Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS Registry

Benefit of an implanted solid barrier for the feasibility of a sequence of three different hepato-biliary operations in a small animal model

BACKGROUND

Current liver surgery includes complex multi-stage procedures such as portal vein ligation (PVL) followed by extended liver resection, especially in patients with Klatskin tumours. The risk for severe adhesions increases with every procedure. Finally, this complex sequence could fail because of malignant adhesions. Therefore, we proved the hypothesis of reducing malignant adhesions and increasing feasibility of a sequence with three hepato-biliary operations by implantation of a solid barrier.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We operated in male rats (n=40). Our sequence included as 1st operation bile duct ligation mimicking Klatskin III° or IV°, the 2nd operation was a selective portal vein ligation (sPVL) and 3rd procedure was a 70% liver resection. The mechanical barrier (part of a sterile glove) was implanted at the end of the first operation between the upper (median lobe+left lateral lobe [ML+LLL]) and lower (right lobe+caudate lobe [RL+CL]) rat liver lobes. We assessed the degree of adhesions and the feasibility of the 2nd and 3rd operation by using an established adhesion score (Zühlke) and a feasibility score. The severity of the adhesions and the pro-inflammatory cellular response were further evaluated by morphometry of thickness (HE) of the adhesion layer and quantification of infiltrating neutrophils (ASDCL) in the adhesion layer on the liver surface.

RESULTS

The planned liver resection as the third procedure was only feasible when a mechanical barrier was placed. Extent of cholestasis or time interval between the operations had no significant impact on adhesions score or feasibility of the whole sequence.

CONCLUSION

A sequence of three hepato-biliary operations in a small animal model (rat) is feasible. It should be considered to implant a mechanical barrier in a sequence of more than two surgical interventions in an experimental model in order to assure the feasibility of the final operation.

Patient Survival After Simultaneous ALPPS and Colorectal Resection

BACKGROUND

Liver resection combined with colorectal surgery (CRS) is the only curative option in many patients presenting with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases (CRLM). Simultaneous resection has been shown to offer benefits in patients with low hepatic tumor load; however, in the setting of in situ colorectal tumor with extensive CRLM and a small predicted future liver remnant (FLR), the use of simultaneous ALPPS and CRS is controversial, lacking outcome data.

METHODS

Thirty-one cases of simultaneous ALPPS and CRS prospectively entered into the International ALPPS Registry were examined. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality after stage-2.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (97%) completed both stages. CRS was performed during stage-1 in 22 patients (73%). Seven patients (23%) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) following stage-2 ALPPS. The 90-day mortality rate was 15%. Patients who had a severe complication after stage-1 were significantly more likely to have 90-day mortality following stage-2 (p = 0.002). MELD score > 10 on postoperative day-5 after stage-1 was also significantly associated with 90-day mortality (p = 0.011). Disease-free survival and overall survival were 36% and 76% at 1 year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of the high mortality and poor long-term survival identified in this series, the adoption of ALPPS with CRS cannot be recommended without further data. Patients who suffer severe complications or have an elevated MELD score after stage-1 are at higher risk of mortality following stage-2.

Survival after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for advanced colorectal liver metastases: A case-matched comparison with palliative systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows the resection of colorectal liver metastases with curative intent which would otherwise be unresectable and only eligible for palliative systemic therapy. This study aimed to compare outcomes of ALPPS in patients with otherwise unresectable colorectal liver metastases with matched historic controls treated with palliative systemic treatment.

METHODS

All patients with colorectal liver metastases from the international ALPPS registry were identified and analyzed. Survival data were compared according to the extent of disease. Otherwise unresectable ALPPS patients were defined by at least 2 of the following criteria: ≥6 metastasis, ≥2 future remnant liver metastasis, ≥6 involved segments excluding segment 1. These patients were matched with patients included in 2, phase 3, metastatic, colorectal cancer trials (CAIRO and CAIRO2) using propensity scoring in order to compare survival.

RESULTS

Of 295 patients with colorectal liver metastases in the ALPPS registry, 70 patients had otherwise unresectable disease defined by the proposed criteria. Two-year overall survival was 49% and 72% for patients with ≥2 and <2 criteria, respectively (P = .002). Median disease-free survival was 6 months compared to 12 months (P < .001) in the ≥2 and <2 criteria groups, respectively. Median overall survival was comparable between ALPPS patients with ≥2 criteria and case-matched patients who received palliative treatment (24.0 vs 17.6 months, P = .088).

