Right lobe living donor liver transplantation

[Living donor liver transplantation in adults. Initial results]

AIM

To analyze the preliminary results of the implementation of a living donor liver transplantation program.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between March and September 2000 we performed 7 living donor liver transplantations using the right hepatic lobe. The donors were 5 men and 2 women with a mean age of 39.3 11.5 years. Three donors were genetically related (daughter, mother, son). The mean relative liver volume transplanted was 58.8 2.5%. The mean age of the recipients was 50.4 16.5 years. Six patients presented hepatitis C virus-induced cirrhosis and one presented familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy.

RESULTS

Three complications occurred in the donors: 1 slight infection and 2 biliary fistulae. Graft function was adequate in all recipients and there were three acute rejections. Four biliary leakages occurred of which two required reoperation. None of the patients developed vascular thrombosis. Two recipients died, 53 and 72 days after the operation, with a correctly functioning graft.

CONCLUSION

Living donor liver transplantation constitutes a necessary complement to the current cadaveric donor program to increase the number of patients who can benefit from this treatment, which may represent 10% of the activity of our center. The technical complexity of this procedure is much greater than that of cadaveric transplantation. The right hepatic lobe provides sufficient hepatic mass for most adult recipients.

Right hepatic lobe donation for living donor liver transplantation: impact on donor quality of life

Adult right hepatic lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has rapidly gained widespread acceptance as an effective procedure for selected patients with end-stage liver disease. However, there are currently no published data on the effect of this procedure on the quality of life of donors. We report the results of a survey of our living liver transplant donors to determine the effect of right hepatic lobe donation on quality of life. We have performed 30 LDLTs since 1997; 24 of these have a follow-up of 4 months or longer. In August 2000, these patients were sent a questionnaire (including a Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Survey) regarding psychosocial outcomes and symptoms after surgery. Major complications occurred in 4 of 24 patients (16%), and minor complications, in 4 of 24 patients (16%). Complete recovery occurred in 75% of patients at a mean time of 3.4 months. Ninety-six percent of patients returned to the same predonation job after a mean time of 2.4 months, and 66% of patients required a period of light-duty work for a mean of 2.8 months before returning to full-duty work. A change in body image was reported in 42% of patients, and 71% reported mild ongoing symptoms (primarily abdominal discomfort) that they related to the donor surgery for which 29% sought evaluation by a physician. The donor's relationship with the recipient was the same or better in 96% of donors, and the relationship with the donor's significant other was the same or better in 88% of donors. Mean out-of-pocket expenses incurred by donors were $3,660. Sixty-three percent of donors reported experiencing more pain than anticipated. All patients would donate again if necessary, and 96% benefited from the donor experience. In conclusion, (1) all our donors are alive and well after donation; (2) almost all donors were able to return to predonation employment status within a few months; (3) most donors have mild persistent abdominal symptoms, and some donors had a change in body image that they attribute to the donor surgery; and (4) this information should be provided to potential donors so they may better understand the impact of donor surgery.

Use of intraoperative Doppler ultrasound to diagnose hepatic venous obstruction in a right lobe living donor liver transplant

Right lobe liver transplantation is a relatively new and technically challenging method of living donor transplantation. Integrity of the hepatic venous anastomosis is crucial for successful transplantation. We describe the use of intraoperative Doppler sonography to diagnose stenosis of the hepatic vein anastomosis, with associated compromise of venous drainage and graft perfusion.

Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor liver transplantation using right lobe

BACKGROUND

Modality of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been expanded to adult cases. However, the safety of right lobectomy from living donors has not yet been proven.

METHODS

A total of 62 cases of LDLT, using the right lobe, were reviewed. Study 1: Discrepancy between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight was evaluated. Study 2: Postoperative liver functions were analyzed in relation to residual liver volume (RLV) or age. Residual liver volume of donors was defined using two indices, (RLV = estimated whole liver volume - estimated graft volume and %RLV = RLV/estimated whole liver volumex100). Donors were divided into two groups on the basis of either %RLV (<40%; 40%< or =) or age (<50 years old; 50 years old < or =). Study 3: Right lobe donors were compared with left lobe donors (35 cases) in terms of their postoperative liver functions.

