Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels

Debate: "How low should LDL cholesterol be lowered for optimum prevention of vascular disease?" Viewpoint: "Below 100 mg/dl"

Arteriosclerotic vascular disease manifests as heart disease, stroke, aortic aneurysms, and peripheral vascular disease, and is a growing problem world-wide. The preventive efforts made so far have demonstrated that lowering LDL-C is one action that individuals and populations can do with significant success in delaying the onset of clinical events. Epidemiological studies and small clinical trials suggest that more aggressive and sustained lowering to LDL-C below 100 mg/dl could result in 50 to 70% reductions in vascular death. The full benefit of reducing LDL-C is only now being tested in adequate clinical trials.

Statins, hormones, and women: benefits and drawbacks for atherosclerosis and osteoporosis

Clinical trials have shown that 3-hydoxy-3- methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, known as statins, significantly reduce the risk of both primary and secondary coronary heart disease events. Although these trials have included few women, the evidence suggests that statins are as effective in women as in men. The addition of hormone replacement therapy to statin therapy augments lowering of low- density lipoprotein cholesterol, but may not increase the favorable effects on clinical events achieved with statins alone. Finally, new data suggest that statins may also reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures, a provocative finding still in need of verification by clinical trials.

A review of clinical trials in dietary interventions to decrease the incidence of coronary artery disease

Of the associations between dietary elements and coronary artery disease (CAD), the greatest body of evidence deals with the beneficial effect of reducing the dietary intake of saturated fatty acids and cholesterol. Furthermore, it is well established, on the basis of convincing evidence, that reduction in serum total cholesterol results in reduction in coronary morbidity and mortality, as well as in regression of other atherosclerotic manifestations.In fact, dietary intervention studies revealed that it is possible to reduce the incidence of coronary death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, as well as manifestations of atherosclerosis in cerebral and peripheral arteries, by reducing dietary intake of saturated fat and cholesterol. In two recently reported dietary interventions the incidence of coronary events, especially coronary mortality, and total mortality were reduced by increased intake of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and by a modification of the diet toward a Mediterranean-type diet (rich in alpha-linolenic acid. In addition to those findings, the potential efficacy of the dietary newcomers phytostanol and phytosterol esters on reducing coronary incidence is discussed in the present review.

How cost-effective is the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes but without cardiovascular disease?

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiological studies have shown that the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetic patients without cardiovascular disease (CVD) is comparable to the risk of MI in patients with CVD. We used a validated Markov model to compare the long-term costs and benefits of treating dyslipidemia in diabetic patients without CVD versus treating CVD patients without diabetes in the U.S. The generalizability and robustness of these results were also compared across six other countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the U.K.).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

With use of the Cardiovascular Disease Life Expectancy Model, cost effectiveness simulations of simvastatin treatment were performed for men and women who were 40-70 years of age and had dyslipidemia. We forecast the long-term risk reduction in CVD events after treatment. On the basis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study results, we assumed a 35% reduction in LDL cholesterol and an 8% rise in HDL cholesterol.

RESULTS

In the U.S., treatment with simvastatin for CVD patients without diabetes was cost-effective, with estimates ranging from $8,799 to $21,628 per year of life saved (YOLS). Among diabetic individuals without CVD, lipid therapy also appeared to be cost-effective, with estimates ranging from $5,063 to $23,792 per YOLS. In the other countries studied, the cost effectiveness of treating diabetes in the absence of CVD was comparable to the cost effectiveness of treating CVD in the absence of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among diabetic men and women who do not have CVD, lipid therapy is likely to be as effective and cost-effective as treating nondiabetic individuals with CVD.

SSM Health Care clinical collaboratives: improving the value of patient care in a health care system

BACKGROUND

In 1998 SSM Health Care (St Louis) began a series of clinical collaboratives modeled after The Institute of Healthcare Improvement (Boston) Breakthrough Series. There are now four collaboratives, with 46 teams in progress, and four additional collaboratives are scheduled.

COLLABORATIVE TOPICS AND STRUCTURE

Each collaborative consists of three phases: the prework, active, and the continuous improvement phases. The structure of the collaboratives is quite similar to that of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series. However, the SSMHC collaboratives include a continuous improvement phase, which was designed to help maintain gains from the projects and to involve entities not originally involved in the collaborative. RESULTS OF COLLABORATIVES IN PROGRESS: Entity teams participating in multiple collaboratives seem to ascend a learning curve and become progressively more skilled in subsequent collaborative work. In Collaborative 1--Improving the Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease--the participating entities showed significant improvement in cholesterol screening and treatment. In Collaborative 2--Improving Prescribing Practices--the collaborative teams also showed significant improvement, with a combined cost savings of approximately $450,000 per year. Collaboratives 3--Using Patient Information to Improve Care and Assure Success-and-4--Enhancing Patient Safety Through Safe Systems--are under way.

SUMMARY

The collaboratives accelerate improvement work through sharing of successes and failures and peer influence within a reinforcing environment. Most of the collaborative teams have reached their project goals, and the pace of clinical improvement work has accelerated since the start of the collaboratives. The collaboratives provide an environment for clinicians to constructively participate in improvement of patient care.

