Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition vs Chemotherapy in Combination With Radiation Therapy Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastasis Undergoing Neurosurgical Resection

Practice Variation in Perioperative Dexamethasone Use and Outcomes in Brain Metastasis Resection

Importance

Variations in perioperative dexamethasone dosing are common in brain metastasis resection, but their impact on patient outcomes remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the association between perioperative dexamethasone dosing and patient outcomes, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective multicenter comparative effectiveness study used data collected from January 2010 to December 2023. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases undergoing primary surgical resection at 7 neurological centers in Germany and 1 in Austria and who had complete records of perioperative dexamethasone dosing were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounders. Analysis was conducted from March to June 2024.

Exposures

Cumulative perioperative dexamethasone administration over 27 days, dichotomized at 122 mg using maximally selected rank statistics.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included extracranial PFS (ecPFS) and intracranial PFS (icPFS) as well as incidence of wound revision surgery after brain metastasis resection. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 1064 patients were included in the analysis. The median (IQR) age was 64 (56-72) years, with 489 female patients (49%) and 541 male patients (51%). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common tumor entity (564 patients [53%]), followed by breast cancer (146 patients [14%]) and melanoma (138 patients [13%]). After PSM, patients receiving cumulative dexamethasone doses less than 122 mg had a median OS of 19.1 (95% CI, 15.2-22.4) months compared with 12.0 (95% CI, 9.1-14.7) months for those receiving 122 mg or more (P = .002). Multivariable analysis showed an independent association between higher cumulative dexamethasone doses and reduced OS (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.66; P < .001). Secondary analyses demonstrated consistent findings with icPFS and ecPFS and a dose-response association between cumulative dexamethasone and hazard for death.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, higher cumulative perioperative dexamethasone was associated with reduced OS, icPFS, and ecPFS in patients undergoing brain metastasis resection. These findings suggest that stricter dosing protocols could improve outcomes. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these associations and guide evidence-based practice.

Metastatic brain tumors: from development to cutting-edge treatment

Metastatic brain tumors, also called brain metastasis (BM), represent a challenging complication of advanced tumors. Tumors that commonly metastasize to the brain include lung cancer and breast cancer. In recent years, the prognosis for BM patients has improved, and significant advancements have been made in both clinical and preclinical research. This review focuses on BM originating from lung cancer and breast cancer. We briefly overview the history and epidemiology of BM, as well as the current diagnostic and treatment paradigms. Additionally, we summarize multiomics evidence on the mechanisms of tumor occurrence and development in the era of artificial intelligence and discuss the role of the tumor microenvironment. Preclinically, we introduce the establishment of BM models, detailed molecular mechanisms, and cutting-edge treatment methods. BM is primarily treated with a comprehensive approach, including local treatments such as surgery and radiotherapy. For lung cancer, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown efficacy, while in breast cancer, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates are effective in BM. Multiomics approaches assist in clinical diagnosis and treatment, revealing the complex mechanisms of BM. Moreover, preclinical agents often need to cross the blood-brain barrier to achieve high intracranial concentrations, including small-molecule inhibitors, nanoparticles, and peptide drugs. Addressing BM is imperative.

Factors associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease: A SEER-Medicare study

INTRODUCTION

The presence of pre-existing autoimmune disease (PAD) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) poses challenges in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study investigated factors influencing ICI utilization in older adults with mNSCLC and PAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with a 12-month baseline prior to treatment initiation was conducted using the SEER-Medicare data. Patients aged 66 years and above diagnosed with mNSCLC between January 2015 and December 2017, who initiated immunotherapy only/chemoimmunotherapy (IT/CIT) or chemotherapy only (CIT) and had at least one PAD diagnosed any time before treatment initiation, were included. Multiple factors, guided by the Model of Health Services Utilization, were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95.0% CIs were reported.

