Alemtuzumab CARE-MS I 5-year follow-up: Durable efficacy in the absence of continuous MS therapy

Potential mechanisms of action related to the efficacy and safety of cladribine

Oral cladribine is a novel treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This appears to be a semi-selective immune-reconstitution therapy that induces long-term therapy from short treatment cycles. It has a relatively good safety profile that currently does not require extensive monitoring associated with some continuous immunosuppressive and relatively non-selective immune reconstitution therapies. The efficacy and safety of cladribine relates to its particular physicochemical properties, the function of the lymphocyte subsets that are selectively targeted by the drug and the repopulation kinetics of these subsets. As such, there is marked and long-term depletion of memory B cell subsets, which probably relates to the therapeutic efficacy. This is also coupled with a more limited, but likewise long-term, depletion of CD4 T subsets. There is limited depletion of cells of the innate immune system and modest effects on CD8 and probably plasma cells, which provide immediate and durable protection from infection. Targeting of CD4 T regulatory cells, CD8 T suppressor cells and regulatory B cell subsets appears more limited as these populations recover rapidly and so repopulating pathogenic cells re-emerge into a regulatory environment. This appears to lead to re-establishment of immune-tolerance that produces long-term control of MS. Although this hypothesis contains a number of unknown details, it is based on knowledge about the biology of cladribine, basic immunology and the effects of other high-efficacy B and T cell depleting agents that exhibit stereotyped repopulation behaviours. These concepts are relatively simple to interrogate, and can be modified as new knowledge about the durability of disease control and safety with cladribine emerges.

Rituximab vs placebo induction prior to glatiramer acetate monotherapy in multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether rituximab induction followed by glatiramer acetate (GA) monotherapy is more effective than GA alone for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with active disease.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty-five participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either rituximab (R-GA) or placebo (P-GA) induction, followed by GA therapy initiated in all participants. Participants were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA): those without relapse, new MRI lesions, and sustained change in disability.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight and 27 participants received rituximab and placebo induction, respectively, with one participant in each arm withdrawing before 6-month MRI. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At end of study, 44.44% of R-GA participants demonstrated NEDA vs 19.23% of P-GA participants (p = 0.049). Treatment failed for a smaller proportion of R-GA participants (37.04% R-GA vs 69.23% P-GA, p = 0.019), and time to treatment failure was longer (23.32 months R-GA vs 11.29 months P-GA, p = 0.027). Fewer participants in the R-GA arm had new lesions (25.93% R-GA vs 61.54% P-GA, p = 0.009), and there were fewer new T2 lesions (0.48 R-GA vs 1.96 P-GA, p = 0.027). Probability of demonstrating NEDA in the R-GA arm returned to baseline within the study period. There were no differences in adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with rituximab followed by GA may provide superior efficacy in the short term than GA alone in relapsing multiple sclerosis, but this benefit appears to wane within the study period. Larger studies are needed to assess sustainability of results.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01569451.

Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and generic glatiramer acetate 20 mg among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

Markov model with annual periods from payer perspective.

METHODS

The modeled population represented pooled patients from the CARE-MS I and II trials. Therapies' comparative efficacy at reducing relapses and slowing disability worsening was obtained from network meta-analyses. Safety information was extracted from package inserts. Withdrawal rates, treatment waning, resource use, cost, and utility inputs were derived from published studies and clinical expert opinion. To project the natural history of disease worsening, data from the British Columbia cohort was used.

RESULTS

Alemtuzumab dominated comparators by accumulating higher total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (8.977) and lower total costs ($421 996) compared with fingolimod (7.955; $1 085 814), natalizumab (8.456; $1 048 599), ocrelizumab (8.478; $908 365), and generic glatiramer acetate (7.845; $895 661) over a 20-year time horizon. Alemtuzumab's dominance was primarily driven by savings in treatment costs because alemtuzumab has long-term duration of response and is initially administered as 2 annual courses, with 36.1% of patients requiring retreatment over 5 years, whereas comparators are used chronically. In model scenarios where alemtuzumab's long-term duration of response was assumed not to hold and therapy had to be administered annually, probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that alemtuzumab remained cost-effective versus ocrelizumab at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY in 74% to 100% of model runs.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab was a cost-effective therapy. Model results should be used to optimize clinical and managed care decisions for effective RMS treatment.

