201
|
Ketamine for refractory chronic pain: a one-year follow-up study. Pain 2021; 163:690-701. [PMID: 34252909 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ketamine is often used in pain clinics for refractory chronic pain, but its long-term efficacy is poorly reported. The main objective was to assess the long-term effect of ketamine on pain and health variables in patients with refractory chronic pain.A prospective, multicenter, one-year follow-up observational study (NCT03319238) was conducted in thirty French pain clinics where ketamine is commonly prescribed. This study focused on patients with one ketamine delivery procedure (n=256). The primary endpoint was pain intensity (0-10 numerical pain rating scale) before and after ketamine every month for one year. Secondary outcomes aimed to identify pain trajectories by semi-parametric mixture models and to collect adverse events.The following data were obtained for 256 patients: pain intensity decreased significantly (6.8±1.8, n=240 at baseline versus 5.7±1.8, n=93 at 12 months, p<0.001). The effect size of the main endpoint was 0.61 (95%CI: [0.40; 0.80]; p<0.001). Three pain trajectories were identified: 16.0% of patients in "mild pain" (mostly neuropathic pain), 35.3% in "moderate pain" and 45.7% in "severe pain" (mostly fibromyalgia) trajectory. Neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia presented opposite outcomes, pain severity being associated with anxiety, depression and a poorer quality of life. Adverse events occurred at one week in 108/218 [50%] patients and this rate gradually decreased throughout the follow-up.This real-life study in chronic pain identified distinct pain trajectories and predictive variables of ketamine efficacy. It is now pivotal to further study and optimize the subtyping of patients to provide the most effective and safe ketamine treatment in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
|
202
|
Oh J. Evaluation and diagnosis of neuropathic pain. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.7.477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Thorough evaluation and an accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain are essential for effective treatment. The therapeutic approach and choice of medication for neuropathic pain are different from those for other kinds of nociceptive pain. Therefore, this study aimed to present the current evaluation and diagnostic methods for neuropathic pain.Current Concepts: Grading of the certainty of the presence of neuropathic pain according to the results of clinical history, neurological examination, and confirmatory tests improves the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire, Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions, and PainDETECT are mainly used for neuropathic pain screening. During physical examination, sensory nerve function tests are more critical than other nervous system examination items, including the test of the sense of touch with a cotton swab and the sense of vibration with a tuning fork. In addition, pain sensation using pins and temperature sensation using cold metal are tested to check for nociceptive pathway abnormalities. Diagnostic tests include imaging tests, nerve conduction tests, and other neurophysiological tests, such as quantitative sensory function tests, autonomic nerve function tests, and blood tests.Discussion and Conclusion: To diagnose neuropathic pain, physicians should first determine whether patient symptoms match the characteristics of neuropathic pain. If there is a possibility of neuropathic pain, physicians should perform a neurological screening examination and a proper diagnostic test to identify the cause of pain.
Collapse
|
203
|
Sohn E. Treatment of neuropathic pain. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.7.484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Neuropathic pain presents a therapeutic challenge because patients cannot be relieved from it, even when all known medical options have been tried. Several treatment guidelines have been provided, and several pharmacotherapies have been proposed with non-pharmacological treatments. This study aimed to present the current pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used to treat patients with neuropathic pain. Furthermore, several treatment guidelines for neuropathic pain are compared.Current Concepts: Tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentinoids, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are the first-line agents recommended by clinical guidelines in several countries. Tramadol and topical agents are recommended as second-line agents. Opioids and cannabinoids are recommended as third-line agents; cannabinoids are recommended by Canadian treatment guidelines. Combination therapy may be more effective because it results in synergistic pain-relieving effects, and the individual drug dose may be lower. Non-pharmacologic treatment is recommended as third-line or supplementary management because of the lack of evidence.Discussion and Conclusion: Several guidelines have recommended similar drugs; however, it is impossible to completely cure neuropathic pain. Therefore, therapeutic goals must be realistically discussed to improve patient compliance. In addition, additional studies based on pathophysiological mechanisms should be conducted to improve the management of neuropathic pain.
Collapse
|
204
|
Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Meeus M, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Penen F, De Baerdemaecker T, Haenen V, Bernar K, De Vrieze T, De Groef A. Quantitative Sensory Testing in Women After Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Clin J Pain 2021; 37:538-564. [PMID: 33883413 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a noninvasive technique to evaluate functioning of the somatosensory system. In many women surgically treated for breast cancer (BC), somatosensory functioning is disturbed with high prevalence of sensory loss and/or pain. The aims of this systematic review were (1) to summarize literature about QST methods; (2) to summarize the results within women surgically treated for BC (patients and survivors); (3) to compare QST results between women surgically treated for BC with and without pain; and (4) to compare the results between women surgically treated for BC and women without history of BC. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted up to February 2020. Included studies had to report on QST methods (mechanical or thermal detection-pain thresholds, pressure pain thresholds [PPT], temporal summation [TS], or conditioned pain modulation [CPM]) in women over 18 years with-without pain, who had undergone unilateral surgery for BC. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included. Discrepancies in QST methods were greatest for TS and CPM. A local disturbance in thermal detection and an increased pain facilitation were found in BC survivors with pain in the surgical area. BC survivors with upper limb pain had significantly lower PPT at the surgical area and PPT were also significantly lower compared with women without history of BC, at affected and nonaffected sides for both local and remote body regions. DISCUSSION Standardized QST incorporating assessments of CPM is warranted in order to draw conclusions about neurobiological mechanisms of pain and somatosensory disturbances after surgical treatment for BC and to enhance mechanism-based management of these sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| | - Elien Van der Gucht
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for Lymphedema, UZ Leuven-University Hospitals Leuven
| | | | - Frauke Penen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| | | | - Vincent Haenen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| | - Koen Bernar
- The Leuven Centre for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, MOVANT, Antwerp
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Increased Expression of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin in Chronic Constriction Injury of Rat Nerve. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22137105. [PMID: 34281158 PMCID: PMC8268825 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a well-known cytokine for T helper 2 inflammatory responses. A nerve injury activates the neuroinflammation cascade and neuron-glia interaction in dorsal root ganglions (DRG)s, leading to neuropathic pain. Therefore, this study was to investigate the role of TSLP after nerve injury. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided as an experimental group with chronic constriction injury (CCI) to the sciatic nerve and a control group. The mechanical pain threshold response was determined by calibration forceps. After assessment of mechanical allodynia, the ipsilateral spinal cord, DRG, sciatic nerve and skin were harvested. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to identify cell types with various markers. Western blot analyses were performed to evaluate protein expressions. Mechanical allodynia developed after CCI and persisted for the next 14 days. Astrocyte reactions occurred and continued until day 14, too. After CCI, DRG and the sciatic nerve also had significantly increased expressions of TSLP/TSLP-R/STAT5. The TSLPR was localized to sensory neuronal endings innervating the skin. This study is the first to demonstrate that the TSLP complex and the STAT5 pathway in nerve are potential therapeutic targets because of their roles in pain regulation after nerve injury.
Collapse
|
206
|
Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Gomez-Varela D, Erdmann G, Kaschube K, Segelcke D, Schmidt M. A proteome signature for acute incisional pain in dorsal root ganglia of mice. Pain 2021; 162:2070-2086. [PMID: 33492035 PMCID: PMC8208099 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT After surgery, acute pain is still managed insufficiently and may lead to short-term and long-term complications including chronic postsurgical pain and an increased prescription of opioids. Thus, identifying new targets specifically implicated in postoperative pain is of utmost importance to develop effective and nonaddictive analgesics. Here, we used an integrated and multimethod workflow to reveal unprecedented insights into proteome dynamics in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of mice after plantar incision (INC). Based on a detailed characterization of INC-associated pain-related behavior profiles, including a novel paradigm for nonevoked pain, we performed quantitative mass-spectrometry-based proteomics in DRG 1 day after INC. Our data revealed a hitherto unknown INC-regulated protein signature in DRG with changes in distinct proteins and cellular signaling pathways. In particular, we show the differential regulation of 44 protein candidates, many of which are annotated with pathways related to immune and inflammatory responses such as MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinases signaling. Subsequent orthogonal assays comprised multiplex Western blotting, bioinformatic protein network analysis, and immunolabeling in independent mouse cohorts to validate (1) the INC-induced regulation of immune/inflammatory pathways and (2) the high priority candidate Annexin A1. Taken together, our results propose novel potential targets in the context of incision and, therefore, represent a highly valuable resource for further mechanistic and translational studies of postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - David Gomez-Varela
- Max-Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Somatosensory Signaling and Systems Biology Group, Goettingen, Germany
| | | | - Katharina Kaschube
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Daniel Segelcke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Manuela Schmidt
- Max-Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Somatosensory Signaling and Systems Biology Group, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Heutehaus L, Schuld C, Solinas D, Hensel C, Kämmerer T, Weidner N, Rupp R, Franz S. Revisiting the Examination of Sharp/Dull Discrimination as Clinical Measure of Spinothalamic Tract Integrity. Front Neurol 2021; 12:677888. [PMID: 34276538 PMCID: PMC8280296 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.677888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Revisiting the sharp/dull discrimination as clinical measure of spinothalamic tract function considering the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Three clinically relevant factors were evaluated as to their impact on reliability: (1) the localization of dermatomes in relation to the sensory level, (2) the examination tool, and (3) the threshold of correct answers for grading of a preserved sharp/dull discrimination. Design: Prospective monocentric psychometric study. Setting: Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Participants: Convenient sample of 21 individuals with subacute spinal cord injury (age: 31–82 years) and 20 individuals without spinal cord injury (age: 24–63 years). Assessment: All participants underwent three assessments for sharp/dull discrimination, applying five commonly used examination tools in seven dermatomes, performed by three trained examiners under conditions in accordance with ISNCSCI. Main Outcome Measures: Assessment of interrater reliability by determining both the Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficient and the percentage agreement between raters. Data were dichotomized regarding the ISNCSCI threshold. Results: Interrater reliability in individuals with SCI was overall substantial (κ = 0.68; CI 0.679–0.681) and moderate (κ = 0.54; CI 0.539–0.543) in dermatomes below the sensory level. All applied tools led to at least moderate reliability below the sensory level (lowest κ = 0.44; CI 0.432–0.440), with the officially endorsed safety pin achieving the highest (substantial) reliability (κ = 0.64; CI 0.638–0.646). Percentage agreement differed between non-SCI (97.3%) and formally intact above level dermatomes in SCI (89.2%). Conclusions: Sharp/dull discrimination as a common clinical examination technique for spinothalamic tract function is a reliable assessment. Independent from the used examination tools, reliability was substantial, with the medium-sized safety pin delivering the most favorable results. Notwithstanding this, all other tools could be considered if a safety pin is not available. Regarding interrater reliability and guessing probability, a threshold of 80% correct responses for preserved sharp/dull discrimination appears to be most suitable, which is in line with current clinical approaches and ISNCSCI. The causal attribution of the identified differences in sharp/dull discrimination between clinically intact dermatomes of individuals with SCI and unaffected dermatomes of individuals without SCI requires future work. Clinical Trial Registration Number (German Clinical Trials Register): DRKS00015334 (https://www.drks.de).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Heutehaus
