Asian American Women's Experiences of Discrimination and Health Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated racism experienced by Asian Americans, especially women and older individuals. Little is known about how discriminatory experiences during the pandemic have influenced health behaviors among Asian Americans. Between 10/2021 and 6/2022, we surveyed 193 Asian American women in the San Francisco area. Participants were asked to report types of discrimination they experienced since March 2020. We explored bivariable associations of discrimination and changes in health behaviors and healthcare utilization. Most women were Chinese American (75%) and over 45-years-old (87%). The top three discriminatory experiences reported were being treated with less respect (60%), being treated unfairly at restaurants/stores (49%), and people acting as if they are better (47%). Chinese American women (vs. non-Chinese Asian American women) reported higher frequencies of being threatened/harassed (40% vs. 22%). Women who reported any discriminatory experience (vs. none) were more likely to report less physical exercise (42.7% vs. 26.3%) and canceling/rescheduling medical appointments (65.0% vs. 45.1%). Our findings begin to elucidate Asian American women's experiences of discrimination since the pandemic and provide evidence of the harmful impacts of anti-Asian racism on health behaviors.

Association between Airport Ultrafine Particles and Lung Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) are unregulated air pollutants abundant in aviation exhaust. Emerging evidence suggests that UFPs may impact lung health due to their high surface area-to-mass ratio and deep penetration into airways. This study aimed to assess long-term exposure to airport-related UFPs and lung cancer incidence in a multiethnic population in Los Angeles County.

METHODS

Within the California Multiethnic Cohort, we examined the association between long-term exposure to airport-related UFPs and lung cancer incidence. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the effect of UFP exposure on lung cancer incidence. Subgroup analyses by demographics, histology and smoking status were conducted.

RESULTS

Airport-related UFP exposure was not associated with lung cancer risk [per one IGR HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.97-1.05] overall and across race/ethnicity. A suggestive positive association was observed between a one IQR increase in UFP exposure and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) risk [HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.17] with a Phet for histology=0.05. Positive associations were observed in 5-year lag analysis for SCC [HR = 1.12, CI: 1.02-1.22] and large cell carcinoma risk [HR = 1.23, CI: 1.01-1.49] with a [Phet for histology = 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

This large prospective cohort analysis suggests a potential association between airport-related UFP exposure and specific lung histologies. The findings align with research indicating that UFPs found in aviation exhaust may induce inflammatory and oxidative injury leading to SCC.

IMPACT

These results highlight the potential role of airport-related UFP exposure in the development of lung SCC.

The Association of Alcohol Outlet Density with Alcohol Intake: The Multiethnic Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Neighborhood characteristics have been shown to influence lifestyle behaviors. Here we characterized alcohol outlet density in Los Angeles County, California, and Hawaii and assessed the association of alcohol outlet density with self-reported alcohol intake in the Multiethnic Cohort.

METHOD

Participants (n=178,977) had their addresses geocoded, at cohort entry (1993-1996), and appended to block group-level alcohol outlet densities (on- and off-premises). Multinomial logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-reported alcohol intake and on- and off-premise alcohol outlet densities by each state. Stratified analysis was conducted by sex, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Overall, we did not find associations between alcohol outlet density and self-reported alcohol intake in Los Angeles County, but we found that on-premise alcohol outlets were associated with 59% (OR=1.59, 95% CI:1.29,1.96) increased odds of consuming >2 drinks per day in Hawaii. Women living in neighborhoods with high density of on-premise alcohol outlets (Los Angeles County OR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.95,1.40) and (Hawaii OR=2.07, 95% CI: 1.43,3.01) had an increased odds of >2 drinks per day.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that neighborhood factors are associated with individual level behaviors and that there may be a need for multilevel interventions.

Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for a Pilot Study to Sample Cancer Survivors for NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-SEER 2021

The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) is a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults in which 12-17% of respondents report a cancer history. To increase representation from adult cancer survivors, in 2021, NCI sampled survivors from three Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program cancer registries: Iowa, New Mexico, and the Greater Bay Area. Sampling frames were stratified by time since diagnosis and race/ethnicity, with nonmalignant tumors and non-melanoma skin cancers excluded. Participants completed a self-administered postal questionnaire. The overall response rate for HINTS-SEER (N = 1,234) was 12.6%; a non-response bias analysis indicated few demographic differences between respondents and the pool of sampled patients in each registry. Most of the sample was 10+ years since diagnosis (n = 722; 60.2%); 392 respondents were 5 to < 10 years since diagnosis (29.6%); and 120 were < 5 years since diagnosis (10.2%). Common cancers included male reproductive (n = 304; 24.6%), female breast (n = 284; 23.0%), melanoma (n = 119; 9.6%), and gastrointestinal (n = 106; 8.6%). Tumors were mostly localized (67.8%; n = 833), with 22.4% (n = 282) regional, 6.2% (n = 72) distant, and 3.7% (n = 47) unknown. HINTS-SEER data are available by request and may be used for secondary analyses to examine a range of social, behavioral, and healthcare outcomes among cancer survivors.

Increasing risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with successive generations in the United States among Mexican American adults: The Multiethnic Cohort

BACKGROUND

US-born Latinos have a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than foreign-born Latinos. Acculturation to unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and an immigrant self-selection effect may play a role. In this study, the authors examined the influence of generational status on HCC risk among Mexican American adults.

METHODS

The analytic cohort included 31,377 self-reported Mexican Americans from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). Generational status was categorized as: first-generation (Mexico-born; n = 13,382), second-generation (US-born with one or two parents born in Mexico; n = 13,081), or third-generation (US-born with both parents born in the United States; n = 4914). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to examine the association between generational status and HCC incidence.

RESULTS

In total, 213 incident HCC cases were identified during an average follow-up of 19.5 years. After adjusting for lifestyle and neighborhood-level risk factors, second-generation and third-generation Mexican Americans had a 37% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.92) and 66% (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.11-2.49) increased risk of HCC, respectively, compared with first-generation Mexican Americans (p for trend = 0.012). The increased risk associated with generational status was mainly observed in males (second-generation vs. first-generation: HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.05-2.44]; third-generation vs. first-generation: HR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.29-3.37]).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing generational status of Mexican Americans is associated with a higher risk of HCC. Further studies are needed to identify factors that contribute to this increased risk.

Patient and physician perspectives on treatments for low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are confronted with a difficult decision regarding whether to undergo definitive treatment or to pursue an active surveillance protocol. This is potentially further complicated by the possibility that patients and physicians may place different value on factors that influence this decision. We conducted a qualitative investigation to better understand patient and physician perceptions of factors influencing treatment decisions for low-risk PCa.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 43 racially and ethnically diverse patients diagnosed with low-risk PCa, who were identified through a population-based cancer registry, and 15 physicians who were selected to represent a variety of practice settings in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area.

RESULTS

Patients and physicians both described several key individual (e.g., clinical) and interpersonal (e.g., healthcare communications) factors as important for treatment decision-making. Overall, physicians' perceptions largely mirrored patients' perceptions. First, we observed differences in treatment preferences by age and stage of life. At older ages, there was a preference for less invasive options. However, at younger ages, we found varying opinions among both patients and physicians. Second, patients and physicians both described concerns about side effects including physical functioning and non-physical considerations. Third, we observed differences in expectations and the level of difficulty for clinical conversations based on information needs and resources between patients and physicians. Finally, we discovered that patients and physicians perceived patients' prior knowledge and the support of family/friends as facilitators of clinical conversations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the gap between patient and physician perceptions on the influence of clinical and communication factors on treatment decision-making is not large. The consensus we observed points to the importance of developing relevant clinical communication roadmaps as well as high quality and accessible patient education materials.

Asian American Enclaves and Healthcare Accessibility: An Ecologic Study Across Five States

INTRODUCTION

Access to primary care has been a long-standing priority for improving population health. Asian Americans, who often settle in ethnic enclaves, have been found to underutilize health care. Understanding geographic primary care accessibility within Asian American enclaves can help to ensure the long-term health of this fast-growing population.

METHODS

U.S. Census data from five states (California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas) were used to develop and describe census-tract level measures of Asian American enclaves and social and built environment characteristics for years 2000 and 2010. The 2-step floating catchment area method was applied to National Provider Identifier data to develop a tract-level measure of geographic primary care accessibility. Analyses were conducted in 2022-2023, and associations between enclaves (versus nonenclaves) and geographic primary care accessibility were evaluated using multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, adjusting for potential area-level confounders.

RESULTS

Of 24,482 census tracts, 26.1% were classified as Asian American enclaves. Asian American enclaves were more likely to be metropolitan and have less poverty, lower crime, and lower proportions of uninsured individuals than nonenclaves. Asian American enclaves had higher primary care accessibility than nonenclaves (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.23, 95% CI=1.17, 1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Asian American enclaves in five of the most diverse and populous states in the U.S. had fewer markers of disadvantage and greater geographic primary care accessibility. This study contributes to the growing body of research elucidating the constellation of social and built environment features within Asian American enclaves and provides evidence of health-promoting characteristics of these neighborhoods.

Spatial clusters of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli causing community-onset bacteriuria due to repeat infections: cluster analysis from a large urban medical center, San Francisco, 2014-2020

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. coli) may occur as outbreaks due to common-source exposures. Yet, it is currently unknown if they cluster geographically as would be expected as part of an outbreak.

