Multicentricity of breast carcinoma demonstrated by routine correlated serial subgross and radiographic examination

Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

When ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer (IMBC) is detected, standard routine is to evaluate the largest tumor with immunohistochemistry (IHC). As all foci are not routinely characterized, many patients may not receive optimal adjuvant treatment. Here, we assess the clinical relevance of examining at least two foci present in patients with IMBC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed and treated for IMBC at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) between 2012 and 2017 were screened. In total, 180 patients with ≥ 2 invasive foci (183 specimens) were assessed with IHC and included in this study. Expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, Ki67, HER2, and tumor grade were used to determine the molecular surrogate subtypes and discordance among the foci was recorded. An additional multidisciplinary team board was then held to re-assess whether treatment recommendations changed due to discordances in molecular surrogate subtype between the different foci.

RESULTS

Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was found in 2.7%, 19.1%, 7.7%, and 16.9% of invasive foci, respectively. Discordance in the molecular surrogate subtypes was found in 48 of 180 (26.7%) patients, which resulted in therapy changes for 11 patients (6.1%). These patients received additional endocrine therapy (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 3), and combined chemotherapy and trastuzumab (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, when assessing at least two tumor foci with IHC, regardless of shared morphology or tumor grade between the different foci, 6.1% of patients with IMBC were recommended additional adjuvant treatment. A pathologic assessment using IHC of all foci is therefore recommended to assist in individualized treatment decision making.

Accuracy and precision of contrast enhanced mammography versus MRI for predicting breast cancer size: how "good" are they really?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the accuracy and precision of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) vs MRI to predict the size of biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

Prospective study, 59 women with invasive breast cancer on needle biopsy underwent CEM and breast MRI. Two breast radiologists read each patient's study, with access limited to one modality. CEM lesion size was measured using low-energy and recombined images and on MRI, the first post-contrast series. Extent of abnormality per quadrant was measured for multifocal lesions. Reference standards were size of largest invasive malignant lesion, invasive (PathInvasive) and whole (PathTotal). Pre-defined clinical concordance ±10 mm.

RESULTS

Mean patient age 56 years, 42 (71%) asymptomatic. Lesions were invasive ductal carcinoma 40 (68%) with ductal carcinoma in situ (31/40) in 78%, multifocal in 12 (20%). Median lesion size was 17 mm (invasive) and 27 mm (total), range (5-125 mm). Lin's concordance correlation coefficients for PathTotal 0.75 (95% CI 0.6, 0.84) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.56, 0.82) for MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) respectively. Mean difference for total size, 3% underestimated and 4% overestimated, and for invasive 41% and 50% overestimate on MRI and CESM respectively. LOAs for PathTotal varied from 60% under to a 2.4 or almost threefold over estimation. MRI was concordant with PathTotal in 36 (64%) cases compared with 32 (57%) for CESM. Both modalities concordant in 26 (46%) cases respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neither CEM nor MRI have sufficient accuracy to direct changes in planned treatment without needle biopsy confirmation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Despite small mean differences in lesion size estimates using CEM or MRI, the 95% limits of agreement do not meet clinically acceptable levels.

Duct carcinoma in situ: A personal perspective

In the recent past, DCIS was a rare diagnosis established by biopsy of palpable breast masses or nipple changes. Mammography increased the frequency of a DCIS diagnosis by 20 × resulting in a tsunami of small circa 10 mm lesions detected only by mammography. The impact of pathologic technique in examining and characterizing such lesions is reviewed, and the development of algorithms incorporating prognostic factors and histology based on serial sequential processing techniques are described and contrasted with those which relied on tissue sampling. The development of the initial clinical trails of irradiation all demonstrated the significant benefit of irradiation but none could identify subsets with a more favorable outcome. The latter was precluded by their common practice of tissue sampling: Size could not be calculated and margin width and microinvasion could not be reliable demonstrated. Multigene signature assays are increasingly being utilized, most prominently Oncotype DCIS. However, these assays must be interpreted in conjunction with the limitations set forth in the validating studies-in the case of Oncotype DCIS-the size, margin width, and grade which defined the baseline study (E5194). Tamoxifen and other anti-hormonal agents (aromatase inhibitor therapy) have been shown to have a limited impact on ipsilateral recurrence which makes their use given their morbidities problematic. Such interventions do impact the frequency of contralateral occult in situ and invasive lesions. In the one study which permitted a comparison of local recurrence in irradiated vs nonirradiated breast, there was no added benefit of Tamoxifen in irradiated breasts. Some are attempting to identify a low-risk subset of DCIS which can be treated without surgical re-excision for margins or adjuvant irradiation. These studies are in progress but surrogates identified within the Van Nuys prospective series defined by grade and inadequate margins (≤ 1 mm) would suggest a significant recurrence and progression rate. DCIS remains a work in progress both in terms of classification and treatment. However, limited our progress in these areas we have certainly advanced from the oft-proclaimed mantra: "Radiation and Tamoxifen are standard of care."

