Activity of multitargeted antifolate (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Unified framework for patient-derived, tumor-organoid-based predictive testing of standard-of-care therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer

Predictive drug testing of patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) holds promise for personalizing treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but prospective data are limited to chemotherapy regimens with conflicting results. We describe a unified framework for PDTO-based predictive testing across standard-of-care chemotherapy and biologic and targeted therapy options. In an Australian community cohort, PDTO predictions based on treatment-naive patients (n = 56) and response rates from first-line mCRC clinical trials achieve 83% accuracy for forecasting responses in patients receiving palliative treatments (18 patients, 29 treatments). Similar assay accuracy is achieved in a prospective study of third-line or later mCRC treatment, AGITG FORECAST-1 (n = 30 patients). "Resistant" predictions are associated with inferior progression-free survival; misclassification rates are similar by regimen. Liver metastases are the optimal site for sampling, with testing achievable within 7 weeks for 68.8% cases. Our findings indicate that PDTO drug panel testing can provide predictive information for multifarious standard-of-care therapies for mCRC.

Effective combination of liposome-targeted chemotherapy and PD-L1 blockade of murine colon cancer

Therapeutic cancer drug efficacy can be limited by insufficient tumor penetration, rapid clearance, systemic toxicity and (acquired) drug resistance. The poor therapeutic index due to inefficient drug penetration and rapid drug clearance and toxicity can be improved by using a liposomal platform. Drug resistance for instance against pemetrexed, can be reduced by combination with docetaxel. Here, we developed a specific liposomal formulation to simultaneously deliver docetaxel and pemetrexed to enhance efficacy and safety. Hydrophobic docetaxel and hydrophilic pemetrexed were co-encapsulated into pH-sensitive liposomes using a thin-film hydration method with high efficiency. The physicochemical properties, toxicity, and immunological effects of liposomes were examined in vitro. Biodistribution, anti-tumor efficacy, and systemic immune response were evaluated in vivo in combination with PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy using two murine colon cancer models. In cellular experiments, the liposomes exhibited strong cytotoxicity and induced immunogenic cell death. In vivo, the treatment with the liposome-based drug combination inhibited tumor development and stimulated immune responses. Liposomal encapsulation significantly reduced systemic toxicity compared to the delivery of the free drug. Tumor control was strongly enhanced when combined with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy in immunocompetent mice carrying syngeneic MC38 or CT26 colon tumors. We showed that treatment with liposome-mediated chemotherapy of docetaxel and pemetrexed combined with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy is a promising strategy for the treatment of colon cancers.

Pemetrexed/Erlotinib as a Salvage Treatment in Patients with High EGFR-Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Following Failure of Standard Chemotherapy: A Phase II Single-Arm Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Despite new agents to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), patients eventually progress and additional therapies are needed.

OBJECTIVE

We intended to evaluate the combination of pemetrexed/erlotinib in patients with high epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing (2+ or 3 on immunohistochemistry) metastatic CRC who experienced disease progression after standard chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated pemetrexed and erlotinib (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² on Day 1 and erlotinib 100 mg/m² on Days 1-21) as a salvage treatment, given every 3 weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary outcome was overall response rate (RR).

RESULTS

From May 2017 to April 2018, 29 metastatic CRC patients with high EGFR expression who had previously received standard therapies were enrolled into this trial. The regimen was well tolerated. Skin rash, vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia were common toxic effects but were mostly manageable and controllable side effects of grades 1 or 2 only. In an intent-to-treat analysis, three partial responses (PRs) were observed in enrolled patients, revealing an overall RR of 10.3%. This value supported the statistical hypothesis of this study. Fifteen patients had stable disease and the disease control rate (DCR) was 62.1%. All three patients who achieved a PR had a tumor EGFR expression of 3+. Among the eight patients with EGFR 3+ expression, the RR and DCR were 37.5% and 75.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This phase II trial using pemetrexed/erlotinib in metastatic CRC with high EGFR expression met the primary endpoint of tumor response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03086538).

Anticancer Properties of Halogenated Pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines with Decreased Toxicity via N5 Substitution

Halogenated pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine analogues have shown antiproliferative activity in recent studies, with cell accumulation occurring in the G2 /M stage without apoptosis. However, the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of these compounds has yet to be determined. To investigate the PK profile of these compounds, a series of halogenated pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine compounds was synthesized and first tested for activity in various cancer cell lines followed by a mouse model. EC50 values ranged from 0.014 to 14.5 μm, and maximum tolerated doses (MTD) in mice were between 5 and 10 mg kg-1 . This indicates a wide variance in activity and toxicity that necessitates further study. To decrease toxicity, a second series of compounds was synthesized with N5-alkyl substitutions in an effort to slow the rate of metabolism, which was thought to be leading to the toxicity. The N-substituted compounds demonstrated comparable cell line activity (EC50 values between 0.83-7.3 μm) with significantly decreased toxicity (MTD=40 mg kg-1 ). Finally, the PK profile of the active N5-substituted compound shows a plasma half-life of 32.7 minutes, and rapid conversion into the parent unsubstituted analogue. Together, these data indicate that halogenated pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines present a promising lead into potent antiproliferative agents with tunable activity and toxicity, and rapid metabolism.

