Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Molecular predictors of treatment and outcome in colorectal cancer

Understanding of the metabolism and mechanisms of resistance of tumors to chemotherapeutic agents is essential so that we can administer therapy to maximize response and minimize toxicity. In this review we describe molecular markers associated with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy that may predict the outcome of therapy when patients are treated with these agents. We discuss the ways in which determination of gene expression levels can enhance the treatment of colorectal cancer through prediction of patient response and tailoring of chemotherapy to the characteristics of an individual tumor.

Colorectal cancer: integrating oxaliplatin

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), used according to several types of administration and several modulations, remained the standard treatment of colorectal cancer for many years. However, two major drugs (irinotecan and oxaliplatin) improved the therapeutic possibilities for this disease. Both drugs are active as a single agent, but they have a clear in vitro and in vivo synergistic antitumoral activity when combined with modulated 5-FU. Significant improvements in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival have been obtained by irinotecan/5-FU and oxaliplatin/5-FU combinations compared to 5-FU alone. Integrating these drugs in the therapeutic strategy of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment was a challenge for clinical trials. Second- and third-line treatments are often used, and these treatments are a large reason for the improvement in survival. Each patient who is able to receive several lines of therapy should be offered this strategy. Many attempts to optimize the results of these combinations have been performed. Although no definitive data show one drug to be better than the other, several arguments favored the oxaliplatin/5-FU combination as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. A better collaboration between surgeons and oncologists, based on the improvement of surgical techniques and highly active chemotherapeutic regimens, provides patients more strategies with curative intent in liver and lung metastatic disease. Progress in treating metastatic disease will hopefully translate into the improvement of cure rates when applied to adjuvant therapy. The tolerance of the oxaliplatin/5-FU combination allows for design regimens integrating new drugs, such as biologic modifiers.

Review article: colorectal cancer chemotherapy

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death world-wide. There have been important advances in the chemotherapeutic management of colorectal cancer as a result of a deliberate collaborative process of well-designed clinical trials. From the earlier standard of 5-fluorouracil-based therapy alone, the recent availability of newer agents, including capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, has significantly expanded the options available for the management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with consequent improvements in survival. For patients with resected, high-risk, localized disease, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy improves survival. The identification of new chemotherapy regimens, the use of predictive testing and the integration of novel targeted therapies with cytotoxic chemotherapies are areas of active clinical investigation. A review of the chemotherapeutic management of colorectal cancer is presented.

Gastrointestinal cancer: towards a tailored tumour therapy

Major progress has been made in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, but conventional chemotherapy is unlikely to lead to a major breakthrough in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours. Prognosticators, novel means of early diagnosis of cancer which at the same time indicate prognosis, as well as novel, tumour-specific therapeutic strategies, are urgently needed. There is an increasing amount of promising data from array technology and functional proteomics suggesting that this goal could be achieved in the near future. Research into the mechanisms of cancer signal transduction over the past 20 years has enabled the identification of numerous novel targets for tumour therapy and subsequently the development of various novel drugs termed magic bullets. The in vitro results with these drugs are promising; many drugs lost their magic after the first clinical trials. The state of novel diagnostics and therapeutics in gastrointestinal cancer and the implications for the future treatment of these tumours are discussed in this review.

Irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil I.V. bolus every other week may be a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of biweekly irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus in metastatic colorectal carcinoma according to the age of patients. For this purpose, we have analysed 108 patients randomly allocated to receive irinotecan 200 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) on day 1, and L-leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) i.v. (1-h infusion) plus 5-fluorouracil 850 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2 every 2 weeks (IRIFAFU) in our previous SICOG 9801 trial. According to age, patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: younger (</=54 years, n=37), middle-aged (55-69 years, n=64), and elderly (>/=70 years, n=17). Apart from gender, pretreatment characteristics were well balanced across the three groups. WHO grade >/=3 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected on the whole 46 and 16 patients, respectively, without any significant difference according to age-grouping. Patients aged </=54 years stayed on therapy for a longer time (median 24 vs 14-15 weeks), and received more cycles (median 9 vs 7), than the older ones. Only one patient in the young group withdrew consent to therapy as opposed to four patients each in the aged and elderly one. Response rate was 38% for younger patients, 34% for aged, and 35% for the elderly ones. Median time to progression was 7.4, 8.0, and 5.3 months, and median survival time was 13.4, 15.3, and 13.9 months, respectively. We conclude that IRIFAFU given every other week may represent a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced non-pretreated colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients were enrolled. Capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2)/day was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) was administered as a 2-h infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and 39 for clinical activity: the main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 28% of the patients. The response rates were 44% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3% to 59.0%] and 48.7% (95% CI 33.0% to 64.4%) (intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively). The median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 12-28).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer; therefore, the capecitabine dose we utilized is probably too high. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. This combination may be preferable compared to a standard combination with infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin as it is more convenient and practical with similar efficacy. Thus, phase III trials are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer--how can we improve results?

Resection of liver metastases due to large bowel cancer has become an important part of treatment. In recent years, there have been advances in technique and the selection of patients has been extended. Surgery is the only modality which currently offers the possibility of long-term survival. Resection combined with chemotherapy may offer improved survival, but more data are needed. Chemotherapy may cause regression of metastases to permit resection where initially they were considered unresectable. The data available from such studies are presented.

