Simultaneous antiandrogen withdrawal and treatment with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma

Ketoconazole plus Lenalidomide in patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC): results of an open-label phase II study

Introduction Ketoconazole is CYP-17 inhibitor with demonstrated activity in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Lenalidomide is an antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory agent with broad antitumor activity. We hypothesized that the modulation of the cellular immune response to apoptosis caused by ketoconazole may be increased with the addition of lenalidomide. Methods This is an open-label, non-randomized, single-arm phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination of ketoconazole and lenalidomide in patients with CRPC. Treatment schema included standard ketoconazole 400 mg orally three times daily plus hydrocortisone orally (20 mg in the morning and 10 mg at night) in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg orally daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle and aspirin 75 mg daily. The primary endpoint of this study was response (either by ≥ 50% PSA decline or objective disease assessed by RECIST v1.0). Exploratory endpoints included changes in T cell, dendritic cell (DC) marker counts, and their correlation with PSA response to treatment. Results A total of 34 CRPC patients, median age 69 years, 76% ECOG 0 and 76% with metastases participated in the study. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-35); nine patients (26%) received >10 cycles of treatment. PSA responses were observed in 17 patients (50%) with 11 patients (32%) achieving a PSA decline of >90%. Among the 9 patients with measurable disease, 2 patients (22%) had PR and 2 other (22%) had SD as best response. Median time to failure (TTF) was 2.7 months (range 0.2-32.8); and 8 patients were treated for ≥ 15 months. Most common adverse events included fatigue (76%), skin reactions (62%), lymphopenia (44%) and anemia (44%). One possible treatment-related death was noted. For 16 patients with available serial correlative data, there was a significant increase in the dendritic cells subsets BDCA-1 (+146.7, -20.1 to +501.1%, p = 0.018) and BDCA-3 (39.8%, -100 to 282.6%, p = 0.001) after 8 weeks of treatment. No association between immune cell counts and PSA response at 8 weeks was observed. Conclusion The combination of ketoconazole and lenalidomide was well tolerated but did not meet the primary endpoint of response, despite durable responses were observed in a selected group of patients. Although ketoconazole has now been replaced with more active novel agents, the combination of novel CYP-17 inhibitors with agents capable of modulating the immune system warrants further prospective investigation. NCT00460031.

Targeting prostate cancer cells with hybrid elastin-like polypeptide/liposome nanoparticles

Prostate cancer cells frequently overexpress the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, and various strategies have been applied in preclinical settings to target this receptor for the specific delivery of anticancer compounds. Recently, elastin-like polypeptide (ELP)-based self-assembling micelles with tethered GRP on the surface have been suggested to actively target prostate cancer cells. Poorly soluble chemotherapeutics such as docetaxel (DTX) can be loaded into the hydrophobic cores of ELP micelles, but only limited drug retention times have been achieved. Herein, we report the generation of hybrid ELP/liposome nanoparticles which self-assembled rapidly in response to temperature change, encapsulated DTX at high concentrations with slow release, displayed the GRP ligand on the surface, and specifically bound to GRP receptor expressing PC-3 cells as demonstrated by flow cytometry. This novel type of drug nanocarrier was successfully used to reduce cell viability of prostate cancer cells in vitro through the specific delivery of DTX.

The transcriptional programme of the androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is essential for normal prostate and prostate cancer cell growth. AR transcriptional activity is almost always maintained even in hormone relapsed prostate cancer (HRPC) in the absence of normal levels of circulating testosterone. Current molecular techniques, such as chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), have permitted identification of direct AR-binding sites in cell lines and human tissue with a distinct coordinate network evident in HRPC. The effectiveness of novel agents, such as abiraterone acetate (suppresses adrenal androgens) or enzalutamide (MDV3100, potent AR antagonist), in treating advanced prostate cancer underlines the on-going critical role of the AR throughout all stages of the disease. Persistent AR activity in advanced disease regulates cell cycle activity, steroid biosynthesis and anabolic metabolism in conjunction with regulatory co-factors, such as the E2F family, c-Myc and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) transcription factors. Further treatment approaches must target these other factors.

Changing paradigms in management of metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

Recently, the standard of care for metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) has changed considerably. Persistent androgen receptor (AR) signaling has been identified as a target for novel therapies and reengages the fact that AR continues to be the primary target responsible for metastatic prostate cancer. Androgen receptor gene amplification and over expression have been found to result in a higher concentration of androgen receptors on tumor cells, making them extremely sensitive to low levels of circulating androgens. Additionally, prostate cancer cells are able to maintain dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentration in excess of serum concentrations to support tumor growth. For many years ketoconazole was the only CYP17 inhibitor that was used to treat mCRPC. However, significant toxicities limit its use. Newly approved chemotherapeutic agents such as Abiraterone (an oral selective inhibitor of CYP17A), which blocks androgen biosynthesis both within and outside the prostate cancer cells), and enzalutamide (blocks AR signaling) have improved overall survival. There are also ongoing phase III trials for Orteronel (TAK- 700), ARN- 509 and Galeterone (TOK-001), which targets androgen signaling. In this review, we will present the rationale for the newly approved hormonal treatments, their indications and complications, and we will discuss ongoing trials that are being done to improve the efficacy of the approved agents. Finally, we will talk about the potential upcoming hormonal treatments for mCRPC.

