Using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia during neonatal sepsis

Cytokines and preterm labour

Preterm labour and its consequences are the major contributors to perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. The prevention of preterm labour and delivery is the single most important challenge to modern obstetrics today. Progress in this area has been hampered by lack of understanding of the basic mechanisms responsible for preterm labour. The implicit paradigm which has governed the study of parturition, is that term and preterm labour are fundamentally the same processes except for the gestational age at which they occur. Indeed, they share a common terminal pathway composed of uterine contractility, cervical dilatation and rupture of membranes. We proposed that while term labour is the result of physiological activation of this common terminal pathway, preterm labour and delivery is the consequence of pathological activation.1Thus, preterm labour may be considered as the response of the fetomaternal unit to a variety of insults (e.g. chorioamnionitis, ischaemia, fetal growth restriction, etc.) (Fig 1) If these insults cannot be effectively handled in the context of a continuing pregnancy, then labour and delivery may occur.

Human developmental biology of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

The availability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has influenced the management of neonates with neutropenia. Since the first use of G-CSF in a neonate with neutropenia, much has been learned about the cellular sources and physiologic roles of G-CSF. This article reviews our present understanding of G-CSF and its cognate receptor in the fetus and neonate.

Neonatal alloimmune neutropenia in premature monozygous twins

Alloimmune neonatal neutropenia (ANN) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disorder of the neonate and young infant. Hematologically, the mother's peripheral neutrophil count is normal. However, the passive transfer of maternal immunoglobulin G neutrophil-specific antibodies and the subsequent sensitization of fetal neutrophils can result in severe neutropenia in the neonate. Generally, ANN is a self-limiting condition, but with severe bacterial infection, mortality can be high. We present the clinical features of monozygous twins delivered at 33 weeks' postconception with this condition. This case report is unique in that it occurred in twins born prematurely and was attributable to antibodies against 2 neutrophil-specific antigens, NA1 and NB1. A brief review of the diagnosis, management, and treatment of ANN is presented.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor serum and urine concentrations in neutropenic neonates before and after intravenous administration of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

BACKGROUND

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) has been suggested as a treatment for certain varieties of neonatal neutropenia, but little is known about the pharmacologic disposition of rG-CSF in that population.

METHODS

Ten neutropenic neonates were treated with rG-CSF, 10 micrograms/kg intravenously once daily for 3 to 5 days. Serum and urine samples were obtained before rG-CSF dosing and at intervals thereafter for G-CSF quantification by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Five of the neutropenic neonates (termed group 1) were not infected but likely had hyporegenerative neutropenia (4 were born after pregnancy-induced hypertension/intrauterine growth restriction, and 1 had Rh hemolytic disease). Five other infants (group 2) had neutropenia accompanying bacterial sepsis and shock. Before receiving the first dose of rG-CSF, endogenous G-CSF serum and urine concentrations were relatively low in group 1, averaging 130 pg/mL (range: 48-209) in serum and 53 pg/mL (range: 15-141) in urine. Serum concentrations immediately before the final dose were much higher (range: 81-24 835 pg/mL), whereas urine concentrations were unchanged (range: <7 pg/mL-126 pg/mL). In group 2 patients, before receiving the first-dose of rG-CSF, endogenous concentrations were very high, averaging 59 575 pg/mL (range: 20 028-98 280) in serum and 3189 pg/mL (range: 23-4770) in urine. Predose serum concentrations before the final dose (range: 427-14 460 pg/mL) were lower than before the first dose. The area under the concentration curve after the first dose of rG-CSF administration in group 1 was significantly lower than after the first dose in group 2, but no difference in area under the concentration curve was observed between groups 1 and 2 after the last dose of rG-CSF.

SPECULATION

The principal means of clearing G-CSF from the serum is by saturable binding to specific G-CSF receptors (G-CSF-Rs). Therefore, the very high G-CSF serum and urine concentrations of group 2 patients before the first rG-CSF dose implies that their G-CSF-Rs were saturated before the dose was given. We speculate that if G-CSF-Rs are saturated with endogenous G-CSF, treatment with rG-CSF will add little or nothing to the granulocytopoietic effort. On this basis, we judge that neonates with septic shock and neutropenia are unlikely to derive benefit from rG-CSF administration.