Synthesis of Non-Glutamate-Type Pyrrolo[2,3-d]Pyrimidines via Direct Aminocarbonylation of Aryl Halides Using Solid Co2(CO)8 as a CO Source and Their Antibacterial Activity

The synthesis of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives by direct aminocarbonylation was demonstrated using solid Co2(CO)8 as a CO source in an autoclave at elevated temperature by reacting an aryl halide scaffold with a variety of amines. Using this method, 12 non-glutamate-type pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine analogues were prepared. Some compounds exhibited antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Pemetrexed-Induced Rash May Be Prevented by Supplementary Corticosteroids

Pemetrexed, a chemotherapeutic drug, is highly active in non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Unfortunately, rashes are more commonly associated with pemetrexed than other chemotherapies, and it is recommended that patients receive corticosteroids (8 mg/d of dexamethasone) for 3 d, including the day of pemetrexed administration (day 1). However, the efficacy of corticosteroids in this context has not been fully verified. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the medical records of 78 patients who received pemetrexed between April 2009 and March 2014, to confirm whether supplementary corticosteroids prevented rash development. The incidence of rash was lower in the 47 patients who received supplementary corticosteroids (after day 1) compared with the incidence among the 31 patients who did not receive supplementary corticosteroids (19.1% vs. 38.7%). The average cutoff dosage of supplementary corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 was 1.5 mg/d of dexamethasone, as calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the odds ratio was 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.94). Administration of ≥1.5 mg of corticosteroids on day 2 and day 3 significantly reduced the severity of the rash compared to no supplementary treatment (grades 2/3, 13.3% vs. 33.3%, p<0.05). However, increasing the dose of corticosteroids had no additional effect on rash development. These results suggest that ≥1.5 mg of supplementary dexamethasone on day 2 and day 3 (in addition to day 1) may be necessary for preventing pemetrexed-induced rash, but high doses of dexamethasone (e.g., 8 mg/d) are unnecessary.

Reduced folate and serum vitamin metabolites in patients with rectal carcinoma: an open-label feasibility study of pemetrexed with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation

The objectives of this single-center, open-label, phase II study were to evaluate (a) the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant administration of pemetrexed with oral folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ (FA/B₁₂) in newly diagnosed patients with resectable rectal cancer and (b) intracellular and systemic vitamin metabolism. Patients were treated with three cycles of pemetrexed (500 mg/m², every 3 weeks) and FA/B₁₂ before surgery. The reduced folates tetrahydrofolate, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate were evaluated from biopsies in tumor tissue and in adjacent mucosa. Serum levels of homocysteine, cystathionine, and methylmalonic acid were also measured. All 37 patients received three cycles of pemetrexed; 89.2% completed their planned dosage within a 9-week feasibility time frame. Neither dose reductions nor study drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Reduced folate levels were significantly higher in tumor tissue compared with adjacent mucosa at baseline. After FA/B₁₂ administration, tissue levels of reduced folates increased significantly and remained high during treatment in both tumor and mucosa until surgery. Serum levels of cystathionine increased significantly compared with baseline after FA/B₁₂ administration, but then decreased, fluctuating cyclically during pemetrexed therapy. Homocysteine and methylmalonic acid levels decreased significantly after FA/B₁₂ administration, and remained below baseline levels during the study. These results indicate that administration of three neoadjuvant cycles of single-agent pemetrexed, every 3 weeks, with FA/B₁₂ in patients with resectable rectal cancer is feasible and tolerable. Tissue and serum vitamin metabolism results demonstrate the influence of pemetrexed and FA/B₁₂ on vitamin metabolism and warrant further study.

Study of Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancers

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed based chemotherapy in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers as first-line, second-line or third-line therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2011 to January 2015, we recruited 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 19 patients with advanced ovary cancer, 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer,5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer,5 patients with advanced cervical cancer and 1 patient with advanced tongue cancer in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute.All of them were pathologically confirmed and treated with pemetrexed based chemotherapy. After two cycles of treatment,efficacy and safety can be evaluated.

RESULTS

For pemetrexed based regimens,including 76 patients with 6 kinds of advanced cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Complete remission represents CR, partial remission represents PR, stable disease represents SD, progressive disease represents PD. Among 29 patients with advanced breast cancer, 4 patients chose pemetrexed based regimens as second-line treatment,1 of them was PR,the other 3 got SD. The last 25 patients made use of this chemotherapy as third-line treatment, except one patient could not be assessed, 2 of them got PR,6 of them got SD,the remaining 16 of them finally were PD.19 patients with advanced ovary cancer,5 patients used this regimens as second-line treatment, 3 of them got PD,the remaining patients got SD, respectively. The last 14 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment,. RR (CR+PR) was 28.5%. Among 17 patients with advanced esophageal cancer, 2 patients made use of pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment,both of them got PR.4 of them used this chemotherapy as second-line regimen, except 2 patients could not be assessed,the remaining 2 was PD at last. The last 11 patients was third-line users, RR (CR+PR) was 18.2%. Among 5 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used in 1 patient as first- line treatment and 1 patient as second-line treatment. The curative effect was SD and PD, respectively. 3 patients accepted pemetrexed based regimens as third-line treatment, 2 of them got PD as results and another was SD. Among 5 patients with advanced cervical cancer, just 1 patient adopted pemetrexed based regimens as first-line treatment, whose curative effect was PR.2 patients chose this chemotherapy regimens as second-line treatment. Both of them got PD as their consequence. The last 2 patients made use of the regimens as third-line treatment, the effect of them was PD and SD, respectively. The one who with advanced tongue cancer, pemetrexed based regimens was used as second-line treatment, and the consequence was PD. About 71.1% patients experienced bone marrow suppression. Among them, 5 patients reached 4 grade. Other toxicity of pemetrexed were neurotoxicity, fatigue, diarrhea, dysphagia and vomiting. No treatment related death occurred with pemetrexed-based treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed based chemotherapy has considerable effect in patients with advanced cancers such as breast cancer,esophageal cancer and ovary cancer. More randomly clinical trials are needed to verify the results.

