1
|
Hershey AD, Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Holler-Managan Y, Potrebic S, Billinghurst L, Gloss D, Licking N, Sowell M, Victorio MC, Gersz E, Vrijsen E, Zanitsch H, Yonker M, Mack K, Gelfand AA, Szperka CL, Powers SW. New Guidelines: Interpretation, Application and the Future. Headache 2020; 59:1133-1143. [PMID: 31529478 DOI: 10.1111/head.13629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Hershey
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Maryam Oskoui
- Department of Pediatric and Neurology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Tamara Pringsheim
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Yolanda Holler-Managan
- Department of Pediatrics (Neurology), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sonja Potrebic
- Neurology Department, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lori Billinghurst
- Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Gloss
- Department of Neurology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Nicole Licking
- Department of Neuroscience and Spine, St. Anthony Hospital-Centura Health, Lakewood, CO, USA
| | - Michael Sowell
- University of Louisville Comprehensive Headache Program and University of Louisville Child Neurology Residency Program, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - M Cristina Victorio
- Division of Neurology, NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Marcy Yonker
- Division Neurology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kenneth Mack
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina L Szperka
- Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott W Powers
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
This article outlines key features of diagnosis and treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. It emphasizes techniques that can be used by clinicians to optimize history taking in this population, as well as recognition of episodic conditions that may be associated with migraine and present in childhood. Acute treatment strategies include use of over-the-counter analgesics and triptan medications that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in children and adolescents. Preventive treatment approach includes lifestyle modifications, behavioral strategies, and consideration of preventive medications with the lowest side effect profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Greene
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Pediatric Headache Center, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Mission Hall Box 0137, 550 16th Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Samantha L Irwin
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Pediatric Headache Center, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Mission Hall Box 0137, 550 16th Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Amy A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Pediatric Headache Center, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Mission Hall Box 0137, 550 16th Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Benign Headache Management in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med 2018; 54:458-468. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
4
|
Abstract
Medication overuse is not uncommon among children and adolescents with primary headache disorders. Medication overuse in adults is associated with increased headache frequency and reduced effectiveness of acute and preventive medications. These issues probably exist in children. While withdrawal of overused medications is generally recommended, it may not result in improved headache frequency in all patients. This review summarizes what is known about predicting the response to medication withdrawal. Strategies for managing children and adolescents with medication overuse are also offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Gelfand
- UCSF Headache Center, 1701 Divisadero St. Suite 480, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon MS, Savidou I, Diener HC, Limmroth V. Evidence-based medicine in migraine prevention. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 5:333-41. [PMID: 15938666 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.5.3.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Migraine headache is a chronic, painful, disabling and potentially progressive, condition primarily occurring in early and middle adulthood. For many patients, daily activities are impaired by the sudden and unpredictable occurrence of migraine attacks. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the field of migraine treatment. For the acute treatment of migraine attacks, 5-hydroxytryptophan(1B/D) agonists (so called triptans), were the most innovative development, successfully aborting attacks in less than 1 h. The search for innovative drugs usable for migraine prevention, however, was less successful, mainly due to the lack of reliable and predictive animal models. Recently, neuromodulators such as valproic acid and topiramate, initially developed as anticonvulsants, have been shown in large clinical trials to be effective in the prevention of migraine. As for the acute treatment of migraine attacks more than 10 years ago, large clinical trial programs are now setting new standards for evidence-based medicine in migraine prevention. This review summarizes the current options in migraine prevention with special emphasis on clinical trial design and new developments such as topiramate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min-Suk Yoon
