First-Line Osimertinib for Previously Untreated Patients With NSCLC and Uncommon EGFR Mutations: The UNICORN Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Osimertinib vs. Afatinib in 1L therapy of atypical EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): A multi-institution, real-world survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Data are limited on the efficacy of different TKIs for patients with atypical EGFR-mutated (AM) mNSCLC, a heterogeneous group excluding classical mutations (CM) L858R and exon19del. In our previous single-institution analysis, AM patients had longer survival with osimertinib than afatinib, but outcomes for patients with specific mutations could not be compared due to sample size.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institution, retrospective survival analysis of atypical EGFR mutated (AM) mNSCLC patients treated with 1L osimertinib or afatinib between 2015-2021 at 12 US institutions. Time to discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log rank tests between treatment or mutation groups.

RESULTS

Among 52 patients identified, 32 (62 %) were treated with osimertinib and 20 (38 %) with afatinib. 20 had mutations in G719X (38 %), 12 in L861Q (23 %), and 5 in S768I (10 %). 34(65 %) had compound mutations: 20(62 %) had AM + CM, and 14(38 %) had ≥ 2 AMs. Among G719X (n = 20), afatinib was associated with longer time to discontinuation (TTD) (log-rank: p = 0.047) and longer OS (p = 0.043) vs. osimertinib. Median TTD (mTTD) was 20.3 m[95 %CI 7.3-24.2] and 9.4[1.7-14.0], respectively. For L861Q (n = 12), osimertinib was associated with longer TTD vs. afatinib (p = 0.004), with no statistical difference in OS (p = 0.215). mTTD was 7.2 m[2.2-12.3] and 1.3[0-3.1], respectively. In AM + CM (n = 20), osimertinib was associated with longer TTD and OS compared to those receiving afatinib (p = 0.037, p = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with G719X alterations experienced longer TTD and OS with afatinib than osimertinib. In contrast, patients with L861Q alterations had longer TTD with osimertinib. In AM + CM pts, TTD and OS with osimertinib were longer than afatinib, suggesting that classical mutations may be driving the outcomes. Atypical EGFR mutations may warrant distinct treatment recommendations based on the specific mutation(s) identified, but more studies are needed.

Furmonertinib in uncommon EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases: A retrospective cohort study

Uncommon EGFR mutations constitute 10%-20% of all EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), forming a molecularly distinct and clinically heterogeneous subgroup. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in managing central nervous system (CNS) metastases among NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (excluding exon 20 insertion variants). Thirty-one eligible patients treated at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between March 2022 and August 2024 were enrolled. Serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling. Clinical endpoints included CNS objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety parameters. The cohort demonstrated a CNS ORR of 38.7% (95% CI, 21.8%-57.8%) and DCR of 64.5% (95% CI, 45.4%-80.8%), with a median iPFS of 6.97 months. Median OS remained immature at data cutoff. A total of 21 patients with leptomeningeal metastases had baseline EGFR-mutant ctDNA detected in their CSF, with ctDNA analysis indicating intracranial responses corresponded to decreased or cleared ctDNA abundance. Longitudinal CSF ctDNA monitoring in a representative case demonstrated significant temporal correlation between molecular response and radiographic/clinical improvement. The safety profile was favorable, with no grade ≥4 adverse events or treatment-related mortality. These findings suggest that furmonertinib provides clinically meaningful CNS activity with acceptable toxicity in uncommon EGFR-mutant NSCLC, particularly when integrated with CSF ctDNA dynamics as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker. This study highlights the therapeutic implications of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in molecularly defined NSCLC subpopulations.

Pragmatic Randomized Study of Afatinib Versus Chemotherapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: ACHILLES/TORG1834

PURPOSE

To our knowledge, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 trial is the first randomized study comparing afatinib and chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label study was performed at 51 Japanese institutions and recruited treatment-naïve patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations, excluding exon 20 insertions and T790M mutations. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive afatinib (30 or 40 mg orally, at the treating physician's discretion) or a combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and pemetrexed, followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety. A prespecified interim analysis was planned to provide clinically meaningful information promptly, along with a crossover recommendation if necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were enrolled between March 2019 and February 2023. In the interim analysis, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving afatinib than in those undergoing chemotherapy (10.6 v 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.421 [95% CI, 0.251 to 0.706]; P = .0010). ORRs to afatinib were similar across the overall population and among participants with major uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and S768I), compound, and other mutations (61.7%, 55.8%, 72.7%, and 60.0%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were diarrhea, paronychia, and rash for afatinib, and appetite loss and nausea for chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Afatinib should be considered the standard initial therapy for patients with NSCLC with sensitizing uncommon EGFR mutations.

