Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Combined chiropractic care and Tai Chi for chronic neck pain: A protocol for a pilot randomized trial

Background

Neck pain presents a personal and socioeconomic burden globally. Despite increasing prevalence, research on chronic neck pain (CNP) is limited and management relies on generalized approaches. There is growing interest in non-pharmacological interventions, however their efficacy remains uncertain due to the multifactorial etiology of CNP. Two interventions, multimodal chiropractic care (MCC) and Tai Chi, have shown promise individually in managing CNP, and when combined may offer synergistic benefits. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of combining these interventions for CNP.Methods/design: Forty-eight adults, aged 18-65y, with CNP defined as occurring ≥5 days a week for ≥3 consecutive months, severity of ≥3 on the numeric rating scale, and a score of ≥5 on the Neck Disability Index will be recruited. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of the three treatment groups (MCC plus Tai Chi and Enhanced Usual Care (EUC), MCC plus EUC, or EUC alone). The MCC was validated using a modified Delphi approach. Primary outcomes relate to feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence) and secondary outcomes include clinical measures of neck pain severity and disability, health-related quality-of-life, psychosocial well-being, and physical function. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 16-weeks (post-intervention), and 24-weeks. Qualitative interviews will be conducted.

Discussion

Results of this study will provide preliminary evidence regarding the feasibility and clinical evaluation of pragmatically delivered MCC, alone or in combination with Tai Chi, for individuals with CNP. These data will be used to inform the design of a fully powered, factorial trial evaluating two promising non-pharmacological therapies for CNP.

Trial registration

This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05726331).

Acceptability of multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program for chronic low back pain: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The Programa d'Atenció Integral pels Pacients amb Dolor Crònic (PAINDOC) is a multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program that integrates pain neuroscience education, mindfulness meditation, pain psychotherapy, Empowered Relief, and therapeutic exercise. It serves as a therapeutic option for individuals with chronic low back pain, providing them with comprehensive adaptive strategies for pain management.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study explores participants' retrospective acceptability of the PAINDOC Program.

METHODS

To ensure demographic variability and information power, a purposive sampling approach was applied. Twelve participants were interviewed through three focus groups, supplemented with four individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and evaluated based on the Therapeutic Framework of Acceptability.

RESULTS

Participants provide positive feedback regarding active pain coping strategies and improved self-management. While certain aspects of the Program were more emphasized, participants integrated tools from all components. Strategies included pain reconceptualization, positive self-talk, or problem-solving. The Program's ethicality was closely linked to individual values and may also be influenced by time constraints of certain program elements, the immediate effects of specific approaches, participant perceptions, and individual preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide valuable insights into the acceptability of the PAINDOC Program, guiding future improvements and the development of similar interventions.

Beyond pain intensity: Validating single-item pain bothersomeness measures

Chronic pain is a complex and multifaceted health condition, rendering pain intensity alone insufficient for comprehensively understanding the impact of pain. Pain bothersomeness scales have been developed to measure pain's impact on life, however lack adequate validation. Our study examines the validity of two single-item measures (5-point and 11-point response scales) for pain bothersomeness. We collected data from 633 treatment-seeking adults with mixed-etiology chronic pain. Pearson correlations were conducted to examine the relationships between each pain bothersomeness item and 20 general and pain-related functioning measures. ANOVAs examined the ability of pain bothersomeness scores to discriminate between eight groupings based on general and pain-related functioning. Linear regressions analyzed pain bothersomeness as a predictor of 14 measures of general and pain-related functioning three months later. Both pain bothersomeness items correlated significantly with 19 functioning measures and discriminated between eight groupings. Controlling for covariates, both items were consistently predictive of worse pain interference (Total adj r² =.34), pain catastrophizing (Total adj r² =.21-.22), depression (Total adj r² =.25-.26), and satisfaction with social roles (Total adj r² =.13-.16) three months later. Both single-item pain bothersomeness items demonstrated consistent concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity. These low-burden assessments provide valuable information about patient functioning in clinical settings, suggesting their utility in improving chronic pain care. PERSPECTIVE: Both single-item pain bothersomeness measures demonstrated consistent concurrent and discriminant validity. Both items predicted worse pain interference, pain catastrophizing, depression, and social functioning 3-months later.

Leveraging Lifestyle Medicine for Better Outcomes in Connective Tissue Diseases

Background/Objective: Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are a group of over 200 disorders that significantly impact quality of life due to chronic inflammation and systemic complications. While pharmacological interventions remain the cornerstone of treatment, lifestyle medicine offers a complementary approach to managing these conditions. This article explores the application of lifestyle interventions in CTDs to improve clinical outcomes and reduce disease burden. Methods: A review of current evidence on lifestyle factors, including nutrition, physical activity, sleep, stress management, avoidance of harmful substances, and social connections, was conducted. This review integrates findings from epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and expert recommendations to provide actionable insights for managing CTDs. Results: Key findings highlight the significant role of diet in influencing inflammatory activity and supporting overall health. Specifically, ultra-processed foods and other lifestyle factors could impact the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In contrast, the Mediterranean diet is particularly beneficial for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), offering anti-inflammatory properties and potential improvements in symptoms. Additionally, regular physical activity plays a vital role in preserving joint and muscle function across these conditions. Restorative sleep and effective stress management are critical in mitigating disease activity, as poor sleep and high stress are associated with worsened outcomes. Smoking and alcohol consumption were identified as modifiable risk factors that exacerbate disease progression, emphasizing the importance of lifestyle interventions for improved disease management and overall quality of life. Conclusion: Incorporating lifestyle medicine into the management of CTDs offers a patient-centered approach that complements pharmacologic treatments. By addressing modifiable risk factors, healthcare providers can empower patients to improve quality of life, reduce reliance on medications, and potentially slow disease progression. Further research is needed to establish long-term outcomes and refine intervention strategies.

Screening system for assessing suitability of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain

An objective method to evaluate patient suitability for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic low back pain (LBP) is currently lacking. Inappropriate application can result in prolonged hospital visits and increased medical costs. Therefore, identifying an objective biomarker for evaluating suitability is crucial. This study focused on electroencephalogram (EEG) complexity as a potential biomarker for evaluating CBT suitability for chronic LBP, assessing its discriminative ability and identifying factors that impede treatment. Complexity was analyzed as multiscale fuzzy sample entropy (MFSE). Fifty patients with suspected psychosocial factors causing LBP along with 20 healthy volunteers were included. The analysis included 25 responders and 25 non-responders for CBT. MFSE showed significant effects of scale factor [F(19,171) = 14.82, p < 0.01, partial η2 = 0.622] and interaction between group and scale factor [F(38,171) = 7.34, p < 0.01, partial η2 = 0.620]. The low-frequency band MFSE score had an odds ratio of 10.768 (95% confidence interval: 8.263-10.044, p < 0.001). The low-frequency band showed a high discriminative ability (area under the curve: 0.825), with a cut-off value of 1.25. The low-frequency FMSE is a superior biomarker for predicting suitability for CBT. This method can quickly evaluate suitability, reducing the burden on medical professionals and patients, and lowering medical costs.

Application of Algorithm-Based Treatment Approach to Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

Low back pain accounts for nearly 4 million annual emergency department (ED) visits, and patient outcomes following an ED visit for low back pain are poor. Additionally, only a small portion of patients visiting the ED for low back pain follow up with outpatient physical therapy within 3 months, despite established benefits of early versus delayed physical therapy referral such as improved patient outcomes, less opioid use, and reduced downstream health care utilization. Integrating a physical therapist directly into the ED care team can facilitate evidence-based guideline concordant care and improve patient outcomes, however, physical therapists who are staffed into this role from other settings may lack experience with evaluating and managing patients with acute low back pain. Additionally, there are several unique considerations of the ED care environment which may make existing treatment-based classification approaches difficult to apply in this setting, including physical constraints (eg, delivering care in stretchers and hallways), higher symptom severity and psychosocial stressors necessitating an emergency visit, and greater likelihood of alternative medical diagnoses (eg, kidney stone, aortic aneurysm) contributing to symptoms of low back pain. This perspective presents a modified ED treatment-based classification system (ED-TBC) for low back pain with 3 illustrative case examples. The ED-TBC for low back pain can be used to facilitate guideline concordant care, increase physical therapist confidence in evaluating low back pain in the ED, and reduce clinical practice variation.

Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD): A pilot randomized trial

Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30-0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms. PERSPECTIVE: The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Relief: Pain and Itch

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that may cause debilitating pain and itch. Given their physical and psychological burden, recognition and treatment of HS-associated symptoms are critical for supporting patients with HS. The complex nature of HS pain, encompassing acute and chronic timing as well as nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic character, requires a tailored treatment approach. Itch in HS, although less studied, is also a prevalent and distressing symptom. The aim of this narrative review is to apply current knowledge of HS pain and pruritus to develop a practical approach for symptomatic management in the dermatology office.

Combining procedural and behavioral treatments for chronic low back pain: A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Individual treatments for chronic low back pain (CLBP) have small magnitude effects. Combining different types of treatments may produce larger effects.