CONCLUSION

Early oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced liver metastases undergoing ALPPS were not superior to results of matched patients receiving systemic treatment with palliative intent. Careful patient selection is essential in order to improve outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS (RALPPS) in patients with cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has high morbidity and mortality. In this study, the safety and efficacy of a modification of ALPPS (radiofrequency-assisted ALPPS, RALPPS) were assessed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with HCC and were considered to have an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) were enrolled. In stage I, a radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device was used to cauterise along the planned transection plane to form a coagulum avascular area. When the FLR reached above 40%, hepatectomy was performed in stage II along the coagulum area established previously. After two stages, operative morbidity, mortality, per cent increase in FLR, operative time and blood loss were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between July 2014 and September 2015, 10 patients with HCC (9 with hepatitis-related cirrhosis) were treated with the RALPPS procedure. The incidence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) was 20% (2/10). One patient died. No biliary leakage, intraperitoneal infection or post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurred after both stages. The median FLR before stage I was 31% (364 ml). This increased to 47% (632 ml) before stage II after a median interval of 28 days. The median percentage increase in FLR was 53% (210 ml). Additionally, the median operative time during the first and second stages was 214 and 281 min, respectively. The corresponding median blood loss was 200 and 550 ml, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RALPPS has a potential advantage in eliminating serious complications of biliary leakage and PHLF associated with classic ALPPS. On the basis of rigorous patient selection criteria, RALPPS may achieve the same effect of promoting significant growth of the FLR in patients with cirrhosis-related HCC and insufficient FLR volume, albeit at the cost of a longer interval time.

Animal Models for Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS): Achievements and Future Perspectives

Background: Since 2012, Associated Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been standing in the limelight of modern liver surgery and numerous questions have been raised regarding this novel approach. On the one hand, ALPPS has proved to be a valuable method in the treatment of hepatic tumors, while on the other hand, there are many controversies, such as high mortality and morbidity rates. Further surgical research is essential for a better understanding of underlying mechanisms and for enhancing patient safety. Summary: Until recently, only 8 animal models have been created with the purpose to mimic ALPPS-induced liver regeneration. From these 7 are rodent (6 rat and 1 mouse) models, while only 1 is a large animal model, which uses pigs. In case of rodent models, portal flow deprivation of 75-90% is achieved via portal vein ligation leaving only the right (20-25%) or left median (10-15%) lobes portally perfused, while liver splitting in general is carried out positioned according to the falciform ligament. As for the swine model, the left lateral and medial lobes (70-75% of total liver volume) are portally ligated, and the right lateral lobe (accounting for 20-24% of the parenchyma) is partially resected in order to reach critical liver volume. Each model is capable of reproducing the accelerated liver regeneration seen in human cases. However, all species have significantly different liver anatomy compared with the human anatomic situation, making clinical translation somewhat difficult. Key Messages: Unfortunately, there are no perfect animal models available for ALPPS research. Small animal models are inexpensive and well suited for basic research, but may only provide limited translational potential to humans. Clinically large animal models may provide more relevant data, but currently no suitable one exists.

ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) does not affect proliferation, apoptosis, or angiogenesis as compared to standard liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

Background

ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) is a novel two-stage strategy to induce rapid hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) when patients are in danger of postoperative liver failure due to insufficient FLR. However, the effects of ALPPS on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are not clear so far. The aim of our study was to determine whether ALPPS induces proliferation, apoptosis, or vascularization compared to standard (one-stage) liver resection.

Methods

Six patients who underwent ALPPS were matched with 12 patients undergoing standard liver resection regarding characteristics of the metastases (size, number), time of appearance (syn-/metachronous), preoperative chemotherapy, primary tumor (localization, TNM stage, grading), and patient variables (gender, age). The largest resected metastasis was used for the analyses. Tissue was stained for tumor cell proliferation (Ki67), apoptosis (TUNEL, caspase-3), vascularization (CD31), and pericytes (αSMA).

Results

Vascularization (CD31; p = 0.149), proliferation (Mib-1; p = 0.244), and αSMA expression (p = 0.205) did not significantly differ between the two groups, although a trend towards less proliferation and αSMA expression was observed in patients undergoing ALPPS. Concerning apoptosis, caspase-3 staining showed significantly fewer apoptotic cells upon ALPPS (p < 0.0001), but this was not confirmed by TUNEL staining (p = 0.7344).

Conclusions

ALPPS does not induce proliferation, apoptosis, or vascularization of CRLM when compared to standard liver resection.

Hypoxia of the growing liver accelerates regeneration

BACKGROUND

After portal vein ligation of 1 side of the liver, the other side regenerates at a slow rate. This slow growth may be accelerated to rapid growth by adding a transection between the 2 sides, i.e., performing portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection. We found that in patients undergoing portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection, portal vein hyperflow in the regenerating liver causes a significant reduction of arterial flow due to the hepatic arterial buffer response. We postulated that the reduction of arterial flow induces hypoxia in the regenerating liver and used a rat model to assess hypoxia and its impact on kinetic growth.

METHODS

A rat model of rapid (portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection) and slow regeneration (portal vein ligation) was established. Portal vein flow and pressure data were collected. Liver regeneration was assessed in rats using computed tomography, proliferation with Ki-67, and hypoxia with pimonidazole and HIF-1α staining.