Systematic, immediate in-hospital initiation of lipid-lowering drugs during acute coronary events improves lipid control

Background: Patients who have had a coronary heart attack often go completely untreated for hypercholesterolemia. We investigated whether immediate initiation of lipid-lowering drugs during hospitalization for acute coronary events increases the proportion of correctly treated patients compared to referred treatment as recommended by current guidelines. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study randomized 57 hypercholesterolemic patients hospitalized for acute coronary events to immediate in-hospital initiation or to referred initiation of lipid-lowering drugs by primary care physicians 3 months after unsuccessful nutritional intervention. Results: After 6 months, 53 patients were available for follow-up. More patients in the immediate initiation group (26/30 patients, 87%) were treated with lipid-lowering drugs than in the referred initiation-group (13/23 patients, 57%, P=0.03). Twenty-seven patients (87%) in the immediate initiation group versus 17 patients (65%) in the referred initiation group had a 10% or greater decrease in total cholesterol or a 15% or greater decrease in LDL-cholesterol (P=0.18). Although statistically not significant, there was a trend to improved lipid values in the immediate initiation group compared to the referred initiation group (TC, -21.1 vs. -13.8% (P=0.08); LDL-C, -28.2 vs. -18.9% (P=0.13); HDL-C, +10.8 vs. +5% (P=0.44); TC/HDL-C ratio, -24.7 vs. -15.1% (P=0.22)), and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was -34.1 vs. -19.1% (P=0.04, P=NS after Bonferroni correction). Conclusion: The immediate initiation of lipid-lowering drugs in hypercholesterolemic patients hospitalized for acute coronary events increases the rate of correctly treated patients and has the potential to improve lipid control.

Pravastatin down-regulates inflammatory mediators in human monocytes in vitro

There is experimental evidence that pravastatin, which is designed to inhibit the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, can affect cell metabolism and proliferation. We therefore studied the effects of pravastatin on the generation of inflammatory mediators in non-stimulated and stimulated primary human monocytes in vitro. In our experimental model, pravastatin induced a dose-dependent inhibition of monocyte cholesterol synthesis (up to 67%), up-regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA (by about 35%) and reduction in intracellular cholesterol accumulation. In parallel, exposure of non-stimulated monocytes to various doses of pravastatin resulted in inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 protein expression (up to 15-fold), reduction of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels (up to 2.4-fold) and a total loss of metalloproteinase-9 activity in stimulated cells. Pravastatin at concentrations of 5, 100 and 500 microM caused an inhibition of TNF-alpha-induced cellular oxygen consumption from 2. 4- to 5.5-fold. These data extend the findings of potential anti-inflammatory actions of statins and also suggest the possibility for pravastatin use in a broader spectrum of inflammatory situations.

Beneficial effects of pravastatin (+/-colestyramine/niacin) initiated immediately after a coronary event (the randomized Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease [L-CAD] Study)

Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease by antilipidemic therapy beginning at > or =3 months after an acute coronary syndrome is well documented. The impact, however, of immediate initiation of antilipidemic therapy on coronary stenoses and clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome is unknown. In our study, patients were randomized, on average, 6 days after an acute myocardial infarction and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty secondary to unstable angina, to pravastatin (combined, when necessary, with cholestyramine and/or nicotinic acid) to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of < or =130 mg/dl (group A, n = 70). In controls (group B, n = 56), antilipidemic therapy was determined by family physicians. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed at inclusion, and at 6- and 24-month follow-up. The combined clinical end points were total mortality, cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, need for coronary intervention, stroke, and new onset of peripheral vascular disease. Minimal lumen diameter in group A increased by 0.05 +/- 0.20 mm after 6 months and 0.13 +/- 0.29 mm after 24 months, whereas it decreased by 0.08 +/- 0.20 mm and 0.18 +/- 0.27 mm, respectively, in group B (p = 0.004 at 6 months and p <0.001 at 24 months). After 2 years, 29 patients of 56 patients in group B, but only 16 of 70 patients in group A, experienced a clinical end point (p = 0.005; odds ratio 0.28, confidence intervals 0.13 to 0.6). We conclude that pravastatin-based therapy initiated immediately after an acute coronary syndrome is well tolerated and safe, lessens coronary atherosclerosis, and has a pronounced clinical benefit.

Effects of pravastatin in 3260 patients with unstable angina: results from the LIPID study

BACKGROUND

The LIPID study is a major trial of secondary prevention of coronary-heart-disease events that includes hospital admission with unstable angina (as well as myocardial infarction) as a qualifying event. In this substudy of LIPID, we compared subsequent cardiovascular risks and the effects of pravastatin in patients with previous unstable angina or previous myocardial infarction.

METHODS

3260 patients diagnosed with unstable angina and 5754 with acute myocardial infarction 3-36 months previously were randomly assigned 40 mg pravastatin daily or placebo over a mean of 6.0 years. The risk reduction of a range of cardiovascular events was estimated by means of the hazard ratio in Cox's proportional hazards model.

FINDINGS

Among patients assigned placebo, survival in the two diagnosis groups was similar. The relative risk reduction for mortality with pravastatin was 20.6% in the myocardial infarction group and 26.3% in the unstable angina group (p=0.55). Pravastatin significantly reduced the rates of all prespecified coronary endpoints in the myocardial infarction group. In patients with previous unstable angina, coronary heart disease mortality, total mortality, myocardial infarction, a need for coronary revascularisation, the number of admissions to hospital, and the number of days in hospital were significantly lower with pravastatin. Overall, hospital admission for unstable angina was the most common endpoint (24.6% of the placebo group; 22.3% of the pravastatin group).

INTERPRETATION

Patients who have survived acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina have a similar long-term prognosis, a high occurrence of subsequent unstable angina, and benefit similarly from therapy with pravastatin.