Phase I/II study of hepatic arterial therapy with floxuridine and dexamethasone in combination with intravenous irinotecan as adjuvant treatment after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Patients who undergo resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer have an average 2-year survival of 65%. With hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus systemic fluorouracil and leucovorin, 2-year survival increased to 86%. For further improvement in both local and systemic control, combinations of new systemic drugs with HAI are being explored. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of systemic irinotecan (CPT-11) and HAI floxuridine (FUDR) plus dexamethasone (DEX) as combination adjuvant therapy after liver resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-six patients who underwent complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated with six monthly cycles of HAI FUDR plus DEX for 14 days of each 4-week cycle plus escalating doses of systemic CPT-11. The primary end points of the phase I/II study were the MTD and efficacy of this regimen.

RESULTS

The MTD for combined systemic CPT-11 and HAI FUDR was CPT-11 at 200 mg/m2 every other week and FUDR at 0.12 mg/kg x pump volume / pump flow rate. The dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, the 2-year survival rate is 89%. All of the 27 patients who were treated at the MTD are alive.

CONCLUSION

In patients who undergo resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, adding systemic CPT-11 to HAI therapy in an adjuvant regimen is feasible. This regimen seems to have comparable activity to fluorouracil and leucovorin, but further studies are needed to assess whether it improves local control or decreases extrahepatic recurrences.

Liver metastases from rectal carcinoma: disease progression during chemotherapy despite loss of arterial-phase hypervascularity on real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography at low acoustic energy

We used a new sonographic technique, real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography at low acoustic energy, to evaluate liver perfusion and liver metastases from colorectal cancer in a 73-year-old woman after chemotherapy. After 6 weeks of chemotherapy, liver metastases that had been clearly visible on conventional sonography before chemotherapy were no longer detectable on conventional sonography but were still evident on contrast-enhanced sonography. At about 6 months after initiation of chemotherapy, the lesions were all visible again on conventional sonography and had become significantly larger, although some no longer showed contrast enhancement during the arterial phase. In this case, changes in arterial perfusion over time did not parallel the response of liver metastases to chemotherapy.

Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) in patients with rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) or low-lying rectal cancer received preoperative RT (total dose, 50.4 Gy). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 825 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, with oxaliplatin starting at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 with planned escalation steps of 10 mg/m2. End points of the phase II study included downstaging, histopathologic tumor regression, resectability of T4 disease, and sphincter preservation in patients with low-lying tumors.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in two of six patients treated with 60 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. Thus, 50 mg/m2 was the recommended dose for the phase II study. Toxicities observed at this dose level were generally mild, with only two cases of short-lived grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, was restricted to grade 2 in 19% of patients. T-category downstaging was achieved in 17 (55%) of 31 operated patients, and 68% of patients had negative lymph nodes. Pathologic complete response was found in 19% of the resected specimens. Radical surgery with free margins could be performed in 79% of patients with T4 disease, and 36% of patients with tumors < or = 2 cm from the dentate line had sphincter-saving surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative XELOX-RT is a feasible and well tolerated treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based therapy with XELOX chemoradiotherapy.

Implications of genetic testing in the management of colorectal cancer

The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is impacted by various factors at the time of diagnosis, including location of the tumor, gender, age and overall performance status of the patient. Optimal postoperative management of patients who have undergone successful tumor resection involves the utilization of reliable determninants of prognosis to help select patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment, while sparing others from drug-related adverse effects. Tailoring chemotherapy for patients with disseminated cancer, or for patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy, is also critical. Interpatient differences in tumor response and drug toxicity are common during chemotherapy. Genomic variability of key metabolic enzyme complexes, drug targets, and drug transport molecules is an important contributing factor. The identification of genetic markers of response and prognosis will aid in the development of more individualized chemotherapuetic strategies for cancer patients. Potential prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer include oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, genes involved in angiogenic and apoptotic pathways and cell proliferation, and those encoding targets of chemotherapy. Specifically, molecular markers such as deletion of 18q (DCC), p27 and microsatellite instability are promising as indicators of good or poor prognosis. Molecular determinants of efficacy and host toxicity of the most commonly used drugs in colorectal cancer, fluoracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, are being investigated. Alterations in gene expression, protein expression and polymorphic variants in genes encoding thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, dUTP nucleotidehydrolase and thymidine phosphorylase (for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy), uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and carboxylesterase (for irinotecan therapy), and excision repair cross-complementing genes (ERCC1 and ERCC2) and glutathione-S-transferase P1 (for oxalilplatin-based regimens) may be useful as markers for clinical drug response, survival and host toxicity.

Palliative treatment of patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using palliative chemotherapy is reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence was aimed at.

RESULTS

The continuous improvements during the past 13-15 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered two lines of chemotherapy based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival has gradually improved from below 6 months to above 18 months in some recent trials. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, and whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. Future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.

