Effects of topoisomerase I inhibition on the expression of topoisomerase II alpha measured with fluorescence image cytometry

Review : Topoisomerase I inhibitors: 1. Topotecan

Purpose. The primary objective of this article is to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clin ical use, and adverse effects of the approved topoisomerase I inhibitors. This is the first in a series of two articles and will focus on topotecan.

Data Sources. We reviewed the literature through a MEDLINE search of English language articles from 1985 through 1997. Relevant articles cited in the titles obtained from the MEDLINE search were also used. The following terms were used for purpose of conducting the MEDLINE search: topoisomerase inhibitors, topotecan, topo isomerase I, Hycamtin, SKF 104864.

Data Extraction. We reviewed the current literature in order to discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, toxicity, drug inter actions, indications, formulation, dosage and ad ministration, and pharmaceutical issues surround ing the use of topotecan.

Data Synthesis. The topoisomerase I inhibi tors are new antineoplastic agents with a unique mechanism of action. Promising areas of applica tion include ovarian cancer, lung cancer, radiation sensitization, and refractory leukemias. Clinical tri als detailing its activity in these areas are pre sented.

Topoisomerase IIα poisoning and DNA double-strand breaking by chiral ruthenium(ii) complexes containing 2-furanyl-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline derivatives

Some chiral ruthenium(ii) complexes bearing furan ligands were developed to act as topoisomerase IIα poisons and caused DNA double-strand damage that could lead to apoptosis.

Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer

A pharmacokinetically guided phase I study of topotecan and etoposide phosphate was conducted in recurrent ovarian cancer. The scheduling of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors was determined using in vitro activity data. All patients had recurrent disease following prior platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients had a World Health Organisation performance status of 0–2 and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. Treatment was with topotecan intravenously for 5 days followed immediately by a 5-day intravenous infusion of etoposide phosphate (EP), with pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustment. Plasma etoposide levels were measured on days 2 and 4 of the infusion. A total of 21 patients entered the study. In all, 48% were platinum resistant and 71% had received prior paclitaxel. The main toxicities were haematological, short lived and reversible. A total of 29% of patients experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 66% grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was dose limiting. The maximum-tolerated dose was topotecan 0.85 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ days 1–5 followed immediately by a 5-day infusion of EP at a plasma concentration of 1 μg ml⁻¹. The response rate (RR) was 28% in 18 evaluable patients. There was marked interpatient variability in topoisomerase IIα levels measured from peripheral lymphocytes, with no observed increase following topotecan. This regimen of topotecan followed by EP demonstrated good activity in recurrent ovarian cancer and was noncrossresistant with paclitaxel. Both the toxicity and RR was higher than would be expected from the single agent data, in keeping with synergy of action.

A phase II study of timed sequential therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) for patients over the age of 60: two cycle timed sequential therapy with topotecan, ara-C and mitoxantrone in adults with poor-risk AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly is a serious problem characterized by poor response to therapy and short survival. To improve response to therapy, a timed sequential therapy (TST) approach was designed utilizing topotecan, cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) and mitoxantrone based on multiple studies suggesting that topotecan and mitoxantrone are effective in older patients. Thirty-two adults, >or=60-year-old (median age 69) were included. None had favorable cytogenetics and 44% had and antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or 2 degrees AML. Fifty-nine percent achieved a complete response (CR). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-12.0 months; range, 15 days to 25.3 months). Disease-free survival (DFS) for the 19 patients achieving a CR was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.1-13.7 months; range, 2.9-25.3 months). There were no differences in OS or DFS between cytogenetic or disease etiology groups. Although TST was well tolerated, long-term results in this group of patients are not satisfactory and new approaches are needed.

Expression of functional markers in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We analyzed surface antigens, multidrug resistance (MDR) parameters (PGP, MRP, LRP), tissue infiltration parameters (CD18, CD44, VCAM, MMP2), receptors for colony stimulating factors (G-CSFr, GM-CSFr) and cell cycle parameters (Ki-67, topoisomerase IIalpha) in 86 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). LRP, PGP and CD18 were associated with poor clinical outcome, and LRP expression was related with CD18, CD44 and G-CSFr. Of the cell cycle parameters, Ki-67 (+) fraction was increased in ALL with hepato-splenomegaly and extramedullary involvement. In conclusion, analysis of LRP, PGP, CD18 and Ki-67 could be helpful to predict the clinical behavior of ALL.

A phase I study of sequential intravenous topotecan and etoposide in lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (T) and the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide (E) are active drugs in lung cancer. The complementary functions of their targets may suggest benefit from the combined use of these agents but drug scheduling has been shown to play a critical role in preclinical models. To establish the optimal schedule and assess the impact of sequential administration of the combination of T and E, we conducted a dose finding study of sequential intravenous T and E in a four-weekly-schedule in relapsed lung cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The importance of drug sequence was assessed in consecutive patients throughout all dose levels; patients received in the first course either T followed by E (the TE group: T on days 1-3 and E on days 4-6) or E before T (the ET group: F on days 1-3 and Ton days 4-6). The sequence of Tand E was alternated in the successive courses. In this crossover design, each patient served as his own control for analysis of hematological toxicity in which TE sequence was compared to that of the ET sequence. Moreover, hematological toxicity after the first course was compared between the TE and the ET groups. The starting dose was T/E 0.75/75 mg/m2 at dose level 1and dose escalation was planned to T/E 1.00/75 mg/nm2 at dose level 2, T/E 1.00/100 mg/m2 at dose level 3, T/E 1.25/100 mg/m2 at dose level 4 and T/E 1.50/100 mg/m2 at dose level 5. Nineteen patients (small-cell lung cancer 7, non-small-cell lung cancer 11, mesothelioma 1 patient) were included.

