Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Pharmacobezoar After Venlafaxine and Oxazepam Overdose: How Pharmacokinetics Could Help?-A Grand Round

ABSTRACT

The authors present here a case of a pharmacobezoar after drug overdose, diagnosed using multiple blood samples for TDM. This grand round highlights the importance of a dialog between a clinician and a TDM consultant for the optimal care of a patient.

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for relevant drugs in epilepsy patients using dried blood spots

Epilepsy is one of the most common diseases of the central nervous system globally. To ensure the correct dosage of antiepileptic treatment, it is helpful to check the blood levels of the administered substances regularly. The analysis of the capillary dried blood samples provides a promising and less-invasive alternative to venous blood collection. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop an LC-MS method for the quantification of 22 commonly used drugs in patients with an epileptic syndrome and 5 drug metabolites in one dried blood spot (DBS). The calibration ranges were selected in such a way that the therapeutic reference ranges in serum for the respective substances were completely covered. The analytical validation was successfully performed according to relevant guidelines with a consideration of requirements for DBS analysis. Proof of concept of the developed method was obtained by the analysis of DBSs from 282 authentic leftover ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid blood samples, which were compared with the corresponding serum concentrations. Altogether, the results show a dependency on the blood/plasma (b/p) ratios of the respective analytes so that for drugs with b/p ratios close to one, for example, lacosamide, levetiracetam, brivaracetam, and sertraline, a good accordance was observed.

Effects of antiepileptic drugs' administration during pregnancy on the nerve cell proliferation and axonal outgrowth of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y nerve cells

It has been suggested that the intelligence quotient of children born to pregnant women taking 1000 mg or more of valproic acid per day is lower than that of children born to pregnant women taking other antiepileptic drugs. However, the mechanism whereby intelligence quotient is decreased in children exposed to valproic acid during the fetal period has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we used the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y to evaluate the effects of antiepileptic drugs containing valproic acid on nerve cells. We assessed the anti-proliferative effects of drugs in these cells via WST-8 colorimetric assay, using the Cell Counting Kit-8. We also quantified drug effects on axonal elongation from images using ImageJ software. We also evaluated drug effects on mRNA expression levels on molecules implicated in nervous system development and folic acid uptake using real-time PCR. We observed that carbamazepine and lamotrigen were toxic to SH-SY5Y cells at concentrations >500 μM. In contrast, phenytoin and valproic acid were not toxic to these cells. Carbamazepine, lamotrigen, phenytoin, and valproic acid did not affect axonal outgrowth in SH-SY5Y cells. Sodium channel neuronal type 1a (SCN1A) mRNA expression-level ratios increased when valproic acid was supplemented to cells. The overexpression of SCN1A mRNA due to high valproic acid concentrations during the fetal period may affect neurodevelopment. However, since detailed mechanisms have not yet been elucidated, it is necessary to evaluate it by comparing cell axon elongation and SCN1A protein expression due to high-concentration valproic acid exposure.

Effect of Chronic Administration of 5-(3-chlorophenyl)-4-Hexyl-2,4 -Dihydro-3H-1,2,4-Triazole-3-Thione (TP-315)-A New Anticonvulsant Drug Candidate-On Living Organisms

About 70 million people suffer from epilepsy—a chronic neurodegenerative disease. In most cases, the cause of the disease is unknown, but epilepsy can also develop as the result of a stroke, trauma to the brain, or the use of psychotropic substances. The treatment of epilepsy is mainly based on the administration of anticonvulsants, which the patient must most often use throughout their life. Despite significant progress in research on antiepileptic drugs, about 30% of patients still have drug-resistant epilepsy, which is insensitive to pharmacotherapy used so far. In our recent studies, we have shown that 4-alkyl-5-aryl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones act on the voltage-gated sodium channels and exhibit anticonvulsant activity in an MES (maximal electroshock-induced seizure) and 6Hz test in mice. Previous studies have shown their beneficial toxic and pharmacological profile, but their effect on a living organism during chronic use is still unknown. In the presented study, on the basis of the previously conducted tests and the PAMPA (parallel artificial membrane permeability assay) BBB (blood–brain barrier) test, we selected one 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivative—TP-315—for further studies aimed at assessing the impact of its chronic use on a living organism. After long-term administration of TP-315 to Albino Swiss mice, its effect on the functional parameters of internal organs was assessed by performing biochemical, morphological, and histopathological examinations. It was also determined whether the tested compound inhibits selected isoforms of the CYP450 enzyme system. On the basis of the conducted tests, it was found that TP-315 does not show nephrotoxic nor hepatotoxic effects and does not cause changes in hematological parameters. In vitro tests showed that TP-315 did not inhibit CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, or CYP3A5 enzymes at the concentration found in the serum of mice subjected to long-term exposure to this compound.

Antiseizure Medication use in Gastric Bypass Patients and Other Post-Surgical Malabsorptive States

Healthcare professionals are encountering an increasing number of patients who have undergone bariatric surgeries. Antiseizure medications (ASM) have a narrow therapeutic window, and patients with malabsorptive states receiving ASM present a complex situation as the pharmacokinetics of these drugs have only been studied in patients with a normal functioning gastrointestinal tract. Patients with malabsorptive states may have altered pharmacokinetics, and there is limited literature to guide drug selection and dosage adjustment in patients with malabsorptive states. This review highlights pharmacokinetic parameters of common ASM, and considerations when managing patients on them. The effect of pH, lipophilicity, absorption, and metabolism should be taken into account when selecting and managing ASMs in this patient population. Based on these parameters, levetiracetam, and topiramate have fewer issues referable to absorption related to bariatric surgery while oral formulations of phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine and valproic acid have reduced absorption due to effects of bariatric surgery based on the pharmacokinetic properties of these medications. Extended formulations should be avoided and ASM serum concentrations should be checked before and after surgery. The care of patients with epilepsy who are scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery should be guided by a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist and a neurologist who should be involved in the adjustment of the ASMs throughout the pre-surgical and post-surgical periods.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Second- and Third-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs: Insights From a College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Survey

CONTEXT.—

Therapeutic drug monitoring has traditionally been widely used for first-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. The last 2 decades have seen the introduction of second- and third-generation AEDs (eg, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate) into clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE.—

To use data from the College of American Pathologists Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Extended proficiency testing survey to determine the performance of assays used for therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs, including comparison of enzyme immunoassay and chromatographic techniques.

DESIGN.—

Six years of proficiency testing surveys were reviewed (2013-2018).

