Type-specific efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccine

Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy

Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20-40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community.

Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?

Pertussis (whooping cough) remains an epidemic disease responsible for infant and child morbidity and mortality, and is perceived as a serious public health problem. Since the widespread use of whole-cell pertussis vaccines in the 1940s, vaccination programs have varied greatly between countries. National specificity is a function of several factors. The most important are: vaccine efficacy and tolerability;vaccine coverage and distribution; and vaccine acceptance by parents and professionals. During the 1970s, Sweden, England, Wales and Japan provided contrasting examples of the attitude of health authorities to the use of whole-cell vaccines. The increase in pertussis incidence was noted as a consequence of active opposition to this vaccine. The re-emergence of pertussis in the 1990s, in countries with high vaccination coverage and increased incidence of disease in individuals >15 years and <6 months of age, has drawn attention to the role of booster doses of pertussis vaccines and their introduction into regular vaccination programs. The use of acellular vaccines for booster doses for adolescents and adults would seem unambiguous because of their decreased reactogenicity, although the exact schedule has yet to be established. The choice between the two kinds of vaccines is more difficult for primary courses, where safety and efficacy profiles are similar, and the attitude towards acellular vaccines varies from country to country. In this case, the strategy adopted results from the national history of pertussis infection and from the quality of the available whole-cell vaccine. Two contrasting examples are the US, where acellular vaccines were licensed for the primary series in the 1990s, and the UK, where whole-cell vaccines are exclusively used for primary immunization. The changing epidemiology of pertussis, and its local diversification, would suggest that at present it is difficult to define a single worldwide strategy with only one kind of vaccine and one schedule. In order to control pertussis incidence, each country should continue to determine the best national vaccination program established in very close relation to the past and present epidemiological situation and available healthcare resources.

Characterization of the protective capacity and immunogenicity of the 69-kD outer membrane protein of Bordetella pertussis

Immunization with the 69-kD outer membrane protein (OMP) of Bordetella pertussis protected neonatal mice against lethal respiratory challenge with B. pertussis 18323. Active immunization elicited a serum IgG anti-69-kD OMP response at the time of challenge, with IgG anti-69-kD OMP antibodies detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after challenge. Intravenous administration of BPE8, a monoclonal IgG1 anti-69-kD OMP, also protected young mice against B. pertussis challenge. Intravenously injected BPE8 was detected in the lungs of mice at the time of aerosol challenge, suggesting that the presence of specific antibody in the lungs may mediate protection. Thus the 69-kD OMP of B. pertussis is a protective antigen in mice that elicits specific serum antibody that can transude to the lung. The 69-kD OMP was detected in a preparation of a Takeda acellular vaccine by immunoblot analysis and a serum antibody response to the 69-kD OMP was observed in 18-mo-old children boosted with this preparation of Japanese acellular vaccine. Our results demonstrate that the B. pertussis 69-kD OMP is a protective antigen in animals, is immunogenic in humans, and is present in a preparation of acellular pertussis vaccine that is widely used in Japan. These findings indicate that the 69-kD OMP should be seriously considered as a candidate for inclusion in new formulations of antigenically defined acellular pertussis vaccines.