Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Radiofrequency ablation extends the scope of surgery in colorectal liver metastases

AIMS

To assess outcome in patients treated by a multidisciplinary team, with a combination of liver resection and RF ablation.

METHODS

Sixteen unselected patients (f=9; m=7) with colorectal liver metastases who were not suitable for surgery alone, were treated as follows: six had RF ablation at open laparotomy, three patients had synchronous ablation and resection while seven patients had RF ablation after liver resection. Standard liver resection techniques were used. RF was performed using internally cooled, single or cluster electrodes with a high power (200 W) generator. All patients were followed with regular contrast enhanced CT and survival noted.

RESULTS

A total of 27 tumours with diameters 1.2-10 cm were treated. Two minor complications were recorded. 2/6 (33%) who had intraoperative RF had incomplete ablation due to large tumour size (6 and 10 cm respectively). Further RF ablation sessions were carried out successfully. 11/16 (69%) are alive at 2 years of whom 7 (44%) have no evidence of residual or recurrent liver disease.

CONCLUSION

In our study, RF ablation extends the therapeutic envelope, is an effective local treatment of liver metastases and improves life expectancy.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles.

RESULTS

The median age was 51 years (range 34-75). Twenty patients (40%) had received three or more chemotherapeutic regimens, 64% had three or four metastatic sites and 78% had visceral metastases. All patients had prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, one patient (2%) achieved a complete response and 16 (32%) a partial response, for a 34% overall response rate. Twenty-one patients (42%) had stable disease and 12 (24%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression was 5.3 months (range 0.5-12.8) and the median overall survival was 12.3 months (range 0.5-19.2). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32% and 18%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by three patients (6%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was reported in 14% of the patients and gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Cycle delays were reported in 28% of patients and dose reductions in 26%. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis were not significant. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV seems to be an active regimen in patients with MBC and prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes with a good safety profile. The incidence of severe toxicity was quite low and the compliance of patients to the treatment was satisfactory. The results obtained with this regimen could be considered encouraging in this heavily pretreated group of breast cancer patients with a high incidence of visceral metastases.

EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group early phase II trial of S-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

Cancer of the colon and rectum is one of the most frequent malignancies both in the US and Europe. Standard palliative therapy is based on 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid combinations, with or without oxaliplatin or irinotecan, given intravenously. Oral medication has the advantage of greater patient convenience and acceptance and potential cost savings. S-1 is a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine derivative. In a nonrandomized phase II study, patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with S-1 at 40 mg m-2 b.i.d. for 28 consecutive days, repeated every 5 weeks, but by amendment the dose was reduced to 35 mg m-2 during the study because of a higher than expected number of severe adverse drug reactions. In total 47 patients with colorectal cancer were included. In the 37 evaluable patients there were nine partial responses (24%), 17 stable diseases (46%) and 11 patients had progressive disease (30%). Diarrhoea occurred frequently and was often severe: in the 40 and 35 mg m-2 group, respectively, 38 and 35% of the patients experienced grade 3-4 diarrhoea. The other toxicities were limited and manageable. S-1 is active in advanced colorectal cancer, but in order to establish a safer dose the drug should be subject to further investigations.

Recent advances in the pharmacological treatment of colorectal cancer

Recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer have lead to significant gains in response rates and survival. The combination of newer agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin using various dosing schedules in the metastatic setting has resulted in a steady improvement in the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer. Experimental therapies such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, have shown promise in early clinical trials and have acceptable toxicity profiles. Efforts towards improving risk-stratification of stage II colorectal cancer patients and optimising therapy in patients with advanced disease, have focused on molecular and genetic markers. It is hoped that the addition of new therapies to existing drug combinations, as well as further advances in the understanding of colorectal cancer biology, will lead to further improvement in survival and quality of life for patients.

Chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the anus

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and limitations of definitive chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the anal canal and to propose a treatment strategy that addresses the limitations of treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1976 and 1998, 16 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the anal canal were treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy with curative intent. Available histologic slides were reviewed for evidence of primary adenocarcinoma of anal duct origin. The treatment results for these patients were compared with those of a group of patients with epidermoid histologic features who were all treated with definitive chemoradiation (55 Gy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, n = 92) between 1989 and 1998. The hospital records were reviewed for all patients. Patients with epidermoid carcinoma presented with more advanced primary tumors (42% vs. 19% Stage T3 or greater). All adenocarcinoma patients were treated with radiotherapy (median dose 55 Gy): 11 received concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and 5 received radiotherapy alone. The initial surgical procedures included abdominoperineal resection, excisional biopsies (n = 5), and local excision (n = 1). Abdominoperineal resection was performed as salvage therapy after local recurrence in 5 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 5-year actuarial pelvic control, distant disease control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The median follow-up was 45 months (range 5-196) for patients with adenocarcinoma and 44 months (range 9-115) for patients with epidermoid histologic features.

