1
|
Lorenz V, Mastrobuoni S, Aphram G, Pettinari M, de Kerchove L, El Khoury G. Tricuspid valve repair for infective endocarditis. INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY 2024; 38:ivae084. [PMID: 38688562 PMCID: PMC11096269 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivae084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The progressive increase in the use of implantable electronic devices, vascular access for dialysis and the increased life expectancy of patients with congenital heart diseases has led in recent years to a considerable number of right-side infective endocarditis, especially of the tricuspid valve (TV). Although current guidelines recommend TV repair for native tricuspid valve endocarditis (TVE), the percentage of valve replacements remains very high in numerous studies. The aim of our study is to analyse our experience in the treatment of TVE with a reparative approach. METHODS This case series includes all the patients who underwent surgery for acute or healed infective endocarditis on the native TV, at the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Bruxelles, Belgium) between February 2001 and December 2020. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were included in the study. Twenty-eight (90.3%) underwent TV repair and 3 (9.7%) had a TV replacement with a mitral homograft. The repair group was divided into 2 subgroups, according to whether a patch was used during surgery or not. Hospital mortality was 33.3% (n = 1) for the replacement group and 7.1% (n = 2) for repair (P = 0.25). Overall survival at 10 years was 75.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 52-89%]. Further, freedom from reoperation on the TV at 10 years was 59.3% (95% CI: 7.6-89%) vs 93.7% (95% CI: 63-99%) (P = 0.4) for patch repair and no patch use respectively. Freedom from recurrent endocarditis at 10 years was 87% (95% CI: 51-97%). CONCLUSIONS Considering that TVE is more common in young patients, a repair-oriented approach should be considered as the first choice. In the case of extremely damaged valves, the use of pericardial patch is a valid option. If repair is not feasible, the use of a mitral homograft is an additional useful solution to reduce the prosthetic material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Lorenz
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefano Mastrobuoni
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaby Aphram
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Pettinari
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent de Kerchove
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gebrine El Khoury
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schipmann LC, Moeller V, Krimnitz J, Bannehr M, Kramer TS, Haase-Fielitz A, Butter C. Outcome and microbiological findings of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection. Heart Vessels 2024:10.1007/s00380-024-02380-y. [PMID: 38512486 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-024-02380-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a multifactorial disease that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE The aim was to analyze patient-, disease- and treatment-related characteristics including microbiological and bacterial spectrum according to survival status and to identify risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality in patients with local and systemic CIED infection. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with CIED-related local or systemic infection undergoing successful transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Survival status as well as incidence and cause of rehospitalization were recorded. Microbiology and antibiotics used as first-line therapy were compared according to mortality. Independent risk factors for 1- and 3-year mortality were determined. RESULTS Data from 243 Patients were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was 2.5%. Mortality rates at 30 days, 1- and 3 years were 4.1%, 18.1% and 30%, respectively. Seventy-four (30.5%) patients had systemic bacterial infection. Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality included age (OR 1.05 [1.01-1.10], p = 0.014), NT-proBNP at admission (OR 4.18 [1.81-9.65], p = 0.001), new onset or worsened tricuspid regurgitation after TLE (OR 6.04 [1.58-23.02], p = 0.009), and systemic infection (OR 2.76 [1.08-7.03], p = 0.034), whereas systemic infection was no longer an independent risk factor for 3-year mortality. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 18.1% of patients who survived and in 25% of those who died, p = 0.092. There was a high proportion of methicillin-resistant strains among coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.5%) compared to Staphylococcus aureus (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS Staphylococci are the most common causative germs of CIED-infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci showing higher resistance rates to antibiotics. The independent risk factors for increased long-term mortality could contribute to individual risk stratification and well-founded treatment decisions in clinical routine. Especially the role of tricuspid regurgitation as a complication after TLE should be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara C Schipmann
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Nephrology and Diabetology, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Hospital OWL, University of Bielefeld, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Viviane Moeller
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliane Krimnitz
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Marwin Bannehr
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- LADR MVZ GmbH Neuruppin, Zur Mesche 20, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany
- LADR Zentrallabor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - Anja Haase-Fielitz
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health System Research, Otto Von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christian Butter
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW) Brandenburg, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Ladeburger Straße 17, 16321, Bernau Bei Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burger H, Strauß M, Chung DU, Richter M, Ziegelhöffer T, Hakmi S, Reichenspurner H, Choi YH, Pecha S. Infection remediation after septic device extractions: analysis of three treatment strategies including a 1-year follow-up. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 10:1342886. [PMID: 38274307 PMCID: PMC10808596 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1342886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In CIED infections, all device material needs to be removed. But, especially in pacemaker-dependent patients it is often not possible to realize a device-free interval for infection remediation. In those patients, different treatment options are available, however the ideal solution needs still to be defined. Methods This retrospective analysis includes 190 patients undergoing CIED extractions due to infection. Three different treatment algorithms were analyzed: Group 1 included 89 patients with system removal only (System removal group). In Group 2, 28 patients received an epicardial electrode during extraction procedure (Epicardial lead group) while 78 patients in group 3 (contralateral reimplantation group) received implantation of a new system contralaterally during extraction procedure. We analyzed peri- and postoperative data as well as 1-year outcomes of the three groups. Results Patients in the system removal and epicardial lead groups were significantly older, had more comorbidities, and suffered more frequently from systemic infections than those in contralateral reimplantation group. Lead extraction procedures had comparable success rates: 95.5%, 96.4%, and 93.2% of complete lead removal in the System removal, Epicardial Lead, Contralateral re-implantation group respectively. Device reimplantation was performed in all patients in Epicardial lead and Contralateral reimplantation group, whereas only 49.4% in System removal group received device re-implantation. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from infection and absence of pocket irritation were comparable for all groups (94.7% Contralateral reimplantation group and Epicardial lead group, 100% System removal group). No procedure-related mortality was observed, whereas 1-year mortality was 3.4% in System removal group, 4.1% in Contralateral re-implantation group and 21.4% in Epicardial lead group (p < 0.001). Conclusion In patients with CIED infection, systems should be removed completely and reimplanted after infection remediation. In pacemaker-dependent patients, simultaneous contralateral CIED re-implantation or epicardial lead placement may be performed, depending on route, severity and location of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Burger
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- CampusKerckhoff-Klinik, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Department of Angiology and Cardiology, CardioVascular Center, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Mona Strauß
- CampusKerckhoff-Klinik, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Da-Un Chung
- Department of Cardiology& Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Richter
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- CampusKerckhoff-Klinik, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Tibor Ziegelhöffer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- CampusKerckhoff-Klinik, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Samer Hakmi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany
| | - Yeong-Hoon Choi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- CampusKerckhoff-Klinik, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RhineMain, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Simon Pecha
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu S, Chen H, Xu F, Chen F, Yin Y, Zhang X, Tu S, Wang H. Unravelling staphylococcal small-colony variants in cardiac implantable electronic device infections: clinical characteristics, management, and genomic insights. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 13:1321626. [PMID: 38259974 PMCID: PMC10800868 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1321626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Staphylococcal small-colony variants (SCVs) are common in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. This is the first retrospective and multi-case study on CIED infections due to staphylococcal SCVs, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical management of CIED and device-related infections caused by staphylococcal SCVs. Methods Ninety patients with culture positive CIED infections were enrolled between 2021 and 2022. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with and without SCVs and performed genomic studies on SCVs isolates. Results Compared to patients without SCVs, those with SCVs had a longer primary pacemaker implantation time and were more likely to have a history of device replacement and infection. They showed upregulated inflammatory indicators, especially higher NEUT% (52.6 vs. 26.8%, P = 0.032) and they had longer hospital stays (median 13 vs. 12 days, P = 0.012). Comparative genomics analysis was performed on Staphylococcus epidermidis wild-type and SCVs. Some genes were identified, including aap, genes encoding adhesin, CHAP domain-containing protein, LPXTG cell wall anchor domain-containing protein, and YSIRK-type signal peptide-containing protein. Conclusion Staphylococcal SCVs affect the clinical characteristics of CIED infections. The process of staphylococcal SCVs adherence, biofilm formation, and interaction with neutrophils play a vital role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongbin Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fangjie Xu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Urumqi Friendship Hospital, Urumqi, China
| | - Fengning Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuyao Yin
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyang Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shangyu Tu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pisani AR, Rubini D, Altini C, Ruta R, Gazzilli M, Sardaro A, Iuele F, Maggialetti N, Rubini G. The Role of the 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Patients Suspected of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices' Infection. J Pers Med 2024; 14:65. [PMID: 38248766 PMCID: PMC10820973 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDI) is a real public health problem. The main aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of CIEDI. Methods: A total of 48 patients, who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT for the clinical suspicion of CIEDI were retrospectively analyzed; all patients were provided with a model with procedural recommendations before the exam. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of 18F-FDG PET/CT were calculated; the reproducibility of qualitative analysis was assessed with Cohen's κ test. The semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SQR and TBR) were evaluated in CIEDI+ and CIEDI- patients using the Student' t-test; ROC curves were elaborated to detect cut-off values. The trend of image quality with regards to procedural recommendation adherence was evaluated. Results: Se, Sp, PPV, NPV and DA were respectively 96.2%, 81.8%, 86.2%, 94.7% and 89.6%. The reproducibility of qualitative analysis was excellent (K = 0.89). Semiquantitative parameters resulted statistically different in CIEDI+ and CIEDI- patients. Cut-off values were SUVmax = 2.625, SQR = 3.766 and TBR = 1.29. Trend curves showed increasing image quality due to adherence to procedural recommendations. Conclusions:18F-FDG-PET/CT is a valid tool in the management of patients suspected of CIEDI and adherence to procedural recommendations improves its image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Rosario Pisani
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Dino Rubini
