Colectomy rate comparison after treatment of ulcerative colitis with placebo or infliximab

Efficacy, safety, and predictors of response to infliximab therapy for ulcerative colitis: a Korean multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Infliximab is currently used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) with an inadequate response to conventional agents. The efficacy and safety of infliximab in Korean patients with UC were assessed.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study including all adult patients who received at least one infliximab infusion for UC. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes and adverse events of infliximab therapy were evaluated, and predictors of response were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 134 UC patients were included. The indications for infliximab therapy were acute severe UC in 28%, steroid-dependency in 38%, and steroid-refractoriness in 33%, respectively. The rates of clinical response and remission were 87% and 45% at week 8. In multivariate analysis, we found significant predictors of clinical remission at week 8: immunomodulator-naïve (odds ratio [OR] = 4.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-16.66, P = 0.01), hemoglobin ≥ 11.5 g/dL (OR = 4.47, 95% CI: 1.48-13.45, P = 0.008), C-reactive protein ≥ 3 mg/dL (OR = 4.77, 95% CI: 1.43-15.94, P = 0.01), and response at week 2 (OR = 20.54, 95% CI: 2.40-175.71, P = 0.006). Long-term clinical response and remission rates were 71% and 52%, respectively, and mucosal healing was the only factor influencing long-term response. Adverse events related to infliximab occurred in 15% of patients, and most of them were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab is effective and safe in the treatment of active UC in Korea. No history of previous immunomodulator use and high baseline C-reactive protein are independent predictors of good response.

Oral tacrolimus as maintenance therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis--an analysis of outcomes in two London tertiary centres

BACKGROUND

The medical management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) remains a significant challenge. Two randomised controlled studies have demonstrated tacrolimus therapy is effective for the induction of remission of moderate to severe UC. However, the long term outcomes of UC patients treated with tacrolimus as maintenance therapy are not certain.

AIMS

This study aims to assess the efficacy of tacrolimus maintenance therapy for refractory UC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with UC treated with tacrolimus at two London tertiary centres was performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed at six months, at the end of tacrolimus treatment, or at the last follow-up for patients continuing tacrolimus treatment. Modified Truelove-Witts score (mTW) and Mayo endoscopy subscores were calculated.

RESULTS

25 patients with UC, treated with oral tacrolimus between 2005 and 2011, were identified. The median duration of tacrolimus treatment was 9 months (IQR 3.7-18.2 months). The median duration of follow-up was 27 months (range 3-66 months). At six months thirteen (52%) patients had achieved and maintained clinical response and eleven (44%) were in clinical remission. The mean mTW score decreased from 10+/-0.5 before therapy, to 5.8+/-0.8 (p≤0.001 95% CI 2.7-5.8) at cessation of treatment or last follow-up. Mayo endoscopy subscore decreased from 2.6+/-0.1 to 1.2+/-0.2 (p≤0.001 mean reduction 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-1.9). Eight patients (32%) subsequently underwent a colectomy within a mean time of 17 months (range 2-45 months).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is effective for the maintenance of refractory UC and can deliver sustained improvement in mucosal inflammation.

Clinical implications of mucosal healing in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

The natural history of Crohn's Disease and ulcerative colitis is characterized by repeated episodes of inflammation and ulceration of the bowel. This results in complications implying a worse quality of life and significant healthcare costs, due to hospitalization, surgery and an escalation of therapy. The main goal of the therapy in inflammatory bowel disease is to achieve and maintain disease remission, with an improved health-related quality of life, less hospitalization, and less surgery. The concept of remission has changed in the recent years. In fact the concept of clinical remission, where only the patients' symptoms are in remission, has been replaced by the new concept of deep remission. This implies not only sustained clinical remission but also complete mucosal healing, with the normalization of serological activity indexes. Mucosal healing, rarely achieved with traditional drugs, can now be achieved and maintained by means of biological drugs. Current evidence suggests that the achievement of mucosal healing might significantly change the natural course of inflammatory bowel diseases and should represent an objective end point of future therapeutic trials, particularly for colonic diseases.

Cost-effectiveness of biological agents used in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) produces bloody diarrhoea, severe abdominal pain, and need for clinic visits, hospitalizations, and surgeries. UC results in reduced health-related quality of life for patients and large direct medical and indirect costs for health systems and employers. Patients with the most severe disease require the most medical services, and these patients have larger costs than patients with mild or moderate disease. Despite biological therapies being quite expensive, they are indicated for patients unresponsive to initial standard therapies. Future hospitalizations may be reduced by starting a biological treatment. Cost-effectiveness results vary between countries, health systems, and model designs. Since restorative proctocolectomy can be curative, this surgery dominates biological therapy by being both less costly and more effective when measuring health system costs and patient quality-adjusted life years for 20 years. However the dose, duration, and effectiveness of biological treatments significantly impact estimates of their cost-effectiveness.

The impact of thiopurines on surgical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: do they make a difference?

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease together are known as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Surgery is considered for more severe disease and is a dreaded consequence for patients. Thiopurines have proven efficacy in the induction and maintenance of remission of IBD, but the long-term need for surgery remains uncertain with conflicting results from the available studies. The timing and duration of thiopurines also appears to play a pivotal role in the management of these conditions and may also affect the need for surgery. Data from Denmark, Canada, Hungary and the UK appear to suggest a reduction in surgery rates prior to the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. The authors aim to review the more recent literature evaluating the surgery rates in IBD and changes in disease trends over time. We ask whether increasing thiopurine prescribing has had an effect on the surgery rates in the era of biologic therapy and whether more aggressive treatment approaches have altered the natural history of IBD.