Multicentric breast cancer with heterogeneous histopathology: a multidisciplinary review

Multiple synchronous (multifocal or multicentric) ipsilateral breast cancers with heterogeneous histopathology are a rare clinical occurrence, however, their incidence is increasing due to the use of MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. Some studies have demonstrated poorer clinical outcomes for this pattern of breast cancer, but there is no evidence to guide clinical practice. In this multidisciplinary review, we reflect on pathology and molecular characteristics, imaging findings, surgical management including conservation and reconstructive options and approach to the axilla, and the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary discussions appear decisive in planning an appropriate surgical choice and defining the correct systemic treatment tailored to each clinical condition.

Revisiting multifocal breast cancer: a clonality study of ductal carcinoma using whole exome sequencing

Multifocal breast cancer (MFBC), ductal type, has been hypothesized to arise by one of two mechanisms: either through intramammary/intralymphatic spread from a single index tumor (MBC-1), or as multiple independent tumors with each focus carrying its corresponding ductal carcinoma in-situ (MBC-2). In order to improve our understanding of MFBC pathogenesis, we employed laser capture microdissection coupled with whole-exome sequencing to study clonal origin in MFBC. We selected three cases of MBC-1 (C1 to C3) and MBC-2 (C4 to C6) and analyzed three foci from each case. MBC-1 cases were histologically similar and showed a strong predilection for satellite foci, vascular invasion and nodal metastasis when compared to MBC-2. Our bioinformatics approach provided strong evidence for clonal relationships in MBC-1, as demonstrated by distinct clusters of genes conserved across all tumor foci. Conversely, no gene clusters were shared across all the foci in MBC-2, suggesting multiple independent tumors. These findings provide further support for the two distinct pathogenetic mechanisms in MFBC.

Primary Tumor Site, Size, Patients Age and Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancers

This study considers the correlations between some characteristics of the primary tumor and level of lymph node involvement in 185 primary breast cancers. The average number of lymph nodes was higher in N + women than in N— women. Primary tumors with a diameter of more than 4 cm yielded the highest mean number of lymph nodes (17.5). The risk of developing lymph node metastases was fourfold in tumors with a diameter greater than 2 cm when compared to those with a diameter less than or equal to 2 cm. The most commonly metastasized lymph node level, in both large and small tumors, was the first; however, one-fifth of the patients had simultaneous lymph node metastasis in all three axillary levels. Although the left breast was the most affected (58.9 %), there was no evidence of a different risk of metastasis between the two breasts; 34.1 % of the tumors were multifocal. Lymph node involvement was higher in women under 50 years of age with a primary tumor larger than 2 cm.

Independent Submacroscopic Foci of Infiltrating Carcinoma in Breasts Removed for Clinical Cancer

The aim of our study was the detection and the characterization of submacroscopic foci of infiltrating carcinoma in the human female mammary glandular tree collateral to clinical cancer. Accordingly, we analyzed 100 breasts surgically removed by radical mastectomy. Five thin slices per case were analyzed under a dissecting microscope by subgross method of observation. Submacroscopic foci of invasive cancer, well separated and apparently independent of the primary tumor, were found in 19 % of the cases and were confirmed by histologic examination. Foci of submacroscopic cancer were either single (79 %) or multiple (21 %), and were located in slices including or not the main tumor mass (31 % and 69 % of cases, respectively). Their size ranged from 1 to 4 mm. Four histologic types were represented: 1) invasive ductal NOS with productive fibrosis, scirrhous type (36 % of cases); 2) invasive ductal NOS without productive fibrosis, simplex type (32 % of cases); 3) invasive ductal with tubular component (16 % of cases); 4) medullary (16 % of cases). Concordance between histology of clinical and submacroscopic cancers was assessed in 42 % of cases. A significant association of the tubular type (invasive ductal carcinoma with a consistent tubular component) of primary tumor was demonstrated (P < 0.05), as well as with the presence of ductal and lobular proliferative changes in the collateral glandular tree (intraductal papillomas, P < 0.01; atypical lobules, P < 0.02). No relationship was found between submacroscopic foci of infiltrating carcinoma and neoplastic familiarity, patients’ age by decades, axillary lymph node metastases, size of clinical tumor or profile of the collateral mammary glandular tree. These data support the hypothesis of a multicentric origin of human breast cancer and suggest a systemic nature of the neoplastic mammary disease. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of this concept are discussed.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ or with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background

A significant number of patients who are initially diagnosed with pure DCIS will harbor missed or occult invasive disease at their definitive surgery. To provide more accurate staging information and to avoid a second operation, some investigators believe that SLN mapping should be performed in DCIS patients. The role of SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer is controversial.

Methods

A review of the literature was performed to determine the role of SLN biopsy in patients with DCIS or advanced breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The success rate of SLN biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was investigated as well as the percentage of positive SLNs in patients with DCIS.

Results

Two consecutive studies revealed metastatic disease to the regional lymph nodes in up to 13% of DCIS patients. In addition, 10% of DCIS patients were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma at their definitive therapy. The ability of the SLN to predict the status of the remaining non-SLNs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unknown. False-negative rates range from 0% to 33%. The success rate for SLN identification for the combined series varies from 84% to 97%.

Conclusions

SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive technique that can be used to evaluate the regional nodal status of DCIS patients. Performing a SLN biopsy during the initial surgical procedure may avoid a second operation in some DCIS patients who are diagnosed with invasive disease at their definitive operation. The success rate of sentinel node identification does not seem to be altered after neoadjuvant therapy. However, the ability of the SLN to predict the pathologic status of the adjacent non-SLNs remains unknown. Therefore, until further prospective randomized trials are conducted, it cannot be assumed that all the regional nodes have the same biologic response to chemotherapy as the SLN.

