1
|
Nabi J. Synergies in Risk Communication: Integrating Ethical Frameworks and Behavioral Economics in Public Health Emergencies. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:92-94. [PMID: 38529976 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
|
2
|
De Groot LM, Shearer K, Sambani C, Kaonga E, Nyirenda R, Mbendera K, Golub JE, Hoffmann CJ, Mulder C. Health care providers acceptance of default prescribing of TB preventive treatment for people living with HIV in Malawi: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:15. [PMID: 38178173 PMCID: PMC10768226 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10493-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT) substantially reduces the risk of developing active TB for people living with HIV (PLHIV). We utilized a novel implementation strategy based on choice architecture (CAT) which makes TPT prescribing the default option. Through CAT, health care workers (HCWs) need to "opt-out" when choosing not to prescribe TPT to PLHIV. We assessed the prospective, concurrent, and retrospective acceptability of TPT prescribing among HCWs in Malawi who worked in clinics participating in a cluster randomized trial of the CAT intervention. METHODS 28 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCWs from control (standard prescribing approach) and intervention (CAT approach) clinics. The CAT approach was facilitated in intervention clinics using a default prescribing module built into the point-of-care HIV Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system. An interview guide for the qualitative CAT assessment was developed based on the theoretical framework of acceptability and on the normalization process theory. Thematic analysis was used to code the data, using NVivo 12 software. RESULTS We identified eight themes belonging to the three chronological constructs of acceptability. HCWs expressed no tension for changing the standard approach to TPT prescribing (prospective acceptability); however, those exposed to CAT described several advantages, including that it served as a reminder to prescribe TPT and routinized TPT prescribing (concurrent acceptability). Some felt that CAT may reduce HCW´s autonomy and might lead to inappropriate TPT prescribing (retrospective acceptability). CONCLUSIONS The default prescribing module for TPT has now been incorporated into the point-of-care EMR system nationally in Malawi. This seems to fit the acceptability of the HCWs. Moving forward, it is important to train HCWs on how the EMR can be leveraged to determine who is eligible for TPT and who is not, while acknowledging the autonomy of HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M De Groot
- TB Elimination and Health System Innovations - KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - K Shearer
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - C Sambani
- Department of Research, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - E Kaonga
- KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - R Nyirenda
- Department of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - K Mbendera
- National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Elimination Program, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - J E Golub
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - C J Hoffmann
- Center for Tuberculosis Research, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - C Mulder
- TB Elimination and Health System Innovations - KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doshi SD, DeStephano D, Accordino MK, Elkin E, Raghunathan RR, Wright JD, Hershman DL. Disparities with influenza vaccine use in long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:111-119. [PMID: 37688666 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07109-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elderly women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are living longer, however their primary care management may be sub-optimal. Influenza results in preventable hospitalizations and deaths. Guidelines recommend the influenza vaccine for those > 65 years and those with cancer but use is unknown. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with MBC from 1/1/2008-12/31/2017 and were ≥ 65 years of age. The primary outcome was influenza vaccine use among patients surviving ≥ 3-years. We conducted multivariable analyses using demographic and clinical factors to identify associations with vaccine use. We compared utilization to cancer-free controls. RESULTS We identified 1,970 patients with MBC that survived for ≥ 3 years. The median age at diagnosis was 73 years. Furthermore, 1,742 (88%) patients were White, and 153 (8%) patients were Black. Only 1,264 (64%) received an influenza vaccine at least one time and 51% received the vaccine at least two times. A multivariable model found lower odds of vaccine receipt for Black patients (OR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.34-0.68, p < 0.001) and higher odds for patients that saw primary care in the year prior to diagnosis (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.57-2.33, p < 0.001). Patients with MBC had lower odds of vaccine use compared to cancer free controls (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Over 1/3 of long-term MBC survivors in our cohort did not receive the influenza vaccine. Black patients are about half as likely to be vaccinated. Given the known benefit of the vaccine, improving uptake could be an important strategy to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil D Doshi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - David DeStephano
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa K Accordino
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elena Elkin
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rohit R Raghunathan
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iyer R, Park D, Kim J, Newman C, Young A, Sumarsono A. Effect of chair placement on physicians' behavior and patients' satisfaction: randomized deception trial. BMJ 2023; 383:e076309. [PMID: 38101923 PMCID: PMC10726223 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of chair placement on length of time physicians sit during a bedside consultation and patients' satisfaction. DESIGN Single center, double blind, randomized controlled deception trial. SETTING County hospital in Texas, USA. PARTICIPANTS 51 hospitalist physicians providing direct care services, and 125 observed encounters of patients who could answer four orientation questions correctly before study entry, April 2022 to February 2023. INTERVENTION Each patient encounter was randomized to either chair placement (≤3 feet (0.9 m) of patient's bedside and facing the bed) or usual chair location (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the binary decision of the physician to sit or not sit at any point during a patient encounter. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, as assessed with the Tool to Assess Inpatient Satisfaction with Care from Hospitalists (TAISCH) and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys, time in the room, and both physicians' and patients' perception of time in the room. RESULTS 125 patient encounters were randomized (60 to chair placement and 65 to control). 38 of the 60 physicians in the chair placement group sat during the patient encounter compared with five of the 65 physicians in the control group (odds ratio 20.7, 95% confidence interval 7.2 to 59.4; P<0.001). The absolute risk difference between the intervention and control groups was 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.69). Overall, 1.8 chairs needed to be placed for a physician to sit. Intervention was associated with 3.9% greater TAISCH scores (effect estimate 3.9, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 7.0; P=0.01) and 5.1 greater odds of complete scores on HCAHPS (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 24.9, P=0.04). Chair placement was not associated with time spent in the room (10.6 minutes v control 10.6 minutes) nor perception of time in the room for physicians (9.4 minutes v 9.8 minutes) or patients (13.1 minutes v 13.5 minutes). CONCLUSION Chair placement is a simple, no cost, low tech intervention that increases a physician's likelihood of sitting during a bedside consultation and resulted in higher patients' scores for both satisfaction and communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05250778.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchita Iyer
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Do Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas - Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Jenny Kim
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Courtney Newman
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Avery Young
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Sumarsono
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas - Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Parkland Health, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nazaret A, Sapiro G. A large-scale observational study of the causal effects of a behavioral health nudge. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadi1752. [PMID: 37738345 PMCID: PMC10516489 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi1752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Nudges are interventions promoting healthy behavior without forbidding options or substantial incentives; the Apple Watch, for example, encourages users to stand by delivering a notification if they have been sitting for the first 50 minutes of an hour. On the basis of 76 billion minutes of observational standing data from 160,000 subjects in the public Apple Heart and Movement Study, we estimate the causal effect of this notification using a regression discontinuity design for time series data with time-varying treatment. We show that the nudge increases the probability of standing by up to 43.9% and remains effective with time. The nudge's effectiveness increases with age and is independent of gender. Closing Apple Watch Activity Rings, a visualization of participants' daily progress in Move, Exercise, and Stand, further increases the nudge's impact. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of behavioral health interventions and introduces tools for investigating their causal effect from large-scale observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achille Nazaret
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lyons PG, Hough CL. Antimicrobials in Sepsis: Time to Pay Attention to When Delays Happen. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1239-1241. [PMID: 37655955 PMCID: PMC10502879 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-519ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G Lyons
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, and
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ginestra JC, Kohn R, Hubbard RA, Auriemma CL, Patel MS, Anesi GL, Kerlin MP, Weissman GE. Association of Time of Day with Delays in Antimicrobial Initiation among Ward Patients with Hospital-Onset Sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1299-1308. [PMID: 37166187 PMCID: PMC10502885 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202302-160oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Although the mainstay of sepsis treatment is timely initiation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, treatment delays are common, especially among patients who develop hospital-onset sepsis. The time of day has been associated with suboptimal clinical care in several contexts, but its association with treatment initiation among patients with hospital-onset sepsis is unknown. Objectives: Assess the association of time of day with antimicrobial initiation among ward patients with hospital-onset sepsis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included ward patients who developed hospital-onset sepsis while admitted to five acute care hospitals in a single health system from July 2017 through December 2019. Hospital-onset sepsis was defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event criteria. We estimated the association between the hour of day and antimicrobial initiation among patients with hospital-onset sepsis using a discrete-time time-to-event model, accounting for time elapsed from sepsis onset. In a secondary analysis, we fit a quantile regression model to estimate the association between the hour of day of sepsis onset and time to antimicrobial initiation. Results: Among 1,672 patients with hospital-onset sepsis, the probability of antimicrobial initiation at any given hour varied nearly fivefold throughout the day, ranging from 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-4.1%) at 7 a.m. to 13.9% (95% CI, 11.3-16.5%) at 6 p.m., with nadirs at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. and progressive decline throughout the night shift (13.4% [95% CI, 10.7-16.0%] at 9 p.m. to 3.2% [95% CI, 2.0-4.0] at 6 a.m.). The standardized predicted median time to antimicrobial initiation was 3.2 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-3.8 h) for sepsis onset during the day shift (7 a.m.-7 p.m.) and 12.9 hours (IQR, 10.9-14.9 h) during the night shift (7 p.m.-7 a.m.). Conclusions: The probability of antimicrobial initiation among patients with new hospital-onset sepsis declined at shift changes and overnight. Time to antimicrobial initiation for patients with sepsis onset overnight was four times longer than for patients with onset during the day. These findings indicate that time of day is associated with important care processes for ward patients with hospital-onset sepsis. Future work should validate these findings in other settings and elucidate underlying mechanisms to inform quality-enhancing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C. Ginestra
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Rachel Kohn
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Rebecca A. Hubbard
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Catherine L. Auriemma
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | | | - George L. Anesi
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Meeta Prasad Kerlin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
| | - Gary E. Weissman