METHODS

We collected electronic health record data on all patients living in San Francisco with culture-documented community-onset E. coli bacteriuria in a safety-net public healthcare system from January 2014 to March 2020 (diagnosed < 48 h after hospital admission or in outpatient clinical settings without a hospitalization in the past 90 days). We assessed the presence of spatial clusters of (1) ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes, and (2) individuals with any ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episode, with Global and Local Moran's I. We evaluated differences in prevalence of bacteriuria recurrence by ESBL-production by Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Out of 4,304 unique individuals, we identified spatial clusters of ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes (n = 461) compared to non-ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes (n = 5477; Global Moran's p < 0.001). Spatial clusters of individuals with any bacteriuria caused by ESBL-E. coli were not identified (p = 0.43). Bacteriuria recurrence was more likely to occur with ESBL-E. coli (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.10, 3.66, p < 0.001), particularly after an initial ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episode (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.82, 2.83, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found spatial clusters of ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes. However, this was partly explained by clustering within individuals more than between individuals, as having an ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria was associated with recurrence with ESBL-E. coli. These findings may help better tailor clinical treatment of patients with recurrent urinary tract infections after an initial episode caused by ESBL-E. coli.

Dignified Resources and Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Study of Racially and Economically Marginalized Communities

INTRODUCTION

Amid the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), racially and economically marginalized communities experienced a disproportionate burden of disease and social consequences (e.g., unemployment, increased exposure). This study seeks to understand strategies that these communities employed to cope with unequal burdens of the pandemic.

METHODS

We utilized qualitative data collected between 2020 and 2021 from a mobile mapping platform designed to facilitate real-time, geocoded data collection on individual's experiences and perceptions of their neighborhoods. Reports were iteratively coded by an academic researcher and community partner. We employed an inductive approach to analysis, which allowed findings to emerge organically without constraint of researcher hypotheses.

RESULTS

A total of 19 respondents (14 under the age of 45, 16 non-White, 15 with less than half a year of emergency savings) provided 236 qualitative reports. Participants described innovative strategies for exchanging resources as a means of informally networking and building community, the importance of tailored programming (e.g., for specific racial/ethnic groups) in fostering belonging and comfort, and the importance of two specific dimensions of services-interactions with service providers and the quality of goods or services-in providing dignified care.

DISCUSSION

Amidst exacerbated racial and economic disparities emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic, our study highlights the need for investment in mutual aid, the importance of tailored services and support, and promoting dignity in social services. As other macro-level social stressors become more prevalent as the pandemic continues, these findings can inform how we examine and address them.

Role of neighborhood context in ovarian cancer survival disparities: current research and future directions

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among US women with survival disparities seen across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, even after accounting for histology, stage, treatment, and other clinical factors. Neighborhood context can play an important role in ovarian cancer survival, and, to the extent to which minority racial and ethnic groups and populations of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be segregated into neighborhoods with lower quality social, built, and physical environment, these contextual factors may be a critical component of ovarian cancer survival disparities. Understanding factors associated with ovarian cancer outcome disparities will allow clinicians to identify patients at risk for worse outcomes and point to measures, such as social support programs or transportation aid, that can help to ameliorate such disparities. However, research on the impact of neighborhood contextual factors in ovarian cancer survival and in disparities in ovarian cancer survival is limited. This commentary focuses on the following neighborhood contextual domains: structural and institutional context, social context, physical context represented by environmental exposures, built environment, rurality, and healthcare access. The research conducted to date is presented and clinical implications and recommendations for future interventions and studies to address disparities in ovarian cancer outcomes are proposed.

Particulate matter, traffic-related air pollutants, and circulating C-reactive protein levels: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

Inhaled particles and gases can harm health by promoting chronic inflammation in the body. Few studies have investigated the relationship between outdoor air pollution and inflammation by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle risk factors. We examined associations of particulate matter (PM) and other markers of traffic-related air pollution with circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of systemic inflammation. CRP was measured from blood samples obtained in 1994-2016 from 7,860 California residents participating in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study. Exposure to PM (aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm [PM2.5], ≤10 μm [PM10], and between 2.5 and 10 μm [PM10-2.5]), nitrogen oxides (NOx, including nitrogen dioxide [NO2]), carbon monoxide (CO), ground-level ozone (O3), and benzene averaged over one or twelve months before blood draw were estimated based on participants' addresses. Percent change in geometric mean CRP levels and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per standard concentration increase of each pollutant were estimated using multivariable generalized linear regression. Among 4,305 females (55%) and 3,555 males (45%) (mean age 68.1 [SD 7.5] years at blood draw), CRP levels increased with 12-month exposure to PM10 (11.0%, 95% CI: 4.2%, 18.2% per 10 μg/m3), PM10-2.5 (12.4%, 95% CI: 1.4%, 24.5% per 10 μg/m3), NOx (10.4%, 95% CI: 2.2%, 19.2% per 50 ppb), and benzene (2.9%, 95% CI: 1.1%, 4.6% per 1 ppb). In subgroup analyses, these associations were observed in Latino participants, those who lived in low socioeconomic neighborhoods, overweight or obese participants, and never or former smokers. No consistent patterns were found for 1-month pollutant exposures. This investigation identified associations of primarily traffic-related air pollutants, including PM, NOx, and benzene, with CRP in a multiethnic population. The diversity of the MEC across demographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors allowed us to explore the generalizability of the effects of air pollution on inflammation across subgroups.

Neighborhood attributes and cardiovascular disease risk in breast cancer survivors: The Pathways Study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survivors are at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality compared with the general population. The impact of objective social and built neighborhood attributes on CVD risk in a cohort of female breast cancer survivors was examined.

METHODS

The 3975 participants came from the Pathways Study, a prospective cohort of women with invasive breast cancer from an integrated health care system in northern California. Women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 through 2013 were enrolled on average approximately 2 months after diagnosis. Their baseline addresses were geocoded and appended to neighborhood attributes for racial/ethnic composition, socioeconomic status (SES), population density, urbanization, crime, traffic density, street connectivity, parks, recreational facilities, and retail food environment. Incident CVD events included ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or stroke. Cox proportional hazards models estimated associations of neighborhood attributes with CVD risk, which accounted for clustering by block groups. Fully adjusted models included sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors.

RESULTS

During follow-up through December 31, 2018, 340 participants (8.6%) had CVD events. A neighborhood racial/ethnic composition measure, percent of Asian American/Pacific Islander residents (lowest quintile hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.03-3.33), and crime index (highest quartile HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03) were associated with the risk of CVD events independent of individual SES, hormone receptor status, treatment, cardiometabolic comorbidities, body mass index, and physical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

With the application of a socio-ecological framework, how residential environments shape health outcomes in women with breast cancer and affect CVD risk in this growing population can be understood.

Spatial clusters of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli causing community-onset bacteriuria due to repeat infections: cluster analysis from a large urban medical center, San Francisco, 2014-2020

Background

Urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. coli) may occur as outbreaks due to common-source exposures. Yet, it is currently unknown if they cluster geographically as would be expected as part of an outbreak.

Methods

We collected electronic health record data on all patients living in San Francisco with culture-documented community-onset E. coli bacteriuria in a safety-net public healthcare system from January 2014 to March 2020 (diagnosed < 48 hours after hospital admission or in outpatient clinical settings without a hospitalization in the past 90 days). We assessed the presence of spatial clusters of (1) ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes, and (2) individuals with any ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episode, with Global and Local Moran's I. We evaluated differences in prevalence of bacteriuria recurrence by ESBL-production by Poisson regression.

Results

Out of 4,304 unique individuals, we identified spatial clusters of ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes (n = 461) compared to non-ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes (n = 5477; Global Moran's p < 0.001). Spatial clusters of individuals with any bacteriuria caused by ESBL-E. coli were not identified (p = 0.43). Bacteriuria recurrence was more likely to occur with ESBL-E. coli (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.10, 3.66, p < 0.001), particularly after an initial ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episode (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.82, 2.83, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We found spatial clusters of ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria episodes. However, this was partly explained by clustering within individuals more than between individuals, as having an ESBL-E. coli bacteriuria was associated with recurrence with ESBL-E. coli.

Disparities in cancer incidence by rurality in California

BACKGROUND

Cancer rates in rural areas across the United States have different patterns than in urban areas. This study examines associations between rurality and incidence for the top 5 cancers in California and evaluates whether these associations vary jointly by sex, race, and ethnicity.

METHODS

We used 2015-2019 California Cancer Registry data to compare incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and trends for breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, and skin (melanoma) cancers. We leveraged census tract aggregation zones and 7 levels of percentage rural population (0%, >0% to <10%, 10% to <20%, 20% to <30%, 30% to <40%, 40% to <50%, and 50+%).

RESULTS

Zones with higher proportions of rural population were significantly associated with lower incidence of female breast cancer and prostate cancer, though the trends were not statistically significant overall. Zones with higher proportions of rural population were significantly associated with higher incidence of lung cancer and melanoma. There were no statistically significant trends for colorectal cancer overall. Comparing areas with 50% and over rural population with areas with 0% rural population, the IRR for lung cancer in Hispanic females was higher (IRR = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17 to 1.74) than in Hispanic males (IRR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.11). Also, in areas with 50% or more rural population, the IRR for melanoma was higher in Hispanic females (IRR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.45) than non-Hispanic White females (IRR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that rurality is associated with cancer incidence and underscore the importance of jointly examining rural disparities with sex, race, and ethnicity by cancer site.