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schuld
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Solinas
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Hensel
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Kämmerer
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Norbert Weidner
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Rupp
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Franz
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Cummins TM, English O, Minnis H, Stahl D, O’Connor RC, Bannister K, McMahon SB, Ougrin D. Assessment of Somatosensory Function and Self-harm in Adolescents. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2116853. [PMID: 34255048 PMCID: PMC8278268 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Self-harm is a risk factor for suicide in adolescents, with the prevalence highest in young people in group and residential care programs. Although no established risk factors for self-harm exist, adolescents who self-harm may have decreased pain sensitivity, but this has not been systematically investigated. Objective To assess somatosensory function using quantitative sensory testing (QST) in children and adolescents living in care grouped by the number of episodes of self-harm in the past year and compare their somatosensory profiles with community control participants to investigate associations with the incidence or frequency of self-harm. Design, Setting, and Participants Recruitment for this cross-sectional study began January 2019 and ended March 2020. Exclusion criteria included intellectual disability (intelligence quotient <70), autism spectrum disorder, or recent serious injury. Children and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with no underlying health conditions were recruited from local authority residential care settings in Glasgow, UK, and schools and youth groups in London and Glasgow, UK. The volunteer sample of 64 participants included adolescents ages 13 to 17 years (34 [53%] females; 50 [78%] living in residential care; mean [SD] age, 16.34 [1.01] years) with varying incidents of self-harm in the past year (no episodes, 31 [48%]; 1-4 episodes, 12 [19%]; and ≥5 episodes, 2 [33%]). Exposures Participants were tested using a standardized QST protocol to establish baseline somatosensory function. Main Outcomes and Measures Associations between somatosensory sensitivity, incidence and frequency of self-harm, residential status, age, gender, and prescription medication were calculated. Secondary outcomes assessed whether self-harm was associated with specific types of tests (ie, painful or nonpainful). Results A total of 64 participants ages 13 to 17 years completed testing (mean [SD] age, 16.3 [1.0] years; 34 [53%.] females and 30 [47%] males; 50 [78%] living in group homes). Adolescents with 5 or more self-harm incidences showed significant pain hyposensitivity compared with community control participants after adjusting for age, gender, and prescription drug use (SH group with 5 or more episodes vs control: -1.03 [95% CI, -1.47 to -0.60]; P < .001). Hyposensitivity also extended to nonpainful stimuli, similarly adjusted (SH group with 5 or more episodes vs control: -1.73; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.84; P < .001). Pressure pain threshold accounted for most of the observed variance (31.1% [95% CI, 10.5% to 44.7%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that sensory hyposensitivity is a phenotype of Adolescents who self-harm and that pressure pain threshold has clinical potential as a quick, inexpensive, and easily interpreted test to identify adolescents at increased risk of repeated self-harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatum M. Cummins
- Neurorestoration, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Central Modulation of Pain, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver English
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Minnis
- Adverse Childhood Experiences Clinical and Research Centre, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rory C. O’Connor
- Suicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Bannister
- Central Modulation of Pain, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen B. McMahon
- Neurorestoration, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dennis Ougrin
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Sloan G, Selvarajah D, Tesfaye S. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17:400-420. [PMID: 34050323 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-021-00496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and is associated with increased mortality, lower-limb amputations and distressing painful neuropathic symptoms (painful DSPN). Our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease has largely been derived from animal models, which have identified key potential mechanisms. However, effective therapies in preclinical models have not translated into clinical trials and we have no universally accepted disease-modifying treatments. Moreover, the condition is generally diagnosed late when irreversible nerve damage has already taken place. Innovative point-of-care devices have great potential to enable the early diagnosis of DSPN when the condition might be more amenable to treatment. The management of painful DSPN remains less than optimal; however, studies suggest that a mechanism-based approach might offer an enhanced benefit in certain pain phenotypes. The management of patients with DSPN involves the control of individualized cardiometabolic targets, a multidisciplinary approach aimed at the prevention and management of foot complications, and the timely diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. Here, we discuss the latest advances in the mechanisms of DSPN and painful DSPN, originating both from the periphery and the central nervous system, as well as the emerging diagnostics and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Sloan
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dinesh Selvarajah
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Solomon Tesfaye
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Draxler P, Moen A, Galek K, Boghos A, Ramazanova D, Sandkühler J. Spontaneous, Voluntary, and Affective Behaviours in Rat Models of Pathological Pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:672711. [PMID: 35295455 PMCID: PMC8915731 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.672711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In pain patients affective and motivational reactions as well as impairment of daily life activities dominate the clinical picture. In contrast, many rodent pain models have been established on the basis of mechanical hypersensitivity testing. Up to today most rodent studies on pain still rely on reflexive withdrawal responses only. This discrepancy has likely contributed to the low predictive power of preclinical pain models for novel therapies. Here, we used a behavioural test array for rats to behaviourally evaluate five aetiologically distinct pain models consisting of inflammatory-, postsurgical-, cephalic-, neuropathic- and chemotherapy-induced pain. We assessed paralleling clinical expressions and comorbidities of chronic pain with an array of behavioural tests to assess anxiety, social interaction, distress, depression, and voluntary/spontaneous behaviours. Pharmacological treatment of the distinct pain conditions was performed with pathology-specific and clinically efficacious analgesics as gabapentin, sumatriptan, naproxen, and codeine. We found that rats differed in their manifestation of symptoms depending on the pain model and that pathology-specific analgesics also reduced the associated behavioural parameters. Based on all behavioural test performed, we screened for tests that can discriminate experimental groups on the basis of reflexive as well as non-sensory, affective parameters. Together, we propose a set of non-evoked behaviours with a comparable predictive power to mechanical threshold testing for each pain model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Draxler
- Division of Neurophysiology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aurora Moen
- Division of Neurophysiology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karolina Galek
- Division of Neurophysiology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ani Boghos
- Division of Neurophysiology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dariga Ramazanova
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS) Section for Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jürgen Sandkühler
- Division of Neurophysiology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Kersebaum D, Fabig SC, Sendel M, Muntean AC, Baron R, Hüllemann P. Revealing the time course of laser-evoked potential habituation by high temporal resolution analysis. Eur J Pain 2021; 25:2112-2128. [PMID: 34155707 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Reduced laser-evoked potential (LEP) habituation indicates abnormal central pain processing. But the paradigm (four stimulation blocks a 25 stimuli) is time consuming and potentially omits important information on the exact habituation time course. This study examined whether a high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis (dividing the four stimulation blocks into 12 analysis blocks) can answer the following questions: (a) After how many stimuli does LEP habituation occur? (b) Is there a difference in LEP habituation in younger versus older subjects? (c) Is HTR applicable on radiculopathy patients? METHODS EEG data of 129 subjects were included. Thirty-four young healthy and 28 advanced-aged healthy subjects were tested with LEPs on the hand dorsum. Thirty-seven radiculopathy patients and 30 controls were tested with LEPs on the L3 dermatome. The EEG data of the hand dorsa have been analysed conventionally and with HTR analysis. The applicability of HTR has been tested on radiculopathy patients and respective controls. RESULTS HTR was well feasible in young healthy subjects and revealed a strong habituation effect during the first 25 stimuli (i.e. within the first 5 min). After approximately 48 stimuli, no further significant habituation was detectable. LEP amplitudes were higher in young subjects. HTR was unsuitable for elderly subjects and middle-aged radiculopathy patients. CONCLUSIONS In young healthy subjects, HTR allows a shortening of the test protocol while providing a detailed information on the time course of LEP habituation. A shorter protocol might be useful for the applicability of the LEP paradigm for clinical and experimental settings as well as pharmacological studies. SIGNIFICANCE The usage of high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis in young healthy subjects enables a short test protocol and provides the exact time course of laser-evoked potential habituation. This can be useful for the examination of neurological conditions affecting younger patients and for pharmacological studies. HTR was inapplicable in advanced-aged subjects and patients with radiculopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Kersebaum
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sophie-Charlotte Fabig
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Manon Sendel
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexandra Cristina Muntean
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Philipp Hüllemann
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Hurtado-Lorenzo A, Honig G, Weaver SA, Larkin PB, Heller C. Chronic Abdominal Pain in IBD Research Initiative: Unraveling Biological Mechanisms and Patient Heterogeneity to Personalize Treatment and Improve Clinical Outcomes. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2021; 3:otab034. [PMID: 36776666 PMCID: PMC9802354 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Hurtado-Lorenzo
- Research Department, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, New York, New York, USA,Address correspondence to: Andrés Hurtado-Lorenzo, PhD, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, 733 3rd Ave Suite 510, New York, NY 10017, USA ()
| | - Gerard Honig
- Research Department, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Paul B Larkin
- Research Department, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caren Heller
- Research Department, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Bergmann M, Heidbreder A, Stefani A, Raccagni C, Brandauer E, Rudzki D, Fischer MB, Rossmanith E, Pasztorek M, Löscher WN, Högl B, Wanschitz JV. Signs of sympathetic and endothelial cell activation in the skin of patients with restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med 2021; 84:227-236. [PMID: 34174707 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate skin biopsies of patients with early- and late onset restless legs syndrome (RLS) for concomitant small fiber neuropathy (SFN) and to determine cutaneous sympathetic innervation and microvascularization in comparison to healthy individuals. METHODS Density of intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENFD), adrenergic nerve fibers and dermal capillaries was analyzed by immunofluorescence for PGP9.5, tyrosine hydroxylase and endothelial markers CD31 and CD105 in skin biopsies of 11 individuals with RLS and 8 age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS IENFD did not differ between RLS and controls, but two RLS patients with comorbid impaired glucose metabolism fulfilled morphometric criteria of SFN according to published normative values. In contrast, dermal nerve bundles of RLS patients showed an increased density of tyrosine hydroxylase+ adrenergic nerve fibers (p < 0.005). Moreover, an increased ratio between immature CD105+ and mature CD31+ endothelial cells within dermal capillaries was observed in RLS (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS SFN, as a potential contributing factor for RLS, should be considered in patients with predisposing comorbidities presenting with burning or shooting pain, dysesthesias and impaired sensory and temperature perception. Evidence of an increased adrenergic innervation of the skin in RLS patients is in accordance with sympathetic hyperactivity while signs of endothelial cell activation may reflect an adaptive response to tissue hypoxia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Bergmann
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Anna Heidbreder
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Ambra Stefani
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Cecilia Raccagni
