Laboratory Diagnosis and Clinical Profile of Anti-p200 Pemphigoid

Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are two potentially life-threatening groups of autoimmune diseases, characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural components of desmosomes or hemidesmosomes, respectively. Affected patients typically show itchy/painful plaques or blistering skin lesions and/or impairing mucosal blistering and erosions, which may strongly impact their quality of life. Since the milestone work of Walter Lever in 1953, who differentiated these two groups of diseases by histopathological analysis of the level of antibody-mediated skin cleavage, enormous progresses occurred. Achievements made in laboratory diagnostics now allow to identify antigen specific structural proteins of the skin that are targeted by pathogenic autoantibodies. These progresses were accompanied by an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases thanks to the establishment of animal models reproducing disease and on studies on skin and blood of affected individuals, which have been leading to novel and disease-specific treatments. Yet, given their phenotypical overlap with more common dermatological diseases, correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment are often delayed, in some cases leading to irreversible sequelae, including organ dysfunction (i.e., loss of vision in mucous membrane pemphigoid). Here, we provide a concise overview of the clinical appearance, diagnosis and therapeutic management of pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases.

Pemphigus- und Pemphigoid-Erkrankungen: Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie: Pemphigus and pemphigoids: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy

Pemphigus und Pemphigoid sind seltene Autoimmunkrankheiten der Haut mit potenziell lebensbedrohlichem Verlauf. Autoantikörper gegen epidermale und junktionale Strukturproteine (Desmosomen sowie Hemidesmosomen) führen bei Betroffenen typischerweise zu juckenden, schmerzhaften Plaques oder Blasen an der Haut und/oder Blasenbildung und Erosionen der Schleimhäute mit möglicher Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Seit der bahnbrechenden Arbeit von Walter Lever im Jahr 1953, dem es gelang, mittels histopathologischer Untersuchung diese beiden Krankheitsgruppen anhand des Musters der Antikörper‐vermittelten Blasenbildung zu differenzieren, wurden enorme Fortschritte im Verständnis der Erkrankungen erzielt. Die Errungenschaften in der Labordiagnostik ermöglichten die Identifikation von Zielstrukturen zur präzisen Unterscheidung verschiedener Varianten der bullösen Autoimmunerkrankungen. Diese Fortschritte gingen dank der Entwicklung von Tiermodellen mit einem besseren Verständnis der Pathogenese einher. Außerdem haben Studien an Haut und Blut betroffener Patienten zu neuen und krankheitsspezifischen Behandlungen geführt. Aufgrund ihrer Seltenheit und der klinischen Ähnlichkeit mit anderen dermatologischen Erkrankungen verzögern sich die korrekte Diagnosestellung und die Einleitung einer entsprechenden Therapie häufig, was in einigen Fällen zu irreversiblen Folgeerscheinungen, einschließlich Funktionsstörungen von Organen (zum Beispiel Verlust des Sehvermögens beim Schleimhautpemphigoid) führt. Wir geben hier einen Überblick über das klinische Erscheinungsbild, den Diagnosealgorithmus und das therapeutische Management von Pemphigus‐ und Pemphigoid‐Erkrankungen.

Usefulness of immunofluorescence overlay antigen mapping in the identification of autoantigen in anti-p200 pemphigoid

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a rare subepidermal blistering disease showing immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies reactive with a 200-kDa protein. In most patients, serum IgG antibodies react with laminin γ1. The diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid is occasionally difficult, mainly due to the lack of standardized tests. We performed fluorescence overlay antigen mapping by laser scanning confocal microscopy (FOAM-LSCM) to identify autoantigens in an anti-p200 pemphigoid patient and assessed its usefulness for the diagnosis. A 71-year-old man presented with blisters and erosions on the bilateral forearms. No mucosal lesions were observed. Laboratory examinations revealed mild leukocytosis and antinuclear antibody negativity. A histopathological examination showed subepidermal blisters with neutrophil infiltration. Direct immunofluorescence showed linear IgG staining along the basement membrane zone. Indirect immunofluorescence using 1 M NaCl-split skin sections revealed IgG reactivity on the dermal side. Immunoblotting detected circulating IgG autoantibodies that reacted with a 200-kDa protein. Accordingly, anti-p200 pemphigoid was diagnosed. FOAM-LSCM revealed that the patient's IgG signals were co-localized with laminin γ1 but were observed above type VII collagens. A direct immunofluorescent analysis for IgG deposition patterns showed an n-serrated pattern. Thus, FOAM-LSCM may be useful for diagnosing anti-p200 pemphigoid.