RESULTS

Both local and distant recurrence rates were significantly greater in the adenocarcinoma patients. Of 16 patients with adenocarcinoma, 7 (5-year actuarial rate 54%) had recurrence at the primary site compared with 16 (5-year actuarial rate 18%) of 92 patients with epidermoid histologic features (p = 0.004). Distant disease developed in more patients with adenocarcinoma (5-year actuarial rate 66%) than in patients with epidermoid carcinoma (5-year actuarial rate 10%, p <0.001). The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival rate for adenocarcinoma patients was 19% and 64%, respectively, compared with 77% (p <0.0001) and 85% (p = 0.017) for those with epidermoid carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the anus treated with definitive chemoradiation had high rates of pelvic failure and distant metastasis compared with comparably staged patients with epidermoid histologic features treated similarly. On the basis of these limitations, we recommend preoperative chemoradiation followed by abdominoperineal resection to maximize pelvic disease control and consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy to address the problem of micrometastatic disease.

An open phase I study assessing the feasibility of the triple combination: oxaliplatin plus irinotecan plus leucovorin/ 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose of irinotecan and oxaliplatin with a fixed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) regimen in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trial was designed to evaluate escalating doses of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, starting at 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively, given at day 1 with the full-dose LV5FU2 regimen, given on days 1 and 2 as follows: folinic acid 200 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and 600 mg/m2 22 h continuous infusion, every 2 weeks. The second cohort of patients was treated at the recommended dose for oxaliplatin and irinotecan with the simplified LV5FU regimen: on day 1, a 2-h infusion of folinic acid (400 mg/m2), followed by a 10-min intravenous bolus of 5-FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) over 46 h.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated at the following dose levels (oxaliplatin/irinotecan mg/m2): 60/90, 60/120, 85/120, 85/150, 85/180, 85/200 and 85/220 and seven patients were treated at the recommended dose with the simplified LV5FU scheme. The MTD was reached at dose level 85/220 mg/m2 but the recommended dose chosen for the second step was 85/180 mg/m2 to keep a better compliance with the biweekly schedule. Main grade 3/4 toxicities per patient included the following: neutropenia in 78% (febrile episodes in 12%), diarrhea in 27%, nausea/vomiting in 24% and peripheral neuropathy in 37% (Lévi's scale). Antitumor activity was observed at almost all dose levels. Most objective responses were observed in digestive malignancies, since 10 out of 11 were obtained in five colorectal cancers, two pancreatic cancers, two cholangiocarcinoma and one gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose for the triple association is 85/180 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, respectively, with LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU. The antitumor activity in gastrointestinal malignancies should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

First-line chemotherapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid for advanced colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the elderly. Information on tolerability and efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in such patients is limited. Primary aim of the study was to describe tolerability and activity of chemotherapy with the "de Gramont" schedule (FU bolus [400 mg/m ] + FU continuous infusion [600 mg/m ] + folinic acid [100 mg/m ] on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks), in patients with advanced colorectal cancer aged 70 or older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70 or more, with stage IV colorectal cancer, ECOG performance status not worse than 2.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were treated at two participating centers. Seven (20.6%, 95% exact CI = 8.7-37.9) had an objective response, complete in 3 and partial in 4 patients. Five cases of unacceptable toxicity were registered (2 cardiac, 1 each for liver, anemia and diarrhea). Fitting the statistical model to the observed data indicated that the treatment was sufficiently active and tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The de Gramont scheme is active and tolerated in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Minidose warfarin prophylaxis for catheter-associated thrombosis in cancer patients: can it be safely associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy?

PURPOSE

The use of prophylactic low-dose oral warfarin in cancer patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) in place has an established role in the prevention of thrombotic complications and is associated with a low hemorrhagic risk. Despite the literature indicating an adverse interaction between warfarin and fluorouracil (FU), the frequency of this interaction and whether it occurs when minidose warfarin is used is unknown. We analyzed the incidence of alterations in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) and bleeding in cancer patients given minidose warfarin during treatment with continuous-infusion FU-based regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1999 and August 2001, 95 cancer patients were evaluated. Forty-one patients (43%) had liver metastases. Seventy-nine patients (83%) had a Groshong CVC (Bard Access System, Salt Lake City, UT), and 16 (17%) had a Port-a-Cath device (Bard Access System). All patients received oral warfarin at a dose of 1 mg/daily as prophylaxis beginning the day after the catheter was positioned. An INR of more than 1.5 was considered significantly elevated.

RESULTS

INR elevation occurred in 31 patients (33%), with 18 patients (19%) having an INR more than 3.0. Twelve (39%) of the 31 patients had liver metastases. Bleeding was observed in eight patients (8%); seven of these patients had elevated INR levels. We observed INR elevations in 12 of 21 patients treated with a FU, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen, 11 of 40 treated with a de Gramont regimen (FU and folinic acid), and five of 19 treated with a FU, folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of INR abnormalities was observed in our cohort of patients, especially those treated with FOLFOX regimen. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and should regularly monitor the prothrombin time in patients receiving warfarin and FU.

Colorectal cancer in 2003: old principles, new strategies

In the last two decades the prognosis of colorectal cancer has improved for two reasons: (i) the proportion of patients with localized disease has increased and treatment has been standardized, and (ii) new chemotherapeutic agents have led to a longer life expectancy for patients with advanced disease. In this review the current insights in disease etiology and treatment of localized and disseminated colorectal cancer are discussed.