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria; Department of Neurology, Regional General Hospital, Bolzano, 39100, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Brandauer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Dagmar Rudzki
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Michael B Fischer
- Department for Health Science and Biomedicine, Danube University Krems, Krems, 3500, Austria; Clinic for Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Eva Rossmanith
- Department for Health Science and Biomedicine, Danube University Krems, Krems, 3500, Austria
| | - Markus Pasztorek
- Department for Health Science and Biomedicine, Danube University Krems, Krems, 3500, Austria
| | - Wolfgang N Löscher
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Birgit Högl
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
| | - Julia V Wanschitz
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Reimer M, Sachau J, Forstenpointner J, Baron R. Bedside testing for precision pain medicine. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2021; 15:116-124. [PMID: 33905383 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, the identification of therapy responders has become an increasing focus of pain research. On the basis of laboratory quantitative sensory testing, subgroups of patients were identified, which have been shown to predict treatment response. However, the high cost and time expenditure limits the use of these lab-QST protocols in clinical practice and large clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS Recently, different bedside testing protocols were developed as easy-to-use alternative for lab-QST. In addition, patients can be subgrouped based on their symptoms by use of patient-reported outcome measures. First results suggest that these approaches can be used to stratify patients into pathophysiological-plausible subgroups predictive for treatment response. SUMMARY This review presents recently developed bedside approaches that can be implemented as stratification tools in future clinical trials to realize individualized pain medicine. Being complementary rather than replaceable, future studies should combine questionnaires and sensory testing and apply them prospectively in large clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maren Reimer
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Juliane Sachau
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia Forstenpointner
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Center for Pain and the Brain, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
Mehesz E, Karoui H, Strutton PH, Hughes SW. Exposure to an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment can Modulate Perceptual Correlates of Endogenous Analgesia and Central Sensitization in Healthy Volunteers. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 22:707-714. [PMID: 33465506 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to produce analgesic effects during different experimental and clinical pain states. Despite this, the top-down mechanisms are still poorly understood. In this study, we examined the influence of both a real and sham (ie, the same images in 2D) immersive arctic VR environment on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and in a human surrogate model of central sensitization in 38 healthy volunteers. CPM and acute heat pain thresholds were assessed before and during VR/sham exposure in the absence of any sensitization. In a follow-on study, we used the cutaneous high frequency stimulation model of central sensitization and measured changes in mechanical pain sensitivity in an area of heterotopic sensitization before and during VR/sham exposure. There was an increase in CPM efficiency during the VR condition compared to baseline (P < .01). In the sham condition, there was a decrease in CPM efficiency compared to baseline (P < .01) and the real VR condition (P < .001). Neither real nor sham VR had any effect on pain ratings reported during the conditioning period or on heat pain threshold. There was also an attenuation of mechanical pain sensitivity during the VR condition indicating a lower sensitivity compared to sham (P < .05). We conclude that exposure to an immersive VR environment has no effect over acute pain thresholds but can modulate dynamic CPM responses and mechanical hypersensitivity in healthy volunteers. PERSPECTIVE: This study has demonstrated that exposure to an immersive virtual reality environment can modulate perceptual correlates of endogenous pain modulation and secondary hyperalgesia in a human surrogate pain model. These results suggest that virtual reality could provide a novel mechanism-driven analgesic strategy in patients with altered central pain processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erzsebet Mehesz
- The Nick Davey Laboratory, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hajer Karoui
- The Nick Davey Laboratory, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul H Strutton
- The Nick Davey Laboratory, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sam W Hughes
- The Pain Neuroplasticity and Modulation Laboratory, Brain Research and Imaging Centre (BRIC), School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Perreault T, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Cummings M, Gendron BC. Needling Interventions for Sciatica: Choosing Methods Based on Neuropathic Pain Mechanisms-A Scoping Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:2189. [PMID: 34069357 PMCID: PMC8158699 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Sciatica is a condition often accompanied by neuropathic pain (NP). Acupuncture and dry needling are common treatments for pain, and the current literature supports acupuncture as an effective treatment for sciatica. However, it is unknown if the mechanisms of NP are considered in the delivery of needling interventions for sciatica. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and the effectiveness of needling therapies, to identify common needling practices and to investigate if NP mechanisms are considered in the treatment of sciatica. A scoping review of the literature on needling interventions for sciatica and a review of the literature on mechanisms related to NP and needling interventions were performed. Electronic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to August, 2020 to identify relevant papers. Reference lists of included papers were also manually screened and a related-articles search through PubMed was performed on all included articles. Mapping of the results included description of included studies, summary of results, and identification of gaps in the existing literature. Ten articles were included. All studies used acupuncture for the treatment of sciatica, no studies on dry needling were identified. Current evidence supports the efficacy and effectiveness of acupuncture for sciatica, however, no studies considered underlying NP mechanisms in the acupuncture approach for sciatica and the rationale for using acupuncture was inconsistent among trials. This review reveals that neuropathic pain mechanisms are not routinely considered in needling approaches for patients with sciatica. Studies showed acupuncture to be an effective treatment for sciatic pain, however, further research is warranted to explore if needling interventions for sciatica and NP would be more effective if NP mechanisms are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Perreault
- Northern New England Spine Center, Department of Physical Therapy, Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH 03820, USA;
| | - César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mike Cummings
- British Medical Acupuncture Society, London WC1N 3HR, UK;
| | - Barry C. Gendron
- Northern New England Spine Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Musculoskeletal Health and Rehabilitation, Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH 03820, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Enax-Krumova E, Attal N, Bouhassira D, Freynhagen R, Gierthmühlen J, Hansson P, Kuehler BM, Maier C, Sachau J, Segerdahl M, Tölle T, Treede RD, Ventzel L, Baron R, Vollert J. Contralateral Sensory and Pain Perception Changes in Patients With Unilateral Neuropathy. Neurology 2021; 97:e389-e402. [PMID: 34011572 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether contralateral sensory abnormalities in the clinically unaffected area of patients with unilateral neuropathic pain are due to the neuropathy or pain mechanisms. METHODS We analyzed the contralateral clinically unaffected side of patients with unilateral painful or painless neuropathy (peripheral nerve injury [PNI], postherpetic neuropathy [PHN], radiculopathy) by standardized quantitative sensory testing following a validated protocol. Primary outcome was the independent contribution of the following variables on the contralateral sensory function using generalized linear regression models: pain intensity, disease duration, etiology, body area, and sensory patterns in the most painful area. RESULTS Among 424 patients (PNI n = 256, PHN n = 78, radiculopathy n = 90), contralateral sensory abnormalities were frequent in both painful (n = 383) and painless (n = 41) unilateral neuropathy, demonstrating sensory loss for thermal and mechanical nonpainful stimuli and both sensory loss and gain for painful test stimuli. Analysis by etiology revealed contralateral pinprick hyperalgesia in PHN and PNI. Analysis by ipsilateral sensory phenotype demonstrated mirror-image pinprick hyperalgesia in both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia phenotypes. Pain intensity, etiology, and affected body region predicted changes in only single contralateral somatosensory parameters. Disease duration had no impact on the contralateral sensory function. CONCLUSION Mechanisms of sensory loss seem to spread to the contralateral side in both painful and painless neuropathies. Contralateral spread of pinprick hyperalgesia was restricted to the 2 ipsilateral phenotypes that suggest sensitization; this suggest a contribution of descending net facilitation from supraspinal areas, which was reported in rodent models of neuropathic pain but not yet in human patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Enax-Krumova
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Nadine Attal
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Didier Bouhassira
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Rainer Freynhagen
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Janne Gierthmühlen
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Per Hansson
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Bianca M Kuehler
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christoph Maier
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Juliane Sachau
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Märta Segerdahl
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Thomas Tölle
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Rolf-Detlef Treede
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Lise Ventzel
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ralf Baron
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jan Vollert
- From the Department of Neurology (E.E.-K.), BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; INSERM U-987 (N.A., D.B.), Centre D'Evaluation et de Traitement de La Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (N.A., D.B.), Versailles, France; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Hospital Feldafing; Department of Anaesthesiology (R.F.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy (J.G., J.S., R.B.), Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany; Department of Pain Management and Research (P.H.), Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Neuropathic Pain, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (P.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Pain Medicine (B.K., J.V.), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Pain Research (B.K.), Department Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, London, UK; University Hospital of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (C.M.), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; MS Medical Consulting (M.S.); Karolinska Institute (M.S.), Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurology (T.T.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich; Department of Neurophysiology (R.-D.T., J.V.), Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Danish Pain Research Center (L.V.), Department of Clinical Medicine, and Department of Oncology (L.V.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
No pain, still gain (of function): the relation between sensory profiles and the presence or absence of self-reported pain in a large multicenter cohort of patients with neuropathy. Pain 2021; 162:718-727. [PMID: 32868752 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The pathophysiology of pain in neuropathy is complex and may be linked to sensory phenotypes. Quantitative sensory testing, a standardized method to evaluate sensory profiles in response to defined stimuli, assesses functional integrity of small and large nerve fiber afferents and central somatosensory pathways. It has revealed detailed insights into mechanisms of neuropathy, yet it remains unclear if pain directly affects sensory profiles. The main objective of this study was to investigate sensory profiles in patients with various neuropathic conditions, including polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy, and lesions to the central nervous system, in relation to self-reported presence or absence of pain and pain sensitivity using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire. A total of 443 patients (332 painful and 111 painless) and 112 healthy participants were investigated. Overall, loss of sensation was equally prevalent in patients with and without spontaneous pain. Pain thresholds were equally lowered in both patient groups, demonstrating that hyperalgesia and allodynia are just as present in patients not reporting any pain. Remarkably, this was similar for dynamic mechanical allodynia. Hypoalgesia was more pronounced in painful polyneuropathy, whereas hyperalgesia was more frequent in painful mononeuropathy (compared with painless conditions). Self-reported pain sensitivity was significantly higher in painful than in painless neuropathic conditions. Our results reveal the presence of hyperalgesia and allodynia in patients with central and peripheral lesions of the somatosensory system not reporting spontaneous pain. This shows that symptoms and signs of hypersensitivity may not necessarily coincide and that painful and painless neuropathic conditions may mechanistically blend into one another.
