histopathology and endoscopy factors associated with an unfavorable outcome (local recurrence of tumors, metastasis, or death from colorectal cancer) were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 390 patients followed, 141 received oncologic surgery, and 249 did not; overall, 10% had an unfavorable outcome (39/390). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that lymphatic vessel infiltration, poor grading of tumor stage, and incomplete endoscopic resection were risk factors for unfavorable outcomes (odds ratios, 7.8, 3.4, and 2.6, respectively). If these risk factors were applied to patients who did not receive oncologic surgery, negative predictive values for an unfavorable outcome were 94.6% for lymphatic vessel infiltration, 94.2% for poor grading of tumor stage, and 96.5% for incomplete endoscopic resection; positive predictive values were 44.4%, 42.9%, and 19.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor infiltration of lymphatic vessels is the greatest risk factor for an unfavorable outcome after endoscopic resection for colorectal carcinoma. However, its positive predictive value is low. The decision to perform surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancers should be made on the basis of specific features of each patient.

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the elderly patient

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Older age is associated with a rise in colorectal cancer and adenomas, necessitating the need for CRC screening in older patients. However, decisions about CRC screening and surveillance in older adults are often difficult and challenging. The decision requires an individualized assessment that incorporates factors unique to performing colonoscopy in older adults in order to weigh the risks and benefits for each patient according to their overall health and preferences. This review addresses the factors unique to colorectal cancer and performing colonoscopy in older adults that are relevant in weighing the risks and benefits of screening and surveillance in this population.

Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills

BACKGROUND

Despite its ubiquitous use over the past 4 decades, there is no structured, formal method with which to assess polypectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a new method with which to assess competency in polypectomy.

DESIGN

Polypectomy underwent task deconstruction, and a structured checklist and global assessment scale were developed (direct observation of polypectomy skills [DOPyS]). Sixty bowel cancer screening polypectomy videos were randomly chosen for analysis and were scored independently by 7 expert assessors by using DOPyS. Each parameter and the global rating were scored from 1 to 4 (scores ≥3 = competency). The scores were analyzed by using generalizability theory (G theory).

SETTING

Multicenter.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine of the 60 videos were assessable and scored. The majority of the assessors agreed across the pass/fail divide for the global assessment scale in 58 of 59 (98%) polyps. For G-theory analysis, 47 of the 60 videos were analyzed. G-theory analysis suggested that DOPyS is a reliable assessment tool, provided that it is used by 2 assessors to score 5 polypectomy videos all performed by 1 endoscopist. DOPyS scores obtained in this format would reflect the endoscopist's competence.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and polyp size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first attempt to develop and validate a tool designed specifically for the assessment of technical skills in performing polypectomy. G-theory analysis suggests that DOPyS could reliably reflect an endoscopist's competence in performing polypectomy provided a requisite number of assessors and cases were used.

Location in the right hemi-colon is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a multi-center case-control study

OBJECTIVES

Delayed hemorrhage is an infrequent, but serious complication of colonoscopic polypectomy. Large size is the only polyp-related factor that has been unequivocally proven to increase the risk of delayed bleeding. It has been suggested that location in the right hemi-colon is also a risk factor. The objective of this study was to determine whether polyp location is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted in two university hospitals and two community hospitals.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cases and 117 controls were identified. In multivariate analysis, size and location were found to be independent polyp-related risk factors for delayed type hemorrhage. The risk increased by 13% for every 1 mm increase in polyp diameter (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.20, P<0.001). Polyps located in the right hemi-colon had an OR of 4.67 (1.88-11.61, P=0.001) for delayed hemorrhage. Polyps in the cecum seemed to be especially at high risk in univariate analysis (OR 13.82, 95% CI 2.66-71.73), but this could not be assessed in multivariate analysis as the number of cases was too small. Polyp type (sessile or pedunculated) was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyp location in the right hemi-colon seems to be an independent and substantial risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage. A low threshold for preventive hemostatic measures is advised when removing polyps from this region.