- University Hospital Essen, Department of Neurology, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shamliyan TA, Choi JY, Ramakrishnan R, Miller JB, Wang SY, Taylor FR, Kane RL. Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28:1225-37. [PMID: 23592242 PMCID: PMC3744311 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2433-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 03/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Systematic review of preventive pharmacologic treatments for community-dwelling adults with episodic migraine. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases through May 20, 2012. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of preventive drugs compared to placebo or active treatments examining rates of ≥50 % reduction in monthly migraine frequency or improvement in quality of life. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS We assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence and conducted random effects meta-analyses of absolute risk differences and Bayesian network meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 5,244 retrieved references, 215 publications of RCTs provided mostly low-strength evidence because of the risk of bias and imprecision. RCTs examined 59 drugs from 14 drug classes. All approved drugs, including topiramate (9 RCTs), divalproex (3 RCTs), timolol (3 RCTs), and propranolol (4 RCTs); off-label beta blockers metoprolol (4 RCTs), atenolol (1 RCT), nadolol (1 RCT), and acebutolol (1 RCT); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril (1 RCT) and lisinopril (1 RCT); and angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan (1 RCT), outperformed placebo in reducing monthly migraine frequency by ≥50 % in 200-400 patients per 1,000 treated. Adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation (68 RCTs) were greater with topiramate, off-label antiepileptics, and antidepressants than with placebo. Limited direct evidence as well as frequentist and exploratory network Bayesian meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in benefits between approved drugs. Off-label angiotensin-inhibiting drugs and beta-blockers were most effective and tolerable for episodic migraine prevention. LIMITATIONS We did not quantify reporting bias or contact principal investigators regarding unpublished trials. CONCLUSIONS Approved drugs prevented episodic migraine frequency by ≥50 % with no statistically significant difference between them. Exploratory network meta-analysis suggested that off-label angiotensin-inhibiting drugs and beta-blockers had favorable benefit-to-harm ratios. Evidence is lacking for long-term effects of drug treatments (i.e., trials of more than 3 months duration), especially for quality of life.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Migraine constitutes a relatively common reason for pediatric emergency room visits. Given the paucity of randomized trials involving pediatric migraineurs in the emergency department setting compared with adults, recommendations for managing these children are largely extrapolated from adult migraine emergency room studies and trials involving outpatient home pediatric migraine therapy. We review current knowledge about pediatric migraineurs presenting at the emergency room and their management, and summarize the best evidence available to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Gelfand
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gelfand AA, Goadsby PJ. A Neurologist's Guide to Acute Migraine Therapy in the Emergency Room. Neurohospitalist 2012; 2:51-59. [PMID: 23936605 PMCID: PMC3737484 DOI: 10.1177/1941874412439583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a common reason for visits to the emergency room. Attacks that lead patients to come to the emergency room are often more severe, refractory to home rescue medication, and have been going on for longer. All of these features make these attacks more challenging to treat. The purpose of this article is to review available evidence pertinent to the treatment of acute migraine in adults in the emergency department setting in order to provide neurologists with a rational approach to management. Drug classes and agents reviewed include opioids, dopamine receptor antagonists, triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and sodium valproate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA ; Department of Neurology, Division of Headache Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bekkelund SI, Alstadhaug KB. Migraine prophylactic drugs – something new under the sun? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2011; 20:1201-10. [DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2011.601741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, Sándor PS. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine - revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16:968-81. [PMID: 19708964 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 459] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Evers
- Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evers S. Alternativen zu Betablockern in der Migräneprophylaxe. DER NERVENARZT 2008; 79:1135-6, 1138-40, 1142-3. [DOI: 10.1007/s00115-008-2522-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and COX-2 Inhibitors. Pain Manag 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7216-0334-6.50116-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] Open
|
15
|
Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, Sándor PS. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine - report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13:560-72. [PMID: 16796580 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01411.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most frequent disabling neurological conditions with a major impact on the patients' quality of life. To give evidence-based or expert recommendations for the different drug treatment procedures of the different migraine syndromes based on a literature search and an consensus in an expert panel. All available medical reference systems were screened for all kinds of clinical studies on migraine with and without aura and on migraine-like syndromes. The findings in these studies were evaluated according to the recommendations of the EFNS resulting in level A,B, or C recommendations and good practice points. For the acute treatment of migraine attacks, oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans are recommended. The administration should follow the concept of stratified treatment. Before intake of NSAIDs and triptans, oral metoclopramide or domperidon is recommended. In very severe attacks, intravenous acetylsalicylic acid or subcutaneous sumatriptan are drugs of first choice. A status migrainosus can probably be treated by steroids. For the prophylaxis of migraine, betablockers (propranolol and metoprolol), flunarizine, valproic acid, and topiramate are drugs of first choice. Drugs of second choice for migraine prophylaxis are amitriptyline, naproxen, petasites, and bisoprolol.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Migraine is a recurrent clinical syndrome characterised by combinations of neurological, gastrointestinal and autonomic manifestations. The exact pathophysiological disturbances that occur with migraine have yet to be elucidated; however, cervico-trigemino-vascular dysfunctions appear to be the primary cause. Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and new effective treatment options, migraine remains an under-diagnosed, under-treated and poorly treated health condition. Most patients will unsuccessfully attempt to treat their headaches with over-the-counter medications. Few well designed, placebo-controlled studies are available to guide physicians in medication selection. Recently published evidence-based guidelines advocate migraine-specific drugs, such as serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists (the 'triptans') and dihydroergotamine mesylate, for patients experiencing moderate to severe migraine attacks. Additional headache attack therapy options include other ergotamine derivatives, phenothiazines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and opioids. Preventative medication therapy is indicated for patients experiencing frequent and/or refractory attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seymour Diamond
- Diamond Inpatient Headache Unit, Diamond Headache Clinic, St. Joseph Hospital, and Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. This review summarises new treatment options both for the therapy of the acute attack as well as for migraine prophylaxis. Analgesics like aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in treating migraine attacks. Few controlled trials were performed for the use of ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. These trials indicate inferior efficacy compared with serotonin (5-HT(1B/D)) agonists (triptans). The triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan), are highly effective. They improve headache as well as nausea, photo- and phonophobia. The different triptans show only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. The knowledge of their different pharmacological profile allows a more specific treatment of the individual migraine characteristics. Migraine prophylaxis is recommended, when more than three attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if side effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol, the calcium channel blocker flunarizine, several 5-HT antagonists and amitriptyline. Recently anti-epileptic drugs (valproic acid, gabapentin, topiramate) were evaluated for the prophylaxis of migraine. The use of botulinum toxin is under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Diener
- Department of Neurology, University Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Srinivasu P, Rambhau D, Rao BR, Rao YM. Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Sumatriptan and Naproxen. J Clin Pharmacol 2000. [DOI: 10.1177/009127000004000113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Poondru Srinivasu
- University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal‐506 009 (A.P.), India
- 524 Hudson Webber Cancer Research Center, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Devaraj Rambhau
- University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal‐506 009 (A.P.), India
| | - Boinpally Ramesh Rao
- University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal‐506 009 (A.P.), India
| | - Yamsani Madhusudan Rao
- University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal‐506 009 (A.P.), India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Krymchantowski AV, Moreira Filho PF. [Update on migraine prophylactic treatment]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 1999; 57:513-9. [PMID: 10450363 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000300027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Among the primary headaches, patients with migraine are those that seek for medical help the most. Its prevalence is estimated in 12% of the population being more common in women with a prevalence of 18 to 20%, 6% of the men and 4 to 8% of the children. Its economic impact in the productivity and leisure is significant, and the headache attacks may incapacitate the patients for the usual activities. With a complex and still unknown pathophysiology, migraine may present with intermittent and peculiar episodes of intense headache. The most efficient approach for the treatment includes the avoidance of the trigger factors, preventive treatment, rescue treatment for the moments of pain and the accessory or non drug treatment. For the preventive treatment, scope of this update, various classes of substances are used and include the beta blockers, tricyclic antidepressants (and recently the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), calcium antagonists, serotonin antagonists, anticonvulsants and others. Even though its mechanisms of action in the treatment of migraine are unknown, it seems that all of the drugs influence the central serotonergic, noradrenergic and gabaergic functions. New proposals for the mechanisms of action of some of these drugs, also include the inhibition of the synthesis of nitric oxide and the modulation of the neuronal cationic channels. When individualized and correctly used, these preventive medications have been held responsible for important reductions in the frequency and intensity of migraine episodes, decreasing this way, the marathon of suffering and doubtful approaches, that these patients are usually submitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Krymchantowski