The positioning of colectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in the era of biologic therapy

The position of surgery in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed in the era of biologics. Several important questions arise in determining the optimal positioning of surgery in the treatment of UC, which has long been a challenge facing gastroenterologists and surgeons. Surgery is life-saving in some patients and leads to better bowel function and better quality of life in most patients. The benefits of surgery, however, must be weighed against the potential surgical morbidity and compromised functioning that clearly can occur. The introduction of biologic therapy has added further complexity to decisions about medical management, surgery, and the relative timing of these choices. Appropriate medical management of UC may induce and maintain remission and may prevent surgery. However, medical management also carries risks of adverse effects, and recent data suggest that delay of surgery during ineffective medical therapy can increase the chances of negative surgical outcomes. To make individualized timely treatment decisions, early collaboration between gastroenterologists and surgeons is important and more data on predictors of treatment response and positive outcomes are needed. Early identification of patients who would benefit from biologic therapy or surgery is challenging.

Novel treatment options for ulcerative colitis

The approved treatment options for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are currently limited to mesalamine or immunosuppressants. Patients who do not respond to mesalamine-based therapy can be treated with immunomodulators or anti-TNF antibody therapy. Failure or adverse reactions to these medications leaves the patient with little choice other than colectomy. However, novel insights into the pathogenic drivers of UC have led to new developments in drugs that promise clinical efficacy via modulation of targeted pathways. Given the impending expansion of therapeutic options for patients with UC, clinicians and researchers should be familiar with these mechanisms of action. In addition, the typical 'step-up' treatment paradigm for UC will likely need to be reshaped to allow for a more personalized approach to treating UC.

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases has decreased over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic diseases that often require surgery. However, the risk of requirement of surgery over time has not been well characterized. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the cumulative risk of surgery among patients with IBD and evaluated how this risk has changed over time.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and conference proceedings (2009-2012) on May 8, 2013, for terms related to IBD and intestinal surgery. Two reviewers screened 8338 unique citations to identify 486 for full-text review. The analysis included population-based studies published as articles (n = 26) and abstracts (n = 4) that reported risks of surgery at 1, 5, or 10 years after a diagnosis of Crohn's disease and/or ulcerative colitis. The trend in risk of surgery over time was analyzed by meta-regression using mixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Based on all population-based studies, the risk of surgery 1, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis of Crohn's disease was 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.4%-23.2%), 33.3% (95% CI, 26.3%-42.1%), and 46.6% (95% CI, 37.7%-57.7%), respectively. The risk of surgery 1, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis of ulcerative colitis was 4.9% (95% CI, 3.8%-6.3%), 11.6% (95% CI, 9.3%-14.4%), and 15.6% (95% CI, 12.5%-19.6%), respectively. The risk of surgery 1, 5, and 10 years after diagnosis of Crohn's disease and 1 and 10 years after diagnosis of ulcerative colitis has decreased significantly over the past 6 decades (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies, the risk of intestinal surgery among patients with IBD has decreased over the past 6 decades.

Adalimumab in active ulcerative colitis: a "real-life" observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is under debate. Although controlled trials have shown that adalimumab is significantly better than placebo, the absolute clinical benefit is modest. We report data on the effectiveness of adalimumab in a cohort of ulcerative colitis patients treated in 22 Italian centres.

METHODS

All patients with active disease treated with adalimumab were retrospectively reviewed. Co-primary endpoints were clinical remission at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 54. Secondary endpoints were sustained clinical remission, steroid discontinuation, endoscopic remission and need for colectomy.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included. Most patients had received previous infliximab treatment. Clinical remission rates were 17%, 28.4%, 36.4% and 43.2% at 4, 12, 24 and 54 weeks respectively. Twenty-two patients required colectomy. Clinical remission and low C-reactive protein at week 12 predicted clinical remission at week 54 (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.36-19.44; OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.32-14.94, respectively). Previous immunosuppressant use was associated with a lower probability of clinical remission at week 54 (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.08-0.66) and with a higher rate of colectomy (HR 9.7, 95% CI 1.46-9.07).

CONCLUSION

In this large "real-life" experience adalimumab appears effective in patients with otherwise medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Patients achieving early remission can expect a better long-term outcome.

Infliximab reduces hospitalizations and surgery interventions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed infliximab benefit in reducing hospitalizations and/or major surgery rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A literature search to May 2012 was performed to identify all studies (experimental and observational) evaluating patients with IBD treated with infliximab and providing data on hospitalizations and/or major surgery rates. Three reviewers independently performed studies' selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. Analyses were carried according to study design (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] and observational studies) and IBD type (Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]). Random-effects meta-analysis was used to derive pooled and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimates of odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity was assessed with I test.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven eligible studies were included (9 RCTs and 18 observational studies). Infliximab reduced hospitalization risk, both in pooled RCTs (OR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.40-0.65; I = 0%) and results of observational studies (OR, 0.29, 95% CI, 0.19-0.43; I = 87%), without differences between CD and UC. Infliximab reduced surgery risk in pooled RCTs results, both in CD (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.64; I = 0%) and UC (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88; I = 0%). Pooled estimate from observational studies favored infliximab for patients with CD (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.49; I = 77%), but not for patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

The best evidence available points toward a reduction of the risk of hospitalization and major surgery requirement in patients with IBD treated with infliximab. This impact is clinically and economically relevant because hospitalization and surgery are considered to be markers of disease severity and significantly contribute to the total direct costs associated with IBD.