Advances in androgen receptor targeted therapy for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in men. Current research findings suggest that the androgen receptor (AR) and its signaling pathway contribute significantly to the progression of metastatic PCa. The AR is a ligand activated transcription factor, where androgens such as testosterone (T) and dihydroxytestosterone (DHT) act as the activating ligands. However in many metastatic PCa, the AR functions promiscuously and is constitutively active through multiple mechanisms. Inhibition of enzymes that take part in androgen synthesis or synthesizing antiandrogens that can inhibit the AR are two popular methods of impeding the androgen receptor signaling axis; however, the inhibition of androgen-independent activated AR function has not yet been fully exploited. This article focuses on the development of emerging novel agents that act at different steps along the androgen-AR signaling pathway to help improve the poor prognosis of PCa patients.

Targeting the adrenal gland in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a case for orteronel, a selective CYP-17 17,20-lyase inhibitor

Androgen and the androgen receptor (AR) pathway remain the key targets for emerging new therapies against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Adrenal androgens and intratumoral testosterone production appear to be sufficient to activate AR in the castration-resistant setting. This process re-engages AR and allows it to continue to be the primary target responsible for prostate cancer progression. Adrenal androgen production can be blocked by inhibiting cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17), a key enzyme for androgen synthesis in adrenal glands and peripheral tissues. Therapeutic CYP17 inhibition by ketoconazole or by the recently approved adrenal inhibitor abiraterone acetate is the only available choice to target this pathway in CRPC. A new CYP17 inhibitor, with more selective inhibition of 17,20-lyase over 17α-hydroxylase, orteronel (TAK-700), is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials in pre- and postchemotherapy CRPC. In a completed phase II trial in CRPC patients, orteronel demonstrated its efficacy by lowering the levels of circulating androgens, reducing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and decreasing the levels of circulating tumor cells. Ongoing studies evaluating orteronel in CRPC will further define its safety and role in the management of this disease.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer: AUA Guideline

PURPOSE

This Guideline is intended to provide a rational basis for the management of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer based on currently available published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature was conducted using controlled vocabulary supplemented with keywords relating to the relevant concepts of prostate cancer and castration resistance. The search strategy was developed and executed by reference librarians and methodologists to create an evidence report limited to English-language, published peer-reviewed literature. This review yielded 303 articles published from 1996 through 2013 that were used to form a majority of the guideline statements. Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions were used for guideline statements lacking sufficient evidence-based data.

RESULTS

Guideline statements were created to inform clinicians on the appropriate use of observation, androgen-deprivation and antiandrogen therapy, androgen synthesis inhibitors, immunotherapy, radionuclide therapy, systemic chemotherapy, palliative care and bone health. These were based on six index patients developed to represent the most common scenarios encountered in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

As a direct result of the significant increase in FDA-approved therapeutic agents for use in patients with metastatic CRPC, clinicians are challenged with a multitude of treatment options and potential sequencing of these agents that, consequently, make clinical decision-making more complex. Given the rapidly evolving nature of this field, this guideline should be used in conjunction with recent systematic literature reviews and an understanding of the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patients' preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing management strategies.

Non-metastatic CRPC and asymptomatic metastatic CRPC: which treatment for which patient?

The introduction of early PSa-based diagnosis has profoundly impacted the epidemiology of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Many patients enter the disease at an early stage when the only sign of resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a progressive elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This created a very heterogeneous population of non-metastatic (M0) CRPC. PSa kinetics is the most powerful indicator of aggressiveness in that population and can be used to trigger imaging investigation and enrollment in clinical trials. Several registered and near to come treatments have not been tested in that population but in men with more advanced metastatic and often symptomatic disease. Several agents have been investigated to delay the onset of the first bone metastasis but only one, denosumab, has reached its end-point. Because CRPC remains largely driven by the androgen receptor (AR), physicians have relied on second-line hormonal manipulations to delay the progression of the disease, including first generation antiandrogens, adrenal synthesis inhibitors, steroids and estrogens. The data however are mostly limited to phase II trials.

Optimal management of recurrent prostate cancer in older patients

With a large, aging population in the USA and continued prolongation of life expectancy, treatment of cancer in the elderly will continue to be of importance. The most common cancer in men is prostate cancer, which is most often diagnosed in those over the age of 65 years. Initial therapies for prostate cancer are local treatments in those with localized disease and for whom definitive therapy is appropriate. Optimal treatment of an older patient with recurrent prostate cancer now involves more of a decision process than treatment has in the past, with the recent approval of several new medical agents for advanced prostate cancer. Through this article we will focus on treatment options for recurrent prostate cancer, keeping in mind the unique characteristics of the elderly population. A majority of the discussion will focus on many of the newly approved agents used to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer, and exciting agents currently under investigation. Improved androgen blockade has improved overall survival in patients with metastatic disease but carries many of the same adverse effects as previous agents. Newer approaches with immunotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, or second-generation androgen receptor blockers introduce a different adverse-effect profile for older patients. As data matures, these too may improve survival for patients with metastatic disease. Throughout all stages of disease, one must keep in mind the unique needs of an older patient population.