HDL-cholesterol as a marker of coronary heart disease risk: the Québec cardiovascular study

BACKGROUND

Primary as well as secondary prevention trials have shown the relevance of lowering LDL-cholesterol to reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. However, although the association between LDL-cholesterol and CHD is well recognized, there is a considerable overlap in the distribution of plasma LDL-cholesterol levels between CHD patients and healthy subjects. The objective of the present review article is to use data from the Quebec cardiovascular study to demonstrate that in men, a low HDL-cholesterol may be even more of a risk factor and a target for therapy than a high LDL-cholesterol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Results of the Quebec cardiovascular study, a prospective study of 2103 middle-aged men followed for a period of 5 years, have confirmed results of previous studies in showing that plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration was an independent predictor of a first ischemic heart disease (IHD) event which included typical effort angina, coronary insufficiency, nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary death. In addition, a reduced plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration was found to have a greater impact than raised LDL-cholesterol on the atherogenic index (total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio), this ratio being the best variable of the traditional lipid profile for the prediction of IHD events in the Quebec cardiovascular study. However, a low HDL-cholesterol concentration is not often observed as an isolated disorder but also includes hypertriglyceridemia, elevated apo B concentration, and an increased proportion of small, dense LDL particles. These abnormalities are features of an insulin resistant-hyperinsulinemic state resulting from abdominal obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

It is therefore recommended that we need to go beyond LDL-cholesterol measurement lowering therapy for the optimal management of CHD risk. Raising plasma HDL-cholesterol through weight loss and a healthy diet, by an increased physical activity and, if required, by proper pharmacotherapy is therefore a legitimate therapeutic target for the optimal prevention of CHD in a large proportion of high risk patients.

Therapeutic modulation of low-density lipoprotein size

Small, dense LDL particles have been linked to atherosclerosis, often in a cluster of risk factors and affecting approximately 20% of adults. Over the past year, studies confirmed that small dense LDL is an autosomal dominant trait, influenced mainly by hypertriglyceridaemia and obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus and some incompletely investigated genetic loci. Compositional and functional differences have been observed in small LDL. Evidence is emerging that lifestyle as well as pharmacological intervention can modulate LDL size, but there is no proof yet that this is of clinical benefit.

Beneficial effects of statins in coronary artery disease--beyond lowering cholesterol

OBJECTIVE

To review the benefits of statins in coronary artery disease management beyond their cholesterol-lowering effects.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-May 2000) was conducted using the following terms: lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, cerivastatin, endothelium, plaque stabilization, antithrombotic effects.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language human studies and case reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies published demonstrating other mechanisms of statins' clinical beneficial effects were evaluated and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The understanding of the pharmacologic effects of statins has led to the realization that the benefits of these agents extend beyond simply lowering cholesterol. These properties include beneficial effects on vessel endothelial tissue; decreased low-density lipoprotein oxidation and inflammation; ability to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques and perhaps promote regression; proliferative effects on smooth-muscle growths, possibly strengthening atherosclerotic plaques; antithrombotic effects by inhibiting platelet aggregation and stimulation of fibrinolytic factors; and improvement of blood viscosity and flow. With these actions, statins may benefit the situation of long-term atherosclerotic plaque formation and the setting of acute coronary syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Further large-scale studies are needed to determine the clinical importance and validity of these postulated beneficial effects of statins.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: lessons from the Malmö Preventive Project

Major public health problems such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes pose a challenge to both the medical profession and the health care system of most Western countries. In spite of widespread knowledge about risk factors and pathophysiological processes, it has been difficult to find effective preventive mass strategies based on evidence from controlled clinical trials. In the Malmö Preventive Project, Sweden, 33 346 subjects were screened for risk factors between 1974 and 1992, and a quarter of them were offered preventive help for cardiovascular disease risk or alcohol abuse. The overall finding of the project was that benefits of screening and prevention on mortality risk could only be shown in certain subgroups of younger men and women, not in the total screened cohort, as compared with a nonscreened reference population. These findings therefore question the effectiveness of preventive methods and drugs used during previous decades. New preventive methods are therefore needed and should be properly evaluated to form a basis for evidence-based prevention (EBP) in cardiovascular medicine.

High-density lipoprotein: gene-based approaches to the prevention of atherosclerosis

Although the atheroprotective role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) has been well documented in epidemiological and animal studies, highly effective therapeutic approaches for the selective increase of plasma HDL levels or function are not yet available. Several mechanisms by which HDL exerts an atheroprotective effect have been proposed on the basis of experiments in vitro and in vivo. These mechanisms include directing excess cellular cholesterol from the peripheral tissues to the liver in 'reverse cholesterol transport', inhibiting oxidative modification or aggregation of LDL, and modulating inflammatory responses to favour vasoprotection. This review gives an overview of the genes regulating these mechanisms, such as those encoding apolipoprotein AI, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), scavenger receptor B1 (SR-BI), and the ATP-binding cassette transporter 1 (ABC1), and the potential to exploit them to develop gene-based therapeutic approaches to increase the level or function of HDL.

How well are patients with atherosclerotic disease treated? Secondary prevention in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To examine changing trends in the field of secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease in Norwegian general practice.

DESIGN

A multipractice survey of consecutive patients with atherosclerotic disease consulting general practitioners in 1994/95 compared with a similar survey in 1996/97.

SETTING

Primary health care.

SUBJECTS

707 patients attending 31 general practitioners in 1994/95 and 1353 patients attending 63 general practitioners in 1996/97.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The patients were examined and interviewed for risk factors and pharmacological treatment.

RESULTS

In 1994/95, 18% of the patients had been prescribed a lipid-lowering agent as opposed to 55% in the later survey. Consequently, the average level of LDL cholesterol in the 1996/97 population was 19% lower than in the 1994/95 population (3.8 mmol/l vs 4.7 mmol/l), which may imply a marked risk reduction. Aspirin and beta-blockers were prescribed to approximately 50% of the patients in both surveys. Diabetic patients had the same drug prescription rate and lipid profile as non-diabetics. In both surveys, about 25% of the patients were smokers.

