Lymph node status assessment for gastric carcinoma: is the number of metastatic lymph nodes really practical as a parameter for N categories in the TNM Classification? Tumor Node Metastasis

Clinical significance of the number of retrieved lymph nodes in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion

The prognosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) with submucosal invasion is favorable; however, several cases of recurrence have been reported even after curative gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and evaluate the clinical significance of the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) in EGC with submucosal invasion. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 443 patients with gastric cancer with submucosal invasion after curative gastrectomy for recurrent risk factors. Recurrence was observed in 22 of the 443 gastric cancer patients with submucosal invasion. In the univariate analysis, the risk factors for recurrence were the number of retrieved LNs ≤ 25 and node metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, retrieved LNs ≤ 25 (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.754, P-value = .001) and node metastasis (HR = 3.031, P-value = .029) were independent risk factors for recurrence after curative gastrectomy. Body mass index was related to retrieved LNs ≤ 25 in univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = .510, P = .002). The number of retrieved LNs and node metastases were independent risk factors for EGC with submucosal invasion. For EGC with submucosal invasion, retrieved LNs > 25 are necessary for appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Combination of the ratio between metastatic and harvested lymph nodes and negative lymph node count as a prognostic indicator in advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of our study was to examine the impact of the combination of the ratio between metastatic and harvested lymph nodes (RML) and negative lymph node (NLN) count on overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

The clinicopathological data of 2,952 advanced GC patients who received curative resection between 1994 and 2015 were collected. They were divided into four groups according to the RML: 0, 0-0.1, 0.1-0.4, and >0.4. We distinguished survival differences through Kaplan-Meier analysis among the subgroups to investigate the impacts of the RML on OS in advanced GC patients. OS was examined according to clinicopathological variables. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationships between the RML and metastatic lymph node (MLN) count and NLN count.

Results

A total of 1,182 patients were enrolled into the study. The median follow-up time was 39 months (interquartile range 20 to 68 months). The 5-year OS rate of all 1,182 GC patients was 54.4%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the median OS declined significantly with increasing RML (5-year survival rate 81.2% vs. 69.1% vs. 42.8% vs. 13.1%, P<0.001). As the NLN count increased, the survival rate of GC patients increased (5-year survival rate 12.8% vs. 25.2% vs. 60.2%, P<0.05). The RML, not NLN count, was identified as an independent factor for OS (P<0.001) through multivariate analysis. Spearman correlation analysis suggested that the RML was positively correlated with the number of MLNs (ρ=0.973, P<0.001) and inversely associated with the NLN count (ρ=-0.513, P<0.001).

Conclusions

The RML is an independent prognostic predictor of OS in advanced GC patients, and the NLN count may serve as a supplementary strategy for the present tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification to further improve the prognostic prediction efficiency. The combination of the RML and NLN count should be an important predictor for current clinical applications.

Re-appraising the role of lymph node status in predicting survival in resected distal cholangiocarcinoma - A meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to confirm the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR), and determine an optimal LNR cut-off for overall survival (OS) in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) undergoing curative surgery. We additionally aimed to provide a consolidated review of current evidence regarding prognostic significance of positive lymph node count (PLNC) and total lymph node count (TLNC). A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 2020. Studies were included into meta-analysis if there was histological diagnosis, curative surgery, restriction to DCC and relevant LNR results. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Findings for 1228 patients were pooled across 6 studies. Meta-analysis delineated a dose-effect gradient in which higher LNR cut-offs correlated with larger pooled hazard ratios: 0<LNR<0.2 (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.08-2.20; p = 0.02), LNR>0.2 (HR 3.26; 95% CI 2.07-5.13; p < 0.00001) and LNR>0.4 (HR 3.59; 95% CI 2.31-5.58; p < 0.00001) when compared against a control group of LNR = 0. LNR of 0.2 (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.57-2.86; p < 0.0001) was found to be a significant and ideal cut-off for prognostication of poorer OS. A review of current literature reveals an ongoing debate regarding the comparative prognostic value of differing PLNC cut-offs (0/1/3 versus 0/1/4). TLNC of 10-13 is widely reported to be the minimum necessary to ensure improved long term outcomes. PLNC and LNR are strong prognostic factors for OS in DCC. An ideal LNR cut-off of 0.2 is most significantly associated with poorer OS.

What is the Role of Nodal Ratio as a Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Nowadays? Comparison with New TNM Staging System and Analysis According to the Number of Resected Nodes

Nodal ratio (NR) has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of nodal ratio comparing it with the new TNM (2010) classification. One hundred forty-two patients were submitted to potentially curative gastrectomy for cancer. Patients with low performance status underwent D1.5 lymphadenectomy, whereas the other patients underwent D2–D2.5 lymphadenectomy. Nodal staging was classified according to 2010 International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival, stratified for nodal classes and nodal status. Total gastrectomy was performed in 39 per cent of cases and distal gastrectomy in 61 per cent. Mean number of resected nodes was 25.5. Whereas N status was strictly related to the number of resected nodes, the NR was independent from the extension of the lymphadenectomy. Overall five-year survival was 81 per cent for N0 patients, 72 per cent for N1, and 26 and 23 per cent for N2 and N3, respectively. Patients with NR0 had 81 per cent five-year survival, whereas NR1 67 per cent, NR2 51 per cent, and NR3 22 per cent. NR seems to be a simple method to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer; unlike N status, it is independent from the number of resected nodes, and therefore it is particularly useful in case of inadequate lymphadenectomy.

Proposal of the minimal number of retrieved regional lymph nodes for accurate staging of distal bile duct cancer and clinical validation of the three-tier lymph node staging system (AJCC 8th edition)

BACKGROUND

The minimal required number of retrieved lymph nodes (MNRLNs) to enable accurate staging of distal bile duct (DBD) adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The three-tier 8th N staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for DBD adenocarcinoma has been recently released. The present study is aimed at proposing the MNRLNs for accurate staging and validating the 8th N stage.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2015, patients with pathologically confirmed DBD adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were enrolled. MNRLN was calculated via a log-rank test based on cut-off values. The concordance index (C-index) was utilized to compare the discrimination capability of the two- and three-tier N stages.