Current management of prostate cancer: dilemmas and trials

The past decade has witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the biology of prostate cancer. Androgen ablation/androgen receptor inhibition remains as the mainstay of treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Our understanding of the biology of prostate cancer has increased exponentially owing to advances in molecular biology. With this knowledge many intriguing issues have come to light, which clinicians and scientists alike strive to answer. These include why prostate cancer is so common, what drives the development of prostate cancer at a molecular level, why prostate cancer appears refractory to many families of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, and why prostate cancer preferentially metastasizes to bone. Two clinical forms of prostate cancer have been identified: indolent organ confined disease, which elderly men often die of, and aggressive metastatic disease. A method of distinguishing between these two forms of the disease at an organ-confined stage remains elusive. Understanding the mechanisms of castrate resistance is a further issue of clinical importance. New trials of treatments, including molecular agents that target prostate cancer from a range of angles, have been instituted over the past 10-15 years. We can look at these trials not only as a chance to investigate the effectiveness of new treatments but also as an opportunity to further understand the complex biology of this disease.

Novel agents for the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past 2 years, four new treatments have entered the treatment armamentarium for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Although these novel agents differ in their mechanism of action, they all face the same challenges: patient selection, timing of therapy and the cost/benefit of their use. In this review, we will discuss their development and implications when selecting treatment options for CRPC patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few years, a better understanding of the biology of CRPC has allowed us to develop rational therapies that have resulted in an improvement in the outcome of prostate cancer patients. Immunotherapy has entered the field and despite its limitations and challenges is here to stay. A better understanding of the long-term complications of androgen deprivation has changed the initial approach to most patients with advanced disease, and bone health has become a major focus in their management. Understanding the importance of the androgen receptor and other ligands has led to a dramatic paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease in which the androgen receptor becomes a central therapeutic target in the disease. Specific adrenal inhibitors and engineered super androgen receptor inhibitors have become the most promising agents in the disease. Similarly, chemotherapy has demonstrated clinical benefit and is now a standard of care in docetaxel-refractory patients.

SUMMARY

The management of CRPC patients continues to evolve. Novel treatments recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration have significantly impacted the outcome of CRPC. With the economic impact of their use, selecting the right patient, defining the appropriate timing and sequence of therapy have become critical facts that need to be followed when defining the contemporary treatment options for men with CRPC.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer: many treatments, many options, many challenges ahead

Although the long natural history of prostate cancer presents challenges in the development of novel therapeutics, major contributions have been observed recently. A better understanding of the long-term complications of androgen deprivation has changed the initial approach to most patients with advanced disease. Specifically, recognition of the limitations of prostate-specific antigen has driven the pursuit of new tools capable of becoming true surrogates for disease outcome. Understanding the molecular biology of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has led to a dramatic paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease where the androgen receptor becomes a central therapeutic target. Specific adrenal inhibitors and engineered super androgen receptor inhibitors have become the most promising agents in the disease. Novel immune therapies have been shown to improve survival in selected patients with castration-resistant disease despite the inability to impact traditional markers of response. Similarly, agents such as cabazitaxel and abiraterone acetate have demonstrated clinical benefit are now a standard of care in docetaxel-refractory metastatic CRPC patients. All these changes have occurred in a relatively short period and are likely to change the prostate cancer treatment paradigm. This review summarizes the current management of CRPC and discusses potential future directions.

New insights into the androgen-targeted therapies and epigenetic therapies in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in American men. The androgen receptor (AR), a receptor of nuclear family and a transcription factor, is the most important target in this disease. While most efforts in the clinic are currently directed at lowering levels of androgens that activate AR, resistance to androgen deprivation eventually develops. Most prostate cancer deaths are attributable to this castration-resistant form of prostate cancer (CRPC). Recent work has shed light on the importance of epigenetic events including facilitation of AR signaling by histone-modifying enzymes, posttranslational modifications of AR such as sumoylation. Herein, we provide an overview of the structure of human AR and its key structural domains that can be used as targets to develop novel antiandrogens. We also summarize recent findings about the antiandrogens and the epigenetic factors that modulate the action of AR.

Androgen receptor rediscovered: the new biology and targeting the androgen receptor therapeutically

Discoveries over the past decade suggest that castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is sensitive, but not resistant to, further manipulation of the androgen-androgen receptor (AR) axis. Several new therapies that target this axis have demonstrated clinical activity. In this article, preclinical and clinical findings occurring in the field of AR-targeted therapies are reviewed. Reviews of scientific and clinical development are divided into those occurring prereceptor (androgen production and conversion) and at the level of the receptor (AR aberrations and therapies targeting AR directly). Intracrine androgen production and AR amplification, among others, are among the principal aberrancies driving CRPC growth. Phase III data with abiraterone acetate and phase II data with MDV-3100, along with other similar therapies, confirm for the clinician that the scientific findings related to persistent AR signaling in a castrate milieu can be harnessed to produce significant clinical benefit for patients with the disease. Studies aimed at optimizing the timing of their use and exploring the mechanisms of resistance to these therapies are under way. The clinical success of therapies that directly target androgen synthesis as well as the most common aberrancies of the AR confirm that prostate cancer retains dependence on AR signaling, even in the castrate state.

Abiraterone acetate, a novel adrenal inhibitor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

The androgen receptor remains the key player in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Available agents capable of blocking early adrenal androgen production have limited activity and can lead to significant toxicities. Abiraterone acetate, a pregnenolone analog, is a small molecule that irreversibly inhibits CYP17, a rate-limiting enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this compound in men with metastatic CRPC. Recently, a randomized phase 3 trial evaluating abiraterone acetate in docetaxel-refractory CRPC patients demonstrated a survival improvement over placebo-treated patients (14.8 vs 10.9 months; HR 0.646; P < 0.0001). A similar trial in the pre-chemotherapy setting has completed accrual and is undergoing analysis. Here we review the rationale and clinical development of abiraterone acetate in men with CRPC.

