Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel Raf kinase and VEGFR inhibitor BAY 43-9006, administered for 28 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors

The randomized discontinuation trial: a phase II design to assess growth-inhibitory agents: Figure 1

An increasing number of putative anticancer targets and drugs have been identified with many of these expected to be growth inhibitory. Clinical development of these agents in the phase II setting is challenging because tumor shrinkages, or at least tumor shrinkages that meet the standard definitions of objective response, are not expected. Time to progression end points are however problematic because expected times in the absence of therapy (the null hypothesis) cannot be predicted accurately, thus requiring trials to enroll a concurrent control group. Another problem is that the patient population that will benefit from a new drug remains poorly defined in early-phase development. The randomized discontinuation trial design addresses both of these issues. All patients are initially treated with the drug; patients with an objective response continue therapy; patients who do not progress or experience excess toxicity within a prespecified "run-in" period are then randomized to continuing or discontinuing therapy in a double-blind, placebo controlled manner. Despite certain limitations that need to be recognized, the ability of this design to "select" a cohort most likely to benefit and to rigorously evaluate the disease-stabilizing activity of an investigational agent provides multiple advantages.

Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Despite the optimization of chemotherapy regimens, treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still considered to be disappointing. Thus, clinical research of new treatment strategies is warranted. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in NSCLC, but to date, only a few of these new agents can offer hope of a substantial impact on the natural history of the disease. One of the main reasons for the failure of several clinical trials of targeted therapy in lung cancer is that there is multilevel cross-stimulation among the targets of the new biological agents along several pathways of signal transduction that lead to neoplastic events; blocking only one of these pathways, as most first-generation targeted agents do, allows others to act as salvage or escape mechanisms for cancer cells. Sorafenib and sunitinib are two oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-beta and stem cell factor receptor [KIT]). Sunitinib is a multitargeted inhibitor of PDGFR, KIT, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and VEGFR. The kinases targeted and inhibited by sorafenib and sunitinib directly and indirectly regulate tumor growth, survival, and angiogenesis, and this might be expected to result in broad antitumor efficacy. Sorafenib and sunitinib have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib has also been approved for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Their mechanism of action, preclinical data, and phase II studies suggest efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-receptor-signaling in renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies resulted in an overall chance of partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) of only 12.9%. There is a clear need for novel, more effective therapies to prevent relapse, control metastases and improve overall survival. Improved understanding of RCC disease biology has led to the introduction of molecularly targeted treatment strategies in these cancers. Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene inactivation is observed in most clear cell renal carcinoma, resulting in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) over-expression and driving the malignant phenotype. This review discusses the efficacy of novel therapies targeting the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) (e.g. anti-VEGF antibodies, VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors), some of which were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Evaluation Agency (FDA/EMEA) and represent the new treatment standards in RCC patients.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer

Despite improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy and combined modality therapies for lung cancer, the prognosis for patients remains poor, and the majority of patients die from the disease. Angiogenesis, i.e. the formation of new blood vessels, is important for tumor growth, invasion and metastasis and represents a rational target in the development of more effective treatments. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the angiogenic process and consequently, inhibitors of this system are currently under development. The most studied anti-angiogenic agents include anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent clinical trials have yielded promising results. This article will review angiogenesis inhibitors targeting the VEGF pathway which are currently being developed for the treatment of lung cancer.

Present strategies in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an update on molecular targeting agents

The understanding of cellular processes underlying tumour biology has allowed the development of novel molecular-targeted drugs with optimistic results in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene are found in 75% of sporadic RCCs, which results in upregulation of several genes involved in angiogenesis, e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. Other activated pathways in RCC are the epidermal growth factor receptor and the mTOR pathway, which regulate survival and cell growth. In addition to temsirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) two different strategies have been studied to inhibit these targets: monoclonal antibodies, e.g. bevacizumab, and small molecule tyrosine-kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, sunitinib and AG 013736. Phase II studies with these drugs reported substantial clinical activity in advanced RCC. Survival benefit was reported with temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib in randomized trials, which led to the accelerated approval of sorafenib and sunitinib for advanced RCC by regulatory authorities in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, as new therapies develop, new challenges arise for the optimum use of these targeted drugs. We discuss the rationale and the clinical development of these novel molecular-targeted agents, with special emphasis on updated information presented at recent meetings because of the relevance of the data reported and the potential future impact in the management of patients with RCC.