[Pemetrexed nephrotoxicity]

Pemetrexed belongs to a new generation of multitargeted antifolate cytotoxic agents. It is increasingly used as first-line treatment in combination with cisplatin, and as second-line treatment or maintenance monotherapy mainly in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and in malignant mesothelioma. It is increasingly used as first-line treatment in combination with cisplatin in lung adenocarcinoma, and as second-line treatment or maintenance monotherapy in patients mainly controlled by the first-line to progression or poor tolerance. In mesothelioma, pemetrexed is indicated only in first-line with a platinum salt. The main side effect of pemetrexed is myelosuppression, which may be prevented by folinic acid supplementation. This review focuses on the progressive and cumulative emerging renal toxicity of pemetrexed, affecting five to ten percent of "long-term" pemetrexed-treated patients.

A predictive model for evaluating responsiveness to pemetrexed treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To highlight the potential factors that could predict the response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with pemetrexed combined chemotherapy after first- or second-line chemotherapy using the FOLFOX regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2007 and July 2014, 54 patients diagnosed and pathologically-confirmed with advanced colorectal cancer in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, were enrolled. They received pemetrexed at a dose of 500mg/m2 by 10 minute infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Doses were modified depending on nadir counts of blood cells. Combined chemotherapeutic agents included irinotecan, lobaplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, cis-platinum or bevacizumab. Multiple variables (age, sex, hemoglobin, platinum drugs combined, metastasis sites, LDH, ALP, CEA>40 ug/ml) reported earlier were selected.We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate relationships between these and tumor response.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, we found that age was significant in predicting the responsiveness to pemetrexed (p<0.05) combined with oxaliplatin. We did not find any other factors which were significantly associated with the response rate to chemotherapy with pemetrexed and irinotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

By multivariate analysis, we found that age had significant impact on the responsiveness of pemetrexed when combined with oxaliplatin. Additional research based on genomic properties of host and tumors are needed to clarify markers for better selection of patients who could benefit from pemetrexed combined chemotherapy.

Personalizing colon cancer therapeutics: targeting old and new mechanisms of action

The use of pharmaceuticals for colon cancer treatment has been increasingly personalized, in part due to the development of new molecular tools. In this review, we discuss the old and new colon cancer chemotherapeutics, and the parameters that have been shown to be predictive of efficacy and safety of these chemotherapeutics. In addition, we discuss how alternate pharmaceuticals have been developed in light of a potential lack of response or resistance to a particular chemotherapeutic.

Phase II Study of Biweekly Pemetrexed Plus Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background. This open-label, single-arm, two-stage, Phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of bi-weekly pemetrexed combined with irinotecan, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after first-line chemotherapy using FOLFOX regimen. Patients and methods. Patients received pemetrexed 400 mg/m² as a 10-minute intravenous infusion (with vitamin supplementation) followed by irinotecan 180 mg/m² as a 90-minute infusion on day 1 of a 14-day cycle, for a maximum of 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR; H₀ ≤ 5%, H_a ≥ 20%, α = 0.05, power = 90%). Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Results. Partial response was observed in six out of 44 patients enrolled in the study (RR = 13.6%). The median PFS and OS were 4.0 and 13.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were fatigue: 20.5% of patients, neutropenia: 18.6%, diarrhea: 13.6%, elevated transaminases: 9.5%, anemia: 9.3%, and vomiting: 6.8%. Conclusion. Pemetrexed plus irinotecan administered every two weeks is an active and well-tolerated regimen in mCRC patients pretreated with FOLFOX regimen. However, this regimen does not seem to provide clinically relevant advantage over historical data of a classical FOLFIRI regimen.

Addition of S-1 to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib overcomes gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines with MET amplification

PURPOSE

Most non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors with activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are initially responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) such as gefitinib and erlotinib, but they almost invariably develop resistance to these drugs. A secondary mutation in EGFR (T790M) and amplification of the MET proto-oncogene have been identified as mechanisms of such acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. We have now investigated whether addition of the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 to gefitinib might overcome gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cell lines.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The effects of gefitinib on EGFR signaling and on the expression both of thymidylate synthase and of the transcription factor E2F-1 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells were examined by immunoblot analysis. The effects of S-1 (or 5-fluorouracil) and gefitinib on the growth of NSCLC cells were examined in vitro as well as in nude mice.

RESULTS

Gefitinib induced down-regulation of thymidylate synthase and E2F-1 in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells with MET amplification but not in those harboring the T790M mutation of EGFR. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and gefitinib synergistically inhibited the proliferation of cells with MET amplification, but not that of those with the T790M mutation of EGFR, in vitro. Similarly, the combination of S-1 and gefitinib synergistically inhibited the growth only of NSCLC xenografts with MET amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the addition of S-1 to EGFR-TKIs is a promising strategy to overcome EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC with MET amplification.

A randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) versus leucovorin-modulated 5-FU plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicenter, randomized trial compared overall response rate between pemetrexed plus irinotecan (ALIRI) and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Secondary objectives included overall and progression-free survival, duration of response, toxicities, and biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ALIRI patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) with vitamin supplementation on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. FOLFIRI patients received irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15, 29; on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29, 30, patients received leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) as 22-hour infusion.

RESULTS

Of 132 patients randomly assigned, 130 patients (64 = ALIRI, 66 = FOLFIRI) received > or =1 dose of treatment. Response rates (ALIRI = 20.0%, FOLFIRI = 33.3%) were not significantly different between arms (p = 0.095). Progression-free survival was 5.7 months for ALIRI and 7.7 months for FOLFIRI (p < 0.001). Neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the major toxicities. There were 5 drug-related deaths (ALIRI = 4, FOLFIRI = 1). Biomarker analysis failed to reveal that any of the 18 preselected genes were clearly associated with tumor response.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither efficacy nor safety improved on the ALIRI arm compared to the FOLFIRI arm. Progression-free survival on FOLFIRI was significantly longer compared to ALIRI. Potential biomarkers capable of predicting response to either regimen in advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma need further characterization.