RESULTS

The rat model confirmed acceleration of regeneration in portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection as well as the portal vein hyperflow seen in patients. Additionally, tissue hypoxia was observed after portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection, while little hypoxia staining was detected after portal vein ligation. To determine if hypoxia is a consequence or an inciting stimulus of rapid liver regeneration, we used a prolyl-hydroxylase blocker to activate hypoxia signaling pathways in the slow model. This clearly accelerated slow to rapid liver regeneration. Inversely, abrogation of hypoxia led to a blunting of rapid growth to slow growth. The topical application of prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors on livers in rats induced spontaneous areas of regeneration.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that pharmacologically induced hypoxic signaling accelerates liver regeneration similar to portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection. Hypoxia is likely an accelerator of liver regeneration. Also, prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors may be used to enhance liver regeneration pharmaceutically.

Hepatic parenchymal transection increases liver volume but not function after portal vein embolization in rabbits

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy induces more extensive liver hypertrophy than ligation alone; however, the mechanisms underlying the accelerated liver regrowth and the functional quality of the hypertrophic liver are presently elusive. This study, therefore, investigated the effect of parenchymal transection on liver volume and function after portal vein embolization in a standardized rabbit model.

METHODS

Twelve rabbits were subjected to portal vein embolization of the cranial liver lobes and randomized between parenchymal transection of the left lateral liver lobe versus no transection (portal vein embolization only). Liver volume of the nonembolized liver lobe was assessed using computed tomography-volumetry, and liver uptake function was determined by ^99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy before and 3 and 7 days after portal vein embolization.

RESULTS

The increase in nonembolized liver volume 3 days after portal vein embolization was 2.7-fold greater in the transected group compared with the portal vein embolization only group (56 ± 16% vs 21 ± 12%, respectively, P < .01) and 1.7-fold greater 7 days after portal vein embolization (113 ± 34% vs 68 ± 24%, P < .01). Liver uptake function did not differ between groups before portal vein embolization (8.4 ± 3.7%/min in the transection group vs 8.9 ± 1.6%/min) on day 3 (33.2 ± 4.7% after transection vs 30.3 ± 4.6%/min, respectively) and day 7 after portal vein embolization (42.6 ± 8.4% vs 39.1 ± 5.3%/min, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Parenchymal transection after portal vein embolization increases liver growth in terms of volume but not function. These results indicate that the rapid volume increase observed after associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy does not coincide with the clinically more relevant functional increase. Quantitative liver function tests might be essential in associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy to better assess the hypertrophy response and improve clinical decision-making.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: the current role and development

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently been developed to induce rapid liver hypertrophy and reduce post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). ALPPS is still considered to be in an early developmental phase because surgical indications and techniques have not been standardized. This article aimed to review the current role and future developments of ALPPS.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed for articles from January 2007 to October 2016 using the keywords "associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy" and "ALPPS". Additional papers were identified by a manual search of references from key articles.

RESULTS

ALPPS induces more hypertrophy of the FLR in less time than portal vein embolization or portal vein ligation. The benefits of ALPPS include rapid hypertrophy 47%-110% of the liver over a median of 6-16.4 days, and 95%-100% completion rate of the second stage of ALPPS. The main criticisms of ALPPS are centered on its high morbidity and mortality rates. Morbidity rates after ALPPS have been reported to be 15.3%-100%, with ≥ the Clavien-Dindo grade III morbidity of 13.6%-44%. Mortality rates have been reported to be 0%-29%. The important questions to ask even if oncologic long-term results are acceptable are: whether the gain in quality and quantity of life can be off balance by the substantial risks of morbidity and mortality, and whether stimulation of rapid liver hypertrophy also accelerates rapid tumor progression and spread. Up till now, the documentations of the ALPPS procedure come mainly from case series, and most of these series include heterogeneous groups of malignancies. The numbers are also too small to separately evaluate survival for different tumor etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, knowledge on ALPPS is limited, and prospective randomized studies are lacking. From the reported preliminary results, safety of the ALPPS procedure remains questionable. ALPPS should only be used in experienced, high-volume hepatobiliary centers.

Rescue ALPPS is efficient and safe after failed portal vein occlusion in patients with colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can be used as an effective and safe rescue procedure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and insufficient effect on the future liver remnant (FLR) after previous portal vein occlusion (PVO).

METHODS

Eleven patients with bilobar CRLM treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and previous PVO with insufficient effect on the FLR were analyzed retrospectively from a prospective database. FLR was evaluated with computed tomography volumetry 6 days after stage 1, and stage 2 was performed on day seven.

RESULTS

Six days after stage 1, the median increase of the FLR was 209 ml (range 87-314, P < 0.001). This corresponded to a median FLR growth of 61.8 % (range 19.3-120) resulting in an FLR/BW ratio >0.5 % in all patients and successful subsequent removal of the tumor bearing liver (segments IV-VIII) in all patients with no 90-day mortality. No patient had a 3b-complication or more according to Clavien-Dindo. No patient developed severe posthepatectomy liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The powerful hypertrophy of the FLR associated with ALPPS seems to be maintained in patients with CRLM and previous failed PVO.