OBJECTIVE

To (1) assess feasibility of conducting a factorial randomized controlled trial of these treatments; and (2) estimate individual and combined treatment effects of (a) lumbar radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) of the dorsal ramus medial branch nerves (vs. a simulated LRFA control procedure) and (b) Activity Tracker-Informed Video-Enabled Cognitive Behavioral Therapy program for CLBP (AcTIVE-CBT) (vs. an educational control treatment) on back-related disability at 3 months post-randomization.

METHODS

Participants (n = 13) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio in a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Feasibility goals included an enrollment proportion ≥ 30%, a randomization proportion ≥ 80%, and a ≥ 80% proportion of randomized participants completing the 3-month Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) primary outcome end point. An intent-to-treat analysis was used.

RESULTS

The enrollment proportion was 62%, the randomization proportion was 81%, and all randomized participants completed the primary outcome. Though not statistically significant, there was a beneficial, moderate-magnitude effect of LRFA versus control on 3-month RMDQ (-3.25 RMDQ points [95% confidence interval [CI], -10.18 to 3.67]). There was a significant, beneficial, large-magnitude effect of AcTIVE-CBT versus control (-6.29 [95% CI, -10.97 to -1.60]). Though not statistically significant, there was a beneficial, large effect of LRFA+AcTIVE-CBT versus control (-8.37 [95% CI: -21.47, 4.74]).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that it is feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial combining procedural and behavioral treatments for CLBP.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03520387.

Mindfulness vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain Treated With Opioids: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can necessitate opioid therapy. Effective approaches to reduce CLBP's symptoms and opioid-related harms are needed. Cognitive behavioral (CBT) and mindfulness-based (MBT) therapies may be useful but have not been well-studied for opioid-treated CLBP.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of MBT vs CBT in opioid-treated CLBP, hypothesizing MBT's superiority.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this 12-month community partner-informed, partially masked, multisite, randomized clinical trial, participants at primary and specialty care clinics and community settings were randomly assigned (1:1) to MBT or CBT groups. Participants included English-fluent adults (21 years or older), without prior MBT or CBT training, and with moderate-to-severe CLBP (average score ≥3 on the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]; functional limitation score ≥20 on the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), treated with an opioid dosage of at least 15 mg/d of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for at least 3 months. Outcome data were collected from July 1, 2017, to November 23, 2022. Analysis used the intention-to-treat approach.

Interventions

Manual-based MBT or CBT interventions consisting of 8 weekly therapist-led group sessions and at-home practice.

Outcomes and Measures

Self-reported coprimary (average pain severity, 0-10 [BPI]; functional limitations, 0-100 [ODI]) and secondary (mental and physical health-related quality of life [QOL] on the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey and opioid dose in MME per day, Timeline Followback) outcomes compared at 6 and 12 months.

Results

Among 6024 screened individuals, 2926 were ineligible, 2328 were eligible, and 770 were enrolled, including 385 in the MBT and 385 in the CBT groups. Of these, 434 participants (56.4%) were female, 647 (84.0%) identified as non-Hispanic ethnicity, and 630 (81.8%) identified as White race; mean (SD) age was 57.8 (11.3) years. The mean (SD) BPI average pain score was 6.1 (1.6) (moderate pain) and the mean (SD) ODI functional limitation score was 47.2 (14.0) (moderate functional limitations), with reduced physical (mean [SD], 28.5 [8.3]) and mental (mean [SD], 42.5 [11.8]) health-related QOL on the SF-12 and high opioid dosage (mean [SD], 177 [1041] MME/d). Over time, each group significantly improved their outcomes, without serious adverse effects. The intention-to-treat linear mixed-effects model analysis did not detect significant between-group differences at 6 and 12 months for pain (0.21 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.48; P = .12] and 0.13 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.40; P = .33], respectively) or function (0.07 [95% CI, -1.80 to 1.93; P = .94], and 0.27 [95% CI, -1.59 to 2.12; P = .78], respectively) and indicated MBT's noninferiority relative to CBT on primary outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large trial, CLBP-related symptoms improved, while opioid dosage decreased in both MBT and CBT groups at 6 and 12 months. Increasing availability of these safe psychological therapies could help reduce individual and societal burdens of refractory, opioid-treated CLBP.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03115359.

Brief interventions for chronic pain: Approaches and evidence

Various countries have published national guidance supporting the integration of behavioral approaches into chronic pain treatment. Yet multiple barriers prevent broad patient access. Brief treatment formats may address universal shortcomings of therapists and resources and offer patients expanded access to care through lower costs and treatment burdens. This article summarizes published evidence for eight identified therapist delivered brief behavioral pain interventions (operationalized as 1-4 treatment sessions or ≤8 h total treatment time) for adults with chronic pain (≥18 years of age) including a description of the treatment approach, implementation features, evidence to date, and salient points. The discussion includes current clinical dissemination and future directions that leverage technology to enhance patient access to behavioral pain care.

Clinician and researcher responses to the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed: Content analysis of international, cross-sectional, qualitative survey data

Pain catastrophizing is understood as a negative cognitive and emotional response to pain. Researchers, clinicians, advocates, and patients have reported stigmatizing effects of the term on patients when used clinically and in the media. This report describes the results of an international, observational, cross-sectional study investigation of clinician and researcher (professionals) perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing and whether new terminology is needed or desired. Open-ended electronic surveys were distributed to researchers and clinicians by collaborators, stakeholders, and through social media. Professionals reported on their familiarity with the term, its meaning and impacts, and their use of the term with patients. 1397 surveys from professionals in 46 countries (48.5% from the U.S.) were received. The sample was almost two-thirds female (61.3%), with a mean age of 56.67 (SD=4.04) years, and comprised of 78.6% clinicians (63.6%, pain specialists; n=698) and 20.3% researchers. The majority were familiar with the term (82.2%; n=1148). Among the 1098 clinicians, 33.6% had used the term in communication with patients. A content analysis of professionals' responses to open-ended questions is presented. Coded responses were synthesized into five content categories or themes: (1) pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated response to pain; (2) pain catastrophizing is an unhelpful response to pain; (3) the term pain catastrophizing is stigmatizing; (4) the term pain catastrophizing is clinically useful; (5) patients' perception of the term varies. Results highlight the continual controversy surrounding the term pain catastrophizing and the need for additional research and education to incorporate patient-centered approaches into clinical and public communications. Perspective: We present a content analysis of international clinician and researcher perspectives on the term pain catastrophizing. This investigation provides the largest depiction to date of the controversy surrounding pain catastrophizing and may guide future efforts to decrease stigma in patients with chronic pain and improve patient-clinician communication.

Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability study of the cognitive behavior questionnaire in non-specific chronic low back pain:: CBQNSCLBP Turkish Version Validity and Reliability

BackgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a complex condition with significant physical, psychological, and social impacts. The Cognitive Behavior Questionnaire for Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (CBQ-NSCLBP) was developed to assess cognitive-behavioral factors.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to translate the CBQ-NSCLBP into Turkish (CBQ-NSCLBP-Tr), evaluate its psychometric properties, and also to assess the clinicometric properties of the instrument, including its validity, reliability, and effectiveness in assessing cognitive-behavioral factors in Turkish-speaking individuals with chronic low back pain.MethodsA total of 120 participants with CLBP aged 18-65 years were recruited. Construct validity was evaluated by correlating CBQ-NSCLBP-Tr scores with established measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire(FABQ), Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale(TKS), Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire(Back-PAQ), Beck Anxiety Inventory(BAI), and Beck Depression Inventory(BDI). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC), and internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha.ResultsThe CBQ-NSCLBP-Tr demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.89) and strong internal consistency significant correlations with established measures, such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, r = 0.44) and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ, r = 0.48). According to these results, the CBQ-NSCLBP-Tr is a reliable instrument for evaluating cognitive-behavioral variables affecting chronic low back pain in Turkish-speaking individuals.ConclusionsThe CBQ-NSCLBP-Tr is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing cognitive-behavioral factors in Turkish-speaking CLBP populations. It captures critical psychological dimensions influencing pain perception and disability, complementing existing measures.

Pilot study of an integrative telehealth group intervention for chronic pain

The effectiveness of in-person psychological interventions for chronic pain populations has been widely studied. The current retrospective pilot study evaluates the effectiveness of a 10-week integrative telehealth pain group intervention consisting of cognitive, behavioral, mindfulness, and lifestyle strategies on anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, and pain intensity. Participants at a large multidisciplinary hospital are referred internally from various medical departments within the hospital. The present study consists of data from 9 group cohorts from October 2020 to June 2022. The study included 86 patients, with 52 completing all 10 weeks of the intervention with post-questionnaire data available. Measures assessing anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, and pain intensity at baseline and at the completion of the intervention. A series of paired samples t-tests were used to assess change in each outcome measure from baseline to after completion of the program. All the outcome variables including anxiety, depression, pain interference, pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing showed statistically significant reductions after the intervention compared to baseline assessments. There were no significant differences in any of the demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, education level) or chronic pain condition between participants who did and did not complete the program. Preliminary data suggest that this 10-week integrative telehealth pain group intervention significantly lowered anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, pain interference, and pain intensity from pre- to post-intervention. Larger, randomized controlled studies are needed to validate these results.