Results from an in vitro and a clinical/pharmacological phase I study with the combination irinotecan and sorafenib

PURPOSE

This single-centre, open-label, phase I dose-escalation study was performed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, combined with irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an initial dose-escalation phase, patients received irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) and sorafenib 100, 200 and 400 mg twice daily (bid) (cohorts 1-3). In an extended phase, colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received fixed-dose irinotecan 140 mg and sorafenib 400 mg bid (cohort 4).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated: 20 in the dose-escalation phase (common tumour types: CRC [45%], ovarian [5%], pancreatic [5%]) and 14 patients in the CRC extension. Frequent drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms, dermatological reactions and constitutional symptoms. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Generally, concomitant administration of irinotecan had no impact on the PK of sorafenib. Sorafenib 100 or 200 mg bid had no impact on the PK of irinotecan or its metabolite SN38. In contrast, sorafenib 400 mg bid significantly increased irinotecan and SN38 exposures; however, this was not associated with increased toxicities. Stable disease was achieved in 12/20 (60%) evaluable patients in cohorts 1-3, and 10/13 (77%) evaluable patients in cohort 4. A further patient from cohort 4 had a partial response of >200 days. The increase of SN38 exposure might be due to inhibition of formation of the SN38 glucuronide by sorafenib. In vitro, sorafenib strongly inhibited SN38 glucuronidation in human liver microsomes as indicated by a K(i) value of 2.7 micromol/l.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib 400 mg bid can be combined with irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) or 140 mg for the treatment of patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours, although monitoring for toxicity is recommended.

Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy in hematologic malignancies

Angiogenesis, the generation of new blood capillaries from preexisting blood vessels, is tightly regulated in the adult organism. Although many of the initial studies were performed on solid tumors, increasing evidence indicates that angiogenesis also plays an important role in hematologic malignancies. Overexpression of angiogenic factors in particular VEGF and bFGF in most hematologic malignancies may explain the increased angiogenesis found in these malignancies and correlate with poor prognosis as well as decreased overall survival. In this review, we focus on the current literature of angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy in hematologic malignancies, and finally describe advances and potential challenges in antiangiogenic treatment in hematologic malignancies.

Targeting Growth Factor and Antiangiogenic Pathways in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Rationale and Ongoing Trials

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma is characterized by the inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene, which results in an overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor that promotes tumor angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis after binding with its receptor. The mammalian target of rapamycin signal transduction pathway is involved in the translation of hypoxia inducible factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. Sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus have improved clinical outcomes by inhibiting these tumorigenic pathways. Other multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (lapatinib, axitinib, pazopanib) and antiangiogenic agents (lenalidomide) have also demonstrated activity in early studies. Combinations of these agents are being evaluated. Clinical trials designed to further assess these and other agents need to be vigorously supported.

Toxicities of Antiangiogenic Therapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The addition of antiangiogenic agents has improved overall survival in a wide variety of tumor types, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Antibodies to the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were the first targeted agent to yield a significant improvement in overall survival when combined with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. Anti-VEGF antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors blocking VEGF receptor (VEGFR) activity are also being investigated in pretreated NSCLC. Initial experience with anti-VEGF antibodies suggested a mild adverse event profile. However, it has become clear with additional experience that antiangiogenic agents are associated with a distinct array of toxicities, such as hemorrhage, hypertension, thromboembolic events, and proteinuria. Furthermore, an increase in chemotherapy-associated toxicities such as neutropenia has been observed with the addition of anti-VEGF antibodies. Multitargeted small-molecule inhibitors that block activity of the VEGFR tyrosine kinase are associated with fatigue and other toxicities in addition to the aforementioned class-effect toxicities, possibly because of their inhibition of multiple signaling pathways. Currently, only patients without predominant squamous cell histology are eligible to receive bevacizumab. Trials are ongoing to address the feasibility of bevacizumab in patients who were excluded from the phase III pivotal trial. Additionally, further investigation is necessary to determine risk factors for hemorrhage with antiangiogenic agents.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in clinical trials: current status and future directions