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andraweera PH, Wang B, Danchin M, Blyth C, Vlaev I, Ong J, Dodd J, Couper J, Sullivan TR, Karnon J, Spurrier N, Cusack M, Mordaunt D, Simatos D, Dekker G, Carlson S, Tuckerman J, Wood N, Whop L, Marshall HS. Randomised controlled trials of behavioural nudges delivered through text messages to increase influenza and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women (the EPIC study): study protocol. Trials 2023; 24:454. [PMID: 37438776 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07485-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza and COVID-19 infections during pregnancy may have serious adverse consequences for women as well as their infants. However, uptake of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy remains suboptimal. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a multi-component nudge intervention to improve influenza and COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women. METHODS Pregnant women who receive antenatal care at five tertiary hospitals in South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria will be recruited to two separate randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Women will be eligible for the COVID-19 RCT is they have received two or less doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Women will be eligible for the influenza RCT if they have not received the 2023 seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccination status at all stages of the trial will be confirmed by the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR). Participants will be randomised (1:1) to standard care or intervention group (n = 1038 for each RCT). The nudge intervention in each RCT will comprise three SMS text message reminders with links to short educational videos from obstetricians, pregnant women and midwives and vaccine safety information. The primary outcome is at least one dose of a COVID-19 or influenza vaccine during pregnancy, as applicable. Logistic regression will compare the proportion vaccinated between groups. The effect of treatment will be described using odds ratio with a 95% CI. DISCUSSION Behavioural nudges that facilitate individual choices within a complex context have been successfully used in other disciplines to stir preferred behaviour towards better health choices. If our text-based nudges prove to be successful in improving influenza and COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women, they can easily be implemented at a national level. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05613751. Registered on November 14, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabha H Andraweera
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bing Wang
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Blyth
- Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- School of Business, Warwick University, Warwick, UK
| | - Jason Ong
- School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jodie Dodd
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Women's and Babies Division, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jennifer Couper
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Division of Paediatrics, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas R Sullivan
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicola Spurrier
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- SA Health, South Australian Government, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Cusack
- SA Health, South Australian Government, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dylan Mordaunt
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dimi Simatos
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gus Dekker
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Women's Health, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Carlson
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Tuckerman
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Wood
- Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Whop
- Discipline of Public Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Helen S Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Croskerry P, Campbell SG, Petrie DA. The challenge of cognitive science for medical diagnosis. Cogn Res Princ Implic 2023; 8:13. [PMID: 36759370 PMCID: PMC9911579 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00460-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The historical tendency to view medicine as both an art and a science may have contributed to a disinclination among clinicians towards cognitive science. In particular, this has had an impact on the approach towards the diagnostic process which is a barometer of clinical decision-making behaviour and is increasingly seen as a yardstick of clinician calibration and performance. The process itself is more complicated and complex than was previously imagined, with multiple variables that are difficult to predict, are interactive, and show nonlinearity. They appear to characterise a complex adaptive system. Many aspects of the diagnostic process, including the psychophysics of signal detection and discrimination, ergonomics, probability theory, decision analysis, factor analysis, causal analysis and more recent developments in judgement and decision-making (JDM), especially including the domain of heuristics and cognitive and affective biases, appear fundamental to a good understanding of it. A preliminary analysis of factors such as manifestness of illness and others that may impede clinicians' awareness and understanding of these issues is proposed here. It seems essential that medical trainees be explicitly and systematically exposed to specific areas of cognitive science during the undergraduate curriculum, and learn to incorporate them into clinical reasoning and decision-making. Importantly, this understanding is needed for the development of cognitive bias mitigation and improved calibration of JDM in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pat Croskerry
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
| | - Samuel G. Campbell
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - David A. Petrie
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Increasing the value of PSA through improved implementation. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:96-103. [PMID: 34750055 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Low-value testing and treatment contribute to billions of dollars in waste to the United States health care system annually. High frequency, low-cost testing, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, is a major contributor to this inefficient health care delivery. Despite decreasing mortality of prostate cancer over the last few decades, the reputation of prostate specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer screening has fluctuated over the last decade due to lack of clarity of the benefits of screening and high risk for overtreatment. The value of PSA could be improved by efficient implementation of smarter testing strategies that reduce the harms and increase the benefits.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kolla L, Chen J, Parikh RB. Time of Clinic Appointment and Serious Illness Communication in Oncology. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231170488. [PMID: 37071969 PMCID: PMC10126780 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231170488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serious illness communication in oncology increases goal concordant care. Factors associated with the frequency of serious illness conversations are not well understood. Given prior evidence of the association between suboptimal decision-making and clinic time, we aimed to investigate the relationship between appointment time and the likelihood of serious illness conversations in oncology. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of electronic health record data from 55 367 patient encounters between June 2019 to April 2020, using generalized estimating equations to model the likelihood of a serious illness conversation across clinic time. RESULTS Documentation rate decreased from 2.1 to 1.5% in the morning clinic session (8am-12pm) and from 1.2% to .9% in the afternoon clinic session (1pm-4pm). Adjusted odds ratios for Serious illness conversations documentation rates were significantly lower for all hours of each session after the earliest hour (adjusted odds ratios .91 [95% CI, .84-.97], P = .006 for overall linear trend). CONCLUSIONS Serious illness conversations between oncologists and patients decrease considerably through the clinic day, and proactive strategies to avoid missed conversations should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Likhitha Kolla
- Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi B Parikh
- Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vandenplas Y, Simoens S, Turk F, Vulto AG, Huys I. Applications of Behavioral Economics to Pharmaceutical Policymaking: A Scoping Review with Implications for Best-Value Biological Medicines. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:803-817. [PMID: 35972683 PMCID: PMC9379236 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00751-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Pharmaceutical policies are generally based on the assumption that involved stakeholders make rational decisions. However, behavioral economics has taught us that this is not always the case as people deviate from rational behavior in rather predictable patterns. This scoping review examined to what extent behavioral concepts have already been applied in the pharmaceutical domain and what evidence exists about their effectiveness, with the aim of formulating future applications and research hypotheses on policymaking for best-value biologicals. METHODS A scoping literature review was conducted on the evidence of behavioral applications to pharmaceuticals. Scientific databases (Embase, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, and Scopus) were searched up to 20 October, 2021. RESULTS Forty-four full-text scientific articles were identified and narratively described in this article. Pharmaceutical domains where behavioral concepts have been investigated relate to influencing prescribing behavior, improving medication adherence, and increasing vaccination uptake. Multiple behavioral concepts were examined in the identified studies, such as social norms, defaults, framing, loss aversion, availability, and present bias. The effectiveness of the applied interventions was generally positive, but depended on the context. Some of the examined interventions can easily be translated into effective policy interventions for best-value biological medicines. However, some applications require further investigation in a research context. CONCLUSIONS Applications of behavioral economics to pharmaceutical policymaking are promising. However, further research is required to investigate the effect of behavioral applications on policy interventions for a more sustainable market environment for best-value biological medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Vandenplas
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wolf A, Sant'Anna A, Vilhelmsson A. Using nudges to promote clinical decision making of healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Prev Med 2022; 164:107320. [PMID: 36283484 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Nudging has been discussed in the context of policy and public health, but not so much within healthcare. This scoping review aimed to assess the empirical evidence on how nudging techniques can be used to affect the behavior of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in clinical settings. A systematic database search was conducted for the period January 2010-December 2020 using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Review checklist. Two reviewers independently screened each article for inclusion. Included articles were reviewed to extract key information about each intervention, including purpose, target behavior, measured outcomes, key findings, nudging strategies, intervention objectives and their theoretical underpinnings. Two independent dimensions, building on Kahneman's System 1 and System 2, were used to describe nudging strategies according to user action and timing of their implementation. Of the included 51 articles, 40 reported statistically significant results, six were not significant and two reported mixed results. Thirteen different nudging strategies were identified aimed at modifying four types of HPCs' behavior: prescriptions and orders, procedure, hand hygiene, and vaccination. The most common nudging strategy employed were defaults or pre-orders, followed by alerts or reminders, and active choice. Many interventions did not require any deliberate action from users, here termed passive interventions, such as automatically changing prescriptions to their generic equivalent unless indicated by the user. Passive nudges may be successful in changing the target outcome but may go unnoticed by the user. Future work should consider the broader ethical implications of passive nudges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Wolf
- University of Gothenburg, Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sweden; University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sweden
| | | | - Andreas Vilhelmsson
- Lund University, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Graf A, Koh CH, Caldwell G, Grieve J, Tan M, Hassan J, Bakaya K, Marcus HJ, Baldeweg SE. Quality in Clinical Consultations: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin Pract 2022; 12:545-556. [PMID: 35892444 PMCID: PMC9326638 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract12040058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic may have affected the quality of clinical consultations. The objective was to use 10 proposed quality indicator questions to assess outpatient consultation quality; to assess whether the recent shift to telemedicine during the pandemic has affected consultation quality; and to determine whether consultation quality is associated with satisfaction and consultation outcome. A cross-sectional study was used to survey clinicians and patients after outpatient consultations (1 February to 31 March 2021). The consultation quality score (CQS) was the sum of ‘yes’ responses to the survey questions. In total, 78% (538/690) of consultations conducted were assessed by a patient, clinician, or both. Patient survey response rate was 60% (415/690) and clinician 42% (291/690). Face-to-face consultations had a greater CQS than telephone (patients and clinicians < 0.001). A greater CQS was associated with higher overall satisfaction (clinicians log-odds: 0.77 ± 0.52, p = 0.004; patients log-odds: 1.35 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) and with definitive consultation outcomes (clinician log-odds: 0.44 ± 0.36, p = 0.03). In conclusion, consultation quality is assessable; the shift to telemedicine has negatively impacted consultation quality; and high-quality consultations are associated with greater satisfaction and definitive consultation outcome decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke Graf
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.G.); (M.T.); (J.H.); (K.B.)