Hypersensitivity reactions related to oxaliplatin (OHP)

Patients treated with platinum compounds are subject to hypersensitivity reactions. Our study has highlighted the reactions related to oxaliplatin (OHP) infusion. One hundred and twenty-four patients affected by advanced colorectal cancer were treated with different schedules containing OHP, at the Institute of Haematology and Medical Oncology 'L. and A. Seragnoli' of Bologna and at the Medical Oncology Division of Livorno Hospital. Seventeen patients (13%) showed hypersensitivity reactions after a few minutes from the start of the OHP infusion. Usually, these reactions were seen after 2-17 exposures to OHP (Mean+/-s.e.: 9.4+/-1.07). No patient experienced allergic reactions at his/her first OHP infusion. Eight patients developed a mild reaction consisting of flushing and swelling of the face and hands, itching, sweating and lachrymation. The remaining nine patients showed a moderate-severe reaction with dyspnoea, wheezing, laryngospasm, psycho-motor agitation, tachycardia, precordial pain, diffuse erythema, itching and sweating. Six patients out of 17 were re-exposed to the drug with premedication of steroids and all except one developed the hypersensitivity reaction again. The cumulative dose, the time of exposure to OHP and the clinical features are variable and unpredictable. The risk of developing hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with a short infusion of OHP cannot be underestimated.

Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with multiple (five or more) bilobar hepatic metastases irrespective of initial resectability is still under scrutiny. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of hepatectomy alone with that of hepatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 71 patients after hepatectomy for five or more bilobar liver tumours. The outcome of 48 patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy was compared with that of 23 patients treated by hepatectomy alone.

RESULTS

Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better 3- and 5-year survival rates from the time of diagnosis than those who did not (67.0 and 38.9 versus 51.8 and 20.7 per cent respectively; P = 0.039), and required fewer extended hepatectomies (four segments or more) (39 of 48 versus 23 of 23; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

In patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before hepatectomy was associated with improved survival and enabled complete resection with fewer extended hepatectomies.

Oxaliplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a single institution's experience

AIMS

To determine the efficacy of the combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 2 g/m2 daily in two divided doses days 1-14 every 3 weeks, outside of a clinical trial at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Patients could have received any number of lines of previous treatment.

RESULTS

Between September 2000 and March 2002, 47 patients were treated with the combination. Fifteen patients had not received previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, 10 had received one line of treatment and 21 had received two or more lines of previous treatment. The overall response rate was 27.6%, with a complete response rate of 2.1%. Overall response rates according to line of treatment were 33% for non pre-treated patients, 36% for second line and 19% for third and more lines. The median overall survival was 13.4 months and the median failure-free survival was 6.5 months. There were no treatment-related deaths and no grade 4 haematological toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is active in advanced colorectal cancer. It can result in down-staging of tumours to enable hepatic resection. In addition, it is a well-tolerated regimen.

Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil for heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary phase II study

Oxaliplatin shows in vitro and in vivo synergism with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study we evaluate the clinical efficacy of oxaliplatin and 5-FU in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients had to be pretreated with both anthracyclines and taxanes. Pretreatment with capecitabine was recommended but not mandatory. Chemotherapy: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2/2 h day 1, folinic acid 400 mg/m2/2 h day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. push day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion/48 h day 1, q2w. Fourteen patients were included: one male and 13 females; age: median 53 years (38-62); ECOG 0: three patients, 1: nine patients, 2: two patients; all patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes, capecitabine: nine patients, vinorelbine: six patients, trastuzumab: four patients, hormonal therapy: 12 patients; lines of prior palliative chemotherapy: 0: one patient, 1: three patients, 2: one patient, 3: three patients, 4: four patients, 5: two patients.

RESULTS

median number of cycles: 8 (range 1-17). Toxicity (14 patients evaluable; no. of patients with Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4): asthenia: 2/-, paraesthesia 3/-, leuko/neutropenia: 1/2, no neutropenic fever, other (alopecia, skin): 2/-. Response (12 patients evaluable, all with bidimensionally measurable disease): complete remission: no patients, partial remission: four patients (33%, all confirmed), stable disease: five patients, progressive disease: three patients. We conclude that despite the small number of patients, the combination of 5-FU and oxaliplatin shows promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated population.

Activity and safety of oxaliplatin with weekly 5-fluorouracil bolus and low-dose leucovorin as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of oxaliplatin combined with weekly boluses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low doses of leucovorin (LV) and to determine objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. Seventy-nine patients enrolled in an observational, multicenter, prospective, open-label phase II study received intravenous (I.V.) infusions of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over the course of 2 hours on days 1 and 14 and LV 20 mg/m2 over the course of 2 hours and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as a bolus on days 1, 7, and 14 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Seventy-nine patients were evaluable for safety, and data from 70 patients were used for efficacy analysis. The objective response rate was 51.4%. Complete responses occurred in 7 patients (10%), and partial responses occurred in 29 patients (41.4%). Disease control, defined as response or stable disease, was obtained in 56 of 70 patients (80%). The median duration of response was 8.34 weeks (range, 7.3-11.5 weeks). The median time to progression was 7.13 months (range, 6.28-7.72 months), and median overall survival time was 15 months (range, 12.32-18.37 months). Acute dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3/4 diarrhea and neutropenia, which occurred in 10.5% and 3.9% of patients, respectively. Among the 70 patients who experienced neurosensory toxicity, it was estimated that only 1.3% had grade 3 symptoms. Preliminary data showed that the regimen is at least as active as other regimens combining oxaliplatin and infusional schedules of 5-FU and might be more convenient for patients because it avoids the need for I.V. catheter implantation.

