Haloperidol. Plasma levels and prolactin response as predictors of clinical improvement in schizophrenia: chemical v radioreceptor plasma level assays

Prolactin and psychopathology in schizophrenia: a literature review and reappraisal

Secretion of the anterior pituitary hormone prolactin can be significantly increased by antipsychotic drugs, leading to a range of adverse effects in patients with schizophrenia. However, there is evidence from a variety of studies that prolactin may also be related to symptom profile and treatment response in these patients, and recent work has identified variations in prolactin secretion even in drug-free patients. In this paper, a selective review of all relevant studies pertaining to prolactin and schizophrenia, including challenge and provocation studies, is presented. The implications of this work are discussed critically. A tentative model, which synthesizes these findings and argues for a significant role for prolactin in the development of schizophrenia, is outlined.

Haloperidol dose for the acute phase of schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Haloperidol is a benchmark, accessible antipsychotic drug against which the effects of newer treatments are gauged.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the best range of doses for haloperidol for the treatment of people acutely ill with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (February 2010), which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected studies if they involved people being treated for acute schizophrenia, randomised to two or more dose ranges of non-depot haloperidol, and if they reported clinically meaningful outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we inspected all citations and independently re-inspected a sample of citations in order to ensure reliable selection. We resolved any disagreement by discussion, and where doubt remained, we acquired the full-text article for further inspection. We then ordered papers, and reliably re-inspected and quality assessed the full reports, and extracted data. For homogeneous dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. We assumed that people who left the study early or were lost to follow-up had a negative outcome. We calculated mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes that reported ITT, last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. We excluded data if loss to follow-up was greater than 50%.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 19 trials with 19 different randomised dose comparisons. No studies reported data on relapse rates or quality of life and only one compared low dose (> 1.5 to 3 mg/day) haloperidol to higher dose ranges. Using standard lower dose (> 3 to 7.5 mg/day) did not result in loss of efficacy (no clinically important improvement in global state, versus standard higher dose (> 7.5 to 15 mg/day, n = 48, 1 RCT, RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.8, very-low-quality evidence); versus high dose (> 15 to 35 mg/day, n = 81, 2 RCTs, RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.2, very-low-quality evidence). Doses of haloperidol in the range of > 3 to 7.5 mg/day had a lower rate of development of clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects than higher doses (clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects, versus standard higher dose, n = 64, 2 RCTs, RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.1, very-low-quality evidence); versus high dose, n = 144, 3 RCTs, RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.8, very-low-quality evidence; versus very high dose (> 35 mg/day, n = 86, 2 RCTs, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1, very-low-quality evidence). None of the other comparisons between dose ranges yielded statistically significant differences, but several, particularly with lower dose ranges, were underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Noresults were conclusive and all were based on small, short studies of limited quality. However, it would be understandable if clinicians were cautious in prescribing doses in excess of 7.5 mg/day of haloperidol to a person with uncomplicated acute schizophrenia, and if people with schizophrenia were equally reticent to take greater doses. Further research is needed regarding the efficacy and tolerability of the lower dose ranges, especially > 1.5 to 3 mg/day.

Extracting numerical data from published reports of pharmacokinetics investigations: method description and validation

A method has been proposed for extracting numerical data when only graphical results are presented. Reports with both graphical and tabular data were identified and the graphs were electronically scanned. The coordinates of each point were read using the cross-hair facility of Adobe Photoshop 7.0. To improve the precision of these coordinates, each point was read at 1600% magnification. The agreement between the observers was almost perfect (R > 0.99). The proposed method makes possible use of data in meta-analyses that, would otherwise be discarded.