Abstract 1931: Racialized economic segregation and late-stage colorectal cancer in the United States, 2009-2017

We examined the association between racialized economic segregation and late-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) in the US. All CRC cases diagnosed during 2009-2017 were identified using the United States Cancer Statistics database. Late-stage CRC was determined according to the presence of distant involvement (node or site) of the tumor at diagnosis. Racialized economic segregation was measured at the county level by the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) using the 2013-2017 American Community Survey estimates. ICE was calculated to show the extent to which individuals’ residence at diagnosis was located in counties of concentrated advantage or disadvantage. Four ICE metrics were considered, consisting of the difference between the number of households with White individuals reporting incomes in the top quintile of the US distribution, and the number of households with non-White (all people of color (POC), Black, Latino, or Asian American/Pacific Islander) individuals reporting incomes in the lowest quintile, divided by the total of households in the county. ICE metrics were further divided into quintiles based on the distribution of all counties in the US, with Q1 denoting least advantaged counties and Q5 the most advantaged counties. Multilevel logistic regression models accounting for clustering at counties were fit. Models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity, census region and year of diagnosis. A total of 1,356,053 cases were included in the analysis; mean age at diagnosis was 67 years, 52% were men, and 20% of cases had a late-stage diagnosis. In adjusted analysis for ICE-POC, people residing in less advantaged counties had higher odds of late-stage diagnosis than people residing in the most advantaged counties (OR [95% CI], Q1: 1.08 [1.05-1.11], Q2: 1.06 [1.04-1.09], Q3: 1.04 [1.02-1.07], Q4: 1.03 [1.01-1.05], Q5: reference). Similar results were observed on all four ICE metrics. Racialized economic segregation was associated with higher odds of late-stage CRC. These findings underscore the role of institutionalized racism as a driver of health inequities, with laws and policies that led to residential segregation also impacting the conditions for timely preventive care.

Citation Format: Eduardo J. Santiago-Rodriguez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Zinzi D. Bailey, Justin S. White, Isabel E. Allen, Robert A. Hiatt. Racialized economic segregation and late-stage colorectal cancer in the United States, 2009-2017 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1931.

Factors that influence treatment decisions: A qualitative study of racially and ethnically diverse patients with low- and very-low risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Factors that influence prostate cancer treatment decisions are complex, multifaceted, and personal, and may vary by race/ethnicity. Although research has been published to quantify factors involved in decision-making, these studies have been limited to primarily white, and to a lesser extent, Black patients, and quantitative studies are limited for discerning the cultural and contextual processes that shape decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with a racially and ethnically diverse sample of patients diagnosed with low- and very-low risk prostate cancer who had undergone treatment for their prostate cancer. Interviews were transcribed, independently coded, and analyzed to identify themes salient for decision-making, with attention to sociocultural differences.

RESULTS

We found racial and ethnic differences in three areas. First, we found differences in how socialized masculinity influenced patient's feelings about different treatment options. Second, we found that for some men, religion and spirituality alleviated anxiety associated with the active surveillance protocol. Finally, for racially and ethnically minoritized patients, we found descriptions of how historic and social experiences within the healthcare system influenced decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study adds to the current literature by expounding on racial and ethnic differences in the multidimensional, nuanced factors related to decision-making. Our findings suggest that factors associated with prostate cancer decision-making can manifest differently across racial and ethnic groups, and provide some guidance for future research.

Neighborhood Racial and Economic Privilege and Timing of Pubertal Onset in Girls

PURPOSE

Early puberty is associated with adverse health outcomes over the life course, and Black and Hispanic girls experience puberty earlier than girls of other racial/ethnic backgrounds. Neighborhood racial and economic privilege may contribute to these disparities by conferring differential exposure to mechanisms (e.g., stress, obesity, endocrine disruptors) underlying early puberty. We examined associations between neighborhood privilege, measured by the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), and age at pubic hair onset (pubarche) and breast development onset (thelarche) in a large multiethnic cohort.

METHODS

A cohort of 46,299 girls born 2005-2011 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical facilities were followed until 2021. Pubertal development was assessed routinely by pediatricians using the Sexual Maturity Rating scale. ICE quintiles for race/ethnicity, income, and income + race/ethnicity were calculated using American Community Survey 2010 5-year estimates and linked to census tract at birth. We fit multilevel Weibull regression models accommodating left, right, and interval censoring for all analyses.

RESULTS

ICE measures were monotonically associated with pubertal onset, with the strongest associations observed for ICE-race/ethnicity. Adjusting for maternal education, age at delivery, and parity, girls from the least versus most privileged ICE-race/ethnicity quintiles were at increased risk for earlier pubarche (hazard ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.38) and thelarche (hazard ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.36, 1.54). These associations remained significant after adjusting for girls' race/ethnicity and childhood body mass index. Additionally, adjustment for ICE partially attenuated Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities in pubertal onset.

DISCUSSION

Neighborhood privilege may contribute to pubertal timing and related disparities.

Impact of Racial/Ethnic Discrimination on Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors

Although racial/ethnic disparities in health-care access, treatment, and cancer outcomes are well documented, the impact of racial/ethnic discrimination on cancer survivorship is unclear. We examined associations between quality of life (QoL) and self-reported discrimination among 3,991 women with breast cancer recruited during 2006-2013 from the Pathways Study in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated health-care system, using linear regression models. Overall, 31% of women reported experiencing racial/ethnic discrimination, with differences by race/ethnicity (82% among non-Hispanic Black women vs. 19% among non-Hispanic White women) and nativity (40% among foreign-born Hispanic women vs. 76% among US-born Asian-American women). Experiencing racial/ethnic discrimination was associated with lower QoL in fully adjusted models. The mean QoL score was 119.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 102.0, 137.1) for women who did not report discrimination, 115.5 (95% CI: 98.0, 133.0) for those who reported some discrimination/less than the median level, and 110.2 (95% CI: 92.7, 127.7) for those who reported more discrimination/greater than or equal to the median level. Discrimination was associated with lower QoL among women who used passive coping strategies or lived in neighborhoods with high neighborhood socioeconomic status, neighborhoods with high levels of segregation, or non-ethnic enclaves. Among breast cancer survivors, clinically meaningful differences in QoL scores were associated with racial/ethnic discrimination. Additional studies are needed to understand potential pathways through which these social factors affect survivorship outcomes.

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening by Time in the U.S. and Race/Ethnicity, 2010-2018

INTRODUCTION

Longer time lived in the U.S. has been associated with worse health outcomes, especially preventable diseases, among racially and ethnically diverse groups of foreign-born individuals. This study evaluated the association between time lived in the U.S. and colorectal cancer screening adherence and whether this relationship differed by race and ethnicity.

METHODS

Data from the National Health Interview Survey for 2010-2018 among adults aged 50-75 years were used. Time in the U.S. was categorized as U.S.-born, foreign-born ≥15 years, and foreign-born <15 years. Colorectal cancer screening adherence was defined according to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Generalized linear models with Poisson distribution were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CIs. Analyses were conducted in 2020-2022, were stratified by race and ethnicity, accounted for the complex sampling design, and were weighted to be representative of the U.S.

RESULTS

Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening adherence was 63% overall, 64% for U.S.-born, 55% for foreign-born ≥15 years, and 35% for foreign-born <15 years. In fully adjusted models for all individuals, only foreign-born <15 years had lower adherence than U.S.-born (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.97 [0.95, 1.00], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.79 [0.71, 0.88]). Results differed by race and ethnicity (p-interaction=0.002). In stratified analyses, findings for non-Hispanic White individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=1.00 [0.96, 1.04], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.76 [0.58, 0.98]) and non-Hispanic Black individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.94 [0.86, 1.02], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.61 [0.44, 0.85]) were similar to all individuals. Disparities by time in the U.S. were not observed among Hispanic/Latino individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.98 [0.92, 1.04], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.86 [0.74, 1.01]) but persisted among Asian American/Pacific Islander individuals (foreign-born ≥15 years: prevalence ratio=0.84 [0.77, 0.93], foreign-born <15 years: prevalence ratio=0.74 [0.60, 0.93]).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between colorectal cancer screening adherence and time in the U.S. varied by race and ethnicity. Culturally and ethnically tailored interventions are needed to improve colorectal cancer screening adherence among foreign-born people, especially among the most recently immigrated individuals.

Patient-reported supportive care needs among Asian American cancer patients

PURPOSE

Cancer is the leading cause of death for Asian Americans. However, few studies have documented supportive care needs from the perspective of Asian American cancer patients. This study describes the needs reported by Asian American patients with colorectal, liver, or lung cancer over a 6-month period during their treatment.

METHODS

Participants were recruited through the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry and from cancer care providers in San Francisco. Participants self-identified as Asian or Asian American; were age 21 or older; spoke English, Chinese, or Vietnamese; and had stage I-III colon, rectum, liver, or lung cancer. Participants were matched with a language concordant patient navigator who provided support during a 6-month period. Needs were assessed by surveys at baseline, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Among 24 participants, 58% were 65 years or older, 42% did not complete high school, and 75% had limited English proficiency (LEP). At baseline, the most prevalent needs were cancer information (79%), nutrition and physical activity (67%), language assistance (54%), and daily living (50%). At the 3- and 6-month follow-up surveys, there was a higher reported need for mental health resources and healthcare access among participants.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study of Asian American cancer patients who predominantly had LEP, participants reported many needs, with cancer information and language assistance as the most prominent. The findings highlight the importance of culturally and linguistically appropriate patient navigators in addressing supportive care needs among cancer patients with LEP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03867916.