Safety and toxicity analysis of oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil or as a single agent in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Two consecutive compassionate use studies of oxaliplatin were conducted in the United States and Canada in more than 5000 patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had experienced treatment failure after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The main focus was safety. Patients were assigned to treatment with either single-agent oxaliplatin or oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil (FU) and with or without leucovorin (LV) in various regimens. Response data collection was not a trial objective, but time to treatment failure (TTF) was recorded in the first cohort (1370 patients).

RESULTS

All treatment regimens were well tolerated, with an overall incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity of 23.2%, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity of 26.4% (including diarrhea, vomiting, and mucositis), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity 3.9%. Similar results were reported in the second cohort (3806 patients), in which the eligibility criteria were much less restrictive. In the first cohort (in which 83% received prior irinotecan), median TTF was 14 weeks, and was similar for the five regimens combining oxaliplatin and FU with or without LV, but significantly shorter for the single-agent oxaliplatin arm. The overall dose-intensity of oxaliplatin was maintained at 85.5% (range, 80.6% to 94.3%) of that prescribed by protocol (average 36.7 mg/m2/wk).

CONCLUSION

These data in a heavily pretreated patient population confirm that oxaliplatin is safe when used as a single agent or with a variety of FU-based regimens as salvage therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Semimonthly versus monthly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin administered for 24 or 36 weeks as adjuvant therapy in stage II and III colon cancer: results of a randomized trial

PURPOSE

This randomized, 2 x 2 factorial study compared a semimonthly (LVFU2) with a monthly (FULV) regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin and 24 versus 36 weeks of each regimen as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II (Dukes' B2) and III (Dukes' C) colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

LVFU2 was administered semi-monthly for 2 consecutive days as dl- or l-leucovorin (200 or 100 mg/m2, respectively) as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 400 mg/m2 FU bolus and 600 mg/m2 of FU as a 22-hour continuous infusion. FULV was administered monthly for 5 consecutive days as a 15-minute infusion of dl- or l-leucovorin, followed by 400 mg/m2 of FU as a 15-minute infusion.

RESULTS

A total of 905 patients were randomly assigned. The median follow-up was 41 months. Disease-free survival was similar between the LVFU2 and FULV groups (127 v 124 events; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; P =.74) and between 24 and 36 weeks of therapy (128 v 123 events; HR = 0.94; P =.63). Analysis of overall survival showed a slight excess in the number of deaths in LVFU2 compared with FULV (73 v 59), but this difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.78; P =.18). The most commonly observed grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, and mucositis. Toxicities were significantly lower in the LVFU2 group (all toxicities, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm that LVFU2 is less toxic than FULV. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no statistically significant difference could be detected in disease-free or overall survival between the treatment groups or treatment durations.

Phase II study of flavopiridol in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Flavopiridol, a synthetic flavone that inhibits cell cycle progression, has demonstrated activity in colon cancer in xenografts and in a phase I trial. We evaluated flavopiridol in a phase II trial in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty chemotherapy-naïve patients with ACRC received flavopiridol at a dose of 50 mg/m(2)/day via a 72-h continuous infusion every 14 days. Response was assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled; 19 were evaluable for toxicity and 18 for response. There were no objective responses. Five patients had stable disease lasting a median of 7 weeks. The median time to progression was 8 weeks. Median survival was 65 weeks. The principal grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea, fatigue and hyperglycemia, occurring in 21%, 11% and 11% of patients, respectively. Other common toxicities included anemia, anorexia and nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Flavopiridol in this dose and schedule does not have single-agent activity in patients with ACRC. Recent preclinical data suggest that flavopiridol enhances apoptosis when combined with chemotherapy. Trials that evaluate flavopiridol in combination with active cytotoxic drugs should help to define the role of this novel agent in ACRC.

Gene therapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is an important public health problem worldwide. Gene therapy has therapeutic potential for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, incurable by conventional treatments. To date, many strategies of gene therapy have been explored, including mutant gene correction, prodrug activation, immune stimulation and genetically-modified oncolytic viruses. Although the preclinical results of gene therapy for colorectal cancer have shown promise, gene therapy is still at an early stage of clinical development and has not yet shown a significant therapeutic benefit for patients. The main obstacles for introduction of gene therapy to patients are poor targeting selectivity of the vectors and inefficient gene transfer. As the science supporting tumour-selective vectors evolves, gene therapy may expand rapidly in the clinical practice of colorectal cancer treatment.

