Late Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Spinopelvic Imbalance as a Causative Factor

The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components

BACKGROUND

Lewinnek's recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the shape, size, and location of target zones for combined cup and stem orientation for a straight stem/hemispheric cup THA to maximize the impingement-free ROM and (2) To determine whether and how these implant positions change as stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, prosthetic head size and target range of movements are varied.

METHODS

A three-dimensional computer-assisted design model, in which design geometry was expressed in terms of parameters, of a straight stem/hemispheric cup hip prosthesis was designed, its design parameters modified systematically, and each prosthesis model was implanted virtually at predefined component orientations. Functional component orientation referencing to body planes was used: cups were abducted from 20° to 70°, and anteverted from -10° to 40°. Stems were rotated from -10° to 40° anteversion, neck-shaft angles varied from 115° to 143°, and head sizes varied from 28 to 40 mm. Hip movements up to the point of prosthetic impingement were tested, including simple flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, ab/adduction, combinations of these, and activities of daily living that were known to trigger dislocation. For each combination of parameters, the impingement-free combined target zone was determined. Maximizing the size of the combined target zone was the optimization criterion.

RESULTS

The combined target zones for impingement-free cup orientation had polygonal boundaries. Their size and position in the diagram changed with stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, head size, and target ROM. The largest target zones were at neck-shaft angles from 125° to 127°, at stem anteversions from 10° to 20°, and at radiographic cup anteversions between 17° and 25°. Cup anteversion and stem anteversion were inverse-linearly correlated supporting the combined-anteversion concept. The range of impingement-free cup inclinations depended on head size, stem anteversion, and neck-shaft angle. For a 127°-neck-shaft angle, the lowest cup inclinations that fell within the target zone were 42° for the 28-mm and 35° for the 40-mm head. Cup anteversion and combined version depended on neck-shaft angle. For head size 32-mm cup, anteversion was 6° for a 115° neck-shaft angle and 25° for a 135°-neck-shaft angle, and combined version was 15° and 34° respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape, size, and location of the combined target zones were dependent on design and implantation parameters of both components. Changing the prosthesis design or changing implantation parameters also changed the combined target zone. A maximized combined target zone was found. It is mandatory to consider both components to determine the accurate impingement-free prosthetic ROM in THA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study accurately defines the hypothetical impingement-free, design-specific component orientation in THA. Transforming it into clinical precision may be the case for navigation and/or robotics, but this is speculative, and as of now, unproven.

Standardization of lateral pelvic radiograph is necessary to predict spinopelvic mobility accurately

Aims

Patients with abnormal spinopelvic mobility are at increased risk for instability. Measuring the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) can help determine spinopelvic mobility preoperatively. Sacral slope (SS) should decrease at least 10° to demonstrate adequate posterior pelvic tilt. There is potential for different ΔSS measurements in the same patient based on sitting posture. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sitting posture on the ΔSS in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

In total, 51 patients undergoing THA were reviewed to quantify the variability in preoperative spinopelvic mobility when measuring two different sitting positions using SS for planning.

Results

A total of 32 patients had standardized relaxed sitting radiographs, while 35 patients had standardized flexed sitting images. Of the 32 patients with relaxed sitting views, the mean ΔSS was 20.7° (SD 8.9°). No patients exhibited an increase in SS during relaxed sitting (i.e. anterior pelvic tilt or so-called reverse accommodation). Of the 35 patients with flexed sitting radiographs, the mean ΔSS was only 2.1° (SD 9.7°) with 16/35 (45.71%) showing anterior pelvic tilt, or so-called reverse accommodation, unexpectedly increasing the sitting SS compared to the standing SS. Overall, 18 patients had both relaxed sitting and flexed sitting radiographs. In patients with both types of sitting radiographs, the mean relaxed sit to stand ΔSS was 18.06° (SD 6.07°), while only a 3.00° (SD 10.53°) ΔSS was noted when flexed sitting. There was a mean ΔSS difference of 15.06° (SD 7.67°) noted in the same patient cohort depending on sitting posture (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A 15° mean difference was noted depending on the sitting posture of the patient. Since decisions on component position can be made on preoperative lateral sit-stand radiographs, postural standardization is crucial. If using ΔSS for preoperative planning, the relaxed sitting radiograph is preferred. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):41–46.