| | - Chan Hee Koh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (C.H.K.); (J.G.); (H.J.M.)
| | | | - Joan Grieve
- Department of Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (C.H.K.); (J.G.); (H.J.M.)
| | - Melissa Tan
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.G.); (M.T.); (J.H.); (K.B.)
| | - Jasmine Hassan
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.G.); (M.T.); (J.H.); (K.B.)
| | - Kaushiki Bakaya
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.G.); (M.T.); (J.H.); (K.B.)
| | - Hani J. Marcus
- Department of Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (C.H.K.); (J.G.); (H.J.M.)
| | - Stephanie E. Baldeweg
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.G.); (M.T.); (J.H.); (K.B.)
- Centre for Obesity & Metabolism, Department of Experimental & Translational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-7966770637
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Willis VC, Thomas Craig KJ, Jabbarpour Y, Scheufele EL, Arriaga YE, Ajinkya M, Rhee KB, Bazemore A. Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e33518. [PMID: 35060909 PMCID: PMC8817213 DOI: 10.2196/33518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Disease prevention is a central aspect of primary care practice and is comprised of primary (eg, vaccinations), secondary (eg, screenings), tertiary (eg, chronic condition monitoring), and quaternary (eg, prevention of overmedicalization) levels. Despite rapid digital transformation of primary care practices, digital health interventions (DHIs) in preventive care have yet to be systematically evaluated. Objective This review aimed to identify and describe the scope and use of current DHIs for preventive care in primary care settings. Methods A scoping review to identify literature published from 2014 to 2020 was conducted across multiple databases using keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms covering primary care professionals, prevention and care management, and digital health. A subgroup analysis identified relevant studies conducted in US primary care settings, excluding DHIs that use the electronic health record (EHR) as a retrospective data capture tool. Technology descriptions, outcomes (eg, health care performance and implementation science), and study quality as per Oxford levels of evidence were abstracted. Results The search yielded 5274 citations, of which 1060 full-text articles were identified. Following a subgroup analysis, 241 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily examined DHIs among health information technologies, including EHRs (166/241, 68.9%), clinical decision support (88/241, 36.5%), telehealth (88/241, 36.5%), and multiple technologies (154/241, 63.9%). DHIs were predominantly used for tertiary prevention (131/241, 54.4%). Of the core primary care functions, comprehensiveness was addressed most frequently (213/241, 88.4%). DHI users were providers (205/241, 85.1%), patients (111/241, 46.1%), or multiple types (89/241, 36.9%). Reported outcomes were primarily clinical (179/241, 70.1%), and statistically significant improvements were common (192/241, 79.7%). Results were summarized across the following 5 topics for the most novel/distinct DHIs: population-centered, patient-centered, care access expansion, panel-centered (dashboarding), and application-driven DHIs. The quality of the included studies was moderate to low. Conclusions Preventive DHIs in primary care settings demonstrated meaningful improvements in both clinical and nonclinical outcomes, and across user types; however, adoption and implementation in the US were limited primarily to EHR platforms, and users were mainly clinicians receiving alerts regarding care management for their patients. Evaluations of negative results, effects on health disparities, and many other gaps remain to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Van C Willis
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Kelly Jean Thomas Craig
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Yalda Jabbarpour
- Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, The Robert Graham Center, American Academy of Family Physicians, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elisabeth L Scheufele
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Yull E Arriaga
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Monica Ajinkya
- Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, The Robert Graham Center, American Academy of Family Physicians, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Kyu B Rhee
- Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Andrew Bazemore
- The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Park J, Zhong X, Dong Y, Barwise A, Pickering BW. Investigating the cognitive capacity constraints of an ICU care team using a systems engineering approach. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:10. [PMID: 34983402 PMCID: PMC8724599 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01548-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background ICU operational conditions may contribute to cognitive overload and negatively impact on clinical decision making. We aimed to develop a quantitative model to investigate the association between the operational conditions and the quantity of medication orders as a measurable indicator of the multidisciplinary care team’s cognitive capacity. Methods The temporal data of patients at one medical ICU (MICU) of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN between February 2016 to March 2018 was used. This dataset includes a total of 4822 unique patients admitted to the MICU and a total of 6240 MICU admissions. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, quantifiable measures attainable from electronic medical records were identified and a conceptual framework of distributed cognition in ICU was developed. Univariate piecewise Poisson regression models were built to investigate the relationship between system-level workload indicators, including patient census and patient characteristics (severity of illness, new admission, and mortality risk) and the quantity of medication orders, as the output of the care team’s decision making. Results Comparing the coefficients of different line segments obtained from the regression models using a generalized F-test, we identified that, when the ICU was more than 50% occupied (patient census > 18), the number of medication orders per patient per hour was significantly reduced (average = 0.74; standard deviation (SD) = 0.56 vs. average = 0.65; SD = 0.48; p < 0.001). The reduction was more pronounced (average = 0.81; SD = 0.59 vs. average = 0.63; SD = 0.47; p < 0.001), and the breakpoint shifted to a lower patient census (16 patients) when at a higher presence of severely-ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation during their stay, which might be encountered in an ICU treating patients with COVID-19. Conclusions Our model suggests that ICU operational factors, such as admission rates and patient severity of illness may impact the critical care team’s cognitive function and result in changes in the production of medication orders. The results of this analysis heighten the importance of increasing situational awareness of the care team to detect and react to changing circumstances in the ICU that may contribute to cognitive overload. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01548-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeyoung Park
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, 482 Weil Hall, P.O. Box 116595, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6595, USA
| | - Xiang Zhong
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, 482 Weil Hall, P.O. Box 116595, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6595, USA.