Raltitrexed-induced hepatotoxicity: multivariate analysis of predictive factors

Raltitrexed (Tomudex; TOM) hepatotoxicity is usually characterized by a transient and self-limiting increase in transaminase levels. How this may condition daily clinical practice is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate predictive factors of TOM hepatotoxicity. In total, 130 patients were treated at two medical oncology institutions with TOM (3 mg/m2) (52 patients) or TOM plus oxaliplatin (TOMOX) (100 mg/m2 day 1 or 70 mg/m2 day 1, 8) (78 patients). A multinomial logistic regression (adjusted for multilevel data) was performed (on all administered chemotherapy courses) to assess the dependence of hepatic toxicity on a set of clinical factors correlated with patient, disease and treatment characteristics. Creatinine clearance was calculated by the Cockcroft formula before each chemotherapy course. Most of the patients presented colorectal cancer (95%) and metastatic disease (93%). Out of the 130 patients, 41 were aged 70 or more, while 119 (91.5%) had a good performance status (PS) (ECOG 0 or 1). Before chemotherapy, liver metastases were present in 78 (60%) patients and elevated transaminase in 25 (19%). A total of 584 courses were administered (252 TOM and 332 TOMOX). National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1/2 and 3/4 transaminase toxicity was observed in 62 and 20% of patients, respectively. To control transaminase increase, glutathione (GSH) or ademethionine (SAMe) was administered in 96 and 129 cycles, respectively. Hepatotoxicity conditioned delays (a week or more) in 60 (10%) chemotherapy cycles and was the reason for the discontinuation of chemotherapy in eight (6%) patients. Among the factors evaluated with multivariate analysis, sex, age, PS, creatinine clearance, previous chemotherapy treatment, presence of liver metastases and oncology centre were not significantly associated with TOM hepatotoxicity. Elevated baseline transaminase levels (p=0.001), number of chemotherapy cycles (p<0.001), TOM cumulative dose (p=0.018), unprolonged intervals between courses (p<0.001) and TOMOX regimen (p<0.001) emerged as factors predictive of hepatotoxicity. In the same analysis, GSH (p<0.001) and SAMe (p<0.001) were hepatoprotective agents. This study confirmed TOM-based hepatotoxicity as a clinical relevant side-effect and a major factor for treatment delays or discontinuation. Predictive and protective factors listed above could assist the management of this toxicity that has probably been underestimated until now.

Prospects for colorectal cancer treatment: oral chemotherapy and targeted biotherapy

Since the 1990s, the emergence of new drugs has modified the prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer. This malignant disease has largely benefited from the development of new drugs and new therapeutic concepts, such as oral chemotherapy or targeted biotherapy. Although a significant improvement in survival has been reached with these new therapeutic approaches, the optimal strategy remains to be defined, particularly the best sequence of drug administration. This review will focus upon new anticancer drugs, some of them with original mechanism of action, and steps towards the goal of better understanding and anticipating new treatments in colorectal carcinoma.

Oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the activity of biweekly oxaliplatin, combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil (FU) and low-dose leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy (bFOL), as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer; no previous therapy for advanced disease (adjuvant therapy allowed if >6 months since completion); and performance status 0, 1, or 2 were eligible and were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 plus LV 20 mg/m2 over 10 to 20 minutes, followed by a 500 mg/m2 bolus dose of FU on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Patients underwent response evaluation by computed tomographic scan every 2 months.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were entered, and 41 patients were treated, including 20 men and 22 women, nine with previous adjuvant chemotherapy and four with radiation therapy. Three patients achieved complete response, and 23 patients achieved partial response, for a response rate of 63% (95% CI, 49% to 78%). Major toxicities included cumulative neuropathy grade 2 (24%) and grade 3 (12%; requiring discontinuation of oxaliplatin), diarrhea grade 3 to 4 (29%) and grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (10%). Median time to progression was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 10.8 months) with median survival of 15.9 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4 to 19.7 months).

CONCLUSION

The bFOL regimen seems to have activity comparable to be infusional programs of FU combined with oxaliplatin. Prospective trials are warranted to determine the relative merits of this schedule compared with the currently indicated schedules.

Dose-escalating and pharmacological study of oxaliplatin in adult cancer patients with impaired renal function: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated doses of oxaliplatin in patients with renal impairment and to develop formal guidelines for oxaliplatin dosing in this patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven adult cancer patients with variable renal function received intravenous oxaliplatin at 60 to 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCL) into four cohorts: group A (controls, CrCL > or =60 mL/min), group B (mild dysfunction, CrCL 40 to 59 mL/min), group C (moderate dysfunction, CrCL 20 to 39 mL/min), and group D (severe dysfunction, CrCL <20 mL/min). Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients, and urine and plasma ultrafiltrates were assayed for platinum concentrations.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in any patient group during the first cycle of therapy. Escalation of oxaliplatin to the maximum dose of 130 mg/m2 was well tolerated in all patient groups with a CrCL > or =20 mL/min (groups A, B, and C). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that patients with decreased CrCL had a corresponding decrease in the clearance of plasma ultrafiltrable platinum (r2 = 0.765). However, oxaliplatin-induced side effects were not more common or severe in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, despite the decrease in ultrafiltrable platinum clearance.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is well tolerated by patients with mild to moderate degrees of renal dysfunction. These data strongly support the recommendation that dose reductions of single-agent oxaliplatin are not necessary in patients with a CrCL greater than 20 mL/min.

Multicenter phase II trial evaluating a three-weekly schedule of irinotecan plus raltitrexed in patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and raltitrexed are active against advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), act through different mechanisms, and have only partially overlapping toxicity profiles. Phase I studies have shown that single-agent full doses of both drugs can be safely combined. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination in patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory ACC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1999 and December 2000, 52 patients (31 males, 21 females) with a median age of 62 years (range 39-75) were included and received CPT-11 (350 mg/m(2) as a 60-min infusion) plus raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2) as a 15-min infusion, 1 h after CPT-11), with courses repeated every 21 days. Objective response was assessed after every three courses, and treatment maintained until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 313 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles per patient (range 1-14). Seven patients (13.5%) achieved a partial response and one a complete response (1.9%), for an overall intention-to-treat response rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval 6.1% to 27.2%). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was 23.1% for diarrhea, 21.2% for asthenia, 17.3% for neutropenia, 13.4% for emesis and 7.7% for infection. There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 20 months, median survival was 11.9 months and median time to progression was 4.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT-11 plus raltitrexed is active in patients with 5-FU-refractory ACC, at the expense of moderate toxicity.

