1
|
Richardson AS, Dubowitz T, Beyer KM, Zhou Y, Kershaw KN, Duck W, Ye F, Beckman R, Gordon-Larsen P, Shikany JM, Kiefe C. Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. AJPM Focus 2024; 3:100209. [PMID: 38590394 PMCID: PMC10999814 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Historical maps of racialized evaluation of mortgage lending risk (i.e., redlined neighborhoods) have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Little research has examined whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with obesity, differentially by race or gender. Methods This is a cross-sectional study to examine whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with BMI and waist circumference among Black and White adults in 1985-1986. Participants' addresses were linked to the 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation maps that evaluated mortgage lending risk across neighborhoods. The authors used multilevel linear regression models clustered on Census tract, adjusted for confounders to estimate main effects, and stratified, and interaction models by (1) race, (2) gender, and (3) race by gender with redlining differentially for Black versus White adults and men versus women. To better understand strata differences, they compared Census tract-level median household income across race and gender groups within Home Owners' Loan Corporation grade. Results Black adults (n=2,103) were more likely than White adults (n=1,767) to live in historically rated hazardous areas and to have higher BMI and waist circumference. Redlining and race and redlining and gender interactions for BMI and waist circumference were statistically significant (p<0.10). However, in stratified analyses, the only statistically significant associations were among White participants. White participants living in historically rated hazardous areas had lower BMI (β = - 0.63 [95% CI= -1.11, -0.15]) and lower waist circumference (β = - 1.50 [95% CI= -2.62, -0.38]) than those living in declining areas. Within each Home Owners' Loan Corporation grade, residents in White participants' neighborhoods had higher incomes than those living in Black participants' neighborhoods (p<0.0001). The difference was largest within historically redlined areas. Covariate associations differed for men, women, Black, and White adults, explaining the difference between the interaction and the stratified models. Race by redlining interaction did not vary by gender. Conclusions White adults may have benefitted from historical redlining, which may have reinforced neighborhood processes that generated racial inequality in BMI and waist circumference 50 years later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S. Richardson
- RAND Corporation, Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tamara Dubowitz
- RAND Corporation, Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Yuhong Zhou
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kiarri N. Kershaw
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Waverly Duck
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Feifei Ye
- RAND Corporation, Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Robin Beckman
- RAND Corporation, Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, Santa Monica, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pittell H, Calip GS, Pierre A, Ryals CA, Guadamuz JS. Racialized economic segregation and inequities in treatment initiation and survival among patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07319-5. [PMID: 38702585 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07319-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Racialized economic segregation, a form of structural racism, may drive persistent inequities among patients with breast cancer. We examined whether a composite area-level index of racialized economic segregation was associated with real-world treatment and survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study among adult women with mBC using a US nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database (2011-2022). Population-weighted quintiles of the index of concentration at the extremes were estimated using census tract data. To identify inequities in time to treatment initiation (TTI) and overall survival (OS), we employed Kaplan-Meier methods and estimated hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for clinical factors. RESULTS The cohort included 27,459 patients. Compared with patients from the most privileged areas, those from the least privileged areas were disproportionately Black (36.9% vs. 2.6%) or Latinx (13.2% vs. 2.6%) and increasingly diagnosed with de novo mBC (33.6% vs. 28.9%). Those from the least privileged areas had longer median TTI than those from the most privileged areas (38 vs 31 days) and shorter median OS (29.7 vs 39.2 months). Multivariable-adjusted HR indicated less timely treatment initiation (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83, 0.91, p < 0.01) and worse OS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.13, 1.25, p < 0.01) among those from the least privileged areas compared to the most privileged areas. CONCLUSION Racialized economic segregation is a social determinant of health associated with treatment and survival inequities in mBC. Public investments directly addressing racialized economic segregation and other forms of structural racism are needed to reduce inequities in cancer care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harlan Pittell
- Flatiron Health, 233 Spring St, New York, NY, 10013, USA.
