Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with localized and metastasized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the value of several markers of bone turnover in different stages of prostate cancer, as bone metastases are a common feature in this disease, and for assessing bone metastases both bone formation and bone resorption markers are diagnostic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospective study included 219 men, i.e. 129 undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and 25 with bone metastases due to prostate cancer, and 65 with benign urological disorders who served as controls. Before any treatment the concentrations of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (S-CTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP5b) were determined.

RESULTS

Men undergoing RRP were divided into those with lymph node-negative, localized (pT3, 101) and lymph node-positive (28) disease, after histological examination. The controls had the lowest marker levels while patients with bone metastases due to prostate cancer had the highest levels, with significance for ALP, osteocalcin and TRACP5b. Patients with lymph node-positive cancer had significantly high serum levels of TRACP5b and ALP but not for osteocalcin and S-CTX.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone turnover markers represent a new diagnostic tool in prostate cancer; the present data show that both bone resorption and bone formation are crucial for detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer. The value of bone turnover markers in high-risk patients should be evaluated in a longitudinal study.

Regional Cancer Pain Syndromes

Cancer pain often presents in a body region. This review summarizes articles from 1999-2004 relevant to cancer pain syndromes in the head and neck, chest, back, abdomen, pelvis, and limbs. Although the evidence is limited, progress is being made in further development of the evidence base to support and guide current practice.

Appraising Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

Tamoxifen, once the gold standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, is being challenged by third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) that have demonstrated improved disease-free survival in a variety of adjuvant settings for early breast cancer. Tamoxifen and AIs have different safety profiles, which should allow physicians to begin to individualize treatment based on a patient's comorbidities and risk factors. Because of its properties as a partial estrogen agonist, tamoxifen has a positive effect on serum lipids and may confer a cardioprotective benefit, as well as a beneficial effect on bone health. However, tamoxifen increases the risk for endometrial cancer and cerebrovascular/thromboembolic events. In comparison, the major side effect of AIs is increased bone loss, which may heighten the risk for osteoporotic fractures and bone pain. Because of their superior efficacy and manageable side effects, AIs are a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen, and clinical guidelines now embrace AIs as appropriate adjuvant therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. The anticipated results of ongoing trials will provide further insights into the long-term safety and application of AI therapy in the adjuvant setting.

Methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and risk of fracture

We studied the fracture risk associated with use of methotrexate, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. The study was designed as a case-control study. All patients with a fracture (n = 124,655) in the year 2000 in Denmark served as cases. Information on fractures and confounders was retrieved from the National Hospital Discharge Register and a number of other national registers. For each case, three age- and gender-matched controls were randomly drawn from the general population (n = 373,962). Exposure was use of the drugs and a number of covariates including other immunosuppressive drugs, corticosteroids, any cancer, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, liver and kidney disease, prior fracture, and alcoholism. Azathioprine was associated with an increase in overall fracture risk, but besides this, none of the drugs was significantly associated with overall fracture risk or risk of hip, spine, or forearm fracture. Liver [odds ratio (OR) = 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-1.69] and kidney (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37) diseases were significantly associated with increased risk of fractures. Azathioprine was associated with an increase in overall fracture risk but not in the risk of spine, hip, or forearm fractures. Methotrexate and cyclosporine were not associated with fracture risk. It thus seems that the underlying disease for which the treatment is administered may be responsible for much of the increase in fracture risk rather than the drugs used to treat the disorder in question.

Cancer-treatment-induced bone loss, part 1

PURPOSE

The pathophysiology, frequency, sequelae, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer-treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) are discussed.

SUMMARY

CTIBL is a long-term complication associated with cancer therapies that can directly or indirectly affect bone metabolism. Although CTIBL can occur in any patient receiving a cancer therapy known to cause bone loss, CTIBL is most common in patients with breast or prostate cancer who receive chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or surgical castration, as these can cause hypogonadism and induce bone loss. CTIBL causes bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures; therefore, prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of CTIBL are essential to decrease the risk of fracture. Bone loss occurs more rapidly and tends to be more severe in patients with CTIBL compared with those with normal age-related bone loss. Fractures of the hip, vertebra, and wrist are the fractures most commonly associated with bone loss. CTIBL is diagnosed by measuring bone mass using bone densitometry. Treatment of CTIBL consists of changing diet and lifestyle such as optimizing calcium and vitamin D intake, exercising, modifying behaviors known to increase the risk of CTIBL and pharmacologic therapy with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen-receptor modifiers (SERMs), calcitonin, or a bisphosphonate.

CONCLUSION

Early identification and treatment of CTIBL are essential to prevent fractures. Patients should be instructed to optimize calcium and vitamin D intake, exercise regularly, and modify lifestyle behaviors known to cause bone loss. Patients with CTIBL should be treated with an oral or i.v. bisphosphonate; SERMs or HRT may be an option in some patients if contraindications do not exist.

Long-term follow-up of people who have survived cancer during childhood

Substantial improvements in survival after treatment for malignant disease in childhood are leading to a rapidly increasing number of long-term survivors, many of whom are now adults. However, late chronic adverse effects of treatment are common, and have potentially severe effects on survivors' future physical, cognitive, or psychosocial health. The aim of long-term follow-up is to facilitate timely diagnosis and appropriate management of late adverse effects, thereby reducing the frequency of severe complications. Although the delivery of long-term follow-up care varies substantially--particularly in terms of who provides it, where, and how--recognition of the importance of appropriate multidisciplinary care and cross-speciality care is increasing, especially for adolescent and adult survivors of cancer during childhood. Several models of long-term follow-up care have been developed to address this need. This review discusses the present provision of long-term follow-up, and summarises information that might facilitate design and implementation of future models of long-term follow-up care.

