Oral budesonide for active Crohn's disease. Canadian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group

Certolizumab pegol, a monthly subcutaneously administered Fc-free anti-TNFalpha, improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Certolizumab pegol, a polyethylene glycolated Fc-free Fab' was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in a previously reported randomized, placebo-controlled study. In this paper, we report the effect of certolizumab pegol on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease (n = 292) received subcutaneous certolizumab pegol 100, 200, or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8. A post hoc analysis of the intent-to-treat population (290 patients with HRQoL data) assessed HRQoL by evaluating patients' responses to the self-administered inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ) at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.

RESULTS

Patients receiving certolizumab pegol 400 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8 demonstrated, via their IBDQ total score, significantly (P <or= 0.05) greater improvement in HRQoL from baseline to week 12 and at all other time points compared with placebo. Moreover, HRQoL improved over time in all certolizumab pegol groups, irrespective of baseline C-reactive protein levels. Emotional well-being (IBDQ Emotional Function domain) improved throughout the study for patients receiving certolizumab pegol 400 mg. This improvement was significantly (P <or= 0.05) greater than for patients receiving placebo at all time points. In addition, systemic symptoms (IBDQ Systemic Symptoms domain) improved significantly more in patients receiving certolizumab pegol 400 mg than in those receiving placebo at weeks 4, 8, 10, and 12 (P <or= 0.05) and approached statistical significance at week 2 (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that certolizumab pegol 400 mg improves HRQoL in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a review of medical therapy

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. While a cure remains elusive, both can be treated with medications that induce and maintain remission. With the recent advent of therapies that inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha the overlap in medical therapies for UC and CD has become greater. Although 5-ASA agents have been a mainstay in the treatment of both CD and UC, the data for their efficacy in patients with CD, particularly as maintenance therapy, are equivocal. Antibiotics may have a limited role in the treatment of colonic CD. Steroids continue to be the first choice to treat active disease not responsive to other more conservative therapy; non-systemic steroids such as oral and rectal budesonide for ileal and right-sided CD and distal UC respectively are also effective in mild-moderate disease. 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and its prodrug azathioprine are steroid-sparing immunomodulators effective in the maintenance of remission of both CD and UC, while methotrexate may be used in both induction and maintenance of CD. Infliximab and adalimumab are anti-TNF agents approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of Crohn's disease, and infliximab is also approved for the treatment of UC.

Positioning biologic therapy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Over the past decade, the introduction of biologic agents such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and alpha4 integrin leukocyte adhesion molecule inhibitors has provided new and effective treatment options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent debates have centered on where biologics should be positioned within the current treatment strategy so as to maximize efficacy while balancing risk. This review highlights the current position biologics hold relative to conventional therapies within the current "step-up" treatment strategy. It also critically appraises emerging data, testing the hypothesis that positioning biologics early in the IBD treatment algorithm ("top-down" strategy) results in superior outcomes compared with the current step-up strategy, in which biologics are used only in patients failing conventional therapies or who are steroid dependent.

Medical management of Crohn's disease

The clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by unpredictable phases of disease activity and quiescence. The majority of CD patients experience mild to moderate disease or are in clinical remission over significant periods during the course of their disease. These patients can be treated conservatively with 5-aminosalicylates or budesonide depending on the disease location. Those patients with more severe forms of the disease who require corticosteroids should be treated more aggressively with early introduction of immunomodulator and/or biologic therapy, which may help to prevent the complications associated with CD. It has been suggested that therapies directed at mucosal healing may favorably modify the natural history of CD. As newer, more effective medications become available and new therapeutic approaches are introduced (top-down therapy), mucosal healing, and not solely clinical remission, may well become the preferred treatment objective.

Medical management of mild to moderate Crohn's disease: evidence-based treatment algorithms for induction and maintenance of remission

BACKGROUND

Patients with Crohn's disease alternate between periods of active, symptomatic disease and periods of remission. The treatment goal for Crohn's disease is to induce and then maintain remission of symptoms.

AIM

To review evidence from randomized, controlled, clinical trials on medical therapies for inducing and maintaining remission in patients with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease, and to suggest the best evidence-based approaches for induction and maintenance therapies.

METHODS

PubMed search using the following terms: sulfasalazine or salicylazosulfapyridine or aminosalicylate or aminosalicylic acid or mesalamine or mesalazine or corticosteroid or prednisone or prednisolone or methylprednisolone or budesonide or antibiotic or metronidazole or ciprofloxacin or immunosuppressive or azathioprine or mercaptopurine or thiopurine or methotrexate and Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

Randomized, controlled trials demonstrated that sulfasalazine, budesonide, and conventional corticosteroids are effective for inducing remission of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease when administered for a period of 8-16 weeks. An ideal maintenance therapy does not currently exist.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of maintenance therapy is based on a combination of evidence from controlled trials and patient features including disease severity and location, co-morbidities, previous response to treatment, and previous surgical resection. The options for maintenance therapy include therapy cessation and patient observation following successful induction, budesonide, or immunosuppressive therapy.

"Mind the Gap": an unmet need for new therapy in IBD

Most physicians believe that the drugs they prescribe will work in their patients and thus have made little preparation for alternative strategies in the event of failure. In the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), achieving a remission rate of 20% to 30% or a response rate of 50% to 60% is highly acceptable. This review focuses primarily on placebo-controlled trials that evaluated "usual" treatments for IBD in terms of induction and maintenance of remission, and identifies the "gaps" (ie, the percentage of patients lacking any benefit) in currently available treatments for IBD. Approximately, 40% to 60% of patients will not benefit from the available treatments, indicating a considerable unmet need for new, more effective therapies.

Current and future therapies for inflammatory bowel disease

The introduction of biologic agents to the therapeutic arsenal has dramatically impacted the way we treat patients with inflammatory bowel disease, allowing clinicians to achieve lasting remission in patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapies. New research continues to expand our understanding of the inflammatory cascade of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, revealing a host of potential therapeutic targets for intervention. As we look toward the future in this rapidly developing field, we must learn how best to incorporate these new agents into the treatment algorithm to enhance or replace conventional therapies.