Biweekly bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin plus oxaliplatin in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study

The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered on a biweekly schedule and in combination with fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the toxicity profile and antitumor activity of this regimen for pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A total of 26 patients with documented fluoropyrimidine-resistant, advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled into this phase I study. Fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was delivered as an i.v. infusion over 2 h, followed by LV (20 mg/m2) and 5-FU bolus every 2 weeks. The starting dose of 5-FU was 600 mg/m2, which was then incremented by 100 mg/m2 for each dose level. The DLT was determined for the first two treatment cycles, while toxicity and efficacy were evaluated throughout treatment. Six dose levels were tested. The MTD of 5-FU was deemed to be 1000 mg/m2 since dose-limiting fatigue was noted for three of the five-patient cohort during the first two cycles of chemotherapy at dose level 6. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities during the study were neutropenia, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and neuropathy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 30.8% (95% confidence interval 11.8-49.8%) for the 26 patients. The combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks is a feasible and effective treatment at the recommended dosages. A phase II study, to more-precisely define activity and toxicity, is ongoing.

Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: what has been learnt?

Accurate assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is essential to improve our understanding of how cancer and chemotherapy influence patients' life and to adapt treatment strategies. Specific questionnaires have descriptive and predictive value and can be used to evaluate new therapies. Results from HRQoL assessments in randomised trials help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients treated with palliative chemotherapy have an improvement or at least a preservation of their HRQoL. However, several trials have found small differences in HRQoL between treatment groups. This may be due to the insufficient sensitivity of tools, low numbers of patients or missing data. An international consensus on the methods of measurement of HRQoL in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret results and to optimise the publication of precise HRQoL data.

Combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin is an active regimen in malignant mesothelioma: results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

The aim of this open-label phase II study was to evaluate the activity of raltitrexed (Tomudex; AstraZeneca, Cergy, France) and oxaliplatin combination therapy in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. PATIENT AND METHODSs: Fifteen pretreated and 55 chemotherapy-naive patients (median age, 60 years; World Health Organization performance status of < or = 2) were enrolled. Most patients (66%) had advanced disease. Patients received raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (34%) were classified as having a poor prognosis. In the overall study population, 14 patients (20%) had a partial response, and 32 patients (46%) had stable disease. The symptomatic response rates were as follows: shortness of breath, 36%; pain, 30%; activity, 23%; appetite, 21%; and asthenia, 20%. Median time to disease progression was 18 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 22 weeks). In chemotherapy-naive patients, median survival was 31 weeks (95% CI, 23 to 40 weeks) from the start of treatment and 49 weeks (95% CI, 40 to 52 weeks) from diagnosis of mesothelioma. In pretreated patients, median survival was 44 weeks (95% CI, 24 to 40 weeks) from the start of treatment and 226 weeks (95% CI, 63 to 292 weeks) from the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Overall 1-year survival was 26% (95% CI, 15.5% to 36.4%), survival was 22% (95% CI, 10.9% to 33.2%) in chemotherapy-naive patients and 40% (95% CI, 15.2% to 64.8%) in pretreated patients. Hematologic toxicity was mild, and there was no alopecia. The most common adverse events were asthenia, nausea/vomiting, and paraesthesia, and no treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

The raltitrexed and oxaliplatin combination is an active outpatient regimen in malignant mesothelioma and has an acceptable tolerability profile.

Safety and efficacy of outpatient treatment with CPT-11 plus bolus folinic acid/5-fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

The combination of irinotecan (CPT-11), bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) (Saltz regimen) has recently been questioned as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer after high early death rates due to gastrointestinal and thromboembolic events were reported in two US trials. Therefore, we carefully evaluated the safety and efficacy of this regimen, with high value placed on the management of delayed diarrhea. Forty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received this first-line treatment in nine German outpatient clinics. Dose reductions were mandatory from the first cycle in case of toxicity grade >2. Chemotherapy was administered only to diarrhea-free patients. During a total of 175 cycles administered treatments were delayed for 1 week in 11.6% and given at a reduced dose in 14.5%. All and 40 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhea (n=10), leukopenia (n=9), neutropenia (n=3) and anemia (n=4). One non-fatal pulmonary embolism occurred. Four complete responses (CR) and 10 partial responses were seen, for an overall response rate of 35%. In addition, 16 patients (40%) had stable disease. Resectability of liver metastases was achieved in three patients, including one pathologically confirmed CR. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5 and 13 months, respectively. We conclude that outpatient treatment with the Saltz regimen was well tolerated. Severe gastrointestinal toxicity and thromboembolic events were rarely observed and never fatal. As down-staging was possible, combinations of CPT-11 and FA/5-FU should be further investigated in neoadjuvant protocols.

A favourable pathological stage after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with initially irresectable rectal cancer correlates with a favourable prognosis

Initial treatments of locally advanced rectal cancers focus on local control, as local relapse of a rectal cancer is correlated with a high morbidity and mortality. We studied the effect of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on advanced rectal cancer patients in relation to downstaging, local relapse and survival. Post-treatment pathological staging, local relapse and survival were analysed in 66 patients from a single institution. 43 patients had irresectable cancer as determined by laparatomy (n=42) or rectal examination (n=1). These 43 patients received 45-56 Gy preoperatively with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (350/20 mg/m(2)x5 day (d)) in weeks 1 and 5 during the radiation therapy. 23 patients had primary resectable tumours with a T1-2 stage. Of the initially irresectable tumours 79% became macroscopically resectable, in 74% a R0 resection was performed. In 6 of 34 (18%) surgical specimens, no tumour was found (pT0), 7 patients had small tumour remnants (pT1-2). In these pT0-2 tumours, no local relapses occurred (observation period of median 4.5 years, range 18-87 months). In the 21 patients with pT3-4 tumours 3 local relapses were seen. In the 23 patients with primary resectable T1-2 tumours the relapse rate was 4%. Downstaging of an initially irresectable rectal tumour to pT2 or less results in a local relapse rate and overall survival that correspond with the rates in primary resectable cancer with the same T classification.