| | - Gregory S Calip
- Program on Medicines and Public Health, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Amy Pierre
- Flatiron Health, 233 Spring St, New York, NY, 10013, USA
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cleo A Ryals
- Flatiron Health, 233 Spring St, New York, NY, 10013, USA
| | - Jenny S Guadamuz
- Flatiron Health, 233 Spring St, New York, NY, 10013, USA
- Division of Health Policy and Management, Berkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hasjim BJ, Huang AA, Paukner M, Polineni P, Harris A, Mohammadi M, Kershaw KN, Banea T, VanWagner LB, Zhao L, Mehrotra S, Ladner DP. Where you live matters: Area deprivation predicts poor survival and liver transplant waitlisting. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:803-817. [PMID: 38346498 PMCID: PMC11070293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important predictors of poor clinical outcomes in chronic diseases, but their associations among the general cirrhosis population and liver transplantation (LT) are limited. We conducted a retrospective, multiinstitutional analysis of adult (≥18-years-old) patients with cirrhosis in metropolitan Chicago to determine the associations of poor neighborhood-level SDOH on decompensation complications, mortality, and LT waitlisting. Area deprivation index and covariates extracted from the American Census Survey were aspects of SDOH that were investigated. Among 15 101 patients with cirrhosis, the mean age was 57.2 years; 6414 (42.5%) were women, 6589 (43.6%) were non-Hispanic White, 3652 (24.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 2662 (17.6%) were Hispanic. Each quintile increase in area deprivation was associated with poor outcomes in decompensation (sHR [subdistribution hazard ratio] 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; P < .001), waitlisting (sHR 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.76; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (sHR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.12; P < .001). Domains of SDOH associated with a lower likelihood of waitlisting and survival included low income, low education, poor household conditions, and social support (P < .001). Overall, patients with cirrhosis residing in poor neighborhood-level SDOH had higher decompensation, and mortality, and were less likely to be waitlisted for LT. Further exploration of structural barriers toward LT or optimizing health outcomes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bima J Hasjim
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexander A Huang
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mitchell Paukner
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Praneet Polineni
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexandra Harris
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohsen Mohammadi
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Kiarri N Kershaw
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Therese Banea
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lisa B VanWagner
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lihui Zhao
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sanjay Mehrotra
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hussaini SMQ, Fan Q, Barrow LCJ, Yabroff KR, Pollack CE, Nogueira LM. Association of Historical Housing Discrimination and Colon Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:678-687. [PMID: 38320228 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the 1930s, the federally sponsored Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition in its assessment of areas worthy of receiving loans. Neighborhoods with large proportions of Black residents were mapped in red (ie, redlining) and flagged as hazardous for mortgage financing. Redlining created a platform for systemic disinvestment in these neighborhoods, leading to barriers in access to resources that persist today. We investigated the association between residing in areas with different HOLC ratings and receipt of quality cancer care and outcomes among individuals diagnosed with colon cancer-a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment. METHODS Individuals who resided in zip code tabulation areas in 196 cities with HOLC rating and were diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database and assigned a HOLC grade (A, best; B, still desirable; C, definitely declining; and D, hazardous and mapped in red). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated association of area-level HOLC grade and late stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method evaluated differences in time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models investigated differences in overall survival (OS). RESULTS There were 149,917 patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer with a median age of 68 years. Compared with people living in HOLC A areas, people living in HOLC D areas were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12]). In addition, people living in HOLC B, C, and D areas had 8%, 16%, and 24% higher odds of not receiving guideline-concordant care, including lower receipt of surgery, evaluation of ≥12 lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. People residing in HOLC B, C, or D areas also experienced delays in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. People residing in HOLC C (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.13]) and D (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.18]) areas had worse OS, including 13% and 20% excess risk of death for individuals diagnosed with early- and 6% and 8% for late-stage disease for HOLC C and D, respectively. CONCLUSION Historical housing discrimination is associated with worse contemporary access to colon cancer care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Qasim Hussaini
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Qinjin Fan
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Lauren C J Barrow
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Craig E Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| | - Leticia M Nogueira
- Department of Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rahman SN, Long JB, Westvold SJ, Leapman MS, Spees LP, Hurwitz ME, McManus HD, Gross CP, Wheeler SB, Dinan MA. Area Vulnerability and Disparities in Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e248747. [PMID: 38687479 PMCID: PMC11061765 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Area-level measures of sociodemographic disadvantage may be associated with racial and ethnic disparities with respect to receipt of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but have not been investigated previously, to our knowledge. Objective To assess the association between area-level measures of social vulnerability and racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of US Medicare beneficiaries with mRCC from 2015 through 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years who were diagnosed with mRCC from January 2015 through December 2019 and were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Parts A, B, and D from 1 year before through 1 year after presumed diagnosis or until death. Data were analyzed from November 22, 2022, through January 26, 2024. Exposures Five different county-level measures of disadvantage and 4 zip code-level measures of vulnerability or deprivation and segregation were used to dichotomize whether an individual resided in the most vulnerable quartile according to each metric. Patient-level factors included age, race and ethnicity, sex, diagnosis year, comorbidities, frailty, Medicare and Medicaid dual enrollment eligibility, and Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS). Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were receipt and type of systemic therapy (oral anticancer agent or immunotherapy from 2 months before to 1 year after diagnosis of mRCC) as a function of patient and area-level characteristics. Multivariable regression analyses were used to adjust for patient factors, and odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression and relative risk ratios (RRRs) from multinomial logistic regression are reported. Results The sample included 15 407 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [6.8] years), of whom 9360 (60.8%) were men; 6931 (45.0%), older than 75 years; 93 (0.6%), American Indian or Alaska Native; 257 (1.7%), Asian or Pacific Islander; 757 (4.9%), Hispanic; 1017 (6.6%), non-Hispanic Black; 12 966 (84.2%), non-Hispanic White; 121 (0.8%), other; and 196 (1.3%), unknown. Overall, 8317 patients (54.0%) received some type of systemic therapy. After adjusting for individual factors, no county or zip code-level measures of social vulnerability, deprivation, or segregation were associated with disparities in treatment. In contrast, patient-level factors, including female sex (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84) and LIS (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.65), were associated with lack of treatment, with particularly limited access to immunotherapy for patients with LIS (RRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.43). Associations between individual-level factors and treatment in multivariable analysis were not mediated by the addition of area-level metrics. Disparities by race and ethnicity were consistently and only observed within the most vulnerable areas, as indicated by the top quartile of each vulnerability deprivation index. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of older Medicare patients diagnosed with mRCC, individual-level demographics, including race and ethnicity, sex, and income, were associated with receipt of systemic therapy, whereas area-level measures were not. However, individual-level racial and ethnic disparities were largely limited to socially vulnerable areas, suggesting that efforts to improve racial and ethnic disparities may be most effective when targeted to socially vulnerable areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed N. Rahman
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jessica B. Long
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sarah J. Westvold
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael S. Leapman
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lisa P. Spees
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Michael E. Hurwitz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hannah D. McManus
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Michaela A. Dinan
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rollin FG, Lee-Rey S, Wong-Serrano E, Habert S, Tejani M. The Importance of Naming Structural Racism as a Root Cause of Racial Inequities in Breast Cancer Outcomes. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:261-262. [PMID: 38246834 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francois G Rollin
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
| | | | | | - Sydney Habert
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mehul Tejani
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kraus NT, Connor S, Shoda K, Moore SE, Irani E. Historic redlining and health outcomes: A systematic review. Public Health Nurs 2024; 41:287-296. [PMID: 38148621 DOI: 10.1111/phn.13276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing literature on the associations between historic redlining and modern-day health outcomes across the lifespan. METHOD This review searched PubMed and CINAHL for peer-reviewed, data-based articles examining the relationship between historic redlining and any health outcome. Articles were appraised using the JBI critical appraisal checklist. The results were synthesized using a narrative summary approach. RESULTS Thirty-six articles were included and focused on various health outcomes, including cardiovascular outcomes, breast cancer incidence and mortality, firearm injury or death, birth-related outcomes, and asthma outcomes. Most of the included articles (n = 31; 86%) found significant associations between historic redlining and adverse health outcomes such as increased cardiovascular disease, higher rates of preterm births, increased cancer incidence, reduced survival time after breast cancer diagnosis, and increased firearm injury incidence. DISCUSSION This review demonstrates the persistent effect of historic redlining on individuals' health. Public health nurses should recognize redlining as a form of structural racism when caring for affected communities and should advocate for policies and programs that advance health equity. Nurse researchers should develop and test multilevel interventions to address systemic racism and improve health outcomes in communities affected by redlining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa T Kraus
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah Connor
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Krista Shoda
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Scott Emory Moore
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Elliane Irani
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Wood E, Coker T, Salava D, Riley A, Krajcinovic I. Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention Among Low-Income and Minoritized Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:518-528. [PMID: 37625110 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether a community health worker (CHW)-led intervention could improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL; primary outcome) more than usual care among low-income and racial and ethnic minoritized populations newly diagnosed with cancer. METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 1, 2018, until August 31, 2021, in outpatient cancer clinics in Atlantic City, NJ, and Chicago, IL. Hourly low-wage worker members of an employer union health fund age 18 years or older with newly diagnosed solid tumor and hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned 1:1 to usual care (control group) or usual care augmented with a trained CHW for 12 months (intervention group). The CHW assisted participants with advance care planning (ACP), proactively screened symptoms, and referred participants to community-based resources for identified health-related social needs. Usual care comprised nurse case management and benefits redesign (waived copayments and free transportation for any cancer care received at preferred oncology clinics in each city). The primary outcome was HRQoL. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, satisfaction with decision, ACP documentation, health care use, total health care costs, and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 160 participants were enrolled. Intervention group participants had a greater increase in mean HRQoL scores at 4-month and 12-month follow-up as compared with baseline than control group participants (expected mean difference, 11.25 [95% CI, 7.28 to 15.22]; 11.29 [95% CI, 6.96 to 15.62], respectively). CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, a CHW-led intervention significantly improved HRQoL for low-income and racial and ethnic minoritized patients with cancer more than usual care alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manali I Patel
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Kris Kapphahn
- Qualitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Emily Wood
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Tumaini Coker