CYP17 inhibitors for prostate cancer therapy

Prostate cancer (PC) is now the second most prevalent cause of death in men in the USA and Europe. At present, the major treatment options include surgical or medical castration. These strategies cause ablation of the production of testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and related androgens by the testes. However, because these procedures do not affect adrenal, prostate and other tissues' androgen production, they are often combined with androgen receptor antagonists to block their action. Indeed, recent studies have unequivocally established that in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) many androgen-regulated genes become re-expressed and tissue androgen levels increase despite low serum levels. Clearly, inhibition of the key enzyme which catalyzes the biosynthesis of androgens from pregnane precursors, 17α-hydroxy/17,20-lyase (hereafter referred to as CYP17) could prevent androgen production from all sources. Thus, total ablation of androgen production by potent CYP17 inhibitors may provide effective treatment of prostate cancer patients. This review highlights the role of androgen biosynthesis in the progression of prostate cancer and the impact of CYP17 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate, VN/124-1 (TOK-001) and TAK-700 in the clinic and in clinical development. Article from the special issue on Targeted Inhibitors.

Retrospective analysis of the consequences of acid suppressive therapy on ketoconazole efficacy in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The area under the curve of a single ketoconazole dose has been shown to decrease significantly when administered with acid suppressive therapy. No published studies have examined the clinical impact of concurrent ketoconazole and acid suppressive therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of acid suppressive therapy on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in CRPC patients receiving ketoconazole.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated CRPC patients treated with ketoconazole 3 times daily between January 1, 1999, and September 30, 2009. Patients included in the analysis had failed androgen deprivation therapy, and were subsequently initiated on ketoconazole. Response (PSA decline ≥50% maintained ≥4 weeks) was evaluated in patients receiving ketoconazole with (group 1 [G1]) or without (group 2 [G2]) concurrent acid suppressive therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (G1: 11 patients; G2: 19 patients) were included in the analysis. Mean age in G1 and G2 was 71.8 and 69.6 years, respectively. Most patients had received prior therapy with an antiandrogen (90.9% G1; 100% G2) and fewer patients received antiandrogen withdrawal therapy (27.3% G1; 21.1% G2). Median baseline PSA was 109.4 (G1) and 86.9 ng/mL (G2) (p = 0.55). Median duration of ketoconazole was 7.2 months in G1 and 5.8 months in G2 (p = 0.09). Ketoconazole adherence was 82% (G1) and 100% (G2). Median duration of concurrent acid suppressive therapy was 3.8 months (range 2.0-20.4) in G1. PSA response (72.7% and 47.4%; p = 0.26) and time to PSA response (1.2 vs 0.9 mo; p = 0.53) were statistically similar between G1 and G2, respectively. Median progression free survival was higher in G1 (11.5 vs 6.9 months in G2; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of concurrent acid suppressive therapy and ketoconazole in CRPC patients did not decrease PSA response rate, and progression free survival was unexpectedly higher compared with the non-acid suppressive therapy group. Larger studies are needed to verify the clinical impact of acid suppressive therapy in combination with ketoconazole.

Abiraterone acetate: a promising drug for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Abiraterone acetate (CB7630), a pregnenolone analog, is an orally administered small molecule that irreversibly inhibits a rate-limiting enzyme in androgen biosynthesis, CYP17, and blocks the synthesis of androgens in the testes, adrenal glands and prostate without causing adrenal insufficiency. In clinical studies, abiraterone acetate is well tolerated and shows promising clinical activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer. The recommended Phase II dose of abiraterone acetate is 1000 mg orally daily in combination with prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Side effects are minimal and mostly associated with secondary mineralocorticoid excess, owing to a compensatory increase in upstream steroids, such as deoxycorticosterone and corticosterone. These include hypertension, hypokalemia and edema and are easily manageable with a selective mineralocorticoid antagonist, such as eplerenone, or low-dose corticosteroids. Currently, abiraterone acetate is being tested in a Phase III trial for men with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer who are chemotherapy naive. A Phase III trial for patients following prior chemotherapy has been completed and is awaiting analysis.

Treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: updates on therapeutics targeting the androgen receptor signaling pathway

Androgens play a critical role in the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer through androgen receptor (AR)-regulated signaling pathways. Progress has been made in the development of potent agents designed to suppress androgen function by blocking the AR, inhibiting the synthesis of androgens, or targeting downstream AR signaling pathways. This review summarizes the development of novel therapies based on current insights into AR signaling pathways in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

[What comes after docetaxel?]

Chemotherapy with docetaxel represents the standard first-line treatment in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In cases of progression after treatment with docetaxel no standard treatment recommendation exists since no treatment was able to show a survival benefit in clinical trials. This review focuses on available treatment options for patients with progressive CRPC and highlights promising treatments that are currently under investigation in clinical trials including abiraterone acetate and MDV3100.

CYP17 blockade by abiraterone: further evidence for frequent continued hormone-dependence in castration-resistant prostate cancer

The limited prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on existing hormonal manipulation therapies calls out for the urgent need for new management strategies. The novel, orally available, small-molecule compound, abiraterone acetate, is undergoing evaluation in early clinical trials and emerging data have shown that the selective, irreversible and continuous inhibition of CYP17 is safe with durable responses in CRPC. Importantly, these efficacy data along with strong preclinical evidence indicate that a significant proportion of CRPC remains dependant on ligand-activated androgen receptor (AR) signalling. Coupled with the use of innovative biological molecular techniques, including the characterisation of circulating tumour cells and ETS gene fusion analyses, we have gained insights into the molecular basis of CRPC. We envision that a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying resistance to abiraterone acetate, as well as the development of validated predictive and intermediate endpoint biomarkers to aid both patient selection and monitor response to treatment, will improve the outcome of CRPC patients.