Antimetabolite radiosensitizers

Radiosensitization with antimetabolites has improved clinical outcome for patients with solid malignancies, especially cancers of the GI tract, cervix, and head and neck. Fluorouracil (FU) and hydroxyurea have been widely used clinically during the last four decades, and promising results have been observed more recently with gemcitabine. Although the antimetabolites all target DNA replication, they differ with respect to the mechanisms by which they produce radiosensitization. The antimetabolite radiosensitizers may inhibit thymidylate synthase (TS) or ribonucleotide reductase, and the nucleoside/nucleobase analogs can be incorporated into DNA. Radiosensitization can result from chemotherapy-induced increase in DNA double-strand breaks or inhibition of their repair. Studies of repair pathways involved in radiosensitization with antimetabolites implicate base excision repair with the TS inhibitors, homologous recombination with gemcitabine, and mismatch repair with FU and gemcitabine. Gemcitabine can also stimulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation; inhibiting this effect with EGFR inhibitors can potentiate cytotoxicity and radiosensitization. Additional work is necessary to determine more precisely the processes by which antimetabolites act as radiation sensitizers and to define the optimal sequencing of these agents with EGFR inhibitors to provide better guidance for clinical protocols combining these drugs with radiotherapy.

Clinical activity of pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate anticancer agent

Pemetrexed is a new generation antifolate anticancer agent that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes required for production of DNA and RNA intermediates. Early studies showed significant hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities with this agent. However it was found that many of these toxicities related to functional folate status and could be markedly reduced through routine supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B(12), without adversely affecting efficacy. Phase III studies with pemetrexed have established a clinical role for this drug as a single agent in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and in combination with cisplatin for the frontline treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clinical trials of pemetrexed alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents have shown considerable activity in many tumor types including colorectal, pancreatic and breast cancer, and urothelial tumors.

A Dose Escalation Study of Gemcitabine plus Pemetrexed Administered Biweekly in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and identify the dose-limiting toxicities of the biweekly administration of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalated doses of gemcitabine and pemetrexed (starting doses 1,250 and 300 mg/m(2), respectively) both given on days 1 and 15 in cycles of 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were treated at 7 dose levels. The MTD was reached at the dose of 1,750 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and 450 mg/m(2) for pemetrexed. Dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and treatment delay due to grade III hematological toxicities. One partial response in a pretreated patient with ovarian cancer was observed, while 4 other patients experienced stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The biweekly administration of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed at the recommended MTDs is safe, well tolerated and demonstrates antitumor activity which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.

Pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514) demonstrates clinical activity in chemonaive patients with cervical cancer in a phase II single-agent trial

The objective of this study was to determine the response rate in chemonaive patients with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer treated with pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514), a multitargeted antifolate. The patients were treated with either 500 mg/m(2) (11 patients) or 600 mg/m(2) (24 patients) of pemetrexed, administered as a 10-min infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients receiving 500 mg/m(2) dose also received 5 mg/day oral folic acid supplementation beginning 2 days prior and ending on day 3 of each cycle. Of the 34 patients evaluable for efficacy, six patients (18%) had partial response, with median response duration of 3.8 months (range, 3.3-6.6 months). Twenty-four patients (71%) had stable disease, one patient (3%) had progressive disease, and three patients could not be assessed. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (range, 2.9-35.3+ months). Grade 4 hematologic toxicities consisted of neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (9%), anemia (6%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). One patient died of hypotensive shock associated with frank rectal hemorrhage that was considered to be related to the study drug. We conclude that pemetrexed therapy showed moderate activity, similar to other active agents, in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cervical cancer.

Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed in February 2004 for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with cisplatin in patients with unresectable disease or for whom curative surgery is not an option. Pemetrexed is the first agent approved for the treatment of MPM. In August 2004, pemetrexed was approved as a second-line, single-agent treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this article were to summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of pemetrexed, and to review its current and potential roles in therapy for MPM, NSCLC, and other oncologic conditions.

METHODS

Relevant English-language literature was identified through searches of PubMed (1966-December 2004), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (January 1995-December 2004). Search terms included pemetrexed, Alimta, MTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514, mesothelioma, MPM, non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In addition to published literature, abstracts and posters presented at national and international scientific meetings were reviewed.

RESULTS

Myelosuppression was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity of pemetrexed reported in Phase I studies. Identification of the correlation between poor folate status and increased pemetrexed toxicity in a multivariate analysis led to the requirement of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation for patients in all pemetrexed studies, with a resulting noted decrease in pemetrexed toxicity. A single, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial compared the efficacy of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in the treatment of MPM. Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination and 16.7% with single-agent cisplatin (P < 0.001). The median survival time for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination was significantly longer at 12.1 months versus 9.3 months for cisplatin alone (P = 0.02). One international, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial in patients with NSCLC compared single-agent pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Overall response rates (9.1% and 8.8%) and median survival (8.3 months and 7.9 months) did not differ between pemetrexed and docetaxel (P = 0.105 and P = 0.226, respectively). Hematologic adverse effects-grade 3/4 neutropenia (40.2% vs 5.3%; P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001), and neutropenic infections (3.3% vs 0%; P = 0.004)-were significantly greater in the docetaxel-treated patients than in the pemetrexed-treated patients, as was alopecia (37.7% vs 6.4%; P < 0.001). Results of an international, multicenter Phase III trial of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer indicate that the combination is no more efficacious than single-agent gemcitabine. Results in other disease states are still preliminary.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor types as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Efficacy for the treatment of MPM in combination with cisplatin has been demonstrated, and approval as a second-line agent in NSCLC was based on response rate as a surrogate end point for survival. The addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation markedly reduced.