Angiogenesis plays a central role in the process of tumor growth and metastatic dissemination. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of peptide growth factors and receptors are key regulators of this process. Agents directed either against VEGF or VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) have been developed. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors of VEGFRs are low-molecular-weight, ATP-mimetic proteins that bind to the ATP-binding catalytic site of the tyrosine kinase domain of VEG-FRs, resulting in blockade of intracellular signaling. Several of these agents are currently in different phases of clinical development. Large randomized phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in the treatment of patients affected by gastrointestinal stromal tumors and renal cancer refractory to standard therapies, respectively. Positive results also have been reported with the combination of ZD6474 and chemotherapy in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. For other agents, such as vatalanib, contrasting outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients have been reported: the final results of these trials are expected in 2006. However, several key questions remain to be addressed, regarding the choice of an adequate dose or schedule, the presence of "off-target" effects, the safety of long-term administration, and the research of new clinical end points or methodological approaches for the optimal clinical development of these agents.

Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer

Since the molecular revolution of the 1980s, knowledge of the aetiology of cancer has increased considerably, which has led to the discovery and development of targeted therapies tailored to inhibit cancer-specific pathways. The introduction and refinement of rapid, high-throughput screening technologies over the past decade has greatly facilitated this targeted discovery and development process. Here, we describe the discovery and continuing development of sorafenib (previously known as BAY 43-9006), the first oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf and affects tumour signalling and the tumour vasculature. The discovery cycle of sorafenib (Nexavar; Bayer Pharmaceuticals) - from initial screening for a lead compound to FDA approval for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in December 2005 - was completed in just 11 years, with approval being received approximately 5 years after the initiation of the first Phase I trial.

Sorafenib

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor that was recently approved for use in metastatic renal cancer. It is currently undergoing investigation in locally advanced renal cancer and in other tumor types.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sorafenib was initially developed as an inhibitor of Raf kinase; however, it has broad spectrum activity against multiple tyrosine kinases, including angiogenic factors VEGFR and PDGFR. Common toxicities experienced with sorafenib include hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, rash, diarrhea and fatigue. Early clinical trials suggested that sorafenib acts as a cytostatic agent, as many patients experienced prolonged disease stabilization but insufficient tumor shrinkage to meet RECIST criteria for response. To assess whether sorafenib's growth inhibition translated into a clinical benefit, a phase II randomized discontinuation trial was designed. This trial demonstrated that sorafenib increased progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer; the phase II data were confirmed in a large international phase III trial.

SUMMARY

In this review, we will discuss the clinical development of sorafenib and its role in the treatment of renal cancer. Additionally, we will highlight critical methods of clinical trial design and biomarker development that contribute to the development of sorafenib.

Sorafenib for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Objective:

To summarize the pharmacology, development, and clinical application of sorafenib, a specific tyrosine kinase and vascular growth factor inhibitor, for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Data Sources:

Clinical literature, including both primary studies and review articles, was obtained by searching MEDLINE (1966–May 2006), using the search terms BAY 43-9006, sorafenib, renal cell carcinoma, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Additional information was supplied by the manufacturer, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Review articles, abstracts, and clinical studies related to sorafenib were analyzed. An evaluation of the research exploring sorafenib as a potential therapy for RCC was conducted. Relevant information was then selected and is reviewed in this article.

Data Synthesis:

Knowledge of the cellular abnormalities that can cause solid tumors has led to the development of medications that block these pathways. Sorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that both blocks the Raf kinase pathway and inhibits vascular growth factors. Phase I and II trials have demonstrated that sorafenib has activity against RCC. Dermatologic reactions (rash, desquamation), fatigue, and hypertension have been the most commonly seen treatment-related adverse events. Sorafenib received FDA approval in December 2005 for treatment of advanced RCC.

Conclusions:

Sorafenib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor effective in the treatment of RCC.