The immune response in inflammatory bowel disease

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), collectively referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), present with differing histologic and cytokine profiles. While the precise mechanisms underlying the development of IBD are not known, sufficient data have been collected to suggest that it results from a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors. Animal models of colitis, along with a more detailed understanding of the immune response in the normal bowel, have led to unifying hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis. An inappropriate mucosal immune response to normal intestinal constituents is a key feature, leading to an imbalance in local pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Neutrophil and monocyte influx occurs with subsequent secretion of oxygen radicals and enzymes, leading to tissue damage. Therapy of IBD has improved and expanded as the understanding of disease mechanisms has evolved. Pharmacologic agents such as aminosalicylates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, or steroids are the mainstays of therapy. Newer agents including monoclonal antibodies targeted to specific proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), have emerged and provide great clinical benefit, but unknown long-term toxicity and immunogenicity may limit their use.

Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are a well-established treatment for active Crohn's disease and have been widely used for decades. It has become apparent, however, that a proportion of patients either fails to respond to corticosteroids or is unable to withdraw from them without relapsing. Furthermore, their use is associated with a range of side effects, such that long-term treatment carries unacceptable risk.

AIM

To review the evidence regarding the appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease, along with their side effects, safety and alternatives.

METHODS

To collect relevant articles, a PubMed search was performed from 1966 to November 2006 using the terms 'steroid', 'corticosteroid', 'glucocorticoid', 'prednisolone', 'prednisone', 'methylprednisolone', 'hydrocortisone', 'dexamethasone' and 'budesonide' in combination with 'Crohn(s) disease'. Relevant articles were reviewed, as were their reference lists to identify further articles.

RESULTS

When used correctly, corticosteroids are a highly effective, well tolerated, cheap and generally safe treatment for active Crohn' disease. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of recipients will either fail to respond (steroid-resistant) or will be steroid dependent at 1 year. Newer alternatives to corticosteroids are not, however, without risk themselves and, moreover, are not necessarily available universally.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are used widely to treat Crohn's disease, a situation that is unlikely to change in the near future. Accordingly, efforts should be made to ensure that they are used correctly and that their side effects are minimized. Reference is made to recently published guidelines and a simplified 'users guide' is presented.

Current Medical Therapy for Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) include Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and colonic IBD type unclassified (IBDU). This article focuses upon current medical therapies for adult CD and UC, and is organized according to therapy for the corresponding disease type, stage, and severity.

Oral budesonide in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis

BACKGROUND

Pouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal-pouch nal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Ten to 15% of patients develop a chronic pouchitis, either treatment responsive or treatment refractory.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of oral budesonide in inducing remission and improving quality of life in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with active pouchitis, not responding after 1 month of antibiotic treatment were treated with budesonide controlled ileal release 9 mg/day for 8 weeks. Symptomatic, endoscopic and histological evaluations were undertaken before and after treatment according to Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Remission was defined as a combination of Pouchitis Disease Activity Index clinical score of < or = 2, endoscopic score of < or = 1 and total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score of < or = 4. The quality of life was assessed with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) achieved remission. The median total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores before and after therapy were, respectively, 14 (range 9-16) and 3 (range 2-10) (P < 0.001). The median Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score also significantly improved from 105 (range 77-175) to 180 (range 85-220) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Eight-week treatment with oral budesonide appears effective in inducing remission in patients with active pouchitis refractory to antibiotic treatment in this open-label study.

Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are two idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorders. In this paper we discuss the current diagnostic approach, their pathology, natural course, and common complications, the assessment of disease activity, extraintestinal manifestations, and medical and surgical management, and provide diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. We critically review the evidence for established (5-aminosalicylic acid compounds, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, calcineurin inhibitors) and emerging novel therapies--including biological therapies--directed at cytokines (eg, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) and receptors (eg, visilizumab, abatacept) involved in T-cell activation, selective adhesion molecule blockers (eg, natalizumab, MLN-02, alicaforsen), anti-inflammatory cytokines (eg, interleukin 10), modulation of the intestinal flora (eg, antibiotics, prebiotics, probiotics), leucocyte apheresis and many more monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, recombinant growth factors, and MAP kinase inhibitors targeting various inflammatory cells and pathways. Finally, we summarise the practical aspects of standard therapies including dosing, precautions, and side-effects.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Optimal care of the inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, requires a broad understanding of disease pathophysiology and therapeutic alternatives. The goals of therapy are accurate diagnosis and timely treatment to both induce and maintain a clinical remission and improve patient quality of life. Most patients can be adequately treated using a combination or aminosalicylates, antibiotics, and corticosteroids, though many patients with Crohn's disease will require immunomodulators, such as azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. The development of novel biologic therapies, particularly infliximab, have dramatically improved our ability to medically manage more severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients. This review will focus on the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.

Evidence for placebo effects on physical but not on biochemical outcome parameters: a review of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Recent reviews on placebo effects in clinical trials suggest that objective changes following placebo treatments may not exist or, at least, have been considerably overestimated. However, the possibility that yet unidentified subsets of parameters are responsive to placebo treatments has not been taken into account. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the effects of placebo treatments on objectively measured outcome parameters by specifically focusing on peripheral disease processes.

METHODS

An initial dataset was collected from a MEDLINE search for placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Trials with stable disease conditions were identified, and the effects of placebo treatments on peripheral outcome parameters were estimated by the changes from baseline in the placebo groups. An explorative data analysis was conducted in order to identify parameter classes with differential responsiveness to placebo treatments. A subgroup meta-analysis of a second dataset was performed to test whether the preliminary classification would also apply to placebo effects derived from the comparison of placebo groups with untreated control groups.

RESULTS

The explorative analysis of outcome parameters and strength of placebo effects yielded a classification into responsive "physical" versus non-responsive "biochemical" parameters. In total, 50% of trials measuring physical parameters showed significant placebo effects, compared with 6% of trials measuring biochemical parameters. A subgroup meta-analysis substantiated the differential response (physical parameters: n = 14, Hedges' pooled effect size g = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.46; biochemical parameters: n = 15, g = 0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.10). The subanalysis of the second dataset supported the classification and revealed a significant improvement for physical parameters (n = 20, g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36) and a deterioration for biochemical parameters (n = 6, g = -0.17, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that placebo interventions can improve physical disease processes of peripheral organs more easily and effectively than biochemical processes. This differential response offers a good starting point for theoretical considerations on possible mediating mechanisms, and for future investigations in this field.

Inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in patients aged 60 years and older is approximately 3.5/100,000 people/year for Crohn’s disease and 4.5/100,000 people/year for ulcerative colitis. An increased frequency of comorbidities and an increased risk of other forms of colitis in elderly patients can make the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease challenging. The clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly is generally similar to that in younger patients, with primary differences noted in symptom frequency and disease location. The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly is also generally the same as that for younger patients. Elderly patients are more likely to experience side-effects from corticosteroids and to have contraindications to immunosuppressive therapy. Surgical outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly patient have improved over time. Outcomes and complications from surgery in the elderly population are similar to those of younger patients.

Pharmacokinetics and bone effects of budesonide in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the safety of budesonide in primary biliary cirrhosis.

METHODS

77 primary biliary cirrhosis patients, with stages I-III at entry, were randomized to use either budesonide 6 mg and ursodeoxycholic acid 15 mg/kg (group A), or ursodeoxycholic acid alone (group B) daily for 3 years. In 22 patients, budesonide pharmacokinetics was determined after 3 years. Bone mass density was measured in 62 patients at baseline and 3 years; in 57 patients also liver biopsies were performed.

RESULTS

At 3 years, no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of budesonide were found between the patients with stages 0-I, II and III primary biliary cirrhosis. In group A, bone mass density in femoral neck and lumbar spine were decreased by 3.6% (P = 0.0002) and 2.8% (P = 0.003) from the baseline. In group B, the corresponding decreases were 1.9% (P = 0.029) and 0.7% (P = 0.25), but the differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.16 for femoral neck and P = 0.08 for lumbar spine).

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma concentrations of budesonide do not significantly differ within stages I-III primary biliary cirrhosis patients. The combination of budesonide and ursodeoxycholic acid may decrease bone mass density in the femoral neck and lumbar spine in some primary biliary cirrhosis patients, and bone mass density is recommended to be monitored during budesonide therapy.

Interventions for treating collagenous colitis

BACKGROUND

Collagenous colitis is a disorder that is recognized as a cause of chronic diarrhea. Treatment has been based mainly on anecdotal evidence. This review was performed to identify therapies for collagenous colitis that have been proven in randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effective treatments for patients with clinically active collagenous colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant papers published between 1970 and June 2006 were identified via the MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Manual searches from the references of identified papers, as well as review papers on collagenous or microscopic colitis were performed to identify additional studies. Abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings were searched to identify research submitted in abstract form only. Finally, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders Group Specialized Trials Register were searched for other studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Seven randomized trials were identified. One trial studied bismuth subsalicylate (published in abstract form only), one trial studied Boswellia serrata extract (published in abstract form only), one trial studied probiotics, one trial studied prednisolone, and 3 trials studied budesonide for the therapy of collagenous colitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by each author onto 2x2 tables (treatment versus placebo and response versus no response). For therapies assessed in one trial only, p-values were derived using the chi-square test. For therapies assessed in more than one trial, summary test statistics were derived using the Peto odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Data were combined for analysis only if the outcomes were sufficiently similar in definition.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 9 patients with collagenous colitis in the trial studying bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks). Those randomized to active drug were more likely to have clinical (p = 0.003) and histological (p = 0.003) improvement than those assigned to placebo. Eleven patients were enrolled in the trial studying prednisolone (50 mg daily for 2 weeks). There was a trend towards clinical response in patients on active medication compared to placebo (p = 0.064). The effect of prednisolone on histologic improvement was not studied. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the Boswellia serrata extract trial. Clinical improvement was noted in 44% of patients who received active treatment compared to 27% of patients who received placebo (p = 0.32). Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the probiotics trial. Clinical improvement was noted in 29% of patients who received probiotics compared to 13% of patients who received placebo (p = 0.635). A total of 94 patients were enrolled in 3 trials studying budesonide (9 mg daily or in a tapering schedule for 6 to 8 weeks). The pooled odds ratio for clinical response to treatment with budesonide was 12.32 (95% CI 5.53-27.46), with a number needed to treat of 2 patients. There was significant histological improvement with treatment in all 3 trials studying budesonide therapy. Budesonide also appears to improve patients' quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide is effective for the treatment of collagenous colitis. The evidence for benefit with bismuth subsalicylate is weaker. The effectiveness of prednisolone, Boswellia serrata extract, probiotics and other therapies for induction or maintenance of remission of collagenous colitis is unknown and requires further study.

Multidrug resistance 1 genotype and disposition of budesonide in early primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Budesonide, which is a dual substrate of P-glycoprotein, the product of the multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene, and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) has been proposed for treatment of early primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Recently, MDR1 gene polymorphisms have been discussed as a potential cause of glucocorticoid resistance. We tested the hypothesis that MDR1 gene polymorphisms affect absorption of oral budesonide.

METHODS

In 21 patients with histologically proven early-stage (I/II) PBC and nine healthy subjects, we evaluated the impact of MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (2,677G>T,A and 3,435C>T) on disposition of a single oral dose of 3 mg budesonide. CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms (6,986A>G) were analyzed in parallel.

RESULTS

In MDR1 2,677 GG and 3,435 CC genotypes, absorption and elimination of budesonide were not significantly different from those in corresponding homozygous variants. Peak plasma levels and areas under the plasma concentration time curves (AUC) of budesonide were not lower in MDR1 3,435 CC with putatively high intestinal expression of P-glycoprotein than in MDR1 3,435 TT. Interestingly, in two CYP3A5*1/*3 carriers with high enzyme activity, lower AUC was noted than in 28 CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers with a deficient enzyme.

CONCLUSION

Common MDR1 gene polymorphisms do not affect disposition of budesonide in early PBC.

Evaluation of short-term responsiveness and cutoff values of inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ) is a frequently used outcome parameter in clinical trials. Whereas the validity and reproducibility of the IBDQ have been extensively studied, there are limited data on its short-term responsiveness and cutoff values for remission and partial clinical response.