CONCLUSION

Secondary prevention in the majority of patients with atherosclerotic disease though ameliorating is still unsatisfactory. More attention is needed to achieve and sustain treatment goals.

Effect of lovastatin on cardiovascular resource utilization and costs in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS). AFCAPS/TexCAPS Research Group

This cost-consequences analysis of the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study compares the costs of lovastatin treatment with the costs of cardiovascular hospitalizations and procedures. The cost of lovastatin treatment was defined as the average retail price and the cost of drug safety monitoring and adverse experiences. Costs were determined by actual rates of hospitalizations and procedures. Within a trial, lovastatin treatment cost approximately $4,654/patient. Lovastatin treatment significantly reduced the cumulative rate of cardiovascular hospitalizations and procedures (p = 0.002). Over the duration of the study, the cumulative number of cardiovascular hospitalizations and related therapeutic procedures was significantly reduced by 29%. The time to first cardiovascular-related hospitalization or procedure was significantly extended by lovastatin (p = 0.002). Lovastatin reduced the frequency of cardiovascular hospitalization (28%), and cardiovascular therapeutic (32%) and diagnostic procedures (23%). Among therapeutic procedures, treatment reduced coronary artery bypass graft surgery by 19% and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by 37%. Total cardiovascular-related hospital days were reduced by 26% (p = 0.025). The between-group offset in direct medical costs was $524, which resulted in a 11% cost offset of lovastatin therapy over the mean study duration of 5.2 years. Lovastatin provides meaningful reductions in cardiovascular-related resource utilization and reductions in direct cardiovascular-related costs associated with the onset of coronary disease.

Potential for cholesterol lowering in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in europe: findings from EUROASPIRE study. European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events

We have examined the potential for cholesterol lowering in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease based on data from the European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) study carried out in 1995-1996 in nine European centres (Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Slovenia and Spain). Consecutive patients aged < or = 70 years in four diagnostic categories--coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, acute myocardial infarction, and acute myocardial ischaemia without infarction--were identified from hospital records and invited for an interview and risk factor assessment at least 6 months after hospital admission. Plasma lipid measurements were carried out in a central laboratory. Combining patients from all centres and diagnostic categories (n = 2749) the medians (interquartile ranges) for plasma lipids were: total cholesterol 5.36 (4.76-6.03) mmol/l, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol 1.19 (1.01-1.42) mmol/l, triglycerides 1.55 (1.15-2.24) mmol/l, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 3.32 (2.76-3.91) mmol/l. Only 33% of the patients received lipid-lowering drugs. If the therapeutic goal given in the 1998 European recommendations, total cholesterol < 5.0 mmol/l, were applied, 67% of these patients would have needed an intensified cholesterol-lowering action, and with an even stricter goal, total cholesterol < 4.5 mmol/l, this proportion would have been as high as 84%.

Exercise performance-based outcomes of medically treated patients with coronary artery disease and profound ST segment depression

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the relationship between exercise duration and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with profound (> or =2 mm) ST segment depression during exercise treadmill testing (ETT).

BACKGROUND

Patients with stable symptoms but profound ST segment depression during ETT are often referred for a coronary intervention on the basis that presumed severe coronary artery disease (CAD) will lead to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes, irrespective of symptomatic and functional status. We hypothesized that good exercise tolerance in such patients treated medically is associated with favorable long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 203 consecutive patients (181 men; mean age 73 years) with known stable CAD and > or =2 mm ST segment depression who are performing ETT according to the Bruce protocol for an average of 41 months. The primary end point was occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) or death.

RESULTS

Eight (20%) of 40 patients with an initial ETT exercise duration < or =6 min developed MI or died, as compared with five (6%) of 84 patients who exercised between 6 and 9 min and three (3.8%) of 79 patients who exercised > or =9 min (p = 0.01). Compared with patients who exercised < or =6 min, increased ETT duration was significantly associated with a reduced risk of MI/death (6 to 9 min: relative risk [RR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.76; >9 min: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53). This protective effect persisted after adjustment for potentially confounding variables. We observed a 23% reduction in MI/death for each additional minute of exercise the patient was able to complete during the index ETT.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal medical management in stable patients with CAD with profound exercise-induced ST segment depression but good ETT duration is an appropriate alternative to coronary revascularization and is associated with low rates of MI and death.

Improvement in endothelium-dependent brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl

To determine whether the current National Cholesterol Education Program cholesterol recommendations are consistent with beneficial endothelium-dependent vasodilation, we prospectively assessed endothelium-dependent brachial artery vasoreactivity in 50 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Our results showed that endothelial-dependent vasoreactivity was greater when low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was <100 mg/dl, suggesting that it may be beneficial to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II target of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of <100 mg/dl.

Raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as adjunctive therapy to coronary artery revascularization

Several studies shortly after the advent of coronary artery bypass surgery reported early atherosclerosis in saphenous vein grafts, and an association between dyslipidemia and graft occlusion. Lipid-lowering therapy in a number of trials resulted in reduced progression of atherosclerosis in vein grafts and fewer subsequent revascularization procedures. Presently, however, only a few patients are treated and reach target lipid levels. Percutaneous coronary interventions permit rapid relief of symptoms and ischemia, and return to full activity levels, but may not reduce the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease. Whether optimal medical therapy, including aggressive lipid control, could decrease the need for some of these procedures is the subject of ongoing debate and research. Despite successful coronary artery revascularization, subsequent ischemic events continue to occur, supporting the requirement for successful secondary prevention interventions. Ultimately, optimal care of revascularization patients should include maximizing lipid profiles.

