Geminin, a neuralizing molecule that demarcates the future neural plate at the onset of gastrulation

Neural induction

Development of neural fates from ectoderm is accompanied by the blockage of BMP signals at both protein and mRNA levels. Recent work has employed zebrafish, chick and mouse in addition to amphibians as models. Genetics has supplemented experimental embryology in enriching the understanding of the mechanism of neural induction and in posing new questions.

Xbra3 induces mesoderm and neural tissue in Xenopus laevis

Homologues of the murine Brachyury gene have been shown to be involved in mesoderm formation in several vertebrate species. In frogs, the Xenopus Brachyury homologue, Xbra, is required for normal formation of posterior mesoderm. We report the characterisation of a second Brachyury homologue from Xenopus, Xbra3, which has levels of identity with mouse Brachyury similar to those of Xbra. Xbra3 encodes a nuclear protein expressed in mesoderm in a temporal and spatial manner distinct from that observed for Xbra. Xbra3 expression is induced by mesoderm-inducing factors and overexpression of Xbra3 can induce mesoderm formation in animal caps. In contrast to Xbra, Xbra3 is also able to cause the formation of neural tissue in animal caps. Xbra3 overexpression induces both geminin and Xngnr-1, suggesting that Xbra3 can play a role in the earliest stages of neural induction. Xbra3 induces posterior nervous tissue by an FGF-dependent pathway; a complete switch to anterior neural tissue can be effected by the inhibition of FGF signalling. Neither noggin, chordin, follistatin, nor Xnr3 is induced by Xbra3 to an extent different from their induction by Xbra nor is BMP4 expression differentially affected.

Work in progress: the renaissance in amphibian embryology

Various historical eras in the distant as well as the recent past of amphibian embryology are briefly reviewed. The concepts which emerged from the early years matured, then were laid to rest for several decades. A resurgence, driven by key discoveries with peptide growth factors, and fueled by modern molecular biology methods, is underway. The future for several amphibian research projects should be promising since interest in basic concepts remains strong, and application of frontier methodologies is yielding novel findings.

An early requirement for FGF signalling in the acquisition of neural cell fate in the chick embryo

BACKGROUND

In Xenopus embryos, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and secreted inhibitors of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-mediated signalling have been implicated in neural induction. The precise roles, if any, that these factors play in neural induction in amniotes remains to be established.

RESULTS

To monitor the initial steps of neural induction in the chick embryo, we developed an in vitro assay of neural differentiation in epiblast cells. Using this assay, we found evidence that neural cell fate is specified in utero, before the generation of the primitive streak or Hensen's node. Early epiblast cells expressed both Bmp4 and Bmp7, but the expression of both genes was downregulated as cells acquired neural fate. During prestreak and gastrula stages, exposure of epiblast cells to BMP4 activity in vitro was sufficient to block the acquisition of neural fate and to promote the generation of epidermal cells. Fgf3 was also found to be expressed in the early epiblast, and ongoing FGF signalling in epiblast cells was required for acquisition of neural fate and for the suppression of Bmp4 and Bmp7 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The onset of neural differentiation in the chick embryo occurs in utero, before the generation of Hensen's node. Fgf3, Bmp4 and Bmp7 are each expressed in prospective neural cells, and FGF signalling appears to be required for the repression of Bmp expression and for the acquisition of neural fate. Subsequent exposure of epiblast cells to BMPs, however, can prevent the generation of neural tissue and induce cells of epidermal character.

Distinct effects of XBF-1 in regulating the cell cycle inhibitor p27(XIC1) and imparting a neural fate

XBF-1 is an anterior neural plate-specific, winged helix transcription factor that affects neural development in a concentration-dependent manner. A high concentration of XBF-1 results in suppression of endogenous neuronal differentiation and an expansion of undifferentiated neuroectoderm. Here we investigate the mechanism by which this expansion is achieved. Our findings suggest that XBF-1 converts ectoderm to a neural fate and it does so independently of any effects on the mesoderm. In addition, we show that a high dose of XBF-1 promotes the proliferation of neuroectodermal cells while a low dose inhibits ectodermal proliferation. Thus, the neural expansion observed after high dose XBF-1 misexpression is due both to an increase in the number of ectodermal cells devoted to a neural fate and an increase in their proliferation. We show that the effect on cell proliferation is likely to be mediated by p27(XIC1), a cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor. We show that p27(XIC1) is expressed in a spatially restricted pattern in the embryo, including the anterior neural plate, and when misexpressed it is sufficient to block the cell cycle in vivo. We find that p27(XIC1)is transcriptionally regulated by XBF-1 in a dose-dependent manner such that it is suppressed or ectopically induced by a high or low dose of XBF-1, respectively. However, while a low dose of XBF-1 induces ectopic p27(XIC1)and ectopic neurons, misexpression of p27(XIC1)does not induce ectopic neurons, suggesting that the effects of XBF-1 on cell fate and cell proliferation are distinct. Finally, we show that p27(XIC1)is suppressed by XBF-1 in the absence of protein synthesis, suggesting that at least one component of p27(XIC1)regulation by XBF-1 may be direct. Thus, XBF-1 is a neural-specific transcription factor that can independently affect both the cell fate choice and the proliferative status of the cells in which it is expressed.