RESULTS

Study 1: The relationship between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight was linear (y=159.136+0.735x, R2=0.571, P<0.001). Study 2: %RLV ranged from 23.5% to 55.8% (mean +/- SD: 43.2+/-6.0). Fifteen cases showed %RLV less than 40%. Postoperative bilirubin clearance was delayed in that group (%RLV<40%). Serum total bilirubin values on postoperative day 7 in the older group (age > or =50) were significantly higher than those in the younger group (age<50). Study 3: Postoperative liver functions of right lobe donors were significantly higher than those of left-lobe donors. Eleven donors (17.7%) had surgical complications, all of which were cured with proper treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Right lobectomy from living donors is a safe procedure with acceptable morbidity, but some care should be taken early after the operation for donors with small residual liver and aged donors.

Liver transplantation. Living donor, hepatocyte, and xenotransplantation

Liver transplantation is now accepted as effective therapy in the treatment of acute and chronic hepatic failure. Improvements in surgical techniques and immune suppression have led to 5-year survival rates that exceed 70% in most centers. The success of transplantation has led to a dramatic increase in the number of candidates to over 14,000 places on the national waiting list. While the number of patients in need of transplantation increases, there has been little growth in the supply of available cadaveric organs, resulting in an organ shortage crisis. With waiting times often exceeding 1 to 2 years, the waiting list mortality now exceeds 10% in most regions. Several novel approaches have been developed to address the growing disparity between the limited supply and excessive demand for suitable organs.

Liver transplants from living related donors

Liver transplantation from living related donors was unthinkable until recently, when the safety of modern hepatic surgery became widely appreciated. The first step was the successful demonstration that parts of livers could be transplanted. This technique, termed reduced-size liver transplantation, evolved into reliable procedures to allow parents to donate small parts of their livers to small children. More recently, right hepatectomy, in which up to 70% of the liver is resected for donation, has been performed in adults. As the demand for liver transplantation continues to increase, the development of ethically sound, medically and surgically optimal programs for routine use of living donors has become essential. This chapter provides a broad overview of the evolution and current state of liver transplantation with living donors.

Liver transplantation

Continued discussion over organ allocation and distribution remained a focal point in the field of liver transplantation in the year 2000. Despite the ongoing debate, no significant changes were implemented in the current allocation system. By far, the most widely discussed topic in liver transplantation this year was live donor adult-to-adult liver transplantation. Several authors reported on their initial experience, with both recipient and donor outcomes appearing excellent. As the number of transplant centers performing this procedure increases we look forward to further studies regarding the safety and long-term outcome of this innovative procedure. Studies on viral hepatitis after liver transplantation again focused on the problem of recurrent hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Several small studies found benefit in patients with hepatitis B treated with intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after transplantation. Although breakthrough replication remains a problem in some patients, these studies offer hope that combination therapy for hepatitis B may provide improved long-term graft survival in these patients. In patients with hepatitis C, several studies focused on identifying risk factors to predict graft recurrence of the virus after liver transplantation. Both cellular rejection and level of viral replication may be important predictors of recurrent hepatitis C virus in the graft. Early treatment reports using interferon and ribavirin suggest that some patients may have a viral response during therapy; however, it is short lived, and tolerance of medication is difficult. Certainly, we look forward to further studies looking at means of prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Adult living donor liver transplantation: Preferences about donation outside the medical community

An increasing number of transplant centers are performing adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We evaluated peoples' perspectives on possible outcomes of living donation, thresholds for donating, and views regarding the donation process. One hundred fifty people were surveyed; half were from a medical care group serving an indigent population and half were from a private clinic. Preferences about outcomes of adult living donation were ranked and quantified on a visual analogue scale. Thresholds for donation to a loved one were quantified. Sixty percent of the respondents suggested they would prefer to donate and die and have the transplant recipient live rather than forego donation and have the potential transplant recipient die of liver failure. Participants' stated threshold for living donation was a median survival for themselves of only 79%. They would require that their loved one have a median survival of 55% with transplantation before they would agree to donate. Respondents from the medical care group reported higher survival thresholds for themselves and the transplant recipient, and race was the most statistically significant predictor of those thresholds. Sex was more predictive of threshold probabilities from the private clinic. Eighty-one percent of the respondents believed that the potential donor, not a physician, should have the final say regarding candidacy for living donation. In conclusion, the findings of this survey support the use of adult LDLT. Most respondents were willing to accept mortality rates that far exceed the estimated risk of donation and favored outcomes in which a loved one was saved.