The differential effects of atypical antipsychotics on prolactin elevation are explained by their differential blood-brain disposition: a pharmacological analysis in rats

All atypical antipsychotics avoid extrapyramidal side-effects yet differ in their propensity to cause other side-effects, like prolactin elevation. We proposed that the atypical antipsychotics with a propensity for prolactin elevation would show a higher pituitary versus striatal D2 receptor occupancy. To investigate this hypothesis, we tested four atypical antipsychotics, two that are commonly associated with prolactin elevation (amisulpride and risperidone) and two that are less frequently associated (quetiapine and olanzapine). In particular, we calculated their ED(50) values to increase plasma prolactin and block peripheral pituitary D2 receptors to their ED(50) values to antagonize apomorphine-induced stereotypy and occupy central striatal D2 receptors. All antipsychotics dose dependently increased prolactin levels and antagonized apomorphine-induced stereotypy. However, the central to peripheral potency (ED(50) for apomorphine antagonism to ED(50) for prolactin elevation) differed remarkably across these drugs: amisulpride (21764), risperidone (14), quetiapine (10), and olanzapine (1.7). Compounds displaying a higher peripheral potency brought about higher prolactin levels for a given level of functional central antagonism. This dissociation between central and peripheral effects was explained by the differential occupancy of D2 receptors in the striatum versus in the pituitary [ratio of striatal/pituitary ED(50) values (milligram per kilogram) for D2 occupancy): amisulpride (17/0.026 = 654), risperidone (0.89/0.081 = 14), quetiapine (24/4.1 = 6), olanzapine (0.30/0.43 = 0.7). These results indicate that dissociation between central and peripheral D2 receptor occupancy is a major determinant of the degree of prolactin elevation observed at therapeutic doses.

Haloperidol dose for the acute phase of schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Haloperidol is a benchmark, accessible antipsychotic against which the effects of newer treatments are gauged.

OBJECTIVES

The primary goal of this review is to determine the best range of doses for haloperidol for the treatment of people acutely ill with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), CINAHL (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library (1999, Issue 2), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (December 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999) and PsycLIT (1887-1999). They also inspected all references of all identified trials and included studies sought as a citation on SCISEARCH database (1980-1999). Authors of identified studies and pharmaceutical companies were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected if they involved people being treated for acute schizophrenia, randomised to two or more dose ranges of non-depot haloperidol, and if they reported clinically meaningful outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The reviewers independently and blindly inspected citations (10% reliability check), they ordered papers, and reliably re-inspected and quality assessed the full reports. The reviewers, again working independently, also extracted data. For homogeneous dichotomous data the relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. Reviewers assumed that people who left the study early or were lost to follow-up had a negative outcome. Weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for continuous outcomes that reported intention to treat (ITT), last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. Data was excluded if loss to follow-up was greater than 50%.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials with nineteen different randomised dose comparisons were included. No studies reported data on relapse rates, quality of life and none compared >1.5-3.0 mg/day haloperidol to higher dose ranges. Using low doses (>3-7.5mg/day) did not clearly result in loss of efficacy (no clinically important improvement in global state, versus >7.5-15mg/day n=48, 1 RCT, RR 1.09 CI 0.7 to 1.8; versus >15-35mg/day n=81, 2 RCTs, 0.95 CI 0.8 to 1.2). Doses of haloperidol in the range of >3-7.5 mg/day had a lower rate of development of clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects than higher doses (clinically significant extrapyramidal adverse effects, versus >7.5-15mg/day n=64, 2 RCTs, RR 0.12 CI 0.01 to 2.1; versus >15-35mg/day n=144, 3 RCTs RR 0.59 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNH 3 CI 2 to 6; versus >35mg/day n=86, 2 RCTs, RR 0.70 CI 0.5 to 1.1). All other comparisons between dose ranges did not yield statistically significant differences, but several, particularly with lower dose ranges, were underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

No results are conclusive and all are based on small, short, studies. It would be understandable, however, if clinicians were cautious in prescribing doses in excess of 7.5 mg/day of haloperidol to a person with uncomplicated acute schizophrenia, and if people with schizophrenia were equally reticent to take greater doses. Further research is needed regarding the efficacy and tolerability of the >1.5-3.0 mg/day dose range.

Drug strategies and treatment-resistant schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the paper are to review the notion of treatment resistance in schizophrenia and consider the factors important in determining non-responsiveness to standard neuroleptic treatment, and to review the strategies currently available in the treatment of such patients, including an evaluation of recently-introduced, novel drug treatments.

METHOD

A selective review of the literature relating to treatment resistance was undertaken using medline searches, followed by cross-checking for further articles identified in these references.

