The Xenopus homolog of Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless mediates Notch signaling during primary neurogenesis

neurogenin1 is essential for the determination of neuronal precursors for proximal cranial sensory ganglia

The NEUROGENINS (NGNs) are neural-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. Mouse embryos lacking ngn1 fail to generate the proximal subset of cranial sensory neurons. ngn1 is required for the activation of a cascade of downstream bHLH factors, including NeuroD, MATH3, and NSCL1. ngn1 is expressed by placodal ectodermal cells and acts prior to neuroblast delamination. Moreover, NGN1 positively regulates the Delta homolog DLL1 and can be negatively regulated by Notch signaling. Thus, ngn1 functions similarly to the proneural genes in Drosophila. However, the initial pattern of ngn1 expression appears to be Notch independent. Taken together with the fact that ectopic ngn1 expression can convert ectodermal cells to neurons in Xenopus (Ma et al., 1996), these data and those of Fode et al. (1998 [this issue of Neuron]) identify ngns as vertebrate neuronal determination genes, analogous to myoD and myf5 in myogenesis.

A growing family of Notch ligands

Signaling through Notch-like receptors is an evolutionarily well-conserved mechanism for cell-cell communication. Transmembrane ligands of the DSL (Delta, Serrate, LAG-2) family signal to Notch receptors on a neighboring cell, which results in an intracellular signaling cascade, influencing cellular differentiation. Recently published data shed new light on the repertoire of ligands and on processing of Notch receptors. One report provides evidence for a novel, more distantly related ligand of the Delta-type in mouse, DII3 (Delta-like 3). Ectopic expression of DII3 perturbs primary neurogenesis in frog embryos in a manner expected for a bona fide Notch ligand. Two reports provide new information about processing of Notch receptors. A novel protease, Kuzbanian, is identified, which cleaves the Notch receptor at the extracellular side. Biochemical experiments show that the cleavage probably occurs during intracellular trafficking, and that only processed Notch receptors appear at the cell surface. Taken together, these reports extend our knowledge about an important event in cell-cell communication--how Notch ligands and receptors meet and interact.

Involvement of RBP-J in biological functions of mouse Notch1 and its derivatives

Notch is involved in the cell fate determination of many cell lineages. The intracellular region (RAMIC) of Notch1 transactivates genes by interaction with a DNA binding protein RBP-J. We have compared the activities of mouse RAMIC and its derivatives in transactivation and differentiation suppression of myogenic precursor cells. RAMIC comprises two separate domains, IC for transactivation and RAM for RBP-J binding. Although the physical interaction of IC with RBP-J was much weaker than with RAM, transactivation activity of IC was shown to involve RBP-J by using an RBP-J null mutant cell line. IC showed differentiation suppression activity that was generally comparable to its transactivation activity. The RBP-J-VP16 fusion protein, which has strong transactivation activity, also suppressed myogenesis of C2C12. The RAM domain, which has no other activities than binding to RBP-J, synergistically stimulated transactivation activity of IC to the level of RAMIC. The RAM domain was proposed to compete with a putative co-repressor for binding to RBP-J because the RAM domain can also stimulate the activity of RBP-J-VP16. These results taken together, indicate that differentiation suppression of myogenic precursor cells by Notch signalling is due to transactivation of genes carrying RBP-J binding motifs.

Helix-loop-helix factors in growth and differentiation of the vertebrate nervous system

Neural development involves the initial growth phase of dividing precursor cells and the subsequent differentiation phase of postmitotic cells. Recent studies indicate that the transition from the former phase to the latter is controlled antagonistically by multiple helix-loop-helix (HLH) genes. Cascades of neuronal HLH genes promote differentiation whereas anti-neuronal HLH genes repress them under the control of Notch and keep cells at the precursor stage. This antagonistic regulation may be essential for generation of the proper number of neurons and for morphogenesis of the nervous system.

Neural tube morphogenesis

Many important findings in the past year have helped to identify multiple cellular interactions and signals in vertebrates that govern induction of neuroectoderm, its patterning, neural tube formation, and the subsequent differentiation of neurons. For example, the neural inducers have been shown to function as inhibitors of BMP signaling, the roles of bone morphogenetic proteins and Sonic hedgehog during dorso-ventral specification of the neural tube have been further elucidated and the realization of a dorso-ventral inversion of the body axis contributed to a better understanding of evolutionarily related genes and functions between vertebrates and invertebrates.

Notch in vertebrates

Homologs of the Notch receptor and its ligands participate in cell fate decisions during vertebrate development. The past year has seen significant advances in knowledge of the role of Notch in Xenopus neuronal development and T-cell development and in our understanding of the Notch signalling pathway in vertebrates. Connections have also been discovered between alterations in Notch function and human disease.

The Notch ligand, X-Delta-2, mediates segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos

Segmentation of the vertebrate embryo begins when the paraxial mesoderm is subdivided into somites, through a process that remains poorly understood. To study this process, we have characterized X-Delta-2, which encodes the second Xenopus homolog of Drosophila Delta. Strikingly, X-Delta-2 is expressed within the presomitic mesoderm in a set of stripes that corresponds to prospective somitic boundaries, suggesting that Notch signaling within this region establishes a segmental prepattern prior to somitogenesis. To test this idea, we introduced antimorphic forms of X-Delta-2 and Xenopus Suppressor of Hairless (X-Su(H)) into embryos, and assayed the effects of these antimorphs on somite formation. In embryos expressing these antimorphs, the paraxial mesoderm differentiated normally into somitic tissue, but failed to segment properly. Both antimorphs also disrupted the segmental expression of X-Delta-2 and Hairy2A, a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) gene, within the presomitic mesoderm. These observations suggest that X-Delta-2, via X-Notch-1, plays a role in segmentation, by mediating cell-cell interactions that underlie the formation of a segmental prepattern prior to somitogenesis.

The ins and outs of notch signaling

The Notch gene encodes a cell surface protein that regulates cell fate choices in vertebrates and invertebrates. Given the wide variety of cell types influenced by Notch, it would seem that the signal relayed through Notch activation is not an instructive one per se. Rather, Notch signaling is thought to influence the cell's ability to respond to instructive signals responsible for specific cell fates. Expression and functional studies of Notch support this idea; however, the possibility of additional functions for Notch cannot be excluded. Much of what we know about the Notch signaling pathway comes from studies with Drosophila Notch and the Caenorhabditis elegans Notch-related genes lin-12 and glp-1. With the isolation of multiple vertebrate Notch genes we are beginning to understand and define Notch signaling in vertebrates as well. A number of excellent reviews have been published summarizing the current status of Notch/LIN-12/GLP-1 signaling in Drosophila and C. elegans, as well as recent findings with the vertebrate counterparts. Here I review the structure of the various Notch proteins and their putative ligands, and discuss possible interactions between Notch, its ligands, and other cellular components that affect Notch signal transduction. A role for Notch signaling during normal development and in disease processes is discussed in an accompanying review by T. Gridley (1997, Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9: 103-108).