Inhibition of Cytochromes P450: Existing and New Promising Therapeutic Targets

Mammalian cytochromes P450 have been shown to play highly important roles in the metabolism of drugs and xenobiotics as well as in the biosynthesis of a variety of endogenous compounds, many of them displaying hormonal function. The role of P450s as therapeutic targets is still inadequately recognized although several P450 inhibitors became efficient drugs that even reached blockbuster status. Here, we try to give a comprehensive overview on cytochromes P450s, which are already well-established targets - particularly focussing on the treatment of infectious diseases, metabolic disorders and cancer - and on those, which have a high potential to become successful targets. In addition, the design of inhibitors of cytochromes P450 will be discussed.

Phase II study of ketoconazole plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for prostate cancer: effect of extent of disease on outcome

PURPOSE

The efficacy of ketoconazole plus the immunostimulatory cytokine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was prospectively evaluated in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer with and without metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had progressive castration resistant prostate cancer by consensus criteria and had received no prior immunotherapy, chemotherapy or ketoconazole. Patients received 400 mg ketoconazole orally 3 times daily, and 20 mg hydrocortisone orally each morning and 10 mg hydrocortisone orally each evening. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (250 microg/m2) was administered subcutaneously on days 15 to 28 of each 28-day cycle. Progression was defined as disease progression or toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were enrolled, including 37 with radiographically evident metastases and 12 with prostate specific antigen only disease. Median patient age was 68 years (range 52 to 84) and median prostate specific antigen was 23.1 ng/ml (range 5.4 to 306.5). Time to progression, which was the primary study end point, was 9.7 months for all patients. Ten of the 30 treatment failures showed radiographic progression and 6 were due to toxicity, while treatment failure in 14 of 30 patients (47%) consisted only of increasing prostate specific antigen. Median time to progression was 6.9 and 15.4 months in patients with and without metastases, respectively (p = 0.01). Of 48 patients 36 (75%, 95% CI 60-86) experienced a 50% or greater decrease in prostate specific antigen. Four grade 4 events occurred that were unrelated to the study drug. Grade 3 events related to study therapy in more than 1 patient consisted of fatigue in 7 (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ketoconazole and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor yields a high response rate and it is an option for patients with castration resistant prostate cancer. Time to progression in patients without metastases is significantly longer than in those without metastases.

Rising prostate-specific antigen after primary treatment of prostate cancer: sequential hormone manipulation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systematically the current endocrine treatment options for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Literature search of PubMed documented publications and abstracts from international meetings. Key items included timing and type of salvage hormone therapy, length of its application and handling of side effects.

RESULTS

The majority of patients with isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse are not candidates for salvage treatment with curative intent. The PSA threshold that triggers initiation of hormonal therapy is debatable and should be based also on pretreatment risk assessment. Intermittent androgen suppression is an emerging concept to circumvent the unresolved controversy of early versus deferred endocrine therapy. Since the tumor load at time of recurrence is low, peripheral androgen blockade with an antiandrogen and a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor is an acceptable first choice. In case of progression, addition of a LHRH analogue would be the next step. Antiandrogen withdrawal and second-line antiandrogens are clinically of limited value.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical-only progression after definitive treatment in curative intent is different from objective or even symptomatic relapse and allows for sequential hormonal therapy with a variety of compounds.

Pre-clinical evaluation of 1-nitroacridine derived chemotherapeutic agent that has preferential cytotoxic activity towards prostate cancer

Chemotherapy in prostate cancer (CaP) even as an adjunct has not been a success. In this communication, we report the pre-clinical efficacy of a nitroacridine derivative, C-1748 (9[2'-hydroxyethylamino]-4-methyl-1-nitroacridine) in CaP cell culture and human xenograft animal models. C-1748, a DNA intercalating agent has been derived from its precursor C-857 that was a potent anti-cancer drug, but failed clinical development due to "high" systemic toxicities. Chemical modifications such as the introduction of a "methyl" group imparted novel properties, the most interesting of which is the difference in the IC(50) values between LnCaP (22.5 nM), a CaP cell line and HL-60, a leukemia cell line (>100 nM). Using gammaH2AX as an intervention marker of DNA double strand breaks, we concluded that C-1748 is more efficacious in CaP cells than in HL-60 cells. In hormone dependent cells, the androgen receptor (AR) was identified as an additional target of C-1748. In xenograft studies, administration of C-1748 intra-peritoneally inhibited tumor growth by 80-90% with minimal toxicity. These studies identify C-1748 as a novel acridine drug that has a high therapeutic index and low cytotoxicity on myelocytic cells with potential for clinical development.

The case for secondary hormonal therapies in the chemotherapy age

PURPOSE

Virtually all patients with high risk localized and metastatic prostate cancer who are treated with androgen deprivation therapy eventually have progressive clinical or biochemical disease despite this therapy. Despite this fact numerous therapies are available that target the interaction of androgen and androgen receptor in the castrate testosterone milieu and many clinical investigations are under way in this area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This literature review focuses on the current clinical literature in support of secondary hormonal therapy.