RESULTS

The various treatment approaches available are considered, including adjunctive treatment with lithium or carbamazepine. The risks and benefits of high dose antipsychotic treatment are discussed. The possible benefits and side-effects of new treatments, particularly the atypical neuroleptics, are also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The reasons why a proportion of patients with schizophrenia fail to respond to standard neuroleptic treatment are ill-understood. Nevertheless, initial assessment should include identification of any factors that may be related to a patient's poor response, such as poor compliance, substance use or epilepsy. This may help to determine an appropriate treatment strategy. There is a need to be systematic and to ensure that patients be given an adequate trial of each treatment tested in terms of duration and dosage. The available evidence does not support the use of high doses of neuroleptics for the majority of patients. Adjunctive treatments, such as lithium, carbamazepine or benzodiazepines may be beneficial in non-responsive patients, particularly if certain target symptoms are present. Atypical neuroleptics, particularly clozapine, have proved particularly effective in non-responsive patients as well as those sensitive to the motor side-effects of standard drugs. However, the high risk of agranulocytosis with clozapine is a problem; also the drug and the necessary haematological monitoring are expensive. There are hints that some of the other, new, atypical neuroleptics have some benefit in non-responsive patients, but controlled studies are required.

Haloperidol dose and blood level variability: toxicity and interindividual and intraindividual variability in the nonresponder patient in the clinical practice setting

Haloperidol levels in blood were measured monthly in 43 refractory chronic schizophrenic patients referred to a locked skilled nursing facility for long-term treatment. Gross toxic side effects (seizures, catatonia, confusion) and Neuroleptic Induced Deficit Syndrome in conjunction with blood levels over 30 ng/ml were identified in 13 of our 43 patients. Blood level reductions contributed to a reduction of side effects and clinical improvement and led to the expedited discharge of 6 of these 13 patients of the toxic subgroup. Considerable blood level variation was evident in single samples, and four levels appeared necessary to develop confidence for accuracy. Significant dose to blood level interindividual variability was identified, thereby bringing into question fixed-dose approaches to patients. The results strongly suggest the utility of haloperidol blood levels in the clinical setting.

Is there a relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and their clinical efficacy? An analysis of studies design and methodology

There are now more than 50 studies concerning neuroleptic blood levels and clinical outcome relationships. Haloperidol, the most studied, is the only antipsychotic permitting some conclusions. A number of authors suggest that the striking lack of agreement between different studies results from heterogeneity of their quality. Here, we have used a scoring system for assessing the quality of those studies. According to this system, none (0/14) of the studies having a score < 0.60 was able to show a therapeutic window, as compared to 53% (10/19) of those having a score > or = 0.60 (p = 0.002, Fisher exact test). Also, the studies able to identify the presence of a therapeutic window during haloperidol treatment were those having sample size > 20 (p = 0.06) and those whose patients were treated with fixed doses (p = 0.02). The diagnosis of schizophrenia in the studies seems not to be an exclusive condition, as compared with those also including schizophreniform and schizoaffective disorders (p = 0.12). Our qualitative analysis of haloperidol blood level publications seem to indicate that an upper limit may exist for haloperidol efficacy; values above this limit seem not to provide any supplementary clinical improvement and may even reduce therapeutic effect.

Comparative study of dopamine metabolism with local cerebral glucose utilization in rat brain following the administration of haloperidol decanoate

The effects of haloperidol decanoate on dopamine (DA) metabolism in discrete regions of rat brain were investigated and compared with changes in local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU). The concentration of DA and its metabolite, homovanillic acid, and the alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (alpha-MT)-induced decline of DA were measured in 6 brain regions by a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. LCGU in 26 brain regions were examined by [14C]2-deoxy-D-glucose autoradiography. At 24-hr after intramuscular injection of haloperidol decanoate (60 mg eq/kg to haloperidol), the concentration of homovanillic acid in the prefrontal cortex, caudate-putamen, accumbens nucleus, lateral amygdala, and medial thalamus showed significant increase compared with control values. On day 21, the increase in these regions was significantly attenuated with no significant difference from the controls. Furthermore, chronic haloperidol rats showed alpha-MT-induced decline of DA to a similar extent in the control rats. LCGU on day 21 showed significant decrease in the parietal cortex, and a tendency toward decrease in the prefrontal cortex, lateral amygdala and medial thalamus compared with the controls. There was no significant change in LCGU in the caudate-putamen or accumbens nucleus. Chronic haloperidol would thus appear to affect energy metabolism mainly in the cortico-thalamo-limbic circuits, and this may not correspond well to presynaptic DA metabolism.