Traffic-related Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Incidence: The California Multiethnic Cohort Study

Rationale: Although the contribution of air pollution to lung cancer risk is well characterized, few studies have been conducted in racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse populations. Objectives: To examine the association between traffic-related air pollution and risk of lung cancer in a racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse cohort. Methods: Among 97,288 California participants of the Multiethnic Cohort Study, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine associations between time-varying traffic-related air pollutants (gaseous and particulate matter pollutants and regional benzene) and lung cancer risk (n = 2,796 cases; average follow-up = 17 yr), adjusting for demographics, lifetime smoking, occupation, neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), and lifestyle factors. Subgroup analyses were conducted for race, ethnicity, nSES, and other factors. Measurements and Main Results: Among all participants, lung cancer risk was positively associated with nitrogen oxide (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15 per 50 ppb; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.33), nitrogen dioxide (HR, 1.12 per 20 ppb; 95% CI, 0.95-1.32), fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm (HR, 1.20 per 10 μg/m3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43), carbon monoxide (HR, 1.29 per 1,000 ppb; 95% CI, 0.99-1.67), and regional benzene (HR, 1.17 per 1 ppb; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34) exposures. These patterns of associations were driven by associations among African American and Latino American groups. There was no formal evidence for heterogeneity of effects by nSES (P heterogeneity > 0.21), although participants residing in low-SES neighborhoods had increased lung cancer risk associated with nitrogen oxides, and no association was observed among those in high-SES neighborhoods. Conclusions: These findings in a large multiethnic population reflect an association between lung cancer and the mixture of traffic-related air pollution and not a particular individual pollutant. They are consistent with the adverse effects of air pollution that have been described in less racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse populations. Our results also suggest an increased risk of lung cancer among those residing in low-SES neighborhoods.

Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes vary among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander individuals giving birth in California

OBJECTIVE

To compare frequencies of risk factors and pregnancy outcomes in ethnic groups versus the combined total of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) populations.

METHODS

Using linked birth and fetal death certificate and maternal hospital discharge data (California 2007-2018), we estimated frequencies of 15 clinical and sociodemographic exposures and 11 pregnancy outcomes. Variability across 15 AANHPI groups was compared using a heat map and compared to frequencies for the total group (n=904,232).

RESULTS

AANHPI groups varied significantly from each other and the combined total regarding indicators of social disadvantage (e.g., range for high school-level educational or less: 6.4% Korean-55.8% Samoan) and sociodemographic factors (e.g., maternal age <20 years: 0.2% Chinese-8.8% Guamanian) that are related to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Perinatal outcomes varied significantly (e.g., severe maternal morbidity: 1.2% Korean-1.9% Filipino). No single group consistently had risk factors or outcome prevalence at the extremes, i.e., no group was consistently better or worse off across examined factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variability in perinatal risk factors and outcomes exists across AANHPI groups. Aggregation into "AANHPI" is not appropriate for outcome reporting.

Abstract LB159: Neighborhood obesogenic environment and risk of prostate cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort

Background: Obesity is associated with risk of aggressive prostate cancer. It is not known whether neighborhood obesogenic factors are associated with prostate cancer risk.

Methods: Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and four neighborhood obesogenic environment factors (urbanicity, mixed-land development, unhealthy food environment, and parks) were assessed for associations with prostate cancer risk among 41,563 African American, European American, Japanese American, and Latino males in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC), California site. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for non-aggressive and aggressive prostate cancer, adjusting for individual-level sociodemographic, behavioral, and prostate cancer risk factors. Analyses were stratified by race, ethnicity, and, among Latino males, nativity.

Results: Males residing in low SES, compared to high SES, neighborhoods had lower risk of non-aggressive prostate cancer (lowest vs. highest quintile HR=0.81; 95% CI=0.68, 0.95, p-trend 0.024); driven by a similar trend among U.S.-born and foreign-born Latino males. Foreign-born Latino males in neighborhoods with low mixed-land development had increased risk (lowest vs. highest quintile HR=1.52; 95% CI=1.09, 2.12). African American males in neighborhoods with more unhealthy food environments had increased risk of aggressive disease (more vs. none, HR=1.35; 95% CI=1.02, 1.77).

Conclusions: Neighborhood SES and obesogenic factors were independently associated with prostate cancer risk; associations varied by race, ethnicity, nativity, and disease aggressiveness.

Impact: Upstream structural and social determinants of health that contribute to neighborhood obesogenic characteristics likely impact prostate cancer risk differently across groups defined by race, ethnicity, and nativity and by disease aggressiveness.

Citation Format: Mindy C. Hebert-DeRouen, Li Tao, Salma Shariff-Marco, Juan Yan, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Song-Yi Park, Cheryl L. Albright, Kristine Monroe, Loic Le Marchand, Lynne Wilkens, Scarlett L. Gomez, Iona Cheng. Neighborhood obesogenic environment and risk of prostate cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB159.

Neighborhood Obesogenic Environment and Risk of Prostate Cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with risk of aggressive prostate cancer. It is not known whether neighborhood obesogenic factors are independently associated with prostate cancer risk.

METHODS

Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and four neighborhood obesogenic environment factors (urbanicity, mixed-land development, unhealthy food environment, and parks) were assessed for associations with prostate cancer risk among 41,563 African American, Japanese American, Latino, and White males in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study, California site. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for nonaggressive and aggressive prostate cancer, adjusting for individual-level sociodemographic, behavioral, and prostate cancer risk factors. Analyses were stratified by race, ethnicity, and, among Latino males, nativity.

RESULTS

Males residing in low-SES, compared with high-SES, neighborhoods had lower risk of nonaggressive prostate cancer [lowest vs. highest quintile HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.95, Ptrend 0.024], driven by a similar trend among foreign-born Latino males. Foreign-born Latino males in neighborhoods with low mixed-land development had increased risk of non-aggressive disease (lowest vs. highest quintile HR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.07-2.09). For aggressive disease, the only association noted was between lower mixed-land development and lower risk among White males (Ptrend = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

nSES and obesogenic environment factors were independently associated with prostate cancer risk; associations varied by race, ethnicity, nativity, and disease aggressiveness.

IMPACT

Upstream structural and social determinants of health that contribute to neighborhood obesogenic characteristics likely impact prostate cancer risk differently across groups defined by race, ethnicity, and nativity and by disease aggressiveness.

Everyday discrimination and telomere length in a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer survivors

Objectives: Racial/ethnic minority women have disproportionately lower breast cancer survival rates compared to white women. As minorities in the US are exposed to higher levels of discrimination, and exposure to discrimination has been associated with shorter telomere lengths (TLs), we investigated the association between perceived everyday discrimination and TL in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer survivors.Design: We examined a cohort of 58 breast cancer survivors who participated in a pilot study to investigate biological stress. Participants were drawn from the Equality in Breast Cancer Care (EBCC) study and were asked to provide saliva samples for DNA extraction. Ordinary least squares linear regression was used to derive regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: Higher levels of everyday discrimination were associated with longer TLs (e^β = 1.04, CI: 1.01-1.07), adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, breast cancer stage, and breast cancer subtype. Luminal B subtypes were associated with longer telomeres relative to luminal A, while African Americans were less likely than Whites to have longer telomeres.Conclusions: Further research, particularly longitudinal studies, is needed to understand how discrimination, and other social stressors, impact biological stress and health outcomes.

Joint Associations of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With Mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort Study

IMPORTANCE

Socioeconomic status may help delineate racial and ethnic inequities in mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the joint associations of race, ethnicity, and neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status with mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective analysis used data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study. A population-based sample of participants recruited from California (mainly Los Angeles County) and Hawaii from 1993 to 1996 was followed up until 2013. African American, European American, Japanese American, Latino American, and Native Hawaiian men and women were included. Participants with baseline residential addresses that could not be geocoded or who were missing information on education or adjustment variables were excluded. Data analyses were conducted from January 2018 to December 2020.

EXPOSURES

Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) was derived using US Census block group data on education, occupation, unemployment, household income, poverty, rent, and house values. Participants self-reported their highest education attainment. Five racial and ethnic groups, 2 states of residence, 2 nSES, and 2 education categories were combined to create a joint exposure variable. Low and high nSES were defined as quintiles 1 to 3 and 4 to 5, respectively. Low and high education levels were defined as high school or less and greater than high school graduate, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and non-CVD and noncancer deaths were ascertained through 2013 via linkage to death certificates and the US National Death Index. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 182 912 participants (100 785 [55.1%] women and 82 127 [44.9%] men; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [8.9] years; 31 138 African American, 45 796 European American, 52 993 Japanese American, 39 844 Latino American, and 13 141 Native Hawaiian participants) with a mean (SD) follow-up of 17 (5) years, there were 63 799 total deaths, including 23 191 CVD deaths, 19 008 cancer deaths, and 21 235 non-CVD and noncancer deaths. The lowest all-cause mortality was found among 15 104 Japanese American participants in Hawaii with high nSES and high education (eg, 2870 all-cause deaths [19.0%]), and this population served as the reference group for all regression analyses. Native Hawaiian participants in Hawaii with low nSES and low education had the highest all-cause mortality HR (2.38; 95% CI, 2.21-2.57). African American and European American participants in California with low nSES and low education had the next highest all-cause mortality HRs (2.01; 95% CI, 1.91-2.11 and 1.98; 95% CI, 1.85-2.12, respectively). Latino American participants in California with low nSES had equivalent all-cause mortality HRs regardless of education level (high education: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.48-1.66; low education: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.50-1.65). Patterns for cause-specific mortality were similar to those for all-cause mortality. For example, Native Hawaiian participants in Hawaii with low nSES and low education had highest CVD mortality HR (2.92; 95% CI, 2.60-3.27) and cancer mortality HR (2.01; 95% CI, 1.77-2.29).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results suggest that joint associations of nSES and education may further delineate racial and ethnic inequities in mortality and that future investigations of racial and ethnic inequities in mortality should consider differences by measures of socioeconomic status, especially for underserved populations.