Immune reconstitution after alemtuzumab therapy for multiple sclerosis triggering Graves' orbitopathy: a case series

Alemtuzumab-a monoclonal antibody targeting the CD52 glycoprotein expressed by most mature leucocytes-effectively decreases relapse rate and disability progression in early, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). However, secondary autoimmune disorders complicate therapy in nearly 50% of treated patients, with Graves' disease being the most common. Rarely, thyroid eye disease (TED) ensues; only seven such cases have been reported. Our aim was to analyse the largest series of MS patients developing thyroid eye disease after alemtuzumab treatment. We performed a retrospective chart review of MS patients treated with alemtuzumab (1995-2018) and subsequently identified by their treating physicians as having developed TED and referred to our ophthalmology service. As an original trial centre for alemtuzumab, our hospital has treated approximately 162 MS patients with this novel therapy. In total, 71 (44%) developed thyroid dysfunction, most of whom (87%) developed Graves' disease, with ten (16%) referred for ophthalmological evaluation. Two developed active orbitopathy following radioiodine treatment; one occurred after cessation of anti-thyroid drug treatment. Three developed sight-threatening disease requiring systemic immunosuppression, with one refractory to multiple immunosuppressants. The remaining patients were treated conservatively. TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) levels were significantly raised in all cases, when ascertained. We report sight-threatening as well as mild TED in MS patients after treatment with alemtuzumab. Endocrine instability, radioiodine treatment and positive TRAb are all likely risk factors. The data support at least 6-monthly biochemical and clinical assessment with a low threshold for referral to an ophthalmologist, particularly for those with higher TRAb levels who may be at greater risk of orbitopathy.

Treatment with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is effective and safe

BACKGROUND

It has been described that treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with alemtuzumab following fingolimod could be less effective due to the different dynamics of lymphocyte repopulation. Effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab compared to rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A follow-up of a cohort of RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal was accomplished. Effectiveness, measured by the percentage of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), and the presence of side effects (SE) were registered.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients, 28 with alemtuzumab and 27 with rituximab, were analyzed. No differences in the washout period or in the baseline lymphocytes counts were observed. After a mean follow-up period of 28.8 months, the annualized relapsing rate was significantly reduced in the alemtuzumab group from 1.29 to 0.004 (p < 0.001) and in the rituximab group from 1.24 to 0.02 (p < 0.001), without differences. A significant reduction of the median EDSS from 2.8 to 2.0 in the alemtuzumab group and from 3.5 to 2.5 (p < 0.01) in the rituximab group was observed, without differences. Eighty-two per cent (n = 28) of patients in alemtuzumab group and 69.2% (n = 26) in rituximab group achieved NEDA criteria, without differences (p = 0.3). Symptoms related to the infusion were the most frequent SE in both groups. No serious SE were registered.

CONCLUSION

Treating RRMS patients with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal is effective and safe, without significant differences between both groups in our series.

Single-arm study to assess comprehensive infusion guidance for the prevention and management of the infusion associated reactions (IARs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with alemtuzumab (EMERALD)

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody approved in more than 60 countries for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In phase 2 and 3 clinical trials (CAMMS223 (NCT00050778), CARE-MS I (NCT00530348), and CARE-MS II (NCT00548405)), patients receiving alemtuzumab demonstrated significantly greater improvements on clinical and MRI outcomes versus SC IFNβ-1a; mild to moderate infusion-associated reactions (IARs) were the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) associated with alemtuzumab. EMERALD (NCT02205489) was a phase 4, multicenter, multinational, single-arm study designed to assess an algorithm for the prevention and management of IARs in RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab.