RESULTS.—

Steady growth was seen in participant volumes for newer AEDs. The analytical performance of automated enzyme immunoassays for lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate was similar to that of chromatographic methods, consistent with published literature using patient samples for comparisons. The majority of participating laboratories now use enzyme immunoassays to measure levetiracetam.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Survey results reflect steadily growing interest in therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs. The increasing availability of robust immunoassays for new AEDs should facilitate their clinical utility, especially for clinical laboratories that do not perform chromatographic assays for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Experimental Therapeutic Strategies in Epilepsies Using Anti-Seizure Medications

Epilepsies are among the most common neurological problems. The disease burden in patients with epilepsy is significantly high, and epilepsy has a huge negative impact on patients' quality of life with epilepsy and their families. Anti-seizure medications are the mainstay treatment in patients with epilepsy, and around 70% of patients will ultimately control with a combination of at least two appropriately selected anti-seizure medications. However, in one-third of patients, seizures are resistant to drugs, and other measures will be needed. The primary goal in using experimental therapeutic medication strategies in patients with epilepsy is to prevent recurrent seizures and reduce the rate of traumatic events that may occur during seizures. So far, various treatments using medications have been offered for patients with epilepsies, which have been classified according to the type of epilepsy, the effectiveness of the medications, and the adverse effects. Medications such as Levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine are at the forefront of these patients' treatment. Epilepsy surgery, neuro-stimulation, and the ketogenic diet are the main measures in patients with medication-resistant epilepsies. In this paper, we will review the therapeutic approach using anti-seizure medications in patients with epilepsy. However, it should be noted that some of these patients still do not respond to existing treatments; therefore, the limited ability of current therapies has fueled research efforts for the development of novel treatment strategies. Thus, it seems that in addition to surgical measures, we should look for more specific agents that have less adverse events and have a greater effect in stopping seizures.

Valproic Acid-Induced Liver Injury: A Case-Control Study from a Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program in a Tertiary Hospital

Introduction: Valproic acid (VPA) is an antiepileptic drug extensively used for treating partial and generalised seizures, acute mania and as prophylaxis for bipolar disorder. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) persists as a significant issue related to fatal outcomes by VPA. The aim of this study was to increase our knowledge about this condition and to better identify patients affected. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective case-control study that identified cases of DILI by VPA from the Pharmacovigilance Programme from our Laboratory Signals at La Paz University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2019. From the Therapeutic VPA Monitoring program, two control groups were assigned, VPA-tolerant patients and the other with patients who developed mild VPA-related liver injury but who did not meet the DILI criteria, matched for date, age and sex. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study: 15 cases of DILI, 30 VPA-tolerant controls and 15 controls with mild liver injury. Mean age for the cases was 45.7 years, 4 (26.7%) were women and 5 (33.34%) were children under 18 years, of them 3 (20%) were fatal. Polytherapy with other antiepileptic drugs (p = 0.047) and alcohol consumption (p < 0.001) were associated with a greater risk of developing DILI by VPA. A diagnosis of epileptic seizure was more frequently related to DILI when compared with the VPA-tolerant controls (p < 0.001). The cases developed hepatocellular liver injury (p < 0.001), while the mild hepatic damage controls had a higher rate of cholestatic liver injury (p < 0.001). The laboratory lactate dehydrogenase values were statistically higher (even at baseline) in patients with DILI than in both control groups (p = 0.033 and p = 0.039). Conclusions: VPA hepatotoxicity remains a considerable problem. This study offers interesting findings for characterising VPA-induced liver injury and at-risk patients.

Feasibility of Using Oral Fluid for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AED) using blood is well established but limited by its invasiveness, accessibility, cost, interpretation errors, and related disturbances in protein binding. TDM using oral fluid (OF) could overcome these limitations. This paper provides a summary of the current evidence for using OF as a matrix to perform TDM of AEDs, as well as practical considerations. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on April 9, 2018 (and then updated on May 20, 2020) using all AEDs as keywords along with "oral fluid," "saliva," "salivary," "seizure," "epilepsy," "antiepileptic," and "anticonvulsant." A total of 18 relevant articles were found and included in this review. There is evidence to suggest that AED TDM using OF is feasible and that reference ranges can be calculated for the following drugs: carbamazepine, ethosuximide, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and valproic acid. For all other AEDs, there is either a lack of evidence on the feasibility of TDM using OF or the evidence indicates that TDM using OF is not feasible. Practical considerations should include the timing and method of OF collection (stimulated or unstimulated) due to their probable impact on the reliability of AED TDM. Using OF may improve the acceptability and accessibility and reduce the cost of AED TDM. Clinical implementation requires standardized collection protocols, more rigorously defined OF reference ranges, and further studies to determine the relevance to clinically important outcomes.

Effect of S-1 on blood levels of phenobarbital and phenytoin: A case report

Drug-drug interaction of fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer agents with phenytoin is well known, but interaction with phenobarbital is limited. We describe a case showing increases in plasma phenobarbital as well as phenytoin concentrations during preoperative S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) and radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The use of levetiracetam (LEV) has been increasing given its favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Numerous population pharmacokinetic studies for LEV have been conducted. However, there are some discrepancies regarding factors affecting its pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to summarize significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics as well as the need for dosage adjustments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search for population pharmacokinetic studies of LEV conducted using a nonlinear-mixed effect approach from PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, and Science Direct databases from their inception to March 2020. Information on study design, model methodologies, significant covariate-parameter relationships, and model evaluation was extracted. The quality of the reported studies was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Only two studies were conducted with a two-compartment model, while the rest were performed with a one-compartment structure. Bodyweight and creatinine clearance were the two most frequently identified covariates on LEV clearance (CLLEV). Additionally, postmenstrual age (PMA) or postnatal age (PNA) were significant predictors for CLLEV in neonates. Only three studies externally validated the models. Two studies conducted pharmacodynamic models for LEV with relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Significant predictors for LEV pharmacokinetics are highlighted in this review. For future research, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using a larger sample size should be conducted. From a clinical perspective, the published models should be externally evaluated before clinical implementation.

Does Stress Trigger Seizures? Evidence from Experimental Models

This chapter describes the experimental evidence of stress modulation of epileptic seizures and the potential role of corticosteroids and neurosteroids in regulating stress-linked seizure vulnerability. Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that is characterized by repeated seizures. There are many potential causes for epilepsy, including genetic predispositions, infections, brain injury, and neurotoxicity. Stress is a known precipitating factor for seizures in individuals suffering from epilepsy. Severe acute stress and persistent exposure to stress may increase susceptibility to seizures, thereby resulting in a higher frequency of seizures. This occurs through the stress-mediated release of cortisol, which has both excitatory and proconvulsant properties. Stress also causes the release of endogenous neurosteroids from central and adrenal sources. Neurosteroids such as allopregnanolone and THDOC, which are allosteric modulators of GABA-A receptors, are powerful anticonvulsants and neuroprotectants. Acute stress increases the release of neurosteroids, while chronic stress is associated with severe neurosteroid depletion and reduced inhibition in the brain. This diminished inhibition occurs largely as a result of neurosteroid deficiencies. Thus, exogenous administration of neurosteroids (neurosteroid replacement therapy) may offer neuroprotection in epilepsy. Synthetic neurosteroid could offer a rational approach to control neurosteroid-sensitive, stress-related epileptic seizures.