Piperlongumine overcomes osimertinib resistance via governing ubiquitination-modulated Sp1 turnover

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. While targeted therapies like osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, have brought about notable improvements in patient outcomes for advanced NSCLC, the challenge of acquired drug resistance persists. Here, we found that cellular mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met) was highly expressed in osimertinib-resistant cells, and depletion of c-Met markedly inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant cells ex vivo and in vivo, suggesting that c-Met is a potential target to address osimertinib resistance. Through a screening process using a natural product compound library, we identified piperlongumine as a potent inhibitor to overcome osimertinib resistance. Furthermore, the combined treatment of piperlongumine and osimertinib exhibited robust antitumor effects in resistant cells, partially restoring their sensitivity to osimertinib. Additionally, we discovered that piperlongumine could enhance the interaction between E3 ligase RNF4 and Sp1, inhibit the phosphorylation of Sp1 at Thr739, facilitate the ubiquitination and degradation of Sp1, lead to c-Met destabilization, and trigger intrinsic apoptosis in resistant cells. In summary, our study sheds light on the potential of piperlongumine in overcoming osimertinib resistance, offering new strategies and perspectives for the clinical management of drug-resistant NSCLC.

Updates on the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

This review provides a comprehensive update on the evolving landscape of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, particularly focusing on advances in precision medicine and overcoming acquired resistance. Initial success with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC has paved the way for precision oncology and subsequent development of third-generation EGFR TKIs, the current standard of care as first-line therapy in advanced stage NSCLC. Furthermore, a combinational approach of third-generation EGFR TKI with chemotherapy or amivantamab was associated with prolonged progression-free survival. The role of EGFR TKIs also has been investigated in locally advanced and early stage NSCLC, including perioperative and neoadjuvant settings. However, most patients experience acquired resistance, and the resistance mechanism is quite complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the importance of tailored subsequent therapeutic approaches. Overall, this review underscores the dynamic landscape of EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment, emphasizing the need for personalized strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Observational study of the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib and later treatments for uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, including both sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. Its real-world efficacy against uncommon EGFR mutations remains under-researched.

METHODS

The REIWA study, a multicentric, prospective, observational study conducted in Japan from September 2018 to August 2020, enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC receiving osimertinib. Data on clinical outcomes, safety, disease progression, and subsequent treatments were collected for patients with uncommon EGFR mutations.

RESULTS

Of 583 patients receiving osimertinib, 39 (6.7%) had an uncommon EGFR mutation. The present study included 32 of these patients after excluding seven patients with an exon 20 insertion mutation. The overall objective response rate was 53.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.4-69.1], and the disease control rate was 78.1% (95% CI: 61.0-89.3). The median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI: 5.0-20.0), and the median overall survival (OS) was 21.8 (95% CI: 14.4-NA) months. Notably, patients with an exon21 L861Q mutation had a significantly longer OS than those with an exon18 G719X mutation, the respective values being 37.8 and 9.7 months (hazard ratio: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10-0.85; P = 0.02). The rate of grade 3 or worse adverse events was 10.3%. Seven out of 32 (21.9%) patients showed progression involving only the central nervous system.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the clinical setting in patients with uncommon EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Lung Cancer: Targeted Therapy in 2025

Lung cancer treatment has changed in the last twenty years since the discovery of EGFR mutations. In this article, we will review the current state of the art for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) actionable genomic alterations (AGA). AGAs are mostly found in lung adenocarcinomas, a subtype of non-small cell lung cancers. We will focus on the current treatment for EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, ROS1 fusions, BRAF V600E mutations, MET exon 14-skipping mutations, RET fusions, KRAS G12C mutations, ERBB2 mutations (also called HER2 mutations), and NTRK fusions. We will also touch on the key toxicities associated with these medications. Treatments are mostly available for the metastatic stage, but we will also discuss adjuvant therapy for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions, as well as stage III post-chemoradiotherapy treatment for EGFR lung cancer.