Potential contribution of anti-p200 autoantibodies to mucosal lesions in anti-p200 pemphigoid

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a relatively rare subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease (AIBD), which was firstly reported by Detlef Zillikens, Takashi Hashimoto and others in 1996. Skin lesions are considered as the major clinical features of this disease, with occasional involvement of mucosal lesions. The mechanism of mucosal lesions involved in anti-p200 pemphigoid is still unclear. In the present study, we aimed to analyze published data on cases and case series of anti-p200 pemphigoid with mucosal lesions and explored the potential contribution of anti-p200 autoantibodies to mucosal lesions. A total of 32 papers that comprised 52 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients with various mucosal lesions were included in this review. Oral lesions were involved in 75.0% patients, followed by genital lesions (26.9%) and ocular lesions (11.54%). Only one patient had psoriasis, 26.9% patients had multiple mucosal lesions, and 30.8% cases had comorbidity of other AIBDs, particularly anti-laminin (LM) 332-type mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). In comparison with anti-LM332-type MMP, anti-BP180-type MMP and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, higher frequency of genital lesions was identified as a unique character of anti-p200 pemphigoid with mucosal lesions. These results indicated that anti-p200 autoantibodies might contribute to mucosal lesions in a pattern different from other MMP-related autoantibodies, although its pathogenetic mechanisms are still unclear.

Annular bullous diseases

Annular bullous dermatoses represent an etiologically diverse group of cutaneous phenomena that present with a figurate morphology in association with vesicles and bullae. This group of diverse conditions consists of bullous pemphigoid; pemphigoid gestationis; epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Dowling-Meara type; linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis; chronic bullous disease of childhood; anti-p200 pemphigoid; subcorneal pustular dermatosis; and immunoglobulin A pemphigus. Astute examination of clinical, histopathologic, and serologic features is crucial in distinguishing these bullous dermatoses. We review the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, histopathology, and treatments for each bullous annular disease to aid physicians in their recognition, diagnosis, and management.

Histopathology of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: What's new?

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses are characterized by the presence of tissue-bound and often circulating pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structural components of the skin and/or mucous membranes. The diagnostic workup for this heterogeneous group of disorders consists of a multi-step process, of which the light microscopic examination is a crucial component. This review is organized following a classification scheme that is based on two main histopathologic features, namely level of intraepithelial split and composition of the inflammatory infiltrate. Overall, we aim to place emphasis on the histopathologic clues that can assist pathologists in differential diagnosis and review the updates in the literature.

Coexistence of Anti-p200 Pemphigoid and Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

Background

A close association between psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid has been demonstrated by numerous studies. However, the clinical characteristics of patients suffering from these two entities have not yet been well-elucidated.

Objective

This study aimed to review the case reports and case series, summarizing clinical features and therapeutic strategies in patients suffering from anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for studies published in English involving patients with psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid on 6 September 2021. All case reports and case series reporting patients diagnosed with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were included in this systematic review.

Results

A total of 21 eligible studies comprising 26 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients with preceding psoriasis were included in the qualitative synthesis. The average age at blisters eruption was 62.5 years, and the mean duration between the two entities was 15.6 years. Twenty-four percent of patients developed bullous lesions during UV therapy. Clinical manifestation of bullae and/or vesicles was recorded in all patients, and the trunk (94.7%) was most frequently involved, with only 15.8% reporting mucosal involvement. Epitope spreading was detected by immunoblotting in 33.3% of patients. All the patients reached completed remission during the course of disease, with 36.8% experiencing at least one relapse. Monotherapy of prednisolone was the leading therapeutic approach (n=6, 31.6%) required for disease control, but 5 (83.3%) of them suffered from blister recurrence after tapering or ceasing corticosteroid.