Haloperidol Concentrations in Patients With Alzheimer's Dementia

To investigate the relationship between clinical response and haloperidol blood concentrations in Alzheimer's dementia (AD) patients with behavior problems, 29 AD inpatients were assigned to a fixed oral dosage of haloperidol (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, or 2.0 mg) every 12 hours for 3 weeks. BEHAVE-AD ratings and concentrations of plasma and RBC haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were obtained on Days 8, 15, and 22. Although no significant linear or curvilinear relationships were apparent between percent of change on BEHAVE-AD and plasma or RBC haloperidol concentrations, a good response (change ≥ 30%) was observed in 55% of the patients who entered the study.

A multidimensional (pharmacokinetic and clinical-biological) approach to neuroleptic response in schizophrenia. With particular reference to drug resistance

Despite the undisputable effectiveness of the available neuroleptic medications (NDs), short and long term outcome of schizophrenic disorders is often unsatisfactory and drug resistance phenomena are not uncommon. The causes of variability in the response seem to be primarily due to the heterogeneity of schizophrenic syndromes in terms of clinical history, symptoms, and biological patterns. The high non-compliance rate is an important source of therapeutic failure particularly during long-term treatment. The lacking or poor response to NDs can be linked to peculiar drug disposition patterns, which lead generally to inadequate plasma concentrations (too low or too high). To deal with pharmacokinetic aspects two main topics are discussed in this paper: (A) the interindividual differences in bioavailability and metabolism and (B) the plasma level-clinical response relationship. The knowledge of these aspects can significantly contribute to reducing some pseudo-drug resistance phenomena. Moreover, the need to combine these data with the new acquisitions on the pathophysiology of these disorders is emphasized, to deal properly with the complexity of drug response mechanisms during therapy with NDs. New heuristic paradigms for schizophrenic disorders, stemming from the evidences of their heterogeneity, in terms of clinical course, outcome and biological findings, should be considered in relation to response. Accordingly, the concept of 'therapeutic window' (as conceived in the '70s) for NDs (as for antidepressants) needs to be reexamined in relation to recent clinical, neurochemical and neuromorphological data. Finally, the indications for NDs monitoring (particularly for drugs like haloperidol and fluphenazine) are reported, suggesting that a multidimensional operational strategy could be particularly suitable to deal with drug resistance problems.

Plasma concentrations of remoxipride and haloperidol in relation to prolactin and short-term therapeutic outcome in schizophrenic patients

Plasma concentrations of remoxipride and haloperidol as well as prolactin (PRL) were determined in 20 patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia. Ten patients received remoxipride and ten patients haloperidol for a period of 6 weeks. A significant linear correlation was found between the plasma level of remoxipride and the dosage applied (P less than 0.02) as well as between the corresponding haloperidol dosage and plasma concentration (P less than 0.05). In both patient groups a significant reduction in psychopathology was observed during the trial period (P less than 0.001). In the haloperidol group this was associated with a clearcut elevation of plasma PRL, whereas in the remoxipride group after an initial rise for 4 weeks, the mean PRL level returned to baseline at the end of the study.

Pretreatment EEG predicts short-term response to haloperidol treatment

This study analyzed the relationship between pretreatment electroencephalogram (EEG) and response to haloperidol medication in a group of acutely exacerbated schizophrenic patients (n = 34). Improvement was assessed after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment; it was measured globally, as decrease in the total score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), as well as multidimensionally through the individual BPRS factors. Relative powers from four clinical EEG frequency bands were employed as predictor variables. Baseline alpha activity was significantly related to clinical response. Higher alpha values were associated with poorer response to treatment. Specifically, improvements on the "thought disturbance" and "hostility-suspiciousness" factors underlied the relationship between the pretreatment EEG and outcome.