METHODS

The IBDQ score and its bowel (BD), systemic (SysD), emotional (ED), and social (SocD) dimensions were tested for responsiveness in a cohort of 224 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with infliximab for refractory luminal disease. Changes in the IBDQ score and its dimensions 4 weeks after therapy were analyzed and correlated with changes in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The responsiveness ratios of the IBDQ and its dimensions were analyzed. Using regression line with DeltaCDAI, the cutoff values for the IBDQ remission and response were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a good correlation between the CDAI and IBDQ at week 0 (correlation coefficient, 0.69; P < .001) and week 4 (-0.76; P < .001) and change after 4 weeks (0.74; P < .001). The correlation coefficients for DeltaCDAI and changes in BD, SysD, ED, and SocD were 0.753, 0.552, 0.620, and 0.631, respectively; all P < 0.001. The responsiveness ratios for DeltaIBDQ, BD, SysD, ED, and SocD were 2.6, 2.1, 1.9, 1.7, and 1.9, respectively. Regression line for the IBDQ (r = -0.76, P < .001) resulted in a cutoff value for remission of 168 points and for DeltaIBDQ resulted in a cutoff value of 22 and 27 points for clinical improvement based on DeltaCDAI > or = -70 and > or = -100 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The IBDQ is a responsive instrument for reflecting quick change in the quality of life of patients with CD. Cutoff values for the IBDQ remission and partial response were 168 and > or = 27 points.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in children with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Budesonide is effective as initial therapy of mild to moderate Crohn's disease in adults. Superior tolerability to conventional corticosteroids might be attributed to extensive first-pass metabolism of budesonide by cytochrome P450 3A.

AIM

To evaluate biotransformation and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in children.

METHODS

Drug disposition and effects on endogenous cortisol were evaluated in 12 children with Crohn's disease (5-15 years) after first intake of 3 mg budesonide (single dose), and again after 1 week of thrice daily dosing (steady-state). The parent drug and cytochrome P450 3A-dependent metabolites were analysed in blood and urine.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters of budesonide following single-dose administration (e.g. AUC(0-infinity) 7.7+/-5.1 h ng/mL, C(max) 1.8+/-1.2 ng/mL) did not change upon multiple dosing. Overall systemic elimination of budesonide reflected by clearance and half-life was not different between children and adults. After 1 week of treatment reversible adrenal suppression was observed - most pronounced in children aged below 12 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Disposition of oral budesonide appears to be similar between children and adults, but the doctor has to be aware of an increased risk for adrenal suppression in paediatric patients.

Budesonide in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: the first year of experience in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Delayed release budesonide was approved by the FDA for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease involving the ileum and ascending colon. Controlled trials have demonstrated that budesonide is effective in inducing remission and for maintenance of remission, with less frequent steroid side effects than conventional steroids. We sought to determine the benefit of this medication in clinical practice and to identify any non-FDA-approved uses that may warrant further study.

METHODS

Patients in whom oral budesonide was prescribed between November 1, 2001 and October 31, 2002, were identified and medical records were reviewed. Patients were categorized by indication for therapy: ileocolonic Crohn's disease (group 1), Crohn's disease elsewhere (group 2), and other conditions (group 3).

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were identified (108 in group 1, 62 in group 2, and 55 in group 3). Group 3 included patients with microscopic colitis (n = 28), pouchitis (n = 13), ulcerative colitis (n = 12), and celiac disease (n = 2). A favorable outcome occurred in 61% of group 1 patients but only 24% of patients in group 2. In group 3, only microscopic colitis patients and pouchitis patients experienced response rates >50% (77% and 60%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Budesonide is effective in a majority of patients with ileocolonic Crohn's disease and microscopic colitis, which is consistent with results reported from clinical trials. A majority of patients with pouchitis also benefit from budesonide therapy, but prospective controlled trials are necessary to clarify the benefit in this group.

State of the art: IBD therapy and clinical trials in IBD

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) encompass Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, which are diseases characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. IBD is believed to result from predisposing genetic and environmental factors (specific antigens and pathogen-associated molecular patterns) acting on the immunoregulatory system and causing inflammation of the gastrointestinal mucosa. IBD may be the result of an imbalance of effector (proinflammatory) and regulatory T-cell responses. Three scenarios indicative of the outcome of this balance exist in animal models: balanced effector and regulatory T cells resulting in a normal controlled inflammation; overactive effector T cells resulting in inflammation and disease; and an absence of regulatory T cells resulting in uncontrolled inflammation and severe, aggressive disease. The number of products under study for the treatment of IBD has increased from 3 products and 1 target in 1993 to more than 30 products and more than 10 targets in 2005. The number of products under development and continued investigations into the pathogenesis of IBD emphasize the need to expand clinical research efforts in IBD.

Budesonide for induction of remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids continue to play a central role in induction of remission in active Crohn's disease. However, their use comes at a price of significant adverse effects when used repeatedly or for extended periods. Newer corticosteroid agents with limited systemic bioavailability offer a tantalizing option, if they can be shown to be efficacious and safer than conventional corticosteroids. Budesonide is the main alternative corticosteroid currently available in an enteric formulation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of oral budesonide for the treatment of acute flares of Crohn's disease. A secondary but important endpoint was to evaluate the adverse effect profile.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following sources were used to search the literature for potentially relevant papers and trials. 1. A computer-assisted search of the on-line bibliographic database MEDLINE from 1986 onwards. 2. Hand searching the reference lists of trials and review articles identified by means of the computer- assisted search. 3. Proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings were manually searched from 1990 onwards. 4. Contact with the relevant pharmaceutical companies that have been involved in the development of budesonide.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Potentially relevant articles were reviewed in an independent unblinded fashion by two authors to determine if they met the criteria specified below: 1) STUDY POPULATION: Patients of any age with acutely active Crohn's disease, as defined by a CDAI > 150. 2) METHODOLOGY: Randomized double blind controlled trials comparing budesonide to a control treatment. Patients in the control arm may have received placebo, conventional corticosteroids, 5-aminosalicylic acid or sulfasalazine. 3) OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical remission was the outcome measure of interest. The definition of remission was usually a CDAI < 150 by 8 to 16 weeks of therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligible articles were reviewed in duplicate and the results of the primary research trials were abstracted onto specially designed data extraction forms. The proportion of patients achieving remission in the active treatment and control groups of each study were derived from the data provided in the original research papers. Where possible, data were broken down based on site of disease or other strata used by the individual trials.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data extracted from the original research articles were converted, where necessary, into individual 2 x 2 tables (remission versus no remission x budesonide versus control) for each of the individual studies. Where available, individual 2 x 2 tables for strata within studies were also used. The presence of significant heterogeneity among studies was tested for using the chi-square test. Because this is a relatively insensitive test for the presence of heterogeneity, a p-value of 0.10 was regarded as statistically significant. Where p < 0.10 the data from the individual studies were still combined but the pooled results were interpreted with caution. The 2 x 2 tables were synthesized into a summary test statistic using the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals as described by Cochran and Mantel and Haenszel. A fixed effects model was used for the pooling of data. The analysis was performed initially by combining data from all trials to estimate the response rate to budesonide therapy. The analysis was also performed by combining only studies with comparable control groups.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies were deemed eligible for review.