Conclusion

Most of the clinical aspects of patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were similar to what was demonstrated in previous articles on anti-p200 pemphigoid. Nevertheless, compared with other anti-p200 pemphigoid cases without psoriasis, a clinical manifestation pattern with more frequent involvement of the trunk and less mucosal involvement was illustrated in those with psoriasis. Generally, monotherapy is sufficient for a complete remission for such patients. However, one or more relapses have been recorded in a considerable portion of patients, especially those prescribed with prednisolone. It reminded us to be more cautious during a tapering of medication.

A case of anti‐laminin gamma‐1 (p200) pemphigoid with bullous lesions on the lips, hands and feet showing antibodies to desmoglein 1

An 87‐years‐old‐man presented with bullous and erosive lesions exclusively on the lips, hands and feet. Histopathological and direct immunofluorescence studies suggested the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, but the serum anti‐BP180 antibodies were negative. Strangely, anti‐desmoglein 1 antibodies were positive, although no pemphigus‐like features were found. Indirect immunofluorescence showed IgG reactivity with dermal side of 1 M NaCl‐split skin. Immunoblotting showed positive reactivity with the 200 kDa laminin gamma‐1 but not with type VII collagen. After the administration of prednisolone 20 mg/day, bullous lesions cleared within 2 weeks.

When Bullous Pemphigoid Is Not Bullous Pemphigoid: The Importance of Going Beyond Direct Immunofluorescence

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune bullous disease, but rarer forms of pemphigoid may appear identical to BP on routine histopathology and direct immunofluorescence (DIF). Here, we present the case of a 60-year-old man, who was initially thought to have BP, with supportive findings on routine histopathology and DIF. However, prominent oral involvement and cutaneous lesions refractory to conventional treatment suggested an alternate diagnosis. Further workup was performed, including indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on salt-split skin, which showed binding of antibodies to the dermal floor rather than to the blister roof, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for pemphigus and pemphigoid antibodies. With these additional tests, we concluded that the patient does not have BP but rather anti-p200 pemphigoid, anti-p105 pemphigoid, or a yet undiscovered form of pemphigoid. We reached a presumptive diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid, as it is the most common pemphigoid with serum antibodies to the dermal floor of human salt-split skin by IIF. This case demonstrates that suspicion for other autoimmune bullous diseases in cases of treatment-refractory and clinically aberrant BP is essential. A limited workup may lead to a missed diagnosis and ultimately less efficient disease management.

Diagnostics for Dermatologic Diseases with Autoantibodies

Background

Dermatologic diseases with autoantibodies were recognized early as autoimmunity became accepted as a pathogenic immunologic concept. Laboratory testing to identify disease-defining autoantibodies and investigate their role in pathophysiology has evolved since.

Content

Blistering dermatologic diseases, profiled by autoantibody production, target epithelial components critical in cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion, resulting in epithelial separation and other characteristic features of the disorders. This review covers the clinical indications for dermatologic disease-related autoantibody testing, the specifics of procuring specimens to test, the available diagnostic tests, and information provided by the testing. Atypical, uncharacteristic, and less well-known clinical and autoantibody profiles as well as several of the many future prospects for expansion of the testing applications are elaborated on in the online Data Supplement.

Summary

Autoantibody-associated dermatologic diseases are acquired immunologic disorders that have considerable clinical implications affecting essential barrier functions of skin and mucous membranes and causing discomfort, including pain and pruritus. Certain of the diseases can have life-threatening manifestations, and treatments can have significant side-effects. The skin diseases may presage other clinical associations that are important to recognize and treat. Laboratory testing aids in the diagnosis of these diseases through identification of the autoantibodies and is essential for prompt and precise knowledge of the disease type for prognosis, further clinical evaluations, and treatment decisions.

