Interaction between radiation and drug damage in mammalian cells. II. The effect of actinomycin-D on the repair of the sublethal radiation damage in plateau phase cells

Hepatotoxicity in patients treated according to the nephroblastoma trial and study SIOP-9/GPOH

BACKGROUND

A major problem for children receiving Wilms tumor (WT) chemotherapy is hepatotoxicity, which may even be life-threatening. Dactinomycin (AMD) has been shown to be an important factor, as has abdominal irradiation.

PROCEDURE

In the nephroblastoma trial and study SIOP-9 (SIOP-9) two different regimens for the application of AMD were used (standard dose over 3-5 days vs. double dose on a single day). In children at increased risk for local relapse, postoperative abdominal irradiation was given. We analyzed the influence of AMD and radiotherapy on the development of hepatotoxicity in 481 children treated in centers of the German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Society (GPOH). A special questionaire was sent out for all patients with reduced treatment or delay of more than 1 week because of hepatotoxicity. Because SIOP and the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS) used different criteria to asses hepatotoxicity,we applied both definitions.

RESULTS

All 72 cases of mild or severe hepatotoxicity occurred during treatment with AMD over 3-5 days with the standard dose (9.4-22.5 microgram/kg/week) compared to none in the group receiving a double dose on 1 day (3.75-8 microgram/kg/week; P < 0.001). Irradiation of the right abdomen, including parts of the liver, enhanced liver toxicity significantly, with a relative risk (RR) of 2.6 (P < 0.003). Preoperative liver toxicity was more frequent in smaller children (P = 0.02) and especially if no dose reduction was done in children with body weight of less than 12 kg (RR 5.3, P = 0.01). If severe liver toxicity was defined according to NWTS criteria, 10% of all treated patients were affected compared to 4.8% if McDonald's criteria for hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) were applied.

CONCLUSIONS

To diminish the hepatotoxicity of WT treatment, AMD dose intensity should be reduced (below 10 microgram/kg per week), especially in smaller children or when the liver is irradiated.

Chromosome damage induced by DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors combined with g-radiation in vitro

Combined radiation and antineoplastic drug treatment have important applications in cancer therapy. In the present work, an evaluation was made of two known topoisomerase II inhibitors, doxorubicin (DXR) and mitoxantrone (MXN), with g-radiation. The effects of DXR or MXN on g-radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were analyzed. Two concentrations of each drug, 0.5 and 1.0 µg/ml DXR, and 0.02 and 0.04 µg/ml MXN, were applied in combination with two doses of g-radiation (20 and 40 cGy). A significant potentiating effect on chromosomal aberrations was observed in CHO cells exposed to 1.0 µg/ml DXR plus 40 cGy. In the other tests, the combination of g-radiation with DXR or MXN gave approximately additive effects. Reduced mitotic indices reflected higher toxicity of the drugs when combined with radiation.

Iododeoxyuridine incorporation and radiosensitization in three human tumor cell lines

Iododeoxyuridine is a halogenated pyrimidine and non-hypoxic cell radiosensitizer currently being used in clinical trials. The amount of radiosensitization by IdUrd is related to the amount of incorporation of the drug into a cell's DNA. These experiments were carried out in three human tumor cell lines (lung, glioma, and melanoma) in monolayer culture exposed to concentrations of IdUrd from 0.1-10 microM for one and three cell cycles before irradiation to determine incorporation and sensitization as a function of drug exposure. Except for the lung cell line, which required greater than 1 microM IdUrd, these cells demonstrate radiosensitization when exposed to 0.1 microM or greater of IdUrd. Maximum sensitization occurred at 10 microM IdUrd for all the cell lines at three cell cycles. The percent thymidine replacement by IdUrd increased with increasing concentrations, but was cell line dependent. Maximum percent replacement occurred at 10 microM at three cell cycles for all the cell lines: lung = 22.4%, glioma = 32.0%, and melanoma = 39.1%. The relationships between percent thymidine replacement and sensitization are not identical across these human tumor cell lines. If IdUrd is going to be a successful radiosensitizer in clinical trials, sustained plasma levels of 10 microM or greater for at least three cell cycles should be achieved during irradiation. This may be best accomplished with repeated short exposures to IdUrd (three cell cycles or approximately 4 days in these cell lines) every 1-2 weeks during radiation. Measurements of thymidine replacement in a tumor biopsy should be attempted prior to radiation to develop a predictive assay for radiosensitization.