Bone mineral density and bone metabolism in children treated for bone sarcomas

In adolescent bone sarcoma patients, bone mass acquisition is potentially compromised at a time in which it should be at a maximum. To evaluate the problem we measured bone mineral density (BMD) and serum markers of bone formation and resorption in a series of pediatric patients with bone tumors. BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, at clinical remission, for lumbar spine and the neck of the femur in 38 osteosarcoma and 25 Ewing's sarcoma patients. Mean age was 20.65 and 19.13 y respectively. Serum markers of bone metabolism were: OC, PICP, ICTP, 25-OH vit D and 1,25-(OH)(2) vit D, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and intact PTH. Serum was sampled throughout anti-tumoral treatments and follow-up. We analyzed 85 samples from 59 osteosarcoma patients and 54 samples from 36 Ewing's sarcoma patients. Patients had decreased lumbar and femoral BMD. The decrease was more pronounced in pubertal patients compared with those who had completed pubertal development at the time of disease diagnosis. Multivariate analysis indicated that sex, age, weight and BMI were significant in lumbar BMD depletion. Weight and BMI were significant in femoral BMD depletion. Serum markers of bone formation (PICP and OC) and resorption (ICTP) were, throughout, lower than reference values. Significant alterations in other markers were also observed. Up to a third of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma patients in clinical remission had some degree of BMD deficit. The corresponding increased risk of pathologic bone fractures constitutes a reduction in future quality of life.

Density and structural changes in the bone of growing rats after weekly alendronate administration with and without a methotrexate challenge

Alendronate (ALN) and other bisphosphonates have been used successfully in pediatric patients with osteopenia secondary to connective tissue diseases. Loss of growth in height has not been reported, but concerns remain regarding the effect of these potent antiresorptive agents when used in children and adolescents. High-dose methotrexate (MTX) and other chemotherapy drugs have been implicated in osteoporosis and a high fracture incidence in survivors of childhood cancers and are also associated with osteopenia in adult animals. The effect of high dose MTX on bone density during rapid skeletal growth, however, has not been widely studied, nor has the potentially therapeutic effect of bisphosphonates in this setting. We examined the effects of ALN and MTX administration, alone and in combination, on bone density, morphology, mechanical strength, and longitudinal growth in normal growing rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were given ALN once weekly (0.3 mg/kg) from 5 to 11 weeks of age, with and without a course of methotrexate (MTX) given daily in weeks 1 and 3 (0.75 mg/kg/day). Twenty-four animals were randomly divided into four groups: Control (vehicle), ALN alone, ALN + MTX, and MTX alone. After 6 weeks, the femora, tibiae, and lumbar spine were studied by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, mechanical strength testing, microradiography, light microscopy, and by determination of ash weights and bone lengths. ALN treatment increased bone mineral density (BMD) by 23% to 68%. The largest increases in the femur occurred in the distal third where endochondral bone growth was greatest and included large increases in trabecular bone and total cross-sectional area. ALN + MTX produced similar effects to ALN alone. MTX only reduced BMD by 8% in the vertebrae, but not significantly at other sites. MTX also led to femoral length reductions of 2.9%. The small reductions in BMD due to MTX were overwhelmed by the increases due to ALN, whereas the length loss was unaffected. Transverse density banding corresponding to weekly ALN administrations were clearly evident radiographically throughout the growing skeleton, likely due to decreased resorption and possibly increased mineralization in the bands. ALN or ALN + MTX treatment also led to increases in mechanical strength in the femora. Although MTX administration during growth leads to some BMD reduction, ALN given with MTX eliminates this reduction and in fact bone density and strength increase above control levels.

Management of Cancer-Treatment–Induced Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women Undergoing Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy: A Z-FAST Update

The prevention of cancer-treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in long-term adjuvant breast cancer therapy is a high priority. Postmenopausal women with cancer, already at increased risk of bone loss because of age-related estrogen deficiency, face accelerated bone loss with the use of estrogen-depleting therapies such as third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although effective in reducing cancer recurrence rates in the adjuvant setting, AIs are associated with bone loss and an increased risk of fractures. Bisphosphonates, which act by inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption, have been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. Furthermore, the potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid has been shown to be efficacious in reducing bone loss in premenopausal women receiving combination adjuvant hormone therapy (goserelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, plus either an AI or tamoxifen). The use of zoledronic acid to prevent CTIBL in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AI therapy with letrozole is currently being investigated in the Zometa/Femara Adjuvant Synergy Trial (Z-FAST). Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIa estrogen-receptor-positive and/or progesterone-receptor-positive breast cancer starting letrozole are randomized to receive either upfront zoledronic acid or delayed zoledronic acid. At 6 months, assessable women in the upfront group showed a mean increase of 1.55% in lumbar spine (L1 - L4) BMD, compared with a mean decrease of 1.78% in women in the delayed group, resulting in a difference of 3.33% between groups; moreover, women in the former group showed a mean increase of 1.02% in total hip BMD, compared with a mean decrease of 1.40% in those in the latter group, resulting in a significant difference of 2.42% between groups (P <.001). Thus, the Z-FAST BMD results show that upfront zoledronic acid prevents CTIBL in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant letrozole therapy for early breast cancer. Combining the anticancer efficacy of letrozole with the bone-protective effect of zoledronic acid may be a successful treatment in this setting.

Optimizing the use of aromatase inhibitors in adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive early breast cancer: current and future prospects

PURPOSE

Five years of tamoxifen treatment after primary surgery has had a significant impact on outcomes for women with early breast cancer, but the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now challenging tamoxifen as the gold standard endocrine adjuvant treatment. Results from two large, phase III, early adjuvant studies have indicated that the AIs letrozole and anastrozole offer greater protection against recurrence than tamoxifen in upfront substitution strategies in the first 5 years after surgery. Similarly, changeover to an AI (exemestane or anastrozole) after 2-3 years of tamoxifen has been shown to offer greater protection against recurrence than 5 years of tamoxifen. More than 50% of early breast cancer recurrences occur five or more years after surgery. Letrozole has been shown to offer greater protection against recurrence than placebo in the 5 years after a standard course of tamoxifen. The safety implications of treatment with these potent AIs for 5 years or more are being closely monitored. Anticipated effects of estrogen deprivation on bone health may be treatable with bisphosphonates, and this strategy is under investigation. Effects on the cardiovascular system, and other estrogen-sensitive systems such as the central nervous system, are currently unclear and further results are awaited.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that the third-generation AIs will improve outcomes for many women with early breast cancer.