Impact of split completeness on future liver remnant hypertrophy in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma: Complete-ALPPS versus partial-ALPPS

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggested that associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy with a partial split could effectively induce the same degree of future liver remnant hypertrophy as a complete split in non-cirrhotic and non-cholestatic livers with better postoperative safety profiles. Our aim was to evaluate if the same phenomenon could be applied to hepatitis-related chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

In the study, 25 patients who underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy from October 2013 to January 2016 for hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed. Partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (n = 12) was defined as 50-80% of the transection surface split and complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (n = 13) was split down to inferior vena cava. Perioperative outcomes stratified by split completeness were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operating times and blood loss for stage I and II operations between complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. All patients underwent stage II operation without any inter-stage complications. Complete split induced greater future liver remnant hypertrophy than partial split (hypertrophy rate: 31.2 vs 17.5 mL/day, P = .022) with more pronounced effect in chronic hepatitis (P = .007) than cirrhosis (P = .283). Complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy was more likely to attain a future liver remnant/estimated standard liver volume ratio >35% within 10 days (76.9% vs 33.3%, P = .024) and proceed to stage II within 14 days after stage I (100% vs 58.4%, P = .009). The overall postoperative morbidity (≥grade 3a) after stage II was 16% (complete versus partial split: 7.7% vs 25%, P = .238) and hospital mortality after stage II was 8% (complete versus partial split: 0% vs 16.7%, P = .125).

CONCLUSION

Complete-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy induced more rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy than partial-associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy without increased perioperative risk in chronic liver diseases.

Monitoring outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following hepatic resection

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is one of the fatal gastrointestinal cancers with increasing incidence and mortality. Although surgery offers the only potential for cure in iCCA patients, the prognosis is not optimal with low overall survival rate and high disease recurrence. Hence, adjuvant therapy is generally recommended in the management of high-risk patients. Identifying factors associated with disease recurrence and survival of the iCCA patients after resection will improve understanding of disease prognosis and help in selecting patients who will benefit from surgical resection or stratifying them for clinical trials. Despite development of new methods for early detection of tumor recurrence, effective prognostic models and nomograms, and recent advances in management, significant challenges remain in improving the prognosis of iCCA patients.

Hammer versus Swiss Army knife: Developing a strategy for the management of bilobar colorectal liver metastases

For patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases, the recent increase in surgical approaches has resulted in more opportunities to extend the benefits of surgery to patients who were previously deemed unresectable. Surgical options now include anatomic hepatectomy, 1-stage parenchymal sparing hepatectomy, traditional 2-stage hepatectomy with or without portal vein embolization, associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, local ablative techniques, and hepatic arterial infusion therapy. As the diversity of options has increased, controversy has arisen as to the optimal operative management of patients with complex bilateral disease. Moreover, there has been a tendency for various surgeons and groups to champion a single strategy. In contrast to this trend, this article introduces a novel "tailored approach" that takes advantage of all available tools and individually applies them based on an algorithmic assessment of the extent and distribution of metastatic disease.

Transition from open to laparoscopic ALPPS for patients with very small FLR: the initial experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy) has previously been reported but has been the authors' default option since 2015 in patients with small future liver remnant.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing ALPPS at a single referral center was performed using a prospective database from July 2011 to June 2016. Feasibility was studied by assessing conversions. The 90-day mortality and complications were analyzed using a Dindo-Clavien score and the comprehensive complication index. Operative time, blood loss, volumetric growth, and hospital stay were examined. The CUSUM analysis was performed.

RESULTS

ALPPS was performed in 30 patients, 10 of whom underwent a laparoscopic approach. There was no mortality and no complication grade ≥3A observed in laparoscopic ALPPS. In open ALPPS, 10 of 20 patients experienced complications grade ≥3A (p = 0.006) and one patient died. Liver failure was not observed after laparoscopic ALPPS, but two patients in the open ALPPS group developed complications that precluded the second stage. The total hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic ALPPS group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic ALPPS is feasible as the default procedure for patients with very small FLR, and it is not inferior to the open approach. Surgeons experienced with complex laparoscopy should be encouraged to use a laparoscopic approach to ALPPS.

Surgical resection of localized hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and special consideration

Localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refers to a solitary or few tumors located within either the left or right hemiliver without evidence of bilobar or extrahepatic spread. This term encompasses a heterogeneous morphology with no regard to stage of prognosis of the disease. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment for the localized HCC. Various biochemical and radiological tests constitute an indispensible part of preoperative assessment. Emergence of laparoscopic hepatectomy has brought liver resection into a new era. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of HCC allows more aggressive surgical resection without compromising outcomes. New insights into the management of special situations, such as ruptured HCC, pyogenic transformation of HCC, and HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus, rekindle the hopes of curative resection in these terminal events. Amalgamating salvage liver transplantation into the surgical management of resectable HCC has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of this deadly disease.

Liver resection for cancer: New developments in prediction, prevention and management of postresectional liver failure

Hepatic failure is a feared complication that accounts for up to 75% of mortality after extensive liver resection. Despite improved perioperative care, the increasing complexity and extensiveness of surgical interventions, in combination with an expanding number of resections in patients with compromised liver function, still results in an incidence of postresectional liver failure (PLF) of 1-9%. Preventive measures aim to enhance future remnant liver size and function. Numerous non-invasive techniques to assess liver function and predict remnant liver volume are being developed, along with introduction of novel surgical strategies that augment growth of the future remnant liver. Detection of PLF is often too late and treatment is primarily symptomatic. Current therapeutic research focuses on ([bio]artificial) liver function support and regenerative medicine. In this review we discuss the current state and new developments in prediction, prevention and management of PLF, in light of novel insights into the aetiology of this complex syndrome.