Surgical implications of the hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the most successful orthopedic surgical procedure of the last century with excellent survivorship up to 20-years. However, instability remains a major issue representing the most common reason for revision after THA. Hip-spine relationship has gained progressive interest between arthroplasty surgeons and its understanding is crucial in order to identify high-risk patients for postoperative dislocation. Spinal deformity and abnormal spinopelvic mobility have been associated with increased risk for instability, dislocation and revision THA. Preoperative workup begins with standing anteroposterior pelvis x-ray and lateral spinopelvic radiographs in the standing and sitting position. Hip-spine stiffness needs to be addressed before THA in consideration of adapting the preoperative planning to the patient's characteristics. Acetabular component should be implanted with different anteversion and inclination angles according to the pattern of hip-spine motion in order to reduce the risk of impingement and consequent dislocation. Different algorithmic approaches have been proposed in case of concomitant hip-spine disease and in case of altered sagittal balance and pelvic mobility. The aim of this review is to investigate and clarify the hip-spine relationships and evaluate the impact on modern total hip arthroplasty.

Impact of alignment and kinematic variation on resistive moment and dislocation propensity for THA with lipped and neutral liners

Instability and dislocation remain leading indications for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many studies have addressed the links between implant design and dislocation; however, an understanding of the impact of alignment and kinematic variability on constraint of modern THA constructs to provide joint stability is needed. The objective of this study is to provide objective data to be considered in the treatment algorithm to protect against joint instability. Joint contact and muscle forces were evaluated using musculoskeletal models of THA patients performing activities consistent with posterior and anterior dislocation. Position and joint loads were transferred to a finite element simulation with an experimentally calibrated hip capsule representation, where they were kinematically extrapolated until impingement and eventual dislocation. Cup anteversion and inclination were varied according to clinical measurements, and variation in imposed kinematics was included. The resistive moment provided by the contact force and joint capsule, and overall dislocation rate (dislocations/total simulations) were determined with neutral and lipped acetabular liners. Use of a lipped liner did increase the resistive moment in posterior dislocation, by an average of 5.2 Nm, and the flexion angle at dislocation by 1.4° compared to a neutral liner. There was a reduction in similar magnitude in resistance to anterior dislocation. Increased cup anteversion and inclination, hip abduction and internal rotation all reduced the occurrence of posterior dislocation but increased anterior dislocation. A quantitative understanding of tradeoffs in the dislocation risk inherent to THA construct options is valuable in supporting surgical decision making.

The Prevalence of Abnormal Spinopelvic Relationships in Patients Presenting for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The prevalence of an abnormal spinopelvic relationship in patients presenting for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well known. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of abnormal spinopelvic relationships in patients presenting for primary THA.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 338 consecutive, nonselected patients undergoing primary THA from the practice of 2 fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons was performed (J.E.O. and T.S.B.). Sitting and standing radiographs were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS_stand), and pelvic tilt; the sacral slope was also measured on sitting radiographs (SS_sit). Patients were assessed for the presence of spinopelvic imbalance, defined as PI–LL>10°, and decreased spinopelvic motion, defined as SS_stand–SS_sit< 10°. Descriptive statistics were reported.

Results

A cohort of 338 patients was identified; 110 were excluded. In total, 228 unique patients underwent measurement. One hundred one of 228 patients (44.3%) in the cohort were female. The mean age of the cohort was 60.0 ± 13 years, with the mean body mass index of 31 ± 7 mg/kg². Spinopelvic imbalance (PI–LL > 10°) was present in 142 of 228 patients (62.3%). Decreased motion at the spinopelvic junction (SS_stand–SS_sit < 10°) was present in 78 of 228 patients (34.2%). Fifty (21.9%) patients had both spinopelvic imbalance and decreased spinopelvic motion.

Conclusions

In a cohort of 228 patients presenting for primary THA, the prevalence of spinopelvic imbalance was 62.3%, the prevalence of decreased spinopelvic motion was 34.2%, and the prevalence of both spinopelvic imbalance and decreased spinopelvic motion was 22%. Hip surgeons are likely to encounter patients with abnormal spinopelvic relationships.