EFFICACY

Budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission with a pooled odds ratio for the two placebo-controlled trials of 2.85 (95% CI 1.67 - 4.87). A single trial comparing budesonide with mesalamine demonstrated an odds ratio of 2.80 (95% CI 1.50 - 5.20) in favour of budesonide over mesalamine for induction of remission in active Crohn's disease. However, budesonide was inferior to conventional corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone) for induction of remission with a pooled odds ratio for the five trials of 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 - 0.95).

SAFETY

The two trials comparing budesonide versus placebo (Greenberg 1994; Tremaine 2002) showed no difference between study groups for proportion of reported corticosteroid-related adverse effects with the pooled odds ratio for both trials of 0.98 (95% CI 0.58 - 1.67). Five trials comparing budesonide versus prednisone showed the budesonide study group had fewer reported corticosteroid-related adverse effects than the prednisone study group (pooled odds ratio was 0.38 (95% CI 0.28 - 0.53).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

With disease in the ileum or ascending colon, budesonide offers an effective therapy which is somewhat less efficacious but with fewer adverse effects than conventional corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone, prednisolone, or 6-methylprednisolone).

Budesonide in previously untreated autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease that is effectively treated with immunosuppressive therapy. Predniso(lo)ne, often in combination with azathioprine, is the basic therapeutic option to induce remission. However, this regimen can cause numerous side effects. The aim of the present study was to evaluate budesonide as a treatment option in the induction of remission in patients with previously untreated AIH.

METHODS

Between October 1998 and August 1999, 12 patients were treated with 3 mg budesonide thrice daily for 3 months in this open one-arm multicenter phase IIa study. Primary end point was induction of remission indicated by a drop of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels below two times the upper limit of normal.

RESULTS

Seven of the 12 patients (58%) reached complete remission, three patients (25%) had a partial response. Thus, 10/12 individuals (83.3%) responded to therapy. Therapy was tolerated well in 10/12 cases (83.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide monotherapy was effective in the induction of remission and well tolerated in treatment naïve patients with AIH. It should be further evaluated in prospective controlled trials and should be compared to predniso(lo)ne both in monotherapy and in combination with azathioprine.

Budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease in medically induced remission: a predetermined pooled analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease (CD) of the ileum and/or ascending colon.

METHODS

Four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with identical protocols were combined according to a predetermined analysis plan. Three hundred eighty patients with CD in medically induced remission (CD activity index [CDAI]< or =150) were randomized to receive oral budesonide 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo daily for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was time to relapse (increase in CDAI of 60 points above baseline and >150).

RESULTS

The median time to relapse was 268, 170, and 154 days for budesonide 6 mg, budesonide 3 mg, and placebo groups, respectively (p= 0.0072). The frequency of adverse events and glucocorticosteroid side effects were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide 6 mg/day is effective for prolonging time to relapse and for significantly reducing rates of relapse at 3 and 6 months but not 12 months in patients with CD in medically induced remission.

Methods to avoid infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Infections have been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in association with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory medications used to treat IBD. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of information on infectious complication risk in patients with IBD. This review describes infectious complications reported in patients with IBD and provides a framework for future studies to assess potential risk factors and incidence for infection. Recommendations are also provided for prevention of infection.

Site-specific delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs in the gastrointestinal tract: an in-vitro release model

Mesalazine and budesonide are anti-inflammatory drugs that are used to induce and maintain remission of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Both drug substances are intended to act locally at the inflamed sites of the gastrointestinal tract. The therapeutic objective for per oral treatment with these drugs is to achieve a high concentration of the active drug at the sites of inflammation while minimizing systemic absorption. The aim of this study was to develop a test system able to reflect the changing environment that a dosage form incorporating the anti-inflammatory agent is exposed to as it moves through the gastrointestinal tract. The USP dissolution apparatus 3 was used for all experiments. Compendial, as well as biorelevant, media were used to simulate passage through the gastrointestinal tract under various physiological conditions. Different dosage forms of mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) and budesonide available on the German market were tested. Although all dosage forms were indicated for the same therapeutic objectives, each of the dosage forms exhibited a characteristic release pattern under in-vitro conditions simulating a passage through the fasted-state gastrointestinal tract. Results from this test series indicate that, in the case of various dosage forms of mesalazine and budesonide used for the therapy of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, release patterns as the dosage form moves through the gastrointestinal tract may vary widely. As the various phenotypes of IBD have different requirements in terms of pattern of distribution of the inflamed sites, and because other aspects of gastrointestinal physiology vary within the patient population, the test methods and approach described here should be very useful in designing therapy tailored to the needs of each individual patient.

[Pharmacologic therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases: hopes, disappointments]

Because the etiology of inflammatory bowel diseases is unclear, no causative therapy is available. However, pathophysiology of the disease offers a lot of possibilities to disrupt the inflammatory cascade that maintains the inflammatory process. The aim of every therapy is to maintain remission as long as possible and to amend the natural course of the disease. Pharmacotherapy includes 5-Aminosalicylates, glucocorticoids, immunosupressants (methotrexate, azathioprine) as well as specific pharmacologic interventions like monoclonal antibodies directed against TNF-alpha (Infliximab). Important supportive tools are available to improve symptoms like diarrhea and pain. Dietetic treatment and surgical procedures represent important alternatives or supplement pharmacotherapeutic interventions.