Determinants of Colorectal Cancer Screening among South Asian Americans

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer screening rates among South Asian Americans are among the lowest of US population groups. Few population-based studies have examined determinants of screening in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among South Asian Americans.

METHODS

Data from the 2001-2009 California Health Interview Survey and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine determinants of being non-adherent with colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Independent variables include sociodemographic and healthcare access measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 49% of 459 South Asian Americans were non-adherent to screening recommendations. Characteristics associated with non-adherence were the absence of flu shot, absence of doctor visits, sole use of non-English language at home and ≤40% life spent in the United States. In the multivariable model, screening non-adherence was associated with ≤40% life in the United States (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.0 [1.4-6.5]), use of non-English at home (2.8 [1.0-7.8]) and no flu shot (2.5 [1.3-4.8]). Obese (BMI > 27.5 kg/m2) versus normal-weight patients were less likely to be non-adherent (0.4 [0.2-0.9]).

CONCLUSIONS

Length of time in the United States and language spoken at home rather than English proficiency were associated with non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening, reflecting the importance of acculturation and retention of cultural values. Health conditions and behaviors reflecting more proactive healthcare utilization may reinforce the importance of provider recommendations and perceived efficacy of health prevention. Qualitative research would inform cultural tailoring necessary to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among the rapidly growing South Asian American population.

Neighborhood Contexts and Breast Cancer Among Asian American Women

BACKGROUND

This study examines how neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and ethnic composition are associated with breast cancer risk for Asian American women.

METHODS

We linked individual level data from a population-based case-control study of breast cancer among Asian American women with neighborhood level data in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area (cases: n = 118, controls: n = 390). Multivariable logistic regression models examined the association between nSES, ethnic composition, and odds of having breast cancer.

RESULTS

Asian American women living in neighborhoods with high nSES and high ethnic composition had the highest odds of breast cancer, compared to those living in neighborhoods with high nSES and low ethnic composition (OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.75]) or in neighborhoods with low nSES and high ethnic composition (OR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.17-0.83]).

DISCUSSION

Neighborhood socioeconomic and ethnic contexts are associated with breast cancer for Asian American women. We discuss explanations and avenues for future research.

Outdoor ambient air pollution and breast cancer survival among California participants of the Multiethnic Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Within the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC), we examined the association between air pollution and mortality among African American, European American, Japanese American, and Latina American women diagnosed with breast cancer.

METHODS

We used a land use regression (LUR) model and kriging interpolation to estimate nitrogen oxides (NOx , NO2) and particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposures for 3,089 breast cancer cases in the MEC, who were diagnosed from 1993 through 2013 and resided largely in Los Angeles County, California. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association of time-varying air pollutants with all-cause, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and non-breast cancer/non-CVD mortality, accounting for key covariates.

RESULTS

We identified 1,125 deaths from all causes (474 breast cancer, 272 CVD, 379 non-breast cancer/non-CVD deaths) among the 3,089 breast cancer cases with 8.1 years of average follow-up. LUR and kriged NOX (per 50 ppb) and NO2 (per 20 ppb), PM2.5 (per 10 µg/m3), and PM10 (per 10 µg/m3) were positively associated with risks of all-cause (Hazard Ratio (HR) range = 1.13-1.25), breast cancer (HR range = 1.19-1.45), and CVD mortality (HR range = 1.37-1.60). Associations were statistically significant for LUR NOX and CVD mortality (HR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.08-2.37) and kriged NO2 and breast cancer mortality (HR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.02-2.07). Gaseous and PM pollutants were positively associated with breast cancer mortality across racial/ethnic group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, air pollutants have a harmful impact on breast cancer survival. Additional studies should evaluate potential confounding by socioeconomic factors. These data support maintaining clean air laws to improve survival for women with breast cancer.

Home mortgage discrimination and incidence of triple-negative and Luminal A breast cancer among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White females in California, 2006-2015

Purpose

In the United States, Black females are burdened by more aggressive subtypes and increased mortality from breast cancer compared to non-Hispanic (NH) White females. Institutional racism may contribute to these inequities. We aimed to characterize the association between home mortgage discrimination, a novel measure of institutional racism, and incidence of Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes among NH Black and NH White females in California metropolitan areas.

Methods

We merged data from the California Cancer Registry on females aged 20 + diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 2006 and 2015 with a census tract-level index of home mortgage lending bias measuring the odds of mortgage loan denial for Black versus White applicants, generated from the 2007–2013 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database. Poisson regression estimated cross-sectional associations of census tract-level racial bias in mortgage lending with race/ethnicity- and Luminal A and TNBC-specific incidence rate ratios, adjusting for neighborhood confounders.

Results

We identified n = 102,853 cases of Luminal A and n = 15,528 cases of TNBC over the study period. Compared to NH Whites, NH Black females had higher rates of TNBC, lower rates of Luminal A breast cancer, and lived in census tracts with less racial bias in home mortgage lending. There was no evidence of association between neighborhood racial bias in mortgage lending at the time of diagnosis and either subtype among either racial/ethnic group.

Conclusion

Future research should incorporate residential history data with measures of institutional racism to improve estimation and inform policy interventions.

Asian American/Pacific Islander and Hispanic Ethnic Enclaves, Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence in California: An Update

BACKGROUND

Using more recent cancer registry data, we analyzed disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence by ethnic enclave and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) among Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) and Hispanic populations in California.

METHODS

Primary, invasive HCC cases were identified from the California Cancer Registry during 1988-1992, 1998-2002, and 2008-2012. Age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 population), incidence rate ratios, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for AAPI or Hispanic enclave, nSES, and the joint effects of ethnic enclave and nSES by time period (and the combination of the three periods), sex, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

In the combined time period, HCC risk increased 25% for highest versus lowest quintile of AAPI enclave among AAPI males. HCC risk increased 22% and 56% for lowest versus highest quintile of nSES among AAPI females and males, respectively. In joint analysis, AAPI males living in low nSES areas irrespective of enclave status were at 17% to 43% increased HCC risk compared with AAPI males living in areas of nonenclave/high nSES. HCC risk increased by 22% for Hispanic females living in areas of low nSES irrespective of enclave status and by 19% for Hispanic males living in areas of nonenclave/low nSES compared with their counterparts living in areas of nonenclave/high nSES.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant variation in HCC incidence by ethnic enclave and nSES among AAPI and Hispanic populations in California by sex and time period.

IMPACT

Future studies should explore how specific attributes of enclaves and nSES impact HCC risk for AAPI and Hispanic populations.

Contributions of Social Factors to Disparities in Prostate Cancer Risk Profiles among Black Men and Non-Hispanic White Men with Prostate Cancer in California

BACKGROUND

Black men are more likely than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) men to be diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer. We examined the extent to which social factors were associated with differences in prostate cancer risk profiles between Black men and NHW men [using a modification to the original D'Amico risk groups based on prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), and TNM stage (stage)], based on individual and combined clinicopathologic characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional population-based study of 23,555 Black men and 146,889 NHW men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the California Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2017. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of year of diagnosis, block group-level neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), marital status, and insurance type on differences in prostate cancer risk profiles between Black and NHW men.

RESULTS

High PSA (>20 ng/mL), GS, stage, individually and combined prostate cancer risk profiles were more common among Black men versus NHW men. In fully adjusted models, relative to NHW men, we observed a persistent 67% increased odds of high PSA among Black men. nSES was the factor most strongly associated with racial disparity in high PSA, accounting for 25% of the difference. Marital status was the factor that was second most associated with a racial disparity.

CONCLUSIONS

nSES was the factor most strongly associated with racial disparities in high PSA prostate cancer.

IMPACT

The influence of nSES on racial disparities in PSA, GS, stage, and prostate cancer risk profiles warrants further consideration.

Incidence of Lung Cancer Among Never-Smoking Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Females

BACKGROUND

Although lung cancer incidence rates according to smoking status, sex, and detailed race/ethnicity have not been available, it is estimated that more than half of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) females with lung cancer have never smoked.

METHODS

We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates for lung cancer according to smoking status and detailed race/ethnicity among females, focusing on AANHPI ethnic groups, and assessed relative incidence across racial/ethnic groups. We used a large-scale dataset that integrates data from electronic health records from 2 large health-care systems-Sutter Health in Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i-linked to state cancer registries for incident lung cancer diagnoses between 2000 and 2013. The study population included 1 222 694 females (n = 244 147 AANHPI), 3297 of which were diagnosed with lung cancer (n = 535 AANHPI).

RESULTS

Incidence of lung cancer among never-smoking AANHPI as an aggregate group was 17.1 per 100 000 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.9 to 19.4) but varied widely across ethnic groups. Never-smoking Chinese American females had the highest rate (22.8 per 100 000, 95% CI = 17.3 to 29.1). Except for Japanese American females, incidence among every never-smoking AANHPI female ethnic group was higher than that of never-smoking non-Hispanic White females, from 66% greater among Native Hawaiian females (incidence rate ratio = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.56) to more than 100% greater among Chinese American females (incidence rate ratio = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.67 to 3.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed high rates of lung cancer among most never-smoking AANHPI female ethnic groups. Our approach illustrates the use of innovative data integration to dispel the myth that AANHPI females are at overall reduced risk of lung cancer and demonstrates the need to disaggregate this highly diverse population.