Feasibility of endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic colon perforation occurring during colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Colon perforation is one of the most dreaded complications of colonoscopy. Traditionally, patients with a colon perforation have been treated surgically. Although there are several case reports documenting the usefulness of endoscopic closure of colon perforations, there are few current data evaluating the feasibility of endoscopic closure for an iatrogenic perforation on consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of colon perforations and the utility of immediate endoscopic closure during colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent colonoscopy at 1 institution from June 2002 to December 2008 were identified.

INTERVENTION

An attempt at immediate colon perforation closure by endoscopic means.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Successful endoscopic closure of colon perforation.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 8601 colonoscopies were performed (2472 therapeutic interventions, 28.7%). A total of 12 iatrogenic colon perforations occurred, yielding a rate of 1.4/1000. Five (41.7%) occurred during a diagnostic colonoscopy (0.8/1000), and 7 perforations (58.3%) occurred as the result of a therapeutic intervention (2.8/1000). Endoscopic closure of the perforation site was possible in 5 patients (42%). Seven patients were treated surgically (large defects [n = 3], including 1 failed endoscopic closure, difficult endoscope position [n = 2], stool contamination [n = 1], and endoscopist's inexperience with closure of mucosal defects [n = 1]).

LIMITATION

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the incidence of colon perforations was 1.4/1000. Endoscopic closure of iatrogenic colon perforations was attempted in 50% of patients and was successful in 83%. All patients with successful endoscopic closure had lesions smaller than 10 mm.

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps

PURPOSE

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection has been used to treat superficial esophageal and gastric cancers. Efficacy data in the colon are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in the treatment of sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors in the colorectum.

METHODS

Two-hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients with sessile polyps or lateral spreading tumors >or=20 mm were treated between January 2000 and December 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 146 sessile polyps and 136 lateral spreading tumors were treated with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection. Complications occurred in 22 (8.6%) patients (5.5% in sessile polyps and 10.3% in lateral spreading tumors). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 21 (7%) of polypectomies (6% in sessile polyps and 10% in lateral spreading tumors); all were controlled endoscopically. Postcoagulation syndrome occurred in 1 patient with lateral spreading tumor. No perforation occurred. Invasive adenocarcinoma was found in 35 patients, of whom 15 underwent surgery. Endoscopic follow-up in 200 patients with 216 adenomas for a median of 12.1 months showed recurrence in 8 (4%) who were treated with resection and/or ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective treatment for sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors. A disadvantage of the technique is that the resection is piecemeal. Close surveillance provides the opportunity for additional tissue ablation, when required, to achieve complete lesion removal.

Postpolypectomy bleeding in patients undergoing colonoscopy on uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy

BACKGROUND

The risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients undergoing colonoscopy on uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the PPB rate and outcome and identify risk factors associated with PPB in patients taking clopidogrel.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective study. Demographics, clinical parameters, polyp characteristics, polypectomy techniques, and postpolypectomy events in the groups were compared by univariate analysis. Stepwise logistic regression analyses identified independent risk factors associated with PPB.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

A total of 142 patients (375 polypectomies) taking clopidogrel (cases) and 1243 patients (3226 polypectomies) not taking clopidogrel (controls).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Postpolypectomy bleeding, hospitalization, and mortality.

RESULTS

The immediate (intraprocedural) bleeding rate was similar in the 2 groups (2.1% vs 2.1%). Delayed (postprocedural) PPB rate was higher in the group taking clopidogrel (3.5% vs 1.0%, P = .02). Delayed bleeding of significance requiring hospitalization and transfusion/intervention was also higher in patients taking clopidogrel (2.1% vs 0.4%, P = .04). The length of hospital stay and interventions for PPB were comparable between the 2 groups. There was no mortality. Concomitant use of clopidogrel and aspirin/other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (odds ratio 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6-8.5) and the number of polyps removed (OR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4) were the only significant risk factors associated with PPB. Clopidogrel alone was not an independent risk factor for PPB.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study and small number of patients with PPB.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPB rate is significantly higher in patients undergoing polypectomy while taking clopidogrel and concomitant aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; however, the risk is small and the outcome is favorable. Routine cessation of clopidogrel in patients before colonoscopy/polypectomy is not necessary.