The feasibility and acceptability of an online mindfulness-based stress reduction program for chronic musculoskeletal pain: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions affect millions of people worldwide and place a significant burden on individuals and the healthcare systems. Managing chronic musculoskeletal pain requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers biological, psychological, and social factors. However, access to multidisciplinary pain care is challenging, and long wait times can lead to increased stress and health deterioration. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a mind-body approach developed specifically to reduce the distress of living with chronic conditions, such as chronic musculoskeletal pain. This study proposed a novel approach by offering an online MBSR program to patients on waitlists to attend a multidisciplinary pain clinic in Australia's public healthcare system that could improve health outcomes. The study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of this approach using a pilot study design with a mixed-methods approach.

METHODS

This is a mixed-methods pilot randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study. Participants will be recruited from waitlists at two multidisciplinary pain management centres within the Sydney Local Health District in New South Wales, Australia. This pilot trial will randomly assign 32 individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain to either an online MBSR group or a usual care control group. Feasibility outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, adherence to mindfulness practice, and adverse events will be assessed using validated questionnaires. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants in the MBSR group to explore their experiences and evaluate acceptability, and barriers and facilitators of engagement with the intervention.

DISCUSSION

This pilot study will evaluate a novel approach to integrating MBSR into the Australian public healthcare system as a mechanism for providing support to individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain who are waitlisted for a multidisciplinary pain management program. Findings from this study will indicate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of this approach in terms of patient-reported outcomes to guide the design of future large-scale clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was prospectively registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000822785).

Effect of Motivational Interviewing and Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and its concomitant cost implications have continued to rise across the globe. Currently, there is no effective treatment for CLBP that leads to long-term improvement. Hence, there is growing recognition of the need for behaviour techniques including motivational interviewing (MI) to address CLBP.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of MI and exercise on pain in individuals with CLBP.

METHOD

We searched for trials in seven databases from inception to April 2024. Trials were included if MI was used alone or in addition to an exercise programme for improving CLBP in adults aged (≥ 18 years).

RESULTS

From 3062 records retrieved, we included three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only one study was rated as having a low risk of bias. There is no evidence to support the benefit of MI and exercise on improving pain (SMD-0.23, 95% CI-0.55 to 0.09, I2 = 0%, p = 0.16), disability (MD-1.80, 95% CI-4.55 to 0.94, I2 = 85%, p = 0.20) and physical functioning (SMD 0.00, 95% CI-1.31 to 1.32, I2 = 93%, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to support the effect of MI and exercise on pain in individuals with CLBP. More large-scale RCTs are needed in evaluating the effectiveness of MI and exercise in individuals with CLBP.

Development and Initial Validation of Mindfulness-Based Pain Reduction (MBPR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Purpose

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has shown efficacy for alleviating chronic low back pain (cLBP) and is included in current treatment guidelines. However, benefits are moderate. We aimed to optimize MBSR for chronic pain by using recent research to develop Mindfulness-Based Pain Reduction (MBPR) and test it in patients with cLBP.

Patients and Methods

Phase 1: We modified the MBSR curriculum with theory-driven components and convened focus groups with local and international mindfulness and clinical pain management experts to refine an 8-week MBPR program. Phase 2: We recruited participants with cLBP from Northern California using outreach in newsletters, social media, and other methods to test and iteratively modify the curriculum. MBPR was delivered in a group format by videoconference. The first three groups received MBPR; a fourth group was randomized to MBSR or MBPR to assess randomization feasibility. We assessed feasibility and acceptability by attendance, practice logs, and exit interviews. We assessed changes in patient-reported outcome measures for low back pain trials using a single arm (treatment group only) approach at 2 and 6 months with linear mixed models (primary: pain intensity and interference (PEG) scores).

Results

Phase 1: The MBPR curriculum included: 1) mindful interoceptive exposure to pain, 2) pain neuroscience education, and 3) yoga postures specifically for cLBP. Phase 2: we enrolled 58 patients in 4 cohorts; 49 completed post-intervention and 41 completed 6-month follow-up assessments; 29 of the 41 received MBPR. Participants attended a mean of 80% of sessions and 23 of 24 participants accepted randomization in the 4th cohort. Mean PEG scores improved for 20 of 29 MBPR participants in a clinically meaningful way (PEG scores >30%).

Conclusion

MBPR was feasible and acceptable. Two-thirds of MBPR participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and interference scores. MBPR warrants further investigation through a randomized, controlled trial.

An update on non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief

Chronic pain affects a substantial portion of the population, yet current treatments often fail to provide adequate relief. Non-pharmacological interventions, which target behaviors and brain processes underlying the experience of pain, hold promises in offering relief for people with chronic pain. This review consolidates the current knowledge concerning the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain. We focus on psychological interventions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions and emotion-based therapies) that use mental techniques and physical practices (e.g., exercise, massage, acupuncture, and yoga) that use body techniques to reduce pain. The efficacy of neuromodulation is also discussed. Given that placebo and expectation effects may enhance benefits for non-pharmacological interventions, we also discuss placebo interventions and expectation management practices. Finally, we describe digital therapeutics as an emerging approach for managing chronic pain. We argue that non-pharmacological interventions are critical adjunctive or stand-alone interventions for chronic pain conditions.

Efficacy of a Blended Low-Intensity Internet-Delivered Psychological Program in Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is a highly prevalent phenomenon whose presence causes a profound physical, psychological, and economic impact. It hinders help seeking, diagnosis, quality of care, and adherence to treatment, and it poses a significant dilemma for present-day health care systems.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of improved treatment as usual (iTAU) combined with a blended low-intensity psychological intervention delivered using information and communication technologies for the treatment of multimorbidity (depression and type 2 diabetes or low back pain) in primary care settings.

METHODS

A 2-armed, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial was designed for this study. Participants diagnosed with depression and either type 2 diabetes or low back pain (n=183) were randomized to "intervention + iTAU" (combining a face-to-face intervention with a supporting web-based program) or "iTAU" alone. The main outcome consisted of a standardized composite score to consider (1) severity of depressive symptoms and (2a) diabetes control or (2b) pain intensity and physical disability 3 months after the end of treatment as the primary end point. Differences between the groups were estimated using mixed effects linear regression models, and mediation evaluations were conducted using path analyses to evaluate the potential mechanistic role of positive and negative affectivity and openness to the future.

RESULTS

At 3-month follow-up, the intervention + iTAU group (vs iTAU) exhibited greater reductions in composite multimorbidity score (B=-0.34, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.04; Hedges g=0.39) as well as in depression and negative affect and improvements in perceived health, positive affect, and openness to the future. Similar positive effects were observed after the intervention, including improvements in physical disability. No significant differences were found in glycosylated hemoglobin, pain intensity, or disability at 3-month follow-up (P=.60; P=.79; and P=.43, respectively). Path analyses revealed that the intervention had a significant impact on the primary outcome, mediated by both positive and negative affect (positive affect: indirect effect=-0.15, bootstrapped 95% CI -0.28 to -0.03; negative affect: indirect effect=-0.14, bootstrapped 95% CI -0.28 to -0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the efficacy of a low-intensity psychological intervention applied in a blended format on multimorbidity in primary care. It justifies the exploration of the conceptualization of depression in type 2 diabetes as well as the analysis of the implementation of such interventions in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03426709; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03426709.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1186/S12888-019-2037-3.

Upskilling pain relief after surgery: a scoping review of perioperative behavioral intervention efficacy and practical considerations for implementation

Perioperative skills-based interventions may support non-pharmacological management of pain and opioid reduction after surgery. Such interventions may target and enhance predictors for surgical recovery and possibly reduce chronic postsurgical pain. Existing meta-analyses are limited by inclusion of studies that are either non-surgical or with outcomes occurring only in the hours after surgery. Lacking is a scoping review of studies testing perioperative skills-based interventions for postsurgical pain relief and opioid reduction in the days and months after surgery. We reviewed the efficacy of perioperative behavioral interventions; over what time frame and in which surgical populations efficacy evidence exists; and whether such interventions can prevent chronic postsurgical pain. 20 randomized trials were included, with the following intervention types: hypnosis, relaxation therapy, stress management training, mindfulness, mixed-type skills interventions (mind-body skills, preoperative pain self-management, empowered relief for surgery); cognitive behavioral-therapy (CBT); and mindfulness-based CBT. We summarize study methods, treatment specifics, and analgesic effects. No studies were designed to test intervention efficacy for preventing chronic postsurgical pain. Only two studies used active controls as the study comparator. Two studies showed positive effects on postsurgical opioid use. No studies tested whether the interventions enhanced time to pain cessation after surgery. Four studies demonstrated durable analgesic effects at 3-12 months after surgery. We describe the real-world practicality of intervention integration into the perioperative pathway and provide dissemination and implementation methodologies that may increase intervention uptake and therefore fulfill calls from national agencies to better integrate behavioral pain treatments into perioperative care.