IBD: Golimumab in ulcerative colitis: a 'ménage à trois' of drugs

Golimumab, a human anti-TNF antibody, is effective in patients with ulcerative colitis, according to new findings from an international phase III double-blind trial. The addition of this drug makes a ménage à trois of available drugs--comprising infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab--for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Outcomes of salvage therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: ciclosporin vs. infliximab

BACKGROUND

Up to 40% of patients who present with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) fail to make an adequate response to intravenous corticosteroids. Ciclosporin or infliximab are currently employed as salvage therapy in this clinical scenario.

AIM

To compare clinical outcomes in patients treated with ciclosporin or infliximab in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe UC.

METHODS

A prospective study of 83 consecutive presentations of steroid-refractory acute severe UC from 1999 to 2009 was conducted. All study participants satisfied the Truelove and Witts' criteria for acute severe UC. The primary outcome measures were rates of colectomy at discharge from hospital and at 3 months and 12 months following admission.

RESULTS

Eighty-three steroid-refractory acute severe UC events were generated by 83 patients. Salvage therapy was instituted with ciclosporin in 45 patients and infliximab in the remaining 38 patients. Of those patients who received ≥72 h of ciclosporin (2-4 mg/kg), 56% (24/43) avoided colectomy at the time of discharge, while this figure was 84% (32/38) for those administered one dose of infliximab (5 mg/kg) (P = 0.006). At 3 months, the colectomy-free rate was 53% for ciclosporin (23/43) vs. 76% for infliximab (28/37) (P = 0.04), and 42% (18/43) vs. 65% (24/37) at 12 months (P = 0.04). There were no deaths and two serious adverse events, both occurring in the ciclosporin group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients presenting with acute severe UC, we have observed that infliximab salvage therapy is associated with lower rates of both severe adverse events and colectomy than ciclosporin in the short-term and medium-term.

Infliximab as rescue therapy in hospitalised patients with steroid-refractory acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term follow-up of 211 Swedish patients

BACKGROUND

Rescue therapy with infliximab (IFX) has been proven effective in a steroid-refractory attack of ulcerative colitis (UC). The long-term efficacy is not well described.

AIM

To present a retrospective study of IFX as rescue therapy in UC. Primary end points were colectomy-free survival at 3 and 12 months.

METHODS

In this multicentre study, 211 adult patients hospitalised between 1999 and 2010 received IFX 5 mg/kg as rescue therapy due to a steroid-refractory, moderate-to-severe attack of UC. Exclusion criteria were duration of current flare for >12 weeks, corticosteroid treatment for >8 weeks before hospitalisation, previous IFX therapy or Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

Probability of colectomy-free survival at 3 months was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.77), at 12 months 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57-0.70), at 3 years 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) and at 5 years 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44-0.61). Steroid-free, clinical remission was achieved in 105/211 (50%) and 112/209 (54%) patients at 3 and 12 months respectively. Of 75 colectomies during the first year, 48 (64%) were carried out during the first 14 days, 13 (17%) on days 15-90 and 14 (19%) between 3 and 12 months. There were three (1.4%) deaths during the first 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab is an effective rescue treatment, both short- and long-term, in a steroid-refractory attack of UC. Most IFX failures underwent surgery during the first 14 days, which calls for studies on how to optimise induction treatment with IFX. Serious complications, including mortality, were rare.

Moving towards disease modification in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic disabling conditions. Despite the benefits of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents in improving quality of life and reducing the need for surgeries, overall only one-third of patients are in clinical remission at 1 year and loss of response is frequent. It seems clear that treatment must go beyond alleviation of symptoms in IBD. It is important that treatment targets in IBD will ensure mucosal healing and deep remission.

RECENT FINDINGS

The induction of deep remission might be the best way to alter the natural course of these diseases by preventing disability and bowel damage. New disability indices and the new Crohn's disease damage score have recently been developed and they can be used to evaluate the long-term effect on patients and as new endpoints in trials. Early intervention with disease-modifying anti-IBD drugs (DMAIDs) should be considered in patients with poor prognostic factors.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic targets in IBD patients who failed anti-TNF-α therapy are urgently required, and tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab appear to be the most promising drugs. Herein, we review the new and current trends in IBD therapy, with the final aim of changing disease course and patients' lives by both improving quality of life and avoiding disability.

Efforts to improve biological treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis

Biological preparations for the treatment of refractory or severe ulcerative colitis have achieved good results over the past ten years, but their use is not widespread in China. Based on foreign literature and our experience, in this paper we review the advances in biological treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis in terms of treatment indications, contraindications, dosage and duration of treatment, adverse reactions, and biological conversion treatment, with an aim to improve biological treatment of this refractory disease.

Ulcerative colitis: prevention of relapse

The clinical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) involves first treating the acute symptoms to induce remission, and then successfully maintaining it. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acids are safe and useful for maintaining remission in patients with UC. In terms of adherence, a once-daily form of 5-aminosalicylic acid is superior in maintaining remission as compared with split dosing. Patients at high risk of relapse may be candidates for treatment with thiopurines and/or biologics in the early stages of UC. Calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are effective for severe, steroid-refractory UC patients. It is suggested that these patients use thiopurines as their maintenance therapy once they achieve remission with calcineurin inhibitors. Recent studies have confirmed that biologics are effective for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission of UC, and thus they may improve long-term prognosis of UC.

Review article: the role of anti-TNF in the management of ulcerative colitis -- past, present and future

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) consisted of the stepwise use of mesalazine, corticosteroids and immunomodulators, or consideration of surgery. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are recent additions to the UC-treatment algorithm.

AIM

To provide clinicians with a review of the role of anti-TNFs in UC, discussing how the drug(s) were used in the past, their current use and to determine their future role.

METHODS

The scientific literature was reviewed to evaluate data on the use of anti-TNFs in UC.