- Radiotherapy, Precision Medicine Department, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Corinna Altini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Rossella Ruta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | | | - Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Iuele
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rubini
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pokorney SD, Zepel L, Greiner MA, Fowler VG, Black-Maier E, Lewis RK, Hegland DD, Granger CB, Epstein LM, Carrillo RG, Wilkoff BL, Hardy C, Piccini JP. Lead Extraction and Mortality Among Patients With Cardiac Implanted Electronic Device Infection. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:1165-1173. [PMID: 37851461 PMCID: PMC10585491 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Complete hardware removal is a class I recommendation for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, but practice patterns and outcomes remain unknown. Objective To quantify the number of Medicare patients with CIED infections who underwent implantation from 2006 to 2019 and lead extraction from 2007 to 2019 to analyze the outcomes in these patients in a nationwide clinical practice cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included fee-for-service Medicare Part D beneficiaries from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, who had a de novo CIED implantation and a CIED infection more than 1 year after implantation. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2019. Exposure A CIED infection, defined as (1) endocarditis or infection of a device implant and (2) documented antibiotic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes of interest were device infection, device extraction, and all-cause mortality. Time-varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between extraction and survival. Results Among 1 065 549 patients (median age, 78.0 years [IQR, 72.0-84.0 years]; 50.9% male), mean (SD) follow-up was 4.6 (2.9) years after implantation. There were 11 304 patients (1.1%) with CIED infection (median age, 75.0 years [IQR, 67.0-82.0 years]); 60.1% were male, and 7724 (68.3%) had diabetes. A total of 2102 patients with CIED infection (18.6%) underwent extraction within 30 days of diagnosis. Infection occurred a mean (SD) of 3.7 (2.4) years after implantation, and 1-year survival was 68.3%. There was evidence of highly selective treatment, as most patients did not have extraction within 30 days of diagnosed infection (9202 [81.4%]), while 1511 (13.4%) had extraction within 6 days of diagnosis and 591 (5.2%) had extraction between days 7 and 30. Any extraction was associated with lower mortality compared with no extraction (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.90; P < .001). Extraction within 6 days was associated with even lower risk of mortality (AHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61-0.78; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a minority of patients with CIED infection underwent extraction. Extraction was associated with a lower risk of death compared with no extraction. The findings suggest a need to improve adherence to guideline-directed care among patients with CIED infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean D. Pokorney
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lindsay Zepel
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Melissa A. Greiner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Vance G. Fowler
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Christopher B. Granger
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Chantelle Hardy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan P. Piccini
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hernández-Meneses M, Perissinotti A, Páez-Martínez S, Llopis J, Dahl A, Sandoval E, Falces C, Ambrosioni J, Vidal B, Marco F, Cuervo G, Moreno A, Bosch J, Tolosana JM, Fuster D, Miró JM. Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2023; 76:970-979. [PMID: 37028797 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up. METHODS Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed. RESULTS We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections. However, accuracy increased when [18F]FDG-PET/CT was combined with TEE in endovascular lead bacteremic infection. Spleen and bone marrow hypermetabolism could differentiate bacteremic systemic infection from local infection. Although further prospective studies are needed, follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT could play a potential role in the management of chronic antibiotic suppression therapy when complete device removal is unachievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Hernández-Meneses
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Perissinotti
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Spain
| | - Silvia Páez-Martínez
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Llopis
- Departamento de Genética, microbiología y estadística, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Dahl
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Elena Sandoval
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Falces
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Ambrosioni
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Spain
| | - Bárbara Vidal
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Marco
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Clinic-ISGlobal, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Guillermo Cuervo
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Asunción Moreno
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bosch
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Clinic-ISGlobal, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M Tolosana
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Fuster
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José M Miró
- Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Clinic-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Septic pulmonary embolism (SPE) is a rare clinical entity that is distinct from the classic and more common non-septic thrombotic pulmonary embolism. SPE should be suspected in patients with a systemic acute inflammatory reaction or sepsis who develop signs and symptoms of pulmonary involvement. The diagnosis of SPE depends on the specific radiologic finding of multiple, peripheral, nodular, possibly cavitated lesions. SPE should prompt an immediate search for the primary source of infection; typically, right-sided infective endocarditis, cardiac implantable electronic devices, and septic thrombophlebitis as a complication of bone, skin, and soft tissue infection including Lemierre's syndrome, indwelling catheters, or direct inoculation via injection drug use. Invasive treatment of the infection source may be necessary; in thrombophlebitis, the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation remain undefined. Blood cultures may be negative, particularly among patients with recent antibiotic exposure, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy should be considered. The in-hospital mortality of SPE ranges up to 20% in published case series. While trends in the incidence of SPE are unknown, the opioid epidemic, the growing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices worldwide, and the reported increase in cases of septic thrombophlebitis may be leading to an escalation in SPE cases. We provide a contemporary profile of SPE and propose a clinical management algorithm in patients with suspected or confirmed SPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Valerio
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center at the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Larry M Baddour
- Departments of Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Health, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fowler VG, Durack DT, Selton-Suty C, Athan E, Bayer AS, Chamis AL, Dahl A, DiBernardo L, Durante-Mangoni E, Duval X, Fortes CQ, Fosbøl E, Hannan MM, Hasse B, Hoen B, Karchmer AW, Mestres CA, Petti CA, Pizzi MN, Preston SD, Roque A, Vandenesch F, van der Meer JTM, van der Vaart TW, Miro JM. The 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:518-526. [PMID: 37138445 PMCID: PMC10681650 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The microbiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, and treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) have changed significantly since the Duke Criteria were published in 1994 and modified in 2000. The International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) convened a multidisciplinary Working Group to update the diagnostic criteria for IE. The resulting 2023 Duke-ISCVID IE Criteria propose significant changes, including new microbiology diagnostics (enzyme immunoassay for Bartonella species, polymerase chain reaction, amplicon/metagenomic sequencing, in situ hybridization), imaging (positron emission computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, cardiac computed tomography), and inclusion of intraoperative inspection as a new Major Clinical Criterion. The list of "typical" microorganisms causing IE was expanded and includes pathogens to be considered as typical only in the presence of intracardiac prostheses. The requirements for timing and separate venipunctures for blood cultures were removed. Last, additional predisposing conditions (transcatheter valve implants, endovascular cardiac implantable electronic devices, prior IE) were clarified. These diagnostic criteria should be updated periodically by making the Duke-ISCVID Criteria available online as a "Living Document."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vance G Fowler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David T Durack
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Eugene Athan
- Department of Infectious Disease, Barwon Health and School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Arnold S Bayer
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anna Lisa Chamis
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anders Dahl
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Louis DiBernardo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emanuele Durante-Mangoni
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania ‘L. Vanvitelli’, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Xavier Duval
- AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM CIC 1425, Université Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Claudio Querido Fortes
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho—Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | - Emil Fosbøl
- The Heart Centre, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Margaret M Hannan
- Clinical Microbiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Hasse
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Hoen
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine and Inserm CIC-1424, Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France
| | - Adolf W Karchmer
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carlos A Mestres
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and the Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre, The University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Cathy A Petti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- HealthSpring Global Inc, Bradenton, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Albert Roque
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francois Vandenesch
- CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Univ Lyon, INSERM, U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Institut des agents infectieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Jose M Miro
- Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wada M, Inoue YY, Nakai M, Sumita Y, Tonegawa-Kuji R, Miyazaki Y, Wakamiya A, Shimamoto K, Ueda N, Nakajima K, Kamakura T, Yamagata K, Ishibashi K, Miyamoto K, Nagase S, Aiba T, Iwanaga Y, Miyamoto Y, Kusano K. Transvenous lead extraction versus surgical lead extraction or conservative treatment for cardiac implantable electronic device infections: Propensity score-weighted analyses of a nationwide claim-based database. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:833-839. [PMID: 37485704 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infection is one of the most important complications associated with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The number of reports comparing the outcomes of transvenous lead extraction (TLE), surgical lead extraction, and conservative treatment for CIED infections using a real-world database is limited. This study investigated the association between the treatment strategies for CIED infections and their outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 3605 patients with CIED infections admitted to 681 hospitals using a nationwide claim-based database collected between April 2012 and March 2018. RESULTS We divided the 3605 patients into TLE (n = 938 [26%]), surgical lead extraction (n = 182 [5.0%]), and conservative treatment (n = 2485 [69%]) groups. TLE was performed more frequently in younger patients and at larger hospitals (p for trend < .001 for both). The rate of TLE increased during the study period, whereas that of surgical lead extraction decreased (p for trend < .001 for both). TLE was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (vs. surgical lead extraction: odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.70; vs. conservative treatment: OR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22-0.94) and lower 30-day readmission rates (vs. surgical lead extraction: OR, 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.56; vs. conservative treatment: OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.13) in propensity score-weighted analyses. CONCLUSIONS Only 26% of patients hospitalized for CIED infections received TLE. TLE was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day recurrence rates than surgical lead extraction and conservative treatment, suggesting that TLE should be more widely recommended as a first-line treatment for CIED infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Wada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuko Y Inoue