Inhibition of recovery from damage induced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells

Recent studies indicate the importance for radiotherapy of the inherent radiosensitivity of tumour cells in the low-dose region; a region where recovery is probably almost complete. Improvements in radiotherapy may therefore depend on the search for specific inhibitors of cellular recovery. This review summarizes data from studies in which use was made of a variety of mammalian, including human cell systems, where attempts have been made to inhibit recovery using chemical agents. Inhibition of sublethal damage repair, potentially lethal damage repair and low dose-rate sparing has been observed to varying extents by several agents including those thought to act by interfering with DNA repair processes (e.g. ara-C, 3-aminobenzamide) differentiation-inducing agents (e.g. N-methylformamide), halogenated pyrimidines (e.g. iododeoxyuridine), caffeine and chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. adriamycin). No individual agent stands out as exerting an exceptionally dramatic effect on recovery. However, of the agents used clinically, cis-platinum appears to hold some promise, while iododeoxyuridine, N-methylformamide, beta ara-A and caffeine all appear to inhibit to some extent the recovery of ionizing radiation-induced damage. There is an urgent need for further study to determine, in particular, relative effects in tumour versus normal cell types and whether any agents found to be effective in vitro show similar effects in vivo.

The effect of actinomycin D on radiation induced reactions of the lip mucosa of mice

The interaction of intraperitoneally injected Actinomycin D and irradiation was investigated in the lip mucosa of NMRI mice. In this rapidly proliferating tissue, a semiquantitative assessment of possible modifications of the radiation response by a drug can be done without using lethality as an endpoint. It was shown that a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg drug given at different times between 24 hr prior to and 24 hr after single radiation doses did not effect the rate of development nor the intensity of mucosal radiation damage. With extended time intervals of 2, 3, or 7 days between both single agents, a slight increase of the lip mucosal reaction was measured. Similar results were obtained when 5 daily drug injections of 0.15 mg/kg were administered starting at day 5 after a single radiation exposure. No differences in response could be demonstrated when fractionated irradiations with intervals ranging from 1 to 24 hr were closely combined with either single or repeated drug treatments (0.5 mg/kg in total) as compared to irradiation alone. However, a slight modification of the iso-effect dose was measured when 0.5 mg/kg Actinomycin D was administered at various periods in between 2 radiation doses separated by 10 days. A maximal effect was measured with 5 daily injections of 0.15 mg/kg drug each and given at a time when proliferative capacity was high. With 0.1 mg/kg Actinomycin D per daily injection, no enhancement of the radiation injury was found. Thus, in these circumstances no influence of Actinomycin D on radiosensitivity nor on repair of sublethal damage could be demonstrated. A clear inhibitory effect on lip mucosal repopulation by the drug is evident, but only at high drug doses close to toxic concentrations.

Biological basis for the interaction of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy

The ultimate goal of combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy is to improve the therapeutic ratio. When chemotherapy is combined with radiotherapy, improved therapeutic effects may occur as a result of the following: (1) spatial cooperation; (2) enhancement of tumor response with less or no enhancement of normal tissue injury, and (3) diminution of normal tissue injury with less or no diminution of tumor response. Possible mechanisms of interaction between chemotherapeutic agents and radiation that result in an enhanced effect include (1) changes in the slope of the dose response curve, (2) decreased accumulation or inhibition of repair of sublethal damage, (3) decreased recovery from potentially lethal damage, (4) perturbation in cell kinetics with an increase of proportion of cells in the sensitive cell cycle phase and proliferative state, (5) decreased tumor bulk and improved blood supply leading to reoxygenation and recruitment and increased radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity, and (6) increased drug delivery and uptake. The combined effects may be influenced by (1) tumor and normal tissue type, (2) drug type, (3) drug dose and schedule, (4) time sequence between drug and radiation administration, (5) radiation dose and fractionation schedule, and (6) radiation dose rate. Most experimental and clinical data suggest that enhanced tumor effects most often result from simple additivity and therefore do not require direct interaction between drug and radiation, whereas enhanced normal tissue effects are observed most often when drugs are administered in close temporal proximity to radiation. Thus, for the optimal therapeutic effect, it would seem more advantageous to administer chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation in a sequential or alternating manner rather than simultaneously.