Treatment mechanism and outcome decoupling effects in cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and behavior therapy for chronic pain

ABSTRACT

Findings suggest that cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and behavior therapy (BT) for chronic pain produce improvements through changes in putative mechanisms. Evidence supporting this notion is largely based on findings showing significant associations between treatment mechanism variables and outcomes. An alternative view is that treatments may work by reducing or decoupling the impact of changes in mechanism variables on changes in outcomes. We examined the degree to which relationships between previous changes in potential treatment mechanisms and subsequent changes in outcomes changed as treatment progressed and vice versa. Cognitive therapy, MBSR, BT, and treatment as usual (TAU) were compared in people with chronic low back pain (N = 521). Eight individual sessions were administered with weekly assessments of putative treatment mechanisms and outcomes. Lagged analyses revealed mechanism × session number interactions and outcome × session number interactions, such that associations between mechanism and outcome variables were strong and significant in the first third of treatment, but weakened over time and became nonsignificant by the last third of treatment. These effects were similar across treatment conditions but did not emerge among people undergoing TAU. Results suggest that during the course of CT, MBSR, and BT, the links between changes in treatment mechanism variables became decoupled from subsequent changes in outcomes and vice versa. Thus, starting by midtreatment and continuing into late treatment, participants may have learned through participation in the treatments that episodes of maladaptive pain-related thoughts and/or spikes in pain need not have detrimental consequences on their subsequent experience.

Mediators and Moderators of two online interventions for managing pain, fear of progression and functional ability in rheumatoid arthritis

This is a secondary analysis of a trial comparing online mindfulness-based stress reduction with cognitive-behaviour therapy for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Both interventions were administered over eight weeks with five lessons and accompanied by weekly therapist contact. For the purposes of this study, we investigated the pain severity, fear of progression and functional ability as the outcome variables because the treatments had differential effects on these three outcomes but had equivalent effects on other variables. We examined mediators and moderators of relative treatment efficacy of mindfulness based stress reduction (n = 91) versus cognitive-behaviour therapy (n = 103) for these outcomes. For pain severity, no significant mediators or moderators were identified. However, amongst those with low pain severity, mindfulness-based stress reduction was more efficacious than cognitive-behaviour therapy for fears of progression. Furthermore, mindfulness-based stress reduction was more efficacious than cognitive-behaviour therapy for functional ability for those with high trait mindfulness at baseline. Changes in fear of progression during treatment fully mediated the effect of treatment group on functional ability over follow-up. While both online mindfulness-based stress reduction and cognitive-behaviour therapy were efficacious for people with rheumatoid arthritis, mindfulness-based stress reduction was more effective in reducing fears of progression and improving functional ability for those with low levels of pain severity and high levels of mindfulness at baseline, respectively. These results highlight the importance of treating fear of progression for people with rheumatoid arthritis as reductions in fears of progression over treatment led to improvements in functional ability six months later.

Augmentation of Interstitial Cystitis-Bladder Pain Syndrome Treatment With Meditation and Yoga: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether yoga and meditation added to usual care improves treatment response in women with interstitial cystitis-bladder pain syndrome.

METHODS

This randomized trial compared women with interstitial cystitis-bladder pain syndrome receiving standard care alone (control group) with those receiving standard care plus meditation and yoga (mind-body group). Standard care was defined as behavioral changes or medications recommended by the American Urological Association. Individuals in the control group received standard care, and those in the mind-body group received standard care augmented with a commercially available meditation application and standardized yoga tutorial video. Both groups continued their current interstitial cystitis-bladder pain syndrome standard care treatments. The primary outcome was the modified GRA (Global Response Assessment), comparing responders (moderately, markedly improved) with nonresponders at 12 weeks. On power analysis assuming α=5% and β=80%, a sample size of 82 participants was required to find 30% difference on the GRA between groups. Weekly GRA scores over 12 weeks were also compared. Secondary outcomes included ICPI (Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index)/ICSI (Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index), pain, pain interference, anxiety/depression, and self-efficacy scores and treatment escalation over 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Among 97 randomized participants (49 mind-body group, 48 control group), groups did not differ in characteristics or symptoms at baseline. The mind-body group had more GRA responders compared with the control group at 12 weeks (31/43 [72.1%] vs 10/39 [25.6%], relative risk [RR] 2.8, 95% CI, 1.6-4.6), corroborated by superior weekly GRA results over 12 weeks. The mind-body group had superior beneficial change on the ICPI (RR 1.8, 95% CI, 0.5-3.1), ICSI (RR 1.9, 95% CI, 0.2-3.6), and pain (RR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.4-2.5) scores than the control group at 12 weeks. The mind-body group required less treatment escalation than the control group (2/45 [4.4%] vs 14/42 [33.3%], RR 0.13, 95% CI, 0.03-0.55).

CONCLUSION

The addition of meditation and yoga to standard interstitial cystitis-bladder pain syndrome care was associated with improved treatment response and required fewer additional interventions compared with standard care alone.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04820855.

A multidisciplinary pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary programs are the first recommendation for non-specific chronic low-back pain, but implementing this type of program is complicated to get up and running. The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and appropriateness of the PAINDOC multidisciplinary program for subjects with chronic low-back pain. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the decrease in pain intensity, pain-related disability and pain catastrophizing, as well as the improvement in quality of life with this program. Furthermore, another of the secondary objectives was to calculate the sample size for a future randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a hospital pain unit using two successive recruitment waves. First, the feasibility outcomes (recruitment, completion, and drop-out rates) of a 5-month non-random prospective cohort (n = 227) were recorded. Then, the clinical outcomes (pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and pain catastrophizing) were recorded from a prospective, controlled, two-armed and single-blind feasibility study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05974072). It included 41 participants that were randomly allocated to either the pharmacological treatment (n = 21) arm or PAINDOC program (n = 20) arm.

RESULTS

The recruitment rate was 66%, with the completion rate standing at 80.7% and the drop-out rate at 19.3%. Significant differences and a medium size effect were observed between groups in terms of pain intensity (p = .017, r = .408) at the 4-month follow-up. The intragroup analysis of the PAINDOC group revealed significant lessening in pain intensity (p = < 0.001) and improvements in quality of life (p = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the PAINDOC multidisciplinary program is a feasible treatment for patients with non-specific chronic low-back pain. Furthermore, the exploratory results of this study suggest that it could be an effective treatment to reduce pain intensity and improve on self-reported quality of life in these patients, although a future randomized clinical trial is needed to determine its effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05974072 (registration date July 11, 2023; retrospectively registered; ClinicalTrials.gov).

A Tale of Two Treatments: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Mindfulness or Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Delivered Online for People with Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in comparison to a waitlist control (WLC) for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Participants completed assessments before and after treatment and at 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-nine participants with RA were recruited and randomised in a 2:2:1 ratio to MBSR:CBT:WLC. Participants completed a semi-structured clinical interview for depression and were stratified for history of recurrent depression. We measured the primary outcome of pain interference, as well as pain severity, depression, anxiety, functional ability, and fear of progression. We predicted that MBSR and CBT would result in improvements compared to WLC. We also predicted that those with a history of recurrent depression would benefit more from MBSR than CBT for depression.

RESULTS

MBSR and CBT were equally efficacious in reducing pain interference compared to WLC. Similar results were found for depression. MBSR demonstrated superior outcomes to CBT for fear of progression at post-treatment and functional ability at 6-month follow-up. CBT only was better than WLC for pain severity at 6-month follow-up. Depressive status did not moderate the efficacy of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

MBSR and CBT resulted in statistically and clinically significant changes in pain interference compared to WLC. MBSR was more efficacious than CBT for functional ability and fear of progression, while CBT showed superiority for pain severity. The effect sizes were comparable to those achieved with face-to-face interventions, confirming both online treatments are effective for people with RA.

Mindfulness Meditation and Placebo Modulate Distinct Multivariate Neural Signatures to Reduce Pain

BACKGROUND

Rather than a passive reflection of nociception, pain is shaped by the interplay between one's experiences, current cognitive-affective states, and expectations. The placebo response, a paradoxical yet reliable phenomenon, is postulated to reduce pain by engaging mechanisms shared with active therapies. It has been assumed that mindfulness meditation, practiced by sustaining nonjudgmental awareness of arising sensory events, merely reflects mechanisms evoked by placebo. Recently, brain-based multivariate pattern analysis has been validated to successfully disentangle nociceptive-specific, negative affective, and placebo-based dimensions of the subjective pain experience.

METHODS

To determine whether mindfulness meditation engages distinct brain mechanisms from placebo and sham mindfulness to reduce pain, multivariate pattern analysis pain signatures were applied across 2 randomized clinical trials that employed overlapping psychophysical pain testing procedures (49 °C noxious heat; visual analog pain scales) and distinct functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (blood oxygen level-dependent; perfusion based). After baseline pain testing, 115 healthy participants were randomized into a 4-session mindfulness meditation (n = 37), placebo-cream conditioning (n = 19), sham mindfulness meditation (n = 20), or book-listening control (n = 39) intervention. After each intervention, noxious heat was administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging and each manipulation.