Improving bone health in patients with early breast cancer by adding bisphosphonates to letrozole: The Z-ZO-E-ZO-FAST program

Women undergoing treatment for breast cancer often have a number of pre-existing risk factors for bone loss, including existing or induced postmenopausal status. Long-term anticancer treatments may further augment this risk, inducing further bone-loss, increasing the incidence of bone fractures, associated morbidity and mortality, and healthcare costs. Long-term treatment with third-generation antiaromatase agents (AAAs) is used more and more instead of or after the selective estrogen-receptor modulator tamoxifen for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. These AAAs include anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, and all are superior to tamoxifen in both efficacy and safety. In particular, they reduce the incidence of serious adverse events such as thromboembolism and endometrial cancer that are associated with tamoxifen treatment. On the other hand, the AAAs lead to profound estrogen depletion and appear to have a pronounced effect on bone mineral density (BMD), and a significantly higher incidence of osteoporosis/osteopenia and bone fracture has been reported in some trials. Bisphosphonate therapies, including zoledronic acid (ZA), have emerged as a promising means of reducing bone loss associated with antiaromatase therapy. Several large, randomized, multicenter trials are underway to determine whether upfront or delayed ZA therapy can decrease BMD losses in patients undergoing treatment with the antiaromatase agent letrozole (Z-FAST; ZO-FAST, and E-ZO-FAST), and early results from the Zometa-Femara adjuvant synergy trial (Z-FAST) trial indicate a significant benefit of upfront ZA therapy compared with delayed ZA therapy. Forthcoming results from all these trials should determine whether ZA could be used to improve bone heath in women undergoing adjuvant therapy with AAAs for breast cancer.

Natural history and treatment of bone complications in prostate cancer

Bone metastases are highly prevalent in patients with prostate cancer, and they commonly present a therapeutic challenge. The natural history of prostatic bone metastases is characterized by skeletal morbidity, often producing distressing symptoms for individual patients and reducing patient autonomy and mobility. These bone metastases are usually radiologically osteoblastic, but there is also a strong osteolytic component as evidenced by marked increases in bone resorption markers. Malignant bone lesions can reduce the structural integrity of the skeleton, resulting in skeletal complications such as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and severe bone pain, which adversely affect quality of life. Preclinical and clinical studies have provided insight into the pathophysiology of malignant bone disease from prostate cancer and suggest that bone-directed therapies, including radionuclides, endothelin-1 antagonists, and bisphosphonates, may provide both palliative and therapeutic benefits. Clinical investigations with these agents are underway in patients with prostate cancer to gain insight into the pathophysiology of bone metastases and to evaluate the role of bone-specific therapies in treating and preventing bone metastases.

Rationale for zoledronic acid therapy in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with or without bone metastasis

Men with prostate cancer are at risk for bone loss and skeletal complications throughout the course of their disease. Bone loss is prevalent in many men with prostate cancer at initial diagnosis, and initiating androgen deprivation therapy results in accelerated bone resorption, leading to bone loss and an increased risk of fracture. These men are also at high risk for disease progression and bone metastases that can result in significant skeletal morbidity, including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and debilitating bone pain requiring additional therapy. Excessive osteoclast activity plays a central role in the pathophysiology of bone disease at each stage of prostate cancer disease progression. Zoledronic acid, a highly potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, has increased bone mineral density in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy and is the only bisphosphonate that has shown statistically significant reductions in skeletal morbidity in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer. Furthermore, preclinical evidence suggests that zoledronic acid has antitumor activity in prostate cancer models. Recently, a treatment algorithm was developed by the 3rd International Consultation on Prostate Cancer recommending the use of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer, regardless of their hormone status, and for the prevention of treatment-induced bone loss in patients without evidence of bone metastases. According to this algorithm, zoledronic acid should be considered for the prevention of skeletal morbidity in patients with prostate cancer throughout their treatment continuum.

Secondary osteoporosis

Secondary osteoporosis occurs as a consequence of various lifestyle factors (eg, eating disorders, smoking, alcoholism), disease processes (eg, endocrinopathies, gastrointestinal tract disease, hepatobiliary disease), and treatment regimens that comprise corticosteroids or chemotherapeutic agents. Some of the disease entities underlying secondary osteoporosis may be clinically silent and identified only during evaluation for documented osteoporosis. The pathogenesis of osteoporosis in these settings is typically multifactorial. The loss of bone may be direct or indirect but ultimately is related to altered osteoblast or osteoclast function. Causes of secondary osteoporosis should especially be investigated in men at all ages and in premenopausal women with atraumatic fractures. In addition, patients with known risk factors should be evaluated. Early recognition and intervention are essential to prevent further loss of bone mass and to prevent fragility fractures.

PET/CT F-18 FDG Scan Accurately Identifies Osteoporotic Fractures in a Patient with Known Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Positron emissions tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan has been used in many types of cancer to characterize the extent of disease as well as to identify the presence of metastases. However, the utility of PET/CT in patients with both cancer and osteoporosis is less well delineated. In this case, a patient with known metastatic colorectal cancer who was investigated by many forms of conventional imaging for back and pelvic pain was found to have osteoporotic fractures using PET/CT. At the same time malignant disease was excluded.

Changes on Bone Mineral Density after Adjuvant Treatment in Women with Non-metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

. Adjuvant therapies have prolonged survival of non-metastatic breast cancer (NMBC) patients, but they also decrease bone mineral density (BMD). We have analyzed the effects of chemotherapy, hormone therapy with tamoxifen or both, on BMD of women with NMBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively included 168 women with NMBC (stage I-III) referred to the Medical Oncology Service of University Hospital of Canary Islands between 1997 and 2001 (55 +/- 12 years; 37% premenopausal; 43 +/- 13 months of follow-up). We measured lumbar and hip BMD (g/cm2) at diagnosis, after chemotherapy and after 12 months of tamoxifen. If a low BMD was detected, women were treated with bisphosphonates.