RESULTS

Among 1,319 patients initiating first-line (1L) systemic therapy, 22.3% received IT/CIT and 77.7% received CT. Patients initiating IT/CIT were more likely to be 76-80 years old (aOR = 1.70, 95.0% CI = 1.02-2.81) and > 80 years old (aOR = 2.49, 95.0% CI = 1.46-4.25), reside in South (aOR = 2.32, 95.0% CI = 1.36-3.96) and West (aOR = 2.27, 95.0% CI = 1.44-3.60) SEER regions, diagnosed in 2016 (aOR = 6.36, 95.0% CI = 3.06-13.22) and 2017 (aOR = 40.45, 95.0% CI = 19.70-83.07), having a longer time to treatment initiation (aOR = 1.14, 95.0% CI = 1.08-1.19), having non-squamous tumor histology (aOR = 1.511, 95.0% CI = 1.048-2.179), and having a prior hospitalization (aOR = 1.63, 95.0% CI = 1.14-2.33). These patients were less likely to have recently used an immunosuppressant (IS) (aOR = 0.06, 95.0% CI = 0.04-0.10).

DISCUSSION

Several factors, such as age, region, cancer diagnosis year, time to treatment initiation, and recent IS use, intricately shape treatment decisions. Further in-depth research on each of these factors is imperative to optimize strategies for this distinctive patient population.

The effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevalent form of cancer, often leading to brain metastases (BM) and a significant decline in patient prognosis. Whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with brain radiotherapy is superior to conventional chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy in those patients remains to be explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study enrolled 161 NSCLC patients with BM who underwent either ICIs combined with brain radiotherapy or chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy. End points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (IPFS), and extracranial PFS (EPFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were employed to identify prognostic risk variables.

RESULTS

Patients receiving ICIs combined with brain radiotherapy exhibited significantly longer OS compared to those receiving chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy (34.80 months vs. 17.17 months, P = 0.005). In the Cox regression analysis, chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.09-3.05; P = 0.023), smoking (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-2.99; P = 0.043) and squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.31-5.13; P = 0.006) were associated with a worse prognosis. After propensity score matching (PSM), this finding remained consistent with before PSM (43.73 months vs. 17.17 months, P = 0.018). Squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.15-5.26; P = 0.021) and CT + RT (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.88; P = 0.016) were associated with a less favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that the combination of ICIs and brain radiotherapy provides superior OS for NSCLC patients with BM, compared to the chemotherapy combined with brain radiotherapy.

Performance status improvement and advances in systemic treatment after brain metastases resection: a retrospective single-center cohort study of non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BrM) is prevalent among patients with NSCLC, and surgical resection of BrM constitutes a promising treatment strategy for local management and histopathological diagnosis, although it is offered for a select group of patients. Limited information exists concerning the improvement in performance status (PS) following BrM resection or the outcomes stratified by subsequent systemic therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including NSCLC patients with surgically resected BrM and focused on the improvement in PS and subsequent therapy after BrM resection.

RESULTS

71 patients were included, and the median overall survival was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 8.7, not reached). Patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM showed significant improvement in PS (18% and 39% showed ECOG PS of 0-1, before and after BrM resection, respectively [p = 0.006]), and patients with PS improvement were younger than those with PS unimprovement (median, 62 years versus 66 years; p = 0.041). Regarding subsequent systemic therapy after BrM resection, 21 patients (30%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 14 patients (20%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 3 patients (4%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and 21 patients (30%) received no subsequent therapy. The survival outcomes of patients stratified by subsequent systemic treatments suggested the tendency that those who received TKI or ICI showed better survival outcomes, although a small number of patients hindered statistical comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the outcomes of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM, revealing that younger patients were more likely to anticipate improvement in PS, and patients who received TKI or ICI after BrM resection tended to exhibit a more preferable prognosis.

The role of radiotherapy in immunotherapy strategies in the central nervous system

The clinical efficacy and relative tolerability of adverse effects of immune checkpoint immunotherapy have led to its increasingly routine use in the management of multiple advanced solid malignancies. Radiation therapy (RT) is well-known to have both local and distant immunomodulatory effects, which has led to extensive investigation into the synergism of these 2 therapies. While the central nervous system (CNS) has historically been thought to be a sanctuary site, well-protected by the blood-brain barrier from the effects of immunotherapy, over the last several years studies have shown the benefits of these drugs, particularly in metastatic disease involving the CNS. This review explores current progress and the future of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and RT.