RESULTS

A double dissociation in the multivariate pattern analysis signatures supporting pain regulation was revealed by mindfulness meditation compared with placebo cream. Mindfulness meditation produced significantly greater reductions in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings and nociceptive-specific and negative affective pain signatures than placebo cream, sham mindfulness meditation, and control interventions. The placebo-cream group significantly lowered the placebo-based signature.

CONCLUSIONS

Mindfulness meditation and placebo engaged distinct and granular neural pain signatures to reduce pain.

Implementation Outcomes From a Pilot Study of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) as a Chronic Pain Treatment Modality in an Integrative Health Clinic

Background

As regulation of opioid prescribing evolves, primary care and pain clinics are shifting to provide non-pharmacological and interdisciplinary chronic pain care. An under-utilized but growing area of health care for chronic pain is complementary and integrative health (CIH). However, there is limited availability of CIH approaches within the health care system. Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) is an evidence-based mind-body therapy, with a manualized protocol, that focuses on developing interoceptive sensibility for improved self-awareness and nervous system regulation. Prior MABT research shows MABT improves self-report and physiological indicators of interoception as well as mental and physical symptoms of distress.

Methods

This pilot single-group study used a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design and mixed methods to study implementation strategies and outcomes for bringing MABT into an integrative chronic pain clinic. Administrative data, staff surveys, and focus groups were used to understand the implementation process and outcomes (see Additional files 2, 3, and 4). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey and administrative data. A content analysis approach was used to analyze qualitative data from focus groups.

Results

7 staff surveys were administered over the 24-month study period and showed high acceptability and appropriateness that increased over time. Adoption, feasibility, and sustainability were also high. Clinicians made 70 referrals to MABT, 56 patients scheduled a session, 41 patients completed at least one session, and 71% of these completed the protocol. Focus groups identified MABT as a therapy that filled a gap in services, particularly for patients with a lack of body awareness and high emotion dysregulation.

Conclusion

Implementation of MABT was highly successful in an integrative health clinic focused on chronic pain treatment.

ClinicalTrialsgov registration

NCT05289024 Registered March 11, 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05289024?term=NCT05289024&rank=1.

Patient Outcomes Improve in a Pragmatic Implementation Pilot Study of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) for Chronic Pain

Objectives

Non-pharmacologic approaches are now considered best practice for the treatment of chronic pain. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate patient responses to a newly integrated clinic service called Mindful Awareness in Body-oriented Therapy (MABT) at a chronic pain clinic. MABT is designed to develop interoceptive sensibility for improved well-being and emotion regulation.

Methods

A one-group repeated measures design was used to examine MABT referral and delivery follow-through feasibility and change on health outcomes among chronic pain patients. Upon referral, participants were scheduled for the MABT program involving eight individual sessions with one of the clinic massage therapists trained in MABT. Measures were administered at baseline, post-intervention (3 months) and at 6 month follow-up). Outcome measures assessed physical and mental health distress, interoceptive awareness, and emotional well-being. Analyses included descriptive statistics and repeated measures ANOVA.

Results

Seventy patients were referred and 41 received at least one MABT session. Thirty patients (73%) completed the MABT intervention. Statistically and/or clinically significant improvements were identified for most subscales of the PROMIS-29 (the primary outcome), including Physical Function, Fatigue, Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, Social Roles, and Pain Interference. Improvements in interoceptive sensibility and emotion regulation difficulties also demonstrated statistically significant and large effects.

Discussion

This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of MABT referral and delivery follow-through when delivered in a real-life context. Significant improvements with large effects on outcomes in response to the MABT intervention program offers a promising non-pharmacological approach for chronic pain patients.

The Hidden Complexity of Virtual Mindfulness-Based Group Medical Visits: Comfort, Challenge, and the Influence of Social Determinants of Health

Background

Chronic low back pain is globally prevalent and associated with significant impairment in quality of life. Furthermore, people from historically marginalized communities are less likely to receive treatment, contributing to health inequities. Group mindfulness-based interventions improve pain and function, and virtual delivery has been demonstrated to be feasible. Little is known about how participants experience the virtual delivery of mindfulness-based interventions, especially participants from historically marginalized communities.

Objective

This study explored participant perspectives of a virtual mindfulness-based group medical visit for people with chronic low back pain.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the intervention arm of OPTIMUM, a study of virtual medical group visits using an adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program for chronic low back pain. Semi-structured exit interviews were examined, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to compose key themes.

Results

Interviews from 59 participants (mean 56 years, 69.5% women; 45.8% Black or African American) were examined. Two major themes were derived from analysis. The first theme was 'effects of the external environment,' ie, the physical location from which the participant engaged with the session. The subthemes were comfort, social demands in the home setting, and sharing personal spaces. The second theme was 'navigating the virtual platform.' Subthemes were ease, struggle, and levels of support.

Conclusion

Patient experiences varied substantially during the virtual mindfulness-based group medical visit intervention and this variation was influenced by social determinants of health. The key themes bring attention to the effects of the external environment and the technology itself on participation for people from historically marginalized communities. Basic tenets of mindfulness, such as present state awareness and equanimity, can provide a structure within which to navigate virtual participation amid home environments. Future studies are needed to explore differences in virtual and in-person mindfulness programs and to adapt virtual mindfulness programs.

Clinicaltrialsgov ID number

NCT04129450.

Pain during menopause

Menopause is a biological process marking the end of a woman's reproductive years, typically occurring between the ages of 45 and 55. While often associated with hot flashes, mood swings, and hormonal changes, pain is a frequently overlooked and under-addressed aspect of the menopausal experience. This review article explores the multifaceted nature of pain during menopause, and sheds light on its various manifestations and the factors contributing to its prevalence and severity. Pain during menopause may include musculoskeletal discomfort, headaches or migraines, and vulvovaginal pain. The etiology of these is intricate, involving hormonal fluctuations, psychosocial factors, and genetic predispositions. Fluctuations in estrogen and progesterone levels play a pivotal role in musculoskeletal pain and joint stiffness, and increase susceptibility to conditions such as osteoarthritis. Furthermore, mood disorders, stress, and sleep disturbances may exacerbate the perception of pain. Gender norms, as well as changes in reproductive capacity and societal views on aging, may adversely the impact the self-esteem of individuals undergoing menopause. These symptoms can significantly impact a woman's quality of life, underscoring the need for early identification and appropriate management strategies. This review article highlights the factors contributing to pain during menopause, evaluates the effects of hormones on menopausal pain, and investigates management strategies for pain during menopause, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. It also emphasizes the need for further research to better understand the interplay of factors contributing to pain during menopause, in order to allow for more tailored and effective interventions. In understanding and addressing this often-neglected aspect of menopause, healthcare providers can enhance the overall wellbeing and quality of life for women transitioning through this natural life stage.

Decoding Depth of Meditation: Electroencephalography Insights From Expert Vipassana Practitioners

Background

Meditation practices have demonstrated numerous psychological and physiological benefits, but capturing the neural correlates of varying meditative depths remains challenging. In this study, we aimed to decode self-reported time-varying meditative depth in expert practitioners using electroencephalography (EEG).

Methods

Expert Vipassana meditators (n = 34) participated in 2 separate sessions. Participants reported their meditative depth on a personally defined 1 to 5 scale using both traditional probing and a novel spontaneous emergence method. EEG activity and effective connectivity in theta, alpha, and gamma bands were used to predict meditative depth using machine/deep learning, including a novel method that fused source activity and connectivity information.

Results

We achieved significant accuracy in decoding self-reported meditative depth across unseen sessions. The spontaneous emergence method yielded improved decoding performance compared with traditional probing and correlated more strongly with postsession outcome measures. Best performance was achieved by a novel machine learning method that fused spatial, spectral, and connectivity information. Conventional EEG channel-level methods and preselected default mode network regions fell short in capturing the complex neural dynamics associated with varying meditation depths.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the feasibility of decoding personally defined meditative depth using EEG. The findings highlight the complex, multivariate nature of neural activity during meditation and introduce spontaneous emergence as an ecologically valid and less obtrusive experiential sampling method. These results have implications for advancing neurofeedback techniques and enhancing our understanding of meditative practices.

The Role of Mindfulness Decompression Therapy in Managing Acute Stress Disorder in Traumatic Fracture Patients

BACKGROUND

Traumatic fractures are common orthopedic injuries with higher incidence globally, leading to acute stress disorder (ASD). Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) therapy in patients with traumatic bone fractures suffering from ASD.

METHODS

This study included 135 patients who underwent trauma and fracture treatment at The 305th Hospital of the PLA between August 2021 and August 2023. Based on their participation in MBSR therapy, they were categorized into a conventional group (n = 62) and a combined group (n = 73). We comparatively analyzed the ASD Scale (ASDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Sleep Status Scale (SRSS), and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) measurement-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) scores between these two experimental groups. Furthermore, we assessed the incidence of ASD after treatment between these two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, education, income, type of expense, trauma type, marital status, fracture site, diabetes status, hypertension status, and the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, activities of daily living (i.e., modified Barthel index) score, and Social Support Rating Scale score between the two experimental groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, no significant differences were found in the prevalence of ASDS before treatment between these two groups (p > 0.05). However, after treatment, the ASDS score was significantly lower in the combined group than in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, post-management analysis revealed that the incidence rate of ASD was 24.19% in the conventional group and 8.22% in the combined group. Moreover, the incidence of ASD was significantly lower in the combined group compared to the conventional group (p < 0.05). Before intervention, the difference in the SAS or SDS between patients was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, following treatment, the SAS and SDS scores of patients were significantly lower in the combined group than in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Similarly, after treatment, the SRSS scores of patients were substantially lower in the combined group than in the conventional group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the WHOQOL-BREF score of patients was significantly greater in the combined group than in the conventional group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MBSR therapy can significantly alleviate ASD in trauma and fracture patients. Furthermore, this approach can alleviate the incidence of ASD and reduce anxiety, depression, and negative emotions in patients. These positive effects collectively improve sleep quality and overall well-being of patients.