Drug prescribing for schizophrenic out-patients on depot injections. Repeat surveys over 18 years

Serial surveys of the prescribing practices of psychiatrists for schizophrenic out-patients over 1970-88 showed important changes. During the interval 1970-83, polypharmacy and the use of multiple neuroleptics were reduced. The total dose of neuroleptics prescribed fell and the proportion administered by depot injection increased. Since 1983, however, some of these favourable trends have been reversed. Prescribing practices may also vary between teaching and non-teaching hospitals.

The measurement of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol in hair as an index of dosage history

1. We report a method for measuring the concentrations of haloperidol (HL) and its major active metabolite, reduced haloperidol (RHL), in human scalp hair. 2. Hair samples were obtained from 59 patients who had been taking HL at fixed daily doses for more than 4 months and whose compliance was good. A morning pre-dose plasma sample was also obtained from 48 of these patients. 3. The concentrations of HL and RHL in hair (ng mg-1 hair) correlated significantly both with the daily dose (micrograms kg-1 body weight) of HL (r = 0.682, P less than 0.001 for HL and r = 0.813, P less than 0.001 for RHL, n = 59) and with the trough concentration (ng ml-1) of the corresponding compound in plasma at steady state (r = 0.558, P less than 0.001 for HL and r = 0.563, P less than 0.001 for RHL, n = 48). The correlation coefficients were slightly higher using the sum of the concentrations of both substances in hair (r = 0.829 for the correlation with daily dose and r = 0.609 for that with trough concentration). 4. Hair from other patients, in whom the dosage of HL had been changed within a few months prior to sampling, was sectioned into 1 cm-long portions successively from the roots and the concentrations of both compounds in each portion were measured. Assuming a growth rate of 1-1.5 cm/month, a history of individual dosage could be deduced in all patients from the distribution of the drug and metabolite along the single hair length.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Human scalp hair as evidence of individual dosage history of haloperidol: a possible linkage of haloperidol excretion into hair with hair pigment

We report a method for determining haloperidol concentration in human scalp hair and discuss a possible linkage of haloperidol excretion into hair with the hair pigment melanin. First, an animal study was conducted to support the idea that hair contains amounts of haloperidol corresponding to the doses given and pigmented hair contains much more drug than does unpigmented hair. The haloperidol concentration was measured using a radioimmunoassay technique after hairs were dissolved in 2.5 N NaOH solution and the drug extracted. Pigmented and albino rats, whose hair from an area on the back had been removed beforehand by plucking, were administered either 1, 3, or 10 mg of haloperidol (i.p.) per kg body weight every day for 3 weeks. At the end of the administration period hair which had newly grown on the denuded area was plucked and collected. In each of the two groups classified by hair color the drug levels in the hair correlated with the doses given; however, the concentrations in the hair from the albino rats were much lower than those in the hair from the pigmented rats (which was less than 8.5%). Second, black and white hair was collected from each of seven human subjects with grizzled hair, who were receiving or had been administered haloperidol at fixed daily doses for more than 1 month, and the concentration of haloperidol in each type of hair was measured. In the same subject the concentration in the white hair was found to be much lower than that in the black (less than 10%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reduced haloperidol plasma concentration and clinical response in acute exacerbations of schizophrenia

Twenty-nine hospitalized patients suffering acute exacerbations of schizophrenia were treated for 2 weeks with fixed daily oral doses of haloperidol prospectively calculated to achieve a haloperidol plasma concentration of either 8-18 ng/ml or 25-35 ng/ml. Reduced haloperidol as well as haloperidol concentrations were assayed to determine if the former enhanced the predictability of response. Wee 2 haloperidol plasma concentrations were negatively correlated to clinical response as measured by the percentage change in the BPRS score from baseline (r = -0.43, P less than 0.05). In contrast, week 2 plasma concentrations of reduced haloperidol, total haloperidol (haloperidol + reduced haloperidol), and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratio did not correlate with the change in the BPRS score. Chi-square analysis concluded that patients with ratios greater than one were no less likely to be treatment responders (less than 25% improvement in BPRS from baseline and week 2 BPRS less than 55) than those with ratios less than one. Although these data lend additional support to reports of a curvilinear relationship between haloperidol plasma concentration and clinical response, they also suggest that reduced haloperidol plasma concentrations are of no value in predicting treatment response.