Protection against oxaliplatin acute neurosensory toxicity by venlafaxine

Venlafaxine (Effexor; Wyeth Lederlé) has previously shown therapeutic effects for the management of chronic and neuropathic pains. We report here the efficacy of venlafaxine upon acute neurosensory symptoms secondary to oxaliplatin toxicity. A dose of 50 mg of venlafaxine was given orally at the beginning of the oxaliplatin infusion. Patients did not experience any or very low paresthesias, even in the cold. As the results were very dramatic and reproducible, we propose that venlafaxine may be of use in the daily management of oxaliplatin-related neurosensory toxicity.

Colorectal cancer in the elderly: is palliative chemotherapy of value?

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly, with 70% of patients being aged 65 years or older. In Western countries, the total number of elderly patients with this disease is expected to further increase in the future. Since the incidence of adverse physical or socioeconomic conditions in the elderly is higher than in younger patients, a thorough assessment of the patient's suitability for therapy should be performed before a decision is made. Using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to subdivide the population of elderly cancer patients into three groups can help to guide treatment decisions. Both in the adjuvant and in the palliative setting, there are sufficient data supporting the use of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in fit elderly patients who can tolerate cytotoxic treatment. Systemic chemotherapy has been shown to effectively reduce mortality in the adjuvant situation and to be of clinical benefit for patients with metastatic disease in terms of longer survival, control of symptoms and quality of life. In recent years, new substances such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan have shown significant activity in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, information on how to guide the use of these new drugs in elderly patients is still lacking. Limited data from clinical trials indicate treatment efficacy in selected elderly patients comparable to that observed in younger patients, with overall manageable toxicity. Clearly, further clinical trials in elderly patients with colorectal cancer are necessary as well as the incorporation of aspects of geriatric medicine into the teaching programme of medical oncologists.

Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial

PURPOSE

In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher's exact test, P <.0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P <.0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (chi2 test, P <.001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.

A dose-escalating study of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was shown in early clinical studies to have promising activity against gastrointestinal malignancies. Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU also has activity against these tumour types. The primary objective of this study was to determine a tolerable dose for oral eniluracil/5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies were recruited into this open-label study. Patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle), and the dose intensity of oral eniluracil/5-FU was gradually increased by escalating the number of days of treatment per course.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose intensity was eniluracil/5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily for 16 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities included vomiting and diarrhoea. The objective tumour response rate was 26% with a median duration of response of 15.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 8.5-22.1). Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced neurotoxicity (sensory neuropathy or cold-related dysaesthesia), although only two events were severe (grade 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for future study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer is 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for 14 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each treatment cycle.

Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of colorectal adenocarcinoma determined by a modified ex vivo ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA)

Advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) has a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival of only 5% despite treatment with chemotherapeutic agents. Response rate and overall survival varies little between the commonly used single agents, although combinations achieve better outcomes. It is well established that considerable heterogeneity exists between cancers of the same tissue type, but it has been difficult to establish this for CRC. We therefore investigated the heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in CRC using a modified version of the ex vivo ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) capable of handling infected tumor tissue. Fifty-three specimens of primary solid or malignant effusions of CRC were tested, of which 46 (87%) were evaluable. There were considerable differences in sensitivities between individuals. The most active single cytotoxic agents in the assay were identified as 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and mitomycin C (MMC). Cells were exposed to combinations of drugs added simultaneously at the same concentrations tested as single agents. All drug combinations achieved greater growth inhibition than drugs used alone. MMC+gemcitabine was found to be the most effective combination in 83% of specimens. The ATP-TCA has previously been shown to be a good predictor of response to chemotherapy in other tissue types. The degree of heterogeneity demonstrated from these results suggests that the ATP-TCA could be used to identify patients who might benefit from specific chemotherapeutic agents alone or in combination.

Bimonthly leucovorin, infusion 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI-2) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Irinotecan has shown activity in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to leucovorin and fluorouracil. Preclinical experiments on cell cultures and human tumor xenografts indicated potential synergy when combining irinotecan and fluorouracil. We designed a new regimen combining leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and hydroxyurea (FOLFIRI-2) and conducted a phase II study to establish its efficacy and tolerance in advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and consisted of leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on day 1, immediately followed by 46 hours of continuous infusion of fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 3, and hydroxyurea 1,500 mg the day before leucovorin, and on days 1 and 2. Treatment was continued until progression or limiting toxicity. Twenty-nine heavily pretreated patients entered the study. Five patients achieved an objective response (17%), and 12 obtained stabilization of disease or minor response (52%). Five patients failed to continue treatment (17%) because of toxicity or worsening condition. From the start of FOLFIRI-2 treatment, median progression-free survival was 4.1 months and median survival was 9.7 months. Grade III/IV National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria toxicities were nausea 17%, diarrhea 31%, mucositis 14%, neutropenia 52%, and febrile neutropenia 14%. FOLFIRI-2 achieved a good rate of response and stabilization in heavily pretreated patients despite significant toxicity.