Hepatic resection after down-staging of unresectable hepatic colorectal metastases

Half of the patients with colorectal cancer present with liver metastases at some point in their illness. Surgical resection, which offers the only chance of long-term survival, is an option in only 15% of patients at presentation. Novel chemotherapeutic treatments have enabled approximately 15% of those patients initially deemed inoperable to be down-staged to a point where surgery becomes an option. This aggressive approach, which requires close collaboration between surgeons and oncologists, results in a 40% 5-year survival rate, which is similar to that of patients operated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The hope for the future is the development of more effective chemotherapeutic regimens, which may allow more previously unresectable patients to benefit from curative surgery. This article reviews the literature and major areas of progress in treatments for unresectable colorectal cancer.

Management of colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic metastases occur in 60% of patients following resection for colorectal cancer. Liver resection is the only curative option, with one third of resected patients alive at five years. In those developing recurrence in the liver following resection, further liver surgery may be curative, with similar 5 years survival rates of about 30%. Until recently surgery was feasible in only 15-25% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. New strategies, such as downstaging chemotherapy, portal vein embolization and two-stage hepatectomy, may increase the resectability rate by 15%. Earlier detection of liver metastases would increase resectability, although good follow-up trials are lacking. Once suspected, colorectal liver metastases are staged by spiral CT, CT portography and MRI, which have similar overall accuracies. Mortality following liver resection is less than 5% in major centres, with a morbidity rate of 20% to 50%. Prognostic scoring systems can be used to predict the likely cure rate with resection. Pulmonary metastases occur in 10-25% of patients with resected colorectal cancer, but are limited to the lung in only 2% of cases. In these selected cases surgery provides long-term survival in 20-40%, and repeat lung resection has shown similar rates. For patients with unresectable disease, chemotherapy and ablation techniques have been demonstrated to prolong survival, although chemotherapy alone has been shown to improve quality of life.

[Raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer: in vitro and in vivo study of a synergistic cytostatic combination]

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in vitro using 4 colorectal cell-lines and subsequently in vivo in 36 patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing palliative 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-based chemotherapy. In the preclinical phase of this study, the efficacy of oxaliplatin and of raltitrexed as well as of 5-FU alone and in combination was evaluated in 4 different human colorectalcarcinoma cell-lines with the MTT-test (Microculture Tetrazolium Assay). In the clinical phase 36 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with 5-FU/leucovorin +/- irinotecan were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every 3 weeks for a total of 8 courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease. A supraadditive effect was found for the experimental combination of oxalipatin and raltitrexed in 3/4 of cell lines. In the clinical phase the overall response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients. Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only 7 (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 1.2 to 14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8/36 (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in 3, asthenia in 1, diarrhea in 2, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in 2 patients, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has not only in vitro, but also in vivo in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine/leucovorine +/- irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer antitumor activity. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and its convenient 3-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Second-line chemotherapy with a hybrid-alternating regimen of bolus 5FU modulated by methotrexate and infusional 5FU modulated by folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5FU. A phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In vitro, methotrexate (MTX) is the best modulator for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU), whereas folinic acid (FA) is the best for continuous infusion. We evaluated the effect of 5FU modulated by both MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Entry criteria were: at least one 5FU-based chemotherapy regimen as first-line treatment for metastatic disease, or progression within twelve months after 5FU-containing adjuvant therapy. Treatment schedule: MTX 200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 15; 5FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, days 2 and 16; 5FU 200 mg/m2 i.v. continuous infusion for 21 days, starting on day 29; FA 20 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly during the three weeks of 5FU infusion. Cycles were repeated every 56 days. The primary end-point was tumour control rate, including partial responses and stabilizations.

RESULTS

34/35 patients enrolled were evaluable for response. Five (14.7%) had a partial response, 13 (38.2%) disease stabilization, and 16 (47.1%) progressed; tumour control rate was 52.9%. Median TTP was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.03-7.83); 29 patients had died. Median OAS was 15.9 months (95% CI 8.8-21.9). Toxicity was mild.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen constituted by 5FU modulated by MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) is active as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Fulvestrant; Oxaliplatin

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases, reviewing issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoid of the appendix vermiformis: complete and persistent remission after chemotherapy (folfox) of a metastatic case

A 58-year-old woman underwent surgery for a pelvic mass. Palliative resection was performed despite the presence of multiple retroperitoneal lymph nodes. All pathology specimens exhibited an adenocarcinomatous component associated with carcinoid proliferation related to an appendicular tumor leading to the diagnosis of appendicular adenocarcinoid with ovarian, peritoneal, and nodal metastases. The patient's general status worsened rapidly with widespread nodal metastasis. Chemotherapy (Folfox 4 regimen) was given, and the patient improved within six weeks. Complete response was achieved after three months. Presently, more than three years after the end of the treatment, the patient is still alive and in complete remission. Appendicular adenocarcinoid is exceptional. These tumors exhibit two cellular components. Ovarian metastasis is frequent. Prognosis is intermediate between adenocarcinoma and malignant carcinoid. When given to patients with colonic carcinoma, the Folfox regimen used effectively here, is associated with a 50% objective response but complete response is very exceptional.