METHODS

Patients were treated with a study regimen of enhanced IAR prophylaxis relative to phase 2 and 3 studies. H₁ and/or H₂ antagonists or equivalent gastroprotection (proton pump inhibitors) were given 1 day before alemtuzumab infusion, 1 h prior to the infusion, and post-infusion. Methylprednisolone was given orally 1 day before infusion, 1 h prior to the infusion, and as needed post-infusion. Antipyretics were given 1 h before infusion and as needed post-infusion. Anti-emetics and normal saline were given as needed during and post-infusion.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients screened, 58 (95.1%) were enrolled into the study. Of the 58 patients who received the first infusion of Period 1, 57 (98.3%) completed the 5 days of Course 1. A total of 54 patients received the first infusion of Period 2 and 53 completed the 3-day course. All patients (n = 58) completed the Month 6 visit and 54 the Month 12 visit. 93.1% of patients had at least one IAR (91.4% in Period 1 and 81.5% in Period 2), the majority of which were grade 1 (69.1%) or grade 2 (28.0%). The three most common IARs of headache, pyrexia, and rash occurred in 48.8%, 40.7%, and 24.1% of patients during the first course and 14.8%, 17.2%, and 5.6% of patients during the second course, respectively. The majority of IARs occurred within 6 h after the start of alemtuzumab infusion, with a peak during the first 2 h. The types and overall incidence of IARs were consistent with phase 2 and 3 trials. Frequency and distribution of rash were reduced in the EMERALD study compared with previous clinical trials. Serious IARs occurred in 15.5%, a higher rate than reported in clinical trials of alemtuzumab.

CONCLUSION

Although most alemtuzumab-treated patients experienced IARs as in previous controlled clinical studies, there was an improvement in the frequency and distribution of alemtuzumab-associated rash, which may have been associated with this study's prophylaxis regimen.

Therapeutic Outcome of Alemtuzumab in Korean Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 2-Year Follow-Up

Background and Purpose

Alemtuzumab has shown high efficacy in clinical trials that primarily involved Western multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. To evaluate the therapeutic outcome of alemtuzumab in Korean patients with MS.

Methods

This study enrolled 23 consecutive patients who were treated with alemtuzumab from 2015 to 2018. Efficacy was evaluated using the annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and radiological activity. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) was defined as no clinical relapse, no worsening of the EDSS score, and no radiological activity. The safety profiles were also assessed.

Results

The mean age was 36 years and 16 of the patients were female. Seventeen and 12 of 23 patients were followed up for 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The ARR was markedly reduced from 1.52 during the 1-year period preceding alemtuzumab administration to 0.21 after initiating alemtuzumab (p<0.001). During the first and second years after initiating alemtuzumab, EDSS worsening was observed in 3 (18%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively, and radiological activity was exhibited in 9 (53%) and 4 (33%). NEDA was observed in 6 (35%) patients during the first year and in 8 (67%) patients during the second year. Intriguingly, one patient experienced 2 severe clinical exacerbations, which occurred at 10 months after the first and 10 months after the second infusion of alemtuzumab. Nineteen of the 23 patients exhibited infusion-associated reactions and 3 patients exhibited herpes zoster infection. Thyroid dysfunction occurred in two patients at 18 and 20 months after initiating alemtuzumab.

Conclusions

Consistent with observations in Western populations, alemtuzumab therapy in Korean MS patients led to marked reductions of disease activity without unexpected safety issues.

Cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab and natalizumab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment in Iran: decision analysis based on an indirect comparison

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab and natalizumab are approved as second-line therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in Iran who have shown an inadequate response to other disease-modifying therapy (DMT). In the absence of head-to-head trials, evaluations based on decision analytic modeling may be a suitable alternative to compare alemtuzumab and natalizumab in RRMS.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab in RRMS in Iran, based on an indirect comparison of clinical trial data.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was conducted using a cohort-based Markov model to analyze cost-utility in a cohort of 1,000 RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab or natalizumab who had failed at least one previous DMT. Costs were measured in 2018 US Dollars, and were estimated from both the societal and National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective over a 20-year time horizon in Iran. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were carried out to investigate the impact of individual variables on model results.

RESULTS

Alemtuzumab dominated natalizumab in both NHS and societal perspective analyses. From the NHS perspective, the total discounted costs per patient were estimated at $147,417 and $150,579 for alemtuzumab and natalizumab, respectively, over 20 years. The discounted quality-adjusted life years were estimated to be 7.07 and 6.05, respectively. Results were similar for the societal perspective analysis. Results were most sensitive to acquisition costs and the time horizon, while no sensitivity was observed for Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) health-states utility, relapse relative risk, adverse event or EDSS-related costs, and laboratory/monitoring costs.