Collapse
|
219
|
Safety and efficacy of an equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide: a randomized controlled trial in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain 2021; 162:1104-1115. [PMID: 33044394 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an odorless and colorless gas routinely used as an adjuvant of anesthesia and for short-duration analgesia in various clinical settings mostly in the form of an N2O/O2 50%-50% equimolar mixture (EMONO). Experimental studies have suggested that EMONO could also induce long-lasting analgesic effects related to the blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. We designed the first international multicenter proof of concept randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-hour administration of EMONO or placebo (medical air) on 3 consecutive days up to 1 month after the last administration in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. A total of 240 patients were recruited in 22 centers in France and Germany and randomly assigned to 1 study group (120 per group). Average pain intensity (primary outcome), neuropathic pain characteristics (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory), Patient Global Impression of Change, anxiety, depression, and quality of life were systematically assessed before and after treatment. The changes in average pain intensity between baseline and 7 days after the last administration were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, evoked pain intensity (predefined secondary endpoint) and Patient Global Impression of Change (exploratory endpoint) were significantly improved in the EMONO group, and these effects were maintained up to 4 weeks after the last treatment administration. Mostly transient side effects were reported during the treatment administration. These encouraging results provide a basis for further investigation of the long-term analgesic effects of EMONO in patients with neuropathic pain.
Collapse
|
220
|
Doshi TL, Dworkin RH, Polomano RC, Carr DB, Edwards RR, Finnerup NB, Freeman RL, Paice JA, Weisman SJ, Raja SN. AAAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Neuropathic Pain. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:616-636. [PMID: 33575803 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute neuropathic pain is a significant diagnostic challenge, and it is closely related to our understanding of both acute pain and neuropathic pain. Diagnostic criteria for acute neuropathic pain should reflect our mechanistic understanding and provide a framework for research on and treatment of these complex pain conditions. METHODS The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the American Pain Society (APS), and the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) collaborated to develop the ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) for acute pain. A working group of experts in research and clinical management of neuropathic pain was convened. Group members used literature review and expert opinion to develop diagnostic criteria for acute neuropathic pain, as well as three specific examples of acute neuropathic pain conditions, using the five dimensions of the AAAPT classification of acute pain. RESULTS AAAPT diagnostic criteria for acute neuropathic pain are presented. Application of these criteria to three specific conditions (pain related to herpes zoster, chemotherapy, and limb amputation) illustrates the spectrum of acute neuropathic pain and highlights unique features of each condition. CONCLUSIONS The proposed AAAPT diagnostic criteria for acute neuropathic pain can be applied to various acute neuropathic pain conditions. Both the general and condition-specific criteria may guide future research, assessment, and management of acute neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina L Doshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, and Department of Neurology, Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Rosemary C Polomano
- Division of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, University of Pennsylvania-School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel B Carr
- Public Health and Community Medicine Program, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nanna B Finnerup
- Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, and Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Roy L Freeman
- Center for Autonomic and Peripheral Nerve Disorders, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Judith A Paice
- Cancer Pain Program, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven J Weisman
- Jane B. Pettit Pain and Headache Center, Children's Wisconsin, Departments of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Srinivasa N Raja
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Phenotyping peripheral neuropathic pain in male and female adolescents: pain descriptors, somatosensory profiles, conditioned pain modulation, and child-parent reported disability. Pain 2021; 162:1732-1748. [PMID: 33394878 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuropathic pain (NeuP) can be difficult to diagnose and manage in children. Data regarding prevalence and sex-dependent differences are limited, and more detailed phenotyping is needed. This observational cohort study recruited adolescents (10-17 years) with NeuP or complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). After pain history and NeuP questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing was performed. Individual z-score plots were calculated with body-region control measures and matched to mechanism-related sensory profiles (sensory loss, thermal hyperalgesia, and mechanical hyperalgesia). Conditioned pain modulation was assessed with pressure pain threshold and a contralateral cold conditioning stimulus, and meaningful conditioned pain modulation defined as twice the standard error of measurement. Patients and parents completed validated questionnaires for child quality of life (QoL), pain catastrophizing, and self-reported anxiety/depression. Males (n = 23) and females (n = 43) with NeuP (n = 52) or CRPS (n = 14) reported moderate-severe pain with neuropathic sensory descriptors. Mixed patterns of sensory gain/loss at pain sites were not sex-dependent. Thermal hyperalgesia was common in both NeuP and CRPS, whereas sensory loss occurred only with NeuP and in a smaller proportion than adult cohorts. Conditioned pain modulation was inhibitory in 54%, facilitatory in 14%, and nonresponders had variable cold conditioning sensitivity. Males and females reported marked impairment of QoL, increased emotional distress, and pain catastrophising. Child-parent QoL scores correlated, but catastrophizing scores were discordant when parents or adolescents reported higher anxiety/depression. NeuP in adolescents is associated with significant pain, physical impairment, and psychosocial impairment. Quantifying alterations in somatosensory profiles, descending modulation, child and parent psychological function will inform individualized therapy and stratification for future clinical trials.
Collapse
|
222
|
A randomized, controlled trial of a β2-agonist in painful polyneuropathy. Pain 2021; 162:1364-1373. [PMID: 33181580 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Experimental data have suggested that in neuropathic pain, tricyclic antidepressants may work solely through a β2-agonist action. The aim of this study was to test if the β2-agonist terbutaline relieves painful polyneuropathy. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, 3-way, cross-over trial among patients with painful polyneuropathy. The treatment periods were of 5 weeks' duration and were preceded by 1 week for washout and 1 week for baseline observations. The patients received terbutaline (5-15 mg), imipramine (30-150 mg), or placebo in a random order. Drug doses depended on age and metabolizer status. The change in total pain recorded from ratings in diaries (numeric rating scale [NRS] 0-10) was the primary outcome, and the change in rating of specific pain symptoms (NRS 0-10), patient global impression of change, and sleep disturbance were secondary outcomes. Forty-seven patients were randomized. The median score for total pain changed from NRS 6.4 to 6.1 from baseline to week 5 on terbutaline with an average effect during the treatment period as compared with placebo of 0.13 (95% confidence interval -0.12 to 0.38, P = 0.32). The median score for total pain on imipramine changed from NRS 6.6 to 4.8 with an average effect as compared with placebo of -1.17 (95% confidence interval -1.42 to -0.92, P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were also unaltered by terbutaline but improved by imipramine. The β2-agonist terbutaline has no effect in painful polyneuropathy. β2-agonism seems not to be an important mechanism of action of tricyclic antidepressants in neuropathic pain.
Collapse
|
223
|
Differential response to scrambler therapy by neuropathic pain phenotypes. Sci Rep 2021; 11:10148. [PMID: 33980957 PMCID: PMC8115242 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89667-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Scrambler therapy is a noninvasive electroanalgesia technique designed to remodulate the pain system. Despite growing evidence of its efficacy in patients with neuropathic pain, little is known about the clinical factors associated with treatment outcome. We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-arm trial to assess the efficacy and safety of scrambler therapy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain of various etiologies. A post-hoc analysis was performed to investigate whether cluster analysis of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) profiles could identify a subgroup of patients regarding neuropathic pain phenotype and treatment outcome. Scrambler therapy resulted in a significant decrease in the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score over 2 weeks of treatment (least squares mean of percentage change from baseline, − 15%; 95% CI − 28% to − 2.4%; p < 0.001). The mean score of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference subdimension was also significantly improved (p = 0.022), while the BPI pain composite score was not. Hierarchical clustering based on the NPSI profiles partitioned the patients into 3 clusters with distinct neuropathic pain phenotypes. Linear mixed-effects model analyses revealed differential response to scrambler therapy across clusters (p = 0.003, pain NRS; p = 0.072, BPI interference subdimension). Treatment response to scrambler therapy appears different depending on the neuropathic pain phenotypes, with more favorable outcomes in patients with preferentially paroxysmal pain rather than persistent pain. Further studies are warranted to confirm that capturing neuropathic pain phenotypes can optimize the use of scrambler therapy.