| | - Yue Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amelia Barwise
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brian W Pickering
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oncologist phenotypes and associations with response to a machine learning-based intervention to increase advance care planning: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267012. [PMID: 35622812 PMCID: PMC9140236 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While health systems have implemented multifaceted interventions to improve physician and patient communication in serious illnesses such as cancer, clinicians vary in their response to these initiatives. In this secondary analysis of a randomized trial, we identified phenotypes of oncology clinicians based on practice pattern and demographic data, then evaluated associations between such phenotypes and response to a machine learning (ML)-based intervention to prompt earlier advance care planning (ACP) for patients with cancer. METHODS AND FINDINGS Between June and November 2019, we conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial testing the impact of text message prompts to 78 oncology clinicians at 9 oncology practices to perform ACP conversations among patients with cancer at high risk of 180-day mortality, identified using a ML prognostic algorithm. All practices began in the pre-intervention group, which received weekly emails about ACP performance only; practices were sequentially randomized to receive the intervention at 4-week intervals in a stepped-wedge design. We used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify oncologist phenotypes based on 11 baseline demographic and practice pattern variables identified using EHR and internal administrative sources. Difference-in-differences analyses assessed associations between oncologist phenotype and the outcome of change in ACP conversation rate, before and during the intervention period. Primary analyses were adjusted for patients' sex, age, race, insurance status, marital status, and Charlson comorbidity index. The sample consisted of 2695 patients with a mean age of 64.9 years, of whom 72% were White, 20% were Black, and 52% were male. 78 oncology clinicians (42 oncologists, 36 advanced practice providers) were included. Three oncologist phenotypes were identified: Class 1 (n = 9) composed primarily of high-volume generalist oncologists, Class 2 (n = 5) comprised primarily of low-volume specialist oncologists; and 3) Class 3 (n = 28), composed primarily of high-volume specialist oncologists. Compared with class 1 and class 3, class 2 had lower mean clinic days per week (1.6 vs 2.5 [class 3] vs 4.4 [class 1]) a higher percentage of new patients per week (35% vs 21% vs 18%), higher baseline ACP rates (3.9% vs 1.6% vs 0.8%), and lower baseline rates of chemotherapy within 14 days of death (1.4% vs 6.5% vs 7.1%). Overall, ACP rates were 3.6% in the pre-intervention wedges and 15.2% in intervention wedges (11.6 percentage-point difference). Compared to class 3, oncologists in class 1 (adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences 3.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 6.1, p = 0.006) and class 2 (adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences 12.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3 to 20.3, p = 0.003) had greater response to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Patient volume and time availability may be associated with oncologists' response to interventions to increase ACP. Future interventions to prompt ACP should prioritize making time available for such conversations between oncologists and their patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vilhelmsson A, Sant'Anna A, Wolf A. Nudging healthcare professionals to improve treatment of COVID-19: a narrative review. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:e001522. [PMID: 34887299 PMCID: PMC8662583 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Vilhelmsson
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University Faculty of Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Axel Wolf
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barash M, Nanchal RS. Enhancing Analytical Reasoning in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Clin 2021; 38:51-67. [PMID: 34794631 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical reasoning is prone to errors in judgment. Error is comprised of 2 components-bias and noise; each has an equally important role in the promulgation of error. Biases or systematic errors in reasoning are the product of misconceptions of probability and statistics. Biases arise because clinicians frequently rely on mental shortcuts or heuristics to make judgments. The most frequently used heuristics are representativeness, availability, and anchoring/adjustment which lead to the common biases of base rate neglect, misconceptions of regression, insensitivities to sample size, and fallacies of conjunctive, and disjunctive events. Bayesian reasoning is the framework within which posterior probabilities of events is identified. Familiarity with these mathematical concepts will likely enhance clinical reasoning. Noise is defined as inter or intraobserver variability in judgment that should be identical. Guidelines in medicine are a technique to reduce noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Barash
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hub for Collaborative Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, 8th Floor, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Rahul S Nanchal
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hub for Collaborative Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, 8th Floor, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reñosa MDC, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish SL, Bärnighausen K, Bärnighausen T, McMahon SA. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-006237. [PMID: 34593513 PMCID: PMC8487203 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccine hesitancy (VH) and the global decline of vaccine coverage are a major global health threat, and novel approaches for increasing vaccine confidence and uptake are urgently needed. ‘Nudging’, defined as altering the environmental context in which a decision is made or a certain behaviour is enacted, has shown promising results in several health promotion strategies. We present a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the value and impact of nudges to address VH. Methods We conducted a systematic review to determine if nudging can mitigate VH and improve vaccine uptake. Our search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH terms to identify articles related to nudging and vaccination in nine research databases. 15 177 titles were extracted and assessed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The final list of included articles was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Findings Identified interventions are presented according to a framework for behaviour change, MINDSPACE. Articles (n=48) from 10 primarily high-income countries were included in the review. Nudging-based interventions identified include using reminders and recall, changing the way information is framed and delivered to an intended audience, changing the messenger delivering information, invoking social norms and emotional affect (eg, through storytelling, dramatic narratives and graphical presentations), and offering incentives or changing defaults. The most promising evidence exists for nudges that offer incentives to parents and healthcare workers, that make information more salient or that use trusted messengers to deliver information. The effectiveness of nudging interventions and the direction of the effect varies substantially by context. Evidence for some approaches is mixed, highlighting a need for further research, including how successful interventions can be adapted across settings. Conclusion Nudging-based interventions show potential to increase vaccine confidence and uptake, but further evidence is needed for the development of clear recommendations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic increases the urgency of undertaking nudging-focused research. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020185817.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Donald C Reñosa
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines
| | - Jeniffer Landicho
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines
| | - Jonas Wachinger
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah L Dalglish
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- International Health Department, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kate Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, South Africa
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shannon A McMahon
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- International Health Department, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takvorian SU, Bekelman J, Beidas RS, Schnoll R, Clifton ABW, Salam T, Gabriel P, Wileyto EP, Scott CA, Asch DA, Buttenheim AM, Rendle KA, Chaiyachati K, Shelton RC, Ware S, Chivers C, Schuchter LM, Kumar P, Shulman LN, O'Connor N, Lieberman A, Zentgraf K, Parikh RB. Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Implement Sci 2021; 16:90. [PMID: 34563227 PMCID: PMC8466719 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious illness conversations (SICs) are an evidence-based approach to eliciting patients' values, goals, and care preferences that improve patient outcomes. However, most patients with cancer die without a documented SIC. Clinician-directed implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics ("nudges") that identify high-risk patients have shown promise in increasing SIC documentation among clinicians. It is unknown whether patient-directed nudges that normalize and prime patients towards SIC completion-either alone or in combination with clinician nudges that additionally compare performance relative to peers-may improve on this approach. Our objective is to test the effect of clinician- and patient-directed nudges as implementation strategies for increasing SIC completion among patients with cancer. METHODS We will conduct a 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized pragmatic trial to test the effect of nudges to clinicians, patients, or both, compared to usual care, on SIC completion. Participants will include 166 medical and gynecologic oncology clinicians practicing at ten sites within a large academic health system and their approximately 5500 patients at high risk of predicted 6-month mortality based on a validated machine-learning prognostic algorithm. Data will be obtained via the electronic medical record, clinician survey, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients. The primary outcome will be time to SIC documentation among high-risk patients. Secondary outcomes will include time to SIC documentation among all patients (assessing spillover effects), palliative care referral among high-risk patients, and aggressive end-of-life care utilization (composite of chemotherapy within 14 days before death, hospitalization within 30 days before death, or admission to hospice within 3 days before death) among high-risk decedents. We will assess moderators of the effect of implementation strategies and conduct semi-structured interviews with a subset of clinicians and patients to assess contextual factors that shape the effectiveness of nudges with an eye towards health equity. DISCUSSION This will be the first pragmatic trial to evaluate clinician- and patient-directed nudges to promote SIC completion for patients with cancer. We expect the study to yield insights into the effectiveness of clinician and patient nudges as implementation strategies to improve SIC rates, and to uncover multilevel contextual factors that drive response to these strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04867850 . Registered on April 30, 2021. FUNDING National Cancer Institute P50CA244690.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel U Takvorian