CONCLUSION

Alemtuzumab was dominant in the treatment of RRMS compared with natalizumab due to lower total cost, greater efficacy and slowing of disease progression, and lower rate of relapses over a 20-year time horizon in Iran. Comparative head-to-head trials and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Application of advanced MRI techniques to monitor pharmacologic and rehabilitative treatment in multiple sclerosis: current status and future perspectives

Introduction: Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and analyses are improving our understanding of the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). Due to their ability to grade the presence of irreversible tissue loss, microstructural tissue abnormalities, metabolic changes and functional plasticity, the application of these techniques is also expanding our knowledge on the efficacy and mechanisms of action of different pharmacological and rehabilitative treatments. Areas covered: This review discusses recent findings derived from the application of advanced MRI techniques to evaluate the structural and functional substrates underlying the effects of pharmacologic and rehabilitative treatments in patients with MS. Current applications as outcome in clinical trials and observational studies, their interpretation and possible pitfalls in their use are discussed. Finally, how these techniques could evolve in the future to improve monitoring of disease progression and treatment response is examined. Expert commentary: The number of treatments currently available for MS is increasing. The application of advanced MRI techniques is providing reliable and specific measures to better understand the targets of different treatments, including neuroprotection, tissue repair, and brain plasticity. This is a fundamental progress to move toward personalized medicine and individual treatment selection.

Ocrelizumab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is coming to the forefront. Depletion of B cells by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has proved to decrease the activity of the relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and the progression of primary progressive MS (PPMS). Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the rationale of the depletion of B cells in RRMS and PPMS across recent studies on the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS; previous clinical trials with treatments targeting B cells; the mechanism of action of ocrelizumab - a second generation anti-CD20 mAb - and recent phase III clinical trials with ocrelizumab in RRMS and PPMS. Expert commentary: Ocrelizumab is the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for RRMS and the first treatment approved for PPMS. The long-term effect and safety profile need to be evaluated in extension of clinical trials and in real-world studies.

Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Few comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses exist in this area, particularly from a payer perspective, despite rapidly increasing prices of DMTs.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically compare cost effectiveness of all relevant DMTs for first-line treatment of RRMS, second-line treatment of RRMS, and first-line treatment of PPMS.

METHODS

We used a Markov model with health states based on Expanded Disability Status Score categories. Upon discontinuing first-line treatment, RRMS patients continued to second-line therapy then to supportive care, and PPMS patients moved directly to supportive care. Data was sourced from clinical trials and commercially and publicly available sources. The target population was treatment-naïve adults with RRMS or PPMS. We used a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective, and compared DMTs for RRMS (first-line: dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon β-1a, interferon β-1b, peginterferon β-1a, teriflunomide, natalizumab, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab; second-line: alemtuzumab, natalizumab, fingolimod, and ocrelizumab), ocrelizumab for PPMS, and supportive care. Outcome measures included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

For RRMS first-line therapy, ocrelizumab dominated the other DMTs with an ICER of US$166,338/QALY compared with supportive care. For RRMS second-line therapy, alemtuzumab dominated the other three DMTs, providing more QALYs for lower costs. For PPMS, ocrelizumab had an ICER of US$648,799/QALY compared with supportive care. Wide variability in results was observed in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results were sensitive to the relative risk of progression and cost of DMTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocrelizumab would likely be cost effective as a first-line treatment for RRMS with a discounted price but was not cost effective for PPMS. Alemtuzumab dominated other options for second-line treatment of RRMS. Other DMTs were generally similar in terms of costs and health outcomes, providing health benefits compared to supportive care but with significant added costs. If drug prices were lowered, more DMTs could be cost effective.

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system in young adults. This disorder is a heterogeneous, multifactorial, immune-mediated disease that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. In most patients, reversible episodes of neurological dysfunction lasting several days or weeks characterize the initial stages of the disease (that is, clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS). Over time, irreversible clinical and cognitive deficits develop. A minority of patients have a progressive disease course from the onset. The pathological hallmark of MS is the formation of demyelinating lesions in the brain and spinal cord, which can be associated with neuro-axonal damage. Focal lesions are thought to be caused by the infiltration of immune cells, including T cells, B cells and myeloid cells, into the central nervous system parenchyma, with associated injury. MS is associated with a substantial burden on society owing to the high cost of the available treatments and poorer employment prospects and job retention for patients and their caregivers.