RESULTS

In this review, we report how the management of UC has changed with the availability of anti-TNFs. The results from landmark anti-TNF trials have impacted clinical practice, leading to a readjustment of treatment goals. In addition, experience from clinical trials and local real-life cohorts have helped to clarify some misunderstandings in the management of UC. New anti-TNFs are on the horizon but questions still remain on the future role of anti-TNFs with regard to impact on disability, digestive damage and the possible development of risk matrices. Experiences from the use of anti-TNFs in Crohn's disease (for example, combination therapy and early treatment) now need to be addressed in UC.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-TNFs in the management of UC has matured rapidly. Clinical experience has helped shape the current role of anti-TNFs, but more clinical research is needed to optimise their future role.

Impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing can be achieved with infliximab (IFX).

AIM

To assess the impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) when treated with infliximab (IFX) beyond 1 year.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients with refractory UC receiving maintenance treatment with IFX in five French referral centres were analysed retrospectively. Only patients who had endoscopic evaluation between 6 and 52 weeks following IFX initiation were included. According to their Mayo endoscopic sub-score, patients were categorised into mucosal healing (sub-score: 0-1) and no mucosal healing (2-3). Outcome measures were colectomy and IFX failure defined by drug withdrawal due to secondary failure among primary responders.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients (30 women; median age: 38 years), 30 (48%) achieved mucosal healing. The median follow-up duration was 27 (3-79) months. Colectomy-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 100%, 96% and 96% in patients with mucosal healing. The corresponding figures were, respectively, 80%, 65% and 65% in patients without mucosal healing (P = 0.004). By multivariate analysis, mucosal healing was the only factor associated with colectomy-free survival, with an odds ratio of 18.01 (95%CI: 1.58-204.92). IFX failure-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 76%, 69% and 64% in patients with mucosal healing, and 44%, 25% and 21% in those without mucosal healing (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with refractory UC who achieved mucosal healing after IFX initiation had better long-term outcomes, with significantly less colectomy and less IFX failure.

Infliximab in steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis: effectiveness and predictors of clinical and endoscopic remission

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) become steroid-dependent during their course. Thiopurines are recommended in steroid-dependent UC, but their efficacy is debated. Data exploring the use of infliximab in these patients are scarce. Aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of infliximab in steroid-dependent UC and identify predictors of steroid-free remission, mucosal healing (MH), and colectomy.

METHODS

Steroid-dependent UC patients were enrolled and intentionally treated with infliximab. The prospectively designed analyses evaluated (1) steroid-free clinical remission at 6 and 12 months, (2) steroid-free clinical remission and MH at 12 months, and (3) colectomy within 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-six active steroid-dependent UC patients were studied. Of the 126 patients, 36 patients were retrospectively included and 90 patients prospectively enrolled. Steroid-free remission was 53% and 47% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Predictors of steroid-free remission at 6 and 12 months were thiopurine-naive status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.5 and HR, 2.8, respectively) and combination therapy (HR, 2.1 and HR, 2.2, respectively). At 12 months, 32% were in steroid-free remission and MH. Thiopurine-naive status predicted steroid-free remission and MH (odds ratio, 3.6). C-reactive protein drop to normal after infliximab induction was predictive of steroid-free remission at 6 (HR, 5.9) and 12 months (HR, 4.6) and steroid-free remission and MH at 12 months (odds ratio, 6.0). Twelve patients underwent colectomy after a median of 4.7 months. Steroid sparing significantly reduced the risk of colectomy within 12 months (HR, 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab seems effective in steroid-dependent UC. Thiopurine-naive status and combination therapy significantly increase the rate of steroid-free remission up to 12 months.

Preoperative infliximab therapy does not increase morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic resection for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The impact of infliximab on the postoperative course of patients with IBD is under debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of infliximab on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for IBD.

DESIGN

This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, institutional review board-approved database. SETTING, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection on preoperative infliximab (infliximab group) were compared with patients who did not receive infliximab (noninfliximab group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Elective laparoscopic resection for IBD was performed on 518 patients from January 2004 through June 2011; 142 patients were treated with infliximab preoperatively. Both groups had similar demographics, type and severity of IBD, comorbidities, and type of surgery. A significantly higher number of patients in the infliximab group had been on aggressive medical therapy to control symptoms of IBD during the month preceding surgery, including steroids (73.9 vs 58.8%, p = 0.002) and immunosuppressors (32.4 vs 20.5%, p = 0.006). Operative time and blood loss were similar (p = 0.50 and p = 0.34). Intraoperative complication rate was 2.1% in both groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of the conversion rate to laparotomy (6.3% vs 9.3%, p = 0.36), overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (p = 0.93), or mortality (p = 0.61). The rates of anastomotic leak (2.1% vs 1.3%, p = 0.81), infections (12% vs 11.2%, p = 0.92), and thrombotic complications (3.5% vs 5.6%, p = 0.46) were similar. Subgroup analyses confirmed similar rates of overall, infectious, and thrombotic complications regardless of whether patients had ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.

LIMITATIONS

This study is subject to the limitations of a retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab is not associated with increased rates of postoperative complications after laparoscopic resection.