Debate on first-line treatment strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: An expert panel meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The front-line treatment options and regulatory approval scenario for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have rapidly evolved in the recent months, with newly presented positive trial results of novel compounds and combination strategies in the setting of common activating mutations, uncommon mutations, and exon 20 insertions. In this context, international lively debate is emerging on how to choose among the available regimens, based on efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel was held in July 2024 to review data on front-line regimens in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, including common, uncommon and exon 20 insertions. The panel discussed available evidence, and reached common considerations for clinical practice and clinical research.

RESULTS

In the setting of EGFR common activating mutations, all panelists agreed that single agent osimertinib, the combination of osimertinib with platinum-pemetrexed, and the combination of amivantamab and lazertinib, are first-line treatment options. Overall, panelists defined characteristics of patients in which combination treatments should be avoided. Subsequent treatment strategies at disease progression were discussed according to the different front-line options. With regards to uncommon EGFR mutations, panelists agreed that afatinib remains the only drug with phase 3 results available, and that afatinib and osimertinib are the preferred first-line options. In EGFR exon20 insertion positive disease, the combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed and amivantamab has been identified as the preferred front-line treatment, with second-line amivantamab to be used in the second-line setting whenever not available in front-line. The panelists defined priorities in clinical research, with high priority attributed to investigating resistance mechanisms, novel generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and selection biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Different toxicity profiles and sequential strategies were considered, together with efficacy results, to reach common considerations for the front-line treatment strategies in EGFR mutant NSCLC, however clinical research should be prioritized to identify further selection features.

The potential of lazertinib and amivantamab combination therapy as a treatment strategy for uncommon EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pose therapeutic challenge due to limited response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study presents preclinical evidence and mechanistic insights into the combination of lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI; and amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, for treating NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations. The lazertinib-amivantamab combination demonstrates significant antitumor activity in patient-derived models with uncommon EGFR mutations either before treatment or after progressing on EGFR-TKIs. Lazertinib enhances the inhibitory capacity of amivantamab by increasing its on-target expression. Notably, the combination surpasses afatinib, a first-line treatment for uncommon EGFR mutations in NSCLC, in terms of in vivo efficacy. Promising clinical activity is also observed in two case studies of patients treated with this combination (NCT04077463). Our findings highlight the potential of the lazertinib-amivantamab combination as a therapeutic strategy for uncommon EGFR mutations, an area of unmet medical need, and support further clinical investigation.

Osimertinib in the Treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Early and Locally Advanced Stages of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was dramatically revolutionized by the introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice, both in advanced and locally advanced/early stages. The present work focuses on osimertinib use in locally advanced and early NSCLC stages. Phase 3 clinical trials have supported the use of osimertinib as the new standard of care, both in the adjuvant setting and in locally advanced disease. The ADAURA study reported an overall survival (OS) advantage for adjuvant osimertinib in completely resected stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant tumors, while the LAURA study proved a statistically significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and a delay of central nervous system metastasis development in EGFR-mutant patients treated with osimertinib maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, data on osimertinib's efficacy are conflicting; therefore, the Neo-ADAURA study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIB NSCLC and common EGFR mutations. We discuss several issues that need to be clarified, such as the efficacy of the drug on uncommon mutations, the long-term impact on survival, and the management of resistance mechanisms. Moreover, we report the studies that are trying to identify potential biomarkers of response, such as the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), with the aim of selecting patients who will benefit most from osimertinib.

The changing treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The discovery of the association between EGFR mutations and the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, third-generation EGFR TKIs, which are often characterized by potent central nervous system penetrance, are the standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Rational combinations of third-generation EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs, chemotherapy, the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody amivantamab or local tumour ablation are being investigated as strategies to delay drug resistance and increase clinical benefit. Furthermore, EGFR TKIs are being evaluated in patients with early stage or locally advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, with the ambitious aim of achieving cancer cure. Despite the inevitable challenge of acquired resistance, emerging treatments such as new TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, new immunotherapeutic approaches and targeted protein degraders have shown considerable promise in patients with progression of EGFR-mutant NSCLC on or after treatment with EGFR TKIs. In this Review, we describe the current first-line treatment options for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, provide an overview of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs and explore novel promising treatment strategies. We also highlight potential avenues for future research that are aimed at improving the survival outcomes of patients with this disease.