Digital cognitive behavioral therapy vs education for pain in adults with sickle cell disease

ABSTRACT

Despite the burden of chronic pain in sickle cell disease (SCD), nonpharmacological approaches remain limited. This multisite, randomized trial compared digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with a digital pain/SCD education program ("Education") for managing pain and related symptoms. Participants were recruited virtually from seven SCD centers and community organizations in the United States. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with SCD-related chronic pain and/or daily opioid use were assigned to receive either CBT or Education for 12 weeks. Both groups used an app with interactive chatbot lessons and received personalized health coach support. The primary outcome was the change in pain interference at six months, with secondary outcomes including pain intensity, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Of 453 screened participants, 359 (79%) were randomized to CBT (n = 181) or Education (n = 178); 92% were Black African American, and 66.3% were female. At six months, 250 participants (70%) completed follow-up assessments, with 16 (4%) withdrawals. Engagement with the chatbot varied, with 76% connecting and 48% completing at least one lesson, but 80% of participants completed at least one health coach session. Both groups showed significant within-group improvements in pain interference (CBT: -2.13; Education: -2.66), but no significant difference was observed between them (mean difference, 0.54; P = .57). There were no between-group differences in pain intensity, depression, anxiety, or quality of life. High engagement with health coaching and variable engagement with digital components may explain the similar outcomes between interventions in this diverse, hard-to-reach population.

Pain can't be carved at the joints: defining function-based pain profiles and their relevance to chronic disease management in healthcare delivery design

BACKGROUND

Pain is a complex problem that is triaged, diagnosed, treated, and billed based on which body part is painful, almost without exception. While the "body part framework" guides the organization and treatment of individual patients' pain conditions, it remains unclear how to best conceptualize, study, and treat pain conditions at the population level. Here, we investigate (1) how the body part framework agrees with population-level, biologically derived pain profiles; (2) how do data-derived pain profiles interface with other symptom domains from a whole-body perspective; and (3) whether biologically derived pain profiles capture clinically salient differences in medical history.

METHODS

To understand how pain conditions might be best organized, we applied a carefully designed a multi-variate pattern-learning approach to a subset of the UK Biobank (n = 34,337), the largest publicly available set of real-world pain experience data to define common population-level profiles. We performed a series of post hoc analyses to validate that each pain profile reflects real-world, clinically relevant differences in patient function by probing associations of each profile across 137 medication categories, 1425 clinician-assigned ICD codes, and 757 expert-curated phenotypes.

RESULTS

We report four unique, biologically based pain profiles that cut across medical specialties: pain interference, depression, medical pain, and anxiety, each representing different facets of functional impairment. Importantly, these profiles do not specifically align with variables believed to be important to the standard pain evaluation, namely painful body part, pain intensity, sex, or BMI. Correlations with individual-level clinical histories reveal that our pain profiles are largely associated with clinical variables and treatments of modifiable, chronic diseases, rather than with specific body parts. Across profiles, notable differences include opioids being associated only with the pain interference profile, while antidepressants linked to the three complimentary profiles. We further provide evidence that our pain profiles offer valuable, additional insights into patients' wellbeing that are not captured by the body-part framework and make recommendations for how our pain profiles might sculpt the future design of healthcare delivery systems.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we provide evidence for a shift in pain medicine delivery systems from the conventional, body-part-based approach to one anchored in the pain experience and holistic profiles of patient function. This transition facilitates a more comprehensive management of chronic diseases, wherein pain treatment is integrated into broader health strategies. By focusing on holistic patient profiles, our approach not only addresses pain symptoms but also supports the management of underlying chronic conditions, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and improving quality of life. This model advocates for a seamless integration of pain management within the continuum of care for chronic diseases, emphasizing the importance of understanding and treating the interdependencies between chronic conditions and pain.

Integrating Chiropractic Care and Tai Chi Training for the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain in Nurses: A Single-Arm Mixed-Methods Pilot Trial

Objectives: Chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) is prevalent among health care workers, with particularly high rates among nurses. Nurses experiencing CNNP often report decreased job satisfaction, increased absenteeism, and reduced productivity. In recent years, nonpharmacologic approaches have gained attention as effective treatments for the management of CNNP, with exercise and manual therapies representing two of the most common. Early evidence shows that multimodal treatments may be more effective than unimodal strategies. The purpose of this current study was to assess the feasibility and observe the clinical outcomes of combined multimodal chiropractic care (MCC) and Tai Chi (TC) for CNNP in nurses. Methods: A single-arm mixed-methods pilot trial was conducted including 16 weeks of MCC and TC in nurses with self-reported CNNP. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, and adherence to the interventions. Clinical outcomes of interest included neck pain and related disabilities. Secondary outcomes of interest were functional, affective, and work-related performance. Qualitative interviews were also conducted. Results: Of the 59 screened, 36 met the eligibility criteria, and 21 were enrolled. The retention rate was 71.4%, and adherence rates were 85.3% for MCC and 62.5% for TC classes. Multiple pain and disability-related outcomes exhibited modest improvement from baseline to 16-week follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified six emergent themes: (1) neck pain being an inherent part of nursing, (2) nurses push through their pain, (3) MCC relieves pain and is instructive for preventing pain, (4) TC provides overall relaxation, (5) both interventions increased body awareness and improved posture, and (6) scheduling difficulties were a key obstacle for participating. Conclusions: Observed reductions in neck pain and disability suggest the potential utility of combined MCC and TC interventions for managing CNNP. Along with qualitative feedback regarding facilitators and barriers to participation, the findings support and inform a future randomized trial evaluating the combined benefits of MCC and TC for CNNP in nurses. Clinical Trial Registration #NCT06523036.

Evaluating associations between social risks and health care utilization in patients with chronic low back pain

Introduction

Care and outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) are influenced by the social risk factors that they experience. Social risk factors such as food insecurity and housing instability have detrimental effects on patient health and wellness, healthcare outcomes, and health disparities.

Objectives

This retrospective cross-sectional study examined how social risk factors identified in unstructured and structured electronic health record (EHR) data for 1,295 patients with cLBP were associated with health care utilization. We also studied the impact of social risk factors, controlling for back pain-related disability on health care utilization.

Methods

Included patients who received outpatient spine and/or physical therapy services at an urban academic medical center between 2018 and 2020. Five identified social risks were financial insecurity, housing instability, food insecurity, transportation barriers, and social isolation. Outcomes included 4 categories of health care utilization: emergency department (ED) visits/hospitalizations, imaging, outpatient specialty visits related to spine care, and physical therapy (PT) visits. Poisson regression models tested associations between the presence of identified social risks and each outcome measure.

Results

Identified social risks in 12.8% of the study population (N = 166/1,295). In multivariate models, social isolation was positively associated with imaging, specialty visits, and PT visits; housing instability was positively associated with ED visits/hospitalizations and imaging; food insecurity was positively associated with ED visits/hospitalizations and specialty visits but negatively associated with PT visits; and financial strain was positively associated with PT visits but negatively associated with ED visits/hospitalization.

Conclusion

These associations were seen above and beyond other factors used as markers of socioeconomic marginalization, including neighborhood-level social determinants of health, race/ethnicity, and insurance type. Identifying and intervening on social risk factors that patients with cLBP experience may improve outcomes and be cost-saving.

How Bud Craig's Insights Reshape the Research on Pain and Mind-Body Therapies

With his elegant studies, Bud Craig determined the structural neural basis for interoception and critically expanded our conceptual understanding of it. Importantly, he placed pain in the framework of interoception and redefined pain as a homeostatic emotion. Craig understood emotions and pain as experiences based on inferential brain processes within the theoretical model of prediction processing. This chapter aims to give a brief overview of relevant research. Mind-body therapies, such as meditation, mindfulness, yoga, Tai Chi, and others, are included as first-line non-pharmacological approaches in clinical guidelines for the management of chronic pain. Craig's groundbreaking work provided the background for our contemporary understanding of mind-body therapies and for the key role that interoceptive processes play in these therapies as they apply to a wide range of clinical conditions, including pain. This chapter reviews the tremendous influence that Craig's work had on the current state of research on mind-body therapies for managing chronic pain and how it led to new directions for cutting-edge clinical and neuroscientific research.