Histological healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a still unfulfilled promise

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is traditionally based on several drugs, including salicylates, corticosteroids, and antibiotics; in addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has considerably evolved with the advent of newer, effective therapeutic measures (such as the biological agents) that are able to improve in a considerable manner both the clinical and endoscopic variables. Thus, mucosal healing, at least considered from an endoscopic point of view, is today regarded as the ultimate endpoint for treatment of these conditions. However, it is also increasingly clear that endoscopic healing is not necessarily paralleled by histological healing; There are few doubts that the latter should be considered as a true, objective healing and the ultimate goal to reach when treating patients with IBD. Unfortunately, and surprisingly, only a few, incomplete, and somewhat conflicting data exist on this topic, especially because there is still the need to standardize both histological assessment and the severity grading of these disorders; Issues that have not been yet been resolved for clinical practice and therapeutic trials. Hopefully, with the help of an increased awareness on the clinical researchers' side, and the availability of dedicated pathologists on the other side, this matter will be effectively faced and resolved in the near future.

Topical treatment with the Toll-like receptor agonist DIMS0150 has potential for lasting relief of symptoms in patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis by restoring glucocorticoid sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC) are regarded as treatment failures and represent an area of high unmet medical need, as normally the only remaining option is colectomy.

METHODS

We treated a total of eight chronic active severe UC outpatients with the immunomodulatory agent DIMS0150 as an add-on to current therapies. Seven patients received a single topical dose of 30 mg and one special case subject received three doses with 4 weeks between dosing occasions. All patients were classed as treatment failures and were elected for colectomy. Efficacy evaluation was determined in terms of colitis activity index, endoscopic improvement, and histologic disease activity assessed primarily at week 12 with a follow-up period of over 2 years. Glucocorticoid sensitivity was assayed by in vitro measurement of interleukin 6.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated a pronounced and rapid reduction in their colitis activity index within 1 week following a single intracolonic administration via colonoscope of the agent DIMS0150. Further improvements were evident at week 4, resulting in a clinical response rate for the single-dose treatment of 71%, with 43% in clinical remission. By week 12 the clinical response and remission rates had reached 82% and 71%, respectively. A follow-up period of over 2 years posttreatment indicated that all but one of the treated patients had avoided the need for colectomy, with the longest patient being in symptom-free remission for over 27 months. Treatment with DIMS0150 restored glucocorticoid sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

DIMS0150 may have the potential to be an effective agent to treat chronic active UC patients with the prospect to avoid colectomy on a long-term basis and is currently the subject of a clinical phase III study (EudraCT number: 2011-003130-14).

Clinical use and mechanisms of infliximab treatment on inflammatory bowel disease: a recent update

The pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been recently advanced, while it is still challenged with high morbidity and poor prognosis. Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), has emerged as an efficient treatment with many clinical benefits such as quick disease activity reduction and IBD patient life quality improvement. However, the biological effects of infliximab on IBD need to be elucidated. This paper reviewed the clinical use and recently advanced biological action of infliximab on IBD. By forming the stable complex with the soluble or the membrane form of TNF in fluid environment or on cell surface of immune cell, fibroblast, endothelium, and epithelium, infliximab quenches TNF activity and performs the important biological actions which lead to amelioration and remission of immune responses. The mechanisms of infliximab treatment for IBD were intensively discussed. The recent advances on two topics including predictors and side effects of infliximab treatment were also reviewed.

The future of inflammatory bowel disease therapy: where do we go from here?

There are six important trends that will impact the future of inflammatory bowel disease therapy. (1) Increased use of the biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin, and increased imaging with colonoscopy and MRI enterography. (2) Increased use of pharmacokinetics to customize drug dosing for individual patients. Multiple factors impact the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies including the presence of antidrug antibodies, concomitant immunosuppression and low serum albumin and high CRP concentrations. (3) Evolution of treatment end points from symptoms to deep remission (a combination of both clinical remission and mucosal healing) to the prevention of bowel damage (in Crohn's disease) and surgery in the short-to-intermediate term and prevention of disability in the longer term. (4) Evolving data demonstrate that azathioprine monotherapy is minimally effective as a disease modification agent in Crohn's disease. Use of azathioprine as a monotherapy will decline. (5) Combination therapy with azathioprine and infliximab is superior to monotherapy with either agent. Use of combination therapy will increase. (6) There is a rich pipeline of novel therapeutic agents. Treatment strategies that appear particularly appealing include selective anti-integrin therapy with vedolizumab (anti-α4β7), etrolizumab (anti-β7 antibody) and PF-00547,659 (anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody), anti-interleukin 12/23p40 therapy with ustekinumab and Janus kinase 1, 2 and 3 inhibition with toafacitinib.

Mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: pathophysiology and pharmacology

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a colonic inflammatory condition with a substantial impact on the quality of life of affected persons. The disease carries a cumulative risk of need of colectomy of 20-30% and an estimated cumulative risk of colorectal cancer of 18% after 30 years of disease duration. With the introduction of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors for the treatment of UC, it has become increasingly evident that the disease course is influenced by whether or not the patient achieves mucosal healing. Thus, patients with mucosal healing have fewer flare-ups, a decreased risk of colectomy, and a lower probability of developing colorectal cancer. Understanding the mechanisms of mucosal wound formation and wound healing in UC, and how they are affected therapeutically is therefore of importance for obtaining efficient treatment strategies holding the potential of changing the disease course of UC. This review is focused on the pathophysiological mechanism of mucosal wound formation in UC as well as the known mechanisms of intestinal wound healing. Regarding the latter topic, pathways of both wound healing intrinsic to epithelial cells and the wound-healing mechanisms involving interaction between epithelial cells and other cells of the mucosa are discussed. The biochemistry of wound healing in UC provides the basis for the subsequent description of how these pathways are affected by the current medications, and what can be learnt on how to design future treatment regimens for UC based on targeting mucosal healing.

Cost-per-remission analysis of infliximab compared to adalimumab among adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare cost per remission (CPR) of infliximab (IFX) versus adalimumab (ADA) for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active UC.

