The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations

The Mayo Clinic gamma knife experience: indications and initial results

OBJECTIVE

To review the results and expectations of contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,033 consecutive patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1990 and January 1998.

RESULTS

The number of patients undergoing radiosurgery increased from 57 in 1990 to 216 in 1997. Of 97 patients with arteriovenous malformations who underwent follow-up angiography 2 years or more after a single radiosurgical procedure, 72 (74%) had complete obliteration of the vascular malformation. Of 209 patients who underwent radiosurgery for benign tumors (schwannomas, meningiomas, or pituitary adenomas) and had radiologic studies after 2 years or more of follow-up, tumor growth control was noted in 200 (96%). Tumor growth was also controlled in 90% of brain metastatic lesions at a median of 7 months after radiosurgery. Of 20 patients with trigeminal neuralgia and follow-up for more than 2 months, 14 (70%) were free of pain after radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery is a safe and effective management strategy for a wide variety of intracranial disorders. Use of radiosurgical treatment should continue to increase as more data become available on the long-term results of this procedure.

Significance of factors contributing to surgical complications and to late outcome after elective surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations

OBJECTIVES

This study focuses on the relevance of size, eloquence, type of venous drainage, the Spetzler-Martin scale as a whole, and other factors, such as rupture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) for the prediction of neurological deficits in the context of microsurgical AVM removal.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty patients with AVMs, whose data were retrieved from a prospectively employed computerised data bank were included. Seventeen patients (11.3%) underwent preoperative embolisation. According to the Spetzler-Martin scale they were graded as follows: 22.0% grade I, 32.0% grade II, 29.3% grade III, 14.0% grade IV, and 2.7% grade V. Intracerebral haemorrhage was present in 39.0%. The AVMs were <3 cm in 52.00/0, 3-6 cm in 43.3% and >6 cm in 4.7%; 59.3% of the AVMs were eloquently located and 29.3% had deep venous drainage (DVD). Follow up information was assessed 6 months after surgery in all but one patient, who died. The applied statistical test was chi2.

RESULTS

Surgical morbidity was 15.3%. Early new deficits were noted in 39.3%, permanent new deficits in 10.6%, being significant (major) in 7.3%. The occurrence of permanent deficits correlated significantly with size, deep venous drainage, and the Spetzler-Martin scale. There was statistical evidence for a trend in risk of poor surgical outcome across the three categories non-eloquent, "less eloquent" (for example, visual cortex) and "highly eloquent" (brainstem, basal ganglia, or precentral cortex) with the last being associated with the highest risk for permanent neurological compromise.

CONCLUSION

"Eloquence" of the Spetzler-Martin scale should be divided into "highly eloquent" and "less eloquent", which is important for risk analysis of the treatment of asymptomatic and deep seated AVMs and for future trials comparing various treatment modalities. In addition, resection of eloquent AVMs v non-eloquent ones is significantly associated with higher surgical morbidity.

Reflections on the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations

BACKGROUND

The authors report their personal experience in the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), using the three techniques now available: surgical resection, endovascular embolization, and radiosurgery. They review the recent literature on this topic and present their current management algorithm based on this experience.

METHODS

A series of 90 patients treated for cerebral AVMs is reported (68% Grade I-III and 32% Grade IV-V, Spetzler scale). The three methods of treatment were used, either individually or in combination, based on the size and the location of the malformation. The first intervention was surgical resection in 26% of cases, endovascular embolization in 57%, and radiosurgery in 17%. Surgery and embolization were followed by another technique in some cases and eventually single modality treatment was used in 58% of cases (surgical resection 21%, endovascular embolization 20%, radiosurgery 17%) and multimodality treatment in 42% (embolization + resection, 21%; embolization + radiosurgery, 17%; resection + radiosurgery, 4%). Embolization was used as reductive therapy in 38% of the overall series (65% of all embolized patients), and was followed by surgery in 56% of cases or by radiosurgery in 44%. Angiography was used to assess the cure rates.

RESULTS

The following cure rates were obtained, when each technique was used as a first treatment: surgical resection, 82%; embolization, 6%; and radiosurgery, 83% (2-year angiographic follow-up). After combined treatment, embolization and resection resulted in a 100% cure rate, embolization and radiosurgery produced a 90% cure rate. The clinical outcome was evaluated in terms of deterioration attributable to treatment. Seventy-one percent of patients had no complication, minor complications were observed in 18%, and severe complications in 11%. Treatment mortality was 3%. All deaths were attributable to hemorrhage during the embolization procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this management algorithm, AVMs submitted directly to surgery or to radiosurgery were considered "good risk" malformations, and the outcome for these cases was good in terms of clinical result and cure rate. AVMs submitted first to endovascular embolization were considered "poor risk" malformations, including a majority of Spetzler Grade IV-V lesions. Not surprisingly, the majority of severe complications occured in this group during embolization. Thus, the major risk of the treatment of AVMs has now shifted from surgery to endovascular techniques. Endovascular embolization as sole treatment gave a low rate of complete occlusion, but proved to be very useful as a reductive therapy, in preparation for further surgery or radiosurgery. Partial embolization permitted high rates of complete cure in difficult AVMs. Embolization should be used to the maximum extent possible as a reductive technique, despite the risks of the procedure. Because of its risks however, this technique of reductive embolization should be used only if absolutely necessary to allow the complete cure of the malformation. Thus, the use of embolization should be considered very cautiously in small malformations as well as in very large and complex AVMs in which partial embolization will not be sufficient to allow complete cure with either endovascular or surgical techniques.