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Justin Bekelman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Center for Healthcare Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert Schnoll
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alicia B W Clifton
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tasnim Salam
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E Paul Wileyto
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Callie A Scott
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Asch
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katharine A Rendle
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Krisda Chaiyachati
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Rachel C Shelton
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sue Ware
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Corey Chivers
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Lynn M Schuchter
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pallavi Kumar
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nina O'Connor
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Adina Lieberman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Center for Healthcare Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kelly Zentgraf
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Center for Healthcare Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi B Parikh
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 10S-113, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Trinh P, Hoover DR, Sonnenberg FA. Time-of-day changes in physician clinical decision making: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257500. [PMID: 34534247 PMCID: PMC8448311 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Time of day has been associated with variations in certain clinical practices such as cancer screening rates. In this study, we assessed how more general process measures of physician activity, particularly rates of diagnostic test ordering and diagnostic assessments, might be affected by time of day. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 3,342 appointments by 20 attending physicians at five outpatient clinics, matching appointments by physician and comparing the average diagnostic tests ordered and average diagnoses assessed per appointment in the first hour of the day versus the last hour of the day. Statistical analyses used sign tests, two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon tests, Kruskal Wallis tests, and multivariate linear regression. Results Examining physicians individually, four and six physicians, respectively, had statistically significant first- versus last-hour differences in the number of diagnostic tests ordered and number of diagnoses assessed per patient visit (p ≤ 0.04). As a group, 16 of 20 physicians ordered more tests on average in the first versus last hour (p = 0.012 for equal chance to order more in each time period). Substantial intra-clinic heterogeneity was found in both outcomes for four of five clinics (p < 0.01). Conclusions There is some statistical evidence on an individual and group level to support the presence of time-of-day effects on the number of diagnostic tests ordered per patient visit. These findings suggest that time of day may be a factor influencing fundamental physician behavior and processes. Notably, many physicians exhibited significant variation in the primary outcomes compared to same-specialty peers. Additional work is necessary to clarify temporal and inter-physician variation in the outcomes of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Trinh
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America
| | - Donald R Hoover
- Department of Statistics and Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - Frank A Sonnenberg
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trent MJ, Salmon DA, MacIntyre CR. Using the health belief model to identify barriers to seasonal influenza vaccination among Australian adults in 2019. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021; 15:678-687. [PMID: 33586871 PMCID: PMC8404057 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Each year tens of thousands of Australians become ill with influenza, resulting in thousands of severe infections that require hospitalisation. However, only 40% of adults receive the annual influenza vaccine. We surveyed Australian adults to provide up to date, population-specific data on the predictors and barriers of seasonal influenza vaccination. METHODS We administered an online survey to a nationally representative sample of Australian adults. We designed survey questions using the theoretical constructs of the health belief model. Using simple and multivariable Poisson regression, we identified attitudes and beliefs associated with influenza vaccination in 2019. RESULTS Among 1,444 respondents, 51.7% self-reported influenza vaccination in 2019. We estimated vaccine coverage to be 44% for adults under 45, 46% for adults aged 45 to 64 and 77% for adults aged 65 and over. The strongest individual predictors of self-reported vaccination were believing the vaccine is effective at preventing influenza (APR = 3.71; 95% CI = 2.87-4.80), followed by recalling their doctor recommending the vaccine (APR = 2.70; 95% CI = 2.31-3.16). Common perceived barriers that predicted self-reported vaccination included believing the vaccine could give you influenza (APR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.52-0.67), believing the vaccine can make you ill afterwards (APR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.62-0.74) and preferring to develop immunity "naturally" (APR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.32-0.45). CONCLUSION Although vaccine uptake in 2019 appears to be higher than previous years, there are perceived barriers which may limit uptake among Australians. Tailored interventions are needed to combat widespread influenza vaccine hesitancy, particularly among high-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory J. Trent
- Biosecurity ProgramThe Kirby InstituteUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Daniel A. Salmon
- Departments of International Health and Health, Behavior and SocietyInstitute for Vaccine SafetyBloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - C. Raina MacIntyre
- Biosecurity ProgramThe Kirby InstituteUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Caskey R. Behavioral Economics as a Model to Improve Adolescent and Adult Vaccination. Clin Ther 2021; 43:1649-1653. [PMID: 34353638 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Caskey
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nudges are interventions that alter the way options are presented, enabling individuals to more easily select the best option. Health systems and researchers have tested nudges to shape clinician decision-making with the aim of improving healthcare service delivery. We aimed to systematically study the use and effectiveness of nudges designed to improve clinicians' decisions in healthcare settings. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted to collect and consolidate results from studies testing nudges and to determine whether nudges directed at improving clinical decisions in healthcare settings across clinician types were effective. We systematically searched seven databases (EBSCO MegaFILE, EconLit, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and used a snowball sampling technique to identify peer-reviewed published studies available between 1 January 1984 and 22 April 2020. Eligible studies were critically appraised and narratively synthesised. We categorised nudges according to a taxonomy derived from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS We screened 3608 studies and 39 studies met our criteria. The majority of the studies (90%) were conducted in the USA and 36% were randomised controlled trials. The most commonly studied nudge intervention (46%) framed information for clinicians, often through peer comparison feedback. Nudges that guided clinical decisions through default options or by enabling choice were also frequently studied (31%). Information framing, default and enabling choice nudges showed promise, whereas the effectiveness of other nudge types was mixed. Given the inclusion of non-experimental designs, only a small portion of studies were at minimal risk of bias (33%) across all Cochrane criteria. CONCLUSIONS Nudges that frame information, change default options or enable choice are frequently studied and show promise in improving clinical decision-making. Future work should examine how nudges compare to non-nudge interventions (eg, policy interventions) in improving healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana S Last
- Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carter E Timon
- College of Liberal and Professional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sant'Anna A, Vilhelmsson A, Wolf A. Nudging healthcare professionals in clinical settings: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:543. [PMID: 34078358 PMCID: PMC8170624 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare organisations are in constant need of improvement and change. Nudging has been proposed as a strategy to affect people's choices and has been used to affect patients' behaviour in healthcare settings. However, little is known about how nudging is being interpreted and applied to change the behaviour of healthcare professionals (HCPs). The objective of this review is to identify interventions using nudge theory to affect the behaviour of HCPs in clinical settings. METHODS A scoping review. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO for articles published from 2010 to September 2019, including terms related to "nudging" in the title or abstract. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion based on whether the articles described an intervention to change the behaviour of HCPs. Two reviewers extracted key information and categorized included articles. Descriptive analyses were performed on the data. RESULTS Search results yielded 997 unique articles, of which 25 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five additional articles were selected from the reference lists of the included articles. We identified 11 nudging strategies: accountable justification, goal setting, suggested alternatives, feedback, information transparency, peer comparison, active choice, alerts and reminders, environmental cueing/priming, defaults/pre-orders, and education. These strategies were employed to affect the following 4 target behaviours: vaccination of staff, hand hygiene, clinical procedures, prescriptions and orders. To compare approaches across so many areas, we introduced two independent dimensions to describe nudging strategies: synchronous/asynchronous, and active/passive. CONCLUSION There are relatively few studies published referring to nudge theory aimed at changing HCP behaviour in clinical settings. These studies reflect a diverse set of objectives and implement nudging strategies in a variety of ways. We suggest distinguishing active from passive nudging strategies. Passive nudging strategies may achieve the desired outcome but go unnoticed by the clinician thereby not really changing a behaviour and raising ethical concerns. Our review indicates that there are successful active strategies that engage with clinicians in a more deliberate way. However, more research is needed on how different nudging strategies impact HCP behaviour in the short and long term to improve clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas Vilhelmsson
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 100, 40530, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden
| | - Axel Wolf
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 100, 40530, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden.