Budesonide combined with UDCA to improve liver histology in primary biliary cirrhosis: a three-year randomized trial

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe medical therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but its effect on liver histology remains uncertain. Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with high receptor activity and high first-pass metabolism in liver. We evaluated the combination of budesonide and UDCA on liver histology and compared this with UDCA alone in a 3-year prospective, randomized, open multicenter study. Patients with PBC (n = 77), at stages I to III, were randomized into 2 treatment arms, A (n = 41): budesonide 6 mg/d and UDCA 15 mg/kg/d and B (n = 36): UDCA 15 mg/kg/d. Liver histology was assessed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Liver function tests and glucose and cortisol values were determined every 4 months. Paired liver biopsy specimens were available from 69 patients (A = 37 and B = 32). Stage improved 22% in group A but deteriorated 20% in group B (P = .009). Fibrosis decreased 25% in group A but increased 70% in group B (P = .0009). S-PIIINP decreased significantly in group A. Inflammation decreased in both groups, 34% in group A (P = .02), but only 10% in group B (P = NS). Serum liver enzymes decreased significantly in both treatment arms. Bilirubin values rose in group B but stayed stable in group A (A/B P = .002). A mild systemic glucocorticoid effect from budesonide was evident after 2 years. In conclusion, budesonide combined with UDCA improved liver histology, whereas the effect of UDCA alone was mainly on laboratory values. Studies with longer follow-up using a combination of budesonide and UDCA are warranted to confirm safety and effects.

Novel approaches to inflammatory bowel disease

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are chronic, spontaneously relapsing disorders of unknown cause. These diseases appear to be immunologically mediated and have genetic and environmental influences. Although the cause of these diseases remains obscure, the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation is becoming clearer, due to improved animal models of enterocolitis and important advances in immunological techniques. Traditional therapy for IBD, although helping to induce and maintain disease remission, does little to alter the underlying fundamental disease process. New IBD therapy has not developed significantly over the past twenty years and includes 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents, such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate. There is, therefore, a need for new, specific disease-modifying therapy and the development of such therapy has been hastened by a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD. This review examines the most recent novel therapies for IBD, with specific emphasis on immunomodulatory and novel anti-inflammatory therapies. Recent clinical trials are reviewed, and the potential advances and clinical impact that these novel agents may provide are discussed.

Budesonide as maintenance treatment in Crohn's disease: a placebo-controlled trial

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide capsules 6 mg daily for prolongation of time to relapse and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) affecting the ileum and/or ascending colon.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, 110 patients with CD, who had previously achieved remission in a placebo-controlled trial of budesonide 9 mg daily, were randomly assigned to receive budesonide 6 mg once daily or placebo for 52 weeks. Primary outcome measure was time to relapse [CD activity index (CDAI) of >150 plus an increase of at least 60 points from study entry or withdrawal due to clinical deterioration].

RESULTS

Median time to relapse was 360 days for budesonide patients; 169 days for placebo patients (P = 0.132). No significant differences were seen between groups in relapse rates at 1 year. Budesonide was safe and well tolerated, with a similar adverse events profile to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with budesonide 6 mg once daily had a trend towards a prolonged time to relapse and lower CDAI scores compared with patients treated with placebo, but relapse rates were not significantly different at the 1-year end point.

Medical Therapy of Crohn's Disease

There is no medical or surgical treatment that provides a permanent cure for Crohn's disease (CD). However, an evolving understanding of the pathogenesis of CD has provided clinicians with a diversity of medical treatment options for the disease. The goal of therapy is to induce and maintain clinical remission. The efficacy of immune-modifying agents such as azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and infliximab have supported a paradigm shift in CD treatment in which maintenance agents are introduced earlier in the disease course. At the same time, it is imperative to balance the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of medical therapy. Given the variable and relapsing clinical course of CD, the physician and patient should ideally develop an ongoing relationship that allows for individualization of treatment regimens, monitoring of response and side effects, and modification of the therapeutic strategy in the absence of improvement.

Bone mineral density in relation to efficacy and side effects of budesonide and prednisolone in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Osteoporosis frequently occurs in Crohn's disease, often because of corticosteroids. Budesonide as controlled release capsules is a locally acting corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability. We investigated its effects on bone compared with prednisolone.

METHODS

In 34 international centers, 272 patients with Crohn's disease involving ileum and/or colon ascendens were randomized to once daily treatment with budesonide or prednisolone for 2 years at doses adapted to disease activity. One hundred eighty-one corticosteroid-free patients had active disease (98 had never received corticosteroids, corticosteroid naive; 83 had received corticosteroids previously, corticosteroid exposed), and 90 had quiescent disease, receiving long-term low doses of corticosteroids, corticosteroid-dependent; in 1 patient, no efficacy data were obtained. Bone mineral density and fractures were assessed in a double-blinded fashion; disease activity, side effects, and quality of life were monitored.

RESULTS

Neither the corticosteroid-free nor the corticosteroid-dependent patients treated with budesonide differed significantly in bone mineral density from those receiving prednisolone. However, corticosteroid-naive patients receiving budesonide had smaller reductions in bone mineral density than those on prednisolone (mean, -1.04% vs -3.84%; P = .0084). Treatment-emergent corticosteroid side effects were less frequent with budesonide. Efficacy was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with budesonide is associated with better preserved bone mass compared with prednisolone in only the corticosteroid-naive patients with active ileocecal Crohn's disease. In both the corticosteroid-free and corticosteroid-dependent groups, budesonide and prednisolone were equally effective for up to 2 years, but budesonide caused fewer corticosteroid side effects.

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide (Entocort EC) capsules for Crohn's disease

This overview summarises available pharmacokinetic data on budesonide capsules (Entocort EC), approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active Crohn's disease involving the ileum and/or ascending colon and for prolongation of symptom control. Budesonide is a locally-acting glucocorticosteroid with an extensive, primarily hepatic, metabolism after oral administration. It is rapidly absorbed and biotransformed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A to metabolites with negligible glucocorticoid activity. Entocort EC, a pH- and time-dependent oral formulation of budesonide, was developed to optimise drug delivery to the ileum and throughout the colon. Pharmaco-scintigraphic studies have confirmed that the Entocort EC formulation delays budesonide absorption and prolongs the rate of elimination but maintains complete absorption. This improves the delivery of budesonide to the intestinal lumen relative to a plain formulation. A low systemic availability of 9-21% indicates extensive first-pass elimination. Food appears to have little impact on the absorption of budesonide from Entocort EC capsules and the pharmacokinetics are dose-proportional between 3 and 15 mg. On average, systemic availability was 2.5-fold higher in patients with cirrhosis compared with healthy controls; however, mild liver impairment had little effect on systemic exposure. Pharmacokinetics appear unaffected by gender and age, although this has not been tested in younger children. Renal impairment is not expected to have an impact on the kinetics of Entocort EC. Budesonide is unlikely to inhibit the metabolism of other drugs, including CYP3A4 substrates, mainly because of the very low plasma concentrations obtained with the compound even after high doses of Entocort trade mark EC capsules. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, will inhibit the metabolism of budesonide, resulting in several-fold increases in the area under the concentration-time curve of budesonide. Also, grapefruit juice intake may increase systemic availability of budesonide, probably by inhibition of intestinal CYP3A4 activity. Unlike prednisolone, oral contraceptives do not alter plasma budesonide concentrations. An increased pH obtained by gastric acid inhibitory drugs, such as omeprazole, does not affect the pharmacokinetics of budesonide. In summary, budesonide capsules (Entocort EC) possess many pharmacological features that make the formulation well adapted for a targeted treatment of inflammatory disorders, such as Crohn's disease involving the ileum and ascending colon.