Predictive role of intracranial PD-L1 expression in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition following brain metastasis resection

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that treatment of NSCLC brain metastases with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with response rates similar to those of extracranial disease. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) serves as a predictive biomarker for ICI response. However, the predictive value of brain metastasis-specific (intracranial) PD-L1 TPS is not established. We investigated the role of intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection.

METHODS

Clinical data from NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection (n = 64) were analyzed. PD-L1 TPS of brain metastases (n = 64) and available matched extracranial tumor tissue (n = 44) were assessed via immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses included cut point estimation via maximally selected rank statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and multivariable Cox regression analysis for intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS), extracranial progression-free survival (ecPFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was found in 54.7% of brain metastases and 68.2% of extracranial tumor tissues, with a median intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS of 7.5% (0 - 50%, IQR) and 15.0% (0 - 80%, IQR), respectively. In matched tissue samples, extracranial PD-L1 TPS was significantly higher than intracranial PD-L1 TPS (p = 0.013). Optimal cut points for intracranial and extracranial PD-L1 TPS varied according to outcome parameter assessed. Notably, patients with a high intracranial PD-L1 TPS (> 40%) exhibited significantly longer icPFS as compared to patients with a low intracranial PD-L1 TPS (≤ 40%). The cut point of 40% for intracranial PD-L1 TPS was independently associated with OS, icPFS and ecPFS in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the potential role of intracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC, which could be used to predict ICI response in cases where extracranial tissue is not available for PD-L1 assessment as well as to specifically predict intracranial response.

Harnessing immunotherapy for brain metastases: insights into tumor-brain microenvironment interactions and emerging treatment modalities

Brain metastases signify a deleterious milestone in the progression of several advanced cancers, predominantly originating from lung, breast and melanoma malignancies, with a median survival timeframe nearing six months. Existing therapeutic regimens yield suboptimal outcomes; however, burgeoning insights into the tumor microenvironment, particularly the immunosuppressive milieu engendered by tumor-brain interplay, posit immunotherapy as a promising avenue for ameliorating brain metastases. In this review, we meticulously delineate the research advancements concerning the microenvironment of brain metastases, striving to elucidate the panorama of their onset and evolution. We encapsulate three emergent immunotherapeutic strategies, namely immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell transplantation and glial cell-targeted immunoenhancement. We underscore the imperative of aligning immunotherapy development with in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment and engendering innovative delivery platforms. Moreover, the integration with established or avant-garde physical methodologies and localized applications warrants consideration in the prevailing therapeutic schema.

Immunotherapy: an emerging modality to checkmate brain metastasis

The diagnosis of brain metastasis (BrM) has historically been a dooming diagnosis that is nothing less than a death sentence, with few treatment options for palliation or prolonging life. Among the few treatment options available, brain radiotherapy (RT) and surgical resection have been the backbone of therapy. Within the past couple of years, immunotherapy (IT), alone and in combination with traditional treatments, has emerged as a reckoning force to combat the spread of BrM and shrink tumor burden. This review compiles recent reports describing the potential role of IT in the treatment of BrM in various cancers. It also examines the impact of the tumor microenvironment of BrM on regulating the spread of cancer and the role IT can play in mitigating that spread. Lastly, this review also focuses on the future of IT and new clinical trials pushing the boundaries of IT in BrM.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with intracranial metastatic disease

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) complicates the course of nearly 2-4% of patients with systemic cancer. The prevalence of IMD has been increasing over the past few decades. Historically, definitive treatment for brain metastases (BM) has been limited to radiation therapy or surgical resection. Chemotherapies have not typically proven valuable in the treatment of IMD, with the exception of highly chemotherapy-sensitive lesions. Recent data have supported a role for systemic targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of select patients with IMD. There remains, however, a clear clinical need for further investigation to delineate the role of ICIs in patients with BM. In this review, we outline and describe recent and current efforts to identify the efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with IMD.