Neuroleptic-induced vacuous chewing movements as an animal model of tardive dyskinesia: a study in three rat strains

Vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) in three different rat strains developed at considerably different rates after 19 weeks of continual haloperidol treatment at an average daily dose of 1.5 mg/kg. Sprague Dawley (SD) rats displayed relatively high rates of VCMs with low variability, compared to Wistar (W) and Long Evan (LE) rats. Atropine decreased but did not abolish VCMs in two of the three strains (LE greater than SD). After haloperidol withdrawal, VCMs remitted gradually in all strains, but least rapidly in the SD rats. In a separate group of SD rats. VCMs were rated weekly from the start of haloperidol treatment and showed considerable interindividual variability. Even after 24 weeks of continuous haloperidol, 12 out of 32 treated rats showed no VCMs at all, while 13 out of 32 had intense movements, analogous to the clinical situation in which only some patients treated with neuroleptics develop tardive dyskinesia. These results indicate that there are individual and strain differences in the development of VCMs, and suggest that there may also be genetically determined differences in the development of tardive dyskinesia.

Drug therapy in schizophrenia--variability of outcome and prediction of response

In spite of the proven benefits of neuroleptics in reducing acute psychotic symptoms and in preventing relapse in schizophrenic patients, not all schizophrenics benefit equally from neuroleptic therapy. Predictors of response include: demographics, clinical characteristics, neurologic soft signs, neurocognitive functioning, morphologic brain changes, drug blood levels, indices of blockade of the dopamine receptors, subjective response to medications as well as early symptomatic improvement. Methodological difficulties in outcome research in drug therapy are reviewed. No single factor has been identified as a reliable predictor of drug response, and it is unlikely that such a single predictor will prove useful in a heterogeneous illness such as schizophrenia. This paper reviews the factors, which have been suggested as useful in developing better understanding of variability of drug response among schizophrenics.

Clinical response and plasma haloperidol levels in chronic and subchronic schizophrenia

Levels of haloperidol were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) in 30 schizophrenic patients (diagnosed according to the criteria of DSM-III), who were treated with fixed doses of this neuroleptic for a period of 21 days. An inverted U-shaped relationship was found between the percent improvement observed in the BPRS global score and the steady state of haloperidol. The interval of effective concentration of haloperidol was set between 12.0 and 35.5 ng/ml. However, the limits of such an interval found in the subchronic schizophrenic subgroup (SS) ranged from 7.4 to 24.9 ng/ml, whereas in the chronic schizophrenic subgroup (CS), it ranged from 14.8 to 38.5 ng/ml. This finding suggests that the interval of effective concentrations may vary as a function of the number of years of evolution of the subjects' illness. This may be compatible with the development of tolerance in the mesolimbic and/or mesocortical dopaminergic systems as a response to prolonged neuroleptic treatments.

Clinical implications of determination of plasma haloperidol levels

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical utility of monitoring plasma levels, since the utility of monitoring is not yet well established. After a washout period, 30 schizophrenic patients were given fixed doses of haloperidol for 3 weeks. A U-shaped second-grade polynomic relationship (R = 0.69) was found between steady state of haloperidol and percentage improvement in total score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The interval of effective concentrations was between 12 and 59 ng/ml. Fourteen of the 15 patients who had a steady state of haloperidol within that therapeutic interval were responders: only 5 out of the 15 patients below the therapeutic interval were responders. None of the 5 patients who had concentrations below 8 ng/ml was a responder. Furthermore, responder patients showed a steady-state level of haloperidol significantly higher than that of nonresponders. These data suggest that plasma levels of haloperidol are predictors of therapeutic response in schizophrenic disorders.

Determination of plasma haloperidol concentrations by radioreceptor assay in schizophrenia: clinical utility

1. Haloperidol concentrations were determined by radioreceptor assay (RRA) and prolactin concentrations were measured in 20 patients diagnosed as schizophrenia (DSM-III). 2. The patients were treated with a fixed dose of haloperidol for 21 days. 3. Our results suggest the existence of a curvilinear relationship, in the form of an inverted U, between stable haloperidol levels and clinical improvement assessed by total BPRS score. 4. We also found a curvilinear relationship between the improvement observed in positive symptoms and state steady levels. 5. No relationship was seen between improvement in negative symptoms and state steady levels. 6. An interval of optimal haloperidol concentration was found: 8.1 ng/ml to 19.6 ng/ml. 7. No relation was found between the dose of haloperidol administered and plasmatic concentration, nor between haloperidol and prolactin levels. 8. Our findings suggest that haloperidol concentrations determined by RRA have clinical utility as predictors of response in schizophrenia.