Small-for-size grafts in living-related liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The problems associated with small-for-size grafts in living-related liver transplantation are not fully understood.

STUDY DESIGN

A consecutive series of 79 patients underwent 80 living-related liver transplantation procedures, including one retransplant, at the University of Tokyo from January 1996 to January 2000. They were divided into two groups by graft size: graft weight/recipient standard liver volume ratios of 40% or less (n = 24), and more than 40% (n = 56). Preoperative status, mortality, morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative graft function were examined and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The rate of patients who were restricted to the intensive care unit preoperatively was comparable between the groups (33% versus 21%, p = 0.27). The mean standard liver volume ratios were 37% in the small graft group and 84% in the large group. Survival rates were 80% (5 of 24) for the small graft group, which was significantly lower than that for the large group (96%, 54 of 56, p = 0.02). The rate of acute rejection was comparable between the groups (33% versus 43%, p = 0.47). Vascular complication was observed in 17% of the small graft group patients and 23% of the large group (p = 0.77). No difference was observed in the frequency of bile leakage or bile duct stenosis (25% versus 21%, p=0.77). Hyper-bilirubinemia and elongation of prothrombin time persisted longer in the small graft group than in the large group (p < 0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Our surgical results may suggest that a graft weight ratio of 40% or less provides a lower chance of survival after living-related liver transplantation.

Surgical technique for right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation without venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting and with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To report the authors' experience with adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) without venovenous bypass and to describe modifications that will allow for a direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Adult living donor liver transplantation is being evaluated as a method to alleviate the organ shortage. Descriptions of the procedure have emphasized the use of venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, and the mandatory use of a Roux-en-Y biliary enteric anastomosis. The authors describe a technique for ALDLT without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping in 11 recipients and describe the modifications to the procedure that may allow a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in certain cases.

METHODS

Between March 1999 and March 2000, 11 ALDLTs were performed at the authors' institution. All procedures were performed without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping. After a modification to the procedure, five of the last six recipients underwent biliary reconstruction with a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis. Data regarding donor, recipient, and graft survival, complications, and graft function were collected.

RESULTS

Recipients comprised five women and six men, mean age 48 years. Donors comprised five women and six men, mean age 36.5 years. Donor to recipient relationships included sibling, spouse, son, and daughter. Indications for transplantation were hepatitis C, hepatitis C with hepatocellular carcinoma, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, ethanol, and cryptogenic. No case required venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting. The right hepatic vein of the donor graft was anastomosed to the confluence of the left and middle hepatic veins in all cases. All donors are alive and well, with no adverse complications reported. Recipient and graft survival rates were 91% and 82%, respectively, for ALDLT versus 92% and 92% for recipients of cadaveric organs during the same time period. One recipient died of multiple organ failure and sepsis. Biliary reconstruction was performed by Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in the six cases. In five of the last six recipients, direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction with a T tube was used. No anastomotic leaks or strictures occurred in the patients undergoing duct-to-duct reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult living donor liver transplantation can be performed safely and may help alleviate the organ shortage. Neither venovenous bypass nor portocaval shunting is necessary to perform the procedure, and modifications to both the donor and recipient hepatectomy procedures may allow biliary reconstruction to be performed by a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis in selected cases.

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation has become the subject of a great deal of attention over the last few years. Until the use of the donor right lobe was introduced and demonstrated to be relatively safe, it was not possible to offer this alternative to conventional transplantation to most adults. Recent clinical work has focused on the results of these procedures in both donors and recipients, perfecting surgical techniques for right-lobe transplantation, streamlining donor evaluation protocols, and containing costs. This overview summarizes many of the recent publications and presentations in the field of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Use of imaging for living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation is emerging as an alternative to cadaveric liver transplantation. The authors present multimodality images obtained in 44 cases of living donor liver transplantation. The images in this article were derived from the pre-, intra-, and postoperative imaging protocol for their institutional transplantation program. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the donor allows detection of focal liver lesions and accurate determination of liver volume. The latter is crucial to ensure adequate postoperative liver function for donors and recipients. MR cholangiography depicts donor biliary anatomy. MR angiography and digital subtraction arteriography are performed to assess vascular anatomy. Intraoperative ultrasonography (US) helps determine the resection plane during donor hepatectomy. Postoperative MR imaging documents liver regrowth. MR imaging, US, and computed tomography help assess complications in donors and recipients.