Factors affecting serum phenobarbital concentration changes in pediatric patients receiving elixir and powder formulations

Background

Phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as elixir and powder formulations in pediatric care. Its dose adjustment is performed based on individual drug concentration monitoring. Few studies have comprehensively analyzed the variation factors for serum PB concentration. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the factors that influence serum PB concentration and assessed the impacts of dosage formulation and administration route.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study covered clinical data from January 2007 to September 2019 at Mie University Hospital. The present study included 60 pediatric patients administered the elixir and powder of PB through oral route and enteral tube. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors that affect the weight-corrected PB serum concentration/dose (C/D) ratio in pediatric patients. Six subgroups were also established according to the concomitant use of drugs that potentially inhibit PB metabolism, dosage formulation, and administration route to investigate the difference in the PB C/D ratio among the subgroups.

Results

A significant regression equation to predict the PB C/D ratio was found through simple and multiple linear regression analyses, with an adjusted coefficient of determination of 0.53 (p < 0.001). Further, the concomitant uses of valproic acid (VPA) or amiodarone, which were the only two drugs seen in this study as potential inhibitors of PB, was found to have the greatest effect on the PB C/D ratio (standardized partial regression coefficient (β) = 0.543, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant difference in the PB C/D ratio was found between the subgroups classified by the concomitant use of VPA or amiodarone (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant correlations between the PB C/D ratio, dosage formulation, and administration route.

Conclusions

The most influential factor on the PB C/D ratio was the concomitant use of VPA or amiodarone with PB. This result could provide an important perspective in pediatric drug therapy where elixir and powder formulations are administered via the oral route and enteral tube.

Establishing Serum Reference Ranges for Antihypertensive Drugs

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves the measurement of serum drug concentrations to optimize pharmacotherapy. Traditionally, blood pressure measurements alone, and not TDM, have been used to evaluate the antihypertensive drug response. However, approximately 50% of hypertensive patients treated with lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs fail to achieve blood pressure control. Serum drug concentration measurements could be useful to select the optimal drugs in adjusted doses and to identify nonadherence. Implementation of TDM in clinical routine for antihypertensive drugs depends on established serum reference ranges.

METHODS

Commonly used antihypertensive drugs were identified based on prescription data. The authors performed a review of authoritative literature on reported serum drug concentrations and calculated expected concentrations from previously reported pharmacokinetic parameters with commonly prescribed daily doses. Finally, serum drug concentrations in samples from patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment were measured.

RESULTS

Serum reference ranges for 24 frequently used antihypertensive drugs were established based on results from 3 approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum drug concentration measurements, interpreted in light of the established reference ranges, together with blood pressure measurements and other clinical data, may help identify nonadherent patients and tailor individual antihypertensive treatment when deviant drug responses appear in line with the concept of personalized medicine.

The art and science of drug titration

A “one-size-fits-all” approach has been the standard for drug dosing, in particular for agents with a wide therapeutic index. The scientific principles of drug titration, most commonly used for medications with a narrow therapeutic index, are to give the patient adequate and effective treatment, at the lowest dose possible, with the aim of minimizing unnecessary medication use and side effects. The art of drug titration involves the interplay of scientific drug titration principles with the clinical expertise of the healthcare provider, and an individualized, patient-centered partnership between the provider and the patient to review the delicate balance of perceived benefits and risks from both perspectives. Drug titration may occur as up-, down-, or cross-titration depending on whether the goal is to reach or maintain a therapeutic outcome, decrease the risk of adverse effects, or prevent withdrawal/discontinuation syndromes or recurrence of disease. Drug titration introduces additional complexities surrounding the conduct of clinical trials and real-world studies, confounding our understanding of the true effect of medications. In clinical practice, wide variations in titration schedules may exist due to a lack of evidence and consensus on titration approaches that achieve an optimal benefit-harm profile. Further, drug titration may be challenging for patients to follow, resulting in suboptimal adherence and may require increased healthcare-related visits and coordination of care amongst providers. Despite the challenges associated with drug titration, it is a personalized approach to drug dosing that blends science with art, and with supportive real-world outcomes-based evidence, can be effective for optimizing pharmacotherapeutic outcomes and improving drug safety.

Early Exposure of Fosphenytoin, Levetiracetam, and Valproic Acid After High-Dose Intravenous Administration in Young Children With Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus

Fosphenytoin (FOS) and its active form, phenytoin (PHT), levetiracetam (LEV), and valproic acid (VPA) are commonly used second-line treatments of status epilepticus. However, limited information is available regarding LEV and VPA concentrations following high intravenous doses, particularly in young children. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial, a blinded, comparative effectiveness study of FOS, LEV, and VPA for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus provided an opportunity to investigate early drug concentrations. Patients aged ≥2 years who continued to seizure despite receiving adequate doses of benzodiazepines were randomly assigned to FOS, LEV, or VPA infused over 10 minutes. A sparse blood-sampling approach was used, with up to 2 samples collected per patient within 2 hours following drug administration. The objective of this work was to report early drug exposure of PHT, LEV, and VPA and plasma protein binding of PHT and VPA. Twenty-seven children with median (interquartile range) age of 4 (2.5-6.5) years were enrolled. The total plasma concentrations ranged from 69 to 151.3 μg/mL for LEV, 11.3 to 26.7 μg/mL for PHT and 126 to 223 μg/mL for VPA. Free fraction ranged from 4% to 19% for PHT and 17% to 51% for VPA. This is the first report in young children of LEV concentrations with convulsive status epilepticus as well as VPA concentrations after a 40 mg/kg dose. Several challenges limited patient enrollment and blood sampling. Additional studies with a larger sample size are required to evaluate the exposure-response relationships in this emergent condition.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Exhibiting Augmented Renal Clearance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with severe trauma exhibit augmented renal clearance, which can alter the dosing requirement of renally eliminated drugs. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for levetiracetam in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and use it to describe optimal dosing regimens.

METHODS

This was a prospective open-label observational study. Critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage without renal dysfunction and receiving levetiracetam were eligible. Serial levetiracetam plasma concentrations were analyzed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and perform dosing simulations.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model best described the concentration-time data from 30 patients. The mean ± standard deviation parameter estimates were bioavailability (F) of 0.8 ± 0.2, absorption rate constant of 2.4 ± 2 h^-1, clearance 2.5 ± 1.1 L/h, central volume of distribution 8.9 ± 3.0 L/h, and transfer rate constraints of 1.8 ± 1.1 h^-1 from central to peripheral compartments and 0.7 ± 0.3 h^-1 from peripheral to central compartments. For the simulated intermittent dosing regimens, on average, the median trough concentration reduced by 50% for every 40-mL/min/1.73 m² increase in urinary creatinine clearance. Simulated doses of at least 6 g/day were required for some levels of augmented renal clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with augmented renal clearance are at risk of not achieving target levetiracetam plasma concentrations. We suggest dose titration guided by measured creatinine clearance, and/or, therapeutic drug monitoring if available, to minimize the risk of seizures.