RESULTS

BMD after chemotherapy (n = 83) significantly decreased at lumbar (1.014 +/- 0; 0.995 +/- 0, p = 0.0001), trochanter (0.701 +/- 0; 0.690 +/- 0, p = 0.001), intertrochanter (1.095 +/- 0; 1.078 +/- 0, p = 0.0001) and total hip (0.924 +/- 0; 0.915 +/- 0, p = 0.046) areas. Although 60% of the premenopausal women suffered amenorrhea after chemotherapy, there were not significant differences in BMD between them and women who retained menses. BMD of women who received 12 months of tamoxifen after chemotherapy increased--total hip (0.907 +/- 0; 0.922 +/- 0, p = 0.005) and intertrochanter (1.071 +/- 0; 1.091 +/- 0, p = 0.003)--or remained stable--lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle (n = 39). When tamoxifen was the only adjuvant treatment, BMD after 12 months (n = 22) increased in trochanter area (0.644 +/- 0; 0.663 +/- 0, p = 0.011), and remained stable in all other sites. 50 (30%) patients were treated with bisphosphonates because of osteopenia.

CONCLUSION

Women with NMBC are affected by early bone loss after adjuvant chemotherapy. This bone loss is attenuated by one year of tamoxifen treatment.

Effects of exemestane administered for 2 years versus placebo on bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, and plasma lipids in patients with surgically resected early breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate potential detrimental effects of exemestane on bone and lipid metabolism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg daily or placebo for 2 years in a double-blind setting. Primary objective was to evaluate the effect of exemestane on bone mineral density. Secondary objectives were effects on bone biomarkers, plasma lipids, coagulation factors, and homocysteine. Planned size was 128 patients.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled. All patients completed their 24-month visit except for those discontinuing treatment at an earlier stage. The mean annual rate of bone mineral density loss was 2.17% v 1.84% in the lumbar spine (P = .568) and 2.72% v 1.48% in the femoral neck (P = .024) in the exemestane and placebo arm, respectively. The mean change in T-score after 2 years was -0.21 for exemestane and -0.11 on placebo in the hip, and -0.30 and -0.21, respectively, in the lumbar spine. Exemestane significantly increased serum level and urinary excretion of bone resorption, but also bone formation markers. Except for a modest reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < .001) and apolipoprotein A1 (P = .004), exemestane had no major effect on lipid profile, homocysteine levels, or coagulation parameters.

CONCLUSION

Exemestane modestly enhanced bone loss from the femoral neck without significant influence on lumbar bone loss. Except for a 6% to 9% drop in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, no major effects on serum lipids, coagulation factors, or homocysteine were recorded. Bone mineral density should be assessed according to the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.

New therapeutic agents for the treatment of bone diseases

Bisphosphonates have demonstrated important clinical benefits for patients with malignant bone disease, metabolic bone diseases, such as Paget's disease, and postmenopausal osteoporosis. The introduction of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates with high affinity for hydroxyapatite in bone represents an important advancement. These agents are now a standard of care for osteoporosis, Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, primary bone lesions from multiple myeloma and bone metastases from breast cancer. Moreover, the recent clinical development of zoledronic acid (4 mg by 15-minute intravenous infusion) has expanded the benefits of bisphosphonate therapy to patients with bone metastases from any solid tumour. Bisphosphonates are also being investigated at present for the prevention of bone loss resulting from cancer therapy. In addition, a variety of novel biologic agents, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand antibodies, osteoprotegerin and cathepsin K inhibitors are being investigated at present for the treatment of malignant bone disease. The management of bone health is an important area of active research, and the armamentarium and role of bone-specific therapies continue to expand.

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss in patients with breast or prostate cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To review the prevalence, consequences, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in patients with breast or prostate cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, abstracts, book chapters, electronic resources, and manufacturer information.

DATA SYNTHESIS

CTIBL is a long-term complication associated with cancer therapies that cause hypogonadism in patients with breast or prostate cancer. Early diagnosis and treatment of CTIBL is essential to prevent bone fractures. CTIBL treatment includes modification of lifestyles that increase the risk of developing bone loss and fractures and includes the use of bone loss therapies (e.g., bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modifiers, calcitonin).

CONCLUSIONS

CTIBL is becoming more common as patients with breast or prostate cancer survive longer. Identifying and treating CTIBL early are important because once bone is lost, damaged bone becomes more difficult to repair; early diagnosis and treatment also may prevent fractures.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses must be knowledgeable about CTIBL to identify high-risk patients and educate patients and their families about CTIBL, bone loss therapies, and lifestyle modifications.

Bisphosphonate therapy in the oncology setting

Patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement are at chronic risk of skeletal complications, including bone pain, fractures, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Therapies targeting the primary malignancy are often unable to prevent skeletal complications, which often require orthopaedic surgery, radiation therapy and analgesics. Intravenous bisphosphonates can reduce the risk of skeletal complications and the requirement for palliative radiation therapy. Since its broad regulatory approval, zoledronic acid (ZOMETA, Novartis Pharma AG/Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation) 4 mg by 15-minute intravenous infusion has become widely used to treat bone metastases from all solid tumours and is becoming the standard of care for advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Additionally, cancer treatment-induced bone loss is an emerging problem in clinical oncology, and bisphosphonates -- particularly intravenous bisphosphonates -- may provide benefits even before bone lesions develop. Further investigations of bisphosphonates in these and other indications are ongoing.

Fracture risk with multiple myeloma: a population-based study

Pathologic fractures, especially of the axial skeleton, are extremely common in patients with multiple myeloma and cluster around the time of diagnosis. Osteoporotic fractures seem to be less of a problem in these patients.

