1
|
Burr NE, Plumb A, Sood R, Rembacken B, Tolan DJM. CT colonography remains an important test for colorectal cancer. Gut 2022; 71:217-218. [PMID: 33753420 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Plumb
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ruchit Sood
- Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Damian J M Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barosa R, Mohammed N, Rembacken B. Risk stratification of colorectal polyps for predicting residual or recurring adenoma using the Size/Morphology/Site/Access score. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 6:630-638. [PMID: 29881619 DOI: 10.1177/2050640617742485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe procedure to manage large non-pedunculated colonic polyps for which residual/recurrent adenoma is the main drawback. Size/Morphology/Site/Access score determines polypectomy difficulty. We aimed to describe residual/recurrent adenoma rate according to Size/Morphology/Site/Access and to select the ize/Morphology/Site/Access cut-off to predict low residual/recurrent adenoma. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of endoscopic mucosal resection for large non-pedunculated colonic polyps performed in a tertiary centre. Results Three hundred and sixteen procedures were included. The mean size of lesions was 34.5 ± 17.1 mm, 59.5% were sessile, 60.4% were in the right colon and in 17.7% (n = 56) the access was difficult. Of the lesions, 83.6% were Size/Morphology/Site/Access 3-4. Residual/recurrent adenoma at first and second follow-up was significantly lower in Size/Morphology/Site/Access 2 (1.9% and 0.0%, respectively) when compared to Size/Morphology/Site/Access 3 (18.2%, p = 0.004 and 6.7%, p = 0.049) and Size/Morphology/Site/Access 4 (30.8%, p < 0.001 and 22.7%, p = 0.030). The negative predictive value of Size/Morphology/Site/Access 2 for residual/recurrent adenoma at second follow-up was 86.1%. On multivariate analyses, Size/Morphology/Site/Access 3-4 predicted residual/recurrent adenoma at first (odds ratio 11.96, 95% confidence interval 1.57-91.13) and second follow-up (odds ratio 2.47, 95% confidence interval 1.51-4.22) and had higher cumulative incidence of residual/recurrent adenoma compared to Size/Morphology/Site/Access 2 (p ≤ 0.003). Conclusion Use of the Size/Morphology/Site/Access score allows cases to be identified with a low risk of residual/recurrent adenoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Barosa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Noor Mohammed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Bjorn Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phoa KN, Pouw RE, Bisschops R, Pech O, Ragunath K, Weusten BLAM, Schumacher B, Rembacken B, Meining A, Messmann H, Schoon EJ, Gossner L, Mannath J, Seldenrijk CA, Visser M, Lerut T, Seewald S, ten Kate FJ, Ell C, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJGHM. Multimodality endoscopic eradication for neoplastic Barrett oesophagus: results of an European multicentre study (EURO-II). Gut 2016; 65:555-62. [PMID: 25731874 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Focal endoscopic resection (ER) followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) safely and effectively eradicates Barrett's oesophagus (BO) containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or early cancer (EC) in smaller studies with limited follow-up. Herein, we report long-term outcomes of combined ER and RFA for BO (HGD and/or EC) from a single-arm multicentre interventional study. DESIGN In 13 European centres, patients with BO ≤ 12 cm with HGD and/or EC on 2 separate endoscopies were eligible for inclusion. Visible lesions (<2 cm length; <50% circumference) were removed with ER, followed by serial RFA every 3 months (max 5 sessions). Follow-up endoscopy was scheduled at 6 months after the first negative post-treatment endoscopic control and annually thereafter. OUTCOMES complete eradication of neoplasia (CE-neo) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM); durability of CE-neo and CE-IM (once achieved) during follow-up. Biopsy and resection specimens underwent centralised pathology review. RESULTS 132 patients with median BO length C3M6 were included. After entry-ER in 119 patients (90%) and a median of 3 RFA (IQR 3-4) treatments, CE-neo was achieved in 121/132 (92%) and CE-IM in 115/132 patients (87%), per intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol analysis, CE-neo and CE-IM were achieved in 98% and 93%, respectively. After a median of 27 months following the first negative post-treatment endoscopic control, neoplasia and IM recurred in 4% and 8%, respectively. Mild-to-moderate adverse events occurred in 25 patients (19%); all managed conservatively or endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS In patients with early Barrett's neoplasia, intensive multimodality endotherapy consisting of ER combined with RFA is safe and highly effective, and the treatment effect appears to be durable during mid-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR 1211, http://www.trialregister.nl.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Nadine Phoa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte Schumacher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bjorn Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Augsburg Hospital, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Liebwin Gossner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Karlsruhe Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Jayan Mannath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - C A Seldenrijk
- Department of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Mike Visser
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Toni Lerut
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiebo J ten Kate
- Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Ell
