Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning

Mechanism of hyperthermia effects on CNS development: rostral gene expression domains remain, despite severe head truncation; and the hindbrain/otocyst relationship is altered

To study the mechanism of hyperthermia on the development of the rostral neural tube, we used a model in which closely-staged presomite 9.5-day rat embryos were exposed in culture to 43 degrees C for 13 min, and then cultured further for 12-48 hr. This treatment had little effect on the development of the rest of the embryo, but resulted in a spectrum of brain defects, the most severe being a lack of all forebrain and midbrain structures. Whole-mount in situ hybridisation was used to monitor the expression domains of Otx2, Emx2, Krox20, and hoxb1. These showed that there were no ectopic expression patterns, for any gene at any stage examined. Even in those embryos which apparently lacked all forebrain and midbrain structures, there were expression domains of Otx2 and Emx2 in the most rostral neural tissue, and these retained their nested dorso-ventral boundaries, showing that cells fated to form rostral brain were not wholly eliminated. Thus, heat-induced rostral neural tube truncation is of a quite different mechanism from the respecification proposed for retinoic acid, despite their very similar phenotypes. In the hindbrain region of treated embryos, we observed decreased intensity of Krox20, staining and an abnormal relationship developed between the position of hoxb1 expression and the otocyst and pharyngeal arches. In the most extreme cases, this domain was shifted to be more caudal than the rostral edge of the otocyst, while the otocyst retained its normal position relative to the pharyngeal arches. We interpret this as a growth imbalance between neuroepithelium and overlying tissues, perhaps due to a disruption of signals from the midbrain/hindbrain boundary.

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3

The transcription factor genes Hoxa1 and Krox-20 have been shown to play important roles in vertebrate hindbrain segmentation. In this report, we present evidence for novel functions of these genes which co-operate in specifying cellular identity in rhombomere (r) 3. Although Hoxa1 has not been observed to be expressed rostrally to the prospective r3/r4 boundary, its inactivation results in (i) the appearance of patches of cells presenting an r2-like molecular identity within r3, (ii) early neuronal differentiation in r3, normally characteristic of even-numbered rhombomeres, and (iii) abnormal navigation of r3 motor axons, similar to that observed in even-numbered rhombomeres. These phenotypic manifestations become more severe in the context of the additional inactivation of one allele of the Krox-20 gene, demonstrating that Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize in a dosage-dependent manner to specify r3 identity and odd- versus even-numbered rhombomere characters. In addition, these data suggest that the control of the development of r3 may not be autonomous but dependent on interactions with Hoxa1-expressing cells.

Vertebrate hox gene regulation: clustering and/or colinearity?

The relationship between the clustered organization of vertebrate Hox genes and their coordinate transcription in space and time is still lacking a convincing mechanistic explanation. Recent work on the regulatory interactions within Hox complexes suggests some reasons why these genes have remained clustered. Although these results do not address the puzzling issue of colinearity directly, they nevertheless add novel important input to the debate.

How to build a vertebrate hindbrain. Lessons from genetics

During vertebrate embryogenesis, the hindbrain is the site of a segmentation process which leads to the formation, along the anterior-posterior axis, of 7-8 metameres called rhombomeres. This phenomenon plays an essential role in early hindbrain regionalisation and in the specification of the pattern of developing structures in this region of the brain. Data accumulated during the last 10 years have also shown that rhombomeres are units of gene expression and of cell lineage. Hence, a number of regulatory genes are expressed according to segment-specific patterns in the hindbrain and have been implicated in the pattern formation process. In this review, we focus on the analysis of the function and regulation of these genes along the different steps of hindbrain segmentation, from segment delimitation to acquisition of positional identity. On this basis, we propose a model for the control of early hindbrain development.