Acute sarcoidosis in a multiple sclerosis patient after alemtuzumab treatment

Background:

Understanding the long-term effect of alemtuzumab on the immune system of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is crucial.

Objective:

To report a case of acute sarcoidosis (Löfgren’s syndrome) in a relapsing-remitting MS patient, 1.5 years after the second course of alemtuzumab treatment.

Case report:

Sarcoidosis was confirmed dermatohistologically, radiologically, and serologically. Analysis of the lymphocyte subpopulations showed a persistent effect of alemtuzumab treatment (CD4/CD8 ratio increased, absolute lymphocyte count of CD19-positive cells increased while CD3/4/8-positive cells were decreased).

Conclusion:

Our case highlights the profound effect of alemtuzumab on the immune system and its possible risk for autoimmune complications.

Infection risk with alemtuzumab decreases over time: pooled analysis of 6-year data from the CAMMS223, CARE-MS I, and CARE-MS II studies and the CAMMS03409 extension study

Background:

Reduced MS disease activity with alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in core phase 2/3 studies was accompanied by increased incidence of infections that were mainly nonserious and responsive to treatment. Alemtuzumab efficacy was durable over 6 years.

Objective:

To evaluate infections over 6 years in alemtuzumab-treated patients.

Methods:

Three randomized trials (CAMMS223, Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) I, and CARE-MS II) compared two courses of alemtuzumab 12 mg with SC IFNB-1a 44 μg in patients with active relapsing-remitting MS. An extension study (CAMMS03409) provided further evaluation and as-needed alemtuzumab retreatment.

Results:

Infections occurred more frequently with alemtuzumab 12 mg than SC IFNB-1a during Years 1 (58.7% vs 41.3%) and 2 (52.6% vs 37.7%), but declined for alemtuzumab-treated patients in Years 3 (46.6%), 4 (42.8%), 5 (40.9%), and 6 (38.1%). Serious infections were uncommon (1.0%–1.9% per year). Infections were predominantly (>95%) mild to moderate and included upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and mucocutaneous herpetic infections. Prophylactic acyclovir reduced herpetic infections. Lymphocyte counts after alemtuzumab therapy did not predict infection risk.

Conclusion:

Infections with alemtuzumab were mostly mild to moderate and decreased over time, consistent with preservation of components of protective immunity.

Cancer Risk in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Potential Impact of Disease-Modifying Drugs

In the 1990s, the first disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) were injectable immunomodulatory (IM) drugs, including four different interferon-β preparations and glatiramer acetate. Since 2000, more than 15 immunosuppressant (IS) drugs have been used, with a more or less specific action on inflammation. These include monoclonal antibodies targeting CTL4, the integrin receptor, the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor, CD19, CD20, CD52, and the sphingosine 1 phosphate family. The association between MS and cancer has long been investigated but has led to conflicting results. No studies have reported an increased risk of cancer after long-term exposure to IM. Several reports suggest an increase in cancer risk among MS patients treated with IS such as mitoxantrone, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide. Because of their action on the immune system, and due to a lack of available long-term data, a special warning of the potential risk of cancer accompanies the use of recent IS such as cladribine, fingolimod, natalizumab or alemtuzumab. In most studies, factors such as diet, smoking, solar radiation, and hormone therapy, all of which influence cancer risk, have not been considered. For fingolimod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, daclizumab and ocrelizumab, risk management plans outlined by regulatory agencies are mandatory. They allow prospective detection of some red flags, in particular those for the increased risk of cancer. We review the current evidence behind the increased risk of malignancy in MS patients receiving DMTs, and provide an overview of the DMTs that are currently in use and those in clinical trials. The known risks and benefits of these therapies will be considered.

Anti-CD52 antibody treatment depletes B cell aggregates in the central nervous system in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) for which several new treatment options were recently introduced. Among them is the monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab that depletes mainly B cells and T cells in the immune periphery. Considering the ongoing controversy about the involvement of B cells and in particular the formation of B cell aggregates in the brains of progressive MS patients, an in-depth understanding of the effects of anti-CD52 antibody treatment on the B cell compartment in the CNS itself is desirable.