Use of Hematopoietic Growth Factors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Recombinant hematopoietic growth factors have emerged as valuable treatments for a variety of medical conditions. Recently, their applications have reached the neonatal intensive care unit, where they offer new therapeutic options for problems as common as anemia of prematurity, or as catastrophic as neonatal sepsis. When facing bacterial infection, it is known that newborn infants are capable of increasing their serum G-CSF concentrations. However, their response does not reach the concentrations that adults are able to achieve, and frequently neutropenia complicates the picture of neonatal sepsis. Although Phase III clinical trials are still in progress, published animal studies, case reports, and Phase I trials suggest that neonates with a variety of neutropenias experience a rapid elevation in their blood neutrophil concentration following administration of rG-CSF, without significant adverse effects. Although many factors contribute to the development of the “anemia of prematurity,” one of the major factors is the inability of preterm infants to generate an erythropoietin (Epo) response appropriate to their degree of anemia. On the basis of this fact, administration of rEpo to preterm neonates to treat or to prevent the anemia of prematurity has been the subject of multiple clinical studies, and it is now clear that rEpo administration to this population can indeed result in lower transfusion requirements, with only occasional and mild adverse effects. Neonatal thrombocytopenia is also a frequent clinical problem, which in most patients develops without a clear underlying cause. Recent studies, quantifying circulating megakaryocyte progenitors in the peripheral blood of thrombocytopenic neonates, suggest that impaired megakaryocytopoiesis may be the main underlying mechanism of many cases of thrombocytopenia. On the basis of this finding, it is tempting to speculate that recombinant thrombopoietin, the newly discovered physiological stimulator of platelet production, will be of clinical relevance in the treatment of thrombocytopenic neonates.

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may improve outcome attributable to neonatal sepsis complicated by neutropenia

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether adjunctive therapy with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) could reverse sepsis-associated neonatal neutropenia and improve neonatal survival compared with conventional therapy in a phase I/II-type trial.

STUDY DESIGN

An intravenous infusion of rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg/d x 3 d) was administered to 14 septic neutropenic neonates. Neutrophilic responses and outcome of these neonates were compared with 11 concurrently treated, retrospectively selected, case-matched control septic patients identified by using a search of medical records coded for sepsis with neutropenia (>/=24 hours).

RESULTS

Seven neonates with early-onset sepsis with neutropenia at birth and seven neonates with late-onset sepsis plus neutropenia (all with necrotizing enterocolitis) were entered in the rhG-CSF treatment group. Results were compared with a conventional therapy control group (five early onset, six late onset). No significant differences existed in the birth weight, gestational age, use of antibiotic therapy, magnitude of respiratory support, severity of metabolic acidosis, use of vasopressors, or other supportive therapy between the two groups. In the rhG-CSF-treated group and in the conventionally treated control group, the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (mean +/- SEM) was 585 +/- 138 and 438 +/- 152, respectively. The ANC increased to more than baseline in the rhG-CSF-treated group by 10-fold versus 2-fold at 24 hours, 18-fold versus 4-fold at 48 hours, 24-fold versus 5-fold at 72 hours (significant by one-way analysis of variance in the rhG-CSF group only), and 29-fold versus 16-fold at 7 to 10 days when compared with the conventional therapy group. There were no nonresponders in the rhG-CSF group by 24 hours after the first dose of study drug. Monocyte cell counts also increased significantly in both groups by 7 days after entry into this protocol but remained within normal range for age. No clinically significant effect on lymphocytes, erythrocytes, or platelet counts was noted. Thirteen patients in the rhG-CSF-treated group (92%; 13 out of 14) and five in the conventionally treated group (55%; 5 out of 11) survived to 28 days after the onset of the signs of sepsis. No adverse effects were noted in the rhG-CSF-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

rhG-CSF can increase the neutrophil count in critically ill septic neutropenic neonates. This finding suggests that rhG-CSF may be effective in a therapeutically useful time frame to treat septic neonates with neonatal neutropenia attributable to bone marrow suppression or neutrophil consumption. Future randomized trials are needed to validate the beneficial effects of rhG-CSF and to determine whether any significant side effects of therapy exist.

Effect of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on erythropoiesis in the human fetus and neonate

Administration of large doses of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) to mice results in diminished erythropoiesis. Hyporegenerative anemia does not occur in adult humans as a consequence of treatment with rG-CSF, but it is not clear whether this will be a problem in neonates. Because rG-CSF is currently being tested as a treatment for neutropenia in neonates, we assessed the possibility that such treatment will diminish their erythropoiesis. To do this, we added rG-CSF, in vitro, to clonogenic cultures of hematopoietic progenitors obtained from the bone marrow and liver of seven human fetuses and from the umbilical cord blood of five term and five preterm infants. The range of rG-CSF concentrations tested (0.1-10.0 ng/mL) included the peak concentrations measured in the blood of neonates receiving rG-CSF treatment on experimental protocols. Inclusion of rG-CSF in the cultures did not diminish clonal maturation of fetal erythroid (erythroid colony-forming and burst-forming unit) progenitors, nor did it reduce the number of normoblasts generated per erythroid progenitor cell colony. On the basis of these studies we predict that administration of rG-CSF to neonates will not result in down-modulation of erythropoiesis.

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on preeclampsia-associated neonatal neutropenia

Absolute neutropenia lasting longer than 72 hours after birth occurred in four very low birth weight neonates with a maternal history of severe pregnancy-induced hypertension, and was treated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 3 days. Absolute neutrophil counts increased nearly four-fold within 48 hours; maximal values were recorded on the ninth day after the infusion was started. Total leukocyte counts subsequently decreased but remained in the normal range. It appears that recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes a rapid increase in circulating neutrophils in these patients despite the possible presence of a circulating preeclampsia-associated inhibitor of neutrophil production.