- Seattle Childrens Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miller-Kleinhenz JM, Barber LE, Maliniak ML, Moubadder L, Bliss M, Streiff MJ, Switchenko JM, Ward KC, McCullough LE. Historical Redlining, Persistent Mortgage Discrimination, and Race in Breast Cancer Outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2356879. [PMID: 38376843 PMCID: PMC10879950 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Inequities created by historical and contemporary mortgage discriminatory policies have implications for health disparities. The role of persistent mortgage discrimination (PMD) in breast cancer (BC) outcomes has not been studied. Objective To estimate the race-specific association of historical redlining (HRL) with the development of BC subtypes and late-stage disease and a novel measure of PMD in BC mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used Georgia Cancer Registry data. A total of 1764 non-Hispanic Black and White women with a BC diagnosis and residing in an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) in Georgia were included. Patients were excluded if they did not have a known subtype or a derived American Joint Committee on Cancer stage or if diagnosed solely by death certificate or autopsy. Participants were diagnosed with a first primary BC between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017, and were followed through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed between May 1, 2022, and August 31, 2023. Exposures Scores for HRL were examined dichotomously as less than 2.5 (ie, nonredlined) vs 2.5 or greater (ie, redlined). Contemporary mortgage discrimination (CMD) scores were calculated, and PMD index was created using the combination of HRL and CMD scores. Main Outcomes and Measures Estrogen receptor (ER) status, late stage at diagnosis, and BC-specific death. Results This study included 1764 women diagnosed with BC within census tracts that were HOLC graded in Georgia. Of these, 856 women (48.5%) were non-Hispanic Black and 908 (51.5%) were non-Hispanic White; 1148 (65.1%) were diagnosed at 55 years or older; 538 (30.5%) resided in tracts with HRL scores less than 2.5; and 1226 (69.5%) resided in tracts with HRL scores 2.5 or greater. Living in HRL areas with HRL scores 2.5 or greater was associated with a 62% increased odds of ER-negative BC among non-Hispanic Black women (odds ratio [OR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.01-2.60]), a 97% increased odds of late-stage diagnosis among non-Hispanic White women (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.15-3.36]), and a 60% increase in BC mortality overall (hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.17-2.18]). Similarly, PMD was associated with BC mortality among non-Hispanic White women but not among non-Hispanic Black women. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that historical racist policies and persistent discrimination have modern-day implications for BC outcomes that differ by race. These findings emphasize the need for a more nuanced investigation of the social and structural drivers of disparate BC outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren E. Barber
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maret L. Maliniak
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Leah Moubadder
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maya Bliss
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Micah J. Streiff
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kevin C. Ward
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren E. McCullough
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valencia CI, Wightman P, Morrill KE, Hsu C, Arif‐Tiwari H, Kauffman E, Gachupin FC, Chipollini J, Lee BR, Garcia DO, Batai K. Neighborhood social vulnerability and disparities in time to kidney cancer surgical treatment and survival in Arizona. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7007. [PMID: 38400688 PMCID: PMC10891465 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hispanics and American Indians (AI) have high kidney cancer incidence and mortality rates in Arizona. This study assessed: (1) whether racial and ethnic minority patients and patients from neighborhoods with high social vulnerability index (SVI) experience a longer time to surgery after clinical diagnosis, and (2) whether time to surgery, race and ethnicity, and SVI are associated with upstaging to pT3/pT4, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS Arizona Cancer Registry (2009-2018) kidney and renal pelvis cases (n = 4592) were analyzed using logistic regression models to assess longer time to surgery and upstaging. Cox-regression hazard models were used to test DFS and OS. RESULTS Hispanic and AI patients with T1 tumors had a longer time to surgery than non-Hispanic White patients (median time of 56, 55, and 45 days, respectively). Living in neighborhoods with high (≥75) overall SVI increased odds of a longer time to surgery for cT1a (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.31) and cT2 (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.13-4.73). Race and ethnicity were not associated with time to surgery. Among cT1a patients, a longer time to surgery increased odds of upstaging to pT3/pT4 (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 0.99-3.84). A longer time to surgery was associated with PFS (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.99) and OS (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.11). Among patients with cT2 tumor, living in high SVI neighborhoods was associated with worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.07-2.57). CONCLUSIONS High social vulnerability was associated with increased time to surgery and poor survival after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celina I. Valencia
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine – TucsonThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Patrick Wightman
- Center for Population Health SciencesThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Kristin E. Morrill
- Community and Systems Health Science Division, College of NursingThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Chiu‐Hsieh Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Hina Arif‐Tiwari
- Department of Medical ImagingThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Eric Kauffman
- Department of UrologyRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Francine C. Gachupin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine – TucsonThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Juan Chipollini
- Department of UrologyThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Benjamin R. Lee
- Department of UrologyThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - David O. Garcia
- Department of Health Promotion SciencesThe University of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Ken Batai
- Department of Cancer Prevention and ControlRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yanguela J, Jackson BE, Reeder-Hayes KE, Roberson ML, Rocque GB, Kuo TM, LeBlanc MR, Baggett C, Green L, Laurie-Zehr E, Wheeler SB. Simulating the population impact of interventions to reduce racial gaps in breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae019. [PMID: 38281076 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequities in guideline-concordant treatment receipt contribute to worse survival in Black breast cancer (BCa) patients. Inequity-reduction interventions (eg, navigation, bias training, tracking dashboards) can close such treatment gaps. We simulated the population-level impact of statewide implementation of inequity-reduction interventions on racial BCa inequities in North Carolina. METHODS Using registry-linked multi-payer claims data, we calculated Black/White inequities in endocrine (ET; n = 12,033) and chemotherapy (CTx; n = 1,819) receipt. We then built cohort- (ET and CTx), and race-stratified Markov models to simulate the potential increase in the proportion of patients receiving ET or CTx and subsequent improvements in BCa outcomes if inequity-reducing intervention were implemented statewide. We report uncertainty bounds representing 95% of simulation results. RESULTS 75.6% and 72.1% of Black patients received ET and CTx over the 2006-2015 and 2004-2015 periods (vs 79.3 and 78.9% of White patients, respectively). Inequity-reduction interventions could increase ET and CTx receipt among Black patients to 89.9% (85.3, 94.6%) and 85.7% (80.7, 90.9%). Such interventions could also decrease 5-and 10-year BCa mortality gaps from 3.4 to 3.2 (3.0, 3.3) and from 6.7 to 6.1 (5.9, 6.4) percentage points in the ET cohorts and from 8.6 to 8.1 (7.7, 8.4) and from 8.2 to 7.8 (7.3, 8.1) percentage points in the CTx cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Inequity-focused interventions could improve cancer outcomes for Black patients. However, they would not fully close the racial BCa mortality gap. Addressing other inequities along cancer continuum (eg, screening, pre-and post-diagnosis risk factors) is required to achieve full equity in BCa outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Yanguela