Detection of Overlooked Rare EGFR Mutations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Multigene Testing

BACKGROUND

Recognizing rare molecular variants of driver mutations poses a challenge in precision oncology, particularly for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we aimed to determine whether Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi-CDx System (ODxTT), the most widely used genetic test for NSCLC in Japan, potentially overlooks druggable EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 418 patients who underwent molecular testing using ODxTT at our hospital, 267 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. No mutations were reported in 82 of these cases. For these 82 cases, we searched for EGFR mutations in exons 18-21 by examining the binary alignment map file. Once a mutation was identified, its pathological significance was evaluated using the ClinVar database to determine whether ODxTT had overlooked any actionable EGFR mutations.

RESULTS

Mutations in EGFR exons 19 and 18 were identified in six and four cases, respectively. Three, six, and none of these variants were detectable using the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2, Lung Cancer Compact Panel, and Amoy Dx, respectively. Of the 10 patients, five were subsequently treated with EGFR TKI; three showed partial response, one had stable disease, and one had progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

ODxTT failed to identify 10 actionable EGFR mutations, accounting for 12.2% (10/82) of the cases initially reported as not carrying actionable mutations. Therefore, comprehensive genomic profiling should be actively performed early in cases with high clinical suspicion of EGFR mutations.

Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy or EGFR-TKIs as First-Line Therapy in NSCLC Patients Harboring Non-Ex 20 Ins Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Retrospective Study in China

BACKGROUND

Uncommon EGFR mutations are a kind of heterogeneous group of mutations with various responses to EGFR-TKIs and are often excluded from most prospective clinical trials. In this real-world retrospective study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy or various generations of EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy in NSCLC Chinese patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We enrolled 139 NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations in this study retrospectively. Patients' clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of different first-line therapies were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Our data reviewed that for first-line therapy, NSCLC patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations benefited more from EGFR-TKIs compared with chemotherapy. Afatinib performed with great efficacy for the majority of non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 43, ORR = 41.86%, mPFS = 13.5 months, mOS = 20.8 months), especially in L861Q mutation (mPFS = 18.4 months). Osimertinib also demonstrated efficacy in patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations (N = 36, ORR = 27.78%, mPFS = 10.0 months, mOS = 21.0 months), especially in those without L861Q and G719X mutations (mPFS = 12.1 months). When treated with afatinib, patients harboring non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations should pay attention to the management of safety, especially for gastrointestinal-related AE and rash, while osimertinib was safer.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account both efficacy and safety, afatinib and osimertinib are better choices than chemotherapy and first-generation EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with non-ex 20 ins uncommon EGFR mutations. L861Q showed a trend toward a better response to afatinib, while in those without L861Q and G719X mutations, osimertinib might be a better choice. Safety also should be a concern when choosing EGFR-TKI for treatment, patients should pay attention to the management of safety when using afatinib while osimertinib is safer.

TFAP2A drives non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progression and resistance to targeted therapy by facilitating the ESR2-mediated MAPK pathway

Cancer is among the leading causes of death related diseases worldwide, and lung cancer has the highest mortality rate in the world. Transcription factors (TFs) constitute a class of structurally and functionally intricate proteins. Aberrant expression or functional deficiencies of transcription factors may give rise to abnormal gene expression, contributing to various diseases, including tumours. In this study, we propose to elucidate the potential role and mechanism of TFAP2A in NSCLC. We found that TFAP2A levels were significantly greater in tumour tissues than para-tumour tissues, and high expression of TFAP2A was associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients. Additionally, TFAP2A overexpression promoted NSCLC progression both in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, ESR2 is a potential target regulated by TFAP2A and that TFAP2A can bind to the promoter region of ESR2. Furthermore, the overexpression of both TFAP2A and ESR2 in NSCLC cells was associated with the overactivation of MAPK signalling, and the combination of PHTPP and osimertinib had a synergistic effect on suppressing tumour growth.

Precision Oncology: 2024 in Review

This article discusses the specific advances made in precision oncology in 2024. We comment on the evolving nature of predictive molecular events used to select patients who will most benefit clinically from treatment. We also discuss advances in the development of strategic treatment regimens for combination therapies, rational drug design of small-molecule inhibitors, and structurally informed drug repurposing.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with oncogene-addicted metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), published in January 2023, was modified according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Korean Society for Medical Oncology (KSMO). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with oncogene-addicted mNSCLC across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, while respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling and age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies between the different regions of Asia.