New developments in therapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer remains a significant cause of cancer death, and its treatment is the subject of active, ongoing investigation within all treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In this review we discuss selected interesting and important research findings since the year 2000 and comment on their potential impact on the adjuvant and advanced disease management of patients with colon and rectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: systemic treatment in the new millennium

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in North America. Metastatic disease is present at diagnosis in 30% of the patients, and approximately half of early-stage patients will eventually present with metastatic disease. Until recently, few chemotherapy options were available to treat metastatic CRC.

METHODS

The authors review the results of recent clinical trials and the design of ongoing trials in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Fluorouracil (5-FU) with leucovorin (LV) modulation has a marginal but positive effect on survival in those patients. The recent incorporation of irinotecan (CPT-11) and oxaliplatin for the management of advanced CRC has generated further improvement in survival. The development of oral fluoropyrimidines, mimicking continuous infusion 5-FU, is convenient. In randomized trials, capecitabine was equally effective to bolus 5-FU and LV in the management of metastatic CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently completed or ongoing clinical trials to study novel targeting agents have initiated a new era of drug development. Anti-angiogenesis drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and epidermal growth factor blockers are among this new generation of agents with encouraging preliminary data. Randomized trials will determine the impact of these newer agents on survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic CRC.

Hypersensitivity and idiosyncratic reactions to oxaliplatin

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum analog that is used to treat a variety of solid tumors, particularly colorectal carcinoma. Patients may develop hypersensitivity reactions, although this complication occurs infrequently.

METHODS

Three patients developed hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin while undergoing treatment on a Phase I trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine. An Entrez PUBMED search was performed to identify other cases.

RESULTS

Two patients experienced the abrupt onset of erythema alone or with pruritus during the 9th and 11th infusions of oxaliplatin, whereas the other patient developed fever and mild dyspnea a few hours after the 9th oxaliplatin infusion. All 3 patients were rechallenged successfully for at least 1 additional oxaliplatin infusion by using oral dexamethasone, 20 mg orally, 6 and 12 hours before the administration of oxaliplatin and by administering intravenously 125 mg of solumedrol, 50 mg of diphenhydramine, and 50 mg of cimetidine 30 minutes before oxaliplatin. The literature review suggests two distinct patterns of reactions: classic hypersensitivity (as experienced by the first two patients) and idiosyncratic reactions (as experienced by the third patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who develop mild to moderate hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin may be pretreated with steroids and antagonists of Type 1 and 2 histamine receptors, whereas patients who develop severe reactions are unlikely to tolerate further therapy.

Elective bowel resection for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: prognostic variables for asymptomatic patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with stage IV disease at initial presentation remains controversial. Although bowel resection to manage symptoms such as bleeding, perforation, or obstruction has been advocated, management of asymptomatic patients has not been well defined. Patient-dependent factors (performance status, comorbid disease) and extent of distant metastases are among the considerations that impact on the decision to proceed with surgical management in asymptomatic stage IV CRC patients. We postulated that selected patients might benefit from elective resection of the asymptomatic primary CRC. The extent of distant metastases was objectively measured by several methods to identify potential prognostic variables that may help guide patient selection in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed hospital and colorectal service databases for the years 1996 to 1999. Stage IV patients who had colorectal resections with gross residual metastatic disease were identified (n = 209). Among these 209 patients, 82 patients operated on for symptoms (obstruction, perforation, bleeding, or pain) were excluded, leaving 127 patients who underwent elective resection of their asymptomatic primary CRC. Over the same time period, 103 stage IV patients who did not undergo resection were identified. Data on patient characteristics and clinical management were collected. A radiologist performed an independent review of available CT scans to assess extent of liver disease. The chi-square test was used for analysis of categoric data and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and distributions compared by the log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The resected group could be easily distinguished from the nonresected group by a higher frequency of right colon cancers (p = 0.03) and metastatic disease restricted to the liver (p = 0.02) or one other site apart from the primary tumor (p = 0.02). Resected patients had prolonged median (16 versus 9 months, p < 0.001) and 2-year (25% versus 6%, p < 0.001) survival compared with patients never resected. Univariate analysis identified three significant prognostic variables (number of distant sites involved, metastases to liver only, and volume of hepatic replacement by tumor) in the resected group. Volume of hepatic replacement was also a significant predictor of survival in Cox multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.01). Subsequent to resection of asymptomatic primary CRC, 26 patients (20%) developed postoperative complications. Median hospital stay was 6 days. Two patients (1.6%) died within 30 days of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Stage IV patients selected for elective palliative resection of asymptomatic primary colorectal cancers had substantial postoperative survival that was significantly better than those never having resection. Limited metastatic tumor burden and less extensive liver involvement were associated with better survival and a higher likelihood of benefit from elective bowel resection in asymptomatic patients with incurable stage IV CRC.