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Michikazu Nakai
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Yoko Sumita
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Reina Tonegawa-Kuji
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Miyazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Akinori Wakamiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Keiko Shimamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Ueda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Kenzaburo Nakajima
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Kamakura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Yamagata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Kohei Ishibashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Koji Miyamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nagase
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Takeshi Aiba
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Iwanaga
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Miyamoto
- Open Innovation Center, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Kengo Kusano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
- Department of Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Togashi S, Isawa T, Honda T, Furuya K, Yamaya K, Taguri M, Toyoda S. Regional Disparities in Transvenous Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Japan - A Descriptive Study Using the National Database Open Data. Circ J 2023; 87:1000-1006. [PMID: 37197942 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because the penetration of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection has not been investigated in Japan, we conducted a population-based, retrospective, descriptive study to evaluate regional disparities in the use of TLE for CIED infection and the potential undertreatment of CIED infection using a nationwide insurance claims database.Methods and Results: Patients who underwent CIED implantation or generator exchange and TLE between April 2018 and March 2020 were identified. Moreover, the penetration ratio of TLE for CIED infection in each prefecture was estimated. CIED implantation and TLE were most prevalent in the age categories of 80-89 years (40.3%) and 80-89 years (36.9%), respectively. There was no correlation between the number of CIED implantations and that of TLE (rho=-0.087, 95% confidence interval -0.374 to 0.211, P=0.56). The median penetration ratio was 0.00 (interquartile range 0.00-1.29). Of the 47 prefectures, 6, comprising Okinawa, Miyagi, Okayama, Fukuoka, Tokyo, and Osaka, showed a penetration ratio ≥2.00. CONCLUSIONS Our study data indicated great regional disparities in the penetration of TLE and potential undertreatment of CIED infection in Japan. Additional measures are needed to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Togashi
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health
- Department of Nursing Care, Sendai Kousei Hospital
| | | | - Taku Honda
- Department of Cardiology, Sendai Kousei Hospital
| | - Kenichi Furuya
- Department of Medical Technology, Sendai Kousei Hospital
| | - Kazuhiro Yamaya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sendai Kousei Hospital
| | | | - Shigeru Toyoda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lakkireddy DR, Segar DS, Sood A, Wu M, Rao A, Sohail MR, Pokorney SD, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Piccini JP, Granger CB. Early Lead Extraction for Infected Implanted Cardiac Electronic Devices: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:1283-1295. [PMID: 36990548 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Infection remains a serious complication associated with the cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), leading to substantial clinical and economic burden globally. This review assesses the burden of cardiac implantable electronic device infection (CIED-I), evidence for treatment recommendations, barriers to early diagnosis and appropriate therapy, and potential solutions. Multiple clinical practice guidelines recommended complete system and lead removal for CIED-I when appropriate. CIED extraction for infection has been consistently reported with high success, low complication, and very low mortality rates. Complete and early extraction was associated with significantly better clinical and economic outcome compared with no or late extraction. However, significant gaps in knowledge and poor recommendation compliance have been reported. Barriers to optimal management may include diagnostic delay, knowledge gaps, and limited access to expertise. A multipronged approach, including education of all stakeholders, a CIED-I alert system, and improving access to experts, could help bring paradigm shift in the treatment of this serious condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas S Segar
- Ascension Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ami Sood
- Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Archana Rao
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - M Rizwan Sohail
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sean D Pokorney
- Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carina Blomström-Lundqvist
- Department of Cardiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Medical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher B Granger
- Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Beaton AZ, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Fugar S, Generoso G, Heard DG, Hiremath S, Ho JE, Kalani R, Kazi DS, Ko D, Levine DA, Liu J, Ma J, Magnani JW, Michos ED, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Parikh NI, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Shah NS, St-Onge MP, Thacker EL, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Wang NY, Wong ND, Wong SS, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023; 147:e93-e621. [PMID: 36695182 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1034] [Impact Index Per Article: 1034.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2023 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2022 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. The American Heart Association strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) publications, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains. RESULTS Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chung DU, Burger H, Kaiser L, Osswald B, Bärsch V, Nägele H, Knaut M, Reichenspurner H, Gessler N, Willems S, Butter C, Pecha S, Hakmi S. Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: A GALLERY subgroup analysis. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:181-189. [PMID: 36240993 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has evolved as one of the most crucial treatment options for patients with cardiac device-related systemic infection (CDRSI). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to characterize the procedural outcome and risk factors of patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE. METHODS A subgroup analysis of patients with CDRSI of the GALLERY (GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY) database was performed. Predictors for complications, procedural failure, and all-cause mortality were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 722 patients (28.6%) in the GALLERY had "systemic infection" as extraction indication. Patients with CDRSI were older (70.1 ± 12.2 years vs 67.3 ± 14.3 years; P < .001) and had more comorbidities than patients with local infections or noninfectious extraction indications. There were no differences in complete procedural success (90.6% vs 91.7%; P = .328) or major complications (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .416) but increased procedure-related (1.4% vs 0.3%; P = .003) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 0.6%; P < .001) for patients with CDRSI. Multivariate analyses revealed lead age ≥10 years as a predictor for procedural complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-6.60; P = .001). Lead age ≥10 years (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.03-6.46; P = .04) was also a predictor for procedural failure. We identified left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.00-2.99; P = .049), age ≥75 years (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.27-3.48; P = .004), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.17-3.14; P = .01), and overall procedural complications (OR 5.15; 95% CI 2.44-10.84; P < .001) as predictors for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION Patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE demonstrate an increased rate of all-cause in-hospital, as well as procedure-related mortality, despite having comparable procedural success rates. Given these data, it seems paramount to develop preventive strategies to detect and treat CDRSI in its earliest stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da-Un Chung
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Heiko Burger
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Lukas Kaiser
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Brigitte Osswald
- Division of Electrophysiological Surgery, Johanniter-Hospital Duisburg-Rheinhausen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Volker Bärsch
- Department of Cardiology, St. Marien Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany
| | - Herbert Nägele
- Department for Cardiac Insufficiency and Device Therapy, Albertinen-Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg at University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nele Gessler
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Willems
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Butter
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Brandenburg Bernau, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Simon Pecha
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg at University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Samer Hakmi
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patel NJ, Singleton MJ, Brunetti R, Richardson KM, Bhave PD. Evaluation of lead-based echodensities on transesophageal echocardiogram in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:7-13. [PMID: 36317461 PMCID: PMC10100260 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is recommended to rule out endocarditis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). A lead-based echodensity (LBE), however, is often found on TEE in patients with a CIED and may not represent an infection. We sought to evaluate the predictors, characteristics, and clinical significance of LBEs seen on TEE in patients with a CIED. METHODS Patients with a CIED were retrospectively identified from a database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 codes and were cross-matched with Current Procedural Terminology codes for a TEE. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. A blinded echo board-certified cardiologist reviewed all TEEs. RESULTS Out of the 231 patients in the cohort, 191 had TEE performed for a noninfection-related indication while 40 TEEs were part of an endocarditis workup. A total of 50 LBEs were identified, and a majority were in the noninfection cohort. Systemic anticoagulant use in the noninfection cohort was associated with a decreased odds of having LBE on TEE (odds ratio [OR] of 0.23 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.60, p = .003]). Lead dwell time in the noninfection cohort was associated with an increased odds of having LBE on TEE (OR 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04-1.39, p = .009]). CONCLUSION In our cohort of patients who had TEE for noninfection indications we found that systemic anticoagulant use is associated with fewer LBEs on TEEs, suggesting possible thrombin fibrin composition of LBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel J Patel
- Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Section on Cardiology, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Ryan Brunetti
- Department of Cardiology, USF Health, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Karl M Richardson
- Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Section on Cardiology, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Prashant D Bhave
- Atrium Health, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Section on Cardiology, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Long-Term Outcome of Infective Endocarditis Involving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Impact of Comorbidities and Lead Extraction. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247357. [PMID: 36555974 PMCID: PMC9781771 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Management of cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) hinges on complete hardware removal. We assessed whether long-term prognosis is affected by device removal, considering baseline patient comorbid conditions; (2) Methods: A total of 125 consecutive patients hospitalized for CIED-IE were included in this retrospective analysis. Outcomes were in-hospital, one-year, and long-term mortality. There were 109 patients who underwent device removal, 91 by transvenous lead extraction (TLE) and 18 by open heart surgery (OHS); (3) Results: TLE translated into lower hospital mortality (4.4% vs. 22.5% with OHS; p = 0.03). Septic pulmonary embolism was the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR:7.38 [1.49-36.6], p = 0.013). One-year mortality was in contrast independently associated to tricuspid valve involvement (p = 0.01) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI, p = 0.039), but not the hardware removal modality. After a median follow-up of 41 months, mortality rose to 24%, and was significantly influenced only by CCI. Specifically, patients with a higher CCI who were also treated with TLE showed a survival rate not significantly different from those managed with medical therapy only; (4) Conclusions: In CIED-IE, TLE is the strategy of choice for hardware removal, improving early outcomes. Long-term benefits of TLE are lessened by comorbidities. In cases of CIED-IE with high CCI, a more conservative approach might be an option.