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Horst Neuhaus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohammed N, Rehman A, Swinscoe MT, Mundre P, Rembacken B. Outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to timing of endoscopy and the experience of endoscopist: a tertiary center experience. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E282-6. [PMID: 27004244 PMCID: PMC4798939 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding admitted out of hours or at the weekends may have an excess mortality rate. The literature reports around this are conflicting. AIMS AND METHODS We aimed to analyze the outcomes of emergency endoscopies performed out of hours and over the weekends in our center. We retrospectively analyzed data from April 2008 to June 2012. RESULTS A total of 507 'high risk' emergency gastroscopies were carried out over the study period for various indications. Patients who died within 30 days of the index procedure [22 % (114 /510)] had a significantly higher Rockall score (7.6 vs. 6.0, P < 0.0001), a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status (3.5 vs. 2.7, P < 0.001), and a lower systolic blood pressure (BP) at the time of the examination (94.8 vs 103, P = 0.025). These patients were significantly older (77.7 vs. 67.5 years, P = 0.006), and required more blood transfusion (5.9 versus 3.8 units). Emergency out-of-hours endoscopy was not associated with an increased risk of death [relative risk (RR) 1.09, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.12 - 1.95]. Whether the examination was carried out by a senior specialist registrar (senior trainee) or a consultant made no difference to the survival of the patient (RR 0.98, CI 0.77 - 1.32). CONCLUSION Higher pre-endoscopy Rockall score and ASA status contributed significantly to the 30-day mortality following upper gastrointestinal bleeding, whereas lower BP tended towards significance. Outcomes did not vary with the time of the endoscopy nor was there any difference between a consultant and a senior specialist registrar led service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Mohammed
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK,Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,Corresponding author Noor Mohammed, MBBS MRCP Department of GastroenterologySt James’s University HospitalLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeeds LS12 4DJUK+44-113-2068851
| | - Amer Rehman
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Thomas Swinscoe
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Pradeep Mundre
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Bjorn Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohammed N, Rembacken B. Cap, hood, cuff, and balloon - what next for colonoscopy? Endoscopy 2015; 47:564. [PMID: 26030894 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
6
|
Palles C, Chegwidden L, Li X, Findlay JM, Farnham G, Castro Giner F, Peppelenbosch MP, Kovac M, Adams CL, Prenen H, Briggs S, Harrison R, Sanders S, MacDonald D, Haigh C, Tucker A, Love S, Nanji M, deCaestecker J, Ferry D, Rathbone B, Hapeshi J, Barr H, Moayyedi P, Watson P, Zietek B, Maroo N, Gay L, Underwood T, Boulter L, McMurtry H, Monk D, Patel P, Ragunath K, Al Dulaimi D, Murray I, Koss K, Veitch A, Trudgill N, Nwokolo C, Rembacken B, Atherfold P, Green E, Ang Y, Kuipers EJ, Chow W, Paterson S, Kadri S, Beales I, Grimley C, Mullins P, Beckett C, Farrant M, Dixon A, Kelly S, Johnson M, Wajed S, Dhar A, Sawyer E, Roylance R, Onstad L, Gammon MD, Corley DA, Shaheen NJ, Bird NC, Hardie LJ, Reid BJ, Ye W, Liu G, Romero Y, Bernstein L, Wu AH, Casson AG, Fitzgerald R, Whiteman DC, Risch HA, Levine DM, Vaughan TL, Verhaar AP, van den Brande J, Toxopeus EL, Spaander MC, Wijnhoven BPL, van der Laan LJW, Krishnadath K, Wijmenga C, Trynka G, McManus R, Reynolds JV, O'Sullivan J, MacMathuna P, McGarrigle SA, Kelleher D, Vermeire S, Cleynen I, Bisschops R, Tomlinson I, Jankowski J. Polymorphisms near TBX5 and GDF7 are associated with increased risk for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2015; 148:367-78. [PMID: 25447851 PMCID: PMC4315134 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Revised: 10/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We found the risk to be BE has been associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 6p21 (within the HLA region) and on 16q23, where the closest protein-coding gene is FOXF1. Subsequently, the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON) identified risk loci for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma near CRTC1 and BARX1, and within 100 kb of FOXP1. We aimed to identify further SNPs that increased BE risk and to validate previously reported associations. METHODS We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify variants associated with BE and further analyzed promising variants identified by BEACON by genotyping 10,158 patients with BE and 21,062 controls. RESULTS We identified 2 SNPs not previously associated with BE: rs3072 (2p24.1; odds ratio [OR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.18; P = 1.8 × 10(-11)) and rs2701108 (12q24.21; OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86-0.93; P = 7.5 × 10(-9)). The closest protein-coding genes were respectively GDF7 (rs3072), which encodes a ligand in the bone morphogenetic protein pathway, and TBX5 (rs2701108), which encodes a transcription factor that regulates esophageal and cardiac development. Our data also supported in BE cases 3 risk SNPs identified by BEACON (rs2687201, rs11789015, and rs10423674). Meta-analysis of all data identified another SNP associated with BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma: rs3784262, within ALDH1A2 (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.87-0.93; P = 3.72 × 10(-9)). CONCLUSIONS We identified 2 loci associated with risk of BE and provided data to support a further locus. The genes we found to be associated with risk for BE encode transcription factors involved in thoracic, diaphragmatic, and esophageal development or proteins involved in the inflammatory response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Palles
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Laura Chegwidden
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Xinzhong Li
- Centre of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomarkers, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - John M Findlay
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Garry Farnham
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | | | - Maikel P Peppelenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michal Kovac
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire L Adams
- Plymouth University Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, Devon, UK
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sarah Briggs
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Harrison
- Department of Pathology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Scott Sanders
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
| | - David MacDonald
- Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chris Haigh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wansbeck General Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland, UK
| | - Art Tucker
- William Harvey Research Institute, The Ernest Cooke Vascular & Microvascular Unit, Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sharon Love
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine and Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Oxford, UK
