Cardio- and cerebrovascular events in HIV-infected persons

The Nurse Practitioner’s Role in Managing Dyslipidemia and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in HIV-Infected Patients: Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy

The beneficial effects of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the treatment of HIV disease have been accompanied by metabolic changes associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. These changes, which include dyslipidemia, change in body fat distribution, and insulin resistance, resemble the symptoms of metabolic syndrome. Protease inhibitors, nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have all been associated with dyslipidemia to varying degrees. In addition, patients on ART show an increased risk of myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular events. According to the recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program and the Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group, health care providers should assess cardiovascular risk before starting ART and then continue to monitor lipid levels. Treatment of ART-associated dyslipidemia should follow the following sequence: therapeutic lifestyle changes, lipid-lowering drug therapy, and finally, modifying ART if necessary. By providing education, support, and follow-up care, nurse practitioners can help to implement these steps.

Atteintes du système nerveux central et infection par le VIH-1

Central nervous system complications are common in HIV-1 infected patients and occur either as a result of concomitant immunosuppression (opportunistic infections, lymphoma and tumors), as a primary manifestation of HIV infection, or as an adverse effect of therapy (immune restoration and toxicity). These complications contribute largely to patient morbidity and mortality. In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) these disease states have changed in presentation, outcome and incidence. We review in detail the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of these disorders.

HIV Entry Inhibitor TAK-779 Attenuates Atherogenesis in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Deficient Mice

OBJECTIVE

HIV combination therapy using protease inhibitors is associated with elevated plasma levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and increased risk for atherosclerosis. We investigated whether the HIV entry inhibitor TAK-779 affects lipoprotein levels and atherogenesis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. TAK-779 is an antagonist for the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR3, which are expressed on leukocytes, especially T-helper 1 cells, and these receptors may be involved in recruitment of these cells to atherosclerotic plaques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TAK-779 treatment of low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice did not elevate the levels of atherogenic lipoproteins, whereas it dramatically reduced atherosclerosis in the aortic root and in the carotid arteries. The number of T cells in the plaque was reduced by 95%, concurrently with a 98% reduction in the relative IFN-gamma area. TAK-779-treated animals showed a decreased percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood and in mediastinal lymph nodes compared with control-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

TAK-779 not only suppresses HIV entry via blockade of CCR5 but also attenuates atherosclerotic lesion formation by blocking the influx of T-helper 1 cells into the plaque. TAK-779 treatment may be especially beneficial for young HIV patients as they face lifelong treatment, and this drug impairs atherogenesis.

Impact of Treatment With Protease Inhibitors on Aortic Stiffness in Adult Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Background— The role of antiretroviral therapy in acceleration of atherosclerosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is controversial. We hypothesized that aortic stiffness, an early marker of arteriosclerosis, may be increased in HIV patients treated with protease inhibitors.

Methods and Results— In 32 HIV-infected patients treated with protease inhibitors and 32 age-, sex-, and blood pressure–matched HIV-uninfected control subjects, we obtained aortic pulse wave velocity and central aortic pressure waveform, from which aortic augmentation was calculated. HIV patients had a higher aortic pulse wave velocity (7.6±1.1 versus 6.8±1.2 m×s −1 , P =0.015) and aortic augmentation (6.8±5 versus 4.6±4 mm Hg, P =0.037) than control subjects. Age and HIV infection (both P <0.05) independently predicted aortic pulse wave velocity when a consistent number of cardiovascular risk factors was simultaneously controlled for. The cumulative duration of treatment was a predictor of aortic pulse wave velocity, each 5 years of treatment duration being independently related to a 1.35 m×s −1 increase in pulse wave velocity.

Conclusions— Aortic stiffness is increased in HIV-positive individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy including a protease inhibitor. Pulse wave velocity increases with longer exposure to protease inhibitors. We hypothesize that arteriosclerosis is a side effect of antiretroviral treatment including a protease inhibitor.