Total Hip Instability and the Spinopelvic Link

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in technology, implant design, and surgical technique have lowered the dislocation rate in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite these advances, there remain a large number of instability episodes without a known etiology. Recent research suggests that the pelvic and lumbar spine interrelationship may be the explanation in prosthetic dislocations without a known cause. In this review, we describe the biomechanics, measurements, diagnoses, classification, management, and outcomes of total hip and revision total hip instability as it relates to spinopelvic alignment.

RECENT FINDINGS

As a person goes from standing to sitting, lumbar lordosis decreases, and the sacrum and entire pelvis tilts posteriorly with sacrum and coccyx rotating posterior-inferiorly, resulting in increased acetabular cup anteversion to accommodate femoral flexion. A fused spine and associated fixed acetabulum can result in abnormal pelvic femoral motion, impingement, and dislocation. Classifying the spinopelvic mechanics by sacral motion based on sitting and standing lateral radiographs provides an understanding of how the acetabulum behaves in space. This information helps appropriate cup positioning, reducing the risk of femoral side impingement and subsequent dislocation. Surgical techniques to consider in the spinopelvic at-risk patient are positioning considerations in acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, high offset femoral stems, high offset acetabular liners, dual mobility articulations, and removal of impinging structures. Future research is needed to define the safest order of operation in concomitant hip and spine pathology, the effects on pelvic femoral biomechanics in spine surgery, and whether preoperative and intraoperative management strategies have a long-term beneficial effect on the dislocation rate.

The Effects of Pelvic Incidence in the Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint

BACKGROUND

The spine-pelvis-hip interaction during postural change should be considered in the functional anatomy of the hip. The component parts of this anatomy and how they influence hip function are important to know. Pelvic incidence (PI) is one of these components. We studied if PI was preoperatively predictive of impingement risk and if it postoperatively influences hip position, which could cause outliers from the functional safe zone of hip replacement.

METHODS

This was a prospective radiographic study of 187 consecutive patients (200 hips) who had lateral spinopelvis-hip radiographs before and after primary total hip arthroplasty with measurements of the component factors that influence mobility and position of the functional anatomy. The predictive value of PI for risk of impingement of the hip and its postoperative relationship to functional safe-zone outliers were assessed. Forty-one dislocations from our clinical practice were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 200 hips, the PI was normal in 145 hips (73%), low in 18 hips (9%), and high in 37 hips (19%). Eighty-two hips had spinopelvic imbalance: 12 (67%) of the 18 hips with low PI, 56 (39%) of the 145 hips with normal PI, and 14 (38%) of the 37 hips with high PI. Low-PI hips was the most predictive of the risk of impingement and postoperatively these hips had the most outliers from the functional safe zone.

CONCLUSIONS

PI is an anatomical component that is predictive of both impingement risk and functional safe-zone outliers. Preoperative risk, based on factors such as the Lewinnek zones and combined anteversion, is an established guide in determining cup position in hip replacement. Low-PI hips that have the "terrible triad" of a posteriorly tilted pelvis, stiff pelvic mobility, and increased femoral flexion therefore have no functional safe zone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How Can Patients With Mobile Hips and Stiff Lumbar Spines Be Identified Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective, Diagnostic Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with reduced lumbar spine mobility are at higher risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore our study aimed to (1) define the optimal protocol for identifying patients with mobile hips and stiff lumbar spines and (2) determine clinical and standing radiographic parameters predicting these patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 113 patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis awaiting THA was prospectively studied. Clinical data, patient-reported outcome measures, and spinopelvic radiographs were assessed with the patient in the standing, "relaxed-seated," and "deep-flexed seated" position. A "hip user index" was calculated quantifying the percentage of sagittal hip movement compared to overall movement between the standing and deep-flexed seated position.

RESULTS

Radiographs in the relaxed-seated position had an accuracy of 56% (95% confidence interval 46-65) to detect patients with stiff lumbar spines, compared to a detected rate of 100% in the deep-flexed seated position. A standing pelvic tilt of ≥19° was the only predictor for being a hip user with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 71% (area under the curve 0.83). Patients with a standing pelvic tilt ≥19° and an unbalanced spine with a flatback deformity had a 30× fold relative risk (95% confidence interval 4-226, P < .001) of being a hip user.