Impact of value based breast cancer care pathway implementation on pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging utilization

BACKGROUND

Bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer (BC) to assess extent of disease and identify occult foci of disease. However, evidence for routine use of pre-operative MRI is lacking. Breast MRI is costly and can lead to unnecessary tests and treatment delays. Clinical care pathways (care paths) are value-based guidelines, which define management recommendations derived by expert consensus and available evidence based data. At Cleveland Clinic, care paths created for newly diagnosed BC patients recommend selective use of pre-operative MRI. We evaluated the number of pre-operative MRIs ordered before and after implementing an institution wide BC care paths in April 2014.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of BC cases during the years 2012, 2014, and part of 2015. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Pre-operative MRI utilization was compared before and after care path implementation.

RESULTS

We identified 1,515 BC patients during the study period. Patients were more likely to undergo pre-operative MRI in 2012 than 2014 (OR: 2.77; P<0.001; 95% CI: 1.94-3.94) or 2015 (OR: 4.14; P<0.001; 95% CI: 2.51-6.83). There was a significant decrease in pre-operative MRI utilization between 2012 and 2014 (P<0.001) after adjustment for pre-operative MRIs ordered for care path indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of online BC care paths at our institution was associated with a decreased use of pre-operative MRI overall and in patients without a BC care path indication, driving value based care through the reduction of pre-operative breast MRIs.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Survival Outcomes in T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients Who Receive Breast-Conserving Therapy

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on survival outcomes for breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 954 patients who had T1–2 breast cancer and received breast-conserving therapy (BCT) between 2007 and 2010 were enrolled. We divided the patients according to whether they received preoperative MRI or not. Survival outcomes, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed.

Results

Preoperative MRI was performed in 743 of 954 patients. Clinicopathological features were not significantly different between patients with and without preoperative MRI. In the univariate analyses, larger tumors were marginally associated with poor LRRFS compared to smaller tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 3.22; p=0.053). Tumor size, histologic grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), hormonal therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy status were associated with RFS. Larger tumor size, higher histologic grade, lack of ER and PR expression, and no hormonal therapy were associated with decreased OS. Tumor size was associated with LRRFS in the multivariate analyses (HR, 4.19; p=0.048). However, preoperative MRI was not significantly associated with LRRFS, RFS, or OS in either univariate or multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI did not influence survival outcomes in T1–2 breast cancer patients who underwent BCT. Routine use of preoperative MRI in T1–2 breast cancer may not translate into longer RFS and OS.

Whole-breast US following mammography and breast MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: can it be more than just a guidance tool for biopsy?

AIM

To evaluate the role of ultrasound (US) following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers by assessing the additional cancer detection rate of US.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-five women who had undergone 225 MRI examinations followed by US were included. An US-detected additional cancer was defined as a lesion detected using breast US that had not been detected by MRI, and which was shown to be malignant at histopathology. The rate of additional cancer detection, incidence of additional malignancies, positive predictive value (PPV), and false-positive (FP) rate were analysed. Factors associated with an increase in the additional cancer detection rate were analysed.

RESULTS

The additional cancer detection rate was 0% (0/225) for the ipsilateral breast and 0.9% (2/225) for the contralateral breast, and the PPVs were 0% (0/5) and 100% (2/2), respectively. The overall TP:FP ratio was 0.4 (2:5). The additional cancer detection rate was higher for cases with moderate and severe background parenchymal enhancement than cases with minimal and mild background parenchymal enhancement (p=0.003). The additional cancer detection rate for cases with moderate and severe background parenchymal enhancement was 5.7% (2/35) for the contralateral breast (p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative breast US following MRI and mammography can help clinicians screen for contralateral cancers with an additional detection rate of 0.9%. Moreover, whole-breast US might be a useful contralateral screening modality in cases with moderate or marked parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI.

Low rates of additional cancer detection by magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who undergo preoperative mammography and ultrasonography

Purpose

We evaluated the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting additional malignancies in breast cancer patients newly diagnosed by breast ultrasonography and mammography.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,038 breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative mammography, bilateral breast ultrasonography, and subsequent breast MRI between August 2007 and December 2010 at single institution in Korea. MRI-detected additional lesions were defined as those lesions detected by breast MRI that were previously undetected by mammography and ultrasonography and which would otherwise have not been identified.

Results

Among the 1,038 cases, 228 additional lesions (22.0%) and 30 additional malignancies (2.9%) were detected by breast MRI. Of these 228 lesions, 109 were suspected to be malignant (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5) on breast MRI and second-look ultrasonography and 30 were pathologically confirmed to be malignant (13.2%). Of these 30 lesions, 21 were ipsilateral to the main lesion and nine were contralateral. Fourteen lesions were in situ carcinomas and 16 were invasive carcinomas. The positive predictive value of breast MRI was 27.5% (30/109). No clinicopathological factors were significantly associated with additional malignant foci.

Conclusion

Breast MRI was useful in detecting additional malignancy in a small number of patients who underwent ultrasonography and mammography.