Abstract PO-171: Local economic and racial/ethnic segregation and breast cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

Introduction: Residential segregation has been documented to contribute to health inequities. The Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) is a local measure of residential segregation that can capture economic, racial, and combined racialized economic residential segregation. ICE measures have only recently been examined in cancer studies, few of which have focused on breast cancer risk and none among Asian American or Pacific Islander (AAPI) groups. In the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC), we examined the associations of neighborhood ICE measures with breast cancer incidence among 101,811 female participants in five racial/ethnic groups (African American, Latino, Japanese American, Native Hawaiian, and White). Methods: ICE measures were developed based on 1990 U.S. census tract-level data, categorized in quintiles based on Los Angeles county and Hawai'i state-specific distributions, and assigned to the residential census tract of MEC female participants residing, at study baseline, in California (CA) (primarily Los Angeles, n=56,880), and Hawai'i (HI) (n=44,931). Separate ICE measures were created for household income, education, race/ethnicity, and combined household income and race/ethnicity. Women, aged 45-75 at enrollment, completed a comprehensive lifestyle questionnaire and were followed from baseline (1993-1996) to earliest date of invasive breast cancer diagnosis (n=6,398), death, or end-of-follow-up (12/31/2014). Invasive breast cancer incidence was modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for demographics, family history of breast cancer, reproductive and lifestyle factor factors. Stratified analyses were conducted by race/ethnicity and stage at diagnosis. Results: For women in CA MEC, there were significantly higher risks of breast cancer for those living in neighborhoods with more versus less concentrated privilege [Q5 v Q1 Hazard Ratios (HR): ICE income 1.16 (1.03-1.31), ICE education 1.21 (1.05-1.39)]. In stratified analyses, these patterns of associations were seen for African Americans, Latinos, and Japanese Americans. Risks were also higher among Japanese American women living in neighborhoods with greater concentrations of Whites versus AAPI [Q5 v Q1 ICE Race HR: 1.77 (1.22-2.57)] and for Latino women living in neighborhoods with greater concentrations of high income-White households versus low income-Hispanic households [Q4 v Q1 ICE Race + Income HR: 1.48 (1.20-1.82)]. For women in HI MEC, those living in neighborhoods with higher versus lower ICE income or ICE education had higher risk of localized stage at diagnosis and lower risk of regional & distant diagnosis (p Het &lt;0.01). No associations were found among White or Native Hawaiian women. Conclusions: Our findings suggest economic residential segregation plays an important role in breast cancer risk among African American, Latino, and Japanese American women. This study also highlights the importance of examining racial and racialized economic residential segregation separately across racial/ethnic groups.

Citation Format: Jenna Khan-Gates, Salma Shariff-Marco, Katherine Lin, Pushkar Inamdar, Juan Yang, Yuqing Li, Meera Sangaramoorthy, Christopher Haiman, Loïc Le Marchand, Lynne R Wilkens, Scarlett L Gomez, Iona Cheng. Local economic and racial/ethnic segregation and breast cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-171.

Abstract PO-032: Cancer supportive care needs and resource use among Asian American cancer patients: Preliminary findings from a pilot patient navigation intervention, “Patient COUNTS”

Background: Cancer is the leading cause of death for Asian Americans. Patient navigation has shown benefits in enhancing cancer treatment outcomes and quality of life. Navigational needs in accessing cancer supportive care among Asian American cancer patients and how to address such needs, however, remain understudied. Asian Americans face unique language and cultural barriers in cancer care. We designed a culturally and linguistically-tailored pilot patient navigation intervention, Patient COUNTS, to better understand and address the needs of Asian American cancer patients. Objective: To examine cancer supportive care needs and resource use among patients, who participated in a pilot study that aimed to provide culturally and linguistically-tailored navigation for Asian American cancer patients. Methods: We recruited Asian American adults diagnosed with stage I-III colorectal, liver, or lung cancer from the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry and San Francisco hospitals. Participants spoke English, Chinese, or Vietnamese and had not completed treatment. Participants were assigned a language-concordant patient navigator, who provided support for six months. This study describes participants' cancer supportive care needs and resource use from telephone and self-administered surveys collected at baseline, three, and six months. Participants included 24 Asian Americans with cancer who completed the baseline survey, with 18 (75%) who completed at least one of the follow-up surveys. Results: Of the study sample (n=24), 63% were men, 55% were 65 years or older, and 42% did not complete high school. A majority (75%) spoke limited English; participants' preferred language included Cantonese/Mandarin (61%), Vietnamese (26%) and English (13%). Most participants had stage I (54%) or III (42%) cancer of the lung (42%), colon (37%), or liver (21%). Across the three surveys, the most frequently reported types of needs by the 24 participants were: cancer information (83%), language translation (54%), basic resources such as financial, transportation, legal, housing, and food access resources (50%), access to healthcare (42%), and mental health (33%). Among the 18 participants who completed the three- or six-month surveys, 90% reported using one or more resources that navigators directed them to. Specifically, of the 18 patients, the most frequently used resources included healthcare (77%), basic needs (67%), language translation (56%), and mental health (28%). Conclusions: The Asian American cancer patients enrolled in Patient COUNTS, a pilot patient navigation program, had a variety of cancer supportive care needs. Findings provided preliminary support of Patient COUNTS as a promising approach to assess cancer supportive care needs and assist navigation of resources among Asian American cancer patients. These findings will inform future interventions to improve the care that Asian American cancer patients receive.

Citation Format: Katarina Wang, Janice Tsoh, Carmen Ma, Ching Wong, Hoan Bui, Corina Liew, Junlin Chen, Salma Shariff-Marco, Janet N. Chu, Laura Allen, Mei-Chin Kuo, Debora L. Oh, Scarlett L Gomez, Tung T. Nguyen. Cancer supportive care needs and resource use among Asian American cancer patients: Preliminary findings from a pilot patient navigation intervention, “Patient COUNTS” [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-032.

Abstract PO-170: Association between outdoor ambient benzene and invasive breast cancer incidence: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

Background: Benzene is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen in humans. A major pathway of benzene exposure is through the inhalation of ambient air contaminated by emissions from motor vehicle exhaust, gas stations, industries, tobacco smoke, and other consumer products. Past studies on benzene and breast cancer based on job titles or occupational history have yielded mixed results and the role of ambient benzene and breast cancer risk has been sparsely studied. Within the California component of the Multiethnic Cohort study, we examined the association between outdoor exposure to benzene and breast cancer risk among four major U.S. racial/ethnic groups―African Americans, Latinos, Japanese Americans, and Whites. Methods: Outdoor ambient benzene exposure was estimated from U.S. EPA measurements from air monitoring stations that were within 15 km of residences of 57,589 female MEC participants, largely from Los Angeles County, from time of recruitment (1993-1996) through study end date (12/31/2010). Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations between time-varying benzene exposure and invasive breast cancer risk (cases=2,388), adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, smoking pack-years, family history of breast cancer, body mass index, physical activity, parity and age at first live birth, age at menarche, menopausal status, use of hormone therapy, alcohol consumption, intake of total calories, and neighborhood (block group) socioeconomic status. Stratified analyses were conducted by race/ethnicity, smoking history, and hormone receptor status. Results: Outdoor ambient benzene exposure (average median level from 1993-2010 was 0.94 ppb) was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (per 1 ppb hazard ratio [HR]=1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.58). This positive association was observed across all racial/ethnic groups; HR ranged from 1.23 to 1.67 (p values were &lt;0.001 in African Americans, Japanese Americans, and Whites). Analysis by smoking status at baseline showed significant increased risk among former smokers (HR=1.53, 95% CI:1.22-1.91) and never smokers (HR=1.33, 95% CI: 1.12-1.58) but this risk did not reach statistical significance among current smokers (HR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.91-1.79) (Pheterogeneity=0.56). A larger effect estimate of benzene was observed for hormone receptor negative (HR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.18-2.33) than for hormone receptor positive (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.10-1.50) breast cancer (Pheterogeneity=0.02). Conclusions: Benzene exposure adversely impacted the risk of breast cancer across all racial/ethnic groups but appeared to be more prominent for hormone receptor negative breast cancer after adjusting for covariates mentioned above. Additional large population-based studies with breast cancer subtypes are needed to further determine benzene's role in breast cancer development.

Citation Format: Ugonna Ihenacho, Jun Wu, Chiu-Chen Tseng, Juan Yang, Scott Fruin, Timothy Larson, Salma Shariff-Marco, Loic Le Marchand, Daniel Stram, Beate Ritz, Iona Cheng, Anna H. Wu. Association between outdoor ambient benzene and invasive breast cancer incidence: The Multiethnic Cohort Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-170.