CONCLUSION

Patients awaiting THA and having combined high hip and reduced lumbar spine mobility can be screened for with lateral standing radiographs of the spinopelvic complex. Hip user verification should be done utilizing radiographs in the deep-flexed seated position due to a higher accuracy compared to relaxed-seated radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Obesity Alters Spinopelvic Alignment Changes From Standing to Relaxed Sitting: the Influence of the Soft-tissue Envelope

Background

Changes in spinopelvic and lower extremity alignment between standing and relaxed sitting have important clinical implications with regard to stability of total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the effect of body mass index (BMI) on lumbopelvic alignment and motion at the hip joint.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body stereoradiographs in standing and relaxed sitting for total hip arthroplasty planning was conducted. Spinopelvic parameters measured included spinopelvic tilt (SPT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI minus LL (PI-LL), proximal femoral shaft angle (PFSA), and standing-to-sitting hip range of motion. Propensity score matching controlled for age, gender, PI, and hip ostoarthritis grade. Patients were stratified into normal (NORMAL; BMI, 18.5-24.9), overweight (OW; 25.0-29.9), and obese (OB; 30.0-34.9) groups. Alignment parameters were compared using one-way analysis of variance.

Results

There were 84 patients in each group after propensity score matching. Standing alignment between BMI groups was similar for all parameters (P > .05) except for PFSA (P < .001). Significant differences were noted for sitting alignment between patients who are NORMAL, OW, and OB in: SPT (P = .007), PI-LL (P = .018), and LL (P = .029). PFSA between groups was not significantly different (P > .05). Significant differences were found for sitting-to-standing alignment across groups in PFSA change (P < .001), SPT change (P = .006), PI-LL change (P = .005), LL change (P = .037), and hip flexion (P < .001).

Conclusions

Significant differences in sitting and standing-to-sitting change in lumbopelvic alignment based on BMI suggest obese patients recruit more posterior spinopelvic tilt when sitting to compensate for soft-tissue impingement that occurs anterior to the hip joint and limiting hip flexion.

Posterior Pelvic Tilt From Supine to Standing in Patients With Symptomatic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) significantly affects the femoral head coverage by the acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), while no reports have quantified PSI in DDH patients in the supine and standing positions. Furthermore, little is known about how PSI changes after periacetabular osteotomies. Herein, PSI in the supine and standing positions was quantified in DDH patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Twenty-five patients with DDH who had undergone periacetabular osteotomies were analyzed. The preoperative PSI and the PSI 2 years after surgery were measured in the supine and standing positions using the image registration technique between radiographs and computed tomographic images. The percentage of patients who showed PSI changes of more than 10° from the supine to the standing position was quantified. PSI changed 8.2 ± 5.0° posteriorly from the supine to the standing position during the preoperative period. Posterior pelvic tilt of more than 10° was found in nine cases (36%). Two years after periacetabular osteotomies, the postural PSI change was 7.1 ± 3.9° posteriorly. When the preoperative and postoperative PSI values were compared, PSI in the standing position did not differ (p = 0.20). Similarly, the amount of PSI change from the supine to standing position was not significantly different (p = 0.26). In conclusion, posterior pelvic tilt in the standing position was found preoperatively in symptomatic DDH patients, and it remained for 2 years after periacetabular osteotomies. This postural change in PSI does not seem to influence the outcome of periacetabular osteotomy. However, during preoperative planning, surgeons should recognize that acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular coverage differs between the supine and standing positions in some patients with DDH. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:578-587, 2020.

Use of dual mobility cups in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with prior lumbar spine fusion

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with prior lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are a high-risk group for instability with reported incidence of dislocation as high as 8.3% using fixed bearing femoral heads. Purpose of this study was to determine risk of post-operative instability in patients undergoing primary THA with a history of prior LSF using dual mobility acetabular cups.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study with 93 patients undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup with a prior history of instrumented LSF. There were 56 females and 47 males with an average age of 66 years (46-87) and average BMI of 30 with mean follow-up of 2.7 years (range 12-124 months). Surgical approach included posterior (63), direct lateral (15), anterior (11), and direct superior (4). Forty-four percent had one level lumbar fusion, 29% with two levels, and 15% with three or more levels fused. The primary outcome investigated was instability.