An enhancer element in the EphA2 (Eck) gene sufficient for rhombomere-specific expression is activated by HOXA1 and HOXB1 homeobox proteins

In the hindbrain of the mouse embryo, there is often coincident rhombomere-restricted expression of Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and Hox homeobox genes, raising the possibility of regulatory interactions. In this paper, we have identified cis-acting regulatory sequences of the EphA2 (Eck) gene, which direct node and hindbrain-specific expression in transgenic embryos. An 8-kilobase region of mouse genomic DNA element was sufficient to drive rhombomere 4 (r4)-specific expression while conferring patchy expression in the node. Further analysis localized the rhombomere-specific enhancer to a 0.9-kilobase sequence. This element contains multiple Hox-Pbx consensus binding sites that bind to both HOXA1/Pbx1 and HOXB1/Pbx1 proteins in vitro. Co-expression of either HOXA1 or HOXB1 with Pbx1 transactivated EphA2 enhancer-dependent reporter gene expression. These results, together with observations of reduced EphA2 expression in hoxa1 and hoxb1 double mutant mice, suggest that expression of EphA2 gene in rhombomere 4 is directly regulated by Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 homeobox transcription factors.

Genetic analysis of a conserved sequence in the HoxD complex: regulatory redundancy or limitations of the transgenic approach?

Extensive sequencing in the HoxD complex of several vertebrate species has revealed a set of conserved DNA sequences interspersed between neighboring Hox genes. Their high degree of conservation strongly suggested that they are used for regulatory purposes, a hypothesis that was largely confirmed by using "classical transgenesis" or in vivo mutagenesis through the embryonic stem (ES) cell technology. Here, we show that this is not always the case. We report that the deletion of a conserved regulatory sequence located in the HoxD complex gives different results, depending on the transgenic approach that was used. In "conventional" transgenesis, this sequence was necessary for proper expression in a subdomain of the developing limb. However, a deletion of this sequence in complexo did not confirm this effect, thereby creating an important discrepancy between the classical transgenic and the ES cell-based, targeted mutagenesis. This unexpected observation may show the limitations of the former technology. Alternatively, it could illustrate a redundancy in regulatory circuits and, thus, justify the combination of parallel strategies.

Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway

Anteroposterior (AP) patterning in the vertebrate hindbrain is dependent upon the establishment of segmental domains of Hox expression. We investigated the mechanism that governs the early expression of Hoxb4 and found that transient signaling from the paraxial mesoderm induces expression in the hindbrain. Induction involves a retinoid pathway requiring retinoic acid receptor (RAR) function within the neural plate. Characterization of a prerhombomeric enhancer from Hoxb4 reveals that a retinoic acid (RA) response element is an essential component of the early neural response to somite (s) signaling and can interpret positional information for setting the anterior boundary of expression. These data suggest a mechanism whereby, during normal hindbrain development, Hoxb4 expression is initiated by extrinsic signals and is subsequently maintained by Hox feedback circuits. This mechanism also accounts for the ectopic response of Hoxb4 in rhombomere (r) transpositions and after exposure to retinoids.

Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch

The analysis of Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 null mutants suggested that these genes are involved in distinct aspects of hindbrain segmentation and specification. Here we investigate the possible functional synergy of the two genes. The generation of Hoxa1(3′RARE)/Hoxb1(3′RARE) compound mutants resulted in mild facial motor nerve defects reminiscent of those present in the Hoxb1 null mutants. Strong genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 were uncovered by introducing the Hoxb1(3′RARE) and Hoxb1 null mutations into the Hoxa1 null genetic background. Hoxa1(null)/Hoxb1(3′RARE) and Hoxa1(null)/Hoxb1(null)double homozygous embryos showed additional patterning defects in the r4-r6 region but maintained a molecularly distinct r4-like territory. Neurofilament staining and retrograde labelling of motor neurons indicated that Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergise in patterning the VIIth through XIth cranial nerves. The second arch expression of neural crest cell markers was abolished or dramatically reduced, suggesting a defect in this cell population. Strikingly, the second arch of the double mutant embryos involuted by 10.5 dpc and this resulted in loss of all second arch-derived elements and complete disruption of external and middle ear development. Additional defects, most notably the lack of tympanic ring, were found in first arch-derived elements, suggesting that interactions between first and second arch take place during development. Taken together, our results unveil an extensive functional synergy between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 that was not anticipated from the phenotypes of the simple null mutants.