Analysis of treatment failure after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the causes of treatment failure in patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) who underwent radiosurgery, which is increasingly used as a treatment method for selected, surgically high-risk AVMs. Unfortunately, radiosurgical treatment fails in a small but significant percentage of patients. In the time period covered in this study, 72 patients attained angiographically confirmed cures after radiosurgery and 36 were retreated after the initial radiosurgical treatment failed.

METHODS

Using a computerized image fusion technique, the initial radiosurgical dosimetry plan was superimposed on the remaining AVM nidus at the time of retreatment. Twenty-six percent of the retreated cases were found to have AVM niduses outside the original treatment isodose line, which means that targeting error was a factor. The retreated group was also statistically compared with the cured group.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors were statistically significant predictors of treatment failure: increasing AVM size, decreasing treatment dose, and increasing Spetzler-Martin grade.

Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical and angiographic variables that affect the results of arteriovenous malformation (AVM) radiosurgery and to propose a new method of reporting patient outcomes after AVM radiosurgery. This method incorporates both the obliteration status of the AVMs and the postoperative neurological condition of the patient.

METHODS

Patient outcomes were defined as excellent (nidus obliteration and no new deficits), good (nidus obliteration with a new minor deficit), fair (nidus obliteration with a new major deficit), unchanged (incomplete nidus obliteration without a new deficit), poor (incomplete nidus obliteration with any new deficit), and dead. Two hundred twenty patients who underwent AVM radiosurgery at our center before 1992 were subjected to a multivariate analysis with patient outcomes as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis determined four factors associated with successful AVM radiosurgery: smaller AVM volume (P=0.003), number of draining veins (P=0.001), younger patient age (P=0.0003), and hemispheric AVM location (P=0.002). Preradiosurgical embolization was a negative predictor of successful AVM radiosurgery (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

AVM obliteration without new neurological deficits can be achieved in at least 80% of patients with small volume, hemispheric AVMs after single-session AVM radiosurgery. Future studies on AVM radiosurgery should report patient outcomes in a fashion that incorporates all the factors involved in successful AVM radiosurgery.

Failure in radiosurgery treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the reasons for the failure of radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

Seventeen cases of noncured AVMs were reviewed 3 years after radiosurgical treatment. Follow-up ranged from 33 to 54 months (mean, 44.3 mo). Lesion dimensions varied from 9 to 55 mm (mean, 29.2 mm). The lesions were located in critical or near-critical brain regions. Angiography was performed under Talairach's stereotactic conditions. Two large AVMs bled 36 and 39 months after receiving irradiation, respectively. These two AVMs had been incompletely irradiated.

RESULTS

Retrospectively, in four cases (23.5%) we observed errors in determining AVM target shape and size because of inaccurate definition of the nidus and/or because of stereoangiographic incompleteness (absence of external carotid artery injections). In five large and/or irregularly shaped AVMs (29.4%), a strategy of partial volume irradiation had been used. In one patient (5.8%), we observed the recanalization of previously embolized AVMs. In another case (5.8%), the target had been partially missed. The AVMs in one case (5.8%) had been treated with an ineffective peripheral dose. In one (5.8%), the failure occurred because of the lesion angio-architecture. In four cases (23.5%), no evident reasons for failure were determined.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest the necessity of complete irradiation of the nidus. The strategy of partial volume irradiation might be avoided, even if it necessitates lowering the doses to treat large AVMs. Accuracy in the target determination is required, and complete stereoangiography is necessary.

Microsurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations: analysis and comparison with stereotactic radiosurgery

OBJECT

To compare microsurgical and stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), the authors analyzed a prospective series of 72 consecutive patients who were treated microsurgically for cerebral AVMs by one neurosurgeon. The authors then compared the results of microsurgical treatment with published results of stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of small AVMs.