Development and application of an HPLC-DAD technique for human plasma concentration monitoring of perampanel and lamotrigine in drug-resistant epileptic patients

Perampanel is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED), while lamotrigine is a second-generation AED. Both drugs are subject to extensive pharmacokinetic variability between different patients. Furthermore, it has been reported that perampanel and lamotrigine may be implied in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with other AEDs such as carbamazepine or valproate, with consequent alterations of plasma concentrations. This emphasizes the relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel and lamotrigine with appropriate bioanalytical methods. Herein, the development and validation of a bioanalytical techique for the simultaneous quantification of perampanel and lamotrigine in human plasma samples is described. The reported method is based on high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) and sample preparation consists of liquid-liquid extraction. Chromatographic separation of the analytes (lamotrigine and perampanel) and the internal standard (entacapone) was achieved in 12 min on a reversed-phase C₁₈ column at 40 °C by applying a gradient elution program with a mobile phase composed of 0.1% ortho-phosphoric acid pH 2.79 (A) and acetonitrile (B) pumped at 1.0 mL/min. Perampanel was quantified at 320 nm while lamotrigine and the internal standard were monitored at 306 nm. Calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 0.03-4.5 µg/mL (r² = 0.9978) for perampanel and in the concentration range of 0.25-30 µg/mL (r² = 0.9981) for lamotrigine. Overall precision did not exceed 14.3% and accuracy ranged from -6.08 to 12.66%. Some drugs potentially co-prescribed with perampanel and lamotrigine were tested and did not interfere with the retention times of the analytes and internal standard. The method was then successfully applied for the quantification of perampanel and lamotrigine in plasma samples obtained from 42 drug-resistant epileptic patients admitted to the Coimbra University Hospital Centre (CHUC.EPE, Coimbra, Portugal). In conclusion, it is a suitable method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine and perampanel in drug-resistant epileptic patients, as well as, for the assessment of drug-drug interactions. It can also be adopted by hospitals and laboratories, when HPLC with fluorescence and mass spectrometry detections are unavailable.

Critical Appraisal of Cenobamate as Adjunctive Treatment of Focal Seizures in Adults

Cenobamate (CNB) is the latest antiseizure medication (ASM) authorized for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults. Although the precise mechanism of action of CNB is not yet fully understood, this drug inhibits the persistent, rather than transient, voltage-gated sodium channel currents and is a positive allosteric modulator of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors, differently from benzodiazepines. CNB has a non-linear pharmacokinetic with a terminal half-life range of about 50/60 hours within the therapeutic dose range, which allows once daily administration. Cenobamate inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and induces CYP3A4 and 2B6, and hence can potentially interact with ASMs (eg, phenytoin, carbamazepine and clobazam) and no-ASMs drugs. In two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with focal epilepsies, CNB has shown a particularly good efficacy with a rate of seizure freedom of about 20% during the maintenance period in participants treated with the dose of 400 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects include central nervous system-related symptoms, like dizziness, diplopia, somnolence, and gait disturbances. Safety issues of particular interest are severe skin reactions (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) and QT shortening, which contraindicates its use in subjects with familial short QT syndrome or in combination with other QT-shortening drugs. The recommended starting dose is 12.5 mg/day, which can be gradually titrated to the target dose (200 mg/day) and further increased up to 400 mg/day. There are several aspects of CNB that need to be still addressed, including the long-term efficacy and the efficacy in patients with generalized seizures. Ongoing studies will clarify these issues. The clinical relevance of the peculiar pharmacokinetics and the pattern of drug-drug interactions also require further investigation.

The Pharmacology and Clinical Efficacy of Antiseizure Medications: From Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond

Epilepsy is one of the most common and disabling chronic neurological disorders. Antiseizure medications (ASMs), previously referred to as anticonvulsant or antiepileptic drugs, are the mainstay of symptomatic epilepsy treatment. Epilepsy is a multifaceted complex disease and so is its treatment. Currently, about 30 ASMs are available for epilepsy therapy. Furthermore, several ASMs are approved therapies in nonepileptic conditions, including neuropathic pain, migraine, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Because of this wide spectrum of therapeutic activity, ASMs are among the most often prescribed centrally active agents. Most ASMs act by modulation of voltage-gated ion channels; by enhancement of gamma aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition; through interactions with elements of the synaptic release machinery; by blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors; or by combinations of these mechanisms. Because of differences in their mechanisms of action, most ASMs do not suppress all types of seizures, so appropriate treatment choices are important. The goal of epilepsy therapy is the complete elimination of seizures; however, this is not achievable in about one-third of patients. Both in vivo and in vitro models of seizures and epilepsy are used to discover ASMs that are more effective in patients with continued drug-resistant seizures. Furthermore, therapies that are specific to epilepsy etiology are being developed. Currently, ~ 30 new compounds with diverse antiseizure mechanisms are in the preclinical or clinical drug development pipeline. Moreover, therapies with potential antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying effects are in preclinical and clinical development. Overall, the world of epilepsy therapy development is changing and evolving in many exciting and important ways. However, while new epilepsy therapies are developed, knowledge of the pharmacokinetics, antiseizure efficacy and spectrum, and adverse effect profiles of currently used ASMs is an essential component of treating epilepsy successfully and maintaining a high quality of life for every patient, particularly those receiving polypharmacy for drug-resistant seizures.

Effect of drug interactions between carbapenems and valproate on serum valproate concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Concurrent use of valproate and carbapenem antibiotics may decrease serum valproate concentration (SVC). This study evaluated the effects of carbapenem-valproate drug interactions. Research design and methods: We screened PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for eligible prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the effect of concurrent use of carbapenem and valproate compared with valproate alone on SVC. Primary outcomes were the change in SVC from before the addition of the carbapenem to the SVC during the use of carbapenems and after carbapenem discontinuation, and seizure-related outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the influence of valproate or carbapenem dose on SVC and Drug Interaction Probability Scale scores. Results: Twelve studies (633 patients) were included. Compared with valproate alone, combination treatment with carbapenem substantially decreased mean SVC (mean difference, -43.98 mg/L; 95% confidence interval, -48.18 to -39.78). The onset of SVC decreases was within 1-3 days following carbapenem initiation. Seizure frequency increased by 26.3% during combination treatment. No difference was found in mean SVC between the different doses of valproate or carbapenem during combination treatment. Mean SVC increased to similar pre-carbapenem level within 1 to 2 weeks after carbapenem discontinuation. Conclusions: The drug interaction between valproate and carbapenem causes substantial SVC decreases, even to subtherapeutic levels, which may increase the risk of seizures.

Effects of atorvastatin and aspirin on post-stroke epilepsy and usage of levetiracetam

OBJECTIVE

Atorvastatin and aspirin have been used in treating different forms of epilepsy. However, their effect on post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) still needs to be validated by large-scale clinical studies. In addition, their impact on the use of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam for post-stroke epilepsy remains to be explored. Thus, the aim of this study was to further evaluate the effect of atorvastatin and aspirin on PSE and their effect on the usage of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam in PSE patients.