Collapse
|
17
|
Just IA, Barthel F, Moter A, Kikhney J, Friedrich A, Wloch A, Falk V, Starck C, Schoenrath F. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction to detect infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace 2022; 25:578-585. [PMID: 36477494 PMCID: PMC9935028 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS In patients with infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), the identification of causative pathogens is complicated by biofilm formations and previous antibiotic therapy. In this work, the impact of an additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), in combination with polymerase chain reaction and sequencing (FISHseq) was investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS In 36 patients with CIED infections, FISHseq of explanted devices was performed and compared with standard microbiological cultivation of preoperative and intraoperative samples. The mean age was 61.9 (±16.2) years; 25 (69.4%) were males. Most patients (62.9%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Infections occurred as endoplastits (n = 26), isolated local generator pocket infection (n = 8), or both (n = 2); CIED included cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (n = 17), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (n = 11), and pacemaker (n = 8) devices. The overall positive FISHseq detection rate was 97%. Intraoperatively, pathogens were isolated in 42 vs. 53% in standard cultivation vs. FISHseq, respectively. In 16 of 17 FISHseq-negative patients, the nucleic acid strain DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) indicated inactive microorganisms, which were partially organized in biofilms (n = 4) or microcolonies (n = 2). In 13 patients in whom no pathogen was identified preoperatively, standard cultivation and FISHseq identified pathogens in 3 (23%) vs. 8 (62%), respectively. For the confirmation of preoperatively known bacteria, a combined approach was most efficient. CONCLUSION Fluorescence in situ hybridization sequencing is a valuable tool to detect causative microorganisms in CIED infections. The combination of FISHseq with preoperative cultivation showed the highest efficacy in detecting pathogens. Additional cultivation of intraoperative tissue samples or swabs yielded more confirmation of pathogens known from preoperative culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank Barthel
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Annette Moter
- Biofilmcenter, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité—University Medical Center Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany,MoKi Analytics GmbH, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany,Moter Diagnostics Practice, Marienplatz 9, 12207 Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Kikhney
- Biofilmcenter, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité—University Medical Center Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany,MoKi Analytics GmbH, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Aljona Friedrich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexa Wloch
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Falk
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Strengths and limitations of patient registries in infective endocarditis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 29:587-592. [PMID: 36464215 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious albeit relatively infrequent disease. Given the paucity of cases, particularly in non-referral centres, patient registries have progressively gained relevance to inform about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and natural history of IE in the last two decades. Although they have become key to advancing knowledge of IE, registries also have shortcomings that lead to relevant consequences that are often overlooked. OBJECTIVES We aimed to discuss the strengths and limitations of registries in IE. SOURCES We conducted a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 2000 and June 2022. CONTENT The backbone of the contemporary knowledge on IE has been built upon data collected in prospective registries, which has allowed us to collect data on relatively unknown aspects of the disease, identify knowledge gaps, and generate new hypotheses, serving as platforms for further research endeavours. Well-exploited registries can provide key information on how IE is distributed across populations and how it differentially impacts patients and subgroups. However, registries face several difficulties, such as the definition of IE, which includes subjective variables and changes over time. Other limitations include difficulty achieving a comprehensive collection of cases (which depends on both project funding and information systems), over-representation of the centres that created the registry, lack of inclusion of variables to assess endpoints that are relevant to patients in terms of quality of life and prognosis, and ethical issues. IMPLICATIONS The review of the advantages and disadvantages of registries aims to improve the quality of the information collected, the viability of the registry itself, and the ability to answer questions that are relevant to both researchers and patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Management of Common Postoperative Infections in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2022; 36:839-859. [DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
20
|
Sanghavi R, Ravikumar N, Sarodaya V, Haq M, Sherif M, Harky A. Outcomes in cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis: a systematic review of current literature. Future Cardiol 2022; 18:891-899. [PMID: 36073290 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2021-0155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis is a serious infection with poor prognosis. Materials & methods: The systematic review of the literature was conducted using searches from the various databases. We included studies published between January 2010 and June 2021. Results: A total of 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients were approximately 70 years old and an average of 71.2% of patients were male. The most common presenting feature was a fever. The modified Duke criteria was used to aid diagnosis. Management entailed extraction of the cardiac implantable electronic device in 80.5% of the studies. The overall mortality rates ranged from 4 to 36%. The most frequently isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion: Cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis needs timely diagnosis and effective management for promising outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ria Sanghavi
- Department of Medical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University Of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Nidhruv Ravikumar
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Varun Sarodaya
- Department of General Surgery, Junior Clinical fellow, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mawiyah Haq
- Faculty of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohamed Sherif
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Amer Harky
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
A Solution Trick: Implantation of Coronary Sinus Lead Without Delivery System, A Case Series Study. COR ET VASA 2022. [DOI: 10.33678/cor.2021.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
Khaloo P, Uzomah UA, Shaqdan A, Ledesma PA, Galvin J, Ptaszek LM, Ruskin JN. Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infective Endocarditis, Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis, and Native Valve Endocarditis: A Nationwide Study, 2003 to 2017. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e025600. [PMID: 36000421 PMCID: PMC9496407 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.025600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Most published reports describing outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device–related infective endocarditis (CIED‐IE) are single‐center studies with small patient sample sizes. The goal of this study was to utilize population‐based data to assess trends in CIED‐IE hospitalization and to compare outcomes between patients hospitalized with CIED‐IE, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), and native valve endocarditis (NVE). Methods and Results A query of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2003 and 2017 identified 646 325 patients hospitalized with infective endocarditis in the United States of whom 585 974 (90%) had NVE, 27 257 (4.2%) had CIED‐IE, and 26 111 (4%) had PVE. There was a 509% increase in CIED‐IE hospitalizations in the United States from 2003 to 2017 (P trend<0.001). In‐hospital mortality and length of stay associated with CIED‐IE decreased during the study period from 15% and 20 days in 2003 to 9.7% and 19 days in 2017 (P trend=0.032 and 0.018, respectively). The in‐hospital mortality rate was lower in patients hospitalized with CIED‐IE (9.2%) than in patients with PVE (12%) and NVE (12%). Length of stay was longest in the CIED‐IE group (17 compared with 14 days for both NVE and PVE). Hospital costs were highest for the CIED‐IE group ($56 000 compared with $37 000 in NVE and $45 000 in PVE). Conclusions Despite the fact that the number of comorbidities per patient with CIED‐IE increased during the study period, mortality rate and hospital length of stay decreased. The mortality rate was significantly lower for patients with CIED‐IE than for patients with NVE and PVE. Patients with CIED‐IE had the longest lengths of stay and highest hospital costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pegah Khaloo
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| | | | - Ayman Shaqdan
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| | - Pablo A Ledesma
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| | - Jennifer Galvin
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| | - Leon M Ptaszek
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| | - Jeremy N Ruskin
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service MGH Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dzilic E, Nöbauer C, Burri M, Voss S, Krane M, Lange R, Vitanova K. Surgical treatment of isolated tricuspid valve endocarditis: Midterm data. J Card Surg 2022; 37:2999-3005. [DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elda Dzilic
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Christian Nöbauer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Melchior Burri
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Stephanie Voss
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| | - Markus Krane
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
| | - Rüdiger Lange
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) ‐ Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany
| | - Keti Vitanova
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Technische Universität München Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Galgut O, Mitchell AR, Le Page P. Fusobacterium species cardiac device infective endocarditis diagnosed via molecular methods. CLINICAL INFECTION IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
25
|
Ngiam JN, Liong TS, Sim MY, Chew NWS, Sia CH, Chan SP, Lim TW, Yeo TC, Tambyah PA, Loh PH, Poh KK, Kong WKF. Risk Factors for Mortality in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11113063. [PMID: 35683451 PMCID: PMC9181812 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Infections following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation can require surgical device removal and often results in significant cost, morbidity, and potentially mortality. We aimed to systemically review the literature and identify risk factors associated with mortality following CIED infection. Methods: Electronic searches (up to June 2021) were performed on PubMed and Scopus. Twelve studies (10 retrospective, 2 prospective cohort studies) were included for analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted with the restricted maximum likelihood method, with mortality as the outcome. The overall mortality was 13.7% (438/1398) following CIED infection. Results: On meta-analysis, the male sex (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.57–1.01, I2 = 2.2%) appeared to have lower odds for mortality, while diabetes mellitus appeared to be associated with higher mortality (OR 1.47, 95%CI 0.67–3.26, I2 = 81.4%), although these trends did not reach statistical significance. Staphylococcus aureus as the causative organism (OR 2.71, 95%CI 1.76–4.19, I2 = 0.0%), presence of heart failure (OR 1.92, 95%CI 1.42–4.19, I2 = 0.0%) and embolic phenomena (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.67–9.56, I2 = 69.8%) were associated with higher mortality. Surgical removal of CIED was associated with lower mortality compared with conservative management with antibiotics alone (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.09–0.50, I2 = 62.8%). Conclusion: We identified important risk factors associated with mortality in CIED infections, including Staphyloccocus aureus as the causative organism, and the presence of complications, such as heart failure and embolic phenomena. Surgery, where possible, was associated with better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore; (J.N.N.); (P.A.T.)