LAY SUMMARY

Liver failure is the main cause of death after partial liver resection for cancer, and is presumably caused by an insufficient quantity and function of the liver remnant. Detection of liver failure is often too late, and current treatment focuses on relieve of symptoms. New research initiatives explore artificial support of liver function and stimulation of regrowth of the remnant liver.

The ALPPS Risk Score: Avoiding Futile Use of ALPPS

OBJECTIVES

To create a prediction model identifying futile outcome in ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy) before stage 1 and stage 2 surgery.

BACKGROUND

ALPPS is a 2-stage hepatectomy, which incorporates parenchymal transection at stage 1 enabling resection of extensive liver tumors. One of the major criticisms of ALPPS is the associated high mortality rate up to 20%.

METHODS

Using the International ALPPS Registry, a risk analysis for futile outcome (defined as 90-day or in-hospital mortality) was performed. Futility was modeled using multivariate regression analysis and a futility risk score formula was computed on the basis of the relative size of logistic model regression coefficients.

RESULTS

Among 528 ALPPS patients from 38 centers, a futile outcome was observed in 47 patients (9%). The pre-stage 1 model included age 67 years or older [odds ratio (OR) = 5.7], and tumor entity (OR = 3.8 for biliary tumors) as independent predictors of futility from multivariate analysis. For the pre-stage 1 model scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were associated with futile risk of 2.7%, 4.9%, 8.6%, 15%, 24%, and 37%. The pre-stage 2 model included major complications (grade ≥ 3b) after stage 1 (OR = 3.4), serum bilirubin (OR = 4.4), serum creatinine (OR = 5.4), and cumulative pre-stage 1 risk score (OR = 1.9). The model predicted futility risk of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 50% for patients with scores of 3.9, 4.7, 5.5, and 6.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both models have an excellent prediction to assess the individual risk of futile outcome after ALPPS surgery and can be used to avoid futile use of ALPPS.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Pushing the Limits

BACKGROUND

The recent advent of more effective chemotherapy and the development of surgical procedures have expanded the pool of resectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH), associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and ultrasound-guided enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) are the surgical solutions proposed for these patients, but the range of indications for these procedures vary from institution to institution.

SUMMARY

The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are herein discussed. Patients who drop out between the staged operations of TSH limit its success rate, although predictive scores may help with patient selection and thereby optimize the results. Safety and oncological suitability are concerns to be addressed when considering ALPPS. These concerns notwithstanding, ALPPS has introduced an innovative concept in surgery: the monosegmental remnant liver. Studies involving e-OSH have proven the oncological suitability of tumor exposure once the CLM is detached from major intrahepatic vessels. This finding could expand the indications for e-OSH, although the technical challenges that it entails limit its spread among the surgical community. The liver-first approach involves the clearance of tumors from the liver before the colorectal primary is tackled. This approach fully justifies the complexity of e-OSH.

KEY MESSAGES

Predictive scores limiting the interstage dropout of TSH, partial and monosegmental ALPPS, and R1 vascular e-OSH justified by solid long-term results represent new insights that could help refne the patient assignment to each of these approaches. Additionally, liver transplantation is an emerging treatment for CLM that should be taken into account.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in colorectal liver metastasis: the radiologist's perspective

PURPOSE

Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Many multidisciplinary approaches, including the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure, have been proposed to increase the resectability rate in these patients. ALPPS is the most recently described staged liver resection technique, representing an advantageous strategy to induce a rapid and marked increase in the future liver remnant (FLR) volume. The aim of this article is to describe the radiological evaluation of this procedure and its variation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 9 patients with CRLM who underwent the ALPPS procedure. Abdominal imaging studies were reviewed, with an emphasis on a rational radiological approach. The number of liver metastases, the FLR volume (pre- and postportal vein ligation), anatomical variations, potential pitfalls related to disease progression, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The types of hepatic resection included 4 classical ALPPS cases, 3 right ALPPS variations, and 2 left ALPPS variations. The mean FLR volume calculated in the initial evaluation was 453 mL (213-790 mL). Following the first surgery, the mean FLR volume increased to 634 mL (410-957 mL), which indicated a mean volume increase of 181.1 mL (95% CI 149.7-212.5 mL; p < 0.001) and a mean absolute volume increase of 48% (19%-88%).

CONCLUSION

The ALPPS procedure is an emerging form of two-stage hepatectomy. In this context, radiologists should provide crucial preoperative and perioperative information that may change surgical planning and contribute to an improvement in the oncologic outcome.