The interrelationship between portal and arterial blood flow after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

When adults are transplanted with segmental grafts, disparity between the size of the graft and the native organ is almost universal. These grafts presumably still receive all of the native portal inflow despite a reduced vascular bed and dramatically elevated blood flow may result. The hemodynamic changes after segmental transplantation in adults have not yet been studied and their clinical significance is unknown.

METHODS

Portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow were measured intraoperatively in right lobe liver donors and recipients with electromagnetic flow probes. Postoperative evolution was monitored in recipients with ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Portal flow to the right lobe ranged from 601 to 1,102 ml/min before resection and from 1,257 to 2,362 ml/min after transplantation. There was a statistically significant linear correlation between the change in portal flow and graft to recipient body weight ratio. Arterial blood flow ranged from 213 to 460 ml/min before resection and from 60 to 300 ml/min after transplantation. Preoperative portal peak systolic velocity was uniformly around 10 cm/sec. Values on postoperative day 1 were increased to 30 cm/sec in recipients of cadaveric organs, to 50 cm/sec in recipients of organs with graft to recipient body weight ratios of more than 1.2%, and to 115 cm/sec in recipients of organs with ratios less than 0.9%. A decreasing tendency was universally observed. Arterial systolic velocity was inversely related to portal systolic velocity. Neither graft dysfunction nor vascular complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The hemodynamic pattern after right lobe transplantation is predictable and intraoperative measurements and ultrasonography are useful for monitoring. The size of the graft influences the magnitude of the hemodynamic changes.

Living donor liver transplantation in adults: outcome in Japan

1. Twenty centers in Japan performed 308 living donor liver transplants (LDLT) in adults. 2. Right lobe grafts were used in the minority of cases (27.1%); most had left lobe grafts (72.9%). Survival was not influenced by the type of graft. 3. There were no donor deaths (0%); 9.3% of donors experienced mild to moderate complications. Biliary complications were the most frequent. 4. Overall recipient survival was 72.4%.

Biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation using the right liver lobe: techniques and complications

Since the introduction of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe of the liver, biliary problems have led the list of complications resulting in postoperative morbidity. We report our experience with the first 30 living donor liver transplantations performed in our institution from August 1998 to January 2000. Patients were 21 men and 9 women, with a mean age 45 +/- 16 years. Mean recipient weight was 65.1 +/- 17.9 kg, mean graft weight was 877 +/- 146 g, and the mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.5 +/- 0.6. Patient and graft survival rates were 83.3% and 80%, respectively. Biliary anastomosis was either an end-to-end hepaticocholedochostomy with a T-drain or hepaticojejunostomy. Mean follow-up was 217.4 +/- 149.8 days. The overall complication rate was 26.6% (8 of 30 procedures) and was directly correlated to the type of anastomosis and number of bile ducts. Surgical revision was necessary in all cases. Biliary complications were not the primary cause of graft loss. Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe is a successful procedure, with graft and patient survival similar to those in cadaver full-organ transplantation. Postoperative morbidity, mainly caused by biliary leak, was directly related to the number of ducts and type of anastomosis. With increasing experience, we have better defined our plane of transection on the hilar plate, with the goal of obtaining only 1 biliary duct for the anastomosis. We also improved our parenchymal transection technique, which resulted in a decreased incidence of leak at the cut-surface area.

Right-lobe living donor liver transplantation

1. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is currently performed at about 30 centers in the United States. 2. Careful and critical evaluation of donor and recipient is required for optimal outcome. 3. Right lobe donation is preferred over left lobe donation in adult LDLT. 4. There has been 1 donor death (<0.3%) in the US experiences. Donor biliary complications occur in approximately 4% of the cases. 5. Recipient survival after adult LDLT in the United States is approximately 88%. Hepatic artery thrombosis occurs in 3% and biliary complications in 18%.

Split-cava technique: liver splitting for two adult recipients

Split-liver transplantation for 2 adult recipients is a challenging procedure because of the need to split through the midplane of the donor liver. In applied techniques, usually the middle hepatic vein is retained with the left split and the vena cava retained with the right split graft, particularly to avoid serious venous congestion of the right graft after reperfusion. The indispensable division of the caudate lobe veins lead to uncertain viability of liver segment I, and resection might be necessary. To provide optimal venous drainage of both hemiliver grafts, we developed the split-cava technique. This article describes our new technique of liver splitting, which has been successfully used in 2 in situ harvesting procedures.