| | - Tze Sian Liong
- Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore; (T.S.L.); (M.Y.S.)
| | - Meng Ying Sim
- Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore; (T.S.L.); (M.Y.S.)
| | - Nicholas W. S. Chew
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
| | - Ching-Hui Sia
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
| | - Siew Pang Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore
| | - Toon Wei Lim
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
| | - Tiong-Cheng Yeo
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
| | - Paul Anantharajah Tambyah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore; (J.N.N.); (P.A.T.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
- Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Poay Huan Loh
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
| | - Kian Keong Poh
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
| | - William K. F. Kong
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore; (N.W.S.C.); (C.-H.S.); (T.W.L.); (T.-C.Y.); (P.H.L.); (K.K.P.)
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +65-67722476; Fax: +65-68722998
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yildirim Y, Petersen J, Tönnis T, Detter C, Reichenspurner H, Pecha S. Laser Lead Extraction During Venoarterial ECMO support. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 37:401-404. [PMID: 34673505 PMCID: PMC9162412 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of valvular endocarditis in patients with cardiac implantable electrophysiological device (CIED) includes valvular surgery and lead extraction. This can be challenging in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Reduced LVEF in combination with sepsis and cardioplegic cardiac arrest can make weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass difficult. Some of these patients require venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for postcardiotomy syndrome. Lead extraction by manual traction is often not possible in cases with a long lead dwell time. Therefore, a lead extraction procedure with powered sheaths is required during the VA-ECMO support. We describe our technique for laser lead extraction during VA-ECMO support in a 64-year-old patient with triple valve endocarditis and lead vegetations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yalin Yildirim
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Petersen
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Tönnis
- Department of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Detter
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Pecha
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sousa C, Pinto FJ. Endocardite Infecciosa: Ainda mais Desafios que Certezas. Arq Bras Cardiol 2022; 118:976-988. [PMID: 35613200 PMCID: PMC9368884 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20200798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Após catorze décadas de evolução médica e tecnológica, a endocardite infeciosa continua a desafiar médicos no seu diagnóstico e manejo diário. O aumento da incidência, alterações demográficas (afetando pacientes mais idosos), microbiologia com taxas de infeção por Staphylococcus mais elevadas, com complicações graves ainda frequentes e uma mortalidade substancial tornam a endocardite uma doença muito complexa. Apesar de tudo, a inovação no seu diagnóstico, nomeadamente na área da microbiologia e imagem, e a melhoria nos cuidados intensivos e na cirurgia cardíaca (quanto às técnicas, materiais usados e momento de intervenção) podem ter um impacto no seu prognóstico. Os desafios persistem, incluindo repensar a profilaxia, melhorar os critérios de diagnóstico incluindo a endocardite com culturas negativas e endocardite de prótese valvar, o timing para a intervenção cirúrgica, e sua realização ou não na presença de acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico e em usuários de drogas intravenosas. Uma estratégia combinada na endocardite infeciosa é fundamental, incluindo decisões e protocolos clínicos avançados, um manejo multidisciplinar, organização e políticas de saúde que culminem em melhores resultados para os nossos pacientes.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mills MT, Al-Mohammad A, Warriner DR. Changes and advances in the field of infective endocarditis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2022; 83:1-11. [DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis is a rare but deadly disease, with a highly variable presentation. The clinical manifestations of the condition are often multisystemic, ranging from dermatological to ophthalmic, and cardiovascular to renal. Thus, patients with infective endocarditis may first present to the acute or general physician, who may have a variable knowledge of the condition. The diagnosis of infective endocarditis can be challenging, relying on clinical, imaging and microbiological features. Recent decades have seen a transformation in the epidemiology and microbiology of infective endocarditis and yet, despite advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, mortality rates remain high. This review outlines the emerging studies and guidelines on the assessment and management of infective endocarditis, focusing on the evolving epidemiology of the condition, the role of new imaging modalities, updated diagnostic criteria, the latest on antimicrobial and surgical management, and the role of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of patients with infective endocarditis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Mills
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Abdallah Al-Mohammad
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - David R Warriner
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
- Department of Congenital Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Ferguson JF, Generoso G, Ho JE, Kalani R, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Levine DA, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Ma J, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Thacker EL, VanWagner LB, Virani SS, Voecks JH, Wang NY, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 145:e153-e639. [PMID: 35078371 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2281] [Impact Index Per Article: 1140.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2022 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population and an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, and the global burden of cardiovascular disease and healthy life expectancy. RESULTS Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.
Collapse
|
30
|
Wang A, Fosbøl EL. Current recommendations and uncertainties for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: a comparison of American and European cardiovascular guidelines. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:1617-1625. [PMID: 35029274 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery is an effective therapy in the treatment of left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) in patients for whom antibiotic treatment alone is unlikely to be curative or may be associated with ongoing risk of complications. However, the interplay between indication for surgery, its risk, and timing is complex and there continue to be challenges in defining the effects of surgery on disease-related outcome. Guidelines published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology provide recommendations for the use of surgery in IE, but these are limited by a low level of evidence related to predominantly observational studies with inherent selection and survival biases. Evidence to guide the timing of surgery in IE is less robust, and predominantly based on expert consensus. Delays between IE diagnosis and recognition of an IE complication as a surgical indication and transfers to surgical centres also impact surgical timing. This comparison of the two guidelines exposes areas of uncertainty and gaps in current evidence for the use of surgery in IE across different indications, particularly related to its timing and consideration of operative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Wang
- Duke University Hospital, DUMC 3428, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Emil L Fosbøl
- University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Seki A, Fishbein MC. Age-related cardiovascular changes and diseases. Cardiovasc Pathol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822224-9.00004-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
32
|
Echocardiography and FDG-PET/CT scan in Gram-negative bacteremia and cardiovascular infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2021; 34:728-736. [PMID: 34751186 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Current evidence on cardiovascular infections in Gram-negative blood stream infections (GNBSI) with focus on the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography/Computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnostic workup. RECENT FINDINGS Most evidence focuses on characteristics of diagnosed cardiovascular infections and the proportion caused by GNBSI. These proportions are low (1-5%) when it comes to native and prosthetic valve endocarditis as well as cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections whereas the proportion of vascular graft infections caused by GNBSI seems substantially higher (30-40%). Information on the prevalence of cardiovascular infection in patients with GNBSI is limited to a few studies finding around 3% endocarditis in patients with GNBSI and a prosthetic heart valve and 4-16% device-related infection in patients with CIED and GNBSI. SUMMARY Patients with GNBSI and native or prosthetic valves should only undergo work-up for endocarditis (TEE and FDG-PET/CT) if they present GNBSI relapse or signs suggestive of endocarditis. CIED patients with GNBSI with Pseudomonas or Serratia spp. should undergo TEE and PET/CT because of the high prevalence of device-related infection. In other GNBs without IE suggestive signs, normal BSI treatment is reasonable and only cases with relapse need work-up. GNBSI in patients with vascular grafts should lead to consideration of PET/CT.