METHODS

Patients, aged 65 to 85 years, with newly diagnosed post-ischemic stroke epilepsy from August 30, 2014 to August 30, 2018 were included in the study, with the exclusion of those with coexisting conditions.

RESULTS

Initially, 1321 patients were included, and 780 remained in the study at the 1-year follow-up. During the study, atorvastatin treatment with or without aspirin reduced the number of clinical epileptic episodes in PSE patients. It also reduced the dosage of levetiracetam and achieved better control of epilepsy compared to levetiracetam mono-treatment. Aspirin co-treatment with levetiracetam did not result in a significant improvement. However, the combination of aspirin with atorvastatin significantly reduced the number of seizures compared to atorvastatin treatment alone.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin and aspirin co-treatment with levetiracetam can reduce epilepsy in PSE patients and reduce the dosage of levetiracetam required for effective control of PSE.

A combo-strategy to improve brain delivery of antiepileptic drugs: Focus on BCRP and intranasal administration

The breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is an efflux transporter expressed at the apical surface of human brain endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). It was proposed as one of the transporters responsible for the development of drug resistance to several central nervous system (CNS) drugs, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In this context, the present work aimed to characterize the interaction between new-generation AEDs, lacosamide, levetiracetam and zonisamide, and BCRP, in order to investigate whether intranasal administration can successfully avoid the impact of BCRP on brain drug distribution, preventing the development of refractory epilepsy. Firstly, BCRP substrates and/or inhibitors were identified resorting to intracellular accumulation and bidirectional transport assays on Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and the transfected cell line with human ABCG2 (MDCK-BCRP). Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic studies were carried out for BCRP substrates with and without elacridar, a well-known P-gp and BCRP modulator, to assess the impact of efflux inhibition on brain drug distribution. The extent of drug equilibration between plasma and brain was compared after intravenous (IV) and intranasal administration to mice. Among the three tested AEDs, zonisamide was the only AED identified as BCRP substrate in vitro, as demonstrated by the net flux ratio of 2.73, which decreased 53.85 % in the presence of a BCRP inhibitor, Ko143. Lacosamide revealed to inhibit BCRP in all tested concentrations (2.5-75 µM), exhibiting a significant increase (p < 0.001) of the intracellular accumulation of a BCRP substrate (Hoechst 33342) in MDCK-BCRP cells. Levetiracetam did not behave as a BCRP substrate nor inhibitor. After IV administration, the plasma concentrations of zonisamide were unaffected by elacridar, but its extent of brain exposure increased three-fold (as assessed by AUC_t, 674.12 vs 284.47 µg.min/mL). These results corroborate the previous in vitro findings, suggesting that BCRP is involved in the transport of zonisamide through the BBB. In opposition, no significant changes were found in plasma or brain concentrations after the administration of zonisamide by intranasal route, indicating that the influence of BCRP is less relevant than for IV route. In addition, direct nose-to-brain delivery of zonisamide, given by the direct transport percentage, was approximately 49 %. Altogether, these assays demonstrated that the impact of BCRP on the delivery of zonisamide to the brain is lower after intranasal administration, probably due to direct nose-to-brain transport. Therefore, the intranasal administration of AEDs may be a relevant strategy to avoid the impact of efflux transporters at the BBB and the development of drug resistance.

Epilepsy: Workup and Management in Adults

When managing epilepsy, there is a temptation to focus care with respect to the last and the next seizure. However, epilepsy is a multifaceted chronic condition and should be treated as such. Epilepsy comes with many physical risks, psychological effects, and socioeconomic ramifications, demanding a long-term commitment from the treating physician. Patients with epilepsy, compared to other chronically ill patient populations, have a worse quality of life, family function, and less social support. The majority of patients are well controlled on antiseizure drugs. However, approximately one-third will continue to have seizures despite optimized medical management. The primary aim of this article is to explore the long-term management of chronic epilepsy, and to address some of the particular needs of patients with chronic epilepsy.

Retrospective Analysis of Pediatric and Adult Populations Using an LC-MS/MS Method for Oxcarbazepine/Eslicarbazepine Metabolite

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-epileptic drugs is important to manage seizure control in patients with epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine is a second-generation anti-epileptic drug approved for use in pediatric patients, and eslicarbazepine acetate is a newer generation drug used as adjunctive therapy and monotherapy for partial-onset (focal) seizures. While several second and third generation anti-epileptic drugs have broader therapeutic efficacy in patients, these drugs can still have severe side effects and variable interpatient pharmacokinetics. Consequently, there is a need for accurate and sensitive analytical methods to support therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHODS

An assay improvement for a LC-MS/MS method was developed for the major metabolite of oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine, licarbazepine (MHD), using a 13C-labeled form of the compound as the internal standard. Additionally, retrospective data analysis was used to compare the distribution of results observed in adult vs pediatric patients.

RESULTS

Accuracy and linearity across the analytical measuring range of 1 to 60 µg/mL was acceptable. Inter- and intra-run precision was less than 6% at 3 concentrations tested. The limit of detection was determined to be 0.5 µg/mL. Significant interference from hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, or 187 other potential interferences was not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved assay for MHD was appropriate for clinical use. Retrospective data analysis showed that pediatric and adult patients had a similar distribution of oxcarbazepine/eslicarbazepine metabolite concentrations in serum.

Levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy

PURPOSE

To determine clearance of levetiracetam in patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with acute kidney injury or end stage renal disease requiring either CRRT or SLED and levetiracetam were eligible for inclusion. Simultaneous arterial, venous, and effluent samples for analysis of levetiracetam concentrations were collected every two hours for up to 6-8 h. Levetiracetam clearance (CL) and half-life (t_1/2) were calculated for each modality.

RESULTS

Eight CRRT patients and 4 SLED patients completed the study: 67% male, mean age 50 ± 13 years, and 83% had AKI. Seven CRRT patients received continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) [median pre-replacement rate 700 mL/h (range 500-1000), post-replacement rate 500 mL/h (range 200-1000), effluent rate 2500 mL/h (range 1700-3650) and delivered CRRT dose 27 mL/kg/h (range 19-54)] and one patient received CVV hemofiltration (CVVH). The mm mean levetiracetam CL during CVVHDF was 31.2 ± 8.5 mL/min, and the and the mean t_1/2 was 10.4 ± 2.2 h. For the patient requiring CVVH, clearance and t_1/2 were 22.5 mL/min and 9.5 h, respectively. Mean levetiracetam CL during SLED performed at a blood flow rate of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow rate of 100 mL/min was 74.0 ± 25.3 mL/min and t_1/2 was 4.8 ± 2.3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam clearance was substantial with both modalities under the operating conditions reported. There is the potential for subtherapeutic concentrations with current recommended dosing strategies that account only for kidney function and not these extracorporeal routes of elimination.