RESULTS

The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, primarily neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. At dose level 3 several grade 4 toxicities were observed. DLT (febrile neutropenia) occurred in two patients, one in the TE and one in the ET group and precluded further dose escalation. There was no significant difference in WBC and platelet nadirs during the first course between the TE and the ET group. The influence of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide was calculated by comparing the nadir values of cycles I and II for each patient. For none of the dose levels, a significant sequence-dependent effect could be detected. The MTD was reached at the doses of 100 mg/m2 topotecan and 75 mg/m2 etoposide. No objective responses were seen.

CONCLUSION

Although the combined use of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors is attractive on theoretical grounds, excessive myelosuppression prevents substantial dose escalation.

Role of proteasomal degradation in the cell cycle-dependent regulation of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression

1DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is a nuclear enzyme that modifies DNA topology and also serves as a target to mediate the cytotoxicity of several antineoplastic agents. Several reports have demonstrated that a reduction of topo II is associated with reduced sensitivity to these agents. Topo II exists as two isoforms in mammalian cells: topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta. In MCF-7 cells, the half-life (mean +/- SEM) values of topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta in situ were 6.6 +/- 0.3 and 17.6 +/- 2.3 hr, respectively, as determined by [(35)S]methionine/cysteine pulse-chase analysis. Degradation of topo IIalpha in situ was abrogated by the presence of proteasome inhibitors, and the relative activities were carbobenzoxy-leucyl-leucyl-leucinal (MG132) > carbobenzoxy-leucyl-leucyl-norvalinal (MG115) > ALLN congruent with lactacystin. ATP-dependent degradation of topo IIalpha, but not topo IIbeta, was observed in extracts of asynchronously dividing HeLa and MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, degradation of topo IIalpha was abrogated by the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and MG115, but not by lactacystin, in extracts of asynchronously dividing MCF-7 cells. Finally, degradation of topo IIalpha, but not topo IIbeta, was observed to occur in a cell cycle-dependent fashion, in extracts of synchronized HeLa cells, with maximal loss of the alpha isoform occurring 2 hr after release from mitotic arrest. This degradation of topo IIalpha appeared to be facilitated by an ATP-dependent activity. Furthermore, high molecular weight bands (>200 kDa), which may represent polyubiquitinated-topo IIalpha conjugates, were also detected in extracts of synchronized HeLa cells. This study provides evidence for a role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the cell cycle-dependent regulation of topo IIalpha expression.

Clinical resistance to topoisomerase-targeted drugs

This review describes topoisomerase (topo)-mediated drug resistance and topo expression in human tissues and cancers. In some in vitro studies a relation has been observed between topo I, IIalpha or IIbeta expression and sensitivity to topo inhibitors. Drug resistance to topo inhibitors may, however, be multifactorial. Several topo inhibitors are substrates for drug membrane transporters. As most topo inhibitors are cell cycle specific, disturbances in cell cycle regulation can also confer resistance, and downstream events following DNA damage induced by topo inhibitors may be involved in regulating cell death or survival. Several studies in patient specimens have shown a relation between topo IIalpha expression and the proliferative state of the tumor, higher topo IIalpha levels being seen in more highly proliferating tumor types. In contrast, topo IIbeta appears to be expressed in both proliferating and quiescent cells. Furthermore, higher topo I levels were observed in some tumors when compared to their normal counterparts. In some studies a reduced topo IIalpha level was seen in samples taken after chemotherapy treatment, as compared with specimens prior to treatment. No unequivocal relation was observed, however, between expression or activity of the topo genes and response to chemotherapy; nonetheless only a few studies have properly addressed this question. This review summarizes the results of the clinical studies performed so far, and analyzes the critical issues in performing studies on patient material.

Cellular resistance to topoisomerase-targeted drugs: from drug uptake to cell death

DNA topoisomerase inhibitors are important antineoplastic agents used in the treatment of both leukemias and solid tumors, such as breast, lung and colon cancers. Their clinical usefulness is limited by both natural and acquired tumor cell resistance, which almost always is multifactorial in nature. The resistance can be due to pretarget events, such as drug accumulation, metabolism and intracellular drug distribution, or due to reduced drug-target interaction. More recently, post-target events, such as macromolecular synthesis, cell cycle progression, DNA repair/recombination and regulation of cell death, have been shown to play an important role in the sensitivity toward topoisomerase inhibitors. The different mechanisms involved in the cellular resistance toward clinically used topoisomerase inhibitors will be reviewed in this article with particular emphasis on post-target events.