Collapse
|
33
|
El-Ashry AH, Hussein MSA, Saad K, El Elhoufey A. Clinical utility of sonication for diagnosing infection and colonization of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Med Microbiol Immunol 2021; 210:245-250. [PMID: 34254192 DOI: 10.1007/s00430-021-00717-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Our study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the sonication tool for the microbiological diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections (CIEDIs). The extracted cardiac implants of 52 patients were assessed: 19 with CIEDI and 33 with elective generator replacement or revision without clinical infection. Sonication fluid culture of explanted CIEDs yielded higher numbers of microorganisms than pocket tissue or swab cultures. The sensitivity of sonication fluid culture was significantly higher than that of pocket swab and tissue culture for microbiological diagnosis of CIEDI. The microorganisms isolated most frequently via sonication of explanted CIEDs were Gram-positive cocci (70%), of which 50% was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Sonication fluid culture detected colonization in 36.4% of the non-infected patients. Sonication fluid culture represents a promising diagnostic strategy with increased sensitivity compared to conventional culture methods for microbiological diagnosis of cardiac devices associated with infection and colonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira H El-Ashry
- Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Khaled Saad
- Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71516, Egypt.
| | - Amira El Elhoufey
- Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Department of Community Health Nursing, Alddrab University College, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
De Ciancio G, Erpelding ML, Filippetti L, Goehringer F, Blangy H, Huttin O, Agrinier N, Juillière Y, Sadoul N, Selton-Suty C. Adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic practice guidelines for suspected cardiac implantable electronic device infections. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 114:634-646. [PMID: 34742672 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite guidelines describing the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for patients with suspected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections, their management is often challenging. AIMS To describe our diagnostic and therapeutic practices for suspected CIED infection, and to compare them with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guidelines. METHODS Patients hospitalized in the tertiary care Nancy University Hospital for suspected CIED infection from 2014 to 2019 were included retrospectively. We applied the EHRA classification of CIED infection, and compared diagnostic and therapeutic management with the EHRA guidelines. RESULTS Among 184 patients (mean age 72.3±12.4 years), 137 had a proven infection of the lead (by transthoracic echocardiography/transoesophageal echocardiography, 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positive culture of the lead) or an isolated pocket infection without proof of lead infection, and 47 had no proof of CIED infection. According to the EHRA classification, CIED infection was considered as definite in 145 patients and possible in 31 and was excluded in eight patients. Regarding recommended diagnostic procedures, blood cultures were performed in 90.8%, transthoracic echocardiography in 97.8%, transoesophageal echocardiography in 85.9%, 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 50.5% and imaging for embolisms in 78.3% of the patients. Compared with therapeutic recommendations for the 145 cases of definite CIED infection, device removal was performed in 96 patients (66.2%) and antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 130 (89.7%), with a duration equal to or longer than that recommended in 105 (72.4%) of the patients. CONCLUSION This study underlines the difficulties in following theoretical guidelines in daily practice, where both technical and human considerations interfere with their strict appliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marie-Line Erpelding
- Inserm, CIC, Faculty of Medicine, Épidémiologie Clinique, University of Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Laura Filippetti
- Department of Cardiology, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - François Goehringer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Hugues Blangy
- Department of Cardiology, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Olivier Huttin
- Department of Cardiology, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Nelly Agrinier
- Inserm, CIC, Faculty of Medicine, Épidémiologie Clinique, University of Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Yves Juillière
- Department of Cardiology, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Nicolas Sadoul
- Department of Cardiology, CHRU NANCY, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
John LA, Karimianpour A, Gold MR. The Role of Subcutaneous ICDs in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2021. [DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The ICD is an important therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. The transvenous-ICD (TV-ICD) has been the primary device used for this purpose. However, mechanical and infectious complications occur with traditional TV-ICDs increasing morbidity and mortality. The subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) system was developed to circumvent some of these complications, but S-ICDs have their inherent set of limitations as well. These include inappropriate shock delivery, lack of bradycardia, antitachycardia or CRT pacing therapy and shorter device longevity. The S-ICD is now included in guidelines as an acceptable alternative to TV-ICDs among patients without pacing indications. This review discusses the rationale for S-ICDs by reviewing studies including the PRAETORIAN, PAS and UNTOUCHED trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah A John
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | - Michael R Gold
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Suzuki T, Ishikawa K, Matsuo T, Kijima Y, Aoyagi H, Kawai F, Komiyama N, Mori N. Pacemaker infection and endocarditis due to Parvimonas micra: A case report and systematic review. Anaerobe 2021; 72:102459. [PMID: 34555513 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis caused by Parvimonas micra is rare. Its clinical features are presented in this systematic review. We also describe the case of an 82-year-old man with infective endocarditis and pacemaker infection due to P. micra. There are some reports of recurrence during antimicrobial therapy; hence, careful follow-up is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Suzuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan.
| | - Kazuhiro Ishikawa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Takahiro Matsuo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Yasufumi Kijima
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Hideshi Aoyagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Fujimi Kawai
- St. Luke's International University Library, 10-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Komiyama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Mori
- Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuoku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yahia H, Alazab A, Aly R, Elmaraghi S, Andraos A. Implantable Cardiac Device Infections Prevalence: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It has been demonstrated that the use of cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) improve mortality and survivability in a variety of patient populations. Nevertheless, CIED related infection is a serious complication characterized by a high rate of mortality and morbidity.
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of CIED related infections, risk factors, clinical and demographic characteristics, causative organisms, and the management and outcome of patients presented in the Critical Care Department, Cairo University.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 1871 individuals who had been implanted with a cardiac device with a total number of devices of 1968 and 2270 procedures performed from January 2007 to December 2017.
Results: 59 infectious episodes were identified with an estimated incidence of 2.99% of inserted devices and 2.6% of total procedures. The infection rate was considerably higher in patients with multiple procedures than those who had a single procedure (9.27% vs. 1.18%; P<0.001). The individuals with a dual-chamber implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTD) had the highest infection rate of 6.25% & 6.85%, respectively. The rate of pocket infection (PI) and CIED related endocarditis (CDE) was 1.54% & 1.06% of total devices respectively. Numerous risk factors have been found; the most significant of those are diabetes mellitus, recurrent procedures, the device's complexity, and the existence of more than one lead. Gram-positive cocci were the most isolated organisms in all positive cultures (69.23%). Echocardiography revealed lead vegetations and valvular vegetations in 22 patients and 2 patients respectively. In 53 cases (89.83%), the devices were removed; in 41 cases, the entire system was removed; and in 12 cases, only the generator was removed. The mortality rate was found to be 10.17%, having a considerably higher prevalence in CDE individuals than in pocket infection individuals (20.83% vs. 2.86%; P=0.025).
Conclusion: In our center, while the rate of CIED implantation continues to increase, the incidence rate of CIED-related infection continues to decline. Until now, the infection burden associated with secondary intervention is still significantly high. The management strategy of selection is to eliminate the entire system for patients presented with infection especially those with CDE. However, the mortality rate is still high.
Collapse
|
38
|
Boriani G, Mantovani LG, Cortesi PA, De Ponti R, D'Onofrio A, Arena G, Curnis A, Forleo G, Guerra F, Porcu M, Sgarito G, Botto GL. Cost-minimization analysis of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator in adult patients undergoing ICD explant procedures: Clinical and economic implications. Clin Cardiol 2021; 44:1497-1505. [PMID: 34427926 PMCID: PMC8571546 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Patients with permanently increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) can be protected by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). If an ICD must be removed due to infection, for example, immediate reimplantation might not be possible or indicated. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is an established, safe and effective solution to protect patients from SCD during this high‐risk bridging period. Very few economic evaluations on WCD use are currently available. Methods We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the available evidence of WCD in patients undergoing ICD explant/lead extraction. Additionally, a decision model was developed to compare use and costs of the WCD with standard therapy (in‐hospital stay). For this purpose, a cost‐minimization analysis was conducted, and complemented by a one‐way sensitivity analysis. Results In the base case scenario, the WCD was less expensive compared to standard therapy. The cost‐minimization analysis showed a cost reduction of €1782 per patient using the WCD. If costs of standard care were changed, cost savings associated with the WCD varied from €3500 to €0, assuming costs for standard care of €6800 to €3600. Conclusion After ICD explantation, patients can be safely and effectively protected from SCD after hospital discharge through WCD utilization. Furthermore, the use of a WCD for this patient group is cost saving when compared to standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPoliclinico di ModenaItaly
| | - Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP)University of Milano‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
- Value‐Based Healthcare UnitIRCCS MultimedicaSesto San GiovanniItaly
| | | | - Roberto De Ponti
- Department of Heart and VesselsOspedale di Circolo‐University of InsubriaVareseItaly
| | - Antonio D'Onofrio
- Cardiology Division – Electrophysiology Department – AORN dei Colli – Ospedale MonaldiNapoliItaly
| | - Giuseppe Arena
- Cardiology DepartmentAzienda Usl Toscana Nord OvestMassa CarraraItaly
| | - Antonio Curnis
- Cardiology DepartmentPresidio Ospedaliero di Brescia, ASST Spedali CiviliBresciaItaly
| | - Giovanni Forleo
- Cardiology Department, Electrophysiology and Arrhtymology DivisionOspedale Luigi Sacco ‐ Polo UniversitarioMilanItaly
| | - Federico Guerra
- Cardiology and Arrhytmology ClinicAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali RiunitiAnconaItaly
| | - Maurizio Porcu
- Cardiology DepartmentAzienda Ospedaliera “G. Brotzu”CagliariItaly
| | - Giuseppe Sgarito
- Cardiology Department, Electrophysiology and Arrhtymology DivisionA.R.N.A.S. Ospedali CivicoPalermoItaly
| | - Giovanni Luca Botto
- Cardiology – Electrophysiology Division, Department of MedicineOspedale di Circolo Rho, Ospedale Salvini Garbagnate M.se, ASST RhodenseMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Novel Antibacterial Modification of Polycarbonate for Increment Prototyping in Medicine. MATERIALS 2021; 14:ma14164725. [PMID: 34443247 PMCID: PMC8400390 DOI: 10.3390/ma14164725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the era of modern medicine, the number of invasive treatments increases. Artificial devices used in medicine are associated with an increased risk of secondary infections. Bacterial biofilm development observed on the implanted surface is challenging to treat, primarily due to low antibiotics penetration. In our study, the preparation of a new polycarbonate composite, filled with nanosilver, nanosilica and rhodamine B derivative, suitable for three-dimensional printing, is described. Polymer materials with antimicrobial properties are known. However, in most cases, protection is limited to the outer layers only. The newly developed materials are protected in their entire volume. Moreover, the antibacterial properties are retained after multiple high-temperature processing were performed, allowing them to be used in 3D printing. Bacterial population reduction was observed, which gives an assumption for those materials to be clinically tested in the production of various medical devices and for the reduction of morbidity and mortality caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.