The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effect of pravastatin and factors associated with achieving targeted low-density lipoprotein levels in an African-American population

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To describe the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)-lowering effect of pravastatin in African-American patients and to identify factors associated with achieving National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)-defined target levels.

DESIGN

Retrospectively defined cohort study.

SETTING

Large, government-owned, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighty-four African-American patients starting therapy with pravastatin in October-November 1997.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Whether or not target LDL concentrations were achieved was used to measure efficacy. Stepwise logistic regression identified the target LDL, baseline LDL, and baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) as significant predictors of achieving the target. The proportion of patients achieving their target LDL when that target was below 160, below 130, and 100 mg/dl or below was 64%, 32%, and 13% (p=0.004), respectively. Medical record review identified the reasons for not achieving target as incorrect drug regimen, inadequate lipid monitoring, and noncompliance.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that substantial numbers of patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy are not meeting NCEP-defined targets and that with increased drug monitoring and compliance, improvements in achieving NCEP target LDL levels could be realized.

The heart as a target for oestrogens

Observational studies have consistently shown a markedly decreased risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women when treated with oestrogens. This review discusses plausible mechanisms for the physiological effects of oestrogens in healthy and diseased hearts. Oestrogens have well-documented effects on blood lipids and the regulators of the cardiovascular system, which should reduce risk. In addition, the heart is a primary target for oestrogens with functional oestrogen receptors in the coronary vasculature and on cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Rapid oestrogen effects include vasodilatation and anti-arrhythmic effects by actions on ion channels, and some of these effects may be pharmacological rather than physiological. Longer term responses to physiological levels of oestrogen include an increased expression of nitric oxide synthase in myocytes and endothelial cells as well as proinflammatory and pro-arrhythmic effects. Oestrogens induce growth of non-proliferating fibroblasts but inhibit the replication of proliferating fibroblasts. In contrast to the observational studies, two randomised, controlled studies of oestrogen and progestins in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease have now shown increased coronary events, especially in the first year of study, and no change in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Further studies of the complex effects of oestrogens on healthy and diseased animal models are essential. Large clinical trials of the newer selective oestrogen receptor modulators to lower cardiovascular risk in both males and females should be considered as a priority.

Status report of lipid-lowering trials in diabetes

The prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease is a major challenge in the overall management of the patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic dyslipidaemia is an important risk factor and is open to therapeutic intervention. However, as yet there are no primary or secondary coronary heart disease prevention trials of lipid-lowering therapy reported in diabetic populations. In this review, on-going clinical trials of lipid-lowering therapy in specific diabetic populations will be described.

Inhibition of protein isoprenylation impairs rho-regulated early cellular response to genotoxic stress

Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) are early cellular responses to genotoxic stress involved in the regulation of gene expression. Pretreatment of cells with the hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin blocked stimulation of JNK1 activity by UV irradiation and by treatment with the alkylating compound methyl methanesulfonate but did not affect activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 by UV light. Lovastatin also attenuated UV-induced degradation of the NF-kappaB inhibitor IkappaBalpha. The effects of lovastatin on UV-triggered stimulation of JNK1 as well as on IkappaBalpha degradation were reverted by cotreatment with geranylgeranylpyrophosphate but not with farnesylpyrophosphate. Both a geranylgeranyltransferase type I inhibitor and a farnesyltransferase inhibitor blocked JNK1 stimulation by UV irradiation without impairing signaling to NF-kappaB. This indicates that different types of isoprenylated proteins impair UV-induced signaling to JNK1 and NF-kappaB, respectively. Since lovastatin caused a rapid decrease in the level of membrane-bound Rho GTPases, we hypothesize that Rho signaling is inhibited by lovastatin. In line with this hypothesis, Rho-inactivating toxin B from Clostridium difficile abolished both JNK1 activation and IkappaBalpha degradation evoked by UV irradiation. In summary, lovastatin-mediated inhibition of protein isoprenylation abrogates cellular stress responses involving JNK- and NF-kappaB-regulated pathways, which seems to be caused by inactivation of Rho GTPases.

Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of the use of lipid lowering agents and its relation to blood lipid concentrations in English adults.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey.

SETTING

England, 1998.

PARTICIPANTS

Nationally representative sample of 13 586 adults (aged >/=16 years) living in non-institutional households.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean blood concentrations of total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, in participants classified by age and sex; prevalence of raised total cholesterol concentrations and increased ratio of total to HDL cholesterol; prevalence of use of lipid lowering agents and the lipid concentrations of people taking them.

RESULTS

Mean total cholesterol concentrations were 5.47 (SE 0. 02) mmol/l in men and 5.59 (0.02) mmol/l in women. Mean HDL cholesterol concentrations were 1.28 (0.01) mmol/l in men and 1.55 (0.01) mmol/l in women. Overall, of 10 569 adults who had a valid cholesterol measurement taken 7133 (67.5%; 95% confidence interval 66.5% to 68.4%) had a total cholesterol concentration >/=5 mmol/l, 2804 (26.5%; 25.7% to 27.4%) had a ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol >/=5 mmol/l, and 237 (2.2%; 1.9% to 2.5%) reported taking lipid lowering drugs. Of 117 participants with no history of cardiovascular disease but whose estimated 10 year risk of coronary heart disease was >/=30% and whose total cholesterol concentration was >/=5 mmol/l, four (3%) were taking lipid lowering drugs. Of 385 adults aged 16-75 with a history of coronary heart disease and eligible for lipid lowering treatment, 114 (30%; 25% to 34%) were taking lipid lowering drugs, of whom only 50 (44%; 35% to 53%) had a total cholesterol concentration <5 mmol/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high prevalence of dyslipidaemia in English adults, the proportion of adults taking lipid lowering drugs in 1998 was only 2.2%. Rates of treatment were low among high risk patients eligible for primary prevention with lipid lowering drugs, and less than one third of patients with established cardiovascular disease received such treatment.