INTRODUCTION

It is generally believed that fractures are common in patients with multiple myeloma as a result of lytic bone lesions, generalized bone loss, and/or elevated bone turnover from excessive cytokine production, but the actual risk of pathologic versus osteoporotic fractures has not been quantified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a population-based retrospective cohort study, 165 Olmsted County, MN, residents with myeloma diagnosed from 1945 to 2001 (55% men; mean age, 70.7 +/- 11.1 years) were followed for 537 person-years. The relative risk of fractures was assessed by standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), and risk factors were evaluated in proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Altogether, 134 patients experienced 463 fractures. In the year before diagnosis, 16 times more fractures were observed than expected, mostly pathologic fractures of the vertebrae and ribs. Subsequently, there was a 9-fold increase in fracture risk. However, 69% of these fractures were pathologic, and another 11% were found incidentally on myeloma monitoring. With the latter two groups excluded, subsequent fracture risk was elevated 3-fold, with a 2-fold increase in the risk of an osteoporotic fracture. In multivariate analyses, the predictors of overall fracture risk were oral corticosteroid use and elevated serum calcium levels, whereas pathologic fractures were additionally predicted by use of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

There is a dramatic increase in fractures around the time of diagnosis of myeloma, most of which are pathologic fractures. The most important predictor of overall fracture risk is oral corticosteroid use.

The role of bisphosphonates in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Men with advanced prostate cancer are at high risk for developing bone metastases, which result in clinically significant skeletal morbidity. Treatments that prevent skeletal complications in these patients could considerably improve their quality of life. Therefore, this paper reviews the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Published studies were identified through MEDLINE searches, review of bibliographies of relevant articles, and review of abstracts from scientific meetings. Metastatic bone disease in men with HRPC results in skeletal complications such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and debilitating bone pain. First- and second-generation bisphosphonates, clodronate and pamidronate, had transient palliative effects that were not durable and did not prevent skeletal events in these patients. A small open-label study of ibandronate demonstrated significant reductions in pain, but these results have not been confirmed in a larger, randomized, controlled trial. To date, zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in skeletal morbidity in this patient population. In a large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, treatment of men with HRPC and bone metastases with zoledronic acid significantly reduced skeletal-related events and provided a durable reduction of bone pain over 24 months compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate that has demonstrated efficacy for preventing skeletal complications in patients with HRPC and bone metastases. Therefore, initiation of zoledronic acid therapy should be considered to prevent skeletal morbidity and improve the quality of life of these patients.

Skeletal health in postmenopausal survivors of early breast cancer

Estrogen plays an important role in the skeletal health of all women. Many therapies used in the treatment of breast cancer reduce estrogen levels and have the potential to affect bone negatively by increasing the risk of osteoporosis and associated bone fractures. The long-term effects of systemic endocrine therapy on bone, therefore, are an important consideration in the adjuvant setting. Tamoxifen has been shown to have a moderate protective effect on postmenopausal bone due to its partial estrogen agonist activity; however, its long-term use is potentially associated with negative side effects, such as an increased risk of thromboembolic disease and endometrial cancer. Newer agents, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, for example, do not possess estrogen agonist effects and have improved breast cancer outcomes when compared to the standard 5 years of tamoxifen. However, patients treated with adjuvant AIs have been shown to have an increased incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. In order to select the optimal adjuvant therapy for each patient, it is important to assess the overall risk:benefit ratio for each endocrine strategy. All postmenopausal women should follow published guidelines to assess the risk of osteoporosis and, where appropriate, they should receive bone mineral density monitoring. Postmenopausal women with breast cancer who are at increased risk of osteoporotic fracture should be identified and managed with appropriate nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic measures.

Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Failure

Thanks to improvements in treatment regimens, more and more patients are now surviving cancer. However, cancer survivors are faced with the serious long-term effects of the different modalities of cancer treatments. One of these adverse effects is chemotherapy-induced irreversible damage to the ovarian tissues, which leads to premature ovarian failure and its resulting consequences such as hot flashes, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction and the risk of infertility. Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure (or chemotherapy-induced premature menopause) affects the quality of life of female cancer survivors. Although there is no clear definition of chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, irreversible amenorrhoea lasting for several months (>12 months) following chemotherapy and a follicle stimulating hormone level of > or = 30 MIU/mL in the presence of a negative pregnancy test seems to be an appropriate characterisation. Different chemotherapy agents, alkylating cytotoxics in particular, have the potential to cause progressive and irreversible damage to the ovaries. The result of this damage is a state of premature ovarian failure, with progressive declining of estrogen levels, decreasing bone mass and an increased risk of fractures. Historically, hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) has been used to treat menopausal problems in the general population, but concerns about the potential of estrogen to increase the risk of breast cancer in women at high-risk or increase the risk of recurrence in cancer survivors, have forced physicians to utilise alternative treatments. This review discusses some of the newer therapies that are now available to provide appropriate symptom control, avoid complications such as fractures and possibly prevent infertility by making the ovarian epithelium less susceptible to cytotoxic agents.

Clinical management of osteoporosis in women with a history of breast carcinoma

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder that is characterized by low bone mass and compromised bone strength. Fractures are the clinically important consequence of osteoporosis and result not only in disability but also in excess mortality. Women who have a history of breast carcinoma may represent a unique population for whom screening and treatment for osteoporosis should be modified. A review of the English literature was performed that included original, review, consensus, and statement articles that were identified through Medline or National Institutes of Health-related links. According to the literature, osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem. Approximately 55% of the U.S. population > or = 50 years of age has low bone mass (osteopenia or osteoporosis). Annually, > 200,000 women in the U.S. are diagnosed with breast carcinoma. Due to the high prevalence rates of both low bone mass and breast carcinoma in women, these two diseases commonly coexist in the same individuals. Women with a history of breast carcinoma may be at increased risk of developing bone loss and fragility fractures as a consequence of antineoplastic therapies. The majority of women treated for early-stage breast carcinoma do not develop recurrences, as a result of recent advances in therapy. Ensuring the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of long-term toxicities and comorbid conditions like osteoporosis in breast carcinoma survivors is a serious concern and is of increasing importance. In this article, the authors address the evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis in women who have a history of early-stage breast carcinoma.