RESULTS

A total of 780 patients were enrolled. Lymph node (LN) positivity and 5-year overall survival (5-YOS) rates stabilized and significant survival differences between node-negative and -positive patients were observed when ≥12 LNs were retrieved. 5-YOS rates between each 8th N stage significantly differ (N0 vs. N1, P = 0.037; N1 vs. N2, P = 0.003). The C-index of the 8th N stage was higher than that of the 7th (0.59 vs. 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

For accurate staging, at least 12 LNs should be retrieved. The three-tier N staging system is valid for clinical practice and has a more accurate prognostic predictability than the two-tier system.

Clinical impact of underutilization of adjuvant therapy in node positive gastric adenocarcinoma

Background

Adjuvant therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma has shown a survival advantage, though it may be underutilized. The purpose of this study is to examine how infrequently adjuvant therapy is administered with curative intent gastrectomy for node positive gastric cancer and the long-term effects to patients.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006-2013 for patients with node positive gastric adenocarcinoma undergoing a potentially curative gastrectomy. Overall survival was compared between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation and those who did not.

Results

Of 2,565 patients, 793 (30.9%) patients did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy, while 147 (5.7%) received peri-operative chemotherapy and 723 (28.2%) received post-operative chemoradiation. From 2006-2013, the percentage of patients receiving peri-operative chemotherapy rose from 1.1% to 9.9%, while those receiving post-operative chemoradiation decreased from 39.7% to 21.6%. The adjusted restricted mean survival time over 5 years for no adjuvant therapy was 27.7 months, peri-operative chemotherapy was 39.6 months, and post-operative chemoradiation was 37.7 months (P<0.0001).

Conclusions

Approximately one third of patients treated for node positive gastric cancer undergo surgical resection without adjuvant therapy. This is associated with poorer survival, highlighting the need for improvement in multimodality care and cancer outcomes.

Gastric Cancer: Extent of Lymph Node Dissection and Requirements for a Correct Staging

Aims and Background

Lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in gastric cancer. The TNM classification requires at least 15 lymph nodes to stage and identify three prognostic groups according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes: N1 (1-6), N2 (7-15), N3 (>15). The aim of this study was to investigate which type of lymph node dissection allows an accurate staging.

Methods

From 1996 to 2001, we treated 140 gastric cancer patients, 27 with D1 and 113 with D2 dissection. We evaluated lymph node count, status and ratio between metastatic and total number of excised lymph nodes, keeping 20% as the cutoff value.

Results

The mean number of lymph nodes was 18 and 33 respectively for D1 and D2 (P <0.001), 41% of patients in D1 and 5% in D2 had less than 15 lymph nodes (P <0.001). 59% in D1 and 73% in D2 (P = 0.145) had lymph node metastases, but this incidence decreased to 36% (P = 0.045) and 16% (P <0.001) respectively for D, and D2 when less than 15 lymph nodes were available. Considering the ratio between metastatic and total number of lymph nodes, 45% of D1 versus 3% of D2 (P <0.001) in the N1 group exceeded 20%.

Conclusions

D2 lymph node dissection is better than D1 in providing at least 15 lymph nodes required for a correct staging. We confirm the risk of a downstage when less than 15 lymph nodes are available.

Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary

Objective

The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) Node (N) classification is the most common used staging method for the prognosis of gastric cancer. It demands adequate, at least 16 lymph nodes (LNs) to be dissected; therefore different staging systems were invented.

Methods

Between March 2005 and March 2010, 164 patients were evaluated at the Department of General Surgery in the Kenézy Gyula Hospital and at the Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery in the Kaposi Mór Hospital. The 6th, 7th and 8th UICC N-staging systems, the number of examined LNs, the number of harvested negative LNs, the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) and the log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) were determined to measure their 5-year survival rates and to compare them to each other.

Results

The overall 5-year survival rate for all patients was 55.5% with a median overall survival time of 102 months. The tumor stage, gender, UICC N-stages, MLR and the LODDS were significant prognostic factors for the 5-year survival with univariate analysis. The 6th UICC N-stage did not follow the adequate risk in comparing N2 vs. N0 and N3 vs. N0 with multivariate investigation. Comparison of performances of the residual N classifications proved that the LODDS system was first in the prediction of prognosis during the evaluation of all patients and in cases with less than 16 harvested LNs. The MLR gave the best prognostic prediction when adequate (more than or equal to 16) lymphadenectomy was performed.

Conclusions

We suggest the application of LODDS system routinely in western patients and the usage of MLR classification in cases with extended lymphadenectomy.

Positive Lymph Node Ratio as an Indicator of Prognosis and Local Tumor Clearance in N3 Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Nodal metastasis is an important clinical issue in gastric cancer patients. This study was designed to investigate the clinical usefulness of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR), which reflects both metastatic and retrieved lymph node numbers, in patients with pN3 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 138 consecutive pN3 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2012.

RESULTS

A PLNR of 0.4 was proved to be the best cutoff value to stratify the prognosis of patients with pN3 gastric cancer (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that older age, larger tumor size (≥10 cm), and PLNR ≥ 0.4 [P < 0.001, HR 3.1 (95 % CI 1.7-5.4)] were independent prognostic factors in pN3 gastric cancer. Regarding the recurrence, patients with PLNR <0.4 had a significantly lower rate of lymph node recurrence than those with PLNR ≥0.4 (P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in the lymph node recurrence rate between N3a and N3b patients in the PLNR <0.4 group [P = 0.546, 11.6 % (7/60) vs. 12.5 (1/8)], indicating a better local control regardless of pN3 subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

PLNR is useful to stratify the prognosis and evaluate the extent of local tumor clearance in pN3 gastric cancer.

Evaluation of prognostic value and stage migration effect using positive lymph node ratio in gastric cancer

AIMS

To detect the best cut-off value of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) for stratifying the prognosis and analyzing its value with regard to stage migration effect using PLNR in gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1069 consecutive gastric cancer patients, who underwent curative gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy from 1997 through 2009.

RESULTS

1) The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 42.6 in pStage I, 32.4 in pStage II and 37.1 in pStage III. The PLNR of 0.2 was proved to be the best cut-off value to stratify the prognosis of patients into two groups (P < 0.0001; PLNR <0.2 vs. PLNR ≥0.2), and patients were correctly classified into four groups: PLNR 0, PLNR 0-<0.2, PLNR 0.2-<0.4 and PLNR ≥0.4 by the Kaplan-Meier method. 2) Compared patients with the PLNR <0.2, those with the PLNR ≥0.2 had a significantly higher incidence of pT3 or greater, pN2 or greater, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion and undifferentiated cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that the PLNR ≥0.2 was an independent prognostic factor [P < 0.0001, HR 2.77 (95% CI: 1.87-4.09)]. 2) The PLNR cut-off value of 0.2 could discriminate a stage migration effect in pN2-N3 and pStage II-III, which patients with PLNR ≥0.2 might be potentially diagnosed as a lower stage after gastrectomy.