Predictors of Hypertension and Changes of Blood Pressure in HIV-Infected Patients

Objective

We assessed predictors of changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure during follow-up and of the development of hypertension in HIV-infected individuals.

Methods

International cohort collaborative study (D:A:D) of established prospective cohorts of HIV-1-infected patients. Longitudinal analysis of changes in blood pressure (BP) was performed using mixed effects models in 17170 patients. Predictors of development of hypertension during follow-up (systolic BP ≥140 and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or initiation of antihypertensive treatment) were assessed using Cox models in 8 984 patients with a normal BP level at baseline.

Results

73548 BP measurements with a median of 4 per patient (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–6) were recorded over a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.5–2.6). Risk factors significantly associated with a development of higher systolic BP and diastolic BP (differences ≥5 mmHg and P-values <0.001) during follow-up were: older age, male sex, higher body mass index (BMI) and use of BP-lowering drugs. In patients with normal BP at baseline, 1186 developed hypertension for an incidence of 72.1 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval: 68.2–76.0). Factors associated with development of hypertension were: male sex, higher BMI, older age, higher BP at baseline, high total cholesterol and clinical lipodystrophy. Cumulative duration of exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( P=0.75), protease inhibitors ( P=0.92) as well as type of antiretroviral treatment at baseline ( P=0.18) were not associated with a higher risk of hypertension. Cumulative duration of exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) was significantly associated with lower risk of hypertension (hazard ratio=0.78 and 0.67 for those treated ≤10 months and >10 months compared with no exposure; P=0.005).

Conclusions

Increased blood pressure in HIV-infected individuals is associated with established risk factors for hypertension. There was no evidence for an independent deleterious effect of any class of antiretroviral drugs on BP, although the use of NNRTIs was associated with a lower risk of development of hypertension.

Substitution of nevirapine or efavirenz for protease inhibitor versus lipid-lowering therapy for the management of dyslipidaemia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate simplified protease inhibitor (PI)-sparing antiretroviral treatment versus lipid-lowering therapy for the management of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-induced hyperlipidaemia.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label clinical trial assessing the efficacy on hyperlipidaemia of a switching therapy from PI to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) nevirapine or efavirenz versus a hypolipidaemic treatment (with pravastatin or bezafibrate) added to current, unchanged antiretroviral combination.

METHODS

All HIV-infected patients on their first HAART regimen, with stable immuno-virological features, naive to all NNRTIs, and with mixed hyperlipidaemia, were randomized to replace PI with nevirapine (arm A) or efavirenz (arm B), or to receive pravastatin (arm C) or bezafibrate (arm D) with unchanged HAART regimen, and were followed-up for 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients were evaluated: 29 patients were randomized to arm A, 34 to arm B, 36 to arm C, and 31 to arm D. At the end of the 12-month follow-up, a reduction of 25.2, 9.4, 41.2 and 46.6% in mean triglyceridaemia versus respective baseline values was reported in groups A, B, C and D, respectively, with statistically significant difference between arms A-B and C-D (P < 0.01). Similar results were reported for total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Viro-immunological efficacy and tolerability profile were comparable in all considered arms.

CONCLUSION

Pravastatin and bezafibrate proved significantly more effective in the management of HAART-related hyperlipidaemia than the switching therapy from PI to nevirapine or efavirenz.

Low Density Lipoprotein Apolipoprotein B Metabolism in Treatment-Naive HIV Patients and Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

Background

Dyslipidaemia and lipodystrophy have been described in treated HIV patients and in a small percentage of untreated HIV patients. Lipodystrophy in these patients has been shown to be associated with a lower expression of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors.

Methods

We have investigated the effect of antiretroviral treatment with either a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) on body fat distribution and LDL apolipoprotein B (apoB) kinetics in 12 HIV-negative controls and 52 HIV-infected patients, including antiretroviral treatment-naive (TN) patients ( n=13) and patients taking two nucleoside analogues plus either a PI ( n=15) or an NNRTI ( n=24).