Adjuvant Therapy of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a highly variable natural history and carries a dismal prognosis. Unlike many other tumors, RCC is generally unresponsive to cytotoxic, hormonal, and radiation adjuvant therapies after cytoreductive surgery. Different modalities of treatment have been tried and tested with modest success. Until recently, only immunotherapies such as interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha have been shown to provide a response, albeit in a minority of patients and often with severe treatment-associated toxicities. Other adjuvant therapies, such as active specific immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin and autologous renal tumor cell vaccines, have not provided alternative solutions. Recent approaches include heat-shock protein peptide complex 96 vaccine and cG250 monoclonal antibody therapy. Novel targeted therapies have been developed using our knowledge of the molecular genetics that belie RCC. This culminated in sorafenib and sunitinib, the first Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for RCC in more than a decade in the United States. The future will see further trials being carried out in the development of targeted therapies with emphasis placed on patient selection. Staging systems will need to be updated to integrate molecular biomarkers, which could potentially act not just as diagnostic and prognostic predictors, but also as tools for appropriate patient selection for treatment. In the future, this could potentially lead us to our ultimate goal of personalized medicine.

Side effects of anti-cancer molecular-targeted therapies (not monoclonal antibodies)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Major advances have been achieved in the field of biologically based therapies for cancer in the last few years, and some of the recently approved 'molecular-targeted therapies' are now being used in daily clinical practice. We aim to review some aspects of the toxicity and safety of small-molecule anti-cancer molecular-targeted therapies, with some insights into the physiopathology and predictive factors of toxicity, its correlation with response, and how to prevent and overcome it.

RECENT FINDINGS

As a whole, small-molecule molecular-targeted therapies are well tolerated. Their toxic profile is favorable, but during the drug development process some severe (sometimes lethal) toxicities have been observed, such as interstitial lung disease in patients treated with drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Pharmacogenomic studies can help us to identify those patients with well characterized polymorphisms, and to define the best-tolerated and most effective treatments.

SUMMARY

Molecular-targeted therapies have a good toxicity profile in general; however, some patients are exquisitely sensitive to developing particular and severe toxicities related to these drugs.

A rapid and sensitive method for determination of sorafenib in human plasma using a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay

A rapid, sensitive and specific method was developed and validated using LC/MS/MS for determination of sorafenib in human plasma. Sample preparation involved a single protein precipitation step by the addition of 0.1 mL of plasma with 0.5 mL acetonitrile. Analysis of the compounds of interest including the internal standard ([(2)H(3)(15)N] sorafenib) was achieved on a Waters X-Terra C(18) (150 mm x 2.1mm i.d., 3.5 microm) analytical column using a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/10 mM ammonium acetate (65:35, v/v) containing 0.1% formic acid and isocratic flow at 0.2 mL/min for 6 min. The analytes were monitored by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray positive ionization. Linear calibration curves were generated over the range of 7.3-7260 ng/mL for the human plasma samples with values for the coefficient of determination of >0.96. The values for both within day and between day precision and accuracy were well within the generally accepted criteria for analytical methods (<15%).

Emerging antiangiogenic agents in lung cancer

The success of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab in numerous tumor types including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has spurred the development of additional novel antiangiogenic agents with distinct mechanisms of action. These include the small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors ZD6474, sorafenib, sunitinib malate, and AG-013736, all of which inhibit VEGF receptor TK activity. Because of the structural similarity of the different receptor TKs, these receptor TK inhibitors inhibit multiple receptors in addition to VEGF receptor. Vascular endothelial growth factor Trap, a novel, high-affinity molecule with specificity to the VEGF molecule, was generated as a fusion molecule of the VEGF receptor extracellular domain and the Fc portion of immunoglobulin (Ig) G1. Data from phase I/II trials have indicated the clinical feasibility of these agents, which are currently being investigated in phase II/III trials.

Phase II Placebo-Controlled Randomized Discontinuation Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

This phase II randomized discontinuation trial evaluated the effects of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006), an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the tumor and vasculature, on tumor growth in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients initially received oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily during the initial run-in period. After 12 weeks, patients with changes in bidimensional tumor measurements that were less than 25% from baseline were randomly assigned to sorafenib or placebo for an additional 12 weeks; patients with ≥ 25% tumor shrinkage continued open-label sorafenib; patients with ≥ 25% tumor growth discontinued treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of randomly assigned patients remaining progression free at 24 weeks after the initiation of sorafenib.