| | - Manoj Nanji
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - John deCaestecker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - David Ferry
- Department of Oncology, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Barrie Rathbone
- Department for Gastroenterology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Julie Hapeshi
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester, UK
| | - Hugh Barr
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Gloucestershire, Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster HC, Hamilton Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Watson
- School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, NI
| | - Barbara Zietek
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Neera Maroo
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Laura Gay
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Tim Underwood
- University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Lisa Boulter
- University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Hugh McMurtry
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire, UK
| | - David Monk
- General Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester, UK
| | - Praful Patel
- Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Wolfson Digestive Diseases Centre, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Al Dulaimi
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Alexandra Hospital, Redditch, UK
| | - Iain Murray
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK
| | - Konrad Koss
- Macclesfield General Hospital, Macclefield, Cheshire, UK
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Oncology, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Nigel Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell General Hospital, Lyndon, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Chuka Nwokolo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Coventry, Coventry, UK
| | - Bjorn Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Atherfold
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elaine Green
- School of Biomedical & Healthcare Sciences, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- Gastroenterology, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary NHS Trust, Wigan, UK; GI Science Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Salford, UK
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wu Chow
- Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, Scotland, UK
| | - Stuart Paterson
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Sudarshan Kadri
- Department for Gastroenterology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Ian Beales
- Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, Lancashire, UK
| | - Charles Grimley
- Head of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Northern BC, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Mullins
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Conrad Beckett
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Royal United Hospital, Avon, Bath, Somerset, UK
| | - Mark Farrant
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering General Hospital, Rothwell Road, Kettering, Northants, UK
| | - Andrew Dixon
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Sean Kelly
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, Bedfordshire, UK
| | - Matthew Johnson
- Department of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Shahjehan Wajed
- County and Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elinor Sawyer
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lynn Onstad
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Marilie D Gammon
- Division of Research and San Francisco Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, California
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Nigel C Bird
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura J Hardie
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian J Reid
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Weimin Ye
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yvonne Romero
- Registry, On behalf of the Romero; Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute and City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Alan G Casson
- MRC Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rebecca Fitzgerald
- Cancer Control, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - David C Whiteman
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - David M Levine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Tom L Vaughan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Auke P Verhaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan van den Brande
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eelke L Toxopeus
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J W van der Laan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kausilia Krishnadath
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen and University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cisca Wijmenga
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Institute of Molecular Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gosia Trynka
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Institute of Molecular Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ross McManus
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St. James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John V Reynolds
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jacintha O'Sullivan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Padraic MacMathuna
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
| | - Sarah A McGarrigle
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dermot Kelleher
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London, UK
| | - Severine Vermeire
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Cleynen
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Janusz Jankowski
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Warwickshire, England; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwickshire, England.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morino M, Risio M, Bach S, Beets-Tan R, Bujko K, Panis Y, Quirke P, Rembacken B, Rullier E, Saito Y, Young-Fadok T, Allaix ME. Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2015; 29:755-73. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4067-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
8
|