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis in eleven questions and answers

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the most frequent indication for liver resection in many centers. Recent improvements in oncology, surgery, interventional radiology, pathology and anesthesiology allow curative treatment in a larger proportion of patients with CRLM. Areas covered: We illustrate the various aspects of the management of CRLM through 11 questions that summarize the topic, from the current obtained survival to future perspectives such as transplantation. The limits of a curative treatment are also presented from different angles, such as the benefits of pathology, the surgical options for extreme resections, the available chemotherapies and their efficacy, or the non-surgical ablative treatments. Expert commentary: Given the increasing therapeutic possibilities, we strengthen the importance to analyze the situation of each patient with CRLM in a dedicated multidisciplinary team, in order to offer the best individualized treatment combination.

Liver kinetic growth rate predicts postoperative liver failure after ALPPS

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) may occur after ALPPS (Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) despite a sufficient standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) volume. The aim of this study was to test kinetic growth rate (KGR) after ALPPS stage 1, describing the percentage increase of sFLR per day, as a predictor of PHLF after completion of ALPPS.

METHODS

The ability of KGR to predict PHLF after ALPPS stage 2 was investigated in 38 patients. PHLF was defined according to the "50-50" and ISGLS criteria.

RESULTS

Completion of ALPPS was achieved in 95% (36/38) of patients. The incidence of PHLF was 22% (8/36) and 36% (13/36) according to "50-50" and ISGLS criteria, respectively. Whereas a sFLR cut off at 30% alone failed to predict PHLF, KGR ≥6%/day after stage 1 was associated with a significant reduced risk of PHLF ("50-50", p = 0.03/ISGLS, p = 0.03) after stage 2. Adherence to both concomitant KGR ≥6%/day and sFLR ≥30% reduced the incidence of PHLF to 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of KGR is a novel tool to estimate the risk of PHLF after ALPPS. Respecting KGR and sFLR after ALPPS stage 1 may increase safety in patients undergoing ALPPS.

Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, associated with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians at care are frequently confronted with patients who are ineligible for curative treatment such as liver resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. Besides established palliative locoregional therapies, such as ablation or chemoembolization, new treatment options, such as microwave ablation, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization or selective internal radiation therapy, are emerging; however, data from randomized controlled trials are still lacking. In order to achieve optimal tumor control, patients should receive tailored treatment concepts, considering their tumor burden, liver function and performance status, instead of strictly assigning patients to treatment modalities following algorithms that may be partly very restrictive. Palliative locoregional pretreatment might facilitate downstaging to ensure later curative resection or transplantation. In addition, the combined utilization of different locoregional treatment options or systemic co-treatment has been the subject of several trials. In cases where local tumor control cannot be achieved, or in the scenario of extrahepatic spread, sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy option. Alternative targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown encouraging preliminary results, while data from phase III studies are pending.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS): Taking a view of trails

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS) is introduced as a modified two-staged hepatectomy for advanced liver malignancies, which requires extended hepatectomy with very small future remnant liver volume. It is characterized by rapid and large growth of future remnant liver and potential of widening the indication of curative resection with extended major hepatectomy for liver malignancies. It showed, however, much higher morbidity and mortality than extended hepatectomy after portal vein embolization. Here, we review the literatures and examine the role of ALPPS in Japan, where zero mortality after hepatectomy is highly expected.

Mechanistic insights of rapid liver regeneration after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for stage hepatectomy

AIM

To highlight the potential mechanisms of regeneration in the Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy models (clinical and experimental) that could unlock the myth behind the extraordinary capability of the liver for regeneration, which would help in designing new therapeutic options for the regenerative drive in difficult setup, such as chronic liver diseases. Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy has been recently advocated to induce rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy that significantly shortens the time for the second stage hepatectomy. The introduction of Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy in the surgical armamentarium of therapeutic tools for liver surgeons represented a real breakthrough in the history of liver surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy and its utility in liver regeneration is performed.

RESULTS

Liver regeneration after Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy is a combination of portal flow changes and parenchymal transection that generate a systematic response inducing hepatocyte proliferation and remodeling.

CONCLUSION

Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy represents a real breakthrough in the history of liver surgery because it offers rapid liver regeneration potential that facilitate resection of liver tumors that were previously though unresectable. The jury is still out though in terms of safety, efficacy and oncological outcomes. As far as Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy -induced liver regeneration is concerned, further research on the field should focus on the role of non-parenchymal cells in liver regeneration as well as on the effect of Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Stage hepatectomy in liver regeneration in the setup of parenchymal liver disease.

Outcome after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and conventional two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been increasingly adopted by many centres, the oncological outcome for colorectal liver metastases compared with that after two-stage hepatectomy is still unknown.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and June 2014, all consecutive patients who underwent either ALPPS or two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in a single institution were included in the study. Morbidity, mortality, disease recurrence and survival were compared.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of clinicopathological characteristics. ALPPS was completed in all 17 patients, whereas the second-stage hepatectomy could not be completed in 15 of 41 patients. Ninety-day mortality rates for ALPPS and two-stage resection were 0 per cent (0 of 17) versus 5 per cent (2 of 41) (P = 0·891). Major complication rates (Clavien grade at least III) were 41 per cent (7 of 17) and 39 per cent (16 of 41) respectively (P = 0·999). Overall survival was significantly lower after ALPPS than after two-stage hepatectomy: 2-year survival 42 versus 77 per cent respectively (P = 0·006). Recurrent disease was more often seen in the liver in the ALPPS group. Salvage surgery was less often performed after ALPPS (2 of 8 patients) than after two-stage hepatectomy (10 of 17).