Isolated liver perfusion for non-resectable liver tumours: a review

Many treatments have been proposed for non-resectable primary or secondary hepatic cancer but the results have generally been disappointing. Isolated Hepatic Perfusion (IHP) was first attempted four decades ago but it gained acceptance only recently, after spectacular tumour responses were obtained by isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) for melanomas and sarcomas. Surgical isolation of the liver is a technically demanding operation that allows the safe administration of high doses of chemotherapeutics and TNF. Percutaneous techniques using balloon occlusion catheters are simpler but result in higher leakage rates from the perfusion circuit into the systemic circulation. Several phase I-II trials indicate that IHP can yield high tumour response rates, even when there is resistance to systemic chemotherapy. However, no significant advantage in overall survival has been demonstrated so far. IHP offers unique pharmacokinetic advantages for locoregional chemotherapy and biotherapy. It might also allow gene therapy with limited systemic exposure and toxicity. At present, IHP nevertheless remains an experimental treatment modality which should therefore be used in controlled trials only.

Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin-modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

Different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) schedules and/or biochemical modulators may result in different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, potentially affecting the correlation between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and the clinical response to the fluoropyrimidine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TS levels were measured immunohistochemically on archival specimens of colorectal cancer metastases from 124 patients homogeneously treated in a series of clinical trials at our institutions with: (A) leucovorin (LV)-modulated infusional 5-FU (n = 48); (B) LV-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 41); (C) methotrexate (MTX)-modulated bolus 5-FU (n = 35).

RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation between TS levels and the clinical response was observed with the regimens involving continuous infusion and/or LV modulation (response rate in patients with low and high TS: 66% versus 24%, P = 0.003, and 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0001, in group A and B, respectively). Conversely, TS levels failed to predict the clinical response within the group of patients treated with MTX-modulated bolus 5-FU (response rate 21% versus 13%, P = 0.50, with low and high TS, respectively). Consistently, the median time to progression/overall survival time in patients with low and high TS were 9 versus 6 months/19 versus 14 months (P = 0.009/0.035, group A), 8 versus 2 months/12 versus 6 months (P = 0.002/0.0006, group B) and 3 versus 2 months/12 versus 13 months (P = 0.14/0.74, group C).

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between intratumoral TS levels and the clinical response to 5-FU depends strongly on the schedule of administration/biochemical modulators that are used in different 5-FU regimens. These data strengthen the notion that different 5-FU schedules have different mechanisms of cytotoxicity.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days.

RESULTS

Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cryotherapy and surgical resection for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cryotherapy as additional means for eradicating liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma when curative treatment was not possible by resection alone.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 1997, 131 patients with unresectable liver metastases were referred to our department and received chemotherapy. After 3-6 months of chemotherapy, curative surgery of liver metastases was considered possible in 57 patients, either by resection alone in 33 patients (25%) or cryotherapy associated with resection in 24 patients (18%). Characteristics and survival of patients in the cryotherapy plus resection group were compared with those of the 33 patients in the resection group.

RESULTS

All patients in the resection group had partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the cryotherapy plus resection group, neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in 13 partial responses, 9 stable diseases, and 2 disease progressions. The rate of postoperative complications in the entire series was 14%. No major difference was seen between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the median survival time was 39 months. The survival rates at 1, 3, and 4 years were similar in both groups: 94, 58, and 37% in the resection group and 92, 50, and 36% in the cryotherapy plus resection group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cryotherapy, and liver resection constitutes a promising treatment strategy for patients with extremely advanced metastatic liver involvement. Patients having more than four liver metastases from a colorectal carcinoma or patients with a poor liver reserve due to previous resection should be screened carefully to determine whether they could be candidates for this procedure.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil triplet regimen every other week: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs in first-line as well as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown synergism with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We planned this phase I study to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and the recommended doses (RDs) for a triplet regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and 6S-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU on day 2, every 2 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At least three patients had to be treated at each dose level, and the trial proceeded if no more than 33% of patients showed a DLT after the first cycle. Starting from OXA 85 mg/m(2) (over 2 h) and IRI 150 mg/m(2) (over 1 h), an alternated escalation was planned up to 110 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2), respectively. Thereafter, a fixed dose of LFA, 250 mg/m(2) (as 2-h infusion), plus an escalating dose of 5-FU (from 650 to 800 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus) was added on day 2 to the previous dose level of OXA and IRI.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, all but four affected by advanced colorectal primaries, entered this study. The MTDs for OXA and IRI given on the same day were 110 and 200 mg/m(2): these doses caused a DLT in three of six patients. The previous dose level (110 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) on day 1 was safely followed on day 2 by LFA plus 5-FU up to 800 mg/m(2). Indeed, only one of three patients treated at this last level had a DLT. This cohort was then expanded including a total of 14 patients, and on the whole series five cases of DLT occurred: WHO grade 4 neutropenia (two patients), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (three patients). Cumulative toxicity was analysed in 43 patients for a total of 347 cycles: grade 4 neutropenia was detected in 13 patients (30%); it was not dose-related, nor was it exacerbated by the addition of modulated 5-FU. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was suffered by nine (21%) and five (12%) patients, respectively. Two complete and nine partial responses were reported on 40 evaluable patients (six patients were disease-free at study entry), giving a response rate of 27.5% (95% confidence interval 15% to 44%); nine of 18 (50%) assessable patients of the two last cohorts treated with the triplet regimen achieved a complete response (two patients) or a partial response (seven patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The RDs for this biweekly regimen were: OXA 110 mg/m(2) plus IRI 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on day 2. This regimen appeared active in pretreated gastrointestinal malignancies, and it is worthy of being evaluated in advanced colorectal carcinoma after failure of 5-FU-based adjuvant or palliative treatment.