Epidural catheter and increased prothrombin time after right lobe hepatectomy for living donor transplantation

IMPLICATIONS

Donor right hepatic lobectomy for the purpose of living liver transplantation may be associated with postoperative abnormalities in tests of clotting function. This study explores the possible causes and anesthetic implications of this phenomenon.

Selection of donors and recipients for living donor liver transplantation

1. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is increasingly used for adults with end-stage liver disease. 2. Standards for acceptable rates of donor morbidity, and even mortality, must be evaluated in the context of recipient risk of dying while on the waiting list and outcome after transplantation. 3. Use of our current criteria in Colorado for selection of donors and recipients indicated that 15% of recipients could undergo LDLT.

Liver transplantation. The pediatric challenge

Successful liver transplantation in a child is often a hard-won victory, requiring all the combined expertise of a dedicated pediatric transplant team. This article outlines the considerable challenges still facing pediatric liver transplant physicians and surgeons. In looking to the future, where should priorities lie to enhance the success already achieved? First, solutions to the donor shortage must be sought aggressively by increasing the use of from split-liver transplants, judicious application of living-donor programs, and increasing the donation rate, perhaps by innovative means. The major immunologic barriers, to successful xenotransplantation make it unlikely that this option will be tenable in the near future. Second, current immunosuppression is nonspecific, toxic, and unable to be individually adjusted to the patient's immune response. The goal of achieving donor-specific tolerance will require new consideration of induction protocols. Developing a clinically applicable method to measure the recipient's immunoreactivity is of paramount importance, for future studies of new immunosuppressive strategies and to address the immediate concern of long-term over-immunosuppression. The inclusion of pediatric patients in new protocols will require the ongoing insistence of pediatric transplant investigators. Third, the current immunosuppressive drugs have a long-term morbidity and mortality of their own. These long-term effects are particularly important in children who may well have decades of exposure to these therapies. There is now some understanding of their long-term renal toxicity and the risk of malignancy. New drugs may obviate renal toxicity, whereas the risk of malignancy is inherent in any nonspecific immunosuppressive regimen. Although progress is being made in preventing and recognizing PTLD, this entity remains an important ongoing concern. The global effect of long-term immunosuppression on the child's growth, development, and intellectual potential is unknown. Of particular concern is the potential for neurotoxicity from the calcineurin inhibitors. Fourth, recurrent disease and new diseases, perhaps potentiated by immunosuppressive drugs, must be considered. Already the recurrence of autoimmune disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis have been documented in pediatric patients. Now, a new lesion, a nonspecific hepatitis, sometimes with positive autoimmune markers, that may progress to cirrhosis has been recognized. It is not known whether this entity is an unusual form of rejection, an unrecognized viral infection, or a response to immunosuppressive drugs themselves. Finally, pediatric transplant recipients, like any other children, must be protected and nourished physically and mentally if they are to fulfill their potential. After liver transplantation the child's growth, intellectual functioning, and psychologic adaptation may all require special attention from parents, teachers, and physicians alike. There is limited understanding of how the enormous physical intervention of a liver transplantation affects a child's cognitive and psychologic function as the child progresses through life. The persons caring for these children have the difficult responsibility of providing services to evaluate these essential measures of children's health over the long term and to intervene if necessary. Part of the transplant physician's our duty to protect and advocate for children is to fight for equal access to health care. In most of the developing world, economic pressures make it impossible to consider liver transplantation a health care priority. In the United States and in other countries with the medical infrastructure to support liver transplantation, however, health care professionals must strive to be sure that the policies governing candidacy for transplantation and allocation of organs are applied justly and uniformly to all children whose lives are threatened by liver disease. In the current regulatory climate that increasingly takes medical decisions out of the hands of physicians, pediatricians must be even more prepared to protect the unique and often complicated needs of children both before and after transplantation. Only in this way can the challenges of the present and the future be met.

Living donor liver transplantation in adults: outcome in Europe

1. Eleven European centers have performed 228 living donor liver transplants (LDLT): 105 in children and 123 in adults. 2. Right lobe donation was used in 111 of 123 adult cases (90%). 3. There was 1 donor death ( approximately 0.8%), and 17.8% of donors experienced significant complications. 4. Eighty-six percent of recipients and 83% of grafts survived. Biliary complications occurred in 14.6%.