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, NC, USA
| | - Bradford E Jackson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mya L Roberson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tzy-Mey Kuo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew R LeBlanc
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher Baggett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, NC, USA
| | - Laura Green
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin Laurie-Zehr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nicot-Cartsonis MS, Digbeu BDE, Raji MA, Kuo YF. Disparities in Late-Stage Breast and Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Among Hispanic, Non-Hispanic White, and Non-Hispanic Black Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study of Texas Medicare Beneficiaries. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:3168-3177. [PMID: 36575329 PMCID: PMC9794104 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01491-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in late-stage breast or colorectal cancer diagnosis in younger populations are associated with social determinants of health (SDOH; education, poverty, housing, employment). We hypothesized that, in older Medicare beneficiaries, disparities in late-stage cancer diagnosis between Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients would be associated with SDOH, comorbidities, and primary care physician (PCP) access. METHODS We analyzed 2005-2017 Texas Cancer Registry data linked with Medicare data for patients aged ≥ 66 (n = 86,501). Variables included age at diagnosis, sex, comorbidities, poverty level, education, PCP, and relevant cancer screening within 1 year. RESULTS For breast cancer in women (Hispanic, n = 6380; NHW, n = 39,225; NHB, n = 4055), a fully adjusted model showed significantly higher odds of late-stage cancer diagnosis only in NHB patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.22) compared with NHW; adjustment for comorbidities and SDOH partially decreased the odds of late-stage diagnosis relative to NHWs. Interaction terms between race-ethnicity and poverty were not significant. For colorectal cancer, a fully adjusted multivariate model showed significantly higher odds of late-stage diagnosis only among NHBs (n = 3318, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.40) relative to NHWs (n = 27,470); adjustment for SDOH partially decreased the odds of late-stage diagnosis in NHB patients. Interaction terms between race-ethnicity and poverty were not significant. CONCLUSION Racial disparities in late-stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses remain after adjustment for SDOH and clinically relevant factors, underscoring the need to optimize access to screening and timely cancer treatment in racial/ethnic minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Biai D E Digbeu
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Mukaila A Raji
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Sealy Center On Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jayasekera J, El Kefi S, Fernandez JR, Wojcik KM, Woo JMP, Ezeani A, Ish JL, Bhattacharya M, Ogunsina K, Chang CJ, Cohen CM, Ponce S, Kamil D, Zhang J, Le R, Ramanathan AL, Butera G, Chapman C, Grant SJ, Lewis-Thames MW, Dash C, Bethea TN, Forde AT. Opportunities, challenges, and future directions for simulation modeling the effects of structural racism on cancer mortality in the United States: a scoping review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:231-245. [PMID: 37947336 PMCID: PMC10637025 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Structural racism could contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality via its broad effects on housing, economic opportunities, and health care. However, there has been limited focus on incorporating structural racism into simulation models designed to identify practice and policy strategies to support health equity. We reviewed studies evaluating structural racism and cancer mortality disparities to highlight opportunities, challenges, and future directions to capture this broad concept in simulation modeling research. METHODS We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Articles published between 2018 and 2023 were searched including terms related to race, ethnicity, cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, and structural racism. We included studies evaluating the effects of structural racism on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer mortality in the United States. RESULTS A total of 8345 articles were identified, and 183 articles were included. Studies used different measures, data sources, and methods. For example, in 20 studies, racial residential segregation, one component of structural racism, was measured by indices of dissimilarity, concentration at the extremes, redlining, or isolation. Data sources included cancer registries, claims, or institutional data linked to area-level metrics from the US census or historical mortgage data. Segregation was associated with worse survival. Nine studies were location specific, and the segregation measures were developed for Black, Hispanic, and White residents. CONCLUSIONS A range of measures and data sources are available to capture the effects of structural racism. We provide a set of recommendations for best practices for modelers to consider when incorporating the effects of structural racism into simulation models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinani Jayasekera
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Safa El Kefi
- NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica R Fernandez
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kaitlyn M Wojcik
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer M P Woo
- Epidemiology Branch at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Adaora Ezeani
- Health Behaviors Research Branch of the Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ish
- Epidemiology Branch at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Manami Bhattacharya
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, and the Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kemi Ogunsina
- Epidemiology Branch at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Che-Jung Chang
- Epidemiology Branch at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Camryn M Cohen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Ponce
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dalya Kamil
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Julia Zhang
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Sophomore at Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA
| | - Randy Le
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amrita L Ramanathan
- Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gisela Butera
- Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health Library, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christina Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety in the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and the Houston Veterans Affairs, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shakira J Grant
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marquita W Lewis-Thames
- Department of Medical Social Science, Center for Community Health at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chiranjeev Dash
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research at the Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research at the Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Allana T Forde
- Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pichardo MS, Ferrucci LM, Molina Y, Esserman DA, Irwin ML. Structural Racism, Lifestyle Behaviors, and Obesity-related Cancers among Black and Hispanic/Latino Adults in the United States: A Narrative Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1498-1507. [PMID: 37650844 PMCID: PMC10872641 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-1147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
One in three adults in the United States has obesity; a chronic disease that is implicated in the etiology of at least 14 cancers. Cancer is the leading cause of death among U.S. Hispanic/Latino adults and the second most common cause of death, after cardiovascular disease, for Black adults. Our country's legacy in overt discrimination (e.g., slavery, segregation) generated inequities across all spheres in which people function as defined by the socioecological model-biological, individual, community, structural-and two of the many areas in which it manifests today are the disproportionate burden of obesity and obesity-related cancers in populations of color. Inequities due to environmental, social, and economic factors may predispose individuals to poor lifestyle behaviors by hindering an individual's opportunity to make healthy lifestyles choices. In this review, we examined the evidence on obesity and the lifestyle guidelines for cancer prevention in relation to cancer risk and outcomes for Black and Hispanic/Latino adults. We also discussed the role of structural and societal inequities on the ability of these two communities to adopt and maintain healthful lifestyle behaviors in accordance with the lifestyle guidelines for cancer prevention and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret S. Pichardo
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06520
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Leah M. Ferrucci
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06520
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Yamile Molina
- School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago and Cancer Center University of Illinois Chicago, 60607
| | - Denise A. Esserman
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Melinda L. Irwin
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06520
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT 06520
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Semprini J, Ali AK, Benavidez GA. Medicaid Expansion Lowered Uninsurance Rates Among Nonelderly Adults In The Most Heavily Redlined Areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:1439-1447. [PMID: 37782871 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Medicaid expansion narrowed racial and ethnic disparities in health coverage, but few studies have explored differential impact by exposure to structural racism. We analyzed data on historical residential redlining in US metropolitan areas from the Mapping Inequality project, along with data on uninsurance from the American Community Survey, to test whether Medicaid expansion differentially reduced uninsurance rates among nonelderly adults exposed to historical redlining. Our difference-in-differences analysis compared uninsurance rates in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states both before (2009-13) and after (2015-19) the state option to expand Medicaid pursuant to the Affordable Care Act took effect in 2014. We found that Medicaid expansion had the greatest impact on lowering uninsurance rates in census tracts with the highest level of redlining. Within each redline category, there were no significant differences by race and ethnicity. Our results highlight the importance of considering contextual factors, such as structural racism, when evaluating health policies. States that opt not to expand Medicaid delay progress toward health equity in historically redlined communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gabriel A Benavidez
- Gabriel A. Benavidez, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gomez SL, Chirikova E, McGuire V, Collin LJ, Dempsey L, Inamdar PP, Lawson-Michod K, Peters ES, Kushi LH, Kavecansky J, Shariff-Marco S, Peres LC, Terry P, Bandera EV, Schildkraut JM, Doherty JA, Lawson A. Role of neighborhood context in ovarian cancer survival disparities: current research and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:366-376.e8. [PMID: 37116824 PMCID: PMC10538437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among US women with survival disparities seen across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, even after accounting for histology, stage, treatment, and other clinical factors. Neighborhood context can play an important role in ovarian cancer survival, and, to the extent to which minority racial and ethnic groups and populations of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be segregated into neighborhoods with lower quality social, built, and physical environment, these contextual factors may be a critical component of ovarian cancer survival disparities. Understanding factors associated with ovarian cancer outcome disparities will allow clinicians to identify patients at risk for worse outcomes and point to measures, such as social support programs or transportation aid, that can help to ameliorate such disparities. However, research on the impact of neighborhood contextual factors in ovarian cancer survival and in disparities in ovarian cancer survival is limited. This commentary focuses on the following neighborhood contextual domains: structural and institutional context, social context, physical context represented by environmental exposures, built environment, rurality, and healthcare access. The research conducted to date is presented and clinical implications and recommendations for future interventions and studies to address disparities in ovarian cancer outcomes are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett L Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Ekaterina Chirikova
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lindsay J Collin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lauren Dempsey
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Pushkar P Inamdar
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Katherine Lawson-Michod
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Edward S Peters
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE
| | - Lawrence H Kushi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Juraj Kavecansky
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Antioch, CA
| | - Salma Shariff-Marco
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Paul Terry