Arezzo A, Matsuda T, Rembacken B, Miles WFA, Coccia G, Saito Y. Piecemeal mucosectomy, submucosal dissection or transanal microsurgery for large colorectal neoplasm. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 Suppl 1:44-51. [PMID: 25511861 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, Dolwani S, McKaig B, Pullan R, Rembacken B, Riley S, Rutter MD, Suzuki N, Tsiamoulos Z, Valori R, Vance ME, Faiz OD, Saunders BP, Thomas-Gibson S. A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2013; 4:244-248. [PMID: 28839733 PMCID: PMC5369843 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Revised: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 05/11/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopists are now expected to perform polypectomy routinely. Colonic polypectomy varies in difficulty, depending on polyp morphology, size, location and access. The measurement of the degree of difficulty of polypectomy, based on polyp characteristics, has not previously been described. OBJECTIVE To define the level of difficulty of polypectomy. METHODS Consensus by nine endoscopists regarding parameters that determine the complexity of a polyp was achieved through the Delphi method. The endoscopists then assigned a polyp complexity level to each possible combination of parameters. A scoring system to measure the difficulty level of a polyp was developed and validated by two different expert endoscopists. RESULTS Through two Delphi rounds, four factors for determining the complexity of a polypectomy were identified: size (S), morphology (M), site (S) and access (A). A scoring system was established, based on size (1-9 points), morphology (1-3 points), site (1-2 points) and access (1-3 points). Four polyp levels (with increasing level of complexity) were identified based on the range of scores obtained: level I (4-5), level II (6-9), level III (10-12) and level IV (>12). There was a high degree of interrater reliability for the polyp scores (interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93) and levels (κ=0.888). CONCLUSIONS The scoring system is feasible and reliable. Defining polyp complexity levels may be useful for planning training, competency assessment and certification in colonoscopic polypectomy. This may allow for more efficient service delivery and referral pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gupta
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| | - D Miskovic
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - P Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - S Dolwani
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - B McKaig
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - R Pullan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK
| | - B Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - S Riley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - M D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - N Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| | - Z Tsiamoulos
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| | - R Valori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
| | - M E Vance
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| | - O D Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - B P Saunders
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| | - S Thomas-Gibson
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, Regula J, Brandão C, Chaussade S, Dekker E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ferlitsch M, Gimeno-García A, Hazewinkel Y, Jover R, Kalager M, Loberg M, Pox C, Rembacken B, Lieberman D. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45:842-51. [PMID: 24030244 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 392] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The following recommendations for post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance should be applied only after a high quality baseline colonoscopy with complete removal of all detected neoplastic lesions.1 In the low risk group (patients with 1 - 2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm with low grade dysplasia), the ESGE recommends participation in existing national screening programmes 10 years after the index colonoscopy. If no screening programme is available, repetition of colonoscopy 10 years after the index colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 2 In the high risk group (patients with adenomas with villous histology or high grade dysplasia or ≥10 mm in size, or ≥ 3 adenomas), the ESGE recommends surveillance colonoscopy 3 years after the index colonoscopy (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Patients with 10 or more adenomas should be referred for genetic counselling (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 In the high risk group, if no high risk adenomas are detected at the first surveillance examination, the ESGE suggests a 5-year interval before a second surveillance colonoscopy (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). If high risk adenomas are detected at first or subsequent surveillance examinations, a 3-year repetition of surveillance colonoscopy is recommended (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).4 The ESGE recommends that patients with serrated polyps < 10 mm in size with no dysplasia should be classified as low risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). The ESGE suggests that patients with large serrated polyps (≥ 10 mm) or those with dysplasia should be classified as high risk (weak recommendation, low quality evidence).5 The ESGE recommends that the endoscopist is responsible for providing a written recommendation for the post-polypectomy surveillance schedule (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45:142-50. [PMID: 23335011 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 293] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the choice amongst regimens available for cleansing the colon in preparation for colonoscopy. METHODS This Guideline is based on a targeted literature search to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendation and the quality of evidence. RESULTS The main recommendations are as follows. (1) The ESGE recommends a low-fiber diet on the day preceding colonoscopy (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). (2) The ESGE recommends a split regimen of 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (or a same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) for routine bowel preparation. A split regimen (or same-day regimen in the case of afternoon colonoscopy) of 2 L PEG plus ascorbate or of sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate may be valid alternatives, in particular for elective outpatient colonoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). In patients with renal failure, PEG is the only recommended bowel preparation. The delay between the last dose of