Overview of preoperative and postoperative therapy for colorectal cancer: the European and United States perspectives

Surgery is the primary modality for cure in patients with localized colorectal cancer. However, despite potential curative surgery, the risk of recurrence is high. In colon cancer, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is now established in stage III disease. The benefit of adjuvant treatment in stage II disease is likely to be small, and studies performed thus far have been generally underpowered to detect what might be a clinically significant effect on survival. Whereas bolus scheduling of 5-FU and LV is favored in North America, infusion of 5-FU/LV is preferred in Europe. Indeed, infused 5-FU/LV may be a safer partner with new drugs such as oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Oral fluoropyrimidines are attractive agents that might one day replace parenteral 5-FU. In rectal cancer, postoperative combined chemoradiation was recommended as standard practice in stages II and III disease. Despite a lack of randomized data demonstrating clinical benefit, preoperative chemoradiation has been increasingly used in patients with T3 disease in North America. However, preoperative radiation therapy is more frequently used in Europe. There are discrepancies in pathologic reporting of circumferential resection margin involvement and lymph node status between the United States and Europe. Standardized reporting with improved preoperative imaging would allow patients with truly early-stage disease to undergo more conservative management and be spared the morbidity and mortality of unnecessary adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment.

Targeted therapy and pharmacogenomic programs

The goal in administering chemotherapeutics is to develop the ability to predict the outcome of therapy in terms of response and toxicity. Technology has been developed to allow tumor profiling with measurement of protein expression, gene expression levels of markers, and even genetic polymorphisms, which may predict response to particular chemotherapeutics. The chemotherapeutics for which particular markers have been shown to predict outcome include the fluoropyrimidines and platinums. The next step is to develop clinical trials that will assess prospectively the benefits of profiling a patient's particular tumor, which should translate into an improvement in response and toxicity.

Neoadjuvant systemic fluorouracil and mitomycin C prior to synchronous chemoradiation is an effective strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients with previously untreated primary rectal cancer, reviewed in a multidisciplinary meeting and considered to have locally advanced disease on the basis of physical examination and imaging (MRI+CT n=30, CT alone n=6), were recruited. Patients received protracted venous infusion 5-FU (300 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 12 weeks) with mitomycin C (MMC) (7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus every 6 weeks). Starting on week 13, 5-FU was reduced to 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) and concomitant pelvic radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions was commenced followed by 5.4-9 Gy boost to tumour bed. Surgery was planned 6 weeks after chemoradiation. Postoperatively, patients received 12 weeks of MMC and 5-FU at the same preoperative doses. Between January 99 and August 01, 36 eligible patients were recruited. Median age was 63 years (range=40-85). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiological tumour response was 27.8% (one CR and nine PRs) and no patient had progressive disease. In addition, 65% of patients had a symptomatic response including improvement in diarrhoea/constipation (59%), reduced rectal bleeding (60%) and diminished pelvic pain/tenesmus (78%). Following chemoradiation, tumour regression occurred in 80.6% (six CRs and 23 PRs; 95% CI=64-91.8%) and only one patient still had an inoperable tumour. R0 resection was achieved in 28 patients (82%). When compared with initial clinical staging, the pathological downstaging rate in T and/or N stage was 73.5% and pathological CR was found in one patient. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy as a prelude to synchronous chemoradiation can be administered with negligible risk of disease progression and produces considerable symptomatic response with associated tumour regression.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of two different schedules of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin, two new agents with potential synergistic activity, have demonstrated promising antitumor efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Preclinical and clinical evidence indicating that dose intensification of the oral fluorouracil prodrug might result in improved therapeutic results led us to the present randomized multicenter phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with bidimensionally measurable ACC previously untreated for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2)/d days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks (arm A) or to receive oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) days 1 and 14 combined with capecitabine 3,500 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7 and 14 to 21 every 4 weeks (arm B). In both treatment arms, chemotherapy was continued for a total of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progression of disease.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to the high-dose capecitabine combination arm B had a higher radiologically confirmed response rate (54.5% v 42.2%) and a significantly longer median progression-free survival time than those allocated to control arm A (10.5 v 6.0 months; P =.0013). Median overall survival times cannot be calculated for either treatment arm at this point. Despite a 34% higher dose intensity of capecitabine in arm B, there was no difference in hematologic toxicity between treatment arms (neutropenia/thrombocytopenia: 60%/43% in arm B v 56%/33% in arm A). Similarly, the incidence rate and degree of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable: The most commonly encountered symptoms (all grades, arm A and arm B) included nausea/emesis (A: 58%; B: 62%), diarrhea (A: 44%; B: 31%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (A: 80%; B: 83%), and fatigue (A: 40%; B: 50%).

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable, and clinically active. The dose-intensified bimonthly capecitabine arm, however, seems to be more effective in increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time.

Radiofrequency ablation extends the scope of surgery in colorectal liver metastases

AIMS

To assess outcome in patients treated by a multidisciplinary team, with a combination of liver resection and RF ablation.

METHODS

Sixteen unselected patients (f=9; m=7) with colorectal liver metastases who were not suitable for surgery alone, were treated as follows: six had RF ablation at open laparotomy, three patients had synchronous ablation and resection while seven patients had RF ablation after liver resection. Standard liver resection techniques were used. RF was performed using internally cooled, single or cluster electrodes with a high power (200 W) generator. All patients were followed with regular contrast enhanced CT and survival noted.

RESULTS

A total of 27 tumours with diameters 1.2-10 cm were treated. Two minor complications were recorded. 2/6 (33%) who had intraoperative RF had incomplete ablation due to large tumour size (6 and 10 cm respectively). Further RF ablation sessions were carried out successfully. 11/16 (69%) are alive at 2 years of whom 7 (44%) have no evidence of residual or recurrent liver disease.

CONCLUSION

In our study, RF ablation extends the therapeutic envelope, is an effective local treatment of liver metastases and improves life expectancy.