Statin therapy, lipid levels, C-reactive protein and the survival of patients with angiographically severe coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The joint predictive value of lipid and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as well as a possible interaction between statin therapy and CRP, were evaluated for survival after angiographic diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemia increases risk of CAD and myocardial infarction. For first myocardial infarction, the combination of lipid and CRP levels may be prognostically more powerful. Although lipid levels are often measured at angiography to guide therapy, their prognostic value is unclear.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from a prospective cohort of 985 patients diagnosed angiographically with severe CAD (stenosis > or =70%) and tested for total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and CRP levels. Key risk factors, including initiation of statin therapy, were recorded, and subjects were followed for an average of 3.0 years (range: 1.8 to 4.3 years) to assess survival.

RESULTS

Mortality was confirmed for 109 subjects (11%). In multiple variable Cox regression, levels of TC, LDL, HDL and the TC:HDL ratio did not predict survival, but statin therapy was protective (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, p = 0.04). C-reactive protein levels, age, left ventricular ejection fraction and diabetes were also independently predictive. Statins primarily benefited subjects with elevated CRP by eliminating the increased mortality across increasing CRP tertiles (statins: HR = 0.97 per tertile, p-trend = 0.94; no statins: HR = 1.8 per tertile, p-trend < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid levels drawn at angiography were not predictive of survival in this population, but initiation of statin therapy was associated with improved survival regardless of the lipid levels. The benefit of statin therapy occurred primarily in patients with elevated CRP.

Development of tachyphylaxis among patients taking HMG CoA reductase inhibitors

The purpose of this study was to determine if long-term use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin) resulted in tachyphylaxis (a decreasing response to a physiologically active agent). To determine this, the charts of 254 patients treated with statins from the years 1996 to 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. During treatment, the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of patients were followed for a minimum of 300 days. To characterize LDL cholesterol changes during statin therapy, linear and nonlinear kinetic models were generated. Tachyphylaxis, defined as a positive slope of LDL cholesterol over time, after maximum LDL cholesterol reduction, was identified in patients treated with atorvastatin at exposure doses of 10 or 20 mg/day. All other statins, at all doses reviewed, showed no [corrected] evidence of tachyphylaxis. LDL cholesterol tachyphylaxis appeared to be a unique response to prolonged use of long half-life atorvastatin therapy at exposure dosages.

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk: lessons from intervention trials

Although the diagnosis of type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is made when blood glucose levels exceed values which increase the risk of microvascular complications, macrovascular disease is the major complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Both epidemiological and prospective data have demonstrated that treatment of hyperglycaemia is markedly effective in reducing the risk of microvascular disease but is less potent in reducing that of myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. Treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors, although by definition less prevalent than hyperglycaemia, appears to be more effective in preventing macrovascular disease than treatment of hyperglycaemia. In recent years, data from intervention trials have suggested that greater benefits with respect to the prevention of macrovascular disease can be achieved by effective treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia, and by the use of small doses of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) than by treating hyperglycaemia alone. On the other hand, the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), which examined the impact of intensive glucose and blood pressure (BP) control on micro- and macrovascular complications, is the only intervention trial to include only patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UKPDS data, the epidemic increase in the number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and their high cardiovascular risk have, however, initiated several new trials addressing, in particular, the possible benefits of treatment of the most common form of dyslipidaemia (high serum triglyceride and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels) in these patients. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is thus a disease associated with a high vascular risk, where the majority of patients need, and are likely to benefit from, pharmacological treatment of several cardiovascular risk factors provided treatment targets have not been achieved by life-style modification.

Vascular disease prevention in patients with diabetes

Prevention is the key to reducing the vascular sequelae of diabetes. Prevention starts with good glycaemic control and continues with a comprehensive programme of risk modification, such as lipid-lowering therapy, antihypertensive treatment, and improved lifestyle. With regard to lipid modification, agents such as statins may provide additional, non-lipid effects in both the diabetic and non-diabetic patient. This review discusses recent studies supporting risk reduction, available treatments, and recommendations applicable to the diabetic patient.

Colesevelam hydrochloride: a non-absorbed, polymeric cholesterol-lowering agent

Colesevelam hydrochloride (formerly known as Cholestagel((R)) and re-named WelCholtrade mark, GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sankyo Parke-Davis) is a new, polymeric, high potency, water-absorbing hydrogel. It has been shown to be a safe and effective cholesterol-lowering agent with a non-systemic mechanism of action, good tolerability and minimal side effects. To date, the lipid-lowering activity of colesevelam has been evaluated in approximately 1400 subjects. Colesevelam reduces low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels, in a dose-dependent manner, by as much as 20% (median) in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Dosing regimen evaluations indicate that colesevelam is effective at both once per day and twice daily dosing and that concurrent administration of colesevelam with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), specifically lovastatin, does not alter the absorption of the statin. Combination therapy with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, including lovastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin, produces an additional reduction (8 - 16%) in LDL-cholesterol levels above that seen with the statin alone. The overall incidence of adverse effects with colesevelam alone and in combination with statins is comparable with that seen with placebo. Colesevelam lacks the constipating effect seen with typical bile acid sequestrants, a trait that would be expected to improve compliance with lipid-lowering therapy. Colesevelam, recently approved by the US FDA, represents a valuable non-absorbed alternative in the armamentarium against hypercholesterolaemia, both for monotherapy and combination therapy, as an adjunct to diet and exercise.