bowel preparation and colonoscopy should be minimized and no longer than 4 hours (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). (3) The ESGE advises against the routine use of sodium phosphate for bowel preparation because of safety concerns (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Vilsteren FGI, Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw RE, Schrijnders D, Sondermeijer CMT, Bisschops R, Esteban JM, Meining A, Neuhaus H, Parra-Blanco A, Pech O, Ragunath K, Rembacken B, Schenk BE, Visser M, ten Kate FJW, Meijer SL, Reitsma JB, Weusten BLAM, Schoon EJ, Bergman JJGHM. Predictive factors for initial treatment response after circumferential radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2013; 45:516-25. [PMID: 23580412 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is safe and effective for the eradication of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus; however, occasionally there is minimal regression after initial circumferential balloon-based RFA (c-RFA). This study aimed to identify predictive factors for a poor response 3 months after c-RFA, and to relate the percentage regression at 3 months to the final treatment outcome. METHODS We included consecutive patients from 14 centers who underwent c-RFA for high grade dysplasia at worst. Patient and treatment characteristics were registered prospectively. "Poor initial response" was defined as < 50 % regression of the Barrett's esophagus 3 months after c-RFA, graded by two expert endoscopists using endoscopic images. Predictors of initial response were identified through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS There were 278 patients included (median Barrett's segment C4M6). In poor initial responders (n = 36; 13 %), complete response for neoplasia (CR-neoplasia) was ultimately achieved in 86 % (vs. 98 % in good responders; P < 0.01) and complete response for intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM) in 66 % (vs. 95 %; P < 0.01). Poor responders required 13 months treatment (vs. 7 months; P < 0.01) for a median of four RFA sessions (vs. three; P < 0.01). We identified four independent baseline predictors of poor response: active reflux esophagitis (odds ratio [OR] 37.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.2 - 433.2); endoscopic resection scar regeneration with Barrett's epithelium (OR 4.7; 95 %CI 1.1 - 20.0); esophageal narrowing pre-RFA (OR 3.9; 95 %CI 1.0 - 15.1); and years of neoplasia pre-RFA (OR 1.2; 95 %CI 1.0 - 1.4). CONCLUSIONS Patients with a poor initial response to c-RFA have a lower ultimate success rate for CR-neoplasia/CR-IM, require more treatment sessions, and a longer treatment period. A poor initial response to c-RFA occurs more frequently in patients who regenerate their endoscopic resection scar with Barrett's epithelium, and those with ongoing reflux esophagitis, neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus for a longer time, or a narrow esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F G I van Vilsteren
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF, Chilton A, Rutter M, Dumonceau JM, Omar M, Ponchon T. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44:957-68. [PMID: 22987217 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B Rembacken
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC, Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O'Connor A, Pereira C, Pimentel-Nunes P, Correia R, Ensari A, Dumonceau JM, Machado JC, Macedo G, Malfertheiner P, Matysiak-Budnik T, Megraud F, Miki K, O'Morain C, Peek RM, Ponchon T, Ristimaki A, Rembacken B, Carneiro F, Kuipers EJ. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy 2012; 44:74-94. [PMID: 22198778 PMCID: PMC3367502 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 451] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and epithelial dysplasia of the stomach are common and are associated with an increased risk for gastric cancer. In the absence of guidelines, there is wide disparity in the management of patients with these premalignant conditions. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), the European Society of Pathology (ESP) and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) have therefore combined efforts to develop evidence-based guidelines on the management of patients with precancerous conditions and lesions of the stomach (termed MAPS). A multidisciplinary group of 63 experts from 24 countries developed these recommendations by means of repeat online voting and a meeting in June 2011 in Porto, Portugal. The recommendations emphasize the increased cancer risk in patients with gastric atrophy and metaplasia, and the need for adequate staging in the case of high grade dysplasia, and they focus on treatment and surveillance indications and methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal, Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Medical Faculty, Porto, Portugal
| | - M. Areia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Portugal, Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Medical Faculty, Porto, Portugal
| | - A. C. de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Marcos-Pinto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Portugal, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto (ICBAS/UP), Porto, Portugal
| | - M. Monteiro-Soares
- Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Medical Faculty, Porto, Portugal
| | - A. O'Connor
- AMNCH/TCD, Adelaide and Meath Hospital/Trinity College, Gastroenterology Department, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C. Pereira
- Molecular Oncology Research Group, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - P. Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - R. Correia
- Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Medical Faculty, Porto, Portugal
| | - A. Ensari
- Department of Pathology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - J. M. Dumonceau
- Département de Gastroénterologie et d'Hépatopancréatologie, H.U.G. Hôpital Cantonal, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - J. C. Machado
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - G. Macedo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar S. João/Medical Faculty, Porto, Portugal
| | - P. Malfertheiner
- Klinik der Gasroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektologie, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - T. Matysiak-Budnik
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - F. Megraud
- Inserm U853 & Université Bordeaux, Laboratoire de Bacteriologie, Bordeaux, France
| | - K. Miki
- Japan Research Foundation of Prediction, Diagnosis and Therapy for Gastric Cancer (JRF PDT GC), Tokyo, Japan