RESULTS

There were no cases of instability or prosthetic joint infection in this group of patients with prior lumbar spine fusion undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup. There was one intra-operative periprosthetic femur fracture and one case of aseptic acetabular cup loosening.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA with prior LSF are at increased risk for instability due to loss of normal spinopelvic relationship. The use of dual mobility cups in patients with prior LSF undergoing primary THA appears promising with no cases of instability in this high-risk group of patients.

Radiographic assessment of the cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a literature review

Optimal acetabular cup orientation is of substantial importance to good long-term function and low complication rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI) angles of the cup are typically studied due to the practicability, simplicity, and ease of interpretation of their measurements. A great number of methods have been developed to date, most of which have been performed on pelvic or hip anteroposterior radiographs. However, there are primarily two influencing factors for these methods: X-ray offset and pelvic rotation. In addition, there are three types of pelvic rotations about the transverse, longitudinal, and anteroposterior axes of the body. Their effects on the RA and RI angles of the cup are interactively correlated with the position and true orientation of the cup. To date, various fitted or analytical models have been established to disclose the correlations between the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation and the RA and RI angles of the cup. Most of these models do not incorporate all the potential influencing parameters. Advanced methods for performing X-ray offset and pelvic rotation corrections are mainly performed on a single pelvic AP radiograph, two synchronized radiographs, or a two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D-3D) registration system. Some measurement systems, originally developed for evaluating implant migration or wear, could also be used for correcting the X-ray offset and pelvic rotation simultaneously, but some drawbacks still exist with these systems. Above all, the 2D-3D registration technique might be an alternative and powerful tool for accurately measuring cup orientation. In addition to the current methods used for postoperative assessment, navigation systems and augmented reality are also used for the preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance of cup placement. With the continuing development of artificial intelligence and machine learning, these techniques could be incorporated into robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery in the future.

Clinical outcomes and complication profile of total hip arthroplasty after lumbar spine fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hip and spine pathology can alter the biomechanics of spino-pelvic mobility. Lumbar spine fusions can reduce the mobility of the lumbar spine and therefore result in compensatory femoral motion, contributing towards dislocations of THA.

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to determine the effect of pre-existing spine fusions on THA outcomes, and complication profile including hip dislocations, all-cause revisions and all complications.

METHODS

A multi-database search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies that compared patients who underwent THA with and without prior SF were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in this review, consisting of 28,396 SF THA patients and 1,550,291 non-SF THA patients. There were statistically significant higher rates of hip dislocation (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.71-2.85, p < 0.001), all-cause revision (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.96-6.00, p < 0.001) and all complications (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.28-6.24, p = 0.01) in SF than in non-SF THA patients. When registry data were excluded, these rates were approximately doubled. Subgroup analysis of revisions for dislocations was not statistically significant (OR 5.28, 95% CI 0.76-36.87, p = 0.09). While no meta-analysis was performed on clinical outcomes due to heterogeneous parameter reporting, individual studies reported significantly poorer outcomes in SF patients than in non-SF patients.

CONCLUSION

THA patients with SF are at higher risks of hip dislocations, all-cause revisions and all complications, which may adversely affect patient-reported outcomes. Surgeons should be aware of these risks and appropriately plan to account for altered spino-pelvic biomechanics, in order to reduce the risks of hip dislocations and other complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Meta-analysis of non-homogeneous studies). These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Hip stress distribution - Predictor of dislocation in hip arthroplasties. A retrospective study of 149 arthroplasties