METHODS

This is CPR model comparing IFX and ADA in the treatment of UC using clinical trial data. Clinical outcome measures include clinical remission and sustained clinical remission (SCR). Economic endpoints were modeled as medication costs. CPR ratios and number needed to treat (NNT) costs were computed at 8, 52, and 54 weeks.

RESULTS

CPR for bio-naïve patients for IFX and ADA at weeks 8, 52, and 54 was $42,086 vs. $79,558: $147,379 vs. $320,097; $147,379 vs. $330,767, respectively. CPR for all patients for IFX and ADA at weeks 8, 52, and 54 was $42,086 vs. $113,812; $147,379 vs. $349,197; $147,379 vs. $360,836, respectively. Cost per SCR for bio-naïve patients and all patients for IFX and ADA was $203,205 vs. $682,873 and $203,205 vs. $698,393, respectively. NNT and NNT costs for clinical remission for bio-naïve patients at weeks 8, 52, and 54 were lower for IFX (4 vs.10, $40,235 vs. $81,945; 5 vs.10, $134,115 vs. $307,293; 5 vs. 10, $134,115 vs. $317,536, respectively) than for ADA. NNT and NNT costs for clinical remission for all patients at weeks 8, 52, and 54 were lower for IFX (4 vs.14, $40,235 vs. $114,723; 5 vs.11, $134,115 vs. $338,022; 5 vs. 11, $134,115 vs. $349,290, respectively) than for ADA. NNT and NNT costs for SCR for bio-naïve and all patients were lower for IFX (8 vs. 22, $214,584 vs. $676,045; 8 vs.23, $214,584 vs. $706,774) than for ADA. Study limitations include lack of head-to-head trial data, different primary endpoints between the two clinical trials, and indirect costs were not included.

CONCLUSION

IFX had lower CPR and cost per SCR than ADA in the treatment of moderately to severely active UC.

Impact of Clostridium difficile colitis on 5-year health outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile colitis (CDC) is associated with an increased short-term mortality risk in hospitalised ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. We sought to determine whether CDC also impacts long-term risks of adverse health events in this population.

AIM

To determine whether CDC also impacts long-term risks of adverse health events in this population.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted of UC patients hospitalised in Ontario, Canada between 2002 and 2008. Patients with and without CDC were compared on the rates of adverse health events. The primary outcomes were the 5-year adjusted risks of colectomy and death.

RESULTS

Among 181 patients with CDC and 1835 patients without CDC, the 5-year cumulative colectomy rates were 44% and 33% (P = 0.0052) and the 5-year cumulative mortality rates were 27% and 14% (P < 0.0001) respectively. CDC was associated with a higher adjusted 5-year risk of mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.40, 95% CI 1.37-4.20], but not of colectomy (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.54). CDC impacted mortality risk both during index hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio 8.90, 95% CI 2.80-28.3) as well as over 5 years following hospital discharge among patients who recovered from their acute illness (aHR 2.41, 95% CI 1.37-4.22). Colectomy risk was not influenced by CDC in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Clostridium difficile colitis is associated with increased short-term and long-term mortality risks among hospitalised ulcerative colitis patients. As colectomy risk is not similarly impacted by Clostridium difficile colitis, factors predictive of death among C. difficile-infected ulcerative colitis patients require elucidation.

Ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorder of the colonic mucosa, which starts in the rectum and generally extends proximally in a continuous manner through part of, or the entire, colon; however, some patients with proctitis or left-sided colitis might have a caecal patch of inflammation. Bloody diarrhoea is the characteristic symptom of the disease. The clinical course is unpredictable, marked by alternating periods of exacerbation and remission. In this Seminar we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, natural history, medical and surgical management, and main disease-related complications of ulcerative colitis, and briefly outline novel treatment options. Enhanced understanding of how the interaction between environmental factors, genetics, and the immune system results in mucosal inflammation has increased knowledge of disease pathophysiology. We provide practical therapeutic algorithms that are easily applicable in daily clinical practice, emphasising present controversies in treatment management and novel therapies.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease

Although tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have shown clear benefits over conventional treatments for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, a high proportion of patients lose response over time. Given the scarce alternative of treatments when treatment failure occurs, it is highly desirable to optimize both initial response and long-term continuation of TNF antagonists. One of the most well-characterized factors associated with loss of response to these agents is the development of immunogenicity, whereby the production of neutralizing antidrug antibodies accelerates drug clearance, leading to subtherapeutic drug concentrations and, ultimately, to treatment failure. However, other patient-related factors, such as sex and/or body size, and disease severity, including TNF burden and serum albumin concentration among others, also may influence the pharmacokinetics of these agents. Nevertheless, the evidence generated to date about these complex interactions is scarce, and further prospective studies evaluating their influence on the pharmacokinetics of TNF antagonists are needed. Drug adjustment empirically based on clinical symptoms often is inaccurate and may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Recent evidence shows that maintenance of an optimal therapeutic drug concentration is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, incorporation of therapeutic drug monitoring into clinical practice may allow clinicians to optimize treatment by maintaining effective drug concentrations over time.

Impact of medical therapies on inflammatory bowel disease complication rate

Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are progressive diseases associated with a high risk of complications over time including strictures, fistulae, perianal complications, surgery, and colorectal cancer. Changing the natural history and avoiding evolution to a disabling disease should be the main goal of treatment. In recent studies, mucosal healing has been associated with longer-term remission and fewer complications. Conventional therapies with immunosuppressive drugs are able to induce mucosal healing in a minority of cases but their impact on disease progression appears modest. Higher rates of mucosal healing can be achieved with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies that reduce the risk of relapse, surgery and hospitalization, and are associated with perianal fistulae closure. These drugs might be able to change the natural history of the disease mainly when introduced early in the course of the disease. Treatment strategy in inflammatory bowel diseases should thus be tailored according to the risk that each patient could develop disabling disease.