Safety and Efficacy of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Uncommon Tumoral Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The activity of osimertinib is not fully characterized in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon somatic EGFR mutations.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies reporting the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations defined as any mutations other than exon 19 deletion, L858R and T790M mutations, and exon 20 insertion, except when in compound. Then, we performed a meta-analysis to pool survival outcomes and antitumoral activity, including intracranial (ic) response and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies comprising 594 patients were included. The most frequently observed uncommon solitary mutations were G719X in 25% (81/327) of patients and L861Q in 21% (69/327). The most common compound mutations were G719X with T790M in 12% (23/192) of patients and G719X with S768I in 11% (22/192). Pooled analysis showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 51.30% (95% CI, 45.80 to 56.81), a disease control rate (DCR) of 90.11% (95% CI, 86.27 to 92.96), a median progression-free survival of 9.71 months (95% CI, 7.96 to 11.86), and a median overall survival of 16.79 months (95% CI, 9.93 to 28.39). icORR was 45.96% (95% CI, 30.18 to 62.17), and icDCR was 95.76% (95% CI, 69.84 to 100). Osimertinib was well tolerated with a frequency of grade 3 or more adverse events of 21.77% (95% CI, 6.24 to 43.33).

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib demonstrated robust response in NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, without unanticipated safety concerns.

Expert consensus on the use of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer with various T790M mutations post-resistance to first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have emerged as the mainstay of treatment for advanced EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), effectively overcoming the problems of acquired threonine-to-methionine (T790M) mutations associated with the first- or second-generation TKIs. Evidence from several studies suggests that these agents, including osimertinib and aumolertinib, also show potential benefits in T790M-negative or unknown populations, particularly those with brain metastases, where the high permeability of the blood-brain barrier allows effective control of intracranial lesions. Despite the encouraging results, further high-quality research, including prospective trials, is warranted to fully elucidate the efficacy profiles of these third-generation TKIs in T790M-negative or unknown NSCLC patients after first- or second-line TKI failure. The present expert consensus highlights the evolving role of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in overcoming therapeutic resistance and optimizing patient outcomes.

Cancer Patient-Derived Cell-Based Models: Applications and Challenges in Functional Precision Medicine

The field of oncology has witnessed remarkable progress in personalized cancer therapy. Functional precision medicine has emerged as a promising avenue for achieving superior treatment outcomes by integrating omics profiling and sensitivity testing of patient-derived cancer cells. This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the evolution of cancer-directed drugs, resistance mechanisms, and the role of functional precision medicine platforms in revolutionizing individualized treatment strategies. Using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and advanced functional assays has significantly improved our understanding of tumor behavior and drug response. This progress will lead to identifying more effective treatments for more patients. Considering the limited eligibility of patients based on a genome-targeted approach for receiving targeted therapy, functional precision medicine provides unprecedented opportunities for customizing medical interventions according to individual patient traits and individual drug responses. This review delineates the current landscape, explores limitations, and presents future perspectives to inspire ongoing advancements in functional precision medicine for personalized cancer therapy.

[Advances in Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of G719X/L861Q/S768I Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer accounts for the highest proportion of cancer deaths in the world and poses a great threat to human health. About 30% to 40% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is caused by point mutations, exon insertion and exon deletion of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In addition to the common exon 19 deletion mutation and exon 21 L858R mutation, exon 18 G719X mutation, exon 21 L861Q mutation and exon 20 S768I mutation are the most important rare mutations. At present, the diagnostic methods for major rare mutations are mainly next-generation sequencing (NGS), digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), etc. Regarding the targeted therapy of G719X/L861Q/S768I mutant NSCLC, the first generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have poor efficacy, while the second and third generation EGFR-TKIs have similar efficacy. The novel third generation EGFR-TKIs and combination therapy show a good therapeutic prospect. This article summarized the progress in the diagnosis and targeted therapy of G719X/L861Q/S768I mutant NSCLC, so as to provide reference for subsequent clinical drug use and research.
.