Endoscopic closure of acute iatrogenic perforations during diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract using metallic clips: a literature review

Iatrogenic perforations that occur during the endoscopic procedures are generally surgically managed, even if some authors prefer a non-surgical approach in selected cases. The endoscopic application of metallic clips has been widely used in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for hemostasis and also for marking lesions. Since 1993 several series of endoscopic perforations treated with endoclips have been described in the literature. In this review we offer a descriptive analysis of the reported cases of the acute iatrogenic perforation, describing the closure of different perforations occurring in the GI tract, treated with metallic clips.

Diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) can present as an acute and life-threatening event or as chronic bleeding, which might manifest as iron-deficiency anemia, fecal occult blood or intermittent scant hematochezia. Bleeding from the small bowel has been shown to be a distinct entity, and LGIB is defined as bleeding from a colonic source. Acute bleeding from the colon is usually less dramatic than upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and is self-limiting in most cases. Several factors might contribute to increased mortality, a severe course of bleeding and recurrent bleeding, including advanced age, comorbidity, intestinal ischemia, bleeding as a result of a separate process, and hemodynamic instability. Diverticula, angiodysplasias, neoplasms, colitis, ischemia, anorectal disorders and postpolypectomy bleeding are the most common causes of LGIB. Volume resuscitation should take place concurrently upon initial patient assessment. Colonoscopy is the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure of choice, for acute and chronic bleeding. Angiography is used if colonoscopy fails or cannot be performed. The use of radioisotope scans is reserved for cases of unexplained intermittent bleeding, when other methods have failed to detect the source. Embolization or modern endoscopy techniques, such as injection therapy, thermocoagulation and mechanical devices, effectively promote hemostasis. Surgery is the final approach for severe bleeding.

Can magnification endoscopy detect residual adenoma after piecemeal resection of large sessile colorectal lesions to guide subsequent treatment? A prospective single-center study

PURPOSE

This study assesses the ability of magnification endoscopy to detect residual adenomatous tissue after endoscopic piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps and evaluates the impact of the technique on the incidence of recurrence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic piecemeal resection for large (>2 cm) sessile colorectal polyps were included. After endoscopic piecemeal resection, both the outer resection margins and the central severed area were inspected with magnification endoscopy. Completeness of excision as determined from the magnified surface pattern was compared with that determined histologically. Areas of incomplete resection were treated with additional resection or argon plasma coagulation.

RESULTS

A total of 77 lesions were resected. Mean size of the resected lesions was 29 +/- 6 mm (range, 23-60). Complications of resection occurred in eight patients (seven had immediate bleeding that was successfully managed with hemoclip application, and one had delayed perforation that was treated surgically). The sensitivity of magnification endoscopy for predicting remnant adenoma at resection margins was 98% (95% confidence interval 90-100); specificity was 90% (95% confidence interval 79-100). Overall accuracy was 94.5% (95% confidence interval 87.2-98.6). On a mean follow-up of 32 months (range, 18-46) the recurrence rate was 2.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnification endoscopy is accurate at predicting remnant tissue after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile colorectal polypoid lesions. When applied on both outer margins and inner portions of the severed area, it is helpful as a guide to subsequent further treatment to decrease recurrence.

Endoscopic management of large colorectal polyps

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment for large colorectal polyps (LCPs) is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic polypectomy (EP) of colorectal polyps >or=2 cm in size.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-one EP LCPs were performed over a period of 7 years. Diathermal snare was used for pedunculated and pseudopedunculated polyps and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or biopsy forceps polypectomy for sessile and flat polyps. The resected polyps were recovered and collected for histology. At scheduled follow-up visits 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after polypectomy, complications and recurrences were recorded in all patients.