RESULTS

Despite low androgen levels the androgen receptor remains active through the amplification, mutation or alteration of coactivator function. These observations suggest that secondary hormonal therapies remain a reasonable clinical approach. Such approaches can be receptor or ligand directed. Receptor directed approaches to secondary hormonal therapy are antiandrogen withdrawal, sequential use of antiandrogens and estrogenic compounds. Ligand directed therapies are adrenal cortex inhibitors, such as ketoconazole and others in clinical development. Furthermore, in the context of androgen independent tumor growth in patients with metastatic disease clinicians are now faced with the choice of using chemotherapy or secondary hormonal manipulations. Appropriate patient selection is a critical component to the effective use of these agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The modest activity of these secondary therapies challenges the notion that advancing prostate cancer uniformly becomes hormone refractory. It offers an alternative to the early use of chemotherapy in patients with androgen independent disease.

Pre-clinical toxicology and pathology of 9-(2′-hydroxyethylamino)-4-methyl-1-nitroacridine (C-1748), a novel anti-cancer agent in male Beagle dogs

We have developed a group of 4-substituted-1-nitroacridines with potent anti-tumor activity against prostate cancer and less toxic than parent 1-nitroacridines. The most active 9-(2'-hydroxyethylamino)-4-methyl-1-nitroacridine (C-1748) was selected for pre-clinical studies. The current study was undertaken to evaluate clinical and/or morphological adverse effects of C-1748 as a single intravenous dose at concentrations ranging from 0.16 to 4.6 mg/kg administered to male Beagle dogs. The maximum tolerated dose was 1.5 mg/kg. Emesis was observed in all groups lasting an average of 30 min to 12 h post-dosing. At high dose, extreme aggression was observed in one dog followed by disorientation and depression lasting for 48 h a frequent observation with chemotherapy. Reductions in platelets and white blood cells were observed which was similar to that seen with other chemotherapeutic agents. A compensatory hyperplasia of lymph nodes and a transient and limited extravasation in the intestinal mucosa were also observed. Increases in aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and creatine phosphokinase were transient with normal levels restored by day 9. These enzyme increases were accompanied by epithelial hypertrophy of larger bile ductules in the periportal triads of the liver. The low toxicity profile and high tumor target activity make this novel class of drug a promising chemotherapeutic agent.

Secondary Hormonal Manipulations in Prostate Cancer

Targeting AIPC with therapies that affect the mechanisms of androgen receptor signaling despite a castrate testosterone milieu is an active and growing area of clinical research. At present, for patients with AIPC, the data support the maintenance of the castrate state, recognition of the AAWD phenomenon,the sequential use of oral antiandrogens, and a trial of estrogens or adrenal androgen-targeted therapies. Novel agents are being developed that seek to prolong the duration of clinical responses and the overall response rate.

Combination therapy using LHRH and somatostatin analogues plus dexamethasone in androgen ablation refractory prostate cancer patients with bone involvement: a bench to bedside approach

The development of resistance to anticancer therapies is a major hurdle in preventing long-lasting clinical responses to conventional therapies in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Herein, the molecular evidence documenting that bone metastasis microenvironment survival factors (mainly the paracrine growth hormone-independent, urokinase-type plasminogen activator-mediated increase of IGF-1 and the endocrine production of growth hormone-dependent IGF-1, mainly liver-derived IGF-1 production) produce an epigenetic form of prostate cancer cells that are resistant to proapoptotic therapies is reviewed. Consequently, the authors present the conceptual framework of a novel antibone microenvironment survival factor, mainly an anti-IGF-1 hormonal manipulation for androgen ablation refractory prostate cancer (a combination of conventional androgen ablation therapy [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist-A or orchiectomy]) with dexamethasone plus somatostatin analogue, which yielded durable objective responses and major improvement of bone pain and performance status in stage D3 prostate cancer patients.

Secondary Hormonal Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Androgen ablation remains the cornerstone of management for advanced prostate cancer. Therapeutic options in patients with progressive disease following androgen deprivation include antiandrogen withdrawal, secondary hormonal agents and chemotherapy. Multiple secondary hormonal agents have clinical activity and the sequential use of these agents may lead to prolonged periods of clinical response. We provide a state-of-the-art review of the various agents currently used for secondary hormonal manipulation and discusses their role in the systemic treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the peer reviewed literature was performed on the topic of secondary hormonal therapies, including oral antiandrogens, adrenal androgen inhibitors, corticosteroids, estrogenic compounds, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and alternative hormonal therapies for advanced prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Secondary hormonal therapies can provide a safe and effective treatment option in patients with AIPC. The use of steroids and adrenolytics, such as ketoconazole and aminoglutethimide, has resulted in symptomatic improvement and a greater than 50% prostate specific antigen decrease in a substantial percent of patients with AIPC. A similar clinical benefit has been demonstrated with estrogen based therapies. Furthermore, these therapies have demonstrated a decrease in metastatic disease burden. Other novel hormonal therapies are currently under investigation and they may also show promise as secondary hormonal therapies. Finally, guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration Prostate Cancer Endpoints Workshop were reviewed in the context of developing new agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary hormonal therapy serves as an excellent therapeutic option in patients with AIPC in whom primary hormonal therapy has failed. Practicing urologists should familiarize themselves with these oral medications, their indications and their potential side effects.

Chemotherapy for Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: Now It's a Question of “When?”