Abstract IA-21: Applying a data integrative and convergence epidemiology approach to study multilevel risk factors for cancer in distinct AANHPI populations

Background: For Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) females, lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of cancer death. More than half of lung cancers among AANHPI females occur among never-smokers, but incidence rates of lung cancer according to smoking status have not been available. Purpose: With a large, integrated dataset of electronic health record data from two healthcare systems—Sutter Health in Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i—linked to state cancer registry data on incident lung cancer diagnoses 2000-2013, we describe incidence of lung cancer according to smoking status among females across detailed race and ethnicity. Methods: We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates for lung cancer according to smoking status and detailed race and ethnicity among females, focusing on AANHPI ethnic groups, and assessed relative incidence across racial and ethnic groups. The study population included N=1,222,694 females (n=244,147 AANHPI), n=3,297 (n=535) of whom were diagnosed with lung cancer. We examined relative incidence across group defined by detailed race and ethnicity. We also provided incidence of lung cancer among AANHPI males who never smoked in a supplement. Results: Among AANHPI female groups, proportions of lung cancers among never-smokers ranged from 25% among Native Hawaiian to 80% among Chinese females. Incidence of lung cancer among never-smoking AANHPI females as an aggregate was 17.1 per 100,000 (95% CI: 14.9, 19.4), but rates varied widely across ethnic groups. Never-smoking Chinese females had the highest rate (22.8; 95% CI: 17.3, 29.1). Except for Japanese females, incidence among every never-smoking AANHPI female ethnic group was higher than that of all never-smoking females combined. Never-smoking AANHPI males also have higher incidence of lung cancer compared to other groups defined by race and ethnicity. Conclusions: The integrative data analysis approach offers great advantages over traditional cancer cohorts, but it does require substantial time and effort to assure data confidentiality, integrity, and transparency to provide robust results. However, with convergence epidemiology—in this case leveraging needed expertise in data science and analysis to answer an epidemiology question—it is also a valuable approach to study disparate cancer outcomes among small populations. Illustrating this, our study is the first to document high rates of lung cancer among never-smoking AANHPI ethnic groups, dispels the myth that AANHPI females are at overall reduced risk of lung cancer, and demonstrates the need to disaggregate this highly diverse population. Results should inform lung cancer prevention strategies among AANHPI populations.

Citation Format: MIndy C. DeRouen, Alison J. Canchola, Caroline A. Thompson, Anqi Jin, Sixiang Nie, Carmen Wong, Daphne Lichtensztajn, Laura Allen, Manali I. Patel, Yihe G. Daida, Harold S. Luft, Salma Shariff-Marco, Peggy Reynolds, Heather A. Wakelee, Su-Ying Liang, Beth E. Waitzfelder, Iona Cheng, Scarlett L. Gomez. Applying a data integrative and convergence epidemiology approach to study multilevel risk factors for cancer in distinct AANHPI populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr IA-21.

Abstract PO-175: Neighborhood segregation typology and breast cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study

Background: Chronic stress as a result of residing in neighborhoods with higher levels of racial/ethnic segregation may increase a woman's risk of breast cancer. There is strong evidence of increased breast cancer risk due to social stress from animal models. Furthermore, epidemiologic studies have suggested links between racial/ethnic segregation and poor breast cancer outcomes. While a limited number of studies have demonstrated increased breast cancer risk and worse prognostic factors for African American women residing in neighborhoods with high racial/ethnic segregation compared to White women, no studies have examined this potential association in other racial/ethnic groups. Methods: Using data from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) (1993-2014), we examined the association between a neighborhood segregation typology of racial/ethnic compositions and incidence of primary, invasive breast cancer in a population-based sample of 101,811 African American, Japanese American, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White women primarily residing in Los Angeles County, California and Hawaii. Segregation typology was based on the distribution of racial/ethnic groups across census tracts and linked to participants' geocoded baseline residential addresses. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer risk were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, family history of breast cancer, reproductive and lifestyle risk factors for breast cancer, and stratified by state and self-reported race/ethnicity. For each state and racial/ethnic group, the reference typology was specific to co-ethnic residents. Results: A median follow-up of 20 years yielded 6,398 breast cancer cases. In California, African American women living in predominantly White neighborhoods had reduced risk of breast cancer (HR=0.68, 95%CI=0.46-0.99) compared to African American women living in predominantly Black neighborhoods. Among Latina women, compared to residents in predominately Latino neighborhoods, those in mixed White and Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) (HR=1.54, 95%CI=1.05-2.25) and multiethnic White neighborhoods (HR=1.34, 95%CI=1.07-1.69) had increased risk of breast cancer. In Hawaii, Native Hawaiian women in predominantly AAPI neighborhoods had increased breast cancer risk (HR=1.20, 95%CI=1.04-1.38) compared to Native Hawaiian women in mixed White and AAPI neighborhoods. For Japanese American women in Hawaii, those living in mixed Native Hawaiian (HR=1.28, 95% CI=1.05-1.55) and multiethnic (HR=1.61, 95% CI=1.36-1.90) neighborhoods had higher breast cancer risk than those living in predominately Asian neighborhoods. Conclusion: This large-scale prospective study in a multiethnic population found differential associations between neighborhood racial/ethnic segregation and breast cancer risk by state of residence and self-reported race/ethnicity. Future research should aim to identify pathways through which segregation measures influence breast cancer risk in specific racial/ethnic populations.

Citation Format: Meera Sangaramoorthy, Joseph Gibbons, Juan Yang, Katherine Lin, Yuqing Li, Jenna A Khan-Gates, Pushkar Inamdar, Christopher A. Haiman, Loïc Le Marchand, Lynne R Wilkens, Scarlett L. Gomez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Iona Cheng. Neighborhood segregation typology and breast cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-175.

Evaluating the Impact of Social and Built Environments on Health-Related Quality of Life among Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

With almost 17 million U.S. cancer survivors, understanding multilevel factors impacting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is critical to improving survivorship outcomes. Few studies have evaluated neighborhood impact on HRQOL among cancer survivors.

METHODS

We combined sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral data from three registry-based studies in California. Using a three-level mixed linear regression model (participants nested within block groups and study/regions), we examined associations of both independent neighborhood attributes and neighborhood archetypes, which capture interactions inherent among neighborhood attributes, with two HRQOL outcomes, physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) composite scores.

RESULTS

For the 2,477 survivors, 46% were 70+ years, 52% were non-Hispanic White, and 53% had localized disease. In models minimally adjusted for age, stage, and cancer recurrence, HRQOL was associated with neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), racial/ethnic composition, population density, street connectivity, restaurant environment index, traffic density, urbanicity, crowding, rental properties, and non-single family units. In fully adjusted models, higher nSES remained associated with better PCS, and restaurant environment index, specifically more unhealthy restaurants, associated with worse MCS. In multivariable-adjusted models of neighborhood archetype, compared with upper middle-class suburb, Hispanic small town and inner city had lower PCS, and high status had higher MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among survivors, higher nSES was associated with better HRQOL; more unhealthy restaurants were associated with worse HQROL. As some neighborhood archetypes were associated with HRQOL, they provide an approach to capture how neighborhood attributes interact to impact HRQOL.

IMPACT

Elucidating the pathways through which neighborhood attributes influence HRQOL is important in improving survivorship outcomes.

Integrating Electronic Health Record, Cancer Registry, and Geospatial Data to Study Lung Cancer in Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Ethnic Groups

BACKGROUND

A relatively high proportion of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) females with lung cancer have never smoked. We used an integrative data approach to assemble a large-scale cohort to study lung cancer risk among AANHPIs by smoking status with attention to representation of specific AANHPI ethnic groups.

METHODS

We leveraged electronic health records (EHRs) from two healthcare systems-Sutter Health in northern California and Kaiser Permanente Hawai'i-that have high representation of AANHPI populations. We linked EHR data on lung cancer risk factors (i.e., smoking, lung diseases, infections, reproductive factors, and body size) to data on incident lung cancer diagnoses from statewide population-based cancer registries of California and Hawai'i for the period between 2000 and 2013. Geocoded address data were linked to data on neighborhood contextual factors and regional air pollutants.

RESULTS

The dataset comprises over 2.2 million adult females and males of any race/ethnicity. Over 250,000 are AANHPI females (19.6% of the female study population). Smoking status is available for over 95% of individuals. The dataset includes 7,274 lung cancer cases, including 613 cases among AANHPI females. Prevalence of never-smoking status varied greatly among AANHPI females with incident lung cancer, from 85.7% among Asian Indian to 14.4% among Native Hawaiian females.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a large, multilevel dataset particularly well-suited to conduct prospective studies of lung cancer risk among AANHPI females who never smoked.

IMPACT

The integrative data approach is an effective way to conduct cancer research assessing multilevel factors on cancer outcomes among small populations.

Disparities in Prostate Cancer Survival According to Neighborhood Archetypes, A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

To examine survival among men with prostate cancer according to neighborhood archetypes. As an advancement beyond measures of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) or specific measures of the neighborhood environment, archetypes consider interactions among many social and built environment attributes.

METHODS

Neighborhood archetypes for California census tracts in the year 2000 were previously developed through latent class analysis of 39 measures of social and built environment attributes. We assessed associations between archetypes and overall and prostate cancer-specific survival in this population-based study using geocoded cancer registry data for prostate cancer patients diagnosed 1996-2005 in California, followed through 2017 (n = 185,613). We used Cox proportional hazard models stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, tumor factors, treatment, marital status and cluster effect by census tract. Additional analyses examined associations between race/ethnicity and survival, while accounting for neighborhood archetypes.

RESULTS

We observed disparities in overall and prostate cancer-specific risk of death by neighborhood archetypes. Classes with the highest risk of death were defined by lower nSES, but also other domains such as rural/urban status, racial/ethnic composition or age of residents, commuting and traffic patterns, residential mobility, and food environment. Associations between archetypes and survival varied by race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

We observe interactions among several domains of neighborhood social and built environment attributes as demonstrated by the associations between neighborhood archetypes and prostate cancer survival. These results highlight opportunities for multilevel neighborhood interventions to reduce neighborhood disparities in prostate cancer survival.