Long-term implications of bone loss in breast cancer

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is an emerging problem during long-term adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors or ovarian-ablative therapy. CTIBL increases the risk of skeletal complications. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer should receive periodic bone mineral density (BMD) assessments, and those with clinically significant bone loss should be treated with bisphosphonates. Intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonates (e.g., zoledronic acid) appear to be a very effective treatment for CTIBL. Recently, the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 012 trial reported that i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg every 6 months) maintained BMD in premenopausal women receiving goserelin with either tamoxifen or anastrozole. The Z-FAST and ZO-FAST trials are comparing i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg every 6 months) up front with letrozole versus initiation when patients exhibit lumbar-spine BMD T-scores > or =2 standard deviations below normal (i.e., T-score < or =-2.0). These studies will provide important insight into the management of CTIBL.

Skeletal Morbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: Quality-of-Life Considerations throughout the Continuum of Care

OBJECTIVE

With current treatments, men usually survive many years after being diagnosed with prostate cancer. However, without supportive care, the systemic effects of prostate cancer and therapies such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can undermine skeletal integrity, resulting in skeletal complications that may erode quality of life (QOL). Prostate cancer patients are at risk for fractures from cancer treatment-induced bone loss. In addition, they are also at risk for pathologic fractures, severe bone pain, and other sequelae from bone metastases, which almost invariably occur during the progression of prostate cancer. This review investigates the incidence and pathophysiology of bone loss and skeletal morbidity in prostate cancer patients and reviews available treatment options for maintaining skeletal health throughout the continuum of care for these patients.

METHODS

Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches, review of bibliographies of relevant articles, and review of abstracts from national meetings.

RESULTS

Several supportive care options are available to prevent generalized and localized bone loss, including calcium and vitamin D supplements and bisphosphonates. Oral calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone, however, appears to be insufficient to prevent bone loss during ADT. Zoledronic acid administered every 3 months during ADT or every 3 to 4 weeks for patients with bone metastases can reverse bone loss and reduce skeletal morbidity, respectively, in patients with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal complications contribute to the erosion of QOL in prostate cancer patients. Palliative care can provide important benefits to these patients. Some agents, such as zoledronic acid, may provide skeletal health benefits throughout the course of prostate cancer progression. Further investigations of the QOL impact of these benefits are warranted.

Self‐reported health and use of health care services in long‐term cancer survivors

Owing to an increasing number of long-term cancer survivors, the use of health care services and somatic health problems were compared between cancer survivors and a noncancer population. Data from the Nord-Trondelag Health Survey 2 (HUNT 2, 1995-1997) was merged with the Cancer Registry of Norway. Six cancer subgroups were constructed with diagnosis 5 years prior HUNT 2: testicular cancer (n= 59), colorectal cancer (n= 175), prostate cancer (n= 87), breast cancer (n= 258), gynaecological cancer (n= 153) and lymphoma/leukaemia (n= 83). For each cancer survivor 3 matched noncancer controls were selected from the HUNT 2 survey. The prevalence of common health problems, use of health care services and unfavourably life style parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Cancer survivors used health care services and received social welfare benefits more often than the controls. There was an increased risk of perceiving poor health after a history of cancer. Common health problems and/or unfavourable life style parameters could not explain poor health or the increased use of health care services among cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to investigate the reasons for increased use of health care services and perceived poor health in cancer survivors.

Toward New Horizons: The Future of Bisphosphonate Therapy

Bisphosphonate therapy has become a standard of care for patients with malignant bone disease. In addition, preclinical and preliminary clinical data suggest that bisphosphonates may prevent cancer-treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and the development of malignant bone disease in patients with early-stage cancer. Patients who receive adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer or androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer are at an especially high risk for CTIBL because of reduced estrogenic signaling. Oral clodronate (Bonefos; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), oral risedronate (Actonel; Proctor and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Cincinnati, OH), and i.v. zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ) have all demonstrated promise in preventing CTIBL in patients receiving hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated efficacy with the longest between-treatment interval (3-6 months) and is currently being investigated in the Zometa/Femara Adjuvant Synergy Trials (Z-FAST and ZO-FAST in the United States and Europe, respectively). In patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, i.v. pamidronate (Aredia; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) and i.v. zoledronic acid both have demonstrated significant benefits over placebo, but only zoledronic acid produced significant increases in bone mineral density compared with baseline values. Additionally, bisphosphonates have demonstrated antitumor activities in preclinical models, and clinical trials with oral clodronate suggest that bisphosphonates might prevent or delay bone metastasis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Clinical trials are investigating the effect of zoledronic acid on disease progression in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. The results of these clinical trials should further define the clinical benefit of bisphosphonates in the oncology setting.

Bone loss and the evolving role of bisphosphonate therapy in prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can result in significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD) but to date, there are no prospective studies that document the true severity of bone loss and resulting fracture rates. In the general population, however, the incidence of low BMD is increasing in elderly men. Men suffer more morbidity and mortality from fractures associated with low BMD than women. Problems of underdiagnosis and undertreatment in men can be addressed with enhanced awareness of the risk factors for bone loss in men and the available treatment options. Guidelines for diagnosis of low BMD in women can probably be applied to men. Treatment options have not been studied as extensively in men. For men treated with ADT for prostate cancer, however, use of intravenous zoledronic acid at the initiation of ADT has been shown to prevent and even reverse bone loss. Although the routine use of bisphosphonates to prevent bone loss is not yet recommended, zoledronic acid is a logical choice of therapy in men who have low BMD at baseline or who develop bone loss during the course of therapy. In addition to its effects on BMD, zoledronic acid has also been shown to decrease skeletal morbidity in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Whether zoledronic acid or other bisphosphonates might actually prevent or delay the development of bone metastases remains to be studied in randomized clinical trials.