Neuroleptic plasma concentrations and clinical response: in search of a therapeutic window

There is much interest in finding a therapeutic window for commonly used neuroleptics so that dosage can be individualized and side effects minimized. The authors review specific requirements of good study design and survey the literature that has investigated the relationship between therapeutic response and plasma concentrations of neuroleptics. The evidence from a number of fixed-dose haloperidol studies suggests, but does not yet prove, the existence of a therapeutic window for this compound.

Observations on the use of depot neuroleptics in schizophrenia

This paper reviews some of the advantages and disadvantages of long-term maintenance therapy with neuroleptics in schizophrenia. The need to separate first-illness schizophrenia from chronic schizophrenia is illustrated. The reduction in the risk of a further acute relapse with continued medication and the likely duration of maintenance therapy are discussed. The true meaning of a further relapse to the patient in terms of reduced social and work function is also discussed. The advantages of using long-acting depot injections for drug administration are stressed. The complex issue of the correct dosage for maintenance is reviewed, with no proven advantage for either very high doses or very low doses. The frequency of depressive symptoms in schizophrenia is reviewed and the possible aetiologies discussed. The decision to use short- or long-term drug therapy, and whether to use a particular method of drug administration (oral or long-acting depot injections) should be separate issues. Depot injections may, on occasions, be the appropriate method of drug administration for short-term therapies, just as oral drugs have a place in the longer-duration maintenance treatments.

Depot neuroleptic medication and serum levels by radioreceptor assay: prolactin concentration, electrocardiogram abnormalities and six-month outcome

Twenty-six chronic schizophrenic patients on well-established depot neuroleptic regimes with stable doses (16 on fluphenazine decanoate, 10 on flupenthixol decanoate) had serum neuroleptic levels measured by radioreceptor assay (RRA) and were followed for six months. The serum prolactin (PRL) concentration and resting electrocardiogram (ECG) were also taken at the beginning of the study period. Correlations had previously been noted between RRA measured neuroleptic levels and outcome in both acute and chronic patients on oral medication. However, in this study of depot medication no significant correlations were found between serum neuroleptic concentration, serum prolactin concentration and the clinical state or outcome. The prevalence (33%) and type of ECG abnormality observed was similar to that previously reported.

Cortical atrophy and white matter density in the brains of schizophrenics and clinical response to neuroleptics

The relationship between clinical response to neuroleptics and brain morphology as revealed by CT scans was evaluated in a sample of 39 patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychosis. Four measures of brain morphology previously shown to differ between schizophrenics and patients with headaches - white matter density, asymmetry in brain white matter density, sulcal width and global cortical atrophy - did not correlate with clinical improvement after 3 weeks treatment with constant doses of neuroleptics. These brain morphology measures also did not correlate with baseline psychopathology scores. The same results were found with scales or subscales reflecting primarily positive symptoms of schizophrenia as well as those reflecting primarily social withdrawal.

A "new" drug for treating agitation and psychosis in the general hospital: chlorpromazine

Psychiatric residents on a consultation-liaison service consistently avoid chlorpromazine in favor of haloperidol for the treatment of psychotic, agitated patients. The residents' fears of chlorpromazine as a dangerous medication are presented and the literature about chlorpromazine's side effects is reviewed. Evidence was not found to support the contention that chlorpromazine is too dangerous to use in the medical setting. Case material illustrating the benefits of chlorpromazine is presented. A theoretical explanation for the observed prescribing practices is suggested.