Targeted delivery, safety, and efficacy of oral enteric-coated formulations of budesonide

Budesonide is a potent corticosteroid with a high first-pass metabolism rate. Two commercially available enteric-coated pH-dependent release formulations (Entocort EC and Budenofalk) deliver budesonide to the ileum and proximal colon, regions most commonly affected in Crohn's disease. The drug's effectiveness in this disease has been proven in multiple, placebo-controlled trials, where it has been shown to be superior to mesalamine and placebo, and equivalent to prednisolone for the control of mild to moderately active right-sided Crohn's disease. This beneficial therapeutic effect comes with less adrenal suppression and a small improvement in the clinical adverse effect profile, as compared to prednisolone. However, budesonide provides no benefit over conventional therapy for left-sided colonic disease, and it is less effective for treatment of more severe disease activity and more distal colonic disease. Continuous budesonide does not prolong remission and is, therefore, best used in an intermittent fashion to treat acute exacerbations.

Interventions for treating collagenous colitis: a Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group systematic review of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review to determine effective treatments for patients with clinically active collagenous colitis.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified via the MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Collaboration databases, manual searches of the references of identified articles, and review articles on collagenous or microscopic colitis, as well as searches of abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings.

RESULTS

Five randomized trials assessing treatments for collagenous colitis were identified. One trial studying bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 wk) included 9 patients. Patients who received the bismuth preparation were more likely to have clinical (p= 0.003) and histological (p= 0.003) improvement than those who received placebo. In a trial comparing prednisolone (50 mg daily for 2 wk) to a placebo in 11 patients, a trend toward clinical response in patients on prednisone was reported (p= 0.064). The effect of prednisolone on histological improvement was not studied. A total of 94 patients were enrolled in three trials studying budesonide (9 mg daily or in a tapering schedule for 6-8 wk). The pooled odds ratio for clinical response to treatment with budesonide was 12.32 (95% CI: 5.53-27.46). The NNT (number of patients needed to treat with budesonide to achieve 1 improved patient) was 2 patients. This therapy was well tolerated. There was significant histological improvement with treatment in all three trials studying budesonide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence that budesonide is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of collagenous colitis. The evidence for benefit with bismuth subsalicylate or prednisolone is weaker. It is not clear that any of these agents produce actual remission, as opposed to clinical and histological improvement of the disease.

Targeting therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Progress in our understanding of the interaction between the environment and the immune system in disease pathogenesis has led to major advancements in the area of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutics. Biotechnology is keeping pace with these scientific advances. Current therapies target the various elements of the inflammatory cascade implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD. The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of the pharmacologic therapies used in IBD vary from actions that are extremely broad to those that are cellular or cytokine specific. Despite the various therapeutic options available for IBD patients, chosen therapies should be based on the overall treatment goal for individual patients. Therapeutics can be broadly categorized as induction therapies (goal to treat active disease) and maintenance therapies (goal to prevent relapse of disease). The modern thinking behind drug development is that IBD therapy should be disease modifying so to avoid complications and alter the long term natural history of disease. This review will cover both current and emerging agents and highlight the pathogenesis of IBD and how it relates to therapeutic targets.

Review article: the role of nutrition in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Nutrients may be involved in the modulation of the immune response through at least three different mechanisms. First, the intestinal ecosystem plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, triggering the uncontrolled inflammatory response in genetically predisposed individuals. Nutrients, together with bacteria, are major components of, and can therefore influence, the intestinal environment. Second, as components of cell membranes, nutrients can mediate the expression of proteins involved in the immune response, such as cytokines, adhesion molecules and nitric oxide synthase. The composition of lipids in the cell membrane is modified by dietary changes and can influence cellular responses. Indeed, various epidemiological, experimental and clinical data suggest that the immune response may be sensitive to changes in dietary composition. Finally, suboptimal levels of micronutrients are often found in both children and adults with inflammatory bowel disease, although, with the exception of iron and folate, it is unusual to discover symptoms attributable to these deficits. However, subclinical deficits may have a pathophysiological significance, as they may favour the self-perpetuation of the disease (due to defects in the mechanisms of tissue repair), cause defective defence against damage produced by oxygen free radicals and facilitate lipid peroxidation. These events can occur even in clinically inactive or mildly active disease, as well as in the development of dysplasia in the intestinal mucosa. Some dietary manipulations have been attempted as primary treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, and specially formulated diets for enteral nutrition have proved to be an effective treatment for Crohn's disease. Most trials, although lacking sufficient patient numbers, have demonstrated a role for dietary manipulation as primary therapy for inflammatory disease. Dietary lipids are one of the most active nutritional substrates modulating the immune response. Recently, it has been demonstrated that lipids may be a key factor explaining the therapeutic effect of clinical nutrition in Crohn's disease.

Review article: systemic and topical steroids in inflammatory bowel disease

Steroids are still widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacological studies have shown that there is no major abnormality in the pharmacokinetics of steroids in these disorders. Foam preparations with rectal application decrease the bioavailability to low levels, eliminating systemic complications. For oral use, 'nonsystemic' steroids have been developed. In ulcerative colitis, steroids are rarely needed as 5-aminosalicylates are effective in the majority of patients. This is true for rectal application in distal colitis, as well as in more extensive disease. In Crohn's disease, steroids are more often used; however, in population-based studies, less than 50% of patients have been treated with steroids, as there are alternative treatments available for the large group of patients with mild to moderate activity. For those patients needing steroid treatment, budesonide seems to be a good choice in active disease, but has not shown convincing effects in the maintenance of remission over longer periods of time. There is no place for long-term steroid treatment in ulcerative colitis and very little in Crohn's disease--immunosuppression with azathioprine or related drugs is certainly the better alternative.