Iodine-125 brachytherapy treatment for newly diagnosed brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: A biocentric analysis

Purpose

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iodine-125 brachytherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

The study included 158 NSCLC patients diagnosed with brain metastasis from December 2003 to August 2017. Ninety-nine patients underwent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT group), and 59 patients received iodine-125 brachytherapy (¹²⁵I group). In addition, the 6- and 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates and the 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the EBRT group and the ¹²⁵I group. Median OS and PFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test.

Results

The 6-month PFS rate was significantly higher in the ¹²⁵I group (p = 0.002) than in the EBRT group, while no differences were found in the 12-month PFS rate (p = 0.184). Additionally, the 12- (p = 0.839) and 24-month (p = 0.284) OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant differences in median OS (p = 0.525) or PFS (p = 0.425) were found between the two groups.

Conclusions

Iodine-125 brachytherapy is an alternative therapy for patients unable to undergo surgical resection.

Non-small cell lung cancer-derived exosomes promote proliferation, phagocytosis, and secretion of microglia via exosomal microRNA in the metastatic microenvironment

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common tumor that metastasizes to the brain. It is now accepted that the successful colonization and growth of tumor cells are determined by the interaction between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Microglia, brain innate immune cells, have been reported to play a vital role in the establishment of brain metastases. As essential mediators of intercellular communications, tumor-derived exosomes have an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of cancer by transferring their cargos to specific recipient cells. The crosstalk between microglia and tumor-derived exosomes has been extensively described. However, it is still unclear whether metastatic NSCLC cells secret exosomes to microglia and regulate the microglial functions. Here, our results showed that microglia aggregated in the brain metastatic sites. Meanwhile, microglia could take up the exosomes derived from NSCLC cells, leading to alterations of microglial morphology and increased proliferation, phagocytosis, and release of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and CXCL1. Further investigation indicated that miR1246 was the most enriched microRNA in NSCLC-derived exosomes and mediated the partial effects of exosomes on microglia. Notably, miR1246 was also upregulated in the plasmatic exosomes of NSCLC patients. These results offer a new insight into the impact of NSCLC-derived exosomes on microglia and provide a new potential biomarker for diagnosing NSCLC.

Cuproptosis key gene FDX1 is a prognostic biomarker and associated with immune infiltration in glioma

Recent studies have found that the protein encoded by the FDX1 gene is involved in mediating Cuproptosis as a regulator of protein lipoylation and related to immune response process of tumors. However, the specific biological function of FDX1 in glioma is currently unclear. To explore the potential function of FDX1, this study explored the correlation between the expression of FDX1 in cancers and survival prognosis by analyzing the public databases of GEPIA and Cbioportal. Immune infiltration was analyzed by the TIMER2.0 database in tumors. The possible biological processes and functions of FDX1-related in glioma were annotated through gene enrichment. Relationship between Cuproptosis and autophagy was explored through gene co-expression studies. Summary and conclusions of this study: (1) FDX1 is highly expressed in gliomas and associated with poor prognosis in low-grade gliomas (LGG). (2) Gene annotation indicates that FDX1 is mainly involved in the tumor protein lipoylation and cell death. (3) FDX1 expression is positively correlated with the infiltration of immune cells. (4) LIPT2 and NNAT, two other genes involved in lipoylation, may be unidentified marker gene for Cuproptosis. And the Cuproptosis genes related to FDX1 were positively correlated with the expression of autophagy marker genes Atg5, Atg12, and BECN-1. This evidence suggests that there may be some interaction between FDX1 mediated Cuproptosis and autophagy. In summary, FDX1 may serve as a potential immunotherapy target and prognostic marker for Glioma.

Treatment of Brain Metastases: The Synergy of Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Brain metastases are a devastating sequela of common primary cancers (e.g., lung, breast, and skin) and have limited effective therapeutic options. Previously, systemic chemotherapy failed to demonstrate significant benefit in patients with brain metastases, but in recent decades, targeted therapies and more recently immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, there is significant interest in harnessing the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT) to synergize with ICIs. Herein, we discuss studies evaluating the impact of RT dose and fractionation on the immune response, early studies supporting the synergistic interaction between RT and ICIs, and ongoing clinical trials assessing the benefit of combination therapy in patients with brain metastases.