Results

Of 202 patients treated during the run-in period, 73 patients had tumor shrinkage of ≥ 25%. Sixty-five patients with stable disease at 12 weeks were randomly assigned to sorafenib (n = 32) or placebo (n = 33). At 24 weeks, 50% of the sorafenib-treated patients were progression free versus 18% of the placebo-treated patients (P = .0077). Median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was significantly longer with sorafenib (24 weeks) than placebo (6 weeks; P = .0087). Median overall PFS was 29 weeks for the entire renal cell carcinoma population (n = 202). Sorafenib was readministered in 28 patients whose disease progressed on placebo; these patients continued on sorafenib until further progression, for a median of 24 weeks. Common adverse events were skin rash/desquamation, hand-foot skin reaction, and fatigue; 9% of patients discontinued therapy, and no patients died from toxicity.

Conclusion

Sorafenib has significant disease-stabilizing activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and is tolerable with chronic daily therapy.

The place of VEGF inhibition in the current management of renal cell carcinoma

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is overexpressed in around 80% of patients with clear cell carcinoma of the kidney owing to the inactivation of von Hippel Lindau gene activity. VEGF stimulates angiogenesis and acts as an autocrine growth factor. A number of different agents are now available which target VEGF and its signalling pathways. A significant body of evidence has accumulated demonstrating that antagonism of VEGF and its downstream pathways is clinically useful in a significant proportion of patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Enough data is now available to recommend that patients with metastatic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney should at some point during the course of their disease be offered entry into a clinical trial enabling exposure to a targeted inhibitor of VEGF or its signalling pathways. Assuming early clinical trial data is substantiated by ongoing registration studies, efforts should be made to minimise the time taken between licensing and general availability of these active agents.

Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer

In randomized phase III trials two anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) approaches have yielded survival benefit in patients with metastatic cancer. In one approach, the addition of bevacizumab, a VEGF-specific antibody, to standard chemotherapy improved overall survival in colorectal and lung cancer patients and progression-free survival in breast cancer patients. In the second approach, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors that block VEGF receptor and other kinases in both endothelial and cancer cells, demonstrated survival benefit in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and renal-cell-carcinoma patients. By contrast, adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy failed to increase survival in patients with previously treated and refractory metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, addition of vatalanib, a kinase inhibitor developed as a VEGF receptor-selective agent, to chemotherapy did not show a similar benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. These contrasting responses raise critical questions about how these agents work and how to combine them optimally. We summarize three of the many potential mechanisms of action of anti-VEGF agents, and also discuss progress relating to the identification of potential biomarkers for anti-VEGF-agent efficacy in humans.

Current status and perspective of antiangiogenic therapy for cancer: urinary cancer

Angiogenesis is considered a prerequisite for solid tumor growth. Antiangiogenic therapy reduces tumor size and extends host survival in a number of preclinical animal models. However, in humans antiangiogenic therapy is a poor promoter of tumor regression and has shown minimal effect on patient survival. In urinary cancers, such as renal cell cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer, advanced refractory disease is a good candidate for antiangiogenic therapy because of its resistance to ordinary chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Unique characteristics of molecular mechanisms underlie the induction of angiogenesis in urinary cancers. In this review, we summarize these unique mechanisms and review the results of clinical trials of antiangiogenic therapy for these cancers, discussing prospects and problems relating to antiangiogenic therapy.