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Andrew Lawson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Usher Institute, School of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moazzam Z, Woldesenbet S, Endo Y, Alaimo L, Lima HA, Cloyd J, Dillhoff M, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Association of Historical Redlining and Present-Day Social Vulnerability with Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:454-464. [PMID: 37318132 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Healthy People 2030 initiative has set national cancer screening targets at 77.1%, 74.4%, and 84.3% for breast, colon, and cervical cancers, respectively. We sought to assess the association between historical redlining relative and present-day social vulnerability on screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN Data on national census-tract level cancer screening prevalence and social vulnerability index in 2020 was extracted from the CDC PLACES and CDC social vulnerability index databases, respectively. Census tracts were then assigned Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades (A: "Best", B: "Still Desirable", C: "Definitely Declining," and D: "Hazardous/Redlined"). Mixed-effects logistic regression and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades and achievement of cancer screening targets. RESULT Among 11,831 census tracts, 3,712 were classified as redlined (A: n = 842, 7.1% vs B: n = 2,314, 19.6% vs C: n = 4,963, 42.0% vs D: n = 3,712, 31.4%). Notably, 62.8% (n = 7,427), 21.2% (n = 2,511), and 27.3% (n = 3,235) of tracts met screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer, respectively. After adjusting for present-day social vulnerability index and access to care metrics (population to primary care physician ratio and distance to nearest healthcare facility), redlined tracts were markedly less likely to meet breast (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91), colon (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.41), and cervical (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.27) cancer screening targets compared with the "Best" tracts. Notably, poverty, lack of education, and limited English proficiency, among others, mediated the adverse effect of historical redlining on cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS Redlining as a surrogate for structural racism continues to adversely impact cancer screening. Policies that aim to make access to preventive cancer care more equitable for historically marginalized communities should be a public priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorays Moazzam
- From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Labban M, Chen CR, Frego N, Nguyen DD, Lipsitz SR, Reich AJ, Rebbeck TR, Choueiri TK, Kibel AS, Iyer HS, Trinh QD. Disparities in Travel-Related Barriers to Accessing Health Care From the 2017 National Household Travel Survey. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2325291. [PMID: 37498602 PMCID: PMC10375305 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Geographic access, including mode of transportation, to health care facilities remains understudied. Objective To identify sociodemographic factors associated with public vs private transportation use to access health care and identify the respondent, trip, and community factors associated with longer distance and time traveled for health care visits. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, including 16 760 trips or a nationally weighted estimate of 5 550 527 364 trips to seek care in the United States. Households that completed the recruitment and retrieval survey for all members aged 5 years and older were included. Data were analyzed between June and August 2022. Exposures Mode of transportation (private vs public transportation) used to seek care. Main Outcomes and Measures Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with public vs private transportation and self-reported distance and travel time. Then, for each income category, an interaction term of race and ethnicity with type of transportation was used to estimate the specific increase in travel burden associated with using public transportation compared a private vehicle for each race category. Results The sample included 12 092 households and 15 063 respondents (8500 respondents [56.4%] aged 51-75 years; 8930 [59.3%] females) who had trips for medical care, of whom 1028 respondents (6.9%) were Hispanic, 1164 respondents (7.8%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 11 957 respondents (79.7%) were non-Hispanic White. Factors associated with public transportation use included non-Hispanic Black race (compared with non-Hispanic White: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.54 [95% CI, 1.90-6.61]; P < .001) and household income less than $25 000 (compared with ≥$100 000: aOR, 7.16 [95% CI, 3.50-14.68]; P < .001). The additional travel time associated with use of public transportation compared with private vehicle use varied by race and household income, with non-Hispanic Black respondents with income of $25 000 to $49 999 experiencing higher burden associated with public transportation (mean difference, 81.9 [95% CI, 48.5-115.3] minutes) than non-Hispanic White respondents with similar income (mean difference, 25.5 [95% CI, 17.5-33.5] minutes; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that certain racial, ethnic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations rely on public transportation to seek health care and that reducing delays associated with public transportation could improve care for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Nicola Frego
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology and Zhu Family Center for Global Cancer Prevention, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hari S Iyer
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Young KL, Olshan AF, Lunetta K, Graff M, Williams LA, Yao S, Zirpoli GR, Troester M, Palmer JR. Influence of alcohol consumption and alcohol metabolism variants on breast cancer risk among Black women: results from the AMBER consortium. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:66. [PMID: 37308906 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01660-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moderate to heavy alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The etiologic role of genetic variation in genes involved in ethanol metabolism has not been established, with little information available among women of African ancestry. METHODS Our analysis from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium included 2889 U.S. Black women who were current drinkers at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (N cases = 715) and had available genetic data for four ethanol metabolism genomic regions (ADH, ALDH, CYP2E1, and ALDH2). We used generalized estimating equations to calculate genetic effects, gene* alcohol consumption (≥ 7drinks/week vs. < 7/week) interactions, and joint main plus interaction effects of up to 23,247 variants in ethanol metabolism genomic regions on odds of breast cancer. RESULTS Among current drinkers, 21% of cases and 14% of controls reported consuming ≥ 7 drinks per week. We identified statistically significant genetic effects for rs79865122-C in CYP2E1 with odds of ER- breast cancer and odds of triple negative breast cancer, as well as a significant joint effect with odds of ER- breast cancer (≥ 7drinks per week OR = 3.92, < 7 drinks per week OR = 0.24, pjoint = 3.74 × 10-6). In addition, there was a statistically significant interaction of rs3858704-A in ALDH2 with consumption of ≥ 7 drinks/week on odds of triple negative breast cancer (≥ 7drinks per week OR = 4.41, < 7 drinks per week OR = 0.57, pint = 8.97 × 10-5). CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of information on the impact of genetic variation in alcohol metabolism genes on odds of breast cancer among Black women. Our analysis of variants in four genomic regions harboring ethanol metabolism genes in a large consortium of U.S. Black women identified significant associations between rs79865122-C in CYP2E1 and odds of ER- and triple negative breast cancer. Replication of these findings is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin L Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Kathryn Lunetta
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Mariaelisa Graff
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Lindsay A Williams