Potential and toxicity of intravesical pemetrexed: a preclinical study in pigs

PURPOSE

In search for a new drug for intravesical use in superficial urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder, a pig model is used for pharmacokinetics and toxicity measurements after intravesically administered pemetrexed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In the dose escalation phase, two groups of two pigs received 5 and 10 mg/kg pemetrexed intravesically; four groups of three pigs received 15, 20, 25, and 30 mg/kg, respectively. The well-being of the animals was monitored. Blood was studied for pharmacokinetic analysis and signs of myelosuppression. Posttreatment urine samples were collected to measure the concentration of pemetrexed after instillation. Twenty-four hours posttreatment, the animals were cystectomized and sacrificed. Histopathologic examination of the bladder wall was done. In the second study phase, five pigs were instilled weekly with the maximum tested dose for 6 weeks. The same methods were applied.

RESULTS

All doses (5-30 mg/kg) in the first study phase were well tolerated, enabling the use of 30 mg/kg in the second study phase. In both study phases, the pigs' well-being was not influenced. Full blood counts showed no sign of myelosuppression. Systemic absorption was not observed. Urine pemetrexed concentrations remained almost unchanged. Histopathologic examination of the bladder wall did not reveal significant abnormalities. Bladder mucosa remained intact at any time, without hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravesically administered pemetrexed in pigs is well tolerated, not absorbed systemically, and causes no bladder wall toxicity.

The new era in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients: the role of monoclonal antibodies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major health problem in the Western world. Approximately 60% of patients with CRC require systemic therapy for metastatic disease, either at diagnosis or at disease recurrence. Until recently, classic chemotherapeutic agents have been combined in the treatment of advanced CRC. The recent considerable development of novel monoclonal antibodies that target key components of biological pathways has expanded the options to treat advanced CRC patients. These newer agents more specifically target unique features of the cancer cell and its surroundings and so attempt to exploit the progress that has been made in the understanding of basic cell biology. Two targets in particular--the process of new blood vessel development, or angiogenesis, and the EGF receptor and its signalling pathway--are exploited by the newest monoclonal antibodies available for use in this setting. This clinical review focuses on the defining role of the two most clinically advanced novel agents, bevacizumab and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Novel Therapeutic Developments Other Than EGFR and VEGF Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer

Developments that may improve existing cytotoxic therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) include alternatives to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) such as the liposomal Thymidylate Synthase inhibitor OSI-7904L and the multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed. Studies have explored means of reformulating irinotecan, modulating its pharmacokinetics, and enhancing its activity by maximizing DNA damage through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cell cycle inhibitors may offer an alternative to combination with 5-FU. However, as standard regimens become more complex, so do the clinical trials needed to develop new agents, and the path to registration becomes ever more tortuous. It is therefore likely that several drugs with promise in CRC will not be developed for this indication.

Alteration of pemetrexed excretion in the presence of acute renal failure and effusions: presentation of a case and review of the literature

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with mesothelioma and non small cell lung cancer. As this agent is almost exclusively cleared by renal excretion, trials leading to its approval were conducted in patients with normal renal function. However, this cycle active agent often is administered with cisplatin to patients who may have pleural effusions and ascites. As a result, the potential for drug accumulation in effusions and for accompanying renal insufficiency is real. Recommendations for the management of pemetrexed toxicity in the presence of renal failure have not been established. A case of treatment-related acute renal failure following chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed in a patient with advanced mesothelioma and ascites is presented. Pharmacologic studies in this patient revealed persistent pemetrexed levels in ascites and plasma. This is the first time that significant accumulation of pemetrexed in ascetic fluid has been reported in the literature. Treatment with leucovorin, folate, and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis was initiated. Thymidine and carboxypeptidase were not available. Dialysis was unsuccessful in removing pemetrexed. Theoretical and practical approaches to management of similar cases are presented.

Clinical studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine combinations

Pemetrexed (ALIMTA) is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. This agent is broadly active in a wide variety of solid tumors, including breast cancer, bladder cancer, mesothelioma, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer. Pemetrexed has also shown clinically relevant activity in combination with gemcitabine. This combination has been, and continues to be evaluated for the treatment of a number of malignancies, including non-small cell lung and ovarian cancer. A recently published randomized trial of different sequences has identified the sequence of pemetrexed on day 1 followed by gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8, every 21 days as the most efficacious and least toxic sequence.

Dermatologic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents

Due to its high metabolic rate, skin represents one of the major target organs of chemotherapy-associated toxicity. Reactions range from common, nonspecific exanthematous eruptions to rare but distinctive cutaneous lesions that may not become apparent until a drug transitions from clinical trials to widespread oncologic use. The challenge of the physician is to recognize reaction patterns that reflect a drug reaction, identify a likely causative drug, and determine whether the reaction is a dose-limiting toxicity. This review will focus on the cutaneous side effects of the newer classes of chemotherapy drugs, including targeted monoclonal antibody therapy and small molecule inhibitors.

Advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is less than 10%. Median survival with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) therapy is approximately 12 months. Recent additions to the chemotherapy armamentarium for this disease have begun to prolong median survival times. In trials in which patients are exposed to all three approved chemotherapy agents, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and 5-FU/LV, or capecitabine during the course of their disease, median survival has reached 20 months. The addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to 5-FU/LV regimens has also led to the maintenance of quality of life for longer intervals than were traditionally observed with 5-FU/LV alone. Current standard first-line regimens for metastatic CRC are FOLFOX (infusional 5-FU/LV with oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (infusional 5-FU/LV with irinotecan). The addition of bevacizumab to a two-drug regimen (irinotecan with 5-FU/LV) prolongs median survival to 20 months, with a modest amount of additional toxicity. Improvements in this median survival have not yet been realized with modifications to the current standard regimens; however, the oral agent capecitabine appears to be a reasonable substitute for infusional 5-FU/LV in combination regimens or as a single agent, with the advantage of reducing the inconvenience of the long infusion time. Ongoing investigations will identify a place for capecitabine, epidermal growth factor inhibitors, and new cytotoxics in the treatment of metastatic CRC.