Phase I trial of sorafenib and gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors with an expanded cohort in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

With its potent inhibitory effects against Raf-1 kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, sorafenib is a novel oral anticancer agent targeting signal transduction and angiogenic pathways. This study is designed to combine sorafenib and gemcitabine due to their compatibility in preclinical models and nonoverlapping clinical toxicities.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

An initial dose-escalation part of the study enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expanded cohort at the recommended dose for patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Sorafenib is administered continuously, whereas gemcitabine is given at 1,000 mg/m2 weekly x 7 followed by 1 rest week, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients have been enrolled overall, including 19 in the dose-escalation part and 23 in the extended pancreatic cancer cohort. Demographics were as follows: male-to-female ratio = 26:16; median age = 61 years (range 39-83 years); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0:1:2 ratio = 16:21:5. The recommended dose of this combination is sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events of all causalities were thrombocytopenia (28.6%), lymphopenia (21.4%), lipase elevation (19%), neutropenia (16.7%), and fatigue (14.3%). Antitumor activity was observed in both groups, with 2 (10.5%) confirmed partial responses in ovarian cancer and 12 patients (63.2%) with disease stabilization in the dose-escalation part; 13 patients (56.5%) achieved disease stabilization in the pancreatic cohort. There was no consistent pharmacokinetic drug-to-drug interaction between sorafenib and gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib and gemcitabine are well tolerated in combination; further evaluations in pancreatic and ovarian cancers are warranted.

Tailoring Ras-pathway--inhibitor combinations for cancer therapy

Constitutive activation of Ras pathways plays a critical role in cancer development and maintenance. Inhibitors of such pathways are already in use for cancer therapy, with significant but as yet only partial success in the most deadly types of human cancers, against which even combinations of Ras-pathway inhibitors with classic cytotoxic drugs or irradiation are insufficient. Combinations of farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTI's), inhibitors of Ras pathways, are now in use in clinical trials. In this review we analyze possible reasons for the limited efficacy--including the diverse and sometimes even contradictory effects of active Ras pathways in tumor cells--and propose possible alternative methods of tailoring Ras-pathway inhibitor combinations for cancer therapy. Such tailoring is now possible thanks to increased knowledge of the complexity of Ras pathways, their cooperation with other oncogenic pathways, and their "addictive" nature. We provide examples demonstrating that this knowledge can be translated into useful drug combinations that disrupt multiple oncogenic pathways and hit a weak point of a given tumor cell. One such example is combination treatment with a Ras inhibitor and a glycolysis blocker for pancreatic tumor cells. The future design of such potential drug combination therapies and the follow-up of their outcome will undoubtedly be facilitated by gene-expression profiling and proteomic methods.

Results of a phase I trial of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors, including colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006), a multiple kinase inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and tumor angiogenesis by targeting Raf kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. In phase I studies, sorafenib demonstrated single-agent activity in patients with advanced solid tumors and was successfully combined with oxaliplatin in preclinical studies. This phase I study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of sorafenib in combination with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled in the initial dose-escalation part (cohorts 1, 2A, and 2B) and 10 additional patients with oxaliplatin-refractory colorectal cancer were subsequently enrolled in an extension part (cohort 3). Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 was given on day 1 of a 3-week cycle and oral sorafenib was administered continuously from day 4 of cycle 1 at 200 mg twice daily (cohort 1) or 400 mg twice daily (cohorts 2A, 2B, and 3).

RESULTS

Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Common adverse events were diarrhea (52% of patients in the dose-escalation part and 20% in the extension part), sensory neuropathy (44% and 20%), and dermatologic toxicities (41% and 80%). No pharmacokinetic interaction between sorafenib and oxaliplatin was detectable. Two patients with gastric cancer had a partial response. Forty-three percent of patients in cohorts 1 and 2A/B and 78% of patients in cohort 3 exhibited stable disease for >or=10 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Continuous oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was safely combined with oxaliplatin without detectable drug interactions and showed preliminary antitumor activity in this phase I study. This dose is recommended for phase II studies.

Targeting Angiogenesis in Lung Cancer

The prognosis for the majority of patients with lung cancer remains poor, and treatment strategies including newer generation chemotherapeutics have not improved survival. New approaches are required to further improve patient outcome and survival. Recently, key molecules involved in signal transduction pathways that contribute to tumor growth have been identified as therapeutic targets, particularly molecules involved in cellular proliferation and angiogenesis. Novel therapeutics that specifically target angiogenesis have shown promise as single agents and in combination with standard chemotherapy. The results of recent studies validate the use of this class of targeted therapeutics as an important new treatment modality in cancer therapy. This review will focus on a discussion of antiangiogenic therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.