Dislocation after hip arthroplasty is still a major concern. Recent study of the volumetric wear of the cup has suggested that stresses studied in a one-legged stance model could predispose arthroplasty dislocation. The aim of this work was to study whether biomechanical parameters of contact stress distribution in total hip arthroplasty during a neutral hip position can predict a higher possibility of the arthroplasty dislocating. Biomechanical parameters were determined using 3-dimensional mathematical models of the one-legged stance within the HIPSTRESS method. Geometrical parameters were measured from standard anteroposterior X-ray images of the pelvis and proximal femora. Fifty-five patients subjected to total hip arthroplasty that later suffered dislocation of the head and, for comparison, ninety-four total hip arthroplasties that were functional at least 10 years after the implantation, were included in the study. Arthroplasties that suffered dislocation had on average a 6% higher resultant hip force than the control group (p = 0.004), 11% higher peak stress on the load-bearing area (p = 0.001) and a 50% more laterally positioned stress pole (p = 0.026), all parameters being less favorable in the group of unstable arthroplasties. There was no statistically significant difference in the gradient index or in the functional angle of the weight bearing. Our study showed that arthroplasties that show a tendency to push the head out of the cup in the representative body position—the one-legged stance—are prone to dislocation. An unfavorable resultant hip force, peak stress on the load bearing and laterally positioned stress pole are predictors of arthroplasty dislocation.

Stand-to-Sit Kinematics of the Pelvis Is Not Always as Expected: Hip and Spine Pathologies Can Have an Impact

BACKGROUND

Stand-to-sit pelvis kinematics is commonly considered as a rotation around the bicoxofemoral axis. However, abnormal kinematics could occur for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, affecting the hip-spine complex. The aim of this study is to perform a quantitative analysis of the stand-to-sit pelvis kinematics using 3D reconstruction from biplanar x-rays.

METHODS

Thirty volunteers as a control group (C), 30 patients with hip pathology (Hip), and 30 patients with spine pathology (Spine) were evaluated. All subjects underwent standing and sitting full-body biplanar x-rays. Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed in each configuration and then translated such as the middle of the line joining the center of each acetabulum corresponds to the origin. Rigid registration quantified the finite helical axis (FHA) describing the transition between standing and sitting with two specific parameters. The orientation angle (OA) is the signed 3D angle between FHA and bicoxofemoral axis, and the rotation angle (RA) represents the signed angle around FHA.

RESULTS

The mean OA was -1.8° for the C group, 0.3° for Hip group, and -2.4° for Spine group. There was no significant difference in mean OA between groups. However, variability was higher for the Spine group with a standard deviation (SD) of 15.9° compared with 10.8° in the C group and 12.3° in the Hip group. The mean RA in the C group was 18.1° (SD, 9.0°). There was significant difference in RA between the Hip and Spine groups (21.1° [SD, 8.0°] and 16.4° [SD, 10.8°], respectively) (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Hip and spine pathologies affect stand-to-sit pelvic kinematics.

Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic study of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis

AIMS

This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sitting position; 2) assess whether abnormal spinopelvic mobility is associated with worse symptoms; and 3) identify whether spinopelvic mobility can be predicted from static anatomical radiological parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 122 patients with end-stage OA of the hip awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) were prospectively studied. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Oxford Hip Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Score) and clinical data were collected. Sagittal spinopelvic mobility was calculated as the change from the standing to sitting position using the lumbar lordosis angle (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral angle (PFA), and acetabular anteinclination (AI) from lateral radiographs. The interaction of the different parameters was assessed. PROMs were compared between patients with normal spinopelvic mobility (10° ≤ ∆PT ≤ 30°) or abnormal spinopelvic mobility (stiff: ∆PT < ± 10°; hypermobile: ∆PT > ± 30°). Multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test for possible predictors of spinopelvic mobility.

RESULTS

Standing to sitting, the hip flexed by a mean of 57° (sd 17°), the pelvis tilted backwards by a mean of 20° (sd 12°), and the lumbar spine flexed by a mean of 20° (sd 14°); strong correlations were detected. There was no difference in PROMs between patients in the different spinopelvic mobility groups. Maximum hip flexion, standing PT, and standing AI were independent predictors of spinopelvic mobility (R² = 0.42). The combined thresholds for standing was PT ≥ 13° and hip flexion ≥ 88° in the clinical examination, and had 90% sensitivity and 63% specificity of predicting spinopelvic stiffness, while SS ≥ 42° had 84% sensitivity and 67% specificity of predicting spinopelvic hypermobility.