A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study

PURPOSE

This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (intravenous; days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; day 8) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients received a median of five cycles (range one to 22) of treatment and were followed until death or for a median of 28 months (range 19.4-36.6) among living patients. Fourteen partial responses for an overall response rate of 24% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 39%] were documented. Nine (15%; CI 5% to 32%) patients had stable disease for >6 months. The median survival time was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.3-18.9) and the 1 year survival rate was 49% (95% CI 38% to 64%). The median time to progression was estimated to be 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.3). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 83% and 27% of patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Other common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (17%), dyspnea (15%), rash (7%) and anorexia (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is clinically active, with an overall response rate of 24% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Myelosuppression (66% grade 4 neutropenia and 14% febrile neutropenia) was the major treatment-related toxicity observed for this combination.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pemetrexed Administered Every 3 Weeks to Advanced Cancer Patients With Normal and Impaired Renal Function

Purpose

This phase I study was conducted to determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of pemetrexed in cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function.

Patients and Methods

Patients received a 10-minute infusion of 150 to 600 mg/m2 of pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for independent dose escalation by measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) into four cohorts ranging from ≥ 80 to less than 20 mL/min. Pemetrexed plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were evaluated for the first cycle. Patients enrolled after December 1999 were supplemented with oral folic acid and intramuscular vitamin B12.

Results

Forty-seven patients were treated with 167 cycles of pemetrexed. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities occurred in vitamin-supplemented patients (two; 15%) and nonsupplemented patients (six; 18%), and included febrile neutropenia (four patients) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two patients). Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea, and did not correlate with renal function. Accrual was discontinued in patients with GFR less than 30 mL/min after one patient with a GFR of 19 mL/min died as a result of treatment-related toxicities. Pemetrexed plasma clearance positively correlated with GFR (r2 = 0.736), resulting in increased drug exposures in patients with impaired renal function. With vitamin supplementation, pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 was tolerated by patients with a GFR ≥ 80 mL/min, whereas patients with a GFR of 40 to 79 mL/min tolerated a dose of 500 mg/m2.

Conclusion

Pemetrexed was well tolerated at doses of 500 mg/m2 with vitamin supplementation in patients with GFR ≥ 40 mL/min. Additional studies are needed to define appropriate dosing for renally impaired patients receiving higher dose pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation.

Clinical Experience With Pemetrexed in Breast Cancer

Alimta (pemetrexed) is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits several enzymes in the de novo pathways of pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis, including thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. Pemetrexed possesses antitumor activity in several solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, pancreas, colorectal, gastric, bladder, breast, and head and neck cancers. The main toxicities of the drug are myelosuppression, skin rash, and mucositis. Both myelosuppression and mucositis are more frequent in patients with high homocysteine plasma levels (an indicator of deficient vitamin B₁₂ and folate pools). Supplementation with vitamin B₁₂ and folic acid greatly reduces most severe toxicities and has been implemented in pemetrexed trials since December 1999. Pemetrexed has been tested in five phase II trials in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The drug has shown an activity of around 30% in advanced breast cancer patients with minimal or no prior chemotherapy. In patients who received prior anthracyclines, response rates of 21% were reported. Responses have also been observed in a moderate proportion of patients who had been pretreated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine. Some studies have suggested that a correlation exists between thymidylate synthase tumor expression with pemetrexed antitumor activity; this attractive hypothesis should be confirmed in further studies. The optimal dose when combined with vitamin supplementation is under current investigation in patients with breast cancer. A randomized phase II study comparing pemetrexed 600 and 900 mg/m² with vitamin supplementation as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer is ongoing.

An evaluation of pemetrexed in second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate antimetabolite that targets multiple folate-dependent enzymatic pathways and inhibits multiple enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis. Its targets include pathways that, when amplified, are associated with reduced efficacy in conventional cytotoxic agents. As second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, (NSCLC) pemetrexed, when administered with folic acid and vitamin B12, has demonstrated comparable efficacy and a superior toxicity profile relative to docetaxel. A retrospective analysis of the Phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel shows a statistically significant longer toxicity-free survival time for pemetrexed compared with docetaxel. Newer targeted therapies, especially the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib, have produced conflicting results and have only been compared with best supportive care and placebo. They should be compared directly to pemetrexed as second-line therapy in large, randomised studies of patients with advanced NSCLC. For patients with advanced recurrent NSCLC and good performance status who progress after first-line chemotherapy, pemetrexed should be considered as a new standard of care.

Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A randomized three-arm phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the optimum administration schedule of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to three schedules of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2, separated by a 90-minute interval, on a 21-day cycle as follows: schedule A, pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; schedule B, gemcitabine followed by pemetrexed on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; and schedule C, gemcitabine on day 1 and pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 8.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two eligible patients (schedule A, n = 59; schedule B, n = 31, and schedule C, n = 62) received a median of five (schedule A), two (schedule B), and four (schedule C) treatment cycles. Overall, 66% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Common grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were dyspnea (11%), fatigue (16%), and transaminase elevation (9%). Schedule A seemed less toxic compared with schedule C (grade 3 or 4 events: 86% v 94%, respectively; P = .19; grade 4 events: 39% v 48%, respectively; P = .30). Schedule B was closed at interim analysis for inferior efficacy. Schedule A, with a confirmed response rate of 31% (95% CI, 20% to 45%), met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, whereas schedule C, with a confirmed response rate of 16.1% (95% CI, 11% to 34%), did not. Median survival time and time to progression were 11.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, with no observable difference between the arms.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed and gemcitabine administered as outlined for schedule A met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, was less toxic compared with the other treatment schedules, and should be further evaluated.