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a review of the literature

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. Here we review the current use of breast MRI and the impact of MRI on short-term surgical outcomes and rates of local recurrence. In addition, we address the use of MRI in specific patient populations, such as those with ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive lobular carcinoma, and occult primary breast cancer, and discuss the potential role of MRI for assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although MRI has improved sensitivity compared with conventional imaging, this has not translated into improved short-term surgical outcomes or long-term patient benefit, such as improved local control or survival, in any patient population. MRI is an important diagnostic test in the evaluation of patients presenting with occult primary breast cancer and has shown promise in monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the data do not support the routine use of perioperative MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer 2014;120:120:2080-2089. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging

This article reviews the relevant data on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use in screening, the short-term surgical outcomes and long-term cancer outcomes associated with the use of MRI in breast cancer staging, the use of MRI in occult primary breast cancer, as well as MRI to assess eligibility for accelerated partial breast irradiation and to evaluate tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MRI for screening is supported in specific high-risk populations, namely, women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, a family history suggesting a hereditary breast cancer syndrome, or a history of chest wall radiation.

The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on what constitutes adequate negative margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We systematically review the evidence on surgical margins in BCT for invasive breast cancer to support the development of clinical guidelines.

METHODS

Study-level meta-analysis of studies reporting local recurrence (LR) data relative to final microscopic margin status and the threshold distance for negative margins. LR proportion was modeled using random-effects logistic meta-regression.

RESULTS

Based on 33 studies (LR in 1,506 of 28,162), the odds of LR were associated with margin status [model 1: odds ratio (OR) 1.96 for positive/close vs negative; model 2: OR 1.74 for close vs. negative, 2.44 for positive vs. negative; (P < 0.001 both models)] but not with margin distance [model 1: >0 mm vs. 1 mm (referent) vs. 2 mm vs. 5 mm (P = 0.12); and model 2: 1 mm (referent) vs. 2 mm vs. 5 mm (P = 0.90)], adjusting for study median follow-up time. There was little to no statistical evidence that the odds of LR decreased as the distance for declaring negative margins increased, adjusting for follow-up time [model 1: 1 mm (OR 1.0, referent), 2 mm (OR 0.95), 5 mm (OR 0.65), P = 0.21 for trend; and model 2: 1 mm (OR 1.0, referent), 2 mm (OR 0.91), 5 mm (OR 0.77), P = 0.58 for trend]. Adjustment for covariates, such as use of endocrine therapy or median-year of recruitment, did not change the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis confirms that negative margins reduce the odds of LR; however, increasing the distance for defining negative margins is not significantly associated with reduced odds of LR, allowing for follow-up time. Adoption of wider relative to narrower margin widths to declare negative margins is unlikely to have a substantial additional benefit for long-term local control in BCT.

Morphological heterogeneity of the simultaneous ipsilateral invasive tumor foci in breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 418 cases of carcinomas

The aim of this paper was to assess whether the morphological appearance (i.e. histological tumor type and histological grade) of simultaneous invasive breast carcinoma foci is heterogeneous, since it is known that adjuvant therapy is established according to these parameters. Patients with simultaneous breast tumors in which only the features of the largest neoplastic focus are reported could thus be undertreated. A retrospective study of 418 cases of breast carcinomas was conducted over a 3-year period. The histological tumor types and histological grades of multifocal/multicentric carcinomas in each tumor focus were compared, and mismatches among foci were recorded. Ninety-one of the 418 cases reviewed had multiple carcinomas (21.77%). A comparison between multiple synchronous tumor foci revealed that their histological type was different in 12.08% of the cases. Mismatches among foci were also observed in 9.89% of the cases when evaluating the histological grade, and 5 out of 9 additional tumor foci with a different grade from the largest (index) tumor (55.55%) displayed a higher grade compared to the index tumor. Since the histological tumor type and histological grade of the individual foci may vary considerably within the same tumor and the additional foci may be of higher grade than the index tumor, we believe that reporting morphologic parameters with more unfavorable characteristics in addition to the parameters of the index tumor is imperative.

Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS

BACKGROUND

This study examines a modern cohort of women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) in order to identify potential differences in clinical presentation, treatments, and outcome based on age.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2009, a total of 2037 patients with pure DCIS were treated. Clinical presentation, pathologic factors, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy, and local recurrence rates among age groups were compared and analyzed. Median follow-up was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

There were 132 patients (6.5 %) aged <40, 1,690 (83 %) aged 40-70, and 215 (10.5 %) aged >70. Younger patients (<40) were significantly more likely to have a family history of breast cancer, present with clinical symptoms, undergo mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, and have a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P < 0.05). Older patients (>70) were significantly less likely to use adjuvant radiotherapy and tamoxifen (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in DCIS size, estrogen receptor status, necrosis, or contralateral breast cancer based on age. Among women <40, 29.3 % had evidence of multicentric disease versus 17.7 and 13.3 % in the women aged 40-70 and those >70, respectively (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, younger age (<40), larger-size DCIS (≥1.5 cm), and no use of radiotherapy were significant independent predictors of locoregional recurrence. The 5 year rates of local recurrence were 10.1 % in women <40 compared with 3.2 % in older women (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients with DCIS more often have multicentric disease, present with clinical findings, and opt for or require mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Conservative surgery is only appropriate for younger patients if adjuvant radiotherapy is delivered.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer

Despite recent evidence that fails to detect a benefit in surgical and local recurrence outcomes in those who receive optimal surgery and adjuvant systemic and radiotherapy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is still being employed. We review the recent literature to clarify the role in the use of MRI in early breast cancer. A literature search using the Medline and Ovid databases was conducted between 2004 and 2011 using the terms "magnetic resonance imaging' and 'early breast cancer'. Only articles with clinical trials published in English in adult humans with available abstracts were included. Articles on high-risk women, response to neoadjuvant therapy, advanced breast cancer, the occult primary, the contralateral breast and technical articles were excluded. Articles examining the role of MRI in the staging of early breast cancer were retained. Over 260 articles regarding breast MRI have been published in the last 5 years. Additional foci may be found in 16% of patients but the impact on the extent of surgery and local recurrence rate is yet to be defined. Certain sub-groups who may benefit include those with invasive lobular carcinoma and mammographically dense breasts and those for consideration of partial breast irradiation. With standard adjuvant radiotherapy, there is no benefit in routine MRI with respect surgical extent and local recurrence. Should MRI be used, pre-operative biopsy to confirm additional disease must be undertaken prior to a change in surgical extent of resection. However, MRI may be useful in the evaluation of those who can be considered for partial breast irradiation. Centres undertaking breast MRI must have MRI-biopsy capabilities and constantly audit the reporting of MRI with correlation to the final pathology.

Multicentric breast cancer: clonality and prognostic studies

Clonality of multicentric breast cancer has traditionally been difficult to assess. We aimed to assess this using analysis of TP53 status (expression and mutation status). These results were then incorporated into an analysis of prognostic factors in multicentric tumours in a 10-year follow up study. Clonal status of multicentric breast cancer foci (n = 88 foci) was determined by immunohistochemical and molecular studies of TP53 in a total of 40 patients. Prognostic factors from these patients were also compared with 80 age- and stage-matched controls with unicentric breast cancer from the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust Breast Cancer Database. Our results indicate that multicentric breast cancer foci were polyclonal within an individual patient in at least 10 patients (25%) with respect to immunohistochemical staining and in four patients (10%) with respect to abnormal band shifts on single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) molecular analysis. No individual variable was predictive of multicentric or unicentric disease. However, there was a worse overall survival in the multicentric breast cancer patients in whom at least two cancer foci stained positively on TP53 immunohistochemistry compared with the matched control group (P = 0.04). In conclusion, these results suggest that a proportion of multicentric breast cancer foci are polyclonal with respect to TP53 status and that TP53 over-expression predicts for a poorer prognosis in multicentric breast cancer.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for cancer diagnosis and staging

Gadolinium-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is optimally suited for the diagnosis and assessment of breast cancer. The complete breast MRI examination, which includes select nonenhanced sequences, yields abundant information about the nature and stage of disease. In this article, we will explore cancer diagnosis by examining the main imaging features of breast malignancy as well as the assessment of surrounding structures. We will then discuss current ideas in the use of breast MRI in breast cancer, including high-risk screening, evaluation of extent of disease, role in surgical planning, and the use of MRI in the patient receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast MRI plays an important role in the assessment of patients with breast malignancy-a role that is yet to be fully defined and used. By understanding the strengths and weakness of this imaging method in cancer evaluation, we hope to highlight the appropriate uses of the technique.

Occult malignancy in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that predict for occult malignancy or high-risk lesions (HRL) in the contralateral breast among women undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).

BACKGROUND

A growing number of women are choosing to undergo CPM, yet the benefit of this procedure for the average woman with breast cancer remains uncertain. The identification of reliable predictors of occult malignancy or HRL in the contralateral breast may aid in selecting patients most likely to benefit from CPM.

METHODS

Patients undergoing mastectomy with CPM for their first diagnosis of unilateral stage 0 to III breast cancer were retrospectively identified (1997-2005). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of HRL and/or occult contralateral breast cancer (CBC).

RESULTS

Among 2965 patients, 407 (13%) underwent CPM. Occult CBC was identified in 24 (6%) patients, and 114 (28%) had an HRL. On univariate analysis, multifocality/multicentricity of the index cancer was the only factor associated with occult malignancy in the CPM (OR 2.88, P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, patient age and progesterone receptor positivity of the index cancer were associated with finding either malignancy or a HRL in the CPM.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of multifocality/multicentricity invasive index cancer was associated with occult malignancy in the CPM; however, lack of standardized definitions and differences in pathologic evaluation limit the application of this finding in the preoperative setting. Until reliable predictors for occult disease are identified, the low rates of occult CBC do not support the use of CPM in average-risk women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

The hormone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and molecular subtype status of individual tumor foci in multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma of breast