Collapse
|
224
|
Gaynor SM, Bortsov A, Bair E, Fillingim RB, Greenspan JD, Ohrbach R, Diatchenko L, Nackley A, Tchivileva IE, Whitehead W, Alonso AA, Buchheit TE, Boortz-Marx RL, Liedtke W, Park JJ, Maixner W, Smith SB. Phenotypic profile clustering pragmatically identifies diagnostically and mechanistically informative subgroups of chronic pain patients. Pain 2021; 162:1528-1538. [PMID: 33259458 PMCID: PMC8049946 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Traditional classification and prognostic approaches for chronic pain conditions focus primarily on anatomically based clinical characteristics not based on underlying biopsychosocial factors contributing to perception of clinical pain and future pain trajectories. Using a supervised clustering approach in a cohort of temporomandibular disorder cases and controls from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment study, we recently developed and validated a rapid algorithm (ROPA) to pragmatically classify chronic pain patients into 3 groups that differed in clinical pain report, biopsychosocial profiles, functional limitations, and comorbid conditions. The present aim was to examine the generalizability of this clustering procedure in 2 additional cohorts: a cohort of patients with chronic overlapping pain conditions (Complex Persistent Pain Conditions study) and a real-world clinical population of patients seeking treatment at duke innovative pain therapies. In each cohort, we applied a ROPA for cluster prediction, which requires only 4 input variables: pressure pain threshold and anxiety, depression, and somatization scales. In both complex persistent pain condition and duke innovative pain therapies, we distinguished 3 clusters, including one with more severe clinical characteristics and psychological distress. We observed strong concordance with observed cluster solutions, indicating the ROPA method allows for reliable subtyping of clinical populations with minimal patient burden. The ROPA clustering algorithm represents a rapid and valid stratification tool independent of anatomic diagnosis. ROPA holds promise in classifying patients based on pathophysiological mechanisms rather than structural or anatomical diagnoses. As such, this method of classifying patients will facilitate personalized pain medicine for patients with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila M. Gaynor
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrey Bortsov
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric Bair
- Center for Pain Research and Innovation, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roger B. Fillingim
- Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Joel D. Greenspan
- Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Brotman Facial Pain Clinic, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Ohrbach
- Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Luda Diatchenko
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain; Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, School of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea Nackley
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Inna E. Tchivileva
- Center for Pain Research and Innovation, Division of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - William Whitehead
- Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aurelio A. Alonso
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Innovative Pain Therapies, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas E. Buchheit
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Anesthesiology Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard L. Boortz-Marx
- Pain Medicine Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wolfgang Liedtke
- Duke Innovative Pain Therapies, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jongbae J. Park
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - William Maixner
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shad B. Smith
- Center for Translational Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Dickenson A. Why are sodium channel modulators not yet pharmacotherapeutic trailblazers for neuropathic pain? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:1635-1637. [PMID: 33899639 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1917548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Dickenson
- Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Marshall A, Alam U, Themistocleous A, Calcutt N, Marshall A. Novel and Emerging Electrophysiological Biomarkers of Diabetic Neuropathy and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. Clin Ther 2021; 43:1441-1456. [PMID: 33906790 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common complication of diabetes. Small and large peripheral nerve fibers can be involved in DPN. Large nerve fiber damage causes paresthesia, sensory loss, and muscle weakness, and small nerve fiber damage is associated with pain, anesthesia, foot ulcer, and autonomic symptoms. Treatments for DPN and painful DPN (pDPN) pose considerable challenges due to the lack of effective therapies. To meet these challenges, there is a major need to develop biomarkers that can reliably diagnose and monitor progression of nerve damage and, for pDPN, facilitate personalized treatment based on underlying pain mechanisms. METHODS This study involved a comprehensive literature review, incorporating article searches in electronic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, and OVID) and reference lists of relevant articles with the authors' substantial expertise in DPN. This review considered seminal and novel research and summarizes emerging biomarkers of DPN and pDPN that are based on neurophysiological methods. FINDINGS From the evidence gathered from 145 papers, this submission describes emerging clinical neurophysiological methods with potential to act as biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of DPN as well as putative future roles as predictors of response to antineuropathic pain medication in pDPN. Nerve conduction studies only detect large fiber damage and do not capture pathology or dysfunction of small fibers. Because small nerve fiber damage is prominent in DPN, additional biomarkers of small nerve fiber function are needed. Activation of peripheral nociceptor fibers using laser, heat, or targeted electrical stimuli can generate pain-related evoked potentials, which are an objective neurophysiological measure of damage along the small fiber pathways. Assessment of nerve excitability, which provides a surrogate of axonal properties, may detect alterations in function before abnormalities are detected by nerve conduction studies. Microneurography and rate-dependent depression of the Hoffmann-reflex can be used to dissect underlying pain-generating mechanisms arising from the periphery and spinal cord, respectively. Their role in informing mechanistic-based treatment of pDPN as well as facilitating clinical trials design is discussed. IMPLICATIONS The neurophysiological methods discussed, although currently not practical for use in busy outpatient settings, detect small fiber and early large fiber damage in DPN as well as disclosing dominant pain mechanisms in pDPN. They are suited as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers as well as end points in mechanistic clinical trials of DPN and pDPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marshall
- Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Uazman Alam
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Themistocleous
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Nigel Calcutt
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Andrew Marshall
- Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Sachau J, Baron R. Neuropathic pain therapy: a puzzle of different approaches to stratify patients. Pain 2021; 162:993-994. [PMID: 33086285 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Sachau
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
228
|
Rosner J, Scheuren PS, Stalder SA, Curt A, Hubli M. Pinprick Evoked Potentials-Reliable Acquisition in Healthy Human Volunteers. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 21:736-746. [PMID: 31216028 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pinprick evoked potentials (PEPs) represent a novel tool to assess the functional integrity of mechano-nociceptive pathways with a potential toward objectifying sensory deficits and gain seen in neurological disorders. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of PEPs with respect to age, stimulation site, and skin type. METHODS Electroencephalographic responses evoked by two pinprick stimulation intensities (128 mN and 256 mN) applied at three sites (hand dorsum, palmar digit II, and foot dorsum) were recorded in 30 healthy individuals. Test-retest reliability was performed for the vertex negative-positive complex amplitudes, N-latencies, and pain ratings evoked by the 256mN stimulation intensity. RESULTS Feasibility of PEP acquisition was demonstrated across age groups, with higher proportions of evoked potentials (>85%) for the 256mN stimulation intensity. Reliability analyses, that is, Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation coefficients, revealed poor to excellent reliability upon retest depending on the stimulation sites. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the reliability of PEP acquisition from cervical and lumbar segments across clinically representative age groups. Future methodological improvements might further strengthen PEP reliability in order to complement clinical neurophysiology of sensory nerve fibers by a more specific assessment of mechano-nociceptive pathways. Beyond looking at sensory deficits, PEPs may also become applicable to revealing signs of central sensitization, complementing the clinical assessment of mechanical hyperalgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Rosner
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paulina Simonne Scheuren
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Anja Stalder
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Armin Curt
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michèle Hubli
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Bouhassira D, Branders S, Attal N, Fernandes AM, Demolle D, Barbour J, Ciampi de Andrade D, Pereira A. Stratification of patients based on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory: development and validation of a new algorithm. Pain 2021; 162:1038-1046. [PMID: 33136982 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The personalization of neuropathic pain treatment could be improved by identifying specific sensory phenotypes (ie, specific combinations of symptoms and signs) predictive of the response to different classes of drugs. A simple and reliable phenotyping method is required for such a strategy. We investigated the utility of an algorithm for stratifying patients into clusters corresponding to specific combinations of neuropathic symptoms assessed with the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). Consistent with previous results, we first confirmed, in a cohort of 628 patients, the existence of a structure consisting of 3 clusters of patients characterized by higher NPSI scores for: pinpointed pain (cluster 1), evoked pain (cluster 2), or deep pain (cluster 3). From these analyses, we derived a specific algorithm for assigning each patient to one of these 3 clusters. We then assessed the clinical relevance of this algorithm for predicting treatment response, through post hoc analyses of 2 previous controlled trials of the effects of subcutaneous injections of botulinum toxin A. Each of the 97 patients with neuropathic pain included in these studies was individually allocated to one cluster, by applying the algorithm to their baseline NPSI responses. We found significant effects of botulinum toxin A relative to placebo in clusters 2 and 3, but not in cluster 1, suggesting that this approach was, indeed, relevant. Finally, we developed and performed a preliminary validation of a web-based version of the NPSI and algorithm for the stratification of patients in both research and daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier Bouhassira
- Inserm U987, APHP, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, CHU Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | - Nadine Attal
- Inserm U987, APHP, UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, CHU Ambroise Pare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Ana Mercia Fernandes
- LIM-62, Hospital Das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Julio Barbour
- LIM-62, Hospital Das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- LIM-62, Hospital Das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
230
|
Matesanz L, Hausheer AC, Baskozos G, Bennett DL, Schmid AB. Somatosensory and psychological phenotypes associated with neuropathic pain in entrapment neuropathy. Pain 2021; 162:1211-1220. [PMID: 33044393 PMCID: PMC7977619 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT It currently remains unclear why some patients with entrapment neuropathies develop neuropathic pain (neuP), whereas others have non-neuP, presumably of nociceptive character. Studying patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), this cross-sectional cohort study investigated changes in somatosensory structure and function as well as emotional well-being specific to the presence and severity of neuP. Patients with CTS (n = 108) were subgrouped by the DN4 questionnaire into those without and with neuP. The latter group was further subdivided into mild and moderate/severe neuP using a pain visual analogue scale. N = 32 participants served as healthy controls. All participants underwent a clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing, electrodiagnostic testing (EDT), and skin biopsy to determine the structural integrity of dermal and intraepidermal nerve fibres. Patients also completed questionnaires evaluating symptom severity and functional deficits, pain distribution, sleep quality, and emotional well-being. The overall prevalence of neuP in patients with CTS was 80%, of which 63% had mild neuP. Symptom severity and functional deficits as well as somatosensory dysfunction was more pronounced with the presence and increasing severity of neuP. No difference was identified among patient groups for EDT and nerve fibre integrity on biopsies. The severity of neuP was accompanied by more pronounced deficits in emotional well-being and sleep quality. Intriguingly, extraterritorial spread of symptoms was more prevalent in patients with moderate/severe neuP, indicating the presence of central mechanisms. NeuP is common in patients with CTS, and its severity is related to the extent of somatosensory dysfunction and a compromise of emotional well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Matesanz
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - Andrea C Hausheer
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Georgios Baskozos
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David L.H. Bennett
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Annina B. Schmid
- Nuffield Department for Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Kemp HI, Kennedy DL, Vollert J, Davies NWS, Scott W, Rice ASC. Chronic pain and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study in people living with HIV. AIDS Care 2021:1-14. [PMID: 33739206 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1902934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment and chronic pain are amongst the most prevalent neurological sequelae of HIV infection, yet little is understood about the potential bidirectional relationship between the two conditions. Cognitive dysfunction can occur in chronic pain populations whilst those with cognitive impairment can display modified responses to experimentally induced painful stimuli. To date, this has not been explored in HIV cohorts.This study aimed to identify any contribution of chronic pain to cognitive impairment in HIV and to determine differences in pain characteristics between those with and without cognitive dysfunction.This was an observational cohort study involving people living with HIV (n = 148) in the United Kingdom. Participants underwent validated questionnaire-based measurement of pain severity, interference and symptom quality as well as conditioned pain modulation and quantitative sensory testing. All participants completed a computer-based cognitive function assessment.Fifty-seven participants met the criteria for cognitive impairment and 73 for chronic pain. The cognitive impairment group had a higher prevalence of chronic pain (p = 0.004) and reported more neuropathic symptoms (p = 0.001). Those with chronic pain performed less well in emotional recognition and verbal learning domains. The interaction identified between chronic pain and cognitive dysfunction warrants further exploration to identify causal links or shared pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet I Kemp
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Donna L Kennedy
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Vollert
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas W S Davies
- Department of Neurology, Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Whitney Scott
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew S C Rice
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Small-fibre pathology has no impact on somatosensory system function in patients with fibromyalgia. Pain 2021; 161:2385-2393. [PMID: 32897040 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate whether small-fibre pathology, a common skin biopsy finding in patients with fibromyalgia, implies clinically important abnormalities of somatosensory system function and verify whether it is associated with voltage-gated sodium channel variants. In 57 consecutively enrolled patients with fibromyalgia, we used skin biopsy to distinguish patients with and without small-fibre pathology. In all patients, we assessed somatosensory system function using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and laser-evoked potentials and investigated voltage-gated sodium channel genotyping. We then compared these variables in patients with and without small-fibre pathology. We found that clinical measures, QST, and laser-evoked potential variables did not differ between patients with and without small-fibre pathology. In most patients with small-fibre pathology, QST and laser-evoked potential variables fell within normative ranges commonly used in clinical practice. Of the 57 patients, one patient without small-fibre pathology and 2 patients with small-fibre pathology had rare variants of voltage-gated sodium channels, namely SCN11A, SCN9A, and SCN1A variants. The SCN9A variant, found in a patient with small-fibre pathology, was an already profiled gain-of-function mutation, previously reported in small-fibre neuropathy. Our findings suggest that small-fibre pathology has a negligible impact on somatosensory system function in fibromyalgia. The genetic analysis suggests that patients with rare small-fibre neuropathy due to voltage-gated sodium channel variants may be misdiagnosed as patients with fibromyalgia.