Efficacy and quality-of-life data are related in a phase II trial of oral chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and tumor response after administration of an oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients received a mean number of 5.8 cycles of therapy. QOL data were analyzed at baseline, after every two cycles of therapy, and at the time of treatment discontinuation. The Uniscale and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 were both utilized.

RESULTS

The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17% to 37%). Median survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 15.1 months). Global QOL scores were unchanged over the course of therapy by either tool. Only the physical function subscale score had worsened at the end of therapy. In an analysis of responding patients, significant and durable improvements in both global QOL measures as well as select subscale scores were observed. Diarrhea and physical function QOL scores had declined at the time of treatment discontinuation. Patients who did not respond to therapy had preserved QOL scores when they were evaluated after two cycles of therapy.

CONCLUSION

This oral treatment strategy preserved QOL in treated patients. Global QOL measures as well as several QOL subscale scores significantly improved in patients with a documented response to therapy. The profile of improved QOL components indicated that patient well-being was related to tumor response in specific and perceivable ways. Nonresponding patients reported preserved QOL during the first two cycles of therapy. QOL analysis was feasible and informative in this moderately sized multicenter phase II trial.

Early detection of toxicity and adjustment of ongoing clinical trials: the history and performance of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group's real-time toxicity monitoring program

Prospective clinical trials are the gold standard for evidence-based methodology used to support changes in the practice of medicine. Clinical researchers, regulatory agencies, payers, and the public embrace the conduct of phase I, II, and III clinical trials as integral to improving patient care. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) funds a number of cooperative oncology groups to conduct such clinical trials in the United States. In order to protect enrolling patients, the NCI requires expedited reporting to allow rapid identification of severe side effects on NCI-sponsored clinical trials. However, chemotherapy drugs frequently cause predictable side effects, the rapid reporting of which would potentially overwhelm the system. This article describes the development and documents the performance of a real-time toxicity reporting system implemented by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. The goal of this system is to supplement the currently required NCI adverse event monitoring procedures and to permit study teams to identify the need to modify ongoing clinical trials. The system has proven its value in the monitoring of phase II and III trials, including trial N9741, a three-arm, phase III, advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy study exploring combinations of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil. We believe the methods described present opportunities for improving patient safety in clinical research.

Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria

Evaluation of tumour size modifications in response to treatment is a critical issue in the management of advanced malignancies. In 1981, the World Health Organization (WHO) established guidelines for tumour response assessment. These WHO1981 criteria were recently simplified in a revised version, named RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), which uses unidimensional instead of bidimensional measurements, a reduced number of measured lesions, withdrawal of the progression criteria based on isolated increase of a single lesion, and different shrinkage threshold for definitions of tumour response and progression. In order to validate these new guidelines, we have compared results obtained with both classifications in a prospective series of 91 patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Data from iterative tomographic measurements were fully recorded and reviewed by an expert panel. The overall response and progression rates according to the WHO1981 criteria were 19% and 58%, respectively. Using RECIST criteria, 16 patients were reclassified in a more favourable subgroup, the overall response rate being 28% and the progression rate 45% (non-weighted kappa concordance test 0.72). When isolated increase of a single measurable lesion is not taken into account for progression with the WHO1981 criteria, only 7 patients were reclassified and the kappa test was satisfying, i.e. > or =0.75, for the whole population as well as for each of the responding and progressive subgroups. Since it provides concordant results with a simplified method, the use of RECIST criteria is recommended for evaluation of treatment efficacy in clinical trials and routine practice.

Liver involvement in patients with solid tumors of nonhepatic origin

Metastatic disease represents the most common hepatic neoplasm in the Western world. The most common primary malignancies to spread to the liver are those that originate in the gastrointestinal tract. Of non-gastrointestinal malignancies, breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies are most likely to develop hepatic metastases. Some solid tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma, may cause liver-related abnormalities in the absence of hepatic metastases, presumably by way of cytokine-mediated mechanisms. Physical examination, laboratory testing, histologic evaluation, and various radiographic studies are useful in the detection and diagnosis of liver metastases. Multiple treatment modalities are available, including hepatic resection, hepatic arterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, chemoembolization, cryotherapy, ethanol injection, and radiofrequency ablation.

Perspectives on the role of sequential or combination chemotherapy for first-line and salvage therapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection of all known metastatic disease can be curative in selected patients. The majority of patients, however, require the consideration of systemic chemotherapy as optimal palliative treatment for their diseases. Using new effective chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin has resulted in a clear and clinically significant improvement in survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The optimal sequences and combinations of these agents as initial and salvage chemotherapy along with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin are controversial. It seems clear that it is important for all patients to have access to all 3 drugs at some point in their therapy for optimal results. Recent randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in which patients were likely to have access to all 3 effective drugs demonstrated median survivals of 18-20 months. This compares favorably to median survivals of approximately 12 months for patients treated with 5-FU-based regimens alone prior to the availability of effective salvage therapy. A small but meaningful number of patients might develop resectable disease with curative intent as the result of significant tumor response to combination chemotherapy. Herein, we review recent developments in combination and sequential chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer and the implications for the optimal treatment in these patients.