Pemetrexed/Oxaliplatin for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation Research Program

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed and oxaliplatin have clinical activity as single agents in colorectal cancer (response rates, 10%-17%). In this study, these drugs were used in combination as first-line therapy in a group of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four evaluable patients were to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2) every 21 days for 6 cycles or until disease progression occurred. Patients with stable or responding disease could continue therapy beyond 6 cycles at the discretion of the investigator. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status <or=2, no adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months, and >or=12 weeks life expectancy.

RESULTS

The confirmed clinical response rate (primary endpoint) was 29.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-48.6%), with 1 complete response and 15 partial responses. Median time to progression was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.9-6.3 months), and median survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 8.6-17 months). Grade 3/4 nadir neutropenia occurred in 33.3% of patients, and 3 patients experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia or infection associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nadir thrombocytopenia was seen in 11.1% of patients. Only 4% of the patients developed grade 3/4 neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

This regimen of pemetrexed and oxaliplatin has activity in advanced colorectal cancer, and the toxicity profile suggests that escalation of the dose of pemetrexed in this combination may be possible.

A phase IB study of the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and pemetrexed, when administered in rapid sequence to patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that pemetrexed is clinically active when administered 90 min after gemcitabine in a phase I study. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and pemetrexed when pemetrexed is administered immediately after gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 14 patients received 84 cycles of treatment. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 8 immediately following gemcitabine administration. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and recorded as maximum grade per patient for all treatment cycles. Pharmacokinetic analyses of plasma gemcitabine and pemetrexed concentrations were performed.

RESULTS

Neutropenia was the most common severe toxicity. Non-hematologic toxicities, which included nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, rash, and elevated transaminases were of mild-to-moderate severity. No increased toxicity was observed with this schedule in comparison to the previous phase I schedule. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs. One partial response was documented in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer. Eight patients had disease stabilization for five or more cycles.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine immediately followed by pemetrexed is well tolerated and clinically active, and deserves further evaluation in phase II trials.

Chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: Let’s not forget how we got here (until we really can)

Physicians and patients alike have been heartened by the recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The emergence of novel agents that are active in the treatment of this devastating disease, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, has been particularly notable. However, even before these recent events, a substantial change in prognosis for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer had occurred as a result of advances in traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Refinements in dose, schedule, and sequence continue to be made that could lead to further improvements in outcomes. Additionally, new chemotherapeutic agents with promise for activity in colorectal cancer are being studied. Chemotherapy is likely to remain a central element of the treatment strategy. Our understanding of its current role is discussed in this article.

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

The diagnosis and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma are major challenges that often frustrate both patient and clinician alike. Occupational asbestos exposure to crocidolite or amosite forms of the fiber is the most important known risk factor in North America and Western Europe. Other mineral fibers such as erionite, a naturally occurring fibrous zeolite crystal, are associated with mesothelioma in volcanic tuffs of the Cappadocia region of central Anatolia in Turkey. In addition, other possible factors such as the presence of simian virus 40 and genetic susceptibility have been associated recently with the development of mesothelioma in animal models. These latter findings are increasing our understanding of this disease. In addition, the discovery of elevated levels of various markers such as folic acid receptor alpha, cyclooxygenase 2, and multidrug resistance proteins 1 and 2 in mesothelioma tissue have opened up new areas of potential diagnostic and therapeutic importance. However, traditional treatment modalities--surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy--have evolved slowly, and few gains in therapeutic efficacy have occurred. Recently, however, continuing research efforts have led to novel treatment strategies that are changing the way clinicians view a disease that has traditionally been managed with almost universal therapeutic nihilism. This review explores our current knowledge of this disease and presents current and novel therapeutic strategies.

Pemetrexed: a novel antifolate agent enters clinical practice

Pemetrexed (Alimta, Eli Lilly) is a multitargeted antifolate that inhibits at least three enzymes in the nucleic acid synthetic pathways. The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved pemetrexed, in combination with cisplatin, for the first-line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Moreover, pemetrexed was recently shown to be as efficacious as docetaxel (Taxotere, Aventis) in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, and its toxicity profile was preferable. The main toxicity seen with pemetrexed is myelosuppression, which is considerably reduced by coadministration of folic acid and vitamin B12. Multiple Phase II clinical trials have demonstrated that pemetrexed has promising single-agent activity in many other solid tumors, including head and neck, breast and colorectal cancers. Combination regimens consisting of pemetrexed and other chemotherapeutics or novel molecular-targeted agents are currently under investigation. Future studies will better define and likely expand the role of pemetrexed for the treatment of cancer.

New chemotherapeutic advances in pancreatic, colorectal, and gastric cancers

Pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. When curative surgical resection is not an option, these malignancies tend to respond very poorly to chemotherapy and carry a dismal prognosis. There is, therefore, an urgent need for novel treatment strategies for these cancers. Great strides have been made in colon cancer treatment with the recent introduction of several novel agents, including capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin either alone or in combination regimens. Treatment of advanced colon cancer, however, remains essentially palliative, and treatment-related toxicity remains a significant problem. The treatment of advanced gastric and pancreatic cancer has also seen the introduction of new agents, such as gemcitabine and irinotecan; however, the impact of these agents on survival has been small, and toxicity continues to be a major obstacle. The search for new chemotherapeutic agents and treatment strategies will need to focus on improving outcomes and safety and tolerability profiles. To date, several new agents have shown promise, including pemetrexed, G17DT, bevacizumab, and other targeted agents. Further research into their optimal use either alone or in combination regimens should be a priority.