Spongiotic reaction patterns in autoimmune bullous dermatoses (Review)

Spongiosis or a spongiotic reaction pattern is the histological hallmark of intercellular epidermal edema, viewed as clear spaces within the epidermis. Although considered a histopathological term, spongiosis has clinical correlations, with the variable degrees of spongiotic reaction leading to different dermatological findings. This review aimed to highlight the spongiotic reactive patterns found in different autoimmune bullous dermatoses, considering the paucity of publications in this domain. The pathogenesis of spongiosis assumes the passage of extravasated edema fluid from the dermis into the epidermis, frequently accompanied by dermal inflammatory cells, and classification of the spongiotic reaction patterns, as well as their associated spongiotic dermatitis, take into consideration the type and distribution of these inflammatory cells. It is mandatory to consider different reactive processes, specific for other skin disorders, which act as simulants of different spongiotic patterns for the diagnosis. Considering the possible transient occurrence, the heterogeneity and non-specificity of the histopathological features of these diseases, the diagnosis is very complex, requiring clinicopathological correlations and additional analyses. A deep insight into spongiosis pathogeny may open the perspectives of a classification refinement of autoimmune bullous dermatoses.

Serration pattern analysis as a practical adjunct tool for categorization of subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Serration pattern analysis helps in the classification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders; more precisely, it helps to differentiate epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders. Most of the published reports of this tool have come from a single center.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to study the utility of serration pattern analysis in classifying subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders.

METHODS

Seventy five cases of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders were enrolled in this prospective study. A three millimeter punch biopsy was taken from the perilesional skin or mucosa for direct immunofluorescence; indirect immunofluorescence was carried out using salt-split skin. Subclassification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was done based on direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin, indirect immunofluorescence using knockout skin and serration pattern analysis findings.

RESULTS

Indirect immunofluorescence was positive in 68 cases; 14 cases showed a dermal staining pattern while the rest showed either an epidermal or a combined pattern. All patients with epidermal or combined staining patterns showed "n" serrated pattern on direct immunofluorescence. Nine patients with dermal staining on indirect immunofluorescence also revealed an "n" serration pattern on direct immunofluorescence indicating the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid, and the rest showed a "u" serrated pattern. Three patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence showed "u" serration on direct immunofluorescence while the rest showed "n" serration.

LIMITATIONS

ELISA and immunoblotting could not be performed due to resource constraints.

CONCLUSION

Based on indirect immunofluorescence and serration pattern analysis, classification of the majority of patients with subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was possible in our study. Pattern recognition is a cost-effective tool and can be easily learnt. It is recommended to be practiced in all laboratories where facilities for advanced immunological diagnosis are unavailable.

Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses: Clinical features and diagnosis

Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses are a group of rare skin disorders that are characterized by the disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction through the action of autoantibodies. The third article in this continuing medical education series explores the background, epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnostic criteria of each of the major subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses, including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, lichen planus pemphigoides, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis.

Practical Direct Immunofluorescence

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.

Oral Lesions in Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: An Overview of Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Algorithm

Autoimmune bullous diseases are a group of chronic inflammatory disorders caused by autoantibodies targeted against structural proteins of the desmosomal and hemidesmosomal plaques in the skin and mucosa, leading to intra-epithelial or subepithelial blistering. The oral mucosa is frequently affected in these diseases, in particular, in mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. The clinical symptoms are heterogeneous and may present with erythema, blisters, erosions, and ulcers localized anywhere on the oral mucosa, and lead to severe complaints for the patients including pain, dysphagia, and foetor. Therefore, a quick and proper diagnosis with adequate treatment is needed. Clinical presentations of autoimmune bullous diseases often overlap and diagnosis cannot be made based on clinical features alone. Immunodiagnostic tests are of great importance in differentiating between the different diseases. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy shows depositions of autoantibodies along the epithelial basement membrane zone in mucous membrane pemphigoid subtypes, or depositions on the epithelial cell surface in pemphigus variants. Additional immunoserological tests are useful to discriminate between the different subtypes of pemphigoid, and are essential to differentiate between pemphigus and paraneoplastic pemphigus. This review gives an overview of the clinical characteristics of oral lesions and the diagnostic procedures in autoimmune blistering diseases, and provides a diagnostic algorithm for daily practice.