Radiochemotherapy with short daily infusion of low-dose oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU in T3-T4 unresectable rectal cancer: a phase II IATTGI study

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin (OXA)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have confirmed their preclinical synergy in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU + leucovorin (LV) is considered the standard treatment in unresectable rectal cancer patients. The objective was to evaluate OXA with 5-FU + LV and concurrent radiotherapy in unresectable rectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TREATMENT

OXA 25 mg/m(2)/day in 30-min infusions, followed by bolus LV 20 mg/m(2)/day and bolus 5-FU 375 mg/m(2)/day. All drugs were given on 4 days during Weeks 1 and 5 of a standard radiotherapy cycle (50.4 Gy). A single OXA dose (50 mg/m(2)) was also given on the third week of radiotherapy. A cycle of OXA with 5-FU + LV was administered 4 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, with surgery planned 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

Between March 1998 and April 2000, 22 patients with T3-T4 unresectable rectal cancer were accrued. Patient characteristics included the following: 11 females, 11 males, median age 58 (range: 18-76). Performance status ECOG (PS) 0: 2 patients, PS 1: 7 patients, and PS 2: 13 patients. The following RTOG Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported: diarrhea, 6 patients; cutaneous, 3 patients; neutropenia-leukopenia, 2 patients; and thrombocytopenia, 1 patient; 1 treatment-related death resulted (febrile neutropenia-sepsis after chemoradiotherapy). Only 1 patient had neurosensory Grade 2 (OXA-specific Levi's scale) toxicity. Nine patients had PS worsening during treatment. Five patients had chemoradiotherapy delay (median: 6 days). Of 22 patients, 16 underwent surgery (without serious surgical complications); 12/16 had a complete resection (5/12 had sphincter preservation). Pathologic examination revealed 3/12 complete remissions, 2/12 minimal microscopic residual disease, 2/12 T2N0, 1/12 T3N0, and 4/12 positive nodes; 4/16 had unresectable disease. Median follow-up was 15 months (range: 3.0-43.4 months), median time to progression was 15.7 months (CI 95%, 0, 31.7), and median overall survival was 19.5 months (CI 95%, 18.0, 21).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment with low-dose, 30-min daily OXA infusion was feasible and very active, with acceptable toxicity.

Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional Fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility, recommended doses, plasma pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of a biweekly chemotherapy regimen with oxaliplatin (L-OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11), infusional fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received CPT-11 followed by L-OHP and LV 200 mg/m(2) and followed by 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) as a 48-hour infusion, repeated every 2 weeks. In the first part of the study, an escalation of CPT-11 dose and/or a decrease of the L-OHP dose were planned. Once the recommended doses of CPT-11 and L-OHP were determined, all subsequent patients were treated at the recommended doses.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients entered the study. CPT-11 175 mg/m(2) and L-OHP 100 mg/m(2) in combination with LV 200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 3,800 mg/m(2) could be administered with acceptable toxicities; 39 patients were treated at these dose levels. The pharmacokinetics parameters of the agents used and their metabolites did not seem to be influenced by the concomitant use of the other drugs. The most relevant toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia, with 14% of patients experiencing one episode of febrile neutropenia. In five patients (11.9%) a complete and in 25 (59.5%) a partial response was demonstrated, for an objective response rate of 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 83%). In 11 patients (26%), a surgical resection of residual disease could be performed. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 10.4 and 26.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This biweekly regimen is feasible and has acceptable and manageable toxicities and no apparent relevant pharmacokinetics interactions. This combination is associated with a promising antitumor activity, time to progression, and survival. A phase III randomized trial in Italy planned by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest has just started.

Intermittent weekly high-dose capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of an intermittent weekly capecitabine regimen in combination with oxaliplatin. Furthermore, we intended to explore its safety at the recommended dose, and to assess its principal antitumor activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer who previously were unexposed to palliative chemotherapy were enrolled on to this disease-oriented phase I trial. They were treated with a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1) plus escalating doses of capecitabine (given at two divided daily doses from days 1 to 7), repeated every 2 weeks. The dose of oral fluoropyrimidine was escalated in consecutive cohorts of three to six patients from 2500 to 4000 mg/m(2)/day. After having defined the toxic dose, nine additional patients were entered at the MTD/recommended dose to confirm its safety profile, and assure suitability for future phase II/III studies.

RESULTS

In the phase I part of the study, 21 patients were enrolled, and a total of 222 courses were administered through four dose levels of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2). Gastrointestinal toxicities, predominantly diarrhea, were the principal DLTs. Other severe adverse events included grade 3 asthenia, acute neurological symptoms and skin toxicity. The combination was not myelosuppressive, eliciting only sporadically grade 3/4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia. There was no alopecia, and only a few patients experienced mild symptoms of hand-foot syndrome. Externally reviewed objective responses were noted in 15 of all 30 evaluable patients (overall response rate, 50%; 95% confidence interval 31% to 69%) including three complete remissions and median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (range 7-14+ months).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall results of this study indicate that the administration of clinically relevant single-agent doses of both capecitabine and oxaliplatin is feasible and seems to result in promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. On the basis of the toxicological profile of the combination regimen shown in the present study, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 2 weeks administered in combination with capecitabine 3500 mg/m(2)/day x7 in two divided doses is recommended for further evaluations.