Standards of medical treatment and nutrition in Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is a condition of chronic inflammation potentially involving any location of the alimentary tract from mouth to anus but with a propensity for the distal small bowel and proximal large bowel. Frequent complications include stricture and fistula. Numerous extra-intestinal manifestations may also be present. The aetiology of Crohn's disease is incompletely understood, and therapy, although generally effective in alleviating the symptoms, is not curative. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease a major need for the therapeutic approach is the ability to define subgroups with distinct characteristics. However, with regard to the heterogeneity of demographic, anatomic and disease behaviour characteristics, distillation of the numerous possible phenotypes in simple categories is a formidable task. In the present review the focus will be on clinically relevant situations providing therapeutic algorithms according to international guidelines.

[A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of azathioprine in patients with ulcerative colitis]

To clarify the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) in the induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) by using a systematic review of published studies. Studies were searched for from within the 1966 to March 2003 MEDLINE database, Cochrane Library 2003 issue 1, and the 1981 to March 2003 Japana Centra Revuo Medicina database. References from published studies and reviews were also obtained. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of oral AZA or 6MP therapy in adult patients with active or quiescent UC were included. Ratios for the induction and maintenance of remission, the steroid-sparing effect, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were compared and evaluated between the two study arms and expressed by the odds ratio (OR) specific for the individual studies and the meta-analytic summary for the OR. We could find no randomized controlled trial for 6MP therapy. However, four clinical trials for AZA therapy were included in this meta-analysis. For the induction of remission, the pooled OR of the response to AZA therapy compared with placebo in active UC was 1.45 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.68 to 3.08). For the maintenance of remission, the pooled OR for AZA therapy was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.27 to 4.01). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was 6 patients. The pooled OR for AZA therapy's ADRs compared with placebo was 2.11 (95% CI: 0.92 to 4.84). From the viewpoint of effectiveness and safety, this meta-analysis suggests that AZA might be useful in the maintenance of remission in UC patients.

How effective are the usual treatments for Crohn's disease?

BACKGROUND

Details of the efficacy of the various drugs used in Crohn's disease are not readily available.

METHODS

We have reviewed all placebo controlled trials of the commonly used drugs in Crohn's disease for both the induction and maintenance of remission to determine the efficacy and to calculate the numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to achieve a specified benefit for each drug.

RESULTS

Both the drug response rates and the NNTs (with 95% confidence intervals) are tabulated for each drug.

CONCLUSION

Prednisolone/prednisone is the most effective drug to achieve remission with a remission rate of 60% and an NNT for remission of 3 (95% confidence interval: 2-6). Aminosalicylates are only moderately effective in achieving remission with an overall NNT of 10 (95% confidence interval: 6-75), but more effective in high-dose (e.g. NNT for Pentasa 4 g daily = 4; 95% confidence interval: 2.6-9), and less effective in maintaining remission with an NNT of 14 (95% confidence interval: 9-29). Both azathioprine and infliximab are associated with remission induction and maintenance rates of 40-66% and NNTs of 3-5. Methotrexate intramuscularly has a remission induction rate of 39% and an NNT of 5 (95% confidence interval: 3-25).

Choosing Therapy on the Basis of Disease Classifications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) are heterogeneous disorders, and as such, the response to therapy is likewise heterogeneous. Therefore, stratification of patients into distinct phenotypes and potentially genotypes will lead to more definitive answers with respect to evaluation of novel and established therapies.

Left-sided ulcerative colitis

Left-sided ulcerative colitis is not a distinct entity, but a less extensive form of pancolitis. The epidemiologic and genetic characteristics are thought to be analogous. The rate of colorectal cancer, however, seems to be proportional to the extent of disease. Primary treatment for left-sided disease is topical 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5ASA) agents. In patients who do not respond to topical therapy, oral 5ASA agents of differing delivery methods to the distal bowel can be used. There is much debate pertaining to the clinical superiority of the oral 5ASA agents.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are a mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Administered topically, orally, or intravenously corticosteroids rapidly and consistently improve moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, although they are ineffective in the maintenance of remission in either illness. The beneficial effects of corticosteroid therapy are counterbalanced by their many side effects. A better understanding of the mechanism of steroid action and toxicity has led to the development of novel corticosteroids that offer the promise of continued efficacy with minimal toxicity. This article reviews the role of conventional and novel corticosteroids in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Advances in the treatment of Crohn's disease

The medical therapy of Crohn's disease has improved considerably in recent years. In large part, this is due to the introduction of new efficacious agents, both "biologics" and traditional small molecules. Further study of older drugs has also advanced our ability to devise the optimum approach to individual Crohn's disease patients by better clarifying the benefits, adverse effects, and means to optimize doses of established medications. In this review, we present an evidence-based approach to the medical management of active Crohn's disease, Crohn's disease in remission, and perianal Crohn's disease that emphasizes recent advances that have come from the results of randomized controlled clinical trials.

A meta-analysis of the placebo rates of remission and response in clinical trials of active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (PC-RCTs) are commonly used to assess therapies for Crohn's disease (CD). Knowledge of the placebo rates of remission and response and understanding of design factors that influence these rates is important for designing future clinical trials evaluating pharmacotherapy of CD. The aims of this study were to estimate rates of remission and response in patients with active CD receiving placebo and to identify factors influencing these rates.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of PC-RCTs evaluating therapies for active CD identified from MEDLINE from 1966 to 2001.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates of the placebo rates of remission and response were 18% (95% confidence interval, 14%-24%; range, 0%-50%) and 19% (95% confidence interval, 13%-28%; range, 0%-46%), respectively, both with significant heterogeneity among studies (P < 0.01 for remission, P < 0.03 for response). In multivariate models, study duration, number of study visits, and entry Crohn's Disease Activity Index score were important predictors of the placebo remission rate, with study duration the most important. However, no single factor could account for all of the heterogeneity. Factors that influence the placebo response rates were similar to those affecting the placebo remission rates. The absolute benefit of active treatment beyond placebo was generally larger when outcome was measured by response than remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Placebo remission and response rates in PC-RCTs for active CD are variable. Study duration, number of study visits, and disease severity at entry have a large influence on placebo remission rates.