RESULTS

Fifteen polyps were located in the rectum, 84 in the sigmoid colon, 11 in the descending colon, four in the splenic flexure, 11 in the transverse colon, 11 in the hepatic flexure, seven in the ascending colon and eight in the cecum. Fifty-six polyps were sessile, 54 pedunculated, 25 pseudopedunculated, and 16 flat. At histology, most of polyps (131) were adenomas (nine with adenocarcinoma in situ). Five were invasive polypoid carcinomas and required colonic resection. Immediate bleeding occurred in ten patients (7.6%) and it was stopped by endoscopic hemoclips (7), epinephrine injection (1), or surgery (2). There were three perforations (2.3%; all polypoid carcinomas), managed endoscopically (1) or surgically (2). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients (1.5%) and was treated by endoscopic diathermy and hemoclips (1) or surgery (1). During follow-up, six (4.6%) incompletely excised polyps and three (2.3%) relapses in the site of previous EP were detected and endoscopically removed.

CONCLUSION

EP is relatively safe and effective for benign-appearing LCPs.

Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic tri-modal imaging incorporates high-resolution white-light endoscopy (HR-WLE), narrow-band imaging (NBI), and autofluorescence imaging (AFI). Combining these advanced techniques may improve endoscopic differentiation between adenomas and non-neoplastic polyps. In this study, we aimed to assess the interobserver variability and accuracy of HR-WLE, NBI, and AFI for polyp differentiation and to evaluate the combined use of AFI and NBI.

METHODS

First, still images of 50 polyps (22 adenomas; median 3 mm) were randomly displayed to three experienced and four non-experienced endoscopists. All HR-WLE and NBI images were scored for Kudo classification and AFI images for color. Second, the combined AFI and NBI images were assessed using a newly developed algorithm by six additional non-experienced endoscopists.

RESULTS

The outcomes measured were interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy using histopathology as reference standard. Experienced endoscopists had better interobserver agreement for NBI (kappa=0.77) than for AFI (kappa=0.33), whereas non-experienced endoscopists had better agreement for AFI (kappa=0.58) than for NBI (kappa=0.33). The accuracies of HR-WLE, NBI, and AFI among experienced endoscopists were 65, 70, and 74, respectively. Figures among non-experienced endoscopists were 57, 63, and 77. The algorithm was associated with a significantly higher accuracy of 85% among all observers (P<0.023). These figures were confirmed in the second evaluation study.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-experienced endoscopists have better interobserver agreement and accuracy for AFI than for HR-WLE or NBI, indicating that AFI is easier to use for polyp differentiation in non-experienced setting. The newly developed algorithm, combining information of AFI and NBI together, had the highest accuracy and obtained equal results between experienced and non-experienced endoscopists.

Complications of colonoscopy in a large public county hospital in Greece. A 10-year study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Information about the complications of colonoscopy in Southern Europe is limited, particularly in Greece where it is non-existent. Our study sought to determine the complications of colonoscopy in a large public county hospital in Greece over a 10-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All colonoscopy procedures from 1996 to 2006 were entered into a database. Data were analysed by both univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Nine thousand six hundred forty-eight colonoscopies were entered into a database. The procedures were diagnostic in 79% and therapeutic in 21%. Overall bleeding complications occurred in 83 out of the 9648 patients (0.8%: 95% confidence interval [0.7%, 0.9%]). Perforation occurred in four female patients (0.04%: 95% confidence interval [0.01%, 0.07%]) in the sigmoid colon. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis in the therapeutic colonoscopies revealed that presence of significant polyps (odds ratio 4.7, confidence interval [2.9-7.6]), the male sex (odds ratio 2, 95% confidence interval [1.2-3.3]) and the time period of the procedure (the first 5 years) (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval [1.01-3]), are significant predictors of a post-colonoscopy bleeding episode.

CONCLUSION

This historical cohort study, the first in Greece on this subject, shows that colonoscopy is a rather safe procedure and that the rate of complications in this study was low.