Recently, data from two randomized phase III studies that compared docetaxel-based chemotherapy to mitoxantrone-based therapy demonstrated that treatment with docetaxel can prolong life in a significant way for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. For many patients who experience disease progression after androgen-deprivation therapy, however, chemotherapy may not be immediately indicated. Such cases include those individuals with hormone-refractory disease in the absence of clinical metastases, and those with asymptomatic metastatic disease, for example. As a result, clinicians treating patients with hormone-refractory disease must weigh the benefits of earlier chemotherapy against its risks, and may consider other therapies such as secondary hormonal approaches before initiating chemotherapy. This decision is further complicated by the fact that a phase III study designed to compare secondary hormonal therapy with chemotherapy has failed due to lack of accrual. Furthermore, the limitations of chemotherapy for prostate cancer are being clarified and include a lack of standard second-line therapy as well as uncertain benefits for those with nonmetastatic disease. In this review, we will highlight some of the issues that impact on the decision of when to start chemotherapy and in whom as well as the potential benefits of secondary hormonal approaches.

Long-term outcome for men with androgen independent prostate cancer treated with ketoconazole and hydrocortisone

PURPOSE

The combination of high dose ketoconazole and hydrocortisone (HDK) is active against androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Median response times with HDK tend to be brief but a significant minority of AIPC patients benefit with extended responses. Well characterized response and survival information, especially in the cohort of patients who experience these longer, more durable, responses has not been previously reported. Characterization of this subgroup is of particular interest since men with long-term responses derive the greatest benefit from HDK therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 78 patients with AIPC treated with HDK between March 1991 and February 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline clinical and laboratory factors predictive of prolonged response and survival were identified.

RESULTS

The median baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) before the initiation of HDK was 25.1. The number of patients with zero, 1 to 3, and more than 3 lesions on bone scan were 25, 35 and 18, respectively. Median and mean time to PSA progression was 6.7 and 14.5 months. Median and mean survival time was 38.0 and 42.4 months, respectively. Response time and survival were highly correlated (r = 0.799). A total of 34 (44%) men had a greater than 75% decrease in PSA. The median survival times in men with more vs less than a 75% decrease were 60 vs 24 months, respectively. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, prolonged survival was predicted by percent PSA decrease, extent of disease on bone scan and baseline PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketoconazole can induce prolonged responses, occasionally lasting for years. Long responses are more likely to occur in men initiating HDK earlier in the course of disease before the cancer burden becomes excessive.

Secondary hormonal manipulations in prostate cancer

Virtually all patients treated with androgen deprivation eventually develop progressive clinical or biochemical disease despite this therapy. Despite low levels of androgen, the androgen receptor remains active, making secondary hormonal therapies a reasonable clinical approach. Considerations for such patients include antiandrogen withdrawal, sequential use of antiandrogens, adrenal cortex inhibitors, and estrogenic compounds. Collectively, the modest activity of these therapies challenges the notion that advancing prostate cancer will uniformly become "hormone refractory."

An Evaluation of Intermediate-Dose Ketoconazole in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The management of hormone refractory prostate cancer remains controversial. Among the options, second-line hormonal therapy is commonly used. We investigated the efficacy of ketoconazole, an inhibitor of testicular and adrenal androgen biosynthesis, for treating patients with advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer.

METHODS

The study comprised 38 patients with progressive disease despite combined androgen blockade. Treatment consisted of intermediate-dose ketoconazole (300mg three times daily) and replacement hydrocortisone. Patients were monitored clinically and with serial psa measurements every 3 months. the principal endpoint was psa response.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients, 21 (55.3%) showed a decrease in PSA >50% (95% confidence interval 38.3%-71.4%) with a median duration of 6 months (range 3-48 months). A PSA reduction >50% was seen in 21 of 34 patients (61.8%) with established metastases. Thirteen patients (34.2%), all of whom had metastases, exhibited a PSA decrease >80% (95% confidence interval 19.6%-51.4%) with a median duration of 9 months (range 3-48 months). Age, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score and bone scan result were not significantly associated with response to ketoconazole treatment in univariate or multivariate analyses. For the entire study group, the median time to progression was 5 months (range 0-27 months) and the median survival was 12 months (range 3-48 months). Overall, 12 patients (31.6%) reported toxicity related to intermediate-dose ketoconazole but only 6 patients (15.8%) discontinued therapy due to intolerable side effects.

CONCLUSION

It is apparent from this study that a reasonable percentage of patients failing standard hormonal therapy respond favourably to intermediate-dose ketoconazole and that toxicity is mild. In the absence of studies demonstrating better survival with chemotherapy, we believe that a trial of ketoconazole should be considered when progression occurs on hormone therapy.

Novel approaches to treating the asymptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer patient

For >50 years, the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been hormonal therapy. However, all such treated patients eventually develop disease refractory to androgen suppression as manifested by increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, progressive disease on radiographic imaging, and ultimately, symptomatic deterioration. Historical perceptions that treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer was a largely futile venture have faded over the past decade with the advances in new therapeutic strategies. With the use of PSA values to follow the progress of patients after definitive therapy, physicians are seeing more patients who have failed hormonal therapy yet have no symptoms from their disease. There are standard therapies available for patients who require palliation for symptoms, but there is no consensus on treatment for asymptomatic patients. To date, there has been no definitive increase in survival with any therapy in this group of patients. In addition, several novel drugs have advanced through preclinical testing into early clinical trials. It is these drugs--alone or in combination--that are designed to target strategic tumor pathways in these patients. This article will review a selection of agents that may be potentially useful in this population.