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hunt TC, Ambrose JP, Haaland B, Kawamoto K, Dechet CB, Lowrance WT, Hanson HA, O'Neil BB. Decision fatigue in low-value prostate cancer screening. Cancer 2021; 127:3343-3353. [PMID: 34043813 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-value prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is common yet contributes substantial waste and downstream patient harm. Decision fatigue may represent an actionable target to reduce low-value urologic care. The objective of this study was to determine whether low-value PSA testing patterns by outpatient clinicians are consistent with decision fatigue. METHODS Outpatient appointments for adult men without prostate cancer were identified at a large academic health system from 2011 through 2018. The authors assessed the association of appointment time with the likelihood of PSA testing, stratified by patient age and appropriateness of testing based on clinical guidelines. Appointments included those scheduled between 8:00 am and 4:59 pm, with noon omitted. Urologists were examined separately from other clinicians. RESULTS In 1,581,826 outpatient appointments identified, the median patient age was 54 years (interquartile range, 37-66 years), 1,256,152 participants (79.4%) were White, and 133,693 (8.5%) had family history of prostate cancer. PSA testing would have been appropriate in 36.8% of appointments. Clinicians ordered testing in 3.6% of appropriate appointments and in 1.8% of low-value appointments. Appropriate testing was most likely at 8:00 am (reference group). PSA testing declined through 11:00 am (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.64) and remained depressed through 4:00 pm (P < .001). Low-value testing was overall less likely (P < .001) and followed a similar trend, declining steadily from 8:00 am (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42-0.56) through 4:00 pm (P < .001; OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.18-0.30). Testing patterns in urologists were noticeably different. CONCLUSIONS Among most clinicians, outpatient PSA testing behaviors appear to be consistent with decision fatigue. These findings establish decision fatigue as a promising, actionable target for reducing wasteful and low-value practices in routine urologic care. LAY SUMMARY Decision fatigue causes poorer choices to be made with repetitive decision making. This study used medical records to investigate whether decision fatigue influenced clinicians' likelihood of ordering a low-value screening test (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) for prostate cancer. In more than 1.5 million outpatient appointments by adult men without prostate cancer, the chances of both appropriate and low-value PSA testing declined as the clinic day progressed, with a larger decline for appropriate testing. Testing patterns in urologists were different from those reported by other clinicians. The authors conclude that outpatient PSA testing behaviors appear to be consistent with decision fatigue among most clinicians, and interventions may reduce wasteful testing and downstream patient harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor C Hunt
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jacob P Ambrose
- Population Sciences, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christopher B Dechet
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - William T Lowrance
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Heidi A Hanson
- Population Sciences, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Brock B O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
De Sarro C, Papadopoli R, Cautela V, Nobile CGA, Pileggi C, Pavia M. Vaccination coverage among health-care workers: pre-post intervention study to assess impact of an on-site vaccination-dedicated clinic. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:753-759. [PMID: 33896347 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1915776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have revealed low vaccinations coverage among health-care workers (HCWs) for all vaccinations. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of an on-site vaccination-dedicated clinic on the vaccination coverage rates of HCWs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study was carried out among undergraduate and postgraduate students attending medical and health-care professions schools. RESULTS We enrolled 804 students, 404 in the control and 400 in the experimental group. A significantly higher increase of vaccination coverage in the experimental group than in the control group for all the investigated vaccinations (p < 0.001) was found. The odds of adherence to vaccinations in the experimental group, compared to the control group, ranged from 6.9-fold (95% CI 3.51-13.44) to 18.9-fold (95% CI 10.85-32.96). The increase in the coverage rate in the control group was between 2.5% and 3.5%, whereas in the experimental group, higher increases were found, ranging from 34.8% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS The extraordinary increase in the adherence to HCWs recommended vaccinations found in the study seems to indicate a significant role of enabling factors in the complex process of decision-making and implementation of health-related behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina De Sarro
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro (Italy)
| | - Rosa Papadopoli
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro (Italy)
| | - Vincenza Cautela
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro (Italy)
| | | | - Claudia Pileggi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro (Italy)
| | - Maria Pavia
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples (Italy)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Charleston L, Ovbiagele B. Diversity in neurology leadership: Nuances and nudges. J Neurol Sci 2021; 426:117475. [PMID: 33965794 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Underrepresented in medicine (UIM) academic physicians are poorly represented among medical school faculty when compared with their proportion in the US population, receive NIH research awards less frequently, are promoted less often, indicate lower career satisfaction, and report higher social isolation, than faculty who are not under-represented. Supporting a successful and sustainable workforce of UIM academic physicians is essential in neurology, because such neurologists are more likely to engage in research to reduce disparities in neurological outcomes that affect underserved and/or low-income communities, and help improve the paucity of diverse race-ethnic participation in clinical trials. Having more diverse academic neurologists serve in such roles could bolster their careers and model possibilities for others who share similar cultures and backgrounds. Beyond leading/joining diversity affairs committees, more UIM are needed in mainstream leadership roles. In this work, we explore self-application vs. appointment/nomination opportunities and how this play a role in leadership opportunities. In addition to considering appropriate weighing of self-applications vs. appointments based opportunities, we highlight approaches and introduce the concept of nudging. Nudging, which refers to purposely increasing the visibility and appeal of particular items with the goal of boosting the odds of selecting those items, has been shown to successfully influence the process of selection, and may help level the leadership playing field for UIM in neurology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry Charleston
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
| | - Bruce Ovbiagele
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hare AJ, Adusumalli S, Park S, Patel MS. Assessment of Primary Care Appointment Times and Appropriate Prescribing of Statins for At-Risk Patients. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e219050. [PMID: 33974057 PMCID: PMC8114131 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This cohort study examines whether there is an association between primary care appointment times and statin prescribing rates for patients with elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J. Hare
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Srinath Adusumalli
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Saehwan Park
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mitesh S. Patel
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Measured Performance and Vaccine Administration After Decision Support and Office Workflow Changes for Influenza Vaccination. J Healthc Qual 2021; 42:333-340. [PMID: 31917713 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Influenza vaccination is underused. We examined changes in vaccination following decision support and workflow changes in a cross-sectional analysis of three vaccination seasons among adult primary care patients from 21 practices. Interventions included clinical decision support changes to facilitate documentation; changes to rooming workflow for medical assistants and licensed practical nurses to promote vaccination, prepare orders, document care done elsewhere; and record patient refusals. We measured rates for a national vaccination performance measure and receipt of onsite vaccination. Approximately 120,000 patients were eligible each season. Performance on the quality measure increased each year (40.6% to 62.5% to 76.4%). Corresponding rates of onsite vaccination were 27.7%, 28.8%, and 31.5%. The adjusted odds ratio for onsite vaccination in the second season compared with the first was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 0.96). Onsite vaccination was more likely in the third season compared with either previous season-adjusted odds ratio for third versus second 1.14 (95% CI, 1.12, 1.16) or adjusted odds ratio for third versus first 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.09). Sequential changes in decision support and patient rooming process workflows were associated with large improvements in measured performance and with a significant increase in clinic-administered influenza vaccination by the third season.
Collapse
|
32
|
Oakes AH, Patel MS. Time to address disparities in care by appointment time. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:100507. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
33
|
Variation in Cardiologist Statin Prescribing by Clinic Appointment Time. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:661-662. [PMID: 33538261 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
34
|
Last BS, Schriger SH, Timon CE, Frank HE, Buttenheim AM, Rudd BN, Fernandez-Marcote S, Comeau C, Shoyinka S, Beidas RS. Using behavioral insights to design implementation strategies in public mental health settings: a qualitative study of clinical decision-making. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:6. [PMID: 33431032 PMCID: PMC7802291 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is an evidence-based intervention for youth with posttraumatic stress disorder. An important component of TF-CBT is the trauma narrative (TN), a phase in the intervention in which youth are guided to process the memories, thoughts, and feelings associated with their traumatic experience(s). Previous work has shown that TF-CBT clinicians complete TNs with only half of their clients, yet little is known about what determines TF-CBT clinicians' use of TNs. The behavioral insights literature-an interdisciplinary field studying judgment and decision-making-offers theoretical and empirical tools to conceptualize what drives complex human behaviors and decisions. Drawing from the behavioral insights literature, the present study seeks to understand what determines clinician use of TNs and to generate strategies that target these determinants. METHODS Through semi-structured qualitative interviews, we sought the perspectives of trained TF-CBT clinicians working in public mental health settings across the city of Philadelphia (N = 17) to understand their decisions to use TNs with clients. We analyzed the qualitative data using a coding approach informed by the behavioral insights literature. We used an iterative process of structured hypothesis generation, aided by a behavioral insights guide, and rapid validation informed by behavioral insights to uncover the determinants of TN use. We then generated implementation strategies that targeted these determinants using the "Easy Attractive Social Timely" framework, a behavioral insights design approach. RESULTS We generated and validated three broad themes about what determines clinician implementation of TNs: decision complexity, clinician affective experience, and agency norms. We hypothesized behavioral insights that underlie these implementation determinants and designed a list of nine corresponding behavioral insights strategies that may facilitate TN implementation. CONCLUSIONS Our study investigated why an effective component of an evidence-based intervention is difficult to implement. We leveraged robust scientific theories and empirical regularities from the behavioral insights literature to understand clinician perspectives on TN implementation. These factors were theoretically linked to implementation strategies. Our work revealed the potential for using behavioral insights in the diagnosis of evidence-based intervention determinants and the design of implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana S Last
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Simone H Schriger
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carter E Timon