Methods

We used myelin basic protein (MBP)-proteolipid protein (PLP)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57BL/6 (B6) mice as B cell-dependent model of MS. Mice were treated intraperitoneally either at the peak of EAE or at 60 days after onset with 200 μg murine anti-CD52 vs. IgG2a isotype control antibody for five consecutive days. Disease was subsequently monitored for 10 days. The antigen-specific B cell/antibody response was measured by ELISPOT and ELISA. Effects on CNS infiltration and B cell aggregation were determined by immunohistochemistry. Neurodegeneration was evaluated by Luxol Fast Blue, SMI-32, and Olig2/APC staining as well as by electron microscopy and phosphorylated heavy neurofilament serum ELISA.

Results

Treatment with anti-CD52 antibody attenuated EAE only when administered at the peak of disease. While there was no effect on the production of MP4-specific IgG, the treatment almost completely depleted CNS infiltrates and B cell aggregates even when given as late as 60 days after onset. On the ultrastructural level, we observed significantly less axonal damage in the spinal cord and cerebellum in chronic EAE after anti-CD52 treatment.

Conclusion

Anti-CD52 treatment abrogated B cell infiltration and disrupted existing B cell aggregates in the CNS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1263-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Alemtuzumab-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Exhibits Distinctive Clinical and Immunological Features

CONTEXT

Alemtuzumab, a highly effective treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), predisposes to Graves disease (GD), with a reportedly indolent course.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the type, frequency, and course of thyroid dysfunction (TD) in a cohort of alemtuzumab-treated patients with MS in the United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Case records of alemtuzumab-treated patients who developed TD were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 41.1% (102 out of 248; 80 female and 22 male) of patients developed TD, principally GD (71.6%). Median onset was 17 months (range 2 to 107) following the last dose, with the majority (89%) within 3 years. Follow-up data (range 6 to 251 months) were available in 71 case subjects, of whom 52 (73.2%) developed GD: 10 of these (19.2%) had fluctuating TD. All 52 patients with GD commenced antithyroid drugs (ATDs): 3 required radioiodine (RAI) due to ATD side effects, and drug therapy is ongoing in 2; of those who completed a course, 16 are in remission, 1 developed spontaneous hypothyroidism, and 30 (64%) required definitive or long-term treatment (RAI, n = 17; thyroidectomy, n = 5; and long-term ATDs, n = 8). Three cases of thyroiditis and 16 cases of hypothyroidism were documented: 5 with antithyroid peroxidase antibody positivity only, 10 with positive TSH receptor antibody (TRAb), and 1 of uncertain etiology. Bioassay confirmed both stimulating and blocking TRAb in a subset of fluctuating GD cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to published literature, we recorded frequent occurrence of GD that required definitive or prolonged ATD treatment. Furthermore, fluctuating thyroid status in GD and unexpectedly high frequency of TRAb-positive hypothyroidism suggested changing activity of TRAb in this clinical context; we have documented the existence of both blocking and stimulating TRAb in these patients.

Thyroid disorders in alemtuzumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients: a Belgian consensus on diagnosis and management

This paper deals with thyroid disease that can occur after treatment with alemtuzumab (humanized monoclonal anti-CD52) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). The 5-year incidence of thyroid adverse events in phase 3 clinical trials is up to 40.7%. In most cases, the thyroid dysfunction is mild and easily manageable and only few serious thyroid adverse events have been reported. The need for patient education on the risk of thyroid dysfunction, as well as regular clinical and biochemical thyroid function screening is well described. However, practical clinical guidance in case of abnormal thyroid-related findings prior to or after alemtuzumab treatment is currently lacking. Therefore, a Belgian taskforce consisting of MS and thyroid experts was created in 2016, with the objective of issuing a clinical thyroid management algorithm based on available scientific evidence and personal experience with regard to alemtuzumab treatment-related thyroid adverse events.

The Shifting Landscape of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common nontraumatic neurological disorder of young adults, and roughly 85% of patients present with the relapsing form of the disease. Over the past 2 decades, the treatment arsenal for relapsing MS has expanded and evolved from mildly effective and relatively benign injectable agents to potent cell-depleting monoclonal agents. The latter have the potential to achieve disease remission coupled with risk of moderate to severe adverse events with which all MS care providers will need to acquaint themselves.