The fate of liver grafts declined for subjective reasons and transplanted out of a local organ procurement organization

BACKGROUND

Decisions made by transplant surgeons to decline liver grafts for local use are based on both objective and ill-defined subjective parameters. These livers may be offered and subsequently transplanted at non-local centers. We analyzed the fate of these exported livers, focusing on the outcome of grafts declined for subjective reasons. The aim is to determine whether local surgeons' concerns about inferior graft function are justified.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 13.3% of 555 livers in our organ procurement organization (OPO) were exported and transplanted out of the local area. Donor data and reason for decline were obtained from an extensive OPO database. Objective reasons for decline were based on no appropriate matched recipient due to donor size, serologies, or malignancy with potential for spread. Subjective parameters were related to the procuring surgeon's assessment and included variables such as medical and social history, abnormal liver enzymes, older age, organ visualization, and biopsy. Recipient data were obtained from questionnaires sent to outside transplant centers.

RESULTS

There was a significantly higher rate of nonfunction in the subjective group (17.1%), compared to the objective group (0%). One-year graft and patient survival were 79 and 83% for the objective group and 59 and 68% for the subjective group (P=NS). When donors declined for medical/social history were excluded from the subjective group, leaving only grafts declined based solely on the surgeon's assessment of graft quality, there is a significant difference in graft survival (79% for objective and 46% for this subjective subgroup, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Livers declined for local use based on subjective assessment by the procuring surgeon have a high nonfunction rate, associated with a high morbidity. Therefore, the use of these grafts should be restricted to recipients at the most urgent status.

Predictors of survival after In vivo split liver transplantation: analysis of 110 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors that influence patient survival after in vivo split liver transplantation (SLT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Split liver transplantation is effective in expanding the donor pool, and its use reduces the number of deaths in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. Early SLTs were associated with poor outcomes, and acceptance of the technique has been slow. A better understanding of the factors that influence patient and graft survival would be useful in widening the application of SLT.

METHODS

During a 3.5-year period, 55 right and 55 left lateral in vivo split grafts were transplanted in 102 pediatric and adult recipients. The authors' in vivo split technique has been previously described. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. Recipient, donor, and surgical variables were analyzed for their effect on patient survival after SLT.

RESULTS

Overall survival rates of patients who received an SLT were not significantly different from those of patients who received whole organ transplants. Survival of left lateral segment recipients, at median follow-up time, was 76% versus 80% in patients receiving a trisegment. Fifty of 102 patients (49%) were high-risk urgent recipients (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 1 and 2A) and 52 (51%) were nonurgent recipients (UNOS status 2B, 3). High-risk recipients had a survival rate significantly lower than that of nonurgent recipients. By univariate comparison, two variables-UNOS status and number of transplants per patient-were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. Preoperative recipient mechanical ventilation, preoperative prothrombin time, donor sodium level, donor length of hospital stay, and warm ischemia time approached significance. The type of graft (right vs. left) did not reduce the survival rate after transplantation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified UNOS status and length of donor hospital stay as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient survival of in vivo SLT is not significantly different from that of whole-organ orthotopic liver transplantation. The variables affecting outcome of in vivo SLT are similar to those in whole-organ transplantation. in vivo SLT should be widely applied to expand a severely depleted donor pool.

Surgical advances in liver transplantation. Living related and split donors

Surgical innovations to expand an exceedingly small cadaveric liver pool have paved the way for the more complex procedure of adult-to-adult living donation. Although reduced-size liver transplant (RSLT) has provided children and small adults with much needed small size grafts, discarding a part of the liver can no longer be justified in the current era of severe organ shortage. Split liver transplantation may eliminate the need for RSLT and may replace adult-to-adult pediatric donation except in urgent situations. Adult-to-adult living donation is a formidable undertaking that tremendously impacts adult recipients. Adult-to-adult living donation should be approached cautiously to ensure the safety of living donors. Expansion of adult living donation can only be achieved when ethical issues of donation are resolved and long-term donor safety is established.

Selection and outcome of living donors for adult to adult right lobe transplantation

BACKGROUND

The shortage of cadaveric livers has sparked an interest in adult-to-adult living donor transplantation. Right lobe donor hepatectomy is frequently required to obtain a graft of adequate size for adult recipients. Careful donor selection is necessary to minimize complications and assure a functional graft.