New Methods Used in Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Monitoring of the First and Newer Generations of Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)

The review presents data from the last few years on bioanalytical methods used in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the 1st-3rd generation and the newest antiepileptic drug (AEDs) cenobamate in patients with various forms of seizures. Chemical classification, structure, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic data and therapeutic ranges for total and free fractions and interactions were collected. The primary data on bioanalytical methods for AEDs determination included biological matrices, sample preparation, dried blood spot (DBS) analysis, column resolution, detection method, validation parameters, and clinical utility. In conclusion, the most frequently described method used in AED analysis is the LC-based technique (HPLC, UHPLC, USLC) combined with highly sensitive mass detection or fluorescence detection. However, less sensitive UV is also used. Capillary electrophoresis and gas chromatography have been rarely applied. Besides the precipitation of proteins or LLE, an automatic SPE is often a sample preparation method. Derivatization was also indicated to improve sensitivity and automate the analysis. The usefulness of the methods for TDM was also highlighted.

Simultaneous Determination of Lamotrigine, Topiramate, Oxcarbazepine, and 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine in Human Blood Plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS

Background:

Lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC) are commonly used antiepileptic drugs. The bioactivity and toxicity of these drugs were related to their blood concentrations which varied greatly among individuals and required to be monitored for dose adjustment. However, the commercial method for monitoring of these drugs is not available in China.

Methods:

A UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of LTG, TPM, OXC, and OXC active metabolite (10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine, MHD) was developed and validated according to the guidelines and applied in clinical practice.

Results:

he separation was achieved by using methanol and water (both contain 0.1% formic acid) at 0.4 mL/min under gradient elution within 3 min. For all analytes, the isotope internal standard was used; the selectivity was good without significant carry over; LTG and TPM were linear between 0.06 to 12 mg/L while OXC and MHD were linear between 0.03 to 6 mg/L, the upper limit could be 10-fold higher because 10-fold dilution with water did not affect the results; the intra-day and interday bias and imprecision were -13.11% to 5.42% and < 13.32%; the internal standard normalized recovery and matrix factor were 90.95% to 111.94% and 95.57% to 109.91%; and all analytes were stable under tested conditions. LTG and OXC-D4 shared two ion pairs m/z 257.1 > 212.0 and 257.1 > 184.0, and m/z 257.1 > 240.0 was suggested for OXC-D4 quantitation. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine- 13C3 shared three ion pairs m/z 259.0 > 214.0, 259.0 > 168.0 and 259.0 > 159.0, and m/z 259.0 > 144.9 was suggested for LTG-13C3 quantitation. CBZ had a slight influence on OXC analysis only at 0.225 mg/L (bias, 20.24%) but did not affect MHD analysis. Optimization of chromatography conditions was useful to avoid the influence of isobaric mass transitions on analysis. This method has been successfully applied in 208 patients with epilepsy for dose adjustment.

Conclusions:

An accurate, robust, rapid, and simple method for simultaneous determination of LTG, TPM, OXC, and MHD by UHPLC-MS/MS was developed, validated, and successfully applied in patients with epilepsy for dose adjustment. The experiences during method development, validation, and application might be helpful for other researchers.

[Transfer Mechanisms of Compounds between Mother and Fetus/Infant Aimed for Optimized Medication during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding]

Potential risks to the fetus or infant should be considered prior to medication during pregnancy and lactation. It is essential to evaluate the exposure levels of drugs and their related factors in addition to toxicological effects. Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological complications in pregnancy; some women continue to use antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to control seizures. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are widely prescribed for several women who experience symptoms such as anxiety and insomnia during the postpartum period. In this review, we describe the 1) transport mechanisms of AEDs across the placenta and the effects of these drugs on placental transporters, and 2) the transfer of BZDs into breast milk. Our findings indicated that carrier systems were involved in the uptake of gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) in placental trophoblast cell lines. SLC7A5 was the main contributor to GBP transport in placental cells. LTG was transported by a carrier that was sensitive to chloroquine, imipramine, quinidine, and verapamil. Short-term exposure to 16 AEDs had no effect on folic acid uptake in placental cells. However, long-term exposure to valproic acid (VPA) affected the expression of folate carriers (FOLR1, SLC46A1). Furthermore, VPA administration changed the expression levels of various transporters in rat placenta, suggesting that sensitivity to VPA differed across gestational stages. Lastly, we developed a method for quantifying eight BZDs in human breast milk and plasma using LC/MS/MS, and successfully applied it to quantify alprazolam in breast milk and plasma donated by a lactating woman.

Targeted Strategy to Analyze Antiepileptic Drugs in Human Serum by LC-MS/MS and LC-Ion Mobility-MS

Routine small-molecule analysis is challenging owing to the need for high selectivity and/or low limits of quantification. This work reports a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify 14 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in human serum. For the optimized LC-MS/MS method described herein, we applied the guidelines outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) LC-MS C62-A document and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry to evaluate the quality of the assay. In these studies, AED linearity, analyte recovery, matrix effects, precision, and accuracy were assessed. Using liquid chromatography-drift tube ion mobility-mass spectrometry (LC-DTIM-MS), a qualitative method was also used to increase confidence in AED identification using accurate mass and collision cross section (CCS) measurements. The LC-DTIM-MS method was also used to assess the ability of drift tube CCS measurements to aid in the separation and identification of AED structural isomers and other AEDs. These data show that another dimension of information, namely CCS measurements, provides an orthogonal dimension of structural information needed for AED analysis. Multiplexed AED measurements using LC-MS/MS and LC-DTIM-MS have the potential to enable better optimization of dosing owing to the high precision capabilities available in these types of analytical studies. Taken together, these data also show the ability to increase confidence in small-molecule identification and quantification using these analytical technologies.

Involuntary human exposure to carbamazepine: A cross-sectional study of correlates across the lifespan and dietary spectrum

Treated wastewater (TWW) is increasingly used for agricultural irrigation, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Carbamazepine is among the most frequently detected pharmaceuticals in TWW. Moreover, its uptake and accumulation have been demonstrated in crops irrigated with TWW. A previous controlled trial found that urine concentrations of carbamazepine were higher in healthy volunteers consuming TWW-irrigated produce as compared to freshwater-irrigated produce. The aim of the current study was to assess whether carbamazepine is quantifiable in urine of Israelis consuming their usual diets and whether concentrations vary according to age, personal characteristics and diet. In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 245 volunteers, including a reference group of omnivorous healthy adults aged 18-66; pregnant women; children aged 3-6 years; adults aged >75 years; and vegetarians/vegans. Participants provided spot urine samples and reported 24-hour and "usual" dietary consumption. Urinary carbamazepine levels were compared according to group, personal characteristics, health behaviors, and reported diet. Carbamazepine was detectable (≥1.66 ng/L) in urine of 84%, 76%, 75.5%, 66%, and 19.6% of the reference group, vegetarians, older adults, pregnant women, and children, respectively. Quantifiable concentrations (≥5.0 ng/L) of carbamazepine were found in 58%, 46%, 36.7%, 14%, and 0% of these groups, respectively (p = 0.001 for comparison of proportions across groups). In adults, higher carbamazepine concentrations were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with self-defined vegetarianism, usual consumption of dairy products and at least five vegetables/day, and no meat or fish consumption in the past 24-hours. This study demonstrates that people living in a water-scarce region with widespread TWW irrigation, are unknowingly exposed to carbamazepine. Individuals adhering to recommended guidelines for daily fresh produce consumption may be at higher risk of exposure to TWW-derived contaminants of emerging concern.

Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of valproic acid in patients with epilepsy based on Monte Carlo simulations

OBJECTIVE

Delayed or missed doses are unavoidable in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy and significantly compromise the efficacy of antiepileptic drug treatment. An inappropriate remedial regimen can cause seizure relapse or serious adverse events. This study investigated the effect of delayed or missed doses on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of valproic acid (VPA) in patients with epilepsy and established remedial dosing recommendations for nonadherent patients.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations are based on all previous population pharmacokinetic models for pediatric, adult and elderly patients with epilepsy. The following four remedial strategies were investigated for each delayed dose: A) A partial dose or a regular dose is taken immediately; a regular dose is taken at the next scheduled time. B) The delayed dose was administered immediately, followed by a partial dose at the next scheduled time. C) The delayed dose and a partial dose are taken; the next scheduled time is skipped, and the regular regimen is resumed. D) Double doses are taken when missed one dose or two doses, and the regular regimen at the subsequent scheduled time is resumed.

RESULTS

The recommended remedial dose was related to the delay duration and daily dose. Remedial dosing strategies A and B were almost equivalent, whereas Strategy C was recommended when the delayed dose was close to the next scheduled dose. Strategy D was only suggested for delayed two doses.

CONCLUSION

Simulations provide quantitative insight into the remedial regimens for nonadherent patients, and clinicians should select the optimal regimen for each patient based on the individual's status.

Therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs: Recommendations to improve care of patients with epilepsy in the Palestinian practice

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can play a major role in optimizing pharmacotherapy of epilepsy. This study was conducted to explore views and opinions of clinicians who care for patients with epilepsy (PWE) in Palestine and to develop consensus-based recommendations with regard to importance, justification, technical, and analytical issues of TDM of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

The study was conducted in three phases: (1) the published literature was thoroughly searched for an initial list of items relevant to TDM of AEDs, (2) the list was supplemented by items provided by key experts (n = 8) through semi-structured in-depth interviews, (3) views and opinions of clinicians (n = 20) on TDM of AEDs were explored, and (4) a two-round Delphi technique was followed among a panel of experts (n = 27) to develop consensus-based recommendations to guide TDM of AEDs in Palestine.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on items related to importance (8 items) of TDM of AEDs, clinical justifications of TDM of AEDs (19 items), guidelines for optimal TDM of AEDs (11 items), TDM of some AEDs (21 items), TDM practice (24 items), and some technical and analytical issues in TDM of AEDs (13 items).

CONCLUSION

Consensus-based recommendations that might be used in guiding TDM of AEDs in Palestine were developed. Future studies are still needed to investigate if these consensus-based recommendations can improve healthcare of PWE in Palestine.

Evaluation of Fosphenytoin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the current method of calculating a fosphenytoin reloading dose results in a therapeutic free phenytoin level on subsequent days.

METHODS

Medical records of patients receiving fosphenytoin in the neurocritical care unit between July 2017 and June 2018 were screened. Included patients were those who had received at least three doses of fosphenytoin and required reloading doses according to concentrations obtained through therapeutic drug monitoring. Free phenytoin levels were categorized based on the prespecified patient-specific target range, generally between 1.5 and 2.5 mcg/mL.

RESULTS

Of the fosphenytoin reloading doses administered, 48% (73/152) resulted in a therapeutic free phenytoin concentration on the subsequent day, with the remaining 52% resulting in nontherapeutic levels (39% subtherapeutic, 13% supratherapeutic). Our evaluation of reloading dose calculation strategies indicated that patients were two times as likely to obtain a therapeutic level when a modified pharmacokinetic equation omitting the use of volume of distribution or salt formulation was used (58%, n = 39) than they were with doses calculated using the current pharmacokinetic model (41%, n = 20) or doses based on provider preference (39%, n = 14).

CONCLUSION

The current method of calculating a fosphenytoin reloading dose in the critically ill population does not consistently result in therapeutic concentrations. With multiple factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of critically ill patients, the creation of a new pharmacokinetic model with less emphasis on volume of distribution may more consistently result in therapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Portuguese Refractory Epileptic Patients: Effect of Gender, Weight and Concomitant Therapy

Levetiracetam is a second-generation antiepileptic drug, widely used in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsy due to its pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Its pharmacokinetic monitoring is ascribed as useful to personalize its dosing regimen. The aim of the present study was to describe, for the first time, the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in Portuguese refractory epileptic patients. Therefore, a retrospective study was carried out on 65 Portuguese refractory epileptic patients (pharmacokinetic study: 48; validation study: 17) admitted to the Refractory Epilepsy Centre of the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. The pharmacokinetic parameters of levetiracetam were estimated by applying a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination analysis. Male patients showed higher distribution volume (Vd/F) and oral clearance (CL/F) than female patients (median Vd/F: 52.40 L in males and 38.60 L in females, p = 0.011; median CL/F: 4.71 L/h in males and 3.91 L/h in females, p = 0.028). Higher values of Vd/F (p = 0.026) and CL/F (p = 0.003) were also found in overweight patients relative to normal weight and obese patients. Carbamazepine was the co-administered antiepileptic drug that mostly affected the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam, increasing both Vd/F (61.30 L with carbamazepine and 39.10 L without carbamazepine, p = 0.007) and CL/F (6.71 L/h with carbamazepine and 3.91 L/h without carbamazepine, p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam was affected by gender, body mass index, and co-administration of carbamazepine. This study highlights the impact of several factors on the CL/ and Vd/F of levetiracetam when administered to refractory epileptic patients. The importance of its pharmacokinetic monitoring in clinical pharmacy stands out, thereby enabling the optimization of antiepileptic drug therapy.