Anti-p200 Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

The many clinical aspects of anti-p200 pemphigoid are not well-characterized. We aimed to analyze and correlate known existing data on the epidemiological, clinical, histological, and immunological features of anti-p200 pemphigoid. We performed a review using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases (1900–2018). Case reports and series of patients were included. A total of 68 eligible studies that comprised 113 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients were included in the qualitative analysis, where there was a mean age of onset of 65.5 years. All patients presented with bullae/vesicles, and 54.3% had urticarial plaques. A similarity to bullous pemphigoid was reported in 66.1% of cases, but palmoplantar (51.4%), cephalic (40.3%), and mucosal (38.5%) involvement, besides frequent development of scars/milia (15.7%), were reported. Autoantibodies against recombinant laminin γ1 were detected in the sera of 73.1% of patients. Psoriasis was present in 28.3% of anti-p200 pemphigoid patients, particularly among Japanese patients (56.4%). The incidence of pustular psoriasis in this subgroup, was significantly greater than in the normal population. In conclusion, the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid may be suspected when a subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease develops in a younger age group, along with significant acral and cephalic distribution and mucosal involvement.

Assessment of the Prevalence of Mucosal Involvement in Bullous Pemphigoid

Importance

The prevalence of mucosal involvement in bullous pemphigoid (BP) is inconsistent. Nonoral mucosal involvement was reported anecdotally in few patients with BP.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of mucosal involvement in patients with BP, and to characterize the subgroup of patients with mucosal lesions.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was performed including 328 consecutive patients diagnosed with immunopathologically validated BP at a tertiary care referral center for autoimmune bullous diseases in northern Israel between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017.

Main Outcome and Measures

The study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and distribution of mucosal involvement among patients with BP. Patients with mucosal involvement were compared with the remaining BP patients regarding clinical and immunological features, laboratory analyses, and treatments.

Results

The study cohort included 139 (42.4%) male and 189 (57.6%) female patients, with a mean (SD) age of 78.0 (11.8) years at presentation. Fifty-six patients (17.1%) presented with mucosal lesions. The oral mucosa was the most frequently affected mucosal surface (n = 44; 13.7%), followed by the laryngeal (n = 16; 4.9%) and the genital (n = 10; 3.0%) mucosae. Among patients with oral lesions, the most involved oral structures were the buccal mucosa (n = 25; 55.6%) and the soft palate (n = 24; 53.3%). Compared with other patients with BP, patients with mucosal involvement were younger (71.8 [14.4] years vs 79.3 [10.8] years; P < .001), presented more frequently with extensive disease (55.4% vs 39.7%; P = .002), had less peripheral eosinophilia (17.8% vs 41.9%; P < .001), and were treated with higher doses of corticosteroids (prednisone >1 mg/kg: 67.9% vs 51.8%; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

Mucosal lesions are present in a notable subgroup of patients with BP and are associated with disease severity. Laryngeal involvement is more common than previously appreciated.

Keratinocyte footprint assay discriminates antilaminin-332 pemphigoid from all other forms of pemphigoid diseases

Background

Antilaminin‐332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is a chronic severe pemphigoid disease characterized by autoantibodies to laminin‐332. At present no commercial assay is available to demonstrate antilaminin‐332 antibodies, and diagnosis relies on in‐house techniques with limited sensitivities.

Objectives

In order to move, keratinocytes cultured in vitro secrete laminin‐332 to attach to the culture dish. In that way, they leave behind a unique footprint trail of laminin‐332. We aimed to develop a sensitive and specific laboratory assay to determine antilaminin‐332 autoantibodies in patient serum based on binding of patient IgG to these unique footprints.

Methods

Normal human keratinocytes were grown on glass coverslips and incubated with patient or control serum for 1 h. The binding of IgG was then investigated by immunofluorescence. After validating the test for its ability to identify antilaminin‐332 autoantibodies it was converted into a daily available test based on binding of IgG to dried coverslips that can be stored frozen. The staining patterns of sera from patients with antilaminin‐332 pemphigoid were then compared with those of sera from patients with other autoimmune bullous diseases and normal human sera.

Results

IgG of all antilaminin‐332 pemphigoid sera (n = 16) bound to laminin‐332 footprints, while all normal human controls (n = 55) were negative. From the sera of patients with other diseases (n = 72) four sera tested positive. The footprint assay was also positive for sera that were negative by salt‐split skin analysis, demonstrating that it is a very sensitive technique.

Conclusions

The keratinocyte footprint assay is a fast and specific assay to confirm or rule out the presence of antilaminin‐332 autoantibodies.