- College of Liberal and Professional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah E Frank
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brittany N Rudd
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Carrie Comeau
- Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disability Services, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sosunmolu Shoyinka
- Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual Disability Services, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Predictors of Influenza Vaccination. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:3382. [PMID: 32514894 PMCID: PMC7661664 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05900-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
36
|
Adusumalli S, Westover JE, Jacoby DS, Small DS, VanZandbergen C, Chen J, Cavella AM, Pepe R, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Volpp KG, Asch DA, Patel MS. Effect of Passive Choice and Active Choice Interventions in the Electronic Health Record to Cardiologists on Statin Prescribing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 6:40-48. [PMID: 33031534 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Importance Statin therapy is underused for many patients who could benefit. Objective To evaluate the effect of passive choice and active choice interventions in the electronic health record (EHR) to promote guideline-directed statin therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Three-arm randomized clinical trial with a 6-month preintervention period and 6-month intervention. Randomization conducted at the cardiologist level at 16 cardiology practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The study included 82 cardiologists and 11 693 patients. Data were analyzed between May 8, 2019, and January 9, 2020. Interventions In passive choice, cardiologists had to manually access an alert embedded in the EHR to select options to initiate or increase statin therapy. In active choice, an interruptive EHR alert prompted the cardiologist to accept or decline guideline-directed statin therapy. Cardiologists in the control group were informed of the trial but received no other interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcome was statin therapy at optimal dose based on clinical guidelines. Secondary outcome was statin therapy at any dose. Results The sample comprised 11 693 patients with a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (9.1) years; 58% were male (n = 6749 of 11 693), 66% were White (n = 7683 of 11 693), and 24% were Black (n = 2824 of 11 693). The mean (SD) 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score was 15.4 (10.0); 68% had an ASVCD clinical diagnosis. Baseline statin prescribing rates at the optimal dose were 40.3% in the control arm, 39.1% in the passive choice arm, and 41.2% in the active choice arm. In adjusted analyses, the change in statin prescribing rates at optimal dose over time was not significantly different from control for passive choice (adjusted difference in percentage points, 0.2; 95% CI, -2.9 to 2.8; P = .86) or active choice (adjusted difference in percentage points, 2.4; 95% CI, -0.6 to 5.0; P = .08). In adjusted analyses of the subset of patients with clinical ASCVD, the active choice intervention resulted in a significant increase in statin prescribing at optimal dose relative to control (adjusted difference in percentage points, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.0-6.4; P = .008). No other subset analyses were significant. There were no significant changes in statin prescribing at any dose for either intervention. Conclusions and Relevance The passive choice and active choice interventions did not change statin prescribing. In the subgroup of patients with clinical ASCVD, the active choice intervention led to a small increase in statin prescribing at the optimal dose, which could inform the design or targeting of future interventions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03271931.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinath Adusumalli
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Julie E Westover
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Douglas S Jacoby
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Dylan S Small
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Jessica Chen
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ann M Cavella
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rebecca Pepe
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | | | - Kevin G Volpp
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia
| | - David A Asch
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia
| | - Mitesh S Patel
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Caturegli G, Materi J, Lombardo A, Milovanovic M, Yende N, Variava E, Golub JE, Martinson NA, Hoffmann CJ. Choice architecture-based prescribing tool for TB preventive therapy: a pilot study in South Africa. Public Health Action 2020; 10:118-123. [PMID: 33134126 DOI: 10.5588/pha.20.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background All people with HIV who screen negative for active tuberculosis (TB) should receive isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT). IPT implementation remains substantially below the 90% WHO target. This study sought to further understanding of IPT prescription by piloting a simplified prescribing approach. Setting Primary care clinics in Matlosana, South Africa. Design This was a mixed-methods implementation study. Methods Nine providers were recruited and underwent training on 2018 WHO guidelines. A simplified prescribing tool containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) and IPT prescriptions was introduced into the workflow for 2 weeks. Prescription data were collected from file review. Interviews were conducted with prescribers. Results During the study period, 41 patients were evaluated for ART initiation; 34 (83%) files used the simplified prescribing tool. Thirty-seven (90%) patients were eligible for same-day ART and IPT initiation, of whom 36 (97%) received IPT prescription. Qualitative interviews identified the following barriers to IPT prescription: cognitive burden, extensive documentation, limited management support, paucity of training, stock-outs, and patient-related factors. Provider acceptability of the tool was favorable, with unanimous recommendation to colleagues on the basis of streamlining documentation and reminding to prescribe. Conclusions This simplified prescribing device for IPT was feasible to implement. Streamlining documentation and reminding providers to prescribe can reduce work-flow barriers to IPT provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Caturegli
- Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - J Materi
- Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - A Lombardo
- Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - M Milovanovic
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa
| | - N Yende
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa
| | - E Variava
- Department of Medicine, Tshepong Hospital, Klerksdorp, South Africa
| | - J E Golub
- Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - N A Martinson
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa
| | - C J Hoffmann
- Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Maltz A, Sarid A. Attractive Flu Shot: A Behavioral Approach to Increasing Influenza Vaccination Uptake Rates. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:774-784. [PMID: 32772634 PMCID: PMC7457453 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20944190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. We suggest and examine a behavioral approach to increasing seasonal influenza vaccine uptake. Our idea combines behavioral effects generated by a dominated option, together with more traditional tools, such as providing information and recommendations. Methods. Making use of the seasonal nature of the flu, our treatments present participants with 2 options to receive the shot: early in the season, which is recommended and hence "attractive," or later. Three additional layers are examined: 1) mentioning that the vaccine is more likely to run out of stock late in the season, 2) the early shot is free while the late one costs a fee, and 3) the early shot carries a monetary benefit. We compare vaccination intentions in these treatments to those of a control group who were invited to receive the shot regardless of timing. Results. Using a sample of the Israeli adult population (n = 3271), we found positive effects of all treatments on vaccination intentions, and these effects were significant for 3 of the 4 treatments. In addition, the vast majority of those who are willing to vaccinate intend to get the early shot. Conclusions. Introducing 2 options to get vaccinated against influenza (early or late) positively affects intentions to receive the flu shot. In addition, this approach nudges participants to take the shot in early winter, a timing that has been shown to be more cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adi Sarid
- Tel Aviv University and Sarid Research Services, Tel Aviv, IL, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Changolkar S, Rewley J, Balachandran M, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Day SC, Patel MS. Phenotyping physician practice patterns and associations with response to a nudge in the electronic health record for influenza vaccination: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232895. [PMID: 32433678 PMCID: PMC7239439 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems routinely implement changes to the design of electronic health records (EHRs). Physician behavior may vary in response and methods to identify this variation could help to inform future interventions. The objective of this study was to phenotype primary care physician practice patterns and evaluate associations with response to an EHR nudge for influenza vaccination. METHODS AND FINDINGS During the 2016-2017 influenza season, 3 primary care practices at Penn Medicine implemented an active choice intervention in the EHR that prompted medical assistants to template influenza vaccination orders for physicians to review during the visit. We used latent class analysis to identify physician phenotypes based on 9 demographic, training, and practice pattern variables, which were obtained from the EHR and publicly available sources. A quasi-experimental approach was used to evaluate response to the intervention relative to control practices over time in each of the physician phenotype groups. For each physician latent class, a generalized linear model with logit link was fit to the binary outcome of influenza vaccination at the patient visit level. The sample comprised 45,410 patients with a mean (SD) age of 58.7 (16.3) years, 67.1% were white, and 22.1% were black. The sample comprised 56 physicians with mean (SD) of 24.6 (10.2) years of experience and 53.6% were male. The model segmented physicians into groups that had higher (n = 41) and lower (n = 15) clinical workloads. Physicians in the higher clinical workload group had a mean (SD) of 818.8 (429.1) patient encounters, 11.6 (4.7) patient appointments per day, and 4.0 (1.1) days per week in clinic. Physicians in the lower clinical workload group had a mean (SD) of 343.7 (129.0) patient encounters, 8.0 (2.8) patient appointments per day, and 3.1 (1.2) days per week in clinic. Among the higher clinical workload group, the EHR nudge was associated with a significant increase in influenza vaccination (adjusted difference-in-difference in percentage points, 7.9; 95% CI, 0.4-9.0; P = .01). Among the lower clinical workload group, the EHR nudge was not associated with a significant difference in influenza vaccination rates (adjusted difference-in-difference in percentage points, -1.0; 95% CI, -5.3-5.8; P = .90). CONCLUSIONS A model-based approach categorized physician practice patterns into higher and lower clinical workload groups. The higher clinical workload group was associated with a significant response to an EHR nudge for influenza vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujatha Changolkar
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jeffrey Rewley
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Mohan Balachandran
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Charles A. L. Rareshide
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Christopher K. Snider
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Susan C. Day
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Mitesh S. Patel
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an update on implementation efforts in the care of critically ill patients, with a focus on work published in the last 2 years. RECENT FINDINGS Only half of surveyed members of the multidisciplinary care team in the ICU were aware of the Choosing Wisely campaign, and of those that were, approximately one-third reported no implementation of the recommendations. Barriers to implementation of the ABCDE bundle extend to beyond patient-level domains, and include clinician-related, protocol-related, and other domains. Prospective audit and feedback approaches have demonstrated moderate success for improving the quality of antibiotic prescription practices in the ICU. SUMMARY Clinical research in intensive care has moved beyond simple discovery and dissemination. Best practices must be applied to effect change in ICU care, requiring the application of principles from implementation science. Future work should move beyond simple before-after evaluations to provide a stronger case for causal inference following implementation efforts.