Multifocal/multicentric breast cancers are common. However, investigations of biomarkers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in individual tumor foci of such cancers are rare. This study was designed to evaluate the status of the hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and its molecular subtypes in individual foci of multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and to identify the factors associated with the different phenotypes of individual foci. We performed immunohistochemical analyses of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, cytokeratin 5/6, epidermal growth factor receptor, and p53 and fluorescence in situ hybridization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in individual foci of 65 cases of multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma and the associated ductal carcinoma in situ components using tissue microarrays. The estrogen receptor status differed in 2 (3%) of the 65 invasive ductal carcinomas, progesterone receptor status in 7 (11%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in 4 (6%), and molecular subtypes in 5 (8%). The presence of different molecular subtypes in the invasive tumor foci was associated with differences in histologic features (P = .005), high histologic and nuclear grade (P = .012 and P = .021, respectively), p53 overexpression (P = .006), and mixed molecular subtypes in the ductal carcinoma in situ components (P = .011). Multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinomas usually have a single phenotype in terms of hormone receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and molecular subtypes; and thus, immunohistochemical analyses of the index tumor may be sufficient in routine practice. However, if multifocal/multicentric invasive ductal carcinomas are of high grade, of different histologic features, or of heterogeneous ductal carcinoma in situ component, biomarkers of the various foci need to be evaluated separately.

Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on what constitutes adequate negative margins in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We review the evidence on surgical margins in BCT for early-stage invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of studies reporting local recurrence (LR) relative to quantified final microscopic margin status and the threshold distance for negative margins. The proportion of LR was modelled using random effects logistic meta-regression.

RESULTS

Based on 21 studies (LR in 1,026 of 14,571 subjects) the odds of LR were associated with margin status [model 1: odds ratio (OR) = 2.02 for positive/close versus negative; model 2: OR = 1.80 for close versus negative, 2.42 for positive versus negative (P<0.001 both models)] but not with margin distance [1mm versus 2mm versus 5mm (P > 0.10 both models)], adjusting for median follow-up time. However, there was weak evidence in both models that the odds of LR decreased as the threshold distance for declaring negative margins increased. This bordered significance in model 2 [OR for 1mm, 2mm, 5mm: 1.0, 0.75, 0.51 (P = 0.097 for trend)], and was not significant in model 1 [OR for 1mm, 2mm, 5mm: 1.0, 0.85, 0.58 (P = 0.11 for trend)] but was evident when one study (of women ≤ 40 years) was excluded from this model [OR for 1mm, 2mm, 5mm: 1.0, 0.72, 0.52 (P = 0.058 for trend)]: this trend was rendered insignificant by adjustment for the proportion of subjects receiving a radiation boost or the proportion of subjects receiving endocrine therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Margin status has a prognostic effect in all women treated for invasive breast cancer; increasing the threshold distance for declaring negative margins is weakly associated with reduced odds of LR, however adjustment for covariates (adjuvant therapy) removes the significance of this effect. Adoption of wider margins, relative to narrower widths, for declaring negative margins is unlikely to a have substantial additional benefit for long-term local control in BCT.

Contemporary breast imaging and concordance assessment: a surgical perspective

Disease conditions of the breast are very common. Patients with such conditions often present to surgeons for both diagnostic evaluation and treatment. Nearly all of them will require breast imaging. This article summarizes the use, applicability, and concordance assessment of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients who have breast complaints or abnormalities on clinical examination or imaging.

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging: controversies arising in the quest to evaluate clinical benefit

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indisputably the highest sensitivity test available to detect breast cancer, revealing more extensive cancer in the ipsilateral and otherwise occult cancer in the contralateral breasts when used before surgery. The use of preoperative breast MRI has become somewhat controversial, because the clinical benefit of the heightened detection provided by MRI has been questioned in the context of multidisciplinary breast cancer treatment, relatively low local recurrence, and metachronous contralateral cancer rates. Also, MRI detection rates have been compared with the high rates reported in the pathology literature. The emerging clinical outcome literature is showing conflicting results to demonstrating actual overall benefit. Critical review of this literature reveals several misconceptions about MRI detection rates and limitations of many of the published outcome studies to date, which render the results not necessarily generalizable to contemporary optimized breast MRI practices. This article addresses some of the misconceptions raised by critics, provides a critical review of the clinical outcome literature, reviews patient subgroups anticipated to have the highest yield when using preoperative MRI, makes recommendations for optimizing breast MRI practice, and suggests areas for potential future research.

Precise correlation between MRI and histopathology - exploring treatment margins for MRI-guided localized breast cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more often considered to guide, evaluate or select patients for partial breast irradiation (PBI) or minimally invasive therapy. Safe treatment margins around the MRI-visible lesion (MRI-GTV) are needed to account for surrounding subclinical occult disease.

PURPOSE

To precisely compare MRI findings with histopathology, and to obtain detailed knowledge about type, rate, quantity and distance of occult disease around the MRI-GTV.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients undergoing MRI and breast-conserving therapy were prospectively included. The wide local excision specimens were subjected to detailed microscopic examination. The size of the invasive (index) tumor was compared with the MRI-GTV. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the pre-treatment visible lesion. Subclinical tumor foci were reconstructed at various distances to the MRI-GTV.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (64 breasts) were included. The mean size difference between MRI-GTV and the index tumor was 1.3mm. Subclinical disease occurred in 52% and 25% of the specimens at distances ≥10mm and ≥20mm, respectively, from the MRI-GTV.