The effects of lifibrol (K12.148) on the cholesterol metabolism of cultured cells: evidence for sterol independent stimulation of the LDL receptor pathway

Lifibrol (4-(4'-tert. butylphenyl)-1-(4'-carboxyphenoxy)-2-butanol) is a new hypocholesterolemic compound; it effectively lowers low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. We studied the effects of lifibrol on the cholesterol metabolism of cultured cells. In the hepatoma cell line HepG2, Lifibrol decreased the formation of sterols from [14C]-acetic acid by approximately 25%. Similar to lovastatin, lifibrol had no effect on the synthesis of sterols from [14C]-mevalonic acid. Lifibrol did not inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. Instead, cholesterol synthesis inhibition by lifibrol was entirely accounted for by competitive inhibition of HMG-CoA synthase. Lifibrol enhanced the cellular binding, uptake, and degradation of LDL in cultured cells in a dose dependent fashion. The stimulation of LDL receptors was significantly stronger than expected from the effect of lifibrol on sterol synthesis. In parallel, lifibrol increased the amount of immunologically detectable receptor protein. Stimulation of LDL receptor mediated endocytosis was observed both in the presence and in the absence of cholesterol-containing lipoproteins. In the absence of an extracellular source of cholesterol, both lifibrol and lovastatin induced microsomal HMG-CoA reductase. Co-incubation with LDL was sufficient to suppress the lifibrol mediated increase in reductase activity, indicating that lifibrol does not affect the production of the non-sterol derivative(s) which are thought to regulate HMG-CoA reductase activity at the post-transcriptional level. Considered together, the data suggest that the hypolipidemic action of lifibrol may, at least in part, be mediated by sterol-independent stimulation of the LDL receptor pathway. A potential advantage of lifibrol is that therapeutic concentrations do not interfere with the production of mevalonate which is required not only to synthesize sterols but also as a precursor of electron transport moieties, glycoproteins and farnesylated proteins.

Acute relief or future prevention: is urology ready for preventive health care?

The approach to clinical medicine has evolved over the last 20 years to incorporate therapeutic strategies to prevent long-term negative outcomes rather than simply treat acute events. As a result, new treatment paradigms have been developed in various disease areas. These paradigms arise from clinical trials that show a correlation between risk reduction and decreases in painful, traumatic, or fatal events. The field of urology has been relatively slow to adopt the concept of disease prevention. Several areas of clinical urology do employ prophylactic or metaphylactic therapies, although these are generally for secondary prevention after a primary event (e.g., secondary prevention of recurrent bladder cancer or recurrent kidney stones). There is, however, growing interest in the primary prevention of prostate cancer with a variety of interventions, ranging from dietary modifications to selenium and finasteride. Traditionally, clinical trials of agents for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have studied improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary flow rate, and reduction in prostate volume over relatively short periods of 6 weeks to 1 year. More recently, with the availability of long-term data from community-based studies of the natural history of BPH and placebo-controlled clinical trials, interest is shifting beyond short-term effects on symptoms to reducing the risk of long-term negative outcomes and disease progression. This signals an important reorientation of clinical investigation in BPH.

Statins: where are we now?

Statin therapy reduces the risk of cardiac events by 30% in both primary and secondary prevention. Although fine-tuning of the evidence will occur as more clinical trials report, the challenge is now to implement the evidence to the benefit of patients.

Apolipoprotein concentrations during treatment and recurrent coronary artery disease events

The effect of untreated total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as cardiovascular risk factors in both primary and secondary prevention has been extensively investigated. The predictive value of on-treatment lipid and apolipoprotein levels on subsequent cardiovascular events is as yet uncertain. Eight hundred forty-eight patients (675 men and 173 women) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD) who received effective statin therapy (>/=30% decrease of baseline TC) were studied. We analyzed the predictive value of on-treatment levels of TC, LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) on subsequent myocardial infarction (MI) and all cause mortality. On-treatment LDL-C levels were 2.55+/-0.55 mmol/L and 2.58+/-0.62 mmol/L for men and women respectively. Age-adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that only on-treatment apoA-I was predictive for future CAD events in both men and women, whereas on-treatment HDL-C was exclusively predictive in women. On-treatment apoB levels were predictive for recurrent CAD events in the total population but not after separate analysis for men and women. On-treatment levels of TC, LDL-C, and TG did not predict subsequent events. Multivariate analysis showed that on-treatment apoA-I and apoB were the only significant predictors for future cardiovascular events. On-treatment levels of TC, LDL-C, and TG were no longer associated with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in CAD patients treated to target levels, which justifies the current guidelines. However, on-treatment levels of apoB and in particular apoA-I (and HDL-C in women) were significantly predictive for MI and all-cause mortality and may therefore be more suitable for cardiovascular risk assessment in this population.

Effect of a clinical pharmacist-managed lipid clinic on achieving National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein goals

Despite national guidelines for treatment of hyperlipidemia, significant numbers of individuals with coronary artery disease are not treated to their National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) goals. The potential benefits of a clinical pharmacist-managed lipid clinic would be to improve rates of success in achieving these goals, improve drug adherence and compliance with therapy, and reduce cardiovascular events. All patients who had a documented history of coronary artery disease and were under the care of one cardiologist were treated in the pharmacist-managed lipid clinic. A second cardiologist provided usual care to a group of patients with coronary artery disease who served as controls. Patients in each arm were followed for a minimum of 6 months. A protocol for therapy changes in clinic patients was developed by the clinical pharmacist and approved by the cardiologist. At the end of 6 months, 69% of patients in the pharmacist-managed clinic achieved their LDL goal, compared with 50% of controls. Compliance with laboratory tests and drug regimens also improved in clinic patients. Compliance with lipid panels went from 8% 2 months before to 89% 2 months after the start of the study. At the end of 6 months compliance with laboratory work and refills was 80%. Thus the clinical pharmacist-managed clinic was highly successful in achieving NCEP goals for secondary prevention.