CONCLUSION

The PLNR contributes to evaluating prognosis and stage migration effect even in a single institute and enable to identify those who need meticulous treatments and follow-up in patients with gastric cancer.

Clinical management of gastroesophageal junction tumors: past and recent evidences for the role of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary approach

Gastroesophageal cancers (such as esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal-junction -GEJ- lesions) are worldwide a leading cause of death being relatively rare but highly aggressive. In the past years, a clear shift in the location of upper gastrointestinal tract tumors has been recorded, both affecting the scientific research and the modern clinical practice. The integration of pre- or peri-operative multimodal approaches, as radiotherapy and chemotherapy (often combined), seems promising to further improve clinical outcome for such presentations. In the past, the definition of GEJ led to controversies and confusion: GEJ tumors have been managed either grouped to gastric or esophageal lesions, following slightly different surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic approaches. Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) changed the staging and classification system of GEJ to harmonize some staging issues for esophageal and gastric cancer. This review discusses the most relevant historical and recent evidences of neoadjuvant treatment involving Radiotherapy for GEJ tumors, and describes the efficacy of such treatment in the frame of multimodal integrated therapies, from the new point of view of the recent classification of such tumors.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) compared with pathologic node (pN) category.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine patients with gastric cancer with R0 resection were reviewed. LNR, pN, and the number of retrieved LNs were evaluated in node-positive groups with ≥15 or <15 LNs resected and a node-negative group, respectively, by univariate and multivariate analyses. Associations of pN and LNR with the number of retrieved LNs were determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.

RESULTS

LNR and pN were correlated with overall survival. For the node-positive group with ≥15 LNs retrieved, pN and LNR were independent prognostic factors, with the hazard ratio higher for LNR; neither was correlated with the number of retrieved LNs. For the group with <15 LNs retrieved, LNR but not pN was an independent prognostic factor, with LNR uncorrelated with the number of LNs retrieved. For the node-negative group, the number of LNs retrieved retained an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is an independent prognostic factor in node-positive patients with gastric cancer with R0 resection, and it is uninfluenced by the number of LNs retrieved. It may be superior to pN.

Gastric cancer staging with radiologic imaging modalities and UICC staging system

There are two major stage classification systems for gastric cancer: the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages by the International Union against Cancer (UICC) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). Preoperative stage classification using either of these systems is essential for deciding on the treatment strategy in the era of various multimodal therapeutic options. Evolution of multidetector computerized tomography with isotropic volumetric imaging and various 3D images has increased the accuracy of T and N staging in patients with gastric cancer, although detection of peritoneal deposits and nodal metastasis in the absence of lymphadenopathy remain problematic with the imaging tools currently available. The TNM and JGCA classifications have undergone revisions independent of each other, and the discrepancies were not helpful when international comparisons and cooperation were needed. More recently, the JGCA and TNM classifications were merged to have identical T and N categories, in addition to the more straightforward M categories that indicate the presence of distant metastasis. The result of these efforts is that researchers in Japan and the rest of the world are now looking at a similar disease when they discuss cancer that belongs to the same stage. A nomogram that incorporates other established prognostic determinants in addition to the TNM component may be a future direction for a more sophisticated means of predicting outcome. The increasing incidence of junctional (esophagogastric junction) cancer in the Far East has spurred researchers from this region to adequately stage the disease and to consider suitable treatment modalities for this disease entity, whereas Western researchers are more inclined to treat this disease as esophageal cancer. This could be an area for future international debate. For the next more accurate staging, we suggest the collaboration between Eastern and Western high-volume centers in gastric cancer because the inconsistency of surgical approaches, especially with respect to nodal resection, remains a barrier to mutual understanding.

Inflammation-based prognostic score predicts survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving biweekly docetaxel and s-1 combination chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score composed of C-reactive protein and albumin, for patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

A total of 83 advanced gastric cancer patients receiving biweekly docetaxel/S-1 treatment (DS) were included in the study. To identify the value of GPS as prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Unresectable tumors were observed in 78 patients and recurrent tumors were detected in 5 patients. Of these, 12 patients underwent gastrectomy. There were significant correlations between the GPS and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Univariate analysis revealed that the GPS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and gastrectomy after DS treatment significantly affected prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that the GPS, age and gastrectomy independently influenced DSS, and that the GPS and gastrectomy also influenced PFS. Multivariate analysis restricted to patients without gastrectomy showed that the GPS and age independently affected DSS, and that the GPS influenced PFS.

CONCLUSION

In the low GPS group, it may be possible to obtain favorable outcomes by chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. However, a well-designed prospective trial in a large patient cohort is required to corroborate the prognostic value of the GPS.

Stage migration effect on survival in gastric cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy: the reappraisal of positive lymph node ratio as a proper N-staging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the number of examined lymph nodes (NexLN) and survival in gastric cancer and to determine whether the metastatic/examined lymph node ratio (LN ratio) system can compensate for the shortcomings of the UICC/AJCC staging.

METHODS

Prospective data of 8949 primary T1-T4a gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery were reviewed. The patients were stratified by T-stage and grouped according to NexLN; 1 to 14 exLN denoted the first group and every subsequent 10 LNs thereafter. Numbers of LN and 5-year survival rates were analyzed according to NexLN. "The NR-staging system" was generated using 0.2 and 0.5 as the cut-off values of LN ratio and then compared with UICC/AJCC stages.

RESULTS

The proportion of advanced N-stage increased with NexLN. Survival and the LN ratio were constant regardless of NexLN when combining all N0-N3b patients, however, T2/3 and T4a patients showed an increasing tendency toward survival in N1/2 and N3a as NexLN increased, mainly due to a stage migration effect. The LN ratio system showed better patterns of distribution of the LN stage and survival graph. The power of the differential staging of the LN ratio system was fortified with higher NexLN.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between NexLN and survival is probably affected by stage migration in a high-volume gastric cancer center. The LN ratio system could be a better option to compensate for this effect, and the value of the prognosis prediction in this system increases with a higher NexLN.

Validation of the updated 7th edition AJCC TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The recently published 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma contains important revisions to T and N classifications, as well as overall stage grouping. Our goal was to validate the new staging system using a cancer registry.