CONCLUSIONS

For MRI-guided minimally invasive therapy, typical treatment margins of 10mm around the MRI-GTV may include occult disease in 52% of patients. When surgery achieves a 10mm tumor-free margin around the MRI-GTV, radiotherapy to the tumor bed may require clinical target volume margins >10mm in up to one-fourth of the patients.

Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine how often breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) identifies occult cancerous lesions in women with one suspicious lesion detected on mammography or physical exam.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent BSGI between January 1, 2004, and June 4, 2007. Included in the study were 159 women who had one suspicious breast lesion on physical exam and/or mammography and who underwent BSGI to evaluate for occult lesions in the breast. All patients had one or more foci of cancer proven pathologically. BSGI findings were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of the presence of focal radiotracer uptake.

RESULTS

BSGI detected additional suspicious lesions occult to mammography and physical exam in 46 of 159 women (29%). BSGI identified occult cancer in 14 of 40 women (35%) who underwent biopsy or excision because of BSGI findings and in 14 of the 159 (9%) women in this study. In nine women, the occult cancer was present in the same breast as the index lesion (6%), and in five women, the occult cancer was found in the contralateral breast (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

BSGI is an effective imaging modality in the identification of mammographically and clinically occult cancer in women with one suspicious breast lesion.

Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to visualize small tumor deposits that previously could only be identified on pathologic examination. MRI is most valuable in areas in which patient management has been problematic, including screening women with known or suspected BRCA 1 and 2 mutations, and identification of the primary tumor site in patients presenting with axillary adenopathy. The role of MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. Success rates for patients selected for breast-conserving therapy without MRI are high, and rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence are low. Future efforts to improve the local therapy for breast cancer must acknowledge the heterogeneity of the disease and tailor approaches to the biology of individual subsets. This goal can only be accomplished through a multidisciplinary approach that examines the applications of newer diagnostic modalities such as MRI.

Synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancers: implications for patient management

Interest in the presence and management of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer has been reported since the early 1920s. The demonstration of multiple foci of breast cancer has been reported in 9-75% of breast cancer related specimens. The large difference in reported incidence is multifactorial and related to the definitions applied, mode of detection and pathological assessment. However, randomised clinical trials comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation over many years have shown no difference in distant disease-free survival or overall survival in patients with synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer compared with unifocal breast cancer. This review examines the current definitions, incidence, pathological assessment, staging and surgical options of synchronous multiple ipsilateral breast cancer.

Increased lymph node positivity in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Multifocal and multicentric (MF/MC) breast cancers have been reported to be associated with increased lymph node metastases. The limited data on this issue prompted us to investigate the pathologic and clinical differences between unifocal and MF/MC breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 1990 and 2002, 1,322 patients with operable invasive breast cancer underwent a definitive operation at our Breast Clinic. Patients with MF/MC breast cancer (n=147, 11%) were compared with patients with unifocal breast cancer (n=1,175; 89%) in terms of pathologic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients with MF/MC were found to have a higher frequency of lymph node metastases when the largest diameter was used as a tumor size estimate for MF/MC cancer (unifocal T1 and T2, 35% and 49%, respectively, versus MF/MC T1 and T2, 48% and 67%, respectively; p=0.05 and p=0.003, respectively). When the combined diameter assessment was used, the frequency of lymph node positivity was similarly higher in MF/MC patients versus unifocal patients (unifocal T1 and T2, 35% and 49%, respectively, versus MF/MC T1 and T2, 49% and 61%, respectively; p=0.08 and p=0.046, respectively). At a median followup of 55 months (range 12 to 153 months), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; unifocal, 88% versus MF/MC, 82%, p=0.14) and overall survival (OS) rates (unifocal, 92% versus MF/MC, 93%, p=0.43) did not show any significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that breast tumors with multiple foci have a different biology, with an increased metastatic potential to axillary lymph nodes, regardless of tumor size, that reflects an advanced stage. The clinical relevance of the currently used TNM classification system, which uses the diameter of the largest nodule, is supported by our findings.

Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer

PURPOSE We review the evidence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging the affected breast to determine its accuracy and impact on treatment. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI in detection of multifocal (MF) and/or multicentric (MC) cancer not identified on conventional imaging. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves, positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive (TP) to false positive (FP) ratio, and examined their variability according to quality criteria. Pooled estimates of the proportion of women whose surgery was altered were calculated. Results Data from 19 studies showed MRI detects additional disease in 16% of women with breast cancer (N = 2,610). MRI incremental accuracy differed according to the reference standard (RS; P = .016) decreasing from 99% to 86% as the quality of the RS increased. Summary PPV was 66% (95% CI, 52% to 77%) and TP:FP ratio was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.34). Conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to mastectomy was 8.1% (95% CI, 5.9 to 11.3), from WLE to more extensive surgery was 11.3% in MF/MC disease (95% CI, 6.8 to 18.3). Due to MRI-detected lesions (in women who did not have additional malignancy on histology) conversion from WLE to mastectomy was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.6) and from WLE to more extensive surgery was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.5). CONCLUSION MRI staging causes more extensive breast surgery in an important proportion of women by identifying additional cancer, however there is a need to reduce FP MRI detection. Randomized trials are needed to determine the clinical value of detecting additional disease which changes surgical treatment in women with apparently localized breast cancer.