| | - C. O'Morain
- AMNCH/TCD, Adelaide and Meath Hospital/Trinity College, Gastroenterology Department, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R. M. Peek
- Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - T. Ponchon
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Department of Digestive Diseases, Lyon, France
| | - A. Ristimaki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Genome-Scale Biology, Research Program Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - B. Rembacken
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - F. Carneiro
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal, Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty/Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - E. J. Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rembacken B. Brainteaser. Eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Endosc 2012; 24:66-7. [PMID: 22312652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
16
|
Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC, Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O’Connor A, Pereira C, Pimentel-Nunes P, Correia R, Ensari A, Dumonceau JM, Machado JC, Macedo G, Malfertheiner P, Matysiak-Budnik T, Megraud F, Miki K, O’Morain C, Peek RM, Ponchon T, Ristimaki A, Rembacken B, Carneiro F, Kuipers EJ. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Virchows Arch 2011; 460:19-46. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-011-1177-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2011] [Revised: 10/13/2011] [Accepted: 10/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
17
|
Gupta S, Anderson J, Bhandari P, McKaig B, Rupert P, Rembacken B, Riley S, Rutter M, Valori R, Vance M, van der Vleuten CPM, Saunders BP, Thomas-Gibson S. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73:1232-9.e2. [PMID: 21628015 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2010] [Accepted: 01/29/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its ubiquitous use over the past 4 decades, there is no structured, formal method with which to assess polypectomy. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a new method with which to assess competency in polypectomy. DESIGN Polypectomy underwent task deconstruction, and a structured checklist and global assessment scale were developed (direct observation of polypectomy skills [DOPyS]). Sixty bowel cancer screening polypectomy videos were randomly chosen for analysis and were scored independently by 7 expert assessors by using DOPyS. Each parameter and the global rating were scored from 1 to 4 (scores ≥3 = competency). The scores were analyzed by using generalizability theory (G theory). SETTING Multicenter. RESULTS Fifty-nine of the 60 videos were assessable and scored. The majority of the assessors agreed across the pass/fail divide for the global assessment scale in 58 of 59 (98%) polyps. For G-theory analysis, 47 of the 60 videos were analyzed. G-theory analysis suggested that DOPyS is a reliable assessment tool, provided that it is used by 2 assessors to score 5 polypectomy videos all performed by 1 endoscopist. DOPyS scores obtained in this format would reflect the endoscopist's competence. LIMITATIONS Small sample and polyp size. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first attempt to develop and validate a tool designed specifically for the assessment of technical skills in performing polypectomy. G-theory analysis suggests that DOPyS could reliably reflect an endoscopist's competence in performing polypectomy provided a requisite number of assessors and cases were used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Gupta
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London HA1 3UJ., United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boustière C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, Bulois P, Deprez P, Laquiere A, Laugier R, Lesur G, Mosler P, Nalet B, Napoleon B, Rembacken B, Ajzenberg N, Collet JP, Baron T, Dumonceau JM. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2011; 43:445-61. [PMID: 21547880 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing use of antiplatelet agents (APA), their management during the periendoscopic period has become a more common and more difficult problem. The increase in use is due to the availability of new drugs and the widespread use of drug-eluting coronary stents. Acute coronary syndromes can occur when APA therapy is withheld for noncardiovascular interventions. Guidelines about APA management during the periendoscopic period are traditionally based on assessments of the procedure-related risk of bleeding and the risk of thrombosis if APA are stopped. New data allow better assessment of these risks, of the necessary duration of APA discontinuation before endoscopy, of the use of alternative procedures (mostly for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]), and of endoscopic methods that can be used to prevent bleeding (following colonic polypectomy). This guideline makes graded, evidence-based, recommendations for the management of APA for all currently performed endoscopic procedures. A short summary and two tables are included for quick reference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Boustière
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Aabakken L, Rembacken B, LeMoine O, Kuznetsov K, Rey JF, Rösch T, Eisen G, Cotton P, Fujino M. Minimal standard terminology for gastrointestinal endoscopy - MST 3.0. Endoscopy 2009; 41:727-8. [PMID: 19670144 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Standardization of the language of gastrointestinal endoscopy is becoming increasingly important on account of international collaboration, standardized documentation requirements, and computer-based reporting. Version 1 of the Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) was devised to facilitate this development, and, through broad international collaboration, the document was developed and tested further to produce version 2.0, published in 2000. The document forms the basis for computer software by offering standard minimal lists of terms to be used in the structured documentation of endoscopic findings. The ownership of the MST has been transferred to the World Organisation of Digestive Endoscopy (OMED) and in this context, a new revision of the MST document is now in place. Version 3.0 of the terminology includes terms for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and enteroscopy, as well as for adverse event reporting. In addition, acknowledged scoring systems have been included for specific findings, and some structural enhancements have been implemented. The entire document is freely available for noncommercial use from www.omed.org.