METHODS

Retrospective review of gastric cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data (2004-2007). Patients were staged according to both 6th and 7th edition criteria, and 3-year disease-specific survival was compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were identified with complete staging information. When using 7th edition criteria, there was an increase in the number of patients classified as stage III (23% vs. 13%), and a decrease in patients classified as stage IV (47% vs. 53%). Statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-specific survival were observed for all T and N categories and re-staging the same population according to the 7th edition criteria improved survival discrimination. Multivariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in survival and linear progression of hazard ratios for each stage grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7th edition AJCC staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma demonstrate better survival discrimination and risk stratification than previous criteria.

Prognostic implication of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with stage III rectal cancer.

METHODS

A review was made of 175 (male, 98) patients with stage III rectal cancer of R0 resection. LN disease was stratified both by the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer nodal classification (pN) and by quartiles of the lymph node ratio (LNR). Disease-free survivals (DFS) were made using Kaplan-Meier curves and assessed by the log rank test and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Patients ranged in age from 29 to 83 (median, 60) years with median follow-up of 47 months (range, 13 to 181 months). months. There was a significant correlation between the number of metastatic LNs and the LNR (r = 0.8681, P < 0.0001). Cut-off points of LNR quartiles best to separate patients with regard to 5-year DFS were between quartile 2 and 3, and between 3 and 4 (LNR1, 2, and 3); the 5-year DFS according to such stratification was 89.6%, 55.8%, and 18.2% in LNR1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.0001). Cox model identified the LNR as the most significant independent prognostic covariate; LNR2 showed 3.6 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.682 to 7.584; P = 0.0009) and LNR3, 18.7 times (95% CI, 6.872 to 50.664; P < 0.0001) more risky than LNR1.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ratio-based LN staging, which reflects the number of LNs examined and the quality of LN dissection, is a simple and reliable system for prognostic LN stratification in patients with stage III rectal cancer.

Investigation of the recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to investigate the recurrence patterns of gastric cancer and determine the predictive information of recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 308 gastric cancer patients who underwent a curative resection, to identify the factors associated with the recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-nine gastric cancer patients had recurrence following curative resection. One hundred and twenty-six patients were observed for 3 years after the operation. Locoregional recurrence formed part of the recurrence pattern in 107 patients, peritoneal dissemination was observed in 98 patients, and distant metastasis occurred in 22 patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that locoregional recurrence was only associated with the Lauren classification (P = 0.003); peritoneal dissemination was only associated with N stage (P < 0.001); and distant metastasis was only associated with the Lauren classification (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, and distant metastasis were the most common recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection. Each recurrence pattern is associated with specific clinicopathological factors.

Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is considered one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer. However, the optimal system for accurate staging of lymph node metastasis for patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR), which is calculated by dividing the number of metastatic lymph nodes by the total number of nodes harvested from patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 186 consecutive patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at our hospital. The lymph node status was classified according to three systems:the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) system; the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) system; and an MLR-based system (MLR0: 0, MLR1: 0.01-0.19, MLR2: >or=0.2). The influence of the MLR on patient survival was determined using univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the generalized Wilcoxon test, and analysis with the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of the patients with MLR0, MLR1, and MLR2 was 88.6%, 59.4%, and 13.4%, respectively. In addition to the MLR, the UICC/AJCC N category,JGCA n category, tumor stage (pT category), and tumor diameter significantly influenced the 5-year survival rate, as determined by univariate analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed that of the three factors used to stage lymph node involvement, MLR was the most significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLR is an important and easy-to-assess prognostic factor that should be considered for staging lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Prognostic relevance of the lymph node ratio in surgical patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

AIM

Few studies have investigated the influence of the lymph node ratio (LNR), the ratio of the number of lymph nodes harboring metastatic cancer to the total number of lymph nodes removed, on the outcome after surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This study was conducted to examine the prognostic impact of LNR in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 60 consecutive patients who underwent resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We focused on the LNR, which was classified as 0 in 34 patients, between 0 and 0.2 in 13 patients, and greater than 0.2 in 13 patients.

RESULTS

The overall five-year survival rates for patients with LNRs of 0, 0 to 0.2, and ≥0.2 were 44%, 10%, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.023). LNR was an independent predictive factor for estimated survival by both univariate (p = 0.016) and multivariate (p = 0.022) analyses including LNR, the sites of the primary tumors, and surgical margin as the variables. There were no statistically significant differences between patients who had less than 12 lymph nodes removed and those who had 12 or more lymph nodes removed (p = 0.484).

CONCLUSION

LNR was a powerful, independent predictor of estimated survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. LNR should be considered when stratifying patients for future clinical trials.

Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification

BACKGROUND

The seventh TNM staging system for gastric cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) had a more detailed classification than the sixth TNM staging system for both the tumor (T) and lymph nodes (N). The authors compared survival rates assessed by the seventh staging system with those by the sixth system.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the prospectively collected database on patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital between 1986 and 2006, and calculated the survival rates of 9998 cases with primary cancer, R0 resection, and >14 retrieved lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative survival rates (5YSR) according to the seventh edition T or N classifications were significantly different. The 5YSR according to seventh edition of the TNM staging system were 95.1% (stage IA), 88.4% (stage IB), 84.0% (stage IIA), 71.7% (stage IIB), 58.4% (stage IIIA), 41.3% (stage IIIB), and 26.1% (stage IIIC), which were significantly different from each other. The 5YSR of the seventh edition T2 and T3 classifications had significant differences in patients with every N classification, and the 5YSR of seventh edition N1 and N2 classifications had significant differences in T2 patients, T3 patients, and T4 patients. Each stage in the sixth edition was divided into the seventh edition stage with different survival rates. In addition, the number of homogenous groupings in seventh edition TNM stages was increased from 1 to 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh system provided a more detailed classification of prognosis than the sixth system, especially between T2 and T3 tumors and N1 and N2 tumors, although further studies were found to be needed for the N3a and N3b classification.