METHODS

This review is based on a detailed assessment of MS pivotal trials, extension studies, and expert reviews of the agents discussed.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

The following review should aid those practitioners directly and indirectly involved in the care of MS patients in understanding the benefits and risks associated with the medications they prescribe.

Comment on 2018 American Academy of Neurology guidelines on disease-modifying therapies in MS

The American Academy of Neurology has published a comprehensive review and guidelines for the use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) for the first time since 2002. These guidelines represent the work of MS experts, patients, and guideline experts and are based on their review of randomized controlled trials and observational evidence that addresses a set of prespecified questions related to starting, switching, and potentially discontinuing DMTs. Many of the recommendations address decision-making regarding the use of DMTs and incorporate the perspective of patients. Modified Delphi methods were used to establish consensus recommendations that were assigned a level of clinical obligation (actions a clinician must [A], should [B], or may [C] do). Most guideline recommendations are level B. Few reached level A, and several achieved only level C, primarily because of lack of evidence. The guidelines eschew formal treatment algorithms and do not address financial considerations and a variety of other controversies. We identify remaining uncertainties, the most important of which is the choice of available DMTs for the average newly diagnosed patient. We reiterate a number of research needs identified in the guidelines that could affect the use of DMTs, including improved definition of breakthrough disease requiring change in therapy, development of better and universally accepted definitions of both benign and aggressive MS, more and longer-duration comparative effectiveness trials, discovery and validation of biomarkers of disease activity and response to therapy, and development of treatment strategies focused on neuroprotection, remyelination, and neural repair.

Searching for neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis at clinical onset: Diagnostic value of biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Neurodegeneration occurs during the early stages of multiple sclerosis. It is an essential, devastating part of the pathophysiology. Tools for measuring the degree of neurodegeneration could improve diagnostics and patient characterization.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of biomarkers of degeneration in patients with recent clinical onset of suspected multiple sclerosis, and to evaluate these biomarkers for characterizing disease course.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 271 patients with clinical features of suspected multiple sclerosis onset and was the baseline of a prospective study. After diagnostic investigations, the patients were classified into the following disease groups: patients with clinically isolated syndrome (n = 4) or early relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (early RRMS; n = 93); patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with disease durations ≥2 years (established RRMS; n = 39); patients without multiple sclerosis, but showing symptoms (symptomatic controls; n = 89); and patients diagnosed with other diseases (n = 46). In addition, we included healthy controls (n = 51) and patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (n = 23). We analyzed six biomarkers of neurodegeneration: cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain levels; cerebral spinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein; cerebral spinal fluid tau; retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; macula volume; and the brain parenchymal fraction.

RESULTS

Except for increased cerebral spinal fluid neurofilament light chain levels, median 670 ng/L (IQR 400-2110), we could not find signs of early degeneration in the early disease group with recent clinical onset. However, the intrathecal immunoglobin G production and cerebral spinal fluid neurofilament light chain levels showed diagnostic value. Moreover, elevated levels of cerebral spinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein, thin retinal nerve fiber layers, and low brain parenchymal fractions were associated with progressive disease, but not with the other phenotypes. Thin retinal nerve fiber layers and low brain parenchymal fractions, which indicated neurodegeneration, were associated with longer disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinically suspected multiple sclerosis, intrathecal immunoglobin G production and neurofilament light chain levels had diagnostic value. Therefore, these biomarkers could be included in diagnostic work-ups for multiple sclerosis. We found that the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer and the brain parenchymal fraction were not different between individuals that were healthy, symptomatic, or newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. This finding suggested that neurodegeneration had not reached a significant magnitude in patients with a recent clinical onset of multiple sclerosis.

The Sound of Jacqueline du Pré: Revisiting her Medical and Musical History

Jacqueline du Pré was a British cellist, famous for her masterful interpretations and her passionate style of playing. Her outstanding musical career was, unfortunately, cut short by multiple sclerosis. In the present paper, we conduct a historical and medical analysis of her life story, discussing a few aspects regarding her illness and treatment options available at the time of her diagnosis.