Breast Cancer: Pre- and Postoperative Imaging for Staging

Mammography is considered the "gold standard" in the evaluation of the breast from an imaging perspective. Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefit of mammography in detecting smaller cancers, leading to identification of early-stage breast cancers, which largely accounts for decreased mortality from breast cancer and the increased rate of breast conservation. Identification of a suspicious lesion on a mammogram prompts further evaluation including additional mammographic views, ultrasound examination, and biopsy. Recently, MRI and positron emission tomography are being offered as adjuncts to the preoperative workup to better stage the patient; however, there is still controversy over the most appropriate use of these modalities.

Multifocality and multicentricity are not contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

After the availability of the results of validation studies, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced routine axillary dissection (AD) as the new standard of care in early unifocal breast cancers. Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) tumors have been considered a contraindication for this technique due to the possible incidence of a higher false-negative rate. This prospective study evaluates the lymphatic drainage from different tumoral foci of the breast and assesses the accuracy of SLNB in MF-MC breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with preoperative diagnosis of MF or MC infiltrating and clinically node-negative (cN0) breast carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Two consecutive groups of patients underwent SLN mapping using a different site of injection of the radioisotope tracer: a) "2ID" Group received two intradermal (i.d.) injections over the site of the two dominant neoplastic nodules. A lymphoscintigraphic study was performed after each injection to evaluate the route of lymphatic spreading from different sites of the breast. b) "A" Group had periareolar (A) injection followed by a conventional lymphoscintigraphy. At surgery, both radioguided SLNB (with frozen section exam) and subsequent AD were planned, regardless the SLN status.

RESULTS

A total 31 patients with MF (n = 12) or MC (n = 19) invasive, cN0 cancer of the breast fulfil the selection criteria. In 2 i.d. Group (n = 15) the lymphoscintigraphic study showed the lymphatic pathways from two different sites of the breast which converged into one major lymphatic trunk affering to the same SLN(s) in 14 (93.3%) cases. In one (6.7%) MC cancer two different pathways were found, each of them affering to a different SLN. In A Group (n = 16) lymphoscintigraphy showed one (93.7%) or two (6.3%) lymphatic channels, each connecting areola with one or more SLN(s). Identification rate of SLN was 100% in both Groups. Accuracy of frozen section exam on SLN was 96.8% (1 case of micrometastasis was missed). SLN was positive in 13 (41.9%) of 31 patients, including 4 cases (30.7%) of micrometastasis. In 7 of 13 (53.8%) patients the SLN was the only site of axillary metastasis. SLNB accuracy was 96.8% (30 of 31), sensitivity 92.8 (13 of 14), and false-negative rate 7.1% (1 of 14). Since the case of skip metastasis was identified by the surgeon intraoperatively, it would have been no impact in the clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Our lymphoscintigraphic study shows that axillary SLN represents the whole breast regardless of tumor location within the parenchyma. The high accuracy of SLNB in MF and MC breast cancer demonstrates, according with the results of other series published in the literature, that both MF and MC tumors do not represent a contraindication for SLNB anymore.

A Clinical Oncology Perspective on the Use of Breast MR

MR imaging of the breast detects additional carcinoma in as many as 30% of women thought to have localized disease by clinical examination and mammography. This has led some to advocate its routine use in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer patients. However, local failure rates in patients selected for breast conservation by conventional methods are less than 5% at 10 years, suggesting that he majority of this disease is controlled with radiotherapy. The potential role of MR in the preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up of patients with early-stage breast cancer is discussed.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial high dose rate 192iridium brachytherapy: Early Australian experience and review of the literature

Summary Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an evolving new technique of adjuvant irradiation in selected women with early-stage breast cancer. We developed a pilot programme of APBI in 2000 and report end results in seven patients followed for a mean of 42.7 months (range 29-55 months). Good to excellent cosmesis and no loco-regional relapse or systemic metastases have occurred. The literature related to APBI is reviewed.

Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum

Clinical experience has resulted in the identification of a relatively small number of absolute contraindications to breast-conserving therapy (BCT). These contraindications are readily identified by a clinical evaluation and diagnostic mammography. Local failure rates of less than 10% at 10 years support the idea that patients can be reliably selected for BCT with standard clinical modalities. The availability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has raised questions about its role in patient selection for BCT. MR imaging identifies additional cancer in 10-54% of patients with apparently localized disease, resulting in mastectomies that would not otherwise have been done. Clinical experience suggests that the majority of this disease is controlled by radiotherapy. Studies demonstrating clinical benefit in terms of decreased rates of local recurrence or fewer surgeries are needed before MR is used for routine selection of patients for BCT.

Conservative surgery in breast cancer. Significance of resection margins

We approached the issue of surgical margins in the conservative treatment of breast cancer by examining the literature germane to four precise questions: At what distance from the macroscopic margin of the tumour should the resection margin be? To what extent do histologically clear resection margins indicate complete local control of the disease? To what extent do histologically involved margins indicate persistence of disease? and Does the local recurrence rate correlate with the status of the resection margin? We propose categorizing margin involvement into five groups (absent, focal, minimal, moderate and extensive involvement) according to strict histological criteria, and assigning increasingly aggressive subsequent treatments according to the extent of any margin involvement.