Gastric cancer and the search for a good prognostic classification: a challenge

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide. The standard treatment is radical surgical resection, but 60% of patients will present recurrence. TNM classification (6th edition, American Joint Committee on Cancer) recommends the removal of at least 15 regional lymph nodes to carry out an adequate pathological staging. But in our environment, only 20% of cases have the minimum recommended, so it would be very important to have an alternative prognostic. We designed a retrospective study to evaluate different prognostic factors in patients inadequately staged.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We focused on patients with serosal involvement (pT3). The evaluation included general parameters such as age, sex, tumor site, histological type, type of gastrectomy, histological grade, number of nodes analyzed </≥ 10, lymph node ratio (LNR) with a 20% cutoff value, and adjuvant treatment. The association between clinicopathological variables and recurrence was investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. It was considered statistically significant with P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients who met the criteria were studied. Median age 65 years; 68% men, 32% women; median follow-up time for the overall population, 44 months (range 15-119 months); number of nodes analyzed, median 7 (range 0-14 nodes); recurrence in 59%; median time to recurrence, 15 months (range 3-48 months); the cumulative risk of relapse at five years, 64%. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that the LNR (P = 0.03) and total number of nodes analyzed </≥ 10 (P = 0.04) were independent predictors for the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

LNR and total number of nodes analyzed with a threshold of 10 (</≥ 10 nodes analyzed) were independent predictors of recurrence in patients with gastric carcinoma pT3 and an insufficient number of nodes examined.

Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) may have low clinical utility in gastric cancer patients treated by limited lymphadenectomy: results from a single-center experience of 526 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes (N ratio) in gastric cancer patients who underwent limited lymphadenectomy and had a small number (< or =15) of analyzed nodes.

METHODS

The prognostic value of the actual AJCC/UICC pN staging system and the N ratio (0%, 1-25%, > 25%) were analyzed by means of univariate and multivariate analyses for 526 patients who underwent R0 resection for gastric adenocarcinoma at the Latvia Oncology Center.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) number of analyzed nodes was 5.6 (2.8). The number of positive nodes significantly increased with the number of analyzed nodes (p < 0.001). No significant differences in survival (p = 0.508) and risk of death (p = 0.224) were observed between pN1 and pN2 subsets. When the N ratio (1-25% vs. > 25%) was taken into account, a significant difference was demonstrated between pNR1 and pNR2 with respect to survival (p = 0.017) and risk of death (p = 0.012). Nonetheless, the joint allocation of the two classifications demonstrated that only a minority of patients (28 cases) belonged to the pNR1 subset and none of these belonged to the AJCC/UICC pN2 subset.

CONCLUSIONS

When a small number of lymph nodes are analyzed, the N ratio can discriminate patients better than TNM classification. However, because a small number of retrieved nodes produced only a small number of pNR1 patients, the N ratio classification cannot be justified for clinical use.

The node ratio as prognostic factor after curative resection for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The depth of the tumor invasion and nodal involvement are the two main prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Staging systems differ among countries and new tools are needed to interpret and compare results and to reduce stage migration. The node ratio (NR) has been proposed as a new prognostic factor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 282 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Parma University Hospital between 2000 and 2007. TNM stage, NR, overall survival, survival according to nodal status, and survival according to the total number of nodes retrieved were calculated.

RESULTS

At univariate analysis, the TNM stage, number of metastatic nodes, NR, and depth of tumor invasion, but not the number of nodes retrieved, were significant prognosis factors. Patients with more than 15 nodes retrieved in the specimen survived significantly longer (p < 0.04). This was confirmed for all N or NR classes within N groups. There was a correlation between the number of nodes retrieved and N but not with the NR category. NR was an independent prognostic factor at Cox regression.

CONCLUSION

NR is a reliable and sensitive tool to differentiate patients with similar characteristics, probably more so than the TNM system. NR is not strictly related to the number of nodes retrieved and this may potentially decrease the stage migration phenomenon. More trials are needed to validate this factor.

Ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes for prediction of survival in patients with inadequately staged gastric cancer

Background

Staging is inadequate in up to 70 per cent of patients with gastric cancer in Western countries owing to the small number of lymph nodes dissected during surgery. The aim was to determine whether using the ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes (LNR) might improve accuracy.

Methods

Data were analysed from patients with gastric cancer who had gastrectomy in several centres between 1986 and 1998, with dissection of 15 or fewer lymph nodes. LNRs and other prognostic factors were evaluated.

Results

From a total of 738 patients, the median number of resected nodes was 8 (range 1–15) and median LNR was 42·8 per cent. The number of metastatic nodes significantly affected survival only in univariable analysis. In a Cox proportional hazards model, patient age, depth of tumour infiltration, tumour location, and LNR were identified as independent prognostic factors. Compared with node-negative patients, the hazard ratio for an LNR of 0·1–40·0 per cent was 1·85 (P &lt; 0·001), increasing to 2·93 (P &lt; 0·001) when the LNR exceeded 40·0 per cent.

Conclusion

The LNR cannot be used as a substitute for staging with adequate lymphadenectomy. It may help to stratify patients in terms of prognosis when the number of resected lymph nodes is limited.

Influencing factors and clinical significance of the metastatic lymph nodes ratio in gastric adenocarcinoma

Background

To investigate influencing factors of the metastatic lymph nodes ratio (MLR) and whether it is related to survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical features of 121 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma enrolled in our hospital between 2000 and 2007. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff of the MLR, and CK20 immunohistochemical staining was used to detect micrometastasis of the lymph nodes.

Results

The areas under the ROC curve of MLR used to predict the death of 3-year and 5-year postoperative patients were 0.826 ± 0.053 and 0.896 ± 0.046. Thus MLR = 30.95% and MLR = 3.15% were designated as cutoffs. The MLR was then classified into three groups: MLR₁ (MLR<3.15%); MLR₂(3.15% ≤ MLR ≤ 30.95%); and MLR₃ (MLR>30.95%). We found that patients with a higher MLR demonstrated a much poorer survival period after radical operation than those patients with a lower MLR (P = 0.000). The COX model showed that MLR was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.000). The MLR could also discriminate between subsets of patients with different 5-year survival periods within the same N stage (P < 0.05). The MLR has been shown to be 34.7% (242/697) by HE staining and 43.5% (303/697) by CK staining (P = 0.001). The clinicopathological characteristics of lymph vessel invasion and the depth of invasion could significantly affect the MLR.

Conclusion

MLR is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. The combined ROC curve with MLR is an effective strategy to produce a curve to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival rates.