METHODS

A four-step evaluation protocol was used for donor selection and satisfactory results of all tests in each step were required before proceeding to the next. Donors were selected based on a battery of laboratory studies chosen to exclude unrecognized infection, liver disease, metabolic disorders, and conditions representing undue surgical risk. Imaging studies included ultrasonography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoperative cholangiography and ultrasonography. The information obtained from liver biopsy was used to correct the estimated graft mass for the degree of steatosis.

RESULTS

From March 1998 to August 1999, 126 candidates were evaluated for living donation. A total of 35 underwent donor right lobectomy with no significant complications. Forty percent of all donors that came to surgery were genetically unrelated to the recipient. A total of 69% of those evaluated were excluded. ABO incompatibility was the primary reason for exclusion after the first step (71%) and the presence of steatosis yielding an inadequate estimated graft mass after the second step (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor selection limits the application of living donor liver transplantation in the adult population. Unrelated individuals increase the size of the donor pool. Right lobe hepatectomy can be performed safely in healthy adult liver donors. Preoperative liver biopsy is an essential part of the evaluation protocol, particularly when the estimated graft mass is marginal.

Surgical management of anatomical variations of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To review the anatomical variations of the right lobe encountered in 40 living liver donors, describe the surgical management of these variations, and summarize the results of these procedures.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Anatomical variability is the rule rather than the exception in liver and biliary surgery. To make effective use of liver segments from living donors for transplantation, surgical techniques must be adapted to the anomalies.

METHODS

Donor evaluation included celiac and mesenteric angiography with portal phase, magnetic resonance angiography, and intraoperative ultrasonography and cholangiography. Arterial anastomoses were generally between the donor right hepatic artery and the recipient main hepatic artery. Jump-grafts were constructed for recipients with hepatic artery thrombosis, and double donor arteries were joined to the bifurcation of the recipient hepatic artery. The branches of a trifurcated donor portal vein were isolated during the parenchymal transection, joined in a common cuff, and anastomosed to the recipient main portal vein. Significant accessory hepatic veins were preserved, brought together in a common cuff if multiple, and anastomosed to the recipient cava. The bile ducts were individually drained through a Roux-en-Y limb, and stents were placed in most patients.

RESULTS

Forty right lobe liver transplants were performed between adults. No donor was excluded because of prohibitive anatomy. Seven recipients had a prior transplant and five had a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Arterial anomalies were noted in six donors and portal anomalies in four. Arterial jump-grafts were required in three. Sixteen had at least one significant accessory hepatic vein, and one had a double right hepatic vein. There were no vascular complications. Multiple bile ducts were found in 27 donors. Biliary complications occurred in 33% of patients without stents and 4% with stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical variations of the right lobe can be accommodated without donor complications or complex reconstruction. Previous transplantation and TIPS do not significantly complicate right lobe transplantation. Microvascular arterial anastomosis is not necessary, and vascular complications should be infrequent. Biliary complications can be minimized with stenting.

Emergency portacaval shunt for control of hemorrhage from a parenchymal fracture after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

As more adults undergo transplantation with partial liver grafts, the unique features of these segments and their clinical significance will become apparent. A patient presented with life-threatening hemorrhage from an iatrogenic laceration to a right lobe graft 11 days after transplantation. The creation of a portacaval shunt effectively controlled the bleeding, allowing more elective replacement of the organ with another right lobe graft. The regeneration process combined with increased portal blood flow and relative outflow limitation may have set the stage for this complication. Any disruption of the liver parenchyma during transplantation should be securely repaired and followed cautiously. Portacaval shunting is an option for controlling hemorrhage from the liver in transplant recipients. The timely availability of a second organ was likely the ultimate determinant of survival for this patient.

Emergency adult to adult living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure

BACKGROUND

The high mortality rate associated with fulminant hepatic failure combined with the limited availability of cadaveric organs requires consideration of alternatives to conventional cadaveric transplantation. Use of the donor right lobe in adult-to-adult living donor transplantation holds promise in a variety of circumstances, including high-acuity situations.

METHODS

A 28-year-old male with fulminant hepatic failure secondary to hepatitis B was referred to our institution. He rapidly progressed to grade IV encephalopathy, and laboratory values were indicative of a poor prognosis without transplantation. He was listed for transplantation as UNOS status I. Three siblings were simultaneously evaluated for living liver donation. Following established protocols, we completed donor evaluation in less than 24 hr, and donor right lobectomy and living donor transplantation were performed within 36 hr of the recipient's admission to our center.

