1
|
Subramanian L, Hawley ST, Skolarus TA, Rankin A, Fetters MD, Witzke K, Chen J, Radhakrishnan A. Patient perspectives on factors influencing active surveillance adherence for low-risk prostate cancer: A qualitative study. Cancer Med 2023; 13:e6847. [PMID: 38151901 PMCID: PMC10807559 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States. Treatment guidelines recommend active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, which involves monitoring for progression, to avoid or delay definitive treatments and their side effects. Despite increased uptake, adherence to surveillance remains a challenge. METHODS We conducted semi-structured, qualitative, virtual interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), with men (15) who were or had been on active surveillance for their low-risk prostate cancer in 2020. Interviews were transcribed and coded under TDF's behavioral theory-based domains. We analyzed domains related to adherence to surveillance using constructivist grounded theory to identify themes influencing decision processes in adherence. RESULTS The TDF domains of emotion, beliefs about consequences, environmental context and resources, and social influences were most relevant to surveillance adherence-. From these four TDF domains, three themes emerged as underlying decision processes: trust in surveillance as treatment, quality of life, and experiences of self and others. Positive perceptions of these three themes supported adherence while negative perceptions contributed to non-adherence (i.e., not receiving follow-up or stopping surveillance). The relationship between the TDF domains and themes provided a theoretical process describing factors impacting active surveillance adherence for men with low-risk prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS Men identified key factors impacting active surveillance adherence that provide opportunities for clinical implementation and practice improvement. Future efforts should focus on multi-level interventions that foster trust in surveillance as treatment, emphasize quality of life benefits and enhance patients' interpersonal experiences while on surveillance to optimize adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalita Subramanian
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Sarah T. Hawley
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research & DevelopmentVA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Ted A. Skolarus
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research & DevelopmentVA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Department of Surgery, Urology SectionUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Aaron Rankin
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | | | - Karla Witzke
- Department of UrologyMyMichigan HealthMidlandMichiganUSA
| | - Jason Chen
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Archana Radhakrishnan
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research & DevelopmentVA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guan A, Santiago-Rodríguez EJ, Chung BI, Shim JK, Allen L, Kuo MC, Lau K, Loya Z, Brooks JD, Cheng I, DeRouen MC, Frosch DL, Golden T, Leppert JT, Lichtensztajn DY, Lu Q, Oh D, Sieh W, Wadhwa M, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Gomez SL, Shariff-Marco S. Patient and physician perspectives on treatments for low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1191. [PMID: 38053037 PMCID: PMC10696696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11679-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are confronted with a difficult decision regarding whether to undergo definitive treatment or to pursue an active surveillance protocol. This is potentially further complicated by the possibility that patients and physicians may place different value on factors that influence this decision. We conducted a qualitative investigation to better understand patient and physician perceptions of factors influencing treatment decisions for low-risk PCa. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 43 racially and ethnically diverse patients diagnosed with low-risk PCa, who were identified through a population-based cancer registry, and 15 physicians who were selected to represent a variety of practice settings in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area. RESULTS Patients and physicians both described several key individual (e.g., clinical) and interpersonal (e.g., healthcare communications) factors as important for treatment decision-making. Overall, physicians' perceptions largely mirrored patients' perceptions. First, we observed differences in treatment preferences by age and stage of life. At older ages, there was a preference for less invasive options. However, at younger ages, we found varying opinions among both patients and physicians. Second, patients and physicians both described concerns about side effects including physical functioning and non-physical considerations. Third, we observed differences in expectations and the level of difficulty for clinical conversations based on information needs and resources between patients and physicians. Finally, we discovered that patients and physicians perceived patients' prior knowledge and the support of family/friends as facilitators of clinical conversations. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that the gap between patient and physician perceptions on the influence of clinical and communication factors on treatment decision-making is not large. The consensus we observed points to the importance of developing relevant clinical communication roadmaps as well as high quality and accessible patient education materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Guan
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Janet K Shim
- UCSF | Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, United States
| | - Laura Allen
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Mei-Chin Kuo
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Kathie Lau
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Zinnia Loya
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Iona Cheng
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Mindy C DeRouen
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Dominick L Frosch
- Health Science Diligence Advisors, LLC, San Francisco, United States
| | - Todd Golden
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - John T Leppert
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
| | - Daphne Y Lichtensztajn
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Qian Lu
- Dept of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Debora Oh
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Dept of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Michelle Wadhwa
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
- UCSF | Department of Urology, San Francisco, United States
| | | | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States
| | - Salma Shariff-Marco
- Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, United States.
| |
Collapse
|