CONCLUSION

Although major complication and 90-day mortality rates of ALPPS were similar to those of two-stage hepatectomy, overall survival was significantly lower following ALPPS.

Management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare tumors that have a better prognosis than their exocrine counterpart, but frequently present with advanced disease. Management of pNETs has evolved considerably over the past decade. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative option for patients with pNETs. Patients who have locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic pNETs require additional treatments. These include liver-directed (transarterial (chemo)-embolization, selective intraarterial radio therapy) and systemic therapies (somatostatin analogs, targeted therapy such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy). The aim of this article is to review the current treatment options as well as potential future therapeutic perspectives for patients with pNETs.

The ALPPS procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 centimeters

INTRODUCTION

The only means of achieving long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma is complete tumor resection or liver transplantation. Patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas are currently not considered for liver transplantation. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is indicated in selected patients. We present the case of a patient with a huge hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent an ALPPS procedure.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 57-year-old man initially presented with a tumor measuring 19cm×10cm in the right lobe of the liver. The liver function was normal and there was no evidence of portal hypertension. The first part of the procedure was performed without mobilizing the liver. The middle hepatic vein was divided during parenchymal transection. The second procedure was performed after 15days. During that procedure the right hepatic artery, right bile duct, and the right hepatic vein were ligated and divided. Liver segments 4-8 with the tumor were removed. The patient developed moderate ascites but recovered after ten days. After 90days, the patient is doing well with no signs of recurrence.

DISCUSSION

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a complicated disease and ALPPS is not considered an optimal treatment option. However, patients with large tumors are not considered for liver transplantation or chemotherapy. Patients with Child-Pugh A liver disease without portal hypertension can benefit from surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma; in some situations, surgery may be considerably better than other forms of treatment.

CONCLUSION

ALPPS should be considered in selected patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas.

First totally laparoscopic ALPPS procedure with selective hepatic artery clamping: Case report of a new technique

BACKGROUND

ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy) is a new surgical approach for the treatment of liver tumors. It is indicated in cases where the future liver remnant is not sufficient to maintain postoperative liver function. We report a totally laparoscopic ALPPS with selective hepatic artery clamping. Pneumoperitoneum itself results in up to 53% of portal vein flow and selective hepatic artery clamping can reduce blood loss while maintaining hepatocellular function. Therefore, the combination of both techniques may result in effective control of bleeding with no damage in the liver function that may have direct impact in the result of ALPPS procedure.

METHODS

A 65-year-old man with colorectal liver metastases in all liver segments, except liver segment 1 (S1), were evaluated as unresectable. He underwent chemotherapy with objective response and multidisciplinary board decided for ALPPS procedure. First stage was performed entirely by laparoscopy and consisted of enucleation of metastases from segments 2 and 3, ligation of the right portal vein and liver splitting under selective common hepatic artery clamping. The second stage was done 3 weeks later and consisted of laparoscopic right trisectionectomy by laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Operative time was 250 and 200 minutes, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 150 and 100 mL. There was no need for transfusion or hospitalization in intensive care. He was discharged on the 3rd and 5th postoperative day, respectively. Recovery was uneventful after both stages and patient did not present any sign of liver failure. Elevation of liver enzymes was minimal. Computerized tomography (CT) scan before second stage showed a liver hypertrophy of 53%, sFLR was 0.37 before second stage, or 33% of the total liver volume. CT scan shows no residual liver disease and optimum liver regeneration. Patient is well with no evidence of the disease 11 months after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Totally laparoscopic ALPPS is a feasible and safe approach for selected patients with liver tumors. The hypertrophy of the remaining liver was adequate and sequential procedures were performed without morbidity and no mortality. Selective hepatic artery clamping seems to be an interesting solution to decrease intraoperative blood loss without the harsh effect of Pringle maneuver.

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies and Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases

Background and Aims:

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy may increase the possibility of radical resection in the case of liver malignancy. Concerns have been raised about the high morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure, particularly when applied for diagnoses other than colorectal liver metastases. The aim of this study was to analyze the initial experience with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in cases of non-colorectal liver metastases and primary hepatobiliary malignancies in Scandinavia.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of all associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy procedures performed at two Swedish university hospitals for non-colorectal liver metastases and primary hepatobiliary malignancies was performed. The primary focus was on the safety of the procedure.

Results and Conclusion:

Ten patients were included: four had hepatocellular cancer, three had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, one had a Klatskin tumor, one had ocular melanoma metastasis, and one had a metastasis from a Wilms’ tumor. All patients completed both operations, and the highest grade of complication (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) was 3A, which was observed in one patient. No 90-day mortality was observed. Radical resection (R0) was achieved in nine patients, while the resection was R2 in one patient. The low morbidity and mortality observed in this cohort compared with those of earlier reports on associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for diagnoses other than colorectal liver metastases may be related to the selection of patients with limited comorbidity. In addition, procedures other than associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy had been avoided in most of the patients. In conclusion, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can be applied to primary hepatobiliary malignancies and non-colorectal liver metastases with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.