Collapse
|
40
|
Arshad V, Baddour LM, Lahr BD, Khalil S, Tariq W, Talha KM, Cha YM, DeSimone DC, Sohail MR. Impact of delayed device re-implantation on outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device related infective endocarditis. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:1303-1311. [PMID: 34132396 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal timing of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) re-implantation following device removal due to infection is undefined. Multinational guidelines reflect this and include no specific recommendation for this timing, while others have recommended waiting at least 14 days in cases of CIED related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). The current work seeks to clarify this issue. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed institutional data at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota of patients aged ≥ 18 years who developed CIED-IE from January 1, 1991 to February 1, 2016. CIED-IE was defined as echocardiogram reported device lead or valvular vegetation. Regression analyses were used to relate the risk of clinical outcomes to the interval between CIED removal and re-implantation and the location of vegetations. RESULTS A total of 109 patients met study inclusion criteria. A majority (68.8%) of patients were men and the median age was 68.0 years. Transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed in 95.4% of patients, with valve vegetations detected in 33.9% (n = 37). Survival analysis comparing patients in whom device re-implantation was < 14 days vs. ≥14 days, and further categorized by those with and without valve vegetation, showed a significant difference (P = 0.028); patients with valve vegetation and reimplantation interval < 14 days had the lowest (58.7%) 12-month survival. When adjusted for valve vegetation, longer time interval for reimplantation trended toward increased hospital length of stay (P = 0.079). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the recommended 14-day delay between CIED extraction and re-implantation in CIED-IE patients is associated with a survival benefit, but longer length of hospital stay following re-implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verda Arshad
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Larry M Baddour
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brian D Lahr
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sarwat Khalil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wajeeha Tariq
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Khawaja Muhammad Talha
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel C DeSimone
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - M Rizwan Sohail
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hörnsten J, Axelsson L, Westling K. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections; Long-Term Outcome after Extraction and Antibiotic Treatment. Infect Dis Rep 2021; 13:627-635. [PMID: 34287314 PMCID: PMC8293088 DOI: 10.3390/idr13030059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to examine the treatment outcome for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections after extraction. Methods: Patients who underwent CIED extractions due to an infection at Karolinska University Hospital 2006–2015 were analyzed. Results: In total, 165 patients were reviewed, 104 (63%) with pocket infection and 61 (37%) with systemic infection. Of the patients with systemic infection, 34 and 25 patients fulfilled the criteria for definite and possible endocarditis, respectively. Complications after extraction occurred only in one patient. Reimplantation was made after a mean of 9.5 days and performed in 81% of those with pocket infection and 44.3% in systemic infection. Infection with the new device occurred in 4.6%. The mean length of hospital stay for patients with pocket infection was 5.7 days, compared to 38.6 days in systemic infection. One-year mortality was 7.7% and 22.2% in pocket infection and systemic infection, respectively. Patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection had a higher mortality. Conclusions: In this study, the majority of the patients had a pocket CIED infection, with a short hospital stay. Patients with a systemic infection, and S. aureus etiology, had a prolonged hospital stay and a higher mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Hörnsten
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Louise Axelsson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Solna, Sweden;
| | - Katarina Westling
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Solna, Sweden;
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Maciel ADS, Silva RMFLD. Clinical Profile and Outcome of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection. Arq Bras Cardiol 2021; 116:1080-1088. [PMID: 33825793 PMCID: PMC8288527 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Fundamento Houve aumento expressivo na incidência de infecções relacionadas a dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis (DCEI) nos últimos anos, com impacto na mortalidade. Objetivos Verificar a proporção de pacientes com infecção de DCEI e analisar seu perfil clínico, as variáveis relacionadas com a infecção e sua evolução. Método Estudo retrospectivo, observacional e longitudinal com 123 pacientes com infecção de DCEI entre 6.406 procedimentos. Foram usados os testes paramétricos, e o nível de significância adotado na análise estatística foi de 5%. Resultados A idade média dos pacientes foi de 60,1 anos, e 71 eram homens. A média de internação foi de 35,3 dias, e houve remoção total do sistema em 105 pacientes. Identificaram-se endocardite infecciosa (EI) e sepse em 71 e 23 pacientes, respectivamente. A mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi 19,5%. Houve associação entre EI e extrusão do gerador (17,0% vs. 19,5% nos grupos com e sem EI, respectivamente, p = 0,04; associação inversa) e sepse (15,4% vs. 3,2%, p = 0,01). Houve associação entre morte intra-hospitalar e EI (83,3% vs. 52,0% com e sem morte, respectivamente, p = 0,005) e sepse (62,5% vs. 8,1%, p < 0,0001). Foi dada alta hospitalar a 99 pacientes. Durante a média de seguimento clínico de 43,8 meses, a taxa de mortalidade foi de 43%, e 65,2% dos pacientes com sepse faleceram (p < 0,0001). A curva de sobrevida de Kaplan-Meier não indicou associação significante com sexo, agente etiológico, fração de ejeção, EI e modalidade de tratamento. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 32,8% entre os pacientes submetidos a reimplante de eletrodos por via endocárdica e 52,2% entre aqueles por via epicárdica (p = 0,04). Não houve influência da etiologia chagásica, a qual correspondeu a 44,7% das cardiopatias de base, quanto às variáveis clínicas e laboratoriais ou à evolução. Conclusões A taxa de infecção foi de 1,9%, com predomínio em homens. Houve associação entre mortalidade intra-hospitalar e EI e sepse. Após a alta hospitalar, a taxa de mortalidade anual foi de 11,8%, com influência de sepse durante a internação e o implante epicárdico. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
Collapse
|
43
|
Margonato D, Ancona F, Ingallina G, Melillo F, Stella S, Biondi F, Boccellino A, Godino C, Margonato A, Agricola E. Tricuspid Regurgitation in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Marker or Target? Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:702589. [PMID: 34262955 PMCID: PMC8273168 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.702589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Far from being historically considered a primary healthcare problem, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has recently gained much attention from the scientific community. In fact, in the last years, robust evidence has emerged regarding the epidemiological impact of TR, whose prevalence seems to be similar to that of other valvulopathies, such as aortic stenosis, with an estimated up to 4% of people >75 years affected by at least moderate TR in the United States, and up to 23% among patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This recurrent coexistence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and TR is not surprising, considered the multiple etiologies of tricuspid valve disease. TR can complicate heart failure mostly as a functional disease, because of pulmonary hypertension (PH), subsequent to elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, leading to right ventricular dilatation, and valve tethering. Moreover, the so-called "functional isolated" TR can occur, in the absence of PH, as a result of right atrial dilatation associated with atrial fibrillation, a common finding in patients with LVSD. Finally, TR can result as a iatrogenic consequence of transvalvular lead insertion, another frequent scenario in this cohort of patients. Nonetheless, despite the significant coincidence of these two conditions, their mutual relation, and the independent prognostic role of TR is still a matter of debate. Whether significant TR is just a marker for advanced left-heart disease, or a crucial potential therapeutical target, remains unclear. Aim of the authors in this review is to present an update concerning the epidemiological features and the clinical burden of TR in the context of LVSD, its prognostic value, and the potential benefit for early tricuspid intervention in patients affected by contemporary TR and LVSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Margonato
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Cardiology Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Ancona
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ingallina
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Melillo
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Stella
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Biondi
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Boccellino
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cosmo Godino
- Department of Clinical Cardiology, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Margonato
- Department of Clinical Cardiology, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eustachio Agricola