Neural induction

The formation of the vertebrate nervous system is initiated at gastrula stages of development, when signals from a specialized cluster of cells (the organizer) trigger neural development in the ectoderm. This process, termed neural induction, was first described in 1924 and stemmed from experiments on amphibia (Spemann & Mangold 1924). In recent years, the molecular mechanisms underlying neural induction in the amphibian have been elucidated. Surprisingly, neuralizing agents secreted by the organizer do not act via receptor-mediated signaling events; rather, these factors antagonize local epidermal inducers within the cells of the dorsal ectoderm and function to uncover the latent neural fate of these cells. Many of the recent advances in our understanding of vertebrate neural induction come from studies on the frog, Xenopus laevis. It is now clear that a blockade of signaling of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) during gastrula stages is sufficient to initiate neuralization of the ectoderm in this species. Thus this review first details our current understanding of neural induction, using the amphibian as a model. We then use data emerging from other systems to examine the extent to which the Xenopus studies can be applied to other vertebrate species. The initiation of the neurectoderm-specific gene expression program and subsequent steps in patterning and neuronal development are only touched on here. We focus primarily on the initial establishment of the neural fate in the vertebrate gastrula ectoderm.

The POU domain gene, XlPOU 2 is an essential downstream determinant of neural induction

The POU domain gene, XlPOU 2, acts as a transcriptional activator during mid-gastrulation in Xenopus. Overexpression or misexpression of VP16-POU-GR, a fusion protein consisting of the strong activator domain of VP16 and the POU domain of XlPOU 2, results in ectopic expression of the neural-specific genes, nrp-1, en-2, and beta-tubulin. In contrast, overexpressing a dominant-inhibitory form of XlPOU 2 inhibits the chordin-induced neuralization of uncommitted ectoderm, and results in a loss of nrp-1 and en-2 expression in embryos. Furthermore, in uncommitted ectoderm, XlPOU 2 regulates the developmental neural program that includes a number of pre-pattern genes and at least one proneural gene, X-ngnr-1, thus playing a key role during neural determination.

Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis

A vertebrate securin (vSecurin) was identified on the basis of its biochemical analogy to the Pds1p protein of budding yeast and the Cut2p protein of fission yeast. The vSecurin protein bound to a vertebrate homolog of yeast separins Esp1p and Cut1p and was degraded by proteolysis mediated by an anaphase-promoting complex in a manner dependent on a destruction motif. Furthermore, expression of a stable Xenopus securin mutant protein blocked sister-chromatid separation but did not block the embryonic cell cycle. The vSecurin proteins share extensive sequence similarity with each other but show no sequence similarity to either of their yeast counterparts. Human securin is identical to the product of the gene called pituitary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG), which is overexpressed in some tumors and exhibits transforming activity in NIH 3T3 cells. The oncogenic nature of increased expression of vSecurin may result from chromosome gain or loss, produced by errors in chromatid separation.

Regulation of dorsal gene expression in Xenopus by the ventralizing homeodomain gene Vox

Patterning in the vertebrate embryo is controlled by an interplay between signals from the dorsal organizer and the ventrally expressed BMPs. Here we examine the function of Vox, a homeodomain-containing gene that is activated by the ventralizing signal BMP-4. Inhibition of BMP signaling using a dominant negative BMP receptor (DeltaBMPR) leads to the ectopic activation of dorsal genes in the ventral marginal zone, and this activation is prevented by co-injection of Vox. chordin is the most strongly activated of those genes that are up-regulated by DeltaBMPR and is the gene most strongly inhibited by Vox expression. We demonstrate that Vox acts as a transcriptional repressor, showing that the activity of native Vox is mimicked by a Vox-repressor fusion (VoxEnR) and that a Vox-activator fusion (VoxG4A) acts as an antimorph, causing the formation of a partial secondary axis when expressed on the ventral side of the embryo. Although Vox can ectopically activate BMP-4 expression in whole embryos, we see no activation of BMP-4 by VoxG4A, demonstrating that this activation is indirect. Using a hormone-inducible version of VoxG4A, we find that a critical time window for Vox function is during the late blastula period. Using this construct, we demonstrate that only a subset of dorsal genes is directly repressed by Vox, revealing that there are different modes of regulation for organizer genes. Since the major direct target for Vox repression is chordin, we propose that Vox acts in establishing a BMP-4 morphogen gradient by restricting the expression domain of chordin.

Control of neurogenesis--lessons from frogs, fish and flies

Two types of genes activated by neural inducers have been identified, those that lead to the activation of proneural genes and those that limit the activity of these genes to specific domains in the neural plate. The analysis of these genes has begun to fill gaps in our understanding of events that lead from neural induction to the generation of neurons within three longitudinal columns in the Xenopus and zebrafish neural plate.

Neural induction. A bird's eye view

Since the discovery of the phenomenon of neural induction by Spemann and Mangold in 1924, considerable effort has been invested in identifying the signals produced by the organizer that are responsible for diverting the fate of cells from epidermal to neural. Substantial progress has been made only recently by the finding in amphibians that BMP4 is a neural inhibitor and epidermal inducer, and that endogenous antagonists of BMPs are secreted by the organizer. However, recent results in the chick point to the existence of other, upstream events required before BMP inhibition stabilizes neural fates. Here we take a critical view of the evidence for and against the view that BMP inhibition is a sufficient trigger for neural induction in different vertebrates.