Oxaliplatin: results in colorectal carcinoma

Oxaliplatin, a platinum compound characterized by a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum carrier ligand, has proven its efficacy in first- and second-line advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Acute reversible and cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy has been observed frequently with oxaliplatin treatment and limits its use. Its synergism with other drugs, as well as its different mechanism of action and toxicity profile make it an attractive candidate for combination studies in CRC. It can be combined safely with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+/-folinic acid (LV), irinotecan, raltitrexed, multitarget antifolate LY231514 (MTA), and oral 5-FU prodrugs. These combinations confer both an increased response rate compared to that of any single agent and an increased secondary surgical resection of initially unresectable metastases, possibly leading to prolonged survival. In three prospective randomized phase III studies in advanced CRC, oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV improved significantly progression-free survival without a significant increase in median survival time and without affecting quality of life, compared to treatment with 5-FU/LV. Ongoing clinical trials will define its role in the adjuvant setting.

Adjuvant therapy of cancers of the colon and rectum

Important advances have been made in our understanding of the role of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Current standard 5FU-based regimens have been convincingly shown to reduce the incidence of recurrences and to prolong overall survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Colon cancer patients with stage II disease have a better-overall prognosis than those with stage III; however, the relative merits of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. Combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is currently the standard adjuvant approach for stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Despite the advances that have been made, far too many patients with resectable colorectal cancer ultimately relapse and die of their disease. There remains a pressing need for continued development of improved adjuvant treatments. Participation of eligible patients in clinical trials must continue to be actively encouraged. Only in this way will we be able to continue to build and expand on the progress that has been made thus far.

Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: current status and future directions

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer is now well established and 5-FU/LV should be the reference regimen to which new drugs are tested against in the adjuvant setting. In stage II colon cancer, because the risk of recurrence is lower, any absolute benefit of chemotherapy is likely to be less than in stage III disease. The studies performed so far have been generally underpowered to detect what might be a clinically significant effect on survival. Molecular profiling of tumours may identify individuals more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy and tailor individual treatment in the future. After potential curative treatment for localised colon cancer, about two out of five patients will experience disease recurrence, but the most effective strategies for follow-up remain to be established. New drugs such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin and oral fluoropyrimidines may offer improved efficacy or patients' convenience in the adjuvant setting and their impact on survival will be evaluated in the recently closed large randomised studies. This review summarises the current status of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer and describes the future directions for research.

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study

BACKGROUND

We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries. If surgery remains the only cure, recurrence rates for colon cancer range from 30% to 60% for stage III tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for stage III colon tumors and consists of monthly administration of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for 5 consecutive days a month over a 6-month period (Mayo regimen). Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer remains controversial, and its administration is not routinely recommended except in certain high-risk and selected patients. Immunotherapy, new drug-based therapies or combinations, and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are being tested in the adjuvant setting. Total mesorectum excision is now the gold standard surgical technique for rectal cancer resection, and this procedure has dramatically decreased local recurrence. Nevertheless, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is commonly indicated in the United States. In Europe, neoadjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for stage II and III resectable rectal cancers; the role of chemotherapy remains mostly investigational.

Gemcitabine and its combinations in the treatment of malignant lymphoma

Although combination chemotherapy can induce complete remission in a large proportion of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 30%-50% of patients will relapse. Gemcitabine has shown promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with HD and NHL even in those who have progressed after autologous stem cell transplantation. Its favorable toxicity profile allows development of combination regimens with other cytotoxic drugs and anti-CD20-targeted therapy, although hematologic toxicities appear to be greater than when gemcitabine is used as a single agent. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a pharmacologically guided dose rate of 10 mg/m2/minute has demonstrated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantage although clinical efficacy of prolonged infusion needs to be established. Thus far, gemcitabine has been mainly tested in relapsed or refractory patients, and its inclusion in front-line therapy may bring about greater benefit. However, as gemcitabine has not been evaluated in randomized studies either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of lymphoma remains to be determined.

Irinotecan and raltitrexed: an active combination in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and raltitrexed are active agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. Preclinical findings suggest a remarkable synergistic activity between the two drugs and the feasibility of this association has been shown in a recent phase I study. The aim of our phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer untreated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 1998 to February 2000, 46 patients were enrolled. Patients received irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) on day 1 and raltitrexed 2.6 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 3 weeks, for up to nine courses. Tumour assessment was performed every three cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 223 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median number of six (range 1-9) courses per patient, was administered. According to intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval 31% to 61%). The median duration of response was 21 weeks (range 11-> or =101), the median time to progression 27 weeks (range 1-> or =116), and the median overall survival 57 weeks (range 1-> or =130). The main toxicities were diarrhoea, with National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20%, grade 3 nausea-vomiting in 13%, grade 3 asthenia in 11% and grade 3/4 transaminase elevation in 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results achieved with irinotecan and raltitrexed show that this regimen is active, despite 'not-negligible' toxicity, and may represent a useful regimen for specific subgroups of colorectal cancer patients.