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca a Cura e Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mateos Gaitán R, Boix-Palop L, Muñoz García P, Mestres CA, Marín Arriaza M, Pedraz Prieto Á, de Alarcón Gonzalez A, Gutiérrez Carretero E, Hernández Meneses M, Goenaga Sánchez MÁ, Cobo Belaustegui M, Oteo Revuelta JA, Gainzarain Arana JC, García Vázquez E, Martínez-Sellés M. Infective endocarditis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a nationwide study. Europace 2021; 22:1062-1070. [PMID: 32390046 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Patients with infective endocarditis (IE) frequently have cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Here, we aim to define the clinical profile and prognostic factors of IE in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Infective endocarditis cases were prospectively identified in the Spanish National Endocarditis Registry. From 3996 IE, 708 (17.7%) had a CIED and 424 CIED-related IE (lead vegetation). Patients with a CIED were older (68 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 8 years); had more comorbidities {pulmonary disease [176 (24.8%) vs. 545 (16.7%)], renal disease [239 (33.8%) vs. 740 (22.7%)], diabetes [248 (35.0%) vs. 867 (26.6%)], and heart failure [348 (49.2%) vs. 978 (29.9%)]}; and fewer complications {intracardiac destruction [106 (15%) vs. 1077 (33.1%)], heart failure [215 (30.3%) vs. 1340 (41.1%)], embolism [107 (15.1%) vs. 714 (21.9%)], and neurological involvement [77 (10.8%) vs. 702 (21.5%)]} (all P-values <0.001) in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without CIED [171 (24.2%) vs. 881 (27.0%), P = 0.82]. In subjects with a CIED, CIED-related IE was independently associated with in-hospital survival: odds ratio (OR) 0.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.7, P = 0.001]. Surgery was independently associated with in-hospital survival in CIED-related IE: OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.7, P = 0.004); but not in subjects with valve IE and no CIED lead involvement: OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.7, P = 0.77). CONCLUSION Over a sixth of IE patients have a CIED. This group of patients is older, with more comorbidities and fewer IE-related complications in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without a CIED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Mateos Gaitán
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERCV, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucía Boix-Palop
- Unit of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Muñoz García
- Clinical Unit of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos A Mestres
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mercedes Marín Arriaza
- Clinical Unit of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Pedraz Prieto
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arístides de Alarcón Gonzalez
- Clinical Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine Infectious Diseases, Research Group Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS), University of Seville/CSIC/University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Encarnación Gutiérrez Carretero
- Cardiac Surgery Department, University of Sevilla/CSIC/University Hospital Virgen del Rocío Seville, Institute of Biomedicine-Sevilla (IBiS), CIBERCV, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | - José Antonio Oteo Revuelta
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario San Pedro, Centre for Biomedical Research La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, Spain
| | | | - Elisa García Vázquez
- Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Biohealth Research Institute (IMIB), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Manuel Martínez-Sellés
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERCV, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.,Universidad Europea, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
The New Challenge for Heart Endocarditis: From Conventional Prosthesis to New Devices and Platforms for the Treatment of Structural Heart Disease. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:7302165. [PMID: 34222484 PMCID: PMC8219429 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7302165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Infective endocarditis is a sinister condition with considerable morbidity and mortality. Its relevance in the current era is compounded by the increased use of implanted devices such as replacement valves or cardiac implantable electronic devices. These infections are caused by multiple different bacteria with different virulence, pathogenicity, and antimicrobial resistance. Unlike in native endocarditis, the presence of foreign tissue permits sustenance by inflammatory and thrombotic processes as the artificial surfaces promote inflammatory responses and hypercoagulability. Prevention of these infections has been suggested with the use of homografts in combination with antibiotics. Others have attempted to use "low fouling coats" with little clinical success thus far. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis plays a pivotal part in reducing the incidence of prosthesis-related endocarditis. This remains especially crucial with the increasing use of transcatheter heart valve therapies. The widespread use of cardiac implantable electronic devices such as permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices has also heralded a noticeable increase in cases of infectious endocarditis affecting complex equipment which can be difficult to treat. Multimodality strategies are needed with input from surgeons and cardiologists to ensure treatment is both prompt and successful, tailored to the individual needs of the patients.
Collapse
|
46
|
The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus as the primary cause of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis. Infection 2021; 49:999-1006. [PMID: 34089482 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01634-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), as permanent pacemakers (PPM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is associated with the emergence of CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). We aimed to characterize CIED-IE profile, temporal trends, and prognostic factors. METHODS CIED-IE diagnosed at Rennes University Hospital during years 1992-2017 were identified through computerized database, and included if they presented all of the following: (1) clinical signs of infection; (2) microbiological documentation through blood and/or CIED lead cultures; (3) lead or valve vegetation, or definite IE according to Duke criteria. Data were retrospectively extracted from medical charts. The cohort was categorized in three periods: 1992-1999, 2000-2008, and 2009-2017. RESULTS We included 199 patients (51 women, 148 men, median age 73 years [interquartile range, 64-79]), with CIED-IE: 158 PPMs (79%), 24 ICD (12%), and 17 CRT (9%). Main pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS: n = 86, 43%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 60, 30%), and other Gram-positive cocci (n = 28, 14%). Temporal trends were remarkable for the decline in CoNS (P = 0.002), and the emergence of S. aureus as the primary cause of CIED-IE (24/63 in 2009-2017, 38%). Factors independently associated with one-year mortality were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: hazard ratio 3.84 [1.03-6.02], P = 0.03), left-sided endocarditis (HR 2.25 [1.09-4.65], P = 0.03), pathogens other than CoNS (HR 3.16 [1.19-8.39], P = 0.02), and CIED removal/reimplantation (HR 0.41 [0.20-0.83], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS S. aureus has emerged as the primary cause of CIED-IE. Left-sided endocarditis, COPD, pathogens other than CoNS, and no CIED removal/reimplantation are independent risk factors for one-year mortality.
Collapse
|
47
|
Ostrowska B, Gkiouzepas S, Kurland S, Blomström-Lundqvist C. Device infections related to cardiac resynchronization therapy in clinical practice-An analysis of its prevalence, risk factors and routine surveillance at a single center university hospital. Clin Cardiol 2021; 44:739-747. [PMID: 34032293 PMCID: PMC8207984 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have steadily increased, accompanied by a steeper rise of device related infections (DRI). Hypothesis The prevalence of DRI for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is higher in clinical practice than reported previously, even at a university hospital, and likely higher than reported to the national device registry. Methods Electronic medical records of consecutive patients undergoing a CRT procedure between January 2016 and December 2017 were analyzed. Clinical history, procedure related variables and complications were reviewed by specialists in cardiology and infectious diseases. Results A total of 171 patients, mean aged 74 years, 138 males (80.7%) were included. Twelve DRI occurred in 10 patients during mean 2.5 years follow‐up, giving a prevalence of 7% (incidence of 29/1000 person‐years). Reoperation, pocket haematoma, ≥3 procedures, previous device infection and indwelling central venous line were the strongest predictive factors according to univariate analysis. Out of 63/171 (36.8%) major complications, 31(49.2%) were lead‐related. There were 49/171 (28.7%) reoperations and 15/171 (8.8%) minor complications. The number major complications and DRI reported to the national device registry were 7/171 (4.1%) and 2/171 (0.6%), respectively, reflecting a 5‐fold underreporting. Conclusions The high rate of CRT device infections is in sharp contrast to those reported by others and to the national device registry. Although a center specific explanation cannot be excluded, the high rates highlight a major issue with registries, reinforcing the need for better surveillance and automatic reporting of device related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bozena Ostrowska
- Department of Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Spyridon Gkiouzepas
- Department of Medical Sciences and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Siri Kurland
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carina Blomström-Lundqvist
- Department of Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Medical Sciences and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162:e183-e353. [PMID: 33972115 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
49
|
Starck CT, Burger H, Osswald B, Hakmi S, Knaut M, Bimmel D, Bärsch V, Eitz T, Mierzwa M, Ghaffari N, Siebel A. HRS-Expertenkonsensus (2017) Sondenmanagement und -extraktion von kardialen elektronischen Implantaten sowie EHRA-Expertenkonsensus (2018) zur wissenschaftlichen Aufarbeitung von Sondenextraktionen. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00398-021-00421-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
50
|
Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Ferguson JF, Gupta DK, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Lee CD, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Ma J, Mackey J, Martin SS, Matchar DB, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Roth GA, Samad Z, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Shay CM, Stokes A, VanWagner LB, Wang NY, Tsao CW. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021; 143:e254-e743. [PMID: 33501848 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2955] [Impact Index Per Article: 985.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2021 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, the global burden of cardiovascular disease, and further evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors related to cardiovascular disease. RESULTS Each of the 27 chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.
Collapse
|