From Rarity to Reality: Osimertinib's Promising Horizon in Treating Uncommon EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In the realm of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), addressing optimal treatment for uncommon EGFR mutations like G719X in exon 18, S768I in exon 20, and L861Q in exon 21 remains a pivotal yet challenging frontier. Contrary to the well-established efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in common EGFR mutations, these uncommon alterations pose unmet medical needs due to a lack of comprehensive evidence. While afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, has received FDA approval for patients with these uncommon EGFR mutations, the approval was based on a post-hoc analysis of randomized clinical trials. Recent developments include multiple clinical trials investigating the efficacy of both second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. A noteworthy example is a prospective phase II trial of osimertinib including the landmark UNICORN study, which has shown promising results in treating uncommon EGFR mutations. Despite various reports on the efficacy of afatinib and osimertinib in treating uncommon EGFR mutations, the appropriate use of these TKIs remains unclear. This review aims to consolidate the findings from the latest clinical trials focused on uncommon EGFR mutations, outlining variations in the therapeutic efficacy of these TKIs based on the specific genetic mutation. By synthesizing these findings, we aim to guide oncologists toward more informed decisions in employing TKIs for NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations other than exon 20 insertion. Additionally, we explore potential treatment strategies tailored to these patient populations to address the challenges posed by these mutations.

Unveiling the Landscape of Uncommon EGFR Mutations in NSCLC-A Systematic Review

Uncommon EGFR mutations represent a rare subgroup of NSCLC. Data on the efficacy of different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in these rare mutations are scattered and limited to mostly retrospective small cohorts because these patients were usually excluded from clinical trials. This was a systematic review on the efficacy of TKIs in patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, defined as mutations other than exon 20 insertions mutations or T790M. Response rates (RRs) for different generations of TKIs were determined for individual uncommon mutations, compound mutations, and according to classical-like and P-loop alpha helix compressing mutations classes. This study was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 1836 patients from 38 studies were included in the final analysis. Most available data (92.6%) were from patients treated with first- or second-generation TKIs. G719X, S768I, E709X, L747X, and E709-T710delinsD showed RRs ranging from 47.8% to 72.3% to second-generation TKIs, generally higher than for first- or third-generation TKIs. L861Q mutation exhibited 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.6%-88.5%) RRs to third-generation TKIs. Compound mutations with G719X, E709X, or S768I consistently showed RRs above 50% to second- and third-generation TKIs, although fewer data were available for third generations. For classical-like mutations, RRs were 35.4% (95% CI: 27.2%-44.2%), 51.9% (95% CI: 44.4%-59.3%), and 67.9% (95% CI: 47.6%-84.1%) to first-, second-, and third-generation TKIs, whereas for P-loop alpha helix compressing mutations classes mutations, RRs were 37.2% (95% CI: 32.4%-42.1%), 59.6% (95% CI: 54.8%-64.3%), and 46.3% (95% CI: 32.6%-60.4%), respectively. This systematic review supports the use of second-generation TKI afatinib for G719X, S768I, E709X, and L747X mutations and for compound uncommon mutations. For other uncommon mutations such as L861Q, third-generation TKI, such as osimertinib, could also be considered, given its activity and toxicity profile.

Evolving Precision First-Line Systemic Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

First-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly evolved over the past two decades. First, molecularly targeted therapy for a growing number of gain-of-function molecular targets has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with favorable toxicity profiles compared to platinum-containing chemotherapy and can be given as first-line systemic therapy in ~25% of patients with NSCLC. Actionable genetic alterations include EGFR, BRAF V600E, and MET exon 14 splicing site-sensitizing mutations, as well as ALK-, ROS1-, RET-, and NTRK-gene fusions. Secondly, inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or cemiplimab monotherapy have become a standard of care for ~25% of patients with NSCLC whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression (total proportion score (TPS) ≥50%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Lastly, for the remaining ~50% of patients who are fit and whose tumors have no or low PD-L1 expression (TPS of 0-49%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK aberrations, platinum-containing chemotherapy with the addition of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor alone or in combination of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor improves PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. The objectives of this review are to summarize the current data and perspectives on first-line systemic treatment in patients with unresectable NSCLC and propose a practical algorithm for implementing precision biomarker testing at diagnosis.

First-line Osimertinib for Lung Cancer With Uncommon EGFR Exon 19 Mutations and EGFR Compound Mutations

Introduction

Up to 20% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC cases harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, including atypical exon 19 and compound mutations. Relatively little is known about the efficacy of osimertinib in these cases.