CONCLUSION

The hip, on average, accounts for three-quarters of the standing-to-sitting movement, but there is great variation. Abnormal spinopelvic mobility cannot be screened with PROMs. However, clinical and standing radiological features can predict spinopelvic mobility with good enough accuracy, allowing them to be used as reliable screening tools. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:902-909.

Adult spinal deformity and its relationship with hip range of motion: a cohort study of community-dwelling females

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adult spinal deformity affects lower extremity alignment with compensation in joint range of motion (ROM) and alignment of the hip.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and the ROM of the hip joint and the femoral oblique angle (FOA).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, observational cohort study of community-dwelling Japanese women.

METHODS

The study group included 158 women, enrolled in our ongoing prospective cohort study, with upright spine radiographs and physical measurements obtained for all participants. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters included measurement of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt (PT). FOA parameters were measured on hip radiographs and hip ROM included external and internal rotation and extension. The association between spinopelvic parameters, the FOA, and hip joint ROM was evaluated using Spearman's correlation analysis.

RESULTS

External rotation of the hip was correlated with LL (R=0.179, p=.024), PT (R=-0.273, p=.001) and SVA (R=-0.215, p=.007), with the FOA being correlated with the SVA (R=0.502, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in hip external rotation with adult spinal deformity might reflect a structural modification in spinopelvic alignment. An increase in FOA was associated with an increase in SVA, indicative of a sagittal malalignment in the decompensated phase of adult spinal deformity.

Spinopelvic Motion and Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

The stability of a total hip arthroplasty relies on proper positioning of the acetabular cup. Recent research has shown that this cup position is more dynamic than previously thought. The 3-dimensional orientation of the acetabular cup changes when the pelvis tilts anteriorly or posteriorly. These changes in pelvic tilt are directly related to the biomechanics of the lumbosacral junction. In normal physiology, the lumbar spine straightens with sitting and becomes more lordotic with standing. This directly translates to posterior or anterior pelvic tilt due to the rigid sacroiliac attachments. During sitting, increased posterior pelvic tilt opens the acetabulum to accommodate flexion and internal rotation of the hip. This helps prevent anterior impingement and posterior hip dislocation. During standing, anterior pelvic tilt increases superior coverage of the acetabulum. This helps prevent posterior impingement and anterior hip dislocations. When lumbosacral motion becomes pathologic, spinopelvic motion changes and acetabular cup orientation is affected. In cases of decreased lumbosacral motion, patients rely on greater hip motion to reach standing or sitting positions. This can cause pathologic impingement. In addition, traditional safe zones for cup position may not apply in the presence of pathologic spinopelvic motion. This article discusses the normal physiology of spinopelvic motion, the patterns of pathologic change, and the clinical implications therein.

[Revision total hip arthroplasty : Significance of instability, impingement, offset and gluteal insufficiency]

BACKGROUND

Instability is a common cause of failure in primary and, especially, revision total hip arthroplasty. The reasons for instability include implant malpositioning, impingement, inadequate offset reconstruction, and gluteal insufficiency. Impingement following THA and revision THA is divided into prosthetic and bony impingement, and in addition to instability also causes pain in the area of the hip joint. Offset reconstruction during revision THA is of particular biomechanical importance, since insufficient reconstruction leads not only to instability and pain but also to dislocation. Abductor deficiency often occurs after revision THA and leads to a change in gait pattern, instability and pain.

AIM

Current diagnostic and treatment procedures for instability, impingement, insufficient offset reconstruction and abductor deficiency after THA and revision THA are summarized.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of an instable THA and painful THA includes patient history, physical examination and medical imaging. Thus, in almost all cases, the cause can be determined and treated. Dislocation after primary THA in the early postoperative period can often be treated conservatively if accurate component placement is observed, while a late-onset and recurrent dislocation after primary and revision THA usually needs surgical procedures. To avoid bony and prosthetic THA impingement intraoperative control is absolutely necessary. If possible, the offset reconstruction is based on the condition of the native hip joint and can be achieved by using modular prostheses, neck adapters and different head lengths. Abductor deficiency also occurs frequently after revision THA and can be treated surgically if severe clinical symptoms and fatty degeneration of the abductors have been diagnosed.