Role of surgery in severe ulcerative colitis in the era of medical rescue therapy

Despite the growing use of medical salvage therapy, colectomy has remained a cornerstone in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASC) both in children and in adults. Colectomy should be regarded as a life saving procedure in ASC, and must be seriously considered in any steroid-refractory patient. However, colectomy is not a cure for the disease but rather the substitution of a large problem with smaller problems, including fecal incontinence, pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome, cuffitis, anastomotic ulcer and stenosis, missed or de-novo Crohn’s disease and, in young females, reduced fecundity. This notion has led to the widespread practice of offering medical salvage therapy before colectomy in most patients without surgical abdomen or toxic megacolon. Medical salvage therapies which have proved effective in the clinical trial setting include cyclosporine, tacrolimus and infliximab, which seem equally effective in the short term. Validated predictive rules can identify a subset of patients who will eventually fail corticosteroid therapy after only 3-5 d of steroid therapy with an accuracy of 85%-95%. This accuracy is sufficiently high for initiating medical therapy, but usually not colectomy, early in the admission without delaying colectomy if required. This approach has reduced the colectomy rate in ASC from 30%-70% in the past to 10%-20% nowadays, and the mortality rate from over 70% in the 1930s to about 1%. In general, restorative proctocolectomy (ileoanal pouch or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis), especially the J-pouch, is preferred over straight pull-through (ileo-anal) or ileo-rectal anastomosis, which may still be considered in young females concerned about infertility. Colectomy in the acute severe colitis setting, is usually performed in three steps due to the severity of the inflammation, concurrent steroid treatment and the generally reduced clinical condition. The first surgical step involves colectomy and constructing an ileal stoma, the second - constructing the pouch and the third - closing the stoma. This review focuses on the role of surgical treatment in ulcerative colitis in the era of medical rescue therapy.

[Guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The quality of life can decreases significantly during exacerbations of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist and sometimes these lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) Study Group of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) set out the Korean guidelines for the management of UC. These guidelines are made by the adaptation using several foreign guidelines and encompass treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission and indication for surgery in UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence. These are the first Korean treatment guidelines for UC and will be revised with new evidences on treatment of UC.

Immunotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease affects an increasing number of patients worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity. The dysregulation of the immune system with increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines and increased mucosal expression of vascular adhesion molecules play an important role in its pathogenesis. Strategies targeting TNF-alpha and alpha4-integrin have led to the development of novel therapies for treatment of patients with IBD. This article discusses the efficacy of immunologic agents currently approved for treating Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis and reviews the risks and challenges associated with their use.

Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in the biologic therapy era

Recently introduced in the treatment algorithms and guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, biological therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with an acute severe flare not responsive to conventional treatments and for patients with steroid dependent disease. The reduction in hospitalization and surgical intervention for patients affected by ulcerative colitis after the introduction of biologic treatment remains to be proven. Furthermore, these agents seem to be associated with increase in cost of treatment and risk for serious postoperative complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice in ulcerative colitis patients. Surgery is traditionally recommended as salvage therapy when medical management fails, and, despite advances in medical therapy, colectomy rates remain unchanged between 20% and 30%. To overcome the reported increase in postoperative complications in patients on biologic therapies, several surgical strategies have been developed to maintain long-term pouch failure rate around 10%, as previously reported. Surgical staging along with the development of minimally invasive surgery are among the most promising advances in this field.

Pros and cons of medical management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by diffuse mucosal inflammation limited to the colon and rectum. Although a complete medical cure may not be possible, UC can be treated with medications that induce and maintain remission. The medical management of this disease continues to evolve with a goal to avoid colectomy and ultimately alter the natural history of UC. Emergence of antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents has expanded the medical armamentarium. 5-Aminosalicylates continue to be used in mild to moderate UC and corticosteroids are mainly used for induction of remission with immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine/azathiopurine/methotrexate) being applied as steroid-sparing agents for maintenance therapy. Infliximab has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and used in the treatment of moderate to severe UC; nevertheless, its use may be associated with significant adverse effects and have a negative impact on the postoperative course should the patients undergo restorative proctocolectomy. In addition, there is always a concern about patients' compliance to medical therapy, cost of medications, and risk for UC-associated dysplasia. The authors discuss the pros and cons of medications used in the treatment of UC.

Recommendations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis with infliximab: a gastroenterology expert group consensus

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Infliximab is currently the only biologic approved for treatment of adults with moderate to severe, active ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to conventional therapies. It rapidly controls symptoms, induces and sustains steroid-free remission, stimulates mucosal healing, and reduces serious complications. Although infliximab tends to be reserved for patients with severe disease, it may be even more beneficial for moderate disease earlier in the disease course. Therefore, it is important to identify which patients are candidates for infliximab therapy.

METHODS

A collaborative Delphi survey was used to obtain consensus on use of biologic therapy in patients with UC from an expert panel of 12 gastroenterologists with substantial experience using infliximab in clinical practice and clinical trials. The panel also addressed issues that influence the use of infliximab in UC, including its potential as an alternative to surgery.

RESULTS

The panel agreed that: (1) it is necessary to adopt additional treatment goals beyond symptom control, i.e., complete mucosal healing, steroid-free remission, improved QoL, and reduced long-term complications; (2) it may be possible to achieve these treatment goals with infliximab, especially if it is used earlier in the course of UC; and (3) infliximab should be offered as an alternative to surgery in patients being considered for colectomy. The panel also agreed on factors for identifying candidates for infliximab therapy (e.g., persistently active UC, steroid-dependent/refractory disease, and high C-reactive protein).