Methods

Patients treated with first-line osimertinib for NSCLC with rare EGFR exon 19 (non E746_A750del) or compound mutations were included. Response assessment and time to progression were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-seven patients with NSCLC harboring an atypical EGFR exon 19 mutation or compound mutation were treated with first-line osimertinib at Johns Hopkins from 2016 to 2021. Overall response rate (ORR) was 76% and median PFS, TTD, and OS were 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10-15), 22 months (95% CI: 17-32) and 36 months (95% CI, 29-48), respectively. Among atypical exon 19 mutations (n = 25), ORR was 80%, median PFS was 12 months (95% CI: 10-15), median TTD was 19 months (95% CI: 17-38), and median OS was 48 months (95% CI: 25-not reached). Compound mutations (n = 12) had an ORR of 67%, median PFS of 14 months (95% CI: 5-22), median TTD of 26 months (95% CI: 5-36), and median OS of 36 months (95% CI: 20-46). Twelve patients (32%) continued first-line osimertinib after local therapy for oligoprogression.

Conclusions

Osimertinib exhibited favorable outcomes for rare EGFR exon 19 and compound mutations. The heterogeneity in outcomes among these groups of tumors with similar mutations underscores the need for continued reporting and further study of outcomes among rare variants to optimize management for each patient.

Activity of osimeRTInib in non-small-cell lung Cancer with UNcommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: retrospective Observational multicenter study (ARTICUNO)

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib represents the standard of care for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, constituting 80%-90% of all EGFR alterations. In the remaining cases, an assorted group of uncommon alterations of EGFR (uEGFR) can be detected, which confer variable sensitivity to previous generations of EGFR inhibitors, overall with lower therapeutic activity. Data on osimertinib in this setting are limited and strongly warranted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ARTICUNO study retrospectively evaluated data on osimertinib activity from patients with advanced NSCLC harboring uEGFR treated in 21 clinical centers between August 2017 and March 2023. Data analysis was carried out with a descriptive aim. Investigators collected response data according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients harboring uEGFR and treated with osimertinib were identified. Patients with 'major' uEGFR, that is, G719X, L861X, and S768I mutations (n = 51), had an overall response rate (ORR) and mPFS of 50% and 9 months, respectively. Variable outcomes were registered in cases with rarer 'minor' mutations (n = 27), with ORR and mPFS of 31% and 4 months, respectively. Among seven patients with exon 20 insertions, ORR was 14%, while the best outcome was registered among patients with compound mutations including at least one classical EGFR mutation (n = 13). Thirty patients presented brain metastases (BMs) and intracranial ORR and mPFS were 58% and 9 months, respectively. Amplification of EGFR or MET, TP53 mutations, and EGFR E709K emerged after osimertinib failure in a dataset of 18 patients with available rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

The ARTICUNO study confirms the activity of osimertinib in patients with uEGFR, especially in those with compound uncommon-common mutations, or major uEGFR, even in the presence of BMs. Alterations at the E709 residue of EGFR are associated with resistance to osimertinib.

Osimertinib in uncommon EGFR exon 21 L861R and EGFR exon 18 deletion-insertion mutant non-small cell lung cancer-case report

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have changed the treatment landscape for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found to have oncogene-driven activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Whilst there have been a handful of case reports of sensitivity to first-generation TKIs in EGFR L861R mutations, the efficacy of the third-generation TKI osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR L861R and EGFR exon 18 deletion-insertion mutations is limited.

Case Description

We report two patients from our institution with uncommon EGFR mutations treated with first-line osimertinib. Our first patient, a 72-year-old male with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma was identified to harbour a rare EGFR L861R mutation and was commenced on osimertinib. After a follow-up period of 18 months, the patient is continuing to experience treatment benefit with imaging showing a good partial response. The second patient, a 60-year-old male also with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and an EGFR exon 18 deletion-insertion mutation achieved a partial response for 6.6 months. Upon progression, he was commenced on carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy however died from subsequent pneumonia. He had an overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of 7.6 months.

Conclusions

We demonstrate clinical efficacy of first-line osimertinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC harbouring uncommon EGFR L861R and EGFR exon 18 deletion-insertion mutations. These results may be suggestive of the wider applicability of osimertinib in the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutant NSCLC.