- Centro de Avaliação e Tratamento da Dor de Cabeça do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marin PA. Pharmacologic management of migraine. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS 1998; 10:407-12. [PMID: 10085852 DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1998.tb00527.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P A Marin
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In order to understand the pattern of utilization of migraine prophylactic drugs by US physicians, we reviewed the scientific rigor of published trials of anti-migraine medications, assessed their cost, and tested the correlation, if any, between utilization, scientific rigor and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS Scientific rigor of published reports. We identified all placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trials of migraine prophylactic agents through Medline search, major Headache textbooks and proceedings of major scientific meetings where headache-related topics are discussed. We excluded trials that did not include placebo treatment during the active phase of the study. The trials were reviewed and rated for scientific rigor using a 5-point scale (scientific score [ss]; 1 = low, 5 = good), blinded to the physicians' utilization data and cost of the drugs. Studies that did not show benefit of the active drug over placebo were scored -1 to -5, thus allowing for the reverse logic of negative studies. US physicians utilization. Neurologists and primary care physicians (PCP) completed phone-mail-phone questionnaires which inquired about first and second choices of migraine prophylaxis. These choices were averaged to obtain a weighted average percent usage of each drug. Cost. The average wholesale price (AWP) of each drug was obtained from data published by Adelman and Von Seggern, and from the Amerisource (7/9/96) catalog. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the average ss, physician use, and cost of each drug. RESULTS Propranolol (ss = 1.44), amitriptyline (ss = 2.33) and verapamil (ss = 1.00) were the three preferred migraine prophylactic drugs by both neurologists and PCPs. Approximately 10% of neurologists said that divalproex (ss = 3.75) would be their first or second choice. The selective serotonin reuptake blockers were favored by 13.21% of PCPs. All other prophylactic drugs were felt to be first or second line of treatment by less than 10% of either neurologists or PCPs. Except for one study (ss = 1) that showed that propranolol reduced the migraine frequency by 76% over placebo, trials of the three most preferred medications failed to demonstrate that the active drug is > 50% better than placebo, i.e. the difference in headache frequency when on placebo vs active drug is > 50%. Of the drugs available in the United States, flurbiprofen and metoprolol achieved the best ss (5.00 and 4.33, respectively) but their efficacy over placebo (23% and 14-33%, respectively) and cost ($67.2 and $65.6) were unfavorable. Neurologists and PCPs chose migraine prophylaxis on the basis of scientific merit (r = 0.644, p = 0.018; r = 0.576, p = 0.05, respectively) but not cost (r = -0.254, p = 0.45; r = -0.255, p = 0.455). CONCLUSION The three most commonly chosen migraine prophylactic agents have not been shown irrefutably to prevent migraine. Furthermore, their benefit, if any, does not exceed 50% over placebo. The well-conducted recent trials that demonstrated the efficacy of divalproex in migraine prevention are steps in the right direction of finding the "ideal migraine preventative agent". Until that drug is discovered, it is difficult to argue that one migraine prophylactic medication is superior to another and accordingly should be used as a first line of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N M Ramadan
- Cincinnati Headache Center, College of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Ohio 45267-0525, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Migraine is a commonly occurring headache syndrome in children and adolescents. Half of all individuals destined to have migraine begin their attacks before age 20 years. It is characterized by paroxysmal headache, nausea, vomiting, and desire to sleep. On occasion, dramatic neurological symptoms and signs accompany the headache. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, evaluations, and management of migraine are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W Lewis
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common and disabling disease of uncertain pathogenesis. Research on the trigeminovascular system, serotonin receptors, and substance P have provided clues to improving the pharmacotherapy of this disorder. Selective serotonin agonists, such as sumatriptan, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine tartrate, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), isometheptene mucate, and phenothiazines are useful to treat acute attacks. Prophylactic agents include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, NSAIDs, antidepressants, and valproate. The addition of several new agents for the acute and prophylactic therapy of migraine has improved the outlook for this debilitating disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D Solomon