Examining efficacy and potential mechanisms of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxiety and stress reduction among college students in a cluster-randomized controlled trial

The pervasiveness of anxiety and stress among college students necessitates the investigation of potential alternative and accessible interventions which can be implemented into existing curricular and student-support programming to improve students' mental health. Mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT) smartphone applications have shown promising outcomes in alleviating anxiety and stress. However, it is essential to gain insight into the feasibility and efficacy of such an interventional approach in a collegiate population, as well as explore potential underlying mechanisms, which could be better targeted to enhance the efficacy of future interventions for promoting mental health and well-being. The aims for this study were (1) to assess the efficacy of a 4-week MBCT intervention using the Sanvello smartphone application in reducing trait-level anxiety and chronic stress in college-aged young adults (n = 150) compared to a positive control group (n = 139), and (2) to examine potential mediators of this effect. Participants completed assessments of trait anxiety, chronic stress, cognitive reappraisal, cognitive refocusing, distractive refocusing, and negative automatic thoughts at pretest and following 4 weeks of the interventions. Analysis of primary outcomes revealed greater reductions in trait anxiety and chronic stress for the MBCT group, relative to the positive control group with small to moderate effect sizes. The anxiolytic and stress-reducing effects of the MBCT intervention were observed to be mediated by changes in negative automatic thoughts but not by changes in cognitive reappraisal, constructive refocusing, or distractive refocusing. Given the efficacy of the Sanvello smartphone application and the overwhelmingly strong assessments of the appropriateness and feasibility of it use; student support initiatives may be well served by adopting such a platform within the context of first-line treatment and prevention of high anxiety and chronic stress within first year college students. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [number NCT06019299].

Sleep Quality in High-Risk Pregnancies: Mixed Methods Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mindfulness Training Intervention

Objectives: Sleep difficulties in pregnancy are common and increase the risk for obstetric complications. Past research shows that mindfulness training (MT) is helpful for improving sleep in non-pregnant adults and may improve sleep during pregnancy. However, it is unknown if MT improves sleep among pregnant people at risk for obstetric complications. We examined the effects of MT on sleep quality in individuals at risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Methods: Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 32 ± 4 years; mean gestational age, 16 ± 3weeks) at risk for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) were randomized to an 8-week phone-delivered MT intervention (n = 15) or treatment as usual (TAU; n = 14), designed to test MT feasibility and acceptability. As part of the study, participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and participated in a semi-structured individual qualitative interview which queried for sleep changes over pregnancy. Results: Participants randomized to MT reported less daytime sleep dysfunction compared to TAU (F = 5.79, p = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.28). Qualitative data illustrated the common experiences of sleep disturbance across both study groups; however, MT participants reported an improved ability to initiate sleep and return to sleep using mindfulness skills. About half of the participants in the MT condition reported an improvement in overall sleep quality due to less interference related to anxiety and restlessness, while other MT participants reported no change in sleep quality. Conclusions: Results from this study confirm that pregnant individuals frequently encounter sleep challenges. Findings also suggest that MT may be a helpful tool in improving sleep quality among pregnant people at risk for obstetric complications.

Telehealth Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain: The LAMP Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain and comorbid conditions, implementing them at scale poses many challenges, such as the need for dedicated space and trained instructors.

Objective

To examine group and self-paced, scalable, telehealth MBIs, for veterans with chronic pain, compared to usual care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a randomized clinical trial of veterans with moderate to severe chronic pain, recruited from 3 Veterans Affairs facilities from November 2020 to May 2022. Follow-up was completed in August 2023.

Interventions

Two 8-week telehealth MBIs (group and self-paced) were compared to usual care (control). The group MBI was done via videoconference with prerecorded mindfulness education and skill training videos by an experienced instructor, accompanied by facilitated discussions. The self-paced MBI was similar but completed asynchronously and supplemented by 3 individual facilitator calls.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was pain-related function using the Brief Pain Inventory interference scale at 3 time points: 10 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included biopsychosocial outcomes: pain intensity, physical function, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, participation in social roles and activities, depression, patient ratings of improvement of pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Results

Among 811 veterans randomized (mean [SD] age, 54.6 [12.9] years; 387 [47.7%] women), 694 participants (85.6%) completed the trial. Averaged across all 3 time points, pain interference scores were significantly lower for both MBIs compared to usual care (group MBI vs control difference: -0.4 [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.2]; self-paced vs control difference: -0.7 [95% CI, -1.0 to -0.4]). Additionally, both MBI arms had significantly better scores on the following secondary outcomes: pain intensity, patient global impression of change, physical function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social roles and activities, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Both group and self-paced MBIs did not significantly differ from one another. The probability of 30% improvement from baseline compared to control was greater for group MBI at 10 weeks and 6 months, and for self-paced MBI, at all 3 time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, scalable telehealth MBIs improved pain-related function and biopsychosocial outcomes compared to usual care among veterans with chronic pain. Relatively low-resource telehealth-based MBIs could help accelerate and improve the implementation of nonpharmacological pain treatment in health care systems.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04526158.

Twelve-month results for a randomized sham-controlled effectiveness trial of an in-home skills-based virtual reality program for chronic low back pain

Introduction

Low-risk, accessible, and long-term effective nonpharmacologic behavioral interventions for chronic low back pain (cLBP) are needed. Pain education and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are recommended first-line treatments, but access is poor, treatment effectiveness is variable, and long-term effectiveness is inconsistent. In-home virtual reality (VR)-delivered therapies might address these shortcomings because therapeutic content can be delivered in a consistent and quality-controlled manner.

Objective

To determine whether a 56-session, self-administered in-home, Skills-Based VR program for cLBP (RelieVRx) yields long-term reductions in pain intensity and pain interference 12 months posttreatment in a large demographically diverse and clinically severe real-world sample.

Methods

Participants were 1,093 demographically diverse individuals with self-reported nonmalignant cLBP >3 months duration and average pain intensity and interference scores >4/10. Participants were randomized to Skills-Based VR or active Sham, and data were collected from January 31, 2022 to October 31, 2023. Pretreatment to 12-month posttreatment analyses were conducted.

Results

From baseline to 12 months posttreatment, Skills-Based VR reductions for average pain intensity (1.7 ± 2.1) and pain interference (1.9 ± 2.3) were robust and significantly greater than those found for Sham. More than half of Skills-Based VR participants reported at least a 2-point reduction in pain intensity, pain interference, or both at 12 months posttreatment.

Conclusions

A standardized, in-home Skills-Based VR therapy is effective for reducing pain intensity and pain interference, and these effects are maintained to 12 months posttreatment.

Value-based healthcare in management of chronic back pain: A multidisciplinary- and lean-based approach

Background

Chronic back pain stands as the most common musculoskeletal disorder and a primary cause of disability in people under 45 years old. Multidisciplinary consultation offers an efficient approach to chronic back pain management compared to traditional therapeutic-rehabilitative paths. This paper aims to show the benefit of a diagnostic-therapeutic multidisciplinary program pathway for patients with chronic back pain.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent a second-level multidisciplinary consultation with a neurosurgeon and a pain therapist at our University Hospital were retrospectively identified from April 2023 to September 2023. The second-level multidisciplinary consultation is a second step consultation after a first consultation with a single specialist doctor (neurosurgeon, orthopedic, and pain therapist) who did not get the diagnosis and/or did not solve the painful symptom after medical or surgical treatment. Clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-effectiveness analysis were assessed using lean healthcare tools.

Results

With the introduction of second-level multidisciplinary consultation, patients were assessed by multiple physicians during a single visit, reducing the costs of individual visits, reducing the time to obtain the diagnosis, and facilitating early agreement on a diagnostic-therapeutic plan. The lean value-based healthcare approach showed an average of 45 working days lost per single patient and a total cost per single patient with chronic back pain of € 1069 for the national health system for an average Lead time of 18 months. Questionnaire analysis on service quality and utility, along with overall satisfaction, revealed excellent resolution of back pain in 53.8% of cases and partial resolution of back pain in 11.5% of cases after second-level multidisciplinary consultation.

Conclusion

Our multidisciplinary approach to chronic back pain has significantly improved healthcare efficiency. This new proposed clinical model reduces waiting times and costs and improves patient experience by improving clinical outcomes in the management of chronic back pain.

Virtual Reality for Subacute Pain After Orthopedic Traumatic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Acute orthopedic traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent, costly, and often lead to persistent pain and functional limitations. Psychological risk factors (eg, pain catastrophizing and anxiety) exacerbate these outcomes but are often overlooked in acute orthopedic care. Addressing gaps in current treatment approaches, this mixed-methods pilot study explored the use of a therapeutic virtual reality (VR; RelieVRx ), integrating principles of mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy, for pain self-management at home following orthopedic injury.

METHODS

We enrolled 10 adults with acute orthopedic injuries and elevated pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety from Level 1 Trauma Clinics within the Mass General Brigham health care system. Participants completed daily RelieVRx sessions at home for 8 weeks, which included pain education, relaxation, mindfulness, games, and dynamic breathing biofeedback. Primary outcomes were a priori feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pre-post measures of pain, physical function, sleep, depression, and hypothesized mechanisms (pain self-efficacy, mindfulness, and coping).