Understanding treatments for bone loss and bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a practical review and guide for the clinician

Prostate cancer patients are at risk for developing bone loss and bone metastases. Clinicians prescribing ADT should appreciate the potential effects of ADT on BMD as well as the morbidity and mortality that can result from osteoporotic fractures. Measures to address the evaluation of patients and when to treat patients with significant bone loss have been discussed. Bisphosphonates effectively prevent loss of BMD in prostate cancer patients. Treatment of prostate cancer patients with established bone metastases with zoledronic acid should be considered strongly based on the results of the Saad study and other studies of patients with bone metastases with other malignancies. Zoledronic acid is approved by the US FDA for use in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer and in the European Union for any patient with bone metastases, including prostate cancer patients,because of the beneficial impact of zoledronic acid on skeletal-related events. There is no validated method to determine which patients might benefit most from bisphosphonate therapy in this setting. Many questions about the use of bisphosphonate therapy in men with prostate cancer must be addressed, both in terms of the use in bone loss and bone metastases. These questions include: What is the optimal timing of therapy? Which bisphosphonate is best? What is the best dose and dose schedule? Do bisphosphonates effectively decrease skeletal fracture rates in patients with osteoporosis? How long should patients receive therapy? Are bisphosphonate "holidays" warranted? What are the long-term skeletal and renal toxicities? Is there a role for sequencing bisphosphonate therapy either before or after chemotherapy? Is bisphosphonate therapy synergistic with certain chemotherapy or other bone-targeted therapies? Which patients are the most likely to benefit from bisphosphonate therapy? What are clinically significant endpoints of bisphosphonate trials in patients with metastatic disease? Does inhibiting bone turnover also inhibit formation of bone metastases? Preliminary work in these areas has been completed, but more questions than answers are available. Given the rising costs of health care, it is imperative that these questions be addressed to best use the health care dollar while offering high-risk patients the best available therapy. At present, no data suggest that bisphosphonates should be used routinely to prevent BMD loss in men with normal BMD or to prevent the development of bone metastases in men with biochemical relapse. Continuing trials may give us guidance in the future.

Risk factors for low bone mineral density and the 6-year rate of bone loss among premenopausal and perimenopausal women

Risk factors that are associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) may not necessarily be associated with increased bone loss among premenopausal and perimenopausal women. We determined risk factors for lower premenopausal and perimenopausal BMD while simultaneously determining risk factors for increased 6-year rate of bone loss among women aged 24-50 years within a population-based prospective cohort study. BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck, reported as t scores, were measured five times within the 6-year study among 614 women who were between the ages of 24 and 44 in 1992/1993. Rates of bone loss were calculated from the repeated BMD measurements. Risk factors for lower BMD over time at the lumbar spine included history of any fracture ( P=0.005). The major risk factor for lower BMD over time at the femoral neck was family history of osteoporosis ( P<0.002). The major protective factor for greater BMD over time at both skeletal sites was additional body weight ( P<0.0001). Other protective factors for greater BMD over time at the femoral neck were modest alcohol consumption ( P=0.0002) and high-school sports participation ( P=0.002). Risk factors for greater bone loss at either skeletal site included postmenopausal status ( P<0.0001 at the lumbar spine; P=0.01 at the femoral neck), and the reporting of a reproductive cancer ( P<0.0001 at the lumbar spine; P=0.0008 at the femoral neck). Body weight was protective against bone loss at both skeletal sites ( P<0.0001). Baseline age, calcium intake, smoking, and current physical activity were not associated with BMD or bone loss. The understanding of the relative importance of risk factors for both low BMD and bone loss may assist in the identification of women at greater risk for subsequent low postmenopausal BMD.

Strategic approaches to osteoporosis in transplantation

Recipients of stem cell transplantation are at risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Longitudinal studies performed in adults have shown that significant bone demineralization occurs following myeloablative therapy and subsequent immune suppression. Among children and adolescents, cross-sectional analyses indicate that younger patients are also at risk for long-term bone toxicity. Strategies to detect and manage this disorder in pediatric SCT recipients are presented.

In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate, both experimentally and in vivo, if nondedicated standard spiral computed tomography (CT) may be used to obtain reliable bone mineral density (BMD) data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty lumbar spine specimens from human cadavers were examined with standard quantitative CT and spiral CT. In addition, 50 patients with a history of lymphoma and chemotherapy were examined. These patients underwent long-term follow-up CT to rule out tumor recurrence. Quantitative CT was performed before contrast medium administration to assess potential posttherapeutic osteoporosis. In addition, fracture status of the spine was determined. Mean BMD values and SDs were calculated, and relationships between measurements obtained with quantitative CT and spiral CT were assessed with linear regression analysis and two-tailed tests of significance (t test). A linear fit was used to calculate quantitative CT data from spiral CT values.

RESULTS

For the specimens, a coefficient of determination (r(2) = 0.99, P <.001) was found between BMD measurements obtained with quantitative CT and those obtained with spiral CT. Mean BMD in specimens was 63.6 mg/mL +/- 36.6 with quantitative CT and 74.4 mg/mL +/- 38.2 with spiral CT. Mean BMD in patients was 105.0 mg/mL +/- 34.6 with quantitative CT and 139.5 mg/mL +/- 42.7 with contrast medium-enhanced spiral CT. A coefficient of determination (r(2) = 0.91, P <.001) was obtained between these measurements. Mean BMD from L1 through L3 vertebrae was calculated, and spiral CT data were multiplied by 0.77 to yield quantitative CT data. Differences in BMD were significant (P <.05) for patients with (n = 9) and those without fractures (n = 41), as determined with spiral CT and quantitative CT.

CONCLUSION

Correlations between BMD data obtained with spiral CT and standard quantitative CT were highly significant. By using a conversion factor, BMD measurements can be determined with routine abdominal spiral CT scans.

Skeletal morbidity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

PURPOSE

Treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in childhood results in a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). Whether there is a recovery of this lost bone mass in survivors of ALL is not known. We sought to determine if changes in BMD are common long-term sequelae in children with ALL.

METHODS

Bone mineral densitometry of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was performed on 106 patients. The results were compared with those of age-matched normal controls. The effect of treatment was examined in those with low BMD compared with the remainder of the study group.

RESULTS

When data were tested with respect to age, sex, and age and sex, no difference was observed in BMD between survivors of childhood ALL and controls. In the subgroup of patients with low BMD, the difference was not related to age, age at diagnosis, or years since diagnosis. Low BMD of the spine was not explained by radiotherapy (RT), methotrexate (MTX) dose, or corticosteroid dose. Low BMD of the femur was not explained by RT. However, those with low femoral BMD were more likely to have received high-dose MTX or higher-dose corticosteroids compared with the remainder of the group.