EORTC-ROG expert opinion: radiotherapy volume and treatment guidelines for neoadjuvant radiation of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction and the stomach

PURPOSE

The Gastro-Intestinal Working Party of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group (GIWP-ROG) developed guidelines for target volume definition in neoadjuvant radiation of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the stomach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Guidelines about the definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) are based on a systematic literature review of the location and frequency of local recurrences and lymph node involvement in adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach. Therefore, MEDLINE was searched up to August 2008. Guidelines concerning prescription, planning and treatment delivery are based on a consensus between the members of the GIWP-ROG.

RESULTS

In order to support a curative resection of GEJ and gastric cancer, an individualized preoperative treatment volume based on tumour location has to include the primary tumour and the draining regional lymph nodes area. Therefore we recommend to use the 2nd English Edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association which developed the concept of assigning tumours of the GEJ and the stomach to anatomically defined sub-sites corresponding respectively to a distinct lymphatic spread pattern.

CONCLUSION

The GIWP-ROG defined guidelines for preoperative irradiation of adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach to reduce variability in the framework of future clinical trials.

Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with node-negative metastasis following curative resection: outcomes of the survival and recurrence

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to provide valuable prognostic information on lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients following curative resection.

METHODS

Data from 112 lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection were reviewed to identify the independent factors of overall survival and recurrence.

RESULTS

The five-year survival rate of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was 85.7%, and recurrence was identified in 25 patients after curative surgery. The five-year survival rate of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was higher than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P<0.001). Recurrence in lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was less than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P=0.001). The median survival after recurrence of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was longer than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P=0.021). Using multivariate analyses, the following results were determined for lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients: sex, operative type and the presence of serosal involvement were independent factors of overall survival; and lymphadenectomy, number of dissected nodes and the presence of serosal involvement were independent factors of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was better than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients. Male sex, subtotal gastrectomy and nonserosal involvement should be considered to be the favourable predictors of postoperative long-term survival of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients. Conversely, limited lymphadenectomy, few dissected nodes and serosal involvement should be considered to be risk factors of postoperative recurrence of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients.

Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes

The purpose of this study was to clarify the outcome of the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) in gastric cancer patients with < or =15 examined lymph nodes after D2 lymphadenectomy. A retrospective study was performed in 906 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone D2 resection. Patients with < or =15 examined lymph nodes (group 1, n = 729) and those with >15 lymph nodes (group 2, n = 177) were analyzed separately. N ratio categories were identified as follows: N ratio 0, 0%; N ratio 1, 1% to 9%; N ratio 2, 10% to 25%; N ratio 3, >25%. Univariate analysis found that both the tumor, node, metastasis system (N staging system) and N ratio system well classified patients with significantly different prognosis. By multivariate analysis, only the N ratio classification was retained as an independent prognostic factor in both group 1 and 2 compared with the N stage system. Furthermore, when patients were divided into four groups according to the number of lymph nodes examined (1 to 3, 4 to 7, 8 to 11, and 12 to 15), the 5-year survival rates remained similar between groups according to the same N ratio (p > .05). Positive N ratio classification is a better prognostic tool compared with N staging system after D2 resection in patients with gastric cancer. It can prevent stage migration and can be used regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.

Prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 777 advanced gastric cancer patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy at our hospital.

RESULTS

The n ratio was significantly greater in cases with a large tumor, undifferentiated tumor, lymphatic vessel invasion, or blood vessel invasion. Furthermore, the n ratio was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion, level of lymph node metastasis, and number of lymph node metastases. The prognosis for gastric cancer patients correlated well with the n ratio. Multivariate analysis indicated that the n ratio, but not the number of lymph node metastases, was an independent prognostic indicator. Moreover, the n ratio was an independent prognostic factor in N1, N2, and N3 patients defined by the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer (JCGC).

CONCLUSIONS

The n ratio is useful for evaluating the status of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Therefore, the addition of the n ratio to the N (nodal) category defined by the JCGC may be a useful strategy in the N-staging classification of gastric cancer.

Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has shown that lymph node ratio (LNR) is superior to the number of positive lymph nodes (pLNs) in predicting the prognosis in several malignances other than colon cancer. We hypothesize that LNR may play a similar role in stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

We included 24,477 stage III colon cancer cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. Patients were categorized into four groups, LNR1 to 4, according to cutoff points 1/14, 0.25, and 0.50. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate the prognostic effect and estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of LNR.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival for patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC was 71.3%, 51.7%, and 34.0%, respectively (P < .0001). There was no survival difference among LNR1 to LNR4 for stage IIIA patients. In stage IIIB patients, the 5-year survival for those with LNR1 to LNR4 was 63.5%, 54.7%, 44.4%, and 34.2%, respectively (P < .0001). In stage IIIC patients, the 5-year survival for those with LNR2 to LNR4 was 49.6%, 41.7%, and 25.2%, respectively (P < .0001). LNR is an independent predictor of survival after adjusting patient's age, tumor size, tumor grade, race, number of pLNs, and total number of LNs harvested. (RR 2.30, 95% CI 2.08-2.55).

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer represent a heterogeneous group of patients with the majority either overstaged or understaged. LNR is a more accurate prognostic method for stage III colon cancer patients. We propose an algorithm to incorporate LNR into current AJCC staging system.

Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph-node ratio in early gastric cancer

The metastatic lymph-node ratio has important prognostic value in gastric cancer; this study focused on its significance in early gastric cancer. In total, 1,472 patients with early gastric cancer underwent curative gastrectomy between 1992 and 2001. Of these, 166 (11.3%) had histologically proven lymph-node metastasis. Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Metastasis was evaluated using the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JGC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/Tumor, Node, Metastasis (UICC/TNM) Classification. The metastatic lymph-node ratio was calculated using the hazard ratio. The cut-off values for the metastatic lymph-node ratio were set at 0, <0.15, >or=0.15 to <0.30, and >or=0.30. The numbers of dissected and metastatic lymph nodes were correlated, but the number of dissected lymph nodes and the metastatic lymph-node ratio was not related. The JGC and UICC/TNM classification demonstrated stage migration and heterogeneous stratification for disease-specific survival. The metastatic lymph-node ratio showed less stage migration and homogenous stratification. The metastatic lymph-node ratio may be a superior method of classification, which provides also accurate prognostic stratification for early gastric cancer patients.

Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty four patients who underwent D(2) dissection for gastric carcinoma at Ankara Oncology Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The prognostic factors including Japanese classification, AJCC/UICC TNM classification and metastatic lymph node ratio (1-10% and >10%) were evaluated in univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that Borrmann classification, pN-category of AJCC/UICC classification and metastatic lymph node ratio were the most significant prognostic factors and a higher hazard ratio was obtained for metastatic lymph node ratio than pN category of AJCC/UICC classification (4.5 vs. 11.4). When the metastatic ratio groups of 1-10% and >10% were subdivided into pN(1), pN(2) and pN(3) categories of the AJCC/UICC classification, there was no statistical difference between survival curves. When pN(1), pN(2) and pN(3) categories of the AJCC/UICC classification were subdivided into the ratio groups of 1-10% and >10%, the survival rate of ratio group 1-10% was better than ratio group >10%.

CONCLUSION

With its simplicity and reproducibility, metastatic lymph node ratio can be used as a reliable prognostic indicator.

The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series

AIMS

The proportion between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N-ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In the present work we validated the reliability of N-ratio in a large, multicenter series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma. Survival of patients with >15 (Group-1, n=1421) and those with < or =15 (Group-2, n=432) lymph nodes examined was separately analyzed in order to evaluate the influence of lymph node dissection on disease staging. N-ratio categories (N-ratio 0, 0%; N-ratio 1, 1-9%; N-ratio 2, 10-25%; N-ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach.

RESULTS

At multivariate analysis, N-ratio (but not TNM N-category) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in Group-1 and Group-2 (HR for N-ratio 1, N-ratio 2 and N-ratio 3=1.67, 2.96 and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68 and 4.28, respectively). After a median follow-up of 45.5 months, the 5-year overall survival rates of TNM N0, N1 and N2 patients were significantly different in Group-1 vs Group-2. This was not the case when adopting the N-ratio classification, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to patients being understaged using the N-category, but not N-ratio. Moreover, N-ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within TNM N1 and N2 categories in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

N-ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer, including those cases with limited lymph node dissection. These data support the rationale to propose the implementation of N-ratio into the current TNM staging system.

The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is a better prognostic factor as compared with traditional staging systems in patients with gastric cancer regardless of the extension of lymph node dissection.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at 6 Italian centers. Patients with >15 (group 1, n = 1421) and those with <or=15 (group 2, n = 432) lymph nodes examined were separately analyzed. N ratio categories (N ratio 0, 0%; N ratio 1, 1%-9%; N ratio 2, 10%-25%; N ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 45.5 months (range, 4-182 months), the 5-year overall survival of N0, N1, and N2 patients of group 1 versus group 2 was 83.4% versus 74.2% (P = 0.0026), 54.3% versus 44.3% (P = 0.018), and 32.7% versus 14.7% (P = 0.004), respectively, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to the understaging of patients. N ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within N1 and N2 stages in both groups. At multivariate analysis, the N ratio (but not N stage) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in group 1 and group 2 (HR for N ratio 1, N ratio 2, and N ratio 3 = 1.67, 2.96, and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68, and 4.28, respectively). In our series, the implementation of N ratio led to the identification of subgroups of patients prognostically more homogeneous than those classified by the TNM system.

CONCLUSION

N ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer also in case of limited lymph node dissection. These data may represent the rational for improving the prognostic power of current UICC TNM staging system and ultimately the selection of patients who may most benefit from adjuvant treatments.

Classification of Lymph Node Metastases from Gastric Cancer: Comparison between N-Site and N-Number Systems. Our Experience and Review of the Literature

The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system has become the principal method for assessing the extent of disease, determining prognosis in gastric cancer patients, and affecting the therapy strategies. The extent of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor. The aim of this study was to compare the N-classifications of the 4th and the 5th-6th TNM editions and to evaluate retrospectively the prognostic value of the 2002 TNM edition. We evaluated 344 patients who underwent curative total or subtotal gastrectomy. Nodal involvement was detected in 221 (64%) patients. Median follow-up period was 76 months. Thirty per cent of the old N1 patients were reclassified as pN2 (18.5%) and pN3 (11.3%). Eighty-eight per cent of the old N2 patients were reclassified as pN1 (75%) and pN3 (13.7%). In reclassifying the patients, statistically significant changes were reported between 1987 and 2002 TNM stage grouping, mainly in stage IIIB and IV. The 5-year survival rate per stage group did not statistically differ between the 4th and the 5th–6th editions, although a diminutive trend was registered in the IIIA stage. pTNM stage, nodal numerical stage, nodal topographical stage, and depth of tumor invasion resulted in significantly independent prognostic factors. Our data confirm the simplicity and easy application of the new stadiation and the better prognostic stratification of the N-stage. The pN3 group showed a worse prognosis independent of location. On the other hand, prognostic value of pN1 and pN2 stage is lower, probably depending on lymph node location. In multivariate analysis, the difference between old and new TNM staging is low. Hence, we suggest comparing lymph node location and number in larger series. In our series, in pT1 tumors, neither pN2 nor pN3 involvement was found. Hence, in our opinion, for correct N-staging, 10 lymph nodes in early gastric cancer and at least 16 in the other pT-stages seem sufficient for a real pN0 stadiation.

Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (LNR) in patients with stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

A review was made of 201 patients (106 men) with stage III colon cancer of R0 resection. Lymph node (LN) disease was stratified both by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer nodal staging system (pN) and by quartiles of the LNR. Survival curves were made by Kaplan-Meier analysis and assessed by the log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Patients ranged in age from 22 to 82 (median, 59) years with median follow-up of 52 (range, 13-96) months.

RESULTS

The LNR increased as a function of the number metastatic LNs (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], .7155-.8265). Cutoff points of LNR quartiles to be the best separating patients with regard to 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) were between quartile 1 and 2, and between 3 and 4 (pNr1, 2, and 3); the 5-year DFS according to such stratification was 83.6%, 61.1%, and 20% in pNr1, pNr2, and pNr3, respectively (P < .0001). The Cox model identified the pNr as the most statistically significant covariate: pNr2 was three times (95% CI, 1.407-6.280) and pNr3 eight times more risky than pNr1 (95% CI, 3.739-18.704).

CONCLUSIONS

Ratio-based LN staging, which reflects the number of LNs examined and the quality of LN dissection, is a potent modality for prognostic stratification in patients with LN-positive colon cancer.

The N ratio predicts recurrence and poor prognosis in patients with node-positive early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The metastatic status of the regional node is the most significant prognostic factor for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, diverse prognoses are evident even among the same N classifications of the current tumor-node-metastasis system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes (N ratio) in identifying a high-risk subgroup with node-positive EGC.