The effect of treatment in fractionated schedules with the combination of X-irradiation and six cytotoxic drugs on the RIF-1 tumor and normal mouse skin

RIF-1 tumors, implanted syngeneically in the gastrocnemius muscles of the right hind legs of C3H/Km mice, were treated either with X ray alone, drug alone, or drug and X ray combined. The drugs tested were bleomycin, BCNU, cis-diamminedichloro platinum, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and actinomycin-D. All drugs were administered either in the maximum tolerated dose or a dose that causes minimal tumor growth delay. Both drugs and X rays were administered either as a single dose or in five daily fractions. In addition to the single modality controls, seven different schedules of combined modalities were tested. Tumors were measured periodically after treatment in order that the day at which each tumor reached 4 times its initial cross-sectional area, i.e., its size at the time of treatment, could be determined. The effect of treatment on tumors was based upon excess growth delay (GD), i.e., T400% (treated)-T400% (untreated control). Treatment effects for the same combined modality schedules were also determined for normal skin, using the early skin reaction as an endpoint. Dose effect factors (DEF) were computed for all combined modality schedules and were based upon calculated radiation dose equivalents. We also calculated supra-additivity ratios, SRI and SRII, therapeutic gain factors and adjusted therapeutic gain factors. The only drugs to produce significant supra-additivity with X rays were cis-Pt and cyclo. Maximum supra-additivity for cis-Pt was afforded by divided doses of the drug (5 X 2.4 mg/kg/day) given immediately before X ray (5 X 1000 rad/day) on 5 consecutive days, although 3 other schedules also produced significant supra-additivity. Maximum supra-additivity for cyclo was seen for a single dose of 100 mg/kg followed 1 day later by a course of 5 daily X ray doses (5 X 1000 rad/day), and at least one other schedule produced almost as great an effect.

Modification of the effects of continuous low dose rate irradiation by concurrent chemotherapy infusion

The combined effects of continuous low dose rate irradiation (CLDRI) and concurrent infusion of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, cis-platinum, 5-fluorouracil, actinomycin D, and mitomycin C were studied in the SCC VII/SF tumor, a squamous cell carcinoma and the jejunal crypt cells in the mouse. For the SCC VII/SF tumor, enhanced cell killing was seen with each of the six drugs when infused concurrently with CLDRI; the greatest enhancement was seen with mitomycin C and cis-platinum. For the jejunal crypt cells, enhanced cell killing was seen primarily with bleomycin. At a dose of 20 Gy, the dose effect factor (DEF) ranged from 1.13-1.64 for the SCC VII/SF tumor and 0.92-1.19 for the jejunal crypt cells. Our results suggest a therapeutic gain with concurrent CLDRI and chemotherapy infusion for five of the six chemotherapeutic drugs studied with the exception of bleomycin.

Mechanisms of hypoxic cell radiosensitization and the development of new sensitizers

Some of the mechanisms by which drugs can potentiate the radiation response of tumors and cells in culture are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the action of nitroaromatic and heterocyclic compounds as hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, and some potential successors to misonidazole (MISO) are described. These include desmethylmisonidazole and SR 2508, selected because of their low toxicity in experimental systems. Groups of compounds, more efficient sensitizers than would be predicted from electron affinity correlations, have been examined and the use of Ro-03-8799 or RSU 1047 is proposed. Finally, ortho-substituted nitroimidazoles and electron-affinic compounds with alkylating groups are described. The latter group, in particular, holds promise for the development of compounds much superior to MISO.

Simultaneous radiation and drug therapy: tumor response and toxicity

Three patients who received simultaneous radiation and chemotherapy are described. Increased tumor response and enhanced radiation reaction were observed. Simultaneous drug and radiation therapy may prove to be the treatment of choice for particular malignant tumors. More data concerning the magnitude of the toxic effects when 2 modalities are used in conjunction is needed. Dose adjustments will be required for each modality to allow for optimal damage to the tumor with minimal and acceptable adverse reaction in the normal tissue.