CONCLUSION

It appears that survivors of childhood ALL as a whole recover normal BMD. However, those patients who received a total MTX dose of greater than 40000 mg/m(2) or a total corticosteroid dose of greater than 9000 mg/m(2) may not recover normal BMD and therefore should be screened for decreased BMD of the femoral neck.

Effect of pamidronate on new vertebral fractures and bone mineral density in patients with malignant lymphoma receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

High doses of corticosteroids, and the use of alkylating agents like cyclophosphamide with subsequent hypogonadism, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced osteoporosis. In this study, we evaluated whether intravenous pamidronate can prevent bone loss and reduce vertebral fractures in patients with malignant lymphoma who were receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 50 patients who had newly diagnosed stage III or IV malignant lymphoma. All patients were assigned randomly to receive either intravenous pamidronate or placebo. Pamidronate (30 mg per treatment) or placebo was given at 3-month intervals for 12 months. Five patients in the control group dropped out during the trial. The main outcomes were the incidence of vertebral fractures and changes in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur.

RESULTS

During the 12-month study, 6 (30%) of the 20 patients in the control group and 1 (4%) of the 25 patients in the pamidronate group developed new vertebral fractures (P = 0.01). In the control group, the mean percentage changes in bone mineral density were -11.2% in the lumbar spine and -4.5% in the femoral neck. In contrast, pamidronate treatment led to minor losses of bone mineral density at both sites (-2.7% at the lumbar spine; -2.3% at the femoral neck). The difference between the groups was significant at the lumbar spine (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Pamidronate reduces trabecular bone loss and the risk of new vertebral fractures in patients with malignant lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.

Nutritional Approaches to Late Toxicities of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

Adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer reduces recurrence rates and prolongs survival at the cost of both acute and chronic toxicities. Breast cancer survivors who have received adjuvant chemotherapy may suffer from late effects of chemotherapy including congestive heart failure, neuropathy, premature menopause, and osteoporosis. Nutritional approaches to these problems are distinct in their orientation and success. Study of free radical scavengers for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy was born from known pathogenetic mechanisms of cardiotoxicity but has been universally disappointing thus far in clinical trials. Application of agents used for diabetic neuropathy suggests that evening primrose oil, alpha-lipoic acid, and capsaicin may all play a role in the empiric options available to patients with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Plant-derived preparations including black cohosh (Actaea racemosa), dong quai (Angelica sinensis), evening primrose (Oenothera biennis), and red clover (Trifolium pretense) are used by patients experiencing hot flashes due to premature menopause despite a paucity of clinical trial data demonstrating either safety or efficacy. Calcium and vitamin D are widely accepted as an effective means to retard bone loss leading to osteoporosis. Nutritional approaches to late effects of breast cancer chemotherapy offer the prospect of preventing or ameliorating these sequelae of treatment. However, except for vitamin D and calcium for prevention of bone loss, current clinical evidence supporting use of nutritional agents remains sparse.

Body mass and physical capacity indicators of hip osteoarthritis patients with and without malignancy histories: implications for prevention and rehabilitation

The prevalence of patients with cancer histories and types of cancers prevailing among a cohort of adults with end-stage hip osteoarthritis was established in order to determine if this group might require some form of enriched pre- and postoperative rehabilitation in view of their adverse medical history. Body weights and selected physical capacity indicators were specifically compared among hip surgical patients with and without cancer histories to specify characteristics that could direct potentially desirable and improved intervention efforts. The medical records of 1,000 hip osteoarthritis surgical candidates were scrutinized, and numbers with and without malignancy histories were recorded. Malignancy typologies and selected body mass and physical capacity indices were recorded. Specific subgroup comparisons among these variables were then made for 40 cancer survivors and an age- and gender-matched subgroup of 40 otherwise healthy osteoarthritis patients, and for selected breast, prostate, and colon cancer survivors. (1) Fourteen percent of the present patient group had a cancer history. (2) The most common malignancy noted was breast cancer, followed by prostate and then colon cancer. (3) Among subjects matched for age and gender, 85% with a cancer history were overweight or obese, compared with 60% of those with no comorbid disease history. (4) Patients with cancer histories were more impaired immediately before, and after, surgery than patients with no cancer history. (5) Patients with breast and colon cancer histories had significantly slower recovery rates after hip surgery than those with a prostate cancer history (p < 0.05). Thus, breast, prostate, and colon cancer survivors constitute a modest proportion of patients undergoing surgery for painful disabling hip osteoarthritis. As a subgroup, cancer survivors, especially breast cancer survivors, are overweight, and more impaired before and after surgery than adults of the same age without a cancer history undergoing hip surgery.

The potential benefits of dietary and/or supplemental calcium and vitamin D

Osteoporosis is a significant problem in women and men. In addition, as osteoporosis has garnered more attention there should be more attention than ever placed on the potential benefits of calcium and vitamin D. Clinicians need to inform patients that there are numerous healthy dietary sources of calcium and vitamin D. Calcium and vitamin D supplements seem to act synergistically to reduce fracture risk in men and women; therefore, they need to be taken together to impact fracture risk. In addition, almost every randomized trial of an effective osteoporosis drug therapy has utilized calcium and vitamin D to enhance the efficacy of the drug itself. Several forms of calcium supplements are commercially available today and clinicians need to understand the similarities and differences between them. Calcium and vitamin D in moderation also have a good safety profile and may actually have benefits far beyond osteoporosis therapy. For example, calcium may increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL), prevent colon polyps, reduce blood pressure, reduce kidney stone recurrence, and may promote weight loss. Vitamin D may reduce the risk of some cancers, provide an enhanced response to some chemotherapeutic agents, prevent type I diabetes, and may reduce tooth loss along with calcium. Clinicians need to encourage individuals to receive the recommended daily allowance of these two agents because they seem to have an impact on numerous health conditions besides osteoporosis.