METHODS

Patients were categorized by age, gender, presentation, and preoperative neurological status. The AVMs were categorized by size, location, presence of deep venous drainage, and Spetzler-Martin grade. Outcome was assessed for angiographic obliteration, hemorrhage following treatment, presence of a new, persistent postoperative neurological deficit, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. Ordinal logistic regression was used to model the GOS score and to predict new postoperative deficits. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare published results of microsurgical and stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of AVMs. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival plots were generated to compare the two modalities with respect to hemorrhage following treatment. Overall, six patients (8.3%) exhibited a new persistent neurological deficit postoperatively. Sixty-five patients (90.3%) had a GOS score of 5. Three patients were moderately disabled and four patients were severely disabled. No patient was observed to be in a vegetative state and there were no treatment-related deaths. Seventy-one patients (98.6%) underwent intra- or postoperative angiography. Total excision of the AVM was angiographically confirmed in 70 patients (98.6% of those who underwent angiography). To date no patient has suffered from hemorrhage since the microsurgical treatment. When analysis was confined to patients whose AVMs were smaller than 3 cm in maximum diameter, the authors found a 100% angiographic obliteration rate, no new postoperative neurological deficit, and a good recovery in all patients. An analysis of all patients with Spetzler-Martin Grades I to III resulted in a 100% rate of angiographic obliteration, one patient with a new postoperative neurological deficit, and good recovery in 93% of the patients. Size of the AVM, preoperative neurological status, and patient age are associated with GOS score (for all, p < 0.02). The Spetzler-Martin grading system as well as each component of this system are associated with the development of a new postoperative neurological deficit (for all, p < 0.01). For the entire series there were fewer postoperative hemorrhages and deaths than those mentioned in published series of small AVMs treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. When these patients and published series of patients with microsurgically treated AVMs classified as Grade I to III were compared with similar patients treated radiosurgically there were significantly fewer postoperative hemorrhages (odds ratio = 0.210, p = 0.001), fewer deaths (odds ratio = 0.659, p = 0.019), fewer new posttreatment neurological deficits (odds ratio = 0.464, p = 0.013), and a higher incidence of obliteration (odds ratio = 28.2, p = 0.001) for the microsurgical group. Lifetable analysis confirms the statistically significant difference in hemorrhage-free survival time between the two groups (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this analysis, microsurgical treatment of Grades I to III AVMs is superior to stereotactic radiosurgery.

[Point of view of the neurosurgeon]

Stereotactic radiosurgery, a term introduced by Leksell, was born more than 40 years ago, but has made great strides for the last 15 years. There is no consensus among neurosurgeons as to the best device (gamma knife, linear accelerator), the treatment doses, and the clinical indications of stereotactic radiosurgery. Therefore, this report is the viewpoint of one neurosurgical team only. In the radiosurgery literature, there is no clear evidence of better results with the gamma-knife or the linear accelerators. With regard to clinical applications, cerebral arteriovenous malformations are the more widely accepted indications of radiosurgery, since a cerebral angiography can confirm the disappearance of the nidus of an arteriovenous malformation treated by stereotactic radiosurgery. Usually, small and deep arteriovenous malformations can be treated by stereotactic radiosurgery only. Nevertheless, the treatment of the other arteriovenous malformations more often require procedures including one or several of the following treatment methods: microneurosurgery, interventional neuradiology, stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic schwannomas, skull base meningiomas, especially those involving the cavernous sinus, brain metastases, and pituitary tumors seem attractive. Contrary to arteriovenous malformations, the lack of criteria for cure requires a long follow-up and carefully controlled trials to confirm the efficiency of stereotactic radiosurgery for these tumors. On the other hand, experience of stereotactic radiosurgery for astrocytomas and glioblastomas is limited, and few publications are available. Furthermore, because of the infiltrating growth, a major impact of stereotactic radiosurgery for these tumors is presumably not to be expected. Lastly, a close multidisciplinary approach seems absolutely necessary to define the best indications of stereotactic radiosurgery and to improve its clinical results.

Surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery for small, operable cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a clinical and cost comparison

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) may cause stroke and death in young patients. For small AVMs, the major curative treatment options are surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SR). Although the initial costs and risks of SR are less, there is a latency to cure and ultimately the success rate is lower than with surgery. Thus, these two treatment modalities were compared with respect to clinical outcomes and associated costs by means of a cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was developed using Smltree software (J.P. Hollenberg, Roslyn, NY). Probability estimates for cure and complications for both therapies were derived from the literature. Utility values for minor and major stroke were measured in patients with AVMs who were treated at the University of Toronto clinic, using the standard gamble technique. Costs were obtained from several sources, including the case costing systems of several hospitals in Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS

Surgery confers a 0.98 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) advantage over SR, at an additional cost of $6937 per patient. Thus, from a societal perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $7100 per QALY for a patient treated surgically. The result is sensitive to only two variables: surgical morbidity and surgical mortality. However, the preferred treatment strategy changes to favor SR only at the extreme high end of the possible range for these variables, when the rate of permanent neurological morbidity resulting from surgery exceeds 12% or the surgical mortality rate exceeds 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of small AVMs, surgery confers a large clinical benefit over SR. The reason is that surgery protects the patient from hemorrhage earlier and with greater success than does SR. The associated cost-effectiveness ratio, $7100/QALY, is highly economically attractive. Therefore, surgery achieves important improvements in clinical outcomes and is associated with an excellent ratio of incremental costs per QALY gained.