METHODS

From a prospective database of 1264 EGC patients between 1987 and 1997, 156 (12.4%) were found to have histologically confirmed node metastasis. A number of prognostic factors, including the N ratio, were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate of node-positive EGC was 16.7% (n = 26). The overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 84.0%. It was 26.9% and 95.4% in patients with and without recurrence, respectively (P < .0001; log-rank test). The cutoff value of the N ratio was set at .07. The 5-year survival rate of patients with an N ratio <.07 was 94.0%; this was significantly higher than the rate (72.6%) for those with a ratio >.07 (P < .0001; log-rank test). Both univariate and multivariate analysis identified the N ratio as the most significant predictive factor for recurrence and overall survival. Regarding stage migration, it shows superiority in comparison to the number-based N classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The N ratio is a more effective and rational indicator for prognostic stratification of patients with lymph node-positive EGC than the current N classification of the tumor-node-metastasis system.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Metastatic lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is an association between the number of resected lymph node and the number of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer, suggesting that pN category could be influenced by the extension of the lymphadenectomy. This study evaluates this association and proposes a comprehensive use of the ratio as prognostic factor.

METHOD

Review of 183 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. The association between the number of resected lymph nodes and the number of metastatic lymph nodes was analysed and evaluated with other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The number of lymph node metastases increased with the number of resected lymph nodes. The lymph node ratio was a better prognostic factor than the number of metastatic lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The metastatic lymph node ratio seems to be a good prognostic factor, but needs further evaluation.

Ratio Between Metastatic and Examined Lymph Nodes Is an Independent Prognostic Factor After D2 Resection for Gastric Cancer: Analysis of a Large European Monoinstitutional Experience

BACKGROUND

In view of the lack of consensus on the level and number of lymph nodes to be examined for accurate staging of patients with gastric cancer, our aim was to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph node status in a large European monoinstitutional experience.

METHODS

A review was made of our prospective database from 1980 to 2000, when 314 of 445 patients operated for gastric adenocarcinoma underwent radical resection (R0) with D2 lymphadenectomy. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model in forward stepwise regression.

RESULTS

In 277 evaluable patients, 5-year survival was 57% (median follow-up, 48 months; range, 2-251). A total of 7668 lymph nodes were examined (median, 27; range, 11-62). The 5-year survivals according to the metastatic/examined lymph nodes ratio (N ratio) were 14%, 50%, 61%, and 82% in the group of patients with N ratio >25%, 11%-25%, 1%-10%, and 0%, respectively (P <.0001). At multivariate analysis, the N ratio was the best single independent prognostic factor (P =.000).

CONCLUSIONS

After R0 resection for gastric cancer, the N ratio is a potent prognostic factor. It should therefore be considered in the clinical decision making process.

The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The need for a precise lymph node staging without stage migration is of paramount importance when comparing and evaluating international treatment results.

METHODS

We reviewed 1019 patients who underwent R0 resection at Kansai Medical University between 1980 and 1997. The patients were classified according to the 1997 International Union Against Cancer (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN classification or the N staging depending on the ratio between the number of excised and the number of involved lymph nodes (pN1, < or = 25%; pN2, < or = 50%; pN3, >50%).

RESULTS

Among the 1997 UICC/AJCC pN subgroups, prognosis worsened with an increase in lymph node ratio. In contrast, the ratio-based classification showed more homogenous survival according to the number of involved lymph nodes. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the ratio-based classification was the most significant prognostic factor, whereas the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification was not found to be an independent predictor of survival. In addition, the ratio-based classification showed a superiority to the 1997 UICC/AJCC classification with respect to stage migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Ratio-based lymph node staging is simple and gives more precise information for prognosis with fewer problems related to stage migration than the 1997 UICC/AJCC staging system.

Advanced gastric cancer with multiple lymph node metastasis successfully treated with etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin

Gastric cancer usually shows poor sensitivity to chemotherapy, and the presence of lymph node metastases is associated with extremely poor prognosis, especially when the number of such nodes is more than 10. We report here a case of advanced gastric cancer with histopathologically confirmed metastases in 15 regional lymph nodes, in which the recurrent tumor was sensitive to combination chemotherapy. Distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed for the primary tumor. A hard (recurrent) tumor was detected in the upper abdomen 5 months postoperatively. Abdominal CT revealed two tumors measuring 3.5 x 1.8 and 3.3 x 2 cm in diameter at the front of the pancreatic head, which suggested recurrence. Etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin (EAP) chemotherapy (20 mg/kg adriamycin, 100 mg/kg etoposide and 50 mg/kg cisplatin (CDDP)) was administered every 6 weeks. The tumors regressed and became undetectable on CT after four cycles. At that stage, CDDP was replaced with 400 mg/kg carboplatin, which was administered every 1 or 2 months. The patient had no recurrence 8 years after surgery. For treatment of advanced gastric cancer with multiple lymph node metastases, a wide resection of the tumor should be performed followed by treatment of the residual tumor cells with a suitable combination chemotherapy taking into consideration the characteristics of the tumor and the condition of the host. We present a patient with gastric cancer and histopathologically confirmed metastases in 15 regional lymph nodes, who was successfully treated by surgery followed by EAP adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient remains alive and well at 8 years after surgery.

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in Japan: relevance of Siewert's classification applied to 177 cases resected at a single institution

BACKGROUND

There had been a lack of international consensus about the definition of cancer of the gastric cardia until Siewert's classification was approved at a consensus conference during the second International Gastric Cancer Congress held in 1997.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of the prospective gastric cancer database at Aichi Cancer Center from 1983 to 1992 identified 1,913 gastric carcinoma patients who underwent gastrectomy. These patients were classified retrospectively according to the Siewert classification, and 177 patients who fell into one of the three types form the basis of this study. Survival analyses were performed after stratifying patients by clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

There were 33 patients with type II and 144 with type III, although none had type I, a type frequently observed in the west. No evidence of a change in the frequency of types II or III cancers (approximately 9.3% overall) among gastric carcinoma patients was observed over the 10-year period. Clinical staging of gastric carcinoma by the TNM classification was found to reflect accurately the prognosis of these patients. There were no longterm survivors among the few patients with metastasis to the perigastric nodes of the distal stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

A striking difference in the distribution of types of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction was observed in Japan compared with previously reported western data. A subgroup of carcinoma of the proximal stomach identified as types II and III may not require proximal gastrectomy from the viewpoint of sufficient lymphadenectomy.