Cerivastatin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of hypercholesterolaemia

Cerivastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia. The lipid-lowering efficacy of cerivastatin has been demonstrated in a number of large multicentre, randomised clinical trials. Earlier studies used cerivastatin at relatively low dosages of < or =0.3mg orally once daily, but more recent studies have focused on dosages of 0.4 or 0.8 mg/day currently recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Along with modest improvements in serum levels of triglycerides and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, cerivastatin 0.4 to 0.8 mg/day achieved marked reductions in serum levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (33.4 to 44.0%) and total cholesterol (23.0 to 30.8%). These ranges included results of a pivotal North American trial in almost 1000 patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In this 8-week study, US National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Panel II) [NCEP] target levels for LDL-cholesterol were achieved in 84% of patients randomised to receive cerivastatin 0.8 mg/day, 73% of those treated with cerivastatin 0.4 mg/day and <10% of placebo recipients. Among patients with baseline serum LDL-cholesterol levels meeting NCEP guidelines for starting pharmacotherapy, 75% achieved target LDL-cholesterol levels with cerivastatin 0.8 mg/day. In 90% of all patients receiving cerivastatin 0.8 mg/day, LDL-cholesterol levels were reduced by 23.9 to 58.4% (6th to 95th percentile). Various subanalyses of clinical trials with cerivastatin indicate that the greatest lipid-lowering response can be expected in women and elderly patients. Cerivastatin is generally well tolerated and adverse events have usually been mild and transient. The overall incidence and nature of adverse events reported with cerivastatin in clinical trials was similar to that of placebo. The most frequent adverse events associated with cerivastatin were headache, GI disturbances, asthenia, pharyngitis and rhinitis. In the large pivotal trial, significant elevations in serum levels of creatine kinase and transaminases were reported in a small proportion of patients receiving cerivastatin but not in placebo recipients. As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, rare reports of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis have occurred with cerivastatin, although gemfibrozil or cyclosporin were administered concomitantly in most cases. Postmarketing surveillance studies in the US have been performed. In 3 mandated formulary switch conversion studies, cerivastatin was either equivalent or superior to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, including atorvastatin, in reducing serum LDL-cholesterol levels or achieving NCEP target levels. Pharmacoeconomic data with cerivastatin are limited, but analyses conducted to date in the US and Italy suggest that cerivastatin compares favourably with other available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in terms of its cost per life-year gained.

CONCLUSION

Cerivastatin is a well tolerated and effective lipid-lowering agent for patients with hypercholesterolaemia. When given at dosages currently recommended by the FDA in the US, cerivastatin achieves marked reductions in serum levels of LDL-cholesterol, reaching NCEP target levels in the vast majority of patients. Thus, cerivastatin provides a useful (and potentially cost effective) alternative to other currently available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors as a first-line agent for hypercholesterolaemia.

Lipid lowering and coronary bypass graft surgery

This article reviews the rationale for lipid lowering in patients who have coronary heart disease, and specifically for post-bypass patients. It has been well demonstrated that after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, atherosclerosis continues to progress in the native circulation and develops at an accelerated rate in saphenous vein bypass grafts. During the last decade, numerous clinical trials based on angiographic or clinical outcomes have clearly shown the beneficial effect of lipid lowering in coronary heart disease. Three trials (CLAS, post-CABG, and CARE) have demonstrated delayed progression of atherosclerosis in SVGs and/or a reduction of cardiac deaths, nonfatal MI, and the need for revascularization after lowering LDL-cholesterol. The recommended target of LDL cholesterol level of more than 100 mg/dl can be safely reached with diet and monotherapy using one of the statin drugs (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors). Despite this widely-circulated information, there appears to be inadequate public and professional awareness of the importance of properly managing hyperlipidemia after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in 1,030 hypercholesterolemic patients. The Cerivastatin Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study, hypercholesterolemic patients were randomized to treatment with cerivastatin, 0.3 mg (n=250) or 0.4 mg (n=258), or pravastatin, 20 mg (n=266) or 40 mg (n=256), for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, was significantly more effective than pravastatin, 20 mg, in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline (-29.6% vs -26.8%; P=.008). Cerivastatin, 0.4 mg, was significantly more effective than pravastatin, 40 mg, in reducing LDL cholesterol (-34.2% vs -30.3%; P<.001). A larger proportion of cerivastatin-treated patients had greater than 40% reductions in LDL cholesterol than those receiving pravastatin (11.1% vs 6.0%). The percentage of patients who achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target was 71.3% with cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, compared with 67.5% with pravastatin, 20 mg, and 74.0% with cerivastatin, 0.4 mg, compared with 71.1% with pravastatin, 40 mg (no significant difference). Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, reduced total cholesterol to a greater extent than did pravastatin, 20 mg (P<.03). Both agents reduced triglycerides and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to a similar degree (no significant differences). Cerivastatin and pravastatin were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg and 0.4 mg, showed greater efficacy than pravastatin, 20 mg and 40 mg, respectively, in lowering LDL cholesterol. Cerivastatin is safe and effective for patients with hypercholesterolemia who require aggressive LDL cholesterol lowering to achieve NCEP-recommended targets.