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Headaches are a common problem that can be disabling. The clinical features and treatment of migraine, cluster, and tension headaches are presented in this article. Emphasis is placed on the newer drugs available for acute and prophylactic treatment of these headaches. Features of headaches associated with intracranial aneurysms, temporal arteritis, cerebrovascular accidents, brain tumors, and temporomandibular disorders are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Kumar
- Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Migraine is a common and debilitating disorder of uncertain pathogenesis. Recent research into the pathophysiology of migraine and serotonin receptors has revolutionized the approach to pharmacotherapy. New medications, such as sumatriptan, and new dosage forms of older medications, including dihydroergotamine, NSAIDs, and phenothiazines are available to treat acute attacks. New prophylactic approaches include the use of calcium-channel blockers, NSAIDs, fluoxetine, and valproate. The addition of several new agents for the acute and prophylactic therapy of migraine has improved the outlook for this disabling disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D Solomon
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5039
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Once the definitive diagnosis of migraine has been formulated, the physician has many options available for abortive and prophylactic therapy. Nonpharmacologic modalities, including behavioral modification methods such as biofeedback training, may also be considered. Migraine does not necessarily have to disrupt the lives of those afflicted. The patient with mixed headache presents a more difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. These patients can also be helped when the disorder is identified, and inpatient therapy for these patients may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Diamond
- Diamond Headache Clinic, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Todd PA, Clissold SP. Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs 1990; 40:91-137. [PMID: 2202585 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199040010-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Naproxen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) advocated for use in painful and inflammatory rheumatic and certain nonrheumatic conditions. It may be administered orally or rectally using a convenient once or twice daily regimen. Dosage adjustments are not usually required in the elderly or those with mild renal or hepatic impairment although it is probably prudent to start treatment at a low dosage and titrate upwards in such groups of patients. Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that the analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of naproxen is equivalent to that of the many newer and established NSAIDs with which it has been compared. The drug is effective in many rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and nonarticular rheumatism, in acute traumatic injury, and in the treatment of and prophylaxis against acute pain such as migraine, tension headache, postoperative pain, postpartum pain and pain associated with a variety of gynaecological procedures. Naproxen is also effective in treating the pain and associated symptoms of primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea, and decreases excessive blood loss in patients with menorrhagia. The adverse effect profile of naproxen is well established, particularly compared with that of many newer NSAIDs, and the drug is well tolerated. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of naproxen have been clearly established over many years of clinical use, and it can therefore be considered as a first-line treatment for rheumatic diseases and various pain states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Todd
- Adis Drug Information Services, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Migraine headaches can be successfully treated both abortively and prophylactically with carefully selected pharmaceutical agents. Mixed headache syndrome is complex and difficult to manage. Treatment is often complicated by patients' susceptibility to dependency and accompanying sleep disturbances, as well as by troublesome drug interactions. Cranial neuralgias can be successfully treated in the majority of cases. Since many patients with cranial neuralgias are elderly, careful monitoring of serum drug levels and frequent blood cell counts during therapy are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Diamond
- Diamond Headache Clinic, Chicago, IL 60625
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- K L Kumar
- Medical and Ambulatory Care Services, Portland VA Medical Center, OR 97207
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Diamond S, Freitag FG, Solomon GD, Millstein E. Migraine headache. Working for the best outcome. Postgrad Med 1987; 81:174-6, 179-83. [PMID: 3588460 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.1987.11699870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is a common hereditary disorder manifested by episodic headache, irritability, and gastrointestinal upset. The condition may be triggered by dietary, environmental, psychological, or pharmacologic factors. With proper diagnosis and judicious use of abortive and prophylactic therapy, patients often obtain excellent results.
Collapse
|
32
|
Vascular Headache. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987. [DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31692-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
33
|
|