What's already known about this topic?

Antilaminin‐332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is a severe form of pemphigoid, and patients may have an increased risk of malignancies.

The diagnosis of antilaminin‐332 mucous membrane pemphigoid is complicated by the lack of specific commercial tests for antilaminin‐332 antibodies and can be confirmed only in specialized laboratories.

Keratinocytes in culture need laminin‐332 for adhesion and migration and therefore deposit it on the bottom of the culture dish.

What does this study add?

The keratinocyte footprint assay detects antilaminin‐332 autoantibodies in patient serum using the native laminin‐332 produced by cultured keratinocytes.

What is the translational message?

The keratinocyte footprint assay is a fast and specific assay to confirm or rule out the presence of antilaminin‐332 autoantibodies.

Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18372.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18761 available online

Rituximab in autoimmune pemphigoid diseases: Indications, optimized regimens, and practice gaps

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 on B cells with proven efficacy for pemphigus vulgaris, now an FDA-approved indication. Other autoimmune bullous diseases can be challenging to treat and have significant associated morbidity and mortality, but data supporting the use of rituximab in pemphigoid group diseases remain limited. Although rituximab demonstrates efficacy for clinical improvement and remission in pemphigoid, concern for adverse events may also limit the use of this medication. We review the current evidence fo rthe use of rituximab in pemphigoid diseases, pertinent dosing schedules and laboratory monitoring, and the associated common and rare adverse events. Review of the literature to date not only supports consideration of rituximab for treatment of refractory pemphigoid group diseases but also reflects tolerability and an acceptable safety profile.

Proteases in Pemphigoid Diseases

Pemphigoid diseases are a subgroup of autoimmune skin diseases characterized by widespread tense blisters. Standard of care typically involves immunosuppressive treatments, which may be insufficient and are often associated with significant adverse events. As such, a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism(s) of pemphigoid diseases is necessary in order to identify improved therapeutic approaches. A major initiator of pemphigoid diseases is the accumulation of autoantibodies against proteins at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ), followed by protease activation at the lesion. The contribution of proteases to pemphigoid disease pathogenesis has been investigated using a combination of in vitro and in vivo models. These studies suggest proteolytic degradation of anchoring proteins proximal to the DEJ is crucial for dermal-epidermal separation and blister formation. In addition, proteases can also augment inflammation, expose autoantigenic cryptic epitopes, and/or provoke autoantigen spreading, which are all important in pemphigoid disease pathology. The present review summarizes and critically evaluates the current understanding with respect to the role of proteases in pemphigoid diseases.

Pemphigoid variants affecting the skin

Pemphigoid diseases are autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases affecting the skin and mucous membranes, which are caused by autoantibodies targeting structural hemidesmosomal proteins or hemidesmosome-associated proteins. Variants of pemphigoid can be differentiated based on targeted antigens and clinical aspects. In this review, we will discuss pemphigoid variants that predominantly affect the skin, and provide clinicians with clues to diagnosis.

[Anti-p200 pemphigoid]

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune blistering disease. It belongs to the group of pemphigoid diseases and was first described in 1996. The diagnostic gold standard is the combination of (1) linear deposits of immunoreactants at the dermal epidermal junction by direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional skin biopsy, (2) detection of circulating autoantibodies binding to the dermal side (blister floor) of human salt split skin by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and reactivity with a 200 kDa protein (p200) in extract of human dermis by immunoblotting. In 2009, laminin γ1 was described as an additional target antigen in 90% of anti-p200 pemphigoid patients. Since ex vivo and in vivo studies have shown no direct pathogenic relevance for laminin γ1 antibodies and the preadsorption of patient sera against laminin γ1 does not reduce their reactivity with p200, the molecular identity of p200 still remains to be elucidated. The clinical phenotype of the disease is heterogeneous; in most cases, however, it resembles bullous pemphigoid. Anti-p200 patients are younger and skin lesions more often appear on palms of the hands and soles of the feet than in bullous pemphigoid. Therapy consists of topical and systemic corticosteroids. In addition, the use of daspone and immunosuppressants has been reported.

Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases: overview, epidemiology, and associations

Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases of the skin and mucosae comprise a large group of chronic diseases, including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and anti-p200 pemphigoid. These diseases are characterized by an antibody response toward structural components of the basement membrane zone, resulting in subepidermal blistering. The epidemiological features of these diseases vary substantially in different regions of the world. Observational studies investigating comorbidities and associations among patients with these diseases are inconsistent and sometimes inconclusive. This review provides a brief overview regarding each one of the subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases. In addition, it summarizes the most recent understanding of the epidemiological features and associations of this group of organ-specific autoimmune diseases.

The spectrum of histopathologic findings in pemphigoid: Avoiding diagnostic pitfalls

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune vesiculobullous dermatitis that primarily affects the elderly and presents with tense, fluid-filled blisters. The histological hallmark on routine hematoxylin & eosin (H&E)-stained specimens is a subepidermal blister with luminal eosinophils. However, there are histologic variants than can produce diagnostic confusion.

METHODS

All immunofluorescence reports from an independent certified dermatopathology laboratory (2006-2015) were inspected, and those with findings consistent with an autoimmune subepidermal blistering process were selected. Seventy-seven cases were identified, and the corresponding H&E-stained specimens were reviewed by two dermatopathologists who tabulated the histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

Just over half of biopsies showed subepidermal clefting (54%). The histologic variants included: urticarial or eczematous findings (17%), partial or complete re-epithelialization (28%), and epidermal necrosis (7%).

CONCLUSION

While re-epithelialization of subepidermal blisters is a commonly accepted phenomenon, there are no published data demonstrating its incidence. Because only half of the biopsies showed the classic subepidermal blister, it is important to be aware of the spectrum of histopathologic findings that occur in this disease. Specifically, the presence of an intraepidermal blister and/or epidermal necrosis on routine H&E-stained specimens does not preclude the diagnosis of pemphigoid.

Autoimmune Subepidermal Bullous Diseases of the Skin and Mucosae: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management

Autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases of the skin and mucosae constitute a large group of sometimes devastating diseases, encompassing bullous pemphigoid, gestational pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and anti-p200 pemphigoid. Their clinical presentation is polymorphic. These autoimmune blistering diseases are associated with autoantibodies that target distinct components of the basement membrane zone of stratified epithelia. These autoantigens represent structural proteins important for maintenance of dermo-epidermal integrity. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease of the skin and mucosae. Although the disease typically presents with a generalized blistering eruption associated with itch, atypical variants with either localized bullous lesions or "non-bullous" presentations are observed in approximately 20% of patients. A peculiar form of BP typically associated with pregnancy is pemphigoid gestationis. In anti-p200 pemphigoid, patients present with tense blisters on erythematosus or normal skin resembling BP, with a predilection for acral surfaces. These patients have antibodies targeting the 200-kDa basement membrane protein. Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare autoimmune blistering disease associated with autoantibodies against type VII collagen that can have several phenotypes including a classical form mimicking dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, an inflammatory presentation mimicking BP, or mucous membrane pemphigoid-like lesions. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the term agreed upon by international consensus for an autoimmune blistering disorder, which affects one or more mucous membrane and may involve the skin. The condition involves a number of different autoantigens in the basement membrane zone. It may result in severe complications from scarring, such as blindness and strictures. Diagnosis of these diseases relies on direct immunofluorescence microscopy studies and immunoserological assays. Management of affected patients is often challenging. We will here review the clinical and immunopathological features as well as the pathophysiology of this group of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Finally, we will discuss the diagnostic approach and the principles of management in clinical practice.

Diagnosis of anti-laminin γ-1 pemphigoid by immunoblot analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-laminin-γ1 (lam-γ1) pemphigoid, a recently described immunobullous disorder sharing immune serological features of bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), is characterized by the detection of serum IgG autoantibodies against the lam-γ1 chain, a 200 kDa heterotrimeric component of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to develop an easy-to-perform and reliable assay for the serological detection of anti-lam-γ1 IgG autoantibodies. The clinical appearance alone is not sufficient to establish diagnosis of anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid and rather requires immune serological evidence of (i) IgG reactivity against the dermal portion of salt-split human skin; (ii) exclusion of IgG against other components of the DEJ; and (iii) IgG reactivity with a 200 kDa protein of dermal extracts by immunoblot analysis (IB).