Antiandrogen withdrawal alone or in combination with ketoconazole in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients: a phase III trial (CALGB 9583)

PURPOSE

Antiandrogen withdrawal (AAWD) results in a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decline in PSA level of > or =50%) in 15% to 30% of androgen-independent prostate cancer (AiPCa) patients. Thereafter, adrenal androgen ablation with agents such as ketoconazole (K) is commonly utilized. The therapeutic effect of AAWD alone was compared with simultaneous AAWD and K therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

AiPCa patients were randomized to undergo AAWD alone (n=132), or together with K (400 mg orally [p.o.] tid) and hydrocortisone (30 mg p.o. each morning, 10 mg p.o. each evening; n=128). Patients who developed progressive disease after AAWD alone were eligible for deferred treatment with K.

RESULTS

Eleven percent of patients undergoing AAWD alone had a PSA response, compared to 27% of patients who underwent AAWD and simultaneous K (P=.0002). Objective responses were observed in 2% of patients treated with AAWD alone compared to 20% in patients treated with AAWD/K (P=.02). There was no difference in survival. PSA and objective responses were observed in 32% and 7%, respectively, of patients receiving deferred K, and were more common in patients with prior AAWD response. Treatment with K was well tolerated, and resulted in a decline in adrenal androgen levels, which rose at the time of disease progression.

CONCLUSION

K has modest activity in AiPCa patients, while AAWD alone has minimal activity. Adrenal androgen levels fall with treatment with K and then climb at the time of progression, suggesting that progressive disease while on K may be due to tachyphylaxis to the adrenolytic properties of K.

Androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The normal development and maintenance of the prostate is dependent on androgen acting through the androgen receptor (AR). AR remains important in the development and progression of prostate cancer. AR expression is maintained throughout prostate cancer progression, and the majority of androgen-independent or hormone refractory prostate cancers express AR. Mutation of AR, especially mutations that result in a relaxation of AR ligand specificity, may contribute to the progression of prostate cancer and the failure of endocrine therapy by allowing AR transcriptional activation in response to antiandrogens or other endogenous hormones. Similarly, alterations in the relative expression of AR coregulators have been found to occur with prostate cancer progression and may contribute to differences in AR ligand specificity or transcriptional activity. Prostate cancer progression is also associated with increased growth factor production and an altered response to growth factors by prostate cancer cells. The kinase signal transduction cascades initiated by mitogenic growth factors modulate the transcriptional activity of AR and the interaction between AR and AR coactivators. The inhibition of AR activity through mechanisms in addition to androgen ablation, such as modulation of signal transduction pathways, may delay prostate cancer progression.

Role of secondary hormonal therapy in the management of recurrent prostate cancer

Androgen ablation remains the cornerstone of the systemic management of prostate cancer. After initial androgen deprivation, clinical outcomes vary considerably. For the patient with progressive disease after androgen deprivation, multiple therapeutic options are available and include antiandrogen withdrawal, chemotherapy, and secondary hormonal agents. Multiple secondary hormonal agents have clinical activity and the sequential use of these agents may lead to prolonged periods of clinical response. In addition to the use of oral antiandrogens, active secondary hormonal therapies include adrenolytic agents such as ketoconazole and aminoglutethimide, corticosteroids and estrogenic compounds. This article reviews the clinical trial data for these various agents and discusses their role in the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer.

The truth is out there: an overall perspective on androgen deprivation

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay in the treatment of prostate cancer. The ideal timing, duration and composition of ADT remains undefined. At the present time, first-line therapy consists of orchiectomy, LHRH agonists, or combined androgen blockade (CAB). However, new combinations and treatment settings show promise for improving outcomes and decreasing toxicity.

Current strategies in the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in American males, and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Most patients who develop metastatic disease will initially respond to androgen deprivation, but response is invariably temporary. Most patients will develop androgen-independent ("hormone-refractory") disease that results in progressive clinical deterioration and ultimately death. This progression to androgen independence is accompanied by increasingly evident DNA instability and alterations in genes and gene expression, including mutations in p53, over-expression of Bcl2, and mutations in the androgen receptor gene, among others. Treatment options for hormone refractory disease include intensive supportive care, radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, second-line hormonal manipulations, cytotoxic chemotherapy and investigational agents. A post-treatment reduction in the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) by 50% has been shown to correlate with survival and has been accepted by consensus as a valid endpoint in clinical trials. Chemotherapeutic agents such as mitoxantrone, estramustine, and the taxanes have yielded improved response rates and palliative benefit, but not improved survival. Therefore, current efforts must be focused on enrolling patients onto clinical trials of investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action, and on using survival, time to progression, and quality of life as end points in routine clinical practice.

Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer

For more than five decades, the preferred treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been suppression of androgen production by medical or surgical castration. However, all patients treated with androgen deprivation eventually develop resistant disease as manifested by increasing prostate-specific antigen levels, progressive disease on imaging studies, and ultimately worsening symptoms. The treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), once thought to represent a relatively futile endeavor, has changed significantly in the past several years with the development of new therapeutics. One of the most important new treatment strategies involves secondary hormonal manipulation after the failure of primary androgen deprivation; this approach is predicated on the recognition that HRPC is a heterogenous disease. Some patients may respond to alternative hormonal interventions despite the presence of castrate levels of testosterone. Furthermore, the application of chemotherapeutic regimens has provided viable treatment options for patients with HRPC.