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Changolkar S, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Patel MS. Patient, Physician, and Environmental Predictors of Influenza Vaccination During Primary Care Visits. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:611-613. [PMID: 31062223 PMCID: PMC7018886 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05017-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sujatha Changolkar
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Mitesh S Patel
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Platts-Mills TF, Nagurney JM, Melnick ER. Tolerance of Uncertainty and the Practice of Emergency Medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2019; 75:715-720. [PMID: 31874767 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Justine M Nagurney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Edward R Melnick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day: a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:2536-2541. [PMID: 31520229 PMCID: PMC6848585 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05336-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction with healthcare is associated with clinical outcomes, provider satisfaction, and success of healthcare organizations. As the clinic day progresses, provider fatigue, deterioration with communication within the care team, and appointment spillover may decrease patient experience. OBJECTIVE To understand the relationship between likelihood to recommend a primary care practice and scheduled appointment time across multiple practice settings. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort was created of all patients seen within four primary care practices between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. MAIN MEASURES We looked at scheduled appointment time against patient likelihood to recommend a practice as a measure of overall patient experience collected routinely for clinical practice improvement by the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey®. Adjusted mixed effects logistic regression models were created to understand the relationship between progressing appointment time on patient likelihood to recommend a practice. We constructed locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) curves to understand how reported patient experience varied over the clinic day. RESULTS We had a response rate of 14.0% (n = 3172), 80.2% of whom indicated they would recommend our practice to others. Appointment time scheduling during the last hour (4:00-4:59 PM) had a 45% lower odds of recommending our practice when compared to the first clinic hour (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86) which is similar when controlling for patient-reported wait time (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.95). LOESS plots demonstrated declining satisfaction with subsequent appointment times compared with the first session hour, with no effect just after the lunch hour break. CONCLUSIONS In primary care, appointment time of day is associated with patient-reported experience.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hsiang EY, Mehta SJ, Small DS, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Day SC, Patel MS. Association of an Active Choice Intervention in the Electronic Health Record Directed to Medical Assistants With Clinician Ordering and Patient Completion of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1915619. [PMID: 31730186 PMCID: PMC6902810 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Early cancer detection can lead to improved outcomes, but cancer screening tests are often underused. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of an active choice intervention in the electronic health record directed to medical assistants with changes in clinician ordering and patient completion of breast and colorectal cancer screening tests. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective quality improvement study was conducted among 69 916 patients eligible for breast or colorectal cancer screening at 25 primary care practices at the University of Pennsylvania Health System between September 1, 2014, and August 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from January 21 to July 8, 2019. INTERVENTIONS From 2016 to 2017, 3 primary care practices at the University of Pennsylvania Health System implemented an active choice intervention in the electronic health record that prompted medical assistants to inform patients about cancer screening during check-in and template orders for clinicians to review during the visit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was clinician ordering of cancer screening tests. The secondary outcome was patient completion of cancer screening tests within 1 year of the primary care visit. RESULTS The sample eligible for breast cancer screening comprised 26 269 women with a mean (SD) age of 60.4 (6.9) years; 15 873 (60.4%) were white and 7715 (29.4%) were black. The sample eligible for colorectal cancer screening comprised 43 647 patients with a mean (SD) age of 59.4 (7.5) years; 24 416 (55.9%) were women, 19 231 (44.1%) were men, 29 029 (66.5%) were white, and 9589 (22.0%) were black. For breast cancer screening, the intervention was associated with a significant increase in clinician ordering of tests (22.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.2-27.6 percentage points; P < .001) but no change in patient completion (0.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.0 to 4.3 percentage points; P = .45). For colorectal cancer screening, the intervention was associated with a significant increase in clinician ordering of tests (13.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.0-18.9 percentage points; P < .001) but no change in patient completion (1.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.2 to 4.6 percentage points; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE An active choice intervention in the electronic health record directed to medical assistants was associated with a significant increase in clinician ordering of breast and colorectal cancer screening tests. However, it was not associated with a significant change in patient completion of either cancer screening test during a 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shivan J. Mehta
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Dylan S. Small
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | | | - Susan C. Day
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mitesh S. Patel
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Medicine, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Moses BD, Borecky AD, Dubov A. It is OK to nudge for vitamin K. Acta Paediatr 2019; 108:1938-1941. [PMID: 31206781 DOI: 10.1111/apa.14905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bates D Moses
- SoCal Kaiser Permanente Palliative Medicine, Riverside, California
| | | | - Alex Dubov
- Public Health and Bioethics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Time pressure to provide a quick fix is commonly cited as a reason why opioids are frequently prescribed in the United States, but there is little evidence of an association between appointment timing and clinical decision-making. As the workday progresses and appointments run behind schedule, physicians may be more likely to prescribe opioids. OBJECTIVE To estimate whether characteristics of appointment timing are associated with clinical decision-making about pain treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study of physician behavior used data from electronic health record systems in primary care offices in the United States to analyze primary care appointments occurring in 2017 for patients with a new painful condition who had not received an opioid prescription within the past year. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The association between treatment decisions and 2 dimensions of appointment timing (order of appointment occurrence and delay relative to scheduled start time) were assessed. The rates of opioid prescribing were measured and compared with rates of nonopioid pain medication (ie, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) prescribing and referral to physical therapy. All rates were estimated within the same physician using physician fixed effects, adjusting for patient, appointment, and seasonal characteristics. RESULTS Among 678 319 primary care appointments (642 262 patients; 392 422 [61.1%] women) with 5603 primary care physicians, the likelihood that an appointment resulted in an opioid prescription increased by 33% as the workday progressed (1st to 3rd appointment, 4.0% [95% CI, 3.9%-4.1%] vs 19th to 21st appointment, 5.3% [95% CI. 5.1%-5.6%]; P < .001) and by 17% as appointments ran behind schedule (0-9 minutes late, 4.4% [95% CI, 4.3%-4.6%] vs ≥60 minutes late, 5.2% [95% CI, 5.0%-5.4%]; P < .001). Prescribing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and referral to physical therapy did not display similar patterns. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that, even within an individual physician's schedule, clinical decision-making for opioid prescribing varies by the timing and lateness of appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah T. Neprash
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Michael L. Barnett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hsiang EY, Mehta SJ, Small DS, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Day SC, Patel MS. Association of Primary Care Clinic Appointment Time With Clinician Ordering and Patient Completion of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e193403. [PMID: 31074811 PMCID: PMC6512279 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE As the clinic day progresses, clinicians may fall behind schedule and experience decision fatigue. However, the association of time of day with cancer screening rates is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of primary care clinic appointment time with clinician ordering and patient completion of breast and colorectal cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective, quality improvement study of 33 primary care practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey from September 1, 2014, to August 31, 2016. Participants included adults eligible for breast or colorectal cancer screening. Data analysis was conducted from April 24, 2018, to November 8, 2018. EXPOSURES Clinic appointment time during each patient's first primary care physician visit in the study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was clinician ordering of the screening test during the visit. Secondary outcome was patient completion of the tests within 1 year of the visit. RESULTS Among the 19 254 patients eligible for breast cancer screening, the mean (SD) age was 60.2 (6.9) years; 19 254 (100%) were female, 11 682 (60.7%) were white, and 5495 (28.5%) were black. Screening test order rates were highest at 8 am at 63.7%, decreased throughout the morning to 48.7% at 11 am, increased to 56.2% at noon, and then decreased to 47.8% at 5 pm (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for overall trend, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96; P < .001). Trends in screening test completion rates were similar beginning at 33.2% at 8 am and decreasing to 17.8% at 5 pm (adjusted OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97; P < .001). Among the 33 468 patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening, the mean (SD) age was 59.6 (7.4) years; 18 672 (55.8%) were female, 22 157 (66.2%) were white, and 7296 (21.8%) were black. Screening test order rates were 36.5% at 8 am, decreased to 31.3% by 11 am, increased at noon to 34.4%, and then decreased to 23.4% at 5 pm (adjusted OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.93-0.95; P < .001). Trends in screening test completion rates were similar beginning at 28.0% at 8 am and decreasing to 17.8% at 5 pm (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Clinician ordering of cancer screening tests significantly decreased as the clinic day progressed. Patient completion of cancer screening tests within 1 year of the visit was also lower as the primary care appointment time was later in the day. Future interventions targeting improvements in cancer screening should consider how time of day may influence these behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Y. Hsiang
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Shivan J. Mehta
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Dylan S. Small
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | | | - Susan C. Day
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mitesh S. Patel
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rao S, Nyquist AC. The Power of the Nudge to Decrease Decision Fatigue and Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e181754. [PMID: 30646149 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Suchitra Rao
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Ann-Christine Nyquist
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|