RESULTS

The donor surgery was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. The recipient experienced full recovery and was discharged home on postoperative day 14. Of note, the first offer for a cadaveric liver came more than 60 hr after living donor transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Thorough donor workup can be completed in less than 24 hr without inappropriate abbreviation of the evaluation. Simultaneous workup of willing individuals prevents unnecessary delay. Living donor transplantation should be considered for patients with fulminant hepatic failure who are appropriate transplant candidates.

Evaluation of 100 patients for living donor liver transplantation

The initial success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States has resulted in a growing interest in this procedure. The impact of LDLT on liver transplantation will depend in part on the proportion of patients considered medically suitable for LDLT and the identification of suitable donors. We report the outcome of our evaluation of the first 100 potential transplant recipients for LDLT at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver, CO). All patients considered for LDLT had first been approved for conventional liver transplantation by the Liver Transplant Selection Committee and met the listing criteria of United Network for Organ Sharing status 1, 2A, or 2B. Once listed, those patients deemed suitable for LDLT were given the option to consider LDLT and approach potential donors. Donors were evaluated with a preliminary screening questionnaire, followed by formal evaluation. Of the 100 potential transplant recipients evaluated, 51 were initially rejected based on recipient characteristics that included imminent cadaveric transplantation (8 patients), refusal of evaluation (4 patients), lack of financial approval (6 patients), and medical, psychosocial, or surgical problems (33 patients). Of the remaining 49 patients, considered ideal candidates for LDLT, 24 patients were unable to identify a suitable donor for evaluation. Twenty-six donors were evaluated for the remaining 25 potential transplant recipients. Eleven donors were rejected: 9 donors for medical reasons and 2 donors who refused donation after being medically approved. The remaining 15 donor-recipient pairs underwent LDLT. Using our criteria for the selection of recipients and donors for LDLT gave the following results: (1) 51 of 100 potential transplant recipients (51%) were rejected for recipient issues, (2) only 15 of the remaining 49 potential transplant recipients (30%) were able to identify an acceptable donor, and (3) 15 of 100 potential living donor transplant recipients (15%) were able to identify a suitable donor and undergo LDLT. Recipient characteristics and donor availability may limit the widespread use of LDLT. However, careful application of LDLT to patients at greatest risk for dying on the waiting list may significantly reduce waiting list mortality.

Adult-to-adult living-related liver transplantation using the right lobe. Case report

In the last few years an increase in the number of candidates for liver transplantation has been observed. However, the donor pool has not increased proportionally so that the lack of available donor organs remain a major concern. Living-related liver transplantation is actually one of the strategies to maximize donor organ use not only for paediatric but also for the adult patient population. The authors report their experience with the first adult-to-adult living-related liver transplantation using the right lobe. Despite a donor portal anomaly, the donor operation and the transplantation were uneventful. After six months' follow-up, donor and recipient are in excellent clinical state.

Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation

Because of the growing shortage of donor organs, physicians and organ procurement agencies are expanding the donor pool through three mechanisms. The first mechanism is to increase the number of patients (and their families) who give consent for organ donation and thus extend the number of cadaveric livers. The second mechanism is that marginal livers, previously considered unacceptable for transplantation, are now being successfully transplanted. The third way to expand the donor pool is through advances in medical practice such as living-donor liver transplantation and split-liver transplantation.

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a review

The continuing shortage of organs for adult transplant recipients has generated enthusiasm for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The major concern has been the ability to resect a graft of adequate size without subjecting the donor to undue risk. The right hepatic lobe is generally large enough for adult recipients, but because of the real and perceived risks of right lobe (RL) resection, surgeons have been hesitant to offer this option to their patients. The first series of RL resections that included a significant number of patients was reported in 1999, and the results were encouraging. Only minor complications occurred in donors, and the recipients fared quite well. Enthusiasm for these donor resections is growing, and more centers are beginning to perform them. There is a good deal of global experience with pediatric LDLT but little with adults, and there are unique considerations in this population. This review examines donor selection criteria for adult recipients, highlights technical points critical for good outcome, and examines the early results and complications in both donors and recipients. If the preliminary results continue to be reproduced, RL LDLT could have significant impact on the worsening organ shortage.