Results

LDL cholesterol was not different between groups. Compared with the controls, LDL apoB absolute synthetic rate (ASR) and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) were lower and residence time (RT) was higher in the PI and NNRTI groups ( P<0.05). In the TN patients, LDL ASR was lower ( P<0.05) and there was a trend for a lower FCR and higher RT compared with the controls ( P=0.07). LDL apoB pool size was greater in the PI group compared with the controls ( P<0.05). In the PI group, patients on ritonavir (RTV)-containing regimens had a lower LDL apoB ASR ( P=0.009) and a trend to a lower LDL apoB FCR and increased RT compared with non-RTV-containing PI regimens ( P=0.05). There was a positive correlation between LDL apoB FCR and limb fat/lean body mass ( P=0.004) in all subjects.

Conclusions

Decreased LDL FCR, despite unchanged LDL cholesterol, was demonstrated in both treated and untreated HIV patients. It was more marked with RTV-containing regimens and was associated with reduced limb fat. The increased LDL RT may lead to an increased risk of atherogenesis thus contributing to the risk for cardiovascular disease in these patients.

Gender differences in clinical progression of HIV-1-infected individuals during long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess gender differences in the long-term clinical, virological and immunological outcomes during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

This longitudinal observational multicentre study followed 2460 HIV-infected patients who had begun a protease inhibitor-based regimen for a median period of 43 months. Outcome measures were virological suppression (< 500 copies/ml), confirmed virological rebound after suppression, and death or new AIDS-defining illness (ADI).

RESULTS

At baseline, 690 female patients (28.0%) had significantly lower age, higher prevalence of heterosexual contact and lower prevalence of intravenous drug use as risk factors for HIV infection compared with males. Furthermore, females had a lower number of AIDS-defining illnesses, higher CD4 cell counts and lower viral loads. No gender differences were reported in terms of proportion of patients achieving viral suppression or exhibiting rebound after achieving viral suppression. Female patients experienced reduced clinical progression during follow-up compared with males (P = 0.008) by Kaplan-Meier analysis; however this difference was not significant in an adjusted analysis. In a multivariate model, the interaction between gender and risk factor for HIV or viral load showed that female drug users and female patients with a baseline HIV RNA viral load of 10(4)-10(5) copies/ml had a favourable clinical outcome compared with males (P = 0.035 and P = 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No differences were found between genders in terms of virological and immunological outcomes during long-term HAART. Nevertheless, a lower risk of clinical progression was reported among female patients with intermediate baseline viral load than in males.

Sex and the course of HIV infection in the pre- and highly active antiretroviral therapy eras

We reviewed the available literature on the potential effects of sex on the course of HIV infection and found that there is little evidence for sex differences in the rate of disease progression in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and HAART era. Compared to men, women appeared to have lower HIV RNA levels and higher CD4 cell counts shortly after infection with HIV, but studies were inconclusive regarding whether these differences diminish over time. Differences in viral load or CD4+ cell count might cause women to delay initiation of HAART. Nonetheless, we found no substantial sex difference in the benefit of antiretroviral therapy. The studies we reviewed failed to find any harmful effect of pregnancy on HIV disease progression. With the availability of effective antiretroviral agents, HIV-infected women have increasingly decided to have children. Conflicting results exist on the effect of HAART on regression of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN). Unlike CIN, invasive cervical cancer has not been found to be much higher in HIV-infected women than in HIV-uninfected women. Although publication bias cannot be ruled out, published studies suggest higher rates of adverse events among HIV-infected women on therapy as compared to men. As more pharmacological agents are developed, it is especially important that potential sex differences in pharmacodynamics are assessed. The relationship between metabolic abnormalities, changes in body habitus, and endocrine perturbations has not been extensively studied. Whether sex differences are due to unalterable genetic factors or social and environmental conditions, it is imperative that all HIV-infected individuals have equal access to interventions that can slow disease progression.