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Gary R Zirpoli
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Melissa Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegel SD, Brooks MM, Berman JD, Lynch SM, Sims-Mourtada J, Schug ZT, Curriero FC. Neighborhood factors and triple negative breast cancer: The role of cumulative exposure to area-level risk factors. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 36916687 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite similar incidence rates among Black and White women, breast cancer mortality rates are 40% higher among Black women. More than half of the racial difference in breast cancer mortality can be attributed to triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype of invasive breast cancer that disproportionately affects Black women. Recent research has implicated neighborhood conditions in the etiology of TNBC. This study investigated the relationship between cumulative neighborhood-level exposures and TNBC risk. METHODS This single-institution retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 3316 breast cancer cases from New Castle County, Delaware (from 2012 to 2020), an area of the country with elevated TNBC rates. Cases were stratified into TNBC and "Non-TNBC" diagnosis and geocoded by residential address. Neighborhood exposures included census tract-level measures of unhealthy alcohol use, metabolic dysfunction, breastfeeding, and environmental hazards. An overall cumulative risk score was calculated based on tract-level exposures. RESULTS Univariate analyses showed each tract-level exposure was associated with greater TNBC odds. In multivariate analyses that controlled for patient-level race and age, tract-level exposures were not associated with TNBC odds. However, in a second multivariate model that included patient-level variables and considered tract-level risk factors as a cumulative exposure risk score, each one unit increase in cumulative exposure was significantly associated with a 10% increase in TNBC odds. Higher cumulative exposure risk scores were found in census tracts with relatively high proportions of Black residents. CONCLUSIONS Cumulative exposure to neighborhood-level risk factors that disproportionately affect Black communities was associated with greater TNBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Siegel
- Institute for Research on Equity & Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA.,Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Madeline M Brooks
- Institute for Research on Equity & Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Jesse D Berman
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shannon M Lynch
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Sims-Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Zachary T Schug
- The Wistar Institute Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Frank C Curriero
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, John Hopkins Spatial Science for Public Health Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lord BD, Harris AR, Ambs S. The impact of social and environmental factors on cancer biology in Black Americans. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:191-203. [PMID: 36562901 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01664-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with early onset of chronic diseases and reduced life expectancy. The involvement of neighborhood-level factors in defining cancer risk and outcomes for marginalized communities has been an active area of research for decades. Yet, the biological processes that underlie the impact of SES on chronic health conditions, such as cancer, remain poorly understood. To date, limited studies have shown that chronic life stress is more prevalent in low SES communities and can affect important molecular processes implicated in tumor biology such as DNA methylation, inflammation, and immune response. Further efforts to elucidate how neighborhood-level factors function physiologically to worsen cancer outcomes for disadvantaged communities are underway. This review provides an overview of the current literature on how socioenvironmental factors within neighborhoods contribute to more aggressive tumor biology, specifically in Black U.S. women and men, including the impact of environmental pollutants, neighborhood deprivation, social isolation, structural racism, and discrimination. We also summarize commonly used methods to measure deprivation, discrimination, and structural racism at the neighborhood-level in cancer health disparities research. Finally, we offer recommendations to adopt a multi-faceted intersectional approach to reduce cancer health disparities and develop effective interventions to promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany D Lord
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bldg. 37/Room 3050, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4258, USA.
| | - Alexandra R Harris
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bldg. 37/Room 3050, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4258, USA
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bldg. 37/Room 3050, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4258, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taber P, Armin JS, Orozco G, Del Fiol G, Erdrich J, Kawamoto K, Israni ST. Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:387-424. [PMID: 36811808 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE FOR REVIEW This perspective piece has two goals: first, to describe issues related to artificial intelligence-based applications for cancer control as they may impact health inequities or disparities; and second, to report on a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of artificial intelligence-based tools for cancer control to ascertain the extent to which discussions of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, or health disparities manifest in syntheses of the field's best evidence. RECENT FINDINGS We found that, while a significant proportion of existing syntheses of research on AI-based tools in cancer control use formal bias assessment tools, the fairness or equitability of models is not yet systematically analyzable across studies. Issues related to real-world use of AI-based tools for cancer control, such as workflow considerations, measures of usability and acceptance, or tool architecture, are more visible in the literature, but still addressed only in a minority of reviews. Artificial intelligence is poised to bring significant benefits to a wide range of applications in cancer control, but more thorough and standardized evaluations and reporting of model fairness are required to build the evidence base for AI-based tool design for cancer and to ensure that these emerging technologies promote equitable healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Taber
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Julie S Armin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Jennifer Erdrich
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hassan A, Yates L, Hing AK, Hirz AE, Hardeman R. Dobbs and disability: Implications of abortion restrictions for people with chronic health conditions. Health Serv Res 2023; 58:197-201. [PMID: 36424122 PMCID: PMC9836943 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Hassan
- Center for Antiracism Research for Health EquityUniversity of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Lindsey Yates
- Center of Excellence, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Anna K. Hing
- Center for Antiracism Research for Health EquityUniversity of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Alanna E. Hirz
- Fielding School of Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rachel Hardeman
- Center for Antiracism Research for Health EquityUniversity of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|