METHODS

The sera of 55 patients with anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid were tested by IB with two recombinant heterotrimers, laminin 111 (lam-111) and laminin 421 (lam-421), as well as with a recombinant lam-γ1 chain monomer. Additionally, a total of 41 control sera from patients with EBA (n = 15), psoriasis vulgaris (PV; n = 14), and healthy controls (HC; n = 12) were tested.

RESULTS

Immunoblot analysis revealed a positive reactivity with lam-111 and/or lam-421 in 46/55 (84%) of anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid sera. Moreover, 8/9 of the initially non-reactive sera were positive with the lam-γ1 monomer, leading to an overall sensitivity of 98.2%. Analyses of 41 control sera with the three lam-γ1 recombinants led to a specificity of 88%. Specifically, 3/15 EBA sera, 1/14 PV serum and 1/12 HC serum reacted with the lam-γ1 monomer while only the 3 EBA sera reacted with lam-421.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we show a novel two-step IB assay using the two recombinant laminin trimers and lam-γ1 chain monomer for the detection of anti-lam-γ1 serum IgG with high sensitivity and specificity. This assay will facilitate the diagnosis and further characterization of this disease.

International Bullous Diseases Group: consensus on diagnostic criteria for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a complex autoimmune bullous disease disease with variable clinical presentations and multiple possible diagnostic tests, making an international consensus on the diagnosis of EBA essential.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain an international consensus on the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA.

METHODS

The International Bullous Diseases Group (IBDG) met three times to discuss the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA. For the final voting exercise, 22 experts from 14 different countries voted on 50 different items. When > 30% disagreed with a proposal, a discussion was held and re-voting carried out.

RESULTS

In total, 48 of 50 proposals achieved consensus after discussion. This included nine diagnostic criteria, which are summarized in a flow chart. The IBDG was unable to determine one procedure that would be applicable worldwide. A limitation of the study is that differential diagnosis of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus has not been addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

This first international consensus conference established generally agreed-upon clinical and laboratory criteria defining the clinical classification of and diagnostic testing for EBA. Holding these voting exercises in person with the possibility of discussion prior to voting has advantages in reaching consensus over Delphi exercises with remote voting.

Serration pattern analysis for differentiating epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other pemphigoid diseases

BACKGROUND

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a skin biopsy specimen is the reference standard for the diagnosis of pemphigoid diseases (PDs). Serration pattern analysis enables the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) from other PDs using DIF microscopy alone. However, practice gaps need to be addressed in order to implement this technique in the routine diagnostic procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine and optimize the technical requirements for serration pattern analysis of DIF microscopy and determine interrater conformity of serration pattern analysis.

METHODS

We compared serration pattern analysis of routine DIF microscopy from laboratories in Groningen, The Netherlands and Lübeck, Germany with 4 blinded observers. Skin biopsy specimens from 20 patients with EBA and other PDs were exchanged and analyzed. Various factors were evaluated, including section thickness, transport medium, and biopsy specimen processing.

RESULTS

The interrater conformity of our 4 observers was 95.7%. Recognition of serration patterns was comparable in samples transported in saline and in Michel's medium and with section thicknesses of 4, 6, and 8 μm.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include our small sample size and the availability of 20 samples that were compared retrospectively.

CONCLUSION

DIF serration pattern analysis is not restricted by variation in laboratory procedures, transport medium, or experience of observers. This learnable technique can be implemented as a routine diagnostic method as an extension of DIF microscopy for subtyping PD.

Immunofluorescence of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases

Autoimmmune bullous diseases of skin and mucosa are uncommon, disabling, and potentially lethal diseases. For a quick and reliable diagnosis immunofluorescence is essential. This article describes two variants of immunofluorescence. The direct method uses a skin or mucosal biopsy of the patient to detect in vivo bound antibodies. Indirect immunofluorescence uses patient's serum and a substrate to visualize circulating autoantibodies. These two methods supplemented with advanced techniques allow reliable classification of autoimmune bullous diseases; not only the main entities pemphigus and pemphigoid, but also subclasses within these groups. This is important because prognosis and therapy vary among different variants of autoimmune bullous diseases.