Plasma level monitoring of antipsychotic drugs. Clinical utility

The steady-state plasma concentrations of antipsychotic drugs show large interpatient variations but remain relatively stable from day to day in each individual patient. Monitoring of antipsychotic drug concentrations in plasma might be of value provided the patients are treated with only 1 antipsychotic drug. Some studies have reported a relationship between therapeutic response and serum antipsychotic drug 'concentrations' as measured using the radioreceptor assay (RRA) method, which measures dopamine receptor-blocking activity in plasma. Most studies, however, have failed to demonstrate such a relationship, and the RRA does not seem to provide the generally useful tool for plasma concentration monitoring of antipsychotic drugs that was hoped for initially. A lack of correlation between dopamine receptor-blocking activity in plasma and therapeutic response may be due to differences in the blood-brain distribution of both antipsychotic drugs and their active metabolites. Chemical assay methods (e.g. GLC and HPLC) have been used in studies which examined the relationships between therapeutic response and antipsychotic drug concentrations in red blood cells and in plasma. It seems that for these drugs, measuring red blood cell concentrations does not offer any significant advantage over measuring plasma concentrations. Reasonably controlled studies of plasma concentration-response relationships using randomly allocated, fixed dosages of chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, perphenazine, sulpiride, thioridazine and thiothixene have been published but often involve relatively few patients. A correlation between therapeutic response and plasma concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites has not been demonstrated, and plasma level monitoring of thioridazine and its metabolites therefore appears to have no clinical value. Clinical behavioural deterioration concomitant with high plasma concentrations of chlorpromazine and haloperidol have been reported. A dosage reduction might be considered after 2 to 4 weeks' treatment in non-responders who have plasma chlorpromazine concentrations above 100 to 150 micrograms/L or plasma haloperidol concentrations above 20 to 30 micrograms/L. Non-responders and good responders to chlorpromazine treatment, however, have plasma drug concentrations in the same range, and a therapeutic range of plasma chlorpromazine levels has not been defined. Therapeutic plasma haloperidol concentrations (i.e. 'window') in the range of 5 to 20 micrograms/L have been reported by some investigators, but others have found no such relationship.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Neuroleptic withdrawal in chronic schizophrenia: CT and endocrine variables relating to psychopathology

The psychopathology of 36 chronic, schizophrenic patients who had been on maintenance neuroleptics was rated during neuroleptic therapy and after 12 days of neuroleptic withdrawal. At both times, hormonal serum levels were also determined. Moreover, in 27 of these patients, ventricle-brain ratio, maximal width of the third ventricle, and sulcal widening were measured on computed tomography (CT). Neuroleptic withdrawal resulted in individually different psychopathological changes: 7 patients improved, 11 worsened. Within the whole group, thought disorder deteriorated, and anergia improved. Levels of cortisol and beta-endorphin increased; those of prolactin and norepinephrine decreased. The majority of patients showed ventricular enlargement, which was marginally related to reduced thought disorder. CT and endocrine variables were slightly related to psychopathology or psychopathological effects of neuroleptic withdrawal.

Lateral ventricular enlargement and clinical response in schizophrenia

The relationship between enlargement of the lateral ventricles in the brains of schizophrenic patients and clinical response to neuroleptic treatment, as assessed by the ventricle-brain ratio (VBR) and psychopathology scores, was studied in a sample of 39 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective psychosis during a drug-free washout and after 3 1/2 weeks of treatment with either haloperidol or thioridazine. There was a weak, but statistically significant positive relationship between VBR and improvement on BPRS Psychosis factor scores after 3 1/2 weeks of treatment, and a negative correlation between VBR and baseline (washout) scores on the BPRS Anergia factor. Patients with enlarged VBRs, as defined by two criteria, also tended to show a better response to neuroleptics than patients below these criterion values.

Comparative efficacy of red cell and plasma haloperidol as predictors of clinical response in schizophrenia

The relative utility of steady-state (SS), plasma (Pl), and red blood cell (RBC) haloperidol levels for predicting clinical response was evaluated in a fixed-dose study in schizophrenic inpatients. There were significant curvilinear relationships between the decrease in BPRS Psychosis Factor Scores by day 24 of haloperidol treatment and both Pl (R2 = 0.34) and RBC (R2 = 0.38) haloperidol levels. Although SS RBC haloperidol levels consistently showed a slightly stronger relationship to clinical response than Pl levels in several comparisons, the differences in R2s between Pl and RBC haloperidol were not statistically significant. Ninety percent confidence intervals for the blood level ranges associated with optimal clinical response in our sample of patients were: 6.5-16.5 ng/ml Pl haloperidol and 2.2-6.8 ng/ml RBC haloperidol.