Association between Airport-Related Ultrafine Particles and Risk of Malignant Brain Cancer: A Multiethnic Cohort Study

Ultrafine particles (UFP; diameter less than or equal to 100 nm) may reach the brain via systemic circulation or the olfactory tract and have been implicated in the risk of brain tumors. The effects of airport-related UFP on the risk of brain tumors are not known. Here we determined the association between airport-related UFP and risk of incident malignant brain cancer (n = 155) and meningioma (n = 420) diagnosed during 16.4 years of follow-up among 75,936 men and women residing in Los Angeles County from the Multiethnic Cohort study. UFP exposure from aircrafts was estimated for participants who lived within a 53 km × 43 km grid area around the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) from date of cohort entry (1993-1996) through December 31, 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of time-varying, airport-related UFP exposure on risk of malignant brain cancer and meningioma, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, education, and neighborhood socioeconomic status. Malignant brain cancer risk in all subjects combined increased 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-1.27] per interquartile range (IQR) of airport-related UFP exposure (∼6,700 particles/cm³) for subjects with any address in the grid area surrounding the LAX airport. In race/ethnicity-stratified analyses, African Americans, the subgroup who had the highest exposure, showed a HR of 1.32 (95% CI, 1.07-1.64) for malignant brain cancer per IQR in UFP exposure. UFP exposure was not related to risk of meningioma overall or by race/ethnicity. These results support the hypothesis that airport-related UFP exposure may be a risk factor for malignant brain cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: Malignant brain cancer risk increases with airport-related UFP exposure, particularly among African Americans, suggesting UFP exposure may be a modifiable risk factor for malignant brain cancer.

Neighborhood archetypes and breast cancer survival in California

PURPOSE

Previous studies on neighborhoods and breast cancer survival examined neighborhood variables as unidimensional measures (e.g. walkability or deprivation) individually and thus cannot inform how the multitude of highly correlated neighborhood domains interact to impact breast cancer survival. Neighborhood archetypes were developed that consider interactions among a broad range of neighborhood social and built environment attributes and examine their associations with breast cancer survival.

METHODS

Archetypes were measured using latent class analysis (LCA) fit to California census tract-level data. Thirty-nine social and built environment attributes relevant to eight neighborhood domains (socioeconomic status (SES), urbanicity, demographics, housing, land use, commuting and traffic, residential mobility, and food environment) were included.  The archetypes were linked to cancer registry data on breast cancer cases (diagnosed 1996-2005 with follow-up through Dec 31, 2017) to evaluate their associations with overall and breast cancer-specific survival using Cox proportional hazards models. Analyses were stratified by race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

California neighborhoods were best described by nine archetypal patterns that were differentially associated with overall and breast cancer-specific survival. The lowest risk of overall death was observed in the upper middle class suburb (reference) and high status neighborhoods, while the highest was observed among inner city residents with a 39% greater risk of death (95% CI = 1.35 to 1.44). Results were similar for breast cancer-specific survival. Stratified analyses indicated that differences in survival by neighborhood archetypes varied according to individuals' race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

By describing neighborhood archetypes that differentiate survival following breast cancer diagnosis, the study provides direction for policy and clinical practice addressing contextually-rooted social determinants of health including SES, unhealthy food environments, and greenspace.

Multilevel social factors and NICU quality of care in California

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to incorporate social and built environment factors into a compendium of multilevel factors among a cohort of very low birth weight infants to understand their contributions to inequities in NICU quality of care and support providers and NICUs in addressing these inequities via development of a health equity dashboard.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined bivariate associations between NICU patient pool and NICU catchment area characteristics and NICU quality of care with data from a cohort of 15,901 infants from 119 NICUs in California, born 2008-2011.

RESULT

NICUs with higher proportion of minority racial/ethnic patients and lower SES patients had lower quality scores. NICUs with catchment areas of lower SES, higher composition of minority residents, and more household crowding had lower quality scores.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel social factors impact quality of care in the NICU. Their incorporation into a health equity dashboard can inform providers of their patients' potential resource needs.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Survival after Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status: A Pooled Analysis

BACKGROUND

Limited studies have investigated racial/ethnic survival disparities for breast cancer defined by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status in a multiethnic population.

METHODS

Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed associations of race/ethnicity with ER/PR-specific breast cancer mortality in 10,366 California women diagnosed with breast cancer from 1993 to 2009. We evaluated joint associations of race/ethnicity, health care, sociodemographic, and lifestyle factors with mortality.

RESULTS

Among women with ER/PR⁺ breast cancer, breast cancer-specific mortality was similar among Hispanic and Asian American women, but higher among African American women [HR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.63] compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. Breast cancer-specific mortality was modified by surgery type, hospital type, education, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), smoking history, and alcohol consumption. Among African American women, breast cancer-specific mortality was higher among those treated at nonaccredited hospitals (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.21-2.04) and those from lower SES neighborhoods (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.16-1.88) compared with NHW women without these characteristics. Breast cancer-specific mortality was higher among African American women with at least some college education (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.82) compared with NHW women with similar education. For ER^-/PR^- disease, breast cancer-specific mortality did not differ by race/ethnicity and associations of race/ethnicity with breast cancer-specific mortality varied only by neighborhood SES among African American women.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial/ethnic survival disparities are more striking for ER/PR⁺ than ER^-/PR^- breast cancer. Social determinants and lifestyle factors may explain some of the survival disparities for ER/PR⁺ breast cancer.

IMPACT

Addressing these factors may help reduce the higher mortality of African American women with ER/PR⁺ breast cancer.

Ethnic enclaves, discrimination, and stress among Asian American women: Differences by nativity and time in the United States

OBJECTIVES

Living in ethnic enclaves may protect racial/ethnic minority populations from discrimination and stress by facilitating positive intergroup relations in those neighborhoods. This study examines how two different aspects of ethnic enclaves-neighborhood ethnic concentration and cultural institutions-are associated with discrimination and stress among Asian American women, and how these associations differ by nativity and time lived in the United States.

METHOD

A community-based survey of Asian American women with geocoded residential addresses was linked with U.S. Census and business listing data. We created neighborhood variables of ethnic concentration and number of Asian cultural institutions. Analyses consisted of linear regression predicting day-to-day discrimination, general stress, and immigration stress.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that for established immigrants and U.S.-born, higher ethnic concentration was associated with higher discrimination and general stress. For recent immigrants, higher ethnic concentration was associated with lower discrimination, general stress, and immigration stress. For all Asian American women, living in neighborhoods with more cultural institutions was associated with lower discrimination. For recent immigrants, living in neighborhoods with more cultural institutions was associated with lower general stress.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights how ethnic enclaves are associated with discrimination and stress experiences differently, depending on nativity and time in the United States. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Nativity, ethnic enclave residence, and breast cancer survival among Latinas: Variations between California and Texas

BACKGROUND

Among Latinas with breast cancer, residence in an ethnic enclave may be associated with survival. However, findings from prior studies are inconsistent.

METHODS

The authors conducted parallel analyses of California and Texas cancer registry data for adult (aged ≥18 years) Latinas who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1996 to 2005, with follow-up through 2014. Existing indices applied to tract-level 2000 US Census data were used to measure Latinx enclaves and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fit for all-cause and breast cancer-specific survival adjusted for year of diagnosis, patient age, nativity (with multiple imputation), tumor stage, histology, grade, size, and clustering by census tract.

RESULTS

Among 38,858 Latinas, the majority (61.3% in California and 70.5% in Texas) lived in enclaves. In fully adjusted models for both states, foreign-born women were found to be more likely to die of breast cancer and all causes when compared with US-born women. Living in enclaves and in neighborhoods with higher SES were found to be independently associated with improved survival from both causes. When combined into a 4-level variable, those in low nSES nonenclaves had worse survival for both causes compared with those living in low nSES enclaves and, in the all-cause but not breast cancer-specific models, those in high nSES neighborhoods, regardless of enclave status, had improved survival from all causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the same methods across 2 states eliminated previously published inconsistent associations between enclave residence and breast cancer survival. Future studies should identify specific protective effects of enclave residence to inform interventions.

Hospital Characteristics and Breast Cancer Survival in the California Breast Cancer Survivorship Consortium

INTRODUCTION

Racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival are well documented, but the influence of health care institutions is unclear. We therefore examined the effect of hospital characteristics on survival.

METHODS

Harmonized data pooled from 5 case-control and prospective cohort studies within the California Breast Cancer Survivorship Consortium were linked to the California Cancer Registry and the California Neighborhoods Data System. The study included 9,701 patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed between 1993 and 2007. First reporting hospitals were classified by hospital type-National Cancer Institute (NCI) -designated cancer center, American College of Surgeons (ACS) Cancer Program, other-and hospital composition of the neighborhood socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity of patients with cancer. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinical and patient-level prognostic factors were used to examine the influence of hospital characteristics on survival.

RESULTS

Fewer than one half of women received their initial care at an NCI-designated cancer center (5%) or ACS program (38%) hospital. Receipt of initial care in ACS program hospitals varied by race/ethnicity-highest among non-Latina White patients (45%), and lowest among African Americans (21%). African-American women had superior breast cancer survival when receiving initial care in ACS hospitals versus other hospitals (non-ACS program and non-NCI-designated cancer center; hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.83). Other hospital characteristics were not associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

African American women may benefit significantly from breast cancer care in ACS program hospitals; however, most did not receive initial care at such facilities. Future research should identify the aspects of ACS program hospitals that are associated with higher survival and evaluate strategies by which to enhance access to and use of high-quality hospitals, particularly among African American women.