Collapse
|
233
|
Sachau J, Kersebaum D, Baron R, Dickenson AH. Unusual Pain Disorders - What Can Be Learned from Them? J Pain Res 2021; 13:3539-3554. [PMID: 33758536 PMCID: PMC7980038 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s287603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain is common in many different disorders and leads to a significant reduction in quality of life in the affected patients. Current treatment options are limited and often result in insufficient pain relief, partly due to the incomplete understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The identification of these pathomechanisms is therefore a central object of current research. There are also a number of rare pain diseases, that are generally little known and often undiagnosed, but whose correct diagnosis and examination can help to improve the management of pain disorders in general. In some of these unusual pain disorders like sodium-channelopathies or sensory modulation disorder the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms have only recently been unravelled. These mechanisms might serve as pharmacological targets that may also play a role in subgroups of other, more common pain diseases. In other unusual pain disorders, the identification of pathomechanisms has already led to the development of new drugs. A completely new therapeutic approach, the gene silencing, can even stop progression in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis and porphyria, ie in pain diseases that would otherwise be rapidly fatal if left untreated. Thus, pain therapists and researchers should be aware of these rare and unusual pain disorders as they offer the unique opportunity to study mechanisms, identify new druggable targets and finally because early diagnosis might save many patient lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Sachau
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Dilara Kersebaum
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Anthony H Dickenson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Sympathetic and sensory nerve fiber function in multiple system atrophy and idiopathic Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2021; 268:3435-3443. [PMID: 33715046 PMCID: PMC8357748 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore small fiber somatosensory and sympathetic function in PD and MSA. METHODS We recruited 20 PD patients (7 women, median age 65.5 years; IQR 54.75-70.0), 10 MSA patients (4 women; median age 68 years; IQR 66.25-74.0), and 10 healthy subjects (HC; 4 women, median age 68; IQR 59.0-71.0 years). Autonomic testing included forehead cooling, intradermal microdialysis of norepinephrine (NE; 10-5; 10-6; 10-7; and 10-8), and orthostatic hypotension (OH); somatosensory testing included quantitative sensory testing (QST) according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS). RESULTS OH occurred more frequently in PD (p = 0.018) and MSA (p = 0.002) compared to HC. Vasoconstriction responses were stronger in PD compared to MSA during forehead cooling (p = 0.044) and microdialysis of physiologically concentrated NE solutions (10-7; 10-8; p = 0.017). PD and MSA had impaired cold (PD: p < 0.01; MSA: p < 0.05) and warm detection thresholds (PD and MSA, both p < 0.05). The mechanical detection threshold was higher in PD (p < 0.01). Conversely, mechanical pain thresholds were decreased in PD and MSA (both p < 0.001), indicating mechanical hyperalgesia. CONCLUSION In contrast to MSA, we found evidence of peripheral adrenoreceptor hypersensitivity in PD, probably caused by peripheral sympathetic denervation. Sensory testing revealed peripheral neuropathy and central pain sensitization in PD and MSA. Jointly, our data demonstrate autonomic and somatosensory dysfunction in PD and MSA.
Collapse
|
235
|
Jensen TS, Karlsson P, Gylfadottir SS, Andersen ST, Bennett DL, Tankisi H, Finnerup NB, Terkelsen AJ, Khan K, Themistocleous AC, Kristensen AG, Itani M, Sindrup SH, Andersen H, Charles M, Feldman EL, Callaghan BC. Painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy, diagnostic challenges and implications for future management. Brain 2021; 144:1632-1645. [PMID: 33711103 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common complications of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Up to half of patients with diabetes develop neuropathy during the course of their disease, which is accompanied by neuropathic pain in 30-40% of cases. Peripheral nerve injury in diabetes can manifest as progressive distal symmetric polyneuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, radiculo-plexopathies, and mononeuropathies. The most common diabetic neuropathy is distal symmetric polyneuropathy, which we will refer to as DN, with its characteristic glove and stocking like presentation of distal sensory or motor function loss. DN or its painful counterpart, painful DN, are associated with increased mortality and morbidity; thus, early recognition and preventive measures are essential. Nevertheless, it is not easy to diagnose DN or painful DN, particularly in patients with early and mild neuropathy, and there is currently no single established diagnostic gold standard. The most common diagnostic approach in research is a hierarchical system, which combines symptoms, signs, and a series of confirmatory tests. The general lack of long-term prospective studies has limited the evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of new morphometric and neurophysiological techniques. Thus, the best paradigm for screening DN and painful DN both in research and in clinical practice remains uncertain. Herein, we review the diagnostic challenges from both clinical and research perspectives and their implications for managing patients with DN. There is no established DN treatment, apart from improved glycaemic control, which is more effective in type 1 than in type 2 diabetes, and only symptomatic management is available for painful DN. Currently, less than one-third of patients with painful DN derive sufficient pain relief with existing pharmacotherapies. A more precise and distinct sensory profile from patients with DN and painful DN may help identify responsive patients to one treatment versus another. Detailed sensory profiles will lead to tailored treatment for patient subgroups with painful DN by matching to novel or established DN pathomechanisms and also for improved clinical trials stratification. Large randomized clinical trials are needed to identify the interventions, i.e. pharmacological, physical, cognitive, educational, etc., which lead to the best therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troels S Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pall Karlsson
- Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sandra S Gylfadottir
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Signe T Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - David L Bennett
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Hatice Tankisi
- Department of Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Astrid J Terkelsen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karolina Khan
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mustapha Itani
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren H Sindrup
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henning Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Charles
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eva L Feldman
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
236
|
Mouraux A, Bannister K, Becker S, Finn DP, Pickering G, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Graven-Nielsen T. Challenges and opportunities in translational pain research - An opinion paper of the working group on translational pain research of the European pain federation (EFIC). Eur J Pain 2021; 25:731-756. [PMID: 33625769 PMCID: PMC9290702 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
For decades, basic research on the underlying mechanisms of nociception has held promise to translate into efficacious treatments for patients with pain. Despite great improvement in the understanding of pain physiology and pathophysiology, translation to novel, effective treatments for acute and chronic pain has however been limited, and they remain an unmet medical need. In this opinion paper bringing together pain researchers from very different disciplines, the opportunities and challenges of translational pain research are discussed. The many factors that may prevent the successful translation of bench observations into useful and effective clinical applications are reviewed, including interspecies differences, limited validity of currently available preclinical disease models of pain, and limitations of currently used methods to assess nociception and pain in non-human and human models of pain. Many paths are explored to address these issues, including the backward translation of observations made in patients and human volunteers into new disease models that are more clinically relevant, improved generalization by taking into account age and sex differences, and the integration of psychobiology into translational pain research. Finally, it is argued that preclinical and clinical stages of developing new treatments for pain can be improved by better preclinical models of pathological pain conditions alongside revised methods to assess treatment-induced effects on nociception in human and non-human animals. Significance: For decades, basic research of the underlying mechanisms of nociception has held promise to translate into efficacious treatments for patients with pain. Despite great improvement in the understanding of pain physiology and pathophysiology, translation to novel, effective treatments for acute and chronic pain has however been limited, and they remain an unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Mouraux
- Institute of Neuroscience (IONS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsty Bannister
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Susanne Becker
- Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Integrative Spinal Research, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David P Finn
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Centre for Pain Research, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Gisèle Pickering
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Inserm CIC 1405, University Hospital, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology of Pain, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Esther Pogatzki-Zahn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Thomas Graven-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
237
|
Abstract
Neuropathy is a common complication of long-term diabetes that impairs quality of life by producing pain, sensory loss and limb amputation. The presence of neuropathy in both insulin-deficient (type 1) and insulin resistant (type 2) diabetes along with the slowing of progression of neuropathy by improved glycemic control in type 1 diabetes has caused the majority of preclinical and clinical investigations to focus on hyperglycemia as the initiating pathogenic lesion. Studies in animal models of diabetes have identified multiple plausible mechanisms of glucotoxicity to the nervous system including post-translational modification of proteins by glucose and increased glucose metabolism by aldose reductase, glycolysis and other catabolic pathways. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that factors not necessarily downstream of hyperglycemia can also contribute to the incidence, progression and severity of neuropathy and neuropathic pain. For example, peripheral nerve contains insulin receptors that transduce the neurotrophic and neurosupportive properties of insulin, independent of systemic glucose regulation, while the detection of neuropathy and neuropathic pain in patients with metabolic syndrome and failure of improved glycemic control to protect against neuropathy in cohorts of type 2 diabetic patients has placed a focus on the pathogenic role of dyslipidemia. This review provides an overview of current understanding of potential initiating lesions for diabetic neuropathy and the multiple downstream mechanisms identified in cell and animal models of diabetes that may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy and neuropathic pain.