The Role of Pemetrexed in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Although advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and Europe, chemotherapeutic options have only recently expanded with concomitant improvements in survival. Through the 1980s and early 1990s, research focused mainly on the major fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil, a thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor, and methods to enhance its activity through scheduling changes or by biochemical modulation. Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes in addition to TS. This agent has theoretical and preclinical advantages over fluoropyrimidines and more specific antifolates. Phase II studies have shown a broad spectrum of activity in solid tumors, including CRC and pancreatic cancer. Combinations of pemetrexed with gemcitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin have also proven feasible. Further studies of higher and biweekly doses with the use of vitamin supplementation are under way. In pancreatic cancer, the phase II studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine were sufficiently promising to warrant a completed phase III comparison. Based on a recent abstract presentation, it appears that this combination did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine alone. Nonetheless, pemetrexed has important promise for new and improved regimens in the therapy of gastrointestinal cancer.

The role of Alimta in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: an overview of preclinical and clinical trials

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor, but its annual incidence is rapidly increasing. While most patients have locally advanced disease at presentation, to date there is no proven standard chemotherapy for MPM that has shown to increase survival in randomized studies. Therefore, the development of new therapeutic agents is urgent for this disease. Alimta is a novel, multitargeted antifolate with activity as single agent in patients with MPM. Recently, a phase III trial showed that the combination of Alimta with cisplatin resulted in a significantly increased efficacy compared with cisplatin alone. In addition, vitamin supplementation reduced treatment associated toxicities with no apparent affect on activity. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data to define the future role of Alimta in the treatment of patients with MPM.

Abarelix Pemetrexed

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

New systemic frontline treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Options for first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma have broadened considerably with the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has demonstrated efficacy in Phase III trials and recently was approved for first-line treatment in Europe and the United States. Capecitabine yielded similar median times to disease progression and median survival rates compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group regimen), with superior and similar response rates, respectively. However, its role as a first-line, single-agent substitute for intermittent infusional 5-FU/LV remains to be defined. The addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV resulted in improved response rates and progression-free survival in large, randomized trials; moreover, irinotecan-containing regimens resulted in improved overall survival. Prevalent regimens of irinotecan/5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin/5-FU/LV have been compared in two randomized Phase III trials. One study demonstrated the statistical superiority of oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU/LV over irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of response, time to disease progression, and median survival; however, those advantages may have been attributable to infusional administration or to major differences in second-line therapy. A randomized Phase III study comparing irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with the same infusional 5-FU/LV regimens and crossover in case of disease progression showed equivalent efficacy for both schedules in the first-line setting, but the irinotecan combination proved beneficial in terms of safety. New molecular targeted agents, such as angiogenesis-modulating compounds (e.g., bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab), are under clinical investigation. This review updates current systemic frontline treatments and future perspectives for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer: focus on newer chemotherapy and novel agents

Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is evolving rapidly after many years without significant change. Standard adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, on the other hand, remains much the same as it has been since the early 1990s. Recent additions to the colorectal cancer armamentarium include capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. Use of these agents in metastatic colorectal cancer and potential for use in localized rectal cancer are discussed. In addition to these "classical" chemotherapeutic agents, there are a number of exciting therapies designed to target specific molecular features of malignant cells. These agents are now being tested in colorectal cancer in addition to chemotherapy and to radiotherapy, with the hope that improvements in outcome will be made without substantial increases in treatment toxicity. The focus of the section on newer classes of agents will be on agents that are in phase II and III trials, with brief mention of other exciting treatment strategies.

Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines

BACKGROUND

To assess antitumor activity and toxicity of pemetrexed in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven MBC patients from 12 European institutions were entered into the study. Seventy-two patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity. Forty-two patients were classified as anthracycline-failure (relapse >30 days after completion of a prior anthracycline regimen) and 30 as anthracycline-refractory (progression within 30 days after anthracycline therapy). Pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

There were three complete and 12 partial responders [response rate 21% (95% confidence interval 12%)]. Response rates in the anthracycline-failure and anthracycline-refractory groups were 24% and 17%, respectively. A subset of 31 patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes had a response rate of 26%. Median duration of response and median survival were 5.5 and 10.7 months, respectively (13 months in the failure group and 5.7 months for refractory). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 56% and 19% of patients, respectively. Nine patients (12%) experienced neutropenic fever. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included skin rash (10%), nausea (12%), fatigue (10%) and stomatitis (5%).

CONCLUSION

Our trial demonstrates pemetrexed to be active in breast cancer, with manageable toxicity. Activity of pemetrexed did not appear to be adversely affected by prior taxane, 5-fluorouracil or endocrine treatments.

Phase II study of pemetrexed with and without folic acid and vitamin B12 as front-line therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

This phase II clinical study evaluated the efficacy of pemetrexed for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of MPM, chemotherapy-naive measurable lesions, and adequate organ function received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) intravenously over 10 minutes every 3 weeks. After a protocol change, most patients also received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation to improve safety.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were enrolled. Nine (14.1%) of the 64 patients had a partial response. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for median overall survival was 10.7 months. Forty-three patients received vitamin supplementation for all courses of therapy, and 21 patients did not. Seven of the nine responders were vitamin supplemented. The median overall survival was 13.0 months for supplemented patients and 8.0 months for nonsupplemented patients. Vitamin-supplemented patients completed more cycles of therapy than nonsupplemented patients (median, six v two cycles, respectively). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (23.4%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (18.8%) were the most common laboratory toxicities. Fatigue and febrile neutropenia were the most commonly reported nonlaboratory events (grade 3, 6.3%; grade 4, 0.0% each). The incidence of these toxicities was generally lower in the supplemented patients.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent pemetrexed for MPM resulted in a moderate response rate (14.1%) and median overall survival of 10.7 months. Patients supplemented with folic acid and vitamin B12 tolerated treatment better (less toxicity and more cycles of treatment) and had a 5-month greater median overall survival than nonsupplemented patients. These results indicate that patients with MPM could benefit from single-agent pemetrexed treatment combined with vitamin supplementation.