Cladribine treatment of multiple sclerosis is associated with depletion of memory B cells

Background

The mechanism of action of oral cladribine, recently licensed for relapsing multiple sclerosis, is unknown.

Objective

To determine whether cladribine depletes memory B cells consistent with our recent hypothesis that effective, disease-modifying treatments act by physical/functional depletion of memory B cells.

Methods

A cross-sectional study examined 40 people with multiple sclerosis at the end of the first cycle of alemtuzumab or injectable cladribine. The relative proportions and absolute numbers of peripheral blood B lymphocyte subsets were measured using flow cytometry. Cell-subtype expression of genes involved in cladribine metabolism was examined from data in public repositories.

Results

Cladribine markedly depleted class-switched and unswitched memory B cells to levels comparable with alemtuzumab, but without the associated initial lymphopenia. CD3⁺ T cell depletion was modest. The mRNA expression of metabolism genes varied between lymphocyte subsets. A high ratio of deoxycytidine kinase to group I cytosolic 5′ nucleotidase expression was present in B cells and was particularly high in mature, memory and notably germinal centre B cells, but not plasma cells.

Conclusions

Selective B cell cytotoxicity coupled with slow repopulation kinetics results in long-term, memory B cell depletion by cladribine. These may offer a new target, possibly with potential biomarker activity, for future drug development.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-018-8830-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The therapeutic effect of anti-CD52 treatment in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is associated with altered IL-33 and ST2 expression levels

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mice were administered with murine anti-CD52 antibody to investigate its therapeutic effect and whether the treatment modulates IL-33 and ST2 expression. EAE severity and central nervous system (CNS) inflammation were reduced following the treatment, which was accompanied by peripheral T and B lymphocyte depletion and reduced production of various cytokines including IL-33, while sST2 was increased. In spinal cords of EAE mice, while the number of IL-33⁺ cells remained unchanged, the extracellular level of IL-33 protein was significantly reduced in anti-CD52 antibody treated mice compared with controls. Furthermore the number of ST2⁺ cells in the spinal cord of treated EAE mice was downregulated due to decreased inflammation and immune cell infiltration in the CNS. These results suggest that treatment with anti-CD52 antibody differentially alters expression of IL-33 and ST2, both systemically and within the CNS, which may indicate IL-33/ST2 axis is involved in the action of the antibody in inhibiting EAE.

Understanding the positive benefit:risk profile of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: perspectives from the Alemtuzumab Clinical Development Program

The introduction of high-efficacy therapies for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis has driven re-evaluation of treatment goals and benefit:risk considerations in treatment choice. In the alemtuzumab Phase II and III clinical trials, patients treated with alemtuzumab 12 mg versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a demonstrated significantly reduced annualized relapse rates and improved magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, and were significantly more likely to achieve no evidence of disease activity and reduction in brain volume loss. In two of the studies, alemtuzumab-treated patients had a significantly reduced risk of 6-month confirmed disease worsening, compared with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a. Benefits were maintained throughout 5 years, with a majority of patients receiving no alemtuzumab retreatment or other disease-modifying therapy. Trial results support alemtuzumab’s manageable, consistent safety profile in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Infusion-associated reactions, the most frequent adverse events (AEs), can be minimized by corticosteroid pretreatment, monitoring, and symptomatic management. Other AEs include infections and autoimmune events. Oral anti-herpes prophylaxis should be initiated on the first day of each alemtuzumab treatment course and continued according to local guidelines. Overall cancer risk was lower in the alemtuzumab clinical trials than in a reference population; however, continuing surveillance will determine if alemtuzumab may be associated with certain malignancies such as thyroid papillary carcinoma and melanoma, which are currently identified as potential risks. The post-approval risk management strategy includes a safety monitoring program. Autoimmune AEs (thyroid events, immune thrombocytopenia, nephropathies) can be detected in a timely manner with the monitoring program, which includes physician and patient education about the signs and symptoms, monthly renal and hematologic monitoring, and quarterly thyroid function monitoring for 48 months after the last alemtuzumab course. Education, vigilance by physicians and patients, and monthly laboratory monitoring are recommended to maintain alemtuzumab’s positive benefit:risk profile.