Factors to influence the accuracy of albumin adjusted free valproic acid concentration

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended during treatment with valproic acid (VPA), as is the measurement of free VPA concentration (MfVPA). However, MfVPA is unavailable in many institutions. Based on the highly protein-bound characteristics of VPA, an albumin-adjusted formula has been proposed to predict free VPA concentration (PfVPA). Nevertheless, the factors affecting the accuracy of this formula remain unknown, as does the concordance between MfVPA and PfVPA.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving VPA and undergoing TDM were enrolled. Free and total serum concentration (TVPA) were categorized as subtherapeutic, therapeutic, or supratherapeutic based on the reference range of 5-15 and 50-100 μg/mL, respectively. Concordance was defined as MfVPA and PfVPA, or MfVPA and TVPA, falling within the same category. Multivariate logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was adopted to identify factors affecting concordance, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to determine the cutoff values of predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 98 data points from 51 participants were included for analysis. The concordance of MfVPA and PfVPA, and MfVPA and TVPA, was 72% and 44%, respectively. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (0.97 [0.95-0.99], P = 0.01) and TVPA (0.97 [0.95-0.99], P = 0.02) had a significant influence on the concordance of MfVPA and PfVPA. The cutoff values of TVPA and BUN for the accuracy of the albumin-adjusted formula were 56.4 μg/mL and 51.05 mg/dL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

If MfVPA is not available, the albumin-adjusted formula should be applied before VPA dosage adjustment when TVPA is < 56.4 μg/mL and BUN is < 51.05 mg/dL.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Phenobarbital in Neonates and Infants on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and the Influence of Concomitant Renal Replacement Therapy

The objective of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous phenobarbital in neonates and infants on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and to provide dosing recommendations in this population. We performed a retrospective single-center PK study of phenobarbital in neonates and infants on ECMO between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. We developed a population PK model using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, performed simulations using the final PK parameters, and determined optimal dosing based on attainment of peak and trough concentrations between 20 and 40 mg/L. We included 35 subjects with a median (range) age and weight of 14 days (1-154 days) and 3.4 kg (1.6-8.1 kg), respectively. A total of 194 samples were included in the analysis. Five children (14%) contributing 30 samples (16%) were supported by continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). A 1-compartment model best described the data. Typical clearance and volume of distribution for a 3.4-kg infant were 0.038 L/h and 3.83 L, respectively. Clearance increased with age and CVVHDF. Although on ECMO, phenobarbital clearance in children on CVVHDF was 6-fold higher than clearance in children without CVVHDF. In typical subjects, a loading dose of 30 mg/kg/dose followed by maintenance doses of 6-7 mg/kg/day administered as divided doses every 12 hours reached goal concentrations. Age did not impact dosing recommendations. However, higher doses were needed in children on CVVHDF. We strongly recommend therapeutic drug monitoring in children on renal replacement therapy (excluding slow continuous ultrafiltration) while on ECMO.

Safety range of free valproic acid serum concentration in adult patients

Background

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended during valproic acid (VPA) use, and total serum concentration has been widely adopted. However, the free form of VPA is responsible for its pharmacologic and toxic effects, and the total and free concentrations are highly discordant because of VPA’s highly protein bound and saturable binding characteristics. Therefore, free VPA monitoring is increasingly advocated. Nevertheless, the correlation between free VPA concentration and associated adverse effects remains unknown.

Objective

To determine the optimal safety range of free VPA concentration in adult patients.

Materials and methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients undergoing VPA therapy with TDM. Patient characteristics, VPA use, and adverse effects (thrombocytopenia, hyperammonemia, and hepatotoxicity) were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression model was applied to identify the predictors of adverse effects, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to locate the cutoff point of free VPA concentration.

Results

A total of 98 free serum concentrations from 51 patients were included for final analysis. In total, 31 (31.6%), 27 (27.6%), and 4 (4.1%) episodes of hyperammonemia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatotoxicity were observed, respectively. Free VPA concentration was a predicting factor for thrombocytopenia but not for hyperammonemia. A free VPA concentration of >14.67 mcg/mL had the greatest discriminating power (area under the curve = 0.77) for the occurrence of thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions

A free VPA serum concentration of 14.67 mcg/mL had the optimal discriminating power for the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. Ammonemia should be monitored even if free VPA concentration is within the safety range.

A Practice-Based, Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study to Inform Levetiracetam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (PADRE-01)

Limited data exist on the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) methods on anti-epileptic drug pharmacokinetics (PK). This prospective practice-based PK study aims to assess the impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), a modality of CRRT, on levetiracetam PK in critically ill patients and to derive individualized dosing recommendations. Eleven patients receiving oral or intravenous levetiracetam and CVVH in various intensive care units at a large academic medical center were enrolled to investigate the need for dosing adjustments. Prefilter, postfilter, and ultrafiltrate samples were obtained before dosing, after the completion of the infusion or 1-hour postoral dose, and up to 6 additional time points postinfusion or postoral administration. Patient-specific blood and ultrafiltrate flow rates and laboratory values were also collected at the time of sampling. The average sieving coefficient (SC) for levetiracetam was 0.89 ± 0.1, indicating high filter efficiency. Six of the 11 patients experienced concentrations outside the reported therapeutic range (12-46 mg/L). The average volume of distribution was 0.73 L/kg. CVVH clearance contributes a major fraction of the total levetiracetam clearance (36-73%) in neurocritically ill patients. The average bias and precision of the estimated vs. observed total clearance value was ~ 10.6% and 21.5%. Major dose determinants were identified to be SC and effluent flow rate. Patients with higher ultrafiltrate rates will have increased drug clearance and, therefore, will require higher doses in order to match exposures seen in patients with normal renal function.

Herb-drug interaction of gastrodiae rhizoma on carbamazepine: A pharmacokinetic study in rats

OBJECTIVE

Gastrodiae Rhizoma (GR), is a traditional Chinese Medicine that has been used for neurological disorders, including epilepsy. Epilepsy patients may be treated with adjunctive therapy of GR with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In particular, carbamazepine (CBZ) is of high potential to interact with concurrent treatment of Chinese Medicine. This study was to investigate the herb-drug interactions of GR and CBZ, an AED, through pharmacokinetic approach in rats.

METHODS

We adopted a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system to quantify the plasma level of CBZ and its metabolite (carbamazepine-10, 11-epoxide, CBZE). The method was validated as per instructions under United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) guidance. For the herb-drug interaction study, rats were randomly divided into four different treatment groups: single-dose CBZ treatment, single-dose CBZ/GR treatment, 2-week course of CBZ treatment and 2-week course of CBZ/GR treatment.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated the auto-induction of CBZ metabolization when comparing single-dose with 2-week course of CBZ treatment. Pharmacokinetic interactions were noted in concomitant use of GR with CBZ by comparing two single-dose treatments (CBZ versus CBZ/GR). Our data showed that GR increased the mean residence time (MRT0-t) and the time taken to reach the maximum concentration (Tmax) of CBZ in single-dose of CBZ/GR treatment. The maximum drug concentration (Cmax) of CBZ was reduced in single-dose CBZ/GR treatment. When comparing the 2-week course of CBZ treatment with the 2-week course of CBZ/GR treatment, the MRT0-t and half-life of CBZ were increased. The AUC0-t, the Cmax and the half-life of CBZE were increased.

CONCLUSION

CBZ/GR treatment may reduce the auto-induction of CBZ over 2 weeks. While the reduction of auto-induction could enhance the therapeutic effects of CBZ, it could also lead to an increase in neurological side effects and non-neurological adverse effects. Our results provided preclinical evidence of herb-drug interaction, which may have implications for epilepsy patients treated with GR.