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith LA, Sidhu P, Sidhu S, Rembacken B. Meta-analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomography colonography, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 2008; 121:e7; author reply e9. [PMID: 18187060 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2007] [Accepted: 07/25/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
22
|
Rembacken B. To lift or not to lift? That is the question. Endoscopy 2007; 39:740-1. [PMID: 17661251 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- H Barr
- Cranfield Postgraduate Medical School, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Rd, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rembacken B. Should we remove all lesions at colonoscopy? Gut 2004; 53:1877; author reply 1877-8. [PMID: 15542531 PMCID: PMC1774328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
|
25
|
|
26
|
Sumiyoshi T, Gotoda T, Muro K, Rembacken B, Goto M, Sumiyoshi Y, Ono H, Saito D. Morbidity and mortality after self-expandable metallic stent placement in patients with progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:882-5. [PMID: 12776036 DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70024-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Placemet of self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advance esophageal cancer improves dysphagia and occludes tracheoesophageal fistulas. However, the safety of self-expandable metallic stents for patients who have undergone chemoradiotherapy is controversial. This study evaluated the morbidity and modality after self-expandable metallic stent placement in patients with progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS A total of 22 patients in whom self-expandable metallic stents were placed because of progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied. RESULTS All 22 patients had dysphagia, and 13 had a tracheoesophageal fistula. After self-expandable metallic stent placement, the mean dysphagia grade improved from 3.5 to 0.9, and tracheoesophageal fistula was successfully managed in all cases. Seventeen patients had T4 stage disease, and among 8 of them with invasion to the aorta, 6 (75%) died of sudden massive hemorrhage. Median survival for these 6 patients was 31 days (range 13-63 days) compared with 67 days (range 4-262 days) for all patients after self-expandable metallic stent placement. CONCLUSION Self-expandable metallic stent placement improved dysphagia and was useful for treatment of tracheoesophageal fistula. However, for patients with T4 lesions that invade to the aorta, self-expandable metallic stent placement after chemoradiotherapy should be considered carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Sumiyoshi
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sumiyoshi T, Gotoda T, Muro K, Rembacken B, Goto M, Sumiyoshi Y, Ono H, Saito D. Morbidity and mortality after self-expandable metallic stent placement in patients with progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003. [PMID: 12776036 DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Placemet of self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advance esophageal cancer improves dysphagia and occludes tracheoesophageal fistulas. However, the safety of self-expandable metallic stents for patients who have undergone chemoradiotherapy is controversial. This study evaluated the morbidity and modality after self-expandable metallic stent placement in patients with progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS A total of 22 patients in whom self-expandable metallic stents were placed because of progressive or recurrent esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy were studied. RESULTS All 22 patients had dysphagia, and 13 had a tracheoesophageal fistula. After self-expandable metallic stent placement, the mean dysphagia grade improved from 3.5 to 0.9, and tracheoesophageal fistula was successfully managed in all cases. Seventeen patients had T4 stage disease, and among 8 of them with invasion to the aorta, 6 (75%) died of sudden massive hemorrhage. Median survival for these 6 patients was 31 days (range 13-63 days) compared with 67 days (range 4-262 days) for all patients after self-expandable metallic stent placement. CONCLUSION Self-expandable metallic stent placement improved dysphagia and was useful for treatment of tracheoesophageal fistula. However, for patients with T4 lesions that invade to the aorta, self-expandable metallic stent placement after chemoradiotherapy should be considered carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Sumiyoshi
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
As the prognosis of both gastric and colonic cancer remains poor, the challenge is to detect lesions at an early and treatable stage. The benefit of early detection is not only improved survival, but also that patients may be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection, a low-cost, low-morbidity and low-mortality alternative to surgery. In spite of the increasing use of endoscopy in the West, we are not detecting as many early cancers as in Japan. This chapter will discuss the possible reasons for this discrepancy and give a practical guide to 'Japanese endoscopy techniques'. Finally, we have compiled a comprehensive review of the indications, techniques and complications of endoscopic mucosal resection. Throughout the chapter, controversies have been highlighted to give an insight into the limits of our knowledge and stimulate future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Rembacken