RESULTS

The VR and study procedures met or exceeded all benchmarks. We observed preliminary improvements in pain, physical functioning, sleep, depression, and mechanisms. Qualitative exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with RelieVRx and yielded recommendations for promoting VR-based trials with orthopedic patients.

DISCUSSION

The results support a larger randomized clinical trial of RelieVRx versus a sham placebo control to replicate the findings and explore mechanisms. There is potential for self-guided VR to promote evidence-based pain management strategies and address the critical mental health care gap for patients following acute orthopedic injuries.

Combined Physiotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Functional Movement Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Functional movement disorders (FMDs) are frequent and disabling neurological disorders with a substantial socioeconomic impact. Few randomized studies have analyzed the effectiveness of combined physiotherapy and psychotherapy in patients' quality of life.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment (physiotherapy plus cognitive behavioral therapy) in FMDs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a parallel, rater-blinded, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Recruitment took place from June 2022 to April 2023, and follow-up visits were performed at months 3 and 5, concluding in October 2023. Participants were recruited from a national referral center for movement disorders: the Movement Disorders Unit from the Hospital Universitario Virgen Rocio in Seville, Spain. Patients had to be 18 years or older with a confirmed FMD diagnosis and capable of giving consent to participate. Patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or refused to participate were excluded. Any uncontrolled psychiatric disorder was considered an exclusion criterion.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned, in a ratio of 1:1 to multidisciplinary treatment (physiotherapy plus cognitive behavioral therapy), or a control intervention (psychological support intervention).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes: between-group differences in changes from baseline to month 3 and month 5 in patients' quality of life (EQ-5D-5L score: EQ Index and EQ visual analog scale [EQ VAS]; and 36-Item Short-Form Survey Physical Component Summary [SF-36 PCS] and SF-36 Mental Component Summary [MCS]). Linear mixed models were applied, controlling by baseline severity and applying Bonferroni correction.

Results

Of 70 patients screened with an FMD, 40 were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 43.5 [12.8] years; age range, 18-66 years; 32 female [80%]; mean [SD] age at FMD onset, 38.4 [12.1] years), and 38 completed all the follow-up visits and were included in the analysis for primary outcomes. Multidisciplinary treatment improved SF-36 PCS with a mean between-group difference at 3 months of 4.23 points (95% CI, -0.9 to 9.4 points; P = .11) and a significant mean between-group difference at 5 months of 5.62 points (95% CI, 2.3-8.9 points; P < .001), after multiple-comparisons adjustment. There were no significant differences in other quality-of-life outcomes such as SF-36 MCS (mean between-group difference at 3 and 5 months: 0.72 points; 95% CI, -5.5 to 7.0 points; P = .82 and 0.69 points; 95% CI, 2.3-8.9 points; P = .83, respectively), EQ VAS (9.34 points; 95% CI, -0.6 to 19.3 points; P = .07 and 13.7 points; 95% CI, -1.7 to 29.0 points; P = .09, respectively) and EQ Index (0.001 point; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1 point; P = .98 and 0.08 points; 95% CI, 0-0.2 points; P = .13, respectively). At months 3 and 5, 42% and 47% of patients, respectively, in the multidisciplinary group reported improved health using the EQ-5D system, compared with 26% and 16% of patients, respectively, in the control group.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results show that multidisciplinary treatment (physiotherapy plus cognitive behavioral therapy) effectively improves FMD symptoms and physical aspects of patients' quality of life. Further studies must be performed to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of this approach in FMD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05634486.

Telehealth mindful exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: A decentralized feasibility randomized controlled trial

Objective

Negative psychological beliefs like fear avoidance and catastrophizing can interfere with exercise engagement in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Mindfulness, when integrated with exercise, could potentially address both psychological and physical impairments. Our objectives were to optimize and assess the feasibility of a novel telehealth, group-based mindful exercise intervention for people with knee OA.

Methods

We conducted a decentralized randomized controlled trial where participants (n ​= ​40) with symptomatic knee OA were randomized into mindful exercise (n ​= ​21) or exercise-only (n ​= ​19) groups. Both groups received supervised group-based interventions weekly for 8-weeks via Zoom. Primary outcomes were safety, fidelity, and feasibility of the mindful exercise intervention. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for pain, function, and psychological measures at baseline, week-8, and week-14.

Results

Participants were from 21 US states; >90% identified as having White race, 16% were from rural areas, and approximately 40% had an annual income < $50,000. At 8-weeks, mindful exercise and exercise groups had retention rates of 86% (18/21) and 100% (19/19), and attendance was 54% (11.4/21) and 68% (13/19) respectively. There were no adverse events in the mindful exercise group and four in the exercise group related to exacerbation of knee pain. Preliminary findings showed numerically larger improvements in several PROs for the mindful exercise group.

Conclusion

An 8-week telehealth, group-based, mindful exercise intervention was safe for people with knee OA. Our decentralized approach was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention. Further refinement is needed to improve intervention attendance and participant diversity.

Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) Scores and Outcomes After Arthroscopic Meniscectomy

BACKGROUND

Pain is multifactorial, and pain intensity has been shown to be influenced by patients' thoughts. The Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) can be used to quantify unhelpful negative cognitive biases about pain, but the relationship between negative pain thoughts and orthopaedic surgery outcomes is not known.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy using the NPTQ-SF survey and assess the relationship these thoughts have to knee function, general health, pain, and satisfaction before and after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

In total, 146 patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were administered the 4-item NPTQ-SF, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, and visual analog scale pain survey preoperatively between July 2021 and August 2022. The same surveys were completed at a minimum of 3 months and no later than 1 year postoperatively by 92 patients confirmed to have undergone meniscectomy.

RESULTS

NPTQ-SF scores were correlated with IKDC, SF-12, and satisfaction score preoperatively and at least 3 months postoperatively (mean, 108.5 ± 43.7 days). Preoperative NPTQ-SF scores were significantly negatively correlated with postoperative IKDC (R = -0.284), SF-12 (R = -0.266 and -0.328), and visual analog scale pain (R = 0.294) scores, while a relationship with postoperative satisfaction did not reach statistical significance (P = .067). Patients with a preoperative NPTQ-SF score >8 were less likely to achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptom State on the postoperative IKDC questionnaire (39% vs 63%; P = .03). Patients with a history of a psychiatric or chronic pain diagnoses have worse NPTQ-SF, SF-12, and IKDC scores pre- and postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The level of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing meniscectomy is related to knee function, general health, and pain. Patients with a high level of negative pain thoughts are less likely to achieve a favorable outcome from meniscectomy, with a score ≥8 representing a clinically significant threshold for preoperative screening.

Protocol for a randomised trial of a self-directed digital pain management intervention (Empowered Relief) tailored to adults with chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse/disorder: the MOBILE Relief study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain increases the risk of prescription opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). Non-pharmacological treatments are needed to dually address pain and opioid risks. The purpose of the Mobile and Online-Based Interventions to Lessen Pain (MOBILE Relief) study is to compare a one-session, video-based, on-demand digital pain relief skills intervention for chronic pain ('Empowered Relief' (ER); tailored to people at risk for opioid misuse or with opioid misuse/OUD) to a one-session digital health education intervention ('Living Better'; no pain management skills).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MOBILE Relief is an international online randomised controlled clinical trial. Study participants are adults with chronic, non-cancer pain (≥6 months) with daily pain intensity ≥3/10, taking ≥10 morphine equivalent daily dose and score ≥6 on the Current Opioid Misuse Measure. Participants are recruited through clinician referrals and clinic advertisements. Study procedures include electronic eligibility screening, informed consent, automated 1:1 randomisation to the treatment group, baseline measures, receipt of assigned digital treatment and six post-treatment surveys spanning 3 months. Study staff will call participants at baseline and 1-month and 3 months post-treatment to verify the opioid prescription. The main statistical analyses will include analysis of covariance and mixed effects model for repeated measurements regression.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes are self-reported pain catastrophising, pain intensity, pain interference, opioid craving and opioid misuse at 1-month and 3 months post-treatment. We will determine the feasibility of ER (≥50% participant engagement, ≥70% treatment appraisal ratings). We hypothesise the ER group will be superior to the Living Better group in the reduction of multiprimary pain outcomes at 1-month post-treatment and opioid outcomes at 1-month and 3 months post-treatment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Stanford University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB 61643). We will publish results in peer-reviewed journals; National Institute of Drug Abuse (funder) and MOBILE Relief participants will receive result summaries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05152134.

Non-invasive Management of Head and Neck Neuralgia: A Literature Review

Head and neck neuralgia is a prevalent condition impacting millions worldwide, necessitating both invasive and non-invasive management strategies. This review focuses specifically on non-invasive approaches. Using the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3), we categorized neuralgia causing head and neck pain to structure our literature search. Our review identified several non-invasive management techniques, including physiotherapy, pharmacological treatments, Pulsed Radiofrequency, local anesthesia blocks, Botulinum toxin injections, and non-invasive neuromodulation. This review highlights various effective non-invasive strategies for managing head and neck neuralgias, supported by studies published until 2023. These findings emphasize the clinical relevance of tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs, considering the specific type of neuralgia and optimizing outcomes in clinical practice.