Collapse
|
238
|
Ahmad N, Subhan F, Islam NU, Shahid M, Ullah N, Ullah R, Akbar S, Amin MU, Khurram M, Ullah I, Sewell RDE. A novel gabapentin analogue assuages neuropathic pain response in chronic sciatic nerve constriction model in rats. Behav Brain Res 2021; 405:113190. [PMID: 33607164 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Gabapentin (GBP) is an established drug that has been used in the management of symptoms of neuropathy but it is associated with unwanted side effects such as sedation and motor incoordination. The goal of the study was to find out a drug with greater efficacy and safety for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Our previously synthesized GABA analogue (Gabapentsal, GPS) was tested (25-100 mg/kg, i.p) in chronic constriction injury (CCI) induced nociceptive model of static allodynia, dynamic allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, mechanical hyperalgesia and cold allodynia in rats (Sprague Dawley). Open field and rotarod tests were performed to assess the impact of GPS on the motor performance of the animals. GBP (100 mg/kg, i.p) was used as a standard for comparison. GPS dose dependently reduced static (P <0.001) and dynamic allodynia (P <0.001), thermal hyperalgesia (P <0.001), mechanical hyperalgesia (P < 0.001) and cold allodynia (P < 0.001). In comparison to GBP, GPS failed to alter any significantly the motor performance of rats in both the open field and rotarod assays. These results suggest that GPS is effective in alleviating nociception in CCI neuropathic pain model but free from the side effect of motor discoordination seen in the treatment with GBP. In conclusion, GPS may prove to be a prospectively more effective and safer option in the management of neuropathic syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisar Ahmad
- Islam College of Pharmacy, Sialkot, Pakistan.
| | - Fazal Subhan
- Department of Pharmacy, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | - Nazar Ul Islam
- Department of Pharmacy, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | - Muhammad Shahid
- Department of Pharmacy, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | | | - Rahim Ullah
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | - Shehla Akbar
- Department of Pharmacy, CECOS University of IT and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | | | - Muhammad Khurram
- Department of Pharmacy, Abasyn University Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
| | - Ihsan Ullah
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
| | - Robert D E Sewell
- Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF103NB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Fisher AS, Lanigan MT, Upton N, Lione LA. Preclinical Neuropathic Pain Assessment; the Importance of Translatability and Bidirectional Research. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:614990. [PMID: 33628181 PMCID: PMC7897667 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.614990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients suffering with chronic neuropathic pain the need for suitable novel therapies is imperative. Over recent years a contributing factor for the lack of development of new analgesics for neuropathic pain has been the mismatch of primary neuropathic pain assessment endpoints in preclinical vs. clinical trials. Despite continuous forward translation failures across diverse mechanisms, reflexive quantitative sensory testing remains the primary assessment endpoint for neuropathic pain and analgesia in animals. Restricting preclinical evaluation of pain and analgesia to exclusively reflexive outcomes is over simplified and can be argued not clinically relevant due to the continued lack of forward translation and failures in the clinic. The key to developing new analgesic treatments for neuropathic pain therefore lies in the development of clinically relevant endpoints that can translate preclinical animal results to human clinical trials. In this review we discuss this mismatch of primary neuropathic pain assessment endpoints, together with clinical and preclinical evidence that supports how bidirectional research is helping to validate new clinically relevant neuropathic pain assessment endpoints. Ethological behavioral endpoints such as burrowing and facial grimacing and objective measures such as electroencephalography provide improved translatability potential together with currently used quantitative sensory testing endpoints. By tailoring objective and subjective measures of neuropathic pain the translatability of new medicines for patients suffering with neuropathic pain will hopefully be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy S. Fisher
- Transpharmation Ltd., The London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael T. Lanigan
- Transpharmation Ltd., The London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Upton
- Transpharmation Ltd., The London Bioscience Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa A. Lione
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Lu K, Li X, Sun Q, Pang X, Chen J, Minari T, Liu X, Song Y. Solution-processed electronics for artificial synapses. MATERIALS HORIZONS 2021; 8:447-470. [PMID: 34821264 DOI: 10.1039/d0mh01520b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Artificial synaptic devices and systems have become hot topics due to parallel computing, high plasticity, integration of storage, and processing to meet the challenges of the traditional Von Neumann computers. Currently, two-terminal memristors and three-terminal transistors have been mainly developed for high-density storage with high switching speed and high reliability because of the adjustable resistivity, controllable ion migration, and abundant choices of functional materials and fabrication processes. To achieve the low-cost, large-scale, and easy-process fabrication, solution-processed techniques have been extensively employed to develop synaptic electronics towards flexible and highly integrated three-dimensional (3D) neural networks. Herein, we have summarized and discussed solution-processed techniques in the fabrication of two-terminal memristors and three-terminal transistors for the application of artificial synaptic electronics mainly reported in the recent five years from the view of fabrication processes, functional materials, electronic operating mechanisms, and system applications. Furthermore, the challenges and prospects were discussed in depth to promote solution-processed techniques in the future development of artificial synapse with high performance and high integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuakua Lu
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, The Key Laboratory of Material Processing and Mold of Ministry of Education, Henan Key Laboratory of Advanced Nylon Materials and Application, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
241
|
Royds J, Cassidy H, Conroy MJ, Dunne MR, Lysaght J, McCrory C. Examination and characterisation of the effect of amitriptyline therapy for chronic neuropathic pain on neuropeptide and proteomic constituents of human cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Behav Immun Health 2021; 10:100184. [PMID: 34589721 PMCID: PMC8474617 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Amitriptyline is prescribed to reduce the intensity of chronic neuropathic pain. There is a paucity of validated in vivo evidence in humans regarding amitriptyline's mechanism of action. We examined the effect of amitriptyline therapy on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neuropeptides and proteome in patients with chronic neuropathic pain to identify potential mechanisms of action of amitriptyline. METHODS Patients with lumbar radicular neuropathic pain were selected for inclusion with clinical and radiological signs and a >50% reduction in pain in response to a selective nerve root block. Baseline (pre-treatment) and 8-week (post-treatment) pain scores with demographics were recorded. CSF samples were taken at baseline (pre-treatment) and 8 weeks after amitriptyline treatment (post-treatment). Proteome analysis was performed using mass spectrometry and secreted cytokines, chemokines and neurotrophins were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS A total of 9/16 patients experienced a >30% reduction in pain after treatment with amitriptyline and GO analysis demonstrated that the greatest modulatory effect was on immune system processes. KEGG analysis also identified a reduction in PI3K-Akt and MAPK signalling pathways in responders but not in non-responders. There was also a significant decrease in the chemokine eotaxin-1 (p = 0.02) and a significant increase in the neurotrophin VEGF-A (p = 0.04) in responders. CONCLUSION The CSF secretome and proteome was modulated in responders to amitriptyline verifying many pre-clinical and in vitro models. The predominant features were immunomodulation with a reduction in pro-inflammatory pathways of neuronal-glia communications and evidence of a neurotrophic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Royds
- Department of Pain Medicine, St. James Hospital, Dublin and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hilary Cassidy
- Systems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Melissa J. Conroy
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James’s Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
- Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Margaret R. Dunne
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James’s Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
- Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Joanne Lysaght
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James’s Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
- Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, St James’s Hospital Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Connail McCrory
- Department of Pain Medicine, St. James Hospital, Dublin and School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
Eccleston C, Fisher E, Howard RF, Slater R, Forgeron P, Palermo TM, Birnie KA, Anderson BJ, Chambers CT, Crombez G, Ljungman G, Jordan I, Jordan Z, Roberts C, Schechter N, Sieberg CB, Tibboel D, Walker SM, Wilkinson D, Wood C. Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2021; 5:47-87. [PMID: 33064998 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30277-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK; Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK; Department of Clinical-Experimental and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK; Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard F Howard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rebeccah Slater
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paula Forgeron
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Tonya M Palermo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christine T Chambers
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, and Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Clinical-Experimental and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gustaf Ljungman
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Neil Schechter
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine B Sieberg
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dick Tibboel
- Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suellen M Walker
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chantal Wood
- Department of Spine Surgery and Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Isoardo G, Ciullo S, Titolo P, Fontana E, Battiston B, Stella M, Luxardo N, Laino F, Migliaretti G, Stura I, Ardito RB, Adenzato M. The relationship between alexithymia, sensory phenotype and neurophysiological parameters in patients with chronic upper limb neuropathy. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2021; 128:61-71. [PMID: 33315145 PMCID: PMC7815565 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-020-02282-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the relationship between sensory abnormalities evaluated by quantitative sensory testing (QST) and alexithymia, depression and anxiety in patients with neuropathic pain involving the upper limbs. We enrolled 62 patients (34 with carpal tunnel syndrome, 7 with brachial plexopathy, 3 with cervical painful radiculopathy, 5 with ulnar entrapment neuropathy at elbow and 13 with post-burn hypertrophic scars) and 48 healthy controls. All underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS), evaluation of cold, heat pain and vibration detection threshold (VDT) by QST and evaluation of alexithymia by Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), depression by Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), anxiety by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y), level of psychological distress by 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and perceived social support by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The general linear model analysis revealed a significant relationship between TAS-20 overall and TAS-20 sub-score for difficulty identifying feelings and VDT z-scores in the left index with no interaction by year of education and sensory NCS results. Our results demonstrated the association between impairment of vibratory sensation of the left hand, reflecting cutaneous mechanoceptor dysfunction, and alexithymia, particularly the difficulty to identify feelings. The importance of delivering to patients with neuropathic pain personalized care that takes into account not only the neurophysiological aspects but also the aspects of mental functioning is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Isoardo
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Ciullo
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Titolo
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, UOD Reconstructive Microsurgery, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Fontana
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Bruno Battiston
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, UOD Reconstructive Microsurgery, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Maurizio Stella
- Department of Plastic Surgery Burn Center, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Nicola Luxardo
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Unit of Pain Management and Palliative Care, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Laino
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Unit of Pain Management and Palliative Care, Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Migliaretti
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Ilaria Stura
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Rita B Ardito
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Mauro Adenzato
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
Kapitza C, Lüdtke K, Tampin B, Ballenberger N. Application and utility of a clinical framework for spinally referred neck-arm pain: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study protocol. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244137. [PMID: 33370389 PMCID: PMC7769468 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical presentation of neck-arm pain is heterogeneous with varying underlying pain types (nociceptive/neuropathic/mixed) and pain mechanisms (peripheral/central sensitization). A mechanism-based clinical framework for spinally referred pain has been proposed, which classifies into (1) somatic pain, (2) neural mechanosensitivity, (3) radicular pain, (4) radiculopathy and mixed pain presentations. This study aims to (i) investigate the application of the clinical framework in patients with neck-arm pain, (ii) determine their somatosensory, clinical and psychosocial profile and (iii) observe their clinical course over time. METHOD We describe a study protocol. Patients with unilateral neck-arm pain (n = 180) will undergo a clinical examination, after which they will be classified into subgroups according to the proposed clinical framework. Standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) measurements will be taken in their main pain area and contralateral side. Participants will have to complete questionnaires to assess function (Neck Disability Index), psychosocial factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Depression, anxiety and stress scale), neuropathic pain (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions, PainDETECT Questionnaire) and central sensitization features (Central Sensitization Inventory). Follow-ups at three, six and 12 months include the baseline questionnaires. The differences of QST data and questionnaire outcomes between and within groups will be analyzed using (M)AN(C)OVA and/or regression models. Repeated measurement analysis of variance or a linear mixed model will be used to calculate the differences between three, six, and 12 months outcomes. Multiple regression models will be used to analyze potential predictors for the clinical course. CONCLUSION The rationale for this study is to assess the usability and utility of the proposed clinical framework as well as to identify possible differing somatosensory and psychosocial phenotypes between the subgroups. This could increase our knowledge of the underlying pain mechanisms. The longitudinal analysis may help to assess possible predictors for pain persistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Kapitza
- Faculty of Business, Management and Social Sciences, Department Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Kerstin Lüdtke
- Department of Health Sciences, Academic Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Luebeck, Germany
| | - Brigitte Tampin
- Faculty of Business, Management and Social Sciences, Department Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrueck, Germany
- Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercises Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nikolaus Ballenberger
- Faculty of Business, Management and Social Sciences, Department Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrueck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
245
|
Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials. Pain Rep 2020; 6:e845. [PMID: 33511323 PMCID: PMC7837951 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a basis for understanding the emerging science of clinical trials and to provide a set of practical, evidence-based suggestions for designing and executing confirmatory clinical trials in a manner that minimizes measurement error. The most important step in creating a mindset of quality clinical research is to abandon the antiquated concept that clinical trials are a method for capturing data from clinical practice and shifting to a concept of the clinical trial as a measurement system, consisting of an interconnected set of processes, each of which must be in calibration for the trial to generate an accurate and reliable estimate of the efficacy (and safety) of a given treatment. The status quo of inaccurate, unreliable, and protracted clinical trials is unacceptable and unsustainable. This article gathers aspects of study design and conduct under a single broad umbrella of techniques available to improve the accuracy and reliability of confirmatory clinical trials across traditional domain boundaries.