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre for Digestive Diseases, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds, LS16 8LT, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I, Sano Y, Fu KI, Parra-Blanco A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S, Rembacken B. Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished? Endoscopy 2001; 33:306-10. [PMID: 11315890 DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Assessing the nature of lesions at the time of colonoscopy is important, and magnifying colonoscopy allows examination of mucosal crypt patterns. In this study, we assessed mucosal crypt patterns to see whether we could predict the histological findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study of total colonoscopy using magnifying colonoscopy involved 4445 patients between December 1993 and July 1998 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. The mucosal crypt patterns of 3438 lesions were observed under magnifying colonoscopy with 0.2% indigo carmine solution, and classified according to a modified Kudo classification (type I to V). After endoscopic or surgical resection (3291 cases and 147 cases, respectively), histopathological examination was performed. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy of magnifying endoscopy for non-neoplastic lesions was 75% (117/157), for adenomatous polyps it was 94% (3006/3186), and for invasive carcinomas it was 85 % (81/95). CONCLUSIONS The combination of magnifying colonoscopy and dye spraying is helpful in determining the nature of colonic lesions as non-neoplastic, adenomas, or invasive carcinomas. Therefore it may be possible to determine, at the time of colonoscopy, which lesions require no treatment, which can be removed endoscopically, and which should be removed by surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kato
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parente F, Molteni P, Bollani S, Maconi G, Vago L, Duca PG, Rembacken B, Axon AT, Bianchi Porro G. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and related upper gastrointestinal lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. A cross-sectional study with matching. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32:1140-6. [PMID: 9399396 DOI: 10.3109/00365529709002994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a reduced prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection has been observed in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, the clinical significance of H. pylori infection in this setting remains unknown. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the prevalence of H. pylori infection in a large series of IBD patients and the frequency of gastroduodenal lesions in those who agreed to undergo upper GI endoscopy. METHODS Two hundred and sixteen consecutive IBD patients (123 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 93 with ulcerative colitis (UC)) had their anti-H. pylori IgG titres measured. Two hundred and sixteen blood donors matched for age, sex, place of birth in Italy, and socioeconomic status served as controls. All patients were offered the possibility of undergoing endoscopy with antral and corpus biopsies regardless of their H. pylori status. RESULTS The overall seroprevalence of H. pylori infection was 48% in IBD patients versus 59% in the control group (P < 0.05), with a significantly lower frequency in CD versus UC patients (41% versus 56%). After adjustment for age, education, and socioeconomic status CD remained associated with a significantly lower risk of H. pylori infection. Previous therapy with sulphasalazine but not with 5-aminosalicylic acid or with steroids/immunosuppressants was associated with a reduced risk of H. pylori infection both in CD and UC patients. One hundred and eighty-nine patients (110 with CD and 79 with UC) underwent endoscopy; the prevalence of peptic ulcer was similar in both groups (5.5% in CD and 5.1% in UC patients); however, 11 more CD patients had gastroduodenal ulcers that were interpreted as CD-related; 7 of these patients had never had foregut symptoms. Two CD patients had granulomatous gastritis at histology, and another 16 patients with CD had H. pylori-negative gastritis. CONCLUSIONS IBD patients have a reduced prevalence of H. pylori infection as compared with matched healthy controls; this appears mostly attributable to a reduced frequency of H. pylori colonization in CD patients. Previous use of sulphasalazine is associated with a reduced risk of infection both in CD and UC patients. Of CD patients 10% have a gastroduodenal localization of their disease, which is often asymptomatic. Of CD patients 15% also have H. pylori-negative gastritis at histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Parente
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|