Laparoscopic Microwave Liver Ablation and Portal Vein Ligation: An Alternative Approach to the Conventional ALPPS Procedure in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a new procedure aimed at promoting the overgrowth of small future liver remnants (FLR). The role of ALPPS in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (h-CCA) is currently considered marginal because liver split in the presence of bile duct obstruction increases postoperative morbidity and mortality (Schadde et al. in Ann Surg 260:829-836,2014; Nadalin et al. in Z Gastroenterol 52:35-42,2014). Virtual liver split (Gall et al. in Ann Surg 261:e45-e46,2015) could improve the outcome of ALPPS in h-CCA.

METHODS

A 64-year-old woman with a type IIIA h-CCA without evidence of vascular involvement had a small FLR (FLR/body weight: 0.47 cm³/kg). After bilateral percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) and bilirubin normalization, the patient was planned for laparoscopic step 1 ALPPS using microwave ablation (MWA). Because of possible challenge in hilar dissection in this tumor type, robotic assistance was preferred to conventional laparoscopy for step 1.

RESULTS

The patient recovered promptly from step 1, with a 68 % increase in the volume of FLR by postoperative day (POD) 10 (FLR/body weight of 0.79 cm³/kg). On POD 15, the patient underwent open right hepatectomy with en bloc resection of the caudate lobe, bile duct bifurcation, and extrahepatic biliary duct (T2N1M0R0). Estimated blood loss was negligible during step 1 and 150 mL during step 2. The patient recovered well. Chemotherapy was started 6 weeks after ALPPS stage 2, and was well tolerated and full course. Twenty months after resection the patient is alive, well, and disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ALPPS (Machado et al. in Ann Surg 256:e13,2012) and MWA on the intended split line (Gringeri and Boetto in Ann Surg 261:e42-e43,2015) have been recently described. The combination of these techniques with PBD allowed successful ALPPS in a patient with h-CCA.

An updated systematic review of the evolution of ALPPS and evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages in accordance with current evidence

The main obstacle to achieving an R0 resection after a major hepatectomy is inability to preserve an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) to avoid postoperative liver failure (PLF). Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel technique for resecting tumors that were previously considered unresectable, and this technique results in a vast increase in the volume of the FLR in a short period of time. However, this technique continues to provoke heated debate because of its high mortality and morbidity.The evolution of ALPPS and its advantages and disadvantages have been systematically reviewed and evaluated in accordance with current evidence. Electronic databases (PubMed and Medline) were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 2007 to January 2016.ALPPS has evolved into various modified forms. Some of these modified techniques have reduced the difficulty of the procedure and enhanced its safety. Current evidence indicates that the advantages of ALPPS are rapid hypertrophy of the FLR, the feasibility of the procedure, and a higher rate of R0 resection in comparison to other techniques. However, ALPPS is associated with worse major complications, more deaths, and early tumor recurrence.Hepatobiliary surgeons should carefully consider whether to perform ALPPS. Some modified forms of ALPPS have reduced the mortality and morbidity of the procedure, but they cannot be recommended over the original procedure currently. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is still the procedure of choice for patients with a tumor-free FLR, and ALPPS could be used as a salvage procedure when PVE fails. More persuasive evidence needs to be assembled to determine whether ALPPS or two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is better for patients with a tumor involving the FLR. Evidence with regard to long-term oncological outcomes is still limited. More meticulous comparative studies and studies of the 5-year survival rate of ALPPS could ultimately help to determine the usefulness of ALPPS. Indications and patient selection for the procedure need to be determined.

Modified Anterior Approach for the ALPPS Procedure: How We Do It

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a highly complex operation that demands a thorough understanding of the intrahepatic vascular anatomy and skills in parenchymal transection for the in situ split procedure. In order to minimize adhesion formation after the stage I operation and to avoid iatrogenic tumor rupture during right liver mobilization in large tumors, anterior approach appears to be a logical approach for the in situ split procedure. However, in contrast to the anterior approach adopted for the usual right hepatectomy, the right hepatic artery and biliary pedicle remain intact and undivided during the first operation. To address this issue, we hereby reported our experience of the modified 'anterior approach' for the ALPPS procedure that facilitates a complete in situ parenchymal split.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 13 patients who underwent the ALPPS procedure by the modified anterior approach for hepatocellular carcinoma from October 2013 to October 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The baseline future liver remnant volume (FLR) was 286 ml. The median tumor size was 6.0 cm. After a median of 8 days from stage I operation, the left FLR hypertrophied by 52.7 % in volume to 482 ml. All patients proceeded to second stage hepatectomy (extended right hepatectomy, n = 5; right hepatectomy, n = 6; right trisectionectomy, n = 2) without significant adhesion encountered. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 7.7 % (n = 1) and 7.7 % (n = 1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The modified anterior approach is safe and feasible for complete in situ split in the ALPPS procedure.