Collapse
|
246
|
Comparison of Different In Vivo Animal Models of Brachial Plexus Avulsion and Its Application in Pain Study. Neural Plast 2020; 2020:8875915. [PMID: 33273909 PMCID: PMC7676973 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8875915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) are high-energy trauma that can result in serious functional problems in the affected upper extremities, and brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) could be considered the most severe type of them. The booming occurrence rate of BPA brings up devastating impact on patients' life. Complications of muscle atrophy, neuropathic pain, and denervation-associated psychological disorders are major challenges in the treatment of BPA. Animal models of BPA are good vehicles for this kind of research. Full understanding of the current in vivo BPA models, which could be classified into anterior approach avulsion, posterior approach avulsion, and closed approach avulsion groups, could help researchers select the appropriate type of models for their studies. Each group of the BPA model has its distinct merits and demerits. An ideal BPA model that can inherit the advantages and make up for the disadvantages is still required for further exploration.
Collapse
|
247
|
Sachau J, Bruckmueller H, Gierthmühlen J, Magerl W, May D, Binder A, Forstenpointner J, Koetting J, Maier C, Tölle TR, Treede RD, Berthele A, Caliebe A, Diesch C, Flor H, Huge V, Maihöfner C, Rehm S, Kersebaum D, Fabig SC, Vollert J, Rolke R, Stemmler S, Sommer C, Westermann A, Cascorbi I, Baron R. The serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) rs6313 variant is associated with higher ongoing pain and signs of central sensitization in neuropathic pain patients. Eur J Pain 2020; 25:595-611. [PMID: 33171011 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) has been described as an important facilitation mediator of spinal nociceptive processing leading to central sensitization (CS) in animal models of chronic pain. However, whether HTR2A single nucleotide variants (SNVs) modulate neuropathic pain states in patients has not been investigated so far. The aim of this study was to elucidate the potential association of HTR2A variants with sensory abnormalities or ongoing pain in neuropathic pain patients. METHODS At total of 240 neuropathic pain patients and 253 healthy volunteers were included. Patients were phenotypically characterized using standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). Patients and controls were genotyped for HTR2A g.-1438G > A (rs6311) and c.102C > T (rs6313). Genotype-related differences in QST parameters were assessed considering QST profile clusters, principal somatosensory components and sex. RESULTS There was an equal distribution of rs6313 and linked rs6311 between patients and controls. However, the rs6313 variant was significantly associated with a principal component of pinprick hyperalgesia and dynamic mechanical allodynia, indicating enhanced CS in patients with sensory loss (-0.34 ± 0.15 vs. +0.31 ± 0.11 vs., p < .001). In this cluster, the variant allele was also associated with single QST parameters of pinprick hyperalgesia (MPT, +0.64 ± 0.18 vs. -0.34 ± 0.23 p = .002; MPS, +0.66 ± 0.17 vs. -0.09 ± 0.23, p = .009) and ongoing pain was increased by 30%. CONCLUSIONS The specific association of the rs6313 variant with pinprick hyperalgesia and increased levels of ongoing pain suggests that the HTR2A receptor might be an important modulator in the development of CS in neuropathic pain. SIGNIFICANCE This article presents new insights into serotonin receptor 2A-mediating mechanisms of central sensitization in neuropathic pain patients. The rs6313 variant allele was associated with increased mechanical pinprick sensitivity and increased levels of ongoing pain supporting a contribution of central sensitization in the genesis of ongoing pain providing a possible route for mechanism-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Sachau
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Henrike Bruckmueller
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Janne Gierthmühlen
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Walter Magerl
- Chair of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Denisa May
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Binder
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia Forstenpointner
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Judith Koetting
- Department of Human Genetics, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Christoph Maier
- Department of Pain Management, BG Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Thomas R Tölle
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Rolf-Detlef Treede
- Chair of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Amke Caliebe
- Institute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carolin Diesch
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Herta Flor
- Department of Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, Central Institute for Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Volker Huge
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Christian Maihöfner
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Fürth, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Rehm
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Dilara Kersebaum
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sophie-Charlotte Fabig
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jan Vollert
- Chair of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.,Pain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Roman Rolke
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Susanne Stemmler
- Department of Human Genetics, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommer
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Westermann
- Department of Pain Management, BG Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ingolf Cascorbi
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Mechanical detection and pain thresholds: comparability of devices using stepped and ramped stimuli. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e865. [PMID: 33294759 PMCID: PMC7717770 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Nylon monofilaments may substitute for German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain standards in tactile but not pinprick testing. Ramped stimuli are faster but underestimate thresholds due to reaction time artefacts. Quantitative sensory testing is used to assess somatosensory function in humans. The protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) provides comprehensive normative values using defined tools; however, some of these may not be feasible in low-resource settings.
Collapse
|
249
|
Bonezzi C, Fornasari D, Cricelli C, Magni A, Ventriglia G. Not All Pain is Created Equal: Basic Definitions and Diagnostic Work-Up. Pain Ther 2020; 9:1-15. [PMID: 33315206 PMCID: PMC7736598 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00217-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is considered a public health priority by the World Health Organization and European health institutions. It has reached alarming proportions in terms of disability, consumption of health and social resources, and impact on primary and specialist care services. Primary care physicians are often called on to manage this condition. Chronic pain management can be challenging due to its complexity. It has traditionally been considered to include nociceptive pain that that persists longer than the normal healing time, neuropathic pain lasting more than 3 months, or a combination of these. More recently, a third descriptor, nociplastic (primary) pain, was added to classify patients with chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia, nonspecific back pain, or mixed pain that persists or other conditions in which altered central pain modulation results in central sensitization and chronic pain in the absence of actual or threatened damage to tissues, including in the somatosensory nervous system. This document provides an overview of pain types and their underlying mechanisms. Successful pain management is facilitated by identification of the pain type. A set of diagnostic tools and a pain algorithm are presented to guide the clinician toward the correct diagnosis. The algorithm identifies cases that may require referral to a pain specialist. Once the site of origin of the pain (the "pain generator") is identified, or a primary pain syndrome is suspected, the accompanying article provides information and rationale to support treatment decisions based on patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Bonezzi
- ICS Maugeri IRCCS, Via Salvatore Maugeri 10, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Diego Fornasari
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Vanvitelli 32, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Cricelli
- SIMG (Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care), Via Del Sansovino 179, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Magni
- SIMG (Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care), Via Del Sansovino 179, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ventriglia
- SIMG (Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care), Via Del Sansovino 179, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
250
|
Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, Thacker M. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 2020; 18:555-567. [PMID: 32710604 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Cervical spine radiculopathy (CSR) is a disabling condition that has significant negative impacts on a person's mental health, physical functioning and social participation. Research has reported variable CSR incidence and prevalence among different populations. To date, no systematic review has been completed investigating the prevalence or incidence of CSR; therefore, our objective was to determine the incidence and/or prevalence of CSR in adults. DESIGN AND METHOD A systematic review was conducted including searches of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and CINAHL from inception to February 25, 2020. Studies including data on incidence and/or prevalence of CSR were included. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Hayden, Cote and Bombardier appraisal checklist. Data were analysed narratively. RESULTS Nine low- to high-quality studies were included in the final review. Incidence ranged between 0.832 and 1.79 per 1,000 person-years from two high-quality and one low-quality study. Prevalence values ranged from 1.21 to 5.8 per 1,000 from four medium- to high-quality studies. Prevalence values of 1.14% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.82] and 1.31% (95% CI: 0.66-1.96) for males and females, respectively, were reported from one medium-quality study. One medium-quality study reported an unadjusted prevalence value of 6.3% for males and females. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review investigating the epidemiology of CSR in an adult population. This review reports a variable incidence rate and prevalence of CSR among specific populations; however, this was based on nine studies. There is a priority to investigate CSR epidemiology across other populations globally and standardising CSR diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mansfield
- School of Health and Social Care, Department of Allied Health Sciences. Pain Research Cluster; Ageing, Acute and Long Term Conditions Research Group., London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Toby Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, , Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicolas Spahr
- Physiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Pain Section, Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mick Thacker
- School of Health and Social Care, Department of Allied Health Sciences. Pain Research Cluster; Ageing, Acute and Long Term Conditions Research Group., London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|