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus statement provides useful and practical information on how to achieve evolving treatment goals with infliximab in moderate to severe UC.

Outcomes after escalation of infliximab therapy in ambulatory patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) therapy escalation during maintenance treatment occurs frequently in clinical practice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Outcomes for these patients have not been described.

AIM

To describe the prevalence of, and outcomes after, IFX escalation during maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-severe UC.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of clinical outcomes in ambulatory patients with moderate-severe UC treated with maintenance IFX.

RESULTS

Fifty-six ambulatory patients received IFX for moderate-severe UC; fifty (89%) responded and proceeded to maintenance therapy. Mean duration of maintenance therapy was 14 months, with mean follow-up of 38 months. Twenty-seven patients (54%) required IFX therapy escalation after a mean of six maintenance infusions. Clinical remission was noted in 36% of the entire cohort (18/50) at 12 months; 19% in the escalation group and 56% in the non-escalation group. Patients who required IFX escalation were less likely to be in clinical remission at 12 months (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6, P = 0.01) when compared with those who did not. During the follow-up period, 27% of patients required a colectomy, and the mean time to colectomy was 17 months. Patients in the escalation group required a colectomy in 33% of cases, compared with 21% of non-escalation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of ambulatory patients with UC treated with maintenance infliximab required therapy escalation over time. This was associated with lower remission, and higher colectomy, rates.

Infliximab or cyclosporine for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Medical treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited to either cyclosporine or infliximab. Studies comparing cyclosporine with either placebo or intravenous methylprednisone showed promise for cyclosporine, but associated it with significant toxicity. There is conflicting, but increasingly positive evidence for using infliximab. There are no studies directly comparing these two treatments. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with steroid-refractory UC treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective review of inpatients with steroid-refractory UC, treated with either intravenous cyclosporine or infliximab, at Waitemata District Health Board, between January 2001 and February 2010. The primary end-points were time to colectomy, and colectomy rates at 3 and 12 months. Secondary end-points were time to discharge from initiation of treatment, steroid dependence at 12 months, and reported adverse events.

RESULTS

The total study population was 38, with 19 in the infliximab group. Follow up to 12 months was complete in all patients. At 3 months, the colectomy rate was 63% for cyclosporine, compared to 21% (P = 0.0094). By 12 months the rate was 68% and 37% for cyclosporine and infliximab, respectively (P = 0.06). Patients in the cyclosporine group required an additional 5 days in hospital (P = 0.0086). Steroid dependence at 12 months was 50% for cyclosporine versus 25% for infliximab (P = 0.36). Cyclosporine caused more adverse events (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab improved clinical outcomes compared to the previous use of intravenous cyclosporine in patients admitted with steroid-refractory acute severe UC.

Development of a new immunoassay for the accurate determination of anti-infliximab antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The formation of antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) is closely associated with the loss of response to infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the clinical utility of a novel method to measure serum ATI levels in the presence of infliximab.

METHODS

ATI levels were measured using a novel immunoassay and the conventional method in 58 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) under infliximab maintenance therapy. The serum infliximab trough levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

ATIs were detected in 16 out of 58 patients (27.6%) by the new method, but the conventional method detected only 2 patients (3.4%) who had the two highest ATI titers assayed by the new method. The presence of ATIs in the samples positive by the new method but negative by the conventional method was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Western blotting analysis also indicated that the new method could restore the binding capacities of the ATIs whose recognition sites were occupied by free infliximab. In the new method, the addition of infliximab to the samples dose-dependently blocked the detection of ATIs. Patients positive for ATIs had significantly lower serum trough levels of infliximab (P < 0.01) and significantly higher clinical activity scores (P < 0.001) as compared with patients negative for ATI.

CONCLUSIONS

The new method makes it possible to measure serum ATI levels in the presence of infliximab. This method is useful for deciding the optimal management strategies for IBD patients with loss of response to infliximab.

Thirty-day mortality after elective and emergency total colectomy in Danish patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this investigation was to assess 30-day mortality among Danish inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients and to examine the prognostic impact of hospital total colectomy volume, age, gender and comorbidity.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

The authors compared 30-day survival over the period 1996-2010 among 2889 IBD patients with total colectomy identified in the Danish National Registry of Patients. This registry covers all hospitals in Denmark. Postoperative survival patterns for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease were compared, using proportional hazard regression. The regression model accounted for the timing of surgery, hospital total colectomy volume, age, gender and comorbidity.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were enrolled in the study if they had a hospital registry diagnosis of IBD, with accompanying procedure codes for total colectomy (see codes in online appendix table 1). Hospitalisations were described as elective or emergency, and patients were categorised as having Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or as a mixed group.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 2889 IBD patients with total colectomy, 1439 (50%) underwent surgery during an emergency hospitalisation. Thirty-day mortality was 5.3% (76/1439) among emergency cases compared with 1% (14/1450) among elective cases. The highest mortality (8.1%; 11 of 136) was observed among Crohn's patients undergoing emergency surgery. The mortality of patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing emergency surgery was 5.2% (55/1056). After elective surgery, the 30-day mortality was 0.9% (8/938) among patients with ulcerative colitis and 1.5% (3/201) among Crohn's disease patients. Low hospital total colectomy volume, comorbidity and high age were associated with increased 30-day mortality in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

Emergency total colectomy